SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusBABUBHAI KANTIBHAI PATEL
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The Special Land Acquisition Officer and others appealed against compensation awards to Yogeshbhai Shakrabhai Patel in several first appeals, each involving amounts below Rs.5 lakh. The State Government, via a 2016 resolution, classified claims up to Rs.5 lakh as petty and directed their disposal. The Gujarat High Cour…
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusBIJALBHAI VASHRAMBHAI
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The State Government, via a resolution dated 25‑10‑2016, classified compensation claims up to Rs.5 lakh as petty and directed that such matters be disposed of accordingly. The Special Land Acquisition Officer & Anr. filed several first appeals challenging compensation awards that were each below Rs.5 lakh. The Court, a…
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusRAJUBHAI MOHANBHAI PAREKH
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The Special Land Acquisition Officer and others appealed against compensation awards to Yogeshbhai Shakrabhai Patel in several first appeals, each involving amounts below Rs.5 lakh. The State Government, via a 2016 resolution, classified claims up to Rs.5 lakh as petty and directed their disposal. The Gujarat High Cour…
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusYOGESHBHAI SHAKRABHAI PATEL
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The Special Land Acquisition Officer and others appealed against compensation awards to Yogeshbhai Shakrabhai Patel in several first appeals, each involving amounts below Rs.5 lakh. The State Government, via a 2016 resolution, classified claims up to Rs.5 lakh as petty and directed their disposal. The Gujarat High Cour…
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusLHS OF DECD. DAHYAJI BABAJI
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The Special Land Acquisition Officer and others appealed against compensation awards to Yogeshbhai Shakrabhai Patel in several first appeals, each involving amounts below Rs.5 lakh. The State Government, via a 2016 resolution, classified claims up to Rs.5 lakh as petty and directed their disposal. The Gujarat High Cour…
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusVISHNUBHAI BABABHAI PATEL
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The Special Land Acquisition Officer and others appealed against compensation awards to Yogeshbhai Shakrabhai Patel in several first appeals, each involving amounts below Rs.5 lakh. The State Government, via a 2016 resolution, classified claims up to Rs.5 lakh as petty and directed their disposal. The Gujarat High Cour…
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusKALYANSINH RATAJI
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The Special Land Acquisition Officer and others appealed against compensation awards to Yogeshbhai Shakrabhai Patel in several first appeals, each involving amounts below Rs.5 lakh. The State Government, via a 2016 resolution, classified claims up to Rs.5 lakh as petty and directed their disposal. The Gujarat High Cour…
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusLH OF DECD SARTANBHAI HAMIRBHAI
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The Special Land Acquisition Officer and others appealed against compensation awards to Yogeshbhai Shakrabhai Patel in several first appeals, each involving amounts below Rs.5 lakh. The State Government, via a 2016 resolution, classified claims up to Rs.5 lakh as petty and directed their disposal. The Gujarat High Cour…
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusMANUBHAI GORDHANBHAI PATEL
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The Special Land Acquisition Officer and others appealed against compensation awards to Yogeshbhai Shakrabhai Patel in several first appeals, each involving amounts below Rs.5 lakh. The State Government, via a 2016 resolution, classified claims up to Rs.5 lakh as petty and directed their disposal. The Gujarat High Cour…
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusPRAVINBHAI DAHYABHAI PAREKH
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The Special Land Acquisition Officer and others appealed against compensation awards to Yogeshbhai Shakrabhai Patel in several first appeals, each involving amounts below Rs.5 lakh. The State Government, via a 2016 resolution, classified claims up to Rs.5 lakh as petty and directed their disposal. The Gujarat High Cour…
DEPUTY COLLECTORversusSOLANKI NANDUBHAI RAMUBHAI
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
The Deputy Collector filed a first appeal seeking condonation of delay. The sole respondent, Solanki, had died, and the applicant was required to bring the legal heirs of the deceased on record. The court noted that the applicant’s counsel had previously sought time for this purpose but failed to act. Consequently, the…
PATEL VIMALKUMAR AMRUTLALversusTHE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (EAST)
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
The petitioner filed a civil application for condonation of delay, alleging that the court rule had not been served to several respondents. The court noted that the rule remained unserved to certain respondents and set a deadline of 4 May 2026 for service. It ordered that if service is not effected by that date, the pr…
DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION (IRRIGATION)versusGIRISHKUMAR VASHRAMBHAI
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The State Government, through its Revenue Department, issued a resolution classifying claims up to Rs.5 lakh as petty claims to be disposed of expeditiously. The applicants sought condonation of delay in filing their main matters and filed first appeals challenging compensation awards below Rs.5 lakh. The Court conside…
DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION (IRRIGATION)versusRATILAL ANANDBHAI LADANI
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
The Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation) filed a first appeal seeking condonation of delay in the proceedings. The respondent, identified as an unserved party, had not been served with the required rule of court. The High Court set a deadline of 4 May 2026 for service of the rule to the unserved respo…
KAMLABEN AMRUTGIRI GOSAI LHS OF DECD. SHANTABEN D/O. FULJIGAR KANGARJIversusDAULATGAR FULJIGAR GOSWAMI
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, KamlaBen Amrutgiri Gosai and others, filed a miscellaneous civil application before the High Court of Gujarat seeking restoration of a main appeal (First Appeal No. 35038/2025). The application was presented before Justice J.C. Doshi, and counsel for the applicants, Mr. HJ Karathiya, argued the case. T…
SAIDABANU ABDULKARIM RANGREJversusMANAGER EVERCHEM DYES INDUSTRIES
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
The deceased, Abdulbaksh Rangrej, a boiler attendant, suffered a cardiac arrest and died while on duty at Everchem Dyes Industries. His dependants filed a fatal workmen's compensation claim (WC Fatal Case No.58 of 1998) which was dismissed by the Workman Commissioner. The claimants appealed to the High Court under Sect…
M/S AGARWAL TRANSPORT ORGANIZATIONversusM/S STERLITE INDUSTRIES (I) LIMITED
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
M/S Agarwal Transport Organization filed a first appeal against M/S Sterlite Industries (I) Limited and another party. The appellant's counsel, Mr. Hriday Buch, informed the court that no instructions had been received from the appellant to continue the proceedings. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal for…
DESAI KANUBHAI GOKALBHAIversusPARMAR MANUBHAI KESRISINH
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
An appeal (First Appeal No. 2136 of 2011) was filed by Desai Kanubhai Gokalbhai against Parmar Manubhai Kesrisinh in the Gujarat High Court. The court served an advocate notice to the appellant, but no representative appeared before the bench. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal on the ground of non‑prosecutio…
MAHARAJA SALT WORKS CO PVT LTDversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
Maharaja Salt Works Co. Pvt. Ltd filed a first appeal (No. 2449 of 2011) against the State of Gujarat and another party. The appellant's counsel, Mr. MK Vakharia, failed to appear for the hearing despite multiple prior orders dated 18.04.2024, 13.02.2024, and 24.01.2024. On the hearing date of 10 April 2026, no represe…
HEIRS OF RABARI LALA SAGATHAversusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Khant Ashok Hirabhai & Ors., filed multiple civil applications and first appeals seeking restoration of their main matter, which had been stayed due to procedural delays and office objections. The respondents, the State of Gujarat and others, opposed the restoration. The Court examined the averments in…
HEIRS OF RABARI LALA SAGATHAversusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The High Court of Gujarat entertained a series of condonation of delay applications filed by Khant Ashok Hirabhai and others seeking restoration of pending civil matters against the State of Gujarat. The applicants argued that the delay in filing restoration applications was justified and requested the Court to condone…
PATEL HARSANGBHAI KANJIBHAIversusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION AND OFFICER
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Khant Ashok Hirabhai & Ors., filed multiple civil applications and first appeals seeking restoration of their main matter, which had been stayed due to procedural delays and office objections. The respondents, the State of Gujarat and others, opposed the restoration. The Court examined the averments in…
PATEL HARSANGBHAI KANJIBHAIversusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION AND OFFICER
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Khant Ashok Hirabhai & Ors., filed multiple civil applications and first appeals seeking restoration of their main matter, which had been stayed due to procedural delays and office objections. The respondents, the State of Gujarat and others, opposed the restoration. The Court examined the averments in…
PATEL RAMJIBHAI AMRABHAIversusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION AND OFFICER
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Khant Ashok Hirabhai & Ors., filed multiple civil applications and first appeals seeking restoration of their main matter, which had been stayed due to procedural delays and office objections. The respondents, the State of Gujarat and others, opposed the restoration. The Court examined the averments in…
PATEL RAMJIBHAI AMRABHAIversusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION AND OFFICER
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The High Court of Gujarat entertained a series of condonation of delay applications filed by Khant Ashok Hirabhai and others seeking restoration of pending civil matters against the State of Gujarat. The applicants argued that the delay in filing restoration applications was justified and requested the Court to condone…
PATEL DAHYA ANADAversusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION AND OFFICER
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The High Court of Gujarat entertained a series of condonation of delay applications filed by Khant Ashok Hirabhai and others seeking restoration of pending civil matters against the State of Gujarat. The applicants argued that the delay in filing restoration applications was justified and requested the Court to condone…
PATEL DAHYA ANADAversusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION AND OFFICER
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Khant Ashok Hirabhai & Ors., filed multiple civil applications and first appeals seeking restoration of their main matter, which had been stayed due to procedural delays and office objections. The respondents, the State of Gujarat and others, opposed the restoration. The Court examined the averments in…
PATEL SOMETA KARSHAN GOPALversusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION AND OFFICER
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The High Court of Gujarat entertained a series of condonation of delay applications filed by Khant Ashok Hirabhai and others seeking restoration of pending civil matters against the State of Gujarat. The applicants argued that the delay in filing restoration applications was justified and requested the Court to condone…
PATEL SOMETA KARSHAN GOPALversusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION AND OFFICER
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Khant Ashok Hirabhai & Ors., filed multiple civil applications and first appeals seeking restoration of their main matter, which had been stayed due to procedural delays and office objections. The respondents, the State of Gujarat and others, opposed the restoration. The Court examined the averments in…
PATEL NARSINHBHAI SHIVRAMDAS SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS HEIRSversusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH
The heirs of the deceased Patel Narsinhbhai appealed against a judgment of the 9th Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mehsana, which awarded them an additional compensation of Rs.160 per square metre for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act. The appellants argued that a later coordinate‑bench decision of this Court…
DEPUTY COLLECTOR, SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION (IRRIGATION) OFFICERversusLEGAL HEIRS OF HEMUBHAI HARJIBHAI
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The High Court of Gujarat considered applications for condonation of delay and several first appeals filed by the Deputy Collector, Special Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation Officer against the legal heirs of Hemubhai Harjibhai. The court condoned the delay in filing the main matters. It noted a State Government reso…
DEPUTY COLLECTOR, SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION (IRRIGATION) OFFICERversusLEGAL HEIRS OF HEMUBHAI HARJIBHAI
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The High Court of Gujarat considered applications for condonation of delay and several first appeals filed by the Deputy Collector, Special Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation Officer against the legal heirs of Hemubhai Harjibhai. The court condoned the delay in filing the main matters. It noted a State Government reso…
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION (IRRIGATION) OFFICERversusLEGAL HEIRS OF TAPUBHAI MERUBHAI
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The High Court of Gujarat considered applications for condonation of delay and several first appeals filed by the Deputy Collector, Special Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation Officer against the legal heirs of Hemubhai Harjibhai. The court condoned the delay in filing the main matters. It noted a State Government reso…
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION (IRRIGATION) OFFICERversusLEGAL HEIRS OF TAPUBHAI MERUBHAI
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The State Government, via a 2016 Government Resolution, classified claims up to Rs.5 lakh as petty and directed that such matters be disposed of accordingly. In the present case, the Deputy Collector (Special Land Acquisition) sought compensation for the legal heirs, but the awarded amount was below Rs.5 lakh. The peti…
SIMARDEEP SINGH BHATIAversusSAHEEBA HARMINDERSINGH ARORA
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
Petitioner Simardeep Singh Bhatia filed a Special Civil Application seeking relief, but later expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, citing the court's apparent disinclination to entertain it. The petitioner, through advocate Mr. Kushal R. Shah, applied for permission to withdraw, which the court granted. The ord…
DANUMAL FOTUMAL BHIMANI (DECEASED)versusGANGARAM KOZAMAL POPAT
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Danumal Fotumal Bhimani (deceased) and an associate, filed an application seeking condonation of delay in preferring the main civil suit against the respondents, Gangaram Kozamal Popat and others. The application was presented before the High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad, and was argued by Mr. Karan K. …
DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER(MANAGER)versusGANPATBHAI BATABHAI BAROT SINCE DECEASED THRO LEGAL HEIRS
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
The Divisional Controller (Manager) appealed a Workman Commissioner order that required payment of compensation and a penalty after a bus accident in which the deceased driver lost both legs. The dispute centered on whether the Commissioner erred by assigning 100% functional disability despite a medical certificate ind…
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANYversusDHAVALBHAI BHARATBHAI SODHA
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
The National Insurance Company appealed a judgment (Case No.15 of 2002) that awarded the claimants compensation of Rs.3,71,901 with 12% interest. The appeal was filed in the High Court of Gujarat, First Appeal No. 1393 of 2012. The Court, after hearing counsel, observed that the appeal raised no substantial question of…
ANIL STARCH PRODUCTS LIMITEDversusMINERALS AND METALS TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
The High Court of Gujarat dismissed three first appeals filed by Anil Starch Products Limited against Minerals and Metals Trading Corporation of India and others because the appellant’s counsel was repeatedly absent and appeared uninterested in prosecuting the matters. The court noted that the appellant’s advocate had …
ANIL STARCH PRODUCTS LIMITEDversusMINERALS AND METALS TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
The High Court of Gujarat dismissed three first appeals filed by Anil Starch Products Limited against Minerals and Metals Trading Corporation of India and others because the appellant’s counsel was repeatedly absent and appeared uninterested in prosecuting the matters. The court noted that the appellant’s advocate had …
ANIL STARCH PRODUCTS LIMITEDversusMINERALS AND METALS TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
The High Court of Gujarat dismissed three first appeals filed by Anil Starch Products Limited against Minerals and Metals Trading Corporation of India and others because the appellant’s counsel was repeatedly absent and appeared uninterested in prosecuting the matters. The court noted that the appellant’s advocate had …
EXECUTIVE ENGINEERversusPRAGATI KAMDAR SAHKARI MANDALI
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
The appellant, an Executive Engineer, filed First Appeal No. 2910 of 2012 against Pragati Kamdar Sahkari Mandali & Anr. The matter was heard before the High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad, by Justice J.C. Doshi. The appellant was represented by Mr. H.S. Munshaw, while the respondents had no advocate on record. The court o…
NILAMBEN VIJAYKUMAR THAKKERversusMANAGER- OWNER- SHIV SHAKTI ROLLING SHUTTERS AND ENGINEERING WORKS
47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH
The appellant, Nilamben Vijaykumar Thakker, filed a first appeal against the Manager-Owner of Shiv Shakti Rolling Shutters and Engineering Works. The appellant's counsel was directed to serve the respondent with the court documents. The court set a deadline of 4 May 2026 for service of the respondent. The order warned …
REGIONAL DIRECTOR,EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONversusGUJARAT HYDROLICS PVT. LTD
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
The Regional Director of Employees State Insurance Corporation appealed against Gujarat Hydrolics Pvt. Ltd. The court noted that the respondent had not filed the required D.S. affidavit. The judge warned that if the affidavit is not filed by 4 May 2026, the proceedings will be dismissed for default. The matter was adjo…
REGIONAL DIRECTORversusSODHANSANSKAR PVT.LTD.
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
The Regional Director filed a first appeal against Sodhansanskar Pvt. Ltd. The court noted that the respondent had not filed a D.S. affidavit required under the fresh rule. The judge directed that if the affidavit is not filed by 4 May 2026, the proceedings will be dismissed for default without further referral to the …
JAYANTILAL HARGOVANDAS THAKKARversusGRAM PANCHAYAT,RATANGADH
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
The appellants, three brothers who operated under the name Jayantilal Hargovandas Thakkar & Co., filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction and damages for breach of a contract to cut babool trees on 174 acres of Gauchar land awarded by Ratangadh Gram Panchayat. The contract was later obstructed by the Forest Departme…
OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITEDversusSHANKARBHAI DAYABHAI PATEL
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
The High Court of Gujarat entertained a civil application for condonation of delay filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited against Shankarbhai Dayabhai Patel and another. The applicant sought time to bring the legal heirs of the deceased second respondent. The court noted that earlier it had already granted ti…
STATE OF GUJARATversusPATEL DEVKARANBHAI GALBABHAI
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act challenging the award of Rs.1910 per square metre in LAR Case No.112 of 2017. The State argued that the compensation was excessive, relying on a prior decision that reduced compensation by 20% for a comparable village (Gajan). The High Co…
TORRENT POWER LTD.versusRAMABEN BALKRISHNA PUROHIT (DECD. THRO LEGAL HEIRS)
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
The mother and brother of Shayan filed a suit against Ahmedabad Electricity Company (now Torrent) and Gujarat Electricity Board (GEB) for compensation after Shayan died from electrocution caused by a short circuit in a 132 kV line. The trial court awarded Rs 1,90,000 with interest, holding both electricity companies jo…
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONversusSUDHABEN RAMANBHAI PATEL
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESI) appealed against an ESI Court order granting dependency benefits to the family of the deceased Ramanbhai Patel, who died of a cardiac arrest while on duty. The appellant argued that the death was due to a pre‑existing coronary disease and not an employment injury under S…
GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARDversusRAMABEN BALKRISHNA PUROHIT (DEC. THRO LEGAL HEIRS)
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
The mother and brother of Shayan filed a suit against Ahmedabad Electricity Company (now Torrent) and Gujarat Electricity Board (GEB) for compensation after Shayan died from electrocution caused by a short circuit in a 132 kV line. The trial court awarded Rs 1,90,000 with interest, holding both electricity companies jo…
GEB (DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED)versusCITIZEN SYNTHETICS THRO' ABIR HAJI ARIF NOORANI
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
GEB (Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Ltd) filed first appeals (Nos. 429 and 430 of 2002) against Citizen Synthetics through Abir Haji Arif Noorani. The court observed that the respondent could not be located and there was a complete non‑existence of the respondent as per the remarks. Consequently, the appeals were dismisse…
GEB (DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED)versusCITIZEN SYNTHETICS THRO' ABIR HAJI ARIF NOORANI
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
GEB (Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Ltd) filed first appeals (Nos. 429 and 430 of 2002) against Citizen Synthetics through Abir Haji Arif Noorani. The court observed that the respondent could not be located and there was a complete non‑existence of the respondent as per the remarks. Consequently, the appeals were dismisse…
GUJ.ELECTRICITY BOARD NOW DAXIN GUJARAT VIJ CO.LTDversusSWARUPSHRI YARN PVT LTD
40-WITHDRAWN @ FH
The Gujarat Electricity Board (now Daxin Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd) and Swarupshri Yarn Pvt. Ltd were parties to cross‑appeals arising from a common judgment dated 30 March 2000. The appeals had been adjourned repeatedly on the ground of settlement, and a stay application filed by the Board was rejected in 2018. When the mat…
GUJ.ELECTRICITY BOARD NOW DAXIN GUJARAT VIJ CO. LTDversusSWARUPSHRI YARN PVT LTD
40-WITHDRAWN @ FH
The Gujarat Electricity Board (now Daxin Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd) and Swarupshri Yarn Pvt. Ltd were parties to cross‑appeals arising from a common judgment dated 30 March 2000. The appeals had been adjourned repeatedly on the ground of settlement, and a stay application filed by the Board was rejected in 2018. When the mat…
MARUTI PROCESSORSversusJAYPRAKASH RAJUBHAI PATEL
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
In the first appeal filed by Maruti Processors against Jayprakash Rajubhai Patel, the parties jointly presented a notarized settlement indicating a total compensation of Rs.3,18,773 for a non‑fatal work‑men's case. The appellant had already paid Rs.50,000 and subsequently paid an additional Rs.2,75,000, exceeding the c…
BABUBHAI MANILAL PATEL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LGL HRSversusHASMUKHBHAI KANTILAL PATEL(SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, represented by the legal heirs of the deceased Babubhai Manilal Patel, filed an application for condonation of delay in filing a first appeal. The respondents, represented by the legal heirs of the deceased Hasmukhbhai Kantilal Patel, waived service of the rule on the caveat. The court considered the a…
BABUBHAI NARANBHAI PATEL SINCE DECD. THROUGH HIS LEGAL AND REPRESENTATIVESversusMANHARBHAI MAKANBHAI PATEL
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in a matter before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant, represented by Ms. Sonal D. Vyas, later moved the court for permission to withdraw the application. The respondent, Manharbhai Makanbhai Patel, was represented by Mr. Amit V. Thakkar. The …
NITESHBHAI BHANJIBHAI KHETIYAversusDEPUTY COLLECTOR
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
Niteshbhai Bhanjibhai Khetiya filed a first appeal against the Deputy Collector and others, but failed to file it within the prescribed period, resulting in a delay of 354 days. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Pratik K. Chaudhary, highlighted that respondents 3.1 and 3.3 are the applicant's siblings and that respondent 2,…
MAGANBHAI DURLABHBHAI PATELversusVITTHALBHAI SUKHABHAI PATEL
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
In First Appeal No. 4680 of 2022, the appellant Maganbhai Durlabhai Patel sought relief against respondents. The court noted that D.S. affidavits for numerous respondents had not been filed in the appeal. It directed that if these affidavits are not filed by 27 April 2026, the proceedings will be dismissed for default.…
OIL & NATURAL GAS CORP.LTD.versusPATEL CHATURDAS VIRAMDAS
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
The State Government, via a Government Resolution dated 25‑10‑2016, classified claims up to Rs 5 lakh as petty claims to be disposed of expeditiously. In the present first appeal, the compensation awarded to the claimants was less than Rs 5 lakh. The appellant, represented by M/S Trivedi & Gupta, challenged the award, …
THE STATE OF GUJARATversusNAYAK GULABBHAI SHANABHAI
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The State of Gujarat acquired land in Jepura village for a bypass road and paid Rs 6 per square metre as compensation. The claimants obtained an additional Rs 277 per square metre through a reference proceeding (Land Acquisition Reference Cases 651/2009‑659/2009). The State appealed the award under Section 54 of the La…
THE STATE OF GUJARATversusDHULABHAI SHANKARBHAI PARMAR
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The State of Gujarat acquired land in Jepura village for a bypass road and paid Rs 6 per square metre as compensation. The claimants obtained an additional Rs 277 per square metre through a reference proceeding (Land Acquisition Reference Cases 651/2009‑659/2009). The State appealed the award under Section 54 of the La…
THE STATE OF GUJARATversusPRAVINBHAI PRABHATBHAI PARMAR
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The State of Gujarat acquired land in Jepura village for a bypass road and paid Rs 6 per square metre as compensation. The claimants obtained a reference and were awarded an additional Rs 277 per square metre by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Panchmahal. The State appealed the award under Section 54 of the Land Acqu…
THE STATE OF GUJARATversusUDESINH RATANSINH PARMAR
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The State of Gujarat acquired land in Jepura village for a bypass road and paid Rs 6 per square metre as compensation. The claimants obtained an additional Rs 277 per square metre through a reference proceeding (Land Acquisition Reference Cases 651/2009‑659/2009). The State appealed the award under Section 54 of the La…
THE STATE OF GUJARATversusRAYJIBHAI SABURBHAI PARMAR
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The State of Gujarat acquired land in Jepura village for a bypass road and paid Rs 6 per square metre as compensation. The claimants obtained a reference under the Land Acquisition Act and the reference court awarded an additional Rs 277 per square metre. The State appealed the award under Section 54 of the Land Acquis…
THE STATE OF GUJARATversusHEIRS OF DECEASED RAMSINH HIMMATSINH PARMAR
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The State of Gujarat acquired land in Jepura village for a bypass road and paid Rs 6 per square metre as compensation. The claimants obtained a reference under the Land Acquisition Act and the reference court awarded an additional Rs 277 per square metre. The State appealed the award under Section 54 of the Land Acquis…
THE STATE OF GUJARATversusRAYJIBHAI ADARBHAI PARMAR
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The State of Gujarat acquired land in Jepura village for a bypass road and paid Rs 6 per square metre as compensation. The claimants obtained an additional Rs 277 per square metre through a reference proceeding (Land Acquisition Reference Cases 651/2009‑659/2009). The State appealed the award under Section 54 of the La…
THE STATE OF GUJARATversusPRAVINBHAI PRABHATBHAI PARMAR
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The State of Gujarat acquired land in Jepura village for a bypass road and paid Rs 6 per square metre as compensation. The claimants obtained an additional Rs 277 per square metre through a reference proceeding (Land Acquisition Reference Cases 651/2009‑659/2009). The State appealed the award under Section 54 of the La…
THE STATE OF GUJARATversusMANCHHABEN MANGALBHAI SHIVABHAI
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The State of Gujarat acquired land in Jepura village for a bypass road and paid Rs 6 per square metre as compensation. The claimants obtained an additional Rs 277 per square metre through a reference case (651/2009‑659/2009) before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Panchmahal. The State appealed the award under Section…
RASESH BHARATKUMAR SHAHversusHETAL W/O RASESH SHAH D/O DILIPBHAI KUMBHANI
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
Rasesh Bharatkumar Shah filed a special civil application against Hetal, the wife of Rasesh Shah and daughter of Dilipbhai Kumbhani, seeking relief. The petition was listed on the board multiple times, but the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Hitendra D. Rajput, failed to appear on several occasions and had previously taken t…
VIJAYGIRI VASUDEVGIRI GOSWAMIversusHASMITA VIJAYGIRI GOSWAMI
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Vijaygiri Vasudevgiri Goswami, filed a special civil application and later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The respondent, Hasmita Vijaygiri Goswami, was represented by counsel. The learned advocate for the petitioner requested withdrawal of the petition. The Court, after conside…
KIRIT PADMANABH VYASversusBANK OF BARODA
46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH
In the first appeal filed by the late Kirit Padmanabh Vyas against Bank of Baroda, the appellant died in 2017. The court noted that the sole appellant's death renders the appeal abated. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed and any interim relief previously granted was vacated. The appellant's heirs expressed intent t…
RANIBEN KRIPALDAS BACHHANIversusMAHALAXMI TRADERS
40-WITHDRAWN @ FH
M/S WEIGHSCALE INDIA PVT LTDversusKISHOREBHAI @ KASHIRAM SHANKARDAS PATEL
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
The appellant, M/s Weighscale India Pvt Ltd, failed to deposit the cost required for preparing the paper‑book in the first appeal. The court noted the omission and, invoking Rule No. 429 of the Civil Manual and Circular No. JUDICIAL/22/2025, directed the appellant to deposit the cost by 2 April 2026. The order warned t…
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusDOLATSANG JIVABHAI
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The Special Land Acquisition Officer filed applications seeking condonation of delay in preferring the main matters, which the High Court allowed. The same applications also included first appeals challenging compensation awards. The Court noted that each appeal involved compensation of less than Rs.5 lakh, which the S…
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER ANANDversusBAJUBEN ADESANG SOLANKI
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The Special Land Acquisition Officer filed applications seeking condonation of delay in preferring the main matters, which the High Court allowed. The same applications also included first appeals challenging compensation awards. The Court noted that each appeal involved compensation of less than Rs.5 lakh, which the S…
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER ANANDversusKAHALSANG DHIRUBHAI
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The Special Land Acquisition Officer filed applications seeking condonation of delay in preferring the main matters, which the High Court allowed. The same applications also included first appeals challenging compensation awards. The Court noted that each appeal involved compensation of less than Rs.5 lakh, which the S…
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusFATEHSANG ABHESANG
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The Special Land Acquisition Officer filed applications seeking condonation of delay in preferring the main matters, which the High Court allowed. The same applications also included first appeals challenging compensation awards. The Court noted that each appeal involved compensation of less than Rs.5 lakh, which the S…
RAY ANNAPURNA CHIRAGBHAI D/O SHANTILAL SHANKARBHAI PATELversusTULCHHARAM RIDAMALRAM BISHNOI
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Ray Annapurna Chiragbai and another, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay for a restoration application. The court examined the averments made in the condonation application and found them satisfactory. Accordingly, the court allowed the condonation of delay. The court then considered…
PROJECT MANAGER - OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITEDversusTHAKOR MATHURJI SONAJI
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The Project Manager of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in preferring the main matter against Thakor Mathurji Sonaji & Anr. The applicant also moved for an amendment to insert the name of advocate Mr. Ashok Prajapati for the legal heirs of the respondent. Th…
MITTALBEN MANHARLAL MEHTA W/O HIRENKUMAR VASANTLAL SUKALversusHIRENKUMAR VASANTLAL SUKAL
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH
The petitioner challenged the Family Court's order that granted the father visitation rights every Sunday from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. and directed interim custody to be handed over after 7 p.m. The High Court observed that the trial court had not examined the child's welfare or the child's wishes, effectively treating the c…
THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR EMPLOYEES' STATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONversusZALA SHAILESHKUMAR RANGITSINH ALIAS RANJITSINH
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESI) filed a first appeal seeking condonation of a 109‑day delay to challenge an ESI Court order that granted Rs.5,000 as funeral expenses to the heirs of the deceased Ranjitsinh Zala. The corporation argued that it was obtaining an opinion on whether such a delayed grant sho…
MUKAND LIMITEDversusM/S LAXMI ENGINEERING WORKS A PERTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT 1932
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
In Summary Suit No.2 of 2011, the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Valsad camp at Vapi, rejected the leave to defend application and passed a decree in favour of the plaintiff. The aggrieved party filed a First Appeal, during which the appellant was directed to deposit 50% of the decretal amount, which had alread…
UNION OF INDIAversusPRATIMA W/O RAKESH DALVI (W/O DECEASED)
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
The Union of India filed a first appeal (No. 3106 of 2024) challenging a civil application for stay filed by Pratima w/o Rakesh Dalvi and others. The primary procedural issue was the service of notice to Respondent No.3, which had not been served. The Court directed the appellant’s counsel to effect service of the unse…
THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES' STATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONversusV.C.SHAH PATEL SERVICES PVT.LTD.
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation and others filed an application before the Gujarat High Court seeking condonation of delay in filing the main suit against V.C. Shah Patel Services Pvt. Ltd. The applicant argued that the delay was justified and requested the court to condone it. The respond…
DINESHKUMAR JEMALDAN BAROTversusLILABEN D/O DEVARAM BHAAT (MEHRA)
46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH
The appellant, Dinesh Kumar Jemaldan Barot, filed a first appeal against a decision involving his former spouse, Lilaben. Both parties were reported to be living separately. The appellant's counsel stated that attempts to contact the petitioner were unsuccessful. The court noted that the appellant had not removed the r…
PRAKASHCHANDRA GAUTAMBHAI DAMORversusSHAMBUBHAI NAVALBHAI BHAMAT
46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH
The appellant Prakashchandra Gautambhai Damor filed a first appeal against a district court order that appointed Shambubhai Navalbhai Bhamat as guardian of two minor daughters of the deceased Naynaben. Both daughters have now attained the age of majority, having turned 18 years old. The parties argued that the guardian…
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusSABABSANG SHIBHABHAI
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
The Special Land Acquisition Officer and another party filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay before the Gujarat High Court. The respondent, Sababsang Shibhbai, was an unserved expired deceased, and the court noted that the heirs of the respondent had not been brought before it. The issue before the cou…
VINOD DILIP HENDREversusKALIYANI VINOD HENDRE
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The husband (petitioner) filed a Hindu Marriage Petition (HMP) under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights. During the pendency, the wife (respondent) filed an application under Section 24 of the same Act seeking interim maintenance, which the husband did not contest. The Family C…
BRAHMANE MANISHA SADANANDBHAIversusUNION OF INDIA
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
The deceased Sadanand Brahmane died after falling from an upper berth due to a sudden jerk in a train traveling from Bhusawal to Surat. The Railway Claims Tribunal had rejected his family's claim for compensation, holding that the incident did not qualify as an "untoward accident" under section 123(c) of the Railway Cl…
SANDIP PRAVINBHAI MEHTAversusDEVANGI W/O SANDIPBHAI PRAVINBHAI MEHTA D/O BHASKARBHAI JATASHANKER JOSHI
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Sandip Pravinbhai Mehta, filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court seeking direction in a family dispute involving his wife, Devangi, and Jatashanker Joshi. The learned Family Court’s report was taken on record and the matter was scheduled for a final hearing on 25 March 2026. The …
SHEKH SIPAHISHAHIN MOHAMMADHUSSAINversusSHEKH SIRINBANU MOHAMMADSHAHID
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner filed Special Civil Application No. 17721 of 2024 before the Gujarat High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to revive it if needed. The Court, exercising its inherent jurisdiction, granted the request, ordering the p…
STATE OF GUJARATversusVITTHALBHAI MADHAVLAL PATEL
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
The plaintiff, a contractor, performed earth‑filling work on the direction of officials of the defendant department but was not paid. After repeated notices, the plaintiff filed a suit for Rs 4,69,000 with interest; the trial court partially decreed Rs 1,40,000 with 6% interest. The defendants appealed under Section 96…
ABHESING RUMALBHAI PARGHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Abhesing Rumalbhai Parghi, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of a 173‑day delay in filing a restoration application for a Special Criminal Application that had been dismissed multiple times for non‑prosecution. The petitioner repeatedly …
PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ.CO.LTDversusHASAM MAMAD SAMA
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
The parents of Abdul Hasam sued Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. (PGVCL) for compensation after their son was electrocuted by a hanging live wire while crossing a lake embankment on 6‑12‑2001. The trial court held PGVCL negligent and ordered it to pay Rs.3,38,000 with 9% interest per annum. PGVCL appealed, contending that …
KALPESHKUMAR AMRATBHAI NAIversusFALGUNIBEN D/O MAFATLAL GOHIL
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner filed a Special Civil Application seeking relief in connection with Family Suit No. 82 of 2022. The Family Court had dismissed the family suit for default on 22 October 2024. The petitioner submitted the judgment as evidence, and the High Court examined whether the pending application could continue. The…
DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, STATE TRANSPORT OF GUJARATversusLH OF VASANTBHAI RAMJIBHAI JADAV
33-CA DISPOSED OF
The Divisional Controller, State Transport of Gujarat filed a first appeal against an award of the Workmen Compensation Tribunal, but the appeal was filed 46 days late. The applicant sought condonation of this delay and also requested deletion of the name of a deceased respondent from the pleadings. The Court granted p…
MAFATLAL MANILAL DALALversusTHE GUJARAT STATE CO OP COTTON FEDERATION LTD
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
Mafatlal Manilal Dalal filed a first appeal (No. 2875 of 2024) against the Gujarat State Co‑op Cotton Federation Ltd and others. The appellant's counsel, Mr. Suren M. Shah, was absent when the matter was called. The respondents had not filed the required DS affidavit, and the court had set a deadline of 20‑April‑2026 f…
SAGAR NARAN SAMATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH
The appellant, Sagar Naran Samat, challenged a judgment dated 29‑December‑2022 of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Keshod, which dismissed LRC No.151 of 2016 on the ground that the claimants failed to produce evidence despite ample opportunity. The appeal was confined to LRC No.151 and was argued before the High Court…
DEPUTY COLLECTORversusGANDABHAI BHAGVANBHAI PARMAR
33-CA DISPOSED OF
The Deputy Collector filed an application for condonation of delay in a civil suit. The court directed the applicants to serve the unserved respondent by 20 April 2026, failing which the suit would be dismissed without further reference to the court. The order also stayed the matter until 23 April 2026. No substantive …
NARENDRA C DESAI(DECEASED)versusJOGESH JAGMOHANDAS PANWALA
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
In a civil revision application, the petitioner No.1.2 had died and petitioner No.1.1 failed to appear despite being served notice. The court observed that petitioner No.1.1 showed no interest in prosecuting the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The registry was directed to retur…
JITENDRASINH BHAVSINH VADHERversusMOHANSINH BHAVSINH VADHER
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
In Second Appeal No. 231 of 2022, the sole appellant, Jitendrasinh Bhavsinh Vadher, had died before the hearing. The appellant's counsel informed the court of the death, prompting the judge to consider the effect of the appellant's demise on the pending appeal. The court held that the appeal stands abated, but the heir…
HUSEN MAMAD KARA ISMAIL KAKALversusPRABHULAL MANILAL MEHTA
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The applicant, Husen Mamad Kara Ismail Kakal, filed an application for condonation of delay in preferring the main matter before the High Court of Gujarat. The respondent, Prabhulal Manilal Mehta & Ors., opposed the application. The court examined the averments made in the application. No detailed reasoning was recorde…
RAMANI EDUCATION TRUSTversusHEIRS OF DECD. MOHANBHAI NATHABHAI VADODARIYA
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
Ramani Education Trust and others filed a second appeal and sought condonation of delay in preferring the main matter. The application was supported by averments filed before the High Court of Gujarat. Counsel for the applicants and respondents appeared before the court, and notice was served on the respondents. The co…
BECHARBHAI GANGARAMBHAI PATELversusGODAVARIBEN RANCHODBHAI PATEL
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
The appellant, Becharbhai Gangaramabhai Patel & ors., filed a second appeal and a civil application for stay against Godavariben Ranchodbhai Patel & ors. The court noted that respondent No.4 had not been served with notice and that service to respondent No.2 had expired. The judge directed the appellant to complete ser…
GAURAV MANUJI THAKORversusRAKESHKUMAR BABUJI THAKOR
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner was previously directed to serve the unserved respondents and failed to do so. During the first hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested a continuance to the second session, but the counsel was absent when the matter was called. The court, noting the repeated delay and absence, granted a final opportu…
RAMANBHAI SHANABHAI THAKORversusMARGHABHAI SHANABHAI THAKOR (SINCE DECD. ) THROUGH HIS HEIRS AND LRS
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
The matter is a second appeal (C/SA/83/2018) with a civil application for stay filed by Ramanbhai Shanabhai Thakor & Ors against the estate of the deceased Marghabhai Shanabhai Thakor. The appellant sought relief, but the respondent No.1.1 had died, and no steps were taken to bring his heirs on record. The Court noted …
VINODCHANDRA BHAVANJI GALIAversusWIDOW BHANUMATI TALAKSHI SHAH
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
The appellants Vinodchandra BhavanjI Galia & Anr filed multiple appeals and civil applications before the Gujarat High Court. The court observed that notices to several respondents (Nos. 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10) had either not been served or not returned, and no further steps were taken to effect service. The judge granted …
BAHADURSINH ISHWARSINH VANSADIYAversusVATSALABEN WD/O DEVJIBHAI RAMJIBHAI VASAVA
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
The High Court of Gujarat issued an oral order in Second Appeal No. 608 of 2022, directing that if no step is taken by 27 April 2026, the present proceedings shall be dismissed for default without further referral to the Court. The order notes that respondent No.2 has expired. A further sanction order is set for 30 Apr…
VRAJLAL SAKARLALSINCE DECD. THRO HIS HEIRSversusCHHOTALAL DURLABHRAM SINCE DECD. THROUGH HEIRS
40-WITHDRAWN @ FH
The appellants filed a second appeal (C/SA/217/2010) along with several civil applications for condonation of delay, bringing heirs, and direction. The court initially allowed the civil applications to bring certain heirs on record. Subsequently, the appellant's counsel submitted written instructions to withdraw the se…
DEPUTY ENGINEER, PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD.versusDIPAKBHAI PARBATBHAI BERADIYA
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
The Deputy Engineer of Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. filed a civil application for condonation of delay, seeking four weeks to bring the legal heirs of the deceased respondent on record. The court considered whether the applicant should be allowed additional time to comply with procedural requirements. It was held t…
JASHODABEN PARSHOTAMBHAI PRAJAPATIversusNATUBHAI PARSHOTAMBHAI PATEL SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HEIRS
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
The appellant filed a second appeal seeking condonation of delay in a civil application. Respondent No. 3, a party to the proceedings, died, and the appellant has not yet produced the heirs of the deceased on record. The court granted a final opportunity to the appellant to file the heirs' details by 27 April 2026, war…
SARKHEJ ROZA COMMITTEE THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED TRUSTEE/ MUTAWALLIversusUKARSINGH MEGHSINGH
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Sarkhej Roza Committee, challenged a Waqf Tribunal order that dismissed its plaint for insufficient court fees and improper valuation under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The petitioner argued that CPC provisions do not apply to Waqf suits under the Waqf Act, 1995, and that the Tr…
SARKHEJ ROZA COMMITTEEversusSHAHRUKHKHAN ABDUL RAUFKHAN PATHAN
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, represented by the Sarkhej Roza Committee, filed a group of civil revision applications under Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act, 1995, challenging a Waqf Tribunal order that rejected their plaint on the ground of insufficient court fees under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Tribun…
SARKHEJ ROZA COMMITTEEversusDAUDBHAI RAJEBHAI VOHRA
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Sarkhej Roza Committee, challenged a Waqf Tribunal order that dismissed its plaint for insufficient court fees and improper valuation under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The petitioner argued that CPC provisions do not apply to Waqf suits under the Waqf Act, 1995, and that the Tr…
SARKHEJ ROZA COMMITTEEversusCHANDBIBI ABDULRAUFKHAN PATHAN
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Sarkhej Roza Committee, challenged a Waqf Tribunal order that dismissed its plaint for insufficient court fees and improper valuation under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The petitioner argued that CPC provisions do not apply to Waqf suits under the Waqf Act, 1995, and that the Tr…
SARKHEJ ROZA COMMITTEE THROUGH ITS TRUSTEE/MUTAWALLI DILAWARHUSSAIN MIRSHBMIYA SAIYEDversusBHAVINSINGH MEGHSINGH
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Sarkhej Roza Committee, challenged a Waqf Tribunal order that dismissed its plaint for insufficient court fees and improper valuation under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The petitioner argued that CPC provisions do not apply to Waqf suits under the Waqf Act, 1995, and that the Tr…
SARKHEJ ROZA COMMITTEE THROUGH ITS TRUSTEE/MUTAWALLI DILAWARHUSSAIN MIRSHBMIYA SAIYEDversusKESARKHAN RUSTAMKHAN PATHAN
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Sarkhej Roza Committee, challenged a Waqf Tribunal order that dismissed its plaint for insufficient court fees and improper valuation under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The petitioner argued that CPC provisions do not apply to Waqf suits under the Waqf Act, 1995, and that the Tr…
GOVINDBHAI NARANBHAI AHIRversusPARSHOTTAM BAVABHAI PATEL
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
The appellant Govindbhai Naranbhai Ahir filed a second appeal and a civil application for interim relief against Parshottam Bavabhai Patel. The matter was listed repeatedly before the High Court of Gujarat. The appellant’s counsel, Shivani R Modi, failed to appear on several occasions and was observed to be unintereste…
ROHIT MANOJ MANDHYANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of the main criminal matter that had been previously removed from the court file. The High Court examined the application and noted a delay in filing the restoration request, which left the court uncertain about events during the intervening …
TULSI RASULBHAI RATHVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Tulsi Rasulbhai Rathva, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration of the main criminal case (R/Criminal Misc.Application/12020/2020) after a delay. The court noted that the delay left it uncertain what transpired during the intervening period. Despite the lapse, the judge held that …
SARASWATI TECHNICAL INSTITUTE THROUGH PATEL SAROJBEN JAYANTILALversusPRAJAPATI JAYANTIBHAI SHANKARBHAI
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
Saraswati Technical Institute filed a civil revision application before the High Court of Gujarat. The court observed that a required DS affidavit for respondent No.4 had not been filed. The court directed that the affidavit be filed on or before 27 March 2026. It further ordered that if the affidavit is not filed by t…
LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED BAI MIRA FAKIRAversusLEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED NATVARLAL MANILAL - BAI BHAGWATI WD.
40-WITHDRAWN @ FH
The petitioners, legal heirs of the deceased, sought permission to withdraw their civil revision petition concerning a tenancy dispute, requesting a nine‑month period to vacate the demised premises. The Court granted the withdrawal, directing the petitioners to vacate within nine months and to deposit the contractual/d…
APOLLO INTERNATIONAL LTDversusPEARL SHIPTRANS PVT LTD
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
Apollo International Ltd. and another filed civil revision applications seeking permission to withdraw their petitions. The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Jay A. Bhagdev, requested the court to allow the withdrawal. The court considered whether it had the authority to permit such a withdrawal under procedural law. It…
CLS LOGISTICS PVT LTDversusPEARL SHIPTRANS PVT LTD
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
Apollo International Ltd. and another filed civil revision applications seeking permission to withdraw their petitions. The respondents, Pearl Shiptrans Pvt. Ltd., were represented by counsel. The petitioners applied to the High Court of Gujarat for leave to withdraw the pending proceedings. The Court, after hearing th…
DIPAKKUMAR DHIRAJLAL THAKKARversusMADHJIBHA KAPURJI THAKOR (ABATE)
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
Dipakkumar Dhirajlal Thakkar filed a second appeal in the High Court of Gujarat but failed to file it within the prescribed period, resulting in a delay of 522 days. The appellant sought condonation of this delay, explaining that he was arrested in Dubai, detained there, and later extradited to India, which prevented h…
YUSUF MUHAMMAD SONIversusCORPORATOR MUSTAK ISMAIL SONI
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Yusuf Muhammad Soni, filed a civil revision application and later sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The petitioner’s counsel, Rizwan Shaikh, requested the withdrawal, while the respondents were represented by Ashish M. Dagli and Manish S. Shah. The Hon'ble Justice J.C. Doshi consid…
PATEL HASANBHAI ALIBHAI AADAMBHAIversusPATEL JAYESHKUMAR ISHWARBHAI
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
The appellant filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the CPC challenging the appellate court’s decree granting specific performance in a suit concerning a shop mortgaged by a conditional sale deed dated 24‑09‑1979. The deed required the plaintiff to repay Rs.13,000 after seven years, upon which the defendant would …
M/S CHETAN PHARMA DISTRIBUTORSversusKAMINIBEN BHARATBHAI PATVA
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
M/s Chetan Pharma Distributors filed a civil application for condonation of delay against respondents Kaminiben Bharatbhai Patva and others. The applicant was required to file an affidavit of direct service for respondents No.1 to 7, which was not filed. The High Court directed that the affidavit must be filed on or be…
NATHIBEN KARSHANBHAI PARMARversusMANSINGBHAI UKABHAI PARMAR
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
In two civil revision applications (Nos. 562 and 563 of 2025), the petitioners, represented by Advocate Dev D. Patel, sought an early adjudication of the underlying suit, noting that evidence recording was already underway. The petitioner argued that the trial court should decide the suit promptly and that the revision…
NATHIBEN KARSHANBHAI PARMARversusMANSINGBHAI UKABHAI PARMAR
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
In two civil revision applications (Nos. 562 and 563 of 2025), the petitioners, represented by Advocate Dev D. Patel, sought an early adjudication of the underlying suit, noting that evidence recording was already underway. The petitioner argued that the trial court should decide the suit promptly and that the revision…
SHASHTRI BHAKTIPRIYADASJI GURU UTTAMPRIYADASJIversusBALABHAI MANJIBHAI VAGHRI
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
The applicant filed a revision against a trial court order that dismissed an execution proceeding on the ground that the decree pertained to a prohibitory injunction and could not be executed for possession of the suit premises. The High Court held that this dismissal conflicted with established law, noting that object…
GAURANGBHAI BHASKARBHAI RANA, LH OF DECD. BHASKARBHAI RATILAL RANAversusLH OF DECD. GANPATLAL CHHAGANLAL RANA
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
The applicant, Gaurangbhai Bhaskarbhai Rana, filed a civil application for condonation of delay before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant's counsel was directed to submit the necessary copies of the appeal/application within two weeks of the order. The court warned that failure to comply would result in the dismi…
LATE GANGABEN MANILAL PATEL THROUGH LH BHANUMATIBEN THAKORBHAI PATEL D/O MANILAL PATELversusKANTILAL JAGUBHAI PATEL
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Late Gangaben Manilal Patel (through her daughter) and others, filed a second appeal in a civil matter but did so after the prescribed time limit. They applied to the High Court of Gujarat seeking condonation of the delay in filing the appeal. The court examined the application and considered whether t…
BECHARBHAI JETHABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Becharbhai Jethabhai and others, filed Civil Revision Application No. 6549/2025 seeking condonation of delay. The respondents, the State of Gujarat and another party, were served notice of the application. The matter was heard before Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.C. Doshi of the Gujarat High Court. The court c…
AMRUTLAL HARKHAJIBHAI MENPARAversusASHABEN ARVINDKUMAR PATEL
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
Amrutlal Harkajibhai Menpara & Anr filed a civil revision application (C/CA/1685/2025) seeking condonation of delay in filing the revision. The respondents were served notice and the matter was listed before Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.C. Doshi. The court examined the averments made in the application regarding the reasons f…
KALIDAS RATABHAI CHAUHANversusMANGALBHAI RAISINGBHAI PARMAR SINCE DIED THROUGH LHR
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in a second appeal. The applicant later submitted evidence that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and the original decree was satisfied, leading the original decree holder to withdraw the darkhast. Consequently, the applicant, through couns…
AISHABEN MAHMADSAEED MAULVIversusSULTANBHAI GAFURBHAI MULTANI
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The applicant filed a second appeal after a delay and sought condonation of that delay. The court examined the application and, finding no substantive objection, allowed the application, thereby condoning the delay in filing the second appeal. No detailed factual background or legal arguments were recorded in the order…
HEIRS OF DECEASED MANIBEN,WIFE OF ATABHAI MADHABHAI GOHELversusRAJNIKANT GORDHANBHAI PATEL
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The Second Appeal No. 31283 of 2025 was dismissed for default because the appellant failed to remove office objections. The appellant filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application for restoration of the dismissed appeal. The court examined the application and the circumstances of the default. It held that the appeal could be…
SHUKAL KARNAVI D/O BHARGAVNATH GIRINDRANATHversusPUROHIT PARTH BHADRESHKUMAR
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
The appellant, Shukal Karnavi, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking a declaration that the divorce deed executed between the parties is sufficient to dissolve their marriage. The trial and appellate courts had held that a divorce deed is not permissible in the Brahmin community…
PATEL JAYANTIBHAI MANILALversusPATEL KAUSHIKABEN PUNJIRAM
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
The petitioners (Patel Jayantibhai Manilal & ors.) filed a civil application for condonation of delay in a second appeal. The respondents (Patel Kaushikaben Punjiram & ors.) failed to file a DS affidavit for respondents Nos.3,7,8,9. The court directed that if the DS affidavit is not filed on or before 16‑03‑2026, the p…
INDUBEN CHAMANLAL KANDOIversusHEIR OF AMRUTLAL ANANDJI JITENDRA AMRUTLAL SOLANKI
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
The sole petitioner in a civil revision application died on 21 April 2025. The court directed the petitioner’s representatives to file a petition to bring the heirs on record, but no such steps were taken. At the hearing on 10 February 2026, the petitioner’s counsel was absent. Since the heirs had not been identified a…
PATEL RASHESHBHAI MADHUSUDANBHAIversusLHS OF THAKOR CHANDABEN W/O LATE JUGAJI SAGAL
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
In a civil revision application, Patel Rashesbhai sought relief against the LHS of Thakor Chandaben. The court noted that several notices served on the respondents had expired and that the petitioner had not taken steps to bring the heirs of the deceased respondent on record. The court observed that the petitioner had …
LHS OF DECD. RAMJIBHAI JETHABHAI RATHODversusMANIBEN W/O ARJAN LAKHMAN (ABATED)
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The appellants filed a second appeal and sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The learned advocate, on behalf of the appellants, requested that the appeal be withdrawn. Justice J.C. Doshi granted the permission, ordering that the appeal stand disposed of as withdrawn. Consequently, the associated civil applica…
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.versusNIRMA LTD.
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
The landlord (original HUF) sued Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (BPCL) and its sub‑lessee Mahendra Motors for unlawful occupation of a 1,000‑sq‑yard plot leased in 1970. The lease expired on 29 September 1984 and the landlord refused renewal, seeking eviction under the Bombay Rent Act. The trial court and the Small C…
MAHENDRA PATELversusBHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
The landlord (original HUF members) sued Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (BPCL) and its sub‑lessee Mahendra Motors for unlawful occupation of a 1,000‑sq‑yard plot leased in 1970. The lease expired on 29‑Sept‑1984 and the landlord refused renewal, seeking eviction under the Bombay Rent Act. The trial court and the Smal…
PRAKASHBHAI NANDLAL BHATT (SWAMINARAYAN)versusKESHAVLAL AMBALAL PATEL
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The appellant, Prakashbhai Nandlal Bhatt, filed a second appeal and a civil application for stay, seeking permission to withdraw the appeal. The learned advocate for the appellant requested the court's permission to withdraw, and the court exercised its discretion to grant the request. The court clarified that it did n…
MAHESH NATUBHAI GAMITversusCHHAGANBHAI RESHIABHAI THROUGH HEIRS AND L.R.
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
The appellants challenged a judgment that had set aside a trial court decree declaring a 1986 Will executed by their grandfather Reshiabhai void on grounds of lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence. The trial court had found the Will fraudulent but dismissed the suit for jurisdictional reasons; the appellate…
HANSABEN W/O JIVAN BARIYAversusSAKARBHAI RAMBHAI SOLANKI
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
The plaintiff Hansaben filed a suit seeking declaration and cancellation of a 1990 sale deed, asserting she became the owner of a one‑acre land after purchasing it from defendant No.1 in 2009. The trial court dismissed the suit, and the first appellate court affirmed the dismissal. The plaintiff then filed a second app…
PRAVINCHANDRA CHIMANLAL SHAHversusHARSHADKUMAR PRAVINCHANDRA SANGHAVI
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. KV Shelat, informed the court that he had received no instructions from his client despite his efforts. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for default, granting the petitioner liberty to revive the petition if he faces difficulty. The court also vacated any interim relief that …
NARVARBHAI CHHEDADBHAI VASAVversusBHIMJIBHAI CHHEDABHAI VASAVA
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Narvarbhai Chhedadbhaï Vasav, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in preferring the main matter and in filing a second appeal to bring legal heirs on record. The respondents, Bhimjibhai Chhedabhai Vasava, were served with an unserved expired notice. The High Court examined the averme…
HIRAJI AACHAR @AACHU MARWADA (BHADRU)versusPASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD.
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The applicant, Hiraji Aachar @Aachu Marwada (Bhadru), filed a second appeal (No. 2126/2025) and subsequently sought condonation of delay in preferring the main matter. The respondent, Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd., opposed the application. The court examined the averments made in the application regarding the reason…
MILAN HARISHBHAI MAHETAversusMANAJI SHAKRAJI
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The applicant, Milan Harishbhai Maheta, filed a Civil Revision Application seeking condonation of delay in filing the CRA, alleging that he suffered from bipolar disorder and depression since July 2022, which prevented him from contacting counsel. The applicant’s counsel, Senior Advocate Mehul S. Shah, submitted medica…
NOORMOHMAD ABDEREHMAN JHAVERIversusHASANBHAI IBRAHIM JUNEJA
46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH
The appellant Noormohmad Abderehman Jhaveri & Anr filed a second appeal and a civil revision. During the hearing, the appellant's counsel, Mr. PJ Kanabar, stated that he had no instructions to represent the parties. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal for default, granting the appellant liberty to revive the m…
NOORMAHMAD ABDEREHMAN JHAVERI (DECD) THROUGH HAWABAI NOORMAHversusHASANBHA IBRAHIMBHAI JUNEJA
46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH
The appellant Noormohmad Abderehman Jhaveri & Anr filed a second appeal and a civil revision. During the hearing, the appellant's counsel, Mr. PJ Kanabar, stated that he had no instructions to represent the parties. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal for default, granting the appellant liberty to revive the m…
DEENDAYAL KANHAIYALAL BAJAJversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Deendayal Kanhaiyalal Bajaj, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in preferring the main criminal matter. The application was supported by counsel Mr. Suraj A. Shukla. The State of Gujarat, represented by Addl. Public Prosecutor Mr. Chintan Dave, opposed the condonatio…
ADMINISTRATORversusRAMUBHAI KAMALGIRI GAUSWAMI
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
The plaintiffs, Ramubhai Kamalgiri Gauswami and others, claimed long‑standing possession of houses No.11/103 and 11/104 in Ambaji Panchayat, asserting they had lived there for over 30 years, paid taxes and sought a permanent injunction against the Administrator of the Arasuri Ambaji Devsthan Trust and the Gram Panchaya…
HARSHABEN D/O PREMJIBHAI AJAGIYA W/O SURESHBHAI RATHODversusBINABEN DILIPBHAI MAKWANA
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
The petitioners, Harshaben D/o Premjibhai Ajagiya w/o Sureshbhai Rathod and others, filed a second appeal against a decree in favor of the respondent, Binaben Dilipbhai Makwana. The appeal was listed multiple times, and while notice was served on several appellants, they either remained absent or were unserved due to i…
JITENDRA RAGHUNANDAN GOSAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners filed several criminal miscellaneous and special criminal applications seeking restoration of their matters to the original court files. The applications were listed before the Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. C. Doshi of the Gujarat High Court on 27 January 2026. The court examined the applications and found no …
KIRITBHAI ISHVARBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
Kiritbhai Ishvarbhai Patel filed a special criminal application seeking restoration of the main matter to its original file. The State of Gujarat and another party were respondents. The applicant was represented by Mr. C.P. Champaneri, while the respondents were represented by Mr. Chintan Dave, Additional Public Prosec…
DINESHBHAI RATANJIBHAI CHAUDHARYversusANJANA RAMIBEN D/O. DOHJIBHAI MEGHABHAI W/O. MUJI GHAMARBHAI VIRJIBHAI (CHAUDHARY)
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Dineshbhai Ratanjibhai Chaudhary, filed a civil revision application seeking permission to withdraw the petition because the underlying suit had already been disposed of. The petitioner submitted a copy of the order passed in the lower suit, which the court took on record. The court clarified that it ha…
GURUJIBHAI @ AJAYBHAI BIPINBHAI TALPADAversusRONAKBEN @ BHUMIKABEN D/O DILIPBHAI RAVJIBHAI TALPADA W/O GURUJIBHAI@AJAYBHAI BIPINBHAI TALPADA
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner filed a civil revision application before the High Court of Gujarat seeking relief. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the petition and was granted liberty to institute appropriate proceedings before a suitable court. The court granted the withdrawal request, disposing the …
CHAUHAN RATANBEN KESHAJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in a pending matter before the High Court of Gujarat. They alleged that sufficient cause existed for the delay and submitted an affidavit supporting their claim. The Public Prosecutor opposed the application on the ground that the d…
MOHAMMAD SABBIR BASIRBHAI CHEJRAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in a pending matter before the High Court of Gujarat. The application alleged that sufficient cause existed for the delay. The court examined the averments and was satisfied that the petitioners had demonstrated adequate reasons for…
BHIKHABHAI MAHADEVBHAI RABARIversusDEFENSE ESTATE OFFICER
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
The appellant, Bhikhabhai Mahadevbhai Rabari, filed a second appeal and a civil application for stay against the Defense Estate Officer and another respondent. The court observed that the respondents had not filed the required DS affidavit since the matter was initiated in 2021. The judge directed that the DS affidavit…
HEIR OF DECD. PRATAPSINH HARWARILAL DALAL - SATVANTIBEN PRATAPSINH DALALversusRANJANBEN PRATAPSINH DALAL
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
The deceased Pratapsinh Harwarilal Dalal, a veterinary doctor and assistant professor at Junagadh Agricultural University, died in a road accident on 3.5.2016. Original petitioner No.1 Ranjanben claimed to be his legally wedded wife, married in 1993, with two children, and was recorded as nominee in his service book fo…
SHETH VINODCHANDRA MAFATLAL, LH OF DECEASED SHETH MAFATLAL MOHANLALversusLHS OF DECEASED HARIJAN JAGTABHAI RAIMALBHAI (WRONGLY TYPED AS MAVABHAI )
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Sheth Vinodchandra Mafatlal, filed an application for condonation of delay in preferring the main matter of a second appeal. The High Court considered the averments made in the application. The court found the reasons satisfactory and allowed the application. Consequently, the delay in filing the main m…
PRADIPKUMAR GORDHANDAS PATELversusCHANDRAKANT JIVANLAL PATEL
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
The plaintiff, Chandrakant J. Patel, sought a possession warrant against his relative Pradipkumar G. Patel under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Court Act, 1882, claiming that the permission to occupy the disputed premises had been withdrawn. The Small Cause Court issued the warrant under Section 43, which the…
STATE OF GUJARATversusSUJATHA CHANDRASEKHAR PILLAI
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
The plaintiff, Sujatha Chandrasekhar Pillai, sought a compassionate appointment after her mother, a staff nurse, died in service while Sujatha was a minor. The trial court dismissed her suit, holding she was maintained by her father (a government employee) and family pension, and that the applicable Gujarat Government …
POONAMBEN SAMANTHBHAI HAPANI W/O MADHA RAVAJI RATHODversusVAGHAJIBHAI PREMJIBHAI HAPANI
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners sought permission to withdraw their civil revision application and the accompanying stay application, requesting that the trial proceed expeditiously. The High Court granted the withdrawal, vacated the interim relief previously ordered, and directed the trial court to conclude the suit within nine month…
RAJENDRA KRISHNALAL SANDHU PROPRIETOR OF BHARAT MARINE TRADERSversusBATUKBHAI BALABHAI PATEL PROPRIETOR OF SHREE RAM STEEL INDUSTRIES UNIT-2
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The applicant, Rajendra Krishnalal Sandhu, proprietor of Bharat Marine Traders, filed an application seeking condonation of delay in preferring the main matter of a second appeal. The respondent, Batukbhai Balabhai Patel, proprietor of Shree Ram Steel Industries Unit-2, opposed the application. The High Court examined …
MESSRS JAYRAJ GROUP OF COMPANIESversusUNION BANK OF INDIA
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Messrs Jayraj Group of Companies, filed a civil revision application before the High Court of Gujarat. Subsequently, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing, granted permission to withdraw, disposing the petition as withdrawn and discharging the not…
BALDEVBHAI KESHAVLAL SUTHAR (DECD)THROUGH SUBHADRABEN BALDversusKANTILAL AMBALAL SUTHAR
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
The appellant, Baldevbhai Keshavlal Suthar (deceased) and five other co‑appellants, filed a second appeal against Kantilal Ambalal Suthar and another respondent. Notice of appearance was issued to the appellants, but appellant No.1 had died and appellants No.2‑6, although served, did not appear or file any response. Th…
DINESHSING BHAVARSING SHEKAWATversusJITENDRAKUMAR BANSILAL SHARMA
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Dineshsing Bhavarsing Shekawat, filed an application before the Gujarat High Court seeking condonation of delay in preferring the main civil matter. The respondents, Jitendrakumar Bansilal Sharma and another, were served with the application. The court considered the averments made in the application r…
AXITA DHIRAJBHAI VASANIversusSMARK JAYANTIBHAI DOBARIYA
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The applicant Axita Dhirajbhai Vasani filed a petition seeking condonation of a seven‑day delay in filing a Civil Revision Application. The respondent, Smark Jayantibhai Dobariya, was served notice but did not appear before the Court. The applicant’s counsel argued that the delay was inadvertent and that condoning it w…
SHIVABHAI GOVABHAI DAYMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Shivabhai Govabhai Dayma, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in filing the main criminal matter. The application was presented before the High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad, with Mr. M R Saiyed appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Chintan Dave, Additional Public Prosec…
BRIJESHBHAI MAHENDRABHAI AMINversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Brijeshbhai Mahendrabhai Amin & Anr., filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration. They later requested permission to withdraw the petition, seeking liberty to file a fresh application if a discharge application is decided against them. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted permi…
VARUN CHANDRAKANT PUJARA(qua applicant no.1 as withdraw as per order dt.25/03/2021)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, represented by Mr. Hardeep L. Mahida, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw their criminal miscellaneous application and requested liberty to file a fresh quashing petition. The Respondents, represented by Addl. Public Prosecutor Mr. Chintan Dave, opposed the withdrawal. Justice J.C. Doshi conside…
UMARJI ISMAIL MUSAversusIDRIS MOHAMMAD VALI SHETH
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioner, Umarji Ismail Musa, sought permission to withdraw his civil revision petition, which contained only an innocuous relief, in order to expedite the pending trial. The High Court considered the request and granted permission for the withdrawal, disposing the petition as withdrawn. The court directed the tr…
HEIRS OF RABIYABIBI MAKBUL HUSHEN SHEIKHversusGULAM MOHMAD AHMAD SHEIKH (ABATED)
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking condonation of delay in preferring the application. The respondent, Mokadiya Ajaiben Ramabhai, was served notice. The sole issue before the court was whether the delay in filing the application could be condoned. The court…
LALITABEN HASMUKHBHAI RANAversusCHANDUBHAI JENABHAI CHAUHAN
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
The appellants, Lalitabeni Hasmukhbhai Rana & others, filed a second appeal before the Gujarat High Court. Their counsel, Mr. Rutul P. Desai, claimed he had not received any instructions from the appellants despite attempts to contact them. Consequently, the court noted a lack of prosecution of the appeal. The judge di…
DILAVARSINH BAVARJIRAJ GOHIL (DECD)THROUGH JANAKSINH DILAVAversusGHANSHYAMSINH DILAVARSINH GOHIL
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
The appellant, Dilavarsinh Bavarjiraj Gohil (deceased) through his representative, filed a second appeal against the respondents. No advocate appeared for the appellant when the matter was called for hearing, and an advocate notice was served. The court noted the appellant's non‑prosecution and dismissed the appeal. An…
PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTDversusNARANBHAI PITHABHAI VAJA
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking condonation of delay in preferring the application. The respondent, Mokadiya Ajaiben Ramabhai, was served notice. The sole issue before the court was whether the delay in filing the application could be condoned. The court…
PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTDversusSANDEEPBHAI KHIMABHAI CHAVDA
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners, Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking condonation of delay in preferring the application. The respondent, Mokadiya Ajaiben Ramabhai, was served notice. The sole issue before the court was whether the delay in filing the application could be condoned. The court…
LH OF DECD MAGANBHAI CHAMARBHAI PATELversusRAMANBHAI CHAMARBHAI PATEL
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
In a second appeal (No. 6933/2025) arising from Civil Application No. 6120 of 2025, the petitioners (LH of Deceased Maganbhai Chamarbhai Patel & others) sought relief against the respondents (Ramanbhai Chamarbhai Patel & others). The petitioners filed an application requesting condonation of the delay in preferring the…
NITIN JAYANTILAL NAYAKversusMAYABEN DALPATBHAI PATEL
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners Nitin Jayantilal Nayak and others filed a civil revision (C/CRA/272/2013) against Mayaben Dalpatbhai Patel and others, seeking relief from an order of the trial court in Regular Civil Suit No. 1340 of 2015. Both sides jointly requested the High Court to expedite the final hearing of the suit without the…
KACHCHH DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDversusPRAVINKUMAR VISHANJI THACKER
40-WITHDRAWN @ FH
The appellant Kachchh District Co-operative Bank Ltd filed a second appeal against the respondent, Pravinkumar Vishanji Thacker. During the pendency of the appeal, the respondent died without any surviving class 1 heirs. The appellant moved the court to abate the appeal on this ground, seeking its disposal with a liber…
SARKHEJ ROZA COMMITTEE THROUGH AUTHORISED TRUSTEE/MUTAWALLI DILAWARHUSSAIN MIRSHABMIYA SAIYEDversusVICKY DHARMENDRA CHUNARA
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The Sarkhej Roza Committee, through its authorized trustee, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay and a civil revision. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Hon’ble Justice J.C. Doshi granted the request, ordering the petition to be dispose…
BHIKHABHAI CHANDABHAI PARMAR THROUGH POA CHIMANBHAI CHANDABHAI PARMARversusJEBANBA WD/O ALAMMIYA ASKARMIYA PARMAR
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners filed second appeal and miscellaneous civil applications seeking restoration of their matters to the original file. The High Court examined the applications and found no substantive impediment to restoration. The court ordered that the applications be allowed and the matters restored, subject to a condi…
BHIKHABHAI CHANDABHAI PARMAR THROUGH POA CHIMANBHAI CHANDABHAI PARMARversusJEBANBA WD/O ALAMMIYA ASKARMIYA PARMAR
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners sought restoration of two civil applications to their original files. The High Court examined the applications and found no impediment to restoration, subject to the condition that the petitioners remove any office objections within one week. The court ordered that the matters be restored to the origina…
MANOJKUMAR JAYANTILAL SHAH (IN FIR, MANOJKUMAR SHANTILAL SHAH)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
Manojkumar Jayantilal Shah filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in filing the main application. The applicant was represented by Mr. Nandish H. Thackar. The State of Gujarat, represented by Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Chintan Dave, opposed the condonation. The Hon'ble Justice J.C…
MAHESHBHAI NAGJIBHAI GAJERAversusFULAJI MALAJI SOLANKI
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
The petitioners filed a civil revision seeking expedited disposal of Regular Civil Suit No.132 of 2024. The learned advocate for the petitioners requested the court to order a speedy trial without delving into the merits of the impugned order. The High Court, after hearing the request, directed the trial judge to decid…
PATEL AMRUTLAL BECHARDASversusNAVNEETLAL JAYANTILAL PATEL
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The appellant filed a second appeal (R/Misc. Civil Application No. 2722 of 2025) seeking to have the main matter restored to its original file. The court examined the application filed by the petitioner. No detailed factual or legal arguments were recorded in the order. The court concluded that the application should b…
STATE OF GUJARATversusANKIT DILIPBHAI MAKVANA
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
The State of Gujarat filed a second appeal (No. 35386/2025) against Ankit Dilipbhai Makvana. The applicant sought condonation of delay in preferring the main application. The court examined the averments made in the application. Finding them satisfactory, the court allowed the application. Consequently, the delay in fi…
CHATURSINH SULTANJI ZALAversusNEHALBEN DINESHBHAI NATHANI W/O BHAVESH NARSINGANI
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
The appellant, Chatursinh Sultanji Zala, filed a second appeal before the Gujarat High Court against a decree involving Nehalben Dineshbhai Nathani and others. The appellant's counsel, Mr. Harshit S. Bhatt, applied for permission to withdraw the appeal. The court considered whether it could allow the withdrawal of a pe…
AMIBEN KALPESHKUMAR BHAVSARversusKALPESHKUMAR PRAFULBHAI BHAVSAR
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
Amiben Kalpeshkumar Bhavsar filed a special criminal application seeking restoration of the main criminal matter against Kalpeshkumar Prafulbhai Bhavsar and another. The High Court examined the application and considered whether the proceedings could be reinstated in the original file. The Court held that the restorati…