Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

K S RADHAKRISHNAN

245 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 1–200.

T.S.R. SUBRAMANIAN & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2013 INSC 73831 October 2013Disposed off

Retired civil servants filed writ petitions under Article 32 seeking a mandamus directing the Union, State Governments and Union Territories to create an independent Civil Services Board (CSB), to fix a minimum tenure for civil servants, and to require recording of all oral instructions in writing. The Court examined c

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 7231 January 2014Disposed off

The Occupational Health and Safety Association filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking directions for the framing of occupational safety and health guidelines for workers in coal‑fired thermal power plants (CFTPPs) and compensation for occupational diseases. The Court examined whether the right to health and a s

THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE & ANR.versusS. SAMUTHIRAM

2012 INSC 55030 November 2012Appeal(s) allowed

S. Samuthiram, a police officer of the Tamil Nadu Armed Reserve, was charged with eve‑teasing a married woman at a bus stand while intoxicated and with being absent from duty. A departmental inquiry found the charges proved and dismissed him from service. While his service appeal was pending, a criminal court acquitted

BHUPENDRA NATH HAZARIKA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF ASSAM AND ORS.

2012 INSC 55330 November 2012Dismissed

The Assam Public Service Commission advertised 30 regular (direct) APS vacancies and later 20 special‑batch vacancies. Although the regular candidates were recommended first, the State appointed the special‑batch recruits before the regular ones, exceeding the 5% quota prescribed in Rule 5(1)(c) of the Assam Police Ser

MAK DATA P. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II

2013 INSC 73530 October 2013Dismissed

Mak Data Ltd filed its income tax return and was selected for scrutiny. During assessment, the Assessing Officer (AO) discovered documents from a survey of a sister concern and issued a show‑cause notice. The company offered to surrender Rs 40.74 lakhs, claiming it was a voluntary disclosure to avoid litigation. The AO

JAGDISH SINGHversusHEERALAL AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 73430 October 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Bank of India advanced a loan secured by equitable mortgages on several properties, the title deeds of which were deposited with the bank. After the borrowers defaulted, the bank invoked the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) and aucti

STATE OF M.P.versusMOHAN & OTHERS

2013 INSC 50330 July 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The accused fired multiple gunshots at complainants, causing lacerated wounds that did not involve vital organs. They were convicted under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the IPC and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment by the trial court. The High Court reduced the sentence to the time already served, h

D.H.B.V.N.L. VIDYUT NAGAR, HISAR & OTHERSversusYASHVIR SINGH GULIA

2013 INSC 50230 July 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, an Assistant Law Officer of the Haryana State Electricity Board, was charge‑sheeted under Regulation 7 of the Board's Punishment and Appeal Regulations for a alleged major breach. After submitting three replies, the Board, satisfied with his explanations, chose to impose only a minor penalty—stopping on

MINERAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ETC.versusM/S. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ORS.

2011 INSC 23730 March 2011Matter referred to larger bench

The Supreme Court, hearing a civil appeal filed by the Mineral Area Development Authority against the Steel Authority of India, noted a conflict between two earlier decisions—one by a five‑Judge Bench in State of West Bengal v. Kesoram Industries Ltd. and another by a seven‑Judge Bench in India Cement Ltd. v. State of

SASI ENTERPRISESversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2014 INSC 7030 January 2014Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered appeals by a partnership firm, Sasi Enterprises, and its partners who were prosecuted under section 276CC of the Income Tax Act for willfully failing to file income‑tax returns for the assessment years 1991‑92, 1992‑93 and 1993‑94. The issues raised were whether a statutory duty to file ret

LAXMI NARAIN MODIversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 6930 January 2014Directions issued

The Supreme Court, hearing a writ petition under Article 32 concerning the ineffective implementation of various animal welfare and environmental statutes, observed that many slaughter houses across states operated without licences or failed to comply with prescribed guidelines. The Court noted the absence of periodic

MIS. AVK TRADERSversusKERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD.

2013 INSC 73329 October 2013Appeal(s) allowed

M/s AVK Traders, a registered partnership of two partners, filed a suit for recovery of dues against Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation. During the pendency of the suit, the appellant's father, the other partner, died, causing the partnership to dissolve under its deed. The surviving partner applied to continue th

CH. CUM MAN. DIRECTOR MAHANADI COALFIELD LTD.versusRABINDRANATH CHOUBEY

2013 INSC 73029 October 2013Disposed off

The appellant, Mahanadi Coalfield Ltd., sought to withhold the gratuity of its former Chief General Manager, Rabindranath Choubey, on the ground that a departmental inquiry for alleged misconduct was pending. The employee retired on superannuation and applied for gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusSUNIL KUMAR & ANR.

2013 INSC 72929 October 2013Matter referred to larger bench

The respondent filed a claim under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for compensation after a road accident, and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 3.5 lakh. United India Insurance Company appealed, arguing that the claim was not maintainable because the claimant was the driver and no disability

STATE OF M.P.versusAYUB KHAN

2012 INSC 36029 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed

Ayub Khan was apprehended in Guna, Madhya Pradesh, possessing a country‑made barrel gun, two bullets and 50 grams of explosives without a licence. He was convicted under Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959 and the trial court sentenced him to one year of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.100, accounting for se

GURU BASAVARAJ @ BEENE SETTAPPAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2012 INSC 35629 August 2012Dismissed

Guru BasavaraJ @ Beene Settappa, the driver of a tractor‑trailer, was convicted under IPC sections 279, 337, 338 and 304‑A and Motor Vehicles Act section 187 for a highway accident that caused multiple injuries and one death. The accused claimed the crash resulted from mechanical failure and argued that his young age a

VISHAL AGRAWAL & ANR.versusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANR.

2014 INSC 6429 January 2014Dismissed

The appellants, consumers of electricity, were accused of theft of electricity and the State Electricity Board lodged a complaint that led to an FIR under Sections 135/126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The Special Judge took cognizance of the offence, but the appellants challenged the jurisdiction, arguing that an Assi

DEEPAK BHANDARIversusHIMACHAL PRADESH STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED

2014 INSC 6529 January 2014Dismissed

Deepak Bhandari, a director and guarantor of a defaulting industrial company, challenged a suit filed by Himachal Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. for recovery of a loan balance. The corporation had taken possession of the company's mortgaged assets under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporati

NOOR MOHAMMEDversusJETHANAND AND ANOTHER

2013 INSC 6229 January 2013Disposed off

The respondent filed a suit for injunction which was dismissed, appealed and eventually filed a second appeal in 2001. The High Court allowed the appeal after a ten‑year saga marked by repeated adjournments, non‑appearance of counsel and a dismissal for non‑prosecution in 2003, later restored in 2006 and finally admitt

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusSANKAR GHOSH

2013 INSC 79228 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Sankar Ghosh, a Sepoy of the Kolkata Armed Police, was arrested and charged under IPC sections 392, 395 and 412 and Arms Act sections 25 and 27 for alleged involvement in a dacoity. A departmental inquiry found him guilty and he was dismissed from service. The Sessions Court later acquitted him on the ground that the p

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusSHAMBHU KEWAT AND ANOTHER

2013 INSC 79528 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The accused Shambhu Kewat and Banwari Kewat assaulted shopkeeper Abdul Rashid with an iron rod, causing grievous injuries and were convicted under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the IPC, receiving a ten‑year rigorous imprisonment sentence. After the conviction, the victim and the accused reached a monetary settlem

M/S. SHREE MAHAVIR CARBON LTD.versusOM PRAKASH JALAN (FINANCER) & ANR.

2013 INSC 72728 October 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Shree Mahavir Carbon Ltd filed a criminal complaint under IPC sections 420, 406, 468, 471 (also 419, 486) alleging cheating, siphoning of funds and falsification of accounts by Om Prakash Jalan and others. The Judicial Magistrate took cognizance and issued summons. The respondents moved the High Court under CrPC s.482

SUKUMAR DEversusBIMALA AUDDY & ORS.

2013 INSC 72528 October 2013Dismissed

A decree for Rs.6,600 was passed in 1967 and the judgment debtors' property was auctioned in 1990, where the petitioners purchased it for Rs.1.5 lakh. The judgment debtor (Respondent No.4) sought to set aside the sale under Order 21 Rule 89 of the CPC, leading to a series of revisions and recalculations of the amount d

MANUBHAI RATILAL PATEL TR. USHABENversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2012 INSC 43828 September 2012Dismissed

An FIR for offences under sections 467, 468, 471, 409 and 114 IPC was filed against the appellant. He sought quashing of the FIR and a stay of investigation under Section 482 CrPC, but was arrested before the stay order took effect. The magistrate remanded him to police custody and later to judicial custody. The High C

JHARKHAND STATE ELECT. BOARD & ORS.versusM/S. LAXMI BUSINESS & CEMENT CO.P. LTD. & ANR.

2014 INSC 15628 February 2014Dismissed

The Jharkhand State Electricity Board (JSEB) appealed against a High Court order directing it to refund excess amounts charged to two high‑tension consumers under a 1994 agreement. The consumers had paid the bills under protest, arguing that after the Electricity Act, 2003, tariff power shifted exclusively to the State

LAKHA RAM SHARMAversusBALAR MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

2013 INSC 78927 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, who had been using the trademark KUNDAN for his cable business since 1980, filed an injunction suit against the respondent for using the same mark. While the suit was pending, the respondent obtained registration of the mark in 1995. The appellant then filed a rectification application under Sections 45,

CIPLA LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2012 INSC 54227 November 2012Disposed off

Sugen Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn were granted Indian Patent No. 209251 for a pharmaceutical invention. Cipla Ltd. filed an opposition under Section 25(2) of the Patents Act, 1970, and the Controller revoked the patent on 24 September 2012 relying on the Opposition Board’s recommendation, but without furnishing the Boa

SWAMY DEVI DAYAL HOSPITAL & DENTAL COLLEGEversusTHE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2013 INSC 57027 August 2013Disposed off

Swamy Devi Dayal Hospital & Dental College sought renewal of its Master of Dental Surgery (MOS) courses in two specialties for the 2013‑14 academic year. The Dental Council of India (DCI) inspected the college, found deficiencies and recommended to the Central Government that permission not be renewed. The Central Gove

LAXMI NARAIN MODIversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 57527 August 2013Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court, hearing Laxmi Narain Modi v. Union of India (Writ Petition (C) No. 309 of 2003), examined whether State Committees constituted under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Slaughter House) Rules, 2000 were functioning effectively and whether the states had complied with earlier court directions on ani

NARINDER SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

2014 INSC 21727 March 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court considered a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashment of an FIR registered under Sections 307, 324, 323 and 34 IPC after the accused and complainant settled their dispute through a village Panchayat. The High Court had refused to accept the compromise, relying solely on the seriousness

P.C. MISHRAversusSTATE (C.B.I.) & ANR.

2014 INSC 21527 March 2014Dismissed

The case concerned an application by the CBI for a pardon under s.306 CrPC in a corruption investigation where the offence was triable by a Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Metropolitan Magistrate granted the pardon to the co‑accused during the investigation, a decision later challenged b

SUNDEEP KUMAR BAFNAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2014 INSC 21827 March 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Sundeep Kumar Bafna, convicted of offences punishable with death or life imprisonment, applied to the Bombay High Court for surrender and regular bail under s.439 CrPC after his anticipatory bail was denied. The High Court dismissed the bail plea, holding that only a magistrate could entertain it and directing the appe

MANGAT RAMversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2014 INSC 21427 March 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Mangat Ram, was convicted under Sections 498A and 306 of the IPC for allegedly subjecting his wife to cruelty and abetting her suicide after she died from burn injuries at their matrimonial home. The trial and High Courts held that the husband’s failure to keep his wife with him at his posting and allege

DALJIT SINGH GUJRAL & ORS.versusJAGJIT SINGH ARORA & ORS.

2014 INSC 14927 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, managers of INSCOL Multispecialty Hospital, were charged with medical negligence, cheating, forgery and other offences after the complainant alleged that his wife died due to wrong treatment at the hospital. The Punjab & Haryana High Court single judge framed the issue on the premise that the patient di

DEEPAK KUMAR ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC.

2012 INSC 11327 February 2012Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court examined the validity of auction notices issued by the Haryana government for the extraction of minor minerals (boulders, gravel, sand) in parcels not exceeding 5 hectares, including river‑bed mining. Petitioners argued that the notices were issued without any environmental impact assessment (EIA) and

INDRA SARMAversusV.K.V. SARMA

2013 INSC 78626 November 2013Dismissed

The appellant, an unmarried woman, lived with the respondent, a married man, for about 14 years and claimed that his failure to maintain her constituted domestic violence under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The respondent argued that their relationship was a mere live‑in arrangement, not a "

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusSURENDRA KORI

2012 INSC 42726 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh alleged that Surendra Kori, a Deputy Registrar, facilitated the registration of over one hundred forged sale deeds to enable fictitious buyers to claim benefits under a Special Rehabilitation Package for the Sardar Sarovar Project. FIRs and charge‑sheets were filed under IPC sections 420, 46

KAMLESH PRABHUDAS TANNA & ANOTHERversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2013 INSC 56226 August 2013Disposed off

The appellant Kamlesh Prabhudas Tanna and his mother were convicted for dowry harassment, abetment of suicide and culpable homicide after the death of Sandhya, the sister of the informant, who allegedly committed suicide. The trial court found the prosecution evidence sufficient under IPC sections 304‑8, 306, 498A, 34

GUIRAM MONDALversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2013 INSC 28426 April 2013Dismissed

Guiram Mondal, the tenth accused in a double murder case, appealed his conviction under Sections 302 and 148 of the IPC. The trial court had acquitted all accused except one, relying heavily on the absence of the accused's names in the inquest report. The High Court reversed this, holding that the trial court overlooke

N. NARAYANANversusADJUDICATING OFFICER, SEBI

2013 INSC 28726 April 2013Dismissed

The appellant, N. Narayanan, a whole‑time director and promoter of Mis Pyramid Saimira Theatre Ltd., was found to have participated in a scheme that inflated the company’s revenues, profits, security deposits and receivables, thereby creating artificiality in its financial statements. SEBI’s investigation revealed fals

BALDEV SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2014 INSC 92826 February 2014Disposed off

Baldev Singh, a 62‑year‑old retired official, demanded Rs 2,000 from an agriculturist for an early allocation of canal water, which was settled at Rs 1,000. The complainant handed the money to Singh in his house; the cash was later recovered from beneath files and the notes were tallied after washing Singh's hands in s

SHANKAR KISANRAO KHADEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2013 INSC 28125 April 2013Disposed off

Shankar Kisanrao Khade, aged about 52, and his wife abducted an 11‑year‑old girl with moderate intellectual disability, repeatedly raped her and later strangulated her to death. The trial court and the High Court convicted Khade under IPC sections 302, 376, 366‑A, 363 r/w s.34 and sentenced him to death, while his wife

JOGINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2013 INSC 71824 October 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Joginder Singh was tried along with two others for murder, attempted murder and offences under the Arms Act arising from a land dispute that escalated into a shooting. The trial court acquitted all three accused, finding contradictions between eyewitness testimony, the ballistic report and the fact that t

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusSHRI G.R.RAMA KRISHNA & ANR.

2013 INSC 55923 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, G.R. Rama Krishna, was an Assistant Engineer (Mechanical) in Andaman Lakshdeep Harbour Works who had served partly on an ad‑hoc basis and was regularised only in 2005. The UPSC advertised the post of Executive Engineer (Mechanical) for direct recruitment, stating that no departmental candidate satisfied

AKKODE JUMAYATH PALU PARIPALANA COMMITTEEversusP.V. IBRAHIM HAJI AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 48523 July 2013Disposed off

The Akkode Juyamath Palli Paripalana Committee, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, filed a suit for a perpetual injunction to prevent interference with the administration, management, and peaceful enjoyment of a mosque, its madrassa, and related wakf assets. The suit was transferred to the Wakf

ANJANI KUMAR CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANOTHER

2014 INSC 96723 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Advocate Anjani Kumar Chaudhary was assaulted by a group demanding money for a Holi celebration; the assailants used lathis, rods, and sharp weapons, threatened to kill him, and inflicted multiple injuries. An FIR was lodged charging several offences including Section 307 IPC (attempt to murder). The Sessions Court, an

ALBER ORAONversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2014 INSC 96623 April 2014Disposed off

Alber Oraon, a mason and civil‑works contractor, was engaged by Pushpa Devi to construct a house. During the work they became intimate and Oraon lived with her, posing as her husband. Pushpa and her two minor children later disappeared; their bodies were recovered from a soak‑pit that Oraon had dug and sealed with bric

METRO EXPORTERS PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHERversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 96423 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Metro Exporters exported steel coils and, based on a SWIFT message, received a credit of US$199,959.74 in its EEFC account in November 2006. The credit was later discovered to be a mistake, as the funds were intended for the Bank of India and had been recalled by Bank of America, with the amount never actually belongin

PATHAN MOHAMMED SULEMAN REHMATKHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2013 INSC 77022 November 2013Dismissed

The State of Gujarat embarked on a public‑private partnership to develop an International Financial Services City (GIFT) by allotting large tracts of government land to a joint‑venture company, GIFT Company Ltd., and its subsidiary. The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) reported irregularities, alleging non‑uniform

STATE BANK OF INDIAversusGRACURE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.

2013 INSC 77322 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The State Bank of India (SBI) sued Gracure Pharmaceuticals Ltd. for recovery of dues arising from letters of credit, while Gracure filed a separate suit for damages alleging wrongful withdrawal of credit facilities. The two suits were filed within two months of each other, and SBI moved to dismiss the damages suit unde

SATNAM OVERSEASversusSANT RAM & CO. & ANR.

2013 INSC 77622 November 2013Dismissed

Satnam Overseas applied to the Registrar of Trademarks for rectification of the registration of the mark “KOHINOOR” (class 30, rice) on the ground that the respondent, Sant Ram & Co., had not used the mark for more than five years. The Registrar limited the respondent’s use to a few cities in Uttar Pradesh, which was l

CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ,

2013 INSC 70922 October 2013Disposed off

The Centre for Public Interest Litigation filed a writ petition seeking a separate expert committee to examine the health effects of soft drinks, especially on children, and to compel the Union of India to impose stricter regulatory controls, labeling, and advertising standards. The Court examined whether the existing

M/S YOUNG ACHIEVERSversusIMS LEARNING RESOURCES PVT. LTD.

2013 INSC 55522 August 2013Dismissed

IMS Learning Resources sued Young Achievers for trademark infringement, copyright violation and passing off. Young Achievers filed an interim application under Section 8 read with Section 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, invoking arbitration clauses in agreements dated 1 April 2007 and 1 April 2010. The

FIONA SHRIKHANDEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

2013 INSC 55322 August 2013Dismissed

The appellant, accused of insulting her sister‑in‑law's religious sentiments, was charged under Section 504 of the IPC after a complaint alleging that she dragged a deity's idol from a puja room, causing damage and intending to provoke a breach of peace. The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, applying Section 20

KANHAIYA LAL & ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2013 INSC 27422 April 2013Dismissed

The case involved the murder of five persons by a large unlawful assembly allegedly motivated by revenge for the death of the village Sarpanch's son. The trial court convicted 17 accused, sentencing six to death and others to life imprisonment, while some were acquitted. On appeal, the High Court reduced the death sent

STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERSversusKANDATH DISTILLERIES

2013 INSC 11922 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Kandath Distilleries applied in 1987 for a licence to set up a distillery in Kerala. The State received many applications in 1998, granted licences to four applicants but rejected Kandath's, citing a policy of not issuing further licences. The High Court, after several interventions, issued a writ of mandamus directing

STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERSversusSNEHA CHERIYAN AND ANOTHER

2013 INSC 12522 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned teachers in aided schools of Kerala who, after being relieved under Rules 49 or 53 of the Kerala Education Rules, sought preference for re‑appointment under Rule 51A. The State of Kerala issued government orders amending sub‑rule (3) of Rule 7A to bar filling vacancies of less than one academic year

ROPAN SAHOO & ANOTHERversusANANDA KUMAR SHARMA & OTHERS

2013 INSC 4622 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Ropan Sahoo and another, along with the State of Orissa, challenged the High Court's order that quashed their IMFL "ON" shop licences on the ground that no order had been passed relaxing the distance restrictions under Rule 34 of the Orissa Excise Rules, 1965. The Supreme Court examined the note‑sheet a

SRI JEYARAM EDUCATIONAL TRUST AND ORS.versusA.G. SYED MOHIDEEN AND ORS.

2010 INSC 5222 January 2010Dismissed

The respondents instituted a suit under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) before the District Court in Tamil Nadu, seeking relief concerning a public trust. The appellants argued that a 1960 notification empowering Subordinate Courts under Section 92 removed the District Court's jurisdiction, relying on a

DUDDILLA SRINIVASA SHARMA AND ORS.versusV. CHRYSOLITE

2013 INSC 76521 November 2013Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the recruitment of 17 Junior Assistants in the District Court, where the authorities raised the short‑listing benchmark from the statutory intermediate qualification to a degree qualification. The High Court had quashed the appointments, holding that the higher benchmark was illegal. The Supr

B. CHANDRIKAversusSANTHOSH & ANR

2013 INSC 76721 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, the divorced wife of the first accused, challenged summons issued against her in a case under Section 420 read with Section 34 IPC. The police investigation had filed a refer report stating that the complaint was not proved, and the complainant testified that only the husband had been entrusted with mone

HARYANA WAKF BOARDversusMAHESH KUMAR

2013 INSC 76821 November 2013Dismissed

The Haryana Wakf Board filed a civil suit in 2000 seeking possession of land it claimed was Wakf property. The trial court ruled in favor of the Board, but the Additional District Judge held that the question of whether the land was Wakf property fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Wakf Tribunal under Section

E.S.IC. MEDICAL OFFICER'S ASSOCIATIONversusE.S.L.C. & ANR.

2013 INSC 76921 November 2013Dismissed

The ESIC Medical Officer's Association, representing medical officers recruited by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation after 1974, claimed a monthly allowance of Rs.200, arguing that they were workmen like deputed doctors and thus entitled to the same benefits. The Central Government Industrial Tribunal held tha

MATHAI SAMUEL AND ORS.versusEAPEN EAPEN (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2012 INSC 52621 November 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appeal concerned whether the recitals in Exhibit A1, particularly item 1 of Schedule 8, created a testamentary disposition (a Will) or a settlement/gift that vested rights in the plaintiffs during the executants' lifetimes. The Supreme Court examined the nature of the composite document, distinguishing between test

SHAILENDRA BHARDWAJ & OTHERSversusCHANDRA PAL & ANOTHER

2012 INSC 52721 November 2012Dismissed

The appellant filed a civil suit after the testator's death seeking a declaration that a will dated 21‑03‑2003 and a sale deed dated 12‑01‑2005 were forged and should be declared null and void, along with their cancellation. The suit property was valued at Rs 30,00,000, but the plaintiff paid a fixed court fee of Rs 20

SUNITA JUGALKISHORE GILDAversusRAMANLAL UDHOJI TANNA (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 54621 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sunita Jugalkishore Gilda, succeeded a mortgagee who had a mortgage over a three‑storied building since 1953. While several suits between the mortgagee and the mortgagors were pending, the mortgagors inducted a third party as a tenant without the mortgagee's consent. The mortgagee sued for possession and

MANJEET SINGH KHERAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2013 INSC 54721 August 2013Dismissed

The petitioner, Manjeet Singh Khera, sought a court order directing the prosecution to produce the original complaint filed with the Anti‑Corruption Bureau that had initiated the investigation leading to an FIR and charge‑sheet under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and IPC s.109. The prosecution contended that t

GHANSHYAM DASS GUPTAversusMAKHAN LAL

2012 INSC 34321 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed an appeal in the Delhi High Court but, due to a clerical error, the vakalatnama of his new counsel was not filed and no lawyer appeared for either party at the final hearing. Despite the absence of representation, the High Court examined the merits of the case and dismissed the appeal. The appellant

INDIAN BANK ASSOCIATION AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 96321 April 2014Disposed off

The Indian Bank Association and other banking entities filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking uniform guidelines for the trial of cheque‑dishonour cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, alleging that despite the 2002 amendment (Sections 143‑147) courts were not following a uniform summ

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIAversusSAWINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER

2013 INSC 18521 March 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The husband of Sawinder Kaur, late Gurnam Singh Dhillon, applied for a freedom‑fighter pension under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980, claiming service in the Indian National Army. His claim was initially rejected, later accepted after the Ministry of Home Affairs circular dated 31‑Jan‑1983, and the H

JANATHA DAL PARTYversusTHE INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS & OTHERS

2014 INSC 4521 January 2014Dismissed

The Indian National Congress (INC) filed a suit to declare its title and obtain possession of the Congress Bhavan in Bangalore, a property originally gifted to the Bangalore City Congress Committee in 1949. After the 1969 split of the INC into Congress (J) and Congress (O), the Election Commission of India (ECI) recogn

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusBALAKRISHNAN & ANOTHER

2012 INSC 52120 November 2012Case Partly allowed

The Managing Director of a company was injured while travelling in a car owned by the company and insured with National Insurance Company Ltd. He claimed compensation under Sections 140, 147 and 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal held the insurer liable. The insurer appealed, arg

SANGEET & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2012 INSC 52220 November 2012Case Partly allowed

Six persons, including appellants Sandeep and Narender, were convicted of murder, attempt to murder, rioting and other offences for the killings of Ranbir, Simla, Seema and a child, Rahul. The trial court sentenced the appellants to death and the others to life imprisonment; the High Court affirmed the death sentences.

ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusSURENDRA NATH LOOMBA AND OTHERS

2012 INSC 52020 November 2012Disposed off

The claimant, Surendra Nath Loomba, lost both eyes when a car insured by Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. collided with a tree; he claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.20,97,984, which the High Court reduced to Rs.16,42,656, holding the ins

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.versusAANJANEY ORGANIC HERBAL PVT. LTD

2012 INSC 41220 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan challenged a sale of land by members of a Scheduled Caste to Aanjaney Organic Herbal Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, on the ground that Section 42(b) of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 renders such a transfer void. The company argued that the term "person" in the provision should be given i

ASH MOHAMMADversusSHIV RAJ SINGH @ LALLA BABU AND ANR.

2012 INSC 41420 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant lodged an FIR alleging that the accused, Shiv Raj Singh (alias Lalla Babu), a known history‑sheeter, orchestrated the kidnapping, confinement for eight days and assault of Bihari Lal under threat, offences punishable under Sections 364 and 506 IPC. The trial court denied bail, but the High Court granted b

JAGROOP SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2012 INSC 29620 July 2012Dismissed

The appellant Jagroop Singh was convicted of murder under IPC sections 302, 34 and 201 based on circumstantial evidence that the victim was last seen with the accused, voluntary extra‑judicial confessions, and the recovery of a blood‑stained spade. The appellant challenged the conviction, arguing that the time gap betw

ANIL @ ANTHONY ARIKSWAMY JOSEPHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2014 INSC 11920 February 2014Disposed off

The appellant, Anil @ Anthony Arikswamy Joseph, was convicted of murdering a 10‑year‑old boy after subjecting him to pederasty, under Sections 302, 377 and 201 of the IPC and sentenced to death. The Supreme Court examined the reliability of the prosecution's circumstantial and DNA evidence, finding it trustworthy and s

RAJESH AWASTHIversusNAND LAL JAISWAL & ORS.

2012 INSC 49519 October 2012Dismissed

The appellant, Rajesh Awasthi, was appointed Chairperson of the Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Regulatory Commission after a Selection Committee forwarded his name with a note that the government must first ensure compliance with Section 85(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The petitioner challenged the appointment, ar

K. SURESHversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANR

2012 INSC 49019 October 2012Case Partly allowed

K. Suresh was injured in a motor vehicle accident and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.25,00,000 in various heads including permanent disability and loss of earning capacity. The Madras High Court reduced the award to Rs.9,78,000, deleting the permanent disability component and lowering other heads, reason

NAZMAversusJAVED @ ANJUM

2012 INSC 49119 October 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed an FIR under dowry and related offences against the respondent. The respondent's family filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash the FIR; the High Court stayed the arrest of the respondent and ordered a monthly deposit of Rs 2,000. After the investigation closed and the magistra

KAINI RAJANversusSTATE OF KERALA

2013 INSC 63919 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Kaini Rajan was convicted under Section 376 IPC for raping PW2, who alleged that he forcibly took her to a roadside location early in the morning and threatened her with a promise of marriage. PW2 later became pregnant, and the FIR was lodged ten months after the alleged incident. The trial court and High

UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION & ANR.versusNEHA ANIL BOBDE (GADEKAR)

2013 INSC 64119 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court considered whether the University Grants Commission (UGC) could prescribe aggregate qualifying percentages for the 2012 National Eligibility Test (NET) after candidates satisfied the paper‑wise minimum marks. The petitioners (UGC) contended that such criteria were within its statutory authority under

POLAMRASETTI MANIKYAM & ANR.versusTEEGALA VENKATA RAMAYYA & ANR.

2014 INSC 11419 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs filed a suit to cancel a sale deed alleging fraud, contending that the deed was executed for Rs 1 lakh while the market value of the property was Rs 19.36 lakh. The trial court and the appellate courts held that, under Section 37 of the Andhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, the court fee sho

MAYA DEVIversusLALTA PRASAD

2014 INSC 11619 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Maya Devi, filed an objection under Order XXI Rule 58 to execution proceedings initiated by the decree holder, Lalta Prasad, who had obtained an ex‑parte money decree for Rs 3.40 lakh based on an alleged agreement for sale dated 3 Nov 2003 between him and the judgment debtor, Prem Chand Verma. Maya Devi

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusGIRIRAJ DUBEY

2013 INSC 10819 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed a decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court that refused to grant leave to appeal an acquittal of Giriraj Dubey by the Sessions Court. The trial court had acquitted the accused on the ground of insufficient evidence under Sections 294 and 436 IPC. The High Court’s order merely resta

THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERSversusCH. GANDHI

2013 INSC 11019 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a disciplinary proceeding against Ch. Gandhi, a senior accountant, who was punished with reversion to junior accountant for two years and postponement of future increments. The question was whether this constituted two major penalties under Rule 9 of the Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification,

SATISH BATRAversusSUDHIR RAWAL

2012 INSC 48018 October 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a seller, entered into an agreement for sale of immovable property with the respondent, a purchaser, wherein the purchaser paid Rs.7,00,000 as earnest money. The agreement stipulated that if the purchaser failed to pay the balance consideration by a specified date, the earnest money would be forfeited, w

SHREE SHYAM AGENCYversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2012 INSC 48518 October 2012Dismissed

Shree Shyam Agency, a sugar manufacturer, booked a consignment under a "Self" basis and retained the railway receipt, but the buyer failed to pay and the goods were delivered to a third party without authority. The agency filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal seeking compensation for non‑delivery, a

GOTHAMCHAND JAINversusARUMUGAM @ TAMILARASAN

2013 INSC 63418 September 2013Dismissed

Gothamchand Jain filed a suit for specific performance of a contract in Pondicherry in 1991. The trial court held that Article 2262 of the French Code Civil, which provides a thirty‑year limitation, applied and the suit was not time‑barred. The High Court reversed, finding that the Indian Limitation Act, 1963, Section

RANJEET GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR.

2013 INSC 63518 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Ranjeet Goswami was charged with offences under Sections 376, 302 and 201 of the IPC and claimed he was a juvenile at the time of the alleged offences, relying on a school leaving certificate showing a birth date of 10‑05‑1991. The Juvenile Justice Board, after obtaining a medical board opinion that the a

DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR MEDICAL COLLEGE & OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER

2013 INSC 63618 September 2013Dismissed

Private unaided medical colleges challenged a corrigendum (Notification No. 37(1) 2013) that limited the "Enhancement of Annual Intake Capacity" regulations of 2013 to Government medical colleges, alleging violation of Article 14. The Central Government, citing a delay in receiving the original regulations, extended th

KETANKUMAR GOPALBHAI TANDELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2013 INSC 48418 July 2013Case Partly allowed

The appellant was convicted of murder and assault in 1995 and sentenced to life imprisonment and fines. At the time of the offence he was 17 years, 11 months and 5 days old, i.e., below 18 years. The issue was whether he should be treated as a juvenile under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2

SANT LONGOWAL INSTT. OF ENGG. & TECH. & ANR.versusSURESH CHANDRA VERMA

2013 INSC 48318 July 2013Case Partly allowed

The appellant institute granted a lecturer three years of study leave to pursue a Ph.D. and paid him full salary and allowances. The lecturer returned to duty but failed to produce a Ph.D. certificate, prompting the institute to recover Rs.12,32,126 paid during the leave. The High Court ordered the institute to refund

RATTIRAM & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF M.P. THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2013 INSC 26918 April 2013Case Partly allowed

On 29 September 1995 the deceased Daulat was assaulted at Gorelal's shop by a group of accused, leading to his death. The trial court convicted several accused under IPC sections 302, 147, 148 and 149 and sentenced them to life imprisonment; the High Court upheld most convictions and acquitted one. The appellants chall

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PATIALA & ORS.versusATMA SINGH GREWAL

2013 INSC 62717 September 2013Dismissed

The Punjab State Electricity Board (PSEB) appealed a High Court order that quashed a charge sheet served on a retired employee, Atma Singh Grewal, on the ground that the departmental proceeding was barred by the Punjab Civil Service Rules. The Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeal as frivolous and order

EDUCARE CHARITABLE TRUSTversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2013 INSC 62817 September 2013Dismissed

The Educare Charitable Trust, which runs a dental college, applied to the Central Government in August 2012 to double its BDS intake from 50 to 100 seats for the 2013‑14 academic year. The application was rejected because the college had not yet obtained DCI recognition for its existing 50‑seat capacity, a condition pr

CHANDI PRASAD UNIYAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS.

2012 INSC 34017 August 2012Dismissed

The appellants, teachers and principals, challenged a High Court order directing recovery of excess salary paid due to irregular fixation of the 5th and 6th Pay Commission scales. The Supreme Court examined whether over‑payment made without any fraud or misrepresentation on the part of the employees could be reclaimed.

AJAY PANDIT @ JAGDISH DAYABHAI PATEL & ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2012 INSC 28917 July 2012Case Partly allowed

The accused, a dentist, lured vulnerable individuals with false promises of sending them to America, extracted large sums of money and murdered two victims in separate incidents while attempting to murder two others. Conviction under sections 419, 420, 302, 307, 397, 342 and 328 IPC was upheld based on eyewitness testi

ASSOCIATION OF UNIFIED TELE SERVICES PROVIDERS & OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA

2014 INSC 29417 April 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) could audit the accounts of private telecom service providers under the Unified Access Services (UAS) licences to verify revenue sharing with the Union. Service providers argued that the CAG’s powers under Article 149 of the Constitut

HARI NANDAN PRASAD & ANR.versusEMPLOYER L/R TO MANGMT.OF FCI & ANR.

2014 INSC 10417 February 2014Case Partly allowed

The appellants, Hari Nandan Prasad and Govind Kumar Chaudhary, were casual daily‑wage workers of the Food Corporation of India who were terminated after more than 240 days of continuous service without notice, pay in lieu of notice or retrenchment compensation, violating Section 25‑F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 194

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP. & ORS.versusBABU LAL JANGIR

2013 INSC 62416 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation retired Babu Lal Jangir compulsorily in 2002 under its standing orders after a screening committee found his service record unsatisfactory. Jangir challenged the retirement, arguing that the misconduct cited dated from 1978‑1990 was too old and that his more recent record

M/S. TATA IRON & STEEL CO. LTD.versusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.

2013 INSC 62516 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Tata Iron & Steel Ltd. (Tata Steel) sold its cement division to Lafarge India under a Business Transfer Agreement, which purportedly transferred the employees to the buyer. The transferred workers later complained that they were forced to work for Lafarge without consent and sought to be taken back by Tata Steel, alleg

PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEV. AUTHORITY & ORS.versusRAGHU NATH GUPTA & ORS.

2012 INSC 33216 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority (PUDA) conducted a public auction of commercial plots on an "as is where is" basis, offering installment payment with interest, penal interest and penalty for delayed installments. The successful bidder, Raghu Nath Gupta, accepted the allotment and later claimed that PU

BHAVNAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusSALIMBHAI UMARBHAI MANSURI

2013 INSC 47116 July 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent was engaged as a daily‑wage helper for two fixed periods totaling 54 days, after which his service automatically terminated as per the contract. He raised an industrial dispute alleging that his termination amounted to retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, seeking reinstatement with conti

STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERSversusSANJAY NAGAYACH AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 34716 May 2013Dismissed

The Board of Directors of the District Cooperative Central Bank, Panna was superseded by the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies without prior consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, contrary to the second proviso of Section 53(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The Board challenged t

MOTI LAL SONGARAversusPREM PRAKASH @ PAPPU AND ANR.

2013 INSC 34616 May 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant lodged an FIR and later informed the magistrate that another person, Prem Prakash, had not been made an accused. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance under Section 190(1)(b) CrPC and summoned the accused, leading to charges being framed by the Sessions Judge. Prem Prakash challenged th

OM PRAKASHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2014 INSC 27816 April 2014Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the conviction of seven accused under Sections 148 and 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Prabhu Dayal. The appellants argued that the FIR was unduly delayed, that there was no proof that Om Prakash ran over the victim with a tractor, and that no specific ove

KM. HEMA MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 3116 January 2014Dismissed

The appellant, KM Hema Mishra, was named in an FIR under Sections 419 and 420 IPC and sought quashing of the FIR and pre‑arrest protection by filing a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The High Court dismissed the petition, refusing to grant anticipatory bail because Section 438 of the CrPC, which pr

PUBLIC UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIESversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2012 INSC 47215 October 2012Disposed off

The Public Union for Civil Liberties filed a public‑interest writ petition seeking enforcement of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 and the rehabilitation of freed bonded labourers. The Supreme Court examined the persistent non‑compliance of several states and Union Territories with earlier court direction

UCO BANK & ORS.versusSUSHIL KUMAR SAHA

2012 INSC 47415 October 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a senior manager of UCO Bank, was transferred to the head office where the bank discovered serious loan sanctioning irregularities committed during his tenure at a branch. The bank issued a charge‑sheet and, under a 2004 note and circular, the Assistant General Manager (AGM) of the former branch initiat

NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITYversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 27515 April 2014Case Allowed

The Supreme Court considered writ petitions filed by the National Legal Services Authority and a transgender association seeking legal recognition of transgender persons' self‑identified gender and the status of a "third gender" under the Constitution. The Court examined constitutional provisions (Arts. 14, 15, 16, 19,

CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT LAW, WWF-1versusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2013 INSC 25415 April 2013Case Allowed

The Court examined a petition seeking direction to relocate the critically endangered Asiatic lion from its sole habitat in Gir, Gujarat, to Kuno Wildlife Sanctuary, Madhya Pradesh, as a second home for long‑term survival. Scientific studies by the Wildlife Institute of India and the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL)

NAGENDRAPPA NATIKARversusNEELAMMA

2013 INSC 16815 March 2013Dismissed

The husband and wife married in 1987, after which the wife sought maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The parties later entered into a compromise under Order 23 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, agreeing that the wife would receive a lump sum of Rs 8,000 as permanent alimony and would not cl

KAMLENDRA SINGH @ PAPPU SINGHversusSTATE OF M.P.

2013 INSC 16515 March 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Kamlendra Singh (Pappu Singh), was convicted under IPC sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 341 (wrongful restraint) with a common intention charge. He contended that he was a juvenile at the time of the offence (27 August 1993) and produced a high‑school mark‑sheet and admission register showing a date

NIRANJAN HEMCHANDRA SASHITTAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2013 INSC 16915 March 2013Disposed off

The petitioners, a public servant and his wife, sought quashing of a criminal trial under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for alleged disproportionate assets, alleging inordinate delay that violated their right to a speedy trial under Article 21. The Supreme Court examined whether Article 32 could be invoked to

LAHU KAMLAKAR PATIL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2012 INSC 61814 December 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted for the murder of a man named Bhau Harishchandra Patil based on the testimony of PW‑2, an alleged eye‑witness, and PW‑1, an informant who later turned hostile. The Supreme Court examined whether the hostile witness’s evidence could be wholly rejected, whether the investigating officer shou

STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.versusJITENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA & ANR.

2013 INSC 53614 August 2013Dismissed

The respondent, a former government employee, retired with a provisional pension but the State of Jharkhand withheld 10% of his pension, gratuity and leave encashment while criminal and departmental proceedings against him were pending. He filed writ petitions and the High Court ordered the release of the withheld amou

GAJANAN KAMLYA PATILversusADDL. COLLECTOR & COMP. AUTH. & ORS.

2014 INSC 9914 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Gajanan Kamlya Patil, a landowner, was served a notice under Section 10(5) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 demanding surrender of possession of his land, with a threat of force if he failed to comply. The notice was issued after the Act had been repealed by the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) R

BIRJUversusSTATE OF M.P.

2014 INSC 9814 February 2014Disposed off

The appellant Birju was convicted for the murder of a one‑year‑old child, shot with a pistol after the child’s grandfather refused to give him money for liquor. The trial court and the High Court sentenced him to death, invoking his extensive criminal record as an aggravating factor. On appeal, the Supreme Court examin

SURENDER KAUSHIK AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 10314 February 2013Dismissed

The appellants challenged the registration of FIR No. 442 of 2012 on the ground that a second FIR cannot be filed for the same incident after an earlier FIR had been lodged. The Court examined the scope of the "principle of sameness" and held that while a second FIR on identical facts is prohibited, a counter‑FIR prese

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.versusNARENDRA KUMAR PANDEY

2013 INSC 3414 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The State Bank of India dismissed Deputy Manager Narendra Kumar Pandey after a departmental inquiry under its Officers Service Rules for twelve charges of misconduct, including fraud and misuse of bank facilities. Pandey did not attend any of the inquiry sessions, nor did he file a written defence, prompting the Inquir

HARYANA FINANCIAL CORPORATIONversusGURCHARAN SINGH & ANR.

2013 INSC 83513 December 2013Dismissed

The Haryana Financial Corporation (HFC) advanced a loan to Gurcharan Singh, who gave a written, unregistered undertaking on 5 March 1994 that he would not dispose of certain immovable properties during the loan period. After default, HFC seized and sold hypothecated machinery, while Singh's wife obtained a decree decla

MIS PRP EXPORTS & ETC.versusTHE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL

2013 INSC 83413 December 2013Disposed off

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) issued a circular limiting the height of a public parking lot (PPL) to ground plus four upper floors, which conflicted with the developer Kohinoor's plan for a 13‑storey PPL. After a series of writ petitions, stop‑work notices and a settlement, the Supreme Court examin

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

2012 INSC 60913 December 2012Disposed off

Ashok Kumar filed a civil suit for a temporary injunction against Mona Sharma, seeking peaceful possession of a disputed land. While the suit was pending, Mona Sharma filed an application under Section 145 of the CrPC, leading the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SOM) to attach the property under Section 146(1) on the ground

ASHWANI KUMAR SAXENAversusSTATE OF M.P.

2012 INSC 39513 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Ashwani Kumar Saxena, was convicted of murder under IPC s.302 r.w. s.27 Arms Act and appealed, claiming he was a juvenile at the time of the offence (19‑Oct‑2008). He produced school mark‑sheets and the school admission register showing a birth date of 24‑Oct‑1990, while the trial court relied on ossific

ALAKNANDA HYDRO POWER CO. LTD.versusANUJ JOSHI & ORS.

2013 INSC 53513 August 2013Disposed off

The Srinagar Hydro Electric Project (SHEP) in Uttarakhand, originally cleared environmentally in 1985 and forest‑cleared in 1987, was later transferred to Alaknanda Hydro Power Co. Ltd. (AHPCL) with a capacity increase to 330 MW. Petitioners challenged the validity of the clearances and sought a public hearing under th

PRABHUDAS DAMODAR KOTECHA & ORS.versusMANHABALA JERAM DAMODAR & ANR.

2013 INSC 53413 August 2013Dismissed

The appellants, who were occupying a flat in Bombay as a gratuitous licensee, were evicted by a decree of the Small Causes Court under s.41(1) of the Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1882 (as amended by the Maharashtra Act of 1976). They appealed, arguing that the term "licensee" in the statute should be limited to

BHAGWAN TUKARAM DANGEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2014 INSC 18813 March 2014Disposed off

The appellant, Bhagwan Tukaram Dange, and his father were convicted of murdering Dange's wife by beating, dousing her with kerosene and setting her on fire while intoxicated. The prosecution's case relied on two dying declarations recorded by a head constable and a special judicial magistrate, both corroborated by the

RAJENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF M.P. & OTHERS

2013 INSC 9913 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Head Constable, was dismissed for allegedly accepting a bribe in a police complaint, while a constable who actually demanded and received the money received a lighter penalty of reduction of increment. The Supreme Court examined whether the disciplinary authority’s punishment violated the doctrine of e

T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMALPADversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2012 INSC 8913 February 2012Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined petitions seeking to declare sandalwood (Santalum album) and red sandalwood (Pterocarpus santalinus) as "specified plants" under Section 2(27) of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and to include them in Schedule VI. The Court noted that while Indian sandalwood is listed as "vulnerable" in t

T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPADversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2012 INSC 8713 February 2012Disposed off

The petitioners sought a direction to the Union of India and the State of Chhattisgarh to prepare and fund a rescue plan for the endangered Asiatic Wild Buffalo, to prevent inter‑breeding with domestic buffalo and to relocate villages from Udanti Wildlife Sanctuary. The State of Chhattisgarh argued that it lacked suffi

FAKHRUZAMMAversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR.

2013 INSC 83112 December 2013Dismissed

The appellant, a Sub‑Inspector of Police, was removed from service by the Inspector‑General of Police under the Jharkhand Police Manual and subsequently charged with several IPC offences relating to the death of a detainee. He challenged the magistrate’s cognizance on the ground that Section 197 of the Code of Criminal

DEAF EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2013 INSC 82812 December 2013Case Allowed

The Deaf Employees Welfare Association and another association filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a mandamus directing the Central and State Governments to grant transport allowance to government employees with hearing impairment, on par with the allowance already given to blind and orthopaedically disabled

PREMLATA JOSHIversusCHIEF SECRETARY STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

2013 INSC 75012 November 2013Dismissed

The case concerned the promotion of Dr. Premlata Joshi to the post of Director, Medical Health in Uttarakhand. The Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) evaluated candidates' Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) and, contrary to the Government Order dated 16‑April‑2003, classified officers into "very good", "good" and "

PRATAPBHAI HAMIRBHAI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER

2012 INSC 47112 October 2012Disposed off

The appellant, Pratapbhai Hamirbai Solanki, was accused of conspiring to murder an RTI activist and was charged under Sections 302, 201 and 120‑B IPC and Sections 25(1)(b) and 27 of the Arms Act. Bail applications before the Sessions Court and the Gujarat High Court were rejected. After the High Court reserved its judg

MANOHAR LAL SHARMAversusM.C.I. AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 60912 September 2013Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the validity of the Medical Council of India's (MCI) order rejecting the renewal of permission for the third batch of 150 MBBS students at Chintpurni Medical College for the 2013‑14 academic year. The college had previously been granted permission, but a routine inspection followed by a surpr

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND (PREVIOUSLY STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH)versusMOHAN SINGH & OTHERS

2012 INSC 39012 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttarakhand appealed against the Board of Revenue’s order that had allowed a second appeal under Section 331(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, declaring that respondents had acquired Bhumidar rights by adverse possession. The Supreme Court examined whether Section 331(4) inc

UNION OF INDIAversusABN AMRO BANK AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 46212 July 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India prosecuted M/s Maple Leaf Trading International Pvt. Ltd. and its foreign shareholders for trading imported gold coins without RBI permission, alleging violations of Sections 19(1)(a), 19(1)(d), 29(1)(b), 47(1), 49(1)(a) and 68 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. The Adjudicating Authority

SAMTA AANDOLAN SAMITI & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2013 INSC 82211 December 2013Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the All India Institute of Medical Sciences' (AllMS) counseling procedure for MBBS admissions, alleging that it exceeded the 50% reservation ceiling by allowing SC/ST/OBC candidates who secured seats in the open (unreserved) category to later opt for reserved seats, thereby inflating the rese

KAMLESH KUMARversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ANR.

2013 INSC 82511 December 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Dr. Kamlesh Kumar, was charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for the dishonour of a cheque that he alleged was stolen. The complainant presented the same cheque twice, first on 25‑Oct‑2008 and again on 10‑Nov‑2008, each time it was returned unpaid. A legal notice demanding payment w

B.S.N.L.versusBHURUMAL

2013 INSC 82111 December 2013Disposed off

The respondent, Bhurumal, claimed that he had worked as a daily‑wage lineman for BSNL for about 15 years, suffered an electric shock on duty and was subsequently denied reinstatement, alleging illegal termination under section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Industrial Tribunal and the High Court held tha

U. SREEversusU. SRINIVAS

2012 INSC 57811 December 2012Dismissed

The marriage between U. Sree and U. Srinivas broke down, leading the wife to file a petition for restitution of conjugal rights and the husband to file for divorce on the ground of mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The Family Court and the Madras High Court granted the divorce, held the

KUMARI SHAIMA JAFARIversusIRPHAN @ GULFAM AND ORS.

2012 INSC 58311 December 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a criminal appeal filed by the State against an acquittal of the accused Irphan @ Gulfam and others. The Allahabad High Court dismissed the Government appeal in a cryptic order, merely referring to paragraphs of the trial‑court judgment and without giving any reasons. The complainant, Kumari Shaima J

SANJEEV KUMAR SAMRATversusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND OTHERS

2012 INSC 57611 December 2012Dismissed

The owner of a goods vehicle insured the truck with National Insurance Co. and hired it to transport goods. During the journey the hirer and two of his labourers were killed in an accident. The legal heirs of the deceased filed claims under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held the insur

OMA @ OMPRAKASH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2012 INSC 58111 December 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted under IPC sections 395, 396 and 397 for a burglary‑murder that occurred in 1995. Both were arrested ten years later; an identification parade was held only for A1, who later died, while no parade was conducted for A2. The trial court sentenced both to death under section 396, which the Hig

KUKAPALLI MOHAN RAOversusSTATE OF A.P.

2012 INSC 57411 December 2012Dismissed

The appellant, KUKAPALLI MOHAN RAO, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly hacking the deceased with an axe, motivated by a suspicion of an illicit relationship between the deceased and the appellant's wife. The prosecution relied on the eyewitness testimony of the deceased's wife (PW2) and brother

HILL PROPERTIES LTD.versusUNION BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 60711 September 2013Dismissed

Hill Properties Ltd., the appellant, claimed ownership of Flat No.23 in Mumbai, asserting that the flat was allotted to its shareholder (Respondent No.5) who could only occupy it and could not mortgage it without the company's consent under its Articles of Association. Respondent No.5 had created an equitable mortgage

DR. KULMEET KAUR MAHAL & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

2013 INSC 60511 September 2013Dismissed

The appellants, nine medical graduates, challenged a clarificatory order of the Punjab & Haryana High Court which stated that seats already allocated in the general category for postgraduate medical courses would not be disturbed, but any vacant seats from the 60% in‑service quota could be filled by Resident Medical Of

ACC LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE ASSOCIATED CEMENT CO. LTD.)versusGLOBAL CEMENTS LTD.

2012 INSC 25511 June 2012Dismissed

The parties entered into a 1989 agreement containing an arbitration clause that named two specific arbitrators. Both arbitrators later died, and the respondent sought the appointment of a substitute arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Bombay High Court appointed a former Supre

NANHAR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 34311 June 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Nanhar and others were convicted for the murder of Vijay under Sections 302 and 149 of the IPC, primarily on the basis of a note recovered from the deceased's pocket that the trial court treated as a dying declaration, and on circumstantial evidence. The Supreme Court held that the prosecution failed to

DHARAM DEO YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

2014 INSC 26511 April 2014Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Dharam Deo Yadav, was convicted for the murder of a New Zealand tourist, Diana Clare Routley, based largely on circumstantial evidence, including eyewitnesses who saw the accused with the victim, the accused's confession leading police to a skeleton recovered from his house, and DNA testing that matched

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusMANOJ KUMAR

2014 INSC 26611 April 2014Dismissed

The State of Rajasthan appealed against the Rajasthan High Court’s judgment that acquitted two accused (Hemant Kumar and Manoj Kumar) and convicted Raju (Raj Kumar) for the death of Anirudh Mishra arising out of a property dispute. The accused claimed the right of private defence. The Supreme Court examined whether the

STATE OF U.P.versusHARI RAM

2013 INSC 14611 March 2013Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against a High Court order that allowed landowner Hari Ram to claim the benefit of the saving clause in the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999. The dispute centered on whether the "deemed vesting" of surplus vacant land under section 10(3) of the Urban Land (Ceiling

T.P. VISHNU KUMARversusCANARA BANK P.N. ROAD, TIRUPPUR & ORS.

2013 INSC 9211 February 2013Dismissed

Canara Bank filed an original application before a Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) for recovery of a large sum. The respondents filed interim applications seeking production of banking documents, which the DRT rejected, deeming them a delay tactic. The respondents approached the High Court under Article 226, and the Singl

MR. JUSTICE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH (RETD.)versusJANEKERE C. KRISHNA & ORS. ETC.

2013 INSC 3111 January 2013Disposed off

The Karnataka Lokayukta post of Upa‑Lokayukta became vacant and the Chief Minister advised the Governor to appoint Justice Chandrashekaraiah without consulting the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court, as required by s.3(2)(b) of the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984. The High Court quashed the appointment, holding th

DLF LIMITEDversusMANMOHAN LOWE AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 82010 December 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The apartment owners of Silver Oaks Apartments filed a writ petition seeking to quash DLF Limited's declaration under the Haryana Apartment Ownership Act, alleging that the declaration omitted certain community and commercial facilities as "common areas and facilities". The High Court held that the owners were entitled

MSR LEATHERSversusS. PALANIAPPAN & ANR.

2013 INSC 60410 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent issued four cheques which were presented and dishonoured. The appellant sent a statutory notice on 8 January 1997, which was beyond the 30‑day period, but sent a second notice on 28 January 1997 within the limitation period after the second dishonour. A complaint was filed on 4 March 1997. The issue was

LONDHE PRAKASH BHAGWANversusDATTATRAYA EKNATH MANE & ORS.

2013 INSC 60310 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was appointed Headmaster of a private school in August 1996. The respondent, who was the acting Headmaster, waited nearly ten years before filing an application for condonation of delay before the School Tribunal, challenging the appointment under Section 9(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Sc

GURNAIB SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2013 INSC 33910 May 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Gurnaib Singh was convicted for the death of his young wife Amarjeet Kaur, who allegedly committed suicide after being harassed for a dowry demand of Rs 50,000. The trial court and the Punjab High Court upheld a conviction under Section 3048 IPC (dowry death) and sentenced him to seven years' rigorous imp

AARUSHI DHASMANAversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 23110 April 2013Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the plight of two 15‑year‑old craniopagus twins, Saba and Farha, whose parents refused consent for any medical investigation or surgical separation. The petitioners sought a court order to compel investigations and, if necessary, surgery, invoking the twins' right to life and bodily integrity

STATE OF GUJARATversusRATANSINGH @ CHINUBHAL ANOPSINH CHAUHAN

2014 INSC 2010 January 2014Dismissed

The State of Gujarat charged Ratansingh under sections 376, 302 and 201 of the IPC for the alleged rape and murder of a seven‑year‑old girl. The trial court convicted him, awarding a death sentence for murder and life imprisonment for rape. On appeal, the Gujarat High Court acquitted him, holding that the prosecution’s

ARUN BHANDARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 2910 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Arun Bhandari, an NRI, paid Rs.1.05 crore as part payment for a plot in Greater Noida on the basis of an agreement with respondents Savita Singh and Raghuvinder Singh, who later transferred the property to a third party. When the property was not delivered, Bhandari filed an FIR alleging cheating and criminal breach of

PINAKIN MAHIPATRAY RAWALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2013 INSC 5989 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Pinakin Mahipatray Rawal, was convicted under Sections 498A and 306 IPC for allegedly causing his wife's suicide through an extra‑marital relationship with his colleague (A‑2). The Supreme Court examined whether the alleged relationship amounted to cruelty within the meaning of Section 498A and whether i

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.versusNAMDEO ETC. ETC.

2013 INSC 5979 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra rejected pension claims of three applicants who alleged they were underground freedom fighters, on the ground that they had not produced the documents prescribed in the Freedom Fighters Pension Scheme of 4 July 1995. The applicants filed writ petitions and the High Court set aside the State's o

BHANWAR LAL & ANR.versusRAJASTHAN BOARD OF MUSLIM WAKF & ORS.

2013 INSC 5999 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners owned a property in Nagaur that the Wakf Board claimed was Wakf property and sued them for possession, rendition of accounts and declaration that a 1983 sale deed was invalid. The suit was filed in 1980, well before the Rajasthan Wakf Act, 1995 came into force. After the Act, the respondents invoked Sec

IMPROVEMENT TRUST, LUDHIANA ETC.versusUJAGAR SINGH & ORS. ETC.

2010 INSC 3429 June 2010Disposed off

The Improvement Trust, Ludhiana, acquired land and was awarded compensation which it failed to pay, leading to the attachment and auction of the property in 1992. The auction purchaser, Jagan Singh & Co., paid Rs.22.65 lakh, but the Trust later filed objections under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC, which were dismissed in defaul

CHANDRA PRAKASHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2014 INSC 3859 May 2014Dismissed

On 26 January 1996 a bomb exploded at the SMS Stadium in Jaipur, leading to the arrest of six accused, including Chandra Prakash, Abdul Mateen and others. The prosecution relied on the testimony of an approver (PW‑1) who implicated the accused, on material recovered from the accused’s premises (ammonium nitrate, dynami

ARUN KUMAR AGRAWALversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2013 INSC 3309 May 2013Dismissed

Arun Kumar Agrawal filed a public‑interest writ petition under Article 32 challenging the Government of India's approval for the sale of a majority stake in Cairn India Limited (CIL) to Vedanta and seeking a direction that ONGC exercise its right of first refusal (RoFR). The petition also sought a CBI investigation and

ASHOK KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2013 INSC 249 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Ashok Kumar Sharma was arrested after police searched him and recovered two packets of heroin, leading to his conviction under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act and a ten‑year rigorous imprisonment sentence. The appellant challenged the conviction on the ground that the offi

M/S VAAMIKA ISLAND (GREEN LAGOON RESORT)versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 5288 August 2013Dismissed

The petitioners, Mis Vaamika Island (Green Lagoon Resort), challenged the inclusion of their 5.21 acres on Vettilla Thuruthu Island in Map 32A of the Kerala Coastal Zone Management Plan (CZMP) and its classification as a Filtration Pond and CRZ‑1, alleging that the map and classification were ultra vires the Coastal Re

MRITUNJOY BISWASversusPRANAB @ KUTI BISWAS AND ANOTHER

2013 INSC 5258 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerns the murder of Ashalata Biswas, who was shot through a window on 20 April 2001. The trial court convicted Pranab @ Kuti Biswas under Section 302 IPC, but the Calcutta High Court acquitted him, citing the absence of the accused's name in the FIR, the victim's failure to name the shooter, minor inconsist

M/S TIRUPATI DEVELOPERSversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

2013 INSC 5278 August 2013Dismissed

The case involved eleven sale agreements executed by M/s Tirupati Developers for parcels of land in Uttarakhand. The Deputy Registrar impounded the agreements alleging deficient stamp duty and the Assistant Commissioner ordered payment of the deficit, penalty and interest. The appellant contended that no stamp duty was

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIversusYASHWANT SINGH NEGI

2013 INSC 2228 April 2013Dismissed

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) against the Delhi High Court's order dismissing a review petition, while the original High Court judgment dated 5 November 2008 remained unchallenged. The respondent argued that the SLP was not maintainable because the main order had not been conte

THE SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONversusSHEEJA P.R AND ANOTHER

2013 INSC 148 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Kerala Public Service Commission (KPSC) prepared a main rank list and a supplementary list for reserved‑category candidates for the post of Higher Secondary School Teacher (English Junior). The main list was exhausted on 28 September 2010, and a non‑joining duty (NJD) vacancy was reported to the Commission on 12 Se

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION RAJASTHANversusSANJEEV SACHDEVA AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 178 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents purchased a plot and applied to the Rajasthan Municipal Corporation for conversion of land use from residential to commercial under the Rajasthan Municipalities (Change of Land Use) Rules, 2000. The corporation approved the conversion and issued a demand notice for conversion charges of Rs.5,70,300. The

STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERSversusNIRMAL KUMAR GUPTA

2013 INSC 208 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar settled a group of excise shops for retail sale of country liquor in favour of Nirmal Kumar Gupta on 5 June 2006. Under the Bihar Excise (Settlement of Licences for Retail Sale of Country/Spiced Country Liquor) Rules, 2004, Gupta was required to deposit one‑fourth of the annual licence fee as advance

M/S. GIAN CHAND & BROTHERS AND ANOTHERversusRATTAN LAL @ RATTAN SINGH

2013 INSC 188 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, a partnership firm, sued the defendant for recovery of advances allegedly given to him, relying on entries and the defendant's signatures in their cash book. The defendant denied ever borrowing and contested the signatures, but offered no specific denial in the pleadings and produced no documentary evid

G.L. BATRAversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 6797 October 2013Appeal(s) allowed

G.L. Batra, then Additional Secretary of the Lok Sabha, was appointed Chairman of the Haryana Public Service Commission (HPSC) under Article 316 of the Constitution. The State Government initially relaxed Regulation 6 of the HPSC (Conditions of Service) Regulations, 1972, fixing his remuneration at Rs.7,500 per month,

SOMDEV KAPOORversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

2013 INSC 6827 October 2013Dismissed

The appellant, proprietor of a hotel and restaurant, applied in 1992 for a foreign liquor bar licence, which remained pending for years and was finally granted a temporary licence in 2006. Respondents filed a public‑interest writ seeking cancellation of the licence, arguing that Rule 8 of the West Bengal Excise (Select

THALAPPALAM SER. COOP. BANK LTD. AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

2013 INSC 6847 October 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether cooperative societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 are "public authorities" under Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 and thus bound to disclose information. The Court distinguished statutory bodies from bodies merely governed by statutes

NASIRUDDINversusSTATE (NCT) DELHI AND ORS.

2013 INSC 5227 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant, Nasiruddin, alleged that he was shot in the legs by respondents 2‑4 during a family dispute, leading to a FIR under Section 326 IPC. The respondents sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC, and the Additional Sessions Judge granted it, stating that the injury was simple and the elements

ANIMAL WELFARE BOARD OF INDIAversusA. NAGARAJA & ORS.

2014 INSC 3707 May 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the traditional events of Jallikattu in Tamil Nadu and bull‑ock cart races in Maharashtra violate the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (PCA Act) and the Constitution’s fundamental duties. Relying on affidavits and reports from the Animal Welfare Board of India, the Court fou

SHIVASHARANAPPA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2013 INSC 3197 May 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The accused were tried for murder, conspiracy and related offences arising from a property dispute. The trial court acquitted them, finding the conduct of two key witnesses – the deceased's mother‑in‑law and the deceased’s eleven‑year‑old daughter – to be unnaturally silent and therefore unreliable. The High Court reve

MANINDERJIT SINGH BITTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2011 INSC 2807 April 2011Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the implementation of the High Security Registration Plates (HSRP) scheme introduced under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. While earlier judgments upheld the Central Government's power to issue the scheme, many states failed to comply, either by delaying tende

GURVAIL SINGH @ GALA & ANOTHERversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2013 INSC 797 February 2013Case Partly allowed

The appellants Gurvail Singh and Jaj Singh were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for the murder of four members of a family during a property dispute. The trial court and the High Court sentenced them to death, holding the case to be "rarest of rare". On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whe

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusVASAVI CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 137 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Vasavi Co‑op Housing Society sued several defendants for a declaration of title and possession of 6 acres 30 guntas of land, relying on sale deeds, a 1353 Fasli settlement register and a 1939 family settlement deed. The defendants counter‑claimed title based on entries in the General Land Register (GLR) of the Secu

PARBIN ALI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2013 INSC 107 January 2013Dismissed

The appellants Parbin Ali and another were convicted under IPC sections 302 and 34 for the murder of Sakat Ali, based primarily on an oral dying declaration made by the deceased to his wife, father‑in‑law and relatives. The trial court and the Gauhati High Court upheld the conviction, finding the declaration credible d

HARDEVINDER SINGHversusPARAMJIT SINGH & OTHERS

2013 INSC 137 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Sarabjit Singh filed a suit challenging a will, claiming co‑share in ancestral joint Hindu family property. The trial court declared the will void and decreed in his favour. On appeal by defendants 1‑4, the appellate court set aside that decree and dismissed the suit. Defendant No. 5, the brother of the plaintiff, file

HARYANA POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERSversusHARKESH CHAND AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 127 January 2013Disposed off

The respondents, who were initially appointed as apprentices/ITI trainees, claimed that the two‑year apprenticeship period should be counted as regular satisfactory service for the purpose of the Assured Career Progression (ACP) scheme, seeking a second ACP scale after twenty years of service. The employer argued that

NAGAR PANCHAYAT, KURWAI & ANR.versusMAHESH KUMAR SINGHAL AND ORS.

2013 INSC 5916 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Kurwai Nagar Panchayat constructed a bus stand on its own land and, invoking powers under the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, imposed a parking fee of Rs 20 per day or Rs 600 per month on vehicle owners. The fee was challenged through a writ petition, which the High Court dismissed, but a Division Bench later se

PUNJAB SCHOOL EDUCATION BOARDversusDALIP CHAND AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 5946 September 2013Dismissed

The respondent, Dalip Chand, worked in the Punjab Department of Education from 1965 to 1979 and then joined the Punjab School Education Board as Superintendent, serving there until his retirement in 2000. Upon superannuation he claimed pension under Regulation 6 of the Punjab School Education Board (Employees Pension,

ROHILKHAND MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL, BAREILLYversusMEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANOTHER

2013 INSC 5956 September 2013Dismissed

Rohilkhand Medical College, established in 2005, sought renewal of its MBBS intake for the 2008‑09 batch, but the Medical Council of India (MCI) repeatedly recommended non‑renewal due to deficiencies. Despite this, the Central Government granted permission after a central inspection team, which was later found by the C

FAIZA CHOUDHARYversusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ANR.

2012 INSC 3816 September 2012Dismissed

In 2010, the Jammu & Kashmir Board of Professional Entrance Examination had to fill 15 MBBS seats reserved for the Scheduled Tribe Gujjar Bakerwal (STGB) category, with a 15th odd seat earmarked for a female candidate. The seat remained vacant after a male candidate's writ petition was dismissed, and the appellant, a l

M/S. MICRO HOTEL P. LTD.versusM/S. HOTEL TORRENTO LIMITED & ORS.

2012 INSC 3806 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The State Financial Corporation (OSFC) and IPICOL financed a hotel project of MIS. MICRO HOTEL P. Ltd. (the borrower) which defaulted on loan repayments. The corporations offered One‑Time Settlement (OTS) schemes in 2006 and 2007, which the borrower failed to meet, leading to withdrawal of the offers and a demand for f

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search