AMIT KUMAR DAS, JOINT SECRETARY, BAITANIK, A REGISTERED SOCIETYversusSHRIMATI HUTHEESINGH TAGORE CHARITABLE TRUST
2024 INSC 7330 January 2024Case Partly allowed
The Trust obtained a decree for possession of premises occupied by the Society, but the High Court stayed execution pending the Society's appeal and imposed a conditional stay requiring deposits and a status‑quo. The Society later let out the premises for exhibitions, violating the stay conditions, leading the Trust to…
SACHIN GARGversusSTATE OF U.P & ANR.
2024 INSC 7230 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a senior manager of Exide Industries Ltd., was summoned by a magistrate to stand trial under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged criminal breach of trust and intimidation arising from a commercial dispute over the price of dissolved acetylene gas supplied by the respondent. The…
M/S KKK HYDRO POWER LIMITEDversusHIMACHAL PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 105729 August 2025Dismissed
The appellant, KKK Hydro Power Ltd, entered into a 3 MW power purchase agreement (PPA) with HPSEB in 2000 fixing a tariff of ₹2.50/kWh, later augmenting the project to 4.90 MW and attempting to raise the tariff to ₹2.95/kWh through a supplementary PPA in 2010 without the Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commissi…
ABHISHEK SAXENAversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR
2023 INSC 108828 November 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Abhishek Saxena, was charged under IPC sections 323, 384 and 406 for alleged assault, extortion and criminal breach of trust arising from a FIR filed on 4 September 2016. He had earlier filed a petition for dissolution of marriage and a guardianship application under the Guardians & Wards Act, 1890, befo…
DR BALRAM SINGH AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
2024 INSC 89325 November 2024Dismissed
The petitioners challenged the 1976 insertion of the words ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ into the Preamble of the Constitution, arguing that the amendment was retrospective, lacked popular consent, and violated the basic structure by restricting economic policy and religious freedom. The Court examined whether Article 368 …
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusCORPORATION BANK & ORS.
2025 INSC 116125 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) had allotted a plot to Sarita Vihar Club under a lease that gave DDA a pre‑emptive right to purchase and required Lieutenant Governor’s consent for any mortgage. The Club mortgaged the plot to Corporation Bank without such consent, defaulted on the loan and the Bank sought recovery…
GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LIMITEDversusESSAR POWER LIMITED AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 116025 September 2025Disposed off
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd (GUVNL), successor to Gujarat Electricity Board, entered into a power purchase agreement (PPA) with Essar Power Ltd (EPL) for 300 MW of a 515 MW plant, while EPL had a separate PPA with its sister company Essar Steel Ltd (ESL) for the remaining 215 MW. EPL repeatedly supplied electricity to…
CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. (CESC)versusSAISUDHIR ENERGY (CHITRADURGA) PVT. LTD. & ANR.
2025 INSC 103425 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned a 10 MW solar power project where Chamundeshwari Electricity Supply Company Ltd. (CESC) entered into a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with Saisudhir Energy (Chitradurga) Pvt. Ltd. (the Developer) and relied on Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. (KPTCL) to commission two 220 kV evacuation l…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusR. SHANKARAPPA
2025 INSC 89825 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a former Sub‑Divisional Engineer in the Department of Telecommunication, was convicted in two criminal cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act and faced parallel disciplinary proceedings for a trap case and for possessing assets disproportionate to his known income. Two charge‑sheets were issued un…
YOGARANIversusSTATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2024 INSC 72123 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant (accused No.2) was convicted under IPC s.420 and the Passports Act for allegedly facilitating the illegal issuance of a second passport to accused No.1, who already possessed a passport. The prosecution relied on the testimony of three witnesses, including a hostile employee and a handwriting expert, but …
PAPAN SARKAR @ PRANABversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2026 INSC 52822 May 2026Case Allowed
The appellant accused were convicted of pre‑meditated murder based on the "last seen together" theory, alleged extra‑judicial confessions, recoveries of alleged weapons and a motorcycle, and serological evidence. The Supreme Court examined whether the time gap between the accused being last seen with the deceased and t…
STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERSversusBINOD KUMAR AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 4418 January 2024Dismissed
The State of Assam and its officials challenged the validity of Rule 63(iii) of the Assam Police Manual, which designates the Deputy Commissioner as the reporting authority for Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) and Annual Performance Appraisal Reports (APARs) of District Superintendents of Police (SPs). The respondent…
M/S. JERMYN CAPITAL LLC DUBAIversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS.
2023 INSC 54717 May 2023Disposed off
The Supreme Court entertained an application by M/s. Jerlyn Capital LLC Dubai seeking modification of its earlier order dated 09‑05‑2023, which had set aside a requirement to furnish a bank guarantee and allowed the appellant to withdraw Rs.38.52 crore with 4% simple interest from 08‑05‑2006. The appellant submitted ea…
RAKESH MITTALversusAJAY PAL GUPTA @ SONU CHAUDHARY AND ANOTHER
2026 INSC 16117 February 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a complainant, filed an FIR alleging that the accused, Ajay Pal Gupta (also known as Sonu Chaudhary), conspired with others to cheat him of over ₹11.5 crore by supplying foodgrains and using forged documents. The accused was arrested after a 1.5‑year abscondment and his bail application was rejected by t…
ROHIT JANGDEversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2026 INSC 16217 February 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Rohit Jangde, the step‑father of a six‑year‑old girl, was convicted by the trial court and the High Court for her murder based on three circumstances: a ‘last seen together’ theory, recovery of charred bone fragments and ashes after the accused allegedly led police to the site, and DNA matching of verteb…
RIKHAB BIRANI & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 51216 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Rikhab Birani and Sadhna Birani, entered into an oral agreement to sell a godown for Rs 1.35 crore, which the buyer, Shilpi Gupta, failed to fully pay, leading the sellers to re‑sell the property at a lower price. The buyer subsequently approached the Metropolitan Magistrate to register an FIR alleging …
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusN.M. RAUT & ORS.
2024 INSC 104212 December 2024Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the interpretation of the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS), 2008, particularly how financial upgradations granted under the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 should be counted for MACPS eligibility. Respondents, employed as Pharmacists and Superintendents, had…
RAJPALversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2023 INSC 108912 December 2023Dismissed as withdrawn
The petitioner, Rajpal, challenged the denial of his bail application, arguing that his co‑accused had been granted bail by a coordinate bench of the Rajasthan High Court for the same FIR. The Supreme Court noted that despite its earlier directives, High Courts continue to list bail applications arising from the same F…
ANGELWOODS APARTMENT ALLOTTEES ASSOCIATIONversusM LALITHA AND ANOTHER
2026 INSC 47912 May 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Angelwoods Apartment Allottees Association, challenged the approval of its resolution plan by the NCLT, which was appealed by respondent M Lalitha, a financial creditor, under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Lalitha filed the appeal on the last permissible day but failed to attach a cer…
MOHAMMAD AFZAL MOHAMMAD SHARIFversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 110011 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a 17‑year‑old who was assaulted during communal riots in Akola on 13 May 2023, claimed that the police failed to register a First Information Report (FIR) despite his written complaint and hospital statement. He alleged that the assailants also murdered a man mistakenly identified as a Muslim, and that h…
SANJAY KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
2026 INSC 22311 March 2026Dismissed
The case involved the alleged arson and murder of an elderly couple whose shanty was set ablaze, resulting in the death of the husband and later his wife. The prosecution alleged that the younger son and his wife committed the crime, relying primarily on several dying declarations, motive stemming from a property dispu…
MOHAN LAL FATEHPURIAversusM/S BHARAT TEXTILES & ORS.
2025 INSC 140910 December 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, a husband and wife, entered into a partnership deed containing an arbitration clause and later appointed a sole arbitrator, Mr. Anjum Javed, to resolve disputes with the respondents. The arbitrator repeatedly demanded administrative expenses, which the respondents challenged under Sections 14 and 15 of …
NITENDRA KUMAR TOMER, SUSPENDED DIRECTOR, AMBRO ASIA PRIVATE LIMITEDversusUNOX S.P.A. AND ANOTHER
2026 INSC 35610 April 2026Dismissed
The suspended director of Ambro Asia Private Limited, Nitendra Kumar Tomer, appealed to the NCLAT against the NCLT's order admitting an operational creditor's application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The appeal was filed in the name of the corporate debtor even though an interim resoluti…
PANNALAL BHANSALIversusBHARTI TELECOM LIMITED & ORS.
2026 INSC 21310 March 2026Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered an appeal by minority shareholders of Bharti Telecom Limited (BTL) who challenged the company’s reduction of share capital under s.66 of the Companies Act, 2013, alleging that the valuation and the notice were unfair and misleading. BTL had cancelled 28.4 million shares held by the appellan…
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusBALJEET SINGH
2026 INSC 22110 March 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The CBI laid a trap after a complaint that Income Tax Inspector Baljeet Singh (A2) demanded a bribe of Rs 5 lakhs on behalf of Assessing Officer Arun Kumar Gurjar (A1). During the trap, marked notes smeared with phenolphthalein were recovered from A2's coat pocket and his hands turned pink in a sodium carbonate test, c…
AMIT NEHRA & ANR.versusPAWAN KUMAR GARG & ORS.
2025 INSC 10869 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, homebuyers who paid Rs.57,56,684 for an apartment in the IREO Rise project, sought possession after the developer defaulted on delivery. Their claim was filed initially on 11‑01‑2019 and resubmitted on 07‑02‑2020, after which the Resolution Professional verified it and included it in the list of financi…
DEEP NURSING HOME AND ANOTHERversusMANMEET SINGH MATTEWAL AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 10949 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Manmeet Singh Mattewal lost his wife and newborn child during delivery at Deep Nursing Home. He alleged medical negligence by Dr. Kanwarjit Kochhar and the nursing home, leading to compensation orders by the State and National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions. The Supreme Court examined whether the NCDRC correct…
C.S. GOPALAKRISHNAN ETC.versusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & OTHERS
2023 INSC 5109 May 2023Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined challenges to the Tamil Nadu Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 and the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001, alleging inherent arbitrariness and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution. The appellants, who purchased the lands after acquisition notices were issued, sought to invalidate the statutes a…
STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusM/S B.B.M. ENTERPRISES
2026 INSC 3589 April 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The work under a contract was completed on 30 July 2000, but no final bill or measurement certificate was issued by the Engineer-in-Charge. The State of West Bengal filed a notice seeking arbitration on 2 June 2022, more than 21 years after completion, and the High Court ordered arbitration, holding that the limitation…
M/S SHANTI CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.versusTHE STATE OF ODISHA & ORS.
2025 INSC 12957 November 2025Disposed off
The State of Odisha issued an auction notice for a five‑year sand‑quarry lease; Shanti Construction Pvt. Ltd., the highest‑price bidder, was declared non‑responsive for not submitting an Income Tax Return for FY 2021‑22, while a lower‑priced bidder was declared successful. The dispute centered on the meaning of “previo…
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusRAM KISHORI GUPTA & ANR.
2025 INSC 4547 April 2025Disposed off
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued show‑cause notices to Vital Communications Ltd (VCL) and related entities for misleading advertisements, leading to a series of orders: a 2008 restraint order, a 2014 order imposing market bans, and a 2018 disgorgement order. The Securities Appellate Tribunal set…
VINISHMA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ANR.
2025 INSC 11826 October 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Vinishma Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a company with experience supplying sports kits in several Indian states, challenged a tender issued by the State of Chhattisgarh for supplying sports kits to government schools because the tender required bidders to have supplied goods worth at least Rs.6 crore to Chhattisgarh governme…
DIVJOT SEKHONversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
2026 INSC 266 January 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioners challenged the Punjab government's alteration of the sports‑quota admission criteria for MBBS/BDS courses, which expanded the "zone of consideration" from Classes XI‑XII to include Classes IX‑X after applications had been filed. They argued that the mid‑stream change was arbitrary, violated Article 14’s…
S. NAGESHversusSHOBHA S. ARADHYA
2026 INSC 276 January 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act alleging dishonour of a cheque, but the complaint was filed two days after the statutory one‑month period. The magistrate took cognizance of the complaint on the same day it was filed, before any application for condonation of the dela…
THE STATE (NCT) OF DELHIversusKHIMJI BHAI JADEJA
2026 INSC 256 January 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Delhi appealed against a Delhi High Court decision that held each deposit made by investors in a large cheating scheme constituted a separate transaction and that separate FIRs and charge sheets were required. The scheme, alleged to involve 1,852 victims defrauded of ₹46.40 crore, was initially investigate…
UV ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITEDversusELECTROSTEEL CASTINGS LIMITED
2026 INSC 146 January 2026Dismissed
The appellant UV Asset Reconstruction Company claimed that Electrosteel Castings Ltd (ECL), as promoter of borrower Electrosteel Steels Ltd (ESL), had provided a guarantee for a Rs 500 crore loan from SREI, based on Clause 2.2 of a Deed of Undertaking which required ECL to arrange infusion of funds to help ESL meet fin…
ARVIND DHAMversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
2026 INSC 126 January 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a former promoter and non‑executive chairman of Amtek Auto Ltd., was arrested in July 2024 on allegations of massive bank fraud and money‑laundering under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). Despite cooperating with the investigation and being the sole accused taken into custody among 28…
MAKKELLA NAGAIAHversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2023 INSC 8005 September 2023Appeal(s) allowed
Makkella Nagaiah was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for a murder committed on 21‑12‑2005 and sentenced to life imprisonment. He later filed a writ petition under Article 32 claiming that he was a juvenile at the time of the offence, asserting a date of birth of 02‑05‑1989, which would make …
ALPHA CORP DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITEDversusGREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GNIDA) AND OTHERS
2026 INSC 4495 May 2026Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Earth Infrastructures Limited (EIL) and whether the lease‑hold lands held by its subsidiaries could be treated as assets of the corporate debtor. The Court found that the subsidiaries were merely fronts for EIL, which was the real develope…
REGINAMARY CHELLAMANIversusSTATE REP BY SUPERINTENDENT OF CUSTOMS
2026 INSC 1275 February 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Reginamary Chellamani, was arrested for alleged offences under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(C), 22(c), 23, 28 and 29 of the NDPS Act read with Section 135 of the Customs Act, after a contraband substance exceeding the commercial quantity was seized from her. She had been in pre‑trial detention for 4 years, 1…
MMTC LIMITEDversusANGLO AMERICAN METALLURGICAL COAL PVT. LIMITED
2025 INSC 12793 November 2025Dismissed
MMTC Limited entered a Long Term Agreement with Anglo American Metallurgical Coal for the supply of coking coal, but a dispute arose over the price and unlifted quantities, leading to an arbitral award in favour of Anglo. MMTC challenged the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, which was reje…
GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LIMITEDversusGREEN INFRA CORPORATE WIND PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS ETC.
2025 INSC 9223 August 2025Dismissed
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL) entered into power purchase agreements (PPAs) with four wind‑energy companies, fixing a tariff of Rs 3.56 per kWh that was applicable only to projects availing accelerated depreciation under the Income‑Tax Act. The respondents later approached the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory …
SUSHIL KUMAR TIWARIversusHARE RAM SAH & ORS.
2025 INSC 10611 September 2025Disposed off
The case involved a minor girl who became pregnant after being allegedly raped separately by two accused, Hare Ram Sah and Manish Tiwari, in 2016. The trial court convicted them under IPC s.376(2) and POCSO §§4,6, imposing rigorous life imprisonment, but the High Court acquitted them, holding that the prosecution faile…
SUSHIL KUMAR PANDEY & ORS.versusHIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND & ANR.
2024 INSC 971 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the selection process for District Judge posts in Jharkhand where the High Court, via a Full Court resolution, introduced a 50% aggregate marks requirement after candidates' performances were already assessed. Petitioners challenged this alteration, arguing it violated the 2001 Rules, the 201…