Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 5801–6000
The petitioners, three brothers from Hariyath village, sought relief fearing arrest in a kidnapping case (Sections 363, 365 IPC read with 34) concerning the alleged abduction of an 18‑year‑old son of an informant. They contended that the informant fabricated the charge, noting that the boy …
The petitioner, Md. Javed, applied for bail in a case registered as Lalganj P.S. Case No. 21 of 2024, where he is accused of murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and several provisions of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that four unidentified gunmen shot the deceased and …
The petitioners – Indo Devi, Bhola Mahto and Abren Kumar – sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint filed by Lalita Devi under IPC sections 323, 342, 498A, 494 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complaint alleged that the husband’s family demanded a dowry of Rs.1 lakh, and …
The petitioner, Seraj Khan, sought anticipatory bail after a non‑bailable warrant was issued in a 2021 case alleging he participated in a robbery under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR named unknown accused, but the petitioner’s name appeared in a confessional statement made by Ajay Ram …
The petitioner, Anil Agrawal, was charged under sections 302, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting the husband of an informant, resulting in his death. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that the FIR and subsequent police final report were contested by a protest …
The petitioner, Adarsh Kumar, was charged under IPC section 392 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑b), 26 and 35 for alleged robbery of jewellery. The FIR named unknown miscreants, but a co‑accused, Ripu Jha, gave a confessional statement implicating the petitioner; no material was recovered from the …
The petitioner, Ajay Das, was charged under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of the informant's son, who had been in a relationship with Sudha Kumari and disappeared after a visit. The petitioner claimed innocence, citing that a co-accused had been acquitted …
Shah Niyaz @ Chunna was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 109 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged killing of a deceased. He had been in custody since 29 November 2025 and claimed that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the specific …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar Sada, was arrested on 26 October 2025 in connection with a case registered under Sections 363, 366 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly abducting a girl. He applied for bail, claiming innocence and asserting that the victim's statement indicated a consensual …
The petitioner, Md. Arman, was arrested in connection with a robbery alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code after a bike theft. The FIR named unknown miscreants, but during investigation a co‑accused, Sudhanshu, gave a confessional statement that mentioned the petitioner, though no …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 302, 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging his participation in the killing of a deceased person. He applied for bail before the Patna High Court, claiming his custody …
Manju Devi, also known as Shanti Devi, was arrested in connection with a dowry‑related homicide case (Hathauri P.S. Case No. 151 of 2021) and charged under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. She sought bail, claiming a clean antecedent, no involvement in any assault or dowry demand, and …
The appellant Md Quarban was convicted by a Special POCSO Court for kidnapping, rape and related offences against a girl alleged to be a minor. The prosecution relied chiefly on the victim’s testimony, a school registration card to prove minority, and a medical report showing pregnancy but no …
The petitioners, Raju Kumar, Amrenda Kumar, Ramnivash Prasad and Sudhakar Prasad, sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 244/2013 that alleged offences under several IPC sections. They claimed innocence, an alibi and argued that the police never sent them to trial, asserting that the …
The petitioner, Wakar, was charged under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 3 of the Domestic Violence Act following a complaint by his wife, Mobina Praveen. He filed an anticipatory bail petition after a summoning order was issued. The parties reached an amicable settlement wherein the petitioner …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case (Garkha PS No.334 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 302, 307, 323, 341/34 of the IPC, including murder. The prosecution alleges that Kumar assaulted the informant's husband and brother‑in‑law with a knife, leading to …
The petitioners, Raju Kumar, Amrenda Kumar, Ramnivash Prasad and Sudhakar Prasad, sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 244/2013 that alleged offences under several IPC sections. They claimed innocence, an alibi and argued that the police never sent them to trial, asserting that the …
The petitioner, Ravi Sharma, was arrested in a case under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He sought anticipatory bail, contending that the allegations were false and offering to settle outstanding maintenance of Rs.1,17,000 owed to his wife, who had earlier …
The petitioners Rauf Gadi, his wife Lalmuni and Md. Sahabuddin sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint alleging forgery, cheating, criminal conspiracy and assault relating to a disputed piece of land. The complaint claimed the petitioners had forged a sale deed and threatened the …
The appellants, five residents of Kushar Purwari village, appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act seeking anticipatory bail after a trial court had taken cognizance of offences alleged in a land‑dispute case, despite a police final report …
The Patna High Court heard an appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the trial court’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail to four accused charged with offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. The appellants argued that …
The petitioner, Md. Akbar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner submitted an order sheet showing that a default bail had already been granted by the lower court. The …
Kalli Mistri was charged under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 12 of the POCSO Act for alleged repeated rapes of a minor girl. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence, after being in custody since 18 October 2024. The State opposed the bail, asserting that …
Prince Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case (Gwalpara P.S. Case No.107 of 2024) alleged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that he, along with others, killed the deceased over a debt of Rs.70,000 owed to a third …
The petitioner, Aditya Kumar, was charged under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for assaulting an informant with a pistol, causing grievous injury. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and citing a clean antecedent, having been in custody since …
Krishna Yadav petitioned for regular bail in a complaint case involving serious offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 406, 120B, 379, 409 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner's brother‑in‑law, Rekha Devi (Opposite Party No.2), alleged that he had tortured her and contested a …
Arjun Ram was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (P.S. Case No. 319 of 2024) alleged under Sections 363 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserted a clean antecedent, and had been in custody since 9 March 2025. The …
Irshad Ali, a foodgrain dealer, received 900 quintals under government schemes but distributed only 584.91 quintals, leading to an FIR under IPC sections 406, 420 and 120(B). He filed a writ petition to quash a demand letter and was directed to refund Rs.3,95,438, which he could not pay at the time …
Anu Devi was implicated in a FIR alleging assault on the mother of an informant during a family property dispute, with charges under several IPC sections including assault, robbery and attempt to murder. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting the incident arose from a self‑defence reaction to a …
The appellants Victor Besra, Sonu Marandi and Mantu Marandi appealed against the denial of bail in a murder case registered under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The State and the respondent alleged that the appellants, particularly appellant No.2, had confessed to …
Mukesh Kumar, also known as Bai Singh, was implicated in a robbery case (Case No.31 of 2022) under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly stealing a motorcycle from an informant. The petitioner asserted his innocence, stating that no incriminating material had been recovered from him and …
Ashok Kumar, accused under IPC sections 399 and 402 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35, applied for regular bail. The co‑accused had recovered a loaded pistol, another firearm, and charas, and had identified the petitioner, but no material was recovered from the petitioner himself. The …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar Mishra, was charged under Sections 323, 498A and 504 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged dowry demand, cruelty and assault following a marital dispute. He claimed innocence, stating the criminal case was filed after he initiated divorce proceedings and that he has no …
The petitioner, Md. Samir Alam, was charged under Sections 323 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code in a complaint alleging dowry harassment and cruelty. He applied for bail, claiming innocence and no prior criminal record, while the State and complainant opposed, alleging a second marriage and refusal …
The petitioners, Raja Ram Mehta and his son Prawesh Kumar Mehta, were arrested in connection with a case (PS Forbesganj Case No. 422/2024) alleging assault, murder and several other offences under the Indian Penal Code. They applied for regular bail, claiming they were falsely implicated, have no …
The petitioner, Abhishek Singh, was charged with cheating involving the purchase of jewellery worth Rs. 39,82,337, alleged under Sections 363, 365, 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 6 and 8 of the POCSO Act. He sought regular bail, claiming innocence and asserting that he had been …
The petitioner, Md. Nizam, was arrested on 15 July 2024 in connection with a robbery case (Section 395 IPC) alleged to have occurred on 27 April 2024, where eight miscreants broke into his house and stole valuables. The petitioner contended that his name does not appear in the FIR and that his …
The petitioner, Anand Mohan Kumar, has been in custody since January 8, 2024 in connection with a murder and kidnapping case (Sections 302, 201, 34 IPC) arising from FIR dated November 26, 2022. He applied for bail before the Patna High Court, claiming a clean antecedent and that the allegations are …
Manoj Kumar, husband of the deceased, was charged under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly killing his wife and attempting to conceal the body. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and a clean antecedent, having been in custody since 15 July 2025. The State …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Bhagat, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 420, 406, 364, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he was innocent of the alleged murder of the informant’s son in Kathmandu. The prosecution alleged that the accused extorted Rs. 7 lakh, …
Amar Kumar was charged under Sections 376 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged rape in conjunction with other accused. He applied for regular bail for the second time, claiming false implication and lack of eyewitnesses, and has been in judicial custody since June 2022. The State opposed, …
The petitioner, Md. Naushad, was charged under Sections 363, 366A and 302 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant with the intent to marry her, after which the victim's dead body was recovered. This was the third bail application; two earlier applications …
The petitioner, Trivikram Narain Pathak, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 318(4), 336(2), 336(3) and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged fraud and forgery relating to his residence, Aadhar, PAN and voter ID documents. The prosecution alleged that he …
The petitioners, four residents of Saran district, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a 2017 case (Garkha PS Case No.455) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504 of the IPC. The FIR alleges that petitioners 1‑3 assaulted the informant with a common intention to …
The petitioners, nine individuals from the village of Basaitha, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging assault and robbery of an informant's husband and father‑in‑law. They contended that …
Chandan Mahto was arrested for alleged involvement in illicit liquor sale and assaulting police officers, facing charges under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated, that the injuries to police were minor, …
The petitioner, Chaudhary Bhagubhai Mansangbhai, challenged the order of the Additional Sessions Judge dated 11 July 2024 that upheld a charge‑sheet under the PC&PNDT Act and Sections 313, 315 and 114 of the IPC for alleged sex‑determination and illegal abortion. The petitioner argued that, under …
The applicant filed a private complaint alleging massive corruption, fraud and misappropriation of government funds, invoking IPC sections 164, 165 and 120(A) and several provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Principal District & Sessions Judge dismissed the complaint at the …
The appellants appealed their conviction and sentences under Sections 304 and 323 IPC, arguing that the trial record was lost and could not be reconstructed. The High Court examined the provisions of Sections 384, 385 and 386 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which require perusal of the record before …
Mool Chand was convicted by the Sessions Court for attempting murder under Section 307 IPC after firing a gun at Kewal Singh, causing injuries to his ear and back. The appellant appealed, contending that the injury was not grievous and that he could only be liable under Section 324 IPC for causing …
The appeal challenged the conviction of six accused under IPC sections 323, 147 and 452, of which only two appellants (Indra Pal and Surendra alias Sunder) remained alive. The trial court sentenced them to six months, one year and two years of rigorous imprisonment respectively but failed to …
The applicant, Rajesh alias Nirhu, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 142, 64(1) of the IPC, Section 70 of the Evidence Act and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication in a gang‑rape allegation. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the victim …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Sachin Kumar, who was arrested in connection with offences under IPC Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and Section 66‑D of the IT Act. The applicant claimed …
The revisionist, a minor, challenged the order of the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) that transferred his case to a Children’s Court for trial as an adult under Sections 15 and 18(3) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. He argued that his age at the time of the alleged …
The appellants challenged the prosecution's case, arguing that the FIR of 29‑09‑2023 specifically implicated only appellant No.1 for assault, while the other accused were mentioned vaguely without distinct allegations. They contended that proceeding against appellants No.2 and No.3 under the IPC and …
The case arose from a boundary dispute between close relatives in which the deceased Ganesan’s brother was killed after a heated altercation. The accused Senthil (A‑1) and Sivakumar (A‑2) were originally convicted of offences under Sections 324 and 325 IPC respectively, while the trial court …
The appellant, a pediatric surgeon, performed an orchidectomy on a 1½‑year‑old boy after obtaining a consent form that listed both orchidopexy and orchidectomy, but the father alleged that consent for orchidectomy was never given and that the term was interpolated. An FIR was filed under multiple …
The case concerned an FIR registered on 18 October 2022 alleging assault, criminal intimidation and related offences against eight persons, including Sajal Bose, his wife Nabina Bose and Chandidas Joardar. The High Court quashed the proceedings against two co‑accused but refused to grant the same …
The appellant Jhunni Lal was convicted by a Special Judge for dacoity under Section 395 IPC and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment. The prosecution alleged that a group of eight to ten miscreants, including the appellant, looted a house and assaulted its occupants, but only two persons …
The appellants were convicted by a Special Judge under IPC sections 323, 34, 504, 506 and Section 3(1)(10) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for assaulting a Chamar victim in 2002. The trial court sentenced them to rigorous imprisonment of one to three years and imposed fines. The …
The appellants Shishupal and two others were convicted by a Special Judge under IPC sections 323/34, 504, 506 and Section 3(1)(10) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for assaulting a Dalit complainant and using caste slurs. They were sentenced to rigorous imprisonment with fines, all …
The appellants Raju, Sunny and Satish were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Saharanpur, under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (363, 366, 368, 323, 376(2)(G), 328, 315 and 120‑B) and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment with fines, the sentences to run concurrently. They filed a …
The applicants, Puneet Kishore and Saroj Gupta, filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to enforce a Supreme Court order dated 03‑08‑2001 in Transfer Petition (C) No.260 of 2000, which had resulted in a compromise and a divorce decree, and to stay a criminal case (Case No. 417 of 2021) under …
Sujeet Kumar was arrested on 10-12-2024 in connection with a 2022 FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. His earlier bail application was rejected in June 2025 with a direction to apply after charge framing. The charge sheet was filed, charges were …
The Patna High Court considered a second application for regular bail filed by Bimlesh Kumar, who is in custody for offences under Sections 302, 304B, 201 and 34 of the IPC relating to the alleged murder of his sister‑in‑law. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner tortured his wife for dowry …
The petitioners, Rajesh Prasad and Madhuri Devi, feared arrest in a dowry‑death case (IPC §§304B and 34) pending before a Judicial Magistrate. They had earlier filed an anticipatory bail application which was withdrawn and dismissed in May 2024. After about two years, they filed a fresh anticipatory …
Shyam Yadav, arrested on 2 March 2024, is charged under multiple serious offences including sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail after a prior bail application was rejected and a subsequent one was withdrawn. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Babu Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 324, 326, 307, 302 and 34 for allegedly assaulting and causing the death of the informant's brother and his friend. He has been in custody since 21‑06‑2024 and, after a first bail application was rejected, sought bail again, arguing that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gulten Sah, who is accused under IPC sections 342, 344, 376 and 504 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. An earlier order on 17‑02‑2025 had rejected regular bail, citing the gravity of the offences and the victim’s …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was arrested on 3 December 2025 in connection with a 2021 case alleging kidnapping of his daughter for the purpose of marriage, charged under IPC Section 366(A) and POCSO Act Section 8. He contended that he had lawfully married the victim, who affirmed the marriage in a …
The petitioner, Vivek Kumar Mani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case involving offences under sections 341, 323, 406, 498A, 504, 506/34 of the IPC. The dispute stemmed from alleged marital harassment and a pending maintenance suit concerning their differently‑abled daughter. …
The appellant, Butul (also known as Ritwik Kumar), was charged under IPC sections 302, 506, 120B, 34, Arms Act section 27 and SC/ST Act section 3(2)(v) for allegedly assaulting and killing the deceased. He had been in custody for over two and a half years and sought anticipatory bail, which was …
Ankit Kumar was accused of murdering his informant's daughter under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, allegedly over a dowry demand. He had been in custody since June 2024 and his first bail application was rejected, with permission to reapply after nine months if the trial showed no …
The petitioner, Ravindra Das, applied for bail in a murder case (Section 302 and 34 IPC) for which he has been in judicial custody since 18 October 2022. His earlier bail applications were rejected three times. The petitioner claimed innocence and argued that the trial was delayed, with only eleven …
Ganesh Kumar was charged under Sections 363, 364, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code for offences arising from a case registered in Gopalpur Police Station. He has been in judicial custody since 31 March 2024 and filed a third bail application, having previously been denied bail on merit. The …
The petitioner, Sujit Kumar Yadav, was charged with offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506/34 and later 302. He applied for bail after being in judicial custody since 5 December 2023, claiming no prior criminal record. An earlier bail order rejected his regular bail but allowed a fresh …
The petitioner, Manibhushan Yadav, sought bail in a murder case (IPC sections 302 and 201) for which he has been in custody since 10 October 2025. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was falsely implicated, and that the FIR was lodged two days after the alleged incident, indicating a delay. …
The petitioner, Indradeo Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 16, 18, 20 of the UAPA. The FIR does not name him, and his alleged involvement is based only on a …
The appellants, Sahnawaz Ansari and Jamal Ansari, were charged under multiple IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault and caste-based abuse. They sought anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Additional Sessions Judge. On appeal, they argued that the notice …
Petitioner Rahul Kumar Das was charged with murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly killing the brother of an informant. The prosecution's case relied solely on the confessional statements of a co-accused and the petitioner, with no …
Bharat Prasad Singh, charged under IPC sections 324, 302, 120B, 34 and Arms Act section 27, applied for bail after being in custody since 16‑11‑2024. An earlier bail application was rejected, but the petitioner argued that only charge‑framing has occurred, no witnesses have been examined, and the …
Buggi Thakur, accused under Sections 302, 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, applied for regular bail before the Patna High Court. This was his third bail application; the first was rejected and the second was withdrawn. He has been in custody since 31 July 2023 and …
The petitioner, Tinku Kumar, was charged under Sections 366A, 365 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged rape offences. He applied for bail for the third time, arguing that the trial had only reached the stage of charge framing with no witness examination and that he had been in judicial …
The petitioner, Lalan Yadav, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of his wife. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner, together with co‑accused, killed the deceased and disposed of her body, which was later found in a …
The petitioner, Md. Ashraf, is in custody for multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code arising from a 2021 case. He applied for bail while the trial was pending before the Sessions Court. The trial court had scheduled arguments, but the defence counsel failed to appear, leading to the …
Rakesh Kumar Tiwari was arrested in connection with a case (PS Case No.727 of 2021) involving multiple serious offences under the Indian Penal Code (sections 272, 273, 284, 328, 307, 302, 34, 120B) and the Excise Act (sections 30(A), 30(C), 37(B)). The petitioner argued that he was not caught in the …
Kailash Rai was granted anticipatory bail on 22 December 2025 in Cr. Misc. No.89157 of 2025. He filed a petition alleging clerical mistakes: his father's name was recorded as "Ramanand Rai" instead of "Ramanand Rai @ Ram Nandan" and the sections of the FIR were incorrectly listed as "Section 30(a) …
Rakesh Kumar was charged under Sections 302, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code in a case registered on 17 June 2022. He applied for regular bail before the Patna High Court after his earlier bail applications had been rejected twice. The State opposed the bail, and the informant’s report indicated …
Umesh Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 324, 323, 325, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for regular bail before the Patna High Court, having been in custody since 24 December 2021 and having faced three prior bail rejections and one …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Prasad, Chairman of a PACS, was not named in an FIR lodged under Section 409 read with 34 of the IPC concerning missing rice from a State Food Corporation godown. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the substantive allegations were directed only at two co‑accused and …
Chandan Kumar was arrested on 8 October 2025 in connection with a 2023 FIR alleging murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused Kanchan Devi and Nunudai Devi killed the victim, while the petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and that the death was a …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar Tiwari, sought relief fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code concerning an alleged embezzlement of Rs. 7.98 lakh deposited with a co‑accused's cooperative society. The prosecution alleges that Tiwari, while employed at the …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar Yadav, was arrested on 24-07-2023 in connection with a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) registered as Shahkund P.S. Case No. 190 of 2022. He was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement emerged solely from the confessional statement of co‑accused Rituraj Sharma, with …
The Patna High Court considered the bail application of Ashwini Dubey, who had been in custody since 19 November 2025 in connection with a 2019 case under Section 387 of the IPC for alleged firing after a demand for extortion. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a confessional statement of a …
Brajesh Kumar Mehta was arrested in July 2024 and charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including murder, attempt to murder and offences against women. He applied for regular bail, having already been denied once by the Patna High Court. The State and the informant opposed the …
The appellant, Om Narayan Singh, was denied bail by the Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case involving alleged offences of rioting, assault, and other IPC crimes, as well as sections of the SC/ST Act. The prosecution alleged that the appellant disturbed the …
The petitioner, Saurabh Kumar, was arrested in connection with Parsa Police Station Case No. 25 of 2024 for offences under Sections 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail for the third time, having been in custody since 24 …
The petitioner, Pritam Kumar Mandal, is the owner of a pickup van from which 421.5 litres of illegal Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) was seized. The driver, Vijay Kumar Gupta, was arrested and identified two other persons, but the petitioner’s name was not initially recorded. The petitioner claims …
The petitioner, Lalu Kumar, challenged an order dated 27 January 2021 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 364, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that on 16 September 2011 the petitioner’s husband was …
Santosh Mahto was arrested in connection with a robbery alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, based on a complaint lodged on 7 January 2023. He has been in custody since 27 March 2025 and argues that his continued detention is unjustified, especially since a co‑accused was granted bail …
The petitioner, Avishek Kumar, was arrested on 6 December 2025 in connection with a 2019 robbery case (Section 392 IPC) involving the looting of a petrol pump. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that his name surfaced only from a co‑accused’s confession, with no …
The petitioner, Anshu Singh, was arrested in March 2022 in connection with a case involving murder (IPC s.302), criminal conspiracy (IPC s.120B) and common intention (IPC s.34), as well as an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act. He sought regular bail, having been in judicial custody for over …
Vikky Sah petitioned for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 326 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he had thrown acid on an informant and his brother. The prosecution contended that the offences involved rioting, attempt to murder and causing grievous hurt. …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar Rai, was arrested in July 2022 and charged under Sections 302, 201 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. He had been denied bail twice earlier, with the court noting the seriousness of the allegations and the stage of the trial. Counsel argued that the petitioner had no …
The appellants, Bharat Mahto and Kunwar Mahto, were convicted for the murder of Ratan Mahto and for illegal possession of a firearm, receiving life imprisonment under Sections 302/34 of the IPC and a three‑year term under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case rested on the testimony of …
The appellants, Bharat Mahto and Kunwar Mahto, were convicted for the murder of Ratan Mahto and for illegal possession of a firearm, receiving life imprisonment under Sections 302/34 of the IPC and a three‑year term under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case rested on the testimony of …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar and co‑accused, were charged under Sections 302, 34, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for a murder case. He has been in custody since 5 January 2024 and applied for bail. The informant’s counsel noted that all prosecution witnesses had been …
Chandan Prakash Pandey, appointed as a probationer in the Indian Revenue Service (Customs & Central Excise) Group‑A in 2016, completed his training and passed the required departmental examinations. He was arrested on 27 June 2019 for allegedly accepting a bribe, placed under deemed suspension, and …
The appellants, ten individuals from the Quraishi family, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with an alleged caste‑based assault on Sugandhi Devi. They appealed the Special Judge’s refusal to grant …
Sharvan Sahni, accused under IPC sections 395, 412 and 120B, applied for regular bail under Sections 483 and 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. An earlier bail application had been rejected. The petitioner submitted an affidavit indicating 18 pending cases and a police report, but …
The petitioner, Sanif Shah, is in custody for alleged dowry death under IPC sections 304B, 201 and 34, based on a complaint that his wife was poisoned. The petitioner contends that his wife committed suicide, and thus he should be granted bail. The trial court has examined two of seven witnesses, …
The appellant, Butul (also known as Ritwik Kumar), was charged under IPC sections 302, 506, 120B, 34, the Arms Act (s.27) and the SC/ST Act (s.3(2)(v) for allegedly assaulting and killing the deceased. He sought anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge on 20‑12‑2023 and …
Shyam Yadav, accused of multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act, has been in custody since 2 March 2024. He applied for bail, claiming innocence and that the trial had not progressed. The State opposed bail, citing the deceased's statement that Yadav and co‑accused assaulted …
The appellant, Ramesh Mandal, appealed against the order rejecting his regular bail petition in a case involving murder (section 365 IPC) later amended to include sections 302, 120(b)/34 IPC and a provision of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, alleged that he had legally purchased a plot of land and that the opposite parties, Gopal Prasad Roy and Amit Kumar, were fraudulently selling portions of the same property using forged documents and threatening him. A criminal case was filed under several IPC sections …
The appellants Jagdish Yadav, Laxman Yadav and Anil Singh were convicted for murder under IPC 302 and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution’s case rested mainly on the testimony of PW‑7, an eye‑witness and brother of the deceased, who identified Jagdish and Laxman as the shooters, while …
The petitioner, Jabir Khan, is in judicial custody for multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including murder (section 302). The prosecution alleges that he assaulted the informant's son with a blunt weapon ('farsa') and that the victim died six months later, while other co‑accused were …
Sugandhi Devi was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 302/34 IPC) arising from an incident on 14-11-2022 where the victim's husband was allegedly killed after a confrontation at the accused's house. The petitioner contended that she has a clean criminal record and that the FIR …
The appellants, seven residents of Laxman Tola, were charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences for allegedly assaulting and robbing an informant on 22 November 2023. They sought anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Special Judge, prompting an appeal under …
Satya Narayan Singh, a managing director of M/s Agrolimes Overseas Pvt. Ltd., was not named in the FIR but was implicated in a cyber‑fraud case involving alleged digital arrest and large monetary transactions. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC and …
The appellant Baijanti Kuvar challenged the order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge that rejected her anticipatory bail application in a case alleging offences under the IPC and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that she, along with others, snatched …
Ramesh Mahto applied for bail in a murder and conspiracy case (IPC §§302, 120B read with 34, Arms Act §27) after being ordered to surrender following a Supreme Court decision that set aside a prior bail order. He has been in custody since 10 September 2025 and the trial is nearing completion, with …
Mithlesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case (IPC sections 302, 201, 34) and an offence under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act. The trial court had earlier denied regular bail, allowing a re‑application after six months. The petitioner argued that no prosecution witness had been …
The petitioner, Sunarman Yadav, was charged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 354 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code in a case registered in 2021. He had earlier been granted regular bail in April 2023, subject to a condition that the trial court could cancel the bail if he attempted to …
Petitioner Pramendra Gond was charged with offences under sections 191(2), 190, 109, 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 118(1) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant with a sword at Wajirganj More. The petitioner claimed innocence and argued that the injuries were simple and …
Kartik Kumar, accused in a case involving multiple IPC offences (Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 504, 506, 379 and 34), had his earlier bail application rejected on 9 July 2025. He filed a second bail petition before the Patna High Court, fearing arrest. During the hearing on 3 April 2026, counsel for …
The petitioners, Dr. Vishal Sinha and Vikash Sinha, were charged under IPC Sections 420, 406 and 120 in a complaint alleging fraud in a land‑sale transaction where the complainant claimed the agreement was taken and not returned. The petitioners contended that the agreement was unsigned, the …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery (IPC section 392) alleged to have occurred on 9 July 2023, and has been in custody since 1 May 2025. He applied for bail, submitting an undertaking that he would not engage in any criminal activity and that the State could cancel …
Suraj Kumar Mahto was charged under IPC sections 302 and 34 and Arms Act section 27 for allegedly being the driver of a motorcycle used by the shooter who killed an informant's brother. The petitioner argued he was unaware of the shooting plan, had no criminal record, and that the motorcycle did not …
The petitioner, Rajesh Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple IPC offences including assault, grievous hurt, attempt to murder and murder (Section 302). He applied for bail, having been in judicial custody since 5 December 2023. The High Court had earlier rejected …
Ranju Devi applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint (No. 438(C) of 2022) alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) for allegedly executing fraudulent sale deeds of joint family land. The complainant had already obtained a decree in a related title suit (No. 159 of …
The appellant, Sangita Devi, was charged with murder, attempt to murder, abetment, and offences under the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly helping conceal a dead body. She contended that she was falsely implicated, that the primary accusations of firing were …
Amol Bharti (Amol Yadav) was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Pratapganj Case No. 144 of 2021) under IPC sections 302, 120(B)/34 and Arms Act section 27. He was not originally named in the FIR dated 20‑11‑2021, but his name emerged later from the confessional statement of co‑accused …
The petitioner, Md. Eklakh, was arrested on 9 October 2025 in connection with a case involving alleged conspiracy to murder Rajiv Roy and firing on police, charged under IPC sections 414, 353, 307/34 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑b)A, 26, 27 and 35. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar Yadav, was arrested on 20 March 2025 in connection with a violent incident alleged to have occurred on 22 November 2023, for which he faces multiple IPC offences including rioting, assault, and murder. The prosecution’s case is based on the statement of informant Aditya …
Anil Mandal was arrested on 5 October 2024 in connection with a FIR dated 19 May 2024 alleging a violent assault and firing on an informant’s husband, involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The petitioner, claiming a clean record and false implication, sought bail. …
Biru Rai was arrested on 18‑12‑2024 in connection with a 2019 case involving alleged assault on an informant and his father, the latter presumed dead. The FIR charges him under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 363, 365, 34 and Arms Act section 27, based primarily on the confessional statement of …
The appeal challenged a lower court order that denied anticipatory bail to Bheem Yadav and Arjun Yadav, who were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act for alleged molestation, assault, and caste-based abuse. The prosecution alleged that appellant 1 molested the informant's daughter …
The petitioners, Amrit Vai Patel, Janardhan Prasad Mahto and Shankar Saw, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code relating to assault, rioting, and other offences. They claimed they were falsely implicated in an incident that arose after a …
The appellant, Ajay Ram, was charged with murder and related offences under multiple provisions of the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act arising from a case registered in Buxar. The trial court had denied bail, and the appellant appealed that decision …
Arvind Kumar, a retired Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, filed a writ petition seeking his leave encashment and pension, which were withheld due to a pending departmental enquiry and a criminal case alleging illegal money acquisition. He was acquitted in the criminal case by the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashment of an FIR (Bakhtiyarpur PS Case No.371 of 2017) that alleged offences including cruelty, assault, dowry harassment and Section 498A IPC. The complainant, Mausami Kumari, claimed she was married …
The petitioners, Shashibhushan Sharma and his wife Jhunna, applied for anticipatory bail in a 2013 case (PS Case No.111) involving alleged murder, concealment of evidence, and criminal conspiracy under IPC Sections 302, 201, 120B and 34. They argued they have clean antecedents, that the deceased was …
The petitioner, Mantu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, stemming from a violent incident on 11 November 2019 in which the informant's minor son was killed. The FIR alleges that the petitioner …
The petitioner, Satyam Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 399, 401, 402 of the IPC, Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 8(C), 21(B), 21(C), 22(C) of the NDPS Act, on the allegation that 10 g of brown sugar was recovered from his possession. …
Priti Kumari, a woman with a clean record, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the IPC, alleging she was falsely implicated by an informant who is the maternal aunt of Sachin, accused of eloping with the informant's minor daughter. The petitioner sought anticipatory …
The petitioner, Suresh Baitha, was charged in Vijaypur P.S. Case No. 124 of 2017 for offences under Sections 272, 273, 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 37(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. His earlier bail was cancelled on the ground that he had jumped bail, and he …
The petitioner, Makeshwar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged robbery. He claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the informant, Amit Kumar, later became an accused after a tablet was recovered from his house, …
The appellant, Arbind Yadav, appealed against an order dated 12 February 2023 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge‑1‑cum‑Special Judge, Munger, in a case registered as PS Case No. 161 of 2020 involving offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the …
Krishna Singh and Ramji Singh, arrested on 19 January 2026 in connection with a 2006 complaint alleging cheating and forgery, applied for regular bail. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners had taken money from the complainant, Satyendra Kumar, promising land registration that never …
The petitioner, Chunchun Singh, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 302, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging he shot and killed the deceased. He has been in custody since 24 September 2025 and possesses six serious criminal antecedents. The …
Sudesh Kumar was arrested in connection with theft from an Indian Oil Corporation pipeline and charged under Sections 285, 427, 120(B) of the IPC, Sections 15(2) and 15(4) of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipe Line Act, Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act and Section 7 …
Ravinder Yadav was arrested in connection with a mob assault that resulted in the death of an informant's husband, charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that about 30 persons, including the petitioner, participated in the …
The petitioner, Jaiboon Nesh (also known as Murat Bano), mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sahodra P.S. Case No.47 of 2025) alleged under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the deceased’s husband, …
The petitioner was arrested in connection with a robbery and shooting incident (Bochahan P.S. Case No.257 of 2019) and charged under IPC sections 393, 394, 307 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑B) and 27. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, Chandan, which named …
The appellant, Renu Devi, the wife of the deceased Tarkeshwar Singh, appealed against the acquittal of five accused persons in a murder case. The trial court had found no direct evidence, no eyewitness, and a five‑day gap between the last sighting of the victim and the discovery of his skeleton, …
The appellant, Renu Devi, wife of the deceased Tarkeshwar Singh, appealed the trial court's acquittal of Rajesh Ram, who was charged under Sections 302, 201 and 120B of the IPC for the alleged murder of her son. The prosecution's case relied on the informant's statement, the last‑seen theory, and …
The appeal challenged the conviction of Badshah Singh under IPC Sections 324 and 34 for a shooting incident that occurred in 2002, where he was alleged to have ordered his co‑accused Banarsi Singh to fire. The trial court convicted him and sentenced him to three years' rigorous imprisonment. The …
The appellant, Ranjeet Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 406, 420, 323, 504/34 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for cheating a complainant by accepting cheques and cash for a tractor purchase, failing to deliver the tractor, issuing a dishonoured cheque, and allegedly abusing the …
The petitioner, Santosh Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging a sexual relationship with a minor. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner had established a physical relationship with the minor …
The petitioner, Raghuvir Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 363, 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly abducting an informant's daughter to force a marriage. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that he and the victim had …
The appellants, Jitendra Kumar and Shyam Babu Rai, were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for offences arising from a case registered at Shahpur Police Station. They applied for …
The appellants, Gautam Kumar and Subodh Singh, were charged under IPC sections 323, 354, 504, 506, 509/34 and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant with a lathi, iron rod and fists, abusing him with caste slurs, and assaulting and …
The appellant, mother of the deceased, appealed the acquittal of Md. Guddu (R‑2) for the murder of her son under Sections 302 and 201 IPC. The trial court had found that the prosecution failed to prove Guddu's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, relying on the presumption of innocence and the lack of a …
The appellant Ranjit Sah appealed against the acquittal of Suraj Kumar under Sections 302, 341, 323, 325, 504, 307 and 34 of the IPC, contending that the prosecution had proved murder. The trial court had convicted the accused only under Section 304 Part II, finding no intention to kill because the …
Pramod Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case (PS Case No.298 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 379, 498(A), 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated by his wife, Pallavi Kumari, over a …
The appellants, Murari Kumar and Dewan Mahto, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge that rejected their anticipatory bail applications in a case registered under multiple IPC offences, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that on 23 …
The Patna High Court heard two criminal appeals (SJ No.4051/2025 and SJ No.4753/2025) filed by Amit, Ajit and Ankit Giri and by Santosh Giri respectively, seeking anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act after a Special Judge …
Akhilesh Singh appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge dated 21‑09‑2024 which rejected his application for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. …
The appellant, Ranjit Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 384 and 504 and under Section 3(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing the informant with caste slurs, assaulting him and demanding commission. He applied for …
The appellants, three members of the Verma family, appealed against the Special Judge's order rejecting their anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The trial court had already taken …
The petition sought cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the husband (OP No.2) in a criminal case arising from a matrimonial dispute (Complaint No. 614/2013) under Section 498A IPC. Both parties entered into a joint compromise, agreeing that the husband would pay Rs.75 lakh in three …
The appellants, six residents of Hanuman Bigha village, were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault, robbery and outraging modesty against informant Usha Devi. The informant claimed the …
The appellants, six members of the Yadav family, appealed against the order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Araria, which had rejected their anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged caste‑based assault and multiple offences under the IPC and the …
Chandan Kumar appealed against the order dated 16.08.2024 that denied him anticipatory bail in a case alleging kidnapping of the informant's daughter and caste‑based harassment under IPC sections 363, 366A, 34 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the appellant, …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal challenging a Special Judge's order that rejected their anticipatory bail applications in a case involving alleged assault and caste slurs during a construction dispute under the Nal Jal Yojana. The prosecution had charged them under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, …
Manish Singh and Anuj Pandey were charged under Sections 302, 120B/34 of the IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(2)(v) and 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for the alleged murder of the husband of Kaushaliya Devi. The prosecution relied primarily on a confessional …
The petitioner, Kunal Ray, sought regular bail in a case registered under sections 304(b) and 201 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of his sister-in-law. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, together with others, killed the informant’s sister, while the petitioner claimed …
The petitioner, Haribhajan Chaudhary, was implicated in a complaint alleging cruelty, harassment, and dowry demands under IPC sections 498A and 34 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that he had not committed any offence and sought anticipatory bail, offering to pay Rs. 3,000 …
The appellants – Amit, Ajit and Ankit Giri – were charged under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the informant, his daughter and mother‑in‑law on 14 May 2025, allegedly motivated by prior …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, was charged under multiple IPC sections including rape (376) and dowry prohibition offences, based on an FIR alleging he had sexual relations with a 16‑year‑old girl and forced marriage. The petitioner contended that the marriage was consensual, performed in a temple, …
The petitioner, Indal Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS case No.70/2024) alleged under Sections 366A and 34 of the IPC and Sections 8 and 14 of the POCSO Act. He claimed that the alleged victim was his consensual partner, that they had married according to Hindu customs …
Petitioner Pankaj Kumar was implicated in a dowry‑related domestic violence case (PS case No. 348 of 2025) alleging assault with a helmet and bricks. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting innocence and offering to pay Rs. 4,000 per month to the complainant to meet her living expenses. The …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Pathak, applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint case alleging multiple offences under the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, stemming from a marital dispute after ten years of marriage. The complainant alleged physical and mental assault, extortion of money, and …
The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the IPC arising from a family land dispute. The complaint alleged that the petitioner’s wife sold more land than agreed and that the petitioner was …
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, a head clerk in the Child Development Project Office, was implicated in a case alleging corruption in the selection of an Anganwadi Sevika, with offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471. The FIR alleged that the CDPO and others demanded Rs 3 lakh …
Rupnarayan Rana, the petitioner, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging dowry‑related harassment under multiple IPC sections and the Domestic Violence Act. He claimed the allegations were false and sought reconciliation with his wife, the respondent No.2. Both parties agreed to attempt …
Mallu Paswan applied for pre‑arrest bail in connection with a case registered under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that bail should be granted pending investigation. The Court examined the seriousness of the alleged offences, which include murder, culpable …
The original accused filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the FIR (C.R.No.I‑427 of 2003), the charge‑sheet and the pending criminal case (No.4012 of 2007) relating to offences under the Indian Penal Code. The authorised officer of …
The accused filed a revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to set aside their conviction for offences under IPC Sections 323, 324 (with Section 114) and Gujarat Police Act Section 135, for which they had been sentenced to simple imprisonment and fines. Their conviction had been …
The accused, Ajay Hiranand Raghani, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash FIR No.11191046230259 (2023) and a pending Special ATRO case. The FIR alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 427, 294(b), 506(2), Gujarat Police Act section …
The petitioner, Jusab @ Karochor Abbasbhai Kakal, convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, applied for a 30‑day parole leave while an appeal against his conviction is pending. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service. The Court examined the petition, …
The petitioner, Faridbhai Ismailbhai Makrani, applied for a 30‑day parole leave to repair his house and support his family. He is convicted under Section 302 read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code for murder. The court noted that he previously absconded for 2,798 days after being released on …
The petitioner, Rajeshbhai Rameshbhai Sarola, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking furlough leave after his request was rejected by the competent authority. He was convicted on 1 October 2025 for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The State, represented by the …
The complainant filed a criminal complaint (I‑CR‑No.303 of 2005) alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 114 against five accused. The trial court acquitted the accused after evaluating the evidence, noting inconsistencies in the land‑measurement documents and admissions by …
The complainant, Atsiben Dhirenbhai Shah, filed a criminal complaint under IPC sections 498A and 114 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 7 alleging mental and physical cruelty by her husband and his relatives. The trial court acquitted the accused, citing contradictions and omissions in the …
The applicant, Dineshbhai Makwana, was convicted for a road accident that occurred on 18 January 2006 at night, resulting in injuries and one death. He was sentenced under IPC sections 279, 304A, 337, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act section 184, with the conviction affirmed by the Sessions Court. In a …
Ramchandra Jatinbhai Patel inherited a fair‑price‑shop licence in 2016. After a criminal complaint, he was arrested in 2018 and, while in judicial custody, a show‑cause notice was issued and his licence was cancelled on 11‑05‑2018 without his being served with the order. The petitioner learned of …
The appellant Avinash Phulpagare was convicted of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and abetment of suicide (Sec. 201 IPC) for the death of an eight‑year‑old girl, Tanisha, based largely on the testimony of a twelve‑year‑old child witness and recovered wooden plank evidence. On appeal, the High Court examined …
The petition challenged the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, which confirmed a magistrate’s refusal to discharge two bank employees accused in a criminal revision concerning misappropriation of funds of a teachers' cooperative credit society. The petitioners contended that they had no …
