Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

HASMUKH D SUTHAR

1,128 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 601–800.

SUNIL MULTANARAMJI BISHNOIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sunil Multanaramji Bishnoi, a driver, was arrested on 21‑02‑2026 for alleged possession of illicit liquor worth Rs 72.71 lakh under Sections 65(E), 81, 98(2) and 116(B) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. He filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 a

DINESHKUMAR MUKNARAM RAKISHAN GODARA (VISHNOI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Dinesh Kumar Muknaram Rakishan Godara, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He claimed innocence, stating that the investigation was largely complete

BHALAJI RUMALJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Bhalaji Rumalji Thakor, who was arrested on 22 May 2026 for alleged possession of cough‑syrup bottles linked to narcotic offences. The applicant claimed innocence, n

SUDHIRBHAI VIJAYBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Sudhirbhai Vijaybhai Parmar, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences including murder under the BNS and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR i

NARENDRA @NARESH UTTAM DAGDU HANKE (MARATHI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Narendra Uttam Dagdu Haneke, filed a regular bail application before the filing of a charge-sheet. The applicant's counsel submitted that the application was not being pressed and sought liberty to file a fresh bail application after the charge-sheet is filed. The Court considered the request and grante

AADIL HUSEN BELIMversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Aadil Husen Belim, filed a regular bail application before the filing of a charge-sheet. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the application would not be pressed and sought liberty to file a fresh bail application after the charge-sheet is filed. The learned judge granted the permission sou

SURESHBHAI RANCHHODBHAI TADVIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

44-PARTLY ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioners filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking bail for applicants No.3 and 4, who were alleged to have assaulted a victim along with applicants No.1 and 2. The State opposed, arguing the seriousness of the offences (Sections 118(2), 115(2), 3

LALITKUMAR ARUNKUMAR MAVRAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 316(4), 318(4) and 54 of the same Act. The State opposed bail, alleging that the accused conspired to divert grits meant for a company, constituting the

SHAIKH BABARALI @ S.K. BABAR ABDUL HASAN SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

Shahik Babarali (applicant) filed a regular bail application after the filing of a chargesheet in criminal miscellaneous application No. 12209 of 2026 before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant, through counsel, later sought permission to withdraw the bail application. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted

MANOJ VIRENDRAKUMAR MEHTAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Manoj VirendraKumar Mehta, applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR under the Gujarat Prohibition Act alleging possession of contraband liquor. The State opposed bail, arguing that the applicant was found in conscious possessio

RAMARAM LAXMANRAM JAT CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, a driver, was arrested in connection with contraband liquor found in a vehicle under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. He filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, claiming innocence and that he is not the vehicle owner. The State opposed bail, arguing

RAJNISH GOVINDLAL BHARGAVversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The applicant, Rajnish Govindlal Bhargav, filed a regular bail application before the filing of a chargesheet. He later sought the court's permission to withdraw this application, requesting liberty to file a fresh bail application after the chargesheet is filed. The learned counsel for the applicant made the request o

GULAMSADIQ IBADULLAH ANSARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The applicant, Gulamsadiq Ibadullah Ansari, filed a regular bail application before the filing of a chargesheet. He later sought the Court's permission to withdraw that application, requesting liberty to file a fresh bail application after the chargesheet is filed. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, opposed the requ

DHIRUBHAI @ DHIRAJBHAI JIVABHAI BARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Dhirubhai Jivabhai Bariya, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a chargesheet was filed for offences under Sections 108 and 54 of the same Act. The State opposed bail, alleging that the accused threatened the deceased with the release of compromisin

HEMANG @ GADHVI BHIKHUBHAI @ BUPENDRABHAI KARSHANBHAI JETHVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Hemang @ Gadhvi Bhikhubhai @ Bupendrabhai Karshanbhai Jethva, applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a chargesheet was filed for offences under Sections 137(2), 204, 351(3), 308(2) and 54 of the same Act. The State opposed bail, alleging conspira

VIKASH PUKHRAJ BHARGAVversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The applicant, Vikash Pukhraj Bhargav, filed a regular bail application before the filing of a chargesheet. He later sought the court's permission to withdraw that application, requesting liberty to file a fresh bail application after the chargesheet is filed. The learned counsel for the applicant made the request on h

AJAY S/O ANANTRAV MULURAV KUSHVAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Ajay, was charged under Sections 108, 80(2), 85 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 and 7 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged mental and physical cruelty that led to his wife's suicide. He had been in custody since 18‑02‑2026 and filed a regular bail application under Section

BHAKTI W/O. BHAUMIKBHAI VINODBHAI MAKWANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The appellant, Bhakti, filed a criminal appeal seeking cancellation of bail. The appellant's counsel later applied to withdraw the application, seeking liberty to file any appropriate application before the proper forum. The High Court considered the request for withdrawal. The Court granted permission to withdraw the

UDAYO @UDESANG VECHANBHAI VASAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Udayo @Udesang Vechanbai Vasava applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under Sections 298 and 325 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and several provisions of the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act and the Prevention of Cruel

AYUSHI W/O. PIYUSH GANESHPRASAD PANDEYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

Ayushi, the petitioner, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking modification of orders. The petitioner, through counsel, later requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered whether it could grant such permission. The Judge granted the request, stating that the application is disposed

RASIK DHANABHAI MALKIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Rasik Dhanabhai Malkiya, applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 504, 506(2), 120(B) and 114. The State opposed bail, citing the gravity of the alleged offences involving alleged

JAYANTIBHAI KANTIBHAI GEMABHAI DABHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered a regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Jayantibhai Kantibhai Gemabhai Dabhi, who was alleged to have supplied liquor in violation of the Prohibition Act. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that no further recover

SATISHBHAI SOMCHANDBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The applicant, Satishbhai Somchandbhai Parmar, filed a regular bail application before the filing of a charge-sheet. The applicant's counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the bail application, stating that the withdrawal would be effected after the charge-sheet is filed. The Court considered whether it coul

JOGARAM S/O. MULARAM BHAIRARAM JAAT (SIYAG)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Jogaram, applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging he transported liquor worth Rs.14.58 lakh, an offence under the Prohibition Act. The State opposed bail, citing the gravity of the offence, while the petitioner claimed

MAHIPALSINH JAGNARAM JAKHADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offences alleged under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 336(2) and 336(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The State opposed bail, citing four prior convictions and the applic

PANKAJBHAI BHARATBHAI BILVALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Pankajbhai Bharatbhai Bilval, was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged conspiracy, assault and robbery, and has been in custody since December 7, 2025. He filed an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 af

ASHISH @ AASHU S/O SONUBHAI RAGHUNATH KATHERIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Ashish Katheriya, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a chargesheet was filed for offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 296(b) and 54 of the BNS and Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police Act. The State opposed bail, alleging the applic

AMRABHAI HARSURBHAI KHACHARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The appellant, a convicted prisoner, filed a temporary bail appeal through jail, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor submitted a jail report showing the appellant had previously surrendered on bail in a timely manner. The court considered these facts and order

AABID MOHAMMADYAMIN SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Aabid Mohmadyam​in Shaikh in connection with FIR No.11191038260057 alleging offences under Sections 108 and 115(2) of the same Act. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging th

ABHABHAI RUPSIBHAI RAJPUT(GOHIL)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat entertained a regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Abhabhai Rupsibhai Rajput, who was arrested in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Prohibition Act. The applicant claimed innocence and

PRAKASHBHAI @LALO GOVINDBHAI PAMPANIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Prakashbhai @Lalo Govindbhai Pampamiya, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a chargesheet was filed for alleged offences under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 54 of the BNS and Section 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The applicant c

AKIMVANAMI TAIVO DEVIDversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioner, Akimvanami Taivo Devid, filed a regular bail application after the filing of a chargesheet, seeking release from custody. The petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The Hon'ble Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar granted the request, disposing of the application as withdrawn w

BHARATBHAI RAMJIBHAI KOLI (AKHIYANI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Bharatbhai Ramjibhai Koli, was charged under several IPC sections for offences alleged in FIR C.R. No.I-6 of 2018. He had previously been released on bail but failed to appear at trial, leading to a warrant under CrPC Section 82. He filed an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiy

ALPESHBHAI NAVABHAI GAMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The applicant, Alpeshbhai Navabhai Gamar, filed a regular bail application after a chargesheet was filed. While the application was pending, the trial court acquitted him of the charges. The applicant then moved the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the bail application. The Court, noting the acquittal, granted

MAHAMMAD SHAFI @ CHAPPARIYO ABDULGANI GANIHUSEN KURESHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioners Mahammad Shafi and others applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under Section 325 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and several provisions of the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act. They had been in custody

PRATHAMESHWAR MOHANBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The applicant filed a regular bail application before the filing of a charge-sheet. After the charge-sheet was filed, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to file a fresh application before the appropriate court. The respondent's counsel opposed the withdrawal. The court grante

JUNEDBHAI JAVEDBHAI JINDANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Junedbhai Javedbhai Jindani, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under Sections 316(2) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The State opposed the bail, alleging active participation in the c

MAHMADIRSAD MAHMADFAJAL MAHMAD (GORI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Mahmadirsad Mahmadfajal Mahmad, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a charge-sheet was filed for offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The State opposed the bail, alleging the applicant's involvement in the offences. The Court exa

DHRUVRAJSINH HAKUBHA GOHILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Dhruvrajsinh Hakubha Gohil, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 11198067260284 alleging offences under Sections 305(a), 331(4), 317(2) and 54 of the same Act. The State opposed bail, arguing the applicant’s involvem

IMRAN @ BOTTLE HANIFBHAI CHANIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

The petitioner, Imran @ Bottle Hanifbhai Chaniya, filed a regular bail application after the filing of a chargesheet. The applicant sought the court's permission to withdraw the present bail application and to file a fresh application before the trial court after the recording of eye‑witness testimony, as directed by t

RAHULBHAI JAGDISHBHAI BHOIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The applicants, Rahulbhai Jagdishbhai Bhoi and another, filed a regular bail application after the filing of a chargesheet. After being convicted, they sought to withdraw the bail application. The court, upon hearing counsel, allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the application without examining its merits. No substa

RAJKUMAR JAYKRUSHNA PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The applicant, Rajkumar Jaykrushna Patel, filed a regular bail application after the chargesheet was filed. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the pending bail application and requested liberty to file a fresh application if the trial does not progress substantially within a reasonable time. The Cour

AJAY GHANSHYAMBHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioner, Ajay Ghanshyambhai Rathod, filed a regular bail application before the filing of a charge-sheet. After the charge-sheet was filed, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to file a fresh one. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted this request before the High Cour

ASHOKBHAI CHANABHAI JAMODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The applicant, Ashokbhai Chanabhai Jamod, filed a regular bail application before the filing of a charge-sheet. While the charge-sheet was subsequently filed, the applicant sought permission to withdraw the pending bail application and to file a fresh one. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted this request, a

HEMANT DAYARAM BARKADEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant, Hemant Dayaram Barkade, filed a regular bail application before the filing of a charge-sheet. After the charge-sheet was filed, the applicant sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to file a fresh one. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted this request to the High Court of Gujar

JAYESH S/O PARSHOTTAMBHAI MAKWANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioner, Jayesh Makwana, filed a regular bail application before the filing of a charge-sheet. The applicant's counsel did not press the application before the court. The learned judge granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh bail application after the charge-sheet is filed. Consequently, the present appli

SARFARAZ @ KATTO MAHMADBHAI VOHRAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Sarfaraz @ Katto Mahmadbhai Vohra, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a chargesheet was filed for an offence under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The State opposed bail, citing the applicant's alleged involvement and five prior antecede

DILAWAR @LILVARBHAI NAVLABHAI DAMOR (KATARA)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Dilawar @Lilvarbhai Navlabhai Damor, applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging burglary and theft of Rs.1.50 lakh and injury to a witness. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior record, and that the investigation was

AZAZ @ NADIM BHIKHUBHAI RIN BLOCHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The appellant, Azaz @ Nadim Bhikhubhai Rin Bloch, filed a criminal appeal seeking temporary bail before the Gujarat High Court. During the proceedings, the appellant’s counsel applied for permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court, after hearing the application, granted permission to withdraw and ordered the appeal t

KULDEEP @ KANO JAGUBHAI HUDADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants, Kuldeep @ Kano Jagubhai Hudadi and another, were arrested in connection with a raid under the Bombay Prohibition Act (Sections 65A, 65E, 81) and filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 before a chargesheet was filed. They claimed innocence, stat

NATHUJI DHANAJI PARMAR (DARBAR)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

The applicant, Nathuji Dhanaji Parmar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking additional time to attend his daughter's marriage, as the temporary bail granted by the 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Deesa, was set to expire on 15 May 2026. The court noted that the marriage was scheduled for 15 May 2026 and co

MANISH GHANSHYAMDAS RUPANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioner, Manish Ghanshyamas Rupani, filed a regular bail application after the filing of a chargesheet. Subsequently, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application. The Hon'ble Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar considered the request and granted permission for withdrawal. No merits of the b

BHARAT GOPALBHAI TAILLIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The applicant, Bharat Gopalbhai Tailli, filed a regular bail application after the filing of a chargesheet. The applicant's counsel did not press the application before the court. The learned judge observed that the application was not pressed and granted the applicant liberty to file a fresh application if the trial h

MALSINGBHAI @MALLU HARSINGBHAI RATHVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

Malsingbhai @Mallu Harsingbhai Rathva filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Gujarat. The applicant was represented by Advocate Jaydeep H. Sindhi, while the State was represented by Ms. Dhwani R. Tripathi. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel chose not to press the application. Consequen

PRAKASHKUMAR BALVANTRAM BISHNOIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant was arrested on 08‑04‑2026 for alleged possession of contraband liquor in a vehicle, an offence under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, and filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The State opposed bail, arguing the applicant was travelling in the car

SHABANABEN FARUKHBHAI DHIM (THIM)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered a regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a chargesheet was filed for offences under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 and Section 143(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant, a woman alleged to

ANISHBHAI RAFIKBHAI SAIYED (AS PER FIR)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat entertained a regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Anishbhai Rafikbhai Saiyed, who was arrested in connection with FIR C.R. No. 11195018260365 for offences under Sections 115(2), 296(b), 324(4), 326(g) and 351(3) of the

BAROT BHARATKUMAR @ PINTU VARDHAJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The applicant, Barot Bharatkumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking an extension of bail. Subsequently, the applicant, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted permission to withdraw and disposed of the application as withdrawn. No

JATIN PRAFULBHAI KAKKADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The applicant, Jatin Prafulbhai Kakkad, filed a regular bail application before the filing of a chargesheet. He later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application with the liberty to file a fresh one after the chargesheet is filed. The learned advocate for the applicant made this request on his instruction

RAJESHBHAI @ PINTU RAMESHBHAI MANGALBHAI RAVALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rajeshbhai @ Pintu Rameshbhai Mangalbhai Raval, filed a criminal miscellaneous application for temporary bail, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. He highlighted his good conduct in jail and his history of surrendering promptly when released. The court considered these grounds

MUKESH NATAVARBHAI RAVALversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mukesh Natavarbhai Raval applied for temporary bail, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The applicant's jail conduct was reported as good, and he had not been previously released on bail. The court considered these grounds and, after waiving service of rule, granted temporary bail for ten da

JAYESH ALIAS KALU MUKESHBHAI CHAUHANversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Jayesh alias Kalu Mukeshbhai Chauhan, arrested on 06-02-2025, applied for temporary bail citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The applicant's jail report indicated adverse conduct due to misplacement of some papers, and he had not been released previously. The court considered these grounds an

ADNAN ALIAS BABA AARIFBHAI SHEKHversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

Adnan alias Baba Aarifbai Shekh applied for temporary bail before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant’s jail report indicated poor conduct while he is charged with serious offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by Ms. Dhwani Trip

LAMBA TRINATH GAUDAversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

Lamba Trinath Gauda applied for temporary bail, claiming he needed to provide financial assistance to his family. He was arrested on 06-02-2025 and the jail report indicated adverse conduct due to misplacement of some papers, and he had not been released previously. The applicant waived service of the rule on the State

PRAHLADBHAI AJMALBHAI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Prahladbha Ajmalbhai Solanki, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground that he needs to provide financial assistance to his family. The applicant's jail conduct report was submitted, indicating good behavior and that he had not been previously released on bail. The

MEHUL ANILBHAI MOHANJI RANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The accused, Mehul Anilbhai Mohanji Rana, was arrested on 11 October 2025 and has been in custody since. He applied for temporary bail through a jail application, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family and his good conduct while in jail. The court noted the jail report confirming his good conduct

AMIT RAJKUMAR YADAVversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The accused, Amit Rajkumar Yadav, filed a temporary bail application citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The applicant's counsel highlighted his good conduct in jail and his punctual surrender upon previous releases. The court considered these grounds and, after waiving service of the rule, g

SADABKHAN FIROZKHAN AKBARKHAN PATHANversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Sadabkhan Firozkhank Akbarkhan Pathan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail on the ground that he needs to provide financial assistance to his family. He highlighted his good conduct in jail and that he has surrendered promptly whenever released. The court considered the appl

IRFAN ALIAS TAKALO ALIAS CHAMDO IMTIYAZ HUSSAIN SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The appellant, Irfan alias Takalo alias Chamdo Imtiyaz Hussain Shaikh, applied for temporary bail, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The court noted the appellant's good conduct in jail as per the jail report and that he had not previously been released on temporary bail. Considering these

PRAKASH VASHRAMBHAI THAKORversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Prakash Vashrambhai Thakor, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. He highlighted his good conduct in jail as evidenced by the jail report. The court noted the waiver of service of rule to the State and considered

MOHMMED SALIM MOHARALI SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mohammed Salim Moharali Shaikh, the appellant, filed an application for temporary bail, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family. The applicant's counsel, appearing through the jail, waived service of the rule on the State and highlighted the appellant's good conduct as recorded in the jail report.

AJAY KIRITBHAI SHRIMALIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, a 19‑year‑old male, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 69, 64(2)(M), 296(B), 351(1) and 351(3) of the same Act. He claimed innocence, stating that the allegations stemmed from a consensual relat

CHUNARAM @SUNIL MANARAM JATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioner, Chunaram @ Sunil Manaram Jat, filed a regular bail application before the filing of a chargesheet. The petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the pending bail application and requested liberty to file a fresh application after the chargesheet is filed. The respondent, the State of Gu

ANIRUDDHBHAI DADUBHAI KHACHARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Aniruddhbhai Dadubhai Khachar, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior record, and that the investigation was substantially complete with no f

JIGNESHBHAI @ JIGDISH @ JAGO ASHOKBHAI TOGADIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Jigneshbhai Togadiya, was charged under the Gujarat Prohibition Act after contraband liquor was discovered in a vehicle he owned. A chargesheet had been filed and co‑accused were already on bail. He applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, claiming innoc

MUKESHBHARATHI BHUPATBHARATHI GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE

Mukeshbharathi Bhupatbharthi Goswami filed a special criminal application for parole leave on 6 May 2026. The application was already pending before the appropriate authority for adjudication. The petitioner approached the Gujarat High Court seeking relief, but the Court observed that the pending application should be

IMANDEVI @ANANTDEVI W/O ANANTRAM MULURAV KUSHVAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under Sections 108, 80(2), 85 and 54 of the BNSS and Sections 3 and 7 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants, two women, claimed i

ROSHANBHAI VIRABHAI CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Roshanbhai Virabhai Chaudhary, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under Sections 65(e), 81, 83 and 116B of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the alleg

MANAV @MONTU GHANSHYAMversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Manav @Montu Ghanshyam, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court examined factors such as the completed investigation, the applicant's lack of prior record, the nature of the al

DIVYARAJSINH RAJENDRASINH JADEJAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a chargesheet was filed for alleged cyber‑fraud offences under Sections 111(2)(B), 316(5), 318(4) and 61(2) of the same Act. He claimed innocence, stating he merely facilitated fund transfers and received a 3% commi

ANIL KESHNATH RAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The applicant filed a criminal revision seeking to quash an order dated 16‑04‑2015 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Navsari, in Criminal Case No.222 of 2012 and to obtain discharge. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the Court that the dispute had been amicably settled and requested permissi

VINODBHAI NANUBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The applicant, Vinodbhai Nanubhai Patel, filed a criminal revision under R/CR.RA/508/2015 seeking to quash the order dated 16‑04‑2015 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Navsari, in Criminal Case No.222 of 2012 and to obtain discharge. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the Court that the dispu

ANISAHEMAD GULAMHUSEN SUTHARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioner, Anisahmed Gulamhusen Suthar, filed a criminal revision application seeking maintenance against the State of Gujarat and another party. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered whether it could grant such permission. The Court, exe

FIROJKHAN MOHAMADKHAN BALOCHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioner, Firoj Khan Mohadkhan Baloch, filed a regular bail application after the chargesheet had been filed. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the trial court had already acquitted the petitioner, and therefore the bail application was no longer necessary. The petitioner sought permission to withd

JAYDEEPBHAI KASTURBHAI SUTHARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to quash a conviction and sentence under the Negotiable Instruments Act imposed by the JMFC and upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge. The parties later reached an amicable settlement, evidenced by an affidavit filed by the heirs o

JITENDRA @ JITU SHANKERLAL(SHANKARALAL)SITARAM PALIWALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioner filed a regular bail application before the filing of a charge-sheet. After the charge-sheet was filed, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the bail application, seeking liberty to pursue any appropriate remedy under law. The court examined the request and, without delving into the merits of the

RAMESHBHAI BACHUBHAI VAJA KOLI (NAME AS PER FIR)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered a regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organized Crimes Act, 2015. The applicant contended that the GUJCTOC Act was wrongly invoked and t

PRATAP JAYANTILAL THAVARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered a regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Pratap Jayantilal Thavar, who was arrested for alleged bootlegging and other offences under the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organized Crimes Act, 2015. The State argued that the

DIVYAKUMAR CHHOTELAL YADAVversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered a regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Divyakumar Chhotelal Yadav who was charged under IPC sections 420, 120(B), 465, 467, 468 and 471. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior record, and that the charge‑s

ARUNSING @JINTU S/O SHOBHASING RAMSING RAJPUTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered a regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by Arjunsing @ Jintu Rajput, who was alleged to have been a cleaner on a truck carrying contraband liquor, an offence punishable under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The applicant claimed

VINODBHAI @VINUBHAI MANUBHAI JIBHAIBHAI TALPADAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vinodbhai Manubhai Jibhaibhai Palpada was arrested in connection with a theft of temple ornaments and charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. He filed a regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS after the charge‑sheet was filed, claiming innocence. The State opposed bail, cit

BHALUBHA RAJABHA BALDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioner, Bhalubha Rajabha Balda, filed a regular bail application before the filing of a chargesheet in a criminal matter. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, was represented by counsel. The High Court considered the req

PAPPU S/O SHIVSHANKAR MANDALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered a regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Pappu Mandal who was charged under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)B and 29 of the NDPS Act for possession of 3.001 kg of ganja. The court examined the nature of the offence, th

CHANDUBHAI SHAMJIBHAI BAVALIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Chandubhai Shamjibhai Bavaliya, applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 54 relating to alleged vehicle loan fraud and forgery. The State opposed th

VIKRAMBHAI @BABUBHAI HIRABHAI ZAPDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vikrambhai Zapda applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with an FIR under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that the investigation was nearly complete with no direct evidence against him, while the State opposed bail c

SHIVAM JAYPRAKASH SINHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought regular bail before the filing of a chargesheet under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and Gujarat Police Act. He claimed innocence, asserted that the investigation was nearly complete, the injured party had been d

KRUNALBHAI CHHOTUBHAI PARDESHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Krunalbhai Chhotubhai Pardeshi, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the same Act. He claimed the allegations arose from a family transactio

ASHWIN MANUBHAI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Ashwin Manubhai Solanki, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a chargesheet was filed for several offences including sections 103, 189, 191, 190, 238(A) and 54 of the BNSS and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. He claimed innocence, s

BRIJESHBHAI KASHINATH DUBEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioner, Brijeshbhai Kashinath Dube, filed a regular bail application before the filing of a chargesheet. He later sought the court's permission to withdraw the bail petition with the liberty to file a fresh application after the chargesheet is filed. The learned counsel for the petitioner made this request on h

SANJAYSINH JAWANTSINH PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Sanjaysinh Jawantsinh Parmar, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 11207002260129 alleging offences under Sections 303(2) and 305(E) of the BNS. The State opposed, alleging that the applicant trespassed into a court p

VAGHRI KUNVARBEN W/O KALUBHAI JOITABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioner, Vaghri Kunvarben, filed a regular bail application before the filing of a charge-sheet. After the charge-sheet was filed, the petitioner sought the court's permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to pursue any appropriate remedy under law. The respondent, State of Gujarat, oppose

RAJUBHAI @ RAJA KANUBHAI BHOJAKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered a regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by Rajubhai @ Raja Kanubhai Bhojak who was charged with offences under the BNSS, the BP Act and the Arms Act. The State opposed bail citing ten prior antecedents and a risk to public or

SAMJU RUDA BHIMANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The accused filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to quash convictions for offences under IPC Sections 323, 324 and 114 imposed by the Judicial Magistrate and the Sessions Court. One of the accused died during the pendency, leading to abatement of his proceedings. The High Court exami

PARMAR PRAHLADBHAI KANTIBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

During the pendency of a criminal revision application for maintenance, the parties reached an amicable settlement. The respondent filed an affidavit confirming the settlement. The applicant, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the revision application, stating that it would no longer be pressed. The Court,

SAILESHBHAI RATIBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Saileshbhai Ratilal Patel, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging participation in an unlawful assembly and related offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nayaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Gujarat Police A

JIGNESH BHARATKUMAR DALWALA PROP. OF BALAJI FASHIONversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The applicant, Jignesh Bharatkumar Dalwala, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a bounced cheque. He appealed the conviction, and the conviction was upheld by the District and Sessions Court and the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate. During the pendency of a revision applica

JIGNESH BHARATKUMAR DALWALA PROP. OF BALAJI FASHIONversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

Jignesh Bharatkumar Dalwala was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a bounced cheque. He appealed the conviction, and the District and Sessions Court and the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate upheld it. While the revision application was pending, Dalwala deposited the cheque amo

CHIRAGKUMAR MAHIPATLAL RAVALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Amendment Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating he was named only on

SUNIL ZENDU MALIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Sunil Zendu Mali, who was charged under IPC sections 406, 420, 114, 120(B), 409 and Gujarat Prevention of Interest of Depositors Act sections 3 and 7. The applicant, a former dir

NARANBHAI NATHABHAI BAMBHAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants, Naranbhai Nathabhai Bambhava & Ors., filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. They argued that the investigation was nearly complete, no material was recovered from them, and they were f

VINODBHAI NATHABHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Vinodbhai Nathabhai Rathod, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Ordinance, 2016. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences and the applic

DEEPRAJ ASHOKSINH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Deepraj Ashoksinh Chauhan, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under Sections 118(1), 117(2), 296(b) of the BNS and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. The State opposed the bail, arguing the ser

VASAVA CHANDU BAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Vasava Chandu Bava, applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a chargesheet was filed for offences under Sections 65(e), 91 and 98(2) of the Prohibition Act. The State opposed bail, citing the gravity of the offences and the petitioner’s prior similar

SUNILBHAI S/O MOHANBHAI JAVERBHAI VAGHANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sunilbhai Vaghani, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under Sections 108, 85 and 54 of the BNSS and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed the allegations were false, citing a 26‑year marriage and t

AMITBHAI MANSUKHBHAI BABARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Amitbhai Mansukhbhai Babariya, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Ordinance, 2016. The State opposed bail, citing the applicant’s prior similar offences and the seriousne

ASHOKBHAI RAMJIBHAI PADHIYARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a charge‑sheet was filed for alleged violations of the Gujarat Prohibition (Amendment) Ordinance, 2016. The State opposed bail, citing the applicant's prior similar offences and the gravity of the charges. The Court

LAKHABHAI D. KANARA PROPRIETOR OF INDIA SALES AGENCYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

Lakhabhai D. Kanara, convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act for a cheque bounce, filed multiple criminal revision and miscellaneous applications seeking to set aside the conviction and to compound the offence. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement, with the complainant filing an affidavit expr

HIMATBHAI KALYANBHAI JANI - PROPRIETOR OF SITARAM TRADERSversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

DISPOSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The petitioner, Himatbai Kalyanbhai Jani, filed a criminal revision application challenging an order (Exhibit 13) passed by a subordinate court. The petitioner argued that the main accused had already been acquitted by the learned Sessions Judge, rendering the order moot. The learned counsel for the respondent contende

MAHIPATSINH BANESANGBHAI CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

Mahipatsinh Banesangbhai Chauhan filed a criminal revision application against the State of Gujarat. The petitioner submitted an affidavit stating that the dispute between the parties had been amicably settled. The court took the affidavit on record and observed that no further matter remained for adjudication. Consequ

VITTHALBHAI MADHABHAI VEKARIAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioner, Vithalbhai Madhabhai Vekaria, filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/579/2014) challenging an order of a subordinate court. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the revision while retaining the right to contest the legality and validity of the sanction granted under Section 19 of the Pre

SANJAYKUMAR MAHASUKHLAL (DATRANIA)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

44-PARTLY ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, a former Vidhyut Sahayak, was charged under IPC sections 409 and 427 and Section 140 of the Electricity Act in Special Electricity Case No. 50 of 2006. He filed a criminal revision under CrPC sections 397 and 401 seeking to quash the Special Electricity Judge’s judgment. The High Court examined the char

VAKHATSINH AAITABHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

Vakhatsinh Aaitabhai Parmar, the original complainant, filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the Principal Sessions Judge’s order dated 23‑11‑2015 that dismissed his application for further investigation under Section 173(8). The High Court noted that

DHANARAM HARJIRAM(BHAI) DUGER (JAT)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Dhanaram Harijam Duger, was arrested on 29 January 2026 in connection with a FIR (C.R. No. 11821025260116) alleging that he was the driver of a vehicle from which contraband liquor was seized, an offence punishable under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. After the investigation concluded, a chargesheet was fi

SOHIL @BATKO S/O MUNNABHAI SHAIKH THRO SAJEDABANU MUNNABHAI SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The appellant, Sohil @Batko, applied for temporary bail through his mother to attend his brother's engagement ceremony scheduled from 1 May to 5 May 2026. The appellant was arrested on 15 May 2025 and has remained in custody, with a jail report indicating good conduct. The court considered the request, the applicant's

as not pressed)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants, partners of two textile firms, were charged under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 for alleged electricity theft after meters were seized during a raid. Two FIRs were filed for the same alleged offence, and the applicants sought anticipatory bail and later discharge, which was rejected by

SMITA D/O SIMON PETER MACWAN W/O SANJAY JOSPEH MACWANversusSANJAY JOSEPH MACWAN

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The applicant, Smita, filed a criminal revision application seeking maintenance against the respondents. The applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application, stating that an amicable settlement had been reached between the parties. The court considered the request and, without examining the merits

THE GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusCHANDUBHAI RANCHHODBHAI CHAUHAN

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation filed an application seeking restoration of its First Appeal No. 4038/2023, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution. The respondents, Chandubhai Ranchhodbhai Chauhan and others, opposed the restoration. The Court heard counsel for both sides and examined the reasons adv

MANISH GOPALDAS SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Manish Gopaldas Shah, was accused of attempting to cause death under Section 307 IPC for an alleged reckless driving incident that occurred on 11 April 2008, although no injury resulted. The complainant filed the FIR only on 6 August 2011, more than 30 months after the incident, alleging the accused acte

SURESHBHAI BHERURAM JAINversusCHAMPAKLAL MOTILAL JAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The applicant Sureshbhai Bheruram Jain filed a review application seeking to restore his First Appeal No.1804/2022 to its original file. The appeal concerned an enhancement of compensation but had been inadvertently grouped with other appeals filed by insurance companies and subsequently disposed of on the ground of sm

PROPRIETOR OF KALASHANKAR ART SUMESH M. SHARMA S/O MAHESH SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The proprietor of Kalashankar Art, Sumesh M. Sharma, filed a series of criminal miscellaneous applications seeking recall of various revision orders. The applicant’s counsel later informed the court that he does not wish to press any of the applications. The court, noting the withdrawal, disposed of all the listed appl

PROP. OF KALASHANKAR ART SUMESH M. SHARMA S/O MAHESH SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The proprietor of Kalashankar Art, Sumesh M. Sharma, filed a series of criminal miscellaneous applications seeking recall of various revision orders. The applicant’s counsel later informed the court that he does not wish to press any of the applications. The court, noting the withdrawal, disposed of all the listed appl

PROPRIETOR OF KALASHANKAR ART SUMESH M. SHARMA S/O MAHESH SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The proprietor of Kalashankar Art, Sumesh M. Sharma, filed a series of criminal miscellaneous applications seeking recall of various revision orders. The applicant’s counsel later informed the court that he does not wish to press any of the applications. The court, noting the withdrawal, disposed of all the listed appl

PROPRIETOR OF KALASHANKAR ART SUMESH M. SHARMA S/O MAHESH SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The proprietor of Kalashankar Art, Sumesh M. Sharma, filed a series of criminal miscellaneous applications seeking recall of various revision orders. The applicant’s counsel later informed the court that he does not wish to press any of the applications. The court, noting the withdrawal, disposed of all the listed appl

PROPRIETOR OF KALASHANKAR ART SUMESH M. SHARMA S/O MAHESH SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The proprietor of Kalashankar Art, Sumesh M. Sharma, filed a series of criminal miscellaneous applications seeking recall of various revision orders. The applicant’s counsel later informed the court that he does not wish to press any of the applications. The court, noting the withdrawal, disposed of all the listed appl

PROPRIETOR OF KALASHANKAR ART SUMESH M SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The proprietor of Kalashankar Art, Sumesh M. Sharma, filed a series of criminal miscellaneous applications seeking recall of various revision orders. The applicant’s counsel later informed the court that he does not wish to press any of the applications. The court, noting the withdrawal, disposed of all the listed appl

VAGHARI ISHWARBHAI SOMABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Vaghari Ishwarbhai Somabhai filed a criminal revision application against an order of a subordinate court and a criminal miscellaneous application seeking an early hearing. The applicant's counsel indicated that the revision would not be pressed and requested liberty to pursue an alternative remedy under Section 91 of

NURRUDINALI HASANALI LALANIversusRAHULBHAI ISHAKBHAI SHORA

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, an advocate, was charged in a POCSO case with offences including kidnapping, abduction, rape, forgery and other IPC offences, alleged to have facilitated a marriage registration that was later claimed to be forged. He filed an application for discharge under Section 227 CrPC, which the Special Judge dism

PARUBEN @ HANSABEN D/O VIRAMBHAI JIVABHAI CHADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The petitioner, Paruben @ Hansaben, filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/122/2017) before the Gujarat High Court challenging an order of a subordinate court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Jayesh A. Dave, after arguing for some time, chose not to press the application further. Consequently, the High Court dispo

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THRO K.K.SHUKLA S/O AMARNATH SHUKLAversusSHILPABEN PATEL

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The Central Bureau of Investigation filed a criminal revision seeking to set aside a discharge order dated 02‑11‑2018 that had released Shilpaben Patel in two CBI cases. A separate misc. application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was filed for condonation of a 222‑day delay in filing the revision. The court, rel

PATEL VINODBHAI KANTILALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Patel Vinodbhai Kantilal, filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to set aside his conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging that the dispute had been amicably settled. The State opposed the application, citing the seriousness of the offence, but the compl

KANUBHAI NATHABHAI BHRAMBHATTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE

The accused filed a recall application seeking to convert it into a clarification, contending that he had deposited the full compensation amount of Rs.2,75,000 before the trial court, contrary to an earlier direction that only 50% was required. He requested that the trial court release the deposited amount, together wi

ARVIND ASHWINKUMAR TRIVEDIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Arvind Ashwinkumar Trivedi filed revision applications under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging an order dated 07‑11‑2023 of the 8th Additional Sessions Judge, which rejected his request to accept a 20% deposit of a cheque amount as condition for bail. The coordinate bench of the High Court

ARVIND ASHWINKUMAR TRIVEDIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Arvind Ashwinkumar Trivedi filed revision applications under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging an order dated 07‑11‑2023 of the 8th Additional Sessions Judge, which rejected his request to accept a 20% deposit of a cheque amount as condition for bail. The coordinate bench of the High Court

ARVIND ASHWINKUMAR TRIVEDIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Arvind Ashwinkumar Trivedi filed revision applications under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging an order dated 07‑11‑2023 of the 8th Additional Sessions Judge, which rejected his request to accept a 20% deposit of a cheque amount as condition for bail. The coordinate bench of the High Court

ARVIND ASHWINKUMAR TRIVEDIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Arvind Ashwinkumar Trivedi filed revision applications under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging an order dated 07‑11‑2023 of the 8th Additional Sessions Judge, which rejected his request to accept a 20% deposit of a cheque amount as condition for bail. The coordinate bench of the High Court

BHATIYA HARGOVANBHAI JIVABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

The accused, Bhatiya Hargovanbhai Jivabhai, filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to quash his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, for which he had been sentenced to one year imprisonment and a fine of Rs.6 lakh. The High Court noted that the accused had al

NANALAL KARSHAN LIMBANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The applicant was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to one year imprisonment and a fine. After the conviction was upheld by the Sessions Court, the applicant filed a revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC, seeking to quash the judgment and obtain bail. The court noted

DILIPSINH @ DAKO KISHORSINH RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

44-PARTLY ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants were charged under IPC sections 307, 201, 114 and Arms Act sections 3 and 25(1)(B)(A) for firing weapons in the air during a marriage procession. They filed a discharge application under Section 227 of the CrPC, contending that the alleged attempt to murder (Section 307) was not established as there was

VASANTBHAI PREMJIBHAI VEKARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The husband appealed a Family Court order directing him to pay Rs 50,000 per month as maintenance to his wife, who is suffering from cancer, under Section 125 of the CrPC. He claimed that his business had collapsed, his income was minimal and the interim maintenance of Rs 15,000 was arbitrarily increased without basis.

POOJAN DIAMONDS THROUGH BHARAT SEVANTILAL CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioners filed three criminal revision applications (Nos. 231, 232, 233 of 2019) against orders of a subordinate court. During the hearing, the petitioners informed the court that the matters had been settled between the parties and sought permission to withdraw the applications. The court, after noting the sett

POOJAN DIAMONDS THROUGH BHARAT SEVANTILAL CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioners filed three criminal revision applications (Nos. 231, 232, 233 of 2019) against orders of a subordinate court. During the hearing, the petitioners informed the court that the matters had been settled between the parties and sought permission to withdraw the applications. The court, after noting the sett

VIRENDRABHAI BAKULBHAI ACHARYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The applicant filed a criminal revision against an order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhoraji, concerning maintenance payments of Rs.1,06,200 made between June 2013 and January 2014, which were withdrawn by the respondent (wife). The report indicated that the recovery amount claimed exceeded the amount

HITESHBHAI VASANTRAY PAREKH(DECEASED)versusBHARATBHAI GANSHAYMBHAI PARDHARI

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The heirs of the deceased litigant, convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act for a cheque‑bounce offence, filed criminal revision applications under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to quash the convictions. The original complainant settled the dispute, filed an affidavit confirming the settlement, and th

CHAMPABEN P RATHOD (PEON)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The accused, convicted under IPC sections 120(B), 420, 467, 468, 471 and 511 by the Special CBI Court, filed revision applications under CrPC sections 397 and 401 seeking quashing of the conviction and a probation order. The High Court examined the discretionary power under section 401, noting no procedural defect or m

RATILAL M KANERIAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT (C.B.I.)

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The accused, convicted under IPC sections 120(B), 420, 467, 468, 471 and 511 by the Special CBI Court, filed revision applications under CrPC sections 397 and 401 seeking quashing of the conviction and a probation order. The High Court examined the discretionary power under section 401, noting no procedural defect or m

KESHABHAI VARUBHAI VAGHARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

98-DISPOSED AS ABATED

The applicant, Keshabhai Varubhai Vaghari, filed a criminal revision application against an order of a subordinate court. During the pendency of the application, the applicant died on 26 July 2020, and a death certificate was placed on record. The applicant's counsel submitted the death certificate and sought disposal

RATILAL MAGHABHAI SHRIMALIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

Ratilal Maghabhai Shrimali was convicted by a Judicial Magistrate First Class for an offence under Section 409 of the IPC and sentenced to one year simple imprisonment with a fine. He filed a revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to quash the conviction and also applied for regular bail. The High Cour

SOHINIBEN VINODCHANDRA SHRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

44-PARTLY ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, a wife deserted by her husband, sought enhancement of the maintenance awarded by the Family Court under Section 125 of the CrPC. The Family Court had fixed Rs.2,500 per month, considering the husband’s alleged income of Rs.15,000 and the wife’s earnings of Rs.4,500. The petitioner argued that the amount

GUNVANTBHAI SHANTILAL SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The applicant, Gunvantbhai Shantilal Shah, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to six months' simple imprisonment and a fine. He appealed, but the Additional Sessions Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction. He then filed a revision under Sections 397 and 401 of

RAMANBHAI NANJIBHAI DAMORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The accused, Ramanbhai Damor, filed a revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to set aside his conviction for offences under IPC Sections 471, 420 and 120(B) and to obtain probation. The trial court had sentenced him to three years rigorous imprisonment with a fine, and the conviction was affirmed by th

JAYESH JAYANTILAL MANIYARversusAARJIL ENTERPRISE

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The applicant, convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque, was sentenced to one year imprisonment and a fine, later reduced to six months on appeal. He filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to quash the conviction, claiming that he h

RUPABEN W/O PARESHKUMAR PANDYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The petitioners, Rupaben and her son, filed a domestic‑violence application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and were awarded a maintenance of Rs.1,600 per month by the Judicial Magistrate. Unsatisfied, they appealed and the Additional Sessions Judge enhanced the amount to Rs.2,500 per mon

PARTH ANILBHAI SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioner, Parth Anilbhai Shah, filed a criminal revision application (No. 1127 of 2018) before the High Court of Gujarat seeking maintenance. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel Mr. Gaurav Chudasama, applied for permission to withdraw the revision application. The Court, after hearing the request, grant

RAMESHBHAI SHANTILAL SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The applicant had taken a hand loan of Rs.95,000 and issued a cheque that was later dishonoured for insufficient funds. A complaint was filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, leading to his conviction by the Metropolitan Magistrate and affirmation by the Additional Sessions Judge. The applicant soug

JAYANTILAL BHAVARLAL JAINversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioners sought condonation of a 132‑day delay in filing an application for restoration of Special Criminal Application No. 3443/2025, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution. The delay was pleaded to be caused by sufficient cause and not by any malafide or dilatory intent. The Court examined the liberal sc

HARESHKUMAR VALLABHDAS PANJVANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The petitioner, Harshekumar Vallabhdas Panjvani, was convicted by a magistrate to three months' imprisonment, a compensation of Rs.90,000 and a default sentence of 30 days, which was confirmed by the Sessions Court. The petitioner filed a criminal revision seeking relief, arguing a possible compromise and willingness t

KETANBHAI H GANDHI PARTNER OF M/S PRIYANK ENTERPRISEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH

The petitioner, Ketanbhai H Gandhi, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking interim relief. The respondent, the State of Gujarat, opposed the application. The petitioner and his counsel failed to appear at the hearing despite earlier orders dated 11-09-2024 and 18-09-2024. The Court noted the non‑appearance and he

THAKOR USHABEN KANUJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

Thakor Ushaben Kanuji was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a bounced cheque and sentenced to three months' simple imprisonment and a fine. He appealed, but the conviction was upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge. A revision application was filed under Sections 397 and 401 of

UMAR ALI KUMBHARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Umar Ali Kumbhar appealed a conviction under Section 25(1‑B) of the Arms Act for allegedly possessing a country‑made semi‑automatic pistol and live cartridges. He argued that the trial court relied solely on a police officer’s statement and a panchnama, without any ballistic or scientific examination of the weapon, and

JAYSHREEBEN MANILAL PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioner filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/187/2011) before the Gujarat High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner, appearing in person, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The Court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. It ordered that the application stand

DAKSHABEN RAMESHCHANDRA BHARUCHAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The petitioners DAKSHABEN RAMESHCHANDRA BHARUCHA & Anr filed a criminal revision application before the Gujarat High Court. Their counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court granted the request and ordered the application to be disposed of as withdrawn, expressly stating that it had not examined th

INDRANIL BHATTACHARYA S/O HARIPADA BHATTACHARYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

40-WITHDRAWN @ FH

The applicant, Indranil Bhattacharya, filed a criminal revision application seeking maintenance and a related direction application. The applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the revision application. The court granted the request, disposing of the revision application as withdrawn. Consequently, the dir

ASHVINBHAI BHIKHABHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioners, Ashvinbhai Bhikhabhai Patel and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a 129‑day delay in filing a restoration application. They contended that the delay was due to genuine and bona fide reasons, specifically the time taken to procure necessary documents, and that th

JANAKBHAI HASMUKHBHAI PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking recall and cancellation of a non‑bailable warrant dated 12‑03‑2026 issued by the Gujarat High Court. The applicant deposited Rs.1,20,000 on 06‑04‑2026 and produced a payment slip as evidence of the deposit. The court, after hearing the applicant’s counsel

DHANJI BHIMJI AHIRversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The appellant, Dhanji Bhimji Ahir (accused No.2), filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order of the Additional Sessions Judge that rejected his discharge application under Section 227. The case arose from the alleged murder and arson of Pratapbhai Bhimjibhai Damor in 200

GAURISHANKAR RAMSHANKAR JOSHIversusDESAI NAYANKUMAR RATILAL

DISPOSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The High Court of Gujarat considered a criminal revision application filed by Gaurishankar Ramshankar Joshi against his conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act, along with a regular bail application. The revision sought to challenge the conviction and sentence recorded by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Go

HITESH HASMATRAI BAKSANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

DISPOSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The petitioner, Hitesh Hasmatrai Baksani, filed a criminal revision application seeking maintenance against the State of Gujarat and others. During the pendency of the revision, the petitioner died on 04 January 2024, as evidenced by a death certificate submitted by his father. The court examined the death certificate

MALEK SARFARAZMIYA YASINMIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

The applicant, Malek Sarfarazmiya Yasinmiya, filed a criminal revision application against his conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant's counsel did not seek the liberty to file a restoration or delay application alongside the revision. The court observed that the application was not pressed with

SALEHA ARIF SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The petitioner, Saleha Arif Shaikh, filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC challenging the acquittal of the accused by the Metropolitan Magistrate in a case involving alleged assault and related offences. The trial court had considered oral and documentary evidence, including the complainant’s

SATINDERPAL SINGH AHUJA-PARTNER BOMBAY FANCY TEXTILE COMPANYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

DISPOSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The petitioner, Satinderpal Singh Ahuja, filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/561/2009) before the Gujarat High Court. The applicant's counsel informed the court that the main criminal case (Criminal Case No.2954/2006) had already been disposed of. The court took note of the status of the main case and held t

PATEL KANTILAL DHARMSHIBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

The accused, Patel Kantilal Dharmsabhai, was convicted by a trial court in 2008 for offences under IPC sections 323 and 325 and Gujarat Police Act section 135, receiving simple imprisonment and fines. An appeal partially set aside the conviction under the Gujarat Police Act but upheld the IPC convictions. The accused f

PARESH @ PALABHAI KESURBHAI NANDANIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The applicant, Paresh @ Palabhai Kesurbhai Nandaniya, filed a criminal revision application before the Gujarat High Court seeking relief against an order of a subordinate court. The applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court granted the request, disposing of the application as withd

SAMATBHAI RAMABHAI BHARVADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The applicant, Smt. Samatbai Ramabhai Bharvad, filed a criminal revision seeking to quash an anticipatory bail order dated 12 October 2013 granted to respondents No.2 and No.3. The applicant failed to appear before the High Court despite multiple notices, indicating a lack of interest in prosecuting the matter. The Cou

PARASMAL NATHUMAL JAINversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

44-PARTLY ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioners, originally convicted under Sections 7 and 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for supplying sub‑standard palmolein oil, appealed their conviction and sentence of one year imprisonment with a fine, but the appeal was dismissed. They filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of

GOPALBHAI NANUBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

The applicant was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to two years' imprisonment and a fine, with the conviction affirmed on appeal. He filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the judgment. The applicant was absent t

VISHAL CHANDUBHAI UMRANIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

98-DISPOSED AS ABATED

The applicant, Vishal Chandubhai Umraniya, filed criminal revision applications challenging his conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act. While these applications were pending, the applicant died on 23 May 2024, and a death certificate was placed on record. The court considered whether the pending revision appli

VISHAL CHANDUBHAI UMRANIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

98-DISPOSED AS ABATED

The applicant, Vishal Chandubhai Umraniya, filed criminal revision applications challenging his conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act. While these applications were pending, the applicant died on 23 May 2024, and a death certificate was placed on record. The court considered whether the pending revision appli

KALPESHBHAI CHETANBHAI RABARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

98-DISPOSED AS ABATED

The applicant, Kalpeshbhai Chetanbhai Rabari, filed a criminal revision application (R/CR.RA/148/2012) before the High Court of Gujarat. While the revision was pending, the applicant died on 13 March 2017, and a death certificate was placed on record. The sole issue before the court was whether the revision application

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search