Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

V GOPALA GOWDA

121 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.

KEDAR NATH YADAVversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

2016 INSC 63931 August 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the acquisition of about 1,000 acres of land in Singur, West Bengal for Tata Motors' small‑car project. The Court held that the acquisition was made at the instance of a private company, not for a public purpose, and that the State failed to follow the mandatory procedures under Part VII of t

M/S SHANTI CONDUCTORS (P) LTD. ANR.versusASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

2019 INSC 8131 August 2016Matter referred to larger bench

The Supreme Court examined whether the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993 (the 1993 Act) applies retrospectively to supply orders placed before its commencement on 23‑09‑1992. The Court held that the Act is prospective, its liability arising only after the buyer

PEERAPPA HANMANTHA HARIJAN (D) BY LRS. & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA&ANR.

2015 INSC 53630 July 2015Disposed off

The State of Karnataka acquired agricultural land for industrial development under the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act, 1966, and transferred it to the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB), which later allotted the land to Ultra Tech Cement Ltd on a lease basis. The landowners sought compensati

SAVELIFE FOUNDATION & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2016 INSC 28930 March 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The SaveLife Foundation filed a public‑interest writ petition seeking a legal framework to protect by‑standers who assist victims of road accidents, arguing that fear of police harassment deters timely help. The Supreme Court examined whether it could, under Articles 32, 141 and 142 of the Constitution, issue binding g

THE CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL BHALKI, BY ITS CHIEF OFFICERversusGURAPPA (D) BY LRS. & ANR.

2015 INSC 70829 September 2015Dismissed

The deceased respondent Gurappa filed a suit in 1984 (O.S. No. 255) for declaration of title which was dismissed for lack of proper parties and proof of possession. He later filed another suit in 1993 (O.S. No. 39) seeking declaration of title, possession, injunction and correction of revenue records. The Municipal Cou

L.S. SIKANDAR (D) BY LRS. & ORS.versusK. SUBRAMANI & ORS.

2013 INSC 57729 August 2013

The plaintiff sought specific performance of a 1983 agreement of sale and a permanent injunction, but the agreement had been terminated by a notice on 28‑03‑1985 after the plaintiff failed to pay the balance consideration and obtain required permissions within the stipulated five‑month period (extendable by two months)

RAJENDRA SHANKAR SHUKLA & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH & OR$. ETC

2015 INSC 53229 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, landowners in five villages of Raipur district, challenged the Kamal Vihar Township Development Scheme (KVTDS) prepared by the Raipur Development Authority (RDA) under the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Thatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973. They alleged that the scheme was formulated without the required zonal plan

M/S ARIANE ORGACHEM PVT. LTD.versusWYETH EMPLOYEES UNION & ORS.

2015 INSC 37229 April 2015Dismissed

The appellant, Ariane Orgachem Pvt. Ltd., took over the Wyeth Ltd. pharmaceutical factory and its workers under s.25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It later introduced a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) which 45 of the 143 workers accepted. The Wyeth Employees Union later demanded reinstatement of those worke

ROYAL WESTERN INDIA TURF CLUB LTD.versusE.S.I. CORPORATION & ORS.

2016 INSC 22129 February 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether casual workers employed by Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd. on race days fell within the definition of "employee" under Section 2(9) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, and consequently whether the club was liable to pay ESI contributions from the 1978-79 period. Relying on

U. P STATE INDUSTRIAL DEV.CORPN. LTD.versusMONSANTO MANUFACTURES (P) LTD. & ANR.

2015 INSC 7329 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation (UPSIDC) leased industrial plots to several companies under licence agreements and lease deeds that contained clauses prohibiting any transfer, assignment or alteration of the lessee's interest without the lessor's written consent. The lessees later changed the

SURESH &ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2014 INSC 81928 November 2014Disposed off

The appellants Suresh and others were convicted for kidnapping and murdering Devender Chopra and his son Abhishek, and for concealing evidence, under IPC sections 302, 34, 364-A, 201 and 120-B. The Supreme Court held that the prosecution evidence, including the recovery of the victims' bodies and belongings at the accu

SOMASUNDARAM @ SOMUversusSTATE REP. BY DY. COMM. OF POLICE

2020 INSC 41228 September 2016Matter referred to larger bench

The case concerned the abduction and murder of former MLA M.K. Balan. The prosecution’s case against appellants A‑3 (Manickam), A‑4 (Somasundaram) and A‑15 (Bomb Selvam) relied primarily on the testimony of two alleged accomplices, PW‑10 and PW‑11, supported by peripheral witnesses and documentary evidence. The trial c

STANDARD CHARTERED BANKversusANDHRA BANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD & ORS.

2015 INSC 61828 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) bought 17% NPCL bonds from Andhra Bank Financial Services Ltd (ABFSL) and later discovered that the bonds had been misappropriated by broker Hiten P. Dalal and Canara Bank Mutual Fund (CMF). SCB filed a suit for conversion and amended it to implead Dalal and CMF, but the Special Court held

JAGE RAM & ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2015 INSC 7028 January 2015Disposed off

The case involved an altercation in 1994 where the complainant Jagdish and his sons were cutting reeds on land also claimed by the accused Jage Ram and his sons. During the fight, the second accused Rajbir (Raju) delivered a pharsi blow to the head of the son Sukhbir, causing grievous injuries that required emergency s

M/S MAGNUM PROMOTERS P. LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 81627 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Magnum Promoters Ltd., the owner of land in Delhi, challenged acquisition notifications issued under the repealed Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arguing that no physical possession was taken and compensation was not paid, invoking Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Re

UMRALA GRAM PANCHAYATversusTHE SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES UNION & ORS.

2015 INSC 27327 March 2015Dismissed

Workmen employed as safai kamdars by Umralagram Gram Panchayat were classified as daily‑wage workers despite having served for periods ranging from five to eighteen years and performing the same duties and hours as permanent employees. They raised an industrial dispute seeking permanency and associated benefits. The La

SULTAN SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2014 INSC 68826 September 2014Dismissed

Sultan Singh was married to Lavjeet Kaur, who died from severe burn injuries within four years of marriage. The prosecution alleged that the accused and his mother set the fire after the husband demanded Rs 30,000 as dowry, a demand that was repeatedly made up to the time of death. The defence claimed the death was acc

AMAL KUMAR J HAversusSTATE OF CHHATISGARH & ANR.

2016 INSC 34026 April 2016Appeal(s) allowed

Amal Kumar Jha, the doctor-in-charge of a Primary Health Centre, was charged under IPC 304A for the death of a patient after he allegedly refused to provide a government jeep to transfer her to a district hospital. He sought discharge of the criminal proceedings under Section 197 of the CrPC, arguing that the omission

STATEOFU.PversusCHARAN SINGH

2015 INSC 26826 March 2015Disposed off

Charan Singh, a tube‑well operator in the Uttar Pradesh Fisheries Department, was terminated in August 1975 on the ground that he was a temporary employee and was given one month's wages in lieu of notice. He contended that he was a permanent workman and that the termination violated the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disput

SAROJversusSUNDER SINGH & ORS.

2013 INSC 77925 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a minor daughter, along with her two sisters sued their mother (the natural guardian) to declare a sale deed of their father's ancestral land null and void. After the father's death, the mother sold the entire property to a third party, claiming the proceeds were used for the daughters' maintenance, educ

SUKHRAMversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2016 INSC 55325 July 2016Dismissed

The case concerned Sukh Ram, a Gram Sewak, who was alleged to have forged loan applications and misappropriated government funds between 1983 and 1986. During the investigation, an executive magistrate obtained specimen signatures of two witnesses, which were later compared by a handwriting expert who testified that th

STATE OF M.P. & ANR.versusRAJVEER SINGH & ORS.

2016 INSC 33725 April 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the High Court's order quashing an FIR registered under Sections 307 and 34 of the IPC against Assistant Sub‑Inspector Rajveer Singh and others for allegedly shooting and beating a complainant. Rajveer Singh had filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash

DEVINDER SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH CBI

2016 INSC 33525 April 2016Disposed off

The appellants, police officers, challenged the prosecution for alleged fake encounters and custodial deaths, arguing that under Section 6 of the Punjab Disturbed Areas Act, 1983 (as amended 1989) and Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, prior sanction from the Central Government was required. The Court

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY NONAVINAKERE POLICEversusSHIVANNA @ TARKARI SHIVANNA

2014 INSC 34525 April 2014Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court, hearing Special Leave Petition (Cr.) No. 5073 of 2011 filed by the State of Karnataka against Shivanna, observed the persistent incidence of rape and the inadequacy of existing procedural mechanisms. It noted the absence of a fast‑track procedure for rape cases despite the existence of Fast‑Track Cou

ANIL@ BAWAversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2016 INSC 116925 February 2016Dismissed

The father of the deceased, Anand Singh, witnessed his son Partap being beaten to death with lathis and swords by several accused persons on 4 July 2003 and lodged an FIR the next morning. The accused argued that the FIR was delayed, they were falsely implicated, and that two witnesses named in the FIR were not examine

MACKINON MACKENZIE & COMPANY LTD.versusMACKINNON EMPLOYEES UNION

2015 INSC 15425 February 2015Dismissed

Mackinnon Mackenzie & Co. Ltd. retrenched about 98 workmen by serving a notice on 27 July 1992, claiming closure of its clearing and forwarding department due to severe financial losses. The workmen’s union challenged the retrenchment, alleging non‑compliance with the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: no one‑month notice

HIGH COURT OF GUJARATversusHITENDRAVRAJLALASHARA&ANR.

2014 INSC 80324 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a judicial officer, was dismissed following an enquiry under the Gujarat Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1971. He challenged the dismissal in a Special Civil Application, and the High Court set aside the enquiry report and his dismissal. The respondent (the High Court) appealed, arguing that the trial co

DELHI AGRJCULTURAL MARKETING BOARDversusHAKUMAT RAI

2016 INSC 61524 August 2016Disposed off

Hakumat Rai, a commission agent at Phool Mandi, Darya Ganj, sought an alternative shop after the market was de‑notified in 1998. Despite numerous representations from 1985 onward, he was never allotted a shop. The Delhi High Court ordered that he be given a shop in Gazipur Mandi and a Category ‘B’ licence. On appeal, t

FATEHJI & COMPANY & ANR.versusL.M. NAGPAL & ORS.

2015 INSC 35624 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs entered into a written agreement of sale on 2 July 1973 for a property, with performance fixed for 2 December 1973. The defendants sought extensions, the last of which expired on 1 February 1977. The plaintiffs filed a suit for specific performance on 29 April 1994, and the defendants moved to dismiss it

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusGAURAV KUKREJA

2015 INSC 25424 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) appealed against a Delhi High Court order that directed conversion of a leasehold plot to freehold in favour of Gaurav Kukreja. The plot was originally held under a perpetual sub‑lease and was subject to an agreement to sell and a General Power of Attorney executed in favour of the

S. PERUMALversusK. AMBIKA & ANR.

2015 INSC 15124 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a poultry labourer, was injured in a motor vehicle collision on 18 November 2009, sustaining multiple rib fractures and a 25% permanent disability. He claimed Rs 5,00,000 compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, but the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded only Rs 25,300 with 7.5% interest, a d

NANJAPPANversusRAMASAMY &ANR

2015 INSC 15224 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Nanjappan, entered into a 1987 sale agreement to sell his sole property for Rs 45,000, receiving an advance of Rs 25,000, with the balance to be paid within 2½ years. The time for execution was extended repeatedly, ultimately spanning eight years, and the respondents paid a total advance of Rs 42,500. Th

S.P.S. RATHOREversusC.B.I. & ANR.

2016 INSC 90723 September 2016Disposed off

S.P.S. Rathore, a senior police officer, was convicted under Section 354 IPC for molesting a minor girl, Ruchika, after she was forced into his office and embraced against her will. The prosecution relied primarily on the testimony of a single eye‑witness, PW‑13 (Aradhana), whose account was corroborated by other witne

SAYYED RATANBHAI SAYEED (D) TH. LRS. & ORS.versusSHIRDI NAGAR PANCHAYAT & ANR.

2016 INSC 19722 February 2016Dismissed

The appellants, small‑scale shopkeepers near the Shirdi Sai Baba shrine, had a 1979 compromise decree granting them rehabilitation on their occupied plots. Subsequent town‑planning, development‑plan and highway‑control‑line notifications rendered the decree practically impossible to execute, prompting the Nagar Panchay

POOJA PALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2016 INSC 8622 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed

Pooja Pal, the widow of slain MLA Raju Pal, alleged that the state police and administration were complicit or indifferent in the murder of her husband and sought a fresh investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The High Court dismissed her writ petition, but the Supreme Court held that when an inves

DALJIT SINGH GREWALversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

2015 INSC 59821 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Daljit Singh Grewal, a District Commander in the Punjab Home Guards, sought promotion to Battalion Commander but was denied due to adverse entries in his Annual Confidential Reports (ACR) that downgraded his performance. He filed multiple representations, a civil suit (which was decreed in his favour) and a writ petiti

GODREJ & BOYCE MANUFACTURING.CO.LTD.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2015 INSC 5921 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. owned land in Vikhroli that was reserved in the 1991 Development Plan for acquisition by the Ministry of Railways to lay additional tracks. The reservation required acquisition within ten years or, failing that, the landowner could serve a notice and, if no acquisition commenced wi

ANIRUDH KUMARversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

2015 INSC 24220 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a resident of a building in Hauz Khas, challenged the Municipal Corporation of Delhi’s issuance of a Regularisation Certificate that allowed the owners of a pathological laboratory to operate on multiple floors of the residential building. The High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding it was a priv

VISHAL N. KALSARIAversusBANK OF INDIA & ORS.

2016 INSC 7620 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a tenant, challenged the Bank of India's attempt to take possession of a mortgaged premises under the SARFAESI Act after the landlord defaulted on a loan. The Court examined whether Section 35 of the SARFAESI Act, a non obstante clause, could override the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 and allow the

MANIK TANEJA & ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.

2015 INSC 5520 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Manik Taneja and his wife, posted comments on the Bangalore Traffic Police Facebook page alleging harassment by a police inspector after a road accident. The inspector filed an FIR under Sections 353 and 506 of the IPC. The appellants sought quashing of the FIR under Section 482 of the CrPC, but the Kar

LAXMIDEVAMMA & ORS.versusRANGANATH & ORS.

2015 INSC 5420 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs owned a parcel of land (A schedule) that had been earmarked for a road but no road was ever constructed. They sold portions of the land to the first defendant, who later transferred it to the second and third defendants, who subsequently encroached on a portion of the A schedule land (B schedule). The tr

PROF. N. K. GANGULYversusCBI NEW DELHI

2015 INSC 84419 November 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned an alleged illegal transfer of a government plot by senior officials of ICMR and ICPO, who were accused of criminal conspiracy and obtaining undue pecuniary advantage under Section 120B IPC and Sections 13(1)(d) & 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The CBI filed a charge‑sheet and the S

RAJKOT DISTT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2014 INSC 79419 November 2014Dismissed

The Rajkot District Cooperative Bank Ltd. and other specified cooperative societies challenged the delimitation of constituencies for elections to their managing committees under Gujarat Specified Co‑operative Societies Election to Committee Rules, 1982, specifically Rule 3‑A sub‑rules (8) and (9). They argued that the

ESSAR STEEL LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2016 INSC 32519 April 2016Dismissed

Essar Steel Ltd. and other off‑takers had long‑term contracts to purchase regasified LNG (RLNG) at a fixed price. In 2007 the Union Government issued a policy directive to pool RLNG prices and apply a uniform, non‑discriminatory price to all long‑term contracts, which raised the price for the appellants. The appellants

PRAKASH CHAND MEENA & ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

2015 INSC 97619 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan Public Service Commission advertised separate recruitment processes for Physical Training Instructor Grade‑II and Grade‑III posts, specifying distinct educational qualifications. After the examination, the State Government issued a clarification treating B.P.Ed. and D.P.Ed. qualifications as equivalent or

SURENDER @ KALAversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2016 INSC 6919 January 2016Dismissed

The appellant was apprehended on suspicion of possessing one kilogram of opium and, after opting for a search before a Gazetted Officer, was searched and the narcotic was recovered. The investigation was initiated by Sub‑Inspector Satbir Singh, who also lodged the complaint, leading the appellant to argue that the inve

LATA BABURAO MANE & ANOTHERversusRAMACHANDRA BALASAHEB MANE (D) THROUGH LRS.

2014 INSC 103018 November 2014Dismissed

The case concerned a dispute over the partition of family property involving the appellants Baburao Marutrao Mane and his daughter Lata and the respondent Ramchandra Balasaheb Mane, an adopted son. The trial court and successive appellate courts held that no partition had been effected, so succession did not open at th

SUDARSHAN RAJPOOTversusU.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

2014 INSC 78818 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Sudarshan Rajpoot, a driver employed permanently by the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, suffered grievous injuries in a vehicle accident caused by a mechanical defect. The corporation struck his name off the contract roll, alleging negligent driving, and terminated his services without complying with st

R.G. D'SOUZAversusPOONA EMPLOYEES UNION &ANR.

2014 INSC 78618 November 2014Dismissed

The appellant, a former president of the Poona Employees Union, sought cancellation of the union's registration certificate alleging fraud or mistake, filing a petition under Section 10 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926. The Additional Registrar cancelled the certificate, the Industrial Court set aside that cancellation, a

ANDHRA PRADESH STATE COUNCIL OF HIGHER EDUCATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC.

2016 INSC 27018 March 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 required the assets and liabilities of the Andhra Pradesh State Council of Higher Education (APSC) to be divided between the successor states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, and whether the freezing of APSC’s bank accounts by banks on Telan

JAKIR HUSSEINversusSABIR & ORS.

2015 INSC 13518 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Jakir Hussein, a professional driver, suffered grievous injuries to his right arm in a collision caused by the negligent driving of Sabir, rendering him permanently disabled and unable to earn a livelihood as a driver. The claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 sought compensati

STATE OF PUNJABversusJAGGA SINGH ETC

2014 INSC 87817 December 2014Dismissed

The case concerns the murder of Satnam Singh in Ludhiana in 2002. Seven persons were charged; two (Charanjit Singh and Surjit Singh) were convicted under Section 302 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, while five others were acquitted by the High Court. The State appealed the acquittals and the two convicted appealed t

INTERNATIONAL AMUSEMENT LIMITEDversusINDIA TRADE PROMOTION ORGANISATION &ANR.

2014 INSC 87717 December 2014Dismissed

International Amusement Ltd (operator of "Appu Ghar") held a licence from the India Trade Promotion Organisation (ITPO) to occupy land in Pragati Maidan. Clause 28 of the licence agreement provided that any dispute would be referred to arbitration by the Chairman of ITPO or his nominee. After the licence expired, ITPO

RAMANversusUTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.

2014 INSC 88517 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

A four‑year‑old boy was electrocuted when a live wire fell on his roof, resulting in triple amputation and 100% permanent disability. The parents sued Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. under Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for compensation. The Single Judge of the High Court awarded Rs 60 lakhs, directing R

PAWAN KUMAR AGARWALAversusGENERAL MANAGER-II & APPOINTING AUTH. STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.

2015 INSC 84217 November 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Pawan Kumaragarwala, a bank officer, was charged with misconduct for allegedly influencing a loan application and helping a borrower obtain a second loan from another SBI branch without disclosing an existing loan. A disciplinary enquiry found several charges proved and imposed dismissal. The High Court Single Judge se

H. LAKSHMAIAH REDDY & ORS.versusL. VENKATESH REDDY

2015 INSC 33517 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, son of Guramma and the first defendant, claimed ownership of a property originally purchased by his mother and later mutated in his name after her death, asserting that the first defendant had relinquished his half‑share. The first defendant, who later remarried, contested this, arguing that mutation doe

ONGC LTD.versusPETROLEUM COAL LABOUR UNION & ORS.

2015 INSC 33817 April 2015Dismissed

The Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) appointed security workmen through contractors, a cooperative society and later by direct memorandum, without following its recruitment rules. The workmen claimed regularisation after completing more than 240 days of service, alleging an unfair labour practice. The Industrial

DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.versusINTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPN. & OTHERS

2015 INSC 23017 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Delhi International Airport Ltd (DIAL) detained eight aircraft leased by International Lease Finance Corp (ILFC) for non‑payment of landing, parking and housing charges amounting to over Rs 10 crore. The Delhi High Court ordered the release of the aircraft on the basis of minutes of a meeting held on 26 March 2013 invo

VESA HOLDINGS P. LTD. & ANR.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2015 INSC 22817 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

VESA Holdings Ltd and its directors entered into a time‑bound settlement agreement with a former bank official who was to receive a consultancy fee for facilitating the settlement of a loan. The fee was to be paid in two instalments, the first upfront and the balance upon completion of the settlement, which was conditi

PRAVEENBHAI S. KHAMBHAYATAversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 12817 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, owner of two vehicles, claimed that United India Insurance Company should indemnify him for the death of his employee, Ramesh Lalmani Yadav, who was a cleaner and died while filling water in the radiator of a second vehicle on the employer's direction. The Labour Court held the owner jointly liable with

RAJIV SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ANOTHER

2015 INSC 93816 December 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Rajiv Singh was convicted under Sections 304B, 201 and 498A for the alleged murder of his wife Archana during a honeymoon train journey, based on a dead body found near the railway tracks. The Supreme Court examined whether the body was indeed Archana's, whether the prosecution proved a homicidal death, a

SRI JAGANNATH TEMPLE MANAGING COMMITTEEversusSIDDHA MATH & ORS.

2015 INSC 93316 December 2015Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a dispute over lands belonging to the Shri Jagannath Temple at Puri, which had been vested in the State Government by a 1974 notification under the Orissa Estate Abolition Act, 1951 (OEA Act). The Temple Managing Committee claimed that the lands were vested in it under the special Sri Jaganna

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.versusPAWAN KUMAR GUPTA

2015 INSC 66516 September 2015Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a statutory corporation that had acquired the assets and liabilities of the Department of Telecommunications (DoT), could invoke Article 112 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which grants a thirty‑year limitation period for suits by the Central Government.

MUNNAversusSTATE OF M.P.

2014 INSC 63316 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Munna was convicted under Sections 376 and 450 IPC for allegedly raping the prosecutrix at knife point, based primarily on the testimonies of the prosecutrix, her husband (PW‑2) and a village Kotwar (PW‑3). The High Court upheld the conviction, but the Supreme Court examined whether the prosecutrix's test

R. RAJASHEKAR AND ORS.versusTRINITY HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY AND ORS.

2016 INSC 86715 September 2016Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the acquisition of agricultural lands by the Karnataka State Government for Trinity House Building Co‑operative Society, which had hired a middleman, M/s Srinivasa Enterprises, to secure the acquisition in its favour. The Court found that no housing scheme had been framed or approved by the G

SONDUR GOPALversusSONDUR RAJINI

2013 INSC 46515 July 2013Disposed off

The wife filed a petition for judicial separation and custody under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The husband contested the petition’s maintainability, arguing that both parties, being Swedish citizens domiciled in Australia, were outside the Act’s territorial scope. The Supreme Court examined the extent

AIR CUSTOMS OFFICER IGI NEW DELHIversusPRAMOD KUMAR DHAMIJA

2016 INSC 17115 February 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved the smuggling of 184 gold biscuits concealed in meal trolleys of a Lufthansa flight, discovered by customs officers in 1996. Co‑accused Varyam Singh and Ranbir Singh named Pramod Kumar Dhamiya as an investor and participant in the smuggling, but the respondent evaded arrest and was declared a proclaim

N. VENKATESHAPPAversusMUNEMMA & ORS.

2016 INSC 17015 February 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a parcel of Thalavari Inam agricultural land in Kolar district that was sold by the original Inam holders, Muni Papanna and his father, to Nadumpalli Muneppa on 13 May 1971. The land was later re‑granted to the original holder Muni Papanna on 31 March 1982 under the Karnataka Village Offices Act, 196

RAUNAQ EDUCATION FOUNDATIONversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2014 INSC 72514 October 2014Dismissed

The Raunaq Education Foundation was allotted 76 acres of forest land by the State of Haryana in 1972 for establishing an educational complex, subject to conditions of timely construction. The foundation failed to develop the school for decades, prompting the Gram Panchayat to seek return of the land, leading to a resum

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusSMT. SUVARNAMMA & ANR.

2014 INSC 71614 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka appealed the acquittal of Smt. Suvarnamma and her husband Manjunath for the dowry‑related death of the bride, Soumya, who died from severe burn injuries within seven years of marriage. The prosecution proved that the accused had harassed the victim for dowry and that the mother‑in‑law poured kero

M/S PERIYAR & PAREEKANNI RUBBERS LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2015 INSC 65914 September 2015Matter referred to larger bench

The appellants, Periyar & Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd., challenged a Kerala High Court order that limited interest on solatium to the period after 19 September 2001, the date of the Sunder judgment. The land had been acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the Reference Court had awarded enhanced compensation incl

KIRPAL KAURversusJITENDER PAL SINGH & ORS.

2015 INSC 49414 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Kirpal Kaur filed a partition suit seeking her late husband's share in a Delhi building (schedule ‘B’ property). The trial court and the Delhi High Court held the property to be self‑acquired by her father‑in‑law and denied her any share. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the evidence, including the father‑in‑law’s

RAJDEEP SARDESAIversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.

2015 INSC 41514 May 2015Dismissed

The appellants, a group of journalists and media houses, were charged with defamation for publishing a news item that alleged the Additional Commissioner of Police, Rajiv Trivedi, facilitated the Sohrabuddin encounter. The second respondent obtained a previous sanction under Section 199(4)(b) of the Criminal Procedure

STATE OF KERALA & ORS. ETC. ETC.versusARUN GEORGE & ORS. ETC. ETC.

2015 INSC 3514 January 2015Dismissed

The State of Kerala sanctioned new aided courses in private colleges on the condition that it would incur no additional financial commitment. The private college management appointed seven teachers for these courses under the Direct Payment Agreement, but the university rejected their appointments citing lack of vacanc

VIJAYA UKARDA ATHOR (ATHAWALE)versusSTATE OF.MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2015 INSC 3914 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Vijaya Ukarda Athor, daughter of a deceased municipal employee, applied for a compassionate appointment in 1997 as a minor and again in 1998 after attaining majority. She married in 2009, and the corporation appointed the deceased's illegitimate son in 2012, rejecting her claim on the ground that only unmarried daughte

K.V.S. RAMversusBANGALORE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION

2015 INSC 3814 January 2015

The appellant, a driver employed by Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation since 1985, was charged in 1990 with securing his appointment by a false transfer certificate. An enquiry was initiated in 1992 but the report was only submitted in 2002, leading to a dismissal order in 2004. The appellant challenged the d

K. SUBRAMANIversusK. DAMODARA NAIDU

2014 INSC 77613 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant, a government college lecturer, alleged that the accused, also a lecturer, borrowed Rs 14 lakhs in cash in 1997 and issued post‑dated cheques which were later dishonoured, leading to a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding that the

STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.versusNIRMALABEN S. MEHTA & ANR. ETC.

2016 INSC 52313 July 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Gujarat entered into a 20‑year mining lease with the respondents for bauxite extraction. The State later de‑reserved the mining area and sought Central Government permission to impose conditions, including the establishment of a captive plant, under Rule 27(3) of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. When th

HINDUSTAN ZINC LTDversusRAJASTHAN ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

2015 INSC 99613 May 2015Directions issued

The Supreme Court considered appeals by Hindustan Zinc Ltd. and other captive power generators challenging the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission’s (RERC) Renewable Energy Obligation Regulations of 2007 and 2010, which require them to purchase a minimum quantum of electricity from renewable sources. The appell

RAJ KUMARversusDIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS.

2016 INSC 31813 April 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a permanent driver at DAV Public School, was declared surplus and retrenched by the school’s Managing Committee in 2003. The school served a notice under Section 25F(a) of the Industrial Disputes Act but failed to send the statutory notice to the appropriate government authority under Section 25F(c) and

TUKARAM DNYANESHWAR PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2015 INSC 21713 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Dnyaneshwar Patil was attacked by three accused over a field boundary dispute, sustaining fatal injuries; his brother intervened and was also assaulted. The trial court convicted the accused of murder under s.302 IPC read with s.34, but the High Court reduced the conviction to culpable homicide not amounti

AMARKANT RAIversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2015 INSC 21513 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Amarkant Rai, was appointed as a night guard on daily wages by the college principal in 1983, a position for which the principal lacked statutory authority under the Bihar State Universities Act, 1976. Although the university later decided to regularise employees who had served for more than a year, the

SHASHIKALA & ORS.versusGANGALAKSHMAMMA & ANR.

2015 INSC 21213 March 2015Matter referred to larger bench

The deceased H.S. Ravi, a 45‑year‑old self‑employed transport businessman, died in a road accident on 14‑12‑2006. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 7,85,000 as compensation. The Karnataka High Court enhanced the award to Rs 14,69,372 by averaging the deceased’s income over two assessment years and applying

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusM/S. ANANT RAJ AGENCIES PVT. LTD.

2016 INSC 30812 April 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) leased a plot to Balraj Virmani for 20 years with an option to renew for another 20 years. The lessee breached lease conditions, was served notice, and after the lease expired on 10‑08‑1968 the DDA issued a termination notice on 01‑09‑1972. The lessee later sold the property to M/s

AMANULLAH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

2016 INSC 30612 April 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from the murder of Tamanna Khatoon, for which her husband Mukhtar filed an FIR against two accused. During investigation, witnesses under Section 164 of the CrPC alleged that Mukhtar himself killed his wife. The CJM took cognizance of the murder and related offences after reviewing the charge‑sheet and s

KUSUM HARILAL SONIversusCHANDRLKA NANDLAL MEHTA AND ANR.

2016 INSC 31012 April 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a landlord, obtained an eviction order and a decree for monthly compensation against the tenant (respondent No.1) under Section 13A(2) of the Bombay Rent Act, 1947. After possession was handed over, the tenant failed to pay the compensation and purportedly transferred the flat to her daughter (respondent

CHARU KISHOR MEHTAversusJOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER, GREATER BOMBAY REGION & ORS.

2015 INSC 21012 March 2015Dismissed

The appellant, a permanent trustee of the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, alleged that the other trustees and the deceased managing trustee misappropriated trust assets and were guilty of non‑feasance and mal‑feasance. An application under Section 41D of the Bombay Public Trust Act was filed before the Joint Cha

BHIMANDAS AMBWANI (D) THR. LRS.versusDELHI POWER COMPANY LIMITED & ORS.

2013 INSC 9612 February 2013Disposed off

The appellants, owners of land in Delhi, were dispossessed following a series of notifications and a declaration under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (notifications of 1963, 1968 and 1983). The Supreme Court held that each later notification supersedes the earlier ones and that the 1983 notification and its declaration

ESTATE OFFICER UT CHANDIGARH & ORS.versusM/S. ESYS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.

2016 INSC 40911 May 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The Estate Officer of Chandigarh cancelled the allotment of a six‑acre campus site to Esys Information Technologies Pvt. Ltd. after discovering that the company had transferred a major portion of its shares to Esys Global Holdings, Dubai, and subsequently to Teledata Informatics Ltd., without obtaining the permission r

KRISHNA HARE GAURversusVINOD KUMAR TYAGI & ORS.

2015 INSC 10811 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Krishna Hare Gaur, challenged the appointment of respondent No.1 as headmaster on the ground that the latter had used forged experience certificates, violating the U.P. Recognized Basic Schools Rules which require five years of teaching experience. The High Court initially dismissed the appellant's writ

VADODARA MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusPURSHOTTAM V. MURJANI AND ORS.

2014 INSC 61610 September 2014Dismissed

A boat operated by Ripple Aqua Sports under a licence from Vadodara Municipal Corporation was overloaded with 38 passengers (capacity 22) and capsized, killing 22. The victims filed a consumer complaint alleging deficiency in service. The State Consumer Commission and the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

RAJ KUMAR RANAversusRITA RATHORE

2015 INSC 18810 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The husband Raj Kumar Rana married Rita Rathore in 1997, but they separated in February 1998 after the wife gave birth to a son and never returned to the marital home. The husband filed a divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act on grounds of cruelty and desertion, which was dismissed by both the tri

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER FORT, KOCHI & ORS.versusJALAJA DILEEP &ANR.

2015 INSC 19910 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a petition by the owners of a 12.286‑cent plot in Ernakulam district seeking to have the land re‑classified as dry land (‘purayidam’) in the Basic Tax Register (BTR) under the Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961. The High Court, relying on Section 18 of the Land Tax Act, directed the Tahsildar to correct the B

M/S GUJARAT AMBUJA EXPORTS LTD &ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

2015 INSC 9069 December 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttarakhand Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 2011 levied a market fee and development cess on any agricultural produce arriving in a notified market area for sale, storage, processing, manufacturing or other commercial purposes. Gujarat Ambuja Exports Ltd and other manufacturers, who

KUNWARPAL @ SURAJPAL & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANR.

2014 INSC 8499 December 2014Dismissed

The appellants were convicted under IPC sections 302 and 34 for the murder of Ranjit Singh, allegedly attacked with lathis and tabbal by the accused amid a land dispute. The prosecution relied on eye‑witnesses PW3 Atmaram and PW4 Chaman Lal, whose testimonies were corroborated and supported by a post‑mortem report esta

UMA SHANKAR GAUTAMversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2014 INSC 8479 December 2014Dismissed

The appellant, accused No.1, was convicted along with five others for offences under Sections 147, 149 and 302 of the IPC for the murder of Kalua. The High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant and two others, but acquitted accused Nos.5 and 6 on the ground that no lathi injuries were found on the deceased and t

GENERAL MOTORS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITEDversusASHOK RAMNIK LAL TOLAT & ANR.

2014 INSC 6959 October 2014Case Partly allowed

The complainant purchased a Chevrolet Forester advertised as an SUV capable of off‑road travel, but the vehicle was a passenger car and not fit for the promised use, leading him to allege unfair trade practice under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The District Forum, State Commission and National Consumer Disputes R

PANKAJversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2016 INSC 8629 September 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Pankaj was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC and Section 3 read with Section 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting his brother-in-law Raj Kumar, who later died. The prosecution's case rested on the sole eye‑witness testimony of the victim's brother (PW‑8) and corroboration by

UNION OF INDIAversusRAJ KUMAR BAGHAL SINGH (DEAD) TH. LRS. & ORS.

2014 INSC 6139 September 2014Dismissed

The Union of India acquired two parcels of land in Punjab for a military cantonment under notifications of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (1989 and 1988). The Collector initially fixed compensation at Rs 2 lakhs per acre, which was later enhanced by the Reference Court and subsequently reduced by the Punjab & Haryana H

M/S. HCL LNFOSYSTEM LTD.versusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

2016 INSC 5859 August 2016Dismissed

The case concerned HCL Infosystem Ltd., a co‑accused in the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) scam, where the sole public servant co‑accused had died before any charge was framed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act). The issue was whether the Special Judge appointed under s.3(1) of the PC Act could

PURNIMA MANTHENA AND ANOTHERversusDR. RENUKA DATLA & OTHERS

2015 INSC 7388 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute arose in Biological E. Ltd. after the death of its promoter, when the widow (respondent No.1) and her three daughters were appointed directors. The widow challenged the validity of board meetings held on 9‑4‑2013, 10‑4‑2013 and 11‑4‑2013, the appointment of her daughters as directors and the continuance of

PADMAKUMARI & ORS.versusDASAYYAN &ORS.

2015 INSC 2887 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Padmakumari & ors., entered into an unregistered agreement to purchase 2.08 acres of land from defendants 1‑11, agreeing to pay the balance consideration of Rs 63,000 within nine months. The plaintiff failed to make this payment within the stipulated period, while defendants 12‑15 subsequently purchased

SECRETARY, MINOR IRRIGATION DEPTT. & R.E.S.versusNARENDRA KUMAR TRI PATH I

2015 INSC 2867 April 2015Disposed off

The petitioner, Narendra Kumar Tripathi, was first appointed as Work Engineer in 1983 and later, on 12 June 1985, was appointed as Assistant Engineer on an ad hoc basis after a selection committee recommendation. The appointment continued until it was regularised on 14 December 1989 under the Uttar Pradesh Regularisati

STATE OF HLMACHAL PRADESHversusRAJIV JASSI

2016 INSC 3846 May 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Himachal Pradesh appealed the High Court's acquittal of Dr. Rajiv Jass, who was convicted by a trial court for murdering his pregnant wife by forcibly administering organophosphorus poison. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including multiple ante‑mortem injuries on the victim, the accused

SUDHAKARANversusCORP. OF TRIVANDRUM & ANR.

2016 INSC 5015 July 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a tenant of a premises in Trivandrum, held a licence to operate a hardware shop that was originally granted with the landlord's written consent in 2001. When the licence expired, the corporation refused renewal because the landlord did not provide fresh consent. The Tribunal for Local Self Government Ins

SAI BHASKAR IRON LTD.versusA.P. ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS.

2016 INSC 5025 July 2016Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission’s Regulation 45‑B, which prescribes a formula for calculating the fuel surcharge adjustment (FSA) and excludes agricultural consumption until metering is completed. They argued that the regulation was ultra vires the Andhra Pradesh Electric

MUDDASANI SAROJANAversusMUDDASANI SAROJANA

2016 INSC 3735 May 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff purchased a property from Buchamma, the sole surviving sister of the deceased Balaiah, under a registered sale deed dated 25‑04‑1981. After the widow Yashoda's death, the plaintiff took possession, but Defendant No.3 (Sarojana) evicted him, claiming to be Yashoda's adopted daughter and thus an heir. The p

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.versusMIS. RUCHI PRINTERS

2016 INSC 3765 May 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh ordered Mis. Ruchi Printers to print 37,07,726 copies of two booklets, with delivery deadlines of 8 February 2008 for the first half and 25 February 2008 for the balance. The State later extended the deadline to 31 March 2008 but expressly stated that no booklets would be accepted after that

ASPI JAL & ANR.versusKHUSHROO RUSTOM DADYBURJOR

2013 INSC 2185 April 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs, owners of a building, filed three eviction suits against the same tenant. The first two suits (2004) sought eviction on the ground of non‑use for several years, while the third suit (2010) sought eviction on the ground of non‑use for a continuous period of at least six months immediately before the suit

BHAGWAN JAGANNATH MARKAD & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2016 INSC 9474 October 2016Case Partly allowed

The case involved the murder of Bibhishan Vithoba Khadle and injuries to six others during a politically motivated assault by a group of accused. The trial court acquitted all accused, rejecting eye‑witness testimony on the ground of contradictions, alleged interest, and procedural defects. The High Court reversed the

VIJAY SHANKARversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2015 INSC 10094 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Vijay Shankar was convicted under Sections 302 and 449 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Satish Kumar, based primarily on circumstantial evidence such as alleged motive, a 'last seen' testimony, an extra‑judicial confession, and the recovery of blood‑stained clothes and a knife. The prosecution’s

JAYA BISWAL & ORS.versusBRANCH MANAGER, IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE

2016 INSC 1374 February 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant family filed a claim for compensation after their 26‑year‑old son, a truck driver, died in an accident that occurred while he was attempting to stop an unmanned vehicle during the course of his employment. The Employees' Compensation Commissioner awarded Rs 10,75,253 with interest, but the High Court redu

JITENDRA KHIMSHANKAR TRIVEDI & ORS.versusKASAM DAUD KUMBHAR & ORS.

2015 INSC 893 February 2015Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the husband and relatives of Smt. Jayvantiben Jitendra Trivedi, a 22‑year‑old housewife who died in a motor accident caused by the negligent driving of the respondent. The claimants sought enhancement of compensation beyond the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal award of Rs.2,24,0

POONA EMPLOYEES UNIONversusFORCE MOTORS LIMITED & ANOTHER

2015 INSC 8761 December 2015Dismissed

The Poona Employees Union (PEU) applied to the Industrial Court for recognition in place of the existing recognized union, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena (BKS), claiming it had over 30% membership and a larger membership base during the relevant six‑month period. The Industrial Court, relying on the Investigating Officer's repo

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD.versusNILOFER SIDDIQUI & ORS.

2015 INSC 8751 December 2015Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a dispute where Indian Oil Corporation Ltd (IOCL) terminated the LPG distributorship granted to ex‑servicemen respondents under a letter of allotment that referred to a "standard agreement" which was never supplied or executed. The Court held that, because the standard agreement was not concl

LALARAM & OTHERSversusJAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY &ANR.

2015 INSC 8771 December 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants' land was compulsorily acquired in 1981 for an Indian Army field firing range under the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953, and although compensation was awarded, it was never fully paid. The State Government issued a series of policy circulars, culminating in the circular dated 13 December 2001, promi

MUMTAZ @ MUNTYAZversusSTATE OF U.P. (NOW UTTARAKHAND)

2016 INSC 4831 July 2016Disposed off

The appellants Mumtaz alias Muntyaz and Dilshad alias Pappu were convicted under Sections 302 and 34 IPC for setting fire to the victim Pawan Kumar, who later died of burn injuries. The prosecution relied on eyewitness testimony and a dying declaration recorded by a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, which was endorsed by a do

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search