Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Constitution of India

5,773 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act — showing 4,001–4,200.

PANNEY @ PRATAP NARAIN SHUKLA & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2009 INSC 12949 December 2009Dismissed

The appellants Panney @ Pratap Narain Shukla and Channey @ Prabhu Narain Shukla were convicted for the murder of Shivdhari, who was killed by a bomb, a pistol shot and a neck cut during a land‑dispute. The trial court sentenced them to death, a decision affirmed by the High Court and upheld on appeal. In the Supreme Co

M.P.CEMENT MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.

2003 INSC 6989 December 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The M.P. Cement Manufacturers' Association, representing captive power producers, challenged a 2001 amendment to the Madhya Pradesh Upkar Adhiniyam that imposed a cess of 20 paise per unit on electricity produced. The High Court held the cess was on consumption and within State competence under Entry 53 of List II. The

ORISSA SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPN. LTD. AND ANR.versusNARASINGHA CHARAN MOHANTY AND ORS.

1998 INSC 4739 December 1998Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, an Assistant Manager of Orissa Small Industries Corporation Ltd., was terminated, reinstated by the High Court and given a notional promotion to Joint Manager. When a vacancy for Manager arose, the Departmental Promotion Committee considered his candidature but found him unsuitable, promoting two junior

ORISSA SPONGE IRON LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 7989 December 1997Dismissed

Orissa Sponge Iron Ltd., which invested under the 1980 industrial policy and began production on 1 April 1984, sought deferment/exemption of sales tax under the 1989 policy. The 1989 policy, via para 2.18, limited such benefits to "continuing units of 1980 policy" that went into production after 1 April 1986, thereby e

THE COMMISSIONER, AGRA AND ORS.versusROHTAS SINGH AND ORS.

1997 INSC 7999 December 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Allahabad High Court held that Government Advocates and Standing Counsel could not represent State officials in contempt of court proceedings and that any litigation costs must be borne personally by the officials. The State appealed, arguing that it could authorize its law officers to appear for officials in such

RADHEY SHYAM SINGH AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 14449 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Government of India, via a 1975 resolution, created a Subordinate Services Commission to recruit non‑technical Class III posts and issued a 1993 advertisement stipulating zone‑wise recruitment with separate merit lists for each of 15 zones. Applicants who scored higher marks than some selected candidates challenged

S.P. SAMPATH KUMAR ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1986 INSC 2599 December 1986Case Allowed

The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, particularly the exclusion of High Court jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 and the qualifications for appointing the Chairman, Vice‑Chairman and members of the Tribunal. The Court held that while Parliament may creat

SHIVAJIRAO NILANGEKAR PATILversusDR. MAHESH MADHAV GOSAVI & ORS. AND VICE VERSA

1986 INSC 2609 December 1986Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined two Special Leave Petitions arising from a writ petition that alleged tampering of MD (Gynaecology) examination grade sheets to favour the daughter of the then Chief Minister of Maharashtra. The trial judge had held that the tampering was done by Dr. Rawal at the behest of the Chief Minister

UNION OF INDIA & ORSversusD.G.O.F. EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION AND ANR.

2023 INSC 9959 November 2023Dismissed

The D.G.O.F. Employees Association, representing assistants and personal assistants of the Ordnance Factory Board (OFB) headquarters, sought parity in pay with similarly placed employees of the Central Secretariat Service (CSS) and other central cadres, invoking para 3.1.9 of the Sixth Central Pay Commission (CPC) reco

DILIP B JIWRAJKAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS

2023 INSC 10189 November 2023Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of sections 95 to 100 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, alleging violations of Articles 14 and 21 and the denial of a hearing before a resolution professional is appointed. They argued that the resolution professional’s powers to seek information and the

ANKITA THAKUR & ORS.versusTHE H.P. STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ORS.

2023 INSC 9929 November 2023Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the recruitment of Junior Office Assistants (IT) in Himachal Pradesh where the State had, after the application deadline, issued a relaxation order allowing candidates with diplomas from private institutions to be considered eligible. The petitioners argued that the relaxation was illegal bec

M SIDDIQ (D) THR LRSversusV. MAHANT SURESH DAS & ORS

2019 INSC 12319 November 2019Disposed off

The instant appeals arose from five suits between 1950 and 1989 over a 1500 sq yard land in Ayodhya, claimed by Hindus as the birthplace of Lord Ram (Ram Janmabhumi) and by Muslims as the site of the Babri Masjid. The Allahabad High Court had directed a three-way partition of the disputed site, which the Supreme Court

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY & ORS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2016 INSC 10169 November 2016Disposed off

The case concerned the Tamil Nadu Government's decision to relax the qualifying marks in the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) by 5% for candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes, and other disadvantaged groups. The petitioners challenged the relaxation on grounds of lack of statut

J & K NATIONAL PANTHERS PARTYversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2010 INSC 7649 November 2010Dismissed

The Jammu & Kashmir National Panthers Party challenged the 2002 amendment to Section 3 of the Jammu & Kashmir Representation of the People Act, 1957 and the corresponding amendment to Section 47(3) of the Jammu & Kashmir Constitution, which defer the delimitation of Legislative Assembly constituencies until after the f

MONICA BEDIversusSTATE OF AP.

2010 INSC 7659 November 2010Disposed off

Monica Bedi and four co‑accused were convicted under the Indian Penal Code (sections 120‑B, 419, 420) and the Prevention of Corruption Act for a conspiracy to obtain a passport in an assumed name. Bedi argued that her conviction violated Article 20(2) of the Constitution because she had already been tried and sentenced

M/S. SOM DATT BUILDERS LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2009 INSC 12259 November 2009Dismissed

The petitioners, Som Datt Builders Ltd. and others, challenged the Central Government's notification declaring "ordinary earth" used for filling and levelling as a "minor mineral" under Section 3(e) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and the subsequent fixing of royalty at Rs.4 per cubic

INDIAN AIRLINES LIMITEDversusCAPT. RAMAN DOULAGAR

2006 INSC 8149 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Indian Airlines Limited filed a transfer petition under Article 139-A(2) of the Constitution seeking to move a writ petition pending in the Madras High Court to the Delhi High Court, arguing that several other writ petitions involving identical issues were already pending there. The respondent argued that the transfer

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusPRADIP KUMAR DEY

2000 INSC 5129 November 2000Appeal(s) allowed

Pradip Kumar Dey, a Naik (Radio Operator) in the CRPF, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India to implement the CRPF's recommendation to the Fourth Pay Commission for a higher pay scale, invoking the principle of "equal pay for equal work". The Single Judge dismissed the petition for lack

RAM BADAN RAI AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1998 INSC 4179 November 1998Dismissed

The appellants, claiming to be original residents of villages on the Bihar‑Uttar Pradesh border, challenged the validity of the Bihar and Uttar Pradesh (Alteration of Boundaries) Act, 1968, arguing that state boundaries were frozen as of 26‑January‑1950 and that the disputed lands were never transferred. The Supreme Co

ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS.versusTHE CHAIRMAN, BANKING SERVICE RECRUITMENT BOARD AND ORS.

1995 INSC 7079 November 1995Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the recruitment process of the State Bank of India and other nationalised banks, where the Banking Service Recruitment Board prepared a select list containing far more candidates than the vacancies notified. The petitioners argued that this practice violated their constitutional right to cons

JASWANT SINGHversusVIRENDER SINGH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 5069 November 1994

The appellant Jaswant Singh and the respondent Virender Singh contested the 1991 Haryana Legislative Assembly election, with the respondent declared elected. The appellant filed an election petition under Sections 81 and 83 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 alleging irregularities, tampering of vote counts

KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI AND ORS.versusORIENT PAPER AND INDUSTRIES LTD.

1994 INSC 5099 November 1994

Orient Paper Mills bought bamboos from the State Forest Department at depots located within the market area of the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti (the appellant). The Samiti levied market fees on the purchase under Section 19 of the Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1973. The mill challenged the levy in a writ peti

NEPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U. P. & ORS .

1984 INSC 2079 November 1984Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Nepal Singh, a temporary Sub‑Inspector of Police, was terminated from service on the ground of alleged corruption and a second marriage without government permission, based on a circular issued by the Inspector General of Police. The termination order was issued by the Deputy Inspector General under a 19

SURENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

1984 INSC 2089 November 1984Case Allowed

The case concerned nine seats reserved in the medical colleges of Jammu and Kashmir for candidates from Bihar. Thirty‑five applicants applied, and a merit list of seven candidates was prepared by the Controller of Examinations, which included the petitioner Surendra Kumar. The Chief Minister of Bihar, however, recommen

SAMARIAS TRADING CO. PVT. LTD.versusS. SAMUEL & ORS.

1984 INSC 2099 November 1984Disposed off

The Calcutta High Court entertained an oral application in the judge's chambers, without any written record, and issued an interim order maintaining the status quo of a liquor shop auction. The order was made without stating facts, legal questions, or reasons, and was later extended without the parties being informed.

JAVED AHMED ABDUL HAMID PAWALAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1984 INSC 2109 November 1984Case Allowed

Javed Ahmed Abdul Hamid Pawala was convicted of multiple murders and sentenced to death on 6 February 1982, with the sentence confirmed by the High Court and subsequent appeals dismissed. After a clemency petition was rejected, he filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution, arguing that his young age, r

VIJAYA KUMARI S & ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA

2025 INSC 12099 October 2025Case Allowed

The petitioners, three intending couples, had completed the embryo‑freezing stage of surrogacy in 2020‑2021, before the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 came into force on 25 January 2022. After the Act’s commencement, the statutory age limits (female ≤50, male ≤55) barred them from obtaining the eligibility certificat

RAVI ORAONversusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.

2025 INSC 12129 October 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, three teachers appointed in 2015, were terminated in 2016 on the ground that they had not secured the required percentage of marks in their intermediate examination and that their graduation certificates were invalid. They contended that, as Scheduled Tribe candidates, they were entitled to a 5% relaxat

M/S. KEWAL COURT PVT. LTD. AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

2023 INSC 8849 October 2023Matter referred to larger bench

The Supreme Court examined the meaning of “vacant land” under Section 2(q) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, focusing on sub‑clause (i) and the conflict between the earlier Johnson two‑judge decision and the later Billimoria three‑judge decision. The appellants argued that land on which construction

DIVYAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 9009 October 2023Dismissed

The petitioners, including Ms. Divya, applied for the 2022 Civil Services Examination (CSE) claiming reservation under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category but were rejected by the UPSC because they did not possess the required Income & Asset Certificate (I&AC) for FY 2020‑21 before the prescribed cut‑off dat

ARJUN GOPAL AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 10219 October 2017

The Supreme Court considered several interim applications challenging the suspension of licences for the sale of fireworks in Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR) that had been ordered to curb air pollution during Diwali. Petitioners sought a restoration of the complete suspension, while manufacturers and licenc

NADIMINTI SURYANARAYAN MURTHY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusKOTHURTHI KRISHNA BHASKARA RAO & ORS.

2017 INSC 10159 October 2017Disposed off

The plaintiff (respondent No. I) entered into a genuine sale agreement on 18‑01‑1983 with defendants Nos.1‑5 for a house, paying Rs.1,000 as advance. Instead of executing the sale deed, the defendants sold the same house to defendant No.6 on 09‑02‑1983, relying on a purported earlier agreement dated 04‑01‑1983, which t

SANTHINIversusVIJAYA VENKETESH

2017 INSC 10239 October 2017Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined whether video conferencing could be used in matrimonial disputes under the Family Courts Act, 1984, particularly in transfer petitions. It held that Section 11 of the Act obliges the court to hold proceedings in camera if either party desires, and that allowing video conferencing on the conse

STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERSversusFR. WILLIAM FERNANDEZ ETC. ETC.

2017 INSC 10149 October 2017Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether State entry‑tax statutes could levy tax on goods imported from abroad once they entered a local area for consumption, use or sale. It held that the import of goods ends when they cross India's customs frontier and are released for home consumption, after which the State has full compe

P.V. RADHA KRISHNA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF A. P. AND ORS.

2009 INSC 11839 October 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the status of Hyderabad City Police officers under the Andhra Pradesh Employment (Organization of Local Cadres and Regulation of Direct Recruitment) Order, 1975 (the Presidential Order) and the Hyderabad City Police Act, 1348 Fasli. The petitioners, appointed as Sub‑Inspectors of Hyderabad City Polic

T. VIJENDRADAS AND ANR.versusM. SUBRAMANIAN AND ORS.

2007 INSC 10239 October 2007Disposed off

The vendor (RV) sold a municipal property to Sakunthala without notifying the Coimbatore Municipality, which continued to claim property tax arrears. The Municipality sued RV, obtained a decree, and the property was later auctioned; RV's wife bought it and subsequently sold it to a third party, who sold it to the appel

STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDversusPOORAN CHANDRA PANDEY AND ORS.

2007 INSC 10269 October 2007Dismissed

The petitioners were 34 daily‑wage employees of the Cooperative Electric Supply Society who were taken over by the U.P. State Electricity Board on 3 April 1997. They had been appointed before 4 May 1990, the cut‑off date for a Board decision dated 28 November 1996 that sought to regularise all daily‑wage employees who

MAYAWATIversusMARKANDEYA CHAND AND ORS.

1998 INSC 3909 October 1998Disposed off

The case concerned a motion of confidence in the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly on 21 October 1997, after which twelve Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) MLAs voted for the government despite a whip issued by BSP leader Mayawati. Mayawati petitioned the Speaker for their disqualification under paragraph 2(1)(b) of the Tenth

V. KASTURIversusMANAGING DIRECTOR, STATE BANK OF INDIA, BOMBAY AND ANR.

1998 INSC 3929 October 1998Dismissed

V. Kasturi voluntarily retired from the State Bank of India in 1984 after more than 20 but less than 25 years of service and was ineligible for pension under Rule 22(1)(c) which then required 25 years. The Rules were amended in September 1986 reducing the qualifying service to 20 years. Kasturi claimed entitlement to p

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusDELHI CLOTH MILLS & ANR.

1990 INSC 3099 October 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh sought to recover differential excise duty on excess wastage of military rum that was exported by the respondents, Delhi Cloth Mills, under a lower export duty rate. The respondents argued that the duty on excess wastage could not be levied, and the Allahabad High Court quashed the demand. Th

DELHI CLOTH AND GENERAL MILLS LTD.versusS. PARAMJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER

1990 INSC 3059 October 1990Dismissed

Delhi Cloth & General Mills Ltd., a tenant, sought protection under the Jammu and Kashmir Houses and Shops Rent Control Act, 1966, but was denied because its annual net income exceeded Rs 40,000, triggering clause (iii) of Section 1(3). The tenant challenged the clause as violative of Article 14, alleging arbitrary dis

KIRPAL SINGH, M.L.A.versusUTTAM SINGH & ANR.

1985 INSC 2269 October 1985Disposed off

Kirpal Singh was elected to the Punjab Legislative Assembly in 1972, but his election was set aside by the Punjab and Haryana High Court because the nomination of another candidate, Basant Singh, had been improperly rejected on the ground that he was a development officer in the Life Insurance Corporation, a public sec

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusSAJIB ROY

2025 INSC 10849 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The Staff Selection Commission advertised recruitment for Constable (GD) posts with an age limit of 18‑23 years, granting a three‑year relaxation to OBC candidates. Several OBC applicants, including Sajib Roy, availed this relaxation, failed to secure selection in the OBC quota, but scored higher than the last candidat

ABHISHEK BANERJEE & ANR.versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

2024 INSC 6689 September 2024Dismissed

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) issued multiple summons under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) requiring the appellants, Abhishek Banerjee and Rujira Banerjee, to appear in Delhi and produce documents related to a coal theft and money‑laundering investigation. The appellants challenged the s

ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA & ORSversusUNION OF INDIA

2024 INSC 6749 September 2024Dismissed

Former civil servants, scholars and activists filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a court order directing the Union Government to cancel existing licences and stop granting new licences for the export of arms and military equipment to Israel amid the Gaza conflict. The petitioners alleged violations of inter

DHANRAJ ASWANIversusAMAR S. MULCHANDANI & ANR.

2024 INSC 6699 September 2024Dismissed

The respondent, already in judicial custody for ECIR No.10 of 2021, feared arrest in a separate case (CR No.806 of 2019) and applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC. The complainant objected, arguing that a person already in custody cannot seek anticipatory bail for another offence. The Bombay High

M/S SITARAM ENTERPRISESversusPRITHVIRAJ VARDICHAND JAIN

2024 INSC 6859 September 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed the respondent's Special Leave Petitions and granted the landlord nine months to obtain vacant possession of the premises, subject to an undertaking. The respondent failed to file the undertaking on time, filed multiple review and extension applications, and deliberately avoided personal app

CHANDIGARH NURSING HOME AND ANR.versusSUKHDEEP KAUR

2022 INSC 9439 September 2022Disposed off

A minor, Sukhdeep Kaur, filed a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence by Chandigarh Nursing Home after a wrong diagnosis and treatment caused severe rashes. The District Forum awarded Rs 1 lakh compensation, which the nursing home appealed to the State Commission; the State Commission dismissed the appeal. The

H.S.SIDHUversusDEVENDRA BAPNA & ORS.

2015 INSC 10179 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed

H.S. Sidhu and Devendra Bapna, both direct recruits as Assistant Directors, were promoted to Deputy Director, with Bapna senior to Sidhu. When a vacancy for Joint Director arose, the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) prepared a merit list under Rule 15(3) of the 1987 Rules, placing Sidhu ahead of Bapna based on hi

RAGHUVANSH DEWANCHAND BHASINversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2011 INSC 6689 September 2011Dismissed

The appellant, a practising advocate, was charged under IPC s.324. After failing to appear on 7 August 2002, the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate issued a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) returnable on 31 October 2002. The appellant appeared on 12 August and the warrant was cancelled, but on 15 August the police insp

NAGBHAI NAJBHAI KHACKARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2010 INSC 5889 September 2010Dismissed

The appellants, Nagbhai Najbai Khackar, challenged the inclusion of their "bid lands"—uncultivable waste lands used for grazing—within the ceiling limits of the Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 as amended by Act 2 of 1974. They argued that the amendment unintentionally omitted the word "includes" in the def

TIKA RAM & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2009 INSC 11239 September 2009Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Uttar Pradesh Amendment and Validation Act, 1991, which retrospectively validated land acquisition proceedings that had issued simultaneous notifications under Sections 4(1) and 6(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioners argued that the Act atte

STATE OF U.P.versusAWDHESH

2008 INSC 10249 September 2008Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed the Allahabad High Court's acquittal of Awdhesh, who had been convicted for dacoity under Section 396 IPC. The trial court had sentenced him to life imprisonment, but the High Court set aside the conviction, citing inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence and the lack of a direc

DRAUPADI DEVI AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2004 INSC 5079 September 2004Dismissed

The plaintiff claimed title to a Delhi property, alleging it was his private property purchased from the Maharaja of Kapurthala, while the Union of India and others contended it was State property of Kapurthala. The Court examined the 1947 Instrument of Accession, the 1948 covenant, and subsequent correspondence, findi

PADMAversusHIRALAL MOTILAL DESARDA & ORS.

2002 INSC 3719 September 2002Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a public‑interest writ filed by Padma challenging CIDCO's bulk sale of developable land in Aurangabad. The High Court had held that the allotments to several private entities were made without Board approval, at prices below the reserve price, and in violation of Section 115 of the Maharashtr

RAJIV BHATIA ETC.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

1999 INSC 3869 September 1999Dismissed

The natural mother, Priyanka, filed habeas corpus petitions in both the Rajasthan and Delhi High Courts seeking the production of her daughter Akansha, alleging the child was illegally held by her brother‑in‑law after a purported adoption. The Delhi High Court examined the legality of the registered adoption deed, foun

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ETC.versusR. IYYASWAMY AND ORS.

1997 INSC 6449 September 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India challenged the validity of Rule 2(i)(a) of the Assistant Engineers (Akashwani and Doordarshan Group ‘B’ Posts) Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 1985, which provides a 25% promotion quota through a Departmental Promotion Committee. The respondents argued that the rule discriminated against degree‑holder

N.C. DASversusM.A. MOHSIN AND ANR.

1997 INSC 6459 September 1997Dismissed

The petitioner filed a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court seeking to compel the Patna High Court to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents for alleged non‑compliance with a prior order. The High Court held that the order had been complied with, declined to entertain the contempt application

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusKESHAB LAL ROY AND OTHERS

1996 INSC 10089 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, former employees of the privately owned ASL Railways which voluntarily liquidated in 1978, were appointed as "fresh entrants" in Indian Railways under a Ministry of Railways letter dated 17 March 1978. They sought to have their service with ASL Railways counted towards the ten‑year qualifying period fo

SREEDAM CHANDRA GHOSHversusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS.

1996 INSC 10179 September 1996Dismissed

S.C. Ghosh, an Assistant Graduate Teacher, was appointed to officiate as Headmaster of Kahilipara High School after the retirement of the regular headmaster. When a regular headmaster, Mukul Chandra Roy, was transferred to that post, Ghosh challenged the transfer, claiming he had been promoted to a regular headmaster u

M/S. VICTORIAN GRANITES (P) LTD.versusP. RAMA RAO AND ORS.

1996 INSC 10189 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, M/s Victorian Granites (P) Ltd, challenged the Government’s order setting aside the assignment of mining leasehold rights by the original lessee, P. Rama Rao, to Magam Inc. The lease, granted under the Andhra Pradesh Mines & Mineral Concession Rules, 1966, was transferred exactly two years after its gran

MR. ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

1994 INSC 3759 September 1994Dismissed

The petitioners, Ashok Kumar and others, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking mandamus against the Delhi Development Authority, alleging that a letter dated 1 July 1994 required them to pay excess amounts for plots. The petition was filed after a prior order passed by the Supreme Court und

NISAR AHMAD AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1994 INSC 3799 September 1994Dismissed

The appellants challenged the validity of a transport scheme approved by the State Government and published on May 29, 1993, contending that under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, prior approval of the Central Government was mandatory and that the draft scheme had lapsed under Section 100(4). The Supreme Court examined ea

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusSANT LAL AND ANR.

1993 INSC 2929 September 1993Dismissed

The respondents, who are clearing and forwarding agents (dalals), challenged Section 38 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 and Rule 53 of the 1975 Rules, which required them to obtain a licence, furnish transaction particulars and face a penalty of 20% of the value of goods for non‑compliance. The Punjab & Hary

M.G. PANDKE AND ORS.versusMUNICIPAL COUNCIL HINGANGHAT DISTRICT WARDHA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 2409 September 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, teachers employed by the Hinganghat Municipal Council before November 1956, claimed that their statutory retirement age was 60 years under the Madhya Pradesh Secondary Education Act, 1951 and the subsequent Maharashtra Secondary Schools Code, which provided an exception for Vidarbha teachers. The Munici

MINERVA MILLS LTD. & ORS. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1986 INSC 1859 September 1986Dismissed

Minerva Mills Ltd., a loss‑making textile undertaking, was investigated under s.15 of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. The Central Government, finding the mill’s management detrimental to public interest, ordered a takeover under s.18A of the same Act on 19 October 1971. Subsequently, the Sick Tex

CHITRA SHARMA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2018 INSC 6819 August 2018Leave Granted & Disposed off

Jaypee Infratech Ltd (JIL) defaulted on a loan from IDBI Bank, prompting the bank to initiate a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). Home buyers filed a writ petition alleging that the CIRP ignored their interests and sought a pro‑rata refund of the Rs 750

KUMAR SINGH & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2018 INSC 6859 August 2018Disposed off

The appellants, appointed ad‑hoc as Assistant Engineers in 1987 and regularised in 2001, challenged a seniority list that placed promotees (Junior Engineers promoted in 1995) above them, alleging that the promotions were void for lack of consultation with the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (UPPSC) as required

VIJAY KUMAR MISHRA AND ANR.versusHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA AND ORS.

2016 INSC 5869 August 2016Appeal(s) allowed

Vijay Kumar Mishra and another, who had qualified for the Subordinate Judicial Service of Bihar, applied for the District Judge Entry Level (Direct from Bar) interview but were barred by the Patna High Court on the ground of Article 233(2) of the Constitution, which it interpreted to prohibit their participation in the

KAVITA SOLUNKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2012 INSC 3309 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed

Kavita Solunke was appointed as a teacher in an aided school in Maharashtra to a post reserved for Scheduled Tribe candidates, claiming to belong to the Halba tribe. Ten years later, a caste‑verification committee found that her father was a Koshti, a caste not listed as a Scheduled Tribe, and cancelled her caste certi

STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.versusK. SHYAM SUNDER & ORS.

2011 INSC 5559 August 2011Dismissed

The Tamil Nadu government enacted the Uniform System of School Education Act, 2010 to introduce a common syllabus and textbooks for all schools, which was upheld by the High Court and the Supreme Court after certain provisions were struck down. After a change of government in 2011, the new administration hurriedly pass

K.T. PLANTATION PVT. LTD. & ANRversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2011 INSC 5549 August 2011Dismissed

The case concerned lands in the Roerich estate that were exempted from Karnataka's Land Reforms Act, 1961 under Section 107 for linaloe cultivation. The State Government withdrew this exemption by issuing a notification under Section 110 of the Act in 1994, and later enacted the Roerich and Devika Rani Roerich Estate (

RAJIV SARIN & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

2011 INSC 5539 August 2011

The appellants, heirs of a zamindar, challenged a Gazette notification under Section 4‑A of the Kumaun and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960 (KUZALR Act) that vested their 1,600 acres of forest land in the State on 1 January 1978. They argued that the vesting was unconstitutional, repugnant to

L.L. SUDHAKAR REDDY AND ORS.versusSTATE OF A.P. AND ORS.

2001 INSC 3529 August 2001Directions issued

The Manda Revenue Officer filed an application under Section 8 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 alleging that the first appellant had encroached upon five acres of government land and sold it to several respondents. The Special Court held that the land belonged to the government and ordered t

JYANTILAL RATANCHAND SHAHversusRESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS

1996 INSC 8599 August 1996Dismissed

The petitioners, a charitable society and a trust, challenged the High Denomination Bank Notes (Demonetisation) Act, 1978, claiming that the Act extinguished their property rights in high‑denomination notes without compensation, violated Articles 19(1)(f), 19(1)(g) and 31(2) of the Constitution, imposed unreasonable ti

STATE OF AP. AND ORS.versusIND. NATALI GRANITE LTD.

1996 INSC 8679 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Andhra Pradesh and others challenged the writ filed by Ind. Natali Granite Ltd., which questioned the State Government's competence to levy a cess on mining leases. The High Court initially held the amendment to the District Boards Act, 1955, which sought to levy the cess, ultra vires, and subsequently aff

SMT. LAXMI DEVIversusSATYA NARAYAN AND ORS.

1994 INSC 3079 August 1994

The appellant, Laxmi Devi, alleged that her husband, Satya Narayan, had contracted a second marriage, constituting an offence under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court held that the prosecution failed to prove the essential Hindu marriage rite of Saptapadi, which is required to establish a valid marri

AMIR SHAD KHAN AZIZ AHMEDKHAN @ AZIZ MOHD. KHANversusL. HMINGLIANA AND ORS.

1991 INSC 1799 August 1991Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Amir Shad Khan and Aziz Ahmed Khan, were detained under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 after gold bars were recovered from their vehicle. They were served detention orders that allowed them to make representations to the State Government, Central Go

SPL. TEHSILDAR LAND ACQN. VISHAKAPATNAMversusSMT. A. MANGALA GOWRI

1991 INSC 1829 August 1991Appeal(s) allowed

The State acquired 5 acres 589‑1/3 sq. yards of land in Vishakapatnam for a housing scheme in 1963. The initial compensation of Rs 1.58 per sq. yard was enhanced by the Civil Court to Rs 10 per sq. yard with 15% solatium and 4% interest, a figure affirmed by the High Court. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the pro

MADHU MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA

1989 INSC 2359 August 1989Disposed off

The petition under Article 32 sought relief for Gyasi Ram, a death‑row inmate whose mercy petitions had remained pending for about eight years due to administrative delays, including the pending petition of his accomplice Daya Ram. The Supreme Court examined whether such inordinate delay in executing a death sentence v

DR. AJAY PRADHAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS

1988 INSC 2129 August 1988Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered two appeals by Dr. Ajay Pradhan and Dr. Sanjay Kumar Shrivastava who sought admission to postgraduate medical seats that became vacant towards the end of the 1986-87 academic year. Both relied on Rule 10 of the Madhya Pradesh Selection for Post‑Graduation Courses Rules, 1984, which states t

BASELIUS MAR THOMA MATHEWS & ORS.versusPAULOSE MAR ATHANASIUS &. ORS.

1979 INSC 1479 August 1979Appeal(s) allowed

A large number of suits involving a religious community in Kerala were pending in various courts. The High Court and the State Government selected eight significant suits and created an Additional District Court to try them. After evidence was recorded, an application under Section 24(1)(b) of the Code of Civil Procedu

ARMY WELFARE EDUCATION SOCIETY NEW DELHIversusSUNIL KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. ETC.

2024 INSC 5019 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a service dispute between teachers and non‑teaching staff of a school that had been taken over by the Army Welfare Education Society (AWES) and the employees who claimed that their service conditions should not be altered. The employees filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, argu

M/S AL-CAN EXPORT PVT. LTD.versusPRESTIGE H.M. POLYCONTAINERS LTD. & ORS.

2024 INSC 5009 July 2024Case Partly allowed

The case concerned an auction of land owned by Prestige H.M. Polycontainers Ltd., which was mortgaged to a bank and later assigned to ARCIL. The Tahsildar conducted the auction without observing the mandatory 30‑day notice period and issued the sale certificate and possession to the appellant, Al‑Can Export Pvt. Ltd.,

SUBODH KUMAR SINGH RATHOURversusTHE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & ORS.

2024 INSC 4869 July 2024Case Allowed

The appellant was awarded a PPP tender by the Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority (KMDA) to maintain two underpasses, but KMDA later cancelled the tender citing alleged technical faults and a policy change. The appellant challenged the cancellation via a writ petition, which the High Court upheld, holding the ca

MUTHYALA SUNIL KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2024 INSC 4999 July 2024Disposed off

Transporters and tour operators filed a batch of 117 writ petitions under Article 32 challenging the levy of Border Tax/Authorization Fee by several State Governments, alleging that the All India Tourist Vehicles (Permit) Rules, 2023 had abolished such levies. The petitioners claimed double taxation and argued that the

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERSversusLAFARGE DEALERS ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 7349 July 2019Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether sales‑tax exemption/deferment granted to cement manufacturers under the Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994, would continue to apply after the bifurcation of the erstwhile State of Madhya Pradesh into the reorganised State of Madhya Pradesh and the new State of Chhattisgarh. The C

MUKESHversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2018 INSC 5909 July 2018Rejected

The case concerns the infamous Nirbhaya gang‑rape and murder, where the accused Mukesh was convicted and sentenced to death by the trial court, a decision affirmed by the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court. Mukesh filed a review petition under Article 137 of the Constitution, alleging illegal arrest, police‑induced

VINAY SHARMA & ANR.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2018 INSC 5919 July 2018Dismissed

The petitioners, Vinay Sharma and Pawan Kumar Gupta, filed review petitions challenging the Supreme Court's order dismissing their criminal appeals in the Nirbhaya gang‑rape case. They raised numerous grounds, including the abolition of the death penalty, alleged errors in the assessment of eye‑witness testimony, the i

LOKESH KUMAR JAINversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2013 INSC 4539 July 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a former Lower Division Clerk, was implicated in an FIR filed in 2000 for alleged embezzlement of Rs.4,39,617 based on a CAG report. The police investigation stalled for over nine years because the original records were never produced, despite repeated orders. Meanwhile, a departmental inquiry in 2008 ex

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.versusSANGHARAJ DAMODAR RUPAWATE & ORS.

2010 INSC 3959 July 2010Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra issued a notification under s.95 CrPC ordering the forfeiture of every copy of the book "Shivaji – Hindu King in Islamic India" on the basis of an FIR alleging offences under s.153, s.153A and s.34 IPC. The High Court quashed the notification, holding it failed to state the grounds of the Gover

K.D. SHARMAversusSTEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. & ORS.

2008 INSC 7869 July 2008Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a civil appeal challenging the award of a contract by Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL) under its fifth tender notice and the subsequent handling of a fourth tender notice. The appellant alleged fraud and that SAIL had acted against natural justice, claiming a settlement had been reached w

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.versusK. PRASAD AND ANR.

2007 INSC 7279 July 2007Appeal(s) allowed

Two aided primary schools in Kerala applied for upgradation to secondary level but the State rejected the applications citing lack of funds and non‑compliance with the Kerala Education Rules, 1959. The schools claimed discrimination, arguing that two other schools had previously been upgraded by relaxing the same rules

KISHOR KIRTILAL MEHTA AND ORS.versusLILAVATI KIRTILAL MEHTA MEDICAL TRUST AND ORS.

2007 INSC 7369 July 2007Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from a suit concerning the administration of the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. The trial court had struck out portions of the written statements of defendants 11‑13 and parts of the plaintiff's affidavit, and had refused an am

ANUKUL CHANDRA PRADHANversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5459 July 1997Dismissed

Anukul Chandrapradhan filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging Section 62(5) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which bars prisoners and persons in police custody from voting, except those under preventive detention. He contended that the provision violated Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution a

RAJENDRA PRASAD YADAV AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5599 July 1997Dismissed

The appellants, members of the Apex Bank of Madhya Pradesh, challenged the Registrar's assumption of control over the Bank after the term of its Board of Directors and Managing Committee expired without elections. The High Court had held that the Registrar was justified under Section 49(8)(ii) of the Madhya Pradesh Co‑

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.versusSAMARENDRA NATH PAUL AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5489 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of West Bengal sought to requisition two plots of land for a housing project under Section 3(1) of the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948. The owners challenged the requisition, alleging that the statutory notice was not served as required by Rule 3 of the 1948 Rules, specifically that t

THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADUversusD. SUBRAMANYAM RAJADEVAN

1996 INSC 7219 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Directorate of Vigilance investigated corruption complaints against D. Subramanyam RataDev, a Superintendent of Police, and sent a report to the Tamil Nadu Government. The Government referred the matter to the Disciplinary Tribunal under the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Disciplinary Proceedings Tribunal) Rules, 1955,

GAGAN BIHARI SAMAL AND ANRversusSTATE OF ORISSA

1991 INSC 1449 July 1991Dismissed

The appellants forcibly took a teenage girl to a remote house, intoxicated her, undressed her and sexually assaulted her, after which she escaped from a truck and sought help. The trial court convicted them of rape under IPC s.376(2)(g) relying on the victim's uncontroverted testimony and the presumption of lack of con

BAKSISH AHMADversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2026 INSC 6309 June 2026Appeal(s) allowed

Baksish Ahmad, a Border Security Force constable, was dismissed for contracting a second marriage without permission. He filed a statutory petition under Rule 28A of the BSF Rules, which was rejected, and subsequently filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution in the Delhi High Court. The Delhi High Co

BINOY VISWAMversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2017 INSC 4789 June 2017Disposed off

The petitioners, a group of public‑spirited individuals, challenged the constitutionality of Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which makes it mandatory for income‑tax assessees to quote their Aadhaar number while applying for a PAN or filing returns. They argued that the provision violated Articles 14 and 19(1

WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC.versusANI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

2025 INSC 6569 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The Wikimedia Foundation, as a defendant in a defamation suit filed by ANI Media, appealed a High Court order directing it to delete Wikipedia pages and discussion threads that commented on the court's proceedings, alleging that the order violated its freedom of speech and the sub judice principle. The High Court had h

MIHAN INDIA LTD.versusGMR AIRPORTS LTD. & ORS

2022 INSC 5349 May 2022Dismissed

Mihan India Ltd (MIL) invited global tenders for the up‑gradation, modernisation, operation and maintenance of Nagpur Airport. GMR Airports Ltd (GAL) emerged as the highest bidder after negotiating a higher revenue‑share and MIL issued a letter dated 07‑03‑2019 accepting the revised proposal, which GAL acknowledged. De

NIMS UNIVERSITYversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 5379 May 2022Disposed off

NIMS University and other petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a reduction in the eligibility percentile for admission to NEET Super Specialty courses and a mop‑up counselling round to fill 940 vacant seats. The Union of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, and other respondents declined

BHOLA KUMHARversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2022 INSC 5359 May 2022Disposed off

Bhola Kumhar was convicted under IPC section 376 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and sentenced to 12 years rigorous imprisonment with a fine. The Chhattisgarh High Court reduced his term to 7 years rigorous imprisonment but the appellant remained in custody for over 10 years due to alleged default on the f

KALPANA MEHTA AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 3149 May 2018Reference answered

The case arose from public interest litigation challenging the clinical trials of the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccine on adolescent girls in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh, alleging irregularities and health risks. The petitioners relied on reports of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare (7

SHIVASHAKTI SUGARS LIMITEDversusSHREE RENUKA SUGAR LIMITED & ORS.

2017 INSC 12909 May 2017Appeal(s) allowed

Shivashakti Sugars Ltd obtained permission to set up a sugar factory in Saundatti, Karnataka, but the High Court held that the nearby Raibagh Sahakari factory was an existing sugar mill within 15 km, violating Clause 6A of the Sugarcane Control (Amendment) Order, 2006, and ordered the factory’s closure. On appeal, the

IN RE, HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE C. S. KARNANversus.

2017 INSC 4559 May 2017Disposed off

The Supreme Court suo motu initiated contempt proceedings against Justice C.S. Karnan of the Madras High Court for repeatedly issuing letters and orders that alleged corruption and caste-based discrimination against numerous judges, including Supreme Court judges, and for publicly scandalising the judiciary. The Court

AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.versusAHMEDABAD GREEN BELT KHEDUT MANDAL & ORS.

2014 INSC 3829 May 2014Disposed off

The Gujarat government prepared a development plan in 1987 reserving a "green belt" for public housing. After ten years the reservation lapsed under Section 20 of the Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976. The Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority later framed a town‑planning scheme reserving the same l

KISAN SHANKAR KATHOREversusARUN DATTATRAY SAWANT & ORS

2014 INSC 3849 May 2014Dismissed

Kisan Shankar Kathore was elected to the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, but a voter filed an election petition under RPA s.100(1)(d)(i) and (iv) alleging that Kathore’s nomination was improperly accepted because he failed to disclose government dues, his wife’s bungalow and vehicle, and his interest in a partnership

CHANDRAN RATNASWAMIversusK.C. PALANISAMY AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 3349 May 2013Disposed off

The dispute arose from a joint venture agreement in which the appellant, Chandran Ratnaswami, alleged that the respondent, K.C. Palanisamy, misappropriated Rs.75 crore and transferred assets improperly. The matter was finally resolved by the Company Law Board and upheld by the Madras High Court, which ordered repayment

P.S. GOPINATHANversusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2008 INSC 6279 May 2008Appeal(s) allowed

P.S. Gopinathan, a Sub‑Judge promoted to District & Sessions Judge on 14 January 1992, was initially treated as a temporary appointee and later re‑appointed on 15 July 1992 after a fresh panel was prepared following the integration of the Civil and Criminal Judicial Services. He accepted both postings without objection

B. BHARAT KUMAR AND ORS.versusOSMANIA UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

2007 INSC 5359 May 2007Dismissed

The petitioners, teachers in private grant‑in‑aid colleges, sought a writ directing the State Government to raise the superannuation age from 58/60 to 62 years, relying on a UGC notification and a Central Government letter that recommended the higher age. The State Government, while adopting the revised pay‑scales, exp

U.P.S.R.T.CversusRAM KISHAN ARORA

2007 INSC 5389 May 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a conductor with the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, obstructed a police inspection of his bus and misbehaved with officials, constituting a criminal breach of trust. A departmental inquiry proved the misconduct and the corporation dismissed him; the departmental appeal was rejected. The

M/S MASTER CABLES PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2007 INSC 5409 May 2007Dismissed

Master Cables Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer registered under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, sought relief under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, after a tax inspection uncovered unaccounted sales. The company claimed that Section 90(3) of the Scheme barred the State from reopening its sales‑tax assessment, inv

MAHADEO BHAU KHILARE (MANE) AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 5429 May 2007Dismissed

The petitioners, Mahadeo Bhu Khilare and others, were engaged as unpaid assistants by a Talathi (revenue officer) in Maharashtra without any statutory authority or sanctioned post. After the State directed a ban on such engagements, they sought regularisation under a scheme framed by the Maharashtra Administrative Trib

SHREE SURAT VALSAD JILLA K.M.G. PARISHADversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 5449 May 2007Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the validity of the Constitution (Scheduled Caste) Order 2nd Amendment, 2002 which excluded the Mochi sub‑caste outside the Dang District and Umargaon Taluka of Valsad District, Gujarat, from Schedule I. The Court held that the President’s power under Article 341 to specify Scheduled Castes i

STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.versusDINKAR SINHA

2007 INSC 5499 May 2007Case Allowed

The respondent, Dinkar Sinha, was commissioned as an Indian Army officer in March 1979, discharged in 1988, and later joined the Uttar Pradesh Police Service under vacancies reserved for ex‑army personnel. He sought additional seniority under the Uttar Pradesh Non‑Technical (Class‑II/Group B) Services Appointment of De

HARIGOVIND YADAVversusREWA SIDHI GRAMIN BANK & ORS.

2006 INSC 3079 May 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a clerk‑cum‑cashier of Rewa Sidhi Gramin Bank, challenged the promotion of his juniors, arguing that the bank's promotion policy violated the seniority‑cum‑merit requirement under the Regional Rural Banks (Appointment & Promotion of Officers and other Employees) Rules, 1988. The High Court had earlier qu

INDIRA JAISINGversusREGISTRAR GENERAL, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND ANR.

2003 INSC 2889 May 2003Dismissed

Senior Advocate Indira Jaising filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking the Supreme Court’s direction to publish a confidential report of an in‑house committee that had investigated alleged involvement of sitting Karnataka High Court judges in certain incidents, and to order an independent agency to conduct a fre

SYED T.A. NAQSHBANDI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS.

2003 INSC 2899 May 2003Dismissed

The petitioners, a group of judicial officers, filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the grant of selection grade and super‑time scale to certain respondents, alleging that senior officers were bypassed, the criteria were arbitrary, and the process violated Article 16 and the Shetty Commission recommendati

STATE THROUGH SPECIAL CELL, NEW DELHIversusNAVJOT SANDHU @ AFSHAN GURU AND ORS.

2003 INSC 2909 May 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from the Parliament attack of 2001, after which the accused were charged under various statutes including the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (POTA). While the trial was pending, the accused sought an interlocutory order from the Special Judge to exclude intercepted telephone conversations as evidence

KAPILA HINGORANIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2003 INSC 2939 May 2003Directions issued

The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ petition alleging that numerous Bihar‑owned public sector undertakings had failed to pay salaries for years, leading to starvation deaths and suicides of employees and their families. The petition sought directions for payment of arrears and held the State of Bihar l

SUNIL KUMAR GOYALversusRAJASTHAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

2003 INSC 2959 May 2003Dismissed

The petitioners, employed as Legal Assistants in the Rajasthan Education Department, applied for the Rajasthan Judicial Service but had not completed the statutory three‑year active practice at the Bar. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission cancelled their candidature on that ground. The petitioners argued that repre

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusNARAIN SINGH

2002 INSC 2739 May 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Narain Singh, a former driver and later constable in the Border Security Force, was charged with disobeying a lawful command and assaulting his superior after failing to report for sentry duty. He pleaded guilty and appealed his dismissal, arguing that his poverty and admission of guilt warranted leniency. The discipli

CHANDRA PRAKASH TIWARI AND ORS.versusSHAKUNTALA SHUKLA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 2769 May 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the promotion of Sub‑Inspectors of the Uttar Pradesh police to the rank of Inspector. The Selection Committee had used the criteria laid down in the Government Order of 5 November 1965, a special rule under the Police Act, rather than the Uttar Pradesh Government Service (Criteria for Recruitment by

SISIR KUMAR MOHANTY AND ORS.versusST ATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 2779 May 2002Dismissed

The petitioners, who are police ministerial officers working in district offices, sought parity of pay scales and other emoluments with their counterparts in the headquarters (DIG, IG, DGP) based on a 1974 Government of Orissa resolution that created a separate cadre of police ministerial officers. The issue before the

ARNIT DASversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2000 INSC 3119 May 2000Dismissed

Arnit Das was arrested for a murder under IPC 302 and claimed to be a juvenile, asserting a birth date of 18‑09‑1982. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate ordered an enquiry under Section 32 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986, and, after a medical board report, concluded that Das was above 16 years of age on the dat

STATE OF HARYANAversusRAM CHANDER AND ANR.

1997 INSC 5039 May 1997Dismissed

The respondents, language teachers in Haryana Government Vocational Education Institutes, taught Hindi and English to standard 11‑12 students and claimed parity in pay with Lecturers teaching the same subjects in higher secondary schools. They argued that the work, syllabus, examinations and student outcomes were ident

AS. NARA YANA DEEKSHITULU ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5099 May 1997Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987, particularly its provisions abolishing hereditary rights of Archakas and other temple officials. It held that such abolition was not unconstitutional and that the Act's welf

SURJIT SINGH AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5139 May 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a long‑standing dispute between directly recruited Section Officers and promotee officers in the Central Secretariat Service over the allocation of vacancies. The 1962 Rules prescribed a 1/6 (later 1/5) quota for direct recruitment, with the remainder filled by promotion, and the 1984 amendment intro

THE SECRETARY, HAILAKANDI BAR ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

1996 INSC 6589 May 1996Disposed off

The Hailakandi Bar Association filed a writ petition under Article 32 alleging that Superintendent of Police A.K. Sinha Cashyap submitted a false report and affidavit to the Supreme Court to conceal police brutality that led to the death of under‑trial prisoner Nurul Haque. The Court examined the CBI investigation, med

T. LAKSHMI NARASIMHA CHARI ETC.versusHIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS ETC.

1996 INSC 6509 May 1996Disposed off

The appellant, a District Munsif who had been temporarily promoted to Subordinate Judge, was removed from service by the Andhra Pradesh High Court after a departmental inquiry found him guilty of misconduct. He appealed to the Governor under Rule 21(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and A

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusSMT. KAMLA DEVI AND ANR.

1996 INSC 6519 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Kamla Devi was appointed on an ad‑hoc basis under the U.P. Temporary Government Services Rules, 1975 and was repeatedly absent from duty. The State terminated her service on 23 September 1980 under Rule 14(a), which allows termination with one month’s notice or pay in lieu. She sought reinstatement and back wages, but

MAHARAJA KUMAR KHARAK SINGH (DEAD) THOUGH L.RS. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1995 INSC 3529 May 1995Dismissed

The brothers of the former ruler of the princely State of Nabha filed suits in the Patiala Sub‑Judge Court seeking possession of a parcel of land called ‘Bir Bhadson’, relying on a 25 April 1948 letter from Maharaja Pratap Singh that they claimed granted the land to them. The State of Punjab, as the successor to Nabha

SMT. DHANWANTIversusD.D. GUPTA

1986 INSC 1199 May 1986Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a land‑lady, owned a house in Vasant Vihar and repeatedly let it out to the respondent, a judicial officer, for limited periods after obtaining permission under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act. After the last two‑year tenancy expired in April 1982, the respondent refused to vacate, and the appel

AMBIKA PRASAD MISHRA ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ETC.

1980 INSC 1179 May 1980Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, which imposes land‑holding ceilings and provides for surplus land surrender, consolidation, and related restrictions. Petitioners challenged various provisions on grounds of violation of Article

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusRAM RATAN

1980 INSC 1219 May 1980Appeal(s) allowed

Ram Ratan, a Forest Guard in Madhya Pradesh, was charged with misconduct and, after a departmental inquiry, was served a second show‑cause notice under Article 311(2) of the Constitution (pre‑1976) and Rule 15(4)(i)(b) of the Madhya Pradesh Civil Services Rules, 1966, proposing a major penalty of removal from service.

NISHI MAGHU ETC. ETCversusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS.

1980 INSC 1229 May 1980Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined the selection process for admission to the Government Medical College, Jammu for 1979‑80, where the State had reserved seats for various categories including "rectification of regional imbalance", areas adjoining the line of control, bad pockets, social castes, wards of medical staff and stud

BACHAN SINGH ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB ETC. ETC.

1980 INSC 1209 May 1980Disposed off

The case involved a constitutional challenge to the death penalty for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and the sentencing procedure under Section 354(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Supreme Court, by a 4-1 majority, upheld the constitutionality of both provisions. The Court held that th

MALKIT SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND ORS.

2026 INSC 3419 April 2026Directions issued

Malkit Singh, president of the Manimajara Vyaapar Mandal, filed a writ petition seeking the removal of fruit‑vendors, hawkers and other street sellers who were encroaching on public paths, roads and property in Chandigarh, alleging nuisance and traffic hazards. The High Court dismissed the petition and imposed costs, p

SHUVENDU SAHAversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.

2026 INSC 3679 April 2026Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Shuvendu Saha, was involved in a tenancy dispute with the respondent‑2 complainant, which was settled in a civil suit that was subsequently dismissed. Despite the settlement, the complainant filed a criminal complaint leading to an FIR for offences under Sections 409, 417, 418, 419, 420 and 506(2) IPC an

KARIKHO KRIversusNUNEY TAYANG AND ANOTHER

2024 INSC 2899 April 2024Disposed off

In the 2019 Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, independent candidate Karikho Kri was elected from Tezu (ST) constituency. Nuney Tayang challenged the election, alleging that Kri failed to disclose three vehicles, a no‑dues certificate for government accommodation, and municipal/property tax liabilities, t

SMT. NAJMUNISHAversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

2024 INSC 2909 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The prosecution alleged that secret information received by an intelligence officer indicated that Accused No.4 would transport narcotics in an auto‑rickshaw, leading to a raid in which 1.45 kg of charas was seized from the vehicle and, subsequently, 2.098 kg was recovered from the house of Accused No.4 where Accused N

THE VVF LTD. EMPLOYEES UNIONversusM/S. VVF INDIA LIMITED & ANR.

2024 INSC 2939 April 2024Disposed off

The VVF Ltd. Employees Union filed a charter of demand in 2008 seeking wage revisions and various allowances for 146 workmen employed at VVF India Ltd.'s Sewree and Sion units. The Industrial Tribunal awarded relief on several demands but rejected the union's claims for pay‑scale revision, adjustments, and dearness all

FARZANA BATOOLversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2021 INSC 2469 April 2021Appeal(s) allowed

Two students from the Union Territory of Ladakh were allocated central pool MBBS seats at Lady Hardinge Medical College and Maulana Azad Medical College but were not admitted despite the allocations. They filed writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for admission. The Court observed that

BHARATIYA JANATA PARTY WEST BENGALversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

2018 INSC 3189 April 2018Disposed off

The Bharatiya Janata Party (West Bengal) filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a mandamus directing the West Bengal State Election Commission (SEC) to issue nomination forms electronically, allow email submissions, and provide police and para‑military protection, alleging that its candidates were barred from c

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIAversusBAJRANG BAHADUR SINGH & ORS.

2015 INSC 3059 April 2015Dismissed

Bajrang Bahadur Singh was elected to the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly in 2012 and subsequently entered into four contracts with the State. The Governor, under Article 192, declared Singh disqualified under Section 9A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, causing his seat to be declared vacant and a bye‑e

JACKYversusTINY@ ANTONY & ORS.

2014 INSC 2629 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, claiming ownership of a shop, filed a civil suit against the respondent‑tenant. The respondent filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking to quash the plaint and the suit proceedings. The Kerala High Court entertained the writ and set aside the plaint, imposing costs on

PREMJI NATHUversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER

2012 INSC 1669 April 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Premji Nathu, challenged the compensation awarded for his land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. After the Collector issued a notice under s.12(2) on 22‑Feb‑1985 without attaching a copy of the award, the appellant obtained the award later and filed an application on 8‑Apr‑1985 under s.18(1)

STATE OF ORISSAversusPRASANNA KUMAR MOHANTY

2009 INSC 4819 April 2009Disposed off

The State of Orissa prosecuted Prasanna Kumar Mohanty and examined the investigating officer, Bipin Behari Mahapatra, in chief on 1 September 1999. Although the defence was given two occasions to cross‑examine the witness, he was later recalled and failed to appear from 2003 to 2006, citing illness and old age. The Hig

JARNAIL SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

2003 INSC 2229 April 2003Dismissed

The petitioners were already accused in a police case relating to a shooting incident, but were later summoned under Section 319 of the CrPC in a separate complaint case concerning the same occurrence. They challenged the summons, arguing that Section 319 could not be invoked against a person already an accused in anot

STATE OF ORISSAversusORIENT PAPER AND INDUSTRIES LTD.

1999 INSC 1739 April 1999Dismissed

The State of Orissa and Orient Paper & Industries Ltd entered into an agreement granting exclusive rights to fell bamboos, which later gave rise to disputes over the measurement of bamboo quantities. The parties referred three specific questions to an arbitrator: the correctness of the Chief Conservator's determination

THE SREE NARAYANA DHARMASANGHOM TRUSTversusSWAMI PRAKASANANDA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 3999 April 1997Leave Granted & Dismissed

The dispute concerned the validity of elections to the Committee of the Sree Narayana Dharmasanghom Trust. After a series of orders by the Kerala High Court, a Special Leave Petition (SLP) was filed in the Supreme Court and dismissed. The appellant argued that the dismissal of the SLP was not a final order and that the

CHAITANYA KUMARversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

1986 INSC 689 April 1986Dismissed

The Karnataka government invited applications for bottling arrack and, after receiving 131 applications, the Excise Commissioner recommended eight contractors, many of whom were not eligible under the Karnataka Excise (Bottling of Liquor) Rules. The State awarded the contracts despite the rules restricting licences to

HARI DATT KAINTHLA & ANR.versusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS.

1980 INSC 709 April 1980Dismissed

The appellants, junior subordinate judges in Himachal Pradesh, challenged the promotions of three officers to District/Additional District & Sessions Judge (DSJ/ADSJ) and two officers to a selection‑grade subordinate judge post, arguing that such promotions are selection posts that must be based solely on merit and not

GURBAKSH SINGH SIBBIA ETC .versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1980 INSC 689 April 1980Case Partly allowed

Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia, a former minister, faced allegations of political corruption and applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC, fearing arrest for non‑bailable offences. The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the applications, imposing a series of restrictive conditions and rejecting blanket b

ABHISHEK SHARMAversusTHE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS.

2026 INSC 2209 March 2026Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were appointed as junior staff nurses on an "academic arrangement" basis under the 2009 SRO, and later sought regularisation under the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010, which excluded such appointments via Section 3(b). The State argued that the exclusion was valid because

COMMON CAUSE (A REGD. SOCIETY)versusUNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER

2018 INSC 2239 March 2018Disposed off

The petitioner, Common Cause, a registered society, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a declaration that the right to die with dignity is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and for directions to recognize 'living wills' or advance directives. The case was referred to a Constitution B

ANIL JOSHI AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 1829 March 2015Disposed off

The petitioners, former Range Officers of the Himachal Pradesh Forest Department, claimed that a 1983 letter from the Director of Forest Education promised them direct recruitment as Assistant Conservators of Forest, invoking promissory estoppel. The Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal dismissed their applications

R.S. SINGHversusU.P. MALARIA NIRIKSHAK SANGH & ORS.

2011 INSC 1939 March 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The Allahabad High Court summoned the Principal Secretary (Finance) and the Principal Secretary (Medical & Health) to appear personally for allegedly failing to comply with its earlier judgment. R.S. Singh appealed the High Court's interim orders to the Supreme Court, arguing that such summons of senior officials are u

HARICHARAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS,

2011 INSC 1949 March 2011Dismissed

The case concerned the custodial death of Mathura, who was taken into police custody, subjected to electric shock torture, and died shortly after release. The trial court acquitted the police officers, but the High Court convicted them under IPC sections 304 Part II and 330, relying on medical evidence of scrotal burns

STATE OF M.P.versusSUGHAR SINGH & ORS.

2010 INSC 1329 March 2010Disposed off

Eight persons were tried by a Sessions Court in Madhya Pradesh for murder and related offences under the Indian Penal Code. The High Court set aside their convictions, and the State appealed, but only four of the accused were impleaded as respondents in the appeal. The Supreme Court, in a 2008 judgment, reversed the ac

STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.versusMANOJ KUMAR

2010 INSC 1359 March 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana filed an appeal after the High Court, exercising its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, set aside the District Collector’s order directing Manoj Kumar to pay differential stamp duty on a commercial plot that had been sold at a price lower than the circle rate. The sale deed was executed fo

JAVED MASOOD AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2010 INSC 1389 March 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Javed Masood and another were convicted for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) based primarily on the testimony of the deceased's brother (PW‑5), who lodged a Parcha Bayan. Independent witnesses, including the shop owner (PW‑6) and several police personnel (PW‑18, PW‑29, PW‑30), testified that the brother and other a

HASAN ALI RAIHANYversusUOI AND ORS.

2006 INSC 1499 March 2006Disposed off

Hasan Ali Raihany, born in India to Iranian parents, was deported in October 2005 without being told the reasons. He later obtained a Single Entry Permit from the Indian Embassy in Tehran and re‑entered India, but was repeatedly summoned to the Kurla Police Station and feared further deportation without due process. He

RAM DAYAL RAIversusJHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS

2005 INSC 1259 March 2005Disposed off

The appellant, a retired foreman of the Jharkhand State Electricity Board, failed to vacate the Board's quarters after retirement and sought extensions from the High Court, which were eventually granted up to 1 November 1999. He finally vacated the premises on 6 January 2000, after which the Board imposed a permanent 5

CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.versusM/S. SHREY MERCANTILE PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

2005 INSC 1239 March 2005Dismissed

The Calcutta Municipal Corporation demanded mutation fees, calculated on an ad‑valorem basis and varying with property value and the cause of transfer, from developers who had purchased land and sought to change the name in the municipal assessment books. The developers challenged the levy, arguing that it was labelled

K. VENKATACHALA BHAT AND ANR.versusKRISHNA NAYAK (D) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2005 INSC 1269 March 2005Disposed off

The appellants challenged a writ petition that had been disposed of by a single High Court judge on the basis of a purported compromise memo signed only by the respondents. The appellants asserted that they never signed the memo and that the disposal was therefore erroneous. The Division Bench of the High Court refused

JAGDISH RAMversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.

2004 INSC 1459 March 2004Dismissed

Jagdish Ram, a District Ayurvedic Officer, was charged under Section 7 of the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 for allegedly practicing untouchability. The police investigation concluded the complaint was false, but the magistrate, after a second complaint, took cognizance and issued process. The accused repeatedly

OM PRAKASH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2004 INSC 1509 March 2004Dismissed

The Municipal Board of Rishikesh amended its bye‑law to prohibit the sale of eggs within the municipal limits, adding "eggs" to an existing ban on meat and fish. The appellants challenged the amendment, arguing that the board lacked authority because "eggs" were not listed in Section 298(2) List I Heading F of the U.P.

MEWA RAM KANOJIAversusALL INDIA INSTITUTE.OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & ORS.

1989 INSC 839 March 1989Dismissed

M.R. Kanojia, appointed as a Teacher Coordinator and later redesignated as a Hearing Therapist at AIIMS, sought to have his salary raised to the pay scale of Speech Pathologists and Audiologists, claiming that he performed the same work and that the State violated Articles 14, 16 and the Directive Principle of equal pa

SMT. KHATOON BEGUM ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1981 INSC 569 March 1981Case Allowed

Three writ petitions under Article 32 challenged the detention of individuals under the National Security Act, alleging that the authorities delayed consideration of their representations under Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The petitioners had made representations within days of detention, but the authorities eith

AMRIT YADAVversusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS.

2025 INSC 1769 February 2025Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the recruitment of Class‑IV employees in Jharkhand where an advertisement dated 29 July 2010 failed to disclose the number of posts and reservation details, rendering it void under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The Court held that the advertisement was illegal and any appointments m

SAMPURNA BEHURAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 1259 February 2018Disposed off

Sampurna Behura filed a public‑interest writ petition under Article 32 seeking the implementation of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Acts of 2000 and 2015, alleging that many states had failed to establish or properly staff Child Welfare Committees, Juvenile Justice Boards, Special Juvenile Polic

KHURSHEED AHMAD KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2015 INSC 1019 February 2015Dismissed

The appellant, a government irrigation supervisor in Uttar Pradesh, was removed from service for contracting a second marriage while his first marriage was still subsisting, in violation of Rule 29(1) of the U.P. Government Servant Conduct Rules, 1956. He claimed that he had divorced his first wife before the second ma

SARV U.P. GRAMIN BANKversusMANOJ KUMAR SINHA

2010 INSC 909 February 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a bank employee, was found guilty of financial irregularities, fraud and misappropriation and was punished with a reduction of pay after a departmental enquiry. The High Court set aside the punishment on the ground that the enquiry report had not been served to the employee, alleging a breach of natural

D.M. PREMKUMARIversusTHE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, MYSORE DIVISION & ORS.

2009 INSC 1299 February 2009Disposed off

D.M. Premkumari, a member of the Telugu Shetty community, was appointed as a primary school teacher in 1994 under the Group B reservation category as per the Karnataka Government's 1986 classification order. Later verification revealed that her caste, Telugu Balija, had been re‑classified to Group D, making her ineligi

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, U.K. PROJECT.versusMAHABOOB & ANR.

2009 INSC 1359 February 2009Dismissed

The Special Land Acquisition Officer (U.K. Project) appealed against a reference court award that increased compensation for 1 acre 13 guntas of land from Rs.4,000 to Rs.30,420 per acre. Both the first and second appeals were dismissed by the High Court, after which a Special Leave Petition (SLP) was filed alleging pro

BASHEER@ N.P. BASHEERversusSTATE OF KERALA

2004 INSC 929 February 2004Disposed off

The appellants, convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, had pending appeals when the NDPS (Amendment) Act, 2001 came into force on 2‑October‑2001. Section 41(1) of the amendment applied the new graded‑sentence regime to all pending cases except those "pending in appeal". The appellants

V. L. TRESAversusSTATE OF KERALA

2001 INSC 839 February 2001Dismissed

The appellant V.L. Tresa was accused of murdering her husband Vincent, but the trial court acquitted her of the murder charge (Sec. 302 IPC) due to lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt. She was, however, convicted under Sec. 201 of the Indian Penal Code for causing disappearance of evidence and giving false informatio

RAVI S. NAIK AND SANJAY BANDEKAR AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 579 February 1994Dismissed

The case concerned disqualification of members of the Goa Legislative Assembly under Article 191(2) read with the Tenth Schedule. Bandekar and Chopdekar were disqualified for allegedly having voluntarily given up their MGP membership, while Naik was disqualified on similar grounds after claiming a split in the party th

ABDUL LATIF ABDUL WAHAB SHEIKHversusB.K. JHA & ANR.

1987 INSC 389 February 1987Appeal(s) allowed

Abdul Latif Abdul Wahab Sheikh was acquitted of murder but was immediately placed under preventive detention under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985. No Advisory Board existed at the time, and the statutory requirement to refer the case to the Board within three weeks was not met. The first det

KHAZAN CHAND ETC.versusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND OTHERS

1984 INSC 289 February 1984Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, registered dealers under the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962, filed quarterly returns but failed to pay the tax on time, leading the Assessing Authority to levy interest under section 8 of the Act. They challenged the constitutional validity of sections 8(1), 8(2) and 8(3) on grounds of v

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusANURUDH & ANR

2026 INSC 479 January 2026Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against a High Court order that granted bail to the accused Anurudh and directed that a medical board determine the victim's age in all POCSO cases. The accused was charged under IPC sections 363 and 366 and POCSO sections 7 and 8 for allegedly abducting a 12‑year‑old girl. The High

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search