Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Indian Penal Code

17481 judgments · newest first · showing 7601–7800

Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Aman Kumar, sought regular bail in a Special POCSO case involving offences under Sections 363 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code, later amended to include several other IPC sections and Sections 4, 6, 8 and 10 of the POCSO Act. The bail application had previously been rejected twice, …

Amit Kumar Yadav @ Baba @ Amit Kumar @ Amit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar Yadav, was charged under IPC Sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 34 (common intention) and Section 27 of the Arms Act for alleged firing at an injured person. He has ten prior criminal cases and his earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner argued that a …

D. P. Yadav @ Devendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

D.P. Yadav was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (147, 148, 149, 323, 376, 511, 379, 302, 120B) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, having previously been denied twice. The court had earlier directed him to file a supplementary affidavit proving he was …

Jimmy @ Md. ShahnawazversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jimmy @ Md. Shahnawaz, was arrested in connection with a case registered under IPC sections 363, 364 and 365/34 and has been in custody since 19‑12‑2023. An earlier application for regular bail was rejected by the Patna High Court on 26‑06‑2024. In the present application, counsel …

Abhay PanjiyaraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Abhay Panjiyara, was arrested in connection with a 2016 case involving alleged shootings that resulted in one death and injuries to another. He faces charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 307, the Arms Act (Sec. 27) and the Explosive Substances Act (Secs. 3 and 4). The …

Md. Istiyak @ Md. IsteyakversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Istiyak, was implicated in a dowry harassment complaint (Sections 498-A IPC and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act) alleging assault and threats against his wife. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting innocence and offering to pay Rs.3,000 per month to the complainant to …

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh kr RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Santosh Kumar was charged under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 66, 66(B) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act for alleged cyber fraud. He had earlier applied for bail, which was rejected on 14 March 2024. In a second bail application, the …

Om Prakash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Yadav, was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act, including murder and assault. He had previously filed two anticipatory bail applications which were withdrawn, and was in custody since April …

Ramashray PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Vishal Kumar and his father Ramashray Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the IPC concerning the alleged enticement of a 14‑year‑old girl. They contended that the FIR was false, they have clean antecedents, and the …

Rajeshwar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajeshwar Paswan, applied for bail in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 341, 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, relating to a fraud scheme for government jobs. He claimed a clean antecedent, senior citizen status, and that he was falsely …

Sunil Kumar @ Nepali @ Sunil SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, was arrested on 8 March 2025 in connection with a robbery (Section 392 IPC) based on an FIR against unknown persons and a confessional statement of an apprehended accused, which the court held lacked evidentiary value. The petitioner, who has three prior cases, sought …

Shayuddin @ Sayoddin @ Sadiuddin @ Shankar Singh @ RahulversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shayuddin, was arrested in connection with a case registered under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (sections 137(2), 64(1), 3(5)) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (section 4), alleging rape of a minor. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a …

VIMAL KUMAR @ BHUTU SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vimal Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging that he fired a double‑barrel gun at an informant, invoking Sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant escaped unharmed and later stated he had not received …

Aman Gupta @ Aman Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Aman Gupta was arrested in November 2020 and charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (341, 323, 448, 354, 307, 504, 506/34, later 302) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. After more than five years of incarceration, he applied for regular bail, arguing that the trial had been unduly …

Abhishekh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishekh Singh, was named in an FIR for alleged cheating under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, accused of taking Rs. 7 lakh from the informant. He contended that the money was a loan given during a period of cohabitation and that the informant’s claim was a civil dispute over repayment. …

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Yadav @ Vijay Yadav @ VijayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Vijay Kumar applied for regular bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the IPC, the POCSO Act and the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The bail application had previously been rejected in an earlier proceeding. The court noted that the trial was ongoing, with four of seven …

Aditya Yadav @ Aditya JiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Aditya Yadav was arrested in connection with a Naxalite‑related case involving the recovery of a 10 kg bomb and charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Explosive Substances Act, the U.P. Act and the C.L. Act. He has been in custody since 24‑02‑2023 and is also implicated in …

Pushpa KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pushpa Kumari, a 55‑year‑old branch manager of Lotus Proficient Nidhi Limited, was arrested in connection with a cheating case (IPC §§ 406, 420, 34) alleging she withheld matured customer funds and misappropriated money. She applied for regular bail, claiming innocence, no prior criminal record, and …

Vikky Kumar @ Aarabh SrivastavaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Vikky Kumar, was arrested on 30 August 2021 in connection with offences under Sections 399/402 of the IPC, Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 & 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 20, 22, 25 & 29 of the NDPS Act. He applied for regular bail before the Patna High Court, having already been denied bail …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The High Court heard two related criminal miscellaneous applications arising from Complaint Case No. 865 of 2023, wherein the complainant alleged that petitioners Rajesh Kumar and Anil Kumar, partners in a real‑estate project, received Rs.10 lakh for a duplex but failed to deliver the premises or …

Ajay Yadav @ JathaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ajay Yadav and Balgovind Yadav, were charged with murder, attempt to murder, assault, and offences under the Arms Act in connection with a cattle theft and the killing of a Sub‑Inspector. They argued that they were not named in the FIR, were not subjected to an identification …

HEERA KUMAR @ HEERA MANDAL @ HIRA KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Heera Kumar, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case involving alleged kidnapping, forced marriage, sexual assault and related offences under the IPC and POCSO Act. The victim, a 20‑year‑old woman, allegedly eloped with the petitioner in September 2021, later claiming she was forced into …

Amresh Singh @ Amresh ChandravansiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amresh Singh, was charged under Sections 498‑A, 494, 302 and 34 of the IPC for the alleged murder of his wife. He had been in custody since 3 April 2024 and his earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner claimed an alibi, supported by CCTV footage certified under Section …

Ankit Kumar @ Rahish Yadav @ Rahish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The appellant, Ankit Kumar, is in judicial custody for alleged murder under Sections 302/34 of the IPC, along with charges under Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act. The FIR alleges that he, with co‑accused, abused an informant’s son and that the appellant fired a pistol, …

Manoj Mahto @ Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Mahto was arrested on 4 July 2023 in connection with a case registered under IPC sections 363 and 34, later amended to include sections 302, 201 and 120(B). He had been in custody for over two years and his bail applications had been rejected twice earlier. The prosecution had examined eight …

Mantu Kahar @ Mantu SamirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Mantu Kahar was charged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 427, 448, 354, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He had earlier obtained an order for regular bail, but the trial court did not release him because the pending cases were not correctly disclosed. The petitioner sought a …

Shravan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shravan Kumar was charged under Sections 376 and 506 of the IPC for allegedly luring a young woman, forcing sexual intercourse, recording a video, and blackmailing her. The prosecution described a pattern of intimidation and repeated rape, while the defense argued the relationship was consensual, …

Arvind sahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Arvind Sahni applied for regular bail in a case (Baligaon P.S. Case No. 142 of 2021) involving robbery under Section 392 of the IPC, with cognizance taken under Sections 395, 412 and 120B. The petitioner had previously been denied bail and was in custody since September 2022, with eight other …

Md. SajidversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Sajid, is in judicial custody for offences under Sections 363, 366, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code relating to kidnapping, rape and murder. The prosecution relies on a confessional statement by the petitioner, CCTV footage showing him with the victim on a motorcycle, and …

Nandlal SahversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Nandlal Sah and Asha Devi, parents of the alleged rapist Ramkrishna Sah, were named as accused in a FIR alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 376, 504/34 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. They applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the allegations against them …

Kamlesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Kamlesh Paswan was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sections 302/34 IPC) and has been in custody since May 2024. He applied for regular bail after the charge was not yet framed because a discharge petition he filed is pending before the trial court. The petitioner’s counsel argued that he …

Md. Rizwan @ Mohammad RizwanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Rizwan, was charged under Sections 457, 380 and later 411 of the Indian Penal Code for offences alleged in Mithanpura P.S. Case No. 550 of 2023. An earlier bail application was rejected on 13-11-2024 with a direction that a fresh application could be filed after one year; the …

RAJA SRIVASTAVAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The petitioners were accused in a complaint alleging that they induced a complainant to invest Rs 10 lakh for a hand‑pump installation project, of which only Rs 4.5 lakh was returned and the remaining Rs 5.5 lakh was alleged to be misappropriated. The complaint invoked Sections 406, 420, 467 and 468 …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rohit Kumar was arrested in September 2023 for alleged murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC. He had been denied regular bail twice earlier. The petitioner argued innocence, highlighted that only five of nine witnesses had been examined, and cited the long custodial period and trial delay. The …

AJIT @ JANGIO RAMANBHAI RAVAL THRO. MANSURI MOHAMMED SHARIFversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Ajit @ Jangio Ramanbhai Raval was preventively detained on 30 January 2026 by the Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person". He filed a petition challenging the order, arguing that no material was placed …

BHARTIBEN W/O GUNESHBHAI PREMJIBHAI GAMITversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The appellant Bhartiben was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly strangling her husband with a nylon string and inflicting abdominal injuries. The conviction rested primarily on an extrajudicial confession she allegedly made before the village sarpanch and the recovery of the …

DHEERAJ AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionists were charged under Sections 302 and 120B IPC for the alleged poisoning death of Vijay Chauhan, whose body was found to contain aluminium phosphide. The FIR was lodged seven months after the incident, and the investigation relied heavily on affidavits and a post‑mortem report, while …

SEEMA GOELversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The petition filed by Seema Goyal challenged the dismissal of her discharge application in a fraud case involving an alleged investment scam. The complainant alleged that Goyal and other accused misrepresented a real estate project, collected Rs.2.04 crore, and siphoned funds through multiple …

RAMSEWAK AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Ramsewak and another, who had stood as sureties for the accused Abhayram (convicted under Sections 147, 302, 149, 120‑B and 201 IPC), filed a criminal revision seeking discharge from their surety bonds after the accused was released on bail on 15‑Oct‑2025 during the pendency of a …

SHABANA PARVEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The revisionist, Shabana Parveen, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the B.N.S.S. seeking registration of an FIR alleging forcible entry, theft and intimidation by the house owner Akil Ahmad and his family. The trial court treated the application as a mere complaint, holding that no new …

KISHOR SINGH CHANDELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by journalist Kishor Singh Chandel, who was charged under IPC sections 386, 504, 506 and 500 for alleged extortion. The applicant argued that he had not been served with any summons or warrant, …

SATYAM SINHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Satyam Sinha under Sections 110 and 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code in a case involving alleged assault resulting in a fractured parietal bone. The applicant argued that he had no specific role in the incident, …

PRAVEEN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Praveen Kumar appealed a criminal revision challenging the order that framed charges against him under IPC sections 376D, 354, 506, POCSO Act sections 5 and 6, and SC/ST Act section 3(ii)(v). The revisionist argued that the victim was a consenting adult, the FIR was filed three days after the …

BIBI RAZYA SULTANA @ BIBI RAZAYA SULTANAversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners sought to quash an order dated 05-04-2022 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, which took cognizance of offences under IPC sections 323, 420, 504 and 506/34 despite a final report that differed from the complaint and a prior revision order setting aside the earlier …

Akela Kumar @ Vikash Turi @ Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Akela Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault, attempted rape, and video extortion under several IPC sections. The alleged incident occurred on 11 May 2022, where the petitioner and co‑accused allegedly assaulted children, injured a tutor, attempted to …

Ashish Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Ashish Kumar Singh petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail in connection with a 2022 case alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 307 and 34, where he was accused of firing at a victim. The petitioner claimed he did not fire at the victim and that the actual assailant was Shubham …

SATISH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Satish Kumar, chairman of Mararua PACS, was implicated in a 2017 case (PS No. 279) alleging shortage of CMR rice and charged under IPC sections 409 and 34. The prosecution claimed a discrepancy of 16,768.50 quintals of government rice after an inspection of the State Warehousing Corporation godown. …

Gurucharan Singh @ Charan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Gurucharan Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a theft case (IPC Sec. 379, later Sec. 411) registered as Siwan City P.S. Case No. 316 of 2024. The FIR was lodged after a motorcycle was reported missing; the petitioner’s name does not appear in the FIR but is mentioned in a co‑accused’s …

Ravindra MishraversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The Patna High Court considered the bail application of Ravindra Mishra, who is charged under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 380, 302, 504 and 506 for allegedly assaulting and killing the father of an informant and also assaulting the informant’s mother. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging false …

Dilip Yadav @ Dilip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a case arising from FIR No. 535 of 2022, which alleged offences under several IPC sections and the Arms Act, including assault causing grievous and simple injuries and theft. The prosecution alleged that Dilip Yadav and Bechan Yadav inflicted grievous …

Abhishek Kumar @ Awinash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was implicated in a robbery case (Bidupur PS Case No.401 of 2023) under Sections 395 and 412 of the IPC based on confessions of co‑accused Deepak Kumar and Nirbhay Kumar, with no material recovered from his possession. He filed an anticipatory bail application, …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, a 21‑year‑old, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a FIR (Gurua PS Case No. 478 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 363 (theft) and 365 (extortion). He contended that the FIR was lodged two days after the alleged incident and that the …

Aplendra Singh @ Aplander SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aplendra Singh, sought bail in a case (Didarganj P.S. Case No. 162 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner participated in an assault on an informant and his brother, …

Bija Manjhi @ Mahadeo Manjhi @ Mahdev ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, aged 80 and 75, applied for regular bail in a murder case (Sections 302/34 IPC) where their son, Kudish Manjhi, was the principal accused. The prosecution alleged that Kudish assaulted the informant's husband, who later died, and the petitioners were implicated merely as parents. …

Nathuni SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nathuni Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with a case (Dinara P.S. Case No. 252 of 2017) alleging offences under several IPC sections including assault and criminal intimidation. He claimed innocence, a clean …

sudhir Singh @ Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sudhir Singh, was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for regular bail, contending that the lower court's order mistakenly recorded his date of custody as 30‑04‑2025 instead of the correct date of 13‑05‑2025, and …

Laxmi Mahto @ Lakshmi MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Laxmi Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint (Case No. 723 of 2016) alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 354, 504 read with 34, related to alleged illegal cutting of Sheesham trees. Both parties claim ownership of the disputed land, and the …

MD. Imtiyaz Alam @ Imtiyaz KuraisiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, MD Imtiyaz Alam, filed an application for anticipatory bail after learning that he was named in an FIR for alleged assault with a knife on an informant, along with co‑accused Tanvir Alam. The prosecution alleged that the assault caused multiple injuries, including a grievous one, and …

Rajiv Raj SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Rajiv Raj Sinha and Kumari Guriya Sinha, were accused in a complaint case of cheating, criminal breach of trust, assault, and criminal intimidation for taking Rs 44 lakhs from the complainant for a land sale that was never executed and threatening him when the money was demanded. …

Aditya Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Aditya Kumar Das, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 324, 307, 379 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleges that he assaulted the informant with a knife, causing multiple cut injuries on the informant's forehead, …

Md. HusenversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of villagers, were named in an FIR alleging participation in a mob assault on police personnel during a vehicle‑accident incident. They sought anticipatory bail, claiming they were falsely implicated and have clean antecedents. The State opposed the bail but admitted there …

Nathuni SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Nathuni Sah and Deepak Sah, were arrested in connection with a violent incident in Vaishali where the informant’s husband was allegedly assaulted with an iron pipe and a knife. They were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including offences of assault, grievous …

Karun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Karun Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 414 IPC and Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly possessing 0.375 litre of liquor found with Dilip Kumar, who was also in possession of a motorcycle owned by Karun Kumar. The petitioner argued that he had …

Juli KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners – Juli Kumari, Nilu Kumari and Asha Devi – applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 436, 427, 429 and 34. The State opposed the bail, contending that proceedings under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. were already pending against the petitioners …

Neelam KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Neelam Kumari was named in an FIR for alleged forgery of documents to obtain a government teaching post, invoking IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B). She contended that the FIR was lodged without giving her a prior hearing and therefore sought anticipatory bail, emphasizing her clean …

Nitesh Kumar @ Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, was implicated in a FIR alleging murder under Sections 302/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, stemming from a shooting incident on 7 January 2023. He contended that the specific act of killing the informant’s son was attributed to co‑accused Dhananjay Kumar …

Jiyalal Ram @ Ram Prawesh RamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Jiyalal Ram, sought regular bail in a murder case (Sections 302/34 IPC) arising from the death of his wife, Manju Devi. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and his sons discovered the dead body and that unknown persons, possibly including the petitioner, were involved. The …

Latifur RahmanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Latifur Rahman was accused of taking Rs. 2,50,000 in cash and a Rs. 5,00,000 cheque to compromise a pending case, alleged offences being criminal breach of trust, cheating and criminal intimidation under IPC sections 406, 420 and 506. The petitioner contended that the allegations stem from a civil …

Jhunnu Khan @ Jhunna KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jhunnu Khan, was accused of an offence under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly abducting and marrying a woman who was already married. The prosecution alleged that the victim was taken away by the petitioner and later married him, with her statement recorded under …

Deepak Kumar @ Chhotu KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault, threats, and extortion under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and a relative had a physical relationship with the informant, threatened to make a video viral, …

Ravi Ranjan Yadav @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, five members of the Yadav family, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault on an informant and his relatives. They contended that the incident arose from a long-standing land …

Pujit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pujit Kumar, feared arrest in a case (PS Kalyanpur, Case No. 217 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 379, 354, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. The FIR alleges that co‑accused Ankit Kumar assaulted the informant and his wife, and the petitioner is only said to have …

Janif Baitha @ Janif BaithversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Janif Baitha, was named in a dowry death complaint (IPC Sections 304B and 34) arising from a marriage that took place in 2013. The FIR was registered in 2019, and the petitioner applied for anticipatory bail in 2026, more than six years after the case was filed. The court examined …

Motilal ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Motilal Manjhi was arrested in a police raid at a brick kiln where 60 litres of illicit liquor and related equipment were seized, leading to charges under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He has been in custody since 16 January …

CHAMPA DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are the mother‑in‑law, brother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law of an informant, filed an application fearing arrest in a case (Panapur P.S. Case No. 89 of 2018) that alleged they assaulted, tortured and sexually assaulted the informant for dowry demands. The prosecution charged them …

Mahendra SadaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mahendra Sadai applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in CR No. 567 of 2017, which alleged offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 498-A, 494, 504, 506/34 for alleged dowry‑related assault and torture. The State and the informant opposed the bail, contending the seriousness of the …

Narayan Kumar Mallick @ Narayan MallickversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Narayan Kumar Mallick, was arrested in connection with a case alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 476 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code relating to a disputed sale deed and alleged misappropriation of Rs.5 lakh. The informant claims the petitioner must return the …

Narayan Kumar Mallick @ Narayan MallickversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Narayan Kumar Mallick, was charged under Sections 406, 420 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly cheating an informant of Rs. 17.10 lakh by failing to register land in his favour. He contended that the dispute was civil, that he had no intention to cheat, and that the …

Narayan Kumar Mallick @ Narayan MallickversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Narayan Kumar Mallick, director of Manokamna Infra Project Pvt Ltd, was charged with cheating an informant of Rs. 11 lakh for failing to register land in the informant's favour, under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B). He applied for bail, claiming he was falsely implicated and that …

SUBIN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Subin Kumar, was arrested in connection with a dowry‑death case involving his wife’s death, alleged to have occurred within a year of marriage. He faces charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 498A, 307, 34, 304B, 302 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, as well as allegations of …

Raju Kumar Das @ Raju DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raju Kumar Das, sought relief fearing arrest in a murder case (Kesariya P.S. Case No. 126 of 2024) filed under Sections 302, 201 and 120(B) of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that the deceased woman's body was recovered and the case was directed against her in‑laws, with no specific …

DILIP KUMAR @ DILIP SAH @ ANTU SAHversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Dilip Kumar and Rajan, were charged after the complainant Sunil Kumar, a manager of a jewellery firm, alleged that two cheques issued by them bounced due to a closed account. The FIR, registered under Sections 406, 415, 420, 467, 468, 34 of the IPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable …

Pramod Thakur @ Pramod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Pramod Thakur feared arrest in a criminal complaint (Case No. C‑31 of 2019) filed under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The parties resolved their dispute through the Patna High Court Mediation Centre, signing a Memorandum of Agreement on 02‑12‑2025, which was acknowledged by the …

SAHINA KHATOONversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellants were convicted by a Special POCSO Court for kidnapping, rape and trafficking of a minor girl under Sections 376, 120B IPC, Section 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and provisions of the POCSO Act. They appealed, arguing that the alleged offence occurred on 30 September 2012, …

Gopi Sahani @ Gobari Sahani @ Gobri SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gopi Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Lakhaura Police Station Case No. 76 of 2014, which alleged offences under numerous sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act. The FIR named 25 accused …

Chanchala KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Chanchala Kumari, wife of Kumar Nagendra, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a cheating case involving Rs 2.41 crore alleged mis‑transfer of a house to the informant. The offence is alleged under IPC sections 406, 420, 465, 468 and 471. The petitioner argued she …

MD. KAMRULversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Kamrul, Sakina and Mahena, were implicated in a case (Baisi P.S. Case No.232 of 2023) for offences under Sections 143, 341, 323, 308, 354(b), 379, 504 and 506/34 of the IPC. An anticipatory bail application was filed, but the petitioner Kamrul (Petitioner No.1) sought to withdraw …

Om Prakash @ UpendraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Om Prakash @ Upendra was charged under Sections 395, 412 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged dacoity, robbery and criminal conspiracy. He applied for bail before the Patna High Court, marking his third attempt to obtain relief. The court noted that the investigation had produced …

Santosh BiduaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Bidua filed an application to quash FIR No. 415 of 2024, which alleged that he assaulted his brother‑in‑law with an iron rod, invoking IPC sections 341, 323 and 307. The petitioner claimed the case was a vexatious prosecution arising from a personal dispute over a puja, and highlighted a …

Bittu ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Bittu Manjhi was arrested in connection with kidnapping of a minor girl and alleged rape, facing charges under Sections 363, 366(A), 506 and 120(B) of the IPC. The petitioner contended that he has a clean record, was falsely implicated, and that the victim’s medical report did not corroborate the …

Manas Sinha @ Manas MadhuramversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manas Sinha sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple IPC provisions, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The allegations involved an attempt to molest a minor, but the investigation revealed that the informant was an advocate with personal disputes, leading to a …

Shatrudhan Prasad @ Shatrudhan Kumar @ Shatrughan PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shatrudhan Prasad, was arrested on charges of kidnapping and sexual offences under IPC sections 366A, 34, 376 and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6, alleged to have abducted the minor daughter of an informant. He has been in custody since 19‑01‑2025 and the charges have been framed. The …

Bablu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Bablu Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 147, 304(B) and 316 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the death of his wife. The prosecution argued that the death occurred within seven years of marriage, invoking a …

Dipesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Dipesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder (IPC Sec. 302/34) and several offences under the Arms Act. He had been in custody since 04‑06‑2025 and sought regular bail, arguing that his implication arose only from a co‑accused's confession, which he claimed lacked evidentiary value, and …

Shashi Bhushan Paswan @ Aklu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Shashi Bhushan Paswan, was charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for cheating an informant of Rs. 6,40,000 in a land transfer case. He had earlier been granted anticipatory bail in 2017 with conditions, which he violated, leading to cancellation of the bail bond …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code concerning the death of his wife within seven years of marriage. The State argued that the presumption under Section 304B places the husband and his family on the opposite …

Sangita prasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sangita Prasad, sought relief fearing arrest in a criminal case (Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 714 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC for taking Rs. 76 lakhs for the sale of two flats but not delivering possession. She claimed innocence, stating the flats were …

Hira Kumar @ Hira PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Hira Kumar, applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 458 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 395, 412 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, relating to dacoity, robbery and criminal conspiracy. This was his second attempt to obtain bail after the trial had already …

Sujit Bhandari @ Sujit Chaudhary @ Sujit Kumar ChandraversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

Seven appellants were charged under multiple IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault, caste abuse and robbery arising from a land‑related dispute. They applied for anticipatory bail, which the trial court rejected, prompting an appeal. The appellants contended …

Satish SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Satish Singh, was accused in a complaint alleging that he forcibly took Rs.15,000 in cash and a gold chain from the complainant after demanding an additional Rs.1,00,000 for a land sale. The complaint, filed under Sections 323 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code, arose from a land …

Sunil Paswan @ Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sunil Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a Mahila Police Station case (No. 06 of 2015) involving alleged offences under Sections 323, 341, 504, 379, 406, 498‑A of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated in a dowry‑related assault …

Md. FirozversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Firoz, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal complaint (No. 2817 of 2023) alleging offences under Section 498‑A IPC for dowry harassment and cruelty. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and his family demanded dowry and, upon non‑payment, tortured and evicted the …

Mohammad RajaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Mohammad Raja sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint under Section 498-A of the IPC alleging dowry harassment and torture of his wife, Fiza Praveen. He denied any wrongdoing and offered to pay Rs.3,000 per month as maintenance, which the complainant accepted. The court, …

Sunil Kumar Jaiswal @ Sunil JaiswalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Jaiswal, entered into a partnership to run a rice mill on land owned by the complainant’s wife and invested Rs.6,00,000. The partnership failed to deliver rice to the Bihar State Food Corporation, leading to a liability of Rs.34,80,420. The complainant alleges that the …

Neeraj Kumar @ Niraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Neeraj Kumar and Rakesk Kumar Thakur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a cyber‑crime case (Saharsa P.S. Case No. 36 of 2024) involving alleged forgery of death certificates and illegal withdrawal of funds under a labour department scheme. The prosecution alleged that the …

Musmaat Bhabhuka Devi @ Girja Devi @ Bhabhuni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Musmaat Bhabhuka Devi, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging forgery of an Aadhaar card and a fabricated genealogical table to fraudulently sell her land. The allegations stem from a land dispute with the informant, who previously filed a criminal case (Cr. Misc. No. 40696 …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Amit Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint filed by his wife Guddi Kumari under Sections 498(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging dowry harassment and torture. The petitioner denied any wrongdoing and offered to pay Rs. 4,000 per …

Umesh Sharma @ UmeshversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Umesh Sharma applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 1223 of 2023) under Section 498-A IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged he assaulted and tortured the victim to demand dowry. The petitioner pleaded innocence and …

Mithlesh PanditversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mithlesh Pandit and Shashi Pratap, were implicated in a complaint (Case No. 1639/2023) alleging forgery of a land‑sale agreement and conspiracy under Sections 467 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The complainant claimed the petitioners demanded a share of his land and fabricated an …

Prince Kumar @ Prince KurmiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prince Kumar, was apprehended in connection with a case of alleged theft and kidnapping (IPC §§363, 366A/34) after a victim girl disappeared for a second time. In the earlier case (Siswan P.S. Case No. 178 of 2024) the girl had claimed she left home voluntarily due to parental …

Md. Aftab AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Md. Aftab Alam applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 324, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the IPC, relating to alleged cruelty, assault and extortion by his wife. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner demanded a four‑wheeler and Rs.5,00,000 and …

Dharmendra Kumar HimanshuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar Himanshu, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 420, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code alleging illegal construction of a fodder‑manufacturing unit on government land under the Mukhya Mantri Udyami Yojana. He contended that the scheme’s terms …

Diwakar Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Diwakar Kumar Singh, sought protection from arrest in a criminal case filed under Sections 406 and 506 of the IPC concerning an alleged fraudulent land sale. He contended that the dispute was essentially civil, involving breach of a contractual agreement and non‑payment of cheques, …

Kumari Rina Yadav @ Reena YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Kumari Rina Yadav was implicated in a FIR (Hathua P.S. Case No. 133 of 2023) for alleged forgery and related offences under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. She contended that the certificate in question was genuine and that she had no prior criminal …

Sanjay Kumar Golwara @ Sanjay Kumar GolvaraversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sanjay Kumar Golwara and Rajeev Goyal, were charged under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act for allegedly receiving a Rs 10 lakh advance for a sale deed that was never executed, though they claim the amount was returned. They applied for pre‑arrest …

Balkrishna Mehta @ Balkrishna MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Balkrishna Mehta, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging misappropriation of public funds under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that during his tenure as Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Barhouna, irregularities and embezzlement occurred in various …

Jamshed Ansari @ Jamshed AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Jamshed Ansari, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a robbery case (Section 394 IPC) registered in 2022 based on an FIR filed by informant Raju Kumar. The FIR alleged that four persons, including the petitioner, attacked the informant, inflicting knife injuries and …

Kaushal Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Kaushal Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 193 of 2025) alleging fraudulent transfer of land, filed under sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act. The petitioner claimed ownership of the land and that he had already …

Rakesh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of villagers from Sonbarsa, feared arrest in a 2013 case (PS No. 61) involving offences under Sections 147, 149, 332, 333, 337, 338, 353 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. They argued that they had previously been granted protection under Section 41(A) of the Criminal …

Diwakar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Diwakar Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging that a consignment of flour entrusted to a carrier, Zinka Logistics Solution Pvt. Ltd., was not delivered, leading to charges under IPC Sections 406 and 420/34. The petitioner contended that he was merely a local contact for the carrier …

Ashok SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ashok Sah, Abhishek Sah, Birendra Sah and Chhotelal Sah, were implicated in a 2017 case (Kuchaikote PS Case No. 224) for offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have assaulted an informant at her residence. They claim they were falsely implicated due to …

Nawal Kishore Singh @ Nawal Kumar Singh @ Nawal SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nawal Kishore Singh, was named in a complaint alleging mental and physical cruelty under IPC sections 498A and 494, filed after 25 years of marriage. He contended the case was false, arising from his inability to pay maintenance during the Covid-19 period, and argued that the …

Akhilesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellants, five Yadavs from Beniya village, were charged in a 2015 FIR for assault, robbery, arson and other offences under various IPC sections, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They sought anticipatory bail in 2024, arguing that the incident stemmed from local …

Sanjo DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are family members of co‑accused Shyam Sundar Kumar, were implicated in a 2021 case (Udakishunganj P.S. Case No. 345) for offences under several IPC sections and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. They claim innocence, stating that the police’s final report cleared them, but a Judicial …

Ranjit Sahni @ Ranjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ranjit Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case (IPC §§304B, 201, 34) arising from FIR No.153 of 2020 filed by informant Moti Sahni. The FIR alleged that Sahni had married a woman in 2019, tortured her for dowry and that she subsequently disappeared, with …

Gaya PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Gaya Prasad, sought bail in a case alleging kidnapping for marriage under IPC sections 366A and 34 and sexual offences against a 12‑year‑old girl under POCSO Act sections 8 and 12. The prosecution alleged that the minor was abducted and sold to the petitioner, with a statement under …

Mundrika Kumar Ray @ Mundrika RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Mundrika Kumar Ray applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 364 IPC for alleged rape and torture of an 11‑year‑old girl whose statement was recorded under Section 164 CrPC. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating he was not named in the FIR and was only implicated during …

Bipin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a student named Bipin Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered in 2017 for offences under Sections 341, 323, 353 and 504/34 of the IPC, alleging that he was falsely implicated in an altercation over BCA results. He claimed innocence, asserted that he had not …

Nazir Hussain @ NazirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Nazir Hussain and Matiur Rahman, were named in an FIR for kidnapping a 15‑year‑old girl and allegedly raping her after giving her adulterated water, with accusations that they forced her into flesh trade. The petitioners contended that the girl was actually 19‑20 years old per …

Lal Babu Prasad @ Lal Babu GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Lal Babu Prasad, was charged with rape of the informant’s minor daughter under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 and 9 of the POCSO Act. He applied for bail, claiming he was falsely implicated and has no prior criminal record, though he has been in custody since …

Sunil Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellants appealed under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the trial court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case alleging assault and non‑payment of wages. They contended that the complaint was false, the police had filed a closure report, and the …

Dhannu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Dhannu Paswan, applied for bail in a case dating back to 1987 involving alleged dacoity and related offences under Sections 396 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that a group of armed criminals entered the informant’s house, committed dacoity, and later threw …

Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vijay Kumar was arrested in connection with a shooting case (Murliganj P.S. Case No. 200 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 341, 342, 386, 302, 120B, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that several persons, including the petitioner, …

Santosh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Yadav was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging offences under Sections 323 and 406 of the IPC, involving alleged forgery, cheating and threats of murder. The petitioner claimed innocence and offered to pay Rs.6,10,000 to the informant, while the opposite party claimed a higher …

Md. SaddamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Saddam, an engineer with NHAI, was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting Md. Tamanna with a garasa, causing grievous injury. He sought anticipatory bail, asserting an alibi that he was at his workplace in Nagpur at the time of the …

Md. SajjadversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Sajjad, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS No.534 of 2023) involving multiple offences under the IPC, including assault, robbery, and causing grievous hurt. The prosecution alleged that on 21 November 2023, the petitioner and others attacked an …

Anandi PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Anandi Paswan, the brother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, was charged under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for her murder. He had earlier been granted anticipatory bail in 2014 but failed to surrender and was taken into custody on 30‑August‑2025 after more than twelve years of …

Mithlesh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Mithlesh Chaudhary applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 302, 147, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the murder of an informant's son. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner, along with others, assaulted the victim with a …

Vikash MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Vikash Mandal, the husband of a woman who died allegedly due to dowry demands, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 304B of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that he, along with others, tortured his daughter-in-law for a motorcycle and she was burnt to death. The petitioner …

Manish sahni @ Manish kumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Manish Sahni, husband of a woman who was allegedly tortured and killed, was charged under IPC sections 302, 304B and 34. He applied for regular bail, claiming he was falsely implicated and that the post‑mortem report did not support the alleged strangulation. The prosecution presented an FIR stating …

Bijay Yadav @ Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, five Yadavs from Barahkurba village, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No.103 of 2024 alleging offences under multiple IPC sections and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The incident involved an armed assault on an informant's house on 5 April 2024, with specific …

Suresh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suresh Yadav, was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging fraud and forgery under Sections 420 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, relating to a fake sale deed of land. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, fraudulently obtained a land deed that …

Saroj SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Saroj Sharma, husband of a woman who died under suspicious circumstances, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 302, 498A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner murdered his wife for non‑fulfilment of dowry demands, citing …

Vinay RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Vinay Rai, sought regular bail in a case registered under sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code concerning the alleged dowry‑related death of his wife. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner brutally assaulted his wife, leading to her death from head injuries, and no …

Satyam Yadav @ Satyam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Satyam Yadav and Sittu Yadav, were charged under IPC sections 341, 354A, 307, 504, 506 (read with Section 34) and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and firing at him during an attempt to seize his niece. They contended that they were falsely …

Upendra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Upendra Paswan, was charged in a Sessions trial for offences under Sections 363, 365, 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code relating to the disappearance and alleged murder of the informant's son. He applied for regular bail, having been in custody since July 2023, but his earlier …

Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ravindra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 307, 302, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the shooting that killed Virendra Kumar and injured Vijay Yadav. The prosecution relied on the injured …

Avinash MahthaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Avinash Mahtha was arrested in connection with a dowry‑death case (IPC §§304B and 34) after his wife’s death, which the prosecution alleges resulted from a demand for Rs.25 lakh. The petitioner contended that the death was a suicide, that no dowry demand or harassment occurred, and that there was no …

Raj Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint case alleging his involvement in offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 325, 326, 354B, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, where he was accused of assaulting a woman with an iron rod. He had already obtained …

Jitendra PanditversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of family members from Village Rata, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging assault on an informant’s husband and daughters, invoking several IPC offences (147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 427, 448, 506). They contended that they were falsely implicated, …

Sittu Yadav @ Sintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Satyam Yadav and Sittu Yadav, were arrested in connection with a police case involving alleged assault, attempted kidnapping of a minor, and firing upon an informant, charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act, and Section 34 of the IPC. They claimed …

Mukul Kumar Jha @ Mukul JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Mukul Kumar Jha applied for anticipatory bail in a cheating case (Sections 406, 420/34 IPC) where he is alleged to have defrauded Rs. 2,20,000. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that Rs. 60,000 was transferred to his account and later returned to the complainant, and that he has only one …

Agin Yadav @ Agin Kumar Yadav @ BabajeeversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Agin Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2021 case (PS No.53) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506/34 arising from a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted the informant's family, while the petitioner …

PINALBEN JAGDISHBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Petitioner Pinalben Jiagdishbhai Patel filed a Special Criminal Application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a consent order dated 16‑06‑2023 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Criminal Case No. 4711 of 2023, which related to several IPC offences. The State, represented by Mr …

STATE OF GUJARATversusPARMAR GANGABEN W.O. CHHAGANBHAI BHOJABHAI

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The case concerns the murder of Sureshbhai Raval, who was attacked with swords by accused Chhaganbhai Bhojabhai Parmar and Dashrathbhai Ambalal Raval, leading to his death; a third accused, Gangaben, was also present and assaulted the complainant. The trial court convicted the first two under …

PARMAR CHHAGANBHAI BHOJABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The case concerns the murder of Sureshbhai Raval, who was attacked with swords by accused Chhaganbhai Bhojabhai Parmar and Dashrathbhai Ambalal Raval, leading to his death; a third accused, Gangaben, was also present and assaulted the complainant. The trial court convicted the first two under …

AVNISH BHADAURIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Avnish Bhadauriya filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 15‑01‑2026 lodged by informant Rajkumar under several IPC sections. The State argued that a second FIR dated 18‑01‑2026 was filed by the petitioner’s side, indicating that the incident was …

BIRENDRA CHATURVEDI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Birendra Chaturvedi and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 25‑12‑2025 under IPC sections 115(2), 351(2) and 352. The State argued that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet had been filed on 21‑02‑2026 under CrPC section 193(3), and …

VANSHIKAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The revision petition was filed by Vanshika challenging the Special Judge (POCSO) order dated 25‑11‑2024 that dismissed her complaint under Section 203 CrPC. The complaint alleged that on 04‑06‑2024 the accused, identified as Sonu Dhobi and others, had attempted to assault her, threatened her with a …

PRADEEP SONI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Pradeep Soni and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 13‑11‑2025 registered under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State argued that the investigation was complete and a …

HARENDRA @ HARENDRA KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Harendra Kumar and another, filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 24-11-2025 that framed charges against them under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They contended that the charges were improper because they had been …

BRIJESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Brijesh Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging the trial court's rejection of his discharge application in a rape case (Sec. 376 IPC) filed by the complainant. He argued that the alleged sexual relationship was consensual and that a marriage under Section 125 CrPC had been solemnized, thus …

SONUversusState of U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu, who is in custody for alleged offences under Sections 376, 452 and 506 of the IPC arising from a dispute with the alleged victim. The applicant argued that the relationship with the victim was consensual, that there is no medical evidence …

SHAVEJversusState of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Shavej, who has been in custody since 6 December 2023, applied for bail in a case involving offences under Sections 366, 368, 376(3), 506, 120‑B of the IPC and Sections 3/4(2) and 16/17 of the POCSO Act. The trial court had rejected the bail application. The applicant’s counsel argued that the …

PALLAVI SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Pallavi Srivastava, filed a criminal revision under Sections 397/401 CrPC challenging the Family Court's order dated 16 September 2025 that dismissed her Section 125 CrPC maintenance application on jurisdictional grounds. She alleged that after leaving her matrimonial home in …

PRAVEEN KUMAR MITTAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 18‑01‑2025 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Budaun, which alleged their involvement in offences under Sections 120‑B, 420, 467 and 468 of the IPC. The dispute arose from a complex …

SUNIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, a government servant, was accused of embezzling Rs.2,39,498 under IPC sections 420 and 409. He had refunded the entire amount to the State exchequer and had previously been granted interim anticipatory bail by a coordinate bench. The State opposed the grant of anticipatory bail. The …

SHUBHAM SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Three police personnel—Shubham Srivastava, Rajesh Chaudhary and Praveen Kumar—filed anticipatory bail applications under CrPC Section 482 in connection with FIR No. 162 of 2025 alleging extortion, threats and illegal collection of money under IPC Sections 308(6), 140(2), 351(3), 61(2) and the …

Harendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Harendra Rai applied for bail in a case stemming from a 2019 incident in Jurawanpur where he was alleged, along with co‑accused Sanjiv Singh, to have fired on the father of an informant, resulting in death. The charges include offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 307/34, later amended to …

Shyambabu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shyambabu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a communal clash that occurred during a Durga immersion procession, for which a FIR was filed against 74 named persons and many unknown individuals. The petitioner argues that he is not named in the FIR and that his name was later …

Ajay Kumar SinghversusState of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking the release of his Mahindra TUV 300 vehicle seized in connection with a criminal case (Patna Byepass P.S. Case No. 43 of 2024) under IPC sections 328, 379, 420 and 34. He asserted ownership of the vehicle and claimed no involvement in …

Parvej Alam @ Parvej KhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, three brothers from Marawatpur, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (PS Desari Case No. 105 of 2004) involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including sections 147, 149, 342, 323, 324, 354, 447, 504, 506, 379, 279 and 302. The State opposed the bail, …

Golu Kumar @ Golu Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, was accused of kidnapping the minor granddaughter of an informant under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the victim, in a statement recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, denied the prosecution's …

Kabutri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Kabutri Devi petitioned for anticipatory bail in a dowry death case involving alleged offences under Sections 498A and 304B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The FIR dates back to 1999, and the petitioner claimed fear of arrest in 2026, more than 26 years after the case …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Sonu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Nautan P.S. Case No. 434 of 2025) for offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The prosecution, based on a complaint by a temple priest, alleged that Kumar and Asgar Miya assaulted the priest and …

Biram Mahto @ Biran Mahto @ Birendra MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Biram Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that the co‑accused Jato Mahto assaulted the informant’s brother with a knife, while the petitioner was only …

Dasrath Mahto @ Dashrath MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Dasrath Mahto was arrested in connection with a robbery alleged under Section 395 of the IPC, wherein Rs 35,000, a mobile phone and a motorcycle key were allegedly taken at gunpoint. The prosecution’s case rests solely on the confessional statement of a co‑accused, with no material recovered from …

Om Prakash RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Ray, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 414 IPC, Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Section 30(A) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 9 litres of liquor, a 7 mm pistol and two live cartridges from a motorcycle he owned. He …

Vijay SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vijay Sahani applied for bail in a dowry death case (Sections 302, 304B, 201, 34 IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act) where the prosecution alleged that his niece-in-law was killed due to dowry demands. The petitioner claimed he is innocent, has no criminal antecedent, and is the …

Jay Prakash SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Jay Prakash Sah, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging offences under IPC sections 279, 337 and 338 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the recovery of 25 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he …

Vidya Bushan ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Vidya Bushan Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail in a case (PS Case No. 123 of 2019) filed under Sections 406, 420 and 506 of the IPC alleging cheating involving Rs.15,00,000 on a non‑judicial stamp paper. The complainant, Gajendra Rai, claimed that the petitioner, a friend, received …

Gulab KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Gulab Kumar, was charged in Pandarak Police Station Case No.10 of 2023 for theft of petroleum from a pipeline, invoking sections 379, 411, 427 and 120-B of the IPC, sections 15/16 of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipeline Act, 1962, sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act and …

Nesar AhmadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners Nesar Ahmad, Manoj Thakur and Ejaullah were named in FIR No. 321 of 2025 for alleged assault on the informant's son, invoking several IPC sections. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the FIR was exaggerated and that there were counter‑versions of the incident. The …

Md. Hussnain @ Seikh HussnainversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Hussnain, was named in an FIR for alleged robbery under Section 392 IPC, based primarily on a confessional statement of a co-accused, Saddam Sheikh, who claimed the petitioner had disclosed the informant’s travel route. No direct incriminating material or recovered cash was found …

PRIYANKA CHAUDHARY @ PRIYANKA PRASADversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

Priyanka Chaudhary was arrested in connection with a murder case (Nasriganj P.S. Case No.210 of 2024) alleging she, along with others, threatened an informant and his brother and that the brother was shot dead on 29‑06‑2024. The petitioner, who has no prior criminal record, claimed she was falsely …

Hari Narayan GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Hari Narayan Gupta, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case alleging his participation in a conspiracy to fire upon Keshav Kumar, resulting in four gunshot injuries. The prosecution alleged that Gupta was part of a gang that committed the offence …

Baban KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Baban Kumar, was charged under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act in a case registered at Ghoshi Police Station, Jehanabad. He applied for bail, which was rejected on 09-10-2025. Within six months, he filed a second bail application before …

Farhan @ Farhan AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Farhan Alam, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of three litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, …

Md. Najam @ Md. NazamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Najam, was arrested in May 2023 in connection with a case under IPC Sections 304(B) and 328/34. After two earlier refusals of regular bail, he filed a third bail application, arguing that the trial had not concluded and his continued detention violated his Article 21 right to …

Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Ranjan Kumar, Pawan Kumar and Pravin Kumar sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No.62 of 2025 alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that Ravi Kumar entered the complainant's house, opened …