Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17481 judgments · newest first · showing 7801–8000
The petitioner, Md. Chunna, was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for serious offences. He applied for bail for the first time, which was rejected on 17-10-2025. Within six months, he filed a second bail application. The Patna High Court held that the second application was …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was charged under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged murder and conspiracy. He filed a second application for regular bail after an earlier bail denial on 29‑11‑2023. The High Court noted that out of nine charge‑sheeted witnesses, seven had …
Gopal Gond applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Ara Nagar PS Case No. 680 of 2025) involving alleged theft of a bag, cash and documents. The informant, a civil court employee, claimed the petitioner, while intoxicated, seized her bag containing a mobile, documents and Rs. 3,000. …
The petitioner, Randheer Kumar, was arrested in connection with a dacoity case (Section 395 IPC) involving armed robbery on 28 April 2024. He claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that his name does not appear in the FIR and only surfaced through a co‑accused’s confession, with no material …
The petitioner, Rinki Kumari, a self‑declared Naxal, was arrested on 19 June 2024 in connection with a 2017 case (PS Kajra No. 59) involving offences under Sections 121, 121A, 122 of the IPC, Sections 25(1‑b)A and 26 of the Arms Act, and several provisions of the UAPA. She applied for regular bail, …
The petitioner, Md. Pyare Rain, was charged under sections 379 and 34 of the IPC for alleged involvement in a theft of a lady’s bag at Rambadrpur railway station. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the statement of a co‑accused, Niyaz, who named the petitioner, with no material recovered from …
Rupesh Yadav was arrested in connection with a case alleging illegal possession of 800 litres of spirit, charged under IPC sections 272, 273/34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that the liquor was recovered from a joint family house …
Suresh Yadav was arrested in June 2023 for offences under IPC sections 365, 364, 302, 201 and 120B. The trial remains pending and he has been in custody for over two years. Earlier applications for regular bail were rejected twice, but the co‑accused was later released on bail. The petitioner argued …
The appellants, four residents of Kanhaipur, were charged under several IPC sections and Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly stopping a motorcycle, abusing the informant with caste slurs, and assaulting him with an iron rod. Their anticipatory bail …
The petitioner, Rohan Thakur, applied for bail in a case registered under sections 399, 402, 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25(1B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, alleging that police had recovered a pistol, cartridges and mobile phones from alleged co‑accused who claimed the petitioner …
The petitioner, Dharamvir Kumar, was charged with murder under IPC sections 302/34 and related offences including 120-B, 212, 216(a) and with an offence under section 27 of the Arms Act. He is alleged to have fired on the nephew of an informant, causing death, and his name appears in a co-accused's …
The petitioner, Sattan Singh, was charged under sections 302, 342, 323/34 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code for the brutal killing of a deceased person, and has been in custody since 16‑04‑2024. He applied for regular bail in the High Court of Patna. The court examined the seriousness of the …
The appellants, Manu Ray and Abhimanyu Ray, were charged under several IPC offences and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant while intoxicated and plucking his corn. They sought anticipatory bail, which was denied by the SC/ST Exclusive Special Judge. The …
The appellant, Sanjay Yadav, appealed against the rejection of his anticipatory bail application filed under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, in connection with a case registered for offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. The …
Petitioner Kumari Mamta, a post office employee, feared arrest in a case (Guthni PS Case No. 309 of 2023) alleging embezzlement of Rs. 20,66,287 under Sections 409 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged she colluded with a co‑accused to misappropriate funds, while the petitioner …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police raided a liquor operation, seizing 5,000 kg of fermented Mahua and 200 litres of country-made liquor, and reported that the accused opened fire on police. The FIR did not name the petitioner; his name surfaced only through a …
The appellants were charged under several IPC offences and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the father of an informant after a wage dispute, during which caste-based abuse was alleged. The appellants contended that the FIR was filed with a motive to extort money, …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Saurabh, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 172.80 litres of foreign liquor and charged under IPC sections 272, 273, 414 and 34 as well as sections 30 and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was merely a labourer with no knowledge …
The petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code for issuing a Rs. 20,00,000 cheque that was dishonoured. The prosecution alleged that the cheque bounced …
The appellant, Ashish Kumar, was charged under several IPC offences and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a supervisor and demanding a ransom of Rs. 25 lakh. The appellant contended that he was falsely implicated in …
The appellants appealed against the Additional Sessions Judge’s order rejecting their anticipatory bail application under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with a case involving alleged assault, robbery and outraging modesty. The prosecution alleged that the …
The appellants, two women, were charged in a case involving assault, knife attacks and caste-based abuse under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Their anticipatory bail application was rejected by a Special Court under …
The appellants, two women named Babita Devi and Rajan Devi, were charged in a Bochahan police case for alleged assault and caste-based offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Their anticipatory bail application had been rejected by a Special …
The appellant, Rajesh Kishan, a CDPO in Muzaffarpur, was charged under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 509 and 354(b) and under Sections 3(i), 3(iii), 3(vi) and 3(xii) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly harassing and abusing an Aanganwari Sevika, Sudha Kumari, on 25 May 2022. The …
Mukesh Sah, the husband, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case where he was implicated under several IPC offences, notably Section 498A, and a provision of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the allegations were false, the dispute was matrimonial, and he was willing to pay a monthly …
The Special Judge had rejected the appellants' anticipatory bail application in a case arising from an alleged assault and caste-based abuse under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences. The appellants contended that the FIR was filed maliciously because the informant had …
Amir Khan applied for anticipatory bail after learning that a complaint had been lodged against him under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He alleged that the complaint was false, claiming that he and the complainant, Farzana Khatoon, had mutually consented to a …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar Chaupal, applied for anticipatory bail in a case where 486 litres of liquor were seized from six motorcycles, and he is alleged to be the owner of one of the vehicles. He was not arrested at the spot and the seized liquor was not found in his conscious possession. …
Rahul Kumar, a B.Sc. Agriculture student, was charged with multiple offences including murder (Section 302 IPC) after allegedly assaulting an informant and her husband with a bamboo stick, the husband later dying five days later. The petitioner contended he was not present at the scene and that his …
The petitioner, Guddu Baitha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 323, 341, 498(A), 504 and 506/34. He alleged that the complainant, his wife Soni Devi, had falsely implicated him and that she was not contesting the case due to financial constraints. The …
The appellants, seven individuals from Malda village, were charged under the SC/ST (POA) Act and several sections of the Bihar Penal Code for allegedly entering the informant's house, assaulting him and using caste slurs. The appellants contended that the FIR was filed in retaliation for an …
The petitioner, Hiralal Yadav, was charged under sections 302, 147, 148, 149, 323 and 504 of the IPC and section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing on an informant's brother, resulting in death. He applied for bail while the trial was at an advanced stage, with all charge‑sheet witnesses …
Bambam Sah applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 546 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 498A, 341, 323, 379, 504 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner claimed innocence and feared arrest, while the State …
Shankar Kumar, apprehending arrest in a case under Section 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Domestic Violence Act, applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he was falsely implicated by his wife, who had also received a notice in a restitution of conjugal rights suit filed under Section 9 of the Hindu …
Ram Sagar Kumar, the petitioner, married the alleged victim Sugga Kumari after being charged in Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 673 of 2022 for offences under Sections 363, 366, 376, 504, 506/34 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He surrendered on 31.01.2026 and is in custody. He sought to quash …
The appellant, Saurabh Sunny, was charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged dowry‑related physical and mental torture of his wife. The trial court denied his pre‑arrest bail, prompting an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST Act. The Patna High …
Shambhu Kahar, convicted under IPC sections 302 and 149 and Arms Act section 27 and sentenced to life imprisonment, claimed that he had completed the qualifying period of actual custody (14 years) and total custody with remission (20 years). He filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State …
The petitioner, Anup Singh, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Siswan P.S. Case No. 32 of 2020) alleging his involvement in the death of a person, charged under Sections 304 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution presented a post‑mortem report indicating that …
The petitioner, Md. Reyaz Alam, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a Mahila police case alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 498A, 504/34 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner participated in assault and torture of the victim to demand …
The appellant, Malti Devi, mother‑in‑law of a Scheduled Caste woman, was named in an FIR alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 504/34 and Section 3(i)(x) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act arising from a dispute over an inter‑caste marriage. The Special Judge had rejected her …
Petitioner Raja Sah sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Chakmehshi P.S. Case No. 153 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged dowry‑related murder. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner …
Pankaj Kumar Sinha appealed against the rejection of his pre‑arrest bail under the SC/ST Act, alleging that he, as an LIC agent, misappropriated Rs 23 lakh belonging to the complainant. The trial court had taken cognizance of offences under IPC sections 420 and 324 and Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST …
The petitioners, Arvindra Sahni and Munna Sahni, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a police case (Ujiyarpur PS Case No. 443 of 2023) involving alleged offences under Sections 346, 364, 366B, 498A, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They claimed the victim girl was in Buxar, known only …
Muslim Miyan was convicted under Sections 302/34, 307/34 of the IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act and sentenced to life imprisonment with several terms of rigorous imprisonment. After serving more than 14 years in actual custody and over 20 years …
The petitioners, three brothers, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a Gopalganj police case alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118, 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that they assaulted the victim causing simple injury. The petitioners contended they …
The appellants, Manik Choudhary and Shivam Kumar, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and snatching money, with a claim that they used caste‑based abusive language. The appellants …
Kiran Devi and Neha Devi, both women, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a neighbour who was placing a cart near his house. They contended that the neighbour had earlier assaulted Kiran Devi …
The informant lodged an FIR alleging that on 5-6 May 2025 the appellants assaulted him, stole a gold chain and cash, and used caste-based slurs. The Special Judge under the SC/ST (POA) Act rejected the appellants' prayer for anticipatory bail. The appellants appealed, with Dharmendra Kumar later …
Santosh Gond, husband of Sarita Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging attempted murder, assault, and property intimidation under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3), 85 of the B.N.S. 2023 (corresponding to IPC Sections 341, 323, 324, 506 and 498A). He claimed …
The petitioner, Vikash Rana, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging offences under Sections 420, 313, 366(a), 376(3) of the IPC and Sections 4 and 8 of the POCSO Act involving a minor informant. The informant, a 17‑year‑old girl, claimed that the petitioner had taken her to Tamil …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, was implicated in a complaint under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly demanding a dowry of Rs. 25 lakh and assaulting his wife, causing a miscarriage. The petitioner denied the allegations and offered to pay Rs. 5,000 per …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint (No. 140/2024) alleging dowry harassment under IPC sections 498A, 406, 494 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complaint claimed the petitioner demanded a motorcycle and Rs.5,00,000, leading to the …
Mithlesh Kumar, married to Riya Kumari, faced a complaint (Case No. 1669/2017) alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 307, 498A and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, claiming dowry demands and cruelty. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, asserting innocence and that he has been trying …
The petitioners – Mirtunjay Kumar, Upendra Sharma and Bebi Devi – applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Complaint No. 802 of 2024, which alleges offences under several IPC sections (341, 323, 498A, 379, 504, 506, 34) and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They contend they are …
The appellants, a group of twelve individuals, appealed under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against orders dated 28‑06‑2025 and 29‑07‑2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Madhubani. The FIR alleged that the appellants assaulted an …
The appellants – Premshankar Chaudhary, Golu and Prakash Chandra Mishra – appealed under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against an order dated 31 July 2025 of the Exclusive Special Judge (SC/ST Act) that had refused bail in a case arising …
The appellants – Usha Devi, Amin Bagvai and Nitu Kumar – were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and threatening him to vacate a community hall, with accusations of caste‑based abuse. They appealed to the Patna …
The appellants, four women from Nagra Basantpur, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions for allegedly assaulting an informant in a land‑dispute‑related incident. They filed an appeal under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST Act …
The appellants Rajesh Yadav, Arvbind Yadav and Md. Sadam were charged under several IPC provisions and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and abusing the complainant, who claimed SC/ST status, in a land‑dispute context. The appellants …
The appellant, Kamlesh Kumar Mehta, was charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and using caste-based abuse in a land dispute. The informant claimed to belong to a SC/ST community, while the …
The appellant, Md. Faiyaz Ali, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant, a member of a Scheduled Caste, with a knife. The trial court denied bail, holding that the offence fell within the ambit of the Act. The …
The appellants, Rajnish Kumar and Bikash Kumar Ray, appealed under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against an order dated 03‑09‑2025 of the Additional Sessions Judge‑1 cum Special Judge SC/ST Act, Bhojpur, which had denied bail in a case alleging firing on an informant and …
Saryu Chaudhary applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case alleging he fraudulently withdrew Rs 7.5 lakh from the informant’s bank account, invoking several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. Both parties asserted that the matter was essentially a monetary dispute and expressed willingness …
The petitioner, Anand Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a fraud case (Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 14 of 2015) involving alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, where Rs.1,95,000 was transferred to his bank account. He claimed innocence, a clean …
Petitioners Biplab Halder and Shyamal Biswas were implicated in an excise case involving alleged recovery of 882 litres of liquor, charged under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act. They contended that they were not caught in possession, did not own …
Petitioner Raj Kumar Patel was arrested for alleged firing on the leg of an informant's son, charged under IPC sections 307, 34, 120B and Arms Act section 27. He contended that the FIR named an unknown assailant and his only link was ownership of a mobile number used by others, for which he had …
The petitioner, Sanjay Rai, was charged under IPC sections 363, 366A, 34 and POCSO Act section 8 for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant by promising marriage. The victim, now about 20 years old, testified that she voluntarily eloped with Ranjit Kumar Rai, married him, and is …
The appellants, five residents of Sundarpur, were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly setting fire to an informant's house, burning valuables and snatching a gold chain while abusing the …
Anil Kumar was implicated in a criminal case (PS Case No. 434 of 2021) for alleged forgery of documents related to an HL bridge contract under the PMGSY, involving sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that a certificate dated 16‑06‑2016 was forged to obtain …
Arvind Kumar was charged under Sections 419, 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly refusing to execute a sale deed after receiving Rs 44.70 lakh from the informant for land in Bihta. The parties had a written agreement to complete the sale within nine months, but the petitioner failed …
The appellants, Satish Yadav and Nitish Yadav, appealed against the trial court’s order rejecting their anticipatory bail under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The prosecution alleged that the appellants, along with others, …
The petitioners, five members of the Yadav family from Dulamdih, Gaya, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 190, 115, 76, 109, 303(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The State had not produced the injury report at the time of the …
The appellants, Prashant Kumar and Sajan Kumar, were accused of taking a loan of Rs.1,40,000 and refusing to repay it, subsequently abusing the informant on a telephone call with caste-based slurs and threats. The FIR was filed under IPC sections 406, 420, 504, 506, 34 and SC/ST Act 3(1)(r)(s). The …
The appellants, nine individuals, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Court that denied them anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple IPC sections and Section 3(i)(x) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The FIR alleged that the accused had abused a college …
Vikash Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that a FIR (Case No. 682/2025) had been lodged against him for alleged conspiracy to commit loot and possession of a loaded pistol, invoking Sections 310(4), 310(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the …
The appellants, three members of the Mandal family, filed an appeal against an order dated 14‑10‑2025 that granted them anticipatory bail in a criminal case arising from a complaint under sections 307, 148, 323, 379, 504 and 354B of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the …
Md. Shaukat applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS case No.200 of 2025, where he is alleged to have fired a bullet at the mother of an informant, an offence punishable under Section 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution asserted the specific allegation, while …
The petitioner, Shivshaktri Chouhan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 518 of 2021) alleging offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 379, 504, 506/34 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others …
The appellants, Md. Ayaz Akhtar Arzoo and Md. Alamgir, appealed under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Special Judge's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged mob formation, caste‑based abuse of a constable, and damage to government …
The petitioner, Rinku Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code for an alleged robbery where five miscreants allegedly robbed an informant of Rs. 8,000 and valuables. The petitioner claims innocence, stating that no incriminating material was …
The petitioners, a group of women residing in Samhuta Tarkulwa Dera, Buxar, filed an application fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (Dhansoi P.S. Case No. 131 of 2025) that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, …
The petitioner, Rohit Paswan, applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged robbery of Rs. 2,04,000 from a Bank of India branch and alleged collusion in offences under Section 394 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case rests mainly on the confessional statement of a …
The petitioner, Anil Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a motorcycle and a truck. He has five prior excise cases and contends that no liquor …
The appellants, Vinod Sao and Sushma Devi, were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly threatening and assaulting a police informant. They applied for anticipatory bail under Section 14(A)(2) …
Krishna Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case (IPC sections 302, 201) and later charged under sections 120B and 34. The deceased was the son of an informant whose body was recovered near a railway track. The informant initially lodged an FIR against unknown persons but, after seven …
The petitioners, three residents of Mastipur village, sought bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for an alleged attempted kidnapping and assault. They claimed innocence, stating the allegations were vague, the injuries to the victim were minor, and they had no …
The petitioner, Shambhu Manjhi, was arrested in connection with a case involving the seizure of 250 litres of illicit liquor and charged under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He had previously applied for regular bail, which was denied …
The petitioners Abhay Kumar Jha and Nirbhay Kumar Jha applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in PS case No.138 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code including assault, robbery and causing grievous hurt. The prosecution alleged that on 15‑08‑2025 Sonu …
The petitioner, Nitish Mukhiya, applied for bail in a case registered as Raniganj P.S. Case No. 147 of 2024, which alleges his involvement in the murder of his wife under Sections 304(b), 302 and 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution contends that the petitioner, as the husband of the …
Monu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Banka Mahila P.S. Case No. 21 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506, 494/34 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged he assaulted the victim to demand dowry, …
The petitioners, Sanjay Kumar Dubey and Rupesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a 2012 case alleging obstruction of an informant during the operation of an illegal saw‑mill, invoking offences under IPC sections 413, 353, 186, Section 33 of the Forest Act and several provisions …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (PS‑747/2022) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 498, 323, 504, 379 and 34. He claimed he was falsely implicated, while the State opposed the bail. The High Court, relying on the Supreme …
Rajiv Kumar, a chartered accountant, was implicated in a fraud case where he allegedly drafted a partnership deed for a new firm that used a name similar to his client’s company, leading to accusations of cheating and criminal conspiracy under several IPC sections. He applied for anticipatory bail, …
The petitioner, Sadhdha Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment complaint (Case No. 170c of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 341, 498-A, 504/34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3/4. The State opposed the bail, asserting the petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Karamat Mian, applied for regular bail in a murder case registered under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, stating there was no eye‑witness or material evidence against him, and that co‑accused had already been granted anticipatory bail. The State …
The petitioner, Rintu Singh, was implicated in a police case (Sonepur PS Case No.923 of 2022) for alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, relating to a purported fraudulent transfer of a car. The petitioner contended that the vehicle was …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar Rai, sought anticipatory bail after a complaint was lodged against him under Section 498A of the IPC read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He alleged that his wife, Puja Kumari, had concealed a prior marriage to a man named Sumit and had a daughter from that …
Mohnish Kumar was arrested in connection with a 2018 case alleging cheating, forgery and dishonour of cheques under several IPC sections and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The prosecution alleged that he and a co‑accused received Rs. 1.5 crore for a purported business venture and …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar Ray, sought bail in a case (Maker PS Case No.86 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged dowry‑related murder of his wife. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, together with family members, tortured and …
The appellant Chunni Lal was convicted by the Sessions Court for robbery under Section 392 IPC and for robbery with a deadly weapon under Section 397 IPC, based on the testimony of the victim and two eyewitnesses who saw him flee with stolen ornaments. The prosecution alleged that the accused …
The appellants appealed against a summoning order and the entire criminal proceedings initiated under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, alleging that the case stemmed from a civil land‑demarcation dispute. The informant claimed the appellants were …
The High Court examined a criminal revision filed by Sunil Agarwal challenging the trial court's rejection of his discharge application under Section 245(2) CrPC in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 420, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC. The revisionist argued that the receipt produced by the …
Amar Nath Nishad was charged under several IPC sections, including murder and attempt to murder, for a 28 November 2021 incident in which two persons were killed and several injured. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the informant's party was the aggressor and that witnesses' statements …
The petitioners, married to the complainant, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashal of an FIR dated 28‑02‑2024 that alleged offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had amicably settled their matrimonial …
The revisionist, sister‑in‑law of the deceased, challenged the Sessions Judge’s order convicting her under Section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide, arguing that the FIR was lodged six months after the incident, that the deceased had committed suicide, and that a compromise had been reached. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sumit, accused in a case involving alleged assault with hard and blunt objects and a sharp weapon. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR and medical report did not assign him a specific role in causing grievous injury, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Sessions Trial No. 396 of 2020) and the non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued against them. They contended that they were on bail but could not appear in court due to unavoidable …
The appellant Ajay Kumar Mishra filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional District & Sessions Judge’s order that rejected his discharge application and framed charges under Sections 376, 366 and 506 of the IPC. The appellant contended that the alleged victim was a consenting adult, citing …
The revisionist Jatindra Dhiman challenged a discharge order dated 12‑12‑2025 issued by the Civil Judge, Chhata, which had rejected his application for discharge after a charge sheet was filed on 10‑06‑2024 under IPC sections 406 and 420. He contended that the charge sheet was hastily prepared, the …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 29‑09‑2022 and the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 533 of 2021, in which they were charged under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault, …
The revisionists, who were married to the daughter of the opposite party, alleged interference by the opposite party and police, leading to an FIR under multiple IPC sections and the D.P. Act. The investigating officer initially exonerated most of them but later, after a re‑investigation ordered by …
The High Court of Allahabad dismissed a criminal revision filed by Ashok Puri challenging the Sessions Judge’s order rejecting his discharge application in a Section 306 IPC case. Puri argued that the FIR did not disclose any act of abetment under Sections 107 and 108 IPC and that the trial court’s …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summons dated 04‑04‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 4642 of 2022) initiated by the opposite party under Section 506 IPC. The dispute stems from a marriage in 2019 after which the opposite party …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 6905 of 2022, which arose from an FIR alleging offences under Sections 420, 386, 342, 323, 504, 506 and 452 IPC. The applicants contended that the case stemmed from a monetary dispute, that an …
Manoj @ Aryan Chauhan was arrested in connection with a case alleging impersonation of a jailer and extortion of approximately Rs.50,000, charged under several IPC sections (417, 418, 419, 420, 384, 467, 468, 411) and Section 66-D of the IT Act. The accused contended that he was falsely implicated, …
The applicants, Sama Begum and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 2169 of 2016) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC. The parties had already reached a compromise, which was verified …
The revisionist Anil Gangwar filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 11‑09‑2025 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Amroha, which rejected his discharge application and framed charges under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The …
The applicant Subhash Yadav filed a Section 482 application seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 449 of 2019, which alleged that he and others conspired to obtain a loan by using a forged sale deed for a disputed property. The complainant claimed to have purchased the property in 1991, mortgaged it, …
The applicant, Mycale Deno Adex, was arrested in connection with alleged fraud offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act section 66-D. He filed a second bail application after a first one was rejected, contending that he was not named in the FIR, that the FIR was lodged with an …
The appellant Surajpal, who has been in custody since 23 February 2025, filed a bail appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, contending that he was falsely implicated and not named in the FIR, his name appearing only in a co‑accused's …
The appellants were convicted by a Special Judge for offences under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly assembling to commit dacoity and possessing illegal firearms. The prosecution relied on police reports, statements of two independent witnesses, and …
The appellants Sadhu Singh and Amit Singh were convicted under IPC Sections 304 read with 34 and 325 read with 34 for the death of Atar Singh and injuries to Bhure Singh. On appeal, the High Court examined the prosecution evidence, noting the absence of timely medical reports, contradictions in …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 08.04.2016 and the related criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 9738 of 2015 under Section 323 IPC) as well as a non‑bailable warrant dated 20.11.2025. The court noted that the non‑bailable …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 3218 of 2012) filed under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had reconciled and entered into a court‑verified compromise, which was filed before the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Devendra Alias Deva, who was in custody since 27‑12‑2023 for alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC relating to the purported sale of a property in which he had no title. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhagwan Singh, who is accused under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B for allegedly selling a property fraudulently and obtaining a loan against it. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the dispute was essentially …
The High Court considered a criminal revision filed by Smt. Sonu Devi and her minor son against a Family Court order directing the husband, Vipin Kumar, to pay Rs.3,000 and Rs.2,000 per month respectively as maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The husband claimed a higher …
Shahjad Ahmad, arrested in connection with Crime No. 181 of 2024 under IPC sections 363 and 377 and POCSO Act sections 5M/6, applied for bail while in jail since 30 May 2024. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging the alleged conduct did not constitute an offence under Section 377 and that he has …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaffar Khan in a criminal case (Crime No.09 of 2025) involving alleged cyber‑extortion under Sections 308(3), 351(4), 318(4), 319(2) of the IPC and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, …
Shiv Kumar, the first informant, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State respondents to conduct a fair investigation into a case involving offences under Sections 420, 406, 506 and 120‑B IPC. The State, represented by the Advocate General, …
The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittal of six accused persons who had been charged under IPC sections 302, 324, 504, 147, 148 and 149 for a night‑time assault that resulted in one death. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the complainant, an injured relative and the deceased's wife, …
Manoj Mahto petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Riga Police Station Case No. 50 of 2007, which involves serious offences under the IPC, Arms Act, Explosive Substance Act and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The FIR does not name him; the allegations …
The petitioners, Nitish Kumar and Niraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 504 and 34. The prosecution alleged that unknown persons had kidnapped the daughter of an informant, and the victim’s statement recorded under Section …
The petitioners—Mano Devi, Pappu Prasad and Bablu Kumar—sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 376, 504, 506, 34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused Deepu Kumar had raped a woman under a false pretext of …
The petitioner, Nirbhay Kumar Yadav, was charged under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code in PS Shyampur Bhatha case No.124 of 2021. He had been granted provisional bail on 17‑10‑2022 but remained incarcerated because bail in other pending cases had not been secured. The …
Chand Hussain was alleged, via an FIR, to be part of an organised prostitution racket in Premnagar, having confined a victim and forced her into sexual exploitation. The charge‑sheet includes offences under IPC sections 143(2), 143, 144(1), 144(2), 87 and 64, and under the Immoral Traffic …
The petitioner, Lalan Kumar, a former Panchayat Secretary, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged in 2025 for alleged irregularities in Panchayat schemes and construction dating back to 2016. He faced charges under IPC sections 406, 409, 419, 420, 467, 468 and 120B, though no allegation of …
Hare Ram Thakur and his wife Runa Kumari filed an anticipatory bail petition fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple IPC offences. The State argued that criminal proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 of the Criminal Procedure Code had already been initiated, rendering the anticipatory bail …
The petitioner, Nitu Singh, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case (PS Case No. 93 of 2015) alleging offences under Sections 387 and 120(B) of the IPC. He claimed the FIR was lodged against unknown persons, that the mobile number used for extortion did not belong to him, and that …
The petitioner, Lalit Kumar Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Sikti P.S. Case No. 160 of 2021) involving multiple IPC offences including murder, robbery and assault. He alleged that he was falsely implicated due to a prior enmity and a retaliatory case filed by his father. The …
Petitioner Sunny Mahto sought bail in a criminal case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 379, 307 and 34, alleging that he and co‑accused assaulted an informant who later sustained simple injuries. The FIR described a waylaying and assault with a wicket. Counsel for the petitioner argued that …
Manju Devi and Alka Kumari were arrested in connection with a case alleging that they, along with others, assaulted a differently‑abled informant, tied her neck with a saree and disrobed her, invoking several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners contended that they were innocent, that …
The petitioner, Gopal Kumar Das, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint (No. 213(C) of 2023) alleging offences under Section 498A of the IPC for dowry-related assault. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the allegations. Relying on the Supreme Court's guidelines in Arnesh Kumar …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar Yadav, was charged under IPC sections 328, 304B and 34 for allegedly killing an informant's daughter over a dowry demand. The petition sought bail, arguing a three‑day delay in filing the FIR, lack of criminal antecedents, and that the key informant, examined during trial, …
Vivek Anand, husband of complainant Pooja Kumari, feared arrest in a dowry harassment complaint (Case No. 882 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 504, 323, 379, 498A and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the allegations were false, noting a prior matrimonial suit …
The petitioner, Mohit Prasad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner’s name appeared in a self‑inculpatory statement of a co‑accused, and he claimed innocence, alleging false …
The petitioners, who are relatives of the complainant, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a complaint alleging offences under Sections 352, 389, 420, 406, 503, 379 and 506 of the IPC relating to the alleged seizure and sale of trucks belonging to the complainant’s deceased husband. The …
The petitioners, who are relatives of the complainant, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a complaint alleging offences under Sections 352, 389, 420, 406, 503, 379 and 506 of the IPC relating to the alleged seizure and sale of trucks belonging to the complainant’s deceased husband. The …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, was charged with kidnapping the informant's daughter for marriage, initially under Sections 365 and 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code, but the charge sheet later listed Section 302, elevating the offence to murder. He surrendered on 29 March 2025 after a prolonged …
Ravi Shankar Mahto, the husband, sought protection from arrest in a dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 423 of 2024) filed under IPC sections 498A, 323, 341, 504 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed he would keep his wife, Prity Kumari, with care and dignity, while the wife …
The petitioner, Sanjeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Mushrigharari P.S. Case No. 54 of 2023) involving offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A, 379, 506, 34 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleged to be for assault and torture to demand dowry. He contended …
The petitioners, Nanak Mahto and his father Shambhu Mahto, were implicated in a kidnapping case (sections 363 and 366A IPC) registered as Baniyapur PS Case No. 393 of 2022. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming the alleged victim had eloped with Nanak and that Shambhu had no role. The court …
The petitioner, Ramesh Kumar, was arrested in July 2024 in connection with a cheating case (PS Case No. 70 of 2024) alleged under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, wherein he was accused of fraudulently obtaining a loan in the name of an informant. He applied for provisional bail, …
The petitioner, Suman Singh, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under several IPC sections, the Juvenile Justice Act, and the POCSO Act. Her earlier anticipatory bail application was rejected in 2021. She filed a second anticipatory bail application after three years, …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a Mahila Police Station case alleging offences under Sections 498A, 341, 323, 324, 504, 506/34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner participated in assault and …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, was accused of theft under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code in a case registered in 2021. He confessed to the crime and the informant's motorcycle was recovered. He applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest. The court, considering the nature and gravity of the …
The petitioners, Lalti Devi and Vishnudev Ray, father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case (Salimpur PS Case No. 58 of 2025) under sections 80, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They argued that they lived separately from …
The petitioners, comprising Sachin Kumar and three of his family members, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a kidnapping case (Patahi P.S. Case No. 333 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 363, 366A, 506, 34 of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The court examined the …
The petitioner, Shyam Kumar, sought relief fearing arrest in Mahila P.S. Case No. 128 of 2018, where he was alleged to have participated in molestation of the informant under IPC sections 354, 354(D) and 34. The prosecution alleged his involvement, while the petitioner claimed innocence and a clean …
The petitioner, Vishal Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (IPC 498A) filed as Complaint No. C-1906 of 2023. He claimed innocence and alleged false implication, while the State opposed the bail. Relying on the Supreme Court's guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. …
The petitioner, Md. Jabir, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS Case No. 22 of 2024) involving offences under sections 115(2), 127(1), 352, 303(2), 351(2), 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code and section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The allegations include cheating an …
Horen Sharma applied for anticipatory bail after learning of his impending arrest in a dowry‑related case (Barsoi P.S. Case No. 138 of 2017) under Sections 498A/34 of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that he assaulted the victim to demand dowry, while the …
The petitioner, Kundeshwar Jha, was accused in a complaint case for offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 406 and 498A of the IPC, alleged to involve assault and dowry demand. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and false implication. The court, relying on the Supreme Court’s …
Petitioner Pramod Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment and assault case (Sections 498A and 323 IPC) filed as Complaint No. 965 of 2023. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that neither he nor his family demanded dowry. The State opposed the bail …
Manish Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 1693 of 2021) alleging offences under IPC sections 498A, 120B, 494 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that he assaulted the victim to demand dowry, while the petitioner …
The petitioner, Bhavesh Kumar Poddar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a Begusarai complaint case involving alleged forgery of a sale deed using a falsified Aadhaar card and impersonation, charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 120(B) and 34. The prosecution contended that the …
The petitioner, Mantu Yadav, an ex‑ward member, was alleged in an FIR to have withdrawn Rs 4,70,000 for a government Gali‑Nali scheme together with co‑accused Rupesh Yadav, ex‑Panchayat Secretary, and to have failed to complete the work, constituting offences under IPC Sections 406, 409 and 34. He …
Bhola Singh and Sanjeev Singh applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 1146/2023) alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 406, 420, 504 and 506 of the IPC. They contended that they were falsely implicated, had paid Rs. 12,00,000 in cash, and cited the Supreme Court decision …
The petitioners, who are relatives of the main accused Amarjeet Sah, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Bhabhua Police Station Case No. 431 of 2022, which involves offences under several IPC sections, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The prosecution alleges that Amarjeet …
The petitioner, Vikash Sao, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 481 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 498A, 379, 504, 506 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner demanded money from his wife, …
Raja Kumar filed an application fearing arrest in a kidnapping case (PS Rosera Case No. 255 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 363, 365, 366 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleges that he abducted the victim girl, while the petitioner contends he is innocent, asserting that …
Majharul, the petitioner, applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in connection with a kidnapping and human trafficking case (P.S. Case No. 32 of 2000) filed under Sections 363, 366A and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleges that he, along with others, …
Suraj Kumar applied for bail after learning that he may be arrested in connection with Mahindwara P.S. Case No. 154 of 2023, which alleges kidnapping and rape under IPC sections 363, 366(A), 376, as well as offences under the POCSO Act and the Immoral Traffic Act. The prosecution contends that the …
Sanaul Haque applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a trial (No. 3155 of 2024) arising from a 2021 dowry‑related complaint alleging assault (IPC 323) and dowry harassment (IPC 498‑A, Dowry Prohibition Act). The State opposed the bail, while the petitioner claimed innocence and false …
Ranjan Kumar was charged under IPC sections 376, 201 read with 34 and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6 for alleged rape and intimidation of Puja Kumari. The petitioner’s earlier bail plea was denied, but he renewed the application after charge framing, noting that three of eight prosecution witnesses had …
The petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with a kidnapping case (Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 86 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 363, 366(A), 506, 34 of the IPC and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The court heard arguments from the petitioners' counsel, the …
The petitioner, Surendra Yadav, feared arrest in a criminal case (Jamalpur P.S. Case No. 06 of 2024) involving alleged offences under several IPC sections for taking an advance of Rs 17 lakhs from the opposite party, Manoj Kumar Yadav, for a land transaction. The petitioner claimed innocence and …
The petitioner, Arsad @ Ishad Ali, sought relief fearing arrest in a complaint (Case No. 807 of 2024) alleging assault for dowry demand under Section 498A IPC. The prosecution alleged the petitioner assaulted the informant, while the petitioner claimed innocence and that the parties had reached a …
The petitioner, Deep Ratan, was implicated in a complaint (No. 10411 of 2023) alleging assault and torture of a woman for dowry, invoking Sections 498-A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting his innocence and claiming false implication. …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Sharma, feared arrest in a criminal case (CA No. 324 of 2023) alleging assault (IPC s.323) and dowry harassment (IPC s.498‑A). He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and false implication. The State opposed the application. Relying on the Supreme Court’s …
Akshay Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 64, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging he had raped a minor. The prosecution presented the victim’s statement supporting the rape allegation. The High …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar Sahani, applied for anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging he tortured his wife, Babita Kumari, both mentally and physically for dowry, invoking IPC sections 323, 341, 452, 307, 313, 504 and 498A. The husband contended he was ready to care for his wife with dignity, …
The petitioner, Jagjeet Jiwan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 1254 of 2024, Trial No. 2933 of 2025) under Section 498‑A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that he assaulted the victim to demand dowry. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Shubham Kumar, was charged under Section 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code for kidnapping the informant's son. He applied for bail after his earlier bail request was denied on 26-10-2024 and has been in custody since 17-12-2023. The prosecution and the informant opposed bail, noting …
The petitioner, Md Shahid Akhtar, was implicated in a criminal complaint (CA No.463 of 2022) alleging cheating of Rs 30.11 lakh and alleged violations of Sections 120B, 420 and 468 of the IPC. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence and seeking an amicable settlement through mediation. …
The Patna High Court considered a bail application filed by Munna Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a POCSO case involving alleged sexual relations with an 18‑year‑old girl under the pretext of marriage and the viral dissemination of objectionable photographs. The FIR listed serious …
The petitioner, Dabloo, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a 2015 case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged robbery of a tractor and cash. The FIR did not specify the tractor’s registration number and the accusation was based largely on the co‑accused’s information, raising …
The petitioner, Sandeep Anand, was implicated in a complaint under Section 420 IPC alleging cheating in a land sale where the buyer paid Rs.61,51,000 but the sale deed was not executed and a pending title suit was undisclosed. The petitioner argued that the dispute is essentially civil and sought …
The petitioner, Kyas Bind, was charged under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code for an alleged organized theft of a large quantity of gold and silver jewellery from a shop, with material evidence supporting the FIR. He has two prior criminal antecedents of a similar nature. He applied for …
The petitioner, Pratik Rai, was implicated in a robbery case (PS Case No. 408 of 2020) for allegedly looting a truck loaded with bananas, an offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, contending that he is innocent, that the bananas were not …
The petitioners, five relatives from Samastipur, were charged under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act for allegedly cheating the informant by taking ₹10 lakh for a marriage that was later revealed to be fraudulent. They applied for pre‑arrest bail, arguing that …
The petitioners, sons of Lalan Singh, were charged under several IPC sections including 307 (attempt to murder) for allegedly assaulting an informant and his family during a land dispute. They claimed the injuries were simple and caused in self‑defence without intent to kill. The State opposed …
The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS, alleging that he was falsely implicated in an assault on an informant. He asserted that he and the informant are agnates and expressed a desire to settle the …
The petitioners, Bablu Singh and Rajiv Ranjan Singh, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged by informant Mukesh Singh alleging they assaulted him over a dispute involving soil removal from a JCB. The FIR charged them under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita (2023) …
The petitioners, Birbal Sah and Bijendra Sah, were implicated in a FIR dated 23‑08‑2023 under Sections 420, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly embezzling Rs. 3,38,782 in connection with the Chief Minister’s Seven Nischay Drinking Water Scheme. Fearing arrest, they applied for …
The petitioners, Urmila Devi and Manoj Kumar Mahto, were accused in a complaint (CI‑1693/2016) of mental and physical cruelty under Section 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly demanding a dowry of Rs 70,000. They contended that the allegations were vague, unsupported by …
Petitioner Priya Ranjan Singh sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a land‑fraud case (P.S. Case No.44 of 2024) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 419, 471 and 34. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, conspired to …
Reyaz Ahmad, the petitioner, feared arrest in connection with a 2011 case (PS No.272) registered under Sections 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. He filed an anticipatory bail application, seeking liberty to surrender and apply for regular bail within the next eight weeks. The learned counsel …
Petitioner Pritesh Kumar Singh feared arrest in a criminal complaint (Case No. 2869 of 2023) alleging offences under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Both parties submitted that they had settled their matrimonial dispute. The Patna High Court entertained the …
The petitioner, Md. Meraj, was named in a 2022 complaint alleging mental and physical cruelty under Sections 498A, 147, 148, 149, 323, 379, 384, 34 of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act for demanding Rs.1.5 lakh dowry. He filed an anticipatory bail petition, arguing that the complaint lacked an …
