Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

ASHOK BHUSHAN

233 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 1–200.

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusPRANAY SETHI AND ORS.

2017 INSC 106831 October 2017Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined the computation of compensation under Sections 163‑A, 166 and 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in death claims, focusing on the appropriate multiplier, the addition of future prospects to the deceased's income, and the quantification of conventional heads such as loss of estate, loss of co

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS.versusTARA CHAND

2019 INSC 84631 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Bank of India’s Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2001 allowed employees who were over 40 years of age or had 15 years of service to retire voluntarily. Tara Chand, who had 11 years of service and was over 40, opted for voluntary retirement in February 2001, but the Bank denied him a pro‑rata pension. The Single

SUSHIL SETHI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 11831 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, the Managing Director and Director of SPML Infra Ltd, were charged under IPC sections 420 and 120B for allegedly supplying sub‑standard turbines for the Nurang Hydel Power Project of Arunachal Pradesh. The FIR was lodged in 2000, a chargesheet filed in 2004, but summons were only served in 2017. The Hig

VIJAY PANDEYversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2019 INSC 83730 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

Vijay Pandey was seized at his doorstep in the early morning with a plastic packet allegedly containing 10 kg of opium. The prosecution’s case relied solely on police witnesses, with no independent witness from the locality and no recovery memo as required under Section 50 of the NDPS Act. Although a laboratory report

R. JANAKIAMMALversusS.K. KUMARASAMY(DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES AND OTHERS

2021 INSC 31630 June 2021Case Partly allowed

The case involved a joint Hindu family of three brothers who executed a partition deed on 07‑11‑1960 but continued to live and conduct business together, later executing a compromise decree on 06‑08‑1984 to settle disputes. The plaintiff challenged the decree, alleging fraud, misrepresentation and lack of free consent,

REEPAK KANSALversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2021 INSC 31830 June 2021Disposed off

The petitioners sought mandatory ex gratia compensation for families of Covid‑19 victims under Section 12 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, arguing that the word "shall" imposes a duty on the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) to prescribe uniform guidelines. The Union of India contended that "shall" sho

SURENDRANversusSUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2021 INSC 31730 June 2021Case Partly allowed

Surendran, a bus driver, caused a road accident on 16 February 1995 and was charged under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial magistrate convicted him and sentenced him to six months' imprisonment and a fine of Rs.500, with a default month’s imprisonment for the fine under Section 337. The con

RASHMI CHOPRAversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2019 INSC 60030 April 2019Disposed off

The appellants, members of the family of Nayan Chopra, were summoned under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and 498A, and the Dowry Prohibition Act, after a complaint was filed by the victim's father following a divorce proceeding in the United States. The Allahabad High Court refused to quash the complaint under Section 482

S. K. MIGLANIversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI

2019 INSC 60230 April 2019Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a manager in Bank of Baroda, was charged with forgery and related offences for opening a fictitious savings account to encash a refund cheque. He filed an application under Section 197 of the CrPC seeking discharge on the ground that prosecution sanction was required, arguing that he was a public servant

KALABAIversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2019 INSC 59030 April 2019Case Partly allowed

The deceased, Lalita Bai, was burned to death after her sister‑in‑law, Kalabai, threw a burning kerosene stove at her during a domestic quarrel. The trial court convicted Kalabai of murder under Section 302 IPC based on the victim’s dying declaration, imposing life imprisonment. On appeal, the Supreme Court was asked t

AHMAD ALI QURAISHI AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2020 INSC 11230 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, who are neighbours of the complainant, were involved in a long‑standing property dispute with the complainant's father. On 19 July 2016 a quarrel occurred, after which the police recorded proceedings under Sections 151, 107 and 116 of the CrPC and directed both parties to maintain peace. Six weeks later

N. MOTILAL & ORS.versusFAISAL BIN ALI & ANR.

2020 INSC 11430 January 2020Dismissed

The appellants, tenants of a shop under a 20‑year lease dated 27‑08‑1990, challenged the rent increase ordered by the Rent Controller after the new owners of the premises filed an application under Section 4 of the Telangana Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960. The landlords sought to fix a fair rent

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIAversusPRATAP KUNDU

2019 INSC 130529 November 2019Disposed off

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) entered into a handling and transport contract with contractor Pratap Kundu, wherein the rate for supplying casual labour (Item 24) was to be determined by a pending Supreme Court case. The Supreme Court later ordered that casual labourers be paid wages as per Scale‑II rates (order d

SHAMSHER SINGH & ANR.versusLT. COL. NAHAR SINGH (D) THR. LRS. & ORS.

2019 INSC 82029 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The decree‑holders obtained possession of a suit property under a decree of specific performance. Respondent No.1 (Shamsher Singh) claimed he had acquired title by adverse possession and filed an application under Order XXI Rules 98‑100 of the CPC seeking to be put back into possession. The executing court rejected the

RATHIN GHOSHversusWEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. & ORS.

2019 INSC 82229 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Superintending Engineer, attended a private seminar in New Delhi and booked his air tickets through a travel agent of the successful bidder in a pending tender, later paying the fare himself. He was dismissed and penalised with permanent pension withholding and forfeiture of gratuity under the West Ben

M/S. SILPI INDUSTRIES ETC.versusKERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ANR. ETC.

2021 INSC 31429 June 2021Dismissed

The case concerned disputes arising under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act) where a supplier (Silpi Industries) claimed unpaid amounts from Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) and the corporation raised counter‑claims. The issues before the Supreme Court were whether

IN RE: PROBLEMS AND MISERIES OF MIGRANT LABOURERSversus.

2021 INSC 31529 June 2021Disposed off

The Supreme Court, acting suo motu, examined the hardships faced by migrant labourers during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially the lack of food and welfare benefits. It noted that many migrants were not covered by the National Food Security Act (NFSA) and therefore could not access dry rations. The Court directed the C

AJAY KUMAR @ BITTU & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR.

2021 INSC 4829 January 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were named in FIRs for several offences and an informant sought their summons under Section 319 of the CrPC. After the Sessions Judge initially rejected the application, the High Court allowed a revision, leading to an order summoning the appellants on 17‑08‑2019. The appellants failed to appear, resulti

POORAN CHANDversusCHANCELLOR & ORS.

2021 INSC 4629 January 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Dr. Pooran Chand, was appointed Assistant Professor at King George Medical University in August 2005 following a proper advertisement, selection committee recommendation and Executive Council approval. Respondent No.4, Dr. Jitendra Kumar Rao, was initially appointed Lecturer and promoted to Assistant Pro

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.versusDHARMENDRA RATHORE

2019 INSC 10629 January 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Additional District Magistrate (ADM) of Gwalior issued an externment order under the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990, against Dharmendra Rathore for a period of one year. The respondent challenged the order, contending that only a District Magistrate (DM) could exercise the powers conferred by Section

HARBANS KAURversusIQBAL SINGH & ANR.

2019 INSC 10729 January 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord Harbans Kaur let two shops to Iqbal Singh in 1995 at Rs 8,500 per month with a contractual 10 % annual increase, which raised the rent to Rs 16,564 by 2003. The Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 came into force on 1 April 2003. The landlord served a notice on 27 March 2004 demanding arrears of Rs 16,564 per

PRANEETH K. AND ORS.versusUNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION (UGC) AND ORS.

2020 INSC 51928 August 2020Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a batch of writ petitions challenging the University Grants Commission (UGC) guidelines dated 06 July 2020, which required all Indian universities to complete final year examinations by 30 September 2020 amid the COVID‑19 pandemic. Petitioners argued that the guidelines were ultra‑violet of A

SHAIK AHMEDversusSTATE OF TELANGANA

2021 INSC 30828 June 2021Case Partly allowed

The appellant kidnapped a 13‑year‑old schoolboy and demanded a ransom of Rs 2 lakhs, but the prosecution failed to prove that he threatened the victim’s death or hurt, nor that his conduct created a reasonable apprehension of such harm. The Sessions Court and High Court convicted him under IPC s.364A, interpreting the

KALABHAI HAMIRBHAI KACHHOTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2021 INSC 27428 April 2021Dismissed

The appellants, three villagers, were convicted for the murder of Gokalbhai and the assault of two others after a quarrel over rent and animosity. The prosecution presented 32 witnesses, medical and post‑mortem reports, serological evidence and the testimony of injured witnesses who identified the accused. The defence

RAJENDRA KHAREversusSWAATI NIRKHI AND ORS.

2021 INSC 4528 January 2021

Rajendra Khare, who lodged FIR No.39/2016, was not made a party to a transfer petition filed by the accused seeking to move the trial of Criminal Case No.3483 of 2017 from Delhi to Allahabad. The Supreme Court transferred the case on 18 May 2018 without issuing notice under Order XXXIX Rule 2, and the petitioner’s subs

KIRPAL SINGH & ORS.versusKAMLA DEVI & ORS.

2020 INSC 9728 January 2020Dismissed

The case concerned land owned by Jaipal Singh that was declared surplus under the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953, and subsequently sold to Mohan Singh in 1974 and later to the present appellant. While the surplus‑land proceedings were pending, the Haryana Ceiling of Land Holdings Act, 1972 came into force, r

GAJENDRA SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2020 INSC 66227 November 2020Disposed off

Gajendra Sharma, a home loan borrower, challenged the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) notification dated 27 March 2020 that allowed a six‑month moratorium on loan repayments but continued to levy interest, claiming it was ultra vires and violated his right to life under Article 21. The Union of India, invoking powers und

SHAILENDRA SWARUPversusTHE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE

2020 INSC 46527 July 2020Appeal(s) allowed

Modi Xerox Ltd. made foreign exchange remittances in 1985 and was served a show‑cause notice under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) against the company and its directors. One of the directors, Shailendra Swarup, contended that he was a part‑time, non‑executive director and had no responsibility for the

MARUTI TUKARAM BAGAWE AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

2020 INSC 22927 February 2020Case Partly allowed

The Maharashtra Government, under a 1995 Service Career Development Scheme, granted Group C and D employees the pay‑scale of the next promotional post after 12 years of service. In 2004 it issued a resolution extending the Deputy Accountant scale to Junior Clerks, which was later withdrawn by a 2008 resolution after se

DEPARTMENT OF CUSTOMSversusSHARAD GANDHI

2019 INSC 28227 February 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Department of Customs appealed against the discharge of Sharad Gandhi, who was accused of attempting to export a sand‑stone Buddha head classified as an antiquity. The prosecution relied on Sections 132 and 135(1)(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 for false declaration and fraudulent evasion of a prohibition. T

SHIV SENA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2019 INSC 128626 November 2019Directions issued

The petitioners (Shiv Sena, NCP and INC) challenged the Governor of Maharashtra’s decision to invite the BJP leader Devendra Fadnavis to form the government after President's Rule was revoked on 23 November 2019. They argued that the Governor’s action violated constitutional principles, including Article 14 and the doc

KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROLversusB. HEERA NAIK & ORS. ETC.

2019 INSC 128326 November 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB) filed complaints against the City Municipal Council (CMC) of Krishnarajapuram and its former commissioners for discharging untreated sewage in violation of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. The High Court quashed the proceedings under Section

VIKRAM JOHARversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2019 INSC 58326 April 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a certified surveyor, was appointed by an insurance company to assess a fire insurance claim of M/s. Ram Company. After submitting a final survey report that led the insurer to repudiate the claim, the complainant filed a criminal complaint alleging that the appellant, with armed accomplices, threatened

MLA FROM MAU DISTRICT, UPversusJAIL SUPERINTENDENT (ROPAR) & ORS.

2021 INSC 22326 March 2021

The State of Uttar Pradesh filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution and Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking the transfer of criminal proceedings against sitting MLA Mukhtar Ansari from a Punjab court to a Special Court in Allahabad and the hand‑over of his custody from Roopnagar Jail

SURESH KUMARversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2021 INSC 21826 March 2021Dismissed

The petitioners, who were directly recruited as Sub‑Inspectors, challenged the promotion of private respondents to the rank of Inspector on the ground that the eight‑year service requirement under Rule 13.14(2) of the Punjab Police Rules, 1934 was no longer applicable after the State’s 1987 order abolishing selection g

ANWAR ALI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2020 INSC 56325 September 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Anwar Ali and another were convicted by the Himachal Pradesh High Court for murder and related offences based on circumstantial evidence, overturning a trial court acquittal. The trial court had found material contradictions in the prosecution's version of the recovery of a knife, rope, and other items,

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ETC.versusANKUR GUPTA & ORS.

2019 INSC 26425 February 2019Disposed off

The respondents, Ankur Gupta and Geetika Agarwal, applied to adopt a child in India on 19 July 2016 as Indian prospective adoptive parents, although Geetika was already a U.S. citizen and Ankur later acquired U.S. citizenship on 5 December 2016. After obtaining foreign citizenship, they were re‑registered as Overseas C

MURUGAN & ORS.versusKESAVA GOUNDER (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ORS.

2019 INSC 25925 February 2019Dismissed

The suit concerned property of Petha Gounder that had been sold by his son Balaraman both in his own name and on behalf of his minor son Palanivel without court permission, violating Section 8 of the Hindu Minority & Guardianship Act, 1956. The plaintiffs, sons of Kannan, filed a suit in 1992 for declaration and posses

BRIG. SUKHJEET SINGH (RETD.) MVCversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2019 INSC 9125 January 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a retired Brigadier and trustee of a regimental welfare trust, was convicted for cheating in the sale of trust agricultural land. He sought to introduce a 1989 trust deed and a resolution authorising the sale as additional evidence under Section 391 of the CrPC during his appeal, but the trial and appell

PEER GULAM JILANIversusPEER GULAM NASEER AND ORS.

2019 INSC 80324 July 2019Dismissed

The case concerned the succession to the offices of Sajjadah Nashin and Mutawalli of a Dargah governed by a Zabta (constitution). The fourth Sajjadah Nashin, Nurul Hasan, nominated his grandson (the daughter’s son) Gulam Naseer as his successor. The appellant challenged the nomination, arguing that the Zabta required t

DIPAKBHAI JAGDISHCHANDRA PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER

2019 INSC 56824 April 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Dipakbhai Jagdishchandra Patel, was implicated in a counterfeit currency case after co‑accused 1‑3 claimed the fake notes originated from his residence. No counterfeit notes were actually recovered from his home and the only incriminating material was the co‑accused statements recorded by police under Se

PARMAR SAMANTSINH UMEDSINH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2021 INSC 11524 February 2021Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard two civil appeals and a writ petition concerning the Gujarat Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 and related rules on ward delimitation and reservation. The petitioners challenged the constitutionality of sections 5(3)(iii)(a) and 29A of the Act, Rules 4 and 5 of the 1994 Bombay Municipal

INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIAversusJ.R. WILLIAM SINGH

2020 INSC 8724 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) and its Employees' Association entered into a settlement on 10 January 1984 that provided time‑bound promotions for Class III and IV employees, while Clause 1(v) reserved promotion decisions for Jamadars, Drivers, Electricians and similar posts to the President of

SMALL SCALE INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURES ASSOCIATION (REGD.)versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2021 INSC 20323 March 2021Case Partly allowed

The Small Scale Industrial Manufactures Association and several other industry groups filed writ petitions under Article 32 seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India, the Ministry of Finance and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to grant a total waiver of interest, extend the loan moratorium, provide sector‑wise re

SANJAY RAJAKversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

2019 INSC 78722 July 2019Dismissed

The appellant, Sanjay Rajak, was convicted under IPC s.364(A) for kidnapping a 5‑6‑year‑old child and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence: a classmate’s testimony that a man with a covered face, addressed as "uncle" by the child, abducted him; parents’ identification of the

RAM GOPALversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DEHRADUN

2019 INSC 79122 July 2019Dismissed

The CBI investigated a 1992 fraud where a fictitious bank account was opened in the name of Raj Kumar, deposits of Rs 3,22,056 were forged into it and withdrawn through seventeen cheques, leaving a small balance. Two bank employees, Ram Gopal (messenger) and Pankaj Kumar Jain (assistant clerk), were later charged and c

KUMAR GHIMIREYversusTHE STATE OF SIKKIM

2019 INSC 54922 April 2019Case Partly allowed

Kumar Ghimirey was convicted under Sections 9 and 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 and Section 341 of the IPC for attempting to sexually assault a seven‑year‑old girl, and was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the Sikkim High Court altered the convictio

SAMPADA YOGESH WAGHDHAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2019 INSC 55422 April 2019Dismissed

Sampada Yogesh Waghdhare, elected Municipal Councillor and later President, was disqualified under Section 44(1)(e) of the Maharashtra Municipal Council Nagar Panchayat and Industrial Township Act, 1965 because her husband constructed illegal structures, including temporary ones. She challenged the disqualification, ar

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITEDversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2019 INSC 54822 April 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., challenged demand notices for interest on entry tax levied under the Uttar Pradesh Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2007, arguing that the Act contained no substantive provision for interest and that the High Court’s dismissal of its writ petition was barred by res

VST INDUSTRIES LIMITEDversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2019 INSC 54722 April 2019Disposed off

VST Industries Ltd filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the demand of interest on arrears of entry tax under the Uttar Pradesh Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2007. The High Court issued an interim order directing the appellant to deposit 50% of the interest and restraining coercive

UNION OF INDIAversusA. ALAGAM PERUMAL KONE & OTHERS

2021 INSC 10922 February 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India appealed against a Madras High Court order that directed it to grant a Freedom Fighter's pension to A. Alagam Perumal Kone under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme. The petitioner had first applied for the pension in 1997, but the application was rejected and the order became final. Thirtee

KHUSHI RAM & ORS.versusNAWAL SINGH & ORS.

2021 INSC 10622 February 2021Dismissed

The case concerned a consent decree dated 19‑08‑1991 that confirmed a family settlement whereby Smt. Jagno, a Hindu widow, transferred her half‑share in agricultural land to her nephews. The appellants challenged the decree on two grounds: (i) that the decree should have been registered under Section 17 of the Indian R

INDIAN BANK AND ANOTHERversusMAHAVEER KHARIWAL

2021 INSC 3922 January 2021Dismissed

The employee of Indian Bank applied for voluntary retirement on 21 January 2004, requesting a waiver of the three‑month notice period under Regulation 29 of the Indian Bank Employees Pension Regulations, 1995. The bank rejected the application on 20 April 2004, stating the employee was ineligible, and later initiated d

V. SURENDRA MOHANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2019 INSC 7522 January 2019Dismissed

The appellant, a practicing advocate, applied for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) under the partially blind category, submitting a disability certificate showing 70% visual impairment. The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPC) had issued a notification, based on a State Government order consulted with t

RAKESH KUMAR AGARWALLA & ANR.versusNATIONAL LAW SCHOOL OF INDIA UNIVERSITY, BENGALURU & ORS.

2020 INSC 55721 September 2020Disposed off

The petitioners challenged NLSIU's admission notice dated 03‑09‑2020 which introduced a separate online National Law Aptitude Test (NLAT) instead of the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) scheduled for 28‑09‑2020. The Court examined whether the petitioners had locus, whether the notice required prior recommendation of th

DR. P. S. MALIKversusHIGH COURT OF DELHI & ANR.

2019 INSC 93621 August 2019Dismissed

Dr. P.S. Malik, an Additional District Judge, was accused of sexual harassment by a junior judicial assistant. The Delhi High Court's Full Court suspended him and constituted an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) under the Sexual Harassment Act, 2013, which submitted a preliminary report recommending a disciplinary in

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-GUJARAT-IIversusKWALITY STEEL SUPPLIERS COMPLEX

2017 INSC 127321 March 2017Dismissed

The partnership firm KwalitY Steel Suppliers Complex, consisting of a mother and son, was dissolved after the mother’s death, but the son continued the business. In its return, the firm valued closing stock at cost price, a method accepted by the Assessing Officer. The Commissioner of Income Tax, invoking Section 263 o

M/S. ADVANTA INDIA LTD.versusB. N. SHIVANNA

2018 INSC 18321 February 2018Appeal(s) allowed

Advanta India Ltd filed a complaint against advocate B.N. Shivanna alleging cheating, fraud and fabrication of documents, leading the Karnataka State Bar Council’s Disciplinary Committee to debar him for life. The Bar Council of India (BCI) on appeal reduced the punishment to 18 months, but Shivanna’s review petition u

RAMESAN (DEAD) THROUGH LR. GIRIJA AversusTHE STATE OF KERALA

2020 INSC 6621 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed

Ramesan was convicted under Sections 55(a) and 55(g) of the Kerala Abkari Act and sentenced to two years' imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1 lakh for each charge. He appealed the conviction, but died while the appeal was pending. The Kerala High Court held that the imprisonment portion of the sentence became unworkable du

VENKATESAN BALASUBRAMANIYANversusTHE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, D.R.I. BANGALORE

2020 INSC 65220 November 2020Dismissed

Two offences under the NDPS Act were investigated – one for contraband recovered from a car in Hyderabad and another for contraband seized from a factory in Maharashtra. A combined complaint covering both offences was filed in the Special Court at Omerga on 6 July 2018, well within the 180‑day period prescribed for fil

TILAK RAJ BAKSHIversusAVINASH CHAND SHARMA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & OTHERS

2019 INSC 92320 August 2019Dismissed

The plaintiff, Tilak Raj Bakshi, claimed that his brother (the first defendant) violated a family settlement by selling his one‑third share of a Chandigarh house to a stranger (the second defendant) without obtaining the written concurrence of the other brothers and without offering the share to the plaintiff as requir

GURUVIAHversusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2019 INSC 92720 August 2019Dismissed

The case concerned two village assistants who, on the instructions of the village administrative officer, received Rs 600 as alleged gratification for signing papers to transfer an electric connection. The money was counted by one assistant, handed to the other, and the pair were caught in a police‑run trap; the cash w

PAWAN KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2020 INSC 32420 March 2020Dismissed

Pawan Kumar Gupta, convicted of a capital offence, filed a mercy petition with the President of India which was rejected. He challenged the rejection through a writ petition under Articles 32 and 72 of the Constitution, contending that his claim of juvenility had not been finally decided, that he suffered torture in pr

MS. XversusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.

2021 INSC 3120 January 2021Disposed off

Ms. X, a confirmed rape victim, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking rehabilitation, including free education for her minor children, housing accommodation, police protection, and legal aid. The Court noted that she had been convicted of rape in 2002 and had already received compensation under the Jharkhand V

PAWAN KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2020 INSC 5520 January 2020Dismissed

Pawan Kumar Gupta, an accused in the Nirbhaya case, claimed he was a juvenile at the time of the offence on the basis of a school leaving certificate showing a birth date of 08‑10‑1996. He sought an enquiry under Section 7A of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, but the Metropolitan Magist

VISHAL ASHOK THORAT AND ORS.versusRAJESH SHRIRAMBAPU FATE & ORS.

2019 INSC 78119 July 2019Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined a challenge to the recruitment of Assistant Inspectors of Motor Vehicles (Group‑C) in Maharashtra, where a petitioner who had never applied for the post sought to quash the 2016 recruitment Rules, the advertisements of 2017 and the select list of 832 candidates. The High Court had allowed the

RAJESH S/O SHRIRAMBAPU FATE & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2019 INSC 78319 July 2019Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the validity of the 2016 Motor Vehicles Department (Recruitment) Rules, the advertisements for the post of Assistant Inspector of Motor Vehicles (Group‑C) and the selection list of 832 candidates. The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, had entertained a writ petition on these matters. On app

JINOFER KAWASJI BHUJWALAversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

2020 INSC 44119 June 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a director of Aatash Norcontrol Limited (ANL), was arrested in connection with alleged financial irregularities in a Build‑Own‑Operate‑Transfer project for a Vessel Traffic and Port Management System (VTPMS) in the Gulf of Khambhat. While the dispute over capital costs was referred to arbitration, the Gu

GURCHARAN SINGH & ORS.versusANGREZ KAUR & ANR.

2020 INSC 31419 March 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Gurcharan Singh and others, obtained a decree on 9 January 1995 confirming their ownership of a suit land based on a registered will (dated 2 September 1986) and a family settlement (dated 15 June 1994) executed by the sole defendant, Bhajan Singh. Bhajan Singh had admitted these facts in his statement

RAM CHANDRA PRASAD SINGHversusSHARAD YADAV

2020 INSC 32219 March 2020Dismissed

The appellant, a Rajya Sabha MP and JD(U) leader, petitioned the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha to disqualify respondent Sharad Yadav under paragraph 2(1)(a) of the Tenth Schedule, alleging that Yadav had voluntarily given up JD(U) membership by aligning with the RJD. The Chairman, after due process, disqualified Yadav on

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIAversusBRIHANMUMBAI MAHANAGAR PALIKA & ORS.

2020 INSC 31819 March 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) occupied godowns and silos that were constructed by the Central Government on land acquired before 1964 and claimed exemption from Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation's property tax under Article 285(1) of the Constitution. The Municipal Corporation argued that, under Section 146 of t

AKSHAY KUMAR SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2020 INSC 31219 March 2020Dismissed

Akshay Kumar Singh, a convict in the Nirbhaya case, filed a mercy petition with the President of India, which was rejected on 19 March 2020. He subsequently filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the rejection, alleging miscarriage of justice, solitary confinement, torture, media influence, and a pending di

MUKESHversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2020 INSC 31119 March 2020Dismissed

Mukesh, a convicted participant in the Nirbhaya case, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the merits of his conviction and a series of subsequent orders, including the High Court's upholding of the conviction, a review petition, a curative petition, a mercy petition rejected by the Pr

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.versusVIJAY SHANKAR DUBEY

2020 INSC 31719 March 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a former Joint Director, Prosecution who retired on 31 January 1997, sought a revised pension based on a pay‑scale amendment issued by the Uttar Pradesh Government on 2 February 2007, which upgraded the pay scale of certain prosecution posts from 1 April 2001 following an analogy with the CBI. The High

RAJASTHAN STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDversusTHE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (ASSESSMENT) & ANR.

2020 INSC 31319 March 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan State Electricity Board (a government company) filed its return for AY 1991‑92 on 30‑12‑1991 claiming 100% depreciation, although the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1991 had already restricted depreciation for companies to 75%. The Assessing Officer disallowed the excess 25% depreciation and levied additi

BENEDICT DENIS KINNYversusTULIP BRIAN MIRANDA & ORS.

2020 INSC 32019 March 2020Dismissed

The appellants challenged High Court orders that allowed elected councillors, whose caste validity certificates were rejected by the Caste Scrutiny Committee, to retain their seats pending judicial review. Section 5B of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act provides that failure to submit a caste validity certificate wi

SANJEEV KAPOORversusCHANDANA KAPOOR & ORS.

2020 INSC 21519 February 2020Dismissed

The husband and wife filed a maintenance petition under Section 125 of the CrPC, which the Family Court disposed of by a settlement order directing monthly maintenance and a mutual consent divorce. The husband paid only four months' maintenance; the wife filed an execution petition which was rejected as the order was d

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.versusKESHAO VISHWANATH SONONE & ANR.

2020 INSC 71518 December 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The Bombay High Court entertained four writ petitions filed by members of the Gowari community seeking declaration that they belong to the Scheduled Tribe (ST) ‘Gond Gowari’ and quashed the ST certificates issued to them. The High Court held that the tribe ‘Gond Gowari’ was extinct before 1911 and that the caste ‘Gowar

RANA PRATAP SINGHversusVITTIYA EVAM LEKHA ADHIKARI, DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER AND ORS.

2019 INSC 140818 December 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was appointed Junior Accounts Clerk on 21‑12‑1990 after a selection process conducted by a committee under the 1985 Rules and after calling names from the Employment Exchange. The promotion of a senior officer (Shiv Kumar Rai) was later cancelled, leading to the termination of the appellant's appointment,

AKSHAY KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2019 INSC 141118 December 2019Dismissed

The case concerns the conviction and death sentence of Akshay Kumar Singh, a bus cleaner, for his participation in the gang rape and murder of a young woman on a Delhi bus (the Nirbhaya case). Singh filed a criminal review petition challenging the Supreme Court's 2017 judgment that upheld his conviction and death penal

CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATIONversusUNION OF INDIA

2020 INSC 49418 August 2020Dismissed

The Centre for Public Interest Litigation filed a writ petition seeking a fresh National Disaster Management Plan, specific minimum relief standards, and direction to use the National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF) for COVID-19, as well as to channel all contributions to the NDRF instead of the PM CARES Fund. The Court

REGISTRAR KARNATAKA UNIVERSITY & ANR.V. DR. PRABHUGOUDA & ANR.versusDR. PRABHUGOUDA & ANR

2020 INSC 70917 December 2020Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether an associate professor who had worked in an affiliated college could have his promotion under the University’s Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) backdated to the date he completed three years of service there. The petitioner argued that the term “College” in the CAS statute should inclu

TRUSTEES OF H.C. DHANDA TRUSTversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

2020 INSC 55117 September 2020Case Partly allowed

The H.C. Dhanda Trust executed a Deed of Assent to vest two immovable properties in its beneficiaries, paying only Rs.200 stamp duty. The Collector of Stamps treated the deed as a gift deed, levied a deficit duty of Rs.1.28 crore and imposed a ten‑times penalty of Rs.12.80 crore, which was upheld by the Board of Revenu

M/S. MSD REAL ESTATE LLPversusTHE COLLECTOR OF STAMPS & ANR.

2020 INSC 55417 September 2020Disposed off

The appellant, M/s. MSD Real Estate LLP, purchased the Lantern Hotel, a property that was earlier declared a gift deed and found to have a deficiency in stamp duty. The Collector of Stamps imposed a penalty of ten times the duty, which the Supreme Court later reduced to five times. While the stamp duty was paid, the pe

SIRI CHAND (DECEASED) THR. LRS.versusSURINDER SINGH

2020 INSC 43117 June 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord filed an eviction application under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, alleging arrears of rent and house tax. The Rent Controller held that the rent note was not signed by both parties, was not a lease requiring compulsory registration, and ordered eviction. The Appellate Cour

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERSversusANIL PADEGAONKAR

2020 INSC 29517 March 2020Disposed off

The employee, an Aviation Officer of Bharat Petroleum Limited (BPL), was charged with sand contamination in fuel tanks and later with absence from duty. Two charge‑sheets were issued, the first by the Deputy General Manager (Aviation) and the second for the absence, leading to a domestic inquiry that found him guilty o

INDIAN HOTEL AND RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION (AHAR) & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2019 INSC 5217 January 2019Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined challenges to the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance Act, 2016 and its Rules, which regulate dance performances in hotels, restaurants and bar rooms. Petitioners argued that provisions defining "obscene dance", licensing restrictions, punitive measures for tips, and various licensing co

SANJAI TIWARIversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2020 INSC 70416 December 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sanjai Tiwari, was charged under several IPC offences and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. A third‑party advocate, calling himself a social activist, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a High Court order directing the Special Judge to expedite the trial.

PUNEET DALMIAversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, HYDERABAD

2019 INSC 137916 December 2019Disposed off

The appellant, accused No.3 in a CBI case involving offences under Sections 120‑B, 420, 409 IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act, was required to appear before the trial court in Hyderabad every Friday despite residing in Delhi. He applied under Section 205 of the CrPC to be exempted from personal appearance, citin

MUKUL KUMAR TYAGIversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.

2019 INSC 138016 December 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the recruitment of Technician Grade‑II officers by Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd. and the Uttar Pradesh Electricity Service Commission, where the advertisement required a Certificate of Computer Concept (CCC) or an equivalent qualification. Candidates were allowed to self‑declare equiva

SATISH CHANDER AHUJAversusSNEHA AHUJA

2020 INSC 59915 October 2020Dismissed

Satish Chander Ahuja, the father‑in‑law, owned a house in New Delhi and sued his daughter‑in‑law Sneha Ahuja for mandatory and permanent injunction to remove her from the first floor. Sneha had earlier filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, obtaining an interi

STATE OF U.P.versusGAYATRI PRASAD PRAJAPATI

2020 INSC 60115 October 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The former minister Gayatri Prasad Prajapati, accused of offences under Sections 376D, 376, 511, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, was admitted to King George Medical University (KGMU) for treatment of multiple ailments and later shifted to the super‑specialty Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institu

SARAVANANversusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2020 INSC 60015 October 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Saravanan, was arrested for an offence under Section 420 IPC and remanded to judicial custody. He obtained regular bail under Section 437 CrPC on the condition that his wife would deposit Rs.7,00,000, a condition he failed to fulfil. After more than 101 days in jail without a charge‑sheet, he applied for

ABHILASHAversusPARKASH & ORS.

2020 INSC 54615 September 2020Dismissed

The appellant, Abhilasha, a Hindu daughter, challenged a lower court order that limited her maintenance from her father, Parkash, to the period until she attained majority, arguing that under Section 20(3) of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 she could claim maintenance until she marries. The Supreme Court

JEET RAMversusTHE NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, CHANDIGARH

2020 INSC 54515 September 2020Case Partly allowed

The appellant Jeet Ram was charged under Section 20 of the NDPS Act for possession of 13 kg of charas seized from a dhaba he managed. The trial court acquitted him, holding that the prosecution lacked independent witnesses, that Section 50 of the NDPS Act was not complied with, and that the evidence of possession was u

SUDIN DILIP TALAULIKARversusPOLYCAP WIRES PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 75715 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the CPC for recovery of Rs.64.18 lakh, while the respondent had earlier instituted a criminal prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which was later withdrawn. The trial court and the High Court granted conditional leave to defend, impos

S. SREESANTHversusTHE BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 38215 March 2019Case Partly allowed

S. Sreesanth, a registered cricketer, was alleged to have participated in spot‑fixing during an IPL match on 9 May 2013, accepting Rs 10 lakh to concede 14 runs in an over. A one‑man BCCI commission prepared a preliminary report based on video and telephone recordings, and after Sreesanth’s release from police custody,

GAURAV KUMAR @ MONUversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA

2019 INSC 20815 February 2019Disposed off

Gaurav Kumar (Monu) was convicted for murder under IPC 302 for an incident that occurred on 23-24 May 2000. He claimed he was a juvenile at the time, relying on a school certificate showing a date of birth of 17 August 1982, while the municipal birth certificate recorded 17 August 1981. The Sessions Judge, after an inq

GANGAPPA AND ANR.versusFAKKIRAPPA

2018 INSC 121014 December 2018Disposed off

The appellants entered into agreements to sell and sued for specific performance. The trial court impounded the agreements for insufficient stamp duty and ordered payment of the deficit duty plus a penalty of double the duty, which the appellants accepted. The High Court, relying on Digambar Warty v. District Registrar

VASANT GANPAT PADAVE (D) BY LRS. & ORS.versusANANT MAHADEV SAWANT (DEAD) THRU LRS. & ORS.

2018 INSC 120314 December 2018Matter referred to larger bench

The appeal concerned a parcel of agricultural land where the original landlord, a widow, died in 1999 and her successor-in-title failed to give notice under Section 31(3) within one year. The tenants, whose tenancy pre‑dated the 1957 amendment (Tillers' Day), sought to exercise their right to purchase under Section 32F

MANJU PURIversusRAJIV SINGH HANSPAL & ORS.

2019 INSC 124414 November 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Surjan Singh Randhawa executed an unregistered Will in 1961 bequeathing property to his eldest daughter, Gian Hanspal. Twenty years later, a probate petition was filed and the Calcutta High Court granted probate on 4 June 1982 without issuing citations to all legal heirs, notably the younger daughter Beena

GANESANversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2020 INSC 59614 October 2020Dismissed

Ganesan was convicted under Section 7 read with Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 based solely on the testimony of a 13‑year‑old victim (PW‑3). The trial court sentenced him to three years’ rigorous imprisonment (the minimum under Section 8) and ordered Rs 1 lakh compensatio

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusM/S. K.C. SHARMA & CO. & ORS.

2020 INSC 48814 August 2020Dismissed

The Union of India appealed against a Delhi High Court order that set aside a 1989 decree passed under Sections 30 and 31 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which had awarded 87% of compensation to the respondents and 13% to the Gaon Sabha. The appellants alleged that the decree was obtained by fraud, claiming that the

PRASAD @ SANTOSH KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

2020 INSC 19214 February 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted under Sections 376(1) and 450 of the IPC for raping his brother's wife, based solely on the prosecutrix's testimony. The prosecution's case lacked any independent witnesses and the medical and forensic reports showed no injuries, semen or blood stains, and the forensic report was inconclusiv

APS FOREX SERVICES PVT. LTD.versusSHAKTI INTERNATIONAL FASHION LINKERS & ORS.

2020 INSC 19514 February 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant, APS Forex Services, alleged that the accused Shakti International Fashion Linkers and others issued four cheques which were dishonoured, and a fresh consolidated cheque was also returned on a stop‑payment order. A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed. The accused admi

SURAJ JAGANNATH JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2019 INSC 136813 December 2019Dismissed

Suraj Jagannath Jadav was convicted of murder for pouring kerosene on his pregnant wife and setting her ablaze. He appealed, arguing that he was intoxicated, lacked intent to kill, and that the subsequent act of pouring water should reduce the offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Se

ANIL BHARDWAJversusTHE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

2020 INSC 59113 October 2020Dismissed

Anil Bhardwaj was selected for the post of District Judge (Entry Level) in Madhya Pradesh but was declared ineligible after a committee found a criminal case (FIR under IPC sections 498A, 406, 34) pending against him. The committee’s decision, based on the pending case, led to his name being deleted from the select lis

VANEET MAHAJANversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

2017 INSC 127913 April 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Vaneet Mahajan, alleged that he, his brother and an employee were brutally attacked by 10‑12 persons armed with swords, baseball bats and other deadly weapons, allegedly at the behest of a cabinet minister. The attack caused grievous and simple injuries, leading to an FIR and charge‑sheet that included S

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusC. GIRIJA & ORS.

2019 INSC 19113 February 2019Directions issued

The Southern Railway issued a notification on 14‑10‑1999 for five posts under the 30% LDCE quota, four unreserved and one reserved for SC. C. Girija, a general‑category employee, applied but was not placed on the panel declared on 09‑01‑2001. Six and a half years later, on 25‑09‑2007, she filed a representation seeking

DIPIKA JAGATRAM SAHANIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2021 INSC 2313 January 2021Case Allowed

The petition, filed under Article 32 as a public‑interest litigation, challenged the nationwide closure of Anganwadi Centres during the COVID‑19 pandemic and sought their reopening and the provision of nutrition to pregnant women, lactating mothers, adolescent girls and children up to six years as mandated by Sections 

FICUS PAX PRIVATE LTD. & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2020 INSC 42512 June 2020Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined challenges by private employers, including Ficus Pax Private Ltd., to central and state orders issued under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 that compelled private establishments to pay full wages to all workers during the COVID‑19 lockdown. The petitioners argued that the orders were ultra‑

JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH (RETD.)versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2021 INSC 24812 April 2021Disposed off

Retired Justice V. Eswaraiah filed a Special Leave Petition challenging an order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court that directed retired Supreme Court Judge R.V. Raveendran to conduct an enquiry into the authenticity of a conversation recorded on a pen‑drive. The High Court had earlier closed the preliminary objection o

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.versusELEPHANT G. RAJENDRAN & ORS. ETC.

2019 INSC 52312 April 2019Case Partly allowed

The Tamil Nadu government, after receiving a complaint from the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Commissioner, ordered on 01.08.2018 that all idol‑theft investigations being handled by the Idol Wing of the CID be transferred to the CBI. The Madras High Court quashed that order and, under Article 226, appointed

H. S. GOUTHAMversusRAMA MURTHY AND ANR. ETC.

2021 INSC 8212 February 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff H.S. Goutham sued the defendants for repayment of a mortgage loan and a consent decree was passed in 1995 ordering the defendants to pay the amount in instalments. The defendants objected in the execution petition, alleging the decree was obtained by fraud, but the executing court overruled the objection

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusM/S. KARAMDEEP FINANCE & INVESTMENT (I) PVT. LTD. & ORS.

2019 INSC 18612 February 2019Disposed off

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) auctioned a lease‑hold residential plot that had been acquired by the Income Tax Department under Section 269UD of the Income Tax Act, which had already paid the unearned increase to DDA. M/s. Karamdeep Finance & Investment (I) Pvt. Ltd. purchased the plot at auction, later applied

KAUSHAL KISHORE AWASTHIversusBALWANT SINGH THAKUR & ANR.

2017 INSC 121111 December 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant lodged a complaint before the Chhattisgarh State Bar Council alleging that Advocate Kaushal Kishore Awasthi, who had earlier represented him in a suit concerning ancestral land, improperly objected to the registration of the complainant's sale deed, claiming a debt owed to him. The State Bar Council fou

SHEOLI HATIversusSOMNATH DAS

2019 INSC 75111 July 2019Disposed off

Sheoli Hati (mother) and Somnath Das (father) were divorced and disputed the custody and education of their daughter Aditi. The father, having given up his claim to custody, sought a direction that the child be admitted to a reputed boarding school at his expense, while the mother opposed this and preferred schooling i

G H CHIEF REGIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusSIRAJ UDDIN KHAN

2019 INSC 75211 July 2019Case Partly allowed

The respondent, an assistant typist with United India Insurance Co., was transferred to a new branch but failed to join, leading to disciplinary proceedings and a punishment order on 14 May 2009. He retired on 20 June 2012, after which a termination order dated 26 June 2012 was set aside by the High Court. The High Cou

NIRBHAY KUMAR & ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2020 INSC 42311 June 2020Dismissed

The petitioners sought appointment as Sub‑Inspectors of Police in Bihar, claiming parity with 133 candidates who had been appointed without undergoing the physical efficiency test. Those 133 candidates had been granted an exemption by the Supreme Court in a specific litigation context under Article 142, and the Court h

PRAVAT CHANDRA MOHANTYversusTHE STATE OF ODISHA & ANR.

2021 INSC 8011 February 2021Case Partly allowed

Two police officers, the in‑charge of Purighat Police Station and a senior inspector, mercilessly beat Kasinath Naik in the police station premises on 4‑5 May 1985, causing injuries that led to his death that night. The trial court convicted them under Sections 304(Part II), 324, 342, 323, 471 and related provisions; t

SRIDHAR & ANR.versusN. REVANNA & ORS.

2020 INSC 16511 February 2020Dismissed

The grandfather of the parties gifted a property to his grandson, N. Revanna, on 5 June 1957, inserting a condition that the donee and any younger brothers born thereafter could not alienate the property. Revanna later sold the property to four other persons in 1985. The plaintiffs, minor sons of Revanna, sued for a de

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ORS.versusSITAKANT S. DUBHASHI & ANR.

2020 INSC 16911 February 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a claim by Sitakant S. Dubhashi for a central pension under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980 (SSSP) after receiving a State pension from Goa. The Government of India had, by a 2003 order, extended the SSSP scheme to participants of the Goa Liberation Movement Phase‑II, but only to t

RAM MURTI YADAVversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

2019 INSC 135410 December 2019Dismissed

The appellant, a senior judicial officer, was compulsorily retired under Rule 56(c) of the U.P. Fundamental Rules after a censure entry in his service record following a vigilance enquiry into an acquittal he had granted. He challenged the retirement, arguing that a single adverse entry and an error of judgment could n

GOOGLE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDversusM/S. VISAKHA INDUSTRIES

2019 INSC 135210 December 2019Disposed off

The appellant, Google India Private Limited, was summoned under a criminal complaint alleging defamation (IPC ss.120B, 500, 501 r/w s.34) for articles posted in a Google Group hosted by it. It filed a petition under CrPC s.482 seeking to quash the summons, arguing it was not an intermediary and that Section 79 of the I

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusMAJ. GEN. MANOMOY GANGULY. VSM

2017 INSC 109510 November 2017Dismissed

Maj. Gen. Manomoy Ganguly, an Army Medical Corps officer, sought promotion to Lieutenant General. After being passed over by the first Special Promotion Board (SPB) in January 2016, he obtained redress of a statutory complaint that expunged adverse remarks in his 2014 Annual Confidential Report, improving his quantifie

RIZWAN KHANversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2020 INSC 54310 September 2020Dismissed

The appellant Rizwan Khan was seized with 20 kg of ganja from a motorcycle and convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the ND PS Act. He challenged the conviction on several grounds, including that the prosecution relied solely on police witnesses, that the procedural requirements of Sections 42 and 55 of the ND PS Act

LBER LALOOversusALL DIMASA STUDENTS UNION HASAO DISTRICT COMMITTEE & ORS.

2019 INSC 68110 May 2019Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered applications seeking permission to transport coal from the State of Meghalaya after a tragic incident in which labourers died in illegal rat‑hole mining. The Court noted that a prior order dated 04‑12‑2018 had allowed transport of 176,655 metric tonnes of coal up to 31‑01‑2019, of which 94,

PRAMOD KUMAR & ANR.versusZALAK SINGH & ORS.

2019 INSC 66610 May 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Pramod Kumar and another, challenged two separate alienations of ancestral land by their father Tikaram. They filed a suit in 1963 to set aside the first sale deed (21‑01‑1959) and later, in 1971, a second suit to set aside the second sale deed (11‑02‑1959). Both suits were dismissed by the trial court

ASHISH SETHversusSUMIT MITTAL AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 36110 April 2020Directions issued

The dispute arose between the Seth Group and the Mittal Group, partners in a joint venture (TFIPL) that owned land in Sector 89, Faridabad. The parties executed a Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) on 4 May 2015, allocating the External Development Charges (EDC) liability of Rs.59.05 crore between them, with the Seth Group

HARI SHANKAR AGGARWALversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR

2021 INSC 17610 March 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Hari Shankar Aggarwal, was named as a nominee in a complaint under Sections 7 and 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, based on information from the Commercial Tax Department, while the Local Health Officer had identified Devendra Singh Bhadauria as the director of the firm. Aggarwal cont

THE CONSERVATOR AND CUSTODIAN OF FOREST & ORS.versusSOBHA JOHN KOSHY & ANR.

2021 INSC 7510 February 2021Case Partly allowed

The appellants, the Conservator and Custodian of Forest, appealed a Kerala High Court decision that ordered payment of compensation to the respondents, Sobha John Koshy and anr., for land in Wayanad that could not be restored. The land was originally claimed to be vested in the Government under the Kerala Private Fores

STATE OF U.P. & ORS.versusVIRENDRA KUMAR & ORS.

2020 INSC 15810 February 2020Directions issued

The Supreme Court considered Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad challenging High Court orders that applied the 6th Pay Commission benefits to the Parishad’s employees. The core dispute revolved around the earlier judgment in State of U.P. v. Preeta

EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ARULMIGU CHOKKANATHA SWAMY KOIL TRUST VIRUDHUNAGARversusCHANDRAN & ORS.

2017 INSC 12510 February 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff claimed to have purchased 2.73 acres of land that he said formed part of Survey No. 188 and sought a declaration of title and a mandatory injunction to have his name entered in the revenue records. The trial court and the first appellate court held that the plaintiff had not correctly described the suit p

KUSH KALRAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2020 INSC 6929 December 2020Disposed off

The petitioner filed a writ under Article 32 challenging the practice of affixing posters outside the homes of COVID‑19 positive persons under home isolation, alleging violations of privacy, dignity and other fundamental rights. The Union of India submitted the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare's guidelines dated 2

THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA & ORS.versusSHAJI POULOSE & ORS.

2020 INSC 6919 December 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) filed transfer petitions under Article 139-A(1) seeking to move nine writ petitions from the Kerala, Madras and Calcutta High Courts to the Supreme Court. The writ petitions challenge Chapter VI of ICAI's Guidelines dated 08‑08‑2008, which caps the number of tax au

M SIDDIQ (D) THR LRSversusV. MAHANT SURESH DAS & ORS

2019 INSC 12319 November 2019Disposed off

The instant appeals arose from five suits between 1950 and 1989 over a 1500 sq yard land in Ayodhya, claimed by Hindus as the birthplace of Lord Ram (Ram Janmabhumi) and by Muslims as the site of the Babri Masjid. The Allahabad High Court had directed a three-way partition of the disputed site, which the Supreme Court

G H SHIA CENTRAL BOARD OF WAQF U PversusSUNNI CENTRAL BOARD OF WAKF (SLP

2019 INSC 12329 November 2019Dismissed

The Shia Central Board of Waqf Uttar Pradesh filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Supreme Court challenging a civil judgment dated 30 March 1946 passed by the Civil Judge, Faizabad. The petition was filed after an inordinate delay of 24,964 days, and the petitioner failed to provide a satisfactory explanatio

ASHISH SETHversusSUMIT MITTAL AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 5859 October 2020Directions issued

The Supreme Court dealt with a contempt petition filed by the Seth Group against the Mittal Group arising from a joint‑venture dispute over land development, license renewal and EDC liabilities. Both parties had executed a Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) on 4 May 2015, which the Court incorporated into its order disposi

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND OTHERSversusGOVERDHAN LAL SONI AND ANR.

2020 INSC 5399 September 2020Dismissed

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC) absorbed surplus employees of the now‑defunct Rajasthan State Agro Industries Corporation (RSAIC) and offered them a choice between the CPF scheme and the RSRTC pension scheme. Respondent Goverdhan Lal Soni opted for the pension scheme, and the employee and employe

STALINversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2020 INSC 5409 September 2020Case Partly allowed

Stalin, the accused, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for stabbing the deceased with a knife during a quarrel at a beer party. He appealed, arguing that the single blow and lack of pre‑meditation should reduce the offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II, invoking Exce

IN RE : PROBLEMS AND MISERIES OF MIGRANT LABOURERSversusIN RE:

2020 INSC 4209 June 2020Directions issued

The Supreme Court, acting suo motu, examined the plight of migrant labourers stranded during the COVID-19 lockdown and the measures taken by the Central and State governments. While acknowledging the large number of Shramik trains and bus services already deployed, the Court noted lapses in registration, supervision, a

ASHISH RANJAN AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

[2017] 4 S.C.R. 699 June 2017IA disposed

The petitioners, two private medical colleges, and the State of Bihar sought a fresh counselling and an extension of the deadline for postgraduate admissions after earlier counselling rounds were cancelled due to law‑and‑order disturbances and haphazard conduct. The Medical Council of India argued that the time‑schedul

ASHISH RANJAN AND ORS.·versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

[2017] 4 S.C.R. 789 June 2017Rejected

The petitioners, two private universities, sought the Supreme Court's intervention to extend the time for completing post‑graduate medical counselling, relying on the Court's order dated 09‑05‑2017 and a subsequent Ministry of Health circular dated 26‑05‑2017. The State of Madhya Pradesh contended that the first, secon

SHIO SHANKAR DUBEY & ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2019 INSC 6589 May 2019Dismissed

On 16 May 1980, Raj Keshwar Singh was murdered by a group of five accused who were armed and fled the scene. The prosecution relied on the testimony of PW11 (the brother of the deceased and informant), PW13 (a relative of the deceased) and PW5 (an eyewitness who identified four of the accused but omitted one name). The

BASALINGAPPAversusMUDIBASAPPA

2019 INSC 5009 April 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Mudibasappa, issued a cheque for Rs.6,00,000 that was returned for insufficient funds, leading the complainant, Basalingappa, to file a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court acquitted the accused, holding that the complainant failed to prove his financial capacity

SWAATI NIRKHI & ORS.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.

2021 INSC 1719 March 2021Dismissed

The petitioners sought transfer of a criminal case (FIR No. 39/2016) from the Metropolitan Magistrate Court in Delhi to the Metropolitan Magistrate Court in Prayagraj under Section 406 of the CrPC. The Supreme Court had earlier allowed the transfer ex parte, but the complainant (respondent No.4) applied for recall, whi

HANSRAJversusMEWALAL AND ORS.

2019 INSC 419 January 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Hansraj, was the original bhumidhar of Plot No.677 in Village Bahria, Basti, and a co‑sharer with respondents who had acquired a half‑share by sale. Under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, the Assistant Consolidation Officer initially proposed chaks for all co‑sharers on the pitch road that r

NILESH LAXMICHAND AND ANOTHERversusSHANTABEN PURUSHOTTAM KAKAD (SINCE DECEASED) BY LRS

2019 INSC 6508 May 2019Dismissed

The landlords sued the tenants for eviction under sections 16(1)(c), 16(1)(e) and 16(1)(n) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, alleging illegal sub‑letting, nuisance from a food‑stuff business and non‑use of the premises as a book‑shop for more than six months before the suit. The trial court dismissed the suit, but t

P. GOPINATHAN PILLAIversusUNIVERSITY OF KERALA & ORS.

2020 INSC 3338 April 2020Dismissed

The appellant, P. Gopinathan Pillai, was appointed Project Officer and later Assistant Director in the Centre for Adult Continuing Education and Extension (CACEE), a self‑financing centre administered by the University of Kerala. He claimed that, as a "teacher of the University" under the Kerala University Act, 1974, h

RAMJIT SINGH KARDAM & ORS.versusSANJEEV KUMAR & ORS.

2020 INSC 3328 April 2020Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the selection of 1,983 Physical Training Instructor (PTI) posts by the Haryana Staff Selection Commission (HSSC). The Commission had initially announced a written test and interview criteria, later cancelled the written test and altered the short‑listing process without publishing new criteri

RAKESH & ORS.versusBOARD OF REVENUE U.P. & ORS. ETC.

2019 INSC 3368 March 2019Case Partly allowed

Pursottam, a Sirdar, deposited twenty times the land revenue and applied for Bhumidhari rights for three plots, subsequently executing a sale deed. His applications for two plots were rejected and a revision petition was pending when the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms (Amendment) Ordinance, 1977 (la

BOLORAM BORDOLOIversusLAKHIMI GAOLIA BANK & ORS.

2021 INSC 668 February 2021Dismissed

The appellant, a bank manager, was charged with misappropriation and irregular loan disbursal. A departmental enquiry found all charges proved and the disciplinary authority, after issuing a show‑cause notice that enclosed the enquiry report, imposed compulsory retirement. The appellant challenged the procedure, arguin

A. SUBRAMANIAN & ANR.versusR. PANNERSELVAM

2021 INSC 658 February 2021Dismissed

The plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from disturbing his peaceful possession of a property he claimed to have purchased from the heirs of a former owner. The trial court upheld the injunction, finding the plaintiff in possession, but the First Appellate Court set aside the decre

SURINDER SINGH DESWAL @ COL. S. S. DESWAL & ORS.versusVIRENDER GANDHI & ANR.

2020 INSC 218 January 2020Dismissed

The appellants, partners of a firm, issued numerous cheques to a retiring partner which were dishonoured, leading to 28 complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They were convicted and sentenced, but the appellate court suspended the sentence on condition that they deposit 25% of the compensation

TELANGANA POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD. (TSGENCO)versusANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD. MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO (S). 1270/2020 IN

2020 INSC 6807 December 2020Disposed off

The dispute arose after the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh, when the Telangana power utilities unilaterally transferred 1,157 employees to Andhra Pradesh utilities, prompting writ petitions. The High Court set aside the unilateral relief and directed a neutral allocation, which the Supreme Court upheld and appointed a O

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusSMT. SOMWATI AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 5357 September 2020Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court heard a series of appeals filed by three insurance companies challenging the awards of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for "loss of consortium" and a separate head of "loss of love and affection" granted by various High Courts and Motor Accident Claims Tribunals. The Court examined whe

VIKRAM SINGH @ VICKY WALIA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

2017 INSC 5947 July 2017Dismissed

The petitioners Vikram Singh, Jasvir Singh and a third accused were convicted under Sections 302, 364A, 201 and 120B of the IPC and sentenced to death, with the death sentence of the female co‑accused later commuted to life imprisonment. They filed review petitions challenging the Supreme Court’s 2010 judgment on groun

DR. SAURABH DWIVEDI AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2017 INSC 4737 June 2017Disposed off

The petitioners, doctors who had served in remote areas, challenged a High Court order that limited post‑graduate admissions at Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) and Banaras Hindu University (BHU) to students who completed their MBBS in Uttar Pradesh and restricted the weightage under Regulation 9(iv) of the 2000 MCI reg

RAFIQ QURESHIversusNARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU EASTERN ZONAL UNIT

2019 INSC 6397 May 2019Case Partly allowed

Rafiq Qureshi was convicted under Section 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985 for possession of 609.6 grams of heroin and was sentenced by the trial court to 18 years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.2 lakh. The Calcutta High Court upheld the conviction but reduced the term t

HEMAREDDI (D) THROUGH LRS.versusRAMACHANDRA YALLAPPA HOSMANI AND ORS.

2019 INSC 6337 May 2019Dismissed

The appellants, brothers Hemareddi and his late sibling, sued the wife of Basavareddi for a declaration that the first defendant was not an adopted son and had no right to the joint family property. The trial court dismissed the suit, upholding the adoption, and the brothers appealed. During the pendency of the appeal

MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI

2020 INSC 1507 February 2020Dismissed

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., a manufacturer of automobiles liable to excise duty, claimed deductions under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act for a large unutilised MODVAT credit of Rs 69.93 crore and for sales tax recoverable amounting to Rs 3.08 crore for AY 1999‑2000. The Assessing Officer, the Commissioner and the ITAT

PUNJAB WAKF BOARDversusSHAM SINGH HARIKE

2019 INSC 1577 February 2019Disposed off

The Punjab Wakf Board (PWB) claimed ownership of two parcels of land and filed suits for permanent injunction and possession against lessees Sham Singh Harike and Teja Singh. Both suits were transferred to the Wakf Tribunal, where the respondents argued that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction and that the civil courts sh

RAMKHILADI & ANR.versusTHE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY & ANR.

2020 INSC 117 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased was riding a motorcycle borrowed from its registered owner when he was killed in a collision caused by the rash driving of another motorcyclist. The claimants filed a claim under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act against the owner and insurer of the borrowed vehicle, without joining the owner or insur

A. MAHALAKSHMIversusBALA VENKATRAM (D) THROUGH LR. & ANR.

2020 INSC 127 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed

A. Mahalakshmi, holding a power of attorney for the owner of a commercial premises, leased the property to Bala Venkatram under a 2007 rental agreement. The landlord later discovered that the premises were being operated under a different name by Shahu Hameed, who held the sales‑tax certificate, licence and bank accoun

ANAND RAMACHANDRA CHOUGULEversusSIDARAI LAXMAN CHOUGALA AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 8636 August 2019Dismissed

The case arose from a land dispute between related parties that escalated into a verbal duel and scuffle on 7 June 2002, resulting in the death of a person. The trial court convicted all four accused under Section 302 IPC with a common intention charge, but the Karnataka High Court altered the conviction of two accused

JAGDISH AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA

2019 INSC 8646 August 2019Appeal(s) allowed

Thirteen persons were alleged to have assaulted the deceased in a night-time mob attack, resulting in his death. The trial court convicted three accused, including the two appellants, under Sections 302, 149 and 148 of the IPC, while the High Court acquitted one and upheld the conviction of the two appellants. On appea

POONAM DEVI AND OTHERSversusORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2020 INSC 2916 March 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, a 21‑year‑old truck driver employed by the second respondent, was driving from Ambala to Meerut on 11 June 2003 when he stopped near a bridge to fetch water and take a bath in a canal. He slipped and drowned. The Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner had awarded compensation to his legal heirs, but the High

KRISHNA NAND SHUKLAversusDIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION ALLAHABAD & ORS.

2019 INSC 3196 March 2019Disposed off

Krishna Nand Shukla claimed an ad‑hoc appointment as Lecturer of Military Science at a college affiliated to Gorakhpur University and filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to pay his salary. The Allahabad High Court dismissed the petition, relying on paragraphs 3(h) and 3(i) of a counter‑af

SHIVNARAYAN (D) BY LRS.versusMANIKLAL (D) THR. LRS. & ORS.

2019 INSC 1526 February 2019Dismissed

The plaintiff filed a suit in the Indore court seeking declarations of nullity of a will, a sale deed, and transfer documents relating to two immovable properties—one in Indore and another in Mumbai—along with a claim of joint family ownership. Defendants 7 and 8, who were parties to the Mumbai sale deed, moved to dism

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA THROUGH THE REGISTRAR GENERALversusTIRTHA SARATHI MUKHERJEE & ORS.

2019 INSC 1556 February 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerns a candidate (Tirtha Sarathi Mukherjee) who failed to qualify for the Tripura Judicial Service examination and sought re‑evaluation of his answer scripts. His writ petition for re‑evaluation was dismissed in 2012, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed in 2013, and a review petition was filed after a

AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISE LIMITEDversusKS INFRASPACE LLP LIMITED AND ANOTHER

2020 INSC 46 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed

Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprise Ltd. filed suits for specific performance of a sale of land and obtained a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from executing further documents. The defendants appealed, arguing that no concluded contract existed and that the plaintiff had delayed instituting suit, allowing third

SURINDER NATH KESARversusBOARD OF SCHOOL EDUCATION & ORS.

2020 INSC 26 January 2020Dismissed

The appellant, a proof‑reader appointed in 1970, voluntarily retired in February 1988 and was re‑appointed in August 1994. He sought to have the six‑year gap treated as leave without pay so that his entire service could be counted for pension. The Board of School Education resolved to condone the gap, but the applicabl

SHANTI DEVI ALIAS SHANTI MISHRAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2020 INSC 6325 November 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Shanti Devi, sought to revive a writ petition filed by her late husband, a retired Coal India employee, challenging the stoppage of his pension and a demand for repayment of over Rs 8 lakhs. The earlier petition for refund of a smaller amount had been dismissed by the Patna High Court on the ground of la

GURUSIMRAN SINGH NARULAversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2020 INSC 6355 November 2020Disposed off

The petitioner filed a public‑interest writ under Article 32 seeking an immediate ban on the use of chemical or organic disinfectant tunnels and ultraviolet (UV) rays on human beings, alleging that such practices violate the right to health under Article 21. The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare had issued an advis

T. K. DAVIDversusKURUPPAMPADY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. & ORS.

2020 INSC 5765 October 2020Dismissed

The petitioner, a former employee of Kuruppampady Service Co‑operative Bank, challenged his compulsory retirement through a series of proceedings, including a writ petition, writ appeal and a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in 2015, all of which were dismissed. He later filed a review petition in the Kerala High Court aga

KATHI DAVID RAJUversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR.

2019 INSC 8615 August 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was charged under the IPC for allegedly obtaining a false Scheduled Caste certificate by misrepresenting his parentage and caste. The police, shortly after his arrest, applied to a civil court under Section 53 of the CrPC for a DNA test of the appellant, his mother and brothers, and the Additional Junior

VINOD KUMARversusASHOK KUMAR GANDHI

2019 INSC 8605 August 2019Directions issued

The appeal arose from tenants of a non‑residential shop challenging an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, and seeking to have the Supreme Court’s decision in Satyawati Sharma case referred to a larger bench. The petitioners contended that the Satyawati Sharma judgment was per inc

NITIN BANDOPANT SALAGREversusTHE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION & ANR.

2019 INSC 8595 August 2019Appeal(s) allowed

In the 2017 municipal elections for Ward 76 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation, the elected councillor was later disqualified after her caste certificate was invalidated. This created a casual vacancy. The appellant, who had secured the second‑highest number of votes, claimed he should be deemed elected under Section 

DR. JAISHRI LAXMANRAO PATILversusTHE CHIEF MINISTER & ORS.

2021 INSC 2845 May 2021Disposed off

The State of Maharashtra enacted the Maharashtra State Reservation (of Seats for Admission in Educational Institutions in the State and for appointments in the public services and posts under the State) for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2018, granting 12% and 13% reservation to the Maratha com

KIRAN DEVIversusTHE BIHAR STATE SUNNI WAKF BOARD & ORS.

2021 INSC 2245 April 2021Appeal(s) allowed

Kiran Devi claimed that she was the rightful tenant of a hotel premises, asserting that the tenancy belonged to a joint Hindu family and that the Karta could not surrender it without the consent of other coparceners. The Patna High Court held that the tenancy was a joint family business, barred the Wakf Board from acce

MADAN MOHAN SINGHversusVED PRAKASH ARYA

2021 INSC 1555 March 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Madan Mohan Singh, was allotted a market booth in 1972 with a clause prohibiting sub‑letting and transfer of rights. He later entered into a partnership with Ved Prakash Arya in 1976, which was later dissolved, after which Arya worked as an employee. Dispute arose when Arya claimed he was a tenant paying

M/S SUPER MALLS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 8, NEW DELHI

2020 INSC 2775 March 2020Dismissed

The Income Tax Department conducted a search and seizure operation under s.132(1) at the residence of a director of M/s Super Malls (P) Ltd., seizing a pen‑drive and documents showing cash receipts of the company. The Assessing Officer, who was also the Assessing Officer of the director, issued a notice to the company

ASIF KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2019 INSC 3115 March 2019Dismissed

The incident arose from a dispute over water where accused No.1 (Nasibkha) and No.2 (Asif Khan) first assaulted the complainant and his brother Sardarkha, then left on a motorcycle and returned after ten minutes armed with a knife. Accused No.2 held Sardarkha’s neck while accused No.1 stabbed him, causing a fatal liver

MOHAMMADE YUSUF & ORS.versusRAJKUMAR & ORS.

2020 INSC 1335 February 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a suit in 1984 for a 7‑biswa parcel of land and a compromise decree was passed on 4 October 1985 granting them title to that parcel. In a later suit filed in 1998, the respondents sought an injunction over the same land and, during trial, the appellant attempted to introduce the 1985 compromise decr

DHARAM SINGH (D) THR. LRS. & ORS.versusPREM SINGH (D) THR. LRS.

2019 INSC 1395 February 2019Dismissed

The appellants filed a suit for permanent injunction claiming Sirdari (Asami) rights over Plot No. 719, asserting that their predecessor‑in‑interest, Amar Singh, was recorded as occupant of the land. The original owner, Tulsa Devi, died without heirs, so her land escheated to the State, and the Collector ordered that A

THE CHAIRPERSON GOVERNING BODY DAULAT RAM COLLEGEversusDR. ASHA & ORS.

2021 INSC 85 January 2021Appeal(s) allowed

Daulat Ram College, affiliated to the University of Delhi, was embroiled in a dispute over who had the authority to appoint the warden of its college hostel. The Principal had appointed Dr. Asha as warden without the approval of the Governing Body, which the college challenged. The High Court directed a fresh appointme

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search