SURESHversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. R1: STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH R2: DEVI SINGH
2025 INSC 91831 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Suresh alleged that his paternal uncle and the uncle's son, Respondent No.2, forcibly entered his house and the son shot his brother Rajesh, resulting in death. Respondent No.2 claimed juvenility, asserting he was 16 years old at the time, based on a school transfer certificate from the first school he at…
KAMARUDDIN DASTAGIR SANADIversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH SHO KAKATI POLICE
2024 INSC 90829 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Kamaruddin Dastagir Sanadi, was charged with cheating (Sec. 417 IPC) and abetment of suicide (Sec. 306 IPC) after a 21‑year‑old woman, who loved him, committed suicide when he refused to marry her. The trial court acquitted him, finding no evidence of a promise to marry, physical relationship, or any act…
NAVIN KUMAR & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC.
2024 INSC 65628 August 2024Dismissed
The State of Chhattisgarh appointed primary school teachers with B.Ed qualifications after the Supreme Court’s decision in Devesh Sharma, which held that a Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed) is the essential qualification for such posts. B.Ed‑qualified candidates challenged a Chhattisgarh High Court order that q…
ABDUL WAHID & ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2025 INSC 29528 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were convicted for the murder of Ahsan Ali under Sections 302 and 149 of the IPC based on the testimony of a single eyewitness and alleged recovery of weapons. The Supreme Court examined the credibility of the eyewitness, the absence of forensic evidence linking the accused to the crime, and the suspect …
SAMTOLA DEVIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2025 INSC 40427 March 2025Dismissed
The case concerned a dispute over a house owned by the late Kallu Mal, where his eldest son Krishna Kumar continued to occupy a portion of the house and run a utensil business. The parents, Samtola Devi and the deceased Kallu Mal, alleged mental and physical abuse by Krishna Kumar and sought eviction under the Maintena…
C. SELVARANIversusTHE SPECIAL SECRETARY-CUM-DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 90026 November 2024Dismissed
The appellant, C. Selvarani, born to a Christian father and a mother who allegedly converted to Hinduism, applied for a Scheduled Caste (SC) community certificate to secure a government job reserved for SC candidates. The authorities rejected her application on the ground that she does not profess Hinduism, Buddhism or…
JANARDAN DAS & ORS.versusDURGA PRASAD AGARWALLA & ORS.
2024 INSC 77826 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiffs, operating a petrol pump on a jointly owned property, claimed a specific performance of an oral agreement dated 06‑06‑1993 to purchase the land, alleging that the co‑owner brother had authority to bind the three sister co‑owners via a General Power of Attorney. The trial court dismissed the suit, finding…
ANURAG BHATNAGAR & ANR.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
2025 INSC 89525 July 2025Dismissed
The dispute arose between Sunair Hotels Ltd (SHL) and VLS Finance Ltd over a failed Memorandum of Understanding for a hotel project, leading to multiple FIRs and arbitration. SHL filed an application under Section 156(3) CrPC on 1 July 2005, prompting a Metropolitan Magistrate to order registration of FIR No.380/2005 f…
J. GANAPATHA AND OTHERSversusM/S N. SELVARAJALOU CHETTY TRUST REP. BY ITS TRUSTEES AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 39525 March 2025Dismissed
The dispute concerned the ownership of a 0.75‑cent plot (the Plaint Schedule) that had been sold at a court auction in 1962 to the late Padmini Chandrasekaran, with a sale deed executed in 1963. Subsequent wills by the original owner and by Padmini attempted to bequeath the property to various parties, including a trus…
N. THAJUDEENversusTAMIL NADU KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD
2024 INSC 81724 October 2024Dismissed
The Tamil Nadu Khadi and Village Industries Board (respondent) sued to confirm its title and recover possession of a property it claimed to have received by a registered gift deed dated 5 March 1983 from the appellant. The trial court dismissed the suit on the ground that the gift deed was never accepted or acted upon,…
SHYAMSUNDAR RADHESHYAM AGRAWAL & ANR.versusPUSHPABAI NILKANTH PATIL & ORS.
2024 INSC 73024 September 2024Dismissed
The appellants filed a suit for declaration and injunction, after which the defendant sought impoundment of six agreements for sale on the ground that they effected transfer of possession and were therefore conveyances requiring stamp duty and registration. The trial court and the High Court ordered the documents impou…
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusKAPIL WADHAWAN & ANR.
2024 INSC 5824 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a chargesheet on 15 October 2022 against 75 persons, including Kapil Wadhawan and Dheeraj Wadhawan, for alleged conspiracy, fraud and corruption involving DHFL. The respondents applied for default bail under the proviso to Section 167(2) of the CrPC, arguing that the char…
STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBI, ACB, VISAKHAPATNAMversusELURI SRINIVASA CHAKRAVARTHI AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 75822 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The CBI filed an FIR in 2006 alleging that a senior Cotton Purchase Officer and his associates conspired to buy cotton at market rates, hoard it, and sell it to the Cotton Corporation of India (CCI) at the higher Minimum Support Price (MSP) through benami farmers, causing an alleged loss of Rs 21.19 crore. A chargeshee…
MOHD. TAHIR HUSSAINversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI
2025 INSC 10022 January 2025
Mohd. Tahir Hussain, an under‑trial accused in multiple FIRs including rioting and the murder of an IB official, has been in custody since March 2020 and sought interim bail to contest and campaign in the 2025 Delhi Assembly elections. The Delhi High Court allowed only a custodial parole for filing his nomination, prom…
K.C. KAUSHIK AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 80321 October 2024Dismissed
The appellants, retired lecturers and principals of government‑aided private colleges in Haryana, sought parity with government‑college teachers by claiming a revised pension under the Haryana Civil Services (Revised Pension) Part I Rules, 2009, together with interest on the delayed payment of arrears dating back to 1 …
LENIN KUMAR RAYversusM/S EXPRESS PUBLICATIONS (MADURAI) LTD.
2024 INSC 80221 October 2024
The employee, Lenin Kumar Ray, was appointed as Junior Engineer and later promoted to Assistant Engineer in a newspaper publishing company, drawing a salary well above the pre‑amendment threshold of Rs.1,600 per month. He was relieved on 8 October 2003 with payment of one month’s salary in lieu of notice, which he acce…
SMT. SHAIFALI GUPTAversusSMT. VIDYA DEVI GUPTA & ORS.
2025 INSC 73919 May 2025
The mother and younger son filed a suit for partition, possession, declaration, injunction and accounting of properties claimed to be Joint Hindu Family assets against the elder son, his wife and other family members. The elder son’s wife (defendant No.2) and subsequent purchasers (defendants No.5 and 6) sought to have…
STATE OF LOKAYUKTHA POLICE, DAVANAGEREversusC B NAGARAJ
2025 INSC 73619 May 2025Dismissed
The respondent, C B Nagaraj, an Extension Officer, was alleged to have demanded a Rs 1,500 bribe from a teacher, E R Krishnamurthy, for issuing a spot‑inspection report required for a validity certificate. The Lokayuktha police recovered the alleged bribe using a phenolphthalein‑smeared trap and the trial court convict…
THAMMINENI BHASKARversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2025 INSC 112417 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Thammineni Bhaskar, was convicted by the trial court and the High Court for kidnapping and murdering the son of an informant under IPC sections 302, 364 and 201. The prosecution's case relied on the allegation that the accused forcibly took the victim into an auto and that the victim was later found dead…
M SAMBASIVA RAOversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2025 INSC 86817 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, an Assistant Administrative Officer in an insurance company, was accused of demanding a bribe of Rs.40,000 to expedite a claim settlement and of conspiring with a regional manager and his brother in a demand‑and‑trap operation. The trial court acquitted all accused, but the High Court reversed the acquit…
RAJESH KUMARversusANAND KUMAR & ORS.
2024 INSC 44417 May 2024Dismissed
The appellant entered into an agreement to sell land with a power of attorney holder acting for several co‑owners, paid earnest money and obtained extensions for registration of the sale deed. The attorney holder later executed a sale deed in favour of the respondents, prompting the appellant to send a notice and event…
RAGHUNATH SHARMA & ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR.
2025 INSC 72316 May 2025Case Allowed
The appellants entered into a series of sale agreements and a compromise deed, after which an FIR (No.432/2014) for offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC was filed. The High Court, invoking its inherent powers under Section 482 of the CrPC, quashed the FIR on the basis of the compromise. The complainant later applied…
S.C. GARGversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 49315 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, S.C. Garg, Managing Director of Ruchira Papers Ltd., was charged under Section 420 IPC for allegedly cheating respondent R.N. Tyagi after the parties had already resolved a dispute over seven dishonoured cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The earlier NI Act case resulted in Tyag…
RENJITH K.G. & OTHERSversusSHEEBA
2024 INSC 77314 October 2024Dismissed
The appellants, representing the original decree holder, sought to enforce a partition decree dated 9 March 1970 that awarded them a share of a one‑acre property in Kerala. The decree was engrossed on stamp paper in 1990 and an execution petition for possession was filed in 1991, resulting in the plaintiff taking posse…
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS.versusM/S SHREE NIWAS RAMGOPAL & ORS.
2025 INSC 83214 July 2025Dismissed
The dispute arose when Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) stopped supplying kerosene to a partnership firm after one of its three partners died, despite the partnership deed stating that death would not dissolve the firm. The partnership filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing IOCL to continue supply unti…
VANEETA PATNAIKversusNIRMAL KANTI CHAKRABARTI & ORS.
2025 INSC 110612 September 2025Dismissed
The appellant, a faculty member of NUJS, filed a complaint on 26 December 2023 alleging sexual harassment by the Vice‑Chancellor, claiming the last incident occurred in April 2023. The Local Complaint Committee dismissed the complaint as time‑barred because the filing was beyond the three‑month statutory period and the…
A. KARUNANITHIversusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2025 INSC 96712 August 2025Disposed off
The case concerned two village officials, A‑1 (Village Administrative Officer) and A‑2 (Village Assistant), who were convicted under Sections 13(1)(d), 13(2) and 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and receiving a bribe of Rs.500. A trap was laid using phenolphthalein‑treated notes, leading to the…
JYOTI LIMITEDversusBSE LIMITED & ANR
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 111710 December 2024Dismissed
Jyoti Limited sought to list equity shares on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) that were allotted to an Asset Reconstruction Company (RARE) after converting part of its debt into equity. The BSE rejected the application, stating that Jyoti had not obtained in‑principle approval from the exchange and had not secured a sh…
VINOD KUMAR PANDEY & ANR.versusSEESH RAM SAINI & ORS.
2025 INSC 109510 September 2025Disposed off
The case concerned two Central Bureau of Investigation officers, Vinod Kumar Pandey and Neeraj Kumar, who were alleged to have committed a series of cognizable offences under the IPC, prompting writ petitions seeking registration of FIRs against them. The Delhi High Court, after examining the complaints and a prelimina…
AMRIT YADAVversusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS.
2025 INSC 1769 February 2025Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the recruitment of Class‑IV employees in Jharkhand where an advertisement dated 29 July 2010 failed to disclose the number of posts and reservation details, rendering it void under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The Court held that the advertisement was illegal and any appointments m…
RAVIversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB
2025 INSC 1709 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Ravi was convicted of murdering his first wife Jamni by strangulation based largely on circumstantial evidence and hostile witness testimony. The prosecution's case relied on a Zero FIR, a post‑mortem report indicating asphyxia, and the recovery of a rope, while key eyewitnesses turned hostile. The Suprem…
HANSRAJversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2025 INSC 1789 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Hansraj was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Ramlal, based solely on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution alleged a motive of wage dispute, that Hansraj left for his native place, returned with a punctured cycle, and was seen fleeing with a farsi, the alleged murder weapon. The Supreme Court examin…
NO.2809759H EX-RECRUIT BABANNA MACHCHEDversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2024 INSC 959 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed
Four ex‑recruits of the Maratha Light Infantry were dismissed in 2013 on the ground that they had secured enrollment under the Unit Headquarters Quota by producing forged relationship certificates. The appellants contended that they had applied as general‑category candidates and never submitted any such certificates. T…
NEHA ENTERPRISESversusCOMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX, LUCKNOW, UTTAR PRADESH
2025 INSC 4768 April 2025Dismissed
Neha Enterprises, a registered dealer under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008, claimed an input tax credit of Rs. 6,42,260 for purchases related to sales made to a manufacturer‑exporter under Form‑E for the assessment year 2010‑11. The assessing officer initially allowed the credit but later disallowed it und…
RAJENDRA SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL ETC.
2025 INSC 11937 October 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, a father, son and son‑in‑law, were accused of murdering Pushpendra Singh and were acquitted by the trial court but later convicted by the High Court on the basis of alleged ocular testimony and the recovery of swords and a kanta. The Supreme Court examined whether the appellants could be positively iden…
ANNAYA KOCHA SHETTY (DEAD) THROUGH LRSversusLAXMIBAI NARAYAN SATOSE SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS & OTHERS
2025 INSC 4667 April 2025Dismissed
The plaintiff, a hotel operator, entered into a 1967 agreement with the owner (defendant) described as an “agreement for conducting” the hotel business, wherein the plaintiff paid a monthly royalty and was responsible for expenses, while the owner retained ownership. After the owner served notice to vacate, the plainti…
SADIQ B. HANCHINMANIversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. R1: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R2: CHNDRUMAL R3: SANJAY R4: NANDKUMAR R5: VIJAY
2025 INSC 12824 November 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The complainant, Sadiq B. Hanchinmani, filed a private criminal complaint alleging that the accused had forged an e‑stamp rent agreement to illegally occupy his property and had committed offences under Sections 120B, 201, 419, 471, 468 and 420 IPC. The Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) referred the matter to the …
SMT. LAVANYA C & ANR.versusVITTAL GURUDAS PAI SINCE DESEASED BY LRS. & ORS.
2025 INSC 3254 March 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellants, originally defendants in a suit concerning a Joint Development Agreement, gave an undertaking through their counsel in 2007 not to alienate the subject property, which the trial court later incorporated into a court order. In 2011 the plaintiffs filed an application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A alleging br…