Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act

320 judgments · newest first · showing 201–320

Munna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Munna Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act after 234.72 litres of illicit liquor were seized from a car he was driving. He contended that no liquor was found in his personal possession, that he was unaware …

Sanjeev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving the seizure of 801.1 litres of Nepali-made liquor from a bamboo clamp. He was charged under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The prosecution …

Harish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Harish Kumar was arrested in connection with the seizure of 287.4 litres of illicit liquor near Mokoka School, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The petitioner contended that his name surfaced only through a spy’s statement, that no liquor was recovered …

RakeshversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rakesh, a driver, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 225 litres of illicit foreign liquor from a vehicle, charged under Sections 30(a), 32(i)(iii) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, that …

Shiba KarmkarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shiba Karmkar, was arrested on 16‑12‑2025 after a police raid on a ten‑wheeler vehicle that yielded 4,617 litres of illegal foreign liquor, a mobile phone and cash. He contends that none of the contraband was found in his conscious possession, he has a clean antecedent, and the …

Mukesh Kumar @ Bhallu @ BhaluversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mukesh Kumar was arrested in connection with the seizure of 161 litres of illicit country-made liquor, charged under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting …

Suresh Kumar Ram @ Suresh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suresh Kumar, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 1.8 litres of illegal foreign liquor, alleged to be an offence under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and stating that he had been in custody …

Pramod ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pramod Chaudhary, a man with no prior criminal record, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for allegedly possessing 28 litres of liquor recovered from a sack at a location not belonging to him. He argued that the liquor was not in …

Md. Nisar @ Md. NesarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Nisar, sought bail in a case where 207 litres of illicit foreign liquor were seized from his four‑wheel vehicle, alleged to violate Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. The prosecution argued that the liquor was …

Ravi KantversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Kant, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case alleging violation of Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for the alleged recovery of 10,800 litres of liquor …

Ramesh Anup YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Anup Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 29.625 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not found in his …

Sandeep Sahani @ Sandeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sandeep Sahani and Teleshwar Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged possession of 110 litres of country‑made liquor recovered near a pond. They contended that they were falsely implicated, that the …

Suraj Kumar Ray @ Suraj Kr. Ray @ SurajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving the alleged recovery of 1.950 litres of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The prosecution alleged the liquor was recovered, while the …

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Shivam Kumar, a driver, sought bail in an excise case where 1335.6 liters of illicit foreign liquor were seized from his truck. The prosecution alleged violation of Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, while the defence argued that the …

Munna ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Munna Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after the police, acting on a tip, alleged his involvement in illegal liquor trade under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. He was not arrested at the scene and no contraband was recovered from his possession, though he …

Manoj Lal HarijanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Lal Harijan sought anticipatory bail after the police indicated he might be arrested in connection with Special Case No. 84 of 2026 under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, relating to the recovery of 7.410 litres of illicit liquor. The petitioner …

Jagdish ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jagdish Manjhi sought anticipatory bail after police, acting on secret information, seized 40 litres of country-made liquor from his joint family house and 80 litres from another accused's house in connection with offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The petitioner …

Udayi RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three residents of Gopalganj district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Kateya P.S. Case No.710 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for alleged possession of 162 litres of country‑made liquor. The prosecution’s case …

Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ranjan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case where police seized 140 litres of illicit mahua liquor during a raid. The seizure was made from an open field under a palm tree and not from the petitioner’s premises or constructive possession. The local chowkidar …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raja Kumar, was implicated in a case alleging possession of a pickup truck loaded with illicit foreign liquor concealed under paddy husk, under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The police seized 889.2 litres of liquor but did not recover anything from the …

Rupesh Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Rupesh Kumar Paswan and Brajesh Paswan, were arrested in connection with Excise P.S. Case No.209 of 2026 for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, based on the seizure of 189 litres of Nepali country-made liquor from their …

Dinesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dinesh Yadav, applied for bail in an excise case (Case No. 82 of 2026) alleging possession of six litres of foreign liquor, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The prosecution claimed the liquor was recovered from the petitioner, while …

Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Aman Kumar and Rahul Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from them and that the police seizure violated Section 105 of the BNSS. The prosecution claimed that 19.08 …

Rinku DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Rinku Devi and Raktu Mahto, were arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after police recovered 35 litres of country‑made liquor and a pistol from nearby …

Ranjit SahaniversusThe state of bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from a cattle shed owned by a third party. He argued he had no possession of the liquor, no antecedent record, …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Vikash Kumar (driver) and Sanni Kumar (passenger), were arrested after 160.71 litres of foreign liquor was seized from their car in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. They contended they were unaware of the illicit liquor, that none was …

Shambhu Sahni @ Sambhu SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shambhu Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case (PS Case No. 446/2025) alleging that 70 litres of liquor were recovered from two motorcycles, invoking Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. He argued that he had no …

Ramesh Ram @ Ramesh Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 11.72 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his …

Md. Tonu @ Dilfroz @ Md TunuversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act after 255 litres of Nepali liquor were seized from two motorcycles. The petitioner contended that he was neither the owner nor the rider of the bikes, that no liquor was …

Dharmendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Dharmendra Ray was arrested on his cycle with 80 litres of country-made liquor and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The petitioner contended that no liquor was recovered from his possession and that the police seizure violated Section 105 of the BNSS, …

Ramesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ramesh Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, alleging that 340 litres of illicit country-made liquor were seized underground and that only 130 litres were found on an e‑rickshaw, with none recovered from …

Suresh DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suresh Das, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 62 litres of liquor from a public pit. He argued he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not in his conscious …

Uday KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Uday Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for the alleged recovery of 16 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He was not arrested at the spot and argued that he was unaware that his vehicle was being …

Krishna SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Krishna Sahani applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. He argued that the alleged liquor seizures (6 litres from Suraj Kumar and 80 litres from a sugarcane field) were not in his possession and that he was being …

Suraj PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suraj Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his conscious …

Manju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manju Devi applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against her under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for allegedly possessing 10 litres of liquor and 60 litres of Jawa Mahua. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and …

Rambabu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rambabu Singh applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleged seizure of Nepali liquor from a bamboo orchard near his house. The petitioner argued that no liquor was found in his conscious possession and he has no prior …

Fagu ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Fagu Manjhi, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a bamboo orchard not belonging to him. He claimed the accusation was based on a hostile chowkidar’s testimony and that no …

Ashok NatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ashok Nat, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for alleged possession of eight litres of country-made liquor recovered from behind his house. No liquor was seized from his conscious possession or residence. He applied for …

Nawal Kishor Yadav @ Gabbar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nawal Kishor Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case of deaths caused by consumption of poisonous liquor, charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. He claimed false implication and argued that the allegations …

Ramnath Manjhi @ Ramntha MnjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramnath Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging recovery of liquor from his residence, which is a joint family property. He argued he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not in …

Anil kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, alleging that the alleged recovery of liquor was from a field not belonging to him and that he was implicated by an inimical chowkidar without proper investigation. …

Akhilesh Sahani @ Akhilesh Kumar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, alleging that the alleged seizure of liquor and Mahua occurred at a public place not in his possession and that the informant (chowkidar) failed …

Suraj Kumar Gupta @ Suraj SahuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar Gupta, applied for anticipatory bail after learning of his impending arrest in a case involving alleged possession of two country-made pistols, a live cartridge, two motorcycles and a mobile phone, alleged under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 37 of …

Mukesh Mukhiya @ Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Mukhiya sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, where 50 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle not owned by him. He claimed the police implicated him based on a chowkidar’s information …

Munna MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munna Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging recovery of 55 litres of liquor from a location behind his house. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was arrested on 7 February 2026 in connection with an FIR alleging possession of 292.5 litres of illicit liquor, offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. He contended that he was neither the owner nor the …

Amit Paswan @ Amit Kumar Paswan @ Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Amit Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a vehicle not owned by him and that he was implicated solely on secret information. He disclosed three prior …

Sobha SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners Sobha Sah, Ramratan Kumar and Bhola Sah sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act alleging recovery of 105 litres of liquor from an orchard. They contended that they were not in conscious …

Mauni Devi @ Mani DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mauni Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a location adjacent to her house. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession, the …

Umesh Mahto @ Umesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Umesh Mahto, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 219.3 liters of country-made liquor and charged under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 32, and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. He had been in custody since 21‑12‑2025 and …

Jai SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Jai Singh, feared arrest in connection with an excise case (PS No.40 of 2025) alleging violations of Sections 30(a) and 32(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. The prosecution alleged that a Scorpio vehicle owned by the petitioner was used to transport 216 litres of …

Niraj Tiwari @ Niraj Kr.versusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Niraj Tiwari, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 8 and 20(B)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged possession of 5.4 litres of liquor and 1 kilogram of ganja. He claimed …

Dhirendra Singh @ Dhirendra Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhirendra Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, alleging recovery of 1,305 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the …

Badhan Paswan @ Badhan PasavanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Badhan Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR (Imamganj PS Case No. 115 of 2025) for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act involving 70 litres of illicit liquor recovered from a forest area. The prosecution’s …

Sakil @ Mohammad SakilversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sakil @ Mohammad Sakil, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 273/2023) under Section 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, where 120 kg of Mahua flower was recovered from a tempo. The prosecution alleged the petitioner was involved, but he had …

Sadam Alam @ Mir SaddamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sadam Alam, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 189 litres of liquor from a location not owned by him. He has eight prior criminal cases, seven of which are under the Excise Act, …

Raju Kumar Das @ Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raju Kumar Das sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for the alleged seizure of 36 litres of Desi Sophie from a motorcycle. He contended that he neither owned nor was driving the vehicle and that the …

Sri Rahul Kumar @ Raidar @ Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act in connection with a case registered on 25‑12‑2025. While the petition was pending, he was actually arrested. His counsel informed the court that, …

KARISHMA KUMARIversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Karishma Kumari, the registered owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case alleging the seizure of 5.58 litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) from the vehicle on 9 December 2025, leading to the arrest of her brother. The prosecution charged her under Sections 338 and 336(3) of the …

Rajesh Kumar Chauhan @ Pintu Chauhan @ Rajesh ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar Chauhan was arrested as the driver of a scooty from which 125 litres of country-made liquor was seized, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. He contended that the liquor was not in his possession and that he was falsely implicated, …

Dhani Mahto @ Dhanai MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Dhani Mahto and Brija Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case where 69.120 litres of foreign liquor were seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The prosecution’s case linked them to the offence based solely on a …

Upendra MukhiyaversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Upendra Mukhiya and Prabhu Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case (Sangrampur PS Case No. 286 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 281 and 125(a) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The …

Sushil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sushil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving the seizure of 3,948.48 litres of foreign liquor from a truck. The prosecution’s case was based on the statements of co-accused who named the petitioner, although the liquor and vehicle were not found …

Chhotu Kumar @ Chhotu ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Chhotu Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Katra P.S. Case No. 300 of 2025) under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated because the …

Md. SoimversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Soim, owner of an e‑rickshaw, was implicated in a case where police recovered 42.5 litres of illicit liquor from the vehicle, charging offences under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 & 2022. The petitioner argued that the liquor was …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged recovery of 4.5 litres of illicit country‑made liquor from his residence under Section 3(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. He contended that the seizure was unlawful, no contraband was found in his …

Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Sudhir Kumar (driver) and Manoj Kumar (co‑driver), were arrested after 235.140 litres of foreign liquor was seized from their bus. They were charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act and have been in judicial custody since 4 January …

Bijli Singh @ Durga SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bijli Singh, was arrested in connection with a seizure of 310 litres of country-made liquor alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The petitioner contended that the liquor was seized from his joint family property and not from …

SANJEEV KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, two young men from Basantpur, were arrested after police seized 61.200 litres of Nepali country liquor from a motorcycle they were riding. They contend they are neither the owners of the motorcycle nor the liquor, and argue that the FIR was filed after the seizure list was prepared …

Vishal Kumar @ Vishal PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal Kumar was arrested in connection with a 2021 case alleging illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under several provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. The police seized 100 litres of Mahua liquor from the bank of a river and claimed it belonged to the …

Mukesh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Sahani applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a field not belonging to him. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession and that the case was based on a …

Manju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manju Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor and 50 litres of Mahua from her residence, alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. She …

Abhay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhay Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for allegedly having 750 ml of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor, was not in possession at the time of seizure, …

Santosh RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Ram, a resident of East Champaran, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a field not owned by him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, no possession …

Sanjay Sahani @ Sanjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Four brothers were arrested in connection with a case of alleged possession and illegal trade of 750 ml of foreign liquor, charged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The petitioners applied for …

Santosh Kumar Yadav @ Santosh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the case relied solely on a …

Bhadai Paswan @ Bhaday Paswan @ Bhadaya PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhadai Paswan, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for allegedly possessing 3.96 litres of liquor recovered from his house. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was located in a …

Ramadhar Sahani @ Nagendra SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramadhar Sahani applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of liquor. He argued that the liquor was seized from a location not belonging to him, that he had no conscious possession, and that …

Rajeshwar PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajeshwar Pandey, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a pickup vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, did not possess the seized …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Amit Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for allegedly possessing two litres of liquor recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and that his brother had …

Ajay Kumar @ Ajay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, alleging that the alleged liquor and Mahua Jaggery solution were not recovered from his possession. He has two prior excise …

Premi Sahani @ Prami SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Premi Sahani sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for allegedly transporting 7 litres of liquor in his motorcycle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor, was not in actual possession, …

Abdhesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Abdhesh Paswan sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor and 100 kg of Mahua flower from two motorcycles. He argued that he had …

Sikendar RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sikendar Ram, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 729 litres of liquor from four motorcycles, alleged under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing …

Baiju SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Baiju Sah sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging that 47.07 litres of liquor were recovered from his jointly‑owned house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious …

Kunti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kunti Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, where 80 litres of liquor was recovered, 35 litres allegedly from her house. She argued she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor …

Yogendra Kumar @ YogiaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Yogendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging recovery of 13.875 litres of liquor from a public area. He contended that he has a clean criminal record, that the liquor was not in his …

Harekishun Singh @ Hare Kishan SinghversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Harekishun Singh applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 152.625 litres of liquor from a house not owned by him. He argued that the recovery was based solely on a …

Vishal DixonversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vishal Dixon, owner of a vehicle from which 420 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail, arguing he had no conscious possession of the liquor and had merely rented the car to a ride‑sharing service. He contended that the police implicated him solely because he was …

Rahul SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rahul Sahani applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from two motorcycles but he was not arrested on the spot and does not own the vehicles. The petitioner has three prior excise …

NAGENDRA MANJHIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nagendra Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a joint family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, the liquor could belong to other …

Rambabu ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Rambabu Chaudhary and Dhiraj Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for the alleged recovery of 295.200 litres of liquor from their jointly owned house. They argued that they …

Buban Sahni @ BabanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Buban Sahni sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, alleging that the alleged liquor recovery was from a public riverbank and that he had no conscious possession. He contended that the complaint was …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Chandan Kumar and Mohan Kumar Ray, were implicated in a case under Sections 274, 275 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Section 30(a) of its Amendment Act for allegedly recovering 170 litres of spirit and 2 litres of spurious liquor from a house not belonging to them. They …

Rajesh Kumar Sahani @ Rajesh SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rajesh Kumar Sahani applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a river bank. He argued that the liquor was …

Sandil Kumar @ Shandilya RajversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sandil Kumar and Navin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act concerning alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued that no liquor was found in their conscious …

Nagina SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nagina Sahani, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act concerning the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from the Dharauti river. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and …

Guli Sah @ Goli Sah @ Gulli SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Guli Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor near Sirani Canal. He contended that the liquor was not found in his possession, the alleged …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Suraj Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging sexual assault under Sections 74, 75(2) and 79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution contended that the assault occurred …

Raja Kumar Paswan @ Raj Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Raja Kumar Paswan applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from another shop. He asserted a clean criminal record, no possession of the liquor, and no …

Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Akash Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 317(5), 338, 336(3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 78 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued he had a clean …

Pinki Kumari @ Pinki DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Pinki Kumari and Anju Kumari, daughters of Sanjay Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging recovery of 14 litres of liquor and 240 litres of Jawa Mahua from their father's house. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested at the spot, and had …

Kumar ShanuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Kumar Shanu, Ravi Prakash and Prashant Mehta, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Bypass PS No.124/2025) involving alleged offences under Section 52 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act and Sections 292, 352 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. The prosecution’s case was …

Jokhan MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jokhan Mahto sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging recovery of liquor from his joint family house and from Munni Devi's house. The petitioner argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, the …

Pramod RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pramod Ram, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from five sacks. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and …

Vijay Yadav @ Vijo YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vijay Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from a public area. He contended that no liquor was found in his …

Manohar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manohar Sharma was granted anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, with a direction to surrender within four weeks and to have a family member or relative act as bailor. He applied to the Patna High Court for an extension of the surrender period and …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for allegedly recovering 110 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the …

Shankar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shankar Yadav, the owner of a motorcycle from which 12 litres of liquor were recovered, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and that the vehicle had been …

Sanjay MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a husband and three wives, applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging recovery of 25 litres of liquor from their joint family house and a paddy field. They argued they have clean …

Mukesh Mahto @ Mukesh Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Mahto applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 32,400 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, the liquor was not …

Panna Kumar @ Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Panna Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for allegedly possessing 9.5 litres of liquor recovered from his joint‑family house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, that no liquor was found in his conscious …

Dinesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Rai, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act for the alleged recovery of 40 litres of liquor from two motorcycles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was …

Prem Raj @ RikkiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Prem Raj, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged possession of 4.86 litres of liquor and seizure of his scooty. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious …

Tunni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Tunni Devi applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act alleging possession of six litres of liquor at her residence, which is a joint family property. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Santosh kumar @ Santosh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar, facing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 135 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, applied for anticipatory bail. He contended that the seized vehicle was not in his possession, he was not the owner, and his …

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, alleging recovery of 171 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not present at …

Manju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manju Devi, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a public place. She argued that the liquor was not found in her possession, the FIR did not name her, and she had only two …