Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

35028 judgments · newest first · showing 11601–11800

Santosh Ray @ Bavan Ray @ Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Ray sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 270 litres of liquor from a mustard field owned by Munna Singh. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was found in …

Manoj Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar Yadav was implicated in a case under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 228 litres of liquor in his vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was …

Md. Atif Ali @ Md. AsifversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, a driver, was arrested after police seized 57 litres of foreign liquor and 12 litres of beer from his vehicle in Nawada. He claimed he had no knowledge of the contraband and that the seizure was not made in compliance with Section 105 of the BNSS, arguing he was merely a driver and …

Dharmendra Chaurasia @ Dharmendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dharmendra Chaurasia, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a roadside sack and from a third party's premises without his conscious possession. He highlighted his prior …

Raman Sharma @ Raman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Raman Sharma, Shambhu Sharma and Dhiraj Mehta, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 270 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a Tata Safari. They contended that they were not arrested …

HEMANT KUMAR VERMA @ HAVINDRA VERMAversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Hemant Kumar Verma was charged under several IPC offences (sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506) and under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va)). He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge. Subsequently, he was …

Mithilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar, feared arrest in a case alleging recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, charged under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He claimed he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was …

Sameer Suman @ SinnuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sameer Suman, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 329 of 2024) registered under Sections 126(2), 109, 352, 3(5) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the accused, in a drunken state, opened fire during a political discussion, but …

Dilip Sah @ Dilip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilip Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 5.760 litres of liquor recovered from a mustard field that does not belong to him. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, was not caught in possession, and the alleged …

Bhim YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bhim Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,296 litres of liquor from his pickup vehicle. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was seized from the vehicle and not from …

Santosh MahtoversusThe state of bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Mahto sought anticipatory bail after a police case was registered under Section 281 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging that 504 litres of liquor were recovered from his Tata vehicle. He contended that he had a clean …

Babul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Babul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was not the owner, and the case was based solely …

Sanoj RaiversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Sanoj Rai was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending. He approached the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The court heard arguments from both sides and granted the petitioner's request. Consequently, the anticipatory bail …

Sanjay KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Sanjay Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a liquor‑related case (Bairiya PS Case No. 239 of 2021). The State opposed, pointing out discrepancies between the FIR and the prosecution’s version in the impugned order. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory …

Ganesh MarandiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ganesh Marandi was apprehended in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the concept of deemed …

Chandan MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Chandan Mandal and Sanjeet Kumar, were arrested in connection with the recovery of 91 litres of country-made liquor and charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. They applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and having been in custody since 10 February …

Sujeet Chaudhary @ Surjeet ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sujeet Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from his joint‑family house. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested on the spot, and that the liquor …

Santosh Singh @ Santosh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Santosh Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his tea shop. He asserted a clean antecedent and claimed that the …

Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 52.5 litres of liquor from his cow‑shed. He argued that no liquor was seized from his immediate possession, the cow‑shed is a public …

GUDDU MAHTOversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Guddu Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 26.280 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not found in …

Ranjit SahaniversusThe state of bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjit Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged recovery of 24 litres of liquor from a cattle shed owned by a third party. He argued he had no possession of the liquor, no antecedent record, …

Ajay Kumar MahtoversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ajay Kumar Mahto was arrested on 2 February 2026 in connection with an excise case involving the seizure of 62.775 litres of foreign liquor. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 32(c), 36 and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, but the liquor was recovered from the house of a …

NOOR ALAMversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Noor Alam, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a police case in Araria. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Hon’ble Justice Satyavrat Verma granted the …

Ram SadayversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Ram Saday filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, he sought permission to withdraw the application and instead surrender to face regular bail proceedings. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail. The …

Maruti Fuels StationversusThe Union of India

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Maruti Fuels Station, won the e‑auction for Aurangabad Sone Sand Block No.8 but alleged that extensive sand extraction had already depleted the resource and no replenishment study had been conducted. The petitioner sought a direction to halt any coercive action and to compel the …

RAM NARESH SAHANIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Ram Naresh Sahani, died while his criminal appeal was pending before the Patna High Court. The court examined a letter from the Superintendent of Police and a report from the SHO indicating the appellant's death. The legal question was whether the appeal could continue in the absence …

BHOLA YADAV @ PANKAJ YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Bhola Yadav, filed a criminal appeal which was pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency, the appellant died, as confirmed by a letter from the Superintendent of Police and a report from the SHO. The Court examined the provisions of Section 394 of the Code of Criminal …

SUBHADRA DEVI and ANRversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellants, Subhadra Devi and Sanjay Choudhary, filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the police investigation revealed that both appellants had died. No near relative filed an application seeking leave to continue the appeal on their behalf. The …

JAGESHWAR MAHTO @ JAGESHWAR PRASAD @ JAGESAR MAHTOversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Jageshwar Mahto, was charged under several IPC sections (341, 447, 323, 354, 504/34) and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge. On appeal, the respondent (Manti Devi) argued …

Robin Singhla @ Robin SinglaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Robin Singhla, the owner of a vehicle from which 3,051 litres of liquor were seized, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and that his driver, who …

CHUHAN CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Chuhan Chaudhary, died during the pendency of a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court. The court examined a letter from the Superintendent of Police and a police report confirming the appellant's death. The issue was whether the appeal could continue in the absence of a near …

BIJALI PRASAD @ BIJULI PRASADversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Bijali Prasad, died while his criminal appeal was pending before the Patna High Court. The court examined a letter from the Superintendent of Police and a report from the SHO indicating the appellant’s death. The issue was whether the appeal should continue in the absence of any …

Parsuram Yadav @ ParsuversusThe State Of Bihar

ABATED

The appellant, Parsuram Yadav, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.52 of 2015 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the Superintendent of Police reported that the appellant had died. The court examined the report and noted that under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal …

Sheo Dayal Singh and Anr.versusThe State Of Bihar

ABATED

The appellants, Sheo Dayel Singh and Ganga Singh, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.162 of 2014 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, both appellants died, as reported by the Superintendent of Police and the SHO. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal …

BHAGAWAN GHI JHA @ BHAGAWAN JI JHAversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant challenged the acquittal of respondent No.2 (Jagdish Yadav) in a murder case involving the death of Jitendra Jha, alleging that the trial court erred in finding the prosecution evidence insufficient. The prosecution case was based on a private complaint and the testimony of family …

PRINCE KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Prince Kumar and Pushkar Kumar, were charged under several IPC provisions and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant, abusing him with caste slurs, and snatching his gold chain. They contended that the dispute was a …

Jai Prakash @ ChotuversusThe State Of Bihar

ABATED

The appellant, Jai Prakash @ Chotu, died while his criminal appeal (CR. APP (DB) No.340 of 2015) was pending before the Patna High Court. The court examined a letter from the Senior Superintendent of Police and a police report confirming the appellant's death. The issue was whether the appeal could …

LALITA RAUT @ LALIT RAUTversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Lalita Raut, filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 366A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act after a complaint was lodged. The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge‑cum‑SC/ST Special Court rejected the bail, prompting …

SHALIK KAMKARversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Shalik Kamkar, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.265 of 2002 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as reported by the Superintendent of Police and the SHO. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which is now …

Manjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Manjay Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in connection with a case (PS Agamkuan Case No. 998 of 2024) involving offences under various sections of the BNS and the Arms Act. He filed a petition seeking relief from arrest and later requested to withdraw the petition and surrender voluntarily within …

Chiku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Chiku Kumar was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of the deceased. He applied for regular bail for the second time, having been denied bail earlier on 16-12-2024. The petitioner has been in custody since 20-04-2024 and the trial is ongoing. The learned judge …

Upendra Sharma @ Upendra Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Upendra Sharma and three others, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 354(B), 386 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They claimed the FIR was false, filed ten days after the …

MD. SAKIL @ MD. SAKLIN @ MD. SAKLENversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Md. Sakil, appealed against the Special Judge's order rejecting his anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged assault, theft of jewellery, and caste-based abuse under various IPC sections and the SC/ST Act. The FIR alleged that the accused assaulted the informant with lathi and …

Ramakant Ram @ Ramakant ChandrawanshiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the informant's children with weapons and caste slurs on 10 February 2018. They sought anticipatory bail, which was …

Md. Naziruddin @ Anikul Shekh @ Aanikul ShekhversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Naziruddin, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (C.A. No. 411 of 2017) filed under Section 498A of the IPC alleging dowry harassment, physical and mental torture, and forced abortion by his wife. The wife had filed a complaint and the matter was referred to …

Jokhan Sah @ Rahul Sah @ RahulversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Jokhan Sah, the husband of a deceased woman, was charged with murder under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Minor witnesses alleged that he killed his wife, and he has been in custody since December 17, 2024. The petitioner applied for regular bail. The court examined the …

Amarjeet KumarversusPinki Devi

ALLOWED

The appellant Amarjeet Kumar appealed against the dismissal of Guardianship Case No. 03 of 2018 by the Family Court, Hajipur, on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction. The High Court observed that the dismissal was passed in the absence of the petitioner and that the trial court failed to …

Md. Tamizuddin @ Tamizuddin @ BudhanversusThe State Of Bihar

ABATED

The appellant, Md. Tamizuddin, died during the pendency of Criminal Appeal No. 551 of 2014. The court examined a letter and police report confirming his death. The issue was whether the appeal should continue in the absence of a near relative filing an application for leave to proceed. Relying on …

Kapildeo YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

ABATED

Kapildeo Yadav appealed against his conviction by the State of Bihar in Criminal Appeal (DB) No.473 of 2014. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as reported by the Superintendent of Police and the Sub‑Inspector. The court examined the provisions of Section 394 of the Code of …

Badrul HassanversusThe State Of Bihar

ABATED

The appellant, Badrul Hassan, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.740 of 2014 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as reported by the Superintendent of Police and the SHO. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding …

BRAHAMDEO PANDIT and ANRversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellants, Brahamdeo Pandit and Basudeo Pandit, filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, a police letter dated 14‑02‑2026 disclosed that both appellants had died. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding …

Muna Dewan @ Md. MunnaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, members of the Dewan family, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under IPC sections 363, 366A and 34 alleging kidnapping of a 17‑year‑old girl for the purpose of sale. The girl later testified that she had left home voluntarily to meet her boyfriend, Md. Reyazul, and …

PAPPU YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Pappu Yadav and Ajay Yadav, appealed against the order of the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Special Court, Saran, which had rejected their anticipatory bail application in a case registered under multiple IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled …

Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, a 16‑year‑old juvenile, was charged under IPC sections 363 and 366A and POCSO Act section 8 for kidnapping, robbery and rape of a minor. The trial court denied his bail application, citing the seriousness of the offences, without considering the specific provisions of the Juvenile …

Md. GaffarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Gaffar, sought anticipatory bail after a complaint under Section 498A of the IPC was lodged by his wife, Farida Khatoon, alleging dowry harassment and her subsequent ouster from the marital home. The prosecution alleged that the marriage took place in 2019 and that the petitioner …

Rukhi DeviversusThe State Of Bihar

ABATED

The appellant, Rukhi Devi, died during the pendency of Criminal Appeal No. 583 of 2013. The court examined a letter from the Superintendent of Police and a report from the SHO indicating the appellant's death. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of …

Jitender Singh @ SadhuversusThe State Of Bihar

ABATED

The appellant, Jitender Singh @ Sadhu, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.804 of 2013 before the Patna High Court. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as evidenced by a police letter, a gram panchayat report, and a death certificate. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal …

Rajeev Kumar PatelversusAdhula Devi

DISPOSED

The appellants, Rajeev Kumar Patel and Sanjeev Kumar, appealed a decree of a civil suit valued at Rs.3 lakhs before the Patna High Court. The learned counsel argued that an amendment to Section 21 of the Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Court Act, 1887 now limits appeals of suits valued below Rs.10 …

Vibhash Kumar @ Bibhash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vibhash Kumar was arrested on 27-03-2025 in connection with a murder alleged in FIR dated 26-03-2025, charged under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66(B) and 66(D) of the IT Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, assaulted a man in …

Arena Food and Agro Industries Private LimitedversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Arena Food & Agro Industries Pvt Ltd obtained a stone mining lease in Bihar through a public auction for Rs 29 crore for the period 2017‑2022 and paid the auction amount plus a small royalty. The State authorities later demanded an additional royalty of Rs 6.25 crore, asserting that the value of …

RANA YADAV @ RANA PRATAP SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Rana Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being charged under Sections 341, 323, 384, 504, 34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the SC/ST Act. The Special Judge had already taken cognizance of the case on 21.02.2017. The State opposed the bail, arguing that anticipatory bail was not …

BIBHASH KUMAR @ BIBHASH YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Bibhash Kumar, was charged under several IPC provisions and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly entering the informant's room, verbally abusing him on caste grounds, assaulting him, and destroying Panchayat office documents. He sought …

Vimlesh Kumar Pathak @ Bimlesh Kumar PathakversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vimlesh Kumar Pathak sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Darbhanga Mahila P.S. Case No. 07 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the BNS and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that after a 2018 marriage, the petitioner tortured the wife and expelled her, …

UDAL KUMAR SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellants, three villagers, were charged under IPC sections 504, 341, 323/34 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing a caste name, demanding commission and assaulting the respondent's mother during a construction project. The FIR, filed …

AKHILESH SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (341, 323, 386, 387, 307, 435, 427, 34) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that despite having six prior cases, he was acquitted in all, and alleged …

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak BariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint (No. 293(C)/2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 498(A) and a provision of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The coordinate bench had earlier referred the matter to mediation, and the parties reported that …

SANJAY YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, a group of Yadavs, were charged under several IPC sections and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and abusing his caste name, with the informant's wife also said to have been assaulted by a co‑accused. The appellants contended that the specific …

Santosh Paswan @ Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners—Santosh Paswan (brother‑in‑law), Mahendra Paswan (father‑in‑law) and Rinku Devi (sister‑in‑law)—filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case under Sections 103, 238 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 relating to the alleged suicide of a woman. The …

Abhishek UpadhyayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Upadhyay, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under sections 115(2), 303(2), 85 of the BNS and section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached a settlement whereby the petitioner would pay a total of Rs. 4,00,000 to the complainant, …

SEEMA KUMARI @ SEEMAversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Seema Kumari, was charged under IPC sections 504, 506/34 and the SC/ST Act for allegedly abusing an informant with caste-based slurs. The Special Judge had rejected her anticipatory bail application. On appeal, counsel argued that no assault occurred, the incident was not in public …

Lal Babu Mahto @ @ Vivek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Lal Babu Mahto (also known as Vivek Kumar), filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 63262 of 2025 before the Patna High Court. The application sought the court's permission to withdraw the pending petition. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Bipin Kumar, requested that the …

Satyendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 406, 420 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly taking a hired truck that later disappeared. He contended that he was falsely implicated and offered to cooperate with the investigation, having …

Anuj kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Anuj Kumar was charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He filed a second bail application after an earlier one was rejected in September 2024. The prosecution evidence had been closed and the accused's statement recorded, indicating the trial was …

BRIJENDRA SAO @ BIJENDRA SAWversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Brijendra Sao, Bijay Sao and Dipul Sao, were charged under IPC sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 504 and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting informant Vimal Paswan and his son during a land‑possession dispute. They applied for …

Laxmi Prasad @ Vicky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Laxmi Prasad, was charged under Section 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act for kidnapping and sexually assaulting a five‑year‑old child. The child was recovered and the petitioner has been in custody since 4 August 2024. He applied for regular bail …

Shashi Ram and Anr.versusThe State Of Bihar

ABATED

The appellants, Shashi Ram and Ganesh Ram, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.967 of 2015 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, both appellants died, as reported by the Superintendent of Police. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 …

MISHRILAL SAHversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mishrilal Sah and his three sons, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 384 of the Indian Penal Code. They alleged that the complaint was false and stemmed from a matrimonial dispute involving the informant, his wife Sanju Devi, and a prior 498A …

RAM VRIKSH YADAV @ RAM VRIKSH PRASAD YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Ram Vriksh Yadav and Pankaj Yadav, were charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 379/34 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and stealing jewellery and cash. Their anticipatory bail application was rejected by the Exclusive Special Judge, …

Vishal Kumar @ Bishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Vishal Kumar filed an anticipatory bail petition fearing arrest in a criminal case (Batia P.S. Case No. 12 of 2025) under several sections of the BNS. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be withdrawn. The court considered the request and, finding the petition no …

Amrendra Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Amrendra Kumar Singh was charged under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for a murder case (Taraiya PS Case No. 391 of 2023) and has been in custody since December 8, 2023. He filed his third bail application before the Patna High Court after two earlier applications were rejected. …

Sonu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sonu Singh was arrested on 9 October 2024 in connection with a case alleging that he induced an informant's daughter to elope, constituting offences under Sections 366(a) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, asserted that the FIR was fabricated, and argued that …

Vivek kumar @ Vivek kumar ramversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vivek Kumar was arrested in connection with a dowry‑death case (Bijdhari P.S. Case No. 57 of 2024) under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, alleged to have killed his daughter Nishu Kumari over dowry demands. The petitioner contended that the FIR was fabricated, that he had no …

Devan Sharma @ Bhutan SharmaversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Devan Sharma and Rekha Devi were arrested on 28 May 2025 in connection with a dowry‑related case involving the alleged torture and death of the informant's daughter. The FIR accused them of offences under Sections 80, 238, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, alleging they …

Guddu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Guddu Singh, filed an application for regular bail in a criminal case (Sessions Trial No.147 of 2021) arising from a 2016 police case. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State was represented by Advocate Mr. Dilip Kumar. The court noted the absence of …

Ranjit Chaudhari @ Ranjit PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjit Chaudhari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2016 complaint (No. 812) alleging offences under IPC section 498A and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had earlier resolved their dispute through mediation, signing an agreement on 20‑11‑2025 and …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Rohit Kumar was arrested on 8 January 2024 in connection with a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, alleged to have possessed 300 grams of a brown sugar‑like substance, while a co‑accused possessed an additional 200 grams. The petitioner sought bail, arguing a clean …

MANTU YADAVversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellant, Mantu Yadav, was charged under Sections 304 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing an informant by caste name and erecting an electric wire that caused the death of the informant's son and nephew. The …

Maleya Khatoon and AnrversusThe State Of Bihar

ABATED

The appeal (Criminal Appeal (DB) No.645 of 2015) was filed by Maleya Khatoon and Sintu Driver against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, both appellants died, as reported in a letter from the Superintendent of Police and the SHO's report. The court examined Section 394 of the …

Santosh kumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190 and 103 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly striking the informant's husband with a sword and participating in a violent assault that led to the victim's death. The prosecution …

CHANDAN JAISWAL @ CHANDAN PRASADversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants were charged under several IPC sections and Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his wife, using weapons, verbally abusing them by caste name, and stripping the wife of her mangalsutra. The prosecution alleged the …

Md. SalimversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Salim, has been in custody since January 2023 in connection with an NDPS case involving the alleged recovery of 40.5 kg of ganja, a pistol, and live cartridges. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of possession, and alleging procedural lapses under Sections 42 and 50 of …

Mujaffar @ MojaffarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Mujaffar was arrested in May 2025 for the alleged murder of his sister Fugiya Khatoon, based on an informant's statement and charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner claimed he had a clean antecedent, was falsely implicated, and that the …

Mithilesh Kumar @ Mithlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar, sought relief from arrest in a dowry harassment case (sections 85, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act) filed by his wife, Manisha Kumari. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner tortured his wife for dowry and evicted …

Prem Prakash Prasad @ Prem PrakashversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Prem Prakash Prasad, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly colluding to withdraw Rs.2.10 lakh deposited by the complainant in a bank and for abusing her with caste-based slurs. The complainant claimed the money was …

Durgesh Kumar @ Durgesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Durgesh Kumar filed a bail application before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Ms. Rani Shashi Bharti, later sought the court's permission to withdraw the bail application. The State, represented by APP Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2, was present. The court considered whether the …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleged to have participated in an assault on the victim. He claimed he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, and had been in custody since 4 December 2024, …

Vishal Kumar Sahani @ Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal Kumar Sahani sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Taraiya P.S. Case No. 371 of 2024) for alleged offences under IPC section 498A and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner and the complainant had resolved their dispute through a mediator, signing an …

Shahil @ Md. ShahilversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md Shahil, was arrested on 24‑03‑2025 in connection with a kidnapping case (PS Makhdumpur Case No. 199 of 2025) under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that Shahil abducted the complainant’s daughter, while the petitioner claimed …

Guddu kumarversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Guddu Kumar and Diwakar Kumar were arrested on 16 June 2025 for alleged possession of 16.03 kg of ganja, alleged offences under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985. They applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent, false …

Md. Heeru @ HeerwaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Md. Heeru, was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) and an offence under Section 25(1‑B)(a) of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that unknown criminals committed loot and that the petitioner’s name surfaced during investigation; he is also implicated in 33 …

Raju Das @ Raju kumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raju Das, arrested on 25 June 2025 in connection with a rape and alleged poisoning case (PS Dalsinghsarai Case No. 246 of 2024), sought bail. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 76, 115(2), 109, 123, 3(5), 238 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The …

Sahendra MistriversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sahendra Mistri, was arrested on 14 November 2024 in connection with a case alleging he murdered his sister‑in‑law, under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution’s case is based on an informant’s allegation that the petitioner tortured and killed his daughter‑in‑law, …

Krishna Kumar @ Gaya Manjhi @ Krishna ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Krishna Kumar, was accused of multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including assault and grievous hurt, following an alleged attack on a youth named Ajay. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that Ajay had harassed his daughter and that the informant …

Kaushal SahversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Kaushal Sah, was arrested on 7 May 2025 in connection with a murder case (Sections 302 and 201 IPC) arising from the death of a 15‑year‑old girl, Chandni Kumari, whose mother (the petitioner's wife) lodged the FIR. The petitioner contended that the FIR dated 13 March 2024 named an …

Danish Ahamad @ Danish Ahamad KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Danish Ahamad, feared arrest in connection with a FIR registered under sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bihar Food Security Act, 2023, relating to alleged irregularities in paddy procurement. The State Food Corporation, West Champaran, filed a counter‑affidavit stating …

Vikas Kumar @ Vikash Kumar @ Vikas SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vikas Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault, robbery, and illegal discharge of a firearm under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act (B.N.S.) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused …

Gayatri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Gayatri Devi and Shankar Mistri applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 238, 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, relating to the alleged burning and subsequent death of a woman named Khushi. The petitioners claim they have clean antecedents …

Subodh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Subodh Kumar was arrested on 4 July 2025 in connection with a vigilance case alleging that he demanded a bribe for the release of a subsidy under the Prime Minister’s Live Fish Sale Centre. The allegation pertains to a demand of Rs. 2 lakh, later reduced to Rs. 40,000, under Section 7(a) of the …

Najama KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners Najama Khatoon, Kabir Alam and Musa Devan applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Raxaul Police Station Case No. 64 of 2025, which alleged offences under sections 121, 122, 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303 and 352 of the Bihar Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that Musa Devan …

Pradeep Kumar @ Sono KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of villagers, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR (Bodhgaya PS Case No. 353 of 2025) alleged they assaulted an informant’s family with weapons, invoking multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioners contended they were innocent, arguing that …

Sonu PalversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Sonu Pal, was arrested on 4 July 2025 in connection with a dowry‑related homicide alleged under Section 80 of the B.N.S., where the informant's daughter was reportedly killed for non‑payment of dowry. The prosecution contends that the post‑mortem revealed one grievous and one simple …

Sangita Kumari @ ChotiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sangita Kumari, was arrested on 14‑04‑2025 in connection with a kidnapping case (PS‑73/2025) and charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the B.N.S. The prosecution’s case is based primarily on the confessional statements of a co‑accused, Ranjit Patel, and there is …

Umesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Umesh Singh, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding against the State of Bihar and Girja Devi. During the hearing on 19-03-2026, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Hon'ble Justice Praveen Kumar granted the permission to …

Sakir AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Sakir Ali was arrested on 6 March 2025 in connection with a murder case (Sessions Trial No. 648 of 2025) arising from a dowry‑related killing alleged under Sections 80, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S, 2023. The prosecution contended that the petitioner, as the husband of the deceased, …

Manjesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manjesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a violent attack on a brick kiln where several workers were assaulted and one was killed. The informant, Umesh Singh, alleged that the accused, identified through CCTV footage, participated in the assault, leading to charges under the Bihar Negotiable …

Uma Shankar Sharma @ Mukesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court considered two bail applications filed by Uma Shankar Sharma and Chandan Kumar, both accused in a murder case under Sections 103(1), 61(2)(a), 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioners argued that they were not named in the FIR and …

Avian Infrastructure and Energy Pvt. Ltd.versusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Avian Infrastructure and Energy Pvt. Ltd. was awarded a government tender for the Mukhyamantri Gramin Peyjal Nishchay Yojna, executed agreements and began work. Following a complaint by a third‑party, Aman Anand, the State of Bihar cancelled the tender and annulled the agreements through office …

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Suraj Kumar, the petitioner, filed a bail application in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 68346 of 2025 arising out of PS case No. 114 of 2025. The application was heard before Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma on 19-03-2026. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw …

Subodh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Subodh Rai, was arrested on 14 May 2023 in connection with a murder case (Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 IPC) concerning the death of Sudhir Rai. The prosecution alleges that Subodh, along with Sunil Rai and others, conspired to kill Sudhir and concealed the body. The petitioner claims …

Raju Kumar Yadav @ Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raju Kumar Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 123, 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., where he is alleged to have murdered his wife. The prosecution alleges he killed the deceased, while the petitioner claims the deceased committed suicide after …

Shibkaran Kumar @ Shivkaran KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Shibkaran Kumar, was arrested in Nawada for alleged cyber fraud after police traced the location of a mobile phone used in the crime and seized it along with incriminating material. He applied for regular bail, claiming false implication, a clean record, and willingness to cooperate. …

Mithun Mandal @ Mithun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Mithun Mandal was arrested on 20 June 2025 in connection with a case alleging rape of the informant's daughter, charged under Section 64 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The petitioner sought bail, claiming a clean record and that the allegations were …

Mukesh PatelversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Mukesh Patel was arrested in connection with a murder case (Case No. 64/2025) and charged under Sections 103(1), 80, 238, 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The petitioner, his wife, applied for regular bail, claiming he was falsely implicated, has a clean antecedent, and has been in custody since …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Nitish Kumar was arrested on 1 March 2025 in connection with a kidnapping case (Bannubagicha PS Case No.12 of 2025) and charged under several sections of the B.N.S and the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case relies on the confessional statements of a co‑accused, Neeraj Kumar, who named the petitioner …

Suresh Sahani @ Suresh FaujdarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suresh Sahani, was arrested on 16 January 2025 in connection with a case alleging the murder of his granddaughter Priyanka Kumari and related offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The …

Rocky Kumar @ Rockey KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rocky Kumar sought bail after the police took cognizance of a complaint (Case No. 8041 of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 354, 448 and 504, including assault and an attempt to outrage the complainant’s modesty. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging the complaint …

Anish RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Anish Rai was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly participating in a double murder in Chapra, Saran. The petitioner applied for regular bail, claiming false implication and no incriminating articles were found on him, while noting …

Suman DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suman Devi, was arrested on 10 May 2025 in connection with a case alleging that she set fire to Geeta Devi, resulting in Geeta's death. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner ignited a matchbox on the victim's sari and later threw water, leading to fatal burns. The petitioner …

Jitendra Kumar @ Jatindra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, was facing arrest in connection with a case filed under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (341, 323, 324, 308, 504, 506 and 34). He had filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw that …

Shaista Bano @ Shaista KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, relatives of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (PS Case No. 198 of 2025). The prosecution alleged that the petitioners repeatedly tortured the informant’s daughter over …

Syed Shahnawaz WajeehversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Praveen Kumar @ Pinda, was arrested in connection with a robbery in which three unknown assailants allegedly intercepted two motorcyclists and stole cash and mobile phones. He was charged under section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner argued that he was innocent, …

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh RoyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Kumar (also known as Mukesh Roy) and Dev Kumar Singh were arrested on 28 May 2025 in connection with Beur Police Station Case No. 253 of 2025, alleged to have committed offences under Sections 126(2), 109, 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The …

Manoj Kumar @ ManojversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Manoj Kumar, the petitioner, was arrested on 24‑01‑2025 in connection with a case involving kidnapping, kidnapping for marriage, criminal conspiracy and an alleged offence under Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleges that on 25‑11‑2023 the petitioner abducted the informant’s daughter, …

Suman Ravidas @ Suman Kumar RavidasversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Shivdatt Ravidas and Deepak Kumar Ravidas, were charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 103(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly assaulting and killing a person. They applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and that six examined witnesses …

Kalu MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Kalu Mahto and his sons Ravi and Rohit, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR (Case No.214 of 2025) alleged they assaulted and robbed the informant's son, resulting in serious injuries and death. The petitioners contended that the incident was an accident, they merely safeguarded …

Abhay kumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhay Kumar, was arrested on 5 May 2025 in connection with a case under Section 69 of the BNS, alleging that he forcibly took a woman to Bangalore and had an illicit relationship resulting in a pregnancy. The petitioner claimed he had a clean antecedent, denied the allegations, and …

Biran Mandal @ Viran MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Biran Mandal was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 452, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting a victim who later died from head injuries. The petitioner applied for regular bail, claiming he was falsely implicated, has no prior criminal record, and has …

Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Akash Kumar was arrested on 13 May 2025 in connection with a 2023 case alleging kidnapping, rape, and other offences against a 14‑year‑old girl. The prosecution alleges that Kumar, together with Ankit Kumar, abducted the minor, sexually assaulted her, and subsequently sold her to another person, …

Sita Devi @ Devki DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sita Devi, the mother of a co‑accused, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 20 kg 642 g of ganja from her house under sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act. The petitioner argued that the forensic report was not obtained before the charge‑sheet and that she had no criminal …

TATA YADAV @ TATA KUMAR @ NITISH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, four Yadav brothers, were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a woman, abusing her by caste name, and stealing her gold earrings and nose ring. The FIR was lodged …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 126(2), 109, 351, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing upon the victim, resulting in two simple lacerated wounds. He had been in custody since 30‑03‑2025 …

Budhani Devi @ Rani DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Budhani Devi and Chandani Kumari, were arrested in connection with a murder case (Jandaha PS Case No.219 of 2025) alleging they poisoned the informant's son and concealed the body. They sought bail, claiming innocence, lack of specific allegations, and that the cause of death was …

Praveen Kumar @ PindaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Praveen Kumar @ Pinda, was arrested in connection with a robbery in which three unknown assailants allegedly intercepted two motorcyclists and stole cash and mobile phones. He was charged under section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner argued that he was innocent, …

Md. Saif @ Md. SefversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Saif, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition challenging the FIR registered under Sections 137(2), 140(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, alleging procedural irregularities in the investigation. The petition sought relief, presumably to quash the FIR or …

Prince PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Prince Patel was arrested on 22 July 2025 in connection with a kidnapping case involving a minor sister, alleged to have been abducted for marriage. The petition sought bail for offences under Sections 137(2), 140(1), 87, 351, 352, 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 8 and 10 of the POCSO Act. The …

GOPAL KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Gopal Kumar and Amarjeet Ray, were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act for allegedly assaulting and robbing the husband of informant Rinki Paswan. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Exclusive Special Court. The appellants contended that the …

Fida HussainversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, relatives of a married couple, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case alleging dowry demand, forced marriage and the administration of poison leading to the death of the informant's daughter. The FIR, …

Upendra PatelversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Upendra Patel, filed a regular bail application in a criminal case pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the bail application, the trial concluded and the petitioner was acquitted of all charges. Consequently, the petitioner sought to withdraw the bail …

Dipak Kumar Singh @ ChunuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dipak Kumar Singh, was implicated in a case under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for allegedly communicating with and blackmailing an informant's daughter, leading to her suicide. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, highlighting a …

Md. AtifversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Md. Atif, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Case No.452/2025) and charged under Sections 140(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S., with Section 103(1) later added. He applied for regular bail, claiming false implication and noting that seven of eight witnesses had been examined …

Mithun MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Mithun Mandal, the petitioner, applied for regular bail in a murder case (PS Nathnagar Case No. 328 of 2024) where he is charged under Sections 103(1), 351(2)/(3), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that he directly killed the …

kaushalya Devi @ kajalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kaushalya Devi, the second wife of Manoj Yadav, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Ghosi PS Case No. 546 of 2021) under IPC sections 302, 201 and 34. She applied for bail, asserting that the deceased niece died of a sudden cardiac arrest due to pre‑existing medical and mental health …

Rajesh Ray @ Rajesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajesh Ray was arrested in connection with a 2022 incident during a Panchayat dispute where he was alleged to have assaulted the informant and others with a knife, leading to charges under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, …

Nabbir @ Md. NabbirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nabbir, was arrested on 26-04-2025 in connection with a violent incident on 10-04-2025 where he allegedly seized a motorcycle, assaulted the informant with a knife causing grievous injuries to the neck and abdomen, and then fled. The prosecution charged him under Sections 126(2), …

Bablu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners Bablu Kumar and Vikas Kumar were charged under sections 70(1) and 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged participation in a gang rape that resulted in the victim’s death. Both filed applications for regular bail, claiming innocence and citing hostile witnesses among the …

Guria Khatoon @ Shamma NazversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, relatives of the alleged victims in a dowry‑related death case, filed applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 173 of 2025. The FIR alleged that the informant’s daughter was …

Jyoti Kumari @ Lovely Kumari @ LovelyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jyoti Kumari, sought bail fearing arrest in a theft case (Patliputra P.S. Case No.22 of 2025) under sections 331(4) and 305(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR names her and her husband only on the basis of a co‑accused’s confessional statement, with no other material …

Md. Rizwan @ Raza @ Intekhab Alam @ Intekhab @ InekhabversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Rizwan, was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging cheating under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, involving a purported fraud of Rs 1.87 crore and a cheque of Rs 1.40 crore. He has been in custody since 27‑06‑2024. …

KUNDAN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kundan Kumar was arrested in connection with a cyber fraud case (Bhojpur Cyber P.S. Case No. 52/2025) alleged under Sections 318(4) and 319(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. He had been in custody since 6 August 2025 and claimed to have a clean antecedent. The …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners – Manish Kumar, Sanjay Kumarr and Raushan Kumar in one case and Mahesh Kumar in another – sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 126, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109, 3(5), 74 and 303 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging they assaulted the informant’s side …

Deepankar Kumar @ Dipankar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepankar Kumar, filed a bail application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding arising from an NDPS case (Sections 8(c), 21(c), 25 and 29). The court examined the material evidence, including the seizure of cash, mobile phones and identity cards, and considered whether the …

Raushan KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The Patna High Court considered an anticipatory bail petition filed by three accused – Raushan Kumar, Sunita Devi and Ganesh Sharma – in FIR No.302/2025 alleging assault and related offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The State and the informant opposed bail, …

Sagar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sagar Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 115(2), 352, 74, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 12 of the POCSO Act, alleging an attempt to rape a ten‑year‑old girl. He applied for regular bail, asserting that he had been falsely implicated, had no prior …

Sandesh Mahto Alias Sandesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellants, including Sandesh Mahto and others, filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.4352 of 2025 before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Rinku Devi. During the hearing on 19-03-2026, the appellant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal and obtain liberty to file a …

Upendra Mahto @ Opendra MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Upendra Mahto, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case (PS No.110 of 2025) involving alleged kidnapping and murder under Sections 137(2), 140(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR names nine accused; the petitioner’s name appears only through a …

Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajit Kumar, was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act for allegedly attempting to outrage the modesty of a 14‑year‑old girl. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, that the alleged incident occurred in broad daylight and that …

Sukhdev BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sukhdev Bhagat, was arrested in connection with a murder case under section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He claimed innocence, arguing that the only incriminating evidence—a locket—was purchased by him and that the deceased's husband did not name him in trial. The …

Suraj Pasi @ Suraj Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suraj Pasi, was arrested in a POCSO case for an alleged offence under Section 376 of the IPC read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He was initially granted bail in 2019, but the bail bond was cancelled after repeated non‑appearance, leading to his custody. After surrendering in 2023, …

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, eight individuals from Sarro village in Aurangabad district, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No. 76519 of 2025) against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the State was represented by Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha. The matter was listed …

Seema DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Seema Devi, step‑mother of the deceased child Aanchal Kumari, was charged under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the B.N.S., 2023 for allegedly killing the child, burning the body and concealing it in a cement bag. She had been in judicial custody since 2 February 2025, was pregnant at the time of arrest …

Sandeep Sah @ Sanjit Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sandeep Sah, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he entered a house and attempted to tease a minor girl, with charges under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner claimed the allegations stemmed from a personal land dispute, highlighted a five‑day …

JAIBU MAHTON @ JAI JAI RAM MAHTOversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Jaibu Mahton and Mohan Mahto appealed against the order dated 16‑10‑2023 that denied them anticipatory bail in a case alleging assault with an iron rod and caste‑based slurs under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 34 and SC/ST Act 3(i)(r)(s). The appellants contended they were innocent, asserting the case …

Bhavesh Yadav @ Bhavesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Bhavesh Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Raniganj Police Station for offences under Sections 363, 365, 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to involve rape. The petitioner claimed false implication, asserted no prior criminal record, and had been …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested in connection with the alleged kidnapping and sexual assault of a 17‑year‑old girl, charged under Sections 137(2), 96, 24 of the B.N.S. and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the girl was lured and abducted, while the victim’s …

MUNNI DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, four individuals, were charged with offences including assault, robbery and caste‑based violence under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that on 14‑11‑2022 they attacked a SC/ST woman and her husband, …

Abhishek Kumar Mahto @ Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Mahto, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition arising from PS case No. 431 of 2024, alleging police misconduct and false statements in connection with an FIR dated 18-09-2024 that charged him under Sections 85, 80, 118(1), 123 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, …

Raju TiwaryversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raju Tiwary, was in custody for an alleged rape of the informant's daughter under Section 64(1) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The prosecution alleged sexual assault, but the petitioner contended innocence, emphasizing that the victim was a major and that no medical evidence …

Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Arvind Kumar, was arrested in connection with a dowry‑death case (Dinara P.S. Case No. 184/2025) alleging his involvement in the killing of his wife. He claimed he was absent from the scene, working in Delhi, and that the deceased died of natural causes after being taken to a …

Anoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Anoj Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under the NDPS Act after 905 kilograms of hemp were recovered from his pickup van. He contended that he was merely the owner of the vehicle, which had been handed over to the driver and khalasi, and that he had no involvement with the seized …

Shobhanand Mandal @ Shobhanand KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shobhanand Mandal, was arrested in connection with kidnapping and alleged sexual offences under Sections 96, 65(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s initial police statement indicated she had left her house voluntarily with the petitioner, but a …

Ravish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ravish Kumar filed a bail application before the Patna High Court in connection with FIR No.28‑12‑2024 (Case No.1094 of 2024) which alleged offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 316(2), 316(5), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner argued that he was …

Md. Firdaush @ Md. PhirdausversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Firdaush, was arrested in connection with a rape case (Biraul P.S. Case No.243 of 2025) under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He applied for bail, claiming innocence and highlighting contradictions in the victim's statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 …

Pratima DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Pratima Devi and Manoj Paswan, sought bail in a case (PS Mokama Case No. 288 of 2025) alleging offences under sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 relating to the death of their daughter‑in‑law, who allegedly died by suicide after alleged dowry harassment. The …

Vijay ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vijay Chauhan filed a petition seeking bail in connection with an FIR registered on 07‑12‑2024 under Sections 115(2), 64, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner argued that he is married, has no prior criminal record and that the alleged dowry demand is unrelated to the …

Vikas KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners Bablu Kumar and Vikas Kumar were charged under sections 70(1) and 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged participation in a gang rape that resulted in the victim’s death. Both filed applications for regular bail, claiming innocence and citing hostile witnesses among the …

Mahesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners – three brothers in one case and Mahesh Kumar in another – sought anticipatory bail after an FIR (Ge​hlaur PS Case No.32 of 2025) alleged they, along with others, assaulted an informant’s party using weapons, invoking several offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The …

Vinay PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Vinay Paswan, was charged under multiple sections of the BNS and Section 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly forcibly establishing physical relations with a minor girl, the informant's daughter, after a marriage ceremony. He has been in custody since 13 August 2025. The petitioner …

Pradeep MalakarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Pradeep Malakar was arrested in connection with an NDNDPS case for alleged possession of 1.4 kg of ganja recovered from a gumti attributed to him. He pleaded innocence, asserted a clean antecedent, and claimed that the recovery was not from his conscious possession, alleging violations of …

Kumar Gourav @ Gourav Kumar @ Gaurav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kumar Gourav, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS Kotwali (Barari) Case No. 517/2019) under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleges that he kidnapped the informant’s daughter, while the petitioner claims the girl eloped with him and …

Geeta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Geeta Devi was arrested in connection with a murder case alleged under IPC sections 302, 120B and 34, Arms Act section 27 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The informant claimed that the appellant, motivated by a property dispute, had conspired to kill his father, but no eyewitness …

Dipu Rai @ Dipu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dipu Rai, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sonepur P.S. Case No. 572/2024) alleging offences under Sections 103, 238, 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was killed by pressing his neck, while the defence argued that the post‑mortem …

Manjeet SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Manjeet Singh was arrested in connection with a case of extortion and firing a bullet, charged under Sections 308(4), 329(3), 109, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in custody since 18 July 2025 and has seven prior criminal convictions. The …

Bantan Kahar @ Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Bantan Kahar, was charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and several provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for the alleged murder of a woman’s son. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Additional District and Sessions Judge. The appellant …

Viki Kumar @ Vickee KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Viki Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Sessions Trial No. 1512 of 2025) under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS. He claimed innocence and argued that a co‑accused, Vivek Kumar, had already been granted bail and had implicated the petitioner. The petitioner …