Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

D Y CHANDRACHUD

670 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 1–200.

THE STATE OF JHARKHANDversusSHAILENDRA KUMAR RAI @ PANDAV RAI

2022 INSC 113931 October 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The victim was allegedly raped and set on fire by the accused, Shailendra Kumar Rai, and later died of septicemia caused by the burn injuries. While on her way to death she gave a statement to police officer Lallan Prasad, which was read back to her, signed, and later treated as a dying declaration. The Sessions Court

AMBADAS LAXMAN SHINDE AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2018 INSC 102331 October 2018Appeal(s) allowed

Six accused were convicted for murder and related offences; three (1,2,4) received death sentences while the other three (3,5,6) were sentenced to life imprisonment. The State appealed for enhancement of the sentences of 3,5,6, and the Supreme Court bench dismissed the appeals of 1,2,4 and imposed death on 3,5,6. Revie

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusPRANAY SETHI AND ORS.

2017 INSC 106831 October 2017Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined the computation of compensation under Sections 163‑A, 166 and 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in death claims, focusing on the appropriate multiplier, the addition of future prospects to the deceased's income, and the quantification of conventional heads such as loss of estate, loss of co

SUPERTECH LIMITEDversusEMERALD COURT OWNER RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ORS.

2021 INSC 42731 August 2021Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the legality of two towers (T-16 and T-17) constructed by Supertech Limited in the Emerald Court project in NOIDA. It held that the revised plans violated the National Building Regulations 2006 and 2010, as well as the National Building Code 2005, because the distance between the new towers a

SALIMBHAI HAMIDBHAI MEMONversusNITESHKUMAR MAGANBHAI PATEL & ANR.

2021 INSC 43031 August 2021Disposed off

The appellant and the first respondent were partners in a firm and later fell into a dispute involving alleged forgery of partnership documents and non‑payment of dues, leading to an FIR under Sections 405, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The first respondent moved the Gujarat High Court under Section 482 CrPC to quash

SANGHAR ZUBER ISMAILversusMINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, FORESTS AND CLIMATE CHANGE AND ANOTHER

2021 INSC 43131 August 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The Ministry of Environment granted environmental clearance on 5 January 2021 for expanding a refinery at Vadinar, Gujarat from 20 to 46 MMTPA. The appellant, Sanghar Zuber Ismail, challenged the clearance before the National Green Tribunal (NGT), alleging that the expansion would damage mangroves and marine biology. T

M/S. BALWANT SINGH & SONSversusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ANR.

2019 INSC 84431 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant purchased a motor vehicle at an auction from a bank that had lifted its hypothecation lien and paid the insurance premium to the insurer, which issued a policy in the name of the original owner but also listed the appellant’s address. The vehicle was stolen shortly after purchase, and the insurer denied t

IN RE: DISTRIBUTION OF ESSENTIAL SUPPLIES AND SERVICES DURING PANDEMICversus.

2021 INSC 30231 May 2021Directions issued

The Supreme Court, hearing a suo motu writ petition concerning the management of the COVID‑19 pandemic, examined the Central Government's Liberalised Vaccination Policy, which shifted free vaccination for the 18‑44 age group to State/UT governments and private hospitals and introduced differential pricing. The petition

M/S MONGIA REALTY AND BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITEDversusMANIK SETHI

2022 INSC 12231 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Mongia Realty and Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (appellant) sued Manik Sethi (respondent) for recovery of alleged business loans, claiming the loans were repayable within one year of the last instalment and that the suit was filed within the limitation period. The respondent denied any loan relationship, asserting the payments w

KERALA TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITEDversusBASIL T K & ORS

2022 INSC 12131 January 2022Disposed off

The respondents were initially appointed as contract Assistant Managers in 2000 and were regularised in 2006, but their regularisation was cancelled in 2007. The High Court set aside the cancellation and ordered their reinstatement with continuity of service from 12 September 2007, but without any monetary benefits for

STATE OF ODISHA AND ORS.versusGOBINDA BEHERA

2020 INSC 11931 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent applied for a constable position in the Odisha State Police, declaring that he was not involved in any criminal case. Verification later revealed his involvement in a case under multiple IPC sections, leading to his discharge and an Original Application (OA) before the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, whi

DR. PREMACHANDRAN KEEZHOTH & ANRversusTHE CHANCELLOR KANNUR UNIVERSITY & ORS.

2023 INSC 103230 November 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The Chancellor of Kannur University re‑appointed Dr. Gopinath Ravindran as Vice‑Chancellor for a second four‑year term after the expiry of his first term, despite a pending selection process and a statutory age limit of sixty years. The petitioners challenged the re‑appointment on grounds that (i) re‑appointment is not

NHPC LIMITEDversusM/S PATEL ENGINEERING LIMITED

2018 INSC 112430 November 2018Disposed off

NHPC Ltd appealed against a Punjab and Haryana High Court order that, under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, required it to release the amount awarded to M/s Patel Engineering Ltd, subject to a bank guarantee. The appellant contended that the High Court had acted beyond its jurisdiction because

ALEEMUDDINversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS

2018 INSC 112630 November 2018Disposed off

A fifth respondent filed a petition in the Allahabad High Court claiming public interest, seeking a direction that the State Government construct a new Tehsil building at Village Karanpur Mafi, a site adjoining his own land. The High Court, relying on the State's financial sanction, ordered the State to take all steps

ORBIT ELECTRICALS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusDEEPAK KISHAN CHHABRIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 96730 October 2023Disposed off

The Supreme Court had directed the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to postpone pronouncing its judgment in a pending appeal until the result of Finolex Cables Limited's Annual General Meeting (AGM) was declared. Despite being apprised of this order, the NCLAT bench pronounced its judgment on 13 October

ATUL KUMARversusTHE CHAIRMAN (JOINT SEAT ALLOCATION AUTHORITY) AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 74930 September 2024Disposed off

The petitioner, a Scheduled Caste student, secured a seat in Electrical Engineering at IIT Dhanbad after ranking 1455 in his category in JEE Advanced 2024. He attempted to pay the required admission fee of Rs 17,500 before the 5 pm deadline on 24 June 2024, logging into the portal six times between 3:12 pm and 4:57 pm,

KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD.versusJHABUA POWER LIMITED AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 76830 September 2024Disposed off

The Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) procured power through competitive bidding but accepted tariffs and quantities that deviated from standard bidding guidelines, leading to the execution of Power Supply Agreements (PSAs) for 865 MW. KSEB sought approval of these PSAs from the Kerala State Electricity Regulatory

SHRI CHATRAPATI SHIVAJI GAUSHALAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 104530 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

A truck transporting eighteen cattle was intercepted for lacking proper permits, leading to seizure of the animals and registration of FIRs under the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act and related statutes. The private respondents, claiming ownership, applied under CrPC sections 451 and 457 for interim custody, which

AJWARversusNIYAJ AHMAD & ANR.

2022 INSC 105430 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was charged in a FIR for the murder of two sons of the complainant, along with several other offences. Although not named in the FIR, his involvement emerged during investigation and he was later added to the charge‑sheet under Section 161 of the CrPC. The trial court denied bail, but the Allahabad High C

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTDversusAFCONS GUNANUSA JV

2022 INSC 88430 August 2022Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered several petitions concerning the determination of arbitrators' fees under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that arbitrators cannot unilaterally issue binding orders determining their own fees, as this violates party autonomy and the principle that one cannot be a j

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusRAJKUMAR NAGPAL & ORS

2022 INSC 88530 August 2022Case Partly allowed

Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd (RCFL) issued non‑convertible debentures and defaulted in March 2019. The RBI issued a prudential framework requiring lenders to enter into an inter‑creditor agreement (ICA) before a resolution plan, and SEBI later issued a circular on 13 Oct 2020 standardising the procedure for debentur

GAURAV KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2024 INSC 55830 July 2024Disposed off

Gaurav Kumar filed a writ petition challenging the fees levied by State Bar Councils (SBCs) at the time of enrolment, alleging that the amounts far exceed the Rs. 750 (general) and Rs. 125 (SC/ST) prescribed in Section 24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act, 1961, and that additional miscellaneous fees are being made a conditio

INDSIL HYDRO POWER & MANGANESE LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS ETC

2019 INSC 82930 July 2019Disposed off

The appellant, a private hydel project developer, entered into an agreement with the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) to set up a 21 MW captive power plant and to receive free power, subject to KSEB constructing a transmission line. The plant was completed, but KSEB delayed the transmission line, preventing power

SUKHBIRversusAJIT SINGH

2021 INSC 27930 April 2021Case Partly allowed

The plaintiff paid Rs.31.5 lakh of the Rs.32 lakh purchase price for land but the defendant failed to execute the sale deed. The plaintiff sued for specific performance, and the trial court ordered the defendant to execute the deed and receive the balance Rs.50,000. Before the decree was final, the land was acquired by

IN RE: DISTRIBUTION OF ESSENTIAL SUPPLIES AND SERVICES DURING PANDEMICversus.

2021 INSC 28030 April 2021Directions issued

The Supreme Court, exercising suo motu jurisdiction under Article 32, examined the humanitarian crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and issued directions to the Union and State governments on the supply of oxygen, essential drugs, and vaccines, as well as on hospital admission policies and protection of individuals

SNOWTEX INVESTMENT LIMITEDversusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-2, KOLKATA

2019 INSC 59330 April 2019Dismissed

Snowtex Investment Ltd., a non‑banking financial company, incurred a loss from share trading in AY 2008‑09 and sought to set off that loss against profits earned from futures and options trading. The assessing officer treated the share‑trading loss as a speculation loss and disallowed the set‑off, holding that futures

THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.versusDR. SACHINDRA NARAYAN & ORS.

2019 INSC 11530 January 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Anugraha Narayan Sinha Institute of Social Studies, incorporated under the 1964 Act, adopted a retirement benefit scheme in 1985 that it said would be funded from its own resources. The Institute's employees later sought a writ directing the State of Bihar to pay pension arrears after payments stopped in 2014. The

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 104929 November 2023Disposed off

The Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) filed a writ petition fearing that the Union Government would unilaterally appoint the Chief Secretary of the Territory and extend his tenure without the GNCTD’s consent. The petition sought a restraining order and the appointment of a senior AGMUT offic

PRADEEP S. WODEYARversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA

2021 INSC 79829 November 2021Dismissed

The appellants were accused of illegally purchasing, transporting and exporting iron ore without the requisite mining dispatch permits, violating the Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and related environmental statutes. A Special Court, which is a Sessions Court, took cognizance of the offences o

BHOOPENDRA SINGHversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

2021 INSC 69129 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, the son of a murdered village sarpanch, sought to overturn a High Court order that granted bail to the 60‑year‑old second respondent accused of conspiring in his father's murder. The prosecution alleged that the respondent used multiple SIM cards to communicate with a hired shooter, stored the weapons us

DR. SUSHIL KUMAR TRIPATHIversusJAGADGURU RAM BHADRACHARYA HANDICAPPED UNIVERSITY & ANR.

2021 INSC 69229 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Sushil Kumar Tripathi was appointed as Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science of Jagadguru Ram Bhadracharya Handicapped University under a UGC grant for the Tenth Five Year Plan. After protesting a monthly deduction of Rs.5,000 from his salary, his annual increments were stopped and the universi

GANESANversusSTATE REP. BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER

2021 INSC 69829 October 2021Case Partly allowed

The case involved a robbery in which five accused, including Ganesan (A1) and Shanmugam (A3), allegedly used knives and iron rods to assault victims and steal cash and jewellery. The trial court convicted all accused under Section 397 IPC, imposing a minimum seven‑year term, and the conviction was affirmed by the appel

MAHENDRA K CversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.

2021 INSC 70029 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from the suicide of a driver who left a note alleging that his employer, a Special Land Acquisition Officer, had amassed wealth disproportionate to his known income and had threatened the driver, leading to his death. The driver’s brother filed a complaint, resulting in an FIR for abetment of suicide und

A.T. MYDEEN AND ANOTHERversusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS DEPARTMENT

2021 INSC 69729 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved six accused persons charged under the Customs Act for allegedly exporting sandalwood and tiles clandestinely. The trial courts in two separate proceedings acquitted all accused, but the Madras High Court convicted them in a common judgment, relying on evidence from only one of the trials. The Supreme

SARABJEET SINGH MOKHAversusTHE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, JABALPUR & ORS.

2021 INSC 70229 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a hospital director, was detained under the National Security Act (NSA) on 12 May 2021 for allegedly procuring fake Remdesivir injections. He filed a representation against the detention on 18 May 2021, which was communicated to the State and Central Governments, but the authorities delayed considering i

HARIRAM BHAMBHIversusSC/ST

2021 INSC 70129 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Scheduled Caste victim, filed an FIR under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for the murder of his brother. The first respondent was granted bail by the Rajasthan High Court without any notice or opportunity to be heard being given to the victim, contrary to the mandatory requirements of Section

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.versusHEEM SINGH

2020 INSC 62129 October 2020Appeal(s) allowed

Heem Singh, a Rajasthan police constable, was dismissed after a departmental enquiry found him guilty of misconduct for allegedly committing murder while on leave. He had been acquitted of the murder charge in a criminal trial because key witnesses turned hostile and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasona

AJAY KUMAR BHALLA & ORS.versusPRAKASH KUMAR DIXIT

2024 INSC 57529 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

Prakash Kumar Dixit was removed from service in 1995; the Delhi High Court set aside the removal, imposed a minor penalty and ordered his reinstatement with backdated seniority, but the order was not implemented timely and he was denied promotion to IG before retirement. He initiated contempt proceedings, and a Single

MAHARASHTRA CHESS ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 82329 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Maharashtra Chess Association, a society affiliated to the All India Chess Federation, was disaffiliated by the Federation and filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court under Article 226 challenging the action. The Federation invoked Clause 21 of its Constitution and Bye‑laws, which stipulated that any suit ag

A (MOTHER OF X)versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2024 INSC 37129 April 2024Disposed off

A 14‑year‑old girl, X, who alleged sexual assault, became pregnant and sought termination of her pregnancy beyond the statutory 24‑week limit. The High Court denied the request, relying on a clarificatory opinion of a medical board that did not assess the impact on X's physical and mental health. The Supreme Court set

VARAD BALWANT VASANT & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2024 INSC 45929 April 2024Dismissed

The petitioners, a group of CA examination candidates, sought a re‑scheduling of two papers slated for 8 May and 14 May 2024, arguing that these dates fell a day after phase‑wise polling in the General Elections and would cause severe hardship to those exercising their franchise. They highlighted that only 291 cities h

M P HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS

2023 INSC 32129 March 2023Disposed off

The MP High Court Bar Association filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the amendment to the Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs) and Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunals (DRATs) Electronic Filing Rules, 2020, which made e‑filing of pleadings mandatory in all cases from 31 January 2023. The petition argued that the

HANUMAN LAXMAN AROSKARversusUNION OF INDIA

2019 INSC 43429 March 2019Disposed off

The Union Government approved a greenfield international airport at Mopa, Goa, and the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) granted environmental clearance (EC) under the 2006 notification after the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) recommended it. Petitioners Hanuman Laxman Aroskar and the Federation of Rainbow W

VEDANTA LIMITEDversusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS

2024 INSC 17529 February 2024Dismissed

Vedanta Limited operates a copper smelter at the SIPCOT industrial complex in Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu. The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board and the State Government ordered its closure for repeated violations of environmental norms, including operating without consent, improper hazardous waste management, and dumping

HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, ALLAHABADversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2024 INSC 15029 February 2024Reference answered

The Supreme Court was asked to consider whether, under its Article 142 powers, it could issue blanket directions that all interim stays granted by High Courts should automatically lapse after six months and that High Courts must dispose of such cases on a day‑to‑day basis. The Court examined the object of interim order

MANJIT AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2021 INSC 4929 January 2021Dismissed

The petitioners, wards of serving railway employees, sought appointment under the Largess Scheme, which allowed entry into railway service without competitive examination. The Punjab and Haryana High Court and the Supreme Court had earlier directed the Union of India to reconsider the scheme on constitutional grounds.

HIRANDRA KUMARversusHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD & ANR.

2019 INSC 11129 January 2019Dismissed

The petitioners applied for direct recruitment to the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service (UPHJS) but were debarred because they exceeded the age ceiling prescribed in Rule 12 of the UP Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. They challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 8(1), which mandates recruitment at interva

R. R. INAMDARversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2019 INSC 129828 November 2019Disposed off

The appellant, R.R. Inamdar, a Scheduled Caste teacher, was promoted to the solitary post of Lecturer in English in a Karnataka school based on roster points. The senior fifth respondent, who was appointed earlier, challenged the appointment, arguing that reservation under Article 16(4) could not apply to a solitary po

MRS RITIKA SHARANversusMR SUJOY GHOSH

2020 INSC 61528 October 2020Disposed off

The parties, married in 2009, have been living apart since 2016, with the mother, Mrs. Ritika Sharan, caring for their son Sattik while employed in Singapore. The father, Mr. Sujoy Ghosh, obtained interim orders from the Family Court restraining the mother from taking the child out of Bengaluru and granting him visitat

MALOOK SINGH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

2021 INSC 56628 September 2021Disposed off

The appellants were appointed as clerks on an ad hoc basis in 1975‑76 and were regularized on 3 May 1977 with seniority backdated to 1 April 1977. A 1991 writ petition had granted them seniority by counting their ad hoc service, but the High Court later redrew the seniority list excluding ad hoc periods, a decision cha

COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX,versusM/S. ADANI GAS LTD.

2020 INSC 51328 August 2020Dismissed

The Commissioner of Service Tax appealed against M/s. Adani Gas Ltd. challenging the taxability of charges collected for supplying pipelines and measurement (SKID) equipment to gas consumers. The issue was whether Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994 applied, i.e., whether the supply of such tangible goods f

RASHI MANI MISHRA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS

2021 INSC 36428 July 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the seniority of Assistant Engineers in Uttar Pradesh who were initially appointed on an ad‑hoc basis in 1985 and later regularised in December 1989 under the Uttar Pradesh Regularisation of Ad hoc Appointments Rules (1979, 1989). The petitioners challenged a seniority list prepared in 2016 that coun

THE STATE OF KERALAversusK. AJITH & ORS.

2021 INSC 36628 July 2021Dismissed

During the 2015 Kerala budget presentation, several opposition MLAs climbed onto the Speaker's dais and damaged furniture, leading to a criminal case under IPC sections 427, 447, 34 and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. The public prosecutor sought to withdraw the prosecution under Section 321 of t

STATE OF PUNJABversusPRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNOR OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

2023 INSC 18128 February 2023Disposed off

The Punjab government, through its Council of Ministers, recommended that the Governor summon the Vidhan Sabha for its Budget Session on 3 March 2023. The Governor sought extensive information from the Chief Minister under Article 167 and, after receiving a tweet and a letter that he deemed derogatory, said he would se

BANK OF INDIAversusM/S. BRINDAVAN AGRO INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.

2020 INSC 23228 February 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Bank of India debited Rs.27.41 lakh from the respondent Brindavan Agro Industries as 50% of processing and TEV study charges before the loan was sanctioned. The respondent filed a complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, seeking a full refund, and the State and National Consumer Di

RAMAKRISHNA MISSION & ANR.versusKAGO KUNYA & ORS.

2019 INSC 29528 February 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a hospital employee, challenged his superannuation order by filing a writ petition under Article 226 against Ramakrishna Mission and its hospital, alleging that the institution was a 'State' within Art.12 and thus amenable to writ jurisdiction. The High Court initially held the Mission to be a State and

ARNAB MANORANJAN GOSWAMIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2020 INSC 66527 November 2020Disposed off

The appellant, a news‑channel editor, was arrested in November 2020 in connection with an FIR under Sections 306 and 34 of the IPC alleging his role in the suicide of a contractor who claimed unpaid dues. He filed a petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashing of the

VURIMI PULLARAO S/O SATYANARAYANAversusVEMARI VYANKATA RADHARANI W/O DHANKOTESHWARRAO & ANR

2019 INSC 129127 November 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a suit for injunction to prevent the defendant from obstructing possession of agricultural land, and six months later filed a suit for specific performance of the same agreement to sell. The trial court dismissed the specific performance suit, holding that the appellant had omitted to claim that rel

STATE BANK OF INDIAversusINDIA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED

2024 INSC 77427 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed

State Bank of India (SBI) appealed an order of the NCLT rejecting its IBC petition against India Power Corporation Limited. The appeal was filed three days after the statutory 30‑day period, and SBI sought condonation of delay, relying on a free certified copy of the NCLT order sent under Rule 50. A split decision aros

SAREGAMA INDIA LIMITEDversusNEXT RADIO LIMITED & ORS.

2021 INSC 55427 September 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The Madras High Court, in an interim order, altered Rule 29(4) of the Copyright Rules, 2013 by allowing broadcasters to furnish notice details within fifteen days after a broadcast and treating the 24‑hour exception as a routine procedure. Saregama India Ltd and other appellants challenged this order, arguing that the

SHRI MAHADEV MEENAversusPRAVEEN RATHORE AND ANOTHER

2021 INSC 54827 September 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Mahadev Meena, filed a complaint after his son, an IB officer, was found dead under suspicious circumstances. The FIR alleged that the first respondent, Praveen Rathore, an anti‑corruption bureau constable, had a close relationship with the deceased's wife and was involved in a conspiracy to murder, with

CHANDRAPALversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH (EARLIER M.P.)

2022 INSC 62927 May 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved the disappearance and subsequent discovery of the decomposed bodies of a young couple, Kumari Brinda and Kanhaiya, who were found hanging from a tree. The prosecution alleged that Chandrapal, the appellant, conspired with others to murder the couple and later staged the deaths as suicides, relying on

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORSversusRACHNA HILLS & ORS.

2023 INSC 44127 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh challenged the appointment of three teachers in two minority colleges, arguing that the selection process was not complete because the District Inspector of Schools (DIOS) had not approved the proposals before the amendment of Regulation 17. The colleges contended that once the management for

RANBIR SINGHversusSK ROY, CHAIRMAN, LIFE INSURANCE CORP. OF INDIA & ANR.

2022 INSC 48427 April 2022Disposed off

The case concerned claims by thousands of Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) workers who had been employed as temporary, badli or part‑time staff between 20 May 1985 and 4 March 1991, seeking regularisation (absorption) under the Srivastav Award and earlier Tulpule and Jamdar Awards. The Supreme Court examined w

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD.versusM/S DISCOVERY ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. & ANR.

2022 INSC 48327 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) entered into a contract with Discovery Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (DEPL), a member of the DP Jindal Group, which contained an arbitration clause. ONGC sought to bind Jindal Drilling and Industries Ltd. (JDIL), a non‑signatory affiliate, invoking the group‑of‑companies doctrine, an

PATAN JAMAL VALIversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2021 INSC 27227 April 2021Disposed off

The appellant, a known acquaintance of the victim's family, entered the home of a blind Scheduled Caste woman and raped her, after which he was apprehended at the scene. The trial courts convicted him under Section 376(1) of the IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocit

LOK PRAHARIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS

2023 INSC 30227 March 2023Dismissed

Lok Prahari, a society, challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 39-AA of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 and the proviso to Section 33 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, alleging violations of Article 80(4), Article 14 of the Constitution and Section 123(2) of the Act. The petitioner argued that

STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORSversusRAJESH AGARWAL & ORS

2023 INSC 30327 March 2023Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined civil appeals filed by State Bank of India and other banks challenging the classification of borrowers' accounts as fraudulent under the RBI's 2016 Master Directions on Frauds. Borrowers contended that the directions denied them a hearing before such classification, violating the principles o

BHARTIBEN CHANDRAKANTBHAI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS

2023 INSC 17127 February 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an Auxiliary Nurse Midwife appointed in 1980, submitted a resignation on 18 April 1993 but withdrew it on 23 November 1993 before it was accepted. Despite the withdrawal, the State later accepted the resignation effective from 31 March 1993, leading to a series of writ petitions under Article 226. The Hi

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusR.D. SHARMA AND ANR.

2022 INSC 10127 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The retired Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF) of Madhya Pradesh, who retired in 2001, sought a higher pension by invoking the Indian Forests Service (Pay) Second Amendment Rules, 2008 which created an apex scale of Rs.80,000 for the upgraded post of Head of Forest Force. The Central Administrative Tribunal

THE CHIEF REGIONAL OFFICER THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTDversusPRADIP AND ANR

2020 INSC 9127 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The Oriental Insurance Company appointed Pradip as an Assistant on the basis of a caste certificate claiming he belonged to the Dhangad Scheduled Tribe, whereas he actually belonged to the Dhangar community, a non‑ST group. The Scrutiny Committee invalidated his claim, but Pradip filed a writ petition seeking protectio

NASIMA NAQIversusTODI TEA COMPANY LTD. AND ORS

2019 INSC 128426 November 2019Disposed off

Nasima Naqi, the wife of a deceased tenant, continued to occupy a shop premises let for non‑residential purposes since 1988. After the tenant's death in 2002, the landlord sued for eviction alleging default in rent and that the statutory five‑year protection for heirs under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 ha

STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR.versusM. MANGAYARKARASI AND ETC.

2018 INSC 109626 November 2018Leave granted

The State of Tamil Nadu removed two Treasury officers, M. Mangayarkarasi and M. Jayalakshmi, for misappropriating large sums by sanctioning bogus bills. The officers challenged the removal, arguing that other staff charged with similar offences received only stoppage of increments, invoking the principle of parity of t

MBL AND COMPANY LIMITEDversusSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

2022 INSC 62826 May 2022Dismissed

MBL & Co Ltd was found by SEBI’s Whole Time Member (WTM) to have engaged in manipulative self‑trades, placing single‑share buy orders after large sell orders to artificially raise the price of Gujarat NRE Coke Ltd. The WTM barred MBL from trading in its proprietary account for four years under Sections 11, 11(4), 11B a

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHIversusRAM KISHAN DASS

2019 INSC 40026 March 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether, before the Finance Act 2008 amendment, an assessing officer could extend the time for filing a special audit report under s.142(2C) of the Income Tax Act without an application by the assessee. The Delhi High Court had held that such power did not exist, rendering the assessment barr

THE BRANCH MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSMT. MOUSUMI BHATTACHARJEE & ORS.

2019 INSC 40326 March 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The insured, a manager who obtained a home loan with a personal accident insurance rider, died in Mozambique after contracting encephalitis malaria from a mosquito bite. His spouse and father claimed the death benefit, arguing that the bite was an unforeseen event constituting an accident. The insurer contended that de

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusUDAY SINGH

2019 INSC 40126 March 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh seized a tractor and trolley used for illegal sand excavation from the Chambal river under Section 52 of the Forest Act, 1927 (as amended by MP Act 25 of 1983) and initiated confiscation proceedings under Section 52(3). The respondent sought interim release of the seized vehicle under CrPC S

CDR SEEMA CHAUDHARYversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 14726 February 2024Disposed off

Commander Seema Chaudhary, a Short Service Commissioned officer in the Indian Navy's Judge Advocate General's Branch, was denied a Permanent Commission (PC) on the ground of lack of vacancies despite the Supreme Court's earlier directions in Lieutenant Commander Annie Nagaraja's case that women SSC officers be consider

MR.SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA AND OTHERSversusJ M HOUSING LIMITED AND OTHERS

2021 INSC 12226 February 2021Disposed off

The appellants filed a petition under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 alleging oppression and mismanagement, and the NCLT issued an ex‑parte ad‑interim order on 5 October 2020. The respondents appealed to the NCLAT, which set aside the NCLT order on the ground that it violated natural justice and remitt

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE AND ORS.versusRAJENDRA KUMAR DUBEY

2020 INSC 65625 November 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a Sub‑Inspector of the Railway Protection Force, Rajendra Kumar Dubey, who was compulsorily retired on 5 December 2007 for gross neglect of duty relating to theft of railway property. Dubey challenged the retirement in a writ petition, and the Bombay High Court set aside the order, reinstating him wi

OM RATHODversusTHE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF HEALTH SERVICES & ORS.

2024 INSC 83625 October 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Om Rathod, a student with lower‑limb myopathy, secured a high All‑India PwD rank in the NEET‑UG 2024 exam but was declared ineligible for MBBS admission by the AIIMS‑Nagpur Medical Board, which assessed his disability at 88%—above the 80% ceiling in the RPWD guidelines. The High Court upheld the Board’s

IN RE: REMARKS BY HIGH COURT JUDGE DURING COURT PROCEEDINGS versus

2024 INSC 75825 September 2024

The Supreme Court, acting suo motu under Article 32, examined media‑circulated clips of a Karnataka High Court judge who made misogynistic and community‑prejudicial remarks during live‑streamed proceedings on 6 June and 28 August 2024. A report from the Registrar General provided transcripts and translations of the rem

MINERAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.versusM/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR. ETC.

2024 INSC 55425 July 2024Reference answered

The case involved a reference to a nine-judge bench to resolve the divergence between India Cement Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu (which held royalty is a tax) and State of West Bengal v. Kesoram Industries Ltd. (which held royalty is not a tax). The core issues were the true nature of royalty under Section 9 of the Mines

DHANRAJ N ASAWANIversusAMARJEET SINGH MOHINDER SINGH BASI AND OTHERS

2023 INSC 71025 July 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a shareholder and former director of Seva Vikas Co-operative Bank, filed FIR No. 806 of 2019 alleging financial fraud by the bank's chief executive and former chairperson based on a forensic audit report. The Bombay High Court quashed the FIR, holding that Section 81(5B) of the Maharashtra Co-operative S

VINOD KUMAR SACHDEVA (DEAD) THR LRSversusASHOK KUMAR SACHDEVA & ORS

2023 INSC 65025 July 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant and his brother, the first respondent, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) in 2010 that included an arbitration clause. The appellant later filed two suits involving additional parties, including a private company and Canara Bank, seeking injunctions over family property. The first respondent

MAHANADI COALFIELDS LTD & ANRversusM/S IVRCL AMR JOINT VENTURE

2022 INSC 74825 July 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd., a subsidiary of Coal India Ltd., entered into a contract with IVRCL AMR Joint Venture for road works. The contract contained Clause 15 titled “Settlement of Disputes/Arbitration”, which the respondent invoked to issue a notice of arbitration and later sought appointment of an arbitrator under

SHARDA ASSOCIATESversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

2022 INSC 74525 July 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Sharda Associates insured a JCB excavator with United India Insurance for Rs 13.50 lakhs. While the excavator was being used for road construction, a section of the road collapsed, causing the machine to fall into a ditch, killing two workers and resulting in total loss of the excavator. The insurer denied the claim, i

MADHYA PRADESH POWER MANAGEMENT CO. LTD. & ANR. M/S DHAR WIND POWER PROJECTS PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusM/S DHAR WIND POWER PROJECTS PVT. LTD. & ORS.

2019 INSC 81425 July 2019Case Partly allowed

Madhya Pradesh Power Management Co. Ltd. (appellant) and Dhar Wind Power Projects Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) disputed which tariff rate applied to a 12‑15 MW wind project. The 2013 Tariff Order fixed a rate of Rs 5.92 per unit for projects commissioned up to 31 March 2016, while the 2016 Tariff Order reduced the rate to Rs

SANJEEV KUMAR GUPTAversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.

2019 INSC 81625 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, alleged that his son was murdered and that the accused, the second respondent, was a juvenile at the time of the offence. The accused claimed juvenility based on a CBSE matriculation certificate showing a birth date of 17‑12‑1998, while school records, a transfer certificate, Aadhaar

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWversusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED

2019 INSC 81525 July 2019Dismissed

The assessee, Suzuki Powertrain India Ltd (SPIL), was amalgamated into Maruti Suzuki India Ltd (MSIL) effective 1 April 2012. For Assessment Year 2012-13, a notice under s.143(2) of the Income Tax Act was issued to SPIL, which no longer existed, and a final assessment order adding Rs. 78.97 crore was passed in SPIL's n

SUMAN JINDAL & ANR.versusM/S ADARSH DEVELOPERS

2019 INSC 57225 April 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants booked a residential flat with the developer who required a booking amount of 25% of the sale price. Through email correspondence in February 2008, the parties agreed to reduce the booking amount to 15%, which the appellants paid in excess of that amount. The developer later cancelled the allotment, clai

LT. COL. NITISHA & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2021 INSC 21025 March 2021Disposed off

The petitioners, women officers on Short Service Commission (SSC) in the Indian Army, challenged the Army's method of granting Permanent Commission (PC) after the Supreme Court's decision in Babita Puniya, alleging that the benchmarking of their marks against the lowest‑scoring male officer, the reliance on early‑caree

WEST INTERNATIONAL CITY PVT LTDversusDEVASIS RUDRA

2019 INSC 39525 March 2019Disposed off

The appellant, a real‑estate developer, entered into a buyer's agreement with the respondent to deliver possession of a row house by 31 December 2008 with a six‑month grace period. The respondent paid Rs 39,29,280 but the developer failed to hand over possession, and the respondent filed a consumer complaint in 2011 se

MAHAVIR ROAD AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD.versusIFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD.

2019 INSC 39425 March 2019Dismissed

Mahavir Road and Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, engaged in road resurfacing in Nashik, obtained an insurance policy covering material damage but expressly excluding normal wear and tear and gradual atmospheric deterioration. The company claimed that abnormal rainfall and water logging between 25 June and 5 July 2007 caused th

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusMUKESH POONAMCHAND SHAH

2020 INSC 22425 February 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) issued a notice to show cause under Regulation 39(4) of its 1960 Staff Regulations seeking removal of employee Mukesh Poonamchand Shah after his conviction by a Special CBI Judge for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Indian Penal Code. Shah challenged

PUNJAB AND SIND BANK AND ORS.versusMRS. DURGESH KUWAR

2020 INSC 22525 February 2020Disposed off

Mrs. Durgesh Kuwar, a Chief Manager (Scale IV) of Punjab and Sind Bank, was transferred from the Indore branch to a small rural branch at Sarsawa after she reported serious irregularities in liquor contractor accounts and alleged sexual harassment by the Zonal Manager. She contended that the transfer was retaliatory, v

THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORSversusA NISHANTH GEORGE

2022 INSC 9225 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Railway Board introduced the Safety Related Retirement Scheme (2004) and later the Liberalised Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff (LARSGESS) to allow voluntary retirement of safety staff and appointment of their wards. The scheme was challenged as violative of Articles 14 and 16 and

DELHI COMMISSION FOR PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2022 INSC 9825 January 2022Disposed off

The Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking that pregnant women and lactating mothers be classified as a high‑risk category for COVID‑19 vaccination and that specific measures such as priority slots, a dedicated registry, and modifications to the Co‑WIN portal be i

INTERNATIONAL SEAPORT DREDGING PVT LTDversusKAMARAJAR PORT LIMITED

2024 INSC 82724 October 2024Appeal(s) allowed

International Seaport Dredging Pvt Ltd entered into a dredging contract with Kamarajar Port Limited, a statutory undertaking, which later gave rise to disputes and arbitration. The arbitral tribunal awarded the appellant approximately Rs 21.07 crore with interest and costs, and the respondent sought correction under s.

SONAL GUPTA & ORS.versusREGISTRAR GENERAL, RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT JODHPUR & ANR.

2024 INSC 83024 October 2024Dismissed

The petitioners, candidates for the Rajasthan Civil Judge Cadre 2024, challenged the low marks awarded to them in the Language Paper‑II (English Essay) of the main examination, alleging arbitrary and discriminatory evaluation that caused them to miss the interview cut‑off. They sought quashing of the main examination r

MR. RAJEEV NOHWARversusCHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY MAHARASHTRA STATE, PUNE AND OTHERS

2021 INSC 54024 September 2021Appeal(s) allowed

Mr. Rajeev Nohwar booked a residential flat and purchased e‑SBTR stamp paper worth Rs 8,44,500. A dispute with the builder led to a consumer complaint before the NCDRC, which ordered a full refund of the consideration. Nohwar applied for a refund of the stamp duty, but the Deputy Inspector of Registration rejected it,

M/S MAGADH SUGAR & ENERGY LTD.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2021 INSC 53924 September 2021Appeal(s) allowed

M/S Magadh Sugar & Energy Ltd., a sugar mill that generates surplus electricity from bagasse, supplies that electricity to the Bihar State Electricity Board (BSEB). The Bihar Government levied electricity duty and penalty under the Bihar Electricity Duty Act, 1948, which the company challenged through a writ petition u

ZAKIR ABDUL MIRAJKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2022 INSC 85524 August 2022Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra alleged that the appellants were members of an organized crime syndicate operating the illegal "Mumbai Matka" gambling network. Police raided a gambling den, recorded confessions of several accused, including the appellants, by an Additional Superintendent of Police (Addl. SP) under Section 18

MANJEET SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2021 INSC 41924 August 2021Appeal(s) allowed

An FIR (No.477) recorded the death of Amarjit Singh and injuries to his nephew Manjeet Singh, naming five persons as perpetrators. Only one accused, Sartaj Singh, was charge‑sheeted; the other four private respondents were placed in column‑2. During trial, the victim (PW1) reiterated the allegations against the private

HARJIT SINGHversusINDERPREET SINGH @ INDER AND ANOTHER

2021 INSC 41824 August 2021Leave Granted & Allowed

Harjit Singh filed an FIR alleging that his father was murdered by a group of accused, including Inderpreet Singh (respondent No.1), who was alleged to have orchestrated the conspiracy from jail using a mobile phone. The High Court granted bail to Inderpreet Singh, reasoning that he was not physically present at the cr

SARANYAversusBHARATHI AND ANOTHER

2021 INSC 41624 August 2021Appeal(s) allowed

Saranya appealed the Madras High Court's order that quashed the chargesheet against Bharathi (respondent No.1) for offences under Sections 420, 302 r/w 109 IPC. The High Court had examined the evidence and concluded that the accused was likely to be convicted, thereby exercising its power under Section 482 CrPC to dism

WG. CDR. ARIFUR RAHMAN KHAN AND ALEYA SULTANA AND ORS.versusDLF SOUTHERN HOMES PVT LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS BEGUR OMR HOMES PVT. LTD.) AND ORS.

2020 INSC 50324 August 2020Case Partly allowed

The case involved 339 flat buyers who purchased apartments in DLF's Westend Heights project. The developer failed to hand over possession within the contractually stipulated 36 months, causing a delay of two to four years. The buyers sought compensation beyond the Rs 5 per square foot per month stipulated in the Apartm

BENGAL STATE ELECTION COMMISSION AND ORS.versusCOMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIA (MARXIST) AND ORS.

2018 INSC 74424 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The West Bengal State Election Commission sought to set aside a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court order that directed acceptance of nomination papers filed electronically for the 2018 Panchayat elections. The High Court had justified its direction on the ground of ensuring free and fair elections and on a readi

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusSUVENDU ADHIKARI & ORS.

2023 INSC 64724 July 2023Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined six FIRs registered in West Bengal relating to alleged explosive offences and a High Court order that transferred the investigation to the National Investigation Agency (NIA). The High Court had directed the Central Government to invoke its power under Section 6(5) of the National Investigati

EX-HAV ASHOK KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 80924 July 2019Dismissed

Havildar Ashok Kumar completed 24 years of service in the Indian Army and was granted a two‑year extension. During the extension he suffered a stroke, was classified as SHAPE‑3 with 80% disability and was discharged. He was awarded a disability pension under Regulation 173‑A of the Army Pension Regulations, 1961, but s

MAMTA & ANRversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR

2022 INSC 62624 May 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The second respondent was charged with kidnapping and murdering a 13‑year‑old child for ransom, with the trial ongoing since 2014. The Delhi High Court granted him bail, a decision challenged by the parents of the deceased and the State. The Supreme Court examined whether bail under Section 439 of the CrPC was appropri

SUNEETHA NARREDDYversusY S AVINASH REDDY & ANR

2023 INSC 42224 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Y.S. Vivekananda Reddy was murdered in March 2019 and the case was transferred to the CBI, which filed charge sheets naming several accused including the first respondent Y.S. Avinash Reddy. The first respondent sought anticipatory bail and filed a writ petition, prompting the Telangana High Court to grant

ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANRversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2020 INSC 35824 April 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh bought a transit marine insurance policy from Bajaj Allianz to cover the transport of a Bell‑430 helicopter from Canada to Bhopal. After the helicopter arrived in a knocked‑down condition at New Delhi, it was stored and assembled for a planned flight to Bhopal; damage to the window and tail

RELIANCE LIFE INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR.versusREKHABEN NARESHBHAI RATHOD

2019 INSC 56524 April 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Reliance Life Insurance issued a term life policy to the deceased after he had taken a separate policy from another insurer, but he failed to disclose the earlier cover in the proposal form. After the insured's death, Reliance repudiated the claim, invoking Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1932, on the gr

SMT. ALKA SHUKLAversusLIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA

2019 INSC 56724 April 2019Dismissed

The appellant's spouse held three LIC policies that contained an accident benefit clause requiring a bodily injury caused solely and directly by an accident arising from outward, violent and visible means, leading to death within 180 days. The insured suffered chest pain, a heart attack and fell from his motorcycle, dy

MD MISHER ALI @ MESER ALIversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2021 INSC 20524 March 2021Appeal(s) allowed

Md Misher Ali was alleged by the Assam police to be an illegal migrant from Bangladesh who entered India after 24 March 1971. The police referred him to the Foreigner's Tribunal, which served notice by hanging it at his temporary address in Sivasagar, despite his permanent residence being in Dhubri, and subsequently de

CHARANSINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

2021 INSC 20724 March 2021Dismissed

A complaint was lodged alleging that Charansinh, then President of a municipal council, had amassed assets disproportionate to his known income, invoking Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Anti‑Corruption Bureau (ACB) issued a notice directing him to appear for an "open enquiry" and to furnish de

AJAYA KUMAR DAS & ANRversusDIVISIONAL MANAGER & ANR

2022 INSC 8724 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Ajaya Kumar Das, a labourer, suffered an accident in 2000 that left him 85% permanently disabled. The Workmen's Compensation Commissioner awarded him Rs 2,78,926 with 12% interest from the date of the accident. The insurer appealed to the Orissa High Court more than 600 days after the award, and the High Court dismisse

MUNISHAMAPPA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2019 INSC 8824 January 2019Disposed off

A long‑standing property dispute between two families escalated when Survey Department officials arrived to survey the land. After an initial verbal altercation, the accused returned armed with knives, clubs, a baku and explosives, stabbing and killing two members of the complainant’s family and injuring several others

RAJU AMBADAS GANGEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2019 INSC 8424 January 2019Dismissed

The appellant, Raju Ambadas Gankekar, was convicted under Section 304 Part II of the IPC for assaulting Captain Vinod Rawat, who later died from his injuries. The incident occurred on 10 July 1988 at a hotel in Ahmednagar, where the victim was chased and attacked with a gupti. Evidence included a dying declaration desc

GANGARAMversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

2019 INSC 8624 January 2019Appeal(s) allowed

An advertisement by Dr. S.N. Medical College sought a projectionist who possessed a licence to operate a cinema projector. The appellant was appointed despite not having the licence at the time, while the third respondent challenged the appointment on the ground of non‑fulfilment of the qualification. The High Court Si

PUBLIC INTEREST COMMITTEE FOR SCHEDULING SPECIFIC AREAS AND ANRversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 108623 November 2023Disposed off

The Public Interest Committee sought proportional representation for the Limboo‑Tamang Scheduled Tribes in the Lok Sabha and the legislative assemblies of West Bengal and Sikkim, arguing that the 2006 Delimitation Notification and the 2008 Delimitation Order failed to incorporate the tribes after their inclusion under

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusSUBRATA NATH

2022 INSC 122123 November 2022Disposed off

Constable Subrata Nath of the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) was on duty when a truck carrying 800 kg of copper wires was stolen from a scrap yard. He was charged with gross negligence and dereliction of duty, and after a departmental inquiry where eight prosecution witnesses testified, the Disciplinary Autho

AVNI PRAKASHversusNATIONAL TESTING AGENCY (NTA) & ORS

2021 INSC 78123 November 2021Disposed off

The appellant, a student with dysgraphia (a specified disability of 40 % under the RPwD Act), appeared for the NEET (UG) 2021 and was denied the one‑hour compensatory time mandated for persons with disability. The designated examination centre collected her answer sheet after the regular three‑hour duration, and the Na

GLAS TRUST COMPANY LLCversusBYJU RAVEENDRAN & ORS.

2024 INSC 81123 October 2024

The appellant, GLAS Trust Company LLC, a financial creditor of Think & Learn Pvt Ltd (the corporate debtor), challenged the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's (NCLAT) approval of a settlement between the corporate debtor and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the setting aside of the NCLT order

STATE OF U.P. & ORSversusM/S LALTA PRASAD VAISH AND SONS

2024 INSC 81223 October 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a 9-judge bench reference, addressed the scope of Entry 8 of List II of the Seventh Schedule (intoxicating liquors) and its interplay with Entry 52 of List I (industries controlled by the Union). The case arose from a challenge by the State of Uttar Pradesh against a High Court decision t

JUST RIGHTS FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE & ANR.versusS. HARISH & ORS.

2024 INSC 71623 September 2024Disposed off

The case arose from an FIR filed in 2020 alleging that the accused, S. Harish, had downloaded and stored child pornographic videos on his mobile phone. The investigation recovered two such videos and a chargesheet was filed under Section 15(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and Section 6

THE JAMIA MASJIDversusSRI K V RUDRAPPA (SINCE DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS.

2021 INSC 52823 September 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The Jamia Masjid Gubbi filed a suit seeking a declaration that the State Wakf Board owned a specific property, possession, an injunction and mesne profits. Defendants argued that the suit was barred by res judicata, relying on three earlier suits concerning the same property. The Supreme Court examined whether the earl

SRI NILANJAN BHATTACHARYAversusTHE STATE OF KARANATAKA AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 56223 September 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an Indian citizen residing in the US, sought temporary custody of his three‑year‑old US‑citizen son after the mother returned to India with the child. The Superior Court of New Jersey granted the appellant temporary custody, and the appellant filed a habeas corpus petition in the Supreme Court, which was

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM/S G S CHATHA RICE MILLS & ANR.

2020 INSC 56123 September 2020Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered whether Notification 5/2019, issued under Section 8A of the Customs Tariff Act to raise the import duty on goods from Pakistan to 200%, applied retrospectively to bills of entry that had been presented and self‑assessed before the notification was uploaded to the e‑gazette at 20:46:58 on 16

THANGJAM ARUNKUMARversusYUMKHAM ERABOT SINGH & ORS.

2023 INSC 76223 August 2023Dismissed

The appellant, a returned candidate to the Manipur Legislative Assembly, was challenged by the unsuccessful candidate who filed an election petition alleging corrupt practices, including non‑disclosure of a financial transaction. The appellant moved applications under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC and Section 86 of the Re

MD. ISLAM & ORS.versusTHE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

2022 INSC 85223 August 2022Dismissed

The appellants, former employees of the Bihar State Electricity Board (BSEB), sought to have the Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme of 2003 applied retrospectively from 09‑08‑1999, as it was for Bihar state government employees. BSEB had earlier adopted the Bihar Service Code but later framed its own service regul

VANSHIKA YADAVversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 55323 July 2024

The Supreme Court examined a petition seeking a fresh NEET (UG) 2024 examination on the grounds of a question‑paper leak in Hazaribagh and Patna and alleged systemic deficiencies in the conduct of the exam. The Court noted that the Central Bureau of Investigation had identified about 155 beneficiaries of the leak, but

PRAKASH GUPTAversusSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

2021 INSC 35323 July 2021Disposed off

Prakash Gupta, a director of Ideal Hotels & Industries Ltd, was prosecuted by SEBI for alleged price rigging and insider trading during the company's 1995 IPO. Gupta applied to have the offence under Section 24 of the SEBI Act compounded under Section 24A, but the trial judge and the Delhi High Court rejected the appli

EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITEDversusANADINATH BANERJEE (D) AND OTHERS

2021 INSC 35123 July 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned whether Anadi Nath Banerjee, whose land was acquired for the Sonepur Bazari Open Cast Project, was entitled to employment under a tripartite agreement that promised jobs to land‑losers possessing at least two acres. The Land Acquisition Collector’s certificate recorded Banerjee’s own holding as 0.300

LAKSHMAN SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR (NOW JHARKHAND)

2021 INSC 35223 July 2021Dismissed

The case arose from a violent incident at a polling booth where the accused, belonging to another village, attacked a voter slip issuer and his brother, using lathis and pistols, causing injuries to several witnesses. The trial court convicted the accused of voluntarily causing hurt under Section 323 IPC and rioting un

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusN. R. SRIVASTA & ORS.

2020 INSC 46223 July 2020Dismissed

The Union of India and Safdarjung Hospital appealed against the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission’s (NCDRC) order that held Safdarjung Hospital liable for medical negligence and directed payment of Rs.2 lakh compensation to the complainant. The complaint arose from the death of a premature baby who was re

G H SURINDER PAL SONIversusSOHAN LAL (D) THRU LRS .

2019 INSC 79723 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant sought specific performance of a sale agreement and obtained a decree from the trial court directing the respondent to execute the sale deed within two months of depositing the balance consideration. Both parties appealed; the appellate court affirmed the trial court decree, effecting a merger of the two

P R ADIKESAVANversusTHE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF MADRAS AND ANOTHER

2022 INSC 62523 May 2022Dismissed

The appellant, a practising advocate, was charged with criminal contempt after he and about fifty other lawyers obstructed police officers attempting to execute a non‑bailable warrant issued by a Madras High Court judge. The High Court found a prima facie case of contempt under Section 2(c)(iii) of the Contempt of Cour

BHUPINDER SINGHversusUNITECH LIMITED

2023 INSC 28323 March 2023Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined an application filed by Unitech Limited seeking restitution of Rs. 98.07 crore that had been paid to Shri Naresh Kempanna and Col. Mohinder Khaira under an earlier order directing distribution of sale proceeds from a land transaction with M/s Devas Global Services LLP. Unitech argued that it

SUPREME COURT BAR ASSOCIATIONversusMINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT & ORS.

2023 INSC 27823 March 2023Disposed off

The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a mandamus directing the Union Ministry of Urban Development to convert the entire 1.33‑acre parcel of land allotted to the Supreme Court for archives into a chamber block for lawyers, to declare the surrounding area a ‘Supreme Cour

CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (IPC) MP POWER TRADING CO LTD & ANR.versusNARMADA EQUIPMENTS PVT LTD

2021 INSC 20423 March 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board entered into a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with Narmada Equipments in 1999, which was terminated in 2001. The PPA contained an arbitration clause. In 2011 Narmada invoked the clause and, after receiving no response, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY SEC. AND ORS.versusK. BALU AND ANR.

2018 INSC 18823 February 2018Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered applications by the States of Mizoram and Assam seeking exemption from the 500‑metre distance requirement for liquor outlets imposed by its earlier judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. K. Balu. The Court had previously exempted Meghalaya, Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh on the ground of their hi

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY SEC. AND ORSversusK. BALU AND ANR.

2018 INSC 18823 February 2018Disposed off

The Supreme Court was asked to interpret paragraph 7 of its 11 July 2017 order, which dealt with prohibiting the sale of liquor along highways but clarified that it did not apply to licensed establishments within municipal areas. The petitioners sought a further clarification to determine whether the same principle sho

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY SEC. AND ORS.versusK. BALU AND ANR.

2018 INSC 18823 February 2018Directions issued

The State of Himachal Pradesh filed a petition seeking the same liquor‑sale concession that the Supreme Court had granted to the State of Uttarakhand for its hilly districts. The Court noted its earlier order of 31 March 2017, which limited Himachal Pradesh’s exemption to areas with local bodies of population not excee

E. JEEVANANDAMversusN. KOTESWARA RAO & ORS.

2023 INSC 71423 January 2023Disposed off

The petitioner, a former chairperson of Maduravoyal Town Panchayat, purchased a parcel of land in 2011 that included a road earmarked for a sewerage line under a 2001 local body resolution. While the Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply & Sewerage Board laid the sewer main on the adjoining stretches, it left a 110‑metre s

W. N. ALLAL SUNDARAMversusTHE COMMISSIONER H.R. & C.E. ADMN. DEPARTMENT & ORS.

2019 INSC 127422 November 2019Dismissed

The appellant, W.N. Allal Sundaram, challenged a declaration that the Bagyammal Trust was a public trust under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, asserting it was a private family trust. The dispute centered on a Deed of Settlement dated 4 June 1926, which entrusted the construction and

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusHARLEEN KAUR & ORS.

2019 INSC 127522 November 2019Disposed off

The North Delhi Municipal Corporation appealed against the Central Administrative Tribunal's order that regularised Harleen Kaur and others as Entomologists, granting them notional pay and continuity of service. The respondents had been appointed contractually after a public advertisement in 1997‑98, their contracts we

V NAGARAJANversusSKS ISPAT AND POWER LTD.& ORS.

2021 INSC 66322 October 2021Dismissed

The appellant, V. Nagarajan, challenged an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dated 31 December 2019 that dismissed his application for interim relief in a liquidation proceeding. He filed an appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on 8 June 2020, relying on a free certified cop

NARMADA BACHAO ANDOLAN AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2022 INSC 99522 September 2022Disposed off

The petitioners, project‑affected families under the Sardar Sarovar Project, sought clarification or modification of the Supreme Court's 8 February 2017 order that fixed a full‑and‑final compensation of Rs 60 lakhs per family as a comprehensive settlement. The petitioners argued that, since they were entitled to 4.293 

SRI DORAIRAJ SPINTEXversusR CHITTIBABU & ORS

2021 INSC 52722 September 2021Disposed off

The management of Sri Dora Raj Spintax dismissed thirty‑one workmen after initiating disciplinary proceedings for alleged vandalism, while conciliation proceedings were pending on two separate industrial disputes raised by the workmen. The workmen claimed that the dismissals required prior permission under Section 33(1

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, LUCKNOWversusMD. NAWAZ KHAN

2021 INSC 52622 September 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The Narcotics Control Bureau intercepted a vehicle traveling from Dimapur to Rampur and discovered 3.3 kg of heroin concealed under the wiper of the car. The three occupants, including Md. Nawaz Khan, were arrested; a personal search of Khan revealed no contraband, but the drug was found in the vehicle. The trial court

MAHA P. & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2022 INSC 131122 July 2022Disposed off

The Supreme Court was approached to modify its earlier order that the Government had allowed NRI candidates to cure attestation defects by 31 March 2022 in the context of NEET‑UG seats reserved for the NRI quota in Kerala private medical colleges. The State of Kerala contended that no such extension existed and that th

HEMANT KUMAR VERMA & ORS.versusEMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION & ORS.

2022 INSC 74422 July 2022Dismissed

The petitioners, junior resident doctors employed on a contractual bond in ESIC medical colleges, sought inclusion in the 50% "in‑service" reservation for postgraduate medical seats that is available to Insurance Medical Officers Grade‑II (IMO‑II) recruited permanently by ESIC. They argued that both categories possess

SOMESH CHAURASIAversusSTATE OF M.P. & ANR.

2021 INSC 34922 July 2021Disposed off

The appellant Somesh Chaurasia sought cancellation of bail granted to the second respondent, who had been convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and whose sentence was suspended under Section 389(1) CrPC. While the suspension was in force, an FIR (No. 143 of 2019) alleged that the second respondent had murdered the

ANDHRA PRADESH POLLUTION CONTROLversusCCL PRODUCTS (INDIA) LIMITED

2019 INSC 78922 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board (APPCB) directed CCL Products (India) Ltd. to furnish three bank guarantees to secure compliance with environmental directions issued under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. After inspecting the plant and finding violations, the Board invoked the guara

RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ANRversusRATAN DEVI

2019 INSC 79322 July 2019Disposed off

In 1990 the respondent applied for a low‑income group (LIG) tenement in the Mansarover Scheme, paid Rs 4,000 and was issued an allotment letter requiring Rs 47,674 to be paid at possession. The appellant (Rajasthan Housing Board) cancelled the allotment in 1994 for non‑payment, while the respondent claimed she never re

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversus63 MOONS TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

2022 INSC 46522 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra sought attachment of the properties of 63 Moons Technologies, which holds 99.99% of National Spot Exchange Ltd. (NSEL), under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999, alleging that NSEL is a financial establishment that accepted deposits and

RAM CHANDERversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ANR.

2022 INSC 46822 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner, convicted of murder and related offences, served 16 years of a life sentence and applied for premature release under Chhattisgarh Prison Rule 358. The appropriate government sought the opinion of the Special Judge who, without providing detailed reasons or considering the factors laid down in Laxman Nas

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANRversusUMESH

2022 INSC 32222 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Umesh, a village accountant in Karnataka, was criminally charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding a bribe. He was acquitted by a Special Judge, but a disciplinary enquiry under the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 and the Karnataka Civil Services Rules found him guilty of misconduct and imposed c

ANIL KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 25622 February 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant's father’s house was demolished for the Ara‑Sasaram Railway Project, and the appellant sought employment under the Railway Board’s policy circular of 19 April 2006, which provides Group D posts to persons displaced by large‑scale land acquisition. The High Court directed consideration of his claim, but th

KUDRAT SANDHUversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2018 INSC 18522 February 2018Directions issued

The petition sought judicial directions on the selection of chairpersons, judicial, administrative, technical and expert members of various tribunals under the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and Other Authorities (Qualification, Experience and Other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2017. The Supreme Court, after

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ANR.versusPINJU RAM ETC.

2019 INSC 7322 January 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Himachal Pradesh Government issued a policy on 27 February 2004 to regularise part‑time class‑IV employees who had completed ten years of service by converting them to daily‑wage status with prospective effect and no back wages. In Moti Singh v. State, the High Court held that such conversion does not entitle emplo

UNION OF INDIA THR. SECRETARY & ORS.versusUDAI BHAN SINGH

2019 INSC 127121 November 2019Appeal(s) allowed

Udai Bhan Singh, a Postal Assistant, was charged with misconduct for authorising payments of National Savings Certificate commissions to fictitious agents, resulting in a loss of Rs.6.65 lakh. The disciplinary inquiry found the charges proved, leading to a reduction in pay, which was later enhanced to dismissal by the

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTDversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS

2023 INSC 86521 September 2023Dismissed

South Eastern Coalfields Ltd, which operates coal mines in Madhya Pradesh, challenged the levy of a terminal tax by the municipal council on the basis that municipal statutes cannot apply to Scheduled Areas. The company argued that Article 243ZC of the Constitution excludes Part IXA (municipalities) from Scheduled Area

CELIR LLPversusBAFNA MOTORS (MUMBAI) PVT. LTD. & ORS.

2023 INSC 83821 September 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The borrowers defaulted on a loan secured by a mortgage over land in Navi Mumbai, prompting Union Bank of India to initiate SARFAESI proceedings and eventually conduct a public auction. The appellant, CELIR LLP, was the highest bidder, paid the full bid amount, and received a sale confirmation, but the bank withheld th

CHANDAN BANERJEE & ORS.versusKRISHNA PROSAD GHOSH & ORS.

2021 INSC 51621 September 2021Dismissed

The Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC) issued a circular on 3 July 2012 creating super‑numerary Assistant Engineer (AE) posts for Sub‑Assistant Engineers (SAEs) and prescribed different eligibility criteria for diploma‑holders (25 years of service) and degree‑holders (13 years of service). The appellants, diploma‑hold

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, PUNEversusM/S BALLARPUR INDUSTRIES LTD.

2021 INSC 51521 September 2021Disposed off

The case concerned import of Styrene‑Butadiene Rubber (SBR) of the 1900 series, which the importer M/s Ballarpur Industries Ltd. declared as ‘Lutex‑701’ and ‘Lutex‑780’ in its Bills of Entry. The Commissioner of Customs issued show‑cause notices alleging mis‑declaration and demanding confiscation, anti‑dumping duty, in

PRAMOD SURYABHAN PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2019 INSC 93921 August 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Pramod Suryabhan Pawar, sought to quash a First Information Report (FIR) filed under Sections 376, 417, 504, 506(2) of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(u), (w) and 3(2)(vii) of the SC/ST Act, alleging that the allegations were based on a false promise to marry and on WhatsApp messages sent before the relevant p

GANGA VISHAN GUJRATI & ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

2019 INSC 93821 August 2019Dismissed

The appellants, appointed as Land Records Inspectors (LRIs) through a limited departmental examination for vacancies that arose in 2008‑09, 2009‑10 and 2010‑11, were placed in seniority lists dated 2012‑14 and later treated as appointed in 2014‑15. They claimed seniority should be computed from the year the vacancy aro

JAYANTIBHAI RAOJIBHAI PATELversusMUNICIPAL COUNCIL, NARKHED & ORS.

2019 INSC 93421 August 2019Disposed off

Jayantibhai Patel, a headmaster, was first cleared of misconduct in 1994 but a second inquiry—conducted without recorded reasons—found him guilty and led to his removal in 1996. The High Court later quashed the removal but denied back wages, reasoning that Patel had retired. The Supreme Court held that when service is

AJITH K & ORS.versusANEESH K.S. & ORS.

2019 INSC 94021 August 2019Dismissed

The appellants challenged the inclusion of candidates holding a two‑year Diploma in Health Inspectors Course (DHIC) in the short‑list for the post of Junior Health Inspector Grade‑II in the Municipal Common Service, arguing that DHIC was a higher qualification and should be treated as equivalent under Rule 10(a)(ii) of

DURGABAI DESHMUKH MEMORIAL SR. SEC. SCHOOL & ANR.versusVASU SENA & ANR.

2019 INSC 93721 August 2019Case Partly allowed

The appellant school appointed the first respondent as a teacher on a one‑year probation on 1 July 2008. The probation was extended twice, allowing her to serve as a probationer for nearly five years before she was discharged on 30 June 2013. The Delhi High Court held that the continuation of service beyond the two‑yea

XversusTHE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT & ANR.

2022 INSC 74021 July 2022Directions issued

The petitioner, an unmarried woman residing in Delhi, discovered she was 22 weeks pregnant after a consensual relationship ended and she lacked livelihood to raise a child. She filed a writ petition seeking permission to terminate the pregnancy under Section 3(2)(b) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act and

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusKAVINDER AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 45821 July 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The North Delhi Municipal Corporation (N.D.M.C.) advertised a post of Labour Welfare Superintendent requiring a post‑graduate degree or diploma in Social Work, Labour Welfare, Industrial Relations, Personnel Management or any allied subject. The respondent, Kavinder, held an MBA degree in which he studied Human Resourc

NENAVATH BUJJI ETC.versusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ORS.

2024 INSC 23921 March 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Commissioner of Police in Telangana issued a preventive detention order against Nenavath Ravi and his associates under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1986, alleging habitual robbery and gold‑chain snatching that allegedly created fear among women. The order was based on four FIRs, but the Det

M K RANJITSINH & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2024 INSC 28021 March 2024Directions issued

The petitioners sought a blanket prohibition on the installation of overhead transmission lines for solar power across roughly 99,000 square kilometres in Rajasthan and Gujarat, arguing that such lines threaten the critically endangered Great Indian Bustard (GIB). The Supreme Court had earlier ordered the conversion of

SUNDAR @ SUNDARRAJANversusSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2023 INSC 26421 March 2023Disposed off

The petitioner, Sundar, was convicted of kidnapping and murdering a seven‑year‑old child and sentenced to death by the trial court, a decision affirmed by the High Court and the Supreme Court. He filed a review petition alleging errors in the evidence, especially the admissibility of call‑detail records (CDRs) without

ORISSA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BAR ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2023 INSC 27121 March 2023Dismissed

The Odisha Administrative Tribunal (OAT) was created in 1986 under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, but was abolished by a Union Government notification dated 2 August 2019, issued under Section 21 of the General Clauses Act in conjunction with Section 4(2) of the same Act, after the State of Odisha requested it

ANJU KALSIversusHDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 21121 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant's son, an account holder of HDFC Bank, died in a road accident while covered under a "Cardsure Package Policy" issued by HDFC ERGO to the bank. The policy required a non‑ATM transaction within three months prior to a claim, but the insurer denied the claim, alleging the condition was not met. The appellan

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search