Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Arms Act

4780 judgments · newest first · showing 2001–2200

Raj Kumar Prasad @ Santu RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Prasad, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 372 of 2025 filed at Dhanarua Police Station. The FIR alleges that during a meeting over land documents, the petitioner and other accused fired indiscriminately, injuring Manoj Singh …

Shailesh ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Shailesh Manjhi and Ramakant Manjhi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (No. 654/2024) involving alleged threats, murder of a woman’s son and alleged sheltering of the killers, with charges under sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Arms Act. The …

Lalu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Lalu Yadav, was in custody for offences under several sections of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have fired at an informant and looted valuables. He claimed false implication and sought regular bail, arguing the FIR was concoced. The State opposed bail, …

Bisho SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bisho Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Srinagar PS Case No. 63 of 2025) involving alleged violations of Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case rested solely on statements of two co‑accused who claimed Sharma supplied ten live …

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioners Sonu Kumar and Chandan Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with PS Sheikhopur Sarai Case No. 146 of 2025, which involved offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The Sessions Court had …

Narayan Ray @ Ram Narayan RayversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Narayan Ray and Anil Ray were arrested in connection with a case (PS No. 569/2025) involving alleged firing that injured Raju Rai. The prosecution alleged that Ram Iqbal Rai fired at the victim and that petitioner No.1 also fired, while no specific allegation was made against petitioner No.2. The …

Jitendra Rishideo@ Arvind RishideoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Jitendra Rishideo and Dhananjay Rishideo, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) and illegal arms possession (Section 27 Arms Act) arising from FIR No. 289 of 2023. The FIR named three unknown persons, but a co‑accused, Umesh Kumar Rishideo, …

Bablu MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Petitioner Bablu Mahto was arrested on 2 December 2025 in connection with a shooting incident alleged under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case, based on an informant’s report, claims that the petitioner fired at Dilip Singh, causing a bullet …

Pawan Rai @ Pawan Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pawan Rai, sought anticipatory bail in connection with an arms case (Sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act) where a loaded pistol was recovered from an e‑rickshaw belonging to co‑accused Sunil Paswan. The petitioner was not named in the FIR; his name surfaced only through a …

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Kumar (Vikash Yadav) sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Kothi PS Case No. 100 of 2022) for alleged possession of a country‑made stand‑gun, pistol and live cartridges, offences punishable under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 …

Avinash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Avinash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in the illegal possession of arms recovered from a school during an Income Tax raid. The prosecution argued that the offence under the Arms Act was serious, but the weapons were not found in the …

Shyam Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Shyam Kumar Singh and his son Raushan Kumar Singh, were charged under several provisions of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Arms Act for allegedly opening fire on an informant, causing grievous injuries. They contended that they were falsely implicated, that the injury was simple, and that …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with FIR No. 316 of 2025 alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR accuses him of obstructing police duties and pelting stones, but his name …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Kumar applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 238, 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27(3) of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was killed after a confrontation with co‑accused, and the petitioner’s name surfaced only during …

Amit Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Amit Kumar Singh applied for bail in a case registered in 2018 involving offences under IPC sections 326, 307, 120(b), 302 and Arms Act section 27. The prosecution alleged that unknown assailants fired on a victim‑informant during a loot incident. The petitioner had been in custody since 27‑03‑2024 …

Aman Paswan @ Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Aman Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He is alleged to have been part of a gang that stopped an informant, after which a co‑accused fired …

Pintu Ram @ Praveen Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pintu Ram, was charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Arms Act for allegedly firing a weapon that injured an informant. He claimed he was falsely implicated and has been in custody since 28-09-2025. A counter case filed by his wife against the informant was noted, and …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, was named in FIR No.191 of 2025 for allegedly taking part in an unlawful assembly that fired indiscriminately at the husband of an informant, resulting in his death. He filed an application for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and alleging that he was falsely …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case alleging offences under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and several provisions of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case was based on information from an informant who, after a firing incident, apprehended a co‑accused, …

Devendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Devendra Rai, was arrested on 29-11-2025 in connection with a case registered under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 25(1‑AAA) and 26 of the Arms Act, alleging possession of a rifle, a homemade Katta, live and empty cartridges and a …

Principal Kumar @ Princpal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Principal Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 309(5), 109(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated based on a co‑accused's confessional statement. The FIR does not name him, and he has been in custody …

Malay Kumar MishraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Malay Kumar Mishra was named by an informant in FIR No. 566 of 2025 for allegedly firing at the informant, violating Section 109 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging the case was filed maliciously due to political …

Izhar Alam @ Babbar @ BabbanversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Izhar Alam, applied for regular bail in an NDNDPS case where a search of his residence yielded 5,000 ml of codeine‑phosphate & triprolidine cough syrup, arms, cash and other narcotic tablets. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act and Sections …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kumar Bharti @ Chandan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged possession of 11 litres of country-made liquor, a country-made pistol, and cartridges recovered from a cowshed belonging to another person. The prosecution alleged violations of Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 …

Saurav Kumar @ Saurav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Saurav Kumar, was charged under Sections 61(2) and 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at the informant's husband, resulting in death, and injuring another person. He has been in custody since 2 September 2025 and possesses …

Randhir Singh @ Randhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Randhir Singh, applied for bail in a case registered as PS Case No. 158 of 2025, involving offences under Sections 109, 309(6) and 311 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The incident arose from an attempted loot during which a victim assaulted a criminal; …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Guddu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly having two live cartridges in his pocket. The petitioner claimed he was innocent, that no contraband was actually recovered from him, and that the police failed to follow …

Priyank Kumar Upadhyay @ Priyank UpadhyayversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Petitioners Priyank Kumar Upadhyay and Shubham Upadhyay applied for bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The incident involved Kanhaiya Chaubey and others forcibly entering an agricultural field, during which Chaubey fired …

Anurag Kumar @ Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anurag Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He alleged that the informant falsely implicated him in an incident on 07.01.2026 where he was allegedly present …

Ajit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ajit Kumar was arrested in connection with a police case alleging assault and possession of a firearm, based on a co-accused's confessional statement, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, had no specific overt act alleged against him, …

Dheeraj Singh @ Dheeraj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Singh, was arrested in connection with a case (Bhore P.S. Case No. 420 of 2025) alleging that he, along with three others, fired eight shots at an informant, violating Sections 109 and 61 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar Vinod Rai, was charged under Sections 109(1), 308(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly demanding extortion and shooting the victim, causing chest injury. He has been in custody since 27 September 2025 and …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 27, 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was killed by unknown criminals and that the petitioner had acted as an informer, …

Dwarika SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Dwarika Sharma, applied for regular bail in a case registered as Ara Muffasil P.S. Case No. 299/2025, which involves alleged offences under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner …

Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, sought regular bail for offences under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 27, 25(1‑b)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act. The earlier bail application had been rejected, with the court noting a confessional statement implicating the …

Dhanji @ Dhanji SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Dhanji Singh, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he fired upon an injured person during a land dispute. He is charged under Sections 109(1), 303(2) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner applied for bail, claiming …

Prahlad Kumar @ Prahlad Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Prahlad Kumar was arrested during a police raid in Giriyak where 10-12 persons allegedly opened fire on the police. He is charged under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Arms Act, including offences relating to unlawful possession of firearms. The petitioner contended …

Sandip Mandal @ Sandeep MandalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sandip Mandal, was arrested in connection with a case registered under the Arms Act for alleged possession of a country-made pistol, four live cartridges, and a mobile phone. The prosecution alleged that these items were recovered from his possession, while the petitioner contended …

Sujeet Kumar @ Sujit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sujeet Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under the Arms Act for alleged conspiracy to supply illegal weapons, with five country-made pistols recovered from his residence. He has been in custody since 10 October 2025. The petitioner applied for regular bail, …

Raju Sahni @ LangraversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Raju Sahni and Harihar Sahni, applied for bail in a session trial (No. 968/2025) arising from a 2011 incident where miscreants allegedly threatened and entered a house with weapons and explosives. The prosecution alleged offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, the …

Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kumar Singh @ Ajay SinghversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, was arrested in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 71 of 2026 for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that a scuffle broke out after the petitioner …

Ashish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ashish Kumar was arrested in connection with a robbery and illegal possession of arms (IPC Sec. 392 and Arms Act Sec. 27) after a robbery at gunpoint where Rs.50,000 was taken from an informant. The FIR described unknown miscreants on a bike, and the CCTV footage from the shop was later deleted. The …

Sanjay KoraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kora, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 121A and 120B of the IPC, sections 25(1‑B)a, 26(i) and 35 of the Arms Act, and sections 18(B), 19 and 20 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. The prosecution’s case is based solely on the statement …

Niranjan Kumar @ Niranjan Mahto @ KataruyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Niranjan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case concerning alleged purchase of a stolen motorcycle, offences alleged under Sections 317(4) and 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution’s case rests on the confessional statement of a co‑accused who claimed he …

Abhishek Tewatia @ Abhishek @ VishuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Abhishek Tewatia was arrested on 19 May 2025 in connection with a shooting incident and charged under Sections 109 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case rests mainly on a confessional statement of co‑accused Dindayal Yadav, …

Sudhir Bhagat @ Sudheer BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sudhir Bhagat was arrested in connection with a 2014 case alleging participation in a Naxalite outfit, charged under several sections of the IPC, UAPA, CLA and Arms Acts. The FIR was based primarily on an informant's report and the confessional statements of co‑accused who were apprehended at the …

Akhilesh @ Aklesh Kumar @ Nakta @ Akhilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Fatuha PS Case No.702 of 2023) alleged under IPC sections 302, 120B, 34 and Arms Act section 27. The prosecution’s informant claimed that the accused’s firing caused the death of his son, but the petitioner contended that …

Krishna TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Krishna Tiwari, applied for anticipatory bail after police recovered a country‑made pistol and live cartridges from his residence and from his brother's possession, alleging violations of Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that …

Ravi Shankar (Mukhiya)versusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ravi Shankar, a village Mukhiya, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that three youths fired a weapon, causing the death of Manohar Sharma. The petitioner …

Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Kumar Mahaldar @ Dilip Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dilip Kumar was arrested in September 2025 for alleged possession of a loaded pistol and two live cartridges, offences punishable under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the weapons were not in his conscious possession and that there was …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Chandan Kumar was arrested in connection with alleged offences under Sections 20, 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act and Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after 275 g of a brown‑sugar‑like substance was seized from his rented house. The forensic laboratory report indicated that only one exhibit …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raushan Kumar, now 19 but a minor when the FIR was lodged in 2023, sought pre‑arrest bail for offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 379, 354, 307, 504, 506, 34 and Arms Act section 27. The FIR alleged that he, along with co‑accused, fired at an informant, assaulted the informant with the butt of a …

Amarjeet @ Indrajeet Yadav @ Inarjit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, named Amarjeet, Indrajeet and Inarjit Yadav, challenged their inclusion in an FIR that incorrectly recorded their father's name. They were charged under Sections 191(3), 190, 126(2), 109, 352 of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at a victim. The …

Rajnish Gupta @ Rajnish Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Rajnish Gupta, filed a petition seeking to quash the order of cognizance dated 08‑04‑2024 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in a murder case (Sections 302, 120B, 34 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act). The prosecution alleged that on 04‑07‑2019 the victim, Rajnarayan Singh, …

Pradeep YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Pradeep Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 109 of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging he shot an informant and caused firearm injury. The petitioner claimed innocence and alleged false implication, while the …

Hari Shankar @ HaddiaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Hari Shankar @ Haddia was arrested for possession of 102 litres of illicit country-made liquor, a country-made pistol, and a stolen motorcycle. He faced charges under Section 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, and Section 30(a) of the Excise and …

Sanauddin @ SoneyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Sanauddin and Sitare were charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments (B.N.S) Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act for alleged assault and firing of weapons. They applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest. The petitioners argued that the allegations were false and …

Dharmraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dharmraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging that he was part of a group that intercepted and fired at an informant, resulting in a firearm injury and the alleged snatching of a locket. The petitioner contended that he did not fire any weapon and …

Banty Yadav @ Banti Yadav @ Banti KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Banty Yadav applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act relating to a loot of Rs. 14,01,500 from Airtel Payments Bank, during which the victim was shot. The prosecution alleges that the loot was recovered from a co‑accused who identified Yadav as a …

Pradeep SinghversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Pradeep Singh, arrested on 17‑12‑2025 in connection with a case involving alleged firing on the informant's brother, sought bail. He faces charges under multiple sections of the Bihar National Security Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the …

Dharamveer KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Dharamveer Kumar, was implicated in a robbery‑related case (Case No. 61 of 2025) where an informant was shot and Rs. 9,80,000 was stolen. The FIR did not name him, but the investigating agency identified him based on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, Ram Shankar, without any …

Gayanendra Kumar @ LaliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gayanendra Kumar, was arrested on 24‑12‑2025 in connection with FIR No. 833/2025 alleging offences under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 292 of the B.N.S and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR originally did not name him, but his name emerged during investigation and he later …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 109(1), 351(3), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have fired a weapon without causing injury. He had been in custody since 26 September 2025 and claimed two prior antecedent …

Rishikesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rishikesh Kumar, was arrested on 21 January 2026 in connection with an FIR dated 2 October 2025 alleging that he fired at the son of an informant over a petty dispute, causing a simple injury. He is charged under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section …

Sanoj Kumar Singh @ Sanoj SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sanoj Kumar Singh was in custody since 8 April 2025 for alleged offences under IPC sections 401, 414, 413/34 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35, based primarily on the confession of co‑accused Anand Kumar. The petitioner argued that no material other than the co‑accused’s statement linked him …

Shahbaz Ahmad @ Shahbaz Ansari @ Danish Ansari @ SahbazversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Shahbaz Ahmad, was arrested in connection with a robbery‑shooting at a petrol pump on 19 September 2025, during which the victim was injured by gunfire. He is charged under Sections 308(4), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner applied for regular …

Rahul Kumar RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Ranjan, was named in an FIR for possession of a rifle and live cartridges recovered from his car, which he claimed was hired to his driver and that he had no knowledge of the arms. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the recovery of the weapon and the petitioner’s prior …

Saharyar Alam @ Sahareyar Alam @ GudduversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saharyar Alam, was arrested on 26-02-2025 in connection with FIR No. 27-06-2023 relating to robbery under IPC Sec. 392 and an offence under Arms Act Sec. 25(1‑b)(a). He contended that he was never named in the FIR, that his name only emerged during investigation, and that no …

Yogeshwar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Yogeshwar Yadav, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑b)AA, 26(i)(ii) and 35 of the Arms Act, alleging involvement in a mini gun factory operating in his maize field. The prosecution claimed that arms and ammunition were recovered from the field and that …

Naresh Kumar @ Naresh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Naresh Kumar, was implicated in a robbery case (PS Case No 403/2024) on the basis that his motorcycle was used by co‑accused Rakesh Kumar during the alleged offence. The co‑accused was apprehended by villagers who also produced a country‑made pistol and live cartridges, indicating a …

Ashutosh Kumar @ Ashutosh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ashutosh Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act, alleging that no weapon or ammunition was recovered from his possession and that the police failed to comply with Section 105 of the BNSS during the seizure. The prosecution argued that a …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was charged under Sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)a and 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly entering an informant's house and shooting the deceased. He had been in custody since 29‑08‑2025 and claimed a clean …

Dipak SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dipak Sah was arrested on 23-12-2025 in connection with a mob assault on police officers during an incident at Mahinathpur, alleged under multiple sections of the Bihar Police Act, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution’s FIR, based on CCTV footage, claims the petitioner instigated the mob that …

Aditya Kumar @ BandraversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Aditya Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act, alleging that he was involved in an armed dispute that resulted in a firearm injury to the informant. The prosecution contended that the …

Basudeo YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

Basudeo Yadav was convicted by a Sessions Court under Section 436 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly setting fire to a hut during a violent incident linked to a land dispute. The prosecution's case relied solely on four witnesses, all of whom were close relatives of the informant and thus …

Ashok kumar @ Suresh MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellant, Ashok Kumar, appealed the acquittal of eleven accused persons in a 1998 shooting case arising from a land dispute. The trial court had acquitted the accused on charges under Sections 307/34 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act, but the appellant alleged that the judgment erroneously discussed …

Pawan Kumar Singh @ Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that on 19‑08‑2025 a co‑accused fired at the informant's son, causing injury, and the …

Janki DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Janki Das, Biranjan Kumar and Golden Kumar, were arrested in connection with a gang rape alleged to have occurred in Gurua, Gaya, and charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and the Arms Act. …

Sandeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, was arrested in connection with a gang rape case (PS Case No. 386/2025) involving multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, the POCSO Act and the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming false implication despite having three prior criminal …

Suman MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Suman Mahto and Jetan Mahto applied for anticipatory bail in two separate criminal miscellaneous proceedings concerning alleged offences under the Excise Act, the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNSS) Act and the Arms Act. They argued that they were not arrested at the scene, no liquor was …

Sanjeev Yadav @ Sanjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjeev Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, where the prosecution alleged that the accused, including the petitioner, assaulted an informant and opened fire, injuring three …

Rajveer SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rajveer Singh and Karamveer Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging they only dragged the informant’s grandfather from a vehicle while the co‑accused shot him. They …

Suman MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Suman Mahto and Jetan (Jitan) Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail in two separate criminal miscellaneous proceedings concerning alleged offences under the Excise Act and various provisions of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act and the Arms Act. They argued that they were …

Sonu Jha @ Sonu Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sonu Jha, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act for the alleged shooting of a deceased person. The prosecution alleged that three unknown persons fired the shots and that the petitioner’s name appeared in a …

Binod chaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Binod Chaudhary applied for regular bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he shot the victim and caused grievous injury to the victim's right leg. The prosecution contended that the petitioner was …

Pawan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Pawan Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving alleged possession of 1807.56 litres of liquor, a country-made pistol, live cartridges, a motorcycle and a bicycle. He contended that he was not in conscious possession of the seized items, was not the …

Budhraj SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, comprising members of the Singh family, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable (B.N.S.) Act. Petitioners 1 and 2 (Budhraj Singh and Guddu Kumar) were arrested during the pendency of the application and sought to …

Pintu Kumar @ Pintu Ray @ Pintu Yadav @ Randhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery in which Rs. 3,62,200 was allegedly stolen from Vishwam Kumar, and was charged under Section 309(6) of the B.N.S. and Sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26(1) of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended that he had been falsely implicated, …

Raju PaswanversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sasaram, for offences under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code based on a police raid that recovered a pistol, cartridges and a knife. They appealed, arguing that the prosecution failed to examine the investigating officer, …

Mantoo @ Binod YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The Patna High Court heard three appeals arising from the same 2004 Dehri police case in which the appellants were convicted under IPC Sections 399 (dacoity) and 402 (robbery) and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine. The prosecution’s case relied on two police witnesses and …

Ramesh PaswanversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sasaram, for offences under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code based on a police raid that recovered a pistol, cartridges and a knife. They appealed, arguing that the prosecution failed to examine the investigating officer, …

RAJESHWAR RAIversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, accused under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC and Arms Act provisions for a land‑related violent incident, appealed a trial court order that refused them anticipatory bail. One appellant died during the pendency, and the court permitted withdrawal of his …

Kaushal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kaushal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that he and two others fired at the son of an informant, invoking sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The petitioner contended he was innocent, arguing that the injury report showed injuries caused by …

Sanjay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case involving multiple serious offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act, including murder, assault, and illegal possession of arms. He has been in custody since March 6, 2024, and was previously denied bail by a coordinate …

Ajay Yadav @ Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Ajay Yadav, sought regular bail for offences alleged under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 103(1), 331(4), 305, 76, 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act, relating to indiscriminate firing on an informant's family resulting in death and injury, and alleged …

Mukesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for murder and illegal possession of a firearm under Sections 103(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that Paswan, along with others, killed the informant's brother over a …

Saukat Ansari @ Saukat AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saukat Ansari, was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments (B.N.S.) Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at a deceased person. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that another individual, …

Abhishek Kumar @ Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar (alias Vishal Kumar), was arrested on 4 August 2025 in connection with FIR dated 26 July 2025 alleging offences under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 312, 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that on 25 July 2025 …

Sunil JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Jha, was named in an FIR for the murder of the informant's brother, alleged to have been committed with a firearm over a land dispute. He sought anticipatory bail, claiming he was innocent and that the disputed land had already been sold in 2022, leaving no motive for …

Sujeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sujeet Kumar was arrested on 19 May 2025 for possession of a loaded desi pistol and two live cartridges, alleged offences under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail, contending that the FIR did not comply with Section 103 of the BNSS 2023 and pointing out that a …

Sonalal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonalal Yadav, was arrested on 9 August 2025 for allegedly stabbing an informant's son and possessing a country‑made pistol. He faces charges under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Compulsory Statutes and the Arms Act. The petitioner pleaded for bail, asserting a clean criminal …

Surendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Surendra Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26(2) and 35 of the Arms Act, where pistols, rifles and cartridges were recovered from his residence. The prosecution alleged that he was directly involved in the accumulation of illegal arms and …

Dilip SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Dilip Singh, was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging that he shot and killed a person, charging him under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, arguing that he had been in custody since 10 February …

Prince Kumar @ SahilversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Prince Kumar applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The victim identified the petitioner as one of the assailants in a shooting incident, and the petitioner has been in custody since 25 July 2025 with fifteen …

Laxmi Narayan @ Laxmi Narayan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Laxmi Narayan, applied for regular bail in a case registered as Barahiya P.S. Case No. 172/2025, which alleged offences under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that three unknown persons shot and killed the deceased, and a …

Vishwanath PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vishwanath Paswan applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103(2), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, relating to a murder arising from a land dispute. The prosecution alleged a conspiracy involving the accused and unknown persons, but Paswan was …

BHOPALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant Bhopal was convicted by the Sessions Court for robbery (IPC s.392) and related offences, based on a police report of a 1981 armed robbery. The High Court learned that the original trial court record, including the charge‑sheet and evidence, could not be located and reconstruction was …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Vikash Kumar was arrested in connection with a case involving assault that led to the death of an informant’s father, and is charged under Sections 341, 302, 120B, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in custody since 14 November 2023 and this is his …

Aman Kumar @ KargilversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Aman Kumar, filed an application seeking the quashing of an FIR that alleged offences under Sections 308(3), 308(5), 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The High Court noted that the investigation was at a very early stage and the …

Bablu Kumar @ Bablu Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bablu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving the unloading of illicit liquor and alleged violations of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and the Arms Act. He has been in custody since 5 January 2026. The petitioner contended that he neither owned the vehicle nor …

Indal PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Indal Paswan, applied for bail in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a 2022 dacoity case (PS No. 48) in Babubarhi, Madhubani. He is charged under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section ¾ of the Explosive Substances Act, and has …

Saurav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saurav Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 109 and 61(2) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act, after an informant was shot by unknown assailants. The prosecution alleged his involvement but presented no material evidence linking him to the …

Amitabh Gautam @ Tipu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amitabh Gautam (aka Tipu Singh), was arrested in connection with a murder case (Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 235 of 2025) and charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 103 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He had been in custody since 26‑09‑2025 and contended that he …

Sheshmani KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sheshmani Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act after a grocery shop owner reported a theft of Rs. 13,58,000. The prosecution's case relied mainly on the confession of a co-accused, Rahul, who …

Md. Niyaz Ahmad @ Md. UjaleversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md. Niyaz Ahmad and Anil Kumar Singh, were arrested on 11 October 2025 for possession of heroin (31.81 g and 34.40 g respectively) and a pistol, and were charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the NDPS Act. They applied for bail before the …

Rakesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, was arrested on 22 October 2025 in connection with a 2023 FIR alleging assault and firing that resulted in the death of an informant's son. He is charged under multiple IPC sections (147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 324, 504, 506, 302, 120B) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. …

Vikash Kumar Sahni @ Vikas Kumar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Kumar Sahni, a poor accused, had been in custody since January 5, 2022 for offences under Section 414 IPC, Sections 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act and several provisions of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, arguing that the alleged narcotic contraband was of a small quantity and that his …

Rahul YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was not arrested at the scene, that the FIR was lodged a day after the alleged incident, and that the seizure list was prepared prior to the FIR, …

Mukesh sahniversusThe state of bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Sahni applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103(5) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He was not named in the FIR; his name emerged only in the confessional statement of co‑accused Md. Arzoo Khan, who is already on bail. The …

Arjun PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants Arjun Paswan and Nitish Kumar Yadav were convicted under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act for allegedly firing at and causing the death of the complainant's son. They contended that the FIR primarily implicated another accused, Md. …

Nitish Kumar Yadav @ Nitish YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants Arjun Paswan and Nitish Kumar Yadav were convicted under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act for allegedly firing at and causing the death of the complainant's son. They contended that the FIR primarily implicated another accused, Md. …

MD. EZAZ AIYUBI @ EZAZ AIYUBIversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Md. Pappu, Md. Jhaban, and Md. Inam, applied for regular bail in connection with a dacoity case (Ashthawan PS Case No. 253 of 2025) involving alleged robbery of cash and jewellery. The offences alleged include murder under Section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and …

Md. PappuversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, accused of dacoity and robbery amounting to Rs.7,00,000 and alleged violations of the Arms Act, applied for regular bail in connection with PS Case No.253 of 2025. The offences alleged include murder‑attempt under Section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and illegal …

Bhushan Prasad @ Braj Bhushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Bhushan Prasad, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Ghoshi Case No. 429 of 2025) alleged under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that he, along with co‑accused, shot and killed the son of an …

Munna Kumar @ Munna SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Munna Kumar was arrested in connection with a case involving murder, attempted murder, criminal conspiracy and an offence under the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that he participated in the killing of Ranjan Kumar in retaliation for earlier killings of his grandfather. The petitioner contended …

Mukesh Tiwari @ Mukesh Kumar Tiwari @ Jacky TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Mukesh Tiwari applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging his involvement in a murder. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was killed by unknown assailants and that the petitioner, acting as …

Dewa GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dewa Gupta, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a 2016 shooting incident for which an FIR was lodged under IPC sections 307, 34, 120B and Arms Act section 27. The prosecution’s case relied solely on confessional statements of co‑accused, with no material recovered from the …

Praveen Kumar @ Praveen YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Praveen Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he shot a man named Govind Kumar during a dispute. The prosecution’s version, based on the informant’s son’s mobile …

Lucky Kumar Ojha @ Lucky Kumar @ Lucky OjhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Lucky Kumar Ojha was arrested in connection with a police case (No.337 of 2024) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, including a gunshot injury to an informant. The petitioner contended that he was falsely …

Chandramauli YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Chandramauli Yadav and his son Satish Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Pandarak PS Case No.190 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that a group of 19 accused, including the petitioners, fired at an …

Deepu Thakur @ Dipanshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Deepu Thakur, filed an application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged illegal possession of 54 litres of country‑made liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, …

Pintu Kumar @ Surya Prakash @ Ajeet Kumar @ AjeetversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, was named in a police case (PS No. 667 of 2025) for alleged possession of a pistol, invoking Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that nothing was recovered from him and that his name was merely mentioned by an …

Ramu Yadav @ Ram Sogarath YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ramu Yadav, was implicated in a police case (Bheja PS Case No.83 of 2025) for alleged offences under Sections 3 and 27 of the Arms Act, based on a viral social‑media video showing a person with a gun. The petitioner contended that he was not the individual in the video, that no …

Sanjeev Choudhary @ Sanjeev Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjeev Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged against him under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act, alleging that he and others entered a shop, demanded wine, assaulted the informant and stole Rs.66,000. The petitioner claimed …

Nikhil Ray @ Nikhil Rai @ Nikhil Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nikhil Ray, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after police recovered a pistol and live cartridges during a patrol. The police alleged that the petitioner was with a co‑accused who, in his confessional statement, implicated the …

Indrajeet Kumar @ Karu Ray @ Kuru RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Indrajeet Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Sonepur PS Case No.66 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant, Pankaj Kumar, had filed the charge sheet, and the informant's counsel produced the …

Deodas @ Raj Kumar @ Raja BabuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Deodas, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR alleging extortion, assault, and several serious offences under the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that six named and ten unknown accused, including the petitioner, demanded …

Deo Kumar SaoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Deo Kumar Sao applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 111(4) and 112 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a pistol was recovered from co‑accused Dablu Kumar, but no incriminating article was found in the …

Amlesh Kumar Yadav @ Amlesh Yadav @ Amlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Amlesh Kumar Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 302, 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the murder of the informant’s husband. The prosecution alleged that, on the orders of …

Bhagendra @ Kariya @ Satish YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bhagendra @ Kariya @ Satish Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑A), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that three persons on a motorcycle fled from police, were apprehended, and that weapons and ammunition were recovered, with …

Vikash Kumar @ Gujar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Fatehpur P.S. Case No.134 of 2025) where he was alleged to have participated in the robbery and assault of an informant, including snatching a gold chain and taking cash. The prosecution charged him under several sections of the …

Nandan Kumar Paswan @ Aditya Kumar @ AdityaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nandan Kumar Paswan, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Arms Act, where eight to nine miscreants allegedly intercepted a bus, quarrelled and fired shots causing injuries. The prosecution’s case is based on the …

Rajesh RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajesh Ram, was arrested after a country‑made pistol and a live cartridge were recovered from his house in connection with a case under sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that no incriminating article was found in his …

Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ranjan Kumar was arrested in connection with an incident where three accused entered an informant’s CSP centre, stole a laptop and, when confronted, one opened fire injuring the informant’s hand. The FIR was lodged against unknown persons, but the petitioner’s name appeared in a confessional …

Ashish Yadav @ Chhotu @ Ashish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Ashish Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with a case registered under sections 310(4), 310(5), 3(5) of the BNS and sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was already in custody when the application was filed. The …

Govind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Govind Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 214 of 2025) for alleged assault and firing at an informant, alleged to be offences under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant claimed that four youths on scooters demanded his mobile …

Shambhu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shambhu Yadav was arrested in connection with a case under sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act after live cartridges and a loaded pistol were allegedly recovered from his possession. He has been in custody since 10‑Oct‑2025 and a chargesheet was filed. The petitioner applied for regular bail, …

Ram Prawesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ram Prawesh Kumar was arrested in connection with the murder of an informant's nephew, alleged to have occurred after a deceptive phone call and resulting in the victim's death. The petitioner argued that he was not named in the FIR, his name was only disclosed by a co‑accused, and there were no …

Farjana AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Farjana Ansari, the wife of Kamruddin Ansari, applied for regular bail in a case (Harsidhi PS Case No. 708 of 2025) filed under sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that her husband was killed during a political …

Ranveer YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, seven members of the Yadav family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS Sangrampur Case No.130/2025, which alleged offences under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, based on an FIR filed by Sunil Kumar. The prosecution …

Dev Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dev Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with an assault case (Bypass P.S. Case No.162 of 2025) involving injuries to a victim and alleged use of a weapon, charged under sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 109 of the B.N.S., 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act. He had been in custody …

Rupesh kumar @ AndwaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act, alleging that a pistol and three live cartridges were recovered from his possession. He contended that nothing was actually seized from him, that the seizure did not comply …

Niraj Kumar @ Niraj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, was implicated in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after police recovered a loaded pistol, cartridges and cash during a patrolling operation. The police had initially apprehended another individual, Robin Yadav, and seized the …

Vicky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vicky Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 309(6) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was implicated in a robbery and shooting incident despite not being named in the FIR or identified in a TIP. The …

Bittu Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Bittu Kumar Sharma and Shivdhyan Sharma, were arrested in connection with the seizure of 410 grams of ganja, a loaded pistol, and 900 ml of foreign liquor, and charged under the NDPS Act, Arms Act, and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They contended that the seized items were not …

Mohammad Samas Parvez Alam @ Shams Parwej AlamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Mohammad Samas Parvez Alam, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1-AA), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, alleging that no weapon was recovered from his possession and that the police failed to comply with Section 105 of the BNSS during seizure. The State opposed bail, …

Durgesh Shivam @ Samar ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Durgesh Shivam @ Samar Thakur, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with an extortion case (PS Case No.831/2023) involving offences under Sections 341, 342, 386, 387, 452, 307, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he is not named in the FIR, was …

Debu Rai @ Dev Chandra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Debu Rai, a 70‑year‑old accused in a 1996 case involving offences under Sections 447, 364, 5111, 307, 120B, 302 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, had been in custody since 21‑08‑2025. The petitioner sought regular bail, arguing that he was only a suspect, his advanced age and health …

Sujit Kumar Das @ Fulendra @ Fulendra KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Sujit Kumar Das, was arrested on 27‑02‑2025 in connection with a 2011 incident in Belaganj, Gaya, where he is alleged to have participated in a violent attack resulting in murder and injuries, violating IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302, the Criminal Law Amendment Act section 17, and …

Ramesh Ray @ Ramesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ramesh Ray, was arrested on 23 July 2025 in connection with a 2019 case involving alleged assault and use of a sword, charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that he participated in a violent attack on the informant's family, …

Rudal MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rudal Mahto was arrested on 13 September 2024 in connection with a FIR dated 11 September 2024 and charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. His earlier bail application was rejected, and he remained in custody for over a year while …

Subham KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Subham Kumar was arrested on 7 January 2025 in connection with a shooting incident at a medicine shop, alleged under IPC sections 341, 307, 34, 302 and Arms Act section 27. The prosecution claims the informant identified the miscreants, that co‑accused and the petitioner confessed, and that the …

Mukesh Jamadar @ Feku Jamadar @ Leman TeaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Jamadar was arrested on 31‑08‑2025 in connection with a case involving alleged offences under Sections 317(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑B)A, 26/35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution claimed that police, acting on secret information, recovered a live …

Tushar Singh @ Jhatkan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Tushar Singh was arrested in connection with a kidnapping and assault case (Sarsi PS Case No. 68 of 2024) involving multiple IPC offences, a POCSO offence and an Arms Act offence. The informant alleged that the petitioner participated in forcibly abducting his sister, assaulting family …

Dhiraj SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Singh, was arrested in connection with a dacoity at the Bank of Baroda, Ambakala Branch, alleged to have involved robbery of Rs. 26,03,000 and charges under IPC sections 395, 392 and the Arms Act. He contended that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants and that he was …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Guddu Kumar, the petitioner, applied for bail in a case registered as Garkha P.S. Case No. 712 of 2024, alleging offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in custody since 18 November 2024 and is accused, along with others, of …

Abhishek Kumar RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Ranjan, was arrested in connection with Chakmehsi P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025 for alleged possession of a country-made pistol, live cartridges, and firing upon police, invoking sections of the BNS and the Arms Act. He had been in custody since 21 August 2025 and faced …

Ranjeet Kumar Ram @ Etwari RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Chhotu Kumar and Ranjeet Kumar applied for bail in connection with Pothia Police Station Case No. 54 of 2025, which alleged conspiracy to murder and the discharge of a firearm that injured the victim. The prosecution alleged that the accused conspired to kill the victim, and the firearm …

Anju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Anju Devi, Banti Kumar and Triveni Singh, filed a petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 386/2024 registered on 23.11.2024 for alleged assault, attempted shooting, and theft involving their son Raja Kumar. They argued that the FIR was lodged six days after the incident and sent to the …

Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Chhotu Kumar and Ranjeet Kumar applied for bail in connection with Pothia Police Station Case No. 54 of 2025, which alleged conspiracy to murder and the discharge of a firearm that injured the victim. The prosecution alleged that the accused conspired to kill the victim, and the firearm …

Sugan Kumar @ Sugan KaharversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellant, Sugan Kumar, was charged under several IPC sections, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault and firing incidents. He appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act against the trial court's refusal to grant anticipatory …

Ram Pukar SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ram Pukar Sah applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)a and 26 of the Arms Act, where the prosecution alleged that a pistol and four live cartridges were recovered from his possession. The petitioner contended that nothing was seized from him and that the police failed to comply …

Krishna Kumar MishraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Krishna Kumar Mishra, was arrested in connection with a case (Bhore P.S. Case No. 566 of 2025) alleging conspiracy to murder under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in custody since 10 January 2026. The petitioner …

Ranvir Singh Yadav @ Ranbir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Ranvir Singh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was not present at the alleged crime scene where an extortion attempt led to the shooting and death of the informant's son. The petitioner …

Tiger Patel @ Kundan Patel @ Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Tiger Patel applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged in 2017 alleging that he and his brother fired at a person, causing firearm injury, under Sections 307 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner argued that the FIR was initially against unknown persons and that …

Jitendra Kumar Yadav @ JimmiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Yadav, was arrested on 13 May 2025 in connection with FIR No.14‑07‑2024 relating to alleged firing and possession of a pellet, charged under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner argued that his name …

Gautam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Gautam Kumar, sought bail in a case (P.T. No. 3968 of 2025) arising from an Agamkuan police report alleging possession of illegally manufactured firearms and components under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 25(1)(a), 25(1)(b), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution claimed that …

Krishna Kumar Mandal @ Krishna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Krishna Kumar Mandal was arrested in connection with a case (PS‑468/2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and the Arms Act, including alleged firing of a weapon that misfired. The prosecution alleged that a person named Pankaj fired at the informant’s …

Haro @ Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Haro (also known as Ankit Kumar), was charged in Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025 for offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, stemming from an alleged assault and shooting on 07.01.2025. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, a delayed …

Anil Mahto @ Anil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Anil Mahto was arrested on 31 October 2025 in connection with a 2024 FIR alleging that he and co‑accused fired at an informant, causing gunshot injuries, and were charged under Sections 307/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed the FIR was fabricated and pointed out …

Manu Kumar Singh @ Mannu Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Manu Kumar Singh, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, where three country‑made pistols and eight live cartridges were allegedly recovered from his bathan. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that nothing was seized from his …

Manish Ray @ Manish RaiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manish Ray was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes and Section 27 of the Arms Act for alleged indiscriminate firing, ransacking of household articles and damage to a vehicle. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging political …

Jay Prakash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Jay Prakash Yadav applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the BNS and section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that Rupesh Yadav and Govind Yadav fired at the informant's husband and that the petitioner, along with Dabesh Yadav, was …

Manish Yadav @ Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Yadav was arrested in connection with a shooting incident alleged under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substitution Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He filed a bail petition claiming the FIR is false, that he is not specifically named, and that there is no independent witness …

Bharosi RayversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bharosi Ray, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, alleging that the seized weapons and ammunition were recovered from a hut that does not belong to him. The prosecution claimed the weapons were found in his hut and highlighted his …

Krishna Dubey @ Hanuman DubeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Krishna Dubey applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 302, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑b), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner's counsel argued for bail, while the State's counsel and the informant's senior counsel were present. The informant's …

Bambam NishadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bambam Nishad, was implicated in a case involving alleged assault, firing of weapons, and offences under several sections of the Bihar Non-Compulsory Statutes (B.N.S.) and the Arms Act. He claimed the allegations were false, that no one was injured, and that the FIR lacked a clear …

Baijnath ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Baijnath Manjhi was charged with murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting the deceased. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and arguing that the examined witnesses did not support the prosecution's case. The State …

Ashish Raj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Ashish Raj Yadav and Anshu Chandrawanshi, applied for bail in two criminal miscellaneous cases arising from Barun Police Station Case No. 20 of 2025, alleging offences under Sections 103(1), 3(5), and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The …

Baiju Yadav @ Baijnath YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Baiju Yadav, was charged with murder (IPC s.302), criminal conspiracy (IPC s.120B) and illegal possession of a firearm (Arms Act s.27) in the killing of Indal Yadav. The prosecution’s case rests on a recovered pistol and a confessional statement by co‑accused Mithilesh Yadav, who …

Anish Kumar Gupta @ Manish Kumar @ Anish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Anish Kumar Gupta, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 09 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The deceased, before dying, identified the petitioner and co‑accused as the shooters. The …

Rajendra Kumar @ Rajendra Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Rajendra Kumar (also known as Rajendra Kumar Mandal) was charged under Sections 302, 201, 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly killing a victim by firing at her. He has been in custody since 31‑05‑2023 and the trial judge indicated that the …

Anshu Chandrawanshi @ Anshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Ashish Raj Yadav and Anshu Chandrawanshi, applied for bail in two criminal miscellaneous cases arising from Barun Police Station Case No. 20 of 2025, alleging offences under Sections 103(1), 3(5), and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The …