SHABINAABRAHAM & ORS.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS
2015 INSC 52829 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned a show‑cause notice issued under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 for alleged short levy of excise duty by a sole proprietor who died in 1989. The legal heirs challenged the notice, arguing that the Act contains no provision to continue assessment against a dead person’s estate. The Supreme Cou…
SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. & ORS.versusSHREE LAL MEENA
2019 INSC 37226 November 2015Matter referred to larger bench
The employee, Shree Lal Meena, sent a resignation letter on 14 July 1990, which was accepted on 11 January 1991. After the Life Insurance Corporation (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995 were introduced with retrospective effect from 1 November 1993, he claimed pension on the ground that Rule 3 made the Rules applicable to …
MAHABIR INDUSTRIESversusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
2018 INSC 54318 May 2018Appeal(s) allowed
Mahabir Industries, a polythene manufacturer in Himachal Pradesh, claimed tax deductions under Section 80‑IA for two years, then under Section 80‑IB for five years, and after a substantial expansion in AY 2006‑07, under Section 80‑IC. The Assessing Officer allowed the 100% deduction for AY 2006‑07 and 2007‑08 but denie…
BALAJI STEEL RE-ROLLING MILLSversusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS
2014 INSC 102814 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed
Balaji Steel Re‑rolling Mills, a partnership engaged in manufacturing hot re‑rolled products, challenged an order of the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs that fixed its production capacity and duty liability. The matter was remanded by the Appellate Tribunal, but on a later appeal the Tribunal dismissed the a…
PURNIMA MANTHENA AND ANOTHERversusDR. RENUKA DATLA & OTHERS
2015 INSC 7388 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute arose in Biological E. Ltd. after the death of its promoter, when the widow (respondent No.1) and her three daughters were appointed directors. The widow challenged the validity of board meetings held on 9‑4‑2013, 10‑4‑2013 and 11‑4‑2013, the appointment of her daughters as directors and the continuance of …
ARUN KUMAR AGGARWALversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.
2011 INSC 6442 September 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant complained to the Lokayukta that three government officials had caused a loss of Rs.4 crore to the State of Madhya Pradesh by purchasing land at inflated prices. The Lokayukta police investigated, exonerated the officials and filed a closure report under Section 169 of the Cr.P.C. before the Special Judge…