Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

H S BEDI

179 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.

DEHAL SINGHversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2010 INSC 55731 August 2010Dismissed

The police intercepted a car on a highway in Himachal Pradesh and, after a mechanic opened concealed compartments, recovered 27.8 kg of charas. Two 50‑gram samples were sent to the forensic laboratory where they weighed 65.5606 grams, leading the accused to argue that the weight discrepancy undermined the prosecution's

SHINDO ALIAS SAWINDER KAUR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 24731 March 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Balbir Kaur died from severe burns allegedly after her mother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law demanded additional dowry. Two dying declarations were recorded by an ASI and a magistrate, but the trial court rejected them as unreliable because the victim had 100% burn injuries. The High Court, relying on the victim's father's s

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusVISWANADULA CHETTI BABU ETC.

2010 INSC 89530 December 2010Dismissed

The State of Andhra Pradesh appealed against the High Court's decision upholding the conviction of Viswanadula Chettri Babu and others under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The central issue was whether an investigation conducted by an Assistant Sub‑Inspector of Police co

KIRPAL KAUR ANO ANR.versusV.M. SINGH AND ORS.

2007 INSC 88430 August 2007Disposed off

The case arose from two partition suits settled by a family settlement and a decree directing the execution of a General Power of Attorney and payment of amounts. The Supreme Court had earlier ordered that V.M. Singh deposit the balance amount, which he did, but later sought to withdraw his interlocutory application (I

CHANDRA BONIAversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2011 INSC 24030 March 2011Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the appeal of Chandra Sonia, convicted of double murder under IPC s.302 and sentenced to life imprisonment on two counts. The prosecution's case rested on an extra‑judicial confession made by the accused to a neighbor (PW 7) on the day of the murders and on the recovery of the alleged murder

SUBRAMANI @ JEEVA @ KULLAJEEVAversusS.H.O., ODIYANSALAI

2011 INSC 24230 March 2011Dismissed

On 4 November 1991, at a restaurant in Pondicherry, Subramani and six others attacked PW1, his brother Tamilvendhan and friends, stabbing Tamilvendhan to death. PW1 survived with injuries and identified Subramani in a test identification parade. The trial court acquitted all accused, doubting PW1's presence, intoxicati

AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM & ORSversusNAVIN KUMAR SAINI ETC.

2010 INSC 75329 October 2010Case Partly allowed

The respondents were initially appointed as work‑charge helpers in 1979 and later selected as Junior Clerks in 1984 after a limited competitive exam. They claimed that, having performed the duties of Junior Clerks, they were entitled to the Junior Clerk pay scale retroactively from 1979 and from 1 April 1982, invoking

RAGHUBIR SINGHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

2011 INSC 61929 August 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a violent land dispute in which the deceased Girdhari was killed while both parties were ploughing the same field. The trial court convicted seven of nine accused under Sections 302, 307 and related provisions, but the High Court modified the convictions, reducing Kallu's charge to Section 304 Part

DILPESH BALCHANDRA PANCHALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2010 INSC 25329 April 2010Dismissed

The appellant, Dilpesh Balchandra Panchal, was convicted along with two co‑accused for the murder of Indrasinh under IPC s.302 and s.114. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the victim's parents, who witnessed the attack, medical evidence indicating two fatal knife wounds, and the recovery of the murder weapon f

AMARJIT SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 25429 April 2010Appeal(s) allowed

Amarjit Singh and co‑accused were convicted by a trial court for offences under Sections 306 and 498A of the IPC, read with Section 34, and sentenced to imprisonment. They appealed to the Punjab & Haryana High Court, where the single judge dismissed the appeal, stating there was no reason to re‑appreciate the evidence

BAIJ NATH SAHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2010 INSC 25529 April 2010Appeal(s) allowed

Four accused, including Baij Nath Sah, were tried for kidnapping a minor under Sec. 366-A IPC. The trial court convicted them, and the High Court reduced the charge to Sec. 363 and lessened the sentence. On special leave, the Supreme Court examined the sole evidence against Baij Nath Sah—a statement recorded under Sec.

CHANDRAKANT BADDIversusADDL. DIST. MAGISTRATE & POLICE COMMNR. & ORS.

2008 INSC 54829 April 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was detained for one year under Section 3(2) of the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. The Karnataka High Court quashed the detention order on 1 September 2006, releasing him, but later set aside its own order on 30 March 2007 and directed the police to take the appellant back into cu

RANJIT SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 23029 March 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Ranjit Singh was charged with murdering his wife Gurmail Kaur on 1 September 1990, with the prosecution alleging that he, his sisters and his grandmother participated in the killing. The evidence consisted of a post‑mortem report indicating strangulation, an electric wire found near the body, and extra‑judicial confess

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusTARA SINGH

2011 INSC 23129 March 2011Dismissed

Tara Singh was apprehended carrying 8 kg of opium in a gunny bag on his head. He was searched under Section 50 of the NDPS Act, samples were taken and sent to a laboratory, and he was convicted and sentenced to ten years' imprisonment and a fine. The High Court set aside the conviction on two grounds: non‑compliance wi

BRUNDABAN MOHARANA & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF ORISSA

2010 INSC 65328 September 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, the in‑laws of Amani Moharana, were convicted by the trial court for murder based on two dying declarations of the deceased, one recorded by a doctor (PW‑8) and another by a police officer (PW‑9) under Section 161 of the CrPC. The High Court discarded the doctor’s declaration as a Xerox copy but upheld

RAJA GOUNDER & ANR.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2010 INSC 65528 September 2010Dismissed

The appellants, Raja Gounder and others, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of their brother amid a land dispute. The prosecution's case relied on the testimony of the deceased's widow, who was also the sister‑in‑law of the accused, and on medical evidence showing multiple injuries

RAM NIWASversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 44028 July 2010Dismissed

Ram Niwas and four others were tried for the murder of Sher Singh and the attempted murder of Chanda. The trial court convicted Ram Niwas under Sections 302 and 307 of the IPC, acquitting the remaining accused and giving benefit of doubt to two of them. On appeal, the appellant argued that the testimony of two key witn

MAYANDIversusSTATE REP.BY INSP.OF POLICE

2010 INSC 44228 July 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a kitchen employee of a hotel, attacked the managing director with a concealed sickle, inflicting multiple injuries. The victim, a known heart patient who had undergone angioplasty, died the following day; medical evidence attributed death to myocardial infarction and not to the injuries. The trial court

BIRAPPA & ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2010 INSC 44528 July 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved three accused—Birappa (A‑1), Kareppa (A‑2) and Muttappa (A‑3)—charged with the murder of Gulappa. The trial court convicted Birappa based primarily on the testimony of a single eyewitness, PW‑1, the brother of the deceased, while acquitting the other two. On appeal, the High Court upheld Birappa's con

BEERE GOWDAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2010 INSC 44628 July 2010Dismissed

The appellant, Beere Gowda, was charged with murdering his two‑and‑a‑half‑year‑old daughter Pallavi by forcibly administering a mixture of nitric and sulphuric acid, obtained from a goldsmith, while his second wife Indramma was a co‑accused. The Sessions Court acquitted both, holding that the child might have ingested

DEO NARAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 44728 July 2010Appeal(s) allowed

Six persons were tried and convicted for the double murder of Ram Swarup and Ram Pratap Singh under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC. While the appeal was pending, four of the accused died, and the High Court dismissed the appeal of the two survivors, Shiv Singh and Deo Narain. Deo Narain challenged his con

ARUMUGAMversusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2010 INSC 45028 July 2010Dismissed

The appellant, Arumugam, murdered his step‑mother Saroja by strangling her with a rope. He made an extra‑judicial confession first to his step‑sister and shortly thereafter to the Village Administrative Officer, who recorded the statement and handed him over to police. The rope was recovered, and post‑mortem evidence s

RAM SINGHversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS

2011 INSC 34228 April 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a hotel servant, was arrested after 2.1 kg of opium was recovered from a hotel room and he made two confessional statements to officers of the Central Bureau of Narcotics (CBN). The trial court convicted him under Sections 8 and 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, relying on

VIJENDER KUMAR @ VIJAYversusSTATE OF DELHI

2010 INSC 25028 April 2010Dismissed

Vijender Kumar, son of a bus operator, suspected his helper Yogesh of stealing part of the bus fare. After a personal search recovered Rs 100, Kumar became angry, beat Yogesh and then retrieved a knife from a nearby scooter to stab him in the abdomen, causing Yogesh's death. He was convicted under Section 302 IPC for m

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusMANAS KUMAR GUHA

2011 INSC 16428 February 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a constable of the Railway Protection Force, was charged with assaulting and robbing a passenger. An enquiry officer found him guilty and the disciplinary authority ordered his removal from service. The appellate authority set aside the removal, ordered a de novo enquiry, and again found him guilty, sub

AMAR NATH AGARWALLAversusDHILLON TRANSPORT AGENCY

2007 INSC 23528 February 2007Dismissed

The landlord, Amar Nath Agarwala, filed an eviction suit against Dhillon Transport Agency alleging that the tenant had sub-let, assigned or transferred possession of the premises without his consent. The original tenancy was granted to a partnership of four partners which later dissolved; all assets were transferred to

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusM.NARASIMHA RAO

2010 INSC 54827 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Andhra Pradesh appealed the High Court's acquittal of M. Narasimha Rao, who was charged with murder under Section 302 IPC. The prosecution relied on the eyewitness testimony of the victim's son (PW‑1) and wife (PW‑2), corroborated by a detailed post‑mortem report showing multiple fatal injuries. The High C

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusBHASKARENDU DATTA MAJUMDAR

2010 INSC 54927 August 2010Dismissed

Bhaskarendu Datta Majumdar, a senior officer of the State Trading Corporation, was selected by the Public Enterprises Selection Board for promotion to Director (Marketing). Although he obtained clearance from the Central Vigilance Commission and his name was forwarded to the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC),

LOUIS PETER SURINversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2010 INSC 43427 July 2010Appeal(s) allowed

An FIR was lodged in April 1984 under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Indian Penal Code alleging that the appellant, then Managing Director of a district agency, conspired with a Deputy Commissioner to award a contract to a private firm. The State Government denied sanction for prosecution on two occasions (19

DAULAT RAM & ANR.versusCBN MANDSAUR, M.P.

2011 INSC 7527 January 2011Dismissed

The appellants, brothers Daulat Ram and Mangilal, cultivated opium under a licence held by their mother and failed to declare the entire yield to the Lambardar as required by Rule 13 of the NDPS Rules. During a raid, concealed opium was recovered from pits they had dug, and both accused confessed to withholding the opi

ASHOK SURAJLAL ULKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2011 INSC 7627 January 2011Dismissed

The appellant, a school teacher, was convicted under Section 376 of the IPC for raping a 15‑year‑old girl. The FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident, and the medical examination, conducted after three days, did not conclusively prove rape, though it noted a minor finger injury and a missing hymen. The ap

SUKHBIR SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 7827 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a dispute over school land in Punjab where the village sarpanch, Jaswant Singh, was shot dead. The FIR described the killers as two Sikh youths aged 25‑30 wearing kurta pajamas, but no names were given. The two accused, Sukhbir Singh and Dilbagh Singh, were arrested six months later and identified f

STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR.versusA. MANICKAM PILLAI

2010 INSC 6027 January 2010Dismissed

A. Manickam Pillai applied for a freedom fighter's pension in Tamil Nadu. The State Government rejected his application because the co‑prisoner certificate attached was not from an "approved certifier" as required by a Government Order dated 7 February 1996. Pillai filed a writ petition and submitted a second certifica

JUGRAJversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 6227 January 2010Disposed off

Four persons, including Jugraj Singh, were accused of murdering former MLA Bachhitter Singh in December 1996. The trial court convicted all under Sections 302, 34 and related provisions, but the High Court acquitted three co‑accused while upholding Jugraj's conviction, relying on the recovery of a .12‑bore gun and fore

ANJANI CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2010 INSC 73826 October 2010Disposed off

The case involves the murder of Prem Kumar Chaudhary during a family land dispute, where three relatives—Anjani Chaudhary, Bhimsen Chaudhary and Kinkin Chaudhary—were alleged to have attacked the victim with a pistol, lathi, farsa and bhala respectively. The trial court and High Court convicted all three under Section

SANGHARAJ BHOGAPPA KAMBLEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2010 INSC 73926 October 2010Dismissed

On 5 November 1988, the deceased, a neighbour, was persuaded by the accused and his friend to join them for drinks. After consuming alcohol, the accused got into a quarrel with his father, slapped him, and was subsequently rebuked by the deceased who intervened. In a sudden fit of anger, the accused stabbed the decease

MOHD. USMAN MOHD. ISLAM SHAIKH & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2010 INSC 74126 October 2010Dismissed

Four members of a family – the husband, his mother and two sisters – were charged with murdering the husband’s wife, who could not bear children. The prosecution relied on three independent eyewitnesses who testified to a prolonged quarrel and the beating of the victim, as well as medical testimony that the cause of de

NANDYALA VENKATARAMANAversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2010 INSC 74026 October 2010Dismissed

Bhavani married Nandyala Venkataramana in 1992 and was given a dowry of one lakh rupees, but the husband demanded additional items on the wedding night and continued to harass her for further dowry. Despite a Panchayat order for the couple to live separately, the husband, his parents, and brother persisted in making do

JARNAIL SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2009 INSC 107926 August 2009Dismissed

The case arose from a violent dispute over land where the accused forcibly entered a tube well, injured the complainant and migrant labourers, and threw a dead labourer’s body into a canal. The trial court convicted all accused under multiple IPC sections and the Arms Act; the High Court acquitted two co‑accused on the

TAMEEZUDDIN @ TAMMUversusSTATE OF (NCT) OF DELHI

2009 INSC 108026 August 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted under IPC sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) based on the testimony of the prosecutrix and her husband, who alleged that the appellant had raped the woman in a factory and threatened her. Medical examination found no injuries and only semen on the victim's swabs and clothing

BAHADUR SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 33226 April 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Bahadur Singh, was apprehended during a police nakabandi and a bag he was carrying yielded 10 kg of opium. The trial court acquitted him, finding the prosecution story doubtful and noting that a press note about the seizure did not mention him. The High Court reversed, holding that Section 50 of the NDPS

ZAHOOR & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2011 INSC 33326 April 2011Disposed off

The appellants Zahoor, Subrati and Babu were originally convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Allahabad High Court altered the conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304(1) read with Section 34, imposing a fine. On appeal, the Supreme Court held

C.M. SHARMAversusSTATE OF A.P. TH. I.P.

2010 INSC 81525 November 2010Dismissed

The appellant, a Deputy Chief Engineer of South Central Railway, was accused of demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.3,000 from a contractor after passing the contractor's final bill. A pre‑trap operation was conducted by the CBI, during which the contractor, a shadow‑witness, and the CBI inspector observed the appell

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusTHUMMALA ANJANEYULU

2010 INSC 81925 November 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Andhra Pradesh appealed the acquittal of Thummala Anjaneyulu, who was charged with murdering Bhoomaiah during a village Panchayat after being provoked for allegedly ogling women. The trial court had convicted him under Section 302 IPC, but the High Court set him free, doubting the credibility of eyewitness

ABBAS AHMAD CHOUDHARYversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2009 INSC 126225 November 2009Disposed off

On 15 September 1997 three accused—Md. Mizazul Haq, Abbas Ahmad Choudhary and an absconding Ranju Das—kidnapped, gagged and raped a girl aged about 13‑15 years. The trial court convicted both appellants under Sections 376 and 336 of the Indian Penal Code, a decision upheld by the Gauhati High Court. On appeal before th

GURDEEP SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

2011 INSC 61025 August 2011Dismissed

The appellant Gurdeep Singh was convicted under IPC sections 3048 (dowry death) and 498A for allegedly poisoning his wife Rajinder Kaur after a dowry demand. The prosecution alleged that the accused administered poison, that a dowry demand of Rs 25,000 was made shortly before death, and that the body was cremated hasti

OM PRAKASH @ BABAversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2009 INSC 107325 August 2009Appeal(s) allowed

Om Prakash (Baba) was arrested after police raided a house and recovered a large quantity of charas, opium and ganja. He was convicted by the trial court and the conviction was affirmed by the High Court under Sections 8/18, 8/20(B)(ii) and 8/20(B)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. On appe

AMAR BAHADUR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2011 INSC 6925 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was accused of raping his daughter-in-law in the family home on 2 April 1989, an incident allegedly witnessed by several family members and resulting in the victim's bleeding. The trial court convicted him under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to seven years' rigorous imprisonment.

VIKRAM SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 5825 January 2010Disposed off

The appellants Vikram Singh, Jasvir Singh and Sonia were convicted for kidnapping a 16‑year‑old boy, Abhi Verma, for ransom, administering chloroform and pentazocine which caused his death, and for conspiracy under Sections 302, 364A, 201 and 120‑8 IPC. The Supreme Court examined the sufficiency of circumstantial and e

CENTRAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICSversusBAHADUR SINGH

2010 INSC 81324 November 2010Dismissed

The Central Bureau of Narcotics alleged that Bahadur Singh, a servant in a dhaba, was found with a key that opened a locked box containing 17.45 kg of opium. The trial court convicted him under Sections 8 and 18 of the NDPS Act, but the Rajasthan High Court acquitted him, holding that there were no reliable independent

DATTAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2010 INSC 81424 November 2010Dismissed

The appellant was charged under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code for raping a girl aged 10‑12 years. The trial court acquitted him due to lack of medical proof, but the High Court set aside the acquittal, finding the victim’s and her mother’s statements credible and interpreting the medical report as indicating par

BHOLANATIIversusMONIKA (D) THROUGH LRS. ANDANR.

2007 INSC 97124 September 2007Dismissed

The dispute involved a cooperative society that, after an arbitration award in 1981 directing allotment of plot No. 6 to the petitioner, mistakenly executed a sale deed for plot No. 66 in the petitioner's favour. In a separate arbitration, the respondent was awarded any one of plots 66, 91 or 15; with 91 and 15 unavail

SWAPAN KUMAR SENAPATIversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2011 INSC 15724 February 2011Disposed off

The appellant, Swapan Kumar Senapati, assaulted his uncle Satkari Senapati by sitting on his chest and allegedly striking his head with a stone. The victim died three days later from intracranial hemorrhage, with no external injuries found at autopsy. The FIR was lodged three days after the incident, citing Sections 34

TUKARAM & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2011 INSC 16024 February 2011Disposed off

The deceased Prakash was assaulted after a marriage ceremony by members of two rival groups of the Dalit Mukti Sena. He sustained a buttock wound and later developed internal injuries, leading to his death after eighteen days of hospitalization. The trial court convicted the accused of murder (s.302/149 IPC) and other

GURDIAL SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 6424 January 2011Dismissed

The appellants Gurdial Singh, Bakshish Singh and Darshan Singh attempted to divert a village drain towards the house of Buta Singh despite a court injunction. When Buta Singh objected, the appellants, armed with a gandasi and dangs, assaulted him and several witnesses; Buta Singh later died from his injuries. The trial

RAMESHBHAI CHANDUBHAI RATHODversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

2011 INSC 6524 January 2011Disposed off

Rameshbhai Chandubhai Rathod, a 27‑year‑old watchman, was convicted of raping and murdering a ten‑year‑old girl residing in the building where he worked. The trial court sentenced him to death under Section 302 IPC, a decision affirmed by the Gujarat High Court as a "rarest of rare" case. On appeal before a two‑judge S

NATIONAL COMMISSION OF WOMENversusSTATE OF DELHI & ANR.

2010 INSC 42323 July 2010Dismissed

The case arose from the suicide of a 21‑year‑old woman, Sunita, who alleged that the accused, Amit, had exploited her sexually after promising marriage and threatening to expose her. The trial court convicted Amit under IPC s.306 (abetment of suicide) and s.376 (rape), sentencing him to life imprisonment for the latter

PODYAMI SUKADAversusSTATE OF M.P. (NOW CHHATISGARH)

2010 INSC 42523 July 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was accused of killing his mother with a burnt wooden stick. The prosecution relied on an alleged extra‑judicial confession made by the appellant before a village Panchayat, witnessed by four persons, and on the recovery of the alleged weapon at the appellant's request. The trial court and the High Court

KOPPISETTY VENKAT RATNAM (D) THROUGH LRS.versusPAMARTI VENKAYAMMA

2009 INSC 23723 February 2009Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a civil appeal challenging a High Court judgment that set aside the concurrent findings of fact of the trial court and the first appellate court without formulating any substantial question of law, as required by Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (amended 1976). The Court reiterated

RAMESH KUMAR @ TONIversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2009 INSC 58322 April 2009Disposed off

The appellant, while working in his field, struck Rajinder Pal on the head with a spade after a verbal altercation when the victim entered the field. The victim later died, and the trial court convicted the appellant under Section 302 of the IPC, sentencing him to life imprisonment, a decision upheld by the High Court.

RAMJEE PRASAD & ANR.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2009 INSC 58422 April 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, a father and son, were convicted for selling adulterated "Chhena Mithai". The Public Analyst reported adulteration with starch, and the Central Food Laboratory confirmed adulteration but did not specify starch. The trial court and first appellate court convicted them under Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Pre

MAHAVIR JANGONDA PATILversusDIRECTOR OF RESETTLEMENT & ORS.

2009 INSC 58522 April 2009Dismissed

The appellant challenged the Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Displaced Persons Act notifications that declared his village a benefited zone and the subsequent land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act. He argued that a 1979 compromise and partition of his family’s land, which reduced his holdings, should be g

CBIversusMUSTAFA AHMED DOSSA

2011 INSC 15022 February 2011Disposed off

The case concerned the admissibility of evidence recorded in the main trial of the 1993 Bombay blast (BBC No.1/1993) against a co‑accused, Mustafa Ahmed Dossa, who was arrested years later. The Designated Court had held that evidence recorded before Dossa was declared a proclaimed offender could not be used against him

RAMESHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 71721 October 2010Dismissed

The case arose from a violent clash over disputed land in Jind, where several accused, armed with pistols, lathis and other weapons, assembled and attacked a group of persons, resulting in the death of Krishan and injuries to others. The trial court convicted the appellants under Sections 302, 307, 323, 324, 148, 449 I

NIRMAL SINGH PEHLWAN @ NIMMAversusINSPECTOR, CUSTOMS, CUSTOMS HOUSE, PUNJAB

2011 INSC 51321 July 2011

During a joint operation in January 1999, Nirmal Singh was apprehended and offered a choice to be searched before a magistrate or a gazetted officer under Section 50 of the ND PS Act. He chose a gazetted officer, and a search uncovered two kilograms of heroin; he also made a confession to a customs officer under Sectio

FAHIM KHANversusSTATE OF BIHAR NOW JHARKHAND

2011 INSC 32521 April 2011Dismissed

The appellant Fahim Khan and two others were accused of murdering Sagir Hasan Siddique. The trial court acquitted them, but the High Court set aside the acquittal, finding the trial court's judgment perverse and convicting the appellant. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the High Court could interfere with

UDHO DASSversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2010 INSC 22821 April 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the compensation payable for 162.5 acres of land acquired in 1990 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for a housing project in Sonepat, Haryana. The Collector initially awarded Rs 2 lakh per acre, which was later enhanced by the reference court and the High Court using a belting method. The

DANDU JAGGARAJUversusSTATE OF A.P.

2011 INSC 50420 July 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Varalakshmi, an upper‑caste woman, married a Scheduled‑Caste man against her family's wishes. Six years later she disappeared after being lured by her paternal uncle, the appellant, who claimed her grandmother was ill. Her body was later found, showing death by smothering, and jewellery allegedly taken from her was rec

MD. MANNAN @ ABDUL MANNANversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2011 INSC 31920 April 2011Dismissed

The appellant, Md. Mannan, a mason employed in the victim's grandfather's house, sent a seven‑year‑old girl to a betel shop and subsequently abducted her on his bicycle, raping and murdering her. He later confessed, leading police to the body. He was convicted under IPC sections 366, 376, 302 and 201 and sentenced to d

GURMAIL SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 32120 April 2011Appeal(s) allowed

A family dispute arose after the daughter Nindo was teased, leading eight accused to raise a lalkara and attack members of the rival family with knives and lathis. Baljinder Singh received a deep stab wound to the abdomen, a vital organ, and died shortly thereafter; Rajwinder Singh was also injured. The accused were tr

MD. MONIR ALAMversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2009 INSC 125019 November 2009Dismissed

The case arose from a land demarcation dispute in which a fight broke out, leading to the death of lmteyaz Ali. Monir Alam and others were convicted under IPC sections 304(11) and 323, with Alam sentenced to three years. The High Court altered the conviction to include section 149 but upheld the trial court's judgment.

SACHIDANAND THAKURversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2010 INSC 70619 October 2010Dismissed

The appellant, an Indian Army soldier, fired three shots at a member of a Quick Reaction Team during a night security duty after a stone‑throwing incident, killing Naik Jityu Yadav at a distance of 8‑10 feet. Despite being warned by a fellow sentry not to fire, he shot the victim and, when apprehended, said “I did what

GAMINI BALA KOTESWARA RAO & ORS.versusSTATE OF AP. THR. SECRETARY

2009 INSC 105519 August 2009Dismissed

The case arose from a violent incident during the 1995 Mandal elections in Gadiparthivaripalem, where the candidate Soodidela Satyanarayana Reddy was murdered by a group of about twenty accused armed with stones, knives and axes. The trial court acquitted all accused, deeming the two eye‑witnesses (the victim's nephew

PRAHALAD SINGH & ORSversusSTATE OF M.P.

2011 INSC 49919 July 2011Disposed off

On 30 September 1996, five accused ambushed Ganeshram and his companions at a river crossing. Rammilan Lodhi and Babula Lodhi, armed with shotguns, fired, killing Ganeshram and injuring Annilal, while Prahlad, Dullam and Hukum, armed with lathis, only exhorted the shooters. The trial court convicted all under IPC secti

MAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2011 INSC 50019 July 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Man Singh was arrested in 1979 with half a bottle of illicit liquor and equipment for liquor manufacture. He was convicted under Section 60(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Excise Act, 1910 and sentenced to one year of rigorous imprisonment and a fine, a conviction affirmed by the trial, appellate and revisional courts. On appe

IMRAN ALIversusHABIBULLAH AND ANR.

2007 INSC 31119 March 2007Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a High Court bail order that contained an extensive, reasoned discussion essentially declaring the prosecution case meritless. The Court held that while a bail order may include reasons, it must not prejudice the trial by making substantive findings on the merits. Detailed observations that a

AMARJEET SINGH & ORS.versusDEVI RATAN & ORS.

2009 INSC 124418 November 2009Disposed off

The case concerned seniority of Excise Inspectors promoted to Assistant Excise Commissioner (AEC) under two different Departmental Promotion Committees (DPCs). One DPC (19‑Dec‑1998) promoted officers on a merit basis under the pre‑1994 rules, while a second DPC (22‑Jan‑1999) promoted others on a seniority‑subject‑to‑re

AMARJIT SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2009 INSC 124518 November 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a violent incident in July 1998 in which Gurnam Singh was killed and Joginder Singh injured. The accused, including Amarjit Singh and Sher Singh, were convicted of murder under s.302 IPC by the trial court, which accepted the prosecution's version despite doubts about the presence and injuries of a

JAG DISHversusSTATE OF M.P.

2009 INSC 115518 September 2009Dismissed

Jagdish was convicted of murdering his wife and five minor children after his brother and neighbours saw him with a blood‑stained knife and the bodies. The trial court relied on circumstantial evidence, medical post‑mortems and the appellant’s self‑inflicted injuries, and sentenced him to death. On appeal, the Supreme

ASHOK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2009 INSC 115818 September 2009Dismissed

Four accused, including Ashok Singh and Shyam Saran Singh, shot Chhota Singh, who died from a gunshot wound. The trial court convicted all four under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC based on the testimony of the deceased's son (PW3) and an independent witness (PW4), along with forensic evidence of a pellet and two

G. PARSHWANATHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2010 INSC 52518 August 2010Dismissed

The appellant, G. Parshwanath, was convicted for the murder of his wife and minor son and for causing the disappearance of evidence under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC. The prosecution's case rested entirely on circumstantial evidence, including the victims' residence in the appellant's house, a telephone call report

SHIVANNAversusSTATE BY HUNSUR TOWN POLICE

2010 INSC 52618 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a truck driver, was charged with causing death and injuries when his stone‑laden truck overturned on a state highway, leading to convictions under IPC sections 304‑A, 279, 337 and 338. The prosecution relied primarily on the testimony of three injured witnesses who were in the vehicle, alleging that the

RADHEYSHYAM KEJRIWALversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.

2011 INSC 13318 February 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Radheshyam Kejriwal, was investigated by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for alleged violations of Sections 8(2) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA). An adjudication proceeding under Section 51 concluded that the charges were not sustainable and the ED dropped the penalty

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusVISHWESHWAR KOL

2011 INSC 5618 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Vishweshwar K. Kol was accused of pouring kerosene on his second wife and four daughters, resulting in their deaths. The eldest daughter, Jyoti, gave a dying declaration to the police after a doctor certified her fitness to testify. The trial court convicted Kol under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to death based on

STATE NCT OF DELHIversusAJIT SETH @ AJJI

2010 INSC 52017 August 2010Dismissed

The appellant Ajit Seth was convicted for the brutal burning to death of two children, aged three and seven, and sentenced to death under IPC 302 and to ten years' rigorous imprisonment under IPC 364. The High Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment, directing that the appellant not be released until he

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.versusUTTAM VISHNU PAWAR

2008 INSC 6317 January 2008Dismissed

Uttam Vishnu Pawar, a telephone operator in the Maharashtra Irrigation Department, transferred from the Mumbai Zone to the Kolhapur Zone and lost his seniority in the new zone. He filed an application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal seeking that his service in the Mumbai Zone be counted towards the 12‑ye

ABRARversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2010 INSC 88516 December 2010Dismissed

Advocate A was attacked by four armed men on 3 April 1979; he was shot from behind and later died. The prosecution relied on three dying declarations—one forming the FIR, one recorded under Section 161 CrPC by a Sub‑Inspector, and a third recorded by the Tahsildar after a doctor certified the victim fit to speak—while

SUBHASHversusSLATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 88616 December 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Subhash was convicted under Sections 306 and 498A IPC for the death of his wife Anuradha, who suffered severe burns. The prosecution's case relied primarily on a dying declaration recorded by Sub‑Divisional Magistrate Ravi Malik, which alleged that the victim attempted suicide due to dowry harassment. The

HARI SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2010 INSC 88716 December 2010Dismissed

Hari Singh and his brother Mohar Singh, who ran a brick kiln, had a business rivalry with Guiab Singh, the deceased, over nearby kilns. On a moonless night, the brothers entered Guiab Singh's house; Mohar fired a country-made pistol at close range, killing him. The victim's son Prem Pal and two other villagers identifi

SHER SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 89116 December 2010Disposed off

The case involved a violent attack on a farming family in Haryana, resulting in the death of the husband (Urned Singh) and injuries to his wife and son. The accused were charged under Sections 302, 149, 323 and 148 of the IPC. The High Court reduced the murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder (Se

MOHAMMAD MIANversusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 89416 December 2010Dismissed

The case involved a long‑standing enmity between Mohammad Mian and the Husain family, which escalated into a gun‑fire incident resulting in the death of Riyasat Husain and grievous injury to his brother Firasat Husain. The trial court acquitted the accused of murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC, relying on a perceived

STATE OF U.P. & ORS.versusM/S. SWADESHI POLYTEX LTD. & ORS.

2008 INSC 73216 May 2008Dismissed

Swadeshi Polytex Ltd., a sick company unable to pay employee wages, was subjected to attachment and auction of its property under the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The company challenged the sale, arguing that the sale proclamation and auction notice were not served on the actual default

SMT. MOULANA SHAMSHUNNISA & ETC.versusADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS.

2010 INSC 87915 December 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant's son, Nazhar Ahmed, was arrested at Bangalore Airport with undeclared gold jewellery and later granted bail by a Special Court. He was subsequently detained under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA) and the Advisory Board confirmed a one‑year d

STATE OF A. P.versusM. SOHAN BABU & ANR.

2010 INSC 87414 December 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The accused entered a residential house at midnight armed with knives, intending to commit robbery. When confronted by the deceased, a scuffle ensued; A2 stabbed the deceased in the abdomen and a witness, while A1 also stabbed the deceased and threatened other occupants. The deceased died on the way to the hospital. Th

CHHOTELALversusSTATE OF M.P.

2011 INSC 49214 July 2011Dismissed

Chhote Lal was convicted by the Sessions Court under IPC sections 376(2) (rape) and 302 (murder) for the rape and killing of a ten‑year‑old girl and was sentenced to life imprisonment, the judgment clarifying that the term would continue for the remainder of his life. The High Court affirmed the conviction and sentence

SRIVALLA SRINIVASA RAO & ORS.versusSTATE OF A.P.

2011 INSC 49114 July 2011Dismissed

The appellants were convicted of gang rape under Section 376(2g) of the IPC and of voluntarily causing hurt under Section 323, with the trial court sentencing three of them to ten years' rigorous imprisonment. The High Court reduced the rape sentence to seven years and dismissed the appeal. The appellants challenged th

SUDHIR KUMARversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 4214 January 2010Dismissed

The appellant Sudhir Kumar was convicted under Section 304B of the IPC for the dowry death of his wife, Kamlesh Rani, while his mother and other relatives were acquitted. The Supreme Court examined whether the presumption of dowry death under Section 113B of the Evidence Act was rebutted because four of the five accuse

CHANDRAWATIversusRAMJI TIWARI & ANR. ETC.

2010 INSC 4314 January 2010Dismissed

The case arose from a 1997 incident in which Ramji Tiwari, armed with a double‑barrel gun, shot and killed several persons after being urged by co‑accused. The trial court convicted Ramji under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to death, while the other four accused were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 10

BABULAL SAHUversusSTATE OF CHHATISGARH

2011 INSC 29813 April 2011Dismissed

Babulal Sahu was convicted under Section 302 IPC for strangling his wife Basanti Bai after she refused his demand for sexual intercourse. The appellant argued that the killing fell within Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, which would reduce the offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304. The C

VIJAY KUMAR ARORAversusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

2010 INSC 4013 January 2010Dismissed

Vijay Kumar Arora was convicted of murdering his wife, who died from over 90% burn injuries. The prosecution proved that the death was homicidal, not suicidal or accidental, through medical evidence, the victim’s verbal dying declaration before six witnesses, and evidence of physical and mental cruelty and extra‑marita

R.P. TYAGIversusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)

2009 INSC 122912 November 2009Dismissed

In 1987 a police constable was stabbed by Mahender and Ram Kumar. The SHO, R.P. Tyagi, detained the accused's family members and beat them, leading to Mahender's death. Tyagi was initially convicted of murder under IPC s.302 and sentenced to death, but the Delhi High Court modified the conviction to culpable homicide n

GURDEV SINGHversusNARAIN SINGH

2007 INSC 114112 November 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff obtained a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from planting any tree on specified Khasra parcels. The decree holder later filed an application for execution seeking removal of a Bohar tree that stood on the disputed land. The executing court, relying on a commissioner’s report, interpreted the

THE EMPIRE JUTE CO. LTD. & ORS.versusTHE JUTE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. AND ANR.

2007 INSC 107412 October 2007Case Partly allowed

The Empire Jute Co. Ltd. entered into a sale contract for raw jute with the Jute Corporation of India, which was subject to a Production Control Order compelling the mill to purchase jute at a fixed price. The appellant alleged the supplied jute was of inferior quality, refused to purchase, and filed a writ petition ch

M/S. PARAS SHIP BREAKERS LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

2007 INSC 107612 October 2007

Paras Ship Breakers Ltd installed an 8‑metric‑tonne induction furnace but, due to insufficient power supply from the Gujarat State Electricity Board, claimed it had reduced the furnace capacity to 4.5 MT and sought a lower deemed annual production under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act. The department measured the

SWAPAN KUMAR PALversusACHINTYA KUMAR NAYAK AND ORS.

2007 INSC 107712 October 2007Dismissed

The case concerned the grant of a Modified Rationing (MR) dealership in West Bengal. Both Swapan Kumar Pal (appellant) and Achintya Kumar Nayak (first respondent) applied, and the Sub‑Divisional Controller, after applying criteria of financial solvency, possession of a godown and trade proficiency, recommended the firs

MARRIPATI NAGARAJA AND ORS.versusTHE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

2007 INSC 108412 October 2007Disposed off

The appellants applied for the post of Assistant Director of Agriculture under a 1992 APSC notification that did not specify any reservation for women. While the selection process was pending, the Andhra Pradesh Government issued a order on 6 October 1995 granting 30% reservation for women in direct recruitment with re

ANNAKILIversusA. VEDANA YAGAM AND ORS.

2007 INSC 108512 October 2007Dismissed

The respondents bought land from the Corporation of Madras, which was later mistakenly transferred to the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board and allotted to the appellant under a slum‑clearance scheme. The respondents obtained a writ directing the denotification of the area as a slum, but the High Court set aside the dire

RESERVE BANK OF INDIAversusGM, COOPE. BANK DEPOSIT AJC HR. SHA & ORS.

2010 INSC 50512 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The Reserve Bank of India appealed against two orders of the Gujarat High Court that, in a bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC, directed a cooperative bank to repay deposits of poor depositors (those with balances up to Rs 10,000) from funds recovered from accused persons. The bail had been granted to the ex

JABAR SINGHversusSTATE OF M.P.

2010 INSC 50812 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed

Jabar Singh shot Sarnam Singh on 13 November 1984, inflicting a wound that was not fatal. The victim died fourteen days later from peritonitis, which the medical experts attributed to inadequate medical care rather than the gunshot injury. The trial court acquitted the accused due to identification doubts, but the High

GOPAL SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF M.P.

2010 INSC 31512 May 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were charged with murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC, alleged to have killed two men during a land‑dispute. The trial court acquitted them, finding the FIR was delayed, the oral dying declarations unreliable, and the sole eye‑witness's testimony unnatural. The State appealed, and th

KRISHAN SINGHversusEXECUTIVE ENGINEER, HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD, ROHTAK

2010 INSC 14412 March 2010Appeal(s) allowed

Krishan Singh, a daily wager employed by the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board from June 1988, was terminated in December 1993 without notice, violating Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act. He served a demand notice in December 1997, and the dispute was referred to the Labour Court, which held the termi

JABAR SINGHversusDINESH & ANR.

2010 INSC 14512 March 2010Case Allowed

The appellant, father of a murder victim, challenged a High Court order that the accused (Respondent No.1) be tried as a juvenile under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. The accused had filed an application under Section 49 of the Act claiming he was under 18 on the date of the alleged o

DINESH JAISWALversusSTATE OF M. P.

2010 INSC 3412 January 2010Appeal(s) allowed

On 8 July 1987 the prosecutrix alleged that the appellant entered her house, assaulted her with three tangi blows and raped her, after which she snatched the weapon and injured him. Both parties were said to have become unconscious; the husband, son and a relative arrived, and an FIR was lodged. The trial court convict

TAMA @ TAMAL MALversusSTA TE OF WEST BENGAL

2007 INSC 91011 September 2007Dismissed

The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for stabbing the deceased, Alimat alias Aliul Zaman, on 29 September 1990 in Jindighi, Murshidabad. The prosecution relied on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses who saw the appellant stab the victim, while the defence argued that the FIR was lodged after a del

RAKESH CHAND & ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 50311 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed

Neelam Kumari married Anil Kumar in 1998 and later demanded additional dowry amounts, first Rs.20,000 in 2000 and subsequently Rs.50,000 in 2003. The latter demand was made solely by the husband shortly before Neelam's death, and the parents‑in‑law (Rakesh Chand and Pushpa Devi) were accused of involvement under Sectio

STATE OF PUNJABversusRAJINDER SINGH

2009 INSC 104211 August 2009Dismissed

The case concerns the murder of Harinder Kumar, who was shot during a dispute over brick‑kiln ownership. Rajinder Singh was convicted by the trial court under IPC s.302 and the Arms Act s.27, but the Punjab and Haryana High Court acquitted him, relying on a conflict between eyewitness testimony that a shotgun was used

AKLOO AHIRversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2010 INSC 14311 March 2010Dismissed

In 1981, Kishore Bhagat was shot dead after a series of altercations involving several accused. Akaloo Ahir, the appellant, fired a shot that missed the victim, while another co-accused fired the fatal shot. All were charged under Sections 302, 307 and 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The Supreme Court exa

S.K. JHA COMMODREversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER

2011 INSC 2811 January 2011Dismissed

Three Naval Officers were arrested for offences under the Indian Penal Code and were remanded to judicial custody. The Commanding Officer of their naval unit applied to the magistrate for the accused to be handed over for trial under the Navy Act, 1957 (court‑martial). The magistrate rejected the application, holding t

KAMLESHWAR PASWANversusSTATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH

2011 INSC 3211 January 2011Dismissed

Kamleshwar Paswan was convicted for the murder of his two young sons and the attempted murder of a third child after a neighbour witnessed him beating the children with a wooden stick. The trial court sentenced him to death under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, a sentence confirmed by the High Court. On

OSWAL WOOLEN MILLS LTDversusPUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANR.

2008 INSC 4611 January 2008Disposed off

In Oswal Woolen Mills Ltd. v. Punjab State Electricity Board & Anr., the company sought clarification on a prior judgment regarding the commencement date for payment of a surcharge under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948. The issue was whether the surcharge liability arose on 13 May 1992, the date of conversion of sup

KAILASH NATHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2009 INSC 129810 December 2009Dismissed

The case involved a night‑time shooting in which Deep Singh was killed and his wife Chhoti was injured; eight persons were alleged to have participated. The trial court convicted all seven surviving accused under Sections 302, 149 and 307 of the IPC. The Allahabad High Court acquitted four accused who had not caused an

PANNEY @ PRATAP NARAIN SHUKLA & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2009 INSC 12949 December 2009Dismissed

The appellants Panney @ Pratap Narain Shukla and Channey @ Prabhu Narain Shukla were convicted for the murder of Shivdhari, who was killed by a bomb, a pistol shot and a neck cut during a land‑dispute. The trial court sentenced them to death, a decision affirmed by the High Court and upheld on appeal. In the Supreme Co

BISHAN SINGH AND ANR.versusTI-IE STATE

2007 INSC 10189 October 2007Case Partly allowed

The appellants, including Bishan Singh and Govind Ballabh, attacked complainant Harish Bhatt on 30 September 1984, assaulting him with lathis, causing seven injuries (one grievous fracture of the wrist) and extorting Rs 400. The trial court convicted them under Sections 147 and 308/149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) an

DHARAMPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 5939 September 2010Dismissed

The appellants, Dharampal Singh and Major Singh, were arrested when police searched a car they were occupying and recovered 65 kg of opium from the vehicle's dicky. They were charged under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The trial court acquitted them, holding that Section 50 of

RAM NARESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 5959 September 2010Dismissed

In 1978, appellant Ram Naresh shot at Ram Vilas, injuring him; the FIR was lodged the next morning at a police station 9 km away. The trial court and the Allahabad High Court convicted the appellant under Section 307 IPC and sentenced him to five years' rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined wheth

BALWANTBHAI B. PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2009 INSC 11229 September 2009Appeal(s) allowed

On 30 November 1993, three accused—Thakorbhai, Jagdishbhai and Balwantbhai Patel—attacked a group of men in Bharuch, resulting in the death of Sagir Ahmed. Balwantbhai Patel was alleged to have caught hold of Gyasuddin Ansari, enabling Jagdishbhai to inflict a simple injury. All three were convicted under Section 302 I

MAHENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF UTIARANCHAL

2011 INSC 5589 August 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Mahendra Singh, a police constable, shot and killed Janardhan Pathak, a forest gate‑keeper, claiming the incident occurred during a scuffle in which he was attacked. The trial court convicted him of murder under IPC s.302 and sentenced him under the Arms Act; the High Court affirmed. On appeal, the Supreme Court examin

PYLA MUTYALAMMA @ SATYAVATHIversusPYLA SURI DEMUDU & ANR.

2011 INSC 5649 August 2011Case Allowed

The appellant, Pyla Mutyalamma, filed a Section 125 Cr.P.C. application for maintenance against her husband, alleging a valid marriage in 1974 and desertion after 25 years. The trial magistrate found her to be the lawful wife with two surviving children and awarded Rs.500 per month. The husband appealed, claiming a pri

DHARAMVEER AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 1349 March 2010Dismissed

The appellants were convicted for offences under Sections 148, 302/149 and 307/149 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of two persons, based on medical evidence, post‑mortem reports and the testimony of two eye‑witnesses. They appealed to the Supreme Court under Article 136, challenging the conviction on grounds of

UNION OF INDIAversusSHANKAR LAL SONI & ANR.

2009 INSC 12918 December 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court heard appeals by the Union of India and airlines against a Rajasthan High Court order that struck down conditions imposed on senior‑citizen concessions for airline and railway tickets. The petitioners argued that the conditions—such as booking tickets seven days in advance and a mandatory two‑night st

JOGINDER @ JINDIversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2008 INSC 10238 September 2008Disposed off

Joginder was charged with alleged bailable offences and filed a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre‑arrest bail. The High Court ordered his custodial interrogation, treating the petition as valid. The Supreme Court held that Section 438 applies only to non‑bailable offences, making

BHASKAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2011 INSC 5508 August 2011Dismissed

Bhaskar Mishra was charged under Section 307 of the IPC. Anticipating arrest, he filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the CrPC before the Sessions Court, which was dismissed. The Madhya Pradesh High Court later granted anticipatory bail for four weeks and directed him to seek regular bail, but Mi

RAJENDER SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2011 INSC 5518 August 2011

Inspector Kuldip Singh received secret information that the appellant was dealing in opium and sent a Ruqa to the police station, but he neither recorded the information in writing nor forwarded a copy to his superior as required by Section 42 of the NDPS Act. The DSP, Charanjit Singh, was alerted only by a wireless me

NANDIESHA REDDYversusMRS. KAVITHA MAHESH

2011 INSC 4808 July 2011Dismissed

In the 2008 Karnataka Assembly election, the returned candidate Nandiesha Reddy's election was challenged by Kavitha Mahesh, who alleged that her nomination paper, signed by ten electors, was illegally rejected by the Returning Officer. The petitioner filed an election petition and the returned candidate sought to stri

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusV.N. SINGH

2010 INSC 2018 April 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned alleged irregularities in local purchase of goods at the 4th Reserved Petroleum Depot, leading to a series of inquiries and disciplinary proceedings against Lt. Col. V.N. Singh. After a Technical Court of Inquiry and a Staff Court of Inquiry implicated Singh, a General Court Martial (GCM) imposed for

BHOLA SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 1098 February 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Bhola Singh, was a co‑owner of a truck in which police discovered 16 bags of poppy husk. He had given a false residential address at the time of purchasing the vehicle, but there was no evidence that he knew the truck would be used for drug trafficking. He was convicted under Sections 15, 25 and 35 of th

BALASAHEB @ RAMESH LAXMAN DESHMUKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2010 INSC 8547 December 2010Dismissed

The appellant was recorded as a witness under Section 161 of the CrPC in a police case concerning an assault, and later named as an accused in a separate complaint case arising from the same incident. He sought to invoke Article 20(3) of the Constitution to refuse to give testimony in the police case, claiming a blanke

M. SUDAKARversusV. MANOHARAN & ORS.

2010 INSC 8537 December 2010Appeal(s) allowed

M. Sudakar, the President of the Aruppukkottai Nadarkal Uravinmurai Pothu Abiruthi Trust, was debarred by a General Body resolution dated 7 January 2007 from holding any post in the Trust for ten years. He filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to restrain the registration of the resolution.

M/S. GOVIND IMPEX (P) LTD. AND ORS.versusAPPROPRIATE AUTHORITY, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT

2010 INSC 8567 December 2010Dismissed

The appellants leased premises for nine years with a clause allowing the lessee to extend the lease for a further nine years, subject to conditions. The Income Tax Department treated the lease as exceeding twelve years, invoking Chapter XXC of the Income Tax Act and requiring filing of Form 37‑1. The appellants contend

CHATII KONATI RAO & ORS.versusPALLE VENKATA SUBBA RAO

2010 INSC 8607 December 2010Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a civil appeal arising from a suit for recovery of possession of land. The plaintiffs claimed title based on inheritance, while the defendants asserted ownership either through a purported sale or by adverse possession. The High Court, in a Letters Patent appeal, held that a Division Bench ma

LAXMAN RAM MANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2010 INSC 6807 October 2010Dismissed

Vasudha, married to Laxman Ram Mane, drowned in a river about one and a half years after her marriage. The prosecution alleged that the husband, aided by his sisters, harassed her and maintained an illicit relationship with a woman named Pragati, leading to her suicide. The trial court convicted the husband under Secti

NORTHERN MINERAL LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2010 INSC 3657 July 2010Appeal(s) allowed

Northern Mineral Ltd., a manufacturer of insecticides, was served with a report from the Regional Pesticides Testing Laboratory stating that a sample of its product did not meet specifications. The company notified the Insecticide Inspector, within 28 days, of its intention to adduce evidence in controversion of the re

SUBHANKAR BISWASversusSANDEEP META

2011 INSC 2837 April 2011Appeal(s) allowed

A complaint under Section 19 of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 alleged violations of Rules 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 23 of the Packaged Commodities Rules, but failed to identify the individual(s) responsible for the day‑to‑day affairs of the company. The appellant, then Deputy General Manager, and the company

SANTOSH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE THR. CBI

2010 INSC 6796 October 2010Dismissed

The appellant, Santosh Kumar Singh, was accused of raping and murdering Priyadarshini Mattoo. The trial court acquitted him, rejecting the DNA evidence and deeming the circumstantial evidence insufficient. The High Court reversed the acquittal, finding the chain of circumstantial facts – continuous harassment, presence

RATHINAM @ RATHINANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

2009 INSC 11666 October 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved the rape and murder of a mill worker, Chitra, for which Rathinam, the son of the mill owner, was charged under Sections 376, 302 and 201 of the IPC. The trial court acquitted all accused, but the High Court reversed this acquittal based largely on the later statements of two witnesses, PW‑4 and PW‑5,

AVINASH CHAND & ORS.versusAGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEES

2010 INSC 2796 May 2010Dismissed

The appellants, who had been working as auctioneers on a commission basis in the Kaithal Market Committee since 1963‑64, were terminated in 2000 after the Chief Administrator of the Haryana State Agricultural Board reiterated a 1982 directive that auctioneers should not work beyond the age of 60. They challenged the re

UTTAM CHAKRABORTYversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2010 INSC 1986 April 2010Appeal(s) allowed

An eight‑month‑pregnant woman was found dead with severe abdominal injuries and the foetus removed. The husband, Mission Suklabaidhya, and his friend, Uttam Chakraborty, were convicted of murder; the husband received the death penalty and the friend life imprisonment. Both appealed to the Supreme Court, which examined

LAXMICHAND @ BALBUTYAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2011 INSC 166 January 2011Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Laxmichand, was involved in a quarrel with the deceased, Gyaniram Mahajan, who was intoxicated and refused to leave the appellant's house. The appellant dragged the deceased outside and struck him on the head with a spade, causing injuries that led to death after seven days. The appellant made several ex

SURENDERA MISHRAversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2011 INSC 176 January 2011Dismissed

Surendra Mishra was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and for illegal possession of a firearm under Section 27 of the Arms Act after he shot dead Chandrashekhar Choubey. He appealed, claiming that he was of unsound mind at the time of the offence and therefore entitled to the protection of Section 84 IPC. The S

DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE & ANR.versusMOHAMMED NISAR HOLIA

2007 INSC 12265 December 2007Dismissed

The Directorate of Revenue received a fax alleging that a guest in a Mumbai hotel possessed Mandrex tablets and cash. Officers searched the guest's hotel room, seized cash and a fax copy of a consignment note, and recorded the accused's statement under Section 67 of the NDPS Act. The trial court convicted the accused u

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusDONDUSA NAMASA BADDI

2010 INSC 4805 August 2010Dismissed

The appeal arose from a search and seizure conducted on 3 September 1987, where the investigating officer failed to record the information received in writing and did not forward a copy to his immediate superior as required by Section 42(2) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The State argued t

STATE OF U.P.versusSIYA RAM & ANR.

2010 INSC 4825 August 2010Case Partly allowed

The case concerned three accused charged with an offence under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court acquitted one accused and convicted the other two. On appeal, the Allahabad High Court acquitted Siyaram on the ground that his shot did not cause injury and reduced Jiya Lal’s sente

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JINDversusMIS. MANGAT RAM NORATA RAM NARWANA & ANR.

2011 INSC 3555 May 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The Income Tax Officer appealed the acquittal of a partnership firm and its partner, Hem Raj, who were convicted under Sections 276C(i), 277 and 278 of the Income Tax Act for filing false returns. The firm had filed a revised return for AY 1988-89, which the prosecution alleged was signed and verified by Hem Raj, leadi

MUNNAWAR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. ETC.

2010 INSC 2745 May 2010Dismissed

The victim, Fateh Mohammad, was shot by the accused and died five days later from septicemia. Two dying declarations were recorded—one by a police officer and another by an Executive Magistrate, both endorsed by a doctor who certified the victim's lucidity. The trial court convicted the accused under Section 307 IPC bu

S.K. DASGUPTA & ORS.versusVIJAY SINGH SENGAR & ORS.

2010 INSC 2755 May 2010Appeal(s) allowed

Vijay Singh Sengar filed a public interest writ petition alleging that power cuts in Madhya Pradesh were endangering patients in government hospitals and disrupting street lighting. The Madhya Pradesh High Court issued interim orders directing the State Electricity Board to provide round‑the‑clock electricity to hospit

BHARAT AMRATLAL KOTHARI AND ANOTHERversusDOSUKHAN SAMADKHAN SINDHI AND ORS.

2009 INSC 12134 November 2009Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal by animal‑right activist Bharat Kothari against a Gujarat High Court order that quashed an FIR alleging cruelty to nearly 2,000 goats and sheep and simultaneously convicted six livestock owners (respondents) under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, despite them not bein

JAYANTA SILversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2010 INSC 4754 August 2010Dismissed

The appellant, Jayanta Sil, was alleged to have murdered Kandarpa with a sharp cutting weapon while returning from a feast. The prosecution relied on the testimony of six eyewitnesses, including the deceased's wife (PW1) and two other eye‑witnesses (PW5, PW6), as well as corroborative statements from PW2, PW3 and PW11,

MUKESHBHAI GOPALBHAI BAROTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2010 INSC 4774 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a lawyer, was charged with murdering a married Scheduled Caste mid‑wife by setting her on fire after an alleged attempted rape. Three dying declarations were recorded: two (to a magistrate and to police) stated the burns were accidental, while a third (by the husband) alleged homicide. The High Court rej

RUKIA BEGUMversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2011 INSC 2654 April 2011Disposed off

The case involved the murder of Rasheed Sait and his wife, for which eight persons were tried under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 and Section 120‑B of the IPC. The trial court acquitted Rukia Begum and Nasreen, finding that motive, a bucket and a plastic pot did not sufficiently link them to the crime, while c

KILAKKATHA PARAMBATH SASI & ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2011 INSC 1014 February 2011Dismissed

The appellants, members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, were alleged to have formed an unlawful assembly and attacked a Congress worker (PW‑1) and his brother on a bus, resulting in the brother's death. The trial court acquitted all seven accused, but the Kerala High Court reversed the acquittal of four appellants, conv

MOHD. MAQBOOL TANTRAYversusSTATE OF J & K

2010 INSC 784 February 2010Disposed off

Mohd. Maqbool Tantray was one of 18 accused in the abduction and murder of former MLA Mir Mustafa in 1990. After a protracted trial lasting nearly 20 years, only three co‑accused were tried with Tantray; the others were discharged, died, or absconded, and the two co‑accused were acquitted. Tantray was convicted under S

K.H. SHEKARAPPA & OTHERSversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2009 INSC 12823 December 2009Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the case of seven police constables and one additional constable (appellants) accused of beating five suspects in police custody, resulting in two deaths and injuries to three others. The prosecution presented ocular testimony, extensive medical evidence, and the testimony of a hostile witnes

STATE OF U.P.versusKRISHNA MASTER & ORS.

2010 INSC 4713 August 2010Disposed off

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against the Allahabad High Court’s acquittal of Krishna Master and two others for the homicide of six persons. The trial court had convicted them under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and imposed death sentences, which the High Court set aside. The Supreme Court examined the reliabili

HARI SINGHversusSTATE OF M. P.

2010 INSC 4733 August 2010Dismissed

Hari Singh was convicted for the murder of Ashok Kumar on 22 May 1989, based on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses who saw the shooting at a village well. The FIR was lodged within two hours of the incident. The appellant challenged the conviction on grounds of the long lapse (8‑9 years) before the witnesses were recor

BHAIYAMIYAN @ JARDAR KHAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2011 INSC 3493 May 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The accused were charged with gang rape under IPC s.376(2)(g) after the prosecutrix alleged that she was assaulted on 30 August 1984. The FIR was lodged 60 hours later at a police station 22 km from the crime scene, and the victim insisted on a medical examination at a hospital 55 km away, where no injuries were found.

NACHHATTAR SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 953 February 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Balbir Kaur, a married woman, was found dead from poisoning. The prosecution alleged that her husband and parents-in-law demanded dowry and subjected her to cruelty, leading to her suicide. The trial court convicted the parents-in-law under Section 3048 (dowry death); the High Court acquitted them of that charge but co

JAGAT SINGHversusSTATE OF H. P.

2011 INSC 13 January 2011Case Partly allowed

Jagat Singh (A‑1) and three others were involved in a land‑dispute altercation that escalated into a free fight during which the deceased, Bachittar Singh, was stabbed and later died. The trial court acquitted all accused, but the High Court convicted A‑1 under Sections 302 and 307 IPC read with Section 34, sentencing

RANBIR SINGHversusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

2011 INSC 43 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a daily‑wage workman, was terminated in 1999 after being implicated in a criminal case, later acquitted, and filed an industrial dispute alleging violation of Section 25(f) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court ordered his reinstatement with 50% back wages. The State of Haryana filed a w

NEELAM BAHAL & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2009 INSC 12712 December 2009Disposed off

The dispute arose when a servant, Shanichar, left Satish Chandra's tea shop over wage issues and joined Rakesh Bahal. This led to a heated altercation during which Rakesh Bahal, armed with a knife, inflicted injuries on Satish Chandra. Rakesh, his mother Raj Bahal and sister Neelam Bahal were convicted by the trial cou

PREM SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2011 INSC 6462 September 2011Matter referred to larger bench

The victim Siri Krishan was shot during a morning walk; the prosecution relied on the brother's report, two alleged eye‑witnesses (PW‑11 and PW‑12), and a widow's statement linking a property dispute to the accused. The appellant Prem Singh and co‑accused were arrested, but the appellant refused to take part in a test

RAVINDRA TUKARAM HIWALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2010 INSC 4632 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Ravindra Tukaram Hiwale, was convicted for abetment of suicide under IPC s.306 and cruelty under s.498‑A after his wife Alka died by self‑immolation following a domestic quarrel. The trial court sentenced him to four years for s.306 and one year for s.498‑A. The State appealed, and the High Court enhance

SATYAVIR SINGH RATHIversusSTATE THR. C.B.I

2011 INSC 3472 May 2011Dismissed

In 1997 a police party, led by ACP Satyavir Singh Rathi, mistakenly identified two civilians as a notorious criminal and opened fire on their car, killing both occupants and grievously injuring a third. The father of one victim filed a complaint, leading to a CBI investigation and the conviction of ten police officials

U.P. STATE TEXTILE CORPN. LTD.versusSURESH KUMAR

2011 INSC 902 February 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, U.P. State Textile Corporation Ltd., a defunct organization, had appointed the respondent, Suresh Kumar, as Deputy Manager (Export) for a fixed tenure of three years starting 7 September 1987, with a clause allowing termination on three months' notice without cause. The respondent was terminated on 26 Ap

SUKHDEEP SINGH @ DEEP SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2009 INSC 12671 December 2009Dismissed

The appellant Sukhdeep Singh was charged with murder under IPC s.302 for allegedly firing at his rival, Karam Singh, resulting in death. The trial court acquitted him, holding that the eyewitness testimony conflicted with the medical report and that the recovered .303 cartridge could not have been fired from the accuse

AJITSINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 6291 September 2011Matter referred to larger bench

Ajit Singh, the appellant, assaulted Laxmi Devi after a quarrel over her cutting fodder in his field, ordering his servant to fetch a spade and then striking her twice on the neck, causing grievous injuries from which she died after four days. The trial court convicted him under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to lif

ZOLBAversusKESHAO AND ORS.

2008 INSC 4401 April 2008Case Allowed

The appellant, a defendant in a partition suit, failed to file his written statement within the 30‑day period and beyond the 90‑day limit prescribed by Order 8 Rule 1 of the CPC because his counsel advised him to wait for the outcome of a pending appeal and the case files were not available. Both the trial court and th

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search