Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Arms Act

4780 judgments · newest first · showing 2601–2800

Manoj Kumar @ Monaj Rai @ Monaj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manoj Kumar was arrested in connection with an alleged altercation at Mamta Food Plaza where, after a dispute over cold drinks, he and others allegedly fired a weapon causing damage to property. He was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The …

Brajmohan Kumar @ Brij Mohan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Brajmohan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS 297/2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a mob that obstructed a pillar fixing, incited violence, and …

Ganesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ganesh Rai was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a pistol was recovered from a motorcycle near Barharwa village. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that no weapon was found in his personal possession and …

Vimal Ray @ Bimal Kumar @ Bimal Ray @ Vimal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Vimal Ray, was charged under Sections 316(2), 318(3), 3(5), 109, 352 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing a pistol at an informant during a land‑related dispute. The prosecution alleged that after a land sale, the informant discovered the land …

Rishu Kumar @ Chotu @ Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rishu Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a railway case (GRP Rail Barh P.S. Case No. 05 of 2025) involving alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the Arms Act and the Railway Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner …

Bharat YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bharat Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a 2023 arms case involving illegal manufacturing of country-made firearms. The prosecution’s case was based primarily on a confessional statement by co-accused Vijay Bind, with no …

Rana YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners—Rana Yadav, Nitish Kumar and Suraj Yadav—were arrested in connection with a Kasim Bazar police case alleging assault with lathi, robbery of Rs.5,000 and possession of a firearm, invoking several sections of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They contended that the case was …

Nesar Ahmad @ Md. Nesar AhmadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Nesar Ahmad, was arrested in connection with a firing incident arising from a land dispute, for which he was charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others were involved in the incident, which resulted in injuries …

Shivam Kumar @ Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shivam Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 25(1-AA), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, where two co‑accused were found in possession of illegal firearms and alleged that they had purchased the arms from the petitioner. The petitioner contended that he was …

Munna Prasad @ Munna Kumar Gupta @ Raja BabuversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Munna Prasad, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a Siwan case involving alleged offences under sections of the B.N.S., the Arms Act and the NDPS Act. The prosecution’s case is based on a co‑accused, Jitendra Mishra, who was found with a loaded pistol, …

Omprakash Yadav @ Tanik Yadav @ Omprakash @ TanikversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Omprakash Yadav, was named among 63 accused in a violent incident involving the burning of vehicles and assault on workers during a railway bridge construction, alleged under multiple IPC sections, the Arms Act and a U.P. Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and …

Bablu Kumar @ Babu @ BossversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Avinash Kumar and Bablu Kumar, sought bail in a case registered as Ranitalab P.S. Case No. 277 of 2025, which involved offences under IPC Sections 103(1) and 61(2) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the victims were shot and that the petitioners were …

Avinash Kumar @ ShaluversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Avinash Kumar and Bablu Kumar, sought bail in a case registered as Ranitalab P.S. Case No. 277 of 2025, which involved offences under IPC Sections 103(1) and 61(2) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the victims were shot and that the petitioners were …

Pankaj Kumar Yadav @ Pankaj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Yadav, sought regular bail for offences including murder, attempt to murder, and illegal possession of arms, for which he has been in custody since November 2023. The prosecution alleged that he ordered the shooting of the informant’s brother, a material witness, and …

Sunny Paswan @ Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Sunny Paswan was arrested in connection with a case where he and others allegedly fired upon an informant's husband, resulting in death. The FIR charges him under sections 302, 307, 120B, 379, 504, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, with specific allegation that he fired at the victim's …

Rajeev Ranjan Singh @ Bacchan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Rajeev Ranjan Singh was charged under IPC sections 324, 302, 120(B) and Arms Act section 27 for a serious offence. He has been in judicial custody since 5 January 2024 and earlier bail applications were rejected. This is his second bail petition; the trial is at the prosecution‑evidence …

Puttu Singh @ Ranjit Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Puttu Singh, was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in judicial custody since 21 January 2020 and this was his fourth application for regular bail. The petitioner’s counsel argued …

Surya PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Surya Prakash, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Harnaut Case No. 10 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 302, 120B, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He was not named in the FIR, but his name appeared in the confessional statement of co‑accused …

Sonu Kumar @ Avinash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a FIR (Gaya Rail P.S. Case No.28 of 2025) for alleged firing at a victim, charged under Sections 109, 118, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he is innocent, the informant later admitted the FIR was based on hearsay, and …

Ranjan Yadav @ Niranjan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ranjan Yadav, was arrested in connection with the murder of a school teacher, alleged to have been shot by a group that included the petitioner. He faces charges under Sections 103, 3(5) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner …

Rajesh Kumar @ Nakat Gop @ Nakat Rai @ Rajesh GopversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 307, 34, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. This was his third attempt to obtain bail, having previously filed a bail petition (Cr. Misc No. 88602 of 2024) which was rejected on …

Sanjay Dubey @ Sanjay Kumar DubeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Dubey, was charged under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He had earlier applied for regular bail (Cr. Misc No. 34084 of 2025) which was rejected on 6-8-2025. He filed a second bail application (Cr. Misc No. 80709 …

Awinash Kumar @ Avinash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Avinash Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Arms Act, alleging that he was not named in the FIR but was later implicated through witness statements that he, as a clerk, allegedly manipulated and …

Tuntun YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Tuntun Yadav, sought regular bail in a case involving multiple serious offences under the B.N.S. and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that Yadav and two others assaulted the informant's son with a knife, causing grievous injuries, and that one co-accused was seized with a …

Jaleshwar Prasad Singh @ Jaleshwar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered an application for anticipatory bail filed by Jaleshwar Prasad Singh, a 76‑year‑old accused in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Security Act, 2023 and the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and that the FIR …

Arnav Shaurya @ RaviversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Arnav Shaurya, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 77 2020) involving offences under Sections 302, 324, 120(B), 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with another accused, shot the informant’s son over …

Raju Kumar Mahto @ Raju Kumar @ RajeevversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raju Kumar Mahto, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Kotwali P.S. Case No. 351 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 302, 34, 120(B) of the IPC and several provisions of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged his participation in the shooting of the informant's …

VIVEK DUAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused Vivek Dua, who was charged under Sections 3(5), 109(1), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 and 30 of the Arms Act. The …

Raja @ Subhash Kumar Choudhary @ Subash Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court heard bail applications of two accused, Raja Subhash Kumar Choudhary and Omkar Kumar Rajak, who were charged under Sections 25(1‑B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly snatching a mobile phone, cash and a Toto vehicle at point of weapons. The FIR originally named unknown …

Bittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Bittu Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Ranitalab Case No. 277 of 2025) alleged under IPC sections 103(1) and 61(2) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case is based mainly on the informant’s testimony and confessional statements of co‑accused, which allege that …

Raju RaiversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Raju Rai, was charged under Sections 109(1), 3(5), 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at the son of an informant, causing a grievous injury to the lower back. The informant also alleged that a co‑accused, Amrendra Rai, assaulted him with the butt …

Anuj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Anuj Kumar, accused of firing a bullet that injured and later caused the death of an informant's husband, is in judicial custody for offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated and sought regular bail, having previously been …

Pradeep KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pradeep Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 310(4), 310(5), 111(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that while co‑accused were found with a loaded pistol, a knife was …

Monu Singh @ Monu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Monu Singh, accused under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act for assaulting an informant and his daughter and demanding extortion, applied for bail after being in custody since September 2025. The petitioner argued that the informant was linked to a rival criminal …

Gulshan Kumar @ Gulchan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Gulshan Kumar was arrested in Barahat Police Station case No.313 of 2025 for alleged possession of three live cartridges and a loaded musket, offences punishable under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing out the absence of an independent …

Srikant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Srikant Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Athmalgola P.S. Case No.173 of 2025) involving alleged ransom demand, assault, and offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. He contended that the allegations were vague, that co‑accused Nitish Kumar and Satish …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Nitish Kumar was arrested in connection with offences under several sections of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act and has been in custody since 18 January 2025 without the trial commencing. He filed a second regular bail petition, arguing prolonged detention and lack of charge framing as …

Omkar Kumar Rajak @ Omkar Kumar @ Rajak @ KaliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court heard bail applications of two accused, Raja Subhash Kumar Choudhary and Omkar Kumar Rajak, who were charged under Sections 25(1‑B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly snatching a mobile phone, cash and a Toto vehicle at point of weapons. The FIR originally named unknown …

Rahul Kumar Sinha @ Ajit SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Sinha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Fatuha PS No.768/2025) involving offences under Sections 109, 308(5) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a bus carrying logistic department employees was attacked by …

Sudam Bhuiyan @ Sudama Bhuiyan @ Devkumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sudam Bhuiyan, was charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for a murder that occurred in 2002. He had been in custody since December 2024 and his earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner’s counsel argued that he was falsely …

Goodu Kumar @ Bhim Kumar Mahto @ Sanjeev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Goodu Kumar, was charged under Sections 310(2) and 317(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for alleged dacoity and looting a bullet‑motorcycle. He has been in custody since 14 May 2025 and has six prior criminal antecedents. The …

Pritam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Pritam Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under IPC Section 412 and Arms Act Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26, alleging recovery of seven cartridges. He has been in custody since 27 June 2024 and faces nineteen additional cases, with the prosecution highlighting his …

Dheeraj Kumar @ Dhiraj Jaiswal @ Dheeraj Kumar JaisawalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 399, 402 and 414 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 for alleged involvement in a robbery‑arms case. The prosecution’s case relied solely on the statement of a co‑accused; no incriminating article was recovered from the …

Rakesh Kumar @ RokiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rakesh Kumar was arrested in May 2023 for alleged murder under Sections 302, 120(B) and 34 of the IPC and for offences under the Arms Act. He remained in custody for over two years, during which the trial progressed slowly; only two of seventeen witnesses had been examined and none for the last six …

Kamlesh Kumar @ KashyapversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Petitioner Kamlesh Kumar, accused of loot and other offences under Sections 309(4), 309(6), 317(5) of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, applied for regular bail. The application was his second attempt after a prior …

Mahendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mahendra Rai petitioned for regular bail in a case registered under sections 103(1), 61(2), 325 and 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act, relating to a shooting incident that led to the death of an informant's husband and the subsequent murder of the informant's daughter. The prosecution …

Sanjeev Paswan @ Dara Paswan @ DaraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjeev Paswan, was arrested in connection with a 2015 case under Sections 302/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act and has been in custody since 27 October 2023. He filed a second bail petition after the first was rejected, arguing that the trial has been unduly delayed, …

Shankar Rai @ Shankar Singh @ Sankar Ray @ Sankar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shankar Rai, also known by several aliases, was arrested in connection with a case involving the theft of two motorcycles and five live cartridges, alleged to have been recovered from his residence. He was charged under section 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 …

Shailendra Yadav @ KaruversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shailendra Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case under sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act after a country‑made pistol and a live cartridge were allegedly recovered from his house. He applied for regular bail, claiming that no incriminating article was actually found …

Md. AzadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md Azad, was arrested in connection with a robbery and assault involving firearms, alleged to have occurred on 12 August 2025. He is charged under Sections 309(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was not named in the FIR; …

Gudiya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Gudiya Devi, the wife of alleged arms dealer Upendra Singh, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 25(1-AA), 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a police raid uncovered a country‑made carbine from the husband and, based on the wife's disclosure …

Vijay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vijay Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. An earlier bail order dated 10 May 2023 had been granted subject to the framing of charge, but the bail bond was later cancelled …

Abhishek Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Mahto, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving alleged possession of brown sugar, a firearm, and ammunition, along with charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Arms Act and NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that during a police patrol …

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul @ Raushan Kumar @ Raushan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was charged under sections 310(4), 310(5), 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Police raided a location based on intelligence and recovered only a mobile phone from the petitioner, while other material was …

Baso Mandal @ Basu MandalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Baso Mandal, was charged with multiple offences including murder attempt, assault, robbery and violations of the Arms Act, as well as offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The Special Judge had rejected his application for …

Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Yadav sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Roshanganj PS Case No.100 of 2022) involving offences under IPC sections 427 and 307 and Arms Act section 27, where two motorcyclists allegedly set a JCB on fire and shot a helper during bridge construction. The petitioner was not named in the FIR …

Md. JavedversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Md. Javed, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged manufacture and sale of country‑made pistols under several provisions of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that during a police raid, seized individuals implicated Javed in the illegal activity, …

Shambhu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shambhu Yadav petitioned the Patna High Court seeking bail in a 2003 case (Sections 302, 34 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act) alleging his involvement in a murder. He argued that the police investigation found no incriminating evidence, as reflected in the original charge‑sheet (14‑09‑2003) and a …

Chandrahash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Chandrahash Yadav was charged under Sections 302, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting dead the cousin of an informant and injuring the informant. The petitioner, who has been in judicial custody since 23 May 2023, sought regular bail for the third …

Ashok TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ashok Tiwari was arrested in a case involving alleged possession of a country‑made pistol, a live cartridge, and alleged narcotics offences under the NDPS Act, BNSS and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that he was part of a group of five‑six persons who attempted to flee from police and were …

Murari Singh @ Krishna Murari Singh @ Krishna MurariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Murari Singh appealed against the Special Judge’s order rejecting his anticipatory bail under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The prosecution alleged that Singh, along with co‑accused, assaulted and attempted to outrage the modesty of …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Kundan Kumar was arrested in a case under Sections 25(1‑B)a and 26 of the Arms Act for allegedly possessing a country‑made pistol, live cartridges and mobiles seized at a litchi orchard. The petitioner claimed he was a laborer and caretaker of the orchard, falsely implicated due to village politics, …

Avinash Kumar @ Avnish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Avinash Kumar, a 19‑year‑old, was arrested after a robbery in which Rs.31,500 was taken and a country‑made pistol with live cartridges was recovered from his person. He was charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments (B.N.S.) Act and the Arms Act. The petitioner pleaded …

Prakash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Prakash Yadav, was named in an FIR of 2004 alleging offences under IPC sections 399 and 402 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35. The prosecution alleged that a raid recovered weapons and that the petitioner was among five accused who escaped, remaining a fugitive for 21 years …

Niraj Rai @ Neeraj RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Niraj Rai was arrested in November 2022 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He filed a fourth bail application, claiming no criminal antecedent and that the trial was unlikely to conclude soon. The State opposed …

Shubham Kumar @ Chadha @ Shubham ChaddaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Shubham Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder that occurred on 12 July 2024, alleged under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR named unknown miscreants, but two co‑accused, Vivek Kumar and Rohit Kumar, gave …

Ashique @ Md. AshiqueversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ashique, sought bail in a case under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act where a pistol and live cartridge were recovered from co‑accused. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that no arms were found in his possession and that the only link to him was a confessional …

Arvind Yadav @ Aravind YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Arvind Yadav, Sambhu Yadav and Ramashish Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Mehus P.S. Case No. 54 of 2025) alleging assault and firing of a pistol under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the …

Firoz Ansari @ SaddmversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Firoz Ansari was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 111, 62, 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, alleged to have paid Rs.1,000 online for a contract killing of his father. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on police information and …

Madhurendra Singh @ Funnu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Madhurendra Singh was charged under Sections 329(4), 109, 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act for allegedly threatening an informant with a gun and for possession of two pistols and eight cartridges. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging …

Ranjit Yadav @ Ranjit Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Ranjit Yadav, was arrested in connection with a shooting in which he allegedly handed a pistol to co‑accused Sonu Manjhi and urged him to fire at the deceased. He faced charges under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 3(5)) and Section 27 of the …

Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery at Punjab National Bank where cash was stolen and pistols were brandished, leading to charges under Section 309(6) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating no …

Md. JalaluddinversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Jalaluddin, was arrested on charges under Sections 109 and 309(6) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in custody since 4 August 2024 and has five prior criminal antecedents. The trial is ongoing with only two of five witnesses examined, and the …

Vivek Kumar @ BhakoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Vivek Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery and murder at a bank's customer service centre, where three armed assailants looted cash and shot the informant and his husband, the latter dying from injuries. The petitioner claims innocence, asserting that only a co‑accused's …

Tulsi Yadav @ Tulsi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Tulsi Yadav, fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 25, 7, 27 of the Arms Act and Section 66(c) of the Income Tax Act, sought anticipatory bail. The prosecution alleged that a viral video showed him brandishing and firing illegal firearms at a family ceremony, and his name was identified …

Purushttom KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Purushttom Kumar, was charged under sections 103(1), 308(2), 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and section 27(3) of the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting a deceased person. He applied for regular bail for the second time, having been in custody since October 2024. The trial had progressed …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Goradih P.S. Case No. 248 of 2025) under Sections 25, 7 and 27 of the Arms Act and Section 66(c) of the Information Technology Act for allegedly brandishing and firing illegal firearms in a viral video. The …

Lalbabu @ Mohammad Lalbabu @ Md. LalbabuversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Lalbabu, was charged with murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and unlawful possession of arms under Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail after his statement was recorded under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The High Court noted …

Tanveer Mansoor @ Tanbeer MansurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Tanveer Mansoor sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, where a pistol and cartridge were recovered from co‑accused Arbaj Ansari. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner fled the scene, while the petitioner contended that …

Md. Arsi @ Md. AarshiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Md. Arsi, was charged under Sections 394 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly attempting to snatch Rs. 10 lakh and an Apple tablet, and for shooting the informant in the leg during the robbery. He applied for regular bail, which was previously …

Sanni Kumar @ Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanni Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 25, 7, 27 of the Arms Act and Section 66(c) of the I.T. Act, based on a viral video showing illegal firearms. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, brandished and …

Jaymanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Jaymanti Devi, the petitioner, feared arrest in connection with a 2019 case (Case No. 119) involving alleged murder under Sections 302/34 of the IPC, possession of arms under Section 27 of the Arms Act, and offences under Sections 17, 18, 20, 23 of the Uttar Pradesh Act. The prosecution alleged she …

ANKIT KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ankit Kumar was arrested in connection with a raid that uncovered large quantities of heroin and live cartridges, leading to charges under multiple sections of the NDPS Act and the Arms Act. The petitioner contended that he had no conscious possession of any contraband, had no prior criminal record, …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged firing on an informant and a demand for a Rs 1 crore ransom, charged under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and several provisions of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case is based on the …

Ashok RajakversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ashok Rajak and Gareeb Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged assault, firearm discharge, and robbery under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused, including co‑accused …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a pistol and live cartridge were recovered from a motorcycle. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of any incriminating material in his possession, and that his …

Parshuram Singh @ HauwaversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Parshuram Singh and Dhiraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with co‑accused, attacked an informant’s house, with one …

Vikesh Kumar @ Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vikesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Arms Act after police recovered a pistol, a live cartridge and a mobile phone during a search. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that no incriminating items …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged possession of 220.05 liters of liquor, a pistol, magazines and live cartridges, alleged under Sections 25(1‑b), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner …

Sanni Kumar @ Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Sanni Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 307 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging involvement in a loot and shooting incident. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence despite being named in the FIR and …

Abhishek Kumar @ Kumar AbhishekversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Abhishek Kumar was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute‑related shooting that injured Dhiraj Kumar and Rakesh Kumar. The prosecution alleged that Kumar fired the gun, invoking multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable… (B.N.S.) and Sections 27 and 30 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed …

Shamsher Reza @ Shamsher Alam @ Shamser AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Shamsher Reza, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Jokihat P.S. Case No.269 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Section 309(4) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that on 13‑08‑2025 two …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Guddu Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Sonbarsa Case No.146 of 2025) where the husband of an informant was killed. The FIR named nine accused but did not mention Kumar; only a later re‑statement of the informant alleged his presence at the scene, without any overt act. Kumar, …

Munna YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Munna Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR (Brahampur PS Case No.181 of 2025) alleging possession of 147.78 litres of a substance and involvement in an attack on police personnel. The FIR named 35 accused, including the petitioner, under sections …

Chandrahas Paswan @ Shankar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandrahas Paswan, was arrested in connection with the murder of an informant's son and charged under Sections 103(1), 3(5), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner participated in the killing, while the defence contended …

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Paswan, sought bail for offences under Sections 103(1) and 61(2)(a) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act, arising from a shooting incident on 20‑08‑2024 that resulted in the death of Pankaj Ray. The FIR named other assailants, and the …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Biha

BAIL GRANTED

Amit Kumar was arrested in April 2024 for alleged offences under the IPC, Arms Act and NDPS Act, with the police claiming seizure of 30 grams of narcotics, a knife, illegal arms and mobiles. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that no contraband was found in his conscious …

Om Prakash SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Singh, sought regular bail in a case involving alleged conspiracy, extortion, and attempts to murder under IPC sections 120(b), 385, 387 and 307, as well as violations of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a group of five men opened fire on a bus, injuring the …

Harendra NoniyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Harendra Noniya petitioned for bail in a criminal case involving alleged possession of 147.78 litres of illicit liquor, four cartridges, and participation in an attack on police personnel. The charges were under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 109, 132 and 324(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, …

Shiv Ratan Chauhan @ Shiv Jatan ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Shiv Ratan Chauhan, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several IPC provisions for allegedly assaulting an informant's son with an iron rod, firing a weapon, and using caste-based slurs on 13 October 2024. He applied for …

Bipul kumar @ Vipul Kumar @ Bipin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bipul Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Chakia Case No. 301/2023) alleged under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He had been in custody since 30 October 2023 and his earlier bail application was rejected on the …

Kamlesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Kamlesh Yadav, filed an application seeking cancellation of the bail granted to respondents Arjun Yadav and Ram Lal Yadav in a criminal miscellaneous case. The bail had been ordered by the Patna High Court on 6 March 2025 for offences alleged under several sections of the B.N.S. and …

JYOTI SINGH YADAV @ JYOTI SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, JYOTI SINGH YADAV, was charged under IPC sections 323 and 376D, the POCSO Act sections 4 and 8, the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(C)(r)(s), and Arms Act section 27. The appellant sought anticipatory bail against the order of the Additional District and Session Judge …

Mahesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mahesh Yadav, aged over 62 and HIV‑positive, was charged under IPC sections 302 and 34 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at an informant’s husband, resulting in death. He sought bail, citing his serious medical condition, old age, and the fact that he had previously been granted …

AMIT YADAV @ AMIT KUMAR YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Amit Yadav was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302, 506) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, marking his fifth attempt to obtain it. The petitioner’s counsel argued for release, but the court noted that the matter had already …

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was not named in the FIR and that his name only appeared in a confessional statement of co‑accused Deepak @ Bhogi. He …

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Mukesh Kumar (Mukesh Yadav) was charged under IPC sections 302, 326, 307, 120B, 34 and Arms Act section 27 for allegedly firing indiscriminately at the father and brother of an informant, resulting in the father's death. The petitioner sought regular bail, arguing that other co‑accused had been …

Raunak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Raunak Kumar, was arrested in connection with alleged extortion and unlawful possession of arms under IPC Sections 385, 387 and Arms Act Section 27. He claimed the allegations were false, arguing that the ransom demand was made by an unknown person and that the mobile number used …

Amit Kumar Yadav @ Baba @ Amit Kumar @ Amit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar Yadav, was charged under IPC Sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 34 (common intention) and Section 27 of the Arms Act for alleged firing at an injured person. He has ten prior criminal cases and his earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner argued that a …

D. P. Yadav @ Devendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

D.P. Yadav was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (147, 148, 149, 323, 376, 511, 379, 302, 120B) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, having previously been denied twice. The court had earlier directed him to file a supplementary affidavit proving he was …

Abhay PanjiyaraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Abhay Panjiyara, was arrested in connection with a 2016 case involving alleged shootings that resulted in one death and injuries to another. He faces charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 307, the Arms Act (Sec. 27) and the Explosive Substances Act (Secs. 3 and 4). The …

Om Prakash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Yadav, was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act, including murder and assault. He had previously filed two anticipatory bail applications which were withdrawn, and was in custody since April …

Ajit Pandit @ Ajit BhartiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ajit Pandit, applied for bail in a case involving multiple offences under the Arms Act, specifically Sections 25(A), 25(1A), 25(1AA), 25(1B), 25AB, 26(1)(2) and 35. This was his third attempt to obtain bail. The Court examined the earlier order dated 25‑10‑2024, which had already …

VIMAL KUMAR @ BHUTU SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vimal Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging that he fired a double‑barrel gun at an informant, invoking Sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant escaped unharmed and later stated he had not received …

Aman Gupta @ Aman Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Aman Gupta was arrested in November 2020 and charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (341, 323, 448, 354, 307, 504, 506/34, later 302) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. After more than five years of incarceration, he applied for regular bail, arguing that the trial had been unduly …

Ankur Tiwary @ Ankit Tiwary @ Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ankur Tiwary, sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 202 of 2025 alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant claimed the petitioner and two others opened fire on him while he was returning …

Md. Khurshid AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Md. Khurshid Alam, sought regular bail in a case under Sections 395 and 397 IPC (Khagaria P.S. Case No. 207 of 2022). The State opposed, highlighting four other criminal cases pending against him and inconsistencies in his affidavits regarding bail status in those cases. The …

Vikky Kumar @ Aarabh SrivastavaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Vikky Kumar, was arrested on 30 August 2021 in connection with offences under Sections 399/402 of the IPC, Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 & 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 20, 22, 25 & 29 of the NDPS Act. He applied for regular bail before the Patna High Court, having already been denied bail …

Ajay Yadav @ JathaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ajay Yadav and Balgovind Yadav, were charged with murder, attempt to murder, assault, and offences under the Arms Act in connection with a cattle theft and the killing of a Sub‑Inspector. They argued that they were not named in the FIR, were not subjected to an identification …

Navin Mandal @ Ashik RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Navin Mandal, applied for regular bail in a case registered under the Arms Act and NDPS Act pending before the Special Judge, Madhepura. The bail application had been rejected three times earlier, with the last order directing the trial court to complete the accused's Section 313 …

Ankit Kumar @ Rahish Yadav @ Rahish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The appellant, Ankit Kumar, is in judicial custody for alleged murder under Sections 302/34 of the IPC, along with charges under Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act. The FIR alleges that he, with co‑accused, abused an informant’s son and that the appellant fired a pistol, …

Arvind Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arvind Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered on 10‑11‑2024 under Sections 109, 118(1), 3(5) & 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner’s anticipatory bail and an earlier regular bail application had both been rejected, and he …

Naim @ Md. Naim @ Md. NaimeversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Naim, applied for regular bail in a Sessions trial involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. His earlier bail application had been rejected, while bail had been granted to two co‑accused on the condition that they be enlarged on bail after charge …

Mantu Kahar @ Mantu SamirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Mantu Kahar was charged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 427, 448, 354, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He had earlier obtained an order for regular bail, but the trial court did not release him because the pending cases were not correctly disclosed. The petitioner sought a …

Rajeev Singh @ Raju Singh @ RajuversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Rajeev Singh was arrested in connection with a case under several provisions of the Arms Act, where the prosecution alleged that 58 live cartridges were recovered from his possession. The petitioner contended that the seizure list was prepared collectively for all three accused, no …

Dewa ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dewa Chauhan, filed a regular bail application in a case registered under sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, and sections 8/20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that a pistol and a live …

Deepak Kumar @ Dipak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Deepak Kumar was implicated in a case of alleged looting of Rs.5,00,000, blank cheques and a pass book, with Rs.35,000 recovered from him. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating the FIR was against unknown miscreants and the cash recovered was his own, not the looted amount, and that no TIP was …

Chandan Kumar @ Action @ Action Kumar @ Ankit RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Chandan Kumar and others, were charged under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act for the alleged killing of Mukesh Chhotan. They sought regular bail, claiming they were not named in the FIR and that their names emerged only from a …

Monu Kumar @ Monu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Monu Kumar, accused under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Sections 23 and 27 of the Arms Act, sought bail after being detained since 30‑08‑2025 for an alleged attack on his house by Anant Singh and his men. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that no …

Subodh Kumar Singh @ Subodh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners Robbin Kumar and Manish Singh applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Gaya Mufassil Police Station Case No. 827 of 2025, which alleged offences under sections 191(2), 190, 109, 329(3) and 252 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution …

Chhotu Singh @ Anand KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Chhotu Singh, sought regular bail in a case (Obra P.S. Case No.130 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and a co‑accused, armed with pistols, fired …

Vikash MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Vikash Mandal and Lakshman Mandal, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 177/2025 alleging assault with an iron rod and a sword. The petitioners argued that the injuries to the complainant, Chander Mandal, were minor, that Vikash had been acquitted in two prior …

Ramashish SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioners, Ramashish Sharma and Prabhat Kumar (Sonu) Gupta, were arrested in connection with a kidnapping of a teacher, Dilip Kumar, during which police recovered firearms and cartridges. The prosecution alleges that the accused opened fire on the police, though no injuries were caused by …

ABHISHEK KUMAR @ LANGTAHAWAversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a pistol and live cartridge were recovered from a motorcycle that, according to the prosecution, he was identified as riding. The petitioner argued that the identification was …

Rajmani BindversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rajmani Bind was charged under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting and shooting the husband of an informant, resulting in his death. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and a co-accused fired a pistol, but …

RAUSHAN KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Raushan Kumar and Munna Kumar, were arrested in connection with a shooting incident alleged to have occurred on 2 October 2025, for which they were charged under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Indian Arms Act. They applied for regular bail, contending that …

Munna Kumar @ Munna RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Raushan Kumar and Munna Kumar, were charged under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Indian Arms Act for a shooting incident that resulted in a death. They sought regular bail, contending that they were falsely implicated and that there was no eye‑witness or …

Pankaj Yadav @ Pankaj Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Pankaj Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Sadar P.S. Case No. 218 of 2025) involving alleged firing at a tea shop, with offences under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant identified two other …

Dilip Yadav @ Dilip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a case arising from FIR No. 535 of 2022, which alleged offences under several IPC sections and the Arms Act, including assault causing grievous and simple injuries and theft. The prosecution alleged that Dilip Yadav and Bechan Yadav inflicted grievous …

Raghu Paswan @ Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Raghu Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a case (PS No. 177 of 2025) involving alleged firing that injured a victim. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 61(2), 352, 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and …

PRABHAT KUMAR @ SONU GUPTAversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioners, Ramashish Sharma and Prabhat Kumar (Sonu) Gupta, were arrested in connection with a kidnapping of a teacher, Dilip Kumar, during which police recovered firearms and cartridges. The prosecution alleges that the accused opened fire on the police, though no injuries were caused by …

Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ankit Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder alleged to have occurred on 22 September 2025, where the husband of an informant was shot dead during a dispute at Chechar. The prosecution charged him under Sections 103(1), 61(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the …

Raj Kumar Pandit @ Raj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Raj Kumar Pandit was named in an FIR (Muffasil P.S. Case No. 325 of 2025) for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Non‑Specific (BNS) Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming that the …

Faiz KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Faiz Khan, sought bail in connection with FIR No.267/2024 alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act for allegedly firing on Musa Kohar. He contended that he was falsely implicated, noting the absence of the victim's statement or injury report, and …

Mukesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mukesh Yadav and Binod Yadav, were arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a country‑made pistol was recovered from Mukesh's house and allegedly bought from Binod. They claimed false implication, asserted that no weapon was found …

Arvind Prasad @ Mahesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Arvind Prasad, Lilee Prasad and Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Tharthari Police Station Case No. 65 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109 of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The …

Vivek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vivek Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 111(3) and 313 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, after two live cartridges and a mobile phone were allegedly recovered from his possession. The petitioner, who has been …

VIKKY YADAV @ AJAY KUMAR YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikky Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Sadar P.S. No. 218 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The incident involved a firing by several persons at a tea shop, but no one was …

Indradeo Yadav @ Indradev Yadav @ Indresh PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Indradeo Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act relating to a land‑dispute incident in which his son’s friend, Sourabh Kumar, allegedly fired a pistol. The petitioner argued that the weapon was recovered from the co‑accused, …

Bablu Mahto @ Bablu Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bablu Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging conspiracy to fire at an informant, invoking sections 109, 308(4), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR …

Ali Hussain @ Raju @ Ali HusainversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ali Hussain, applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 352, 109, 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that a group of accused demanded cigarettes from an informant, and …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that he, along with three others, entered the informant's house and fired …

Shubham KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shubham Kumar was named in an FIR for assaulting the brother of an informant, allegedly causing head injuries with intent to cause death, under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner argued that the parties were in enmity, the alleged …

Mukul Singh @ Mukul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukul Singh was named in an FIR for the alleged murder of his informant's husband, alleged to arise from a land dispute, under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended that the FIR only implicated five co‑accused in the firing and that he was …

Nitesh Kumar @ Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, was implicated in a FIR alleging murder under Sections 302/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, stemming from a shooting incident on 7 January 2023. He contended that the specific act of killing the informant’s son was attributed to co‑accused Dhananjay Kumar …

Brjesh Sharma @ Brajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Brajesh Sharma was arrested in a case where co‑accused Chunnu Panday and Ankit Pandey fired a pistol at an informant, causing injuries. The FIR alleges Sharma instigated the firing, charging him under Sections 190(1), 118(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, but no …

Md. Asfaque @ AsfaqueversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Asfaque, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act, alleging that a pistol was recovered from his pocket during a police raid based on secret information. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no specific allegations …

Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Prakash Kumar, was arrested after police recovered a country-made pistol and a live cartridge from his residence during a search. He applied for regular bail under Sections 25(1‑B)a and 26 of the Arms Act, claiming he was falsely implicated, has no criminal antecedents, and that the …

Ashutosh Yadav @ Ashutosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three residents of Dhuriya in Madhepura district, sought bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They argued that the FIR only specifically implicated another accused, Manoranjan Kumar, for a …

Arvind RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Arvind Rai applied for bail in a case registered under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he shot the deceased Bhola Kumar. The prosecution contended that Rai was one of the shooters and highlighted that he is already implicated in six other …

Pravesh Kumar @ Pravesh Kumar MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, an 18‑year‑old resident of Bela village, was arrested after police, acting on secret information about an arms‑smuggling operation, stopped three individuals and recovered a country‑made pistol from his waist. He applied for regular bail under Section 317(5) of the B.N.S. and …

Amit PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Amit Pandey, was charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing two rounds that missed a victim and assaulting family members with a lathi and pistol. He claimed innocence, stating the case stemmed from a land dispute and that he had …

Sajan Kumar ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Sajan Kumar Thakur, was arrested for murder under Section 103/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act after the informant’s brother was found dead and allegedly identified the petitioner as his assailant. The petitioner filed a bail application …

Vineet Yadav @ Vineet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vineet Yadav and Sumit Yadav sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Parbatta P.S. Case No. 410 of 2024) alleging assault and firing under several sections of the BNSS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners injured the victim and discharged a firearm. The …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The Patna High Court considered bail applications filed by six petitioners in separate criminal miscellaneous cases arising from a gold‑showroom loot alleged under Sections 310(2) and 111(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, and, in one case, also under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the …

Dipesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Dipesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder (IPC Sec. 302/34) and several offences under the Arms Act. He had been in custody since 04‑06‑2025 and sought regular bail, arguing that his implication arose only from a co‑accused's confession, which he claimed lacked evidentiary value, and …

Nitin Kumar @ Nitin PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The Patna High Court considered five separate bail applications filed by individuals accused of looting a gold showroom, with charges under Sections 310(2) and 111(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and various provisions of the Arms Act. In each case the State argued that the accused …

Gaurav Kumar @ Rishu RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The Patna High Court considered bail applications filed by five petitioners—Abhishek Kumar, Nitin Kumar, Gaurav Kumar, Gautam Kumar, and another Gautam Kumar—who were charged under Sections 310(2) and 111(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and, in one case, under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and …

Anwar Sah @ Anwar ShahversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Anwar Shah was arrested in Gopalganj after a government pistol with live cartridges and a country‑made pistol were allegedly recovered from his residence. He filed a bail petition, claiming the seizure was false, that the seizure list lacked an independent witness, and that he had already been …

Gautam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The Patna High Court considered bail applications filed by five petitioners—Abhishek Kumar, Nitin Kumar, Gaurav Kumar, Gautam Kumar (two cases), and another Gautam Kumar—who were charged under Sections 310(2) and 111(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and certain provisions of the Arms …

Abhinav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Abhinav Kumar was named in an FIR for assault and firearm injury to the son of an informant, with alleged caste‑based abuse. The court found that the firearm injury and caste slur were attributable to co‑accused Vishal Kumar, not to the appellant, who was merely present. The appellant argued that no …

K. D. Verma @ Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

K.D. Verma appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking anticipatory bail after a trial court refused it. The FIR alleges that Verma was one of eighteen accused who, armed with firearms, entered the …

Rahul Kumar Yadav @ Rahul YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Yadav, was charged with murder under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail, arguing that the FIR originally named six unknown persons and that he was implicated only through a confessional statement made in an unrelated …

Abhay Kumar Yadav @ Tufani Yadav @ Abhay Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners sought pre‑arrest bail in a case involving alleged firing on an informant and his family over a land dispute. The FIR alleged that petitioners 1 and 2, along with a co‑accused, indiscriminately fired, causing grievous injuries, while petitioner 3 allegedly assaulted the informant's …

Munna Kumar @ ChhotakuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Munna Kumar and Ram Babu Sah, were charged under Sections 109, 118(2), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly opening fire on an informant, causing grievous abdominal and chest injuries. They claimed innocence, arguing that the case was fabricated due to a …

Jitendra Kumar @ Puttan Singh @ Jitendra Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑a), 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, alleging that a co‑accused, Ravish Singh, had recovered 4,000 cartridges and, in a confessional statement to police, claimed he would supply them to the petitioner and …

Akash Giri @ Akash Kumar GiriversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Akash Giri, applied for bail in a case alleging his participation in a planned dacoity involving arms and narcotics, with charges under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, the Arms Act and the NDPS Act. The prosecution’s case relied primarily on a confessional statement of a …

Chunchun Kumar Sah @ Chunchun SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chunchun Kumar Sah, was implicated in a case involving murder and related offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act, 2023 and the Arms Act. He alleged that he had no active role and that the main accusations were against co‑accused Shambhu Kumar and Alok Kumar, with …

Akhilesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellants, five Yadavs from Beniya village, were charged in a 2015 FIR for assault, robbery, arson and other offences under various IPC sections, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They sought anticipatory bail in 2024, arguing that the incident stemmed from local …

Arvind Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arvind Kumar Yadav was charged under Sections 109, 118(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing on an informant, causing a simple thigh wound. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated in a gang rivalry incident and that no prosecution witness had …

Kedar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Kedar Yadav and Vikash Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a FIR (Kajra P.S. Case No. 97 of 2025) filed under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351, 352, 190, 191(2) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that the petitioners opened …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a pistol was recovered from his residence. The recovery stemmed from a viral video showing Karu Paswan brandishing a pistol, who later informed police that the weapon was kept at the petitioner's …

Angad UpadhyayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Angad Upadhyay, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act alleging possession of an unlicensed rifle seized during a police raid at his residence. The raid was conducted at 11 pm in his absence, with only his two daughters …

Vicky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vicky Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after being named in a FIR (Ghorasahan PS Case No. 314 of 2024) alleging assault, firing of weapons and offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case is based on the informant’s …

Gautam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The Patna High Court considered bail applications filed by six petitioners in separate criminal miscellaneous cases arising from a gold‑showroom loot alleged under Sections 310(2) and 111(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, and, in one case, also under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the …

Lal Bihari YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lal Bihari Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging he was present when firearms were discharged. The prosecution argued that he had multiple criminal antecedents …

Polo Yadav @ Pravesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Polo Yadav was named in an FIR for offences under several IPC sections and the Arms Act, alleged to have assaulted an informant with a khanti and been involved in a firing incident. The petitioner contended that the informant had previously lodged a similar case stemming from a business …

Shivshakti Kumar @ Shivshakti ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shivshakti Kumar, a self‑described local reporter, was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 126(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have fired at an informant after a prior dispute over illegal liquor. The petitioner argued that the informant, who …