Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Arms Act

4780 judgments · newest first · showing 2801–3000

Annu Kumar @ Amrit RajversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Annu Kumar, the petitioner, applied for bail in a criminal case where he is accused under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing on an informant, causing injuries to the informant's stomach and hand. The petitioner claimed the charges …

Mohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Mohit Kumar, was apprehended of arrest in a case alleging that he and others, armed with weapons, fired upon a yajna, injuring the informant's son and nephew. He claimed innocence, arguing that no specific allegation of assault was made against him and that the injuries were minor. …

Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vijay Kumar was arrested in connection with a shooting case (Murliganj P.S. Case No. 200 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 341, 342, 386, 302, 120B, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that several persons, including the petitioner, …

Suphal Yadav @ Sufal Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Suphal Yadav applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in a shooting incident that resulted in the death of the informant's son. The prosecution alleged …

Gaurav Kumar @ Gaurav Mistri @ Gaurav ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Gaurav Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after the police recovered a large quantity of illegal firearms and related materials from a co-accused's house in a case under the Arms Act. He was alleged to have assisted in manufacturing and supplying the weapons with the help of his …

Prem KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Prem Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case (Ujjiyarpur PS Case No. 208 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bihar Non‑Accidental Death Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the confessional statements of co‑accused …

Rajendra Prasad SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Rajendra Prasad Singh was arrested in connection with an alleged illegal arms manufacturing operation at Gangta, Munger, under sections 25(1‑A), 25(1‑AA), 25(1‑B)(a), 26(1), 26(2) and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution said a raid recovered articles used for making firearms and that the …

Manjit @ Munna Yadav @ Manjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Manjit Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple serious offences, including sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that he shot the victim and highlighted his two prior criminal convictions. The court …

Bijay Yadav @ Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, five Yadavs from Barahkurba village, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No.103 of 2024 alleging offences under multiple IPC sections and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The incident involved an armed assault on an informant's house on 5 April 2024, with specific …

Kundan RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kundan Raj, was arrested in connection with an alleged abduction and was charged under Sections 140(2) r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑Ba), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution recovered cash, an iPad and a mobile phone from him, while a loaded …

Satyam Yadav @ Satyam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Satyam Yadav and Sittu Yadav, were charged under IPC sections 341, 354A, 307, 504, 506 (read with Section 34) and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and firing at him during an attempt to seize his niece. They contended that they were falsely …

BOBBY DEOL KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Bobby Deol Kumar and Chhotu Kumar, were arrested in connection with a case under sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a search allegedly recovered two country‑made pistols, a revolver and three live cartridges from their possession. They filed an application for …

Foso YadavversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

Foso Yadav and Chhotu Yadav were accused of aerial firing under several offences of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail, and the counsel sought to withdraw the application filed on behalf of Chhotu Yadav. The court allowed the withdrawal, …

Devendra Thakur @ Debendra ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Devendra Thakur, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 204 litres of liquor, a pistol and a revolver, and charged under Section 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 …

Syed @ Bablu @ Md. BabluversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Syed Bablu, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 634 of 2025) involving alleged illegal arms supply under Section 111(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution relied on a self‑incriminating …

Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ravindra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 307, 302, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the shooting that killed Virendra Kumar and injured Vijay Yadav. The prosecution relied on the injured …

Inzamamul @ AppuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Inzamamul @ Appu, was arrested in a police raid on a house linked to a co‑accused alleged to be running a mini gun factory. The police recovered firearms and related materials, but none were found on the petitioner. He contended that the search violated Section 103(4)(5) of the …

Murad AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Murad Ali, was charged under Sections 61(2) and 109 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at an informant. He contended that he was falsely implicated, noting that his name does not appear in the FIR and the only incriminating material is a …

Anil Kumar Singh @ Doman SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anil Kumar Singh, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act after police recovered a country‑made pistol from a bush during his apprehension. The defence argued that the pistol was found without cartridges, no independent witness was …

Sittu Yadav @ Sintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Satyam Yadav and Sittu Yadav, were arrested in connection with a police case involving alleged assault, attempted kidnapping of a minor, and firing upon an informant, charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act, and Section 34 of the IPC. They claimed …

Manu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manu Kumar Son was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged firing under Section 109(1) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the confessional statements of co‑accused Vishal Kumar and Laddu Yadav, with no …

DIBYANSHU KUMAR @ ANSHU KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dibyanshu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of a country-made pistol and four live cartridges, charged under Sections 261 and 262 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act. He claimed innocence, arguing that the …

Ankit Kumar @ Shashikant Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ankit Kumar, feared arrest in a case (Barh P.S. Case No. 300 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, where six cartridges were recovered from a house he shared but none were found in his personal possession. He pleaded innocence, …

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kr.versusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought bail after an FIR was lodged alleging his involvement in the murder of an informant's son under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant, who was not an eye‑witness, claimed that co‑accused Jilajit …

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Shivam Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case involving a firearm, registered as FIR No. 86 of 2025. The FIR alleged his participation in planning and conspiracy to kill the deceased, with charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and …

Makhan Kumar @ MakhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Makhan Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in connection with FIR No. 86 of 2025, which alleges his participation in a firearm‑related murder. The FIR charges him under Sections 126(2), 118(1), 109, 61(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, …

Harendra RaiversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Harendra Rai applied for bail in a case stemming from a 2019 incident in Jurawanpur where he was alleged, along with co‑accused Sanjiv Singh, to have fired on the father of an informant, resulting in death. The charges include offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 307/34, later amended to …

Ramanshu Kumar SinghversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, three individuals accused under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, applied for regular bail. The prosecution alleged that the accused were part of a firing incident, but the petitioners argued they were falsely implicated, had no …

Rohit RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rohit Ranjan, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, where a pistol, live cartridges and a motorcycle were seized from his co‑accused, Anil Kumar. The petitioner contended that no incriminating article was found in his possession …

Prashant PathakversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, three individuals accused under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, applied for regular bail. The prosecution alleged that the accused were part of a firing incident, but the petitioners argued they were falsely implicated, had no …

Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of a loaded pistol and an empty cartridge, invoking Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act. He contended that the seizure was unlawful, lacking an independent witness and not complying with Section 103(4) of …

Sanjeev Kumar Singh @ Sandeep Kr. Singh @ Sandip SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner Sanjeev Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Maharajganj Case No.450/2025) alleging offences under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused, riding on four motorcycles, …

Nitesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)(i), 25(ix), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated based solely on the co‑accused's statement. The FIR alleged that a video showed the co‑accused brandishing a pistol, and a …

Jai Prakash YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jai Prakash Yadav, was arrested with a white Magic Pick‑Up van from which police recovered 16 grams of a cocaine‑like substance packed in twelve packets, leading to charges under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985 and the Arms Act. He contended that the …

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought bail in a case (Nawkothi PS Case No. 102 of 2025) involving offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Arms Act, arising from an incident where accused opened fire on police and vice‑versa. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner escaped after the …

Naresh Kamat @ Naresh Kumar KamatversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Naresh Kamat was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act after a pistol, two live cartridges and a mobile phone were recovered from a location linked to him. The petitioner contended that nothing was seized from his possession, that the police …

Sanjeev Kumar @ MafiaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar, was implicated in a FIR alleging that he shot and killed the mother of an informant. He faced charges under Sections 126(2), 118(1), 109(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S., Section 27 of the Arms Act and later Section 103 of the B.N.S. The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail, …

Amit Ray @ Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Amit Ray and Golu Ray, were arrested in connection with a criminal case (Bhagwan Bazar PS Case No. 569 of 2025) involving alleged firing of weapons that resulted in injuries and the death of a person. The prosecution alleged that three other accused fired the weapons, while the …

Om Prakash RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Ray, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 414 IPC, Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Section 30(A) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 9 litres of liquor, a 7 mm pistol and two live cartridges from a motorcycle he owned. He …

Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Sanjay Singh, also known as Sanjay Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition fearing arrest in connection with Bairgania Police Station Case No. 211 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the BNS and the Arms Act. The petition sought relief from the impending …

Abhisekh Kumar @ Pranave Kumar @ Pranav KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhisekh Kumar, was implicated in a FIR alleging his participation in firing upon an informant, invoking Sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was innocent, the FIR was lodged after an undue delay of 11 days, no one …

Ranjay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ranjay Yadav applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, where the prosecution alleged possession of a country‑made pistol and live cartridges by co‑accused. No weapon or ammunition was recovered from the petitioner, and his name appeared only in the …

PRIYANKA CHAUDHARY @ PRIYANKA PRASADversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

Priyanka Chaudhary was arrested in connection with a murder case (Nasriganj P.S. Case No.210 of 2024) alleging she, along with others, threatened an informant and his brother and that the brother was shot dead on 29‑06‑2024. The petitioner, who has no prior criminal record, claimed she was falsely …

Neeraj Kumar @ Neeraj PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Neeraj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging assault, rioting, and illegal possession of arms under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that Kumar, along with co‑accused, assaulted an informant and his …

Hari Narayan GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Hari Narayan Gupta, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case alleging his participation in a conspiracy to fire upon Keshav Kumar, resulting in four gunshot injuries. The prosecution alleged that Gupta was part of a gang that committed the offence …

Baban KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Baban Kumar, was charged under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act in a case registered at Ghoshi Police Station, Jehanabad. He applied for bail, which was rejected on 09-10-2025. Within six months, he filed a second bail application before …

Dhiraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, was arrested in a case alleging that he fired four rounds of a firearm, though no one was injured. He contended that the case was fabricated out of a dispute over a damaged mobile phone, and asserted his innocence and clean antecedents. The State opposed his request for …

Umesh Prasad @ Umesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Umesh Prasad, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352 and 109 of the Bihar Non‑Special (BNS) Act and Sections 27 and 30 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that he slapped the brother of an informant while the latter was ploughing his …

Vishwa Nath SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Vishwa Nath Sharma applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 25(1‑A), 25(1‑B)(a), 26, 29 and 35 of the Arms Act alleging his involvement in illegal arms manufacturing. The prosecution’s case was based on a tip‑off and the recovery of weapon‑making materials from a bag …

Jawahir Ray @ Jawahar RayversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Jawahir Ray was arrested in connection with a violent incident in which he and others allegedly assaulted the son of an informant and fired weapons, causing injuries. The prosecution charged him under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and Section 27 …

Md. Naushad AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md Naushad Alam, was implicated in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 380, 323, 341, 354(b) and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have assaulted an informant and others. He contended that he was falsely implicated …

Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Ranjan Kumar, Pawan Kumar and Pravin Kumar sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No.62 of 2025 alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that Ravi Kumar entered the complainant's house, opened …

Rinki Kumari @ Parwati Kumari @ Rinki KodaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Rinki Kumari, a self‑declared Naxal, was arrested on 19 June 2024 in connection with a 2017 case (PS Kajra No. 59) involving offences under Sections 121, 121A, 122 of the IPC, Sections 25(1‑b)A and 26 of the Arms Act, and several provisions of the UAPA. She applied for regular bail, …

Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Poddar @ Biso PoddarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He is alleged to be the order‑giver for a murder. The State opposed the bail, contending the seriousness of the …

Chhotu Kumar @ Tawahi @ Chhotelal ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery and assault case (Case No. 183 of 2025) alleged under Section 309(6) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that four miscreants entered a house, assaulted occupants and …

Arun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Arun Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 25(9), 28 and 30 of the Arms Act, based on a secret video showing a person brandishing a weapon. The prosecution identified the petitioner solely from the video, with no weapon recovered and the source of the …

Praveen KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Praveen Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a pistol and cartridge were recovered from his possession. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no conscious possession of the arms, and pointed to the fact that …

Hari Shankar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Hari Shankar Rai was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 302, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail for the second time after an earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner’s counsel argued …

Jhalu Sahni @ Aditya KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Jhalu Sahni (Aditya Kumar) sought anticipatory bail in a case (PS No. 290/2025) alleging offences including extortion, offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Arms Act, SC/ST Act and POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner demanded rangdari (extortion). The petitioner …

Mankhush Kumar @ B.C.versusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mankhush Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)(1), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for the alleged recovery of a country‑made pistol and cartridge from a dhaba. He had been in custody since 5 September 2025 and disclosed two prior criminal antecedents. The …

Satyam Yadav @ Satyam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Satyam Yadav, was charged under Sections 132 and 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, together with Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26, 35 and 27 of the Arms Act, for alleged possession of a loaded pistol, rifle and cartridges recovered from the residence of co‑accused. The petitioner …

Mantu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Mantu Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Roshanganj Case No.49 of 2025) and charged under Sections 103(1), 238, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27(3) of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, which was first denied by the Patna High Court on 25 June …

Amit Kumar @ Raj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Amit Kumar and Sumit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Kasim Bazar Police Station Case No. 96 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the …

Rohan Thakur @ Diljale ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Rohan Thakur, applied for bail in a case registered under sections 399, 402, 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25(1B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, alleging that police had recovered a pistol, cartridges and mobile phones from alleged co‑accused who claimed the petitioner …

Dharamvir Kumar @ D.K.versusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Dharamvir Kumar, was charged with murder under IPC sections 302/34 and related offences including 120-B, 212, 216(a) and with an offence under section 27 of the Arms Act. He is alleged to have fired on the nephew of an informant, causing death, and his name appears in a co-accused's …

Balendra Kumar Bhagat @ Balendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Balendra Kumar Bhagat, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he shot, injured and subsequently stabbed his father to death. He has been in custody since 20 November …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police raided a liquor operation, seizing 5,000 kg of fermented Mahua and 200 litres of country-made liquor, and reported that the accused opened fire on police. The FIR did not name the petitioner; his name surfaced only through a …

Hiralal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Hiralal Yadav, was charged under sections 302, 147, 148, 149, 323 and 504 of the IPC and section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing on an informant's brother, resulting in death. He applied for bail while the trial was at an advanced stage, with all charge‑sheet witnesses …

Nitish Kumar @ Nitish Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Nitish Kumar, was charged under sections of the BNS, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for a murder allegedly committed during a brick‑kiln dispute. The prosecution alleged that the appellant was present when a group assaulted and shot a labourer belonging to …

Laloo Yadav @ Lalu Yadav @ Jay Krishna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, a group of Yadavs and others, appealed under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act to set aside a district court order that had refused them bail in a case arising from a land‑dispute‑related clash. The FIR alleged assault, …

Mithilesh Kumar @ Mithilesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Mithilesh Kumar was charged with firing at an informant, causing gunshot injuries, and allegedly abusing the informant in a caste-based manner. The charges were under Sections 352, 351(3), 109(1) of the Bihar Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act, and Sections 3(i), (r), (s) of the Scheduled Castes …

Rajnish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Rajnish Kumar and Bikash Kumar Ray, appealed under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against an order dated 03‑09‑2025 of the Additional Sessions Judge‑1 cum Special Judge SC/ST Act, Bhojpur, which had denied bail in a case alleging firing on an informant and …

Ranjit Rawat @ Ranjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ranjit Rawat and Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Jamui P.S. Case No. 794 of 2024) filed under Sections 125(a), 351(2), 351(3), 191(2), 190 of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that they pelted bricks and …

Raj Kumar PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Raj Kumar Patel was arrested for alleged firing on the leg of an informant's son, charged under IPC sections 307, 34, 120B and Arms Act section 27. He contended that the FIR named an unknown assailant and his only link was ownership of a mobile number used by others, for which he had …

Tanikan Bind @ Tanik PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Tanikan Bind, applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No.109 of 2025) alleging violation of Sections 25(1-AA), 25(1-B)(1), 26(1) and 26(2) of the Arms Act for allegedly operating an illegal gun factory at his residence. The prosecution contended that illegal firearms and related …

Arhul DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arhul Devi was arrested under several provisions of the Arms Act after a co‑accused, Praveen (Munna Singh), claimed he had hidden a pistol and cartridges in her house. The petitioner argued that the recovery was false, that proper search‑seizure procedures were not followed, and that she had no …

Nitesh Yadav @ Nishu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitesh Yadav, sought bail in a case registered under sections 25(1‑B)a and 35 of the Arms Act after a pistol and cartridge were recovered from his house. He alleged that the recovery was false and that he was implicated due to a land dispute with agnates. He had been in custody since …

Birendra PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Birendra Pandey, was charged under several provisions of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, the Arms Act and the SC/ST Act for allegedly attempting to forcibly take land belonging to the informant and for caste-based abuse. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting that he does …

Shashibhushan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers from Nalanda district, were implicated in a criminal case (Sare P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025) for alleged assault on an informant, theft of cash and a gold chain, and possession of a rifle, with charges under multiple sections of the B.N.S. 2023 and the Arms Act. They …

Vishal Kumar Jha @ Vishal Jha @ RajaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal Kumar Jha applied for bail in a case (Danapur P.S. Case No. 751 of 2024) where he was implicated under sections 103, 111(2), 61(2), 3(5) of the BNS and section 27 of the Arms Act for the alleged shooting of an informant's son. The FIR named unknown miscreants, and the investigation later …

Farzana AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Farzana Ansari, the wife of co‑accused Kamruddin Ansari, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 111(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a search recovered a large quantity of illegal firearms from her husband’s house. The …

Nepu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nepu Yadav, was charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly entering the informant's house armed, firing shots, and threatening the informant's son. He sought bail, arguing that the FIR was lodged two days after the alleged incident, no …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that a FIR (Case No. 682/2025) had been lodged against him for alleged conspiracy to commit loot and possession of a loaded pistol, invoking Sections 310(4), 310(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the …

Rohit Paswan @ Rohit Kumar Paswan @ Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rohit Paswan, applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged robbery of Rs. 2,04,000 from a Bank of India branch and alleged collusion in offences under Section 394 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case rests mainly on the confessional statement of a …

Md. SabbirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md. Sabbir and Md. Naushad, applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged offences under several sections of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR described a shooting incident on 19 April 2024 where several co‑accused opened fire on the informant’s family, but the …

Suraj Yadav @ Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Suraj Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.38 of 2025, which alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The FIR described an assault and shooting of Amar Kumar by several accused, but the petitioner’s name does not appear in the …

Vipin Yadav @ Vipin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vipin Yadav was arrested in connection with a shooting incident alleged to have injured a man's leg, and was charged under sections 126(2), 352, 351(2), 109, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated due to a prior dispute …

VIBHA DEVI @ BIBHA DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Vibha Devi and Shiv Sagar Mahto, were implicated in a FIR alleging assault with deadly weapons under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. They claimed innocence, arguing that the case was a cover‑up arising from a private dispute and that the injuries …

Alok KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Alok Kumar and Rahul Kumar were arrested in connection with a murder case (Lohiyanagar P.S. Case No. 75 of 2025) alleged under Sections 61(2) and 103(1) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They claimed they were falsely implicated, asserting an alibi that they …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of a loaded pistol and cartridges, offences under Sections 25(1-b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He claimed innocence, asserting that the weapons were planted by police and that nothing was found in his …

Ravin SinghversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Ravin Singh, an army personnel on leave, was charged under Sections 109, 352, 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 27 and 30 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing his licensed pistol indiscriminately during a family land‑dispute, injuring four members of the informant’s family. The …

Kanhaiya KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Arms Act, alleging that the charges were fabricated due to a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused assaulted an informant …

Anish Kumar @ MilkiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners – Anish Kumar, Prashant Pathak and Ramanshu Kumar Singh – were charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly taking part in a firing incident. The prosecution’s case was based on police information that two groups were …

SURAJPALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Surajpal, who has been in custody since 23 February 2025, filed a bail appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, contending that he was falsely implicated and not named in the FIR, his name appearing only in a co‑accused's …

IDRISH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE

The appellants were convicted by a Special Judge for offences under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly assembling to commit dacoity and possessing illegal firearms. The prosecution relied on police reports, statements of two independent witnesses, and …

Harendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Harendra Singh was arrested in connection with a shooting incident alleged to have occurred during a land dispute, and charged under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that Singh and co‑accused opened indiscriminate fire …

Manoj Mahto @ Manoj Patel @ Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Mahto petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Riga Police Station Case No. 50 of 2007, which involves serious offences under the IPC, Arms Act, Explosive Substance Act and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The FIR does not name him; the allegations …

Amresh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Amresh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case (PS‑526/2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case was based on the recovery of a pistol from a co‑accused, Rahish Kumar, and the identification of the …

Dashrath YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Dashrath Yadav petitioned for anticipatory bail after an FIR alleged that he, along with others, assaulted an informant with lathis, danda, iron rods and fired indiscriminately, causing grievous injury. The FIR listed offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Rahul Kumar was arrested in connection with an alleged robbery in which his mobile phone was taken and a loaded country-made pistol was recovered from his possession. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the mobile belonged to him, and that he had no prior criminal record, having been …

Raja Singh @ Rajveer SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Raja Singh was arrested in connection with a case under sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a loaded pistol, cash and gold jewellery were recovered from his house. He claimed innocence, stating that only one pistol was incriminating and the other items were his own, and he …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly pointing a pistol at an informant's son while intoxicated. The FIR states the pistol was fired …

Kamlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Kamlesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have fired a single shot at the left thigh of an informant during a scuffle. The petitioner pleaded innocence, claiming the …

Ravi Paswan @ Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Ravi Paswan sought bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated while the real alleged offender, Karu Paswan, brandished a pistol and fired in the air. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that …

Ludo Singh @ Mukesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ludo Singh was arrested for alleged instigation of a shooting that injured Mitesh Kumar Paswan, with charges under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109 of the BNS and section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that Singh, along with two others, stopped the victims' bike and that Singh …

Mohit Prasad @ Mohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Mohit Prasad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner’s name appeared in a self‑inculpatory statement of a co‑accused, and he claimed innocence, alleging false …

Dilip Kumar Yadav @ Dilip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners Vinod Singh, Pintu Singh and Amit Rao, along with Mukul Singh, applied for bail in two criminal miscellaneous cases (Nos. 52278 and 52372 of 2025) arising from a Bagaha police case alleging offences under various sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale (BNS) Act, the Arms Act and the …

Vinod SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Vinod Singh, Pintu Singh and Amit Rao, along with Mukul Singh, applied for bail in two criminal miscellaneous cases (Nos. 52278 and 52372 of 2025) arising from a Bagaha police case alleging offences under various sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale (BNS) Act, the Arms Act and the …

Mukul SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Vinod Singh, Pintu Singh and Amit Rao, along with Mukul Singh, applied for bail in two criminal miscellaneous cases (Nos. 52278 and 52372 of 2025) arising from a Bagaha police case alleging offences under various sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale (BNS) Act, the Arms Act and the …

Dhanu chaudhary @ Narendra yadav @ Dhanu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhanu Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Kateya No.242/2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the victim, while …

Munna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered a bail application filed by Munna Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a POCSO case involving alleged sexual relations with an 18‑year‑old girl under the pretext of marriage and the viral dissemination of objectionable photographs. The FIR listed serious …

Shankar Yadav @ Prabhat Shankar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, six individuals from Korai village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The FIR was lodged after informant Sushila Devi alleged that the accused fired indiscriminately at her cattle, injuring …

Bablu Singh @ Shubodh Kumar SinghversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Bablu Singh and Rajiv Ranjan Singh, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged by informant Mukesh Singh alleging they assaulted him over a dispute involving soil removal from a JCB. The FIR charged them under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita (2023) …

Monu @ Saurabh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Monu (also known as Saurabh Kumar), a 19‑year‑old, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case is based on an informant, Sheru Mandal, whose mobile phone allegedly contained chats with the petitioner about …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rahul Kumar was arrested in connection with a robbery of Rs. 1,20,000 committed at gunpoint and charged under Section 309(6) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the only link to …

Mintu Yadav @ Mantu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mintu Yadav and Devan Yadav, were arrested in connection with a FIR alleging indiscriminate firing that resulted in a death, charged under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 109 of the B.N.S. and section 27 of the Arms Act. They contended that the FIR contains only vague, omnibus …

Karan Kumar @ Karan TantiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Karan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder (IPC Sections 302 & 34) and an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The deceased, Pintu Das, was shot by unknown assailants, and the petitioner’s name surfaced only through confessional statements of co‑accused, not in the …

Rohit SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rohit Singh was arrested in connection with an offence under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after a co‑accused fired at the SHO and illegal weapons were recovered from a nearby house. The petitioner claims he was falsely implicated, has no possession of the seized arms, and only one …

Satayendra Nut @ Satendra NatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Satayendra Nut, the petitioner, was arrested in connection with a case involving theft of a country-made katta, live cartridges, and two stolen motorcycles, and is charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely …

Sheo Nath Nut @ Shivnath NatversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sheo Nath Nut, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged possession of country‑made katta, live cartridges, and stolen motorcycles, and charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed false implication, …

Sudhir Sharma @ Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sudhir Sharma sought bail after being implicated in a case (Pipra PS No. 89 of 2025) for alleged firing on an informant's son, alleged offences under Sections 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged his participation, but the injured’s statement identified …

Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Pawan Kumar applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 109, 61(2), 111, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging conspiracy to murder. The prosecution, based on the FIR, alleged that the accused, including the petitioner, hired criminals who killed the …

Bolbam PrasadversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bolbam Prasad applied for regular bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he fired a weapon causing grievous injury to the husband of an informant. The petitioner contended that he and the injured party are …

Kishun Kumar Paswan @ Kishun PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Kishun Kumar Paswan, was arrested in connection with a murder case (G.R. No. 1538 of 2025) under Section 103(1) of the Bihar Non-Applicable Statutes and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The deceased was the informant's father, who died en route to a medical facility after being shot. The …

Bipin YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bipin Yadav was arrested in connection with a case involving the recovery of two country‑made pistols and 6.8 kg of ganja from a riverbank. He was charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Arms Act and the NDPS Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, argued that a …

Adhik RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Adhik Ram and Sudama Ram were arrested in connection with a murder case (Suryagarha P.S. Case No. 177 of 2024) under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleges that a co‑accused, Budhan Ram, shot an informant who later died, while the petitioners …

Sanjay Singh @ Khesari SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Singh, was implicated in a murder case (IPC Sections 302, 120B) and an offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act after his name appeared in the confessional statements of co‑accused. He argued that the FIR originally named unknown persons and that the statements of other …

SUNIL PASWANversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Sunil Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after being named in FIR No. 16 of 2025 for offences under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 308(3), 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging involvement in an armed assault that resulted in the death of an informant's …

Sumit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case where he is accused of firing a weapon that injured the informant's son, under sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner’s firing caused the injury, while the petitioner …

Aslam Khan @ Mohamad Aslam KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a father and son, were arrested following a raid on their house where various firearms and ammunition were seized under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. They contended that the seizure report was inconsistent with the prosecution’s claim and that the search violated …

Chhotey Kumar @ Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chhotey Kumar was arrested in connection with a firearm incident under sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a boy was injured by friends who fired a pistol, and live cartridges were recovered from the accused. The petitioner contended he was falsely …

Aman Kumar @ Aman Kumar GiriversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Aman Kumar, applied for regular bail in an NDPS case where a search of a motorcycle he was riding yielded 17 grams of smack. The prosecution alleged the substance was morphinan mixed with trimethoprim, and the petitioner has prior involvement in eight criminal cases, including …

Rashid HussainversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rashid Hussain applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Bengal Public Gambling Act and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a raid at his residence uncovered live cartridges and other items, though the petitioner was not present at the …

Md. Saif @ BalkainversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Saif Balkain, was accused of theft under sections 331(4) and 305 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 650 of 2025. The prosecution alleged that four persons, including the petitioner, committed the theft and that stolen articles were recovered …

Devan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mintu Yadav and Devan Yadav, were arrested in connection with a FIR alleging indiscriminate firing that resulted in a death, charged under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 109 of the B.N.S. and section 27 of the Arms Act. They contended that the FIR contains only vague, omnibus …

Ram Sighasan SinghversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ram Sighasan Singh and his son Gaurav Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging assault, stone‑pelting, and a gunshot that killed a passer‑by, with charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the …

Prakash Kora @ Prakash @ Prakash ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Prakash Kora was arrested in connection with a 2019 case alleging violations of the Arms Act and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, based primarily on the confession of a co-accused who named him as a Naxalite. The petitioner contended that no incriminating material was recovered …

Rakesh Nut @ Pahalwan NutversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rakesh Nut, sought bail in a case involving serious offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act, alleging that country‑made katta, live cartridges and stolen motorcycles were recovered. The prosecution contended that the petitioner was apprehended with a loaded …

Nawal SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nawal Sah, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Shikarganj P.S. Case No.212 of 2025) alleged under Sections 103(1), 61(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the second husband of an informant was …

Satendra Adiwasi @ Chhotu AdiwasiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Satendra Adiwasi was named in a case (Jagdispur PS Case No. 276 of 2025) for alleged offences under Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act after co‑accused were arrested with a pistol and a mobile phone. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that no incriminating article …

Yogi Kumar @ Yogi PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Yogi Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case (PS No. 981 of 2025) alleging possession of a country‑made pistol and live cartridge, and charged under Sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. He contended that …

AMIT MACHHINDRA SHETEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Amit Machhindra Shete, was charged in Crime No. 332 of 2024 for offences including robbery, criminal intimidation, and violations under the Arms Act, Criminal Law Amendment Act and MCOCA. The prosecution alleged that on 27 June 2024 the co‑accused attempted to rob a jewellery shop …

Jai Kishun SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Jai Kishun Sahni, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (PS No. 143 of 1994) involving alleged offences under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The charge-sheet had been filed on 23 March 1995, and the petitioner approached the High Court …

Md. Aftab Alam @ Md. AfttabversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md. Aftab Alam and Md. Abid Alam, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under the Arms Act for alleged possession of illegal arms. The prosecution’s case relied solely on the confessional statement of a co‑accused, Md. Ekram, who had been caught with the weapons and named …

Ajit Kumar @ ChuhwaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Ajit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under IPC sections 302 and 34 and Arms Act section 27. The State opposed, arguing that criminal proceedings under CrPC sections 82 and 83 had already been initiated against him on 22 July 2013. The court considered the …

Sugriv Paswan @ Sugriv KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Sugriv Paswan, was named in an FIR alleging his participation in a violent incident that resulted in three firearm injuries to the brother of an informant. The FIR charges him under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. …

Nandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Nandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being apprehended in a raid where a pistol, ganja chillam and a mobile phone were recovered from his possession. The prosecution alleged that he was caught with an illegal weapon under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and that …

Pappu Ray @ Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pappu Ray was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act after police recovered a pistol and live cartridges from a co‑accused’s premises. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that his name was linked only to a confessional statement of the co‑accused, …

MD. IQBAL NAIYARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Iqbal Naiyar, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, alleging that a rifle and sixteen live cartridges were seized from him. He claimed innocence, asserted that the seizure was not made in accordance with Section 105 of the BNSS, and …

Sajan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sajan Kumar, sought bail after fearing arrest in a case registered under sections 126(2), 127(2), 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) and section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that two persons on a motorcycle fired at the informant on 24‑06‑2025, and …

Angad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Angad Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly possessing two knives (katta) and six live cartridges. The prosecution alleged that the items were recovered from a straw sack in a public place, while the …

Bipin KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Bipin Kumar was arrested in connection with a violent incident that resulted in the death of an informant's son, with the prosecution alleging his involvement under sections 103, 238 and 3(5) of the BNS and section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR …

Md. JunaidversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Junaid, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, after police recovered a pistol, three live cartridges and a mobile phone from the scene. The …

Aamir Alam @ Ameer AlamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Aamir Alam, sought bail in a case (Belaganj P.S. Case No. 583 of 2025) where he was accused under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act for allegedly supplying a rifle and live cartridges to co‑accused Md. Iqbal Naiyar. The prosecution’s case rested on the recovery of the …

Ramvijay Kumar @ Ram Vijay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ramvijay Kumar was arrested during a police raid based on secret information about a planned offence. The police claimed to have recovered a pistol, four live cartridges and a mobile from his possession, charging him under sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and sections 310(4), 310(5), …

Divesh Kumar Sah @ Davesha @ DeveshversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Divesh Kumar Sah, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS‑277/2024) involving alleged offences under the NDPS Act and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged recovery of a country‑made pistol, live cartridges, 3.4 kg of ganja and a mobile phone from a shop, linking …

Pramod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

Petitioners Pramod Kumar and Krishna Singh sought relief from imminent arrest in a criminal case involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The petitioners filed applications for bail, with Pramod Kumar seeking to withdraw his application and Krishna Singh seeking …

Raju SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raju Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Bettiah Muffasil P.S. No.21 of 2025) involving alleged offences under sections 308(4), 308(5), 140(2), 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and section 25(9) of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the …

Md. Bablu @ FirojversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Md. Bablu and Md. Minju, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 25(1‑AA), 26(2) and 35 of the Arms Act, where four country‑made pistols and 20 live cartridges were recovered from co‑accused Masudan Yadav. The prosecution’s case …

Suraj Kumar @ Lucho KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Suraj Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping case (Section 366A IPC) and offences under the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that he, along with Mitthu Singh, abducted the informant's daughter on a motorcycle. The petitioner contended that the alleged victim …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Mukesh Kumar, the petitioner, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Dalsinghsarai police case No.67 of 2025, which alleges offences under section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner had originally filed the case as an informant but the …

Golu Kumar @ Golu Kumar Bind @ Golu BindversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, sought bail in a case where he was charged under IPC sections 448 and 302/34 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 for allegedly entering the informant's house and firing at the informant's daughter, resulting in her death. The prosecution alleged direct involvement …

Daya Nand Kumar @ Daya Nand RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Daya Nand Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Maner P.S. Case No. 274 of 2024) and charged under Sections 302, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming an alibi that he was in Delhi at the time of the …

Saintu Kumar @ Sintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saintu Kumar, was arrested for alleged firing on police and possession of an illegal firearm, charged under Sections 132, 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. He contended that the recovery of the weapon was …

Mahendra YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mahendra Yadav and Rajendra Yadav were charged under IPC sections 448, 307, 506, 34 and Arms Act section 27 for abusing, threatening an informant and firing a licensed rifle. They had previously obtained bail in 2005, which was cancelled in 2008 for misuse, and have been in custody since 20‑08‑2025. …

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vishal Kumar appealed against the denial of bail by the Exclusive Special Judge under the SC/ST Act, Arms Act and the BNS for his alleged involvement in the murder of Vinay Kumar Das. The prosecution alleged that Kumar, along with co‑accused Monu and an unknown person, committed the murder, while …

Lokendra Kumar @ Lochan @ Lokendra Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lokendra Kumar, was arrested along with co‑accused on a secret tip and a country‑made pistol with two live cartridges was seized from his possession. He contended that the recovery was false as the seizure was not witnessed by any independent person and the list of witnesses …

Ritesh Kumar @ Ritesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ritesh Kumar, was charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly opening fire on an informant, though no weapon was recovered and no one was injured. He sought bail, arguing that the case was filed with an oblique motive and that he had no …

Saravjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, a constable named Saravjeet Kumar, was arrested in connection with FIR No.214 of 2025 alleging that he shot and caused the death of the informant’s husband, violating Section 103(1) of the Bihar Non‑Compulsory Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail, claiming false …

Chhotu Mishra @ Krishna KanhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Chhotu Mishra, accused under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the SC/ST Act, appealed against the lower court's order rejecting his bail application. The appellant had been in judicial custody since September 2024 and had previously sought bail twice, both times …

Munni Paswan @ Mundrika PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Munni Paswan, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge denying his bail in a case involving arson, assault, and alleged land‑mafia activities against 60 families in Nawada. The prosecution alleged that a large group of armed men, including the appellant, set fire to …

Jabbar @ Jabba @ Md. JabbarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Jabbar and Sattar, were charged under Sections 310(4), 310(5) and 111 of the B.N.S. and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 37 of the Arms Act in a case arising from Maranga Police Station. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused persons were apprehended with arms and that the petitioners …

Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay DasversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sanjay Ram, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 504, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have thrown a bomb and fired at an informant, causing injuries. The petitioner claimed innocence, …

Aman Jha @ Aman Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Aman Jha applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 109(1) and 118(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he supplied arms to Gaurav Kumar, who shot an informant. The petitioner argued that his name does not appear in the FIR and that no …

Ashok RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Ashok Ray petitioned for anticipatory bail after learning that he was likely to be arrested in case No.295 of 2025, which alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act, including firing on a police party. The petitioner, who has eight prior criminal records, claimed innocence, …

Mr. Sajid PrawezversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Sajid Prawez sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a cyber‑fraud and money‑laundering case involving alleged conversion of defrauded funds into USDT and other cryptocurrencies. The prosecution’s case relied primarily on confessional statements of co‑accused, which mentioned …

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Sharma, was arrested in connection with a raid at Dinesh Yadav's house where illegal arms and gun‑making instruments were recovered, and was charged under Sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and several provisions of the Arms Act. He contended that …

Harendra Rai @ Harendra Ray @ Harendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Harendra Rai was arrested in connection with a violent incident in which the informant’s son was stabbed to death and several others were assaulted. The FIR alleges that Rai, acting as a bodyguard, opened fire, although no one was injured by the gunfire. Rai pleaded innocence, claiming he was …

Md Shabbir Hasan @ TipuversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md Shabbir Hasan @ Tipu, was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of illegal arms and related equipment, charged under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act and the Arms Act. The prosecution claimed a large quantity of arms and manufacturing …

Anuj Kumar @ ArnowversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anuj Kumar, filed a second bail application in a case registered under Sections 310(4), 310(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a pistol, live cartridge and a mobile phone were recovered from him after a …

Jay Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jay Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging that he and co‑accused, armed with deadly weapons, attempted extortion and looted construction materials from a residential school site, firing at an informant. The petitioner claimed innocence, noting that the FIR lacked details of the …

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, was arrested on 24 March 2025 in connection with the alleged murder of his wife by firing a gun. He is charged under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner applied for bail before the High Court. Considering the seriousness of the …

Vivek Kumar @ Vivek rajversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vivek Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Case No.627 of 2024) alleged under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged two days after the incident and that only a confessional …

Murari Kumar @ Murari PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Murari Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleges indiscriminate firing by the petitioner, but the specific firearm injury is attributed to a co‑accused, Annu …

NIRANJAN SHAHI @ NIRANJAN KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

Niranjan Shahi was arrested in connection with the murder of an informant's son, alleged to have conspired with co‑accused to fire the fatal shots. The prosecution charged him under Sections 103(2), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner …

VIKASH KUMAR JHAversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vikash Kumar Jha was in judicial custody for offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, relating to the killing of an informant’s brother. The prosecution’s case relied on the informant’s allegation that Jitu Yadav and his …

Takku Gaddi @ Takku @ HappuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Takku Gaddi, was charged with murder under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act for the killing of the informant's son on 16 April 2025. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with other accused, murdered the victim, whose body was later …

Aman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Aman Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (PS Dobhi Case No. 48 of 2025) alleging offences under sections 121(1), 132, 111(1), 109, 310(4), 310(5) of the B.N.S and sections 25(1‑ba), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act, with a pistol and two live cartridges reportedly recovered from his …

Bipin Ray @ Vipin RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Bipin Ray, was charged with a series of offences including murder, assault, and illegal possession of arms arising from an incident where he allegedly struck the informant's brother on the head with a spade, causing the victim's death, while co‑accused used lathi, danda and knife. He …

Jitesh JhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Jitesh Jha, was arrested in connection with the murder of an informant's brother, alleged to have been carried out by firing a gun. He was charged under Sections 103(2) and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended that …

Nitish Kumar @ KaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was charged with offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, arising from an FIR that alleged he fired a weapon that struck the informant's husband, causing his death on the spot. The petitioner applied …

Aryan Kumar @ Vivek Kumar @ Chhotka Vivek @ AryanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Aryan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Danapur P.S. Case No. 627 of 2024) and alleged violations of Sections 103, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that the informant's husband was killed on 12 July 2024, and the …

Kallu Rai @ Srikant Rai @ Sri Kant YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kallu Rai, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 216 of 2020) involving the killing of the informant's cousin brother, allegedly over a monetary dispute. He is charged under Sections 302, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The …

Shailesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shailesh Singh applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 310(4), 310(5) and 111(3) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that two mobile phones, an ATM card and a PAN card were recovered from his …

Ranveer KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ranveer Kumar, sought regular bail in a case under Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated and that no contraband was recovered from his possession. The prosecution alleged that during a night patrol on 30‑09‑2025 the petitioner was …

Satyam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Satyam Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 25(1‑B)a, 27 and 25(9) of the Arms Act, alleging that a video showed a birthday party where a single round was fired and that he was falsely implicated. The prosecution relied on the video and a statement that the …