NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusPRANAY SETHI AND ORS.
2017 INSC 106831 October 2017Reference answered
The Supreme Court examined the computation of compensation under Sections 163‑A, 166 and 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in death claims, focusing on the appropriate multiplier, the addition of future prospects to the deceased's income, and the quantification of conventional heads such as loss of estate, loss of co…
PRIYA PRAKASH VARRIER AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF TELANGANA AND ANOTHER
2018 INSC 77331 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioners, who were the actor, producer and director of the film "Oru Adaar Love", sought to quash FIR No.34 of 2018 filed under Section 295A IPC alleging that the picturisation of the song "Manikya Malaraya Poovi" offended Muslim sentiments. They argued that the song is a traditional Mappila folk song in the pub…
SHRI GANGAJALI EDUCATION SOCIETY & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2017 INSC 83231 August 2017Appeal(s) allowed
Shri Gangajali Education Society applied to the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MHFW) for a Letter of Permission to start a medical college. The Medical Council of India (MCI) found several deficiencies and recommended rejection, but the Supreme Court‑constituted Oversight Committee (OC) later accepted the college…
APOLLO INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & RESEARCH AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2017 INSC 83131 August 2017Case Allowed
The Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences & Research applied to the Ministry of Health for permission to start a new medical college for the 2016-17 session. The Ministry, relying on a negative recommendation of the Medical Council of India (MCI), initially denied the permission, but an Oversight Committee later granted…
YATIN NARENDRA OZAversusKHEMCHAND RAJARAM KOSHTI & ORS.
2016 INSC 119831 August 2016Disposed off
Yatin Narendra Oza, a senior counsel of the Gujarat High Court, was held liable for contempt after making unwarranted speeches, letters and statements that the Gujarat High Court deemed scandalous. The High Court issued a notice under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 restraining him from further such activity and from …
SREENIVASA COOPERATIVE BUILDING SOCIETYversusPUVVADA RAMA (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.
2018 INSC 65131 July 2018Dismissed
Lakshmi Sreenivasa Cooperative Building Society filed suits for specific performance of alleged sale agreements of land against Puvvada Rama (deceased) and others. The trial court dismissed the suits, finding the Society failed to prove execution of the agreements, payment of earnest money, and possession, noting the a…
RANI & ORS.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.
2018 INSC 65231 July 2018Case Partly allowed
The case arose from a motor accident in 2009 where a lorry collided with a motorcycle, killing the rider Satish and injuring his pillion rider Anand. Separate claims were filed under s.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for compensation to Satish's legal representatives and to Anand, and the Motor Accident Claims Trib…
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusSUNIL TRIPATHI ETC. ETC.
2018 INSC 65331 July 2018Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined appeals by the Union of India and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against a Delhi High Court order that directed the CBI to convert three preliminary enquiries into FIRs/RCs and to complete the investigation. The CBI argued that its preliminary enquiries concluded there was no invol…
BAIRAM MURALIDHARversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2014 INSC 51231 July 2014Dismissed
The appellant, Sub‑Inspector Bairam Muralidhar, was charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding bribes. The public prosecutor filed an application under Section 321 of the CrPC to withdraw the prosecution, relying solely on a Government order directing withdrawal. Both the trial court and the High Cour…
SANJAY GUPTA & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2014 INSC 51331 July 2014Hearing Adjourned
A fire broke out at a consumer exhibition in Meerut on 10 April 2006, killing 64 people and injuring more than a hundred. The victims filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking damages from the State of Uttar Pradesh and the event organizers. The State had appointed a one‑man Commission of Inqui…
LIC OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusKRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA AND ANOTHER ETC.
2016 INSC 29331 March 2016Disposed off
The Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) passed a Board resolution in 2001 to upgrade the basic pension and dearness relief for retirees who left service before 1 August 1997, proposing an amendment to the 1995 Employees Pension Rules (Para 3A of Appendix IV). The amendment required a rule under Section 48 of the Life Insu…
S. KRISHNAMOORTHYversusCHELLAMMAL
2015 INSC 98431 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant lent Rs.2,20,000 to the respondent, who issued a post‑dated cheque that later bounced, leading to a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings, alleging that the loan was actually ta…
RAMBEER SHOKEENversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI
2018 INSC 7631 January 2018Dismissed
Rambeer Shokeen was arrested on 1 December 2016 in connection with offences under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA) and the Arms Act. The prosecution filed an application on 28 February 2017 for an extension of time to file the charge‑sheet, which was pending when the appellant filed a statut…
AJAY KUMAR GHOSHAL ETC.versusSTATE OF BLHAR & ANR.
2017 INSC 9031 January 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were convicted for a dowry death and related offences under the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court, noting certain procedural lapses, set aside the conviction and ordered a de novo retrial under Section 386(b)(i) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Supreme Court examined whether such la…
JAGDAMBA DEVIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2017 INSC 8931 January 2017Dismissed
The appellant, Jagdamba Devi, claimed a dependent family pension under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980, on behalf of her late husband Hari Kant Jha, a freedom fighter who was arrested for only thirteen days and alleged to have been underground for about 26 months. The State Government initially recom…
A. SATYANARAYANA REDDY AND OTHERSversusPRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT AND OTHERS
2016 INSC 120230 September 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were employees of a government undertaking who were laid off and later transferred to another company. The Government of Andhra Pradesh issued a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) offering a special compensation package, which the appellants accepted, but the VRS did not provide for lay‑off compensation. …
ARUN DEV UPADHYAYAversusINTEGRATED SALES SERVICE LTD & ANR.
2016 INSC 120330 September 2016Dismissed
Arun Dev Upadhyaya appealed against a judgment of the Single Judge of the Bombay High Court that enforced an international arbitration award against one of the respondents but not the other. The appeal raised the question of whether a Letters Patent appeal could be filed before the Division Bench under the Commercial C…
KANACHUR ISLAMIC EDUCATION TRUST (R)versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
2017 INSC 82430 August 2017Case Allowed
The Kanachur Islamic Education Trust sought confirmation of the conditional Letter of Permission (LOP) granted to its medical college for the 2016-17 academic year and extension for 2017-18, after the Union of India and the Medical Council of India (MCI) debarred the college and ordered encashment of its bank guarantee…
DR. JAGAT NARAIN SUBHARTI CHARITABLE TRUST AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2017 INSC 82530 August 2017Case Allowed
The Dr. Jagat Narain Subharti Charitable Trust applied for permission to establish a new medical college in Dehradun for the 2016‑17 session. The Medical Council of India (MCI) flagged deficiencies in faculty, residents, OPD attendance, bed occupancy and questioned land‑ownership compliance, leading the Central Governm…
YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMONversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
2015 INSC 53730 July 2015Dismissed
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusDILER SINGH
2016 INSC 47930 June 2016Appeal(s) allowed
Constable Oiler Singh of the CRPF left his camp without permission, consumed alcohol and quarrelled with civilians. The disciplinary authority dismissed him under Section 11(1) of the Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949. Singh filed a civil suit seeking a declaration that the dismissal was illegal; the trial court s…
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (VIGILANCE)versusM/S HINDUSTAN LEVER LIMITED
2016 INSC 47830 June 2016Dismissed
The appellant, Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, challenged the exemption granted to Mis Hindustan Lever Ltd under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, on the ground that the company fixed a uniform maximum retail price (MRP) for tea packets that were marked "inclusive of all taxes" despite some units being tax‑ex…
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH CBIversusNIRALA YADAV @ RAJA RAM YADAV @ DEEPAK YADAV
2014 INSC 42530 June 2014Dismissed
The accused, Nirala Yadav, was arrested for offences under the IPC, Arms Act and POTA. After the statutory 90‑day period for filing a charge‑sheet elapsed without a charge‑sheet or an extension application, he filed an application under s.167(2) CrPC for bail. The CBI then filed an application for a 30‑day extension, a…
HARDEIversusSTATE OF U.P.
2016 INSC 29030 March 2016Dismissed
The appellant, Hardei, a Block Pramukh, was summoned under Section 319 of the CrPC to face trial for alleged embezzlement under the MNREGA scheme, although she was not named in the original FIR or charge‑sheet. The prosecution, after examining witnesses, filed an application under Section 319, alleging that evidence re…
RAGHAVENDRA SWAMY MUTTversusUTTARADI MUTT
2016 INSC 29130 March 2016
The appellant Raghavendra Swamy Mutt challenged an interim injunction granted by the Karnataka High Court in a dispute with Uttaradi Mutt over possession of a religious property. The High Court, without first admitting the second appeal under Section 100 of the CPC or formulating the required substantial question of la…
STATE OF PUNJABversusSAURABH BAKSHI
2015 INSC 27630 March 2015
The respondent, Saurabh Bakshi, was convicted under Section 304A of the IPC for causing the deaths of two persons by rash and negligent driving. The trial magistrate sentenced him to one year of rigorous imprisonment and a fine; the High Court reduced the sentence to the 24 days already served, relying on the fact that…
STATE OF- UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERSversusSUBHASH CHANDRA JAISWAL AND OTHERS
2016 INSC 108329 November 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Uttar Pradesh challenged a writ petition filed under Art.226 that sought mandamus against certain respondents for alleged violations of excise licence rules and alleged fraud. The High Court, after examining the investigation, issued a series of sweeping directions ordering the creation of a separate inves…
ASHOK KUMAR & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2016 INSC 107929 November 2016Disposed off
The appellants, landowners whose properties were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed multiple civil appeals seeking compensation. The Supreme Court noted that the factual matrix of each appeal—location of the land, acquisition notifications, and prior compensation determinations—mirrored earlier landma…
POONAMversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2015 INSC 81329 October 2015Dismissed
The appellant, a visually‑handicapped allottee of a fair‑price shop, challenged an appellate order that restored the original allottee's licence and cancelled her own allotment. The High Court dismissed her writ petition on the ground that she was not a necessary party. The Supreme Court examined whether a subsequent a…
NEERU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.
2015 INSC 71329 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Neeru Yadav challenged the Allahabad High Court's order granting bail to respondent No.2, a repeat offender accused of multiple heinous offences including murder and armed assault. The High Court had relied primarily on the doctrine of parity, noting that other co‑accused had been released on bail, and ha…
ANIL KALRAversusJ.D. PANDEY AND OTHERS
2015 INSC 71029 September 2015Disposed off
The case concerned a century‑old building in Lucknow covered by the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. The landlord, Anil Kalra, obtained a release order under s.16(1)(b) for demolition, but several occupants, allegedly placed by the respondents through a cooperative soc…
KRISHAN KUMAR MADAN AND ORS.versusASHOK KUMAR AND ORS.
2018 INSC 75929 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were selected for the post of Personal Assistant by the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission on 3 March 2000, before the reorganisation of Uttar Pradesh into Uttar Pradesh and Uttaranchal (now Uttarakhand) on 9 November 2000. After the reorganisation they exercised the option to serve Uttarakhand and …
STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHERversusTHE L.R.C.G. AND OTHERS
2017 INSC 81829 August 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The Gujarat High Court, in a public‑interest litigation, directed the State to compensate trusts and institutions for religious places damaged in the 2002 communal riots and appointed special officers to assess claims. The State responded by framing an ex‑gratia scheme limiting assistance to Rs 50,000 per place, subjec…
PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD NOW PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD.versusRAJ KUMAR GOEL
2014 INSC 57629 August 2014Appeal(s) allowed
Raj Kumar Goel, a lower‑division clerk of the Punjab State Electricity Board, was found absent without leave and was disciplined with a punishment of stoppage of five annual increments without cumulative effect, also treating the period of absence as non‑duty. He sued the Board seeking a declaration that the order shou…
YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMONversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS
2015 INSC 53429 July 2015Dismissed
The petitioner, convicted under the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts and sentenced to death by a TADA court, sought a writ under Article 32 to stay the execution of the death warrant dated 30 April 2015, alleging procedural irregularities and that his curative petition had not been decided by a bench constituted as per Supreme …
COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT ANURAGI DEVI DEGREE COLLEGE & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.
2016 INSC 47229 June 2016Dismissed
The Committee of Management of Anuragi Devi Degree College sought a writ of mandamus directing Deen Dayal Upadhyay Gorakhpur University to extend its temporary affiliation for the 2015-16 academic session after the statutory deadline had passed. The college had applied for permanent affiliation, but the university fail…
TARA SFNGH & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2016 INSC 47729 June 2016Dismissed
The petitioners, convicted under the NDPS Act and sentenced to more than ten years' rigorous imprisonment, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 32 directing the authorities to grant them remission as per the Punjab Jail Manual. The Court examined whether Section 32A of the NDPS Act bars such remission and whether Ar…
V. VENKATA PRASAD & ORS.versusHIGH COURT OF A.P. & ORS.
2016 INSC 46129 June 2016Dismissed
The appellants, originally District Munsifs promoted to Sub‑Judges, were appointed as District & Sessions Judges (Grade II) to vacant Fast Track Courts (FTCs) under the 2001 Special Rules for Ad‑hoc Appointments. The respondents were later appointed as direct recruits to regular vacancies under the 1958 Rules. The appe…
PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORP.versusBHUSHAN CHANDER & ANR.
2016 INSC 46029 June 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The Punjab State Warehousing Corporation appealed against a High Court order that set aside the conviction of its former Godown Assistant, Bhushan Chander, for criminal breach of trust (IPC s.409) and related offences (s.467, 468, 471) on the ground that prosecution required prior sanction under CrPC s.197. The Supreme…
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.versusLAL SINGH @ MANJIT SINGH & ORS.
2016 INSC 46329 June 2016Appeal(s) allowed
Lal Singh, convicted under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act and sentenced to life imprisonment, applied for premature release under CrPC ss.432 and 433 after being transferred to a Punjab jail. The Gujarat Government rejected his application; the Punjab High Court directed Gujarat to reconsider …
LIFE CONVICT LAL SINGH @ MANJEET SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
2016 INSC 47629 June 2016Disposed off
Lal Singh, a life convict also known as Manjeet Singh, filed a writ petition (Criminal) No. 181 of 2012 under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the orders of the State of Punjab. The petition was heard by a two‑Judge Bench of the Supreme Court. The Court observed that the issues raised in the writ petition had…
ARUN KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU DIST. JUDGE
2013 INSC 36329 May 2013Dismissed
Arun Kumar Yadav, a litigant, entered a courtroom on 5 September 2005 and shouted threatening, unparliamentary remarks at a Judicial Magistrate who was dictating an order. The magistrate lodged a complaint, and the Allahabad High Court framed a charge of criminal contempt under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act,…
THE SECRETARY, MIN.OF DEFENCE & ORS.versusPRABHASH CHANDRA MIRDHA
2012 INSC 25229 May 2012Disposed off
The case concerned an Assistant Foreman of an Ordnance Factory who was served a charge memo alleging bribery and challenged the disciplinary proceedings on the ground that the charge memo was issued by an authority subordinate to his appointing authority. The Central Administrative Tribunal quashed the charge memo, a d…
M/S. CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF HARYANA
2016 INSC 27929 March 2016Appeal(s) allowed
Mis. Casio India Co. Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of radio pagers in Haryana, claimed exemption from Central Sales Tax (CST) on inter‑state sales of goods it purchased from another dealer holding a valid exemption certificate under Rule 28A. The State of Haryana rejected the claim, contending that the exemption applied on…
M/S NEERJA REALTORS PVT LTDversusJANGLU (DEAD) THR. LR.
2018 INSC 6729 January 2018Dismissed
M/s Neerja Realtors Pvt Ltd sued the deceased Janglu for specific performance of a land sale agreement. The trial court issued summons, but the bailiff reported that the defendant had vacated the premises and the summons were returned unserved. An application for substituted service under Order V Rule 20 was filed and …
DHARAM PALversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
2016 INSC 11229 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant's minor daughter was allegedly raped and, a few days later, his wife was murdered; the police investigation led to the acquittal of the accused in the rape case and a pending trial in the murder case. The appellant sought the transfer of the investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) citin…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusSALEENA
2016 INSC 11129 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the detention of Abdu Rahiman under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA). The detenu filed a representation against his detention, which was rejected by the competent authority; the rejection was communicated to him by an under‑secretary rat…
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALAversusMIS K.T.C. AUTOMOBILES
2016 INSC 10629 January 2016Dismissed
The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes of Kerala challenged a penalty of Rs.86 lakh imposed on K.T.C. Automobiles for allegedly evading Kerala sales tax by registering 263 cars sold from its Mahe branch under the Pondicherry Sales Tax Act. The High Court set aside the penalty, holding that the sale was completed at Mahe …
MANOHAR LAL SHARMAversusSANJAY LEELA BHANSALI & ORS.
2017 INSC 115628 November 2017Dismissed
The petitioner, Manohar Lal Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a direction that the film "Padmavati" not be exhibited abroad without a certificate from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) and that the CBI register an FIR against the film's producers under Section 7 of the Cinematograph Ac…
DILBAGH SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2016 INSC 106728 November 2016Dismissed
The appellant and a co-accused were intercepted while travelling in a car and six bags of poppy husk were seized from the vehicle. The appellant challenged the conviction under the NDPS Act, contending that the investigating officers had violated Sections 50 and 57 of the Act. The Supreme Court examined whether Section…
RAM AUTAR & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P.
2016 INSC 107028 November 2016Case Partly allowed
The incident arose when the deceased's cattle trespassed into the fields of the appellants, leading to a heated exchange. Later that day, while seated in adjacent compounds, an altercation escalated; the appellants, urged by others, fetched a gun and shot the deceased, who was also assaulted with lathis. The trial cour…
MOHD. HASHIMversusSTATE OF UP & ORS.
2016 INSC 106628 November 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents were convicted under IPC sections 323 and 498‑A and under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, and sentenced to imprisonment and fine. They sought release on probation of good conduct under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958. The question before the Supreme Court was whether Sect…
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX, U.P.versusM/S OSWAL GREENTECH LIMITED
2016 INSC 728 October 2016Dismissed
M/s Oswal Greentech Ltd., a holder of a recognition certificate under Section 4‑B of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, purchased natural gas at a concessional rate using Form III‑B and used it to manufacture urea. Some of the finished urea was transferred out of Uttar Pradesh by way of stock transfer rather than by sale…
SHYAM PALversusDAYAWATL BESOYA & ANR.
2016 INSC 100128 October 2016Case Partly allowed
The appellant was convicted in two separate complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing dishonoured cheques of Rs.5 lakh each, relating to two loans advanced by the same complainant on different dates but on identical terms. Both trials awarded ten months' simple imprisonment and a fine o…
MANOJ I NAIK &ASSOCIATESversusOFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR
2014 INSC 74128 October 2014Hearing Adjourned
The petition concerned the sale of 291 plots belonging to Vitta Mazda Ltd, a company under liquidation. The Official Liquidator, following orders of the Company Court, attempted to auction the plots at prices far below market value, prompting the petitioners to challenge the price fixation and the liquidation process. …
ROMILA THAPAR AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2018 INSC 91228 September 2018Disposed off
Five eminent citizens filed a writ petition under Article 32 on behalf of five human‑rights activists arrested in connection with the Bhima‑Koregaon violence. The petitioners alleged that the arrests were fabricated, that the police were using the media to prejudice public opinion, and sought a Special Investigating Te…
INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSN.versusSTATE OF KERALA 561 INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION & ORS.V. THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
2017 INSC 104028 September 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court of India, by a 4:1 majority, struck down the practice of excluding women aged 10 to 50 from the Sabarimala temple in Kerala. The Court held that the devotees of Lord Ayyappa do not constitute a separate religious denomination under Article 26 of the Constitution. The exclusionary practice was found no…
SAMAR PAL SINGHversusCHITRANJAN SINGH
2015 INSC 69928 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The landlord, Samar Pal Singh, sued his tenant, Chitranjan Singh, for eviction and arrears of rent under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. The tenant deposited the full arrears with interest and costs, invoking protection under Section 20(4) of the Act. The High Cou…
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusMANINDER SINGH
2015 INSC 61428 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The CBI alleged that Maninder Singh, together with a co‑accused, obtained credit facilities from New Bank of India by submitting forged documents and colluding with a bank manager, thereby cheating the bank of over Rs 10.62 lakh. After a lengthy investigation, a charge‑sheet was filed under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 …
M/S. GALADA POWER AND TELECOMMUNICATION LTD.versusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER ETC.
2016 INSC 56028 July 2016Appeal(s) allowed
M/s. Galada Power and Telecommunication Ltd. claimed a transit loss of aluminium wire insured with United India Insurance Co. The loss was reported within a few days of delivery, and the insurer appointed a surveyor who confirmed the loss. Despite the surveyor's report, the insurer sent a repudiation letter stating the…
ACC LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA
2016 INSC 56128 July 2016Dismissed
ACC Ltd entered into an agreement with Cochin Cement Ltd (CCL) whereby CCL would manufacture cement using raw material supplied by ACC and the cement would be marketed under ACC's brand. ACC claimed that, under Section 5(2) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, the sale made by CCL was the first sale and ACC's sub…
MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL & OTHERSversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & OTHERS
2017 INSC 41728 April 2017Appeal(s) allowed
Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical College, a constituent of Maharishi Markandeshwar University (created under the 2010 Act), was directed by the Himachal Pradesh Government to obtain affiliation from Himachal Pradesh University under the amended Section 3(6a) of the 2006 Private Medical Educational Institutions Act. The …
PAWAN KUMARversusSTATE OF H.P.
2017 INSC 41528 April 2017Dismissed
The appellant, previously acquitted of kidnapping and rape offences, repeatedly threatened and teased the victim, a teenage girl, leading her to set herself ablaze and die. The victim’s dying declaration, recorded by a Head Constable in the presence of a doctor, implicated the appellant as the sole cause of her death. …
SHIVAWWA AND ANRversusTHE BRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANR.
2018 INSC 28528 March 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased, Chanabasayya, was killed when he fell from a tractor‑trailer owned by respondent No.2 while returning from unloading maize at Holealur. His father filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation from the insurer (respondent No.1), the vehicle owner (respondent No.2) an…
MOHINDER SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusPARAMJIT SINGH & ORS.
2018 INSC 28328 March 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned a suit for possession of ancestral land that had been alienated by a gift deed. The original plaintiff, Mohinder Singh, obtained a declaratory decree in 1963 based on a compromise, but the decree was conditional on the death of the donor, Ujjagar Singh, which occurred in 1971. The decree sheet was fi…
VIRUPAKSHAPPA GOUDA AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER
2017 INSC 28328 March 2017Dismissed
Virupakshappa Gouda and another were charged under several IPC sections, including 302 and 149, for an alleged honour killing. They applied for bail repeatedly; the trial court and High Court rejected the first two applications and a Special Leave Petition, but a third application was granted bail by an Additional Sess…
CIPLA LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2012 INSC 54227 November 2012Disposed off
Sugen Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn were granted Indian Patent No. 209251 for a pharmaceutical invention. Cipla Ltd. filed an opposition under Section 25(2) of the Patents Act, 1970, and the Controller revoked the patent on 24 September 2012 relying on the Opposition Board’s recommendation, but without furnishing the Boa…
DR. SANDEEP S/O SADASHIVRAO KANSURKAR AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2015 INSC 80727 October 2015Dismissed
The petitioners challenged the domicile‑based reservation for admission to super‑specialty medical courses in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Tamil Nadu, arguing that it violated Articles 14 and 16 and was contrary to national interest. The States relied on the 1974 Presidential Order issued under Article 371‑D and the 1…
M. SIDDIQ (D) THR. LRS.versusMAHANT SURESH DAS AND OTHERS ETC.
2019 INSC 123127 September 2018Directions issued
The appeals arise from civil suits concerning title to the disputed Ayodhya structure and challenge the validity of the Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act, 1993. The petitioners sought to refer the matter to a Constitution Bench, arguing that the observations in Dr. M. Ismail Faruqui v. Union of India (1994) – …
JOSEPH SHINEversusUNION OF INDIA
2018 INSC 89827 September 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioner challenged the constitutional validity of Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which criminalized adultery, and Section 198 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), which restricted the right to prosecute for adultery to the husband. A five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court held that …
PADMINI SINGHAversusTHE STATE OF ASSAM & OTHERS
2018 INSC 90127 September 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Vice President of Masughat Gaon Panchayat, moved a no‑confidence motion against the President (respondent No. 6) under Section 15(1) of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994. The required special meeting was convened by the Block Development Officer (BDO) rather than the Deputy Commissioner, who is statutorily m…
ASEER JAMALversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2018 INSC 90327 September 2018Disposed off
Aseer Jamal filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking directions to the Union, States and Union Territories to create an effective mechanism for illiterate and visually impaired persons to obtain information under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The petitioner argued that Section 6(1) of the Act discriminates …
SURJIT SINGH & ORS.versusGURWANT KAUR & ORS.
2014 INSC 57027 August 2014Appeal(s) allowed
Surjit Singh filed a suit for specific performance of a land sale contract. The trial court dismissed the suit and rejected the plaintiff's application under Section 151 CPC to file bank statements as additional documents; the High Court affirmed this rejection. On appeal, the plaintiff sought to introduce the same ban…
DENY BORAversusSTATE OF ASSAM
2014 INSC 57127 August 2014Appeal(s) allowed
A doctor was shot dead in his clinic and the accused, Deny Bora, was charged under Sections 302, 34 and 314 of the IPC and under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA). The Designated Court acquitted him of the TADA offences but convicted him for murder based solely on the testimony of PW‑14, w…
GAYATHRIversusM. GIRISH
2016 INSC 118927 July 2016Dismissed
The plaintiff, a septuagenarian, filed a suit in 2007 for possession and damages. The trial proceeded with a prolonged examination-in-chief and the defendant repeatedly sought adjournments under Order XVII Rules 1 and 2, filing more than a dozen interlocutory applications on flimsy grounds, many of which were granted w…
MOHAR SAI AND ANR.versusGAYATRI DEVI AND ORS.
2018 INSC 42927 April 2018Dismissed
The deceased Krishna Kumar Sahu died in a motorcycle accident; his heirs filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held that the motorcycle was driven by the appellant's son, Prem Lal Rajawade, whose rash driving caused the accident, and awa…
NISHAN SINGH & ORS.versusORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. THROUGH REGIONAL MANAGER & ORS.
2018 INSC 43127 April 2018Case Partly allowed
The appellants filed a claim petition after Balvinder Kaur died in a collision where a Maruti car rear-ended a truck. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and the Uttarakhand High Court held that the car driver was at fault for not maintaining a safe distance and dismissed the claim, finding no negligence on the part of …
K. ANBAZHAGANversusSTATE OF KARNATAKAAND OTHERS
2015 INSC 32327 April 2015Disposed off
The case arose from the transfer of a corruption trial involving J. Jayalalithaa from Tamil Nadu to Karnataka. Karnataka appointed Bhavani Singh as Special Public Prosecutor for the trial, but Tamil Nadu later attempted to authorize him to appear before the Karnataka High Court for the appeal. The Supreme Court held th…
NGT BAR ASSOCIATION (WESTERN ZONE)versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
[2018] 3 S.C.R. 6527 March 2018Directions issued
The NGT Bar Association (Western Zone) filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking clarification on the appointment of an acting Chairperson of the National Green Tribunal after the incumbent’s term ended. The issue centered on the interpretation of Section 11 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, which authoris…
SHAKTI VAHINIversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2018 INSC 26627 March 2018Disposed off
The petition sought directions to the Union and State governments to prevent honour crimes, including honour killings, by mandating a national and state plan of action, special cells, and prosecution of offenders. The Court held that any torture or interference with an adult's choice of marriage, even if sanctioned by …
PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD.AND ORS.versusHARI KLSHAN VERMA
2015 INSC 98227 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed
Hari Krishan Verma, an Additional Assistant Engineer with Punjab State Electricity Board, faced disciplinary actions and was deemed inefficient. Upon attaining the age of 55, a High Empowered Integrity Committee examined his entire service record, including past misconduct, and recommended his premature retirement unde…
RAVADA SASIKALAversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR.
2017 INSC 18127 February 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a young man, trespassed into the victim's house and poured acid on her head after his marriage proposal was rejected, causing grievous hurt. He was convicted under Sections 326 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced by the trial court to one year of rigorous imprisonment with fines. The High Cour…
ZARIF AHMAD (D} THROUGH LRS. & ANOTHERversusMOHD. FAROOQ
2015 INSC 6627 January 2015Dismissed
The plaintiff, Mohd. Farooq, filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants, Zarif Ahmad and another, from interfering with his possession of plot No. 358, describing the land by its boundaries and municipal number. The trial court decreed in favour of the plaintiff, but the first appell…
SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. & ORS.versusSHREE LAL MEENA
2019 INSC 37226 November 2015Matter referred to larger bench
The employee, Shree Lal Meena, sent a resignation letter on 14 July 1990, which was accepted on 11 January 1991. After the Life Insurance Corporation (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995 were introduced with retrospective effect from 1 November 1993, he claimed pension on the ground that Rule 3 made the Rules applicable to …
VASANT SAMPAT DUPAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2014 INSC 103326 November 2014Dismissed
Vasant Sampat Dupare was convicted of raping and murdering a four‑year‑old girl. The prosecution relied on a chain of circumstantial evidence – eyewitnesses who saw the accused with the child, forensic matches of blood on the stones and the accused’s clothing, and the accused’s own disclosure leading police to the body…
JARNAIL SINGH & OTHERSversusLACHHMI NARAIN GUPTA & OTHERS
2018 INSC 88126 September 2018Reference answered
The Supreme Court examined a slew of petitions seeking a referral of the M. Nagaraj judgment to a larger bench, focusing on the validity of its requirement that States collect quantifiable data on the backwardness of Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) for promotion reservations. The Court held that while t…
SWAPNIL TRIPATHIversusSUPREME COURT OF INDIA
2018 INSC 88626 September 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 32 seeking a declaration that Supreme Court proceedings of constitutional and national importance be live‑streamed and that a regulatory framework be established. The Court examined whether live‑streaming is compatible with the constitutional mandate of open courts, the rights…
LOK PRAHARI, THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY S.N. SHUKLAversusELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS.
2018 INSC 88426 September 2018Dismissed
Lok Prahari, a society, filed a public‑interest litigation seeking a declaration that a stay of conviction granted by an appellate court does not remove the disqualification of a sitting MLA/MP under Section 8 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and that the legislative seat becomes vacant from the date of c…
TEHSEEN POONAWALLAversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2018 INSC 88826 September 2018Disposed off
Ms. Indira Jaising, appearing as counsel for an intervenor in Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India, filed a Miscellaneous Application seeking to expunge Supreme Court remarks that the conduct of counsel for the petitioners and intervenors amounted to prima facie contempt of court. She contended that the observations in…
UTTARADI MUTTversusRAGHAVENDRA SWAMY MUTT
2018 INSC 88526 September 2018Disposed off
The appellant Uttaradi Mutt filed a suit for injunction against the respondent Raghavendra Swamy Mutt, which was dismissed by the trial court. On appeal, the respondent sought to produce additional evidence under Order XLI Rule 27 of the CPC; the First Appellate Court rejected these applications while allowing the appe…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusKRISHNA RAO & ORS. ETC. ETC.
2018 INSC 88226 September 2018Disposed off
E Krishna Rao and another, employed on contract as TV News Correspondent and TV Assistant News Correspondent, opted to be treated as government servants under the Indian Broadcasting (Programme) Service Rules, 1990. After twelve years without promotion, they approached the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) claiming…
SUPER BAZAR KARAMCHARI DALIT SANGH AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2018 INSC 89426 September 2018Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined contempt petitions filed by Writers & Publishers Ltd. (WPL) alleging non‑compliance of its own order dated 17 May 2018, which directed a full refund of WPL’s investment in the failed revival of the multi‑state cooperative society Super Bazar along with 6% interest. The Court held that the ord…
PATEL AHMED MOHAMMADversusBALWANT SINGH RAJPUT & ORS.
2018 INSC 88726 September 2018Leave Granted & Disposed off
Patel Ahmed Mohammad, a Rajya Sabha member, was challenged by Balwant Singh Rajput in an election petition alleging corrupt practices and vote irregularities. The appellant filed three applications for dismissal of the petition: (i) on the basis that office objections under Gujarat High Court Rules were not removed (Ap…
JUSTICE K. S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD.)versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2018 INSC 88026 September 2018Disposed off
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016, which provides a unique identity number to residents based on biometric and demographic data. The petitioners challenged the Act on grounds of violation of the right…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusSURENDRA KORI
2012 INSC 42726 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh alleged that Surendra Kori, a Deputy Registrar, facilitated the registration of over one hundred forged sale deeds to enable fictitious buyers to claim benefits under a Special Rehabilitation Package for the Sardar Sarovar Project. FIRs and charge‑sheets were filed under IPC sections 420, 46…
BAKSHI SECURITY AND PERSONNEL SERVICES PVT. LTDversusDEVKISHAN COMPUTED PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
2016 INSC 55926 July 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The Gujarat Transport Department floated a tender for manpower services with conditions that the salary paid must not be less than the minimum wage and that bids must be fixed, not open‑ended. Three bidders qualified; the Technical Evaluation Committee fixed a minimum‑wage figure of Rs 3,00,92,346, rendering the bids o…
STATE OF BIHAR & ORSversusARBIND
2013 INSC 49726 July 2013Disposed off
Arbind, a headmaster, was suspended pending a departmental enquiry and was required to remain at the headquarters. His salary and subsistence allowance were not paid, forcing him to leave the headquarters due to poverty, after which he missed the enquiry and was dismissed ex‑parte. He challenged the dismissal; the High…
SADHU SARAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
2016 INSC 21726 February 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from a violent incident in 1994 in which five accused persons allegedly attacked the family of informant Bhola Singh, resulting in the death of three of his sons. The trial court convicted all six accused of murder and related offences, sentencing two of them to death and the others to life imprisonment.…
NASHIK WORKERS UNIONversusHINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LIMITED
2016 INSC 117026 February 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The Nashik Workers Union filed several complaints under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 seeking reinstatement and back wages for trainees of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL). The dispute turned on whether, for HAL, the "appropriate Government" under Sec…
DHIRENDRA KUMAR @ DHIROOversusSTATE OF UTIARAKHAND
2015 INSC 14826 February 2015Dismissed
The appellant, Dhirendra Kumar, was convicted of murdering Surat Singh by striking him on the head with a stone. The prosecution presented eye‑witnesses, the widow of the deceased, and corroborative testimony establishing prior enmity and a motive. The accused claimed he was falsely implicated and that the incident was…
TEJRAM PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2015 INSC 16626 February 2015Dismissed
The appellant, Tejram Patil, was convicted of murdering his wife Savita by pouring kerosene and setting her on fire; Savita’s mother Prabhabai and the landlady Vimal also sustained burn injuries and died. The trial court admitted Prabhabai’s dying declaration (OD) to prove the cause of Prabhabai’s death but rejected Sa…
K.P. MANUversusCHAIRMAN, SCRUTINY COMMITTEE FOR VERIFICATION OF COMMUNITY CERTIFICATE
2015 INSC 16326 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, K.P. Manu, born to Christian parents, reconverted to Hinduism at age 24 and obtained a Hindu Pulaya caste certificate. The Scrutiny Committee and the Kerala High Court cancelled the certificate, holding that his Christian birth precluded Scheduled Caste status. The Supreme Court examined whether a person…
PUBLIC INTEREST FOUNDATION & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2018 INSC 86225 September 2018Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether it could compel Parliament to enact a law disqualifying candidates against whom serious criminal charges have been framed and whether it could direct the Election Commission to deny such candidates the use of a party's reserved symbol. The Court held that disqualification is a matter …
COAL INDIA LTD. & ANR.versusNAVIN KUMAR SINGH
2018 INSC 86425 September 2018Dismissed
Navin Kumar Singh, an executive of Coal India Ltd., was transferred from Dankuni Coal Complex (DCC) to its subsidiary CMPDIL on his own request. The company's policy stated that seniority in the new company would be reckoned from the date of transfer, but it was unclear whether past service in the parent unit could be …
REEMA SALKANversusSUMER SINGH SALKAN
2018 INSC 86725 September 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant-wife filed a Section 125 CrPC maintenance petition in 2003 after her husband, a Canadian permanent resident, failed to bring her to Canada and allegedly obstructed her visa. The Family Court awarded Rs.10,000 per month from July 2003 to December 2010 and denied maintenance thereafter, finding the husband …
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAYversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2018 INSC 86625 September 2018Dismissed
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a direction to bar Members of Parliament, Legislative Assemblies and Councils from practising as advocates while holding office, invoking Bar Council of India Rule 49 which prohibits advocates from being full‑time salaried employees. The Court examined wheth…
UNION OF INDIAversusHARDY EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION (INDIA) INC
2018 INSC 86525 September 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The Union of India challenged an arbitral award made in its favour by Hardy Exploration and Production (India) Inc, contending that Indian courts had jurisdiction to entertain a Section 34 application despite the arbitration agreement specifying Kuala Lumpur as the "venue" for proceedings. The Delhi High Court held tha…
MURLIDHAR SHIVRAM PATEKAR & ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2014 INSC 68025 September 2014Disposed off
The husband and wife were convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for the death of Asaram, who they alleged had raped the wife. The trial and High Courts upheld the conviction, but the Supreme Court examined medical evidence, eyewitness testimony, and the dying declaration, finding the death homicidal but caused in a…
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusJAINUDEEN SHEKHANDANR.
2015 INSC 61025 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Rajasthan appealed against a Special Judge's order granting Rs.1,50,000 compensation to two accused persons, Jainudeen and Shabbir, who were acquitted under the NDNDPS Act after a forensic report, delayed by two years, showed no contraband. The trial judge had based the compensation on alleged malice and t…
SATYA PAL ANANDversusSTATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS
2016 INSC 98825 August 2015
Satya Pal Anand, a septuagenarian, claimed that a plot of land allotted to his mother by a cooperative society was unlawfully cancelled by the society through a Deed of Extinguishment dated 9‑8‑2001, and that subsequent sale deeds to third parties were also void. The Sub‑Registrar refused to cancel the extinguishment d…
VAISHAGGARWAL PANCHAYATversusINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS
2015 INSC 60725 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The Vaish Aggarwal Panchayat, a society, filed a declaration suit in 2001 seeking to declare a 1998 decree and subsequent sale deed as void on grounds of fraud and collusion, after having earlier objected to the execution of that decree. The respondents, who were parties to the original 1993 suit, moved an application …
SGT CHAMAN LALversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2017 INSC 66225 July 2017Dismissed
The appellant, Sergeant Chaman Lal, a disabled airman classified as medical category A4G4 (P), claimed that he was discriminated against in promotion to Junior Warrant Officer because officers with higher disability percentages were promoted. He relied on Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, arguing i…
STATE OF U.P. & ORS.versusPANKAJ KUMAR VISHNOI
2013 INSC 49625 July 2013Disposed off
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Vishnoi, son of a Head Constable who died in service, was initially given a compassionate appointment as Constable. He later sought a compassionate appointment as Sub‑Inspector without undergoing the required physical test, after having failed such a test earlier. The High Court directed th…
JUSTICE SUNANDA BHANDARE FOUNDATIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
2017 INSC 128425 April 2017Hearing Adjourned
The petitioners sought directions for the Union, State Governments and Union Territories to comply with the Supreme Court's earlier orders on the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, noting that the Act had been repealed and replaced by the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The Court examined the legislati…
DINESHversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2014 INSC 33325 April 2014Dismissed
The appellant Dinesh was convicted for the death of his wife Manju Bala, who committed suicide by ingesting a pesticide within four years of marriage. The prosecution alleged that Dinesh and his brothers repeatedly harassed the deceased for additional dowry items such as a television and a gold chain, and barred her pa…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM/S. HAMDARD (WAQF) LABORATORIES
2016 INSC 116825 February 2016Dismissed
M/s. Hamdard (Waqf) Laboratories, a manufacturer of the sweetened non‑alcoholic beverage Rooh Afza, disputed the classification of its product under the Central Excise Tariff, which led to a refund claim of Rs 3.74 crore. The refund was granted by the Assistant Commissioner on 16 Nov 2000, but no interest was paid. The…
MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD.versusM/S. APPLIED ELECTRONICS LTD.
2016 INSC 105924 November 2016Directions issued
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. appealed a Delhi High Court order that had held the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) applicable to an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and had entertained a cross‑objection under Order XLII Rule 22 CPC. The Supreme Court examined whether the 1996 Act is a…
SHAMSHER SINGH VERMAversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2015 INSC 86024 November 2015Appeal(s) allowed
Shamsher Singh Verma was charged under IPC 354 and the POCSO Act for allegedly molesting his nine‑year‑old niece. The accused filed an application under Section 294 of the CrPC to have a compact disc containing a recorded conversation between the victim's father, the accused's son and his wife played in court and sent …
COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICERversusA INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
2015 INSC 85924 November 2015Dismissed
The Commercial Taxes Officer appealed against A Infrastructure Ltd's claim of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on raw material used to manufacture asbestos cement sheets. The assessing authority had disallowed the ITC, contending that the final product was exempted under Notification S.O. 377/2007, and therefore the goods were "…
SAROJ AGARWALLA (DEAD) THR. LR ABHISHEK AGRAWALLAversusYASHEEL JAIN
2016 INSC 98624 October 2016Dismissed
The appellant sought probate of a will of her deceased brother, but two respondents—Yasheel Jain, claiming to be the testator's nephew and beneficiary under an alleged earlier will, and Malati Tulshan, claiming to be the testator's second wife—filed caveats. The Calcutta High Court rejected the appellant's prayer to di…
CHEVITI VENKANNA YADAVversusSTATE OF TELANGANA AND ORS.
2016 INSC 120624 October 2016Dismissed
The petitioners were appointed as Chairmen, Vice‑Chairmen and members of Agricultural Market Committees under the Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966. After the creation of Telangana in 2014, the State promulgated Ordinance No.1 of 2014 reducing the size of the committees, shortening t…
GEORGE BHAKTANversusRABINDRA LELE & ORS.
2014 INSC 67524 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant filed a private complaint under Section 200 CrPC alleging forgery and fraud in connection with a machinery supply contract, leading the magistrate to take cognizance of offences under Sections 425, 468 and 471 IPC. The respondents obtained a stay of the cognizance by invoking Section 195(1)(b)(ii) CrPC, a…
BENGAL STATE ELECTION COMMISSION AND ORS.versusCOMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIA (MARXIST) AND ORS.
2018 INSC 74424 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The West Bengal State Election Commission sought to set aside a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court order that directed acceptance of nomination papers filed electronically for the 2018 Panchayat elections. The High Court had justified its direction on the ground of ensuring free and fair elections and on a readi…
M/S COLGATE PALMOLIVE (INDIA) LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, PATNA
2016 INSC 119524 August 2016Dismissed
M/S Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd imported dentifrice products from Nepal and claimed exemption from customs duties under Notification No. 37/96 issued pursuant to the India‑Nepal Treaty of Trade. After the introduction of Section 3A of the Customs Tariff Act in 1998, a Special Additional Duty (SAD) was levied on the i…
STATE OF HARYANAversusRAM MEHAR & OTHERS ETC. ETC.
2016 INSC 61624 August 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Haryana prosecuted 148 workers for offences including murder arising from a factory fire. After the prosecution examined 102 witnesses and the accused gave statements under Section 313 CrPC, the defence sought recall of several prosecution witnesses under Section 311 CrPC, alleging that the lead counsel ha…
TAMIL NADU MEDICAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2018 INSC 33224 April 2018Disposed off
The Tamil Nadu Medical Officers Association challenged Regulation 9(iv) and 9(vii) of the Post‑Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000, alleging that the provisions barred states from creating a separate entry stream for in‑service doctors seeking postgraduate degree seats and were violative of Articles 14 and 19(…
CHERAN PROPERTIES LIMITEDversusKASTURI AND SONS LIMITED AND ORS.
2018 INSC 39424 April 2018Dismissed
The dispute arose from a share purchase agreement where KCP and its nominees, including Cheran Properties Limited (the appellant), were to acquire shares of SPIL from KSL. The parties later entered arbitration, which awarded KSL the return of share documents and payment of Rs 3.58 crore. The award attained finality, an…
VUTUKURU LAKSHMAIAHversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2015 INSC 35224 April 2015Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the murder of Patrangi Ramanaiah, who was stabbed by a group of accused during an unlawful assembly. The trial court and High Court had convicted most of the accused under Sections 302, 148 and 324 IPC, relying on eyewitness testimony, a dying declaration, and forensic evidence, while acquitt…
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIAversusM/S ITD CEMENTATION INDIALIMITED
2015 INSC 35324 April 2015Disposed off
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) entered into a FIDIC‑based contract with M/s ITD Cementation for highway widening, which contained price‑adjustment clauses (70.1‑70.8) and a provision that all duties, taxes and levies existing 28 days before bid submission were to be included in the bid price. After the…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusNOMI SINGH AND ANOTHER
2015 INSC 25524 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh claimed ownership of 45 bighas of land acquired in 1946 for an industrial area, which had been leased to the plaintiff Nomi Singh for one year in 1951. The plaintiffs asserted title as Bhumiswamis based on an alleged oral patta from the former Zamindar and later pleaded adverse possession af…
PRADESH AND OTHERSversusPUNRADEVI
2015 INSC 25624 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed
Punra Devi, appointed as an Anganwadi Helper (AWH) at the Chori centre in Himachal Pradesh, applied for promotion to Anganwadi Worker (AWW) at the Hardeeppur centre, invoking a 2012 communication from the Director of Social Justice and Empowerment that gave priority to AWHs for vacant AWW posts in the same centre. The …
V. RAJENDRAN AND ANR.versusANNASAMY PANDLAN (D) THR. LRS. KARTHYAYANL NATCHIAR
2017 INSC 125724 January 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants filed a suit for permanent injunction in 2004 describing the suit property as Survey No.192/9. During the trial they discovered that the respondents had transferred the patta and executed an Inam Settlement Deed referring to the same land as Survey No.192/14, creating a confusion about the identity of th…
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusQ.C.R.G. MEMORIAL TRUST & ORS.
2017 INSC 113223 November 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court entertained Civil Appeal No. 19662 of 2017 filed by the Medical Council of India against the G.C.R.G. Memorial Trust, which had been debarred from admitting medical students for the 2017‑18 and 2018‑19 academic years. The High Court, despite a Supreme Court order dated 28‑08‑2017 prohibiting any inter…
RANJIT SARKARversusSTATE OF TRIPURA
2015 INSC 102623 September 2015Disposed off
The appellant, Ranjit Sarkar, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for delivering a single blow with a wooden file to the head of the deceased, Anil Das, who later died from head injuries. The prosecution alleged multiple injuries, while the defence argued that only one blow caused the death, making it culpabl…
HEMANTA MONDAL AND OTHERSversusSRI GANESH CHANDRA NASKAR
2015 INSC 102523 September 2015Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a dispute arising from a sale agreement where the buyer paid Rs.60,000 as earnest money and agreed to pay the balance upon execution of a sale deed. The buyer sought specific performance, possession and injunction, but the sellers refused to execute the deed, questioning the measurement of th…
AKHILESH KUMAR SINGHversusRAM DAWAN & ORS.
2015 INSC 102423 September 2015Dismissed
The case concerned a single clerk post in a U.P. Intermediate College governed by the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921. The college's regulations required that 50% of sanctioned posts be filled by promotion, with a note that a single post would be deemed as one when calculating the 50% quota. The petitioner argued…
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusSHASHANK GOSWAMI & ANR.
2012 INSC 24623 May 2012Appeal(s) allowed
Anand Kishore Gautam, a senior accountant, died while in service, leaving a widow and three children. The widow applied for a compassionate appointment in a Group C post, but the application was rejected because the family had received terminal benefits exceeding the Rs 3 lakh ceiling stipulated in the compassionate ap…
PRANAY KUMAR PODDERversusSTATE OF TRIPURA AND OTHERS
2017 INSC 26423 March 2017
The appellants, two candidates who scored the required marks for MBBS admission, were declared ineligible on the ground of partial colour‑vision deficiency (CVD). They challenged the decision of the Medical Council of India (MCI) and the State of Tripura before the High Court, which dismissed their writ petition, holdi…
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY SEC. AND ORS.versusK. BALU AND ANR.
2018 INSC 18823 February 2018Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered applications by the States of Mizoram and Assam seeking exemption from the 500‑metre distance requirement for liquor outlets imposed by its earlier judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. K. Balu. The Court had previously exempted Meghalaya, Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh on the ground of their hi…
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY SEC. AND ORSversusK. BALU AND ANR.
2018 INSC 18823 February 2018Disposed off
The Supreme Court was asked to interpret paragraph 7 of its 11 July 2017 order, which dealt with prohibiting the sale of liquor along highways but clarified that it did not apply to licensed establishments within municipal areas. The petitioners sought a further clarification to determine whether the same principle sho…
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY SEC. AND ORS.versusK. BALU AND ANR.
2018 INSC 18823 February 2018Directions issued
The State of Himachal Pradesh filed a petition seeking the same liquor‑sale concession that the Supreme Court had granted to the State of Uttarakhand for its hilly districts. The Court noted its earlier order of 31 March 2017, which limited Himachal Pradesh’s exemption to areas with local bodies of population not excee…
K.V. PRAKASH BABUversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2016 INSC 105122 November 2016
The appellant, K.V. Prakash Babu, was convicted under Sections 498‑A and 306 of the IPC for the suicide of his wife, who allegedly suspected him of an extra‑marital affair. The prosecution alleged that the husband's alleged relationship and the resulting suspicion constituted mental cruelty that drove the wife to kill …
PONNAIYAH RAMAJAYAM INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCESversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
2017 INSC 97822 September 2017Disposed off
The Ponnaiyah Ramajayam Institute of Medical Sciences (PRIMS) applied for a Letter of Permission (LOP) to start a new medical college for the 2016‑17 academic year and sought renewal for 2017‑18. Conditional LOP was granted for 2016‑17, but subsequent inspections by the Medical Council of India (MCI) revealed persisten…
BUNGA DANIEL BABUversusMIS SRI VASUDEVA CONSTRUCTIONS & ORS.
2016 INSC 54622 July 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a landowner, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with a builder to construct a multi‑storey building, with the completed flats to be shared 40% to the landowner and 60% to the builder. The agreement required completion within 19 months and stipulated rent payable for delay. The construction was de…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusMARICO INDUSTRIES LTD.
2016 INSC 54722 July 2016Dismissed
The State of Madhya Pradesh challenged the imposition of entry tax on Marico Industries' products Mediker and Revive instant starch. The issue was whether Mediker, marketed as an anti‑lice treatment, should be classified as a shampoo under Schedule II Entry 32 of the Madhya Pradesh Entry Tax Act, 1976, or as a drug/med…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusR.P. SINGH
2014 INSC 40422 May 2014Dismissed
R.P. Singh, an Assistant Engineer in CPWD, faced departmental proceedings for alleged misconduct. The Inquiry Officer found the charges unproved, but the Disciplinary Authority disagreed, sought advice from the UPSC, received a recommendation to reduce his pay, and imposed the penalty, communicating the UPSC advice onl…
RAMESH KUMAR @BABLAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2016 INSC 117922 April 2016Case Partly allowed
The case arose from a clash between two groups in 1997 where the appellant, Ramesh Kumar @ Babla, was alleged to have struck the complainant with a sword, causing head injuries. The trial court convicted him under Section 307 of the IPC for attempted murder and sentenced him to three years' rigorous imprisonment, a dec…
PRAKASH NAGARDAS DUBAL SHAHAversusSOU. MEENA PRAKASH DUBAL SHAH & ORS.
2016 INSC 117822 April 2016Dismissed
The wife filed an application under Sections 12, 18‑22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 seeking maintenance for herself and her children, alleging mental and physical abuse, the husband’s second marriage and failure to pay alimony after a dismissed divorce petition. The Sessions Court dismiss…
KUDRAT SANDHUversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2018 INSC 18522 February 2018Directions issued
The petition sought judicial directions on the selection of chairpersons, judicial, administrative, technical and expert members of various tribunals under the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and Other Authorities (Qualification, Experience and Other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2017. The Supreme Court, after …
EX. GNR. LAXMANRAM POONIA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusUNLON OF INDIA AND ORS.
2017 INSC 17022 February 2017Appeal(s) allowed
Laxmanram Poonia enlisted in the Indian Army in 2005 and was diagnosed with acute schizophrenia in 2007, leading to his invalidation in 2009 with a 60% disability rating. The Medical Board concluded the disability was neither attributable to nor aggravated by military service, and the Armed Forces Tribunal rejected his…
M/S. JAYASAWALS NECO LTD.versusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ANOTHER
2017 INSC 16822 February 2017Appeal(s) allowed
Mis. Jayasawals NECO Ltd., a power‑intensive industry, challenged the Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission’s imposition of minimum monthly charges based on a 30% load‑factor for FY 2005‑2006. The Commission, after reviewing the appellant’s consumption pattern, reduced the minimum charge to 10% load‑fact…
BUSSA OVERSEAS & PROPERTIES (P) LTD. & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2016 INSC 116422 January 2016Dismissed
Bussa Overseas & Properties Ltd. sought a refund of excess provisional customs duty under Section 18(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. The customs authority directed the claim to be made under Section 27(2) and the appellants contested this, filing a writ petition. The High Court dismissed the writ and, on review, rejected …
INDIAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCEMENT OF RESEARCH AND EDUCATION HALDIA (!CARE) & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2017 INSC 96921 September 2017Disposed off
The petitioners, ICARE Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, sought approval and recognition under Section 11(2) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 for MBBS courses. The Medical Council of India (MCI) conducted several inspections, including a surprise compliance‑verification inspection on 24‑April‑2017, and f…
M/S KOHINOOR TRANSPORTERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2018 INSC 73121 August 2018Disposed off
The dispute arose from an arbitral award dated 20 July 1984 under the Arbitration Act, 1940, which was made a rule of the court and later reduced in interest rate. The appellant sought execution of the award, and the State (respondent) deposited Rs 75,65,945, after which the executing court ordered the State to deposit…
M/S KOHINOOR TRANSPORTERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2018 INSC 73121 August 2018
An arbitral award dated 20 July 1984, made a rule of the court in 1986, was being executed when the State of Uttar Pradesh deposited Rs 75,65,945 and was later directed by the executing court to deposit an additional Rs 1,25,16,969.56, which the State objected to. The State filed a civil revision, and the High Court, i…
SUMAN DEVIversusMANISHA DEVI AND ORS.
2018 INSC 73021 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was declared elected as Ward Councilor on 28 January 2016. The first respondent filed an election petition under Section 176 of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act on 10 February 2016, withdrew it on 1 March 2016 and was given liberty to file a fresh petition, which she did on 2 March 2016—beyond the 30‑day pe…
M/S. SONELL CLOCKS AND GIFTS LTD.versusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
2018 INSC 72721 August 2018Dismissed
M/s Sonell Clocks and Gifts Ltd. had an insurance policy covering its plant and machinery. Flood damage occurred on 4 August 2004, but the insurer was notified only on 30 November 2004, well beyond the 15‑day period required by Clause 6 of the policy. The insurer appointed a surveyor, whose report concluded that the cl…
SAMIR NARAIN BHOJWANIversusM/S. AURORA PROPERTIES AND INVESTMENTS AND ANR.
2018 INSC 73321 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a developer, was ordered by the Bombay High Court to hand over eight flats and sixteen parking spaces to the plaintiff under a settlement agreement between the plaintiff and another respondent, even though the appellant had no direct contract with the plaintiff. The appellant challenged the High Court's …
SHAILESH MANUBHAI PARMARversusELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA THROUGH THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER & ORS.
2018 INSC 72821 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The petition filed by Shailesh Manubhai Parmar, the Chief Whip of the INC in Gujarat, challenged the Election Commission's circulars that introduced the "None of the Above" (NOTA) option in Rajya Sabha (Council of States) elections. The Court examined whether NOTA, which was introduced for direct elections to Parliamen…
KUDRAT SANDHUversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2018 INSC 18521 August 2018Disposed off
The Supreme Court, hearing a writ petition under Article 32, clarified the superannuation ages for members of several statutory tribunals. It held that a member of the Central Sales Tax Tribunal (CESTAT) shall serve until the age of 62 years, while the President may serve until 65 years. Similarly, a member of the Inco…
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.versusHYUNDAI ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. & ORS.
2018 INSC 73221 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether clause 7 of a Contractor's All Risk insurance policy constituted a valid arbitration clause. The clause stipulated that arbitration would apply only if the insurer admitted liability and a dispute arose over the quantum payable. The insurer, United India Insurance, had repudiated the …
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusRATHIN DANDAPAT AND OTHERS
2015 INSC 59921 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from the killing of nine persons and injuries to many villagers in Netai, West Bengal, where the CBI investigated and filed a charge sheet against 21 accused, some of whom were absconders. After the charge sheet, several proclaimed offenders were arrested and the CBI sought police remand under Section 16…
RAJU @ DEVENDRA CHOUBEYversusSTATE OF CHHATISGARH
2014 INSC 55821 August 2014Disposed off
The case concerned the murder of Bhavna Tripathi, the daughter‑in‑law of accused No.1 (Shashi Tripathi), who was alleged to have hired contract killers (accused Nos.2 and 4) to kill her over a domestic dispute. The sole eyewitness, a 13‑year‑old servant (PW‑21), identified the accused and described how accused No.4 cau…
GHANSHYAM DASS GUPTAversusMAKHAN LAL
2012 INSC 34321 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant filed an appeal in the Delhi High Court but, due to a clerical error, the vakalatnama of his new counsel was not filed and no lawyer appeared for either party at the final hearing. Despite the absence of representation, the High Court examined the merits of the case and dismissed the appeal. The appellant…
MS. EERA THROUGH DR. MANJULA KRIPPENDORFversusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
2017 INSC 65821 July 2017Disposed off
The appeal concerned the interpretation of Section 2(d) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, where the appellant, a mentally retarded adult, argued that "age" should include mental age so that she could be treated as a child. The Court examined the POCSO Act's objects and reasons, its d…
MR. ROBERT JOHN D'SOUZA AND OTHERSversusMR. STEPHEN V. GOMESANDANOTHER
2015 INSC 50621 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, directors of Mukka Welfare Society, were summoned in a criminal complaint alleging breach of trust and cheating in respect of a 1996 sale of society land. The complainant, not a member of the society, filed the complaint more than a decade after the deeds were executed, despite an earlier police investi…
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORSversusSARAT CHANDRA GOSWAMI
2014 INSC 40221 May 2014Dismissed
The respondent, a District Manager of the Food Corporation of India, was penalised under Regulation 60 of the FCI (Staff) Regulations, 1971 for alleged neglect of duties, resulting in a fine and censure. He challenged the disciplinary order, contending that the Chairman‑cum‑Managing Director had not complied with Regul…
MADIRAJU VENKATA RAMANA RAJUversusPEDDIREDDIGARI RAMACHANDRA REDDY & ORS.
2018 INSC 24921 March 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant challenged the election of respondent No.1 to the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly on the ground that the Returning Officer had improperly accepted the respondent's nomination form, which contained blank columns and lacked signatures on each page, violating the Representation of People Act, 1951. The r…
RAM KISHAN FAUJIversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
2017 INSC 23821 March 2017Appeal(s) allowed
Ram Kishan Fauji challenged the Haryana Lokayukta's recommendation to register an FIR and investigate alleged corruption. The Punjab & Haryana High Court, sitting as a Single Judge, quashed the recommendation and the FIR under a writ petition filed under Article 226. The State appealed the judgment via a Letters Patent…
NEERAJ KUMAR SAINY AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
2017 INSC 23921 March 2017Dismissed
The appellants, who cleared the Uttar Pradesh Post Graduate Medical Entrance Examination but were not allotted seats in the first round of counselling, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to conduct second, third and mop‑up rounds of counselling as prescribed in the information brochure. The Hi…
VASANTHIversusVENUGOPAL (D) THR. LRS.
2017 INSC 24021 March 2017Disposed off
Vasanti purchased a residential property on 26 June 1982 from the heirs of Ramnathan Chettiar and sought a declaration of title and possession. The original occupant, Venugopal (deceased), claimed he had a 1975 agreement of sale with the same owner, had paid part consideration, taken possession and invoked Section 53A …
JAYANTILAL CHIMANLAL PATELversusVADILAL PURUSHOTTAMDAS PATEL
2017 INSC 16021 February 2017Disposed off
The appellant-landlord filed a suit in 1992 seeking a permanent injunction against the tenant for constructing a permanent structure without consent, invoking Section 13(b) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. The trial court partially decreed the suit, but the High Court later dismisse…
PATHUBHA GOVINDJI RATHOD & ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2015 INSC 6521 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed
In a village in Gujarat, two rival groups clashed, resulting in a free fight in which appellant No.1 Pathubha Govindji Rathod was stabbed with a knife and subsequently fired a revolver, killing Natha Nagabhai. Both appellant No.1 and appellant No.2 Hemubha Govindji were convicted under Section 302/304 read with Section…
VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2015 INSC 95621 January 2015Dismissed
Vinod Kumar, an octroi inspector, was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.500. The prosecution relied on the recovery of the tainted notes, the testimony of an independent clerk (PW‑6), a shadow witness (PW‑7) who was later declared ho…
KRISHNA BHATACHARJEEversusSARATHI CHOUDHURY AND ANR.
2015 INSC 84820 November 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a wife, filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 seeking seizure of her stridhan held by her husband after they were judicially separated. The trial court, Sessions Court and High Court dismissed the application on the grounds that she was no longe…
ELEKTRON LIGHTING SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.versusSHAH INVESTMENTS FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS AND CONSULTANTS PVT.LTD AND ORS. ETC.
2015 INSC 84920 November 2015Case Partly allowed
The Aurangabad Municipal Corporation invited an online BOT tender for replacing street lights with LED fittings. Elektron Lighting Systems and its joint venture were awarded the work order after their technical bid was accepted and price bid negotiated, while two other bidders were disqualified. The successful bidder h…
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusBALAKRISHNAN & ANOTHER
2012 INSC 52120 November 2012Case Partly allowed
The Managing Director of a company was injured while travelling in a car owned by the company and insured with National Insurance Company Ltd. He claimed compensation under Sections 140, 147 and 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal held the insurer liable. The insurer appealed, arg…
M/S SHOBIKAA IMPEX PVT. LTD. AND ANR.versusCENTRAL MEDICAL SERVICES SOCIETY AND ORS.
2016 INSC 120120 September 2016Dismissed
The appellants, Mis Shobikaa Impex Pvt. Ltd. and a related entity, submitted a bid for a government tender to supply long‑lasting insecticide nets but failed to produce a Central Insecticide Board (CIB) registration certificate at the time of bid opening. The tender documents, as amended, required the registration cert…
PEMMADA PRABHAKAR & ORS.versusYOUNGMENS VYSYA ASSOCIATION & ORS.
2014 INSC 54920 August 2014Case Partly allowed
The suit involved a self‑acquired, intestate property of the deceased Pemmada Venkateswara Rao, which devolved equally among his wife, three sons and three daughters under the Hindu Succession Act. The plaintiffs sought specific performance of a sale agreement that was executed only by two of the six co‑heirs, who did …
SATVIR SINGHversusSTATE OF DELHI THROUGH CBI
2014 INSC 54820 August 2014Appeal(s) allowed
Satvir Singh, an Inspector Customs, was accused of demanding and accepting a bribe from complainant Ramesh Suri in 1989. The trial court acquitted him, finding that the prosecution had not proved the demand, acceptance, or recovery of illegal gratification and that the presumption under Section 20 of the Prevention of …
MRS. KANIKA GOELversusSTATE OF DELHI THROUGH S.H.O. AND ANR.
2018 INSC 62220 July 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved a US‑born minor girl, M, whose mother (the appellant) fled the United States with her to India and filed for divorce. The father (respondent No.2) obtained a US custody order and sought a writ of habeas corpus in Delhi to have the child returned to the US. The Delhi High Court ordered her return, but …
STATE OF ASSAMversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2018 INSC 62720 July 2018Disposed off
The State of Assam, in a boundary dispute with the State of Nagaland, sought the production of additional topographical maps from a Survey of India witness during the trial. An earlier order of the Court had already permitted the production of certain maps, but Assam required more documents that were not in its possess…
HETCHIN HAOKIPversusSTATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS.
2018 INSC 62820 July 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was detained under the National Security Act, 1980 on 12 July 2017, and the District Magistrate reported the detention to the State Government only on 17 July 2017, a five‑day delay. The petitioner challenged the detention on the ground that the report was not made "forthwith" as required by Section 3(4) …
NUTAN RANI AND ANR.versusGURMAIL SINGH AND ORS.
2018 INSC 62120 July 2018Appeal(s) allowed
Ashok Kumar, a 30‑year‑old salesman earning Rs 3,000 per month, died in a bus accident. His heirs filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded only Rs 50,000, while the High Court increased the award to Rs 3,98,500 but neither added a benefit for future pro…
INDIAN BANK & ANR.versusK PAPPIREDDIYAR & ANR.
2018 INSC 62620 July 2018Appeal(s) allowed
Indian Bank granted a term loan to Yelagiri Dairy Farm and secured it by mortgaging 6.10 acres of land. When the loan became a non‑performing asset, the bank invoked the SARFAESI Act, took possession and sold the property. The borrowers contended that the land was agricultural and therefore exempt from the Act, while t…
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, COMMISSIONER, DELHI - ILL, GURGAONversusM/S. KAP CONES, UDYOG VIHAR, PHASE-V, GURGAON
2015 INSC 100420 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed
M/s. Kap Cones, a manufacturer of paper cones, was penalised by the Commissioner of Central Excise for disallowing Cenvat credit and for other violations. The Committee of Chief Commissioners, after reviewing the Commissioner’s order, directed the Commissioner to file an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Ta…
BABLU KUMARAND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAIR AND ANR.
2015 INSC 100320 July 2015Dismissed
The appellants were charged with murder and related offences under the IPC. The trial court issued summons and warrants but failed to verify whether they were served, recorded that witnesses were absent and acquitted the accused under Section 232 CrPC. The informant filed a criminal revision under Section 401 CrPC; the…
MAHENDRA SINGH DHONIversusYERRAGUNTLA SHYAMSUNDAR AND ANR.
2017 INSC 128220 April 2017Disposed off
The complainant, dissatisfied with a magazine cover that featured the petitioner with the caption "God of Big Deals," filed a complaint under Section 295A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code before a magistrate in Andhra Pradesh. The petitioner sought transfer of the proceedings to Karnataka and simultaneousl…
KINNARI MULLICK AND ANOTHERversusGHANSHYAM DAS DAMANI
2017 INSC 128120 April 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, joint owners of a property, entered into development agreements with the respondent which contained an arbitration clause. A dispute arose and an arbitrator awarded in favour of the respondent, but the award was unreasoned. The appellants challenged the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conc…
HALLIBURTON OFFSHORE SERVICES INC & ANR.versusPRINCIPAL OFFICER OF MERCANTILE MARINE DEPARTMENT & ORS.
2017 INSC 128320 April 2017Directions issued
Halliburton Offshore Services and others sought to challenge the revocation of a Provisional Certificate of Registry (PCOR) issued for the vessel Sita Devi. The Supreme Court examined the statutory requirements under Section 40 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 for granting a PCOR and whether such a certificate could …
USAMMAANTONY AND ANOTHERversusKARTHIYAYANI AND ANOTHER
2015 INSC 97920 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiffs filed a suit for a permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from trespassing and demolishing the boundary fence of their property. The trial court decreed the injunction in favour of the plaintiffs and the first appellate court affirmed that decree. The High Court entertained a second appeal under…
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OFversusNANDINI J. SHAH & ORS
2018 INSC 17820 February 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) sought eviction of several respondents from a licensed premises under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. The Estate Officer ordered eviction; the respondents appealed to the Appellate Officer, identified as the District Judge/Principal Judge…
RAVI PRAKASH SINGH @ARVIND SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2015 INSC 14520 February 2015Dismissed
The appellant surrendered before the Chief Judicial Magistrate on 5 July 2013 and was remanded to judicial custody. He applied for bail on 3 October 2013 under Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, claiming that the charge sheet had not been filed within the statutory 90‑day period. The magistrate, noting an e…
THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND OTHERSversusREVAT SINGH
2015 INSC 14320 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The father of Revat Singh, a driver with the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, died in service, and Singh applied for a compassionate appointment as a driver. The corporation rejected his application because he did not meet the minimum qualifications – he had only passed the 8th standard and possessed a licen…
M/S TRANS ASIAN SHIPPING SERVICES (PVT.) LTD.versusM/S BEACON SHIPPING LINES LTD. REPRESENTED BY MR. MOHAMMED S. ASLAM MANAGING DIRECTOR & OTHERS
2018 INSC 83119 September 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioner, an Indian shipping company, entered into an agency agreement with a Bangladeshi shipping firm. The petitioner alleged breach of the agreement and claimed a sum of USD 134,875.88. The agreement contained a clause stating that any dispute not settled amicably shall be resolved by arbitration governed by I…
MEENA VERMAversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ANOTHER
2018 INSC 83419 September 2018Dismissed
The Himachal Pradesh Government advertised a vacancy for a part‑time female member of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. A Selection Committee, chaired by the Commission President and comprising two Principal Secretaries, interviewed candidates and prepared a panel based solely on performance, placing Su…
JANABAIversusADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS
2018 INSC 83219 September 2018Dismissed
Janabai, a member of the Gram Panchayat Kalamba (Mahali), was challenged for continuing in office because her husband and father‑in‑law had encroached on government land since 1981 and she was using the land. The question was whether Section 14(1)(j‑3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 disqualifies a membe…
SAMPELLY SATYANARAYANA RAOversusINDIAN RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY LIMITED
2016 INSC 88719 September 2016Dismissed
The appellant, a director of Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Ltd, had taken a loan of Rs 11.5 crore which was disbursed on 28 February 2002. The loan agreement required repayment of installments by post‑dated cheques, which were described as "security". Several of these cheques were dishonoured and a crimina…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH CBIversusVIKRAM ANANTRAI DOSHI AND OTHERS
2014 INSC 65519 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The CBI prosecuted Vikram Doshi and others for fraud involving bank loans, forged letters of credit, and diversion of funds to fictitious companies, alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 406 and others. The bank later settled the civil dispute, paid a sum and issued a "no due certificate", after which the Bombay Hi…
COMMISSIONER, M.P. HOUSING BOARD AND OTHERSversusM/S. MOHANLAL AND COMPANY
2016 INSC 118719 July 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The parties entered into a construction contract containing an arbitration clause, and an award was rendered on 11 November 2010. The respondent later filed a Section 11 application in the High Court seeking appointment of an arbitrator, claiming the clause was invalid; the application was dismissed. Subsequently, on 2…