MANISH SISODIAversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
2023 INSC 95630 October 2023Dismissed
Manish Sisodia, former Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi, appealed to the Supreme Court seeking bail in prosecutions under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the Indian Penal Code and an enforcement case under the Prevention of Money‑Laundering Act, 2002. The Court examined the scope of bail under s.45 of the PMLA, h…
GAYATRI BALASAMYversusM/S ISG NOVASOFT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
2025 INSC 60530 April 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court was asked to resolve a long‑standing controversy over whether courts exercising jurisdiction under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can modify an arbitral award. The issue arose from the earlier decision in Project Director, NHAI v. M. Hakeem, where the Court held that …
THE STATE OF RAJASTHANversusNEMI CHAND MAHELA AND OTHERS
2019 INSC 58830 April 2019Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a long‑running dispute concerning the award of domicile‑based bonus marks in appointments of primary school teachers in Rajasthan. Earlier judgments (Kailash Chand Sharma and Manmohan Sharma) had declared such bonus marks unconstitutional and applied the doctrine of prospective overruling, li…
INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANOTHERversusSUNITA
2021 INSC 70429 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Life Insurance Corporation of India issued a life insurance policy with an additional accident benefit. The policy lapsed on 14 October 2011 due to non‑payment of premium. The insured suffered a fatal accident on 6 March 2012, and the premium was paid on 9 March 2012 to revive the policy, without disclosi…
INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS’ FEDERATION OF INDIA (REGD.)versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
2022 INSC 87929 August 2022Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2009, which amended the definition of “employee” in the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and inserted Section 13A with retrospective effect from 3 April 1997 to extend gratuity benefits to teachers in private schools. The pe…
SARANPAL KAUR ANANDversusPRADUMAN SINGH CHANDHOK AND OTHERS
2022 INSC 34728 March 2022Directions issued
Saranpal Kaur Anand filed a suit in 2012 seeking a declaration that a 1969 sale deed and a 1995 deed were void, and an injunction against the defendants. The defendants moved to reject the plaint on the ground of limitation under Order VII Rule 11(d). The Delhi High Court Single Judge framed a preliminary issue under O…
BHARTI CELLULAR LIMITED (NOW BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED)versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 57, KOLKATA AND ANOTHER
2024 INSC 14828 February 2024Disposed off
The case concerned whether cellular mobile service providers (the assessees) were required to deduct tax at source under section 194-H of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the margin earned by franchisees/distributors from selling prepaid kits at a price higher than the discounted price paid to the assessees. The Revenue arg…
ADJUDICATING OFFICER, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusBHAVESH PABARI
2019 INSC 28928 February 2019Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the scope of Sections 15‑J and 15‑A to 15‑HA of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 in a series of appeals arising from penalties imposed on Bhavesh Pabari, Shree Radhe and other respondents for violations of SEBI regulations. The principal issue was whether the factors liste…
VINOD KUMAR GARGversusSTATE (GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI)
2019 INSC 128727 November 2019Dismissed
Inspector Vinod Kumar Garg was convicted for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.500 from Nand Lal in exchange for facilitating an electricity connection to a shed, with the money recovered from his pant pocket during a police trap. The appellant appealed, alleging material contradictions in the testimonies of the co…
G H CENTURY RAYON LIMITEDversusIVP LIMITED AND OTHERS
2019 INSC 128827 November 2019Appeal(s) allowed
Century Rayon Ltd (appellant) sought to erect 100 kV electricity transmission towers on land owned by IVP Ltd (first respondent) under a sanction from MSEDC. IVP Ltd filed a suit for permanent injunction alleging the contractors were excavating its land without permission. The trial court and High Court imposed a tempo…
MADHYA PRADESH ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONversusVINCENT DANIEL AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 40827 March 2025Dismissed
The Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation sought to acquire land for a highway project and determined compensation using the circle rate fixed under the Indian Stamp Act, as prescribed by the Collector’s Guidelines. The landowners challenged the award, arguing that the compensation was excessive and that the "the…
RADHIKA AGARWALversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 27227 February 2025
The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of the amendments to the Customs Act, 1962 and the arrest provisions in the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, arguing that offences under these statutes remain non‑cognizable and that authorized officers must obtain a magistrate's warrant, relying on the Om…
THE STATE OF KARNATAKAversusCHANDRASHA
2024 INSC 92826 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Karnataka appealed against the Karnataka High Court’s order acquitting a government servant, Chandrasha, who was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs 2,000 to facilitate the encashment of surrender‑leave …
SHIV SENA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2019 INSC 128626 November 2019Directions issued
The petitioners (Shiv Sena, NCP and INC) challenged the Governor of Maharashtra’s decision to invite the BJP leader Devendra Fadnavis to form the government after President's Rule was revoked on 23 November 2019. They argued that the Governor’s action violated constitutional principles, including Article 14 and the doc…
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusAGRICAS LLP AND OTHERS ETC.
2020 INSC 50826 August 2020Disposed off
The Union of India amended the import policy for peas and other pulses, shifting them from a free to a restricted category and imposing quantitative import limits through notifications and a trade notice issued under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (FTDR Act). Importers challenged the validity …
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMSversusELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
2024 INSC 34126 April 2024Disposed off
The Association for Democratic Reforms challenged the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) with VVPAT, seeking a return to paper ballots, physical hand‑over of VVPAT slips to voters, and 100% VVPAT counting, alleging possible manipulation. The Supreme Court examined the technical architecture of EVMs, the safeguard…
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERSversusDR. RAO, V.B.J. CHELIKANI AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 89425 November 2024Disposed off
The case concerned several Government Orders (GoMs) issued by the Andhra Pradesh (now Telangana) government that allotted public land at basic rates to a select class of persons – MPs, MLAs, All India Services officers, judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts, and journalists – through cooperative societies. The pe…
DR BALRAM SINGH AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
2024 INSC 89325 November 2024Dismissed
The petitioners challenged the 1976 insertion of the words ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ into the Preamble of the Constitution, arguing that the amendment was retrospective, lacked popular consent, and violated the basic structure by restricting economic policy and religious freedom. The Court examined whether Article 368 …
SALUJA CONSTRUCTION COMPANYversusNORTHERN COALFIELDS LIMITED
2021 INSC 78825 November 2021Case Partly allowed
Saluja Construction Company entered into a contract with Northern Coalfields Limited for the Bina Project and invoked arbitration under Clause 9, filing an application under Sections 8 and 20 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 limited to that project. The arbitrator, however, issued an award that also covere…
PARIVAR SEVA SANSTHAversusAHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
2022 INSC 122424 November 2022Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered appeals by Parivar Seva Sanstha and Bai Gulab Hargovandas Trust seeking exemption from municipal property tax on the ground that their hospitals and clinics are run by charitable trusts. The issue was whether clause (b) of Section 132 of the Gujarat Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, wh…
NEVADA PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTORversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
2019 INSC 107724 September 2019Reference answered
The Supreme Court examined whether the phrase “any property” in Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 includes immovable property. It held that the provision confers power only to seize movable property, as the word “seize” implies taking physical custody, which is impossible for immovable assets. The Cou…
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusEX. HC/GD VIRENDER SINGH
2022 INSC 85022 August 2022Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether the Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme for Central Armed Police Forces should be applied from 1 January 2006 or from 1 September 2008, and what financial up‑gradation entitlement it confers. It held that the MACP Scheme became operative on 1 September 2008, superseding …
S. TIRUPATHI RAOversusM. LINGAMAIAH & ORS.
2024 INSC 54422 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute arose from a civil suit concerning the partition of ancestral land, which led to a decree directing the Tahsildar to mutate the name of the first respondent in revenue records. The Tahsildar failed to comply, prompting a contempt petition that was initially allowed by a Single Judge but later set aside by a…
LEONARD XAVIER VALDARISversusJITENDRA RAMNAYARAN RATHOD & ORS.
2024 INSC 34422 April 2024Disposed off
In the Bombay High Court, two single judges issued contradictory orders on the same set of facts concerning the framing of a charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The first judge upheld the charge, while the second judge directed that the charge should not be framed, creating a conflict. The Supreme Court …
DR. JAYA THAKUR & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2024 INSC 24622 March 2024
The petitioners challenged the constitutionality of Section 7(1) of the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service, and Term of Office) Act, 2023, which replaces the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister in the Selection Committee for appointing the C…
M/S TAMIL NADU CEMENTS CORPORATION LIMITEDversusMICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 9122 January 2025Matter referred to larger bench
The appeal concerned whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution can be filed against an order of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC) made under Section 18 of the MSMED Act, 2006, and if so, under what circumstances. The Supreme Court examined earlier conflicting judgments, no…
BATLIBOI ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS LIMITEDversusHINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANOTHER
2023 INSC 85021 September 2023Dismissed
Batliboi Environmental Engineers Ltd (BEEL) entered into a turnkey contract with Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (HPCL) to construct a sewage water reclamation plant. The project was delayed, work was 80% complete and BEEL abandoned it, later claiming damages for overheads, profit, idle machinery and other losses. …
SUNIL KUMAR MAITYversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR.
2022 INSC 8421 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed
Sunil Kumar Maity deposited a cheque that was mistakenly credited to another customer with a similar name at State Bank of India. He filed a complaint before the Consumer Forum, which was allowed; the bank appealed to the State Consumer Commission, which partially upheld the order. The bank then sought revision before …
SATYANAND SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2024 INSC 23620 March 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Havaldar in the Indian Army, was discharged in 2001 after being diagnosed with AIDS based on a medical report that linked his HIV-positive status with neuro‑tuberculosis. He challenged the discharge, arguing that the diagnosis was erroneous, his CD4 count remained above the threshold prescribed in the …
SURESHKUMAR LALITKUMAR PATEL & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
2023 INSC 14520 February 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the recruitment of Supervisor Instructor posts in Gujarat where the Departmental Selection Committee, after publishing results, reduced the cut‑off marks to accommodate candidates under horizontal reservations (women, ex‑servicemen, physically challenged) by treating them as vertical reservations. Th…
SANTOSH @ RAJESH @ GOPALversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2024 INSC 72319 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Santosh @ Rajesh @ Gopal, was convicted for the murder of Narayan Singh based on the recovery of a pistol from his possession and a ballistic report linking the weapon to the fatal bullet. The prosecution’s case relied on a disclosure statement made by a co-accused, which led to the discovery of the pist…
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, SALEMversusM/S MADHAN AGRO INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LTD.
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 89318 December 2024Dismissed
The case concerned whether pure coconut oil sold in small retail packs (5 ml‑2 L) should be classified as ‘edible oil’ under Heading 1513 of Chapter 15 or as ‘hair oil’ under Heading 3305 of Chapter 33 in the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The respondents marketed the oil as edible oil, while th…
G H KANWAR PAL SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER
2019 INSC 140618 December 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a director of a mining company, was granted a lease to excavate sand in specific plots in Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, but was alleged to have mined sand outside the permitted area, leading to registration of an FIR under Section 379 IPC, the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the …
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF INDIA (THROUGH STRESSED ASSETS STABILIZATION FUND CONSTITUTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA)versusSUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS AND OTHERS
2023 INSC 74618 August 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI), as a secured creditor, sought to enforce its charge over imported machinery that had been stored in a private bonded warehouse and remained unpaid of customs duty. The company was wound up on 1 December 2003, and the Official Liquidator applied for possession of the good…
EXPERION DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusHIMANSHU DEWAN AND SONALI DEWAN AND OTHERS
2023 INSC 74818 August 2023Disposed off
Experion Developers, the builder of the Windchants housing project, increased the sale area of apartments and demanded extra payment from the allottees. The allottees (respondents) filed a consumer complaint seeking a refund of the excess amount, and the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) ordered t…
DISORTHO S.A.S.versusMERIL LIFE SCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED
2025 INSC 35218 March 2025Case Allowed
Disortho S.A.S., a Colombian company, and Meril Life Sciences, an Indian company, entered an International Exclusive Distributor Agreement for medical products in Colombia. Clause 16.5 of the agreement states that Indian law governs the contract and Gujarat courts have jurisdiction, while Clause 18 provides for concili…
ASSOCIATION OF DEMOCRATIC REFORMS & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2024 INSC 22618 March 2024Disposed off
The Supreme Court earlier ordered the State Bank of India (SBI) to disclose details of electoral bonds purchased and the contributions received by political parties. A Miscellaneous Application was filed seeking to pre‑date the point from which such disclosure must be made. The Court examined the language of sub‑paragr…
RAJ KUMARI AND OTHERSversusSURINDER PAL SHARMA
2019 INSC 138817 December 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Raj Kumari filed a partition suit claiming a one‑fourth share in a tenement allotted to her mother Suhagwanti. The respondent Surinder Pal Sharma defended the suit by producing a registered Will dated 02‑01‑1992, allegedly executed by Suhagwanti in his favour and attested by Ramesh Kumar (the appellant's …
MAHESHWARY HANDLING AGENCY PRIVATE LIMITEDversusBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF KANDLA PORT TRUST AND OTHERS
2019 INSC 104117 September 2019Dismissed
Maheshwary Handling Agency Pvt. Ltd., a cargo clearing and forwarding company, used storage facilities at Kandla Port and was levied penalty rent for storing cargo beyond sixty days under a circular issued by the Traffic Manager on 31 August 1998. The agency challenged the circular, arguing that after the 1997 amendmen…
M/S SUNDEW PROPERTIES LIMITEDversusTELANGANA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ANR.
2024 INSC 43917 May 2024Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Sundew Properties Ltd., was notified by the Ministry of Commerce & Industry as a developer of a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) and claimed that, under the 2010 Notification inserting a proviso to section 14(b) of the Electricity Act, it automatically became a deemed distribution licensee without needing to …
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusASHARAM @ ASHUMAL
2023 INSC 38317 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Rajasthan appealed against a High Court order that allowed the respondent, Asharam, to summon Deputy Commissioner of Police Ajay Pal Lamba under Section 391 of the CrPC, based on a claim in his book that he had recorded a video of the crime scene a day before site maps were prepared. The Supreme Court held…
M/S SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD. & ORS.versusNAVEEN MATHEW PHILIP & ANR. ETC. ETC.
2023 INSC 37917 April 2023Disposed off
The appellants, South Indian Bank Ltd. and others, appealed against the Kerala High Court’s orders allowing borrowers to defer loan repayment under the SARFAESI Act. The borrowers had filed writ petitions under Article 226 challenging notices issued under Sections 13(2) and 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, even though the De…
SAFIQ AHMADversusICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & OTHERS
2021 INSC 91016 December 2021Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined the widespread filing of fraudulent compensation claims under the Motor Vehicles Act and the Workmen's Compensation Act, as investigated by a Special Investigating Team (SIT) in Uttar Pradesh. The SIT reported 1,376 suspicious claims, of which 247 had been examined, leading to 92 criminal cas…
RIKHAB BIRANI & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 51216 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Rikhab Birani and Sadhna Birani, entered into an oral agreement to sell a godown for Rs 1.35 crore, which the buyer, Shilpi Gupta, failed to fully pay, leading the sellers to re‑sell the property at a lower price. The buyer subsequently approached the Metropolitan Magistrate to register an FIR alleging …
ARCADIA SHIPPING LTD.versusTATA STEEL LIMITED AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 33316 April 2024Dismissed
Bhushan Steel (now Tata Steel) filed a suit in the Delhi High Court against several parties, including Arcadia Shipping, alleging non‑payment under a Letter of Credit for galvanized steel shipped from Mumbai to Djibouti. The plaintiff claimed that the cause of action arose in Delhi because the supply order and payment …
KRISHNAMURTHY @ GUNODU AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2022 INSC 19016 February 2022Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined the murder of Venkatarama, where Krishnamurthy, Gopala and Thimmappa were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. Evidence showed Krishnamurthy brutally assaulted the victim after he fell, causing fatal injuries, establishing his liability for murder. The Court held that Gopala …
VINAY PRAKASH SINGHversusSAMEER GEHLAUT & ORS.
2019 INSC 125115 November 2019Directions issued
The petitioner sought enforcement of a Singapore arbitral award of about Rs.3,500 crore against respondents who owned Fortis Healthcare. The Supreme Court had earlier ordered a status‑quo on 11 August 2017, clarified on 31 August 2017 and modified on 15 February 2018, prohibiting any change in the shareholding of Forti…
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 20915 March 2024Disposed off
The Election Commission of India (ECI) had earlier submitted data on electoral bonds to the Supreme Court, which was kept in sealed custody as per an interim order dated 12 April 2019. The Court later directed the ECI to upload this data on its website, assuming the ECI retained a copy. The ECI informed the Court that …
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2024 INSC 11315 February 2024
The Supreme Court of India struck down the Electoral Bond Scheme and related amendments to the Finance Act 2017, which had introduced anonymous financial contributions to political parties. The Court held that the scheme violated the right to information of voters under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, as informat…
SATYE SINGH & ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2022 INSC 18515 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased Shashi Devi, a married woman, was found burnt in the hut of her husband Satye Singh; her father filed a complaint implicating the husband, his mother and sister‑in‑law. The Sessions Court convicted the husband and his mother under Sections 302, 34 and 201 of the IPC based solely on circumstantial evidence,…
RAM KRISHAN GROVER AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2019 INSC 123914 November 2019Dismissed
The petitioners, tenants in Chandigarh and Punjab, challenged Section 13‑B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, which gives Non‑Resident Indian (NRI) landlords a preferential right to evict tenants, and the extension of this provision to the Union Territory of Chandigarh by a 2009 notification under Sec…
SAMAJ PARIVARTANA SAMUDAYA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
2024 INSC 26714 March 2024Directions issued
The Supreme Court heard applications arising from the long‑standing illegal mining controversy in Bellary, Chitradurga and Tumkur districts of Karnataka. The petitioners sought directions for demarcating seven mining leases that straddle the Karnataka‑Andhra Pradesh boundary, for the implementation of Reclamation and R…
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-IIversusM/S BPL LIMITED
2022 INSC 107713 October 2022Dismissed
The Deputy Commissioner of Gift Tax appealed against the valuation of shares gifted by M/s BPL Limited to M/s Celestial Finance Ltd. The shares, although listed, were promoter quota shares subject to a lock‑in period, raising the question of whether they were "quoted" for valuation purposes. The Supreme Court held that…
MEENA DEVIversusNUNU CHAND MAHTO @ NEMCHAND MAHTO & ORS
2022 INSC 108013 October 2022Appeal(s) allowed
A 12‑year‑old boy died when a jeep struck him while he was playing outside his house. The mother filed a claim petition under Sections 140, 166 and 171 of the Motor Vehicles Act seeking Rs 2,00,000 compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 1,50,000 and the High Court enhanced it only to the claimed am…
M/S ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PVT. LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 21513 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
M/s ABCI Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. submitted a financial bid of Rs 1,569 crores for a tunnel project but due to a typographical error the bid appeared as Rs 1,569 only. The appellant discovered the mistake on 24‑08‑2023, promptly informed BRO and sought to withdraw or rectify the bid, but BRO demanded justification, de…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusN.M. RAUT & ORS.
2024 INSC 104212 December 2024Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the interpretation of the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS), 2008, particularly how financial upgradations granted under the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 should be counted for MACPS eligibility. Respondents, employed as Pharmacists and Superintendents, had…
P. DAIVASIGAMANIversusS. SAMBANDAN
2022 INSC 107012 October 2022Dismissed
The appellant, who owned a one‑acre wetland, entered into a 1989 agreement to sell the land to the respondent for Rs 6,50,000, with a six‑month completion clause. The respondent repeatedly notified the appellant to perform, demonstrated his readiness and willingness, and filed a suit for specific performance in 1993. T…
ROHAN BUILDERS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITEDversusBERGER PAINTS INDIA LIMITED
2024 INSC 68612 September 2024Directions issued
Rohan Builders sought an extension of time under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the statutory twelve‑month period (or the six‑month consent‑based extension) for making an arbitral award had expired. The Calcutta High Court had held that such an application was not maintainable, a view e…
A. VALLIAMMAIversusK.P. MURALI AND OTHERS
2023 INSC 82312 September 2023Disposed off
A. Valliammai entered into an agreement to sell land to K. Sriram in 1988, with an advance paid and the balance due by May 1989, later extended to November 1989. After disputes and notices in 1991 indicating Valliammai's refusal to perform, Sriram filed an injunction suit, which was later dismissed, and assigned his ri…
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANOTHERversusM/S. CHIRANJILAL (MINERAL) INDUSTRIES OF BAGANDIH AND ANOTHER
2023 INSC 82412 September 2023Case Partly allowed
The State of West Bengal appealed against a High Court order directing the execution of a mining lease for dolomite to M/s. Chiranjilal (Mineral) Industries (the respondent). The dispute centered on whether the respondent's 1998 application for a mining lease remained eligible under the Mines and Minerals (Development …
ARVIND KEJRIWALversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
2024 INSC 51212 July 2024Matter referred to larger bench
The Supreme Court examined the arrest of Arvind Kejriwal under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, in connection with the Delhi excise policy case alleging kickbacks and money‑laundering. Kejriwal challenged the arrest as illegal, arguing that the "reasons to believe" did not disclose all materi…
G H UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusWING COMMANDER S.P. RATHORE
2019 INSC 135911 December 2019Appeal(s) allowed
Wing Commander S.P. Rathore, an Air Force officer, retired on superannuation with a disability assessed at less than 20% and applied for a disability pension. The Armed Forces Tribunal granted the pension by applying the rounding‑off provisions of Para 7.2 of the Ministry of Defence circular. The Union of India appeale…
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, AMRITSAR (PUNJAB)versusM/S D.L. STEELS ETC
2022 INSC 66611 July 2022Dismissed
M/s D.L. Steels imported two consignments of dried pomegranate seeds (anardana) from Pakistan and classified them under heading 1209.99.90 of the Customs Tariff, attracting 5% duty. The Customs authorities re‑classified the goods under heading 0813.40.90, imposing a 30% duty, leading to differential duty, penalty and i…
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusSUNIL KRISHNA KHAITAN AND OTHERS
2022 INSC 66911 July 2022Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined two appeals filed by SEBI against Sunil Krishna Khaitan and others and Madhuri S. Pitti, challenging SEBI's show‑cause notices and directions under the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997. The Court clarified that the term “acquirer” in Regulation 10 inclu…
M.P. RAJYA TILHAN UTPADAK SAHAKARI SANGH MARYADIT, PACHAMA, DISTRICT SEHORE AND OTHERSversusM/S. MODI TRANSPORT SERVICE
2022 INSC 55311 May 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiff filed a suit for settlement of accounts against the defendant and applied for a Chartered Accountant to be appointed as a panch/commissioner to audit the accounts. The trial court appointed the CA, who submitted a report indicating amounts due, and treated the appointment as an arbitration reference under…
STATE BANK OF INDIAversusASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 19511 March 2024
The Supreme Court had earlier declared the Electoral Bond Scheme unconstitutional and directed the State Bank of India (SBI), as the authorized bank, to furnish the Election Commission of India (ECI) with details of each bond purchased and redeemed between 12 April 2019 and 15 February 2024. SBI filed a Miscellaneous A…
JAINA CONSTRUCTION COMPANYversusTHE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR.
2022 INSC 17711 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Jaina Construction Company insured a Tata Aiwa truck with Oriental Insurance Company, which was stolen on 04‑11‑2007. The appellant lodged an FIR the next day, but informed the insurer of the theft only after five months, prompting the insurer to repudiate the claim on the ground of delayed notice under C…
KUNJAN SADANA & ANR.versusMAHESH KUMAR & ORS
2019 INSC 134810 December 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The claimants, the mother and minor brother of 19‑year‑old Yitesh Sadana, sought compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act after his death in a bus accident caused by driver negligence. The Tribunal and the Delhi High Court awarded loss of dependency using a multiplier of 15, based on the mother’s age, and did not acco…
THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERSversusPAWAN KUMAR AND OTHERS ETC.
2021 INSC 71310 November 2021Directions issued
The State of Bihar appealed against a National Green Tribunal (NGT) order that barred sand mining in Banka district until a District Survey Report (DSR) received approval from the State Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) and the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA). The Supreme Court examined whether th…
ARVIND KEJRIWALversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
2024 INSC 40010 May 2024
Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi, was arrested on 21 March 2024 by the Directorate of Enforcement in connection with alleged offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and related statutes. He challenged the arrest before the Supreme Court, arguing that the legality of his detention was sub judic…
ANNA MATHEWS AND OTHERSversusSUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2023 INSC 12210 February 2023Dismissed
The petitioners challenged the appointment of an individual as an Additional Judge of the Madras High Court, alleging that the collegium had not properly considered the candidate's suitability and seeking a writ of certiorari and mandamus to quash the recommendation and compel reconsideration. The Court examined whethe…
M/S. DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITEDversusM/S. GAYATRI SHAKTI PAPER AND BOARD LIMITED AND ANOTHER, ETC.
2023 INSC 8869 October 2023Reference answered
The Supreme Court examined the eligibility criteria for a Captive Generating Plant (CGP) under the Electricity Act, 2003 and the Electricity Rules, 2005 in the appeal filed by M/s. Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. against M/s. Gayatri Shakti Paper and Board Ltd. The Court clarified that a CGP qualifies only if the capt…
CHALASANI UDAYA SHANKAR AND OTHERSversusM/S. LEXUS TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 6719 September 2024Case Allowed
The appellants, who claimed to have purchased 94.8% of the equity shares of M/s. Lexus Technologies Pvt. Ltd., filed a company petition before the NCLT seeking rectification of the Register of Members under Sections 59 and 88 of the Companies Act, 2013 and relief for oppression, mismanagement and fraud. The NCLT, and s…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERSversusLAFARGE DEALERS ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS
2019 INSC 7349 July 2019Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether sales‑tax exemption/deferment granted to cement manufacturers under the Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994, would continue to apply after the bifurcation of the erstwhile State of Madhya Pradesh into the reorganised State of Madhya Pradesh and the new State of Chhattisgarh. The C…
THE PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE AND INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
2019 INSC 7329 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed
Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. floated collective investment schemes where subscribers deposited money that was to be repaid with interest and could be forfeited under certain clauses. For assessment years 1985-86 and 1986-87 no forfeiture occurred, yet the company recorded the subscription receipts a…
RINA KUMARI @ RINA DEVI @ REENAversusDINESH KUMAR MAHTO @ DINESH KUMAR MAHATO AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 559 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The husband, Dinesh Kumar Mahto, obtained a decree for restitution of conjugal rights against his wife, Reena, in 2022, yet she continued to live apart, alleging mental cruelty, dowry demands, and a miscarriage. Reena filed a maintenance suit under Section 125 of the CrPC in 2019 and was awarded ₹10,000 per month. The …
NEPA LIMITED THROUGH ITS SENIOR MANAGER (LEGAL)versusMANOJ KUMAR AGRAWAL
2022 INSC 12638 December 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The arbitral award dated 14‑04‑2000 directed Nepa Ltd to pay Rs 14,49,300 to Manoj Kumar Agrawal with 18% interest from the award date. The High Court, on a stay order, required Nepa to deposit 50% of the amount (Rs 7,78,280) which the respondent withdrew on 08‑11‑2001 after giving a personal undertaking. The responden…
HARI NIWAS GUPTAversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANOTHER
2019 INSC 12278 November 2019Dismissed
Three Bihar judicial officers were dismissed by a Full Court resolution that invoked clause (b) of the second proviso to Article 311(2) of the Constitution, dispensing with a departmental inquiry. The High Court had failed to record written reasons for dispensing with the inquiry, leading the Division Bench to set asid…
C.T. KOCHOUSEPHversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER ETC.
2025 INSC 6618 May 2025Dismissed
The appellants purchased goods from dealers who were exempt from sales tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and challenged the levy of purchase tax under s.5A of the Kerala Act and s.7A of the Tamil Nadu Act. The questions were whether such purchases constitut…
DESH DEEPAK KUMAR VIHANGAM@ DEEPAK KUMARversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR
2022 INSC 2788 March 2022Dismissed
The case concerned the kidnapping for ransom of Dr. Shashi Kumar Sinha and his driver in February 2006. Six persons were convicted under IPC sections 364A (kidnapping for ransom) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Supreme Court examined whether the prosecution had proved the existenc…
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHERversusR.K. PANDEY AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 488 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
R.K. Pandey, a former lab assistant of a state‑run medical college, claimed that his superannuation age should be 60 years and sought relief through arbitration, relying on an alleged 1957 arbitration agreement between the municipal board and the Governor of Uttar Pradesh. He unilaterally appointed two arbitrators who …
THE STATE OF RAJASTHANversusGURBACHAN SINGH & OTHERS
2022 INSC 12607 December 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Rajasthan appealed the conviction of Gurbachan Singh for murder arising out of a land‑dispute in which Teja Singh was killed. The High Court had acquitted Singh of the murder charge, holding that he only struck the victim's feet with a lathi and therefore lacked common intention to cause death. The Supreme…
H MANOHARANversusSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARIETY HALL POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE (REVIEW PETITION (CRL.) NOS.446-447 OF 2019) IN
2019 INSC 12167 November 2019Disposed off
The petitioners were convicted for the abduction, rape, and murder of two children, based on a confessional statement, forensic evidence, and eyewitness testimony. They challenged the conviction and death sentence in a review petition, arguing that the confession was involuntary, the retraction should invalidate it, an…
ALL INDIA BANK OFFICERS’ CONFEDERATIONversusTHE REGIONAL MANAGER, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 3897 May 2024Dismissed
The All India Bank Officers’ Confederation and other bank staff unions challenged Section 17(2)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 3(7)(i) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, alleging that they amounted to an excessive delegation of the essential legislative function to the Central Board of Direct Taxes and that the…
PRADEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusPOST MASTER GENERAL AND OTHERS
2022 INSC 1567 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants purchased Kisan Vikas Patras (KVPs) in joint names and, relying on an agent named Rukhsana, handed the certificates to her for transfer. Rukhsana encashed the KVPs at a different post office and received Rs. 25,54,000 in cash, which she kept. The appellants filed a consumer complaint; the NCDRC dismissed…
TARUN DHAMEJAversusSUNIL DHAMEJA & ANR.
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 9876 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, as legal representative of a deceased partner, invoked an arbitration clause in a partnership deed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, after the High Court dismissed his petition. The central issue was whether the clause was merely optional or required the consent of all pa…
M/S ORIENTAL KURIES LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN P. D. JOSEversusLISSA & ORS.
2019 INSC 12116 November 2019Amount Awarded
The appeal concerned a chit fund operated by Oriental Kuries Ltd., where the respondents defaulted on twelve instalments. The lower courts had allowed recovery of the past instalments but barred recovery of future instalments, holding that a chitty agreement creates only a promise to pay, not a debt. The Supreme Court …
SMT. ROOPA SONIversusKAMALNARAYAN SONI
2023 INSC 8146 September 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The marriage between Roopa Soni and Kamalnarayan Soni, solemnised in 2002, broke down after the birth of their child, leading to a separation that has lasted for over fifteen years. Both parties filed serious allegations against each other, including a complaint under Section 498A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, and…
DECCAN VALUE INVESTORS L.P. & ANR.versusDINKAR VENKATASUBRAMANIAN & ANR.
2024 INSC 3216 March 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined an appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code filed by the successful resolution applicants, Deccan Value Investors L.P. and DVI PE (Mauritius) Ltd., who sought to withdraw their approved resolution plan for Metalyst Forgings Ltd., alleging fraud by the resolution professio…
AYYUB & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 1686 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from a suspected romantic relationship between Ziaul Rahman and his cousin Tanu. After Ziaul’s death in a physical assault, Tanu allegedly committed suicide, and the complainant Vijay (R‑2) filed an FIR accusing the appellants of abetting her suicide under Section 306 IPC. The High Court refused to quash…
JYOTHIR RversusSUNISHA N.S. & ORS.
2019 INSC 10095 September 2019Disposed off
The case concerned admission to the MBBS programme in Kerala under the sports quota. The appellant, a candidate who had applied under the individual sports category, sought a writ directing the Sports Council to shift another candidate from the individual to the team list, which would have raised the appellant’s rank. …
SNEHADEEP STRUCTURES PVT. LIMITEDversusMAHARASHTRA SMALL SCALE INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
2024 INSC 2015 March 2024Dismissed
Snehadeep Structures Pvt. Ltd. (SSPL) entered into a supply/purchase order with Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd. (MSSIDCL) on 30 March 1995 for the delivery of goods to the Maharashtra State Electricity Board. The contract stipulated that MSSIDCL would pay SSPL only after the goods were a…
HARBHAJAN SINGH ETCversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
2019 INSC 13154 December 2019Dismissed
The appellants, tenants of shops in a Gurudwara, challenged the Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997 on the ground that it withdrew the protection afforded to them under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restrictions Act, 1949 and violated Article 14. The Supreme Court held that the State …
SOM DUTT & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
2022 INSC 3854 April 2022Case Partly allowed
The appellants, Som Dutt and others, were convicted by three successive courts for theft under Section 379 read with Section 34 of the IPC and sentenced to three months' simple imprisonment and a fine. They challenged the High Court's dismissal of their revision petition, seeking release on probation under Section 361 …
SMRITI DEBBARMA (DEAD) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVEversusPRABHA RANJAN DEBBARMA AND OTHERS
2023 INSC 84 January 2023Dismissed
The appellant, Smriti Debbarma (representing the late Maharani Chandratara Devi), filed a suit seeking declaration of title and possession of the Schedule ‘A’ property (Khosh Mahal). The trial court decreed in her favour, but the Gauhati High Court set aside that decree, holding that she failed to prove legal ownership…
OACHIRA PARABRAHMA TEMPLE & ANR.versusG. VIJAYANATHAKURUP AND ORS.
2024 INSC 9223 December 2024
The appellants, elected Secretary and President of the Executive Committee of Oachira Parabrahma Temple, challenged two High Court orders that removed the elected committee and appointed an unelected committee under an Administrative Head. They argued that the High Court, having disposed of the regular first appeal, la…
RAMA DEVIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 7553 October 2024Case Partly allowed
The case concerns the murder of MLA Brij Bihari Prasad and his bodyguard Lakshmeshwar Sahu at IGIMS Hospital in 1998. The trial court convicted several accused, but the Patna High Court acquitted all, prompting appeals by the State (through the CBI) and the victim's wife, Rama Devi. The Supreme Court examined the credi…
STATE OF WEST BENGALversusBAISHAKHI BHATTACHARYYA (CHATTERJEE) AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 4373 April 2025Disposed off
The West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) conducted a 2016 recruitment for assistant teachers and non‑teaching staff that was later found to involve massive irregularities, including rank‑jumping, out‑of‑panel appointments, manipulation of OMR scores, destruction of original answer sheets and illegal subcontrac…
DBS BANK LIMITED SINGAPOREversusRUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND ANOTHER
2024 INSC 143 January 2024Matter referred to larger bench
DBS Bank Limited Singapore extended a USD 50 million loan to Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, secured by first charges over immovable assets. A resolution plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors with 96.95% support, but DBS dissented, receiving a pro‑rata distribution that was lower than the liquidation value of …
BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusVIJAYKUMAR V. IYER AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 153 January 2024Dismissed
Bharti Airtel Ltd. and Bharti Hexacom Ltd. entered into spectrum trading agreements with Aircel Ltd. and Dishnet Wireless Ltd., which later led to disputes over bank guarantees and payments. When Aircel entered the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), Airtel claimed a right to set‑off Rs. 112.87 crore agains…
PERUMAL RAJA @ PERUMALversusSTATE, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2024 INSC 133 January 2024Dismissed
The appellant, Perumal Raja, was detained during an investigation into a separate murder and gave a disclosure statement that led police to recover the body parts of his cousin, Rajini, and other stolen items. The key issue was whether the appellant was "in custody" for the purposes of Section 27 of the Evidence Act de…
M/S. MUTHOOT LEASING AND FINANCE LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
2023 INSC 53 January 2023Appeal(s) allowed
Muthoot Leasing and Finance Ltd and another, classified as credit institutions, challenged the levy of interest tax on the interest component embedded in hire‑purchase instalments under the Interest‑Tax Act, 1974. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that hire‑purchase agreements are composite transactions wit…
DAUVARAM NIRMALKARversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2022 INSC 7862 August 2022Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Dauvaram Nirmalkar, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for killing his brother Dashrath Nirmalkar. The trial court and High Court found him the sole perpetrator based on eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence, and his own confession, which was held inadmissible under Section 25 of the Evidenc…
UMC TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LTD.versusFOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR. M.A. NO. 175/2021 IN
2021 INSC 542 February 2021Case Allowed
The Supreme Court entertained an application to correct a typographical error in its earlier judgment dated 16 November 2020 in the case of UMC Technologies Private Ltd. v. Food Corporation of India & Anr. (Civil Appeal No. 3687 of 2020). The application sought deletion of the words “including an employee of the appell…
MANOHARANversusSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARIETY HALL POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE
2019 INSC 8511 August 2019Disposed off
Manoharan was convicted for kidnapping, gang‑rape of a 10‑year‑old girl and the murder of the girl and her 7‑year‑old brother, who were thrown into a canal after a failed poisoning attempt. The prosecution proved the offences beyond reasonable doubt through extensive witness testimony, forensic DNA evidence linking Man…
SHARIF AHMED AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER
2024 INSC 3631 May 2024Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined three criminal appeals arising from chargesheets filed in Uttar Pradesh that were alleged to lack sufficient factual detail and evidence under Section 173(2) of the CrPC. It considered whether a chargesheet must contain detailed facts and material evidence to enable a magistrate to take cogni…