Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Constitution of India

5,773 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act — showing 2,201–2,400.

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARYversusP. K. SINHA AND ANR.

2018 INSC 53818 May 2018Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard contempt petitions filed by the State of Tamil Nadu (and a private party) alleging that the Union of India had failed to frame a Cauvery water‑management scheme within the six‑week period ordered by the Court. The Court examined objections raised by Karnataka and Kerala to certain clauses of the

SUKHWANT SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2009 INSC 83518 May 2009Disposed off

Petitioners Sukhwant Singh and others applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC, which the Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed. They appealed to the Supreme Court, which did not interfere with the High Court's order. However, the Court clarified that a court hearing a regular bail application posses

CATERPILLAR INDIA PVT. LTD.versusWESTERN COAL FIELDS LTD. AND ORS.

2007 INSC 63018 May 2007Disposed off

The petitioners, a private firm (Caterpillar) and a public sector enterprise (Bharat Earth Movers Ltd.), challenged a series of Government Office Memoranda that granted purchase preference to public sector enterprises (PSEs) in procurement of earth‑moving machines by coal‑field companies. They argued that the substitut

BIDHANNAGAR (SALT LAKE) WELFARE ASSONversusCENTRAL VALUATION BOARD AND ORS.

2007 INSC 64318 May 2007Disposed off

The Bidhannagar Welfare Association, whose members occupied lands and buildings in Bidhannagar Municipality, challenged the West Bengal Central Valuation Board (Amendment) Act, 1994, which altered the procedure for municipal tax valuation by removing the pre‑decisional hearing and vesting review powers in a committee c

UCO BANK AND ANR.versusRAJINDER LAL CAPOOR

2007 INSC 64818 May 2007Dismissed

The respondent, a Branch Manager of UCO Bank, was superannuated on 1 November 1996 after show‑cause notices were issued for alleged irregularities in sanctioning PMRY loans. A charge‑sheet was issued only on 13 November 1998, well after his retirement, and disciplinary proceedings were launched under Regulation 20(3)(i

VIJAYKUMAR BALDEV MISHRA @SHARMAversusST ATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2007 INSC 65218 May 2007Disposed off

The appellant, Vijay Kumar Baldev Mishra, was charged under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) and IPC for a gang‑related murder. A Review Committee, set up under the Kartar Singh guidelines, recommended that the TADA provisions were inapplicable because the offence was motivated by persona

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusJEET S. BISHT AND ANR.

2007 INSC 65618 May 2007Disposed off

The petitioners, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, appealed against a High Court order that directed the State Government to create at least five State Consumer Forums, prescribe salaries and allowances for members, and grant retired High Court judges the same facilities as sitting judges. The Supreme Court examin

MRINMOY MAITYversusCHHANDA KOLEY AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 31418 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was awarded an LPG distributorship in 2014 after a draw of lots, and later sought permission to use alternate land for the godown and showroom, which the corporation approved in 2017. The rival applicant (respondent No.1) filed a writ petition in 2017 challenging this approval, alleging the land was unsui

THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS.versusMOHD. ABDUL QASIM (DIED) PER LRS.

2024 INSC 31018 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Mohd. Abdul Qasim, claimed title over 106.34 acres of land that had been declared a reserved forest under the Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967. He filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction, but the trial court and the High Court found that the land was forest land and that he had fail

DELMA LUBNA COELHOversusEDMOND CLINT FERNANDES

2023 INSC 38918 April 2023Dismissed

The husband filed a divorce petition in the Family Court at Mangaluru, Karnataka. The wife, a permanent resident of Canada now residing in Mumbai, filed a transfer petition seeking to move the proceedings to the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai. She argued that traveling to Mangaluru would be difficult, costly, and would

MASHYAK GRIHNIRMAN SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADITversusUSMAN HABIB DHUKA & ORS.

2013 INSC 26618 April 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a co‑operative housing society, entered into a development agreement and later amalgamated two of its plots. The plaintiffs, members of the society, sued to restrain construction on the amalgamated plot but did not challenge a conveyance deed dated 8 February 1989 at the time of filing. They later sought

U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD & ORS.versusOM PRAKASH SHARMA

2013 INSC 27118 April 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad (the Board) conducted a public auction of a plot, where Om Prakash Sharma was the highest bidder and deposited earnest money. The Housing Commissioner later rejected his bid, prompting Sharma to sue for a declaration that the auction was binding and the rejection illegal. The

BACHPAN BACHAO ANDOLANversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2011 INSC 30718 April 2011Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ filed by Bachpan Bachao Andolan seeking protection for children employed in Indian circuses, who were subjected to physical, sexual and emotional abuse and denied education. The Court examined whether such employment violated the children’s fundamental rights, especi

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusTANTIA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.

2011 INSC 30818 April 2011Dismissed

The East Central Railways awarded a risk‑and‑cost tender to Tantia Construction for a rail over‑bridge. Subsequent design changes required an extended viaduct, increasing the work and cost. The contractor refused to undertake the additional work, which was not covered by the original agreement, and the Railways attempt

BHOLANATH MUKHERJEE & ORS.versusR.K. MISSION V. CENTENARY COLLEGE & ORS.

2011 INSC 30918 April 2011Dismissed

The appellants, senior teachers of RK Mission Vivekananda Centenary College, challenged the appointment of a monk (respondent No.3) as principal, alleging he was junior and lacked the statutory qualifications prescribed in Government Order No. 149‑Edn(CP) 1994 and the West Bengal College Acts. The High Court’s Single J

HITESH BHATNAGARversusDEEPA BHATNAGAR

2011 INSC 30618 April 2011Dismissed

Hitesh Bhatnagar and Deepa Bhatnagar, married under the Hindu Marriage Act, filed a joint petition for divorce by mutual consent in 2001. Before the required second motion, Deepa withdrew her consent after the 18‑month period, leading the trial court to dismiss the petition. The appellant appealed, arguing that the 18‑

INDIAN BANKversusABS MARINE PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.

2006 INSC 23218 April 2006Dismissed

Indian Bank filed an application before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 to recover a loan amount. While the application was pending, the borrower, ABS Marine Products, sued the bank in the Calcutta High Court for damages alleging non‑disburs

BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.

1996 INSC 54418 April 1996Disposed off

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd (BHEL), a public sector undertaking, manufactured boiler components in its Hyderabad unit and dispatched some to its Tiruchi unit and others directly to the work‑site at Angul, Orissa, for a NALCO power‑plant project. The Andhra Pradesh State began levying Central Sales Tax (CST) on these c

THE ENTRY TAX OFFICER, BANGALORE ETC. ETC.versusM/S CHANDANMAL CHAMPALAL AND CO.

1994 INSC 16018 April 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Entry Tax Officer of Karnataka challenged the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Area for Consumption, Use or Sale therein Act, 1979, contending that the tax applied to goods sold within a local area even when the seller intended to take them out of the area. The Karnataka High Court held that Section 3 of

INDER PAL YADAV AND ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS ETC.

1985 INSC 9618 April 1985Dismissed

Project casual labourers of Indian Railways, who had served continuously for years, were terminated when their projects ended. They filed writ petitions invoking Articles 41, 42 and 14 of the Constitution, seeking security of employment. The Railway Ministry issued a scheme treating such workers as temporary after 360

S. SHAMSHUDDIN & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

1984 INSC 8718 April 1984Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the Central Government's fixation of a uniform quota of 50 all‑India tourist permits per State under Section 63(7) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (as amended by the 1969 Amendment), alleging that the quota was arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court examined whet

SABIR AHMEDversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1980 INSC 8918 April 1980Case Allowed

Sabir Ahmed filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the detention of his brother, Dawood Hasan Sheikh Ibrahim, under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA). The detenu had made a representation to the detaining authority and later applied to the Centr

YOGESH KUMARversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS

2025 INSC 37918 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a former stenographer appointed to the District Court, Saharanpur, was terminated after serving eight years due to an excess of appointments. He filed writ petitions seeking payment of salary for the period he worked, but the High Court dismissed them on the ground that the relief could only be obtained

SOMNATHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2024 INSC 23218 March 2024Disposed off

The appellant was arrested for theft and granted bail, but a police officer (respondent No.2) allegedly paraded him half‑naked, verbally abused him on the basis of caste and physically assaulted him, illegally detaining him for four hours despite bail. An inquiry by the Sub‑Divisional Police Officer found the officer r

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURTversusVED PRIYA & ANR.

2020 INSC 30618 March 2020Appeal(s) allowed

Ved Priya, a probationary civil judge, was not confirmed after a two‑year probation and his services were terminated by the State Government on the recommendation of the Rajasthan High Court. He challenged the termination, alleging it was punitive, based on corruption allegations and violated his right to a hearing und

ANDHRA PRADESH STATE COUNCIL OF HIGHER EDUCATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC.

2016 INSC 27018 March 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 required the assets and liabilities of the Andhra Pradesh State Council of Higher Education (APSC) to be divided between the successor states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, and whether the freezing of APSC’s bank accounts by banks on Telan

JOINT SECRETARY, POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF MEGHALAYA, MAIN SECRETARIAT, SHILLONGversusHIGH COURT OF MEGAHALAYA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR, SHILLONG

2016 INSC 27318 March 2016Case Partly allowed

The Joint Secretary, Political Department, Government of Meghalaya filed a suo motu writ petition under Article 226 seeking to give effect to the Meghalaya Lokayukta Act, 2014 and to bring the Lokayukta institution into existence. The High Court, on its own motion, stayed the eligibility clause (s.3(2)(a)) of the Act a

NIRMALA J. JHALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

2013 INSC 17018 March 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Chief Judicial Magistrate, was accused by a litigant of demanding a Rs.20,000 bribe to influence a case. A preliminary inquiry was followed by a regular departmental enquiry, which found her guilty of the first charge and partially guilty of a second. The High Court, on the administrative side, recomme

STATE OF M.P.versusRAMESH AND ANR.

2011 INSC 22118 March 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the High Court’s acquittal of Ramesh and Bhaggo Bai for the murder of Bhaggo’s husband, Chatra. The prosecution’s case rested primarily on the testimony of an eight‑year‑old daughter, Ran nu Bai, who alleged that the accused beat the deceased, supported by medical findings o

STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusM. KRISHNAPPAN AND ORS.

2005 INSC 15718 March 2005Appeal(s) allowed

The Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1974 was amended in 1998 to introduce a one‑time "life‑time tax" for vehicles registered on or after 1 July 1998, calculated on a "weight‑cum‑value" index. The tax was challenged as unconstitutional, discriminatory, and beyond the State's power under Entry 57 of List II of th

MOHAN DAS N. HEGDE (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.

2005 INSC 15818 March 2005Dismissed

The appellant, the legal representative of the deceased Mohan Das N. Hegde, challenged the Karnataka Motor Vehicle Taxation (Amendment) Act, 1997 which imposed a "life time tax" on vehicles based on their market value, classifying those costing Rs. 6 lakhs or more as a separate class. The appellant argued that this cla

M.C. MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2004 INSC 18818 March 2004Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether mining activities within a 5 km radius of the Delhi‑Haryana border and in the Aravalli hills cause environmental degradation and whether the earlier order of 6 May 2002 banning such mining should be varied. It held that the ban remains in force until a newly constituted Monitoring Com

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusSAVINDERJIT KAUR

2004 INSC 18518 March 2004Dismissed

The respondent, a sewing teacher appointed in 1981, claimed that she should receive the same revised pay scale as Classical and Vernacular teachers. Her representation was rejected, and the Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed her writ petition, granting the higher scale. The State appealed, arguing that the Punjab St

RANJEET SINGHversusRAVI PRAKASH

2004 INSC 18918 March 2004Leave Granted & Allowed

The landlord, Ranjeet Singh, sought eviction of his tenant, Ravi Prakash, on the grounds of bonafide requirement for his own fertilizer business and the need to reconstruct the dilapidated shop after a municipal demolition notice. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the appellate court allowed eviction. The tenant

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI-IIversusM/S ALLIED PHOTOGRAHICS INDIA LTD.

2004 INSC 18718 March 2004Appeal(s) allowed

The Commissioner of Central Excise appealed against the refund granted to Mis Allied Photographies India Ltd (the sole distributor of New India Industries Ltd) for excise duty paid by the manufacturer under protest. The Court examined whether duty paid under protest falls under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act or

NAGAR MAHAPALIKA, MEERUTversusM/S. PREM NATH MONGA BOTTLERS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.

1996 INSC 40118 March 1996Dismissed

The Meerut Municipal Corporation attempted to levy octroi on empty glass bottles of the aerated drink "Double Seven" that were brought into the municipal area for refilling. The bottling company contended that the bottles were exempt under Entry 13 of the 1975 Notification, which exempts "mineral water bottles" importe

MOHAMMAD JAFAR AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA

1994 INSC 12218 March 1994Case Allowed

The Central Government, on 10 December 1992, declared the Jamaat-e-Islami Hind (JEIH) an unlawful association under Section 3(1) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, and invoked the proviso to Section 3(3) to give the ban immediate effect. The petitioners challenged this exercise of power, arguing that th

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSCIENTIFIC WORKERS ASSOCIATION (REGD.) KANPUR AND ORS.

1994 INSC 12318 March 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Board of Arbitration under the Joint Consultative Machinery (JCM) Scheme awarded a higher pay scale to Senior Scientific Assistants effective 22 September 1982. The Government of India, without invoking the procedure in Clause 21 of the JCM Scheme, decided to implement the award from 1 January 1988, prompting the C

NARPATCHAND A BHANDARIversusSHANTILAL MOOLSHANKAR JANI AND ANR.

1993 INSC 10318 March 1993Dismissed

The appellant, Narpatchand, occupied a flat in a multi‑storeyed building. The building was mortgaged with possession to the respondents, who became usufructuary mortgagees and thus landlords under the Bombay Rents Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. The respondents served a quit notice and sued for evictio

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusJAGANNATH DUTTA AND ORS.

1993 INSC 10518 March 1993Appeal(s) allowed

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) entered into a storage agency agreement with Jagannath Dutta in 1967, which contained a clause allowing either party to terminate the contract with two months' notice without assigning a reason. In 1985, FCI decided, through a series of meetings and letters, to abolish private storag

OM PRAKASH SHUKLAversusAKHILESH KUMAR SHUKLA & ORS.

1986 INSC 4318 March 1986Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the validity of a competitive examination held in 1981 for recruitment to Grade III ministerial staff of the Subordinate Civil Courts in Kanpur. The petitioner argued that the examination, conducted under the 1950 Rules, was unauthorised because the 1969 Amending Rules and the 1975 Rules had supersed

HARISH PAHWAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

1981 INSC 7318 March 1981Appeal(s) allowed

Harish Pahwa was detained under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 on 16 May 1980. He filed a representation against his detention on 3 June 1980, which the Uttar Pradesh State Government received on 4 June but failed to decide promptly, finally rejecting it on 24 June

DR. POORNIMA ADVANI & ANRversusGOVERNMENT OF NCT & ANR.

2025 INSC 26218 February 2025Disposed off

The appellants purchased an e‑stamp paper for a property transaction which was subsequently lost, prompting them to seek a refund of the stamp duty of Rs 28,10,000. The Delhi High Court ordered a refund of the principal amount but declined interest, leading the appellants to file a Letters Patent Appeal, which was dism

K. KUMARA GUPTAversusSRI MARKENDAYA AND SRI OMKARESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE & ORS

2022 INSC 20718 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, K. Kumara Gupta, purchased temple land in a public auction on 24‑06‑1998, was declared the highest bidder, and the sale was confirmed and the deed executed. Over two decades later, third parties who had not participated in the auction claimed they could have paid a higher price and sought a re‑auction. T

DR. HIRA LALversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2020 INSC 20418 February 2020Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Hira Lal, a former Touring Veterinary Officer of Bihar, was suspended in 2002 and retired in 2008 while criminal proceedings were pending against him. The State of Bihar, relying on circulars of 1974 and a 1980 government resolution, withheld 10% of his pension and the entire gratuity. The appellant challenged this

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI & ORS.versusRAFIQUNNISA M. KHALIFA (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIR MR. MOHD. MUQUEEN QURESHI & ANR.

2019 INSC 22118 February 2019Appeal(s) allowed

Six food stall owners on Bandra Station Road were operating without permission of the Municipal Commissioner and had erected their stalls on a public sewer line, causing obstruction. The Municipal Corporation removed the stalls on 26 May 2016 under Section 314(1) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and the o

M. SURENDER REDDYversusGOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

2015 INSC 13218 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the applicability of G.O.Ms. No.124 dated 7 March 2002, which amended the procedure for filling posts under the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment Order, 1975. The selection process for various executive and non‑executive posts had already begun under Advertisement No.10 of 1999, and some appointments

V. SRIHARAN @ MURUGANversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 11018 February 2014Case Allowed

Three death‑row convicts (V. Sriharan @ Murugan, T. Suthendraraja @ Santhan and A.G. Perarivalan @ Arivu) filed mercy petitions under Articles 72/161 of the Constitution. The Governor of Tamil Nadu rejected the petitions in 2000 and the President finally rejected them in August 2011 after an inordinate delay of more th

STATE OF SIKKIM AND OTHERSversusADUP TSHERING BHUTIA AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 10918 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Sikkim integrated three separate police forces into a single Sikkim Police Force under the 2000 Rules, fixing seniority of officers at the sub‑inspector level to address promotion inequities. The High Court struck down Rule 9(iv) and the seniority list, holding that the retrospective deemed promotions viol

CHOWDHURY NAVIN HEMABHAI & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2011 INSC 13818 February 2011Disposed off

The appellants, students belonging to SC, ST and OBC categories, secured the required 40% marks in the qualifying examination but scored less than 40% in the Gujarat common entrance test for MBBS admission in 2008‑2009. They were admitted to the MBBS course under Gujarat Professional Medical Educational Colleges Rules,

ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusANGAD KOL AND ORS.

2009 INSC 20918 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The heirs of Genda Bai, who died after being struck by a goods carriage vehicle, claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Oriental Insurance Co. denied liability, contending that the driver, Umesh Gupta, did not hold a valid licence to drive a goods vehicle, thereby breaching the insurance contract. The

HARYANA SEEDS DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD.versusSADHU AND ANR.

2005 INSC 8518 February 2005Appeal(s) allowed

The farmers, including Sadhu Singh, purchased wheat seeds from Haryana Seeds Development Corporation and a cooperative credit society and alleged poor germination, filing a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The District Consumer Forum, State Commission, and National Commission all allowed the complaint

LALIT POPLIversusCANARA BANK AND ORS.

2003 INSC 10118 February 2003Dismissed

Lalit Popli, a clerk of Canara Bank, was dismissed after an internal enquiry found him guilty of forgery and unauthorized withdrawal of Rs.1.07 lakh, relying heavily on a handwriting expert’s report. The employee challenged the dismissal, arguing that the expert’s evidence was inadmissible, that adverse remarks about t

CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS GOVT. OF A.P.versusTHE COLLECTORS AND ORS.

2003 INSC 10418 February 2003Dismissed

The Chief Conservator of Forests of Andhra Pradesh filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Commissioner of Survey, Settlement and Land Record concerning title to certain lands, without joining the State as a party. The same issue was pursued in a civil appeal after a suit by the pattedars (private landholders

SHRI KRISHNA GYANODAY SUGAR LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2003 INSC 10018 February 2003Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the Bihar Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1985, which sought to acquire certain sugar mills and associated distilleries. Petitioners challenged the Act on the ground that it was beyond the State's legislative competence, overlapped with the central Sugar Undertaking (Taking over of Mana

RAM BAIversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1999 INSC 7118 February 1999Appeal(s) allowed

Ram BAI's land was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and she received compensation which was later enhanced with solatium and interest by a civil court, a decision affirmed by the High Court. She disclosed the interest as income in a return filed under Section 139(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, but the Inc

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusBARMALT (INDIA) LTD., GURGAON

1997 INSC 15418 February 1997Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court considered whether malt and malt extract manufactured by Barmalt (India) Ltd. qualify as "food products" under Excise Notification No. 55 of 1975 and whether the company was entitled to a refund of excise duty on the basis of unjust enrichment. The Court affirmed the Delhi High Court's view that malt

REFERENCE UNDER ARTICLE 317(1) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA., REGARDING ENQUIRY AND REPORT ON THE ALLEGATIONSversusAGAINST SH M. MEGHA CHANDRA SINGH, CHAIRMAN, MANIPUR SERVICE COMMISSION.

1994 INSC 7918 February 1994Disposed off

The President of India referred a matter under Article 317(1) of the Constitution to the Supreme Court, seeking an inquiry into allegations of misbehaviour against Shri M. Megha Chandra Singh, Chairman of the Manipur Public Service Commission, including tampering with examination papers and taking a bribe. While the re

DR. M.A. HAQUE AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1993 INSC 5818 February 1993Disposed off

The petitioners were appointed as Assistant Divisional Medical Officers on an ad‑hoc basis by the Railways between 1968 and 1 October 1984. Their services were later regularised by two Supreme Court orders (24 September 1987 and 1 November 1988). They then sought fixation of their seniority relative to doctors recruite

A.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusP.V. RAMAMOHAN CHOWDHARY AND ORS.

1992 INSC 5018 February 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The Andhra Pradesh Government, under sections 68‑C, 68‑D and 68‑E of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, approved a draft nationalisation scheme for the Anantapur‑Dharmavaram route, exempting four specific routes from the scheme. Two private operators (respondents) challenged the exemption, alleging discrimination and a viol

KANUBHAI BRAHMBHATTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1987 INSC 4818 February 1987

In Writ Petition No. 1669 of 1986 filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, the petitioner sought relief directly from the Supreme Court against the State of Gujarat. The Court examined whether there were good and substantial reasons to require the petitioner to first approach the concerned High Court. It held that a

CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR.versusV. J. CORNELIUS ETC.

1981 INSC 4018 February 1981Dismissed

The Andhra Pradesh Government issued the Revised Scales of Pay Rules, 1969 and later an executive order fixing the pay of employees placed in the Selection Grade so that it would not exceed the pay of their seniors in higher posts. The High Court struck down this order as violative of Articles 14, 16 and Fundamental Ru

NARENDER SINGHversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2022 INSC 5918 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a JBT teacher, applied for the post of Assistant Professor advertised by the Haryana Public Service Commission and was required to submit a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from his employer at the time of interview. Despite applying for the NOC in March 2016, the employer delayed issuance until June 2018;

BHAGWANIversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2022 INSC 5218 January 2022Case Partly allowed

The appellant was convicted of kidnapping, raping and murdering an 11‑year‑old girl after she disappeared from a village ceremony. Circumstantial and forensic evidence, including DNA matches to the co‑accused Satish and blood‑stained clothing recovered from the appellant's cowshed, linked the appellant to the crime, wh

STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.versusSUNNY PRAKASH & ORS.

2013 INSC 4118 January 2013Dismissed

The Government of Bihar had repeatedly declared that non‑teaching staff of universities and constituent colleges were to be treated as equivalent to government staff, but successive agreements (most recently on 18 July 2007) were not implemented, leading to strikes by the Bihar State University and College Employees Fe

REPUBLIC OF ITALY AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2013 INSC 4318 January 2013Disposed off

The case arose from an incident on 15 February 2012 when two Italian naval officers aboard the merchant vessel M.V. Enrica Lexie fired on an Indian fishing boat 20.5 nautical miles off the Kerala coast, killing two fishermen. The Kerala police lodged an FIR under the Indian Penal Code and arrested the officers, which t

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERversusTHE HOOGHLY MILLS CO. LTD. & ORS.

2012 INSC 3918 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner appealed against Hooghly Mills Co. Ltd., an exempted establishment under the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, for defaulting on contributions. The High Court had held that the exemption barred the application of Sections 6, 7A, 8 and 14B, and tha

BURDWAN CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.versusASIM CHATTERJEE & ORS.

2012 INSC 4018 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Burdwan Central Cooperative Bank dismissed Respondent No.1, a Grade‑III employee, on the ground of financial irregularities he allegedly committed while employed with an affiliated cooperative society (Raipur Krishi Unnayan Samity). The employee challenged the dismissal, arguing that the bank had no juris

RAMESHBHAI DABHAI NAIKAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & OTHERS

2012 INSC 3718 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed

Rameshbhai Dabhai Naika, whose mother belonged to the Nayak Scheduled Tribe and father was a Kshatriya, had his tribal certificate cancelled by a Scrutiny Committee and the Gujarat High Court upheld the cancellation, relying on Valsamma Paul, Punit Rai and Anjan Kumar. The Supreme Court examined whether a person born o

OFFSHORE HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.versusBANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS .

2011 INSC 5418 January 2011Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined whether Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, which provides for lapse of acquisition proceedings after two years, applies to acquisitions made under the Bangalore Development Authority Act (BDA Act). The appellant argued that the acquisition had lapsed, rendering the land de‑notified, whi

STATE OF UTTARANCHALversusBALWANT SINGH CHAUFAL & OTHERS

2010 INSC 4718 January 2010Hearing Adjourned

The State of Uttarakhand appealed against a High Court order that had entertained a public‑interest writ challenging the appointment of L.P. Nathani as Advocate General on the ground that he was over 62 years old. The Supreme Court examined whether Article 165 in conjunction with Article 217 of the Constitution imposes

U.P. STATE SUGAR CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS.versusKAMAL SWAROOP TONDON

2008 INSC 7018 January 2008Case Allowed

The appellant corporation alleged that its resident engineer, Kamal Swaroop Tondon, caused a loss of Rs.1 lakh due to negligence and initiated disciplinary proceedings by issuing a show‑cause notice on 13 January 2000, followed by a regular notice on 31 January 2000, the day of his retirement. While the employee filed

SHIV DASSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .

2007 INSC 6418 January 2007Disposed off

Shiv Dass, a former Army Medical Corps officer, became 80% disabled in 1982 and was invalidated from service. He applied for a disability pension in 1983, which was rejected, and after an unresponded appeal he filed a writ petition in 2005. The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petition as belated. On appeal,

PEOPLE'S UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIESversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2005 INSC 3518 January 2005Matter referred to larger bench

A vacancy arose in the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and a retired Director of the CBI, a former police officer, was appointed as a member under Section 3(2)(d) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. The petition challenged his eligibility, arguing that police officers are disqualified and that the appo

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusBHUSHAN SACHDEVA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 3418 January 2002Disposed off

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 12.53 lakh in compensation for a 1994 accident, directing United India Insurance Co. to pay the amount jointly with the driver, while the insured driver did not appeal. United India Insurance Co. filed a revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, believing it

PURAN SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1996 INSC 9318 January 1996

The appellants filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging an order of the Additional Director, Consolidation of Holdings, Punjab, relating to land allocation under the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948. During the pendency of the petitio

MIRZA MAJID HUSSAINversusSTATE OF M.P. AND ANR .

1995 INSC 5418 January 1995Dismissed

The appellant's land was acquired for the Garna Dam project and a compensation award was made in 1969. The Collector rejected the reference to the award in 1975, prompting the appellant to file a revision before the District Judge in 1982, which was dismissed. After a further delay, a writ petition was filed in the Hig

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSAMARENDRA KISHORE ENDOW AND ANR.

1994 INSC 1418 January 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Branch Manager of State Bank of India, claimed reimbursement for moving his household goods after a transfer and was charged with five offences, including false claims and irregular loan disbursement. An enquiry officer found all charges proved on documentary evidence, and the disciplinary authority i

K. NAGARAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC.,versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR. ETC.

1985 INSC 618 January 1985Dismissed

The Andhra Pradesh government, after coming to power in 1983, reduced the superannuation age for most government employees from 58 to 55 years by issuing an order and two notifications, claiming it would create employment opportunities for youth. Over 28,000 employees were forced to retire, prompting writ petitions cha

ATHAR PARWEZversusUNION OF INDIA

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 109317 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, alleged active member of the Popular Front of India (PFI), was arrested in July 2022 for allegedly planning disturbances during the Prime Minister's visit to Patna. He was charged under several sections of the IPC and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), but the chargesheet had not been frame

RAVINDER KUMAR DHARIWAL & ANR.versusTHE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2021 INSC 91617 December 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an Assistant Commandant in the CRPF, was subjected to multiple disciplinary enquiries after a complaint alleged that he made threatening statements and exhibited misconduct. He was later diagnosed with a permanent mental disability (40‑70%) and classified as unfit for duty. The appellant challenged the d

PANI RAMversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2021 INSC 92217 December 2021Appeal(s) allowed

Pani Ram, a former regular army infantry officer, re‑enrolled in the Territorial Army (TA) and suffered a severe accident while returning from leave, resulting in an 80% disability. The Medical Board and a Court of Inquiry found the injury attributable to military service, and he was invalided out, seeking a disability

DR NARESH KUMAR MANGLAversusSMT. ANITA AGARWAL & ORS. ETC.

2020 INSC 70617 December 2020Disposed off

Dr. Naresh Kumar Mangla filed a criminal appeal challenging the Allahabad High Court's order granting anticipatory bail to his deceased daughter's in‑laws under Section 438 CrPC. The FIR alleged dowry harassment, assault in 2017, money demands and the unnatural death of the daughter within seven years of marriage, invo

DR. (MAJOR) MEETA SAHAIversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2019 INSC 138717 December 2019Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Meeta Sahai, a former Army Medical Corps doctor, applied for a General Medical Officer post in Bihar but was denied marks for work experience because the advertisement limited such experience to hospitals run by the Government of Bihar. She challenged this restriction, arguing that the Bihar Health Service (Appoint

M/S. RAM BARAI SINGH & CO.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2014 INSC 88117 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. Ram Bara Singh & Co. appealed against a Division Bench order that set aside a Patna High Court judgment allowing its writ petition under Art. 226. The respondents argued that an arbitration clause in the 1989 contract made the writ petition non‑maintainable, even though the contract had been completed and payments

MANOHAR LAL SHARMAversusTHE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS.

2013 INSC 83917 December 2013Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether Section 6A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, which requires prior Central Government approval for CBI investigations into senior officials, applies when the investigation is being monitored by the Court itself. The Court noted that the CBI had initiated investigatio

YAZDANI INTERNATIONAL P. LTD.versusAUROGLOBAL COMTRADE P. LTD. & ORS.

2013 INSC 84817 December 2013Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the termination of licences granted by the Paradeep Port Trust (the Board) for manual and mechanically operated iron‑ore storage plots. The appellants claimed an indefeasible right to renew their licences and alleged that the Board’s decision violated constitutional principles. The Court held

BHUWALKA STEEL INDUS. LTD.versusBOMBAY IRON & STEEL LABOUR BO. & ANR.

2009 INSC 131817 December 2009Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the meaning of "unprotected worker" under Section 2(11) of the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969. The petitioners argued that the term should be limited to casual workers not covered by other labour statutes, relying on earlie

SHANTI BHUSHAN AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2008 INSC 145717 December 2008Disposed off

The petitioners filed a public‑interest writ under Article 32 seeking to quash the appointment of a Madras High Court judge, alleging that the appointment as a permanent judge was made without the required collegium consultation and that the judge was unsuitable, as evidenced by repeated extensions of his tenure as an

D.S. GREWALversusVIMMI JOSHI & ORS.

2008 INSC 146217 December 2008Disposed off

The case concerned the termination of Vimmi Joshi, a principal of an Army public school, who alleged sexual harassment by the Vice‑Chairman of the School Managing Committee, Col. Hitendra Bahadur. The High Court had held that a clear case of sexual harassment existed and ordered disciplinary action against the officers

SHRI ASHOK TANWAR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF H.P. AND ORS.

2004 INSC 72117 December 2004Dismissed

The Himachal Pradesh government sought to fill a vacancy for President of the State Consumer Redressal Commission by appointing a sitting High Court judge, Justice Surinder Swaroop. The government initially sent a proposal to the Chief Justice, but the High Court pointed out that the appointment process should be initi

CHOLAN ROADWAYS LTD.versusG. THIRUGNANASAMBANDAM

2004 INSC 72617 December 2004Appeal(s) allowed

A bus driven by the respondent crashed, killing seven passengers. The employer dismissed the driver after a domestic enquiry and sought approval of the dismissal under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Industrial Tribunal refused approval, holding that the enquiry was flawed because the passengers we

BAHADURSINH LAKHUBHAI GOHILversusJAGDISHBHAI M. KAMALIA AND ORS.

2003 INSC 72817 December 2003Dismissed

An auction was held by the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation (then Gujarat) in 1951 for a 99‑year lease of a vacant plot. The highest bidder, Shri Vajubha (predecessor of the appellant), paid only part of the premium and was given a three‑month extension to pay the balance, with a condition that failure would can

STATE OF PUNJABversusRAMDEV SINGH

2003 INSC 73117 December 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Punjab appealed the acquittal of Ramdev Singh, who was convicted by a trial court for raping a minor girl. The FIR was lodged 17-18 days after the incident because the victim's father was seriously ill, and the medical report noted that the girl was habituated to sexual intercourse. The Punjab and Haryana

DEVENDER PAL SINGHversusSTATE N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ANR.

2002 INSC 54417 December 2002Dismissed

The petitioners filed review applications under Article 137 of the Constitution seeking to set aside death sentences imposed by the Supreme Court in three criminal appeals. They argued that because one of the three judges on the bench had either acquitted the accused or suggested life imprisonment, the death penalty sh

STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.versusKAMLA PALACE

1999 INSC 56817 December 1999Dismissed

The Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 was amended in 1992 to permit cinema owners to levy an extra maintenance charge under Section 3A, but a proviso barred those receiving a government grant‑in‑aid from imposing this charge. Several cinema owners challenged the proviso as violative of Article 14 of

KULDEEP SINGHversusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS.

1998 INSC 48417 December 1998Appeal(s) allowed

Constable Kuldeep Singh was dismissed in 1991 after a departmental enquiry found him guilty of misappropriating Rs 200 of Rs 1,000 allegedly received from a factory owner for payment to three labourers. The enquiry did not produce any of the labourers, relying instead on prior statements under Rule 16(3) of the Delhi P

BALIRAM PRASADversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 149517 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Baliram Prasad appealed against the appointment of respondent No. 7 as Extra Department Branch Post Master, alleging that he was more meritorious. The Central Administrative Tribunal dismissed his petition on two grounds: the application was filed after the one‑year limitation period and the appellant was disqualified

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusKUNJI RAMAN

1996 INSC 150217 December 1996Case Partly allowed

Kunji Raman and 36 other work‑charged employees of the Mahi Sagar Project filed a writ petition alleging that the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 and the Rajasthan Service (Concessions on Project) Rules, 1962/1975 were inapplicable to them, depriving them of house‑rent allowance, project allowance and leave encashment. T

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusMOHINDER SINGH CHAWLA ETC.

1996 INSC 150617 December 1996Disposed off

A government servant suffering from a heart ailment was permitted to obtain specialized treatment at AIIMS/Escorts Heart Institute because such facilities were unavailable in Punjab state hospitals. He submitted his medical bills for reimbursement, including the actual room rent paid during his inpatient stay, but the

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusUPENDRA SINGH

1994 INSC 62317 December 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India filed disciplinary proceedings against IRS officer Upendra Singh alleging that, while handling income‑tax proceedings under sections 133A, 144A and 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, he acted illegally by ignoring incriminating evidence, acquiescing to a reduced disclosure by the assessee and directing pr

JAGDISH PRASAD AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusM.C.D. THROUGH COMMISSIONER AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1992 INSC 34617 December 1992Dismissed

The petitioners, low‑income employees of the Delhi Electricity Supply Undertaking (DESU), occupied residential quarters built under the 1954 Low Income Housing Scheme and paid rent. They filed writ petitions seeking transfer of ownership of the quarters, relying on the scheme, a municipal resolution (No. 868 of 1970) t

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusW.N. CHADHA

1992 INSC 34717 December 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the Union of India's and CBI's challenge to a Delhi High Court order that quashed the FIR registered against W.N. Chadha in the Bofors scandal and set aside the letters rogatory issued to Swiss authorities. The Court held that the FIR disclosed a prima facie offence and that the High Court ha

ATLAS CYCLE INDUSTRIES LIMITEDversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

1992 INSC 34517 December 1992Dismissed

The petitioners, Atlas Cycle Industries Ltd. and another, challenged the levy of octroi on their factories after the Sonepat municipal limits were extended, arguing that Section 5(4) of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 (as amended) was unconstitutional for denying them a right of representation and for its retrospective

BABURAO ALIAS P.B. SAMANTversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1987 INSC 38117 December 1987Dismissed

The petitioner, an income‑tax assessee, challenged the validity of the 1971 and 1975 Proclamations of Emergency, the House of the People (Extension of Duration) Act, 1976 and the Finance Act, 1976, arguing that the proclamations were ultra vires or had ceased to operate because the parliamentary resolutions approving t

STATE OF MYSOREversusB. BASAVALINGAPPA

1986 INSC 26917 December 1986Dismissed

The respondent, B. Basavalingappa, was appointed as a workshop mechanic and later promoted to workshop instructor in the Mysore State. When pay scales were revised in 1961, diploma holders were placed in a higher scale (Rs.150‑320) than certificate holders (Rs.150‑250), and a further revision in 1964 gave a still highe

T.R. KAPUR & ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

1986 INSC 27017 December 1986Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, diploma‑holding engineers appointed in the erstwhile Punjab Service, were promoted to Sub‑Divisional Officer in Class II and were eligible for promotion to Executive Engineer in Class I under the unamended Rule 6(b) of the Punjab Service of Engineers (Class I) Rules, 1964. The Haryana Government issued

ASHOK GULATI & ORS.versusB.S. JAIN & ORS.

1986 INSC 27117 December 1986Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, Ashok Gulati and others, were promoted as Executive Engineers on an ad‑hoc basis by the Haryana Government in 1978, while respondents B.S. Jain and S.L. Gupta, who had earlier served as Temporary Engineers on an ad‑hoc basis, claimed that their service should count for seniority and eligibility for pro

D.S. NAKARA & OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA

1982 INSC 10317 December 1982Case Allowed

The petitioners, two retired government servants and a society of pensioners, challenged two 1979 Government memoranda that liberalised pension computation but limited the benefit to employees who were in service on 31 March 1979 (civil servants) or 1 April 1979 (armed forces) and retired on or after those dates. They

A. T. ZAMBRE AND OTHERSversusKARTAR KRISHNA SHASHTRI

1980 INSC 23817 December 1980Dismissed

The appellant challenged the High Court's order that declared sub‑section (5) of section 17 of the Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act, 1961 unconstitutional. The provision allowed persons who were practising Ayurvedic or Unani medicine in the Bombay area on 4 November 1941, but not listed under the Bombay Medical Pr

DR. RAM LAKHAN SINGHversusSTATE GOVERNMENT OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

2015 INSC 84117 November 2015Disposed off

Dr. Ram Lakhan Singh, a senior Indian Forest Service officer, was subjected to a vigilance enquiry, house raid and arrest without the prior approval of the Chief Secretary, as required by the State's procedural rules. The petitioner contended that the State violated his fundamental rights, unlawfully suspended him, and

SHIV CHARAN SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

2006 INSC 86117 November 2006Dismissed

Shiv Charan Singh appealed to the Supreme Court under Article 136, challenging the Punjab and Haryana High Court's order dismissing his review application against a writ order that had been rejected on the ground of his alleged habitual absenteeism. The High Court had found the petitioner absent for about three years a

STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS.versusAMBAY CEMENTS AND ANR.

2004 INSC 64917 November 2004Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Jharkhand appealed against a Jharkhand High Court order that had treated a temporary registration certificate issued to Ambay Cements as the "prior permission" required for sales‑tax exemption under the Bihar Industrial Promotion Policy, 1995. The policy, as amended by Notifications S.O. 57 and 58 dated 2 

DR. MANJU VARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2004 INSC 65317 November 2004Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Manju Varma filed a writ petition in the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court seeking promotion based on seniority. Respondent No.6 (Dr. Gauri Ganguli) applied to the Chief Justice for transfer of the petition to the Allahabad Bench under paragraph 14 of the United Provinces High Courts (Amalgamation) Order, 1

REGISTRAR, HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AND ANR.versusC.G. SHARMA

2004 INSC 65517 November 2004Appeal(s) allowed

C.G. Sharma was appointed as a Civil Judge on a two‑year probation under the Gujarat Judicial Service Recruitment Rules, 1961. His probation was extended twice and he was terminated for alleged unsatisfactory performance and integrity concerns. Sharma argued that the expiry of the probation period meant automatic confi

NAIR SERVICE SOCIETYversusDISTT. OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ORS.

2003 INSC 63317 November 2003Disposed off

The Kerala Public Service Commission (KPSC) prepared a main rank list of 177 candidates and a supplementary list of 62 reserved‑category candidates for Sub‑Engineer posts in the State Electricity Board. After 20 candidates (including open‑category and reserved‑category) failed to join, the KPSC refused to advise appoin

B.S. SHARMAversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

2000 INSC 53317 November 2000Dismissed

The petitioner, a judicial officer of the Haryana Judicial Service, was transferred by the High Court in 1997 to serve as Presiding Officer of an Industrial Tribunal‑cum‑Labour Court. He argued that, under Section 7‑C of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, he could remain in that post until the age of 67, even though th

MANOHAR M. GALANIversusASHOK N. ADVANI

1999 INSC 52317 November 1999Appeal(s) allowed

Manohar M. Galan filed criminal complaints alleging that Kishore Keswani had lodged false FIRs against him and his family, leading to their arrest. A social activist filed a public interest petition (PIP) in the Gujarat High Court, which directed an inquiry into alleged scandal in a subordinate court at Dakor. While th

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL THROUGH PRESIDENTversusV.K. AGARWAL AND ANR.

1998 INSC 43117 November 1998Case Allowed

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (through its President) filed a contempt petition against the former Law Secretary, V.K. Agarwal, alleging that his letters demanding a report on alleged contradictory orders interfered with the Tribunal's judicial functions. The Tribunal had originally issued a single order signed by

P.N. KRISHNA LAL AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusGOVT. OF KERALA AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

1994 INSC 52417 November 1994

The appellants, licensees of arrack and foreign liquor shops, were convicted under sections 57A and 57B of the Kerala Abkari Act (as amended in 1984) for mixing or permitting the mixing of noxious substances such as methanol with liquor, or for failing to take reasonable precautions, and for possessing adulterated liqu

ASSIT. COLLECTOR OF ESTATE DUTY MADRASversusSMT. V. DEVAKI AMMAL, MADRAS

1994 INSC 52317 November 1994Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined two conflicting Madras High Court decisions on the constitutionality of Section 34(1)(c) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, which mandates aggregation of coparcenary interests of Mitakshara joint Hindu families for estate duty purposes. The issue was whether this provision discriminated against me

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusKARNAIL SINGH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 52517 November 1994

The Union of India appealed against the High Court’s order granting additional statutory benefits to landowners whose lands in Bhatinda district had been acquired. The original award by the Collector under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act was later enhanced by civil courts, but the owners filed an application und

GANNON DUNKERLEY AND CO. A.ND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1992 INSC 31217 November 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined appeals by Gannon Dunkerley Co. and other contractors challenging the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 and its rules which imposed tax on the transfer of property in goods used in works contracts. The Court held that Section 5(3) of the Act and sub‑rule (i) of Rule 29 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax

C.B. GAUTAMversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 31317 November 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner C.B. Gautam sought to purchase a lease‑hold plot in Delhi, but the Income Tax authority ordered its compulsory purchase by the Central Government under Section 269UD of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, without giving any reasons or a chance to be heard. The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter XX‑C of the Act

BUILDERS' ASSOCIATION.OF INDIAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS

1992 INSC 31517 November 1992Dismissed

The Builders' Association of India, an association of contractors, challenged the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, specifically Explanation 3(c) to Section 2(t) and Section 5‑B with the Sixth Schedule, alleging that they converted inter‑state sales into intra‑state sales and imposed tax on the value of works contracts in

HAJI T.M. HASSAN RAWTHERversusKERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION

1987 INSC 33617 November 1987Dismissed

The Kerala Financial Corporation (KFC), a state corporation, obtained a decree against T.M. Hassan Rawther for default on a loan secured by a tea estate. After an unsuccessful court auction in 1969, KFC purchased the estate but could not take possession until 1982 due to a labour dispute. KFC then invited public tender

GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADUversusAHOBILA MATAM

1986 INSC 23717 November 1986Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Tamil Nadu appealed against a Madras High Court order that had quashed a full land‑revenue assessment on lands granted to the Ahobila Matam, a Hindu religious institution. The lands were originally given as an inam by a Tanjore prince and were recorded as a religious endowment held tax‑free. The High Court

SAJEENA IKHBAL & ORS.versusMINI BABU GEORGE & ORS.

2024 INSC 78717 October 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Ikhbal was killed in a road accident where his motorcycle was allegedly struck by a car driven by respondent No.2. The appellants, his widow, child and parents, claimed compensation from the car's insurer, but the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the claim on the ground that the car’s involvement a

IN RE : SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT 1955 versus

2024 INSC 78917 October 2024Reference answered

The case concerns the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which grants citizenship to certain migrants from Bangladesh to Assam based on cut-off dates (before 1.1.1966 and between 1.1.1966 and 25.3.1971). The provision was enacted to implement the Assam Accord. Petitioners challenged it

SUPRIYO @ SUPRIYA CHAKRABORTY & ANRversusUNION OF INDIA

2023 INSC 92017 October 2023Disposed off

The Supreme Court of India considered a batch of petitions seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriage under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, and other laws. The Court held that there is no fundamental right to marry under the Constitution, and the Special Marriage Act is not unconstitutional for excluding same-sex c

THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.versusDEVENDRA SHARMA

2019 INSC 115717 October 2019Disposed off

The case concerned a large number of appointments to Class III and Class IV posts in the Bihar Health Department that were made without sanctioned vacancies, advertisement or competent authority, many on forged documents. A State Committee classified the appointments as illegal, forged or irregular and termination orde

M/S. SETHI AUTO SERVICE STATION AND ANR.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS.

2008 INSC 117117 October 2008Dismissed

The appellants, owners of two petrol pumps at Mahipalpur, claimed that the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) had a duty to relocate their outlets after a flyover project made the sites commercially unviable. The DDA’s Technical Committee and later the Screening Committee had initially recommended resettlement, but the

RENUSAGAR POWER CO. LTD. ETC.versusGENERAL ELECTRIC CO. ETC.

1993 INSC 34217 October 1993Dismissed

Renusagar Power Co. entered into a contract with General Electric for the supply of equipment for a power plant, which later gave rise to disputes and an ICC arbitration. The arbitral tribunal awarded US$12,215,622.14, including regular interest, delinquent interest, compensatory damages, and costs. Renusagar challenge

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusSHAIK ALI

1989 INSC 31017 October 1989Dismissed

Shaik Ali, a Class III railway employee, was suspended after a confrontation with a Divisional Safety Officer and subsequently ordered to retire prematurely under Rule 2046(h)(ii) of the Indian Railway Establishment Code, despite not having reached the required age of 55. The Central Administrative Tribunal set aside t

ADARSH TRAVELS BUS SERVICE & ANRversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

1985 INSC 23217 October 1985Dismissed

The appellants, holders of stage‑carriage permits, sought to operate their services over routes that were partially nationalised under Chapter IVA of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, by imposing "corridor restrictions" (i.e., not picking up or dropping passengers on the nationalised segment). The Supreme Court examined wh

SMT. J. S. RUKMANI ETC.versusGOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

1984 INSC 19517 October 1984Case Allowed

The widows of former Madras State government servants who retired before the 1956 reorganisation sought family pension under the Tamil Nadu Notification of 26 May 1979. The Tamil Nadu Government later issued a clarification (G.O. MS/63, 18 March 1982) that denied pension where the servant’s last posting was in a territ

UFLEX LTD.versusGOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2021 INSC 49217 September 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a dispute over a government tender for polyester hologram excise labels, where two unsuccessful bidders, Kumbhat Holographics and Alpha Lasertek India LLP, alleged that the tender specifications were tailored to favour the successful bidders, UFLEX Ltd. and Montage Enterprises. The Court held

K. ARJUN DASversusCOMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, ORISSA & ORS.

2019 INSC 103917 September 2019Appeal(s) allowed

K. Arjun Das, claiming to be a tenant of land belonging to the deity Sri Rama Laxman Sita Swamy Bije, applied under Section 19 of the Orissa Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1951 for permission to sell 4.255 acres of barren land. The Commissioner, after an inquiry, fixed an upset price of Rs.10 lakhs per acre, gave Das

PRADEEP SINGH DEHALversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS.

2019 INSC 104517 September 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned two recruitment advertisements for Assistant Professor posts at Himachal Pradesh University. The appellant, an OBC candidate, was appointed, while the respondent, a General category candidate, claimed he was denied five marks for "publications" that had been awarded in an earlier, incomplete selectio

COMMITTEE FOR C.R. OF C.A.P. & ORS.versusSTATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH & ORS.

2015 INSC 67217 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Committee for Citizenship Rights of the Chakmas of Arunachal Pradesh filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a direction to the Union of India to grant Indian citizenship to Chakma and Hajong refugees who migrated between 1964 and 1969 and have since settled in Arunachal Pradesh. The State of Arunachal Prade

BABA TEK SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2012 INSC 40417 September 2012Disposed off

Baba Tek Singh alleged that the Union of India and other respondents were threatening his life, liberty and property and were trying to remove him from his positions in a Gurudwara and a trust. He had earlier filed a writ petition under Article 226 before the Punjab and Haryana High Court (CWP No.21234/2011) and obtain

STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS.versusMANSHU KUMBHKAR

2007 INSC 93317 September 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Jharkhand appointed several Class III and IV employees, including the respondent Manshu Kumbhkar, without complying with the administrative instructions dated 3‑12‑1980, which required advertisement, a selection committee, and recruitment through the district employment exchange. The appointments were late

SATICHIDANANDA MISHRAversusSTATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.

2004 INSC 53117 September 2004

The Orissa Government appointed 49 junior teachers on an ad‑hoc basis in 1980‑81 without constituting a Selection Board as required by the 1979 Recruitment Rules, which mandated a member of the Orissa Public Service Commission (OPSC) as Chairman. The OPSC refused to concur with these appointments, prompting the legisla

M.P. HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2004 INSC 53217 September 2004

The Madhya Pradesh High Court Bar Association challenged a notification issued under Section 74(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 that abolished the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, alleging that the provision was ultra‑vires Article 323A, amounted to excessive delegation of legislative pow

RAMANUJ PRASADversusCOAL INDIA LTD. AND ORS.

2003 INSC 49217 September 2003Dismissed

Ramanuj Prasad, a Draftsman appointed by Bharat Coking Coal Ltd (a subsidiary of Coal India Ltd) in 1975, was promoted to Executive cadre as Public Relations Officer (E‑2) in 1987 and later assumed charge of the Public Relations Manager post (E‑5) in 1990 without a formal promotion order. A 1993 circular stipulated tha

WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS.versusSAMIR K. SARKAR

1999 INSC 42117 September 1999Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Samir K. Sarkar, applied for a compassionate appointment after his father, an employee of the West Bengal State Electricity Board, died within two years of his scheduled superannuation. The Board rejected the application citing an office order dated 15 March 1993, which imposes an embargo on appointment

SHRI JAGANNA TEMPLE PURI MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS ADMINISTRATOR AND ANR. ETC.versusCHINTAMANI KHUNTIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 66017 September 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Sections 28‑B(5) and 28‑C(9) of the Shri Jagannath Temple Act, 1954, which barred temple attendants (Sevaks) from receiving any share of offerings placed in newly installed hundis and from claiming a share of the foundation fund. The Sevaks argued that these pro

STATE OF PUNJABversusM/S. YOGINDER SHARMA ONKAR RAI & CO. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 106017 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab government auctioned liquor vends in March 1996. M/s Yoginder Sharma Onkar Rai & Co. claimed it had made higher bids than the successful bidders and challenged the auction in a writ petition. The High Court Division Bench quashed the auction and ordered a re‑auction, criticizing the Financial Commissioner’s

IN RE : HARIJAI SINGH AND ANR.versusIN RE : VIJAY KUMAR

1996 INSC 106217 September 1996Disposed off

The Supreme Court entertained contempt petitions filed against the editors and publishers of The Sunday Tribune and Punjab Kesari for publishing a news item that falsely alleged that the sons of a senior Supreme Court judge and the Chief Justice of India had been allotted petrol pumps from a discretionary quota. The Co

D.K. CHHANGANI AND ORS.versusNITYA RANJAN MUKHERJEE AND ORS.

1996 INSC 106617 September 1996Disposed off

The appeal arose from a Calcutta High Court order concerning the recognition of a rival union of Geological Survey of India employees. The dispute centered on whether the High Court had jurisdiction to review an Industrial Tribunal's decision in Maharashtra regarding the membership and recognition of that union. The Su

GHAN SHYAM DAS GUPTA AND ANR.versus. ANANT KUMAR SINHA AND ORS.

1991 INSC 23817 September 1991Appeal(s) allowed

The landlords (appellants) obtained an eviction decree against their tenant, Respondent No.7, but the tenant's relatives (Respondents 1‑5) claimed they were also tenants in their own right and filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The High Court entertained the writ, holding that the decree did n

CHANDER MOHAN KHANNAversusNATIONAL COUNCIL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND TRAINING AND ORS.

1991 INSC 24117 September 1991Dismissed

The appellant, an employee of the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT), challenged his termination by filing a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition, holding that NCERT was not an "instrumentality or authority" within the meaning of Art

NEELIMA SHANGLA PH.D. CANDIDATEversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

1986 INSC 19217 September 1986Case Allowed

Miss Neelima Shangla, ranked 24th in the 1983‑84 Haryana Civil Service (Judicial) examination, claimed that despite 54 qualified candidates, the Haryana Public Service Commission (PSC) recommended only 26 names and withheld the full list from the Government, thereby denying her appointment. The petition under Article 3

PRAVEEN KUMAR C.PversusKERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.

2021 INSC 40417 August 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Praveen Kumar C.P. and Anitha Devi, applied for High School Assistant posts in Kerala where the recruitment notification required a B.Ed. in the concerned subject (Natural Science). Their B.Ed. degrees were in Biological Science (and related subjects) obtained from universities outside Kerala. They obta

RAJDEEP GHOSHversusSTATE OF ASSAM & ORS.

2018 INSC 71817 August 2018Dismissed

The petitioners, students from Assam, challenged Rule 3(1)(c) of the 2017 Rules governing admission to first‑year MBBS/BDS courses, which required candidates to have studied in Assam from class VII to XII, with relaxations only for children of government employees posted outside the state. They argued that the rule vio

MS. ZversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 75617 August 2017Appeal(s) allowed

Ms. Z, a 35‑year‑old destitute woman with mild mental retardation and HIV‑positive status, alleged that she had been raped and sought termination of her 18‑week pregnancy under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. The government hospital failed to perform the termination, involving the appellant’s father and

SMT. BHARATI REDDYversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

2017 INSC 76817 August 2017Disposed off

The appellant was elected as Adhyaksha of the Zilla Panchayat, Bellary, and a group of voters filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the election on grounds of a false caste certificate. The Karnataka High Court Single Judge dismissed the petition, invoking the bar in clause (b) of Arti

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2011 INSC 58317 August 2011Disposed off

The State of Madhya Pradesh filed an original suit under Article 131 of the Constitution challenging the Central Government's notifications issued under sections 58(3) and 58(4) of the Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000, which dissolved the M.P. Electricity Board and apportioned its assets. In 2009, the State soug

STATE OF WEST BENGALversusSUBHAS KUMAR CHATTERJEE & ORS.

2010 INSC 51917 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed

Senior Laboratory Assistants in West Bengal sought a higher pay scale, leading to a High Court order granting scale 11. Subsequent pay commissions fixed lower scales, and the State framed statutory rules (ROPA Rules) reflecting those scales. Research Assistants later applied to the State Administrative Tribunal for pay

AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIAversusRAJEEV RATAN PANDEY & ORS.

2009 INSC 104817 August 2009Appeal(s) allowed

Senior Manager Rajeev Ratan Pandey was transferred by the Airports Authority of India from Lucknow to Calicut. He challenged the transfer in a writ petition, alleging it violated the Authority's transfer policy, but did not initially claim any mala fides. After the High Court refused an interim stay, he filed a supplem

SARASWAT CO-OP. BANK LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 51317 August 2006Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined several civil appeals and a writ petition challenging Section 3(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, which exempts premises let to government, banks, public sector undertakings, foreign missions, multinational companies and private/public limited companies with a paid‑up share cap

S.R. CHAUDHURIversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

2001 INSC 37317 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, S.R. Chaudhuri, filed a writ of quo warranto challenging the re‑appointment of Shri Tej Parkash Singh as a Minister in Punjab after he had resigned for failing to be elected within six months as required by Article 164(4) of the Constitution. The High Court dismissed the petition, but the Supreme Court e

RAMESH KUMARversusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ORS.

2001 INSC 37817 August 2001Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a large batch of appeals concerning compensation claims arising from deaths or injuries of persons travelling in goods vehicles. The claimants argued that the insurer was liable under Section 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 and Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (as amended in 199

A.C. THALWALversusHIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS.

2000 INSC 40117 August 2000Dismissed

A.C. Thalwal, a former Air Force officer, joined the Himachal Pradesh Judicial Service under the ex‑servicemen quota and sought to have his 11 years of approved military service counted for seniority and pay fixation under the Ex‑Servicemen (Reservation of Vacancies in H.P. Judicial Service) Rules, 1981. The High Court

CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM AND ORS.versusV.N. ENTERPRISES

1995 INSC 47117 August 1995Disposed off

V.N. Enterprises supplied goods to the Chief General Manager, Telecom and others, raising bills of Rs 66,09,669.36, of which only part was paid. The appellants, a statutory authority, claimed a loss of Rs 43,16,400 due to high quotations and therefore withheld that amount. The Orissa High Court entertained a writ petit

LUMBINI NAGAR COOP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 47617 August 1995Disposed off

The respondents, Union of India and others, initiated eviction proceedings under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 against nine of the 169 original allottees of Lumbini Nagar Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. Those nine allottees, who had allegedly relinquished their right to occupy thei

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusRAM KHELAWAN AND ORS.

1995 INSC 47817 August 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh filed a special leave appeal against an interim order of the Allahabad High Court that directed the respondents to be paid as regular employees. The High Court had issued the direction while the substantive employment dispute was still pending before it. The Supreme Court examined whether suc

RAMCHANDRA GANPAT SHINDE AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1993 INSC 26717 August 1993Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned the election of the managing committee of Shri Vathal Sakhar Sehakari Karkhana Ltd., a specified cooperative society whose term expired on 3 December 1991. The final list of voters was published on 17 December 1991, but the State Government postponed the election to 30 September 1992. Two members

HIS HIGHNESS MAHARAJA PRATAP SINGHversusHER HIGHNESS MAHARANI SAROJINI DEVI AND ORS.

1993 INSC 26817 August 1993Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined two disputes concerning properties bought by the former ruler of Nabha, R.S., benami in the names of others. The first involved the Simla property (Sterling Castle) and the second the Delhi property (34 Alipur Road). The Court held that the rule of primogeniture, which applies to the rulershi

SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER & ORS. ETC.versusDR. MEHAR SINGH AND ORS. ETC.

1988 INSC 22817 August 1988Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab Government had declared certain areas as notified areas under Section 241 of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1939 and later cancelled those notifications under Section 244. The office‑bearers of the notified‑area committees filed writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 244, arguing it gav

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ETC.versusMADHUKAR BALKRISHNA BADIYA & ORS. ETC.

1988 INSC 22917 August 1988Disposed off

The State of Maharashtra amended the Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958 to levy a one‑time tax on motorcycles and tricycles, charging fifteen times the annual rate and a higher rate for company‑owned vehicles, with limited refund provisions. The Bombay High Court struck down the amendment as beyond the State's legisla

SPECIAL REFERENCE CASE NO. 1 OF 1983versusSPECIAL REFERENCE CASE NO. 1 OF 1983

1983 INSC 9517 August 1983Disposed off

The President referred a question under Article 317(1) of the Constitution concerning whether a member of the Punjab Public Service Commission, Gopal Krishan Saini, should be removed for alleged gross misbehaviour after allegedly slapping the Chairperson, Santosh Chowdhary. The Court held that the President is not requ

M SAMBASIVA RAOversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2025 INSC 86817 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an Assistant Administrative Officer in an insurance company, was accused of demanding a bribe of Rs.40,000 to expedite a claim settlement and of conspiring with a regional manager and his brother in a demand‑and‑trap operation. The trial court acquitted all accused, but the High Court reversed the acquit

RAM CHARAN & ORS.versusSUKHRAM & ORS.

2025 INSC 86517 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, who are the legal heirs of Dhaiya, a Scheduled Tribe woman, filed a suit for partition of land that belonged to their maternal grandfather, claiming that their mother was entitled to an equal share. The trial court and the High Court dismissed the suit, holding that the plaintiffs failed to prove any cu

THE STATE OF GUJARAT ETC.versusCHOODAMANI PARMESHWARAN IYER & ANR. ETC.

2023 INSC 97217 July 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Gujarat appealed against a Gujarat High Court order that had directed the GST authority to complete an adjudicatory process within eight weeks and had granted the respondents protection from arrest after they were served summons under Section 69 of the CGST Act, 2017 for interrogation. The respondents, fea

PYARE LALversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2020 INSC 45717 July 2020Directions issued

The appellant, convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, was released in 2019 under a Haryana Government policy granting special remission to elderly convicts who had served a minimum period. The policy was implemented by the Governor under Article 161 of the Constitution without placing the individual fa

JAGDISH PRASAD SHARMA ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2013 INSC 47517 July 2013Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the University Grants Commission (UGC) could, through regulations under the UGC Act, impose a composite scheme that revised pay scales and raised the retirement age of teachers from 62 to 65 years on State universities and colleges. The petitioners argued that the UGC's recommendation

MANAGER (NOW REGIONAL DIRECTOR), R.B.I.versusGOPINATH SHARMA AND ANR.

2006 INSC 43817 July 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned Gopinath Sharma, a daily‑wage (Ticca Mazdoor) employee of the Reserve Bank of India, who worked only 58 days in 1975‑76 and was omitted from the 1976‑77 waiting list. After repeated representations, the dispute was referred to a Central Government Industrial Tribunal, which rejected his claim on grou

EKTA SHAKTI FOUNDATIONversusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

2006 INSC 44117 July 2006Dismissed

The Delhi Government framed a scheme under the Integrated Child Development Service (ICDS) to supply supplementary nutrition through Anganwadi Centres, inviting NGOs with at least three years of registration to apply. Three NGOs challenged the three‑year eligibility rule, arguing it was irrational, violated Article 14’

GANGA RAM MOOLCHANDANIversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

2001 INSC 29817 July 2001Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined the validity of Rules 8(ii) and 15(ii) of the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1969, which required that candidates for direct recruitment to the Higher Judicial Service must have practiced for at least seven years in the Rajasthan High Court or its subordinate courts. The petitioners

B.V. SIVAIAH AND ORS.versusK. ADDANKI BABU AND ORS.

1998 INSC 26217 July 1998Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the meaning of the "seniority‑cum‑merit" criterion prescribed in the Regional Rural Banks (Appointment & Promotion of Officers and Other Employees) Rules, 1988 and applied it to promotions of officers to Area/Senior Manager posts in several banks. It held that seniority‑cum‑merit requires a m

STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.versusMOHD. MYNUDDIN

1987 INSC 17217 July 1987Appeal(s) allowed

Mohd. Mynuddin, a Manager (Middle Management Grade Scale II) in State Bank of India, was repeatedly denied promotion to Grade Scale III despite satisfactory confidential reports. He filed a writ petition seeking a direction for promotion with retrospective effect from 1979, arguing eligibility and lack of adverse remar

VINOD KUMAR ARORAversusSMT. SURJIT KAUR

1987 INSC 17417 July 1987Dismissed

The widowed landlady (respondent) sought eviction of two tenants, including the doctor (appellant), alleging that they had changed the use of the premises to non‑residential purposes and that she required the hall for her own residential needs. The Rent Controller and Appellate Authority found against the landlady on b

D. D. SURIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1979 INSC 12017 July 1979Dismissed

D.D. Suri, an emergency recruit from the open market, was appointed to the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) in 1950 and was assigned a year of allotment of 1944 by the Government of India, affecting his seniority. He sought a higher year of allotment (1942), additional pay for holding two posts simultaneously, and p

KRISHNA KUMARversusDIVISIONAL ASSISTANT ELECTRICAL ENGINEER CENTRAL RAILWAY AND ORS.

1979 INSC 11917 July 1979Appeal(s) allowed

Krishna Kumar was appointed as a Train Lighting Inspector by the Chief Electrical Engineer on 11 July 1974. He was removed from service on 31 August 1976 by the Divisional Assistant Electrical Engineer, who was subordinate to the Chief Electrical Engineer. Kumar challenged the removal in a writ petition, which the Bomb

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusTALEVAR & ANR.

2011 INSC 41717 June 2011Dismissed

In December 1996 a dacoity with two murders was committed at a house in Rajasthan. Two of the accused, Kuniya and Talevar, were later arrested and, based on their disclosure statements, cash, silver items and a scooter were recovered, but the recoveries occurred several days after the incident and involved items that c

RAVIKUMAR DHANSUKHLAL MAHETA & ANR.versusHIGH COURT OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2024 INSC 43617 May 2024Dismissed

Two Civil Judges (Senior Division) in Gujarat challenged the High Court's promotion process, alleging that the recruitment notice of 12 April 2022 applied a seniority‑cum‑merit approach contrary to the statutory requirement of merit‑cum‑seniority for the 65% promotional quota. The petitioners invoked Article 32 of the

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.versusM/S BSK REALTORS LLP & ANR.

2024 INSC 45517 May 2024

The Supreme Court examined a massive batch of land‑acquisition disputes involving the Government of NCT of Delhi and its agencies versus private landowners, notably M/s BSK Realtors LLP. The core issues were whether the dismissal of a civil appeal by one authority in the first round barred other authorities from filing

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search