BHAVEN CONSTRUCTION THROUGH AUTHORISED SIGNATORY PREMJIBHAI K. SHAHversusEXECUTIVE ENGINEER SARDAR SAROVAR NARMADA NIGAM LTD.& ANR.
2021 INSC 96 January 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Bhaven Construction, entered into a contract to manufacture and supply bricks that contained an arbitration clause. It unilaterally appointed a sole arbitrator, who dismissed Respondent No.1's Section 16 challenge to his jurisdiction. Instead of using the statutory remedy under Section 34, Respondent No.…
AJAY SINGH AND ANR. AND ETC.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANR.
2017 INSC 356 January 2017Dismissed
The trial judge in two dowry‑death cases recorded the acquittal of the accused in the order sheet but did not pronounce a judgment in open court, nor was any typed judgment signed or dated. A complaint led the High Court to investigate and find that no judgment existed on record, resulting in the judge's suspension and…
M/S. PEPSICO INDIA HOLDING PVT. LTD.versusKRISHNA KANT PANDEY
2015 INSC 96 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed
Krishna Kant Pandey, employed by Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd., was terminated after serving in various supervisory roles, most recently as Fleet Executive. He claimed that he was a "workman" under Section 2(z) of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and that his termination violated Section 6 of the Act.…
DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMYversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.
2014 INSC 9026 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the administration of the Sri Sabhanayagar Temple at Chidambaram, claimed by the Podhu Dikshitars, a Smarthi Brahmin community, as their religious denomination. The High Court had earlier dismissed the State's order appointing an Executive Officer under the Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endow…
DR. MRS. NUPUR TALWARversusC.B.I., DELHI & ANR.
2012 INSC 86 January 2012Disposed off
The case arose from the murder of a young girl, Arushi, and a domestic help, Hemraj, where the CBI filed a closure report. The father of the deceased filed a protest petition, leading the Special Judicial Magistrate to take cognizance of offences under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 IPC against Dr. Rajesh Talwar and Dr. Nu…
PEPOLE'S UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2004 INSC 206 January 2004Dismissed
The petitioners sought disclosure of the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board's (AERB) safety report under the right to information, claiming that Section 18 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, which restricts disclosure of nuclear information, was ultra‑vires and lacked guidelines. The Union of India contended that the right to…
M/S. PEARLITE LINERS PVT. LTD.versusMANORAMA SIRSI
2004 INSC 216 January 2004Appeal(s) allowed
Pearlite Liners Pvt Ltd. transferred the respondent, a trainee accountant later promoted, from its head office to a sales office. The employee refused to comply, was absent, and a chargesheet was issued. She filed a suit seeking a declaration that the transfer order was void, that she remained in service, and an injunc…
VETERINARY COUNCIL OF INDIAversusNDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
2000 INSC 46 January 2000Appeal(s) allowed
The Veterinary Council of India (VCI) framed Regulation 5(8) under the Veterinary Council Act, 1984, authorising it to conduct an All India Common Entrance Examination to fill 15% of seats in veterinary colleges. The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) also claimed the right to conduct the test and advertise…
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusVATSAVYI KUMARA VENKATA KRISHNA VERMA
1999 INSC 16 January 1999Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a holder of agricultural land under the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973, and his wife sold four parcels of land within a 15‑day period between 24‑Jan‑1971 and before the notified date. One sale was to the respondent’s father and three to others, with installment …
MINERVA TALKIES, BANGALORE & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. ETC.
1988 INSC 16 January 1988Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined whether Karnataka's Rule 41-A, limiting cinema owners to four daily shows, was within the rule‑making power granted by Section 19 of the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulations) Act, 1964, and whether it violated the right to carry on business under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The Court held…
SILIGURI MUNICIPALITY & OTHERSversusAMALENDU DAS & OTHERS
1984 INSC 76 January 1984Appeal(s) allowed
The Siliguri Municipality sought to levy a graduated consolidated rate on the annual value of its holdings under the Bengal Municipal (Amendment) Act, 1980. The Calcutta High Court, invoking its jurisdiction under Article 226, issued an interlocutory order staying the municipality's recovery of the tax. The municipalit…
NEW BIHAR BIRI LEAVES CO. & ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
1981 INSC 16 January 1981Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the Bihar Kendu Leaves (Control of Trade) Act, 1973, which created a state monopoly over the sale of Kendu leaves for bidi manufacturing. The petitioners, traders in Kendu leaves, challenged Clause 13 (a minimum royalty of 75% of the estimated yield) and Clause 4(bb) (purchasers could not obj…
KAMLA KANAHIYALAL KHUSHALANIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
1981 INSC 36 January 1981Case Allowed
The petitioner, K. K. Khushalani, was detained under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 on 20‑10‑1980. Although the grounds of detention were served, the documents and materials on which the order relied were supplied only on 05‑11‑1980, and the detenu's representation…
ADARSH SAHKARI GRIH NIRMAN SWAWLAMBI SOCIETY LTD.versusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.
2025 INSC 13895 December 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a cooperative society registered under the Jharkhand Self‑Supporting Cooperative Societies Act, sought exemption from stamp duty on a land transfer to its members under Section 9A of the Stamp (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1988. The State, through a memorandum issued by the Principal Secretary, Department of Re…
M/S BHUWALKA STEEL INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2017 INSC 2655 December 2019Directions issued
The Supreme Court was asked to decide the validity of Rule 5 of the 1997 Central Excise Rules, which was challenged on the grounds of being ultra vires of Section 3A of the Central Excise Act and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. The Division Bench, however, diverted attention to a different issue concerning…
BALWANT VITHAL KADAMversusSUNIL BABURAOI KADAM
2017 INSC 11705 December 2017Dismissed
The respondent sued the appellants for specific performance of two agreements to sell a share of land, having paid earnest money but no deed was executed. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the first appellate court set aside that decree and ordered specific performance. The appellants appealed, arguing that the a…
KAMALAKHYA DEY PURKAYASTHA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .
2017 INSC 11845 December 2017Disposed off
The petitioners filed writ petitions under Article 32 seeking a judicial definition of the phrase “originally inhabitants of the State of Assam” in Clause 3(3) of the Schedule to the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issues of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003, and directions on how such persons should be id…
SASIDHAR REDDY SURAversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.
2013 INSC 8055 December 2013Disposed off
The appellant applied for the post of District and Sessions Judge (Entry Level) under the Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service Rules, 2007 and was placed on the select list, but was not appointed because he was under 35 years of age. He challenged the decision before the High Court, which held that the 35‑year minimum…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.versusVISAN KUMAR SHIV CHARAN LAL
2008 INSC 14035 December 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh filed a Letters Patent Appeal against a Division Bench order that had dismissed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking to quash a Labour Court order passed under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The High Court held the appeal non‑maintainable, relying on the petition’s nom…
TAMILNAD MERCANTILE BANK SHARE HOLDERS WELFARE ASSOCIATIONversusS.C. SEKAR AND ORS.
2008 INSC 14065 December 2008Dismissed
The Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Share Holders Welfare Association (appellant) sought to restrain the election of directors at the bank's 83rd, 84th and 85th Annual General Meetings, alleging that the meetings violated a 26 July 2006 injunction that allowed only certain agenda items to be considered. After the High Court a…
DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE & ANR.versusMOHAMMED NISAR HOLIA
2007 INSC 12265 December 2007Dismissed
The Directorate of Revenue received a fax alleging that a guest in a Mumbai hotel possessed Mandrex tablets and cash. Officers searched the guest's hotel room, seized cash and a fax copy of a consignment note, and recorded the accused's statement under Section 67 of the NDPS Act. The trial court convicted the accused u…
UDYAMI EVAM KHADI GRAMODYOG WELFARE SANSTHA ANDANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2007 INSC 12285 December 2007Dismissed
The appellant, a cooperative society, repeatedly filed several writ petitions and a public interest litigation challenging recovery proceedings and the constitutionality of Section 35A of the Uttar Pradesh Khadi and Village Industries Board Act, 1960. The High Court dismissed the latest writ petition on the ground that…
SHEIKH ABDUL RASHID & ORS.versusSTATE OF J & K & ORS.
2007 INSC 12295 December 2007Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, who were directly recruited as Sub‑Inspectors on 25‑04‑1979, challenged a Government order dated 03‑12‑1985 that retrospectively promoted certain private respondents (promotees) who had been entered in Promotion List E in 1978. The order sought to give them seniority over the appellants, ignoring the st…
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, JABALPURversusOM PRAKASH DUBEY
2006 INSC 9595 December 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The Municipal Corporation of Jabalpur appointed a large number of daily‑wage workers without following the recruitment rules prescribed under the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act. Several labour disputes arose and the High Court, exercising contempt jurisdiction, directed the corporation to prepare a gradation …
GOVT. OF A.P. AND ORS.versusM.T. KHAN
2003 INSC 6915 December 2003Appeal(s) allowed
The Government of Andhra Pradesh issued a Government Order granting remission of sentences to certain categories of prisoners, expressly excluding those convicted by courts of other States but serving their sentences in Andhra Pradesh. Two convicts, S. Appala Swamy (convicted in Madhya Pradesh) and Rajender (convicted …
SUDAMA PANDEY AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR
2001 INSC 5965 December 2001Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were charged with the murder of a 12‑year‑old girl, Gudia Kumari, and were convicted by the Sessions Court and sentenced to death on the basis of circumstantial evidence; the High Court confirmed the conviction but commuted the sentence to life imprisonment. On appeal to the Supreme Court under Article 1…
BEHARILAL AND ANR.versusSMT. BHURI DEVI AND ORS.
1996 INSC 14395 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Rajasthan Government’s Mandi Committee allotted two plots to Beharilal in 1953, issued a patta and delivered possession in 1954. After the patta was cancelled in 1956, the same plots were re‑allotted to Ram Gopal (husband of Bhuri Devi) and possession was handed over to him. Criminal proceedings under S. 145 Cr.P.C…
KHODAY DISTILLERIES LIMITED AND ANR.versusTHE REGISTRAR GENERAL SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
1995 INSC 8365 December 1995Dismissed
Khoday Distilleries Ltd. and others filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking reconsideration of a Supreme Court judgment that had become final after the dismissal of appeals and review petitions. They contended that the civil appeals were decided on merits without a proper hearing, violating n…
DHAN SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
1990 INSC 3765 December 1990Case Partly allowed
The petitioners were ex‑servicemen re‑employed in the Haryana civil service who had served in the Indian Army during the 1962‑68 national emergency. The State had adopted the Punjab Government National Emergency (Concessions) Rules, 1965, which granted benefits such as increments, seniority and pension to such ex‑servi…
BIHAR STATE MADARASA EDUCATION BOARD, PATNA, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMANversusMANAGING COMMITTEE OF MADARASA HANFIA ARABIC COLLEGE JAMALIA AND ORS.
1989 INSC 3745 December 1989Dismissed
The Bihar State Madarasa Education Board dissolved the managing committees of two minority‑run Madarasa institutions for failing to obey its salary directives, invoking Section 7(2)(n) of the Bihar State Madarasa Education Board Act, 1982. The institutions challenged the dissolution before the Patna High Court, allegin…
MALAK SINGH ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & HARYANA & ORS.
1980 INSC 2305 December 1980Dismissed
The appellants, Malak Singh and Jaswant Singh, challenged the inclusion of their names in a police surveillance register maintained under the Punjab Police Rules, alleging that the entry was made without any material basis and violated their fundamental right to privacy under Articles 21 and 19(1)(d) of the Constitutio…
PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2024 INSC 8355 November 2024Reference answered
The Supreme Court of India, in a nine-judge bench decision, addressed two major constitutional questions. First, it held that Article 31C, to the extent it was upheld in Kesavananda Bharati, remains in force after the 42nd Amendment was struck down in Minerva Mills, as the amendment was a substitution and its invalidat…
ANJUM KADARI & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2024 INSC 8315 November 2024Disposed off
The Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004, which created a board to regulate standards, teacher qualifications and examinations in madrasas, was struck down by the Allahabad High Court on the ground that it violated secularism and Articles 14 and 21A of the Constitution. The petitioners challenged the High…
MUKUL KUMAR TYAGIversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 8325 November 2024Case Allowed
The Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation (UPPCL) advertised for 2,211 Technician Grade‑II posts requiring a Certificate of 80‑hour Course on Computer Concepts (CCC) to be produced at the interview. Candidates who produced the CCC certificate at the interview were selected and issued appointment letters on 14 July 2015. A Hi…
SHANTI DEVI ALIAS SHANTI MISHRAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2020 INSC 6325 November 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Shanti Devi, sought to revive a writ petition filed by her late husband, a retired Coal India employee, challenging the stoppage of his pension and a demand for repayment of over Rs 8 lakhs. The earlier petition for refund of a smaller amount had been dismissed by the Patna High Court on the ground of la…
ALL KERALA ONLINE LOTTERY DEALERS ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.
2015 INSC 8315 November 2015Dismissed
The State of Kerala issued notifications prohibiting the sale of computerized and online lottery tickets while permitting paper lotteries, which the All Kerala Online Lottery Dealers Association and others challenged as discriminatory under Section 5 of the Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998. The petitioners argued that …
DHARAM CHANDversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
2008 INSC 12475 November 2008Case Partly allowed
The appellant, brother of the deceased Anju Devi, challenged the High Court's order that acquitted three accused who lived separately and released the husband on the ground that he had already served his sentence. The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the three accused, finding that the evidence did not prove their…
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICESversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2004 INSC 6435 November 2004Dismissed
Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) sold canned computer software packages and was assessed sales tax by the Andhra Pradesh Commercial Tax Officer, who held that the software constituted "goods" under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. TCS appealed, arguing that software is intangible intellectual property and…
U.P. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMISSIONversusSUBHASH CHANDRA DIXIT AND ORS.
2003 INSC 6065 November 2003Appeal(s) allowed
The Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (UPPSC) conducted three competitive examinations – the U.P. Civil Judge (Junior Division) Examination 2000, the Provincial Civil Services (Executive Branch) Main Examination 2001 and its Preliminary Examination 2002 – and applied a scaling formula to the marks awarded by four…
SRI RAMNIK VALLABHDAS MADHVANI AND ORS.versusTARABEN PRAVINLAL MADHVANI
2003 INSC 6015 November 2003Dismissed
The widow of Pravinlal Madhvani sued the Madhvani brothers for partition of a tea estate, accounts of a family partnership and mesne profits, seeking 6% interest. While the appeal of the preliminary decree was pending, the High Court allowed an amendment to raise the interest rate to 13% and awarded interest at prevail…
GURDEV SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2001 INSC 5545 November 2001Dismissed
The appellant Gurdev Singh challenged the detention of his son, Swarn Singh Sandhu, under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA), alleging misuse of the Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) export incentive scheme and forging shipping bills. The det…
OUSEPH MATHAI AND ORS.versusM. ABDUL KHADIR
2001 INSC 5555 November 2001Appeal(s) allowed
The landlord Joseph Mathai filed an eviction petition under the Kerala Building (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965 on grounds of arrears of rent and bona‑fide need for reconstruction. The Rent Control Court initially dismissed the arrears claim but later allowed eviction on reconstruction; the tenant appealed, and the la…
UNION OF LNDIA AND ORS.versusSUSHIL KUMAR MODI AND ORS.
1996 INSC 12805 November 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court heard appeals against a Patna High Court order that, in an application for extension of time, directed all CBI investigation reports in the Bihar "Fodder Scam" to be submitted directly to the High Court and barred the Director of the CBI from intervening in the investigation. The Court held that the D…
IN RE: AJAY KUMAR PANDEY...CONTEMNERversus.
1996 INSC 12835 November 1996Disposed off
Advocate Ajay Kumar Pandey filed petitions and letters containing intemperate, insulting language against two Supreme Court judges, demanded apologies and compensation, and threatened to prosecute them, also filing a criminal complaint in a magistrate's court. The Supreme Court, after giving him opportunities to delete…
DR. S.K. KHANNA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1993 INSC 3665 November 1993
The plaintiffs, originally appointed as Lecturers in a private college that was later taken over by the Haryana Government, claimed they had been promoted to Senior Lecturers under the UGC scheme and that the Government’s regularisation of them as Lecturers amounted to a demotion. The Court examined the statutory order…
STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusKAMLESH JAIN
1992 INSC 3045 November 1992Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Bihar terminated the services of 320 doctors, including Dr. Sandhya Das, after they failed to return from leave and did not respond to a general notice. Ms. Kamlesh Jain filed a public interest litigation seeking financial assistance and post‑retirement benefits for Dr. Das, and the Patna High Court ordere…
H.C. PUTTASWAMY AND ORS.versusHONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT, BANGALORE AND ORS.
1990 INSC 3385 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed
The Karnataka High Court advertised 40 vacancies for Second Division Clerks in 1978, but the Chief Justice appointed about 398 candidates, many of whom were later transferred to subordinate courts, bypassing the State Public Service Commission and the statutory recruitment rules. Seven of the original applicants filed …
EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
1985 INSC 2385 November 1985Disposed off
The petitioners, Express Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. and others, challenged two notices: one issued by the Engineer Officer, Land & Development Office, for re-entry upon forfeiture of lease, and another by the Zonal Engineer (Building), Municipal Corporation of Delhi, for demolition of the Express Building. The petitioners al…
B. S. YADAV AND OTHERS ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ETC,
1980 INSC 2075 November 1980Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined disputes between promotee and direct‑recruit judicial officers in Punjab and Haryana over seniority, confirmation and probation. The petitioners argued that the High Court improperly applied a rotation system at confirmation, violating the quota rule and their constitutional rights. The Court…
KARNATAKA STATE ELECTRONICS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.versusKUMAON ENTERTAINMENT AND HOSPITALITIES PVT. LTD.
2023 INSC 8715 October 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The Karnataka State Electronics Development Corporation (KSEDC), a wholly‑owned public sector undertaking, allotted a 0.25‑acre plot to Kumaon Entertainment for IT‑related activities on a lease‑cum‑sale basis, with a tentative price of Rs 1 crore per acre and a provision that the final price would be fixed later. The a…
SHRACHI BURDWAN DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
2021 INSC 6205 October 2021Disposed off
The Burdwan Development Authority acquired land for a satellite township under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and entered into an unregistered MoA with Bengal Shrachi for public‑private partnership development. The Reference Court enhanced compensation payable to landowners from Rs 5.8 lakh to Rs 35 lakh per acre, prom…
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.versusPREMLATA
2021 INSC 6195 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The widowed petitioner Premlata applied for a compassionate appointment under Rule 5 of the Dying‑in‑Harness Rules, 1974, after her husband, a Class‑IV messenger in the Uttar Pradesh Police Radio Department, died. Her first application for an Assistant Operator post was rejected for lack of eligibility, and a subsequen…
T. K. DAVIDversusKURUPPAMPADY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. & ORS.
2020 INSC 5765 October 2020Dismissed
The petitioner, a former employee of Kuruppampady Service Co‑operative Bank, challenged his compulsory retirement through a series of proceedings, including a writ petition, writ appeal and a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in 2015, all of which were dismissed. He later filed a review petition in the Kerala High Court aga…
RAVI SINHA & ORSversusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND
2017 INSC 10065 October 2017Dismissed
The case concerned attachment of properties under the Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance, 1944 in a large‑scale fraud involving the father of the appellants, who died before trial, and his son Ravi Sinha, who was convicted in one case and faced trial in another. The State sought to make the interim attachment orders ab…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusABU SALEM ABDUL KAYYAM ANSARI AND ORS.
2010 INSC 6715 October 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Maharashtra appealed a decision that allowed a co‑accused to cross‑examine an approver whose pardon, granted under Section 307 of the CrPC, was later forfeited by a certificate under Section 308. The Supreme Court examined the statutory scheme of Sections 306, 307 and 308, holding that forfeiture of the pa…
U.P. ROLLER FLOUR MILLS ASSOCIATION AND ORS.versusGOVT. OF INDIA AND ORS.
2007 INSC 10065 October 2007Disposed off
The U.P. Roller Flour Mills Association filed a writ petition under Article 32 alleging that subsidised wheat stocks meant for the Public Distribution System (PDS) were being diverted by the states of West Bengal, Assam and other North‑East states to rolling flour mills, causing loss to the exchequer and depriving inte…
CARONA LTD.versusM/S PARATHY SWAMINATHAN & SONS
2007 INSC 10085 October 2007Dismissed
Carona Ltd., a public limited company with paid‑up share capital exceeding Rs. 1 crore, was let a premises by a partnership landlord. After defaulting on rent, the landlord gave notice terminating the tenancy on 31 March 2001 and filed an eviction suit. While the suit was pending, the tenant passed a resolution to redu…
PRABIR BANERJEEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS
2007 INSC 10105 October 2007Dismissed
Prabir Banerjee, a Group‑B Superintendent in the Central Excise Department, was transferred from the Bhopal zone to the Nagpur Commissionerate under an office order. He challenged the transfer, arguing that circulars dated 19 Feb 2004 and 9 Mar 2004 prohibited inter‑zonal transfers, making the order void. The Central A…
IN RE: SMT. SAYALEE SANJEEV JOSHI, MEMBER MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.versus.
2005 INSC 4825 October 2005
The President of India, under Article 317(1) of the Constitution, referred the matter of alleged misbehaviour by Smt. Sayalee Sanjeev Joshi, a member of the Maharashtra Public Service Commission, to the Supreme Court for inquiry. The allegations stemmed from a 1999 examination scam, leading to her arrest by the Anti‑Co…
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusCHARANJIT SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
2005 INSC 4845 October 2005Disposed off
The State of Haryana appealed against several High Court orders directing daily‑wage and contract workers (ledger clerks, pump operators, fitters, etc.) to receive the minimum pay of regular Class IV employees from the date of filing their writ petitions. While the appeals were pending, the respondents were regularised…
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.versusRAM SUKHI DEVI
2004 INSC 5775 October 2004Leave Granted & Allowed
Ram Sukhi Devi, the widow of a part‑time tubewell operator, applied for a compassionate appointment under the Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying‑in‑Harness Rules, 1974. A Government Order dated 26 Oct 1998 excluded dependents of part‑time employees from such benefits. The Allahabad Hig…
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusJALAL UDDIN AND ORS.
2004 INSC 5785 October 2004Leave Granted & Allowed
Respondent No.1 filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking promotion to Principal of a Government Degree College on the basis of seniority under Rule 16 of the U.P. Higher Education (Group A) Service Rules, 1985. The High Court allowed the petition, directing his promotion. The State of Uttar Pradesh app…
TATOBA BHAU SAVAGAVE (D) BY LRS. AND ANR.versusVASANTRAO DHINIRAJ DESHPANDE AND ORS.
2001 INSC 4865 October 2001Dismissed
The landlord, a serving member of the armed forces, filed a tenancy case under Section 43‑IB of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 seeking resumption of land from the tenants. The High Court, after remand, held that the partition of the joint family lands in 1944 was conclusive and that land owned by t…
V.SREENIVASA REDDY AND ORS.versusGOVT. OF A.P. AND ORS.
1994 INSC 4415 October 1994Dismissed
The appellants were temporarily appointed as Assistant Executive Engineers under Rule 10(a)(i)(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Service Rules in 1980 and later regularised in 1984. The PSC candidates, selected through direct recruitment in 1981, were appointed to the same service in May 1984. The dispute centered on whether th…
M/S. SITARAM AND BROS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.
1994 INSC 4445 October 1994Dismissed
The petitioners challenged the Rajasthan Excise Amendment Act, 1985, which added Section 17A and the class "Mollasses" to Section 41(2)(d) of the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950, alleging that it conflicted with the central Mollasses Control Order, 1961 made under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. The S…
A.N. PARASURAMAN ETC.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
1989 INSC 3045 October 1989Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, who run private educational institutions, challenged the Tamil Nadu Private Educational Institutions (Regulation) Act, 1966 on the ground that several of its provisions gave unfettered discretionary power to the State, violating Article 14 of the Constitution. The High Court had struck down only section…
ARJUN KHIAMAL MAKHIJANI ETC.versusJAMNADAS C. TULIANI & ORS. ETC.
1989 INSC 3035 October 1989Dismissed
Jamunadas C. Tuliani, the landlord, sued five tenants and Arjun Khiamal Makhijani (defendant No.6) for eviction under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, alleging six months' rent arrears and illegal sub‑letting of a garage. The trial court decreed eviction on the grounds of rent default …
ADANI PORTS AND SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE LIMITEDversusTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT AUTHORITY & ORS
2022 INSC 9255 September 2022Disposed off
Adani Ports & Special Economic Zone Ltd. was disqualified from two tenders issued by the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority (JNPA) on the ground that its concession agreement with the Visakhapatnam Port Authority had been terminated. The termination, however, is the subject of an ongoing arbitration. The company sought re…
P. CHIDAMBARAMversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
2019 INSC 10105 September 2019Dismissed
The appellant, former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram, was charged with alleged irregularities in a foreign investment clearance and money‑laundering offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Prevention of Money‑Laundering Act (PMLA). The Enforcement Directorate (ED) produced a sealed cover containing doc…
DR. ASHWANI KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
2019 INSC 10075 September 2019Disposed off
Dr. Ashwani Kumar, a former Law Minister, filed a miscellaneous application seeking a Supreme Court direction to Parliament to enact a comprehensive law against custodial torture, invoking the UN Convention against Torture and arguing that such torture violates Article 21 of the Constitution. The Court noted that the m…
LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITEDversusADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES & ANR.
2016 INSC 8525 September 2016Disposed off
Larsen & Toubro Ltd., a contractor, executed works contracts and assigned portions of the work to registered sub‑contractors who paid sales tax on their own turnover. The issue was whether the payments made to these sub‑contractors should be included in L&T's total turnover for computing turnover tax under Section 6‑B …
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusB.V. GOPINATH
2013 INSC 5895 September 2013Dismissed
The Union of India challenged the quashing of charge sheets issued to senior income‑tax officers under Rule 14(3) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1965, arguing that the Finance Minister's approval for initiating disciplinary proceedings under Rule 14(2) also sufficed for the char…
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAversusMADAN MOHAN PRASAD & ORS.
2011 INSC 6525 September 2011Disposed off
The respondent, a former Munsif in the Bihar State Judicial Service, was dismissed, reinstated, and later suspended, after which he was posted as an Additional Munsif. He repeatedly sought promotion to higher judicial posts on the basis that his juniors had been promoted between 1971 and 1978, filing numerous writ peti…
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusRAM VEER SINGH AND ORS.
2007 INSC 8925 September 2007Dismissed
The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed the Allahabad High Court's acquittal of three accused who had been convicted for murder under Sections 302, 34 and 201 of the IPC. The prosecution's case relied on the identification of a decomposed body recovered a month after the incident, based solely on the clothes worn, and on t…
M.P. STATE AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ANDANR.versusJAHAN KHAN
2007 INSC 8955 September 2007Dismissed
The respondent, a branch manager of M.P. State Agro Industries Development Corporation Ltd, was found to have caused a loss of Rs 16,903.41 by failing to recover rent on machinery he had let out. The Managing Director, acting as disciplinary authority, imposed a composite penalty of recovering the loss from the respond…
C. RAVICHANDRAN IYERversusJUSTICE A.M. BHATTACHARJEE
1995 INSC 5375 September 1995Disposed off
The petitioner, a practising advocate, filed a public‑interest writ under Article 32 seeking to restrain the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, the Bombay Bar Association and the Advocates' Association of Western India from pressuring the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, Justice A.M. Bhattacharjee, to resign an…
GABRIEL SAVER FERNANDES AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.
1994 INSC 3535 September 1994Dismissed
The appellants, who were Village Assistants without SSLC qualifications, challenged the pay scale disparity with Talatis who possessed SSLC qualifications, arguing that the distinction violated Articles 14 and 39(d) of the Constitution. They sought parity in the Rs. 90‑200 pay scale, contending that a High Court direct…
STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.versusBIHARI LAL
1994 INSC 3545 September 1994Disposed off
Bihari Lal, an Assistant Commissioner in the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Department, was compulsorily retired under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules on the ground of persistent adverse remarks and being classified as an officer of a bad category. He challenged the order in the Allahabad High Court, which quashed the ret…
P. GANESHWAR RAO & ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.
1988 INSC 2615 September 1988Disposed off
The State of Andhra Pradesh sought to fill 51 Assistant Engineer vacancies that had arisen in 1978‑79 by direct recruitment under the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Engineering Service (Special) Rules, 1963. An amendment to the Rules on 28 April 1980 changed the recruitment formula to 37½% of substantive vacancies "arisi…
KRISHNABAI ANAJI GHULE AND OTHERSversusNIVRUTTI RAMCHANDRA RAYKAR AND ANOTHER
1983 INSC 1125 September 1983Dismissed
The case concerned a certificated landlord who, after obtaining an exemption certificate under s.88-C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, sought possession of land from excluded tenants under s.33-B, claiming he needed it for personal cultivation. The tenants challenged the landlord's claim, arguing…
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLY CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR.versusSANJAY KUMAR
2025 INSC 9335 August 2025Dismissed
The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation entered into contracts with rice millers for paddy procurement and included an arbitration clause. Allegations of massive fraud and misappropriation of public funds led to criminal FIRs, charges under the Penal Code, and recovery proceedings under the Bihar & Orissa P…
ODISHA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATIONversusVIGYAN CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 9285 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Odisha State Financial Corporation (OSFC) financed a bleaching powder unit that defaulted, leading to its possession of the unit and subsequent litigation. Respondent Vigyan Chemical Industries sued the defaulting borrower and later impleaded OSFC, claiming repayment with interest calculated under the repealed Inte…
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHIversusOFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI
2024 INSC 5785 August 2024Dismissed
The Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi challenged the Lieutenant Governor’s notifications nominating ten experts to the Delhi Municipal Corporation, arguing that the power must be exercised on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers under Article 239AA(4). The Court examined the constitutional…
COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX DELHIversusQUICK HEAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
2022 INSC 8015 August 2022Disposed off
Quick Heal Technologies Ltd. sold antivirus software on CDs together with a license key and free updates to end‑customers. The Revenue argued that the transaction comprised two components – sale of the CD (goods) and provision of updates (service) – and that service tax should be levied on the entire consideration desp…
CENTRAL GOVT. OF INDIAversusRAJ DEVI ALIAS RAJ KUMARI & ANR.
2021 INSC 3835 August 2021Leave Granted & Allowed
The Central Government appealed against a High Court order that directed it to pay interest on solatium to Raj Devi from the date she was deprived of possession (16‑06‑1990). The Government argued that, per Gurpreet Singh v. Union of India, interest on solatium could only be awarded from the date of the Supreme Court’s…
THE CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, COCHIN PORT TRUSTversusM/S AREBEE STAR MARITIME AGENCIES PVT. LTD. & ORS.
2018 INSC 2165 August 2020Reference answered
The Cochin Port Trust sought to recover ground rent and demurrage for containers that remained unclaimed by consignees after customs clearance, arguing that the steamer agents should not be liable beyond the 75‑day limit set by the Tariff Authority. The Supreme Court examined whether the passage of title, endorsement o…
M/S EXL CAREERS AND ANOTHERversusFRANKFINN AVIATION SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED
2020 INSC 4775 August 2020Disposed off
The appellant, EXL Careers, filed a suit for recovery in a Gurgaon civil court despite an exclusive jurisdiction clause in a franchise agreement that designated Delhi courts as the sole forum. The Gurgaon court returned the plaint under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC, and the High Court ordered its transfer to Delhi, dir…
JANHIT ABHIYANversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2020 INSC 4755 August 2020Directions issued
The petitioners challenged the Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019, which inserted clauses 15(6) and 16(6) permitting a 10% reservation for economically weaker sections in educational institutions and public employment. They argued that the amendment violated the basic structure of the Constitution…
ABU SALEM ABDUL QAYYUM ANSARIversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR.
2013 INSC 5125 August 2013Disposed off
Abu Salem, an accused in the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts, was extradited from Portugal to India in 2005 on the assurance that he would not face the death penalty or imprisonment beyond 25 years. After his return, the Designated Court framed additional charges beyond those covered by the extradition, which Abu Salem argued …
REFERENCE UNDER ARTICLE 317(1) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, FOR INQUIRY AND REPORT ON THE CHARGES LEVELED AGAINST DR. H.B. MIRDHA,CHAIRMAN ORISSA PSCversus.
2005 INSC 3365 August 2005Hearing Adjourned
The Supreme Court was asked to consider a reference under Article 317(1) of the Constitution, seeking an inquiry into alleged misbehaviour by Dr. H.B. Mirdha, Chairman of the Orissa Public Service Commission. The respondent raised a preliminary objection questioning the maintainability of the reference, specifically wh…
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)versusPREM RAJ
2003 INSC 3675 August 2003Appeal(s) allowed
Prem Raj was convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced to two years of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.500, and an additional three years of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1,000, to run concurrently. He appealed to the Delhi High Court seeking a reduction in the term of impri…
M/S HIRA LALL AND SONS AND ORS.versusM/S. LAKSHMI COMMERCIAL BANK
2002 INSC 3275 August 2002Dismissed
The petitioners, importers, had obtained a Letter of Credit from the respondent bank for a consignment that later sank at sea. The bank, after rejecting the petitioners' documents as discrepant, sued them for recovery of the amount, and the suit was transferred to a Debt Recovery Tribunal under the Recovery of Debts Du…
GOVERNMENT SERVANT CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
1998 INSC 2915 August 1998Dismissed
The appellants, owners of properties in Delhi, challenged notices issued under Section 126 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 that revised the rateable value of their properties on the basis of actual rent received. The Court examined how to determine rateable value when the rent is not subject to the Delhi R…
I.C.A.R. AND ANR.versusT.K. SURYANARAYAN AND ORS.
1997 INSC 5975 August 1997Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined appeals against the Central Administrative Tribunal’s orders that granted accelerated promotion to three ICAR employees on the basis of their educational qualifications. The employees had not been initially fit into Grade T‑1‑3 Category I when the Technical Service Rules of the Indian Council…
BHARAT COKING COAL LTD. AND ORS.versusBABULAL AND ANR. ETC.
1996 INSC 8245 August 1996Disposed off
The case arose from a fatal roof collapse in the South Govindpur Colliery on 30 June 1989, which killed five miners and injured two. The senior mining engineer, Babular, and the manager, Maheshwari Sharma, were alleged to have been absent and to have failed to take safety precautions, leading a fact‑finding committee t…
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusR. REDDAPPA AND ANOTHER
1993 INSC 2585 August 1993
Approximately 800 railway employees were dismissed under Rule 14(2) of the Railway Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules for taking part in a Loco Staff strike in January 1981. The disciplinary authority claimed that holding a departmental inquiry was not reasonably practicable, but no material was placed before it to …
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, U.P. AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusBAKHTAWAR LAL KAILASH CHAND ARETI AND ORS. ETC. ETC
1992 INSC 1925 August 1992Dismissed
The Commissioner of Sales Tax, Uttar Pradesh challenged the tax treatment of purchases made by a dealer acting as a commission agent for out‑of‑state principals. The dealer bought agricultural produce and other goods in Uttar Pradesh and dispatched them to the principals in other states. The State argued that the purch…
TEJ PAL SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.
1986 INSC 1565 August 1986Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, an Additional District and Sessions Judge, was ordered to retire prematurely by the Governor of Uttar Pradesh based on the opinion of an Administrative Judge, without a prior recommendation from the High Court or its Administrative Committee as required by Article 235 of the Constitution. The appellant c…
VASUDEO VISHWANATH SARAFversusNEW EDUCATION INSTITUTE & ORS.
1986 INSC 1595 August 1986Appeal(s) allowed
Vasudeo Vishwanath Saraf, a former principal of a school run by New Education Institute, challenged multiple departmental enquiries and termination orders that were passed without hearing or reasons. The High Court repeatedly dismissed his writ petitions with laconic orders such as "rejected" and "dismissed" without re…
AZAD RICKSHAW PULLERS UNION (REGD.) CH. TOWN HALL AMRITSAR & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS
1980 INSC 1475 August 1980Disposed off
The Azad Rickshaw Pullers Union and other petitioners challenged the Punjab Cycle Rickshaws (Regulation of Rickshaws) Act, 1976, alleging it violated their fundamental rights under Articles 32 and 38 of the Constitution. The Act prohibited owners of cycle rickshaws from obtaining licences unless they themselves were th…
NANHU & ORS. ETC.versusDELHI ADMINISTRATION & ORS.
1980 INSC 1485 August 1980Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the Delhi Municipal Corporation's Cycle Rickshaw Bye‑Law (1960, amended 1976) which required that only owners of a cycle rickshaw could obtain a licence to ply for hire. Petitioners challenged this provision, arguing that the criteria for granting licences were arbitrary and that a ceiling on…
S. NARAHARI AND ORSversusS.R. KUMAR AND ORS.
2023 INSC 6045 July 2023Matter referred to larger bench
The Supreme Court examined whether a liberty granted to approach the High Court for review, after an earlier Special Leave Petition (SLP) was dismissed, automatically places the matter in the escalation matrix and permits filing a fresh SLP. The Court held that Order XLVII Rule 7 of the CPC bars an SLP against an order…
ARUN DEV UPADHYAYAversusINTEGRATED SALES SERVICE LTD. & ANR.
2023 INSC 6105 July 2023Dismissed
The dispute arose from a representation agreement between D.M.C. Management Consultants Ltd. and Integrated Sales Service Ltd., which contained an arbitration clause. After the arbitrator awarded US $6.9 million against DMC, the award was sought to be enforced against non‑signatory parties, including Arun Dev Upadhyaya…
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANRversusMOHD. PARVEZ ABDUL KAYUUM ETC
2019 INSC 7245 July 2019Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Gujarat High Court's judgment that acquitted several accused of murder and terrorism charges in the killing of former Home Minister Haren Pandya and the attempted murder of Jagdish Tiwari. The CBI had investigated and found both incidents were part of a larger conspiracy…
THE DIRECTOR STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.V. ISPAT KHADAN JANTA MAZDOOR UNIONversusISPAT KHADAN JANTA MAZDOOR UNION
2019 INSC 7285 July 2019Disposed off
The case concerned contract labour employed in SAIL's captive limestone mines under a tripartite agreement with contractors. After a prohibition notification under Section 10(1) of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 was issued in 1993, the contract labour continued to work until their services were …
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. & ANR.versusJAGGU & ORS. ETC.
2019 INSC 7275 July 2019Disposed off
The case concerned 2,040 contract labourers employed in SAIL's captive limestone mine who, after a 1993 prohibition on contract labour under the CLRA Act, continued to work and claimed parity of wages with regular SAIL employees under the NJCS memorandum. The respondents sought relief under Section 20(1) of the Minimum…
MAHIPAL SINGH RANA, ADVOCATEversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2016 INSC 4925 July 2016Disposed off
Advocate Mahipal Singh Rana threatened a civil judge in Etah on two occasions, leading the Allahabad High Court to convict him of criminal contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and impose two months' imprisonment, a fine, and a ban on appearing in Etah courts until he purged the contempt. The High Court also …
SUBRAYA M.N.versusVITTALA M.N. & ORS.
2016 INSC 4945 July 2016Case Partly allowed
The suit sought partition of three parcels of land that were part of the joint family of the deceased Narayana. The defendant claimed that the first two parcels had been relinquished by the plaintiffs through a village panchayat resolution and receipts, while the third parcel was his self‑acquired property. The trial c…
ANIL KUMAR GUPTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2016 INSC 4975 July 2016Disposed off
The petition arose from a tragic incident on 1 February 2011 when over two lakh candidates gathered for an ITBP recruitment drive in Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, and, after the drive was postponed, many climbed onto the roof of the Himgiri Express. The train, travelling at 75 kmph, struck a low foot‑over‑bridge whose clear…
S. SUBRAMANIAM BALAJIversusTHE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.
2013 INSC 4445 July 2013Dismissed
The appellant challenged the Tamil Nadu government's distribution of free colour television sets, laptops, mixers, and other welfare items promised in the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) election manifesto, alleging that the expenditure was unauthorized, violated Article 14 and amounted to a corrupt practice under Sect…
THE STATE OF KARNATAKAversusTHE ASSOCIATED MANAGEMENT OF (GOVT. RECOGNIZED UNAIDED ENGLISH MEDIUM) PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS & ORS.
2013 INSC 4415 July 2013Matter referred to larger bench
The State of Karnataka appealed against the High Court's partial upholding of its 1994 Government Orders mandating mother‑tongue or Kannada as the medium of instruction in primary schools, which had been challenged by unaided English‑medium schools. The Supreme Court examined whether the State could compel the mother t…
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusGOPALI & ORS.
2012 INSC 2715 July 2012Dismissed
The case involved a claim for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act after the death of Nanag Ram, a 36‑year‑old machine operator, in a road accident. The claimants sought Rs.24 lakh, while the insurer challenged the award on several grounds. The Supreme Court examined whether the High Court should ha…
BAROT VIJAYKUMAR BALAKRISHNA & ORS.versusMODH VINAYKUMAR DASRATHLAL & ORS.
2011 INSC 4555 July 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The Gujarat Public Service Commission (GPSC) recruited Assistant Public Prosecutors under the 2008 Recruitment Rules, which required minimum qualifying marks for both written and viva‑voce tests. The advertisement omitted the viva‑voce cut‑off, and the Commission fixed a 10‑out‑of‑30 minimum mark shortly before the int…
RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
2011 INSC 4605 July 2011Disposed off
The case concerned three former Short Service Commissioned Officers who had joined the Indian Army after the period of emergency and were later appointed to the Uttar Pradesh Provincial Police Service. They claimed back‑service seniority and other benefits under the Uttar Pradesh Non‑technical (Class‑II) Services (Rese…
INDU BHUSHAN DWIVEDIversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR.
2010 INSC 3485 July 2010Appeal(s) allowed
Indu Bhushan Dwivedi, a Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate, was dismissed from service after a departmental inquiry found two of three charges proved: leaving headquarters without permission and using derogatory language. The High Court’s dismissal recommendation relied on adverse remarks in his Annual Confidential Rep…
RASID JAVED & ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. ETC. ETC.
2010 INSC 3525 July 2010Dismissed
The appellants, private bus operators, claimed that a 1999 notification under s.102(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which purported to modify the 1993 scheme and allow them to operate on the Saharanpur‑Delhi inter‑state route, was validly approved by a Hearing Authority and could not be rescinded. The State of Utta…
M/S. CRAWFORD BAYLEY AND CO. AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2006 INSC 3955 July 2006Dismissed
Crawford Bayley & Co., a firm of advocates, challenged the termination of its tenancy in a bank‑owned building and the subsequent show‑cause notice issued by an Estate Officer under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971. The firm argued that Section 3 of the Act and its second proviso, whic…
M/S. RAJURESHWAR ASSOCIATESversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
2004 INSC 3925 July 2004Dismissed
The appellant, a partnership firm, paid Rs. 781.33 lacs for the purchase of land and buildings of a cooperative cotton mill that had been partially resumed by the State. The liquidator executed a sale agreement, but the State later cancelled it, claiming the price was far below market value and that the sale lacked pro…
ALPHA CORP DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITEDversusGREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GNIDA) AND OTHERS
2026 INSC 4495 May 2026Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Earth Infrastructures Limited (EIL) and whether the lease‑hold lands held by its subsidiaries could be treated as assets of the corporate debtor. The Court found that the subsidiaries were merely fronts for EIL, which was the real develope…
RAJENDRA ANANT VARIKversusGOVIND B. PRABHUGAONKAR
2025 INSC 6335 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Rajendra Anant Varik, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a dishonoured cheque and was ordered to pay compensation. He appealed, and the First Appellate Court acquitted him, holding that the complainant was an unlicensed money‑lender under the Goa Money‑Lenders Act, whic…
DR. JAISHRI LAXMANRAO PATILversusTHE CHIEF MINISTER & ORS.
2021 INSC 2845 May 2021Disposed off
The State of Maharashtra enacted the Maharashtra State Reservation (of Seats for Admission in Educational Institutions in the State and for appointments in the public services and posts under the State) for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2018, granting 12% and 13% reservation to the Maratha com…
RE: EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN LN ORPHANAGES LN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusUNION OF LNDIA & ORS.
2017 INSC 4505 May 2017Directions issued
The Supreme Court heard a public‑interest writ petition alleging systematic sexual abuse of children in orphanages in Tamil Nadu and the broader failure of the State to protect children in need of care and protection. The Court examined the scope of the term "child in need of care and protection" under Section 2(14) of…
SUMER SINGHversusSURAJBHAN SINGH AND OTHERS
2014 INSC 9695 May 2014Case Partly allowed
The case concerns a criminal appeal filed by the injured party, Sumer Singh, under Article 136 of the Constitution seeking enhancement of the sentence imposed on Surajbhan Singh and others for grievous hurt (IPC s.326) and related offences arising from a land dispute. The High Court had reduced the sentence to the seve…
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LTD. & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2011 INSC 3545 May 2011Dismissed
The Union of India issued a Request for Proposal for 20 fast patrol vessels, stipulating that bids must be at a firm and fixed price for the contract duration. Larsen & Toubro (Petitioner No.1) submitted the lowest commercial bid but included a foreign‑exchange rate variation clause without specifying the currency, vio…
SHANKARA CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.versusM. PRABHAKAR & ORS.
2011 INSC 3595 May 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute concerned about 90 acres of land in Andhra Pradesh that had been declared evacuee property under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 by a notification dated 11‑12‑1952 and later acquired by the Central Government under Section 12 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1…
BONDU RAMASWAMYversusBANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.
2010 INSC 2715 May 2010Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the legality of land acquisitions undertaken by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) for the Arkavathi layout, focusing on whether the BDA Act required President's assent, was repugnant to the Land Acquisition Act, and complied with constitutional provisions under Parts IX and IX‑A. The …
S.K. DASGUPTA & ORS.versusVIJAY SINGH SENGAR & ORS.
2010 INSC 2755 May 2010Appeal(s) allowed
Vijay Singh Sengar filed a public interest writ petition alleging that power cuts in Madhya Pradesh were endangering patients in government hospitals and disrupting street lighting. The Madhya Pradesh High Court issued interim orders directing the State Electricity Board to provide round‑the‑clock electricity to hospit…
STATE OF CHHATISGARH & ORS.versusDHIRJO KUMAR SENGAR
2009 INSC 6725 May 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased headmaster of a government school died intestate, leaving his brother and nephew as natural heirs. The nephew, Dhirjo Kumar Sengar, applied for a compassionate appointment claiming to be the deceased's adopted son, supported by an unregistered deed of adoption and a succession certificate. The Joint Direct…
DHARMESHBHAI VASUDEVBHAI & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
2009 INSC 6815 May 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The City Co-operative Bank filed a complaint alleging several offences and the Judicial Magistrate ordered an investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC. The complainant later applied to withdraw the inquiry on the ground of a compromise, and the Magistrate recalled his earlier order. Depositors in the bank challenged the…
HARI RAMversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
2009 INSC 6935 May 2009Appeal(s) allowed
Hari Ram was arrested in 1998 for offences under the IPC and the trial court initially held him to be a juvenile (under 16) and sent the case to the Juvenile Justice Board. The Rajasthan High Court later held he was over 16 and applied the 1986 Juvenile Act, rejecting the claim of juvenility. On appeal, the Supreme Cou…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM/S MARTIN LOTTERY AGENCIES LTD.
2009 INSC 7015 May 2009Dismissed
The case concerned whether the sale, promotion and marketing of state‑run lottery tickets by M/s Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd. attracted service tax under Section 65(19) of the Finance Act, 1994. The High Court had held that lottery tickets are not "goods" and that the distributor’s activities were merely promotion, not…
NIYAS AHMAD KHANversusMAHMOOD RAHMAT ULLAH KHAN & ANR.
2008 INSC 5845 May 2008Case Allowed
The tenant's rent was fixed at Rs.150 per month under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. The landlords sought eviction on the ground of bonafide requirement, but the eviction petition was dismissed by the prescribed and appellate authorities. The landlords then filed…
SMT. SELVI & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2007 INSC 5205 May 2007Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered whether the involuntary administration of narcoanalysis, polygraph, and Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) tests for investigative purposes violates fundamental rights. The Court held that compulsory administration of these techniques violates Article 20(3) of the Constitution, whic…
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, SUJANPURversusSURINDER KUMAR KUMAR
2006 INSC 2965 May 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The Municipal Council, Sujanpur terminated Surinder Kumar, a daily‑waged worker appointed in violation of its recruitment rules and allegedly as a supervisor. The Labour Court held that Kumar was a workman who had completed the requisite 240 days of work and ordered his reinstatement with full back wages. The High Cour…
M/S. GEO MILLER AND CO. PVT. LTD. AND ORS.versusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.
2004 INSC 3525 May 2004Dismissed
MIS Geo Miller & Co. Pvt. Ltd. and others, registered dealers under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, were assessed entry tax under the Madhya Pradesh Entry Tax Act, 1976 for goods brought into the state for execution of works contracts. They contended that the tax violated Article 301 (and 304(b)) of the Const…
BALBIR KAUR AND ANR.versusSTEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. AND ORS.
2000 INSC 2925 May 2000Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioners, dependents of a deceased SAIL employee, applied for a compassionate appointment after the employee's death, but SAIL declined, citing a Family Benefit Scheme introduced under the 1989 NJSC Tripartite Agreement that required the family to deposit provident fund and gratuity amounts in exchange for a mon…
LILY THOMAS, ETC. ETCversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2000 INSC 2935 May 2000Dismissed
The Supreme Court dismissed a review petition and several writ petitions filed by Lily Thomas and others seeking to set aside the earlier judgment in Sarla Mudgal’s case, which held that a Hindu husband who converts to Islam without dissolving his first marriage commits bigamy under Section 494 IPC. The Court held that…
JAI MANGAL ORAONversusSMT. MIRA NAYAK AND ORS. ETC.
2000 INSC 2955 May 2000Dismissed
The appellant, a member of a Scheduled Tribe, claimed title to land that had been surrendered by his predecessor Nanda Oraon in 1942 to a landlord. He alleged that he was the adopted son of Sukhi Oraon and therefore succeeded to the land, filing a complaint that led the Special Officer under the Chhotanagpur Tenancy Ac…
ANJUMAN KHADDAMUL HUJJAI, ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ETC. ETC.
2000 INSC 2985 May 2000Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined the applicability of the Haj Committee Act, 1959 after pilgrim travel shifted from sea to air in 1993, rendering the ex‑officio members listed in Section 4(1)(a)‑(f) practically redundant. The petitioners sought direction to replace these members, arguing the Act had become obsolete, while th…
M/S. ELECTRONICS CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. ETC. ETC.versusSECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1999 INSC 2245 May 1999Appeal(s) allowed
Electronics Corporation of India Ltd., a company wholly owned by the Union of India, challenged a demand for non‑agricultural land assessment levied by the Andhra Pradesh Revenue Department on land it leased from the Central Government. The company argued that Article 285 of the Constitution barred the State from taxin…
G.B. PANT AGRICULTURAL AND TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITYversusKESHO RAM
1994 INSC 1935 May 1994
Kesho Ram was appointed as a temporary Assistant Block Superintendent at G.B. Pant Agricultural & Technology University in 1972 with a contract allowing termination on one month's notice. He was dismissed in 1976 for irregular attendance without a prior inquiry, and he sued for a declaration that the termination was il…
COMMISSIONER, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES,LUCKNOW, U.P. AND ANOTHERversusPRAKASH CHANDRA SAXENA AND ANOTHER
1994 INSC 1955 May 1994
The Commissioner of Food and Civil Supplies terminated the services of Prakash Chandra Saxena, a temporary government servant of nearly 20 years, by a non‑speaking order without conducting any enquiry. The Service Tribunal held that such termination amounted to punishment and violated Article 311(2) of the Constitution…
REGIONAL DIRECTOR, E.S.I. CORPN. AND ANR.versusFRANCIS DE COSTA AND ANR.
1992 INSC 1485 May 1992Matter referred to larger bench
The employee of J&P Coats was struck by his employer's lorry while riding his bicycle on a public road 1 km from the factory, fifteen minutes before his shift began. He claimed disability benefits under the Employees' State Insurance Act, arguing that the injury occurred in the course of his employment. The corporation…
N. ABDUL BASHEER & ORS. ETC. ETC.versusK.K. KARUNAKARAN & ORS.
1989 INSC 1815 May 1989Dismissed
Non‑graduate Excise Preventive Officers challenged an amendment to Special Rule 2 of the Kerala Excise & Prohibition Subordinate Service Rules that introduced a 1:3 ratio favouring graduates for promotion to Second Grade Excise Inspector. The Kerala High Court and a Division Bench held the amendment violated Articles 1…
TAKHATRY SHIVADATTRAY MANKADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
1989 INSC 1855 May 1989Dismissed
The appellant, a former civil engineer of the erstwhile State of Junagadh, was compulsorily retired in 1961 and later deemed to have served until 1964 following a Supreme Court order. After his retirement, the Gujarat Government reduced his pension and gratuity by 50% under a show‑cause notice, invoking Rules 188 and 1…
FERTILIZERS & CHEMICALS TRAVANCORE LTD.versusKERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANOTHER
1988 INSC 1415 May 1988Dismissed
Fertilizers & Chemicals Travancore Ltd entered into a 1948 agreement with the princely State of Travancore for electricity at a fixed rate, later succeeded by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB). In 1968 KSEB raised the tariff for the appellant to Rs.200 per kW per year under Regulation 11 of the 1966 General Tar…
TATA TEA LTD. & ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. ETC.
1988 INSC 1445 May 1988Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined writ petitions filed by Tata Tea Ltd. and other tea companies challenging amendments made by the West Bengal and Kerala legislatures that sought to tax the entire income from the sale of tea grown and manufactured by the assessees. The petitioners argued that only 60% of such income could be …
FEDERATION OF ALL INDIA CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE STENOGRAPHERS (RECOGNISED) & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
1988 INSC 1465 May 1988Dismissed
The petitioners, Grade I stenographers attached to heads of the Customs and Central Excise Departments, claimed that they were paid less (Rs.550‑900) than their counterparts attached to Joint Secretaries and higher officers in the Central Secretariat (Rs.650‑1040) and alleged discrimination under Articles 14 and 16(1) …
B.S. YADAV & ANR.versusCHIEF MANAGER, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS.
1987 INSC 1485 May 1987
The petitioners, officers of the Central Bank of India appointed after the 1969 nationalisation, challenged their forced retirement at age 58 under Rule 3 of the Bank's Rules for Age of Retirement, arguing that having two different retirement ages (60 for pre‑July 19, 1969 officers and 58 for post‑July 19, 1969 officer…
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANOTHER ETC.versusS.S. SRIVASTAVA & OTHERS
1987 INSC 1495 May 1987Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the constitutional validity of Regulation 19(2) of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1960, as amended in 1977, which required employees appointed on or after 1 September 1956 and belonging to Class I or II to retire at age 58, with a provision for retirement at 50 in the co…
RAJA SATYENDRA NARAYAN SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
1987 INSC 1505 May 1987Dismissed
The estate of the late Raja Nilkanth Narayan Singh was vested in the State of Bihar under the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950. While some mines were being worked under leases and royalties were paid, the successors-in-interest filed a writ petition seeking compensation for coal-bearing areas that had not been exploited at…
ASHOK KUMARversusDELHI ADMINISTRATION & ORS.
1982 INSC 515 May 1982Dismissed
Ashok Kumar challenged his preventive detention under the National Security Act, 1980, arguing that the two‑day delay in furnishing the grounds of detention violated Article 22(5) of the Constitution and that the detaining authority failed to specify the period of detention and to link the grounds to "public order". Th…
DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICERversusBISHWANATH TEA CO. LTD.
1981 INSC 1085 May 1981Appeal(s) allowed
Bishwanath Tea Co. Ltd., a corporate lessee of a tea plantation lease, sought to cut timber from the leased grant for constructing staff houses in other tea estates and challenged the Divisional Forest Officer's demand for royalty, filing a writ petition under Art. 226 for refund and a mandamus to waive royalty. The Hi…
DR NARENDRA GUPTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2023 INSC 3225 April 2023Directions issued
Dr. Narendra Gupta filed a public interest litigation alleging that women, especially from marginalized communities, were subjected to unnecessary hysterectomies under government health schemes in several states, violating their right to health under Article 21 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court examined affidavits…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusDILIP KUMAR MALLICK
2022 INSC 13015 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a CRPF employee, was removed from service for concealing a pending criminal case while filling a verification roll. The disciplinary and appellate authorities upheld the removal, but the High Court Division Bench later directed the employer to impose a lesser punishment, deeming removal too harsh. The S…
KALPANA MEHTA AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2017 INSC 3145 April 2017Matter referred to larger bench
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus challenging the approval and administration of the HPV vaccine, relying heavily on a report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee. The Union of India contended that such a report could not be used as evidence to establish facts, invoking parliamentary privilege and the doctri…
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR.versusM/S DISTILLERS CO. LTD.
2007 INSC 3865 April 2007Dismissed
The respondent, Mis Distillers Co. Ltd., a licensed arrack bottler under the Karnataka Excise Act, paid additional amounts to the Excise Department for bottling unmatured arrack and for non‑affixation of labels after failing to comply with a circular prescribing a 15‑day maturation period. It claimed these payments as …
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusSATYPRAKASH AND ORS.
2006 INSC 2025 April 2006Dismissed
The Union of India appealed a High Court order that had granted relief to several OBC candidates, including the petitioner, who were denied appointments despite being recommended by the UPSC for the 174 OBC‑reserved vacancies. The respondents argued that OBC candidates selected on merit (i.e., without resorting to the …
NARINDER MOHAN ARYAversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.
2006 INSC 2155 April 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, an inspector with United India Insurance, was dismissed after a departmental inquiry found him guilty of antedating an insurance cover note following a fire. He appealed, but the appellate authority upheld the dismissal. Simultaneously, a civil suit by the consignor concluded that the cover note was not …
U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THROUGH ITS CHAIRMANversusOMADITYA VERMA AND ORS.
2005 INSC 1825 April 2005Appeal(s) allowed
The Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) challenged a High Court order that directed the State Transport Authority to issue 38 stage‑carriage permits to private operators for the Muzaffarnagar‑Chajlet route. The permits covered the Bijnor‑Noorpur segment, which had been notified as a state‑run road‑t…
ASSOCIATED CEMENT COMPANIES LTD.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR.
2005 INSC 1815 April 2005Dismissed
Associated Cement Companies Ltd. manufactures cement at Kymore and was levied a terminal export tax of 0.50% on cement by the Kymore Municipal Council under a 1991 notification. The State Government later issued a circular on 15 December 1995 prescribing a uniform rate of 0.20% for cement across Madhya Pradesh. The com…
NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPN. LTD. AND ORS.versusM/S. HARIBOX SWALRAM AND ORS.
2004 INSC 2335 April 2004Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioners had advance contracts with two Bombay textile mills for cloth, but after the mills were taken over by the Central Government under the Textile Undertakings (Taking over of Management) Act, 1983, the custodian claimed the contracts were cancelled and it bore no liability for pre‑takeover obligations. The…
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.versusP. KESAVAN AND ANR.
2004 INSC 2285 April 2004Appeal(s) allowed
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPC) sought renewal of a lease originally granted to Burmah Shell in 1967, which contained a renewal clause. The Burmah Shell (Acquisition of Undertakings) Act, 1976 transferred Burmah Shell's rights to the Central Government and subsequently to BPC, creating a legal fiction that BPC …
CHATTISGARH RURAL AGRICULTURE EXTENSION OFFICERSversusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.
2004 INSC 2295 April 2004Dismissed
The Chhattisgarh Rural Agriculture Extension Officers Association, originally appointed as matriculate Village Level Workers, were transferred to the Agriculture Department and redesignated as Rural Agriculture Extension Officers. The State of Madhya Pradesh, invoking a policy that only graduates could fill the post, c…
M.C. MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2002 INSC 1855 April 2002Hearing Adjourned
The Supreme Court examined the Union of India's repeated attempts to extend the deadline for phasing out diesel buses in Delhi and to modify the Court's earlier orders directing a complete conversion to CNG. It held that the directions of the Bhure Lal Committee and the Environment Pollution (Prevention and Control) Au…
UNION OF INDIAversusERA EDUCATIONAL TRUST AND ANR. ETC.
2000 INSC 1885 April 2000Appeal(s) allowed
Respondent Era Educational Trust applied to the Central Government for consent to establish a medical college, which was rejected after two inspections by the Medical Council of India. The Trust filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, and the Allahabad High Court, without allowing a counter‑affidav…
GOVIND A. MANE AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
2000 INSC 1915 April 2000Dismissed
The appellants, having passed the 12th examination with 63‑65% marks, applied for admission to a B.Ed. course that was filled through a common entrance test. Seats were allocated on a district‑wise basis among Parbhani, Nanded, Beed and Latur, and the appellants challenged this allocation as violative of Article 14 of …
MANOJversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1999 INSC 1545 April 1999Appeal(s) allowed
Manoj was arrested in a Rajasthan NDNDPS case and bail was granted, but he remained in custody because he was subsequently arrested in a separate Madhya Pradesh NDNDPS case. The Madhya Pradesh authorities failed to produce him before a magistrate within the constitutionally mandated 24‑hour period and did not file a ch…
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.versusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.
1999 INSC 1555 April 1999Appeal(s) allowed
The Central Government sought land in Madhya Pradesh for the Bhilai Steel Plant and, under the 1925 Rules, agreed to pay the State a one‑time capitalised amount equal to 25 times the assessed land revenue, thereby obtaining exemption from further land revenue. The land was transferred to Hindustan Steel Ltd, whose succ…
A.N. SEHGAL AND ORS.versusRAJE RAM SHEORAN AND OR.S
1991 INSC 935 April 1991Disposed off
The case concerned the inter‑se seniority of officers promoted from the Class II Engineers Service (the promotees) and a directly recruited Assistant Executive Engineer, R.R. Sheoran, under the Haryana Service of Engineers (Class I) Rules, 1966. The promotees were elevated to Executive Engineer on an officiating basis …
S.L. CHOPRA AND ORS. ETC. ETCversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1991 INSC 945 April 1991Disposed off
The appellants, Class II engineers promoted on an officiating basis, challenged the promotion, confirmation and subsequent promotion of direct recruits B.D. Sardana and F.L. Kansai in the Haryana Service of Engineers, arguing that they should be deemed members of the service from the date of their initial officiating p…
NATIONAL UNION OF ALL INDIA RADIO AND ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ETC.
1990 INSC 1225 April 1990Disposed off
The petitioners, staff artists of All India Radio and Doordarshan, challenged a 1982 government circular that bifurcated them into "artists" and "government servants" and required them to exercise an option to choose their status. They sought parity with regular civil servants, pension rights, and a declaration that al…
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusL.K. AHUJA & CO.
1988 INSC 925 April 1988Dismissed
The Union of India entered into four construction contracts with L.K. Ahuja & Co., which were completed and final bills were accepted. Later the respondent claimed a balance of Rs 1,91,137 and sought arbitration, but the government replied that no dispute existed. The respondent filed an application under Section 20 of…
JOYI KITTY JOSEPHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 3275 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The wife of a man detained under the COFEPOSA Act challenged his preventive detention, arguing that the detaining authority had not applied its mind and had ignored the stringent bail conditions imposed by the magistrate. The Supreme Court examined the factual matrix, which showed the detainee’s involvement in a large‑…
VIJAY BAHADURversusSUNIL KUMAR & ORS.
2025 INSC 3325 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Vijay Bahadur contested the election of Gram Pradhan in Chaka village, alleging a discrepancy of 19 votes between the Presiding Officer’s oral statement (1194 votes) and Form 46 (1213 votes) and claiming irregularities such as missing poll‑booth diaries and police interference. He filed an election petiti…
UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONversusBIBHU PRASAD SARANGI AND OTHERS
2021 INSC 1565 March 2021Disposed off
The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) challenged a Central Administrative Tribunal order that directed the reconsideration of the promotion of Bibhu Prasad Sarangi to the Indian Administrative Service, citing a disciplinary penalty imposed on him. The matter was taken to the Orissa High Court under Article 226 of …
THE PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIAversusDR. S.K. TOSHNIWAL EDUCATIONAL TRUSTS VIDARBHA INSTITUTE OF PHARMACY AND ORS. ETC.
2020 INSC 2765 March 2020Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a batch of petitions challenging the approval of increased intake and second‑shift courses in pharmacy colleges approved by AICTE but rejected by the Pharmacy Council of India (PCI). The core issue was whether the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (a special statute) or the All India Council for Technical E…
ANKUSH MARUTI SHINDE AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2019 INSC 3055 March 2019Disposed off
The case involved six accused who were convicted of murder, robbery and rape of a woman in a hut robbery in 2003, based primarily on the identification of two eye‑witnesses (PW1 and PW8) in a test identification parade (TIP) and in court. The Supreme Court examined whether the prosecution had proved guilt beyond reason…
STATE OF KERALA & ORS.versusB. SURENDRA DAS ETC
2014 INSC 9335 March 2014Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined two amendments to Kerala's Abkari Policy that altered Rule 13 of the Foreign Liquor Rules: (i) the removal of "three‑star" hotels from eligibility for FL‑3 liquor licences, and (ii) the introduction of a distance rule (Rule 3E) prohibiting new licences within 3 km in panchayat areas and 1 km …
SUSHIL ANSALversusSTATE THROUGH CBI
2014 INSC 1685 March 2014Case Partly allowed
The Uphaar Cinema tragedy in Delhi on 13 June 1997 resulted in 59 deaths and over 100 injuries due to asphyxiation from smoke. The Ansal brothers, as occupiers and licensees of the cinema, were convicted under Sections 304A, 337, 338 read with Section 36 IPC and Section 14 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952. The High Court…
RANI ALOKA DUDHORIA AND OTHERSversusGOUTAM DUDHORIA AND OTHERS
2009 INSC 3215 March 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined a long‑running partition suit involving three immovable properties. The parties had agreed to an inter‑party auction without a formal valuation, but the Commissioner of Partition and the Calcutta High Court failed to comply with mandatory provisions of the Partition Act, 1893, notably Section…
NAWAB SHAQAFATH ALI KHAN & ORS.versusNAWAB IMDAD JAH BAHADUR & ORS.
2009 INSC 3255 March 2009Disposed off
The dispute concerned the interpretation of the H.E.H. Nizam's Jewellery Trust deed, incorporated by the Nizam's Trust Deeds (Validation) Act, 1950, particularly clauses dealing with the "Remaining Sons' Fund" and "Remaining Daughters' Fund". Original petitions under Sections 56 and 61 of the Indian Trusts Act were fil…
DHANANJAY MALIK AND ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL AND ORS.
2008 INSC 3045 March 2008Disposed off
The State of Uttaranchal advertised for Physical Education Teachers, specifying B.P.E. or a graduate with a diploma in Physical Education as the required qualification. Unsuccessful candidates challenged the selection criteria, alleging inconsistency with the U.P. Subordinate Educational (Trained Graduates Grade) Servi…
BIHAR FINANCE SERVICE H.C. COOP. SOCIETY LTD.versusGAUTAM GOSWAMI & ORS
2008 INSC 3115 March 2008Disposed off
The Bihar Finance Service H.C. Cooperative Society Ltd. sought land acquisition for housing its members, leading to a declaration and award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The High Court quashed the declaration and remitted the matter for further inquiry, but the Supreme Court later directed the High Court to rel…
G.M. HARYANA ROADWAYSversusJAI BHAGWAN AND ANR.
2008 INSC 3125 March 2008Dismissed
The State, G.M. Haryana Roadways, terminated a casual driver, Jai Bhagwan, whose reinstatement was ordered by the Labour Court. The State reinstated him on 10 May 2002 and later regularized his service on 21 June 2004, but failed to disclose these material facts in a writ petition before the High Court and again in a S…
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.versusE.I.T.A. INDIA LTD. AND ORS.
2003 INSC 1505 March 2003Appeal(s) allowed
The State of West Bengal challenged the constitutional validity of several provisions of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994 and its 1995 Rules, including Section 2(6), the explanation to Section 11, and Section 14(4), as well as Rules 172, 173, 174, 188 and 189. The respondents argued that these provisions created a s…
MRS. RENA DREGOversusLALCHAND SONI, ETC.
1998 INSC 1325 March 1998Appeal(s) allowed
The landlady, Ms. Rena Drego, sought eviction of her tenant under Section 13(1)(g) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, claiming a bona‑fide and reasonable need for additional accommodation for her large family. The trial court dismissed her suit, but the appellate Small Causes Court granted …
SWARAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
1998 INSC 1335 March 1998Appeal(s) allowed
Shri Doodh Nath, an MLA, was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He filed a remission petition before the Governor of Uttar Pradesh, which was granted despite the Governor not being informed of material facts such as five other serious criminal cases pending against him, the earlier dismissal of his…
ANIMAL AND ENVIRONMENT LEGAL DEFENCE FUNDversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1997 INSC 2315 March 1997Disposed off
The Animal and Environment Legal Defence Fund challenged the Madhya Pradesh government's order granting 305 fishing permits to tribals residing in the Pench National Park area, arguing that such permits would damage the park's biodiversity and contravene the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and the Indian Forest Act. T…
EXCISE COMMISSIONER, KARNATAKA AND ANR.versusV. SREEKANTA
1993 INSC 845 March 1993Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, V. Sreekanta, was appointed as an Excise Inspector (Junior) on a purely temporary, ad‑hoc basis on 17 January 1968 as a "local candidate" through the Employment Exchange. In October 1971, he was regularised under the Karnataka State Civil Services (Direct Recruitment to Class III posts) (Special) Rules,…
AMRIT BANASPATI CO. LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.
1992 INSC 635 March 1992Dismissed
The Punjab Government issued a brochure promising a refund of sales tax as an incentive for setting up large‑scale industries in focal points. Amrit Banaspati Co. relied on assurances from the Director and Secretary of Industries, purchased land and machinery, and later sought a refund of sales tax paid. The High Court…
SMT. GUROversusATMA SINGH AND ORS.
1992 INSC 645 March 1992Appeal(s) allowed
Ganga Singh executed a will on 2 October 1968 bequeathing his one‑third share in land to Atma Singh and died eight days later. The Assistant Collector rejected the will as suspicious and allowed mutation in favour of Smt. Guro, Ganga's sister's daughter, prompting her to sue Atma Singh for declaration of her inheritanc…
D.K. TRIVEDI AND SONS AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1986 INSC 285 March 1986Dismissed
The petitioners, holders of quarry and mining leases for minor minerals in Gujarat, challenged a series of state notifications and a circular that altered rates of royalty and dead rent and classified building stones. The core issue was whether Section 15(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1…
A.C. JOSEversusSIVAN PILLAI & ORS.
1984 INSC 525 March 1984Appeal(s) allowed
A.C. Jose, a losing candidate in a Kerala Legislative Assembly election, challenged the election of Sivan Pillai on the ground that votes cast by electronic voting machines in 50 of 85 polling stations were illegal. The Election Commission had issued a notification permitting the use of machines, but the Representation…
V.T. KHANZODE & ORS.versusRESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ANR.
1982 INSC 315 March 1982Dismissed
The case concerned a challenge by 25 Group I officers of the Reserve Bank of India to an Administrative Circular (No. 8, 7 January 1978) and an Office Order (No. 679, 27 April 1978) that introduced a combined seniority list and inter‑group mobility for officers across Groups I, II and III, with retrospective effect fro…
WING COMMANDER J. KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
1982 INSC 335 March 1982Dismissed
Wing Commander J. Kumar, an Air Force officer permanently seconded to the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) in 1971, challenged Rule 16 (promulgated in 1979 under Article 309) which fixed seniority of permanently seconded officers based on the date they attained the substantive rank of Major/equivale…
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.versusVAGHELA DAYABHAI CHATURBHAI & ORS.
1980 INSC 425 March 1980Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the validity of a Gujarat Government Resolution dated 28 December 1966 that discontinued public auctions for bhatha lands and instead allocated lease‑hold rights preferentially to bona‑fide agriculturists, Harijans, Adivasis, backward classes and cooperative societies. Petitioners claimed they were u…
M/S S.R.S. TRAVELS BY ITS PROPRIETOR K.T. RAJASHEKARversusTHE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION WORKERS & ORS.
2025 INSC 1525 February 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2003, which repealed the Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976, and whether the State Transport Authority (STA) could delegate the power to grant contract carriage, speci…
GAJANAN BABULAL BANSODE & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2021 INSC 635 February 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The Maharashtra Government, without consulting the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC), issued a Government Resolution on 22 April 2019 to appoint an additional 636 candidates as Police Sub‑Inspectors, effectively doubling the vacancies advertised for the Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE) 201…
D. RAGHU AND OTHERSversusR. BASAVESWARUDU AND OTHERS ETC.
2020 INSC 1305 February 2020Disposed off
The appellants, originally recruited as Data Entry Operators (DEOs) Grade B, challenged a notice that limited promotion to the post of Inspector to pre‑restructured categories, arguing that the 2001 cabinet‑approved cadre restructuring merged DEOs into the Senior Tax Assistant (STA) cadre and that their prior service s…