Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 2022

1,017 judgments, newest first — showing 1–200.

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusMUNSHI RAM

2022 INSC 114131 October 2022Dismissed

The case concerned commission vendors of the Northern Railway who, after being absorbed into regular railway service, sought to have 50% of their pre‑absorption service counted as qualifying service for pension benefits, as had been granted to similarly situated vendors in other railway zones. The Union of India appeal

THE STATE OF JHARKHANDversusSHAILENDRA KUMAR RAI @ PANDAV RAI

2022 INSC 113931 October 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The victim was allegedly raped and set on fire by the accused, Shailendra Kumar Rai, and later died of septicemia caused by the burn injuries. While on her way to death she gave a statement to police officer Lallan Prasad, which was read back to her, signed, and later treated as a dying declaration. The Sessions Court

DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENTversusPADMANABHAN KISHORE

2022 INSC 114331 October 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Enforcement Directorate registered a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PML Act) against Padmanabhan Kishore for allegedly handing over Rs 50 lakh as a bribe to an Additional Commissioner of Income Tax. Kishore contended that the money remained "untainted" while in his possession and only beca

AROON PURIEversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

2022 INSC 114231 October 2022Disposed off

The case arose from an India Today article titled “Mission Misconduct” that alleged sexual misconduct and other improprieties by an Indian Foreign Service officer. The officer, after disciplinary action, filed a criminal complaint against the magazine’s Editor‑in‑Chief (A‑1), the article’s author (A‑2) and several publ

GUJARAT STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD.versusMAHAKALI FOODS PVT. LTD. (UNIT 2) & ANR

2022 INSC 114031 October 2022Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a series of appeals arising from disputes between buyers and micro‑small suppliers under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act) and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The core issue was whether Chapter V of the MSMED Act, which provides a special, t

NADAKERAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS. & ORS.versusPILLAMMA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS. & ORS.

2022 INSC 37431 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the grant of occupancy rights to Nadakerappa, a protected tenant, under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. The Land Tribunal had awarded occupancy rights in 1982, which the landowners later challenged through multiple writ petitions and appeals. The High Court Single Judge dismissed one petition o

DR. Y. IBEHAIBI DEVI (D) BY LRS. & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER (HIGHER AND TECHICAL EDUCATION) GOVERNMENT OF MANIPUR & ANR.

2022 INSC 37531 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, eight retired assistant professors and a college librarian from Manipur, claimed a revised pension entitlement effective from 1 April 2010 based on an Office Memorandum (OM) dated 5 May 2010, which was issued by the Governor and had statutory force. The State Government issued a later OM on 24 December

PATTALI MAKKAL KATCHIversusA. MAYILERUMPERUMAL & ORS.

2022 INSC 37831 March 2022Disposed off

The Tamil Nadu Legislature enacted the 2021 Special Reservation Act, earmarking 10.5% of the 20% reservation for Most Backward Classes (MBCs) and Denotified Communities (DNCs) for the Vanniyakula Kshatriya community. Several writ petitions challenged the Act on the ground that the State lacked legislative competence af

KALYAN DOMBIVALI MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusSANJAY GAJANAN GHARAT AND ANOTHER

2022 INSC 37731 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDM Corp) and the State of Maharashtra appealed against a Bombay High Court order that set aside the suspension of Sanjay Gajanan Gharat, an Additional Municipal Commissioner (AMC), and quashed the departmental inquiry against him. Gharat had been arrested under the Preventio

MATA PRASADversusTHE STATE OF U.P. & ANR.

2022 INSC 12331 January 2022Case Allowed

Mata Prasad, convicted of murder and related offences and sentenced to life imprisonment, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking premature release under the Uttar Pradesh Governor's 2018 policy for Republic Day releases. Although he satisfied the 2018 criteria, his application was rejected, and the State cited

NATIONAL HIGH SPEED RAIL CORPORATION LIMITEDversusMONTECARLO LIMITED & ANR

2022 INSC 12431 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSRCL) issued a tender for the Mumbai‑Ahmedabad Bullet Train project, which is funded by a loan from Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). Monte Carlo Limited submitted a technical bid that was rejected by NHSRCL as non‑responsive due to material deviations, a

M/S AGMATEL INDIA PVT. LTD.versusM/S RESOURSYS TELECOM & ORS.

2022 INSC 12631 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti (NVS) issued a notice inviting tenders on the GeM portal for 68,940 tablets, requiring bidders to have supplied the same or similar category products for at least 60% of the bid quantity in the preceding three financial years. M/s. Resoursys Telecom supplied only smart phones and claimed t

M/S MONGIA REALTY AND BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITEDversusMANIK SETHI

2022 INSC 12231 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Mongia Realty and Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (appellant) sued Manik Sethi (respondent) for recovery of alleged business loans, claiming the loans were repayable within one year of the last instalment and that the suit was filed within the limitation period. The respondent denied any loan relationship, asserting the payments w

KERALA TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITEDversusBASIL T K & ORS

2022 INSC 12131 January 2022Disposed off

The respondents were initially appointed as contract Assistant Managers in 2000 and were regularised in 2006, but their regularisation was cancelled in 2007. The High Court set aside the cancellation and ordered their reinstatement with continuity of service from 12 September 2007, but without any monetary benefits for

UNITED BANK OF INDIAversusBISWANATH BHATTACHARJEE

2022 INSC 11731 January 2022Dismissed

The appellant, United Bank of India, dismissed Biswanath Bhattacharjee, a former branch manager, on five charges including non‑recording of a subsidy, disbursement to fictitious beneficiaries, misappropriation of loan and subsidy amounts, removal of documents and unauthorized demand‑draft transfers. The disciplinary en

PAPPU TIWARYversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2022 INSC 11831 January 2022Dismissed

On 7 March 2000 Vikas Kumar Singh was shot by Pappu Tiwari and subsequently stabbed by five others, resulting in his death. All six accused were convicted under IPC sections 302 and 34 and, in Pappu Tiwari's case, also under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The appellants challenged the convictions on several grounds, inclu

SHRI CHATRAPATI SHIVAJI GAUSHALAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 104530 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

A truck transporting eighteen cattle was intercepted for lacking proper permits, leading to seizure of the animals and registration of FIRs under the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act and related statutes. The private respondents, claiming ownership, applied under CrPC sections 451 and 457 for interim custody, which

MUNIKRISHNA @ KRISHNA ETC.versusSTATE BY ULSOOR PS

2022 INSC 132230 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The State prosecuted four appellants for the murder of a 72‑year‑old man in Ulsoor, alleging they confessed to the crime while in police custody and led investigators to a knife and stolen gold. The trial court and the Karnataka High Court convicted them under IPC s.302 r.w. s.34 and sentenced them to life imprisonment

AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIAversusCENTRE FOR AVIATION POLICY, SAFETY & RESEARCH (CAPSR) & OTHERS

2022 INSC 104730 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Airport Authority of India (AAI) issued Request for Proposals for ground handling services at various airport groups, setting eligibility criteria that included regional clustering, a 36‑month experience requirement for scheduled flights, and a minimum annual turnover of Rs 30 crore (later reduced to Rs 18 crore).

SUSHANTA KUMAR BANIKversusSTATE OF TRIPURA & ORS.

2022 INSC 105330 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sushanta Kumar Banik, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 on the basis of two FIRs for alleged drug trafficking. The State of Tripura sought preventive detention, arguing that he was a habitual offender, while the ap

HDFC BANK LTD. & ORSversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2022 INSC 105630 September 2022Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by several banks challenging the Reserve Bank of India's directions to disclose confidential information under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The banks argued that the directions conflicted with Section 8 of the RTI Act, the RBI Act and the Banking Regul

M/S. EMAAR INDIA LTD.versusTARUN AGGARWAL PROJECTS LLP & ANR.

2022 INSC 104930 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Emaar India Ltd entered into a Collaboration Agreement and a 2011 Addendum with Tarun Aggarwal Projects LLP. A dispute arose concerning performance under clauses 3, 6 and 9 of the Addendum, and the parties invoked Clause 36, which permits specific performance in a court, while Clause 37 provides for arbitration of

C.S. RAMASWAMYversusV. K. SENTHIL & ORS

2022 INSC 104630 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs filed suits in 2015‑2016 to cancel sale deeds executed in 2005, alleging fraud. The defendant moved to reject the plaints under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC, contending the suits were barred by the 10‑year limitation period. The trial court and High Court refused to reject the plaints, holding that li

K. RAMYAversusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.

2022 INSC 104430 September 2022Disposed off

The deceased businessman K. Kumareshan died in a motor accident, leaving a widow, minor children and parents as dependents who claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 4,29,37,700 based on the deceased's income tax returns and audit reports, but the

SANGHI INDUSTRIES LIMITEDversusRAVIN CABLES LTD., AND ANR

2022 INSC 105030 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Sanghi Industries Ltd invoked performance bank guarantees issued by Ravin Cables Ltd in respect of three purchase orders and subsequently commenced arbitration. Ravin Cables filed two applications under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before Commercial Courts seeking to secure the disputed amoun

FERTILIZERS AND CHEMICALS TRAVANCORE LTD. & ORSversusANUSREE K.B.

2022 INSC 105130 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The father of the respondent, Anusree K.B., died in service in 1995, leaving a widow who was already employed and a minor daughter. Fourteen years after his death, the daughter applied for a compassionate appointment, which was rejected on the ground that she was not listed as a dependent and that the policy favoured w

BOHATTI DEVIversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2022 INSC 105230 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against the Allahabad High Court's order granting bail to respondent No.2, who is charged with murder (IPC s.302) and criminal conspiracy (IPC s.120B). The Supreme Court observed that the High Court failed to consider the gravity of the offences, the charge‑sheet details, the earlier

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (R AND B) AND OTHERSversusGOKUL CHANDRA KANUNGO (DEAD) THR. HIS LRS.

2022 INSC 104330 September 2022Case Partly allowed

The appellants, contractors, obtained an arbitral award that granted them a sum of money plus interest at 18% per annum for the pre‑reference, pendente lite and post‑award periods. The arbitrator did not provide any reasons for fixing the rate of interest. The respondents had remained silent for long periods (1977‑1989

AJWARversusNIYAJ AHMAD & ANR.

2022 INSC 105430 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was charged in a FIR for the murder of two sons of the complainant, along with several other offences. Although not named in the FIR, his involvement emerged during investigation and he was later added to the charge‑sheet under Section 161 of the CrPC. The trial court denied bail, but the Allahabad High C

KAZI MOINUDDIN KAZI BASHIRODDIN & ORS.versusTHE MAHARASHTRA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THROUGH ITS SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER REGIONAL OFFICE, MTDC, AURANGABAD, MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2022 INSC 105530 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, land owners, challenged the High Court's order allowing the Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation (MTDC) to withdraw Rs 1,37,50,547 that it had deposited on 20 March 2018 as part of the compensation awarded in a land‑acquisition case. The dispute centred on whether the Supreme Court’s order of 29 

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTDversusAFCONS GUNANUSA JV

2022 INSC 88430 August 2022Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered several petitions concerning the determination of arbitrators' fees under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that arbitrators cannot unilaterally issue binding orders determining their own fees, as this violates party autonomy and the principle that one cannot be a j

MAHADEO & ORSversusSMT. SOVAN DEVI & ORS

2022 INSC 88830 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The widow of a permanently disabled ex‑serviceman, Smt. Sovan Devi, claimed that a 1971 inter‑departmental letter from the Soldier Welfare Department to the District Collector constituted a valid allotment of 25 bighas of land to her late husband under the Rajasthan Special Assistance to Disabled Ex‑Servicemen Rules, 1

SANJEET KUMAR SINGH @ MUNNA KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2022 INSC 88330 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sanjeet Kumar Singh, was convicted under the NDNDPS Act for possession of 47.37 kg of ganja after a police search of his car. The prosecution’s case relied heavily on the testimony of PW‑7, a police officer who was both the informant and the investigating officer, and on his claim that the search was con

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusRAJKUMAR NAGPAL & ORS

2022 INSC 88530 August 2022Case Partly allowed

Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd (RCFL) issued non‑convertible debentures and defaulted in March 2019. The RBI issued a prudential framework requiring lenders to enter into an inter‑creditor agreement (ICA) before a resolution plan, and SEBI later issued a circular on 13 Oct 2020 standardising the procedure for debentur

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANKversusMR. VIJAY SITARAM DANDNAIK & ANR.

2022 INSC 88730 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Punjab National Bank (PNB) filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Jailaxmi Sugar Products Pvt Ltd, alleging default and seeking initiation of a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP). The Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) issued a certificate of recovery on 1 November 20

DIBAKER NUNIA & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF ASSAM

2022 INSC 88630 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Dibakar and Babul were convicted for murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC based primarily on the testimony of the deceased's parents, who claimed to have witnessed the assault. The trial and High Courts accepted this testimony despite inconsistencies, such as the parents allegedly returning home,

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDversusA. BALAKRISHNAN & ANR.

2022 INSC 63030 May 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Kotak Mahindra Bank (the appellant) sought initiation of a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Prasad Properties and Investments Pvt. Ltd. (the corporate debtor) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The corporate debtor had stood as guarantor for loans to three borrower

P. NAZEER ETC.versusSALAFI TRUST & ANR. ETC.

2022 INSC 36930 March 2022Dismissed

The dispute concerned the management of Salafi Juma Masjid, a waqf registered under the Waqf Act, 1995. The Mahal Committee, claiming to be a local (Sakha) unit of the registered society Kerala Naduvathil Mujahideen, sued the Salafi Trust seeking a declaration that a certificate of registration issued under s.36 of the

SWARNALATHA & ORS.versusKALAVATHY & ORS.

2022 INSC 37230 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The married couple Mannar Reddiar and Adhilakshmiammal executed separate wills bequeathing their properties to their two sons, excluding their daughter Kalavathy who had earlier received gifts. After the death of the testators, the daughter and the second son filed a suit for partition and contested the probate of the

CHANDRA PRAKASH MISHRAversusFLIPKART INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

2022 INSC 37030 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Deputy Commissioner (Commercial Tax), challenged the High Court's observations and cost orders that accused him of deliberate, malafide actions in passing ex‑parte provisional assessment orders against Flipkart India Private Limited under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act. The High Court had set asid

B.R.K. AATHITHANversusSUN GROUP & ANR.

2022 INSC 123629 November 2022Dismissed

The appellant, B.R.K. Aathithan, filed a criminal complaint under Sections 499 and 500 IPC alleging defamation by the respondents for broadcasting his arrest. The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the complaint, finding that the allegations fell within the fourth exception to Section 499. The appellant sought redress throu

SUNEETHA NARREDDY & ANOTHERversusTHE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 123829 November 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, the daughter and wife of the deceased Y.S. Vivekananda Reddy, sought transfer of the CBI trial concerning his mysterious murder from the CBI Special Court in Kadapa to a court outside Andhra Pradesh, alleging threats to witnesses and potential bias in the investigation. They argued that key witnesses h

SANSERA ENGINEERING LIMITEDversusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LARGE TAX PAYER UNIT, BENGALURU

2022 INSC 123429 November 2022Dismissed

Sansera Engineering Ltd, a manufacturer of excisable goods, exported products in August‑October 2015 and paid excise duty. It claimed rebate of the duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 in February 2017, but the claims were rejected as being beyond the one‑year limitation prescribed in Section 11B of the

SUKHBIRI DEVI & ORSversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2022 INSC 103729 September 2022Dismissed

The appellants filed a declaratory suit challenging a relinquishment deed and were dismissed by the trial court on a preliminary issue of limitation, a decision affirmed by the first appellate court and the Delhi High Court. They contended that the limitation period should be extended to twelve years under Article 136

M/S PRIME PROPERTIESversusSANA LAKSHMI DEVI (DIED) THROUGH HER LRS. & ORS.

2022 INSC 104129 September 2022Disposed off

The case involved a series of civil suits filed in 2001 that had been repeatedly amended and impleaded, leading to a long pendency. The plaintiff sought to file a rejoinder after the defendants had filed written statements, but the trial court initially rejected the application, later allowing it on review. The High Co

HARKIRAT SINGH GHUMANversusPUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT & ORS.

2022 INSC 88129 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Harkirat Singh Ghuman, contested the 2019 Punjab/Haryana Superior Judicial Service examination, alleging procedural irregularities such as a missing question in Paper V (Criminal Law), absence of an OMR sheet and transparent answer key for Paper VI (General Knowledge), non‑provision of Bare Acts, and den

INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS’ FEDERATION OF INDIA (REGD.)versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2022 INSC 87929 August 2022Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2009, which amended the definition of “employee” in the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and inserted Section 13A with retrospective effect from 3 April 1997 to extend gratuity benefits to teachers in private schools. The pe

M/S BHAGWANDAS B. RAMCHANDANIversusBRITISH AIRWAYS

2022 INSC 76829 July 2022Dismissed

The appellant, a cargo importer, claimed damages from British Airways for loss of perishable goods shipped from Mumbai to Canada, filing suit in 2012. The trial court held the claim was not time‑barred, but the Bombay High Court dismissed it, holding that the two‑year limitation under Rule 30 of the Carriage by Air Act

DAXABENversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2022 INSC 77129 July 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The widow of Shaileshkumar Patel challenged the quashing of FIR No. I‑11209016200112, filed under Section 306 IPC for alleged abetment of his suicide, on the ground that the complainant and accused had reached a monetary settlement. The Gujarat High Court, invoking its inherent power under Section 482 of the CrPC, set

M. V CHANDRAKANTHversusSANGAPPPA & ORS

2022 INSC 76929 July 2022Dismissed

M. V. Chandrakanth (appellant) challenged a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court that had set aside a Single Judge's order dismissing a writ petition filed by Respondent No.1, who claimed Other Backward Class (OBC) reservation as a member of the Ganiga caste. The central issue was whether a person belonging to th

NATIONAL PETROLEUM CONSTRUCTION COMPANYversusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(2), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI & ANR.

2022 INSC 77229 July 2022Matter referred to larger bench

National Petroleum Construction Co., a UAE‑incorporated firm, sought a Section 197 certificate for a 4% TDS rate on payments from ONGC for contracts involving both onshore and offshore work in FY 2019‑20. The Deputy Commissioner issued a certificate directing 4% TDS on the entire amount, despite the appellant’s earlier

ROHITH THAMMANA GOWDAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2022 INSC 77029 July 2022Disposed off

The appellant, a US permanent resident, filed a writ petition in Karnataka High Court seeking habeas corpus to have his 11‑year‑old son, a naturalised US citizen born in the United States, returned to the US. The child had been taken to India by the mother without the father's consent in March 2020, and US courts had i

OMKAR SINHA & ANRversusSAHADAT KHAN & ORS

2022 INSC 49129 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned whether a 1977 circular issued by the Governor of undivided Madhya Pradesh, which granted entry into Ranger training for Forest Guard trainees who topped their training, remained in force after the creation of Chhattisgarh in 2000. The State of Chhattisgarh issued several communications in 2009 and 2

THE NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSIONversusPOOJA THANDU NARESH & ORS.

2022 INSC 49429 April 2022Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether a student who obtained an MBBS degree from a Chinese university, where the tenth‑semester clinical training was delivered online due to COVID‑19, is entitled to provisional registration by the National Medical Commission (NMC). The Court held that the Eligibility Regulations require t

WAQF BOARD, RAJASTHANversusJINDAL SAW LIMITED & ORS

2022 INSC 49329 April 2022Dismissed

The Rajasthan Waqf Board claimed that a structure identified as the Qalandari Masjid on Tiranga Hill was a waqf religious site situated within Survey No. 6731, which had been leased to Jindal Saw Ltd for mining. The High Court allowed the mining lease to proceed, prompting the Board to appeal. The Supreme Court examine

ATBIRversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2022 INSC 49229 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Atbir, convicted of multiple murders and originally sentenced to death, had his sentence commuted to life imprisonment by a presidential order that barred parole and any remission for the remainder of his natural life. He applied for furlough under the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, but the Director General of Prisons denie

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusRAJAN SOOD & ORS.

2022 INSC 36229 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Government of NCT of Delhi appealed a Delhi High Court order that had declared the land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as deemed to have lapsed under section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabili

MEKHA RAM AND OTHERS ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS ETC. ETC.

2022 INSC 36029 March 2022Disposed off

The appellants, employees of the Rajasthan Medical & Health Subordinate Service, applied for a three‑year General Nursing Training as in‑service candidates and sought to have their study leave treated as deputation. A Single Judge of the Rajasthan High Court allowed the petitions, directing the State to grant deputatio

JAI BHAVANI SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDALversusRAMESH & ORS.

2022 INSC 35829 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an educational society, dismissed its principal (the first respondent) after a departmental inquiry found several charges proved. The principal appealed to the School Tribunal, which set aside the dismissal on the ground that the Inquiry Committee was not constituted as required by Rule 36(2)(b) of the 1

MASTER AYUSHversusTHE BRANCH MANAGER, RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.

2022 INSC 36429 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court considered the claim of a five‑year‑old child who became a paraplegic after a road accident in 2010. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 18,24,000, which the Karnataka High Court reduced to Rs 13,46,805. On appeal, the Court examined the method of calculating compensation under the Motor Veh

RAJESH GUPTAversusSTATE THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

2022 INSC 35929 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a senior Income Tax officer, was convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.15,000 from the complainant, Madhu Bala, during a CBI‑operated trap. The prosecution relied primarily on the complainant’s testimony and on the recovery of currency notes

TARLOCHAN SINGH @ RANAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2022 INSC 35629 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Tarlochan Singh, was the licensed holder of a double‑barrel 12‑bore rifle that was used to murder Gurdeep Singh. The prosecution alleged that the appellant had delivered the firearm to co‑accused Gurpreet Singh, who then used it in the killing, leading to convictions under Sections 29 and 30 of the Arms

ANJU GARG & ANRversusDEEPAK KUMAR GARG

2022 INSC 103328 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The wife (appellant) and her son filed a maintenance petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, alleging that the husband subjected her to cruelty, dowry harassment and forced her to leave the matrimonial home. The Family Court dismissed the wife’s application but granted maintenance to the son, a decis

RAM KUMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.

2022 INSC 103428 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Ram Kumar, was allotted a Fair Price Shop licence during the pendency of an appeal by the earlier licence holder, Kiran Devi (respondent No.9), whose licence had been cancelled by the Deputy Collector. Kiran Devi challenged the cancellation in the High Court, which set aside the cancellation, holding tha

CHOTKAUversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2022 INSC 103228 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Chotkau, was convicted and sentenced to death for the rape and murder of a six‑year‑old girl based solely on the testimonies of three prosecution witnesses and circumstantial evidence. The Supreme Court found serious contradictions in the witnesses' accounts regarding the FIR filing, the handling of the

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANRversusB. R. MURALIDHAR & ORS.

2022 INSC 76128 July 2022Disposed off

The State of Karnataka issued a land acquisition notification under Section 17 of the Karnataka Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1973. The petitioners challenged the notification on grounds of inadequate consideration of objections, alleged lapse of the acquisition process, and the constitutionality of Secti

SUNIL SIKRIversusGURU HARKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR.

2022 INSC 76428 July 2022Dismissed

The appeal concerned Sunil Sikri, a former teacher of Guru Harkrishan Public School, who challenged a Tribunal order directing his reinstatement with 50% back wages. The key issues were whether Sections 8 and 11 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 empower the Tribunal to award back wages, whether Rule 121 of the De

SHIV KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2022 INSC 76528 July 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a public servant, was convicted under Section 13(1)(d)(ii) read with Section 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 477A of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly manipulating measurement books and causing excess payment in school construction works. The prosecution alleged that he reduced

THE KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD & ANRversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS

2022 INSC 76228 July 2022Directions issued

The Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) initiated compulsory land acquisition under Section 33(2) of the Karnataka Housing Board Act, 1962 without a housing scheme having been sanctioned under Section 24(2). Petitioners argued that such acquisition was void for lack of a sanctioned scheme, relying on earlier decisions in Moh

MRS. AKELLA LALITHAversusSRI KONDA HANUMANTHA RAO & ANR.

2022 INSC 75928 July 2022Case Partly allowed

The mother, Akella Lalitha, gave birth to a child with her first husband Konda Balaji, who died shortly after. She later remarried Akella Ravi Narasimha Sarma, and the child's grandparents sought guardianship and visitation, later prompting the High Court to order a restoration of the child's original surname and to re

SANJAY PURAN BAGDE & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2022 INSC 76628 July 2022Dismissed

On the night of 2-3 November 2015, the deceased Vilas Gawande was attacked by four accused; two of them wielded an axe while the other two, Sanjay Puran Bagde and Rajratna (Nandu) Bagde, held the victim. The victim’s wife, an eyewitness, testified that all four were present and that the accused had a pre‑meditated plan

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusMUKESH KUMAR MEENA

2022 INSC 49028 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Mukesh Kumar Meena, an ST employee, appeared for the departmental exam for Income Tax Inspector and passed in his reserved category with 43% in the "Other Taxes" paper, exceeding the 40% threshold for ST candidates. He sought two grace marks to reach the 45% required for the general category, aiming for promotion. The

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED & ANR.versusSANDEEP CHOUDHARY & ORS.

2022 INSC 48928 April 2022Dismissed

BSNL conducted a recruitment exam for Telecom Technical Assistants. Two OBC candidates (Alok Kumar Yadav and Dinesh Kumar) scored higher than the last selected general‑category candidate. The question was whether such OBC candidates must be adjusted to the general‑category pool and not counted against the OBC quota, wi

JAI NARAIN VYAS UNIVERSITY, JODHPUR AND ANR.versusMUKESH SHARMA ETC. ETC.

2022 INSC 35128 March 2022Case Partly allowed

The petitioners, who had been employed on contractual or daily‑wage terms for 15 to 30 years at Jai Narayan Vyas University, filed writ petitions seeking regularisation and parity with similarly situated permanent staff. The Rajasthan High Court ordered their regularisation with all consequential benefits, a decision t

SARANPAL KAUR ANANDversusPRADUMAN SINGH CHANDHOK AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 34728 March 2022Directions issued

Saranpal Kaur Anand filed a suit in 2012 seeking a declaration that a 1969 sale deed and a 1995 deed were void, and an injunction against the defendants. The defendants moved to reject the plaint on the ground of limitation under Order VII Rule 11(d). The Delhi High Court Single Judge framed a preliminary issue under O

VISHAL ASHWIN PATELversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 25(3) & ORS.

2022 INSC 35328 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Vishal Ashwin Patel and others challenged the reopening of their income‑tax assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by filing writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petitions in a terse order stating it was not inclined to entertain them, without

RAJBIRversusSURAJ BHAN & ANR

2022 INSC 24728 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Rajbir, entered into a sale agreement which later resulted in a suit for specific performance. The trial court decreed that the respondents, Suraj Bhan and others, must execute a sale deed in favour of the appellant and deposit the balance consideration. The respondents filed an execution petition and su

AMRITLALversusSHANTILAL SONI & ORS.

2022 INSC 24328 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a written complaint on 10 July 2012 alleging that the respondents had failed to return silver entrusted to them, with the alleged offence dated 4 October 2009. An FIR was registered and a charge‑sheet filed, after which the Judicial Magistrate took cognizance on 4 December 2012. The respondents cont

SURJEET SINGH SAHNIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2022 INSC 24528 February 2022Dismissed

The petitioner entered into a sale deed with NOIDA in 2001 that promised a 10% plot allocation. After ten years he made a representation to NOIDA, and eleven years after the deed filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking specific performance. The High Court entertained the petition, directed NOIDA to decide the r

CHANDRA SEKHAR JHAversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2022 INSC 24628 February 2022Dismissed

Chandra Sekhar Jha was intercepted in 2013 while smuggling gold and was penalised Rs 75 lakhs. He appealed the penalty before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in 2017, but the Tribunal dismissed the appeal because he had not made the pre‑deposit required under Section 129E of the Customs Act. The

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL GONDIAversusDIVI WORKS & SUPPLIERS, HUF & ORS.

2022 INSC 24428 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Municipal Council of Gondia issued a work order to Divi Works & Suppliers for school furniture, but suspended and later cancelled it due to the COVID‑19 pandemic and a government circular restricting non‑priority expenditure. The original petitioner claimed it had already manufactured the customized goods and sough

PRAVEEN KUMAR C.PversusKERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.

2022 INSC 11228 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

In a miscellaneous application (No. 1769 of 2021) filed in Civil Appeal No. 4846 of 2021, the petitioner sought correction of a typographical error in the cause title of the judgment dated 17‑08‑2021. The judgment incorrectly read the respondent's name as "Kerala Public Service Commission Commission & Ors." The Supreme

ASHISH SHELAR & ORS.versusTHE MAHARASHTRA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY & ANR.

2022 INSC 11628 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, twelve BJP MLAs, were suspended for one year by a resolution of the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly after a heated monsoon session. They challenged the resolution under Articles 14, 21 and 190(4) of the Constitution, arguing that the suspension exceeded the period allowed by Rule 53 of the Assembly Ru

AMAR NATH (DEAD) THROUGH L.R.versusGIAN CHAND AND ORS.

2022 INSC 10628 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Amar Nath, executed a special power of attorney (PoA) on 28‑01‑1987 in favour of the second defendant to sell his land for Rs.55,000. When the first defendant could not pay, the second defendant allegedly returned the PoA on 02‑02‑1987 and the plaintiff claimed it was cancelled, yet no formal notice or r

JARNAIL SINGH & ORSversusLACHHMI NARAIN GUPTA & ORS

2022 INSC 10528 January 2022Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined the legal framework governing reservation in promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under Articles 16(4‑A) and 16(4‑B) of the Constitution. It clarified that the State must collect quantifiable, cadre‑wise data to demonstrate backwardness and inadequate representation, but no fi

THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR.versusK. SUDHEESH KUMAR & ORS.

2022 INSC 11428 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, former Assistant Enforcement Officers, claimed that on their third financial upgradation under the Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme they were entitled to a grade pay of Rs.6600, the grade pay of the next promotional post. The High Court allowed this claim, interpreting the scheme to fo

SUBHASH CHANDER & ORS.versusM/S BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.(BPCL) & ANR.

2022 INSC 10728 January 2022Dismissed

The appellants, owners of a 10,000 sq ft plot in Kaithal, sued the respondents for possession after a lease to Burmah Shell (later transferred to Bharat Petroleum) expired in 1998. The lease had a renewal clause exercised once, and the Central Government, under the Burmah Shell (Acquisition of Undertakings) Act, 1976,

CENTRUM FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITEDversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

2022 INSC 11528 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Centrum Financial Services Ltd., a non‑banking financial company, filed a criminal appeal against the Delhi High Court’s order granting bail to Jayant Kumar Jain (Respondent No.2) in a case involving alleged siphoning of Rs 25 crore through shell companies and offences under IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120

DEEPAK S/O LAXMAN DONGREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2022 INSC 11028 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Deepak Dongre, was ordered to leave District Jalna for two years under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, based on five offences (three dated 2013‑2018 and two from 2020) and confidential witness statements. He challenged the externment order through a statutory appeal and a writ pe

MESSER GRIESHEIM GMBH (NOW CALLED AIR LIQUIDE DEUTSCHLAND GMBH)versusGOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD.

2022 INSC 11328 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Messer Griesheim GmbH (now Air Liquide Deutschland GmbH) obtained a money decree of the English High Court, a superior court of a reciprocating territory, for US $5.8 million. The decree, exceeding Rs 20 lakhs, was filed for execution before the Delhi High Court. The Division Bench held that only a District Court could

MORESHAR S/O YADAORAO MAHAJANversusVYANKATESH SITARAM BHEDI (D) THR. LRS. AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 102727 September 2022Dismissed

The plaintiff, a doctor, rented part of the defendant's house and later entered into an agreement to purchase that portion for Rs 50,000, paying Rs 24,000 and Rs 6,000 and taking possession. The plaintiff sued for specific performance, admitting in the plaint that the suit property was jointly owned by the defendant, h

NEMAI CHANDRA KUMAR (D) THR. LRS. & ORSversusMANI SQUARE LTD. & ORS

2022 INSC 75627 July 2022Dismissed

The appellants leased a property in Calcutta for 20 years from 1973 to 1993 and erected pucca structures on it. After the lease expired, they applied to the Thika Tenancy Controller claiming status as thika tenants under the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949, the 1981 Act and the 2001 Act, seeking land vesting in the St

M/S R. D. JAIN AND CO.versusCAPITAL FIRST LTD. & ORS.

2022 INSC 75427 July 2022Dismissed

The borrower, M/s R.D. Jain & Co., challenged the Bombay High Court’s interpretation that the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) and District Magistrate (DM) under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act are not persona designata and that the terms include their additional counterparts. The secured creditor, Capital First Ltd.

PRAHLADversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.

2022 INSC 75327 July 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The victim Ramesh, who had political enmity with three accused (Mohan, Prahlad and Jagdish), was shot and died in June 1991. The trial court acquitted all three, finding the prosecution evidence insufficient. The High Court reversed the acquittal of Mohan and Prahlad, relying on the sole testimony of an eye‑witness (PW

VIJAY MADANLAL CHOUDHARY & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2022 INSC 75727 July 2022Reference answered

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of most provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA), including the definition of money-laundering, attachment of property, search and seizure, arrest, bail conditions, and burden of proof. The Court interpreted Section 3 to have a wider reach, c

MANOJ PARIHAR & ORS.versusSTATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR & ORS

2022 INSC 65427 June 2022Dismissed

The petitioners, a group of Munsiffs appointed in 2003 by direct recruitment, challenged the High Court's order fixing their inter‑se seniority on the basis of roster points under the Jammu & Kashmir Reservation Rules, 2005. They argued that seniority should be determined by the merit order prepared by the State Public

CHANDRAPALversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH (EARLIER M.P.)

2022 INSC 62927 May 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved the disappearance and subsequent discovery of the decomposed bodies of a young couple, Kumari Brinda and Kanhaiya, who were found hanging from a tree. The prosecution alleged that Chandrapal, the appellant, conspired with others to murder the couple and later staged the deaths as suicides, relying on

RANBIR SINGHversusSK ROY, CHAIRMAN, LIFE INSURANCE CORP. OF INDIA & ANR.

2022 INSC 48427 April 2022Disposed off

The case concerned claims by thousands of Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) workers who had been employed as temporary, badli or part‑time staff between 20 May 1985 and 4 March 1991, seeking regularisation (absorption) under the Srivastav Award and earlier Tulpule and Jamdar Awards. The Supreme Court examined w

NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCILversusMINOSHA INDIA LIMITED

2022 INSC 48627 April 2022Dismissed

NDMC entered into a purchase order with Minosha India Ltd, terminated it for alleged non‑performance and the latter invoked the arbitration clause on 7 June 2016. Before the arbitration could commence, the corporate debtor was admitted to corporate insolvency resolution on 14 May 2018, a moratorium was imposed under Se

RAMJHAN GANI PALANIversusNATIONAL INVESTIGATING AGENCY AND ANR

2022 INSC 48227 April 2022Dismissed

The petitioner was arrested after a joint operation by the Indian Coast Guard and DRI seized over 236 kg of heroin from a Pakistani vessel near Jakhau Port, Gujarat. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, aboard an Indian fishing boat, responded to a VHF call intended for the drug handover, indicating his role as

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD.versusM/S DISCOVERY ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. & ANR.

2022 INSC 48327 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) entered into a contract with Discovery Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (DEPL), a member of the DP Jindal Group, which contained an arbitration clause. ONGC sought to bind Jindal Drilling and Industries Ltd. (JDIL), a non‑signatory affiliate, invoking the group‑of‑companies doctrine, an

K. ARUMUGA VELAIAHversusP.R. RAMASAMY AND ANR.

2022 INSC 10327 January 2022Dismissed

The appellant‑plaintiff, K. Arumuga Velaiyah, claimed a one‑fourth share in ancestral joint family property based on a 1994 will of his grandfather, Periyaiya Servai, and sought partition and separate possession. The lower courts dismissed the suit, holding that a partition had already been effected in 1964 by a pancha

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusR.D. SHARMA AND ANR.

2022 INSC 10127 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The retired Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF) of Madhya Pradesh, who retired in 2001, sought a higher pension by invoking the Indian Forests Service (Pay) Second Amendment Rules, 2008 which created an apex scale of Rs.80,000 for the upgraded post of Head of Forest Force. The Central Administrative Tribunal

SATISH CHANDRA YADAVversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS

2022 INSC 102426 September 2022Dismissed

The appellants, Satish Chandra Yadav and Pushpendra Kumar Yadav, were dismissed from the CRPF while on probation after it was discovered that they had answered "No" to questions about pending criminal cases in the verification Form-25, despite an FIR and subsequent criminal proceedings against them. The Supreme Court h

BALKRISHNA RAMA TARLE DEAD THR LRS & ANRversusPHOENIX ARC PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS

2022 INSC 102226 September 2022Dismissed

The petitioners, legal heirs of the deceased Balkrishna Rama Tarle, claimed tenancy rights over part of a mortgaged property and challenged the District Magistrate's refusal to assist the secured creditor, Phoenix Arc Private Limited, in taking possession under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The magistrate had conditi

JAGDISH PRASAD SAINI & ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

2022 INSC 102326 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, teachers appointed in a grant‑in‑aid school in Rajasthan, were regularised by the Supreme Court but were denied leave‑encashment and gratuity benefits. The High Court held that payment of salary arrears sufficed, ignoring the entitlement to leave encashment and gratuity. On appeal, the Court examined wh

K. MADAN MOHAN RAOversusBHEEMRAO BASWANTHRAO PATIL & ORS.

2022 INSC 102526 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

K. Madan Mohan Rao filed an election petition (No.34/2019) in the Telangana High Court and moved an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC seeking exemption from filing the impugned order. After a prolonged hearing, the High Court pronounced an order on 15 June 2022 allowing the application and rejecting the el

JAGJIT SINGH AND OTHERS ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ETC. ETC

2022 INSC 87626 August 2022Disposed off

The appellants challenged the compensation awarded by the Punjab and Haryana High Court for land acquired by the Greater Mohali Area Development Authority. The High Court had fixed Rs 7,80,000 per acre (or Rs 19,85,700 per acre in one case) relying on its earlier decisions in Kapoor Singh and Surjit Singh. Those earlie

M/S. R.K. INDUSTRIES (UNIT-II) LLPversusM/S. H.R. COMMERCIALS PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHER

2022 INSC 87226 August 2022Disposed off

The corporate debtor, ABG Shipyard Ltd., was placed under liquidation after a failed resolution process. The liquidator conducted five e-auctions without success and then adopted a Swiss Challenge Process, naming R.K. Industries as the anchor bidder. Before the process could conclude, the liquidator, with the approval

MUNUWA @ SATISH ETC.versusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2022 INSC 87426 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

In 1979, the principal of a college, Iqbal Bahadur Saxena, was allegedly shot by three accused while seated with his physician. The FIR, recorded at the police station, and a later statement made in hospital were treated as two dying declarations. The trial court convicted the accused under Sections 302, 307 and 34 of

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANOTHERversusULTRATECH CEMENT LTD

2022 INSC 87126 August 2022Dismissed

The State of Rajasthan sought to overturn a Rajasthan High Court order directing it to allot a parcel of land, classified as a ‘Johad’, to Ultratech Cement Ltd. for a cement plant. The High Court had relied on two spot‑inspection reports of the Tehsildar, which found no natural water body or catch‑ment on the land, and

ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2022 INSC 87526 August 2022Directions issued

The petitioners challenged pre‑election promises of free goods (“freebies”) made by political parties, arguing that such promises strain state finances and violate the spirit of free and fair elections. They sought judicial intervention, contending that the promises amount to corrupt practices under Section 123 of the

SAMAJ PARIVARTANA SAMUDAYA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS

2022 INSC 87326 August 2022Disposed off

The petitioners challenged the lifting of the ceiling limit on iron‑ore production in the Karnataka districts of Bellary, Tumkur and Chitradurga, arguing that removal could lead to unregulated mining and violate inter‑generational equity. The State, the CEC, the Ministry of Steel and mining lease‑holders sought a compl

M.P. MEDICAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATIONversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

2022 INSC 87826 August 2022Case Partly allowed

The M.P. Medical Officers Association challenged the State of Madhya Pradesh's order withdrawing a 2009 circular that had granted higher pay‑scales to specialists and dental specialists, and the subsequent recovery of excess amounts paid under that circular. The High Court Division Bench upheld the withdrawal of the ci

GHULAM HASSAN BEIGHversusMOHAMMAD MAQBOOL MAGREY & ORS.

2022 INSC 75026 July 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Ghulam Hassan Beigh alleged that seven accused formed an unlawful assembly, assaulted him and his family, and caused the death of his wife, whose post‑mortem reported cardio‑respiratory failure. The trial court, after reviewing the medical report and limited oral evidence, discharged the accused of murder

ALL INDIA HAJ UMRAH TOUR ORGANIZER ASSOCIATION MUMBAIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS

2022 INSC 74926 July 2022Dismissed

The petitioners, a consortium of Haj Group Organizers (HGOs) and private tour operators, challenged the levy of service tax/GST on the packages they provide to Indian Haj pilgrims, arguing that the place of supply is outside India and that the Mega Exemption Notification should exempt their services. The Court examined

MBL AND COMPANY LIMITEDversusSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

2022 INSC 62826 May 2022Dismissed

MBL & Co Ltd was found by SEBI’s Whole Time Member (WTM) to have engaged in manipulative self‑trades, placing single‑share buy orders after large sell orders to artificially raise the price of Gujarat NRE Coke Ltd. The WTM barred MBL from trading in its proprietary account for four years under Sections 11, 11(4), 11B a

SHRADDHA GUPTAversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 48126 April 2022Dismissed

The appellant, Shraddha Gupta, was added as an accused in a murder case after call recordings linked her to the crime. A gang chart was prepared and she was charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. She filed a writ petition under Section 482 of the

AKHILESH PRASADversusJHARKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.

2022 INSC 47426 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Cooperative Development Officer appointed under the Scheduled Tribe (ST) category in undivided Bihar, was transferred to the successor State of Jharkhand after the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000. He applied for promotion to Deputy Collector through a limited departmental examination that required a cas

ASSET RECONSTRUCTION CO. (INDIA) LTD.versusCHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY

2022 INSC 47726 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. acquired a defaulted loan from Oriental Bank of Commerce through an assignment agreement that was registered as a single instrument. The deed contained a Schedule 3 draft of a Power of Attorney (PoA) authorising the assignee to sell immovable property, leading the revenue a

SMT. KAITHUAMI [L] THROUGH L.RS.versusSMT. RALLIANI AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 47526 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned the inheritance of property belonging to the late P.S. Dahrawka and his wife Kaithuami under Mizo Customary Law. The appellant, Thansangi Huha, a divorced daughter who returned to care for her aged mother, claimed a share, while the respondents, including the widow Ralliani and the granddaughter L

RATHISH BABU UNNIKRISHNANversusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

2022 INSC 48026 April 2022Dismissed

The appellant, Rathish Babu Unnikrishnan, challenged a summoning order issued under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the ground that the cheques were security instruments for a share buy‑back and not payable on a legally enforceable debt. The Delhi High Court dismissed his petition under Section 482 of

KALYANI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORSversusTHE SULTHAN BATHERY MUNICIPALITY & ORS.

2022 INSC 47826 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, a group of farmers, allowed the Sulthan Bathery Panchayat (later a municipality) to use a portion of their agricultural land for a bypass road on the promise of compensation, which was never paid. No formal acquisition, transfer, or documented voluntary surrender was produced by the Panchayat or the Pub

STATE OF U.P. & ORS.versusVIRENDRA KUMAR & ORS.

2022 INSC 123225 November 2022Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether determining the conditions of service of officers and employees of the Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad (the Board) is a statutory function of the Board under the 1965 Act. It held that the power to fix service conditions vests in the Board and can be exercised only by regulatio

RAM SHARAN CHATURVEDIversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2022 INSC 86625 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a head cashier of a bank branch, was convicted under Sections 201, 380, 435, 457 and 477 read with Section 120B of the IPC for a theft of Rs. six lakh from the bank's safe, based solely on his custody of one set of keys in a dual‑lock system. The trial and High Courts inferred a conspiracy between the ap

BARUN KUMAR & ORSversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.

2022 INSC 86825 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, who qualified the 6th Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Examination 2016 and were appointed after completing probation, challenged the cancellation of their appointments by the High Court, which had held that Paper‑I marks should be excluded from the merit list and that qualifying marks must be met in e

SMT. KATTA SUJATHA REDDY & ANR.versusSIDDAMSETTY INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.& ORS.

2022 INSC 86525 August 2022Disposed off

The purchaser entered into two sale agreements in 1997, paying 90% of the price but failing to pay the remaining 10% within the three‑month period stipulated as essential. After sending two notices in 2000 and 2002, the purchaser filed a suit for specific performance in 2002, which the trial court dismissed as time‑bar

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6versusKHYATI REALTORS PVT. LTD.

2022 INSC 86425 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee, Khyati Realtors Pvt. Ltd., advanced Rs 10 crore to a builder for the purchase of commercial premises, which later stalled and the amount was written off as a bad debt in 2009. The assessee claimed a deduction under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, arguing that the advance was either a business de

UNION OF INDIAversusMAHENDRA SINGH

2022 INSC 74725 July 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India sought to fill 11,952 constable posts in the Railway Protection Force through a written test, requiring candidates to submit application forms in the language they intended to use for the answer sheet. Mahendra Singh filled his application in English but wrote the paragraph on the OMR sheet in Hindi,

KANCHAN KUMARIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.

2022 INSC 74625 July 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The second respondent filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking anticipatory bail for alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 467 and 468. The Patna High Court granted the bail but, in the same order, directed the cancellation of the licence of Kanchan Kumari, the appellant,

MAHANADI COALFIELDS LTD & ANRversusM/S IVRCL AMR JOINT VENTURE

2022 INSC 74825 July 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd., a subsidiary of Coal India Ltd., entered into a contract with IVRCL AMR Joint Venture for road works. The contract contained Clause 15 titled “Settlement of Disputes/Arbitration”, which the respondent invoked to issue a notice of arbitration and later sought appointment of an arbitrator under

SHARDA ASSOCIATESversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

2022 INSC 74525 July 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Sharda Associates insured a JCB excavator with United India Insurance for Rs 13.50 lakhs. While the excavator was being used for road construction, a section of the road collapsed, causing the machine to fall into a ditch, killing two workers and resulting in total loss of the excavator. The insurer denied the claim, i

HARIS MARINE PRODUCTSversusEXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE CORPORATION (ECGC) LIMITED

2022 INSC 47125 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Harish Marine Products (the appellant) purchased a Single Buyer Exposure Policy from Export Credit Guarantee Corporation (ECGC) covering the risk of a foreign buyer’s non‑payment for goods exported between 14‑12‑2012 and 13‑12‑2013. The goods were loaded onto the vessel on 13‑12‑2012 (as per the Bill of Lading) and the

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusBHIM SAIN GOEL AND ORS.

2022 INSC 47225 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) issued a notification under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in 2003, followed by a declaration in 2004 and an award in 2005 for land needed for a road project. The respondents obtained interim stay orders that prevented DDA from taking possession, and later filed a writ petition und

MANIBEN MAGANBHAI BHARIYAversusDISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER DAHOD & ORS.

2022 INSC 47325 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, Anganwadi workers and helpers employed under the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) scheme in Gujarat, sought gratuity benefits under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Gujarat High Court’s Division Bench held that they were not employees and thus ineligible for gratuity, overturning an e

M/S PAHWA PLASTICS PVT. LTD. AND ANRversusDASTAK NGO AND ORS.

2022 INSC 34525 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Pahwa Plastics Pvt. Ltd. and related firms, are MSME manufacturers of formaldehyde that obtained Consent to Establish and Consent to Operate from the Haryana State Pollution Control Board but did not secure prior environmental clearance (EC) as required by the 2006 EIA Notification. The Haryana governme

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusMEGA CORPORATION LIMITED

2022 INSC 34425 March 2022Dismissed

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) restrained Mega Corporation Ltd, a listed radio‑taxi company, from accessing the capital market after observing an unusual surge in its share price and alleged profit manipulation. SEBI issued a show‑cause notice alleging violations of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulen

STATE OF U.P. THR. SECRETARY AND ORS.versusPREM CHOPRA

2022 INSC 34625 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh sought recovery of license fee and interest from Prem Chopra for a retail liquor shop licence for FY 2002-03. Prem Chopra surrendered the licence, was asked to pay the balance, and filed a writ petition which resulted in an interim stay of the recovery proceedings subject to a partial deposit

NKGSB COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITEDversusSUBIR CHAKRAVARTY & ORS.

2022 INSC 23825 February 2022Disposed off

The NKGSB Cooperative Bank, a secured creditor, sought possession of a mortgaged flat after the borrowers defaulted on a loan, invoking Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) appointed an advocate commissioner to take possession of the asset, a move upheld by several High Courts but str

SRI. BENSON GEORGEversusRELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.& ANR.

2022 INSC 23525 February 2022Case Partly allowed

The claimant, a 29‑year‑old bank employee, suffered grievous brain injuries in a motor accident on 01‑01‑2013 and has remained in a permanent coma and bedridden. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 94.37 lakh with 9% interest; the High Court enhanced the compensation to Rs 1.24 crore but reduced the interest

WAHEED-UR-REHMAN PARRAversusUNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU & KASHMIR

2022 INSC 24025 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was charged under the UAPA and related statutes, and the trial court declared five prosecution witnesses as protected under Section 44 of the UAPA and Section 173(6) of the CrPC, sealing their statements. The appellant later sought, under Section 207 of the CrPC, redacted copies of those statements so tha

AJAY GUPTAversusPRAMOD KUMAR SHARMA

2022 INSC 23625 February 2022Dismissed

Ajay Gupta, leading a consortium, was a resolution applicant in the CIRP of B.B. Foods Pvt. Ltd. He sought to amend his resolution plan to uncap CIRP costs and reduce the plan term from 180 to 90 days, but the resolution professional rejected the amendment. The adjudicating authority (NCLT) allowed the amendment and, t

DAYALU KASHYAPversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2022 INSC 9525 January 2022Dismissed

On 11 September 2010, Sub‑Inspector K.S. Singh, acting on information, apprehended Dayalu Kashyap who was carrying ganja in a green polythene bag on a wooden kanwad. The officer served a notice under Section 50 of the NDPS Act, offering Kashyap the choice of being searched by a gazetted officer, a magistrate, or the of

BRIJESH CHANDRA DWIVEDI (DEAD) THR. LRS.versusSANYA SAHAYAK AND ORS.

2022 INSC 9325 January 2022Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a driver in the Indian Army's 12th Battalion, was found to have driven a truck carrying personnel while under the influence of alcohol, resulting in a minor collision with a jeep. A departmental enquiry proved the misconduct and the disciplinary authority dismissed him, a decision affirmed by the appella

INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ANR.versusWATERLINE HOTELS PVT. LTD.

2022 INSC 9025 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Intercontinental Hotels Group (India) and its associate entered into a Hotel Management Agreement (HMA) with Waterline Hotels, which required the latter to pay incentive fees for renovations. Waterline Hotels failed to pay and later terminated the HMA, prompting the petitioners to invoke the arbitration clause and

THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORSversusA NISHANTH GEORGE

2022 INSC 9225 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Railway Board introduced the Safety Related Retirement Scheme (2004) and later the Liberalised Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff (LARSGESS) to allow voluntary retirement of safety staff and appointment of their wards. The scheme was challenged as violative of Articles 14 and 16 and

MANNO LAL JAISWALversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2022 INSC 9725 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant, Manno Lal Jaiswal, filed an FIR alleging that his son was murdered by a group of accused who were named in the FIR and whose statements were recorded on the same day. The Sessions Court rejected the accused's bail applications, but the Allahabad High Court granted bail, erroneously stating that the acc

DELHI COMMISSION FOR PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2022 INSC 9825 January 2022Disposed off

The Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking that pregnant women and lactating mothers be classified as a high‑risk category for COVID‑19 vaccination and that specific measures such as priority slots, a dedicated registry, and modifications to the Co‑WIN portal be i

JOSEPH STEPHEN AND OTHERSversusSANTHANASAMY AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 9625 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether a High Court, exercising revisional jurisdiction under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, can set aside an acquittal and convert it into a conviction. It held that Section 401(3) expressly bars such conversion; the High Court may only remit the case for retrial or rehearin

B.B. PATEL & ORSversusDLF UNIVERSAL LTD

2022 INSC 9125 January 2022Disposed off

The appellants, buyers of apartments from DLF Universal Ltd., entered into an Apartment Buyer Agreement in 1993 promising possession within 2½‑3 years. Possession was delayed and the builder imposed extra charges, leading the buyers to allege unfair trade practice under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (M

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHERversusANSHIKA GOYAL AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 9425 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Punjab, under its 2006 Act, regulates reservations in private health‑science institutions. While its 2018 Sports Policy prescribed a 3% reservation for sports persons, the Government issued an order on 25‑07‑2019 fixing only 1% reservation. The Punjab High Court, via writ of mandamus, directed the State to

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.versusSHIV DUTT SHARMA AND ANR.

2022 INSC 123124 November 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Government of NCT of Delhi appealed a Delhi High Court order that declared a land acquisition lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 because compensation had not been paid, despite the High Court finding that posse

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILA PARISHAD, THANE & ORS.versusSANTOSH TUKARAM TIWARE & ORS.

2022 INSC 122924 November 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Zila Parishad, Thane appointed Santosh Tiware as a driver on a temporary contractual basis in 2010 pending a tender for driver services. Because the tender was delayed, he continued on contract for about nine years. When the tender was finally awarded to a private agency in July 2021, his services were terminated.

PARIVAR SEVA SANSTHAversusAHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

2022 INSC 122424 November 2022Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered appeals by Parivar Seva Sanstha and Bai Gulab Hargovandas Trust seeking exemption from municipal property tax on the ground that their hospitals and clinics are run by charitable trusts. The issue was whether clause (b) of Section 132 of the Gujarat Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, wh

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – 23versusM/S. MANSUKH DYEING AND PRINTING MILLS

2022 INSC 122524 November 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The partnership firm M/s. Mansukh Dyeing and Printing Mills revalued its assets on 1 January 1993, increasing their value by Rs 17.34 crore, and credited the surplus to the partners’ capital accounts in their profit‑sharing ratios. New partners who had contributed only small amounts of capital received large credits, s

V. P. SINGH ETCversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

2022 INSC 132624 November 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal by three college officials charged under Section 306 of the IPC for alleged abetment of suicide after a student, Gaurav Wahi, was suspended and asked to deposit a security amount as part of disciplinary action. The student subsequently committed suicide, sending an SMS to his brothe

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.versusRADHESHYAM & ORS

2022 INSC 122824 November 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh sought to acquire 38.178 hectares of land in Village Sala for rehabilitation of persons displaced by the Sardar Sarovar Dam. The Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation based on low market values, which the landowners challenged, leading the Reference Court to re‑determine ma

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusCITI BANK, N. A.

2022 INSC 131824 August 2022Dismissed

Citi Bank, an authorized dealer under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA), accepted cash in foreign currency into the NRE account of a non‑resident Indian during October 1992‑January 1993. In 2002 the Enforcement Directorate issued a show‑cause notice alleging violations of several FERA provisions, relying

UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. ANDversusADANI POWER (MUNDRA) LIMITED AND ANOTHER

2022 INSC 86224 August 2022Dismissed

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (UHBVNL) and another distribution licensee appealed against the Appellate Tribunal's order granting Adani Power (Mundra) Ltd. carrying cost with compound interest arising from a Change in Law event that required installation of a Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) unit. The appellants

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIAversusSHEETAL JAIDEV VADE & ORS.

2022 INSC 86124 August 2022Disposed off

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) acquired land from private owners and an arbitrator awarded enhanced compensation, which NHAI challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The land owners, instead of filing an execution proceeding, approached the High Court under Article 226

THE STATE OF TRIPURA & ORSversusSMT. ANJANA BHATTACHARJEE & ORS.

2022 INSC 85924 August 2022Case Allowed

The State of Tripura framed the Tripura State Civil Services (Revised Pension) Rules, 2009, wherein Rule 3(3) provided that revised pension would be computed notionally from 1 January 2006 but the actual financial benefit would be payable only from 1 January 2009. A group of pensioners, led by Smt. Anjana Bhattacharjee

PUSHPENDRA KUMAR SINHAversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2022 INSC 86024 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an Executive Engineer of the Jharkhand State Electricity Board (JSEB), was accused of financial irregularities and fraud in connection with the implementation of an arbitration award favoring Ramjee Power Construction Limited (RPCL). The prosecution alleged that he prepared an agenda for appointing an ar

RAJBIR SINGHversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB

2022 INSC 85824 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Rajbir Singh, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly poisoning his neighbour's wife by mixing organophosphorus into milk he supplied. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including a loan motive, alleged pronote, and chemical reports indicating poison in milk and viscera. The Sup

RAVINDER SINGH CHANAversusKHANNA PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURES PVT. LTD.

2022 INSC 131924 August 2022Disposed off

The appellant, a homebuyer, paid Rs.21.18 lakh to the respondent for the construction of a flat, which remained incomplete beyond the presumed two‑year period. The Madhya Pradesh State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission ordered the respondent to refund the entire amount with 9% simple interest and a modest litigatio

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE VADODARAversusM/S JYOTI LIMITED AND ORS.

2022 INSC 85724 August 2022Dismissed

M/s Jyoti Ltd, a manufacturer of mechanical and electrical goods, performed installation, erection, commissioning and related civil works at customers' sites in addition to selling goods. The Revenue claimed that these activities amounted to "consulting engineer" services and demanded service tax for the period July 19

ST. MARY’S EDUCATION SOCIETY & ANR.versusRAJENDRA PRASAD BHARGAVA & ORS.

2022 INSC 85624 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The private unaided minority school St. Mary's Education Society terminated the services of its non‑teaching employee, Rajendra Prasad Bhargava, after a disciplinary enquiry. Bhargava filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to set aside the termination and the disciplinary committee's order.

ZAKIR ABDUL MIRAJKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2022 INSC 85524 August 2022Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra alleged that the appellants were members of an organized crime syndicate operating the illegal "Mumbai Matka" gambling network. Police raided a gambling den, recorded confessions of several accused, including the appellants, by an Additional Superintendent of Police (Addl. SP) under Section 18

MANOJ PRATAP SINGHversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

2022 INSC 65224 June 2022Dismissed

Manoj Pratap Singh was convicted of kidnapping, raping and murdering a seven-and-a-half-year-old mentally and physically disabled girl. The prosecution proved its case through a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, including DNA matches, blood‑stained clothing, the victim’s body recovered at the appellant’s direc

ZAKIA AHSAN JAFRIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

2022 INSC 65324 June 2022Dismissed

The case arises from the 2002 Gujarat riots following the Godhra train burning incident, in which the appellant's husband was killed in the Gulberg Society massacre. The appellant filed a complaint alleging a larger criminal conspiracy at the highest level of the state government, including the then Chief Minister, to

MAMTA & ANRversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR

2022 INSC 62624 May 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The second respondent was charged with kidnapping and murdering a 13‑year‑old child for ransom, with the trial ongoing since 2014. The Delhi High Court granted him bail, a decision challenged by the parents of the deceased and the State. The Supreme Court examined whether bail under Section 439 of the CrPC was appropri

M/S RAVI RANJAN DEVELOPERS PVT. LTDversusADITYA KUMAR CHATTERJEE

2022 INSC 129924 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The parties entered into a development agreement for a property in Muzaffarpur, Bihar, which contained an arbitration clause stating that the arbitrators' sittings would be in Kolkata. After a dispute arose, the respondent filed an arbitration petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 i

M/S. VAISHNO ENTERPRISESversusHAMILTON MEDICAL AG & ANR.

2022 INSC 34124 March 2022Dismissed

Vaishno Enterprises, a consultancy firm, entered into two consulting agreements with Hamilton Medical AG, a Swiss ventilator manufacturer, the second on 24‑08‑2020. Vaishno registered as an MSME on 28‑08‑2020, after the contract was executed. When a payment dispute arose, Vaishno approached the Micro and Small Medium E

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERSversusR.J. PATHAN AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 34224 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents were initially appointed on a fixed‑term contractual basis for eleven months as drivers in a temporary "Post‑Earthquake Redevelopment Programme" project. When the project closed, the Gujarat Government placed them with the Indian Red Cross Society, which they rejected and filed a writ petition for regul

DINESH CHANDRA SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2022 INSC 33924 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Dinesh Chandra Shukla, had been engaged as a guest lecturer teaching Karm Kand in the Department of Sanskrit of Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapeeth University. When the University advertised a permanent Lecturer post in Karm Kand, the Selection Committee recommended him, but the Executive Council objected on

GAURAV KUMAR BANSALversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2022 INSC 34324 March 2022Disposed off

The Union of India filed an interlocutory application seeking modification of the Supreme Court's earlier orders on ex‑gratia compensation for families of COVID‑19 victims, arguing that the absence of an outer time limit could lead to endless and fraudulent claims. Over 7,38,610 claims had been received, raising concer

MUKESH KUMAR & ANRversusTHE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2022 INSC 22924 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Jagdish Harijan, an Indian Railways employee, died leaving a son, Mukesh Kumar, born of his second wife. The Railway Board circular barred children of a second wife from receiving compassionate appointments, leading to the denial of Mukesh's application. The appellant challenged this denial, arguing it violated constit

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANKversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2022 INSC 23024 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Excise Commissioner ordered the confiscation of land, building, plant and machinery of Rathi Ispat Ltd. (RIL) under Rule 173Q(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 in 2007, even though that rule had been omitted from the statute by a 2000 notification. RIL had earlier mortgaged the same assets to Punjab Nati

STATE OF ODISHA & ORS.versusM/S PANDA INFRAPROJECT LIMITED

2022 INSC 23224 February 2022Disposed off

The State of Odisha blacklisted M/s Panda Infraproject Ltd. after a high‑level inquiry found the contractor responsible for the collapse of a ten‑metre flyover slab that killed one person and injured eleven. The contractor was served a detailed show‑cause notice, replied, and was subsequently debarred under the Orissa

AJAYA KUMAR DAS & ANRversusDIVISIONAL MANAGER & ANR

2022 INSC 8724 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Ajaya Kumar Das, a labourer, suffered an accident in 2000 that left him 85% permanently disabled. The Workmen's Compensation Commissioner awarded him Rs 2,78,926 with 12% interest from the date of the accident. The insurer appealed to the Orissa High Court more than 600 days after the award, and the High Court dismisse

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search