Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Indian Evidence Act, 1872

2,299 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act — showing 601–800.

A. DEIVENDRANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

1997 INSC 70321 October 1997Disposed off

The case involved a dacoity and murder where five accused were committed to the Sessions Court; one accused, MR, was granted pardon by the Chief Judicial Magistrate after commitment and examined as an approver. The Supreme Court held that after a case is committed to a Sessions Court, only that Court can grant pardon u

RAJESH & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2023 INSC 83921 September 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the kidnapping and murder of 15‑year‑old Ajit Pal, for which three relatives – Rajesh Yadav, Raja Yadav and Om Prakash Yadav – were convicted and sentenced to death (two of them) and life imprisonment based largely on circumstantial evidence and confessions recorded before they were formally accused.

RITESH TEWARI & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2010 INSC 62921 September 2010Dismissed

The original landholders, whose holdings exceeded the ceiling under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, were assessed as surplus and transferred a major portion of the land to Mayur Sahkari Awas Samiti in 1982. The Act deemed such surplus land vested in the State, but the authorities never took physical

RAMMI @ RAMESHWAR ETC.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1999 INSC 42821 September 1999Dismissed

The appellants, Rammi alias Rameshwar and Bhura alias Sajjan Kumar, were charged with murder of Sardar Singh Thakur inside a moving bus, allegedly as revenge for a prior killing. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the bus driver, the conductor, and a passenger, as well as weapons recovered under Section 27 of t

VINAYAK ETC.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1984 INSC 17421 September 1984Disposed off

Seven persons were tried for a series of murders allegedly committed as part of a criminal conspiracy under s.302 read with s.120B IPC, and for murder under s.302 read with s.34 IPC. The trial court acquitted all of them of the conspiracy charge but convicted two of them (accused 1 and 6) for the murder of Malan. The H

SYED BASHEER AHMEDversusM/S TINNI LABORATORIES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.

2025 INSC 103021 August 2025Rejected

Syed Basheer Ahmed filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement concerning two parcels of land. The trial court found the plaintiff ready to pay the balance consideration and decreed specific performance. The High Court reversed this decision, holding that the agreement showed a material alteration—differe

RAM BADAN SHARMAversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2006 INSC 52821 August 2006Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the case of Ram Badan Sharma and his father-in‑law, who were accused of killing their daughter‑in‑law Sanju Kumari by poisoning her after persistent demands for a colour TV, a motorcycle and cash. The prosecution proved that the accused repeatedly demanded dowry, harassed and beat the victim,

VASANTKUMAR RADHAKISAN VORAversusBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF BOMBAY

1990 INSC 24121 August 1990Dismissed

V. R. Vora, a tenant of a room owned by the Bombay Port Trust, was served a quit notice under Section 106 read with Section 111(h) of the Transfer of Property Act, terminating his lease effective 28 February 1975. While the notice period was running, the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 (a Central Act) was applied to the Po

NIRMAL SINGH PEHLWAN @ NIMMAversusINSPECTOR, CUSTOMS, CUSTOMS HOUSE, PUNJAB

2011 INSC 51321 July 2011

During a joint operation in January 1999, Nirmal Singh was apprehended and offered a choice to be searched before a magistrate or a gazetted officer under Section 50 of the ND PS Act. He chose a gazetted officer, and a search uncovered two kilograms of heroin; he also made a confession to a customs officer under Sectio

RAMESH DUTI & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

2009 INSC 92921 July 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, members of the managing committee of Shastri Memorial School, obtained a civil decree for possession of a plot of land and later sold a portion of it, after which a First Information Report (FIR) was lodged alleging cheating and offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC. The ap

INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TAMIL NADUversusBALAPRASANNA

2008 INSC 85021 July 2008Dismissed

The case involved the murder of Mayurani, a Sri Lankan student, and the conviction of Balaprasanna under Section 302 IPC based primarily on circumstantial evidence and confessional statements that led to the recovery of various items. The prosecution relied on statements made by the accused while in custody, invoking S

CHITTAR LALversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2003 INSC 32521 July 2003Dismissed

The appellant Chittar Lal was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for killing Lattor Lal. The sole surviving eyewitness, PW3, was not named in the FIR, and two other eyewitnesses turned hostile during trial. The appellant argued that conviction could not rest on a single witness whose name was omitted from the FI

THE STATE OF PUNJABversusBALDEV SINGH

1999 INSC 28221 July 1999Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a batch of appeals concerning searches under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. It held that an empowered officer must inform a suspect of his right to be searched before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, and that this duty is imperative, not merely directory. Failure t

STATE OF PUNJABversusKEWAL KRISHAN

2023 INSC 58321 June 2023Dismissed

The State of Punjab appealed the High Court's acquittal of Kewal Krishan, who had been convicted for murder under Section 302 IPC. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence: the deceased was last seen with the accused on 10‑12‑1998, the body was discovered on 12‑12‑1998, an alleged extra‑judicial confession to

SHAIKAH BAKSHU AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2007 INSC 71621 June 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Rubina, a married woman, died from severe burn injuries allegedly caused by her husband, sister‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law who were charged under IPC s.302 read with s.34 and s.498‑A. The trial court and the Bombay High Court convicted the accused primarily on two dying declarations recorded within a short i

KRISHNA & ANRversusSTATE OF U.P

2007 INSC 72021 June 2007Dismissed

Krishna, Kaira and Sumera borrowed money from Chunua Chamar and later denied the debt. When the deceased went to lodge a police complaint, the accused assaulted him with lathis, causing his death. The trial court convicted them of murder, attempt to murder and assault under Sections 302, 307 and 323 IPC, and the High C

PARVATHI NAIRTHI (DEAD) AND ORS.versusLAXMI NAIRTHY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.

2026 INSC 52121 May 2026Dismissed

The testator B. Sheena Nairi executed a Will on 15 May 1983 bequeathing all his immovable properties to his sister Laxmi Nairthy, cancelling an earlier Power of Attorney in favour of his brother‑in‑law. After his death, his wife applied for mutation of the properties in her name, but the sister filed a suit seeking dec

MD. JAMILUDIN NASIRversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2015 INSC 31621 May 2014Disposed off

The case concerns a pre‑planned terrorist attack on the police guarding the American Centre in Calcutta on 22 January 2002, which resulted in five police deaths and multiple injuries. The accused, including Md. Jamiludin Nasir and Aftab Ahmed Ansari, were convicted under the waging‑war provisions of the IPC and various

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusDAL SINGH & ORS.

2013 INSC 35221 May 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the alleged murder of Kusum Rani, who was burnt alive by her parents‑in‑law. The prosecution relied primarily on the victim’s dying declaration recorded by an executive magistrate and a thumb impression on the FIR, along with medical evidence of 100 % burns. The High Court acquitted the accused, hold

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusDARSHAN SINGH @ DARSHAN LAL

2012 INSC 24121 May 2012Dismissed

The State of Rajasthan convicted Darshan Singh for murder under Section 302 IPC based on the testimony of Geeta, a deaf‑and‑dumb eyewitness, whose statement was recorded in sign language through her father who acted as interpreter. The High Court set aside the conviction, holding that the witness and the interpreter we

DAKKATA BALARAM REDDY & ANRversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR.

2023 INSC 41121 April 2023

The appellants, Dakkata Balaram Reddy and Chinapana Gopi, were convicted for the murder of Vetcha Kesava Rao's son and wife and for robbery of gold ornaments and cash, based largely on circumstantial evidence and the recovery of stolen property from their possession. The prosecution presented testimony of three indepen

DEVENDER SINGH & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2022 INSC 45721 April 2022Case Partly allowed

The deceased Sushila, married to Devender Singh, went missing six months after her marriage and her body was later recovered from a river. The prosecution alleged that she was subjected to dowry harassment, including a demand for Rs.2 lakh or a house, and that she died from injuries before falling into the river, const

STATE OF M.P.versusLAAKHAN @ LAKHAN

2009 INSC 56921 April 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed a High Court order acquitting Lakhhan, who had been convicted by a trial court for the murder of a nine‑month‑old child under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The trial court relied on the testimony of an informant (PW‑1), deeming it cogent and credible. The High Court s

MUKHTIAR AHMED ANSARIversusSTATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI)

2005 INSC 22421 April 2005Appeal(s) allowed

Mukhtiar Ahmed Ansari was convicted under TADA (Sec. 5) and the Arms Act (Sec. 25(IB)) for allegedly possessing firearms and ammunition in a notified area after being arrested near Delhi's Bahai Temple in 1993. He had earlier been acquitted of the related kidnapping charge. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether

PUNJAB AND SIND BANK AND ANR.versusS. RANVEER SINGH BAWA AND ANR.

2004 INSC 29621 April 2004Appeal(s) allowed

Punjab and Sind Bank introduced a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) in December 2000. Respondent No.1, Ranveer Singh Bawa, opted for the scheme on 6‑12‑2000 but requested to withdraw his option on 22‑12‑2000. The bank, relying on clause 10.4, refused the withdrawal and relieved him of service on 29‑01‑2001. The respond

RAM BIHARI YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

1998 INSC 19121 April 1998Dismissed

The appellant, a police officer, was convicted under IPC s.302 for allegedly setting his wife on fire and under s.377 for sodomy. The sole evidence of his guilt was the victim's dying declaration recorded by a Judicial Magistrate, which the defence argued was inadmissible because it was not in question‑answer form, lac

K.M. SINGHversusSECRETARY, ASSOCIATION OF INDIAN UNIVERSITIES AND OTHERS

1992 INSC 11021 April 1992Dismissed

K.M. Singh, a finance officer of the Association of Indian Universities, sued to declare that his resignation was obtained by fraud, coercion and duress. He offered that if two officials of the respondent took a special oath in a Gurudwara and a temple stating the resignation was not extracted under duress, the relevan

SUNDAR @ SUNDARRAJANversusSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2023 INSC 26421 March 2023Disposed off

The petitioner, Sundar, was convicted of kidnapping and murdering a seven‑year‑old child and sentenced to death by the trial court, a decision affirmed by the High Court and the Supreme Court. He filed a review petition alleging errors in the evidence, especially the admissibility of call‑detail records (CDRs) without

OM PRAKASH & ANR.versusMISHRI LAL (DEAD) REPRESENTED BY HIS LR. SAVITRI DEVI

2017 INSC 24521 March 2017Appeal(s) allowed

Om Prakash and another, joint owners of a property, filed an eviction suit under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 against Mishri Lal (deceased) represented by his legal heirs. The tenants admitted tenancy under the appellants' grandmother but denied the appellants as landlor

IBRAHIM MUSA CHAUHAN @ BABA CHAUHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2013 INSC 18021 March 2013Dismissed

The Supreme Court reviewed a series of criminal appeals arising from the 1993 Bombay serial blasts, all tried under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA). The appeals concerned convictions for offences such as unauthorised possession of arms and explosives (s.3(3), s.5, s.6 TADA), conspi

SANJAY DUTT (A-117)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH CBI (STF), BOMBAY

2013 INSC 18221 March 2013Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a series of appeals arising from the Designated Court's judgments in the 1993 Bombay bomb blast case under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA). The Court held that confessional statements recorded under Section 15 of TADA are substantive evidence admissible a

VIRUPAKSHAYYA SHANKARAYYAversusNEELAKANTA SHIVACHARYA PATIADADEVARU

1995 INSC 19221 March 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent‑plaintiff sought possession of a math (public trust) claiming to be the valid Padadayya, challenging the installation of earlier Padadayyas. An earlier proceeding before the Privy Council had held that Shivalingayya was validly nominated and installed, a decision the plaintiff was not a party to. The Sup

RANBIR YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR

1995 INSC 19321 March 1995Dismissed

The case involved three Yadav appellants convicted for rioting, arson and murder during communal violence in Bihar in 1985. The appellants challenged the High Court’s transfer of the trial from the 10th to the 5th Sessions Court, arguing that the transfer was beyond its jurisdiction and amounted to a de novo trial viol

MANGAMMAVVA @ NESE YESODAMMA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1995 INSC 19621 March 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the murder trial of three inter‑related accused (two sisters, A‑1 and A‑2, and the husband of a younger sister, A‑3) who were convicted for killing a devotee, Ramakoti Reddy, based largely on the testimony of a single maid‑servant (PW‑1) and a disputed letter. The Court found PW‑1’s evidence

M.O. SHAMSUDHINversusSTATE OF KERALA.

1995 INSC 19721 March 1995Dismissed

The appellants, a Tehsildar and a Village Assistant, were convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC for demanding a bribe in a land‑patta case. The main issue was whether the testimony of the bribe‑giver, who was an accomplice, required corroboration before a conviction could be sustained. The Supreme Co

RAJ KUMAR KARWALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 9821 March 1990Dismissed

The Department of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) intercepted a truck carrying a large quantity of hashish and, during the investigation, obtained confessional statements from Raj Kumar Karwal and Kirpal Mohan Virmani. The appellants argued that these statements should be excluded under Section 25 of the Evidence Act becaus

M. VIJAYAKUMARversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2024 INSC 17721 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, M. Vijayakumar, was convicted under IPC sections 306, 342 and 365 for allegedly kidnapping and wrongfully confining the deceased, leading to the latter's suicide. The prosecution argued that the appellant’s abduction and confinement forced the victim to commit suicide, thereby satisfying the elements of

MAHENDRANversusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

2019 INSC 24821 February 2019Dismissed

In March 1994 a group of caste Hindus attacked the hut of Murugaiyan, the father‑in‑law of PW1, setting it alight and assaulting him with sickles, resulting in his death. The prosecution relied on the testimony of PW1, PW2, PW3 and PW5, along with medical evidence, to identify twenty‑four accused; the trial court convi

THE STATE OF A.P. & ORS.versusM/S. STAR BONE MILL & FERTILISER CO.

2013 INSC 11621 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Andhra Pradesh (appellant) challenged a civil suit filed by Mis. Star Bone Mill & Fertiliser Co. (respondent) seeking declaration of title over a 3.525‑acre land. The respondent relied on a registered sale deed dated 11‑Nov‑1959 executed by M/s A. Allauddin & Sons, who were merely lessees of the State sinc

REKHA SENGARversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2021 INSC 3721 January 2021Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered a Special Leave Petition filed by Rekha Sengar seeking bail under Section 439 of the CrPC after being charged in a non‑bailable offence under the PC&PNDT Act for alleged prenatal sex determination and sex‑selective abortion. A sting operation led to the seizure of an unregistered ultrasound

PAULversusSTATE OF KERALA

2020 INSC 6921 January 2020Dismissed

Paul was married to Jessy and was accused of cruelty and of causing her death. The trial court initially acquitted him, but the Kerala High Court set aside the acquittal, remanded the case for further examination under Section 313 Cr.PC, and the trial court subsequently convicted him under Section 302 IPC, sentencing h

VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2015 INSC 95621 January 2015Dismissed

Vinod Kumar, an octroi inspector, was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.500. The prosecution relied on the recovery of the tainted notes, the testimony of an independent clerk (PW‑6), a shadow witness (PW‑7) who was later declared ho

RABINDRA KUMAR PAL @ DARA SINGHversusREPUBLIC OF INDIA

2011 INSC 6321 January 2011Dismissed

The case concerns the 1999 arson and murder of Australian missionary Graham Staines and his two sons by a mob in Orissa. The trial court convicted fourteen accused, sentencing Dara Singh (A‑1) to death and the others to life imprisonment; the High Court modified Dara Singh's sentence to life imprisonment and acquitted

SAMITTRI DEVI AND ANR.versusSAMPURAN SINGH AND ANR.

2011 INSC 6121 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Samitiri Devi (appellant) purchased a house in 1985 with her own funds, but the sale deed was executed in the names of her son and brother‑in‑law. They later sold half of the property to Sampuran Singh (respondent No.1) on 13‑April‑1987 without her consent, despite a notice she had posted on 8‑April‑1987 informing him

SHIVA KARAM PAYASWAMI TEWARIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2009 INSC 5021 January 2009Case Partly allowed

Shiva Karam Payaswami Tewari, employed at Hotel Premier, got into a sudden quarrel with the manager Muttukumar and struck him with a wooden log, causing Muttukumar's death. The accused made an extra‑judicial confession to a friend, admitting the incident. The trial court convicted him under IPC sections 302, 321 and 20

RANVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF M.P.

2009 INSC 5221 January 2009Dismissed

The appellant, Ranveer Singh, and his son Munnu were involved in a violent incident where the son shot and killed Lalita, the sister of the complainant, after the father allegedly instructed him to fetch a revolver. The trial court convicted the father under Section 302 IPC read with Section 109 (or Section 34) and sen

VIKAS & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2008 INSC 7221 January 2008Dismissed

The appellant Vikas and others were convicted for murder and conspiracy under Sections 302, 342 and 34 of the IPC based primarily on two dying declarations of the victim, Rekha, recorded by a Special Judicial Magistrate and a Police Sub‑Inspector. The victim's father and a Panch witness, who turned hostile, were disreg

CHACKO @ ANIYAN KUNJU AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2004 INSC 4821 January 2004Case Partly allowed

Four accused assaulted Kuttappan with the handles of an axe, spade and an iron rod at night, causing injuries mainly on non‑vital parts and a single fatal head wound. The trial court convicted them of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34, a decision affirmed by the Kerala High Court. On appeal, the Supreme Cou

QUAMARUL ISLAMversusS.K. KANTA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 2021 January 1994

The returned candidate Quamarul Islam contested the 1989 Karnataka Assembly election and was challenged by his rival S.K. Kanta on alleged corrupt practices under Sections 123(2), (3), (3A) and (4) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, including religious appeals and false statements. The High Court set aside

PRADUMANSINH KALUBHAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1992 INSC 2021 January 1992Dismissed

Pradumansinh Kalubha was accused of stabbing Harijan painter Keshav Uka after a collision at Piplawala Chowk, leading to Uka's death. The trial court acquitted Kalubha, finding the prosecution story implausible, but the Gujarat High Court reversed the acquittal, convicting him under IPC Section 304 Part II and sentenci

STATE OF GUJARATversusGANPATRAM SON OF AMRAJI VISHNOI (DHAYAL)

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittal of Ganpatram Vishnoi and another accused under Sections 17(b) and 22(b) of the NDPS Act, arguing that the trial court failed to appreciate the prosecution's oral and documentary evidence. The police had intercepted the accused, seized 500 g of opium, and recorded the seizure

STATE OF GUJARATversusCHHATRASING JETUSING @ SADRUBHA JETHUJI THAKORE

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of twelve accused in a murder‑related case, alleging that the trial court had ignored substantial oral and documentary evidence. The incident involved the death of Siddharajsing after a midnight assault allegedly orchestrated by the accused over a land dispute. The pr

HIRJI JADVA VARSANIversusPINDORIYA & CO.

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The plaintiff, Hirji Jadva Varsani, entered into a subcontract with Pindoriya & Co. for constructing police quarters and later sued for Rs 5,06,029 including interest, alleging unpaid security deposit, outstanding bills and interest. The trial court, after hearing evidence, decreed only Rs 35,096 with 6% interest, find

HEIRS OF MAHANT DAYARAMDAS- BAI PADMA WD/O DAYARAMDAS (DELETED)versusCHARITY COMMISSIONER

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The Gujarat High Court examined a protracted dispute over the Narsinhji Temple Trust, determining whether the temple and its surrounding lands constitute a public trust or private property of the Mahants. The court considered the validity of multiple First Appeals (77/1979, 478/1979, and 4206/2024) and civil applicatio

BHARATBHAI MAGJIBHAI PATELversusCHUNILAL MERVANBHAI PATEL

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The plaintiffs, Bharatbhai Magjibhai Patel and others, filed a suit seeking a declaration and permanent injunction against Chunilal Mervanbhai Patel and others, claiming ownership of a 3‑acre‑36‑guntha land in Panikhadak and alleging the defendants were attempting to trespass. The trial court dismissed the suit, holdin

RUSHABH DHARAMSHI GADAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rushabh Dharmshi Gada, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR C.R. No. I-11191011260065/2026. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the alleged offences. The court examined factors s

TARJUBHAI VEHLABHAI NAIKAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The appellant, Tarjubhai Vehlabhai Naika, appealed his conviction for murder (IPC Sec. 302) and assault (IPC Sec. 504) sentenced to life imprisonment. He argued that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, that the key eyewitnesses were relatives of the deceased and thus unreliable, that the a

DHANJI BHIMJI AHIRversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The appellant, Dhanji Bhimji Ahir (accused No.2), filed a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order of the Additional Sessions Judge that rejected his discharge application under Section 227. The case arose from the alleged murder and arson of Pratapbhai Bhimjibhai Damor in 200

STATE OF GUJARATversusBALDEVBHAI BUDHAJI DHULAJI CHAUHAN (THAKOR)

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The appellant, Baldevbhai Budhaji Dhulaji Chauhan, was convicted of double murder under Sections 302 and 201 IPC and sentenced to death. The trial court relied on circumstantial evidence, including a disputed reconstruction panchnama, a hostile witness statement that the accused was last seen with a bag, alleged discov

BALDEVBHAI BUDHAJI DHULAJI CHOUHAN (THAKORE)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The appellant, Baldevbhai Budhaji Dhulaji Chauhan, was convicted of double murder under Sections 302 and 201 IPC and sentenced to death. The trial court relied on circumstantial evidence, including a disputed reconstruction panchnama, a hostile witness statement that the accused was last seen with a bag, alleged discov

STATE OF GUJARATversusSANJAY CHINTAMANI MISHRA

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The State of Gujarat filed a criminal revision against the Principal Sessions Judge, Navsari, who had allowed a copy of a dying declaration (Exhibit Mark 8/12) to be admitted only for the purpose of verifying signatures, not its contents, because the original document was unavailable. The State argued that the Sessions

SANDIPKUMAR SURESHBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The appellant Sandeepkumar Patel was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for stabbing Mazharkhan Pathan in a hotel room. The prosecution presented a chain of circumstantial evidence, including the hotel register, eyewitness testimony, and detailed medical findings of multiple fatal injuries. The defence argued th

KHORBAN @ KURBAL @ DINESH @ SARDAR LALUBHAI NAYAKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The appellant Khorban was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for murder under Section 302 IPC based largely on the testimony of hostile witnesses and statements recorded by the investigating officer under Sections 161 and 162 CrPC. The High Court examined the post‑mortem report confirming homicidal death but fo

STATE OF GUJARATversusHARDEVBHAI CHANDUBHAI VINZUDA

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The State appealed the acquittal of four accused who were charged with murder under Sections 302 read with 34 IPC and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. The Sessions Court had acquitted them on the ground that the sole eye‑witness, a close friend of the victim, was unreliable, there was no independent corroboration,

BHARATBHAI RANABHAI MAKWANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The State appealed the acquittal of four accused who were charged with murder under Sections 302 read with 34 IPC and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. The Sessions Court had acquitted them on the ground that the sole eye‑witness, a close friend of the victim, was unreliable, there was no independent corroboration,

MUKESHBHAI GORCHANDBHAI CHAMKAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

Mukeshbhai Gorchandbhai Chamka was convicted by the Sessions Court for raping and murdering a 13‑year‑old girl during a village marriage ceremony. The prosecution presented a chain of circumstantial evidence including eyewitness testimony of the victim being forcibly taken, forensic reports linking the appellant’s bloo

BHARTIBEN W/O GUNESHBHAI PREMJIBHAI GAMITversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The appellant Bhartiben was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly strangling her husband with a nylon string and inflicting abdominal injuries. The conviction rested primarily on an extrajudicial confession she allegedly made before the village sarpanch and the recovery of the nylon string, which the

STATE OF GUJARATversusPARMAR GANGABEN W.O. CHHAGANBHAI BHOJABHAI

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The case concerns the murder of Sureshbhai Raval, who was attacked with swords by accused Chhaganbhai Bhojabhai Parmar and Dashrathbhai Ambalal Raval, leading to his death; a third accused, Gangaben, was also present and assaulted the complainant. The trial court convicted the first two under Section 302 read with Sect

PARMAR CHHAGANBHAI BHOJABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The case concerns the murder of Sureshbhai Raval, who was attacked with swords by accused Chhaganbhai Bhojabhai Parmar and Dashrathbhai Ambalal Raval, leading to his death; a third accused, Gangaben, was also present and assaulted the complainant. The trial court convicted the first two under Section 302 read with Sect

GUDDUKUMAR MADHESH YADAVversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

44-PARTLY ALLOWED @ FH

The accused, Guddu Kumar Madhesh Yadav, was convicted of kidnapping, raping and murdering a two‑and‑a‑half‑year‑old girl, offences punishable under Sections 302, 363, 366, 342, 376(A), 376(AB) and related provisions of the IPC and the POCSO Act. The Special POCSO Court sentenced him to death for the rape‑murder and to

STATE OF GUJARATversusGUDDUKUMAR MADHESH YADAV

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The State of Gujarat sought confirmation of a death sentence imposed on Guddu Kumar Madhesh Yadav for the rape and murder of a two‑and‑half‑year‑old girl. The Special POCSO Court had convicted the accused under multiple sections of the IPC and the POCSO Act, imposing death for offences under Sections 302, 376(A) and 37

RAVAL SHAILESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI VIRCHANDBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

44-PARTLY ALLOWED @ FH

The appellant was convicted of murder (Section 302 IPC) for stabbing his relative during a sudden quarrel, based on medical evidence, post‑mortem report, and dying declarations linking him to the injuries. He appealed, arguing the incident was a heat‑of‑passion assault without pre‑meditation, invoking Exception 4 to Se

AMARATBHAI @ KEVABHAI AAHAJI (DABHI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The appellant, Amarat @ Kevabhai Aahaji, was convicted of murdering his wife Tinaben after she was stabbed multiple times in the night of 5 January 2015. The prosecution’s case rested primarily on the testimony of the 9‑year‑old son, Nilesh, who identified his father as the assailant, and on medical evidence showing fa

ZALA RANJANBEN NILAYBHAIversusJAYESHKUMAR HARMANBHAI PATHIYAR

44-PARTLY ALLOWED @ FH

The appellants, heirs of a deceased scooterist, appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award that held the scooterist 20% contributory negligent and the driver of a Maruti Eeco 80% negligent, awarding Rs 12,40,532 after deduction. The High Court examined the evidentiary basis, noting the panchnama showed front‑end d

PINTUBHAI @ KALIO DOLUBHAI VASAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The appellants, Ajaybhai and Pintubhai Vasava, were convicted of murder (Sec. 302 r/w 114 IPC) and a police act offence (Sec. 135 Gujarat Police Act) for the killing of Parvatiben, based solely on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution relied on the "last seen together" testimony of two villagers, recovery of a blood

AJAYBHAI @ BODKO RAMESHBHAI VASAVAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The appellants, Ajaybhai and Pintubhai Vasava, were convicted of murder (Sec. 302 r/w 114 IPC) and a police act offence (Sec. 135 Gujarat Police Act) for the killing of Parvatiben, based solely on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution relied on the "last seen together" testimony of two villagers, recovery of a blood

STATE OF GUJARATversusRAMESHBHAI BACHUBHAI VAIDHUKIYA

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The appellant, Ramesh Bachubhai Vadhukiya, was convicted and sentenced to death for the rape and murder of a three‑year‑old girl. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, a pan‑shop owner’s testimony, CCTV footage, and DNA analysis linking the accused’s clothing to the victim. The defence argued that the iden

RAMESHBHAI BACHUBHAI VAIDHUKIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The appellant, Ramesh Bachubhai Vadhukiya, was convicted and sentenced to death for the rape and murder of a three‑year‑old girl. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, a pan‑shop owner’s testimony, CCTV footage, and DNA analysis linking the accused’s clothing to the victim. The defence argued that the iden

MAHESH NATUBHAI GAMITversusCHHAGANBHAI RESHIABHAI THROUGH HEIRS AND L.R.

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The appellants challenged a judgment that had set aside a trial court decree declaring a 1986 Will executed by their grandfather Reshiabhai void on grounds of lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence. The trial court had found the Will fraudulent but dismissed the suit for jurisdictional reasons; the appellate

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusPRITESH KRISHNAKUMAR PANDYA

44-PARTLY ALLOWED @ FH

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 44,89,530 to the heirs of a deceased motorcyclist, holding the driver of the other motorcycle solely negligent. United India Insurance Company, insurer of the negligent driver, appealed, contending that the deceased motorcyclist also contributed to the accident and that the

IMTIAZHUSSEIN @ BHAYLU MOHAMMED SIRAJ KHOKHARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The appellant, Imtiyazhusen alias Bhaylu, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly pouring kerosene on Habibunnisha and setting her ablaze, resulting in her death. The conviction was based primarily on three dying declarations made by the deceased at different stages—first to the police, then to the

SIDDIK ISMAILE KUMBHARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The appellant Siddik Ismail Kumbhar was convicted for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and attempt to conceal dead body (Sec. 201 IPC) based largely on circumstantial evidence, a police‑recorded confession, and recovered items. The prosecution's case rested on motive, a "last seen together" theory, and alleged recovery of the wea

VIHABHAI PANCHABHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vihabhai Panchabhai Patel appealed against his conviction for murder, robbery, and related offences under Sections 302, 392, 397 and 449 of the IPC. The trial court relied on circumstantial evidence, including the appellant’s alleged presence with the victims, recovery of stolen ornaments at his instance, and blood‑sta

RUSTOMSING @ BABLU RAVINDRASINHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The case concerns an armed dacoity on a State Transport bus on 20 August 2010, during which four assailants fired at the driver and a passenger, looted valuables and escaped in an Indica car, also firing at a police checkpost. The accused were charged under IPC Sections 395, 396 and 120B, and various provisions of the

STATE OF GUJARATversusYUSUFBHAI HASANBHAI QURESHI

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The State appealed the acquittal of Yusufbhai Hasanbhai Qureshi and others by the Sessions Judge, who had found insufficient evidence to prove charges of murder, dowry death, and cruelty. The deceased, Nurjaha, and her infant daughter died from burns allegedly caused by kerosene, with the prosecution alleging dowry har

PARULBEN W/O MAHENDRABHAI RAMESHBHAI GODANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The appellant, Parulben Mahendrabhai Godani, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Surat, for murder, grievous hurt, robbery, and criminal conspiracy based on Sections 302, 326, 394, 201, 120(B) IPC and Section 135 Gujarat Police Act. She appealed under Section 374 CrPC, contending that the prosecution’s case

KEDARBHAI ISHWARBHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

Kedar Rathod was convicted for kidnapping (IPC s.363), assault (s.365) and rape (s.376) of a girl aged about four years. The trial court relied primarily on the child’s testimony, supported by medical findings of genital injuries, and sentenced him to seven years for kidnapping and assault and life imprisonment for rap

STATE OF GUJARATversusJAKIR UMARBHAI MALLA

46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

The State of Gujarat filed a criminal revision against the order dated 07‑10‑2024 in which the Additional Special Judge, Gondal, marked a Pen Drive and an audio transcript as Mark‑A to be kept with the victim's deposition in a POCSO case. The State contended that the trial court failed to follow the procedural requirem

STATE OF GUJARATversusGOPI @ BHALABHAI GIRISHBHAI DEVIPUJAK

47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH

The Gujarat High Court heard appeals challenging the conviction and death sentence of three accused for gang rape and murder of a married woman. The trial court had sentenced them to death, imprisonment and fines under IPC sections 302, 201, 366 and 376(d). The appellants argued that the prosecution’s case rested on we

JAYANTIBHAI BABABHAI VADIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The Gujarat High Court heard appeals challenging the conviction and death sentence of three accused for gang rape and murder of a married woman. The trial court had sentenced them to death, imprisonment and fines under IPC sections 302, 201, 366 and 376(d). The appellants argued that the prosecution’s case rested on we

GOPI @ BHALABHAI GIRISHBHAI DEVIPUJAKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The Gujarat High Court heard appeals challenging the conviction and death sentence of three accused for gang rape and murder of a married woman. The trial court had sentenced them to death, imprisonment and fines under IPC sections 302, 201, 366 and 376(d). The appellants argued that the prosecution’s case rested on we

STATE OF GUJARATversusCHANDUBHAI SENDABHAI PATANI

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The State appealed the acquittal of Chandubhai Sendabhai Patani under Section 378 of the Cr.P.C., challenging his discharge from charges of kidnapping, kidnapping for ransom, rape (IPC ss. 363, 366, 376) and offences under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The trial court had found that the prosecution failed t

BHIMABEN WD/O BHAGOJI RAGHOJI UTTEKARversusNANUBHAI RAMANLAL SHAH

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The appellants filed a First Appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 challenging the Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner’s order rejecting their claim for compensation after the death of Bhagojirao Uttekar, who fell while painting an advertisement board. The deceased was engaged by opponent No.1

HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusSARFARAJBHAI SULEMANBHAI KHOKHAR

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

On 3 August 2018 a Maruti Eeco, being used for hire and reward, was involved in a collision caused by a heavy vehicle, resulting in the car crashing into a tree. The claimant, a fare‑paying passenger, sued HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company for indemnity, but the insurer contended that the vehicle’s use for hire and r

STATE OF GUJARATversusMERAMAN KARA MER

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The State appealed the acquittal of Meraman Kara Mer and others for alleged cruelty, abetment of suicide and dowry death. The deceased, Puriben, was found dead in a well after alleged harassment by her husband for dowry. The prosecution presented oral testimonies of family members and extensive documentary evidence, bu

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusPANCHAKSHARI GURUPADAYYA HIRAMATH

2002 INSC 57820 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka charged Panchakshari Gurupada Yya Hiramath under Section 302 IPC for the murder of DSP Shankaraiah Hiremath, alleging a fatal attack with a sickle following a land dispute. The prosecution’s case rested primarily on the eye‑witness testimony of PW3, who saw the accused assault the victim, and on

NATHUNI YADAV AND ORSversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR

1996 INSC 152920 December 1996Dismissed

The appellants were convicted of murder for a shooting that occurred on an open terrace on a moonless night, where the victims and neighbours identified them as the assailants. The defence argued that darkness made identification impossible and that there was no discernible motive. The Supreme Court held that despite l

MOTURU NALINI KANTHversusGAINEDI KALIPRASAD (DEAD, THROUGH LRS.)

2023 INSC 100420 November 2023Dismissed

The appellant, Moturu Nalini Kanth, filed a suit as a minor claiming absolute title to the properties of the deceased Venkubayamma based on a registered will dated 03.05.1982 and a registered adoption deed dated 20.04.1982. The trial court upheld the suit, but the Andhra Pradesh High Court reversed the decision, holdin

REKHA MURARKAversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.

2019 INSC 126920 November 2019Disposed off

The appellant, a widow, sought to have her private counsel assist the prosecution in a murder trial by making oral arguments, examining and cross‑examining witnesses, invoking Section 301 read with the proviso to Section 24(8) of the CrPC. The trial court and the Calcutta High Court rejected the application, holding th

HARDEV SINGHversusHARBHEJ SINGH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 135320 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a violent assault on 23 May 1985 in which six accused, armed with a double‑barrel gun, gandhalis, kirpans and gandasas, attacked two men (Harbhajan Singh and Baldev Singh) and injured a third witness (Suba Singh). The trial court convicted four of the accused and acquitted two; the Punjab and Haryana

CHINNAMALversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

1996 INSC 135720 November 1996Disposed off

Six accused were convicted under IPC sections 147, 148, 307 and 302 for a homicide. The Madras High Court set aside the convictions, acquitting them on the ground that the appellant's statement recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC (initially a dying declaration) materially contradicted the FIR report. The Supreme Cou

DEPOT MANAGER, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusMOHD. YOUSUF MIYA ETC.

1996 INSC 134920 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Depot Manager of Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation initiated disciplinary proceedings against driver Mohd Yousuf Miya under Regulation 28(ix) of the Employees Conduct Rules, 1963 after a fatal accident caused by his alleged failure to anticipate the incident. Simultaneously, the driver faced criminal

PANCHOversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2011 INSC 77320 October 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the convictions of three accused (A1‑Pratham, A2‑Pancho and A3‑Gajraj) for murder and robbery of a tractor owner. The prosecution’s case hinged on an extra‑judicial confession made by A1, five months after the incident, to a villager with no close relationship, and on the belated recovery of

SANSAR CHANDversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2010 INSC 71220 October 2010Dismissed

Sansar Chand, a long‑time organiser of illegal wildlife trade, was convicted under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 for receiving leopard skins. The prosecution’s case rested on an extra‑judicial confession by a co‑accused, Balwan, which was corroborated by oral and documentary evidence, including recovered hunting

THREE CHEERS ENTERTAINMENT PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusC.E.S.C. LTD.

2008 INSC 118420 October 2008Appeal(s) allowed

Three Cheers Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. and others produced a television programme alleging illegal acts by Calcutta Electricity Supply Company Ltd. (CESC), leading CESC to file a defamation suit and obtain an interim injunction restraining further telecasts. The High Court, while confirming the injunction, also appointed

STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIAversusMADHUSUDAN DAS & ORS.

2008 INSC 118620 October 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the death of Bhagirathi Das, a mine employee of Steel Authority of India Ltd., who collapsed while on duty. His son sought a compassionate appointment under Para 8.9.4 of the 1989 Memorandum of Settlement, which provides such appointment only if death is due to an accident arising out of and in the c

S. RAMAKRISHNAversusTHE STATE REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. HYDERABAD

2008 INSC 118820 October 2008Dismissed

The appellant, S. Ramakrishna, was convicted of raping a 14‑year‑old girl and threatening her life under Sections 376 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court and the Andhra Pradesh High Court upheld the conviction, relying on the victim’s testimony and medical evidence showing semen and protozoa. The appellan

SMT. RAMTI DEVIversusUNION OF INDIA

1994 INSC 47720 October 1994Dismissed

Ramti Devi filed a suit on 30 July 1966 seeking a declaration that she was the absolute owner of a house and that the sale deed dated 29 January 1947, by which the defendant had allegedly alienated the property, should be avoided or cancelled. The trial court dismissed the suit and the Delhi High Court affirmed the dis

STATE OF ASSAMversusMUHIM BARKATAKI & ANR

1986 INSC 21420 October 1986Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Assam charged Muhim Barkataki and Oulu Dutta with murder and arson, alleging they set fire to the deceased Nagen Dey's shop and body after pouring kerosene. The prosecution relied on eye‑witnesses who saw the fire, a dying declaration made by the victim while in severe pain, and statements recorded under S

SHOOR SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2024 INSC 71320 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, Neelam, died from extensive burn injuries within seven years of her marriage to the son of the appellants, who were her father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law. The prosecution alleged that the accused demanded a motorcycle and Rs 50,000 as dowry and threatened her, invoking the presumption of dowry death under S

APPAIYAversusANDIMUTHU @ THANGAPANDI & ORS.

2023 INSC 83520 September 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant purchased a two‑acre property in 1963 from Puliyankaladi, who had earlier acquired it through a registered sale deed (Exhibit A1) dated 27‑08‑1928. The trial court and the first appellate court held that the certified copy of Exhibit A1, a public document, was admissible as secondary evidence to prove the

BALDEV SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2013 INSC 64420 September 2013Case Partly allowed

The appellants, a Deputy Superintendent of Police and a constable, were convicted for abducting seven members of a family and for their alleged murder. The prosecution alleged that the victims were taken on 29 October 1991, later seen in various police stations, and never returned, leading to convictions under IPC sect

M/S PAYAL VISION LTD.versusRADHIKA CHOUDHARY

2012 INSC 41320 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed

M/S Payal Vision Ltd., the landlord, filed a suit for possession and mesne profits against Radhika Choudhary, the tenant, alleging a lease of Rs.50,000 per month and a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act terminating the tenancy due to unauthorized structural changes. The tenant contested the nature

HARESH MOHANDAS RAJPUTversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2011 INSC 70020 September 2011Disposed off

The appellant, Haresh Mohandas Rajput, was accused of raping and murdering 10‑year‑old Pooja, whose body was discovered under a cot in his house with blood‑stained sheets and forensic evidence of sexual assault and strangulation. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence, including the location of the bo

TILAK RAJ BAKSHIversusAVINASH CHAND SHARMA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & OTHERS

2019 INSC 92320 August 2019Dismissed

The plaintiff, Tilak Raj Bakshi, claimed that his brother (the first defendant) violated a family settlement by selling his one‑third share of a Chandigarh house to a stranger (the second defendant) without obtaining the written concurrence of the other brothers and without offering the share to the plaintiff as requir

SATVIR SINGHversusSTATE OF DELHI THROUGH CBI

2014 INSC 54820 August 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Satvir Singh, an Inspector Customs, was accused of demanding and accepting a bribe from complainant Ramesh Suri in 1989. The trial court acquitted him, finding that the prosecution had not proved the demand, acceptance, or recovery of illegal gratification and that the presumption under Section 20 of the Prevention of

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANKversusR.L. VAID AND ORS.

2004 INSC 46420 August 2004Leave Granted & Disposed off

The accused, charged under IPC s.120‑B and the Prevention of Corruption Act, applied to the trial court for the production of eight documents. The CBI and Punjab National Bank (the appellant) claimed the documents were privileged communication under Evidence Act s.124. The trial court ordered production, but the High C

NALLABOTHU VENKAIAHversusSTATE OF A.P.

2002 INSC 34320 August 2002Dismissed

The appellant, Nallabothu Venkaiah, was one of sixteen accused who allegedly formed an unlawful assembly, hurled bombs and used axes, knives and spears to kill R. Venkateswarlu on 13 October 1992. The trial court convicted him under Section 302 IPC (simpliciter) and sentenced him to life imprisonment, relying on the te

BISHUNDEO NARAIN RAI (DEAD) BY LRS.versusANMOL DEVI AND ORS.

1998 INSC 31720 August 1998Case Allowed

The plaintiffs (first purchasers) bought land from the vendors under a registered sale deed dated 30 April 1963 for Rs.15,000, part of which was to be kept in deposit for a mortgage. The vendors later cancelled this deed and executed a second sale deed in favour of other buyers, alleging that the plaintiffs had not pai

JAGROOP SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2012 INSC 29620 July 2012Dismissed

The appellant Jagroop Singh was convicted of murder under IPC sections 302, 34 and 201 based on circumstantial evidence that the victim was last seen with the accused, voluntary extra‑judicial confessions, and the recovery of a blood‑stained spade. The appellant challenged the conviction, arguing that the time gap betw

DANDU JAGGARAJUversusSTATE OF A.P.

2011 INSC 50420 July 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Varalakshmi, an upper‑caste woman, married a Scheduled‑Caste man against her family's wishes. Six years later she disappeared after being lured by her paternal uncle, the appellant, who claimed her grandmother was ill. Her body was later found, showing death by smothering, and jewellery allegedly taken from her was rec

THE STATE BANK OF INDIAversusSHRI YUMNAM GOURAMANI SINGH

1993 INSC 24220 July 1993Appeal(s) allowed

The State Bank of India sued Yumnam Gouramani Singh for recovery of a loan amount and the trial court decreed a partial sum of Rs.9,962.91 with interest. The High Court reversed this decision, holding that the bank's books of account were not corroborated by any other evidence and thus could not establish liability und

RAJ KUMAR RAJINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS

1990 INSC 20920 July 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, the second son of the former Raja of Bushahr, claimed ownership of about 1,720 acres of forest land based on a 1942 patta and subsequent grants by his father, the Raja. The State argued that the 1942 lease of the forests to the Punjab Government divested the Raja of any right to grant those lands and tha

MACHHL SINGH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1983 INSC 7820 July 1983Disposed off

A long‑standing feud between two families in Punjab resulted in a series of five murders on the night of 12‑13 August 1977, killing seventeen people. Machhi Singh and eleven associates were tried in five separate sessions cases; four were sentenced to death and nine to life imprisonment. The Supreme Court examined (i)

HAMZAversusMUHAMMADKUTTY @ MANI & ORS.

2013 INSC 37220 June 2013Dismissed

The deceased woman was stabbed to death in her matrimonial home, leading to an initial prosecution of four in‑law family members under Sections 498A and 306 IPC, which resulted in acquittal. Two years later, the deceased's brother filed a complaint alleging that six family members, including A‑1 and A‑2, murdered her,

HEERA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2007 INSC 70520 June 2007Dismissed

The appellants were convicted under Section 395 IPC for assaulting a complainant at a petrol pump and stealing cash. The trial court relied on eyewitness testimony and a test identification parade (TI parade) in which the accused were identified by two witnesses; the prosecution also recovered the stolen cash. On appea

STATE OF U.P.versusJAI PRAKASH

2007 INSC 70920 June 2007Dismissed

The dead body of a seven‑year‑old boy was recovered from a well; he had last been seen with the accused, Jai Prakash, who was alleged to have animosity towards the victim’s family and a motive to use the child to facilitate a sexual assault on a woman. The trial court convicted the accused under Sections 302, 364 and 2

MOST REV. P.M.A. METROPOLITAN AND ORS.versusMORAN MAR MARTHOMA AND ANR.

1995 INSC 38020 June 1995Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a long‑standing dispute between the Patriarch of Antioch’s group (the petitioner) and the Catholicos of the East’s group (the respondent) over the nature, governance and authority of the Malankara Jacobite Syrian Church. The Court held that the 1934 Constitution of the Malankara Association i

ABHISHEKversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS

2022 INSC 61820 May 2022Dismissed

The appellant Abhishek Singh was charged under several IPC offences, the Arms Act and MCOCA after a proclamation declared him an absconder. The Additional Director General of Police and Commissioner of Police granted sanction for prosecution under MCOCA, which the appellant challenged before the High Court and then the

SABITRI SAMANTARAYversusSTATE OF ODISHA

2022 INSC 60820 May 2022Dismissed

The appellants, a husband and wife, were accused of strangling a man to death in their rented house and attempting to conceal the body by pouring acid over it. The trial court convicted them and their daughter under Sections 302, 201 and 34 IPC, sentencing the parents to life imprisonment; the High Court later acquitte

DEEPAK GULATIversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2013 INSC 34920 May 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Deepak Gulati was convicted under Sections 365 and 376 of the IPC for allegedly enticing a 19‑year‑old woman with a false promise of marriage, confining her and having sexual intercourse. The woman voluntarily left home to marry the appellant, accompanied him to several locations, and did not raise any ob

CHARAN SINGH @ CHARANJIT SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2023 INSC 40420 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed

Charan Singh, the husband of the deceased Chhilo Kaur, was convicted under Sections 304B, 498A and 201 of the IPC for allegedly killing his wife over dowry demands. The trial court sentenced him to ten years' rigorous imprisonment under 304B, two years each under 498A and 201, which the High Court later reduced the 304

APOLLO ZIPPER INDIA LIMITEDversusW. NEWMAN AND CO. LTD.

2018 INSC 38420 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed

Apollo Zipper India Ltd., which became the absolute owner of a commercial premises after a series of statutory transfers, served a quit notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act to its tenant, W. Newman & Co. Ltd., demanding arrears and vacant possession. The tenant sought leave to defend the summary evi

MD. MANNAN @ ABDUL MANNANversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2011 INSC 31920 April 2011Dismissed

The appellant, Md. Mannan, a mason employed in the victim's grandfather's house, sent a seven‑year‑old girl to a betel shop and subsequently abducted her on his bicycle, raping and murdering her. He later confessed, leading police to the body. He was convicted under IPC sections 366, 376, 302 and 201 and sentenced to d

SUBHASH CHANDRA SINGHversusDHEEMANT SINGH & ANR.

2009 INSC 56220 April 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, father of a woman who died unnaturally within seven years of marriage, challenged the Allahabad High Court's order granting bail to the accused husband, who was charged under IPC s.304B. The High Court had granted bail without providing any reasoning, merely stating that s.1138 of the Evidence Act was in

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusSHANTAPPA MADIVALAPPA GALAPUJI & ORS.

2009 INSC 56320 April 2009Appeal(s) allowed

Four accused were convicted by a trial court for murder and related offences based largely on the testimony of a nine‑year‑old child witness, the son of the deceased. The Karnataka High Court set aside the conviction, discarding the child’s evidence on the ground that he might have been tutored and because of a delay i

STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.versusHARAPRIYA BISOI

2009 INSC 56020 April 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned 53.95 acres of land in Bhubaneswar that vested in the State of Orissa under a 1954 notification of the Orissa Estate Abolition Act, 1951. The respondent, Harapriya Bisoi, claimed she was a "deemed tenant" because her predecessor had obtained a lease from the erstwhile intermediaries before vesting

M/S. ATUL CASTINGS LTD.versusBAWA GURVACHAN SINGH

2001 INSC 22220 April 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Atul Castings Ltd., the tenant, occupied a building leased for residential purposes and kept an office table and equipment in one room to dispose of office files, which the family also used for study. The landlord filed an eviction petition under Section 13(2)(ii)(b) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949,

PAWAN KUMAR GUPTAversusROCHIRAM NAGDEO

1999 INSC 19520 April 1999Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, P.K. Gupta, purchased a shop‑godown from Narain Prasad and sued the tenant, R. Nagdeo, for eviction under the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Act for default in rent. The tenant contended that the sale deed was a benami transaction, alleging that the appellant was merely a name‑lender for his father, Pyarel

STATE OF U.P.versusHARBAN SAHAI AND ORS.

1998 INSC 18720 April 1998Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed the acquittal of Harban Sahai and others, who had been convicted for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The High Court had set aside the trial court's findings on the basis of alleged inconsistencies between the FIR and eyewitness testimony, the weight given to

VIJAYEE SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

1990 INSC 14520 April 1990

Four accused (Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 6) were originally convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC for the killing of Mahendra Singh and Virendra Singh. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the scope of Section 105 of the Indian Evidence Act, holding that the prosecution must prove the offence beyond re

BRIJ LALversusPREM CHAND & ANR.

1989 INSC 13420 April 1989Appeal(s) allowed

Prem Chand married Veena Rani in 1973 and repeatedly tormented her, demanding money and physically abusing her. On 15 September 1975, after a quarrel in which Prem Chand told her she could relieve his financial woes by dying that very day, Veena Rani set herself on fire and died of severe burns. The trial court convict

STATE OF BIHARversusRADHA KRISHNA SINGH & ORS.

1983 INSC 4420 April 1983Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar appealed against a Patna High Court judgment that upheld the title suit of Radha Krishna Singh, who claimed to be the nearest reversioner of the late Maharaja Harendra Kishore Singh's estate. The dispute centered on whether the plaintiffs could prove the genealogical links connecting them to the Maha

JAGADGURU ANNADANISHWARA MAHA SWAMIJIversusV.C. ALLIPUR & ANOTHER

2009 INSC 38120 March 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a school, appealed an order of the Director of Pre‑University Education granting promotion to an assistant teacher (respondent No.1). The respondent filed a contempt petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging wilful disobedience of the Director’s order. The Karnataka

KHET SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA

2002 INSC 15820 March 2002

Khet Singh was apprehended while travelling in a truck that contained a polythene bag of opium. The contraband was seized and samples were taken at the Customs Office, but the seizure mahazar was not prepared at the spot of recovery as required by the NDPS Act and related standing instructions. The appellant contended

AJIT KUMAR SINGH AND ORS.versusCHIRANJIBI LAL AND ORS.

2002 INSC 15920 March 2002Disposed off

The appellants, tenants, were ordered to vacate premises under the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982. After the trial decree and a dismissed first appeal, they filed a second appeal in the Patna High Court, but neither they nor their counsel appeared at the hearing. The High Court nonetheless

SODHI TRANSPORT CO. & ANR, ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P, & ANR. ETC, ETC.

1986 INSC 5120 March 1986Disposed off

The petitioners, transporters of goods across Uttar Pradesh, challenged Section 28-B of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 and Rule 87 of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Rules, 1948, arguing that the provisions were beyond the State's legislative competence, infringed Articles 301 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, and i

APARNA AJINKYA FIRODIAversusAJINKYA ARUN FIRODIA

2023 INSC 14620 February 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The husband filed for divorce on the ground of adultery and sought a DNA test of their son, born during the marriage, to establish paternity. The Family Court and the High Court ordered the DNA test, but the Supreme Court set aside those orders, holding that the conclusive presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 of

PARTAP SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.versusSHIV RAM (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.

2020 INSC 21920 February 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs, heirs of Shri Partap Singh, sued Shiv Ram alleging ownership of certain lands and seeking possession and injunctions, while the defendant claimed to be a tenant and that the suit should be tried in the revenue court. The trial court, relying on oral testimony, held that the presumption of truth in the J

BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD.versusMAHENDRA PRASAD JAKHMOLA & ORS.

2019 INSC 24420 February 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. (BHEL) was subject to the 24‑April‑1990 notification issued under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, and whether the workmen who were engaged through contractors were direct employees of BHEL. The Court held that BHEL’s Haridwar ope

SUNIL MEHTA & ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

2013 INSC 11520 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether depositions taken by a magistrate under Chapter XV of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) before taking cognizance could be used as evidence for framing charges under Part B of Chapter XIX, and whether the accused is entitled to cross‑examine those witnesses before charges are framed.

ANAND KUMARversusSTATE OF M.P.

2009 INSC 22520 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed

Karuna, the wife of Anand Kumar, died by suicide within seven years of marriage. Kumar, his parents and brother were charged under IPC s.306 (abetment of suicide), s.498A (cruelty) and the Dowry Prohibition Act s.4. The trial court acquitted the parents and brother but convicted Kumar based on a letter (Exhibit P‑20) a

KALIAPERUMALversusRAJAGOPAL & ANR.

2009 INSC 22820 February 2009Dismissed

Kaliaperumal purchased immovable property from Rajagopal and others by a deed dated 26 June 1983, agreeing to pay Rs.43,000, of which Rs.40,000 was to be paid in the presence of the Sub‑Registrar at registration. The deed was registered on 26 October 1983, but the balance consideration was never tendered, and the vendo

M/S. BHANDARI CONSTRUCTION COMPANYversusNARAYAN GOPAL UPADHYE

2007 INSC 17320 February 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Bhandari Construction Company, sold an office space to the respondent, Narayan Gopal Upadhye, for Rs.7,75,000 as per a written agreement dated 27‑7‑1997. The respondent paid Rs.5,00,000 by cheque but claimed to have paid the remaining balance, including Rs.4,00,000 in cash, for which no receipt or docume

STATE OF U.P.versusPREMI AND ORS.

2003 INSC 11320 February 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The State of U.P. alleged that the accused entered the house of Raghubir (PW3) at midnight, assaulted him with the butt of a pistol and, when his wife intervened, also struck her, leading to her death the next day. The trial court convicted the accused under Sections 302 r/w 34, 307 r/w 34 and 452 IPC. The Allahabad Hi

DAYA SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2001 INSC 9620 February 2001Dismissed

In 1988 a terrorist attack on Dr. Harnam Singh's house in Kurukshetra resulted in four deaths and several injuries. Fourteen accused, including Daya Singh, were tried under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act and the IPC for murder and attempted murder. The trial court convicted Daya Singh on the b

SHAM LALversusSTATE OF HARYANA ETC.

1997 INSC 16920 February 1997Dismissed

Neelam Rani died from burns in 1987. The husband (appellant) and his father were convicted by the Sessions Court of murder (Sec. 302 IPC), dowry death (Sec. 304B IPC) and cruelty for dowry (Sec. 498A IPC). The High Court upheld the murder conviction and acquitted the father. On appeal, the Supreme Court held that the e

GOPAL SARANversusSATYANARAYANA

1989 INSC 6620 February 1989Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord sued the tenant for eviction under the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950, alleging (i) parting with possession of the shop roof by installing an advertisement board, (ii) material alteration of the premises by fixing the board with iron angles, and (iii) default in rent. The trial

HARCHARAN SINGHversusSHIV RANI AND ORS.

1981 INSC 4320 February 1981Dismissed

Harcharan Singh, a tenant of a shop in a U.P. cantonment, failed to pay rent for 1965‑66. The landlord sent a combined notice of arrears and eviction by registered post on 9 November 1966, which the tenant refused to accept on 10 November. The landlord sued for eviction under the U.P. Cantonment (Control of Rent & Evic

SAURAV DASversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 7620 January 2023Dismissed

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a direction that all State governments upload copies of chargesheets filed under Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code on their websites, invoking the transparency principle established in Youth Bar Association of India v. Union of India. The petition r

RAJ KUMAR@ RAJUversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2017 INSC 5620 January 2017Case Partly allowed

The deceased woman was found dead with her jewellery missing; the appellant had been present in her house the night before the incident and was later arrested with the missing ornaments recovered from his possession. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence – the appellant’s presence, a "last seen" test

TOMASO BRUNO & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2015 INSC 5220 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Three Italian tourists were accused of murdering their fellow tourist in a hotel room in Varanasi. The trial and appellate courts convicted them under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC based on circumstantial evidence, including alleged motive, post‑mortem findings of strangulation, and the claim that they remained in the

JOSHINDER YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2014 INSC 3720 January 2014Dismissed

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of six accused, including the appellant Joshinder Yadav, for the dowry death of Bindula Devi under IPC sections 302 r/w 149, 498A and 201. The Court found that the father and brother of the deceased gave reliable testimony of continuous cruelty and harassment for dowry, and that

SANGRAMSINH P. GAEKWAD AND ORS.versusSHANTADEVI P. GAEKWAD (I) THR. LRS. AND ORS.

2005 INSC 4520 January 2005Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined a family‑run private company where the board had broadened capital by issuing 15,000 new equity shares, allocating 6,475 to the appellants and reserving 8,000 for the late chairman. The petitioner, a class‑I heir, claimed entitlement to the 8,000 shares and alleged oppression and mismanagemen

STATE OF M.P. THROUGH C.B.I. ETC.versusPALTAN MALLAH AND ORS. ETC.

2005 INSC 4620 January 2005Dismissed

The State of Madhya Pradesh, represented by the CBI, appealed against the High Court's acquittal of nine accused, including Paltan Mallah, for the murder of trade‑union leader Shankar Guha Niyogi. The trial court had convicted them under Section 302 read with Section 120B IPC based on circumstantial evidence, but the H

VIDHYA DEVI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2004 INSC 4220 January 2004Dismissed

The appellants Vidhya Devi and others were convicted under Section 304‑B IPC for the dowry death of Satyawati, who was set ablaze four months after a dowry demand and died within seven years of marriage. The trial court and High Court upheld the conviction, and the appellants appealed, challenging the applicability of

JARNAIL SINGH AND ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

1993 INSC 2120 January 1993Dismissed

The accused Jarnail Singh and his four sons were convicted of murder and rioting for killing Gurbux Singh and his brother Wasava Singh. The prosecution alleged a motive stemming from the suicide of the accused's son, who had been in love with the victims' daughter. The defence argued that there was no immediate motive

NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAUversusKASHIF

2025 INSC 104519 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) seized large quantities of Tramadol and Zolpidem tablets in multiple operations and arrested Kashif and co‑accused. Kashif applied for bail, which the Delhi High Court granted solely on the ground that the NCB had not complied with Section 52A of the NDPS Act within a reasonable time,

ASHOK VERMAversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 74319 December 2024Dismissed

The appellant, Ashok Verma, was convicted under Sections 302, 201 and 498A of the IPC for the death of his wife, Pushpa, which occurred in their matrimonial home. He claimed the death was a suicide, pleaded an alibi that he was in a nearby garden, and argued that the non‑rupture of the hyoid bone indicated strangulatio

ROOP SINGH NEGIversusPUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS.

2008 INSC 150219 December 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a peon of Punjab National Bank, was accused of stealing a blank draft issue book. After a five‑year delay, a departmental enquiry found him guilty, relying mainly on a purported confession recorded by police, which the appellant claimed was obtained under duress. The disciplinary authority dismissed him

LALITABEN JAYANTILAL POPATversusPRAGNABEN JAMNADAS KATARIA & ORS.

2008 INSC 150419 December 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court heard an appeal against a Gujarat High Court order that granted probate of a Will dated 18 June 1995 executed by the deceased Jayantilal Kataria. The appellant contended that the Will was not validly attested because Section 63(c) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 requires two or more witnesses, and

MAHILA BAJRANGI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.versusBADRIBAI W/O JAGANNATH AND ANR.

2002 INSC 56419 December 2002Dismissed

Mahila Bajrangi, through her legal representatives, filed a suit for declaration of title and possession of a house, claiming ownership based on a gift deed executed by her mother Gopali, who she alleged was the lawful wife of the deceased Gendilal. The defendants contended that Gopali's marriage to Gendilal was invali

NET RAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF M.P.

1996 INSC 151519 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Netraj was arrested after a silver todal, allegedly stolen during a dacoity that also involved the murder of a woman, was recovered from him two days after the incident. He was convicted under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code for dacoity with murder and sentenced to death, later reduced to life impris

MAFATLAL INDUSTRIES LTD. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA ETC. ETC.

1996 INSC 151419 December 1996Disposed off

The case concerns refunds of excise and customs duties collected contrary to law. The Supreme Court examined the validity of Section 11-B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, as amended in 1991, which restricts refunds to claimants who have not passed on the burden of duty to others. The Court overruled its earli

SUBHASH CHANDRAversusMOHAMMAD SHARIT AND ORS.

1989 INSC 39119 December 1989Dismissed

The appellant, Subhash Chandra, inherited a tenancy originally created by a lease deed (Ext. P.20) between Navinchand and his father Misri Lal. Navinchand later sold the property to the respondents, who terminated the tenancy and sued for eviction. The appellant defended by claiming that the original owner, Smt. Raj Ra

VASANT NARAYAN PAWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1979 INSC 26919 December 1979Dismissed

The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by Vasant Narayan Pawar, who was convicted for allegedly burning his wife to death. The petitioner argued that the dying declaration of the victim, in which she said her husband should not be beaten even as she was dying, should exonerate him under Section 32 o

THE STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.versusAMIN LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS & ORS.

2024 INSC 87519 November 2024Dismissed

The plaintiffs, heirs of Amin Lal, sued the State of Haryana and the Public Works Department for possession of land on the basis of revenue records, sale deeds and mutation entries. The trial court ruled in favour of the plaintiffs, holding that the State had not proved adverse possession. The State appealed and the fi

JAYANTILAL VERMAversusSTATE OF M.P. (NOW CHHATTISGARH)

2020 INSC 64919 November 2020Dismissed

The appellant, Jayantilal Verma, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the strangulation death of his wife, Sahodara Bai, whose body was found in their matrimonial home. The prosecution's case rested primarily on the testimony of the step‑brother (PW‑1) and the post‑mortem report indicating homicidal asphyxia. Althou

BALJINDER KAURversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2014 INSC 79219 November 2014Case Partly allowed

Baljinder Kaur, the sister‑in‑law of the deceased Sharanjit Kaur, was convicted under Section 304B IPC for dowry death based on a demand for a gold karra made two months after the marriage. The deceased died of poisoning, and the prosecution relied on a dying declaration that she was beaten and poisoned by the accused.

SUNIL MAHADEO JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2013 INSC 76319 November 2013Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the custodial death of a kidnapping suspect who was arrested by three police officers and found dead in the lock‑up. The trial court had acquitted all accused, but the High Court convicted them under sections 302, 342, 218 and 193 IPC. The Court held that the arrest panchnama and register wer

VITHAL PUNDALIK ZENDGEversusST ATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2008 INSC 132519 November 2008Dismissed

The appellant Vithal Pundalik Zendge and eight others were convicted of murder under IPC s.302 read with s.149 for the killing of the appellant's brother. The conviction was based primarily on the testimony of a single eyewitness, PW‑1, who was the sister of the deceased. The appellant challenged the conviction, arguin

MUTHU KUTTY AND ANR.versusSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TAMIL NADU

2004 INSC 66219 November 2004Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the appeal of the accused who were convicted for dowry death after the victim, Kodimalar, was set on fire by her in‑laws. The victim gave a dying declaration identifying the accused, which was recorded by a Judicial Magistrate in the presence of a doctor who certified her consciousness. The a

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusGANGULA SATYA MURTHY

1996 INSC 134019 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Andhra Pradesh prosecuted Gangula Satya Murthy for raping and throttling to death a 16‑year‑old girl, Satya Vani, whose body was found on a cot in his house. The trial court convicted him under IPC sections 302 and 376, relying on medical evidence of ante‑mortem neck injuries, a fresh vaginal tear, and an

ASHOK YADAV AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1996 INSC 134119 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, including Ashok Yadav, were convicted for kidnapping and murdering a school‑going child, Avadhesh Sharma, under sections 364 and 302 of the IPC. The Supreme Court examined the prosecution's circumstantial evidence – motive, recovery of the victim's articles, the fact that the victim was last seen with t

INDRAKUNWARversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2023 INSC 93419 October 2023Appeal(s) allowed

Indrakunwar was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly killing a newborn child she was said to have delivered and then thrown into a pond. The prosecution’s case rested on circumstantial evidence and the accused's statement under Section 313 CrPC, but failed to establish any relationship between the accused and

NAVEEN @ AJAYversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2023 INSC 93619 October 2023Disposed off

The appellant, Naveen (alias Ajay), was convicted and sentenced to death for the rape and murder of a three‑month‑old girl under multiple provisions of the IPC and the POCSO Act. The trial was completed in fifteen days, during which a legal‑aid counsel was appointed only hours before the case began and was not given su

PARANAGOUDA AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER

2023 INSC 93319 October 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved the suicide by self‑immolation of Akkamahadevi, married to the accused, who was alleged to have subjected her to mental and physical cruelty for dowry. The trial court convicted the accused under IPC sections 498A, 304B (read with s.34), and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, based largely

S. RAMACHANDRA RAOversusS. NAGABHUSHANA RAO & ORS.

2022 INSC 111419 October 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, S. Ramachandra Rao, sought to have his wife—who held a General Power of Attorney (GPA) for him and was also an enrolled advocate—appear in several civil suits as his GPA holder. The Trial Court allowed her to act in that capacity, but the High Court later set aside those orders and permitted her to appea

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusMUKESH AND ORS.

2006 INSC 71819 October 2006Disposed off

The State of Madhya Pradesh charged three reservation clerks with abetting Suresh Shah in the illegal procurement and sale of railway tickets under Sections 143(1) and 143(2) of the Railways Act, 1989. Shah was arrested with a large number of tickets and cash, but later absconded, and the clerks were convicted on the b

SUBHASH MARUTI AVASAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 72119 October 2006Dismissed

The appellant, accused No.3, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for the killing of Baban, based on eyewitness testimony of the deceased's mother (PW‑1) and other prosecution witnesses. The appellant claimed an alibi, asserting he was unable to walk due to a compound fracture and relied on a doctor's certific

B. VENKATAMUNIversusC.J.YODHYA RAM SINGH AND ORS.

2006 INSC 74319 October 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the validity of an unregistered will executed by an unmarried woman, Akkayamma, bequeathing her property to one of the children of her paramour, Jai Singh. The trial court and a single High Court judge rejected the will, citing nine (later twelve) suspicious circumstances surrounding its execution, i

GULAM HUSSAIN SHAIKH CHOUGULEversusS. REYNOLDS, SUPTD. OF CUSTOMS, MARMGOA

2001 INSC 53019 October 2001Dismissed

Gulam Hussain Shaikh Chougule was convicted under Section 135 of the Customs Act for allegedly smuggling 207 silver ingots aboard a trawler intercepted by customs officers. During the investigation, his statement was recorded by a gazetted customs officer under Section 108 of the Customs Act, without the safeguards of

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search