Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Indian Evidence Act, 1872

2,253 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act — showing 401–600.

AZHAR HUSSAINversusRAJIV GANDHI

1986 INSC 9425 April 1986Dismissed

The respondent was elected to the Lok Sabha from Amethi in the 1984 general election. An elector filed an election petition alleging several corrupt practices, but the petition failed to disclose material facts and particulars required by Section 83 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The High Court dismisse

MD. SHAHABUDDINversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2010 INSC 17125 March 2010Dismissed After

Md. Shahabuddin, a sitting MP, was in custody with more than forty criminal cases pending. Because of serious threats to public order, the Patna High Court, exercising its power under s.9(6) of the CrPC, issued a notification that the Court of Session would hold its sittings inside Siwan District Jail, and the Bihar Go

PRAVINversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2008 INSC 39725 March 2008Dismissed

The appellant Pravin was convicted under IPC sections 395, 397 and 450 for a daylight bank dacoity, and under the Arms Act for possession of an unlicensed firearm. He challenged the conviction on the ground that the identification parade was a farce, photographs of the accused had been shown to witnesses, and the recov

KALIKA TIWARI AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1997 INSC 31625 March 1997Case Partly allowed

The case involved a dacoity on 22 December 1987 at the house of Sanfula Devi, during which three persons were murdered and valuables stolen. The trial court convicted twelve accused under Sections 396 and 120‑B IPC, and the High Court added convictions under Sections 302 and 34 IPC. The Supreme Court examined whether t

RAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF M.P.

2014 INSC 13625 February 2014Disposed off

Raj Kumar, a 32‑year‑old who was a regular visitor to a neighbour's house, was asked to stay overnight while the parents irrigated fields. He raped the 14‑year‑old girl Gounjhi, caused grievous injuries and she died of asphyxia by strangulation. A 10‑year‑old brother witnessed the assault; DNA analysis linked the appel

ASHOK TSHERING BHUTIAversusSTATE OF SIKKIM

2011 INSC 16225 February 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a senior police officer in Sikkim, was charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for possessing assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. He submitted a detailed statement of his assets (Exhibit D‑4) after the FIR, but the prosecution alleged a much larger unexplained amount and

PARAM HANS YADAV & SADANAND TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

1987 INSC 6125 February 1987Disposed off

Param Hans Yadav and Sadanand Tripathi were convicted for the murder of Collector Mahesh Narain Prasad, Yadav having thrown a bomb and later confessing that he acted on Tripathi's orders. Yadav's confession, both judicial and extra‑judicial, was obtained after he was assaulted and was therefore not voluntary. The Supre

RAM CHANDERversusSTATE OF HARYANA

1981 INSC 4725 February 1981Appeal(s) allowed

Ram Chander was convicted of murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court upheld his conviction while acquitting a co‑accused. The appellant argued that the Sessions Judge had violated the principle of a fair trial by rebuking and threatening key eyewitnesses

H. V. NIRMALA & ANR.versusR. SHARMILA & ANR.

2018 INSC 6025 January 2018Dismissed

The dispute concerned immovable property of the late Ramaiah Reddy, who executed a registered will on 12 March 1980 in favour of his minor children Sharmila and Umesh. A later will dated 20 May 1995, executed by the same testator, did not expressly revoke the 1980 will. Umesh filed a partition suit based on the 1995 wi

MANJIT SINGH @ MANGEversusCBI, THROUGH ITS S.P.

2011 INSC 7325 January 2011Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined appeals against a Designated Court (TADA) judgment that convicted three men for the murder of Additional Collector L.D. Arora under the IPC and acquitted them of TADA charges. The key issues were the admissibility of confessional statements made by co‑accused under TADA s.15 against an accuse

VIKRAM SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 5825 January 2010Disposed off

The appellants Vikram Singh, Jasvir Singh and Sonia were convicted for kidnapping a 16‑year‑old boy, Abhi Verma, for ransom, administering chloroform and pentazocine which caused his death, and for conspiracy under Sections 302, 364A, 201 and 120‑8 IPC. The Supreme Court examined the sufficiency of circumstantial and e

SEBASTIAN M. HONGRAYversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

1983 INSC 20524 December 1983Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner, a student, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 32 of the Constitution on behalf of C. Daniel and C. Paul, who were allegedly taken by jawans of the 21st Sikh Regiment from Huining village to Phungrei camp on 10 March 1982 and thereafter disappeared. The respondents (Union of India, State of Mani

SURESH CHANDRA TIWARI & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2024 INSC 90724 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted of murder based on circumstantial evidence that they had last seen the deceased alive, were seen walking near the crime scene, purchased meat, and allegedly pointed out the spot where a blood‑stained stone was recovered. The Supreme Court examined whether each circumstance was proved beyon

RAMESH VERMA (D) TR. LRS.versusLAJESH SAXENA (D) BY LRS & ANR.

2016 INSC 105324 November 2016Dismissed

The case arose from a partition suit filed by the deceased Lajesh Saxena seeking a share in the joint Hindu family property. The trial court allotted shares, which the High Court altered by increasing the daughter’s share to one‑eighth and rejecting the validity of three wills under Section 68 of the Evidence Act. The

SHAMSHER SINGH VERMAversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2015 INSC 86024 November 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Shamsher Singh Verma was charged under IPC 354 and the POCSO Act for allegedly molesting his nine‑year‑old niece. The accused filed an application under Section 294 of the CrPC to have a compact disc containing a recorded conversation between the victim's father, the accused's son and his wife played in court and sent

MOHAMMED ARSHADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 89224 November 2006Disposed off

The deceased Kayyum gave three dying declarations after being assaulted. The first (before a doctor) and second (before a magistrate) named Syed Shaukat and Salim but not Mohammed Arshad; the third (before an investigating officer) named Arshad as having struck the victim with a wooden stick, citing a monetary dispute.

VIKRAMJLT SINGH@ VICKYversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2006 INSC 89424 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Vikramjit Singh (Vicky) was convicted by the Sessions Court and sentenced to death for the murder of his wife, Meena Rani, based on a prosecution case that alleged he killed her due to an illicit relationship. The prosecution relied on a knife allegedly recovered after a confession, jewellery found nearby, and a series

BABUBHAI UDESINH PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2006 INSC 89624 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Babubhai Udesinh Parmar was convicted of raping and murdering a minor girl, Savita, primarily on the basis of a confession recorded by a Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. The Supreme Court found that the confession was recorded without observing the statutory safeguards: it was taken on oath (w

GAGAN KANOJIA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2006 INSC 89724 November 2006Dismissed

The appellants were convicted for kidnapping and murdering two children based largely on circumstantial evidence, including the testimony of a child witness, a taxi driver, extra‑judicial confessions, fingerprint matches, recovered clothing, and a ransom‑demand letter. The trial and High Courts upheld the convictions a

BASO PRASAD AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2006 INSC 89824 November 2006Disposed off

The accused were charged under Sections 302 and 34 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act for the murder of Shivnandan Prasad. Eye‑witnesses identified Brijandan Prasad as the sole shooter, while the other four accused were alleged to have participated in brick‑batting but not in firing. The defence argued that discrepanci

ANIL@RAJU NAMDEV PATILversusADMINISTRATION OF DAMAN & DIU, DAMAN AND ANR.

2006 INSC 90024 November 2006Dismissed

The appellant, Anil Raju Namdev Patil, was convicted of kidnapping a five‑year‑old boy for ransom, the boy’s murder and related offences, and sentenced to death and five years’ rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, arguing that the charge of kidnapping for ransom with intent to murder (Section 364‑A IPC) was never framed

MUNICIPAL BOARD, SAHARANPURversusIMPERIAL TOBACCO OF INDIA LTD .

1998 INSC 44224 November 1998Appeal(s) allowed

The Municipal Board of Saharanpur sought to levy water tax on Imperial Tobacco's factory and residential buildings under Section 128(1)(x) of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916, claiming that the entire complex lay within a 600‑foot radius of a public stand‑pipe and was situated in a "common compound". The respondent ar

SMT. HANS RAJIversusYASODANAND

1995 INSC 78524 November 1995Dismissed

The appellant, an illiterate Harijan widow, sued to cancel a sale deed she had executed in favour of the respondent, alleging fraud, that she thought she was executing a will, and that the deed was obtained without consideration. The trial court, appellate court and Allahabad High Court all held that the deed was volun

MISHRA AND S. ABDUL NAZEER, JJ.]versusSARAH C. URS & ORS.

2019 INSC 118624 October 2019Disposed off

The suit concerned a house inherited by the late K. Basavaraja Urs and his son K.B. Ramchandra Raj Urs (defendant No.1). Plaintiffs Sarah C. Urs and P. Chandrakantaraj Urs entered into an agreement to purchase the property on 24 April 1979, with the late father acting through his son as power of attorney. Rs.1,00,000 w

ASAR MOHAMMAD AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF U.P.

2018 INSC 98524 October 2018Disposed off

The case involved the murder of Zahida Begum and her son Ishlam, whose bodies were recovered from a septic tank after appellant No.1, Asar Mohammad, confessed and led police to the site. The trial court convicted all three accused under Sections 302 and 201 IPC, sentencing them to death (later commuted to life). On app

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusAHMED SHAIKH BABAJAN & ORS.

2008 INSC 122024 October 2008Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the High Court’s order acquitting Ahmed Shaikh Babajan and four co‑accused of murder (Sec. 302 r/w Sec. 34 IPC) and house‑breaking (Sec. 456 r/w Sec. 109 IPC). The facts involved a dispute over possession of a flat, the alleged assault and death of the tenant’s son, and claims

DASHRATH@ CHAMPA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2007 INSC 109924 October 2007Dismissed

The appellants were convicted for murder under IPC s.304(Part I) read with s.34 based primarily on the deceased's statements recorded in the FIR and under s.161 CrPC, which the trial and High Courts treated as dying declarations under s.32 of the Evidence Act. The Supreme Court examined the principles governing dying d

GODABARISH MISHRAversusKUNTALA MISHRA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 121424 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The accused, Kuntala Mishra, a midwife, was alleged to have murdered her daughter‑in‑law Geeta by strangulating her with a petticoat string after a dowry dispute. Geeta had undergone a D&C operation and was under the effect of phenargan, rendering her drowsy. She was found dead in the accused's quarters; the accused cl

STATE OF A.P.versusGUVVA SATYANARAYANA

2008 INSC 108424 September 2008Dismissed

The deceased, Renuka, died from burns after an alleged incident where her husband doused her with kerosene. A dying declaration was recorded by a magistrate on the night of the incident, in which she accused her husband of the act. The trial court convicted the husband under Sections 302 (murder) and 498A (dowry harass

SUMAN VERMAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2004 INSC 54524 September 2004Leave Granted & Dismissed

Suman Verma was appointed as Extra Departmental Branch Post Master (EDBPM) in 1996, satisfying the statutory qualifications of passing the Matriculation Examination and possessing agricultural land. Respondent No.6 challenged the appointment before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), asserting that she had highe

MUKESH SINGHversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2023 INSC 76524 August 2023Dismissed

The appellant Mukesh Singh was convicted of murder, robbery and related offences based primarily on the identification of the injured eyewitness Sushil Kumar, who identified him in court after the accused had refused to attend a test identification parade (TIP). The accused argued that his refusal to participate in the

ZAKIR ABDUL MIRAJKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2022 INSC 85524 August 2022Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra alleged that the appellants were members of an organized crime syndicate operating the illegal "Mumbai Matka" gambling network. Police raided a gambling den, recorded confessions of several accused, including the appellants, by an Additional Superintendent of Police (Addl. SP) under Section 18

MANJEET SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2021 INSC 41924 August 2021Appeal(s) allowed

An FIR (No.477) recorded the death of Amarjit Singh and injuries to his nephew Manjeet Singh, naming five persons as perpetrators. Only one accused, Sartaj Singh, was charge‑sheeted; the other four private respondents were placed in column‑2. During trial, the victim (PW1) reiterated the allegations against the private

STATE OF HARYANAversusRAM MEHAR & OTHERS ETC. ETC.

2016 INSC 61624 August 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana prosecuted 148 workers for offences including murder arising from a factory fire. After the prosecution examined 102 witnesses and the accused gave statements under Section 313 CrPC, the defence sought recall of several prosecution witnesses under Section 311 CrPC, alleging that the lead counsel ha

SASAN POWER LIMITEDversusNORTH AMERICAN COAL CORPORATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

2016 INSC 119624 August 2016Dismissed

Sasan Power Ltd entered into Agreement‑I with the American company NAC, which contained an arbitration clause governed by English law and seated in London. Two years later the parties executed Agreement‑II, a tripartite deed involving Sasan Power, NACC India (a subsidiary of NAC) and NAC, which transferred NAC's rights

TULSI AND ORS.versusCHANDRIKA PRASAD AND ORS.

2006 INSC 54424 August 2006Dismissed

The appellant had earlier mortgaged a portion of a house to a third party and later executed a single document selling the entire house to the respondents, which contained a right to redeem the mortgage. The respondents attempted to redeem, were refused, and filed suit for redemption and specific performance. The trial

SURENDRA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 54824 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, two brothers, were convicted of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and causing hurt (Sec. 324 IPC) for the death of their uncle Devaji and injuries to his children during a property‑related dispute. They claimed they acted in private defence after being attacked by the deceased and his son, who allegedly came armed.

JAI NARAIN PARASRAMPURIA (DEAD) AND ORS.versusPUSHPA DEVI SARAF AND ORS.

2006 INSC 55224 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The promoters of a proposed company purchased a house and land before incorporation and later transferred the title to the incorporated company, which was declared the owner by a decree. The promoters, acting as directors, subsequently entered into a sale agreement with the appellants and also leased the property, lead

CHAIRMAN, M.P. ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS.versusSHIV NARAYAN AND ANR.

2005 INSC 38024 August 2005Matter referred to larger bench

The Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board classified a lawyer's office as a commercial establishment and demanded commercial tariff for electricity consumption. The landlord, who owned the premises, challenged the demand in the High Court, which held that a lawyer's office is not a commercial establishment and the commercia

GILBERT PEREIRAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2004 INSC 46724 August 2004Dismissed

The appellant, Gilbert Pereira, was accused of murdering a young girl and robbing her of gold ornaments. The prosecution relied entirely on circumstantial evidence, including the victim’s body found in a house the appellant could access, blood‑stained clothes and knife matching the victim’s blood group, injuries on the

S. THANGAPPANversusP. PADMAVATHY

1999 INSC 35524 August 1999Dismissed

The appellant, S. Thangappan, was a tenant of premises used for an automobile workshop. The respondent, P. Padmavathy, filed an eviction petition under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, alleging non‑payment of rent from October 1982 to May 1983, the need for demolition and reconstruction, and

GOKARAJU VENKATANARASA RAJUversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1993 INSC 27324 August 1993Dismissed

The appellant was convicted of murder, theft of jewellery and concealment of evidence under IPC sections 302, 404 and 201. The prosecution relied on a series of circumstantial facts – the appellant’s presence with the victim, possession and disposal of the victim’s gold chain, ring and watch, the discovery of the body

DILIP K. BASUversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

2015 INSC 52424 July 2015Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined petitions seeking directions to set up State Human Rights Commissions (SHRCs) in several states that had failed to do so under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. The Court held that the word "may" in Section 21 of the Act does not make the power to constitute SHRCs discretionary; it is

ANUJ KUMAR GUPTA @ SETHI GUPTAversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2013 INSC 49124 July 2013Dismissed

The appellant, Anuj Kumar Gupta, was convicted for the murder of Chhotu Kumar Das based largely on a confessional statement he gave to the investigating officer (PW‑9) that led police to the victim’s body in a river. The trial court sentenced him to death, which the High Court later commuted to life imprisonment. The a

M. SARVANA @ K.D. SARAVANAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2012 INSC 30324 July 2012Dismissed

The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for stabbing and further assaulting the deceased, who later died. The prosecution relied on a dying declaration recorded by a police officer after medical certification of fitness, corroborated by an eye‑witness, forensic blood‑group evidence, the recovered kn

SHUDHAKARversusSTATE OF M.P.

2012 INSC 30124 July 2012Dismissed

The appellant Shudhakar was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly setting his wife on fire. The deceased gave three dying declarations: the first, recorded by a Naib Tehsildar, exonerated the husband and claimed the fire originated from a stove; the second and third, recorded later by a Tehsildar and

SANNAIA SUBBA RAO & ORS.versusSTATE OF A.P.

2008 INSC 86124 July 2008Case Partly allowed

The case involves the kidnapping of a 16‑year‑old girl in 1992. The girl was later found and gave a written report alleging kidnapping, but her trial testimony was later embellished with claims of sexual abuse and an attempt to sell her into prostitution. The trial court acquitted all three accused due to contradiction

RAJBABU & ANR.versusSTATE OF M.P.

2008 INSC 86224 July 2008Case Allowed

The deceased Shanti Bai set herself on fire in 1988 and, in her dying declaration, exonerated all members of her matrimonial home. The trial court convicted her husband and mother‑in‑law under IPC sections 306 (abetment of suicide) and 498A (cruelty) based largely on the dying declaration and a letter she had written,

ARVIND KUMAR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2007 INSC 77524 July 2007Disposed off

Arvind Kumar married Sadhna and, along with his mother Prem Bai, repeatedly demanded additional dowry items. Sadhna, unable to meet these demands, was allegedly harassed and tortured, leading her to set herself on fire and die within 1.5 months of marriage. Both were convicted under IPC s.306 (abetment of suicide) and

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SALEMversusK. CHINNTHAMBAN

2007 INSC 77924 July 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved a firm, M/s V.V. Enterprises, purportedly engaged in prize ticket business and collecting public deposits. Police seized about Rs. 1.18 crore from its premises, and the Assessing Officer found the firm’s books incomplete and could not explain the source of the deposits, treating the amount as undisclo

SADA KAURversusBAKHTAWAR SINGH AND ORS.

1980 INSC 13424 July 1980Dismissed

Sada Kaur, a widow of a Dhaliwal Jat from Tehsil Muktsar, remarried her deceased husband's younger brother in the Karewa form. The brothers of the deceased sued for a declaration that her remarriage caused forfeiture of her life interest in her first husband's estate, seeking a two‑thirds share. The central issue was w

MANOJ PRATAP SINGHversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

2022 INSC 65224 June 2022Dismissed

Manoj Pratap Singh was convicted of kidnapping, raping and murdering a seven-and-a-half-year-old mentally and physically disabled girl. The prosecution proved its case through a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, including DNA matches, blood‑stained clothing, the victim’s body recovered at the appellant’s direc

RUMI BORA DUTTAversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2013 INSC 35424 May 2013Dismissed

The appellant aunt and nephew were convicted for murdering the deceased husband, an Upper Division Clerk, based on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution proved that the death occurred at 1.30 a.m., the victims were found dead in bed, the accused were present, and the nephew’s statement under Section 27 led to the re

RAJPUT JABBARSINGH MALAJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2011 INSC 40924 May 2011Dismissed

The appellant, Rajput Jabbarsingh Malaji, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for murdering his brother Jethusing by striking him on the face with an axe. The prosecution relied on the dying victim's wife (PW‑3) who identified the appellant, corroborated by two brothers (PW‑5, PW‑6) whose statements were recorded under

GURUBACHAN SINGH AND ANR.versusRAM NIWAS

2006 INSC 36124 May 2006Disposed off

The landlord, Ram Niwas, filed an eviction suit against tenants Gurubachan Singh and another, alleging default in rent and unauthorized sub‑letting of a shop to the Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation (RTDC) at Rs 2100 per month for four months. The tenants contended that they had deposited rent in court under Se

DASHRATHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2025 INSC 65424 April 2025Case Partly allowed

Dashrath was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting a bribe. He challenged the conviction on four grounds: the sanction to prosecute was mechanically granted, the investigation was conducted by an Inspector of Police contrary to Sect

MAGHAVENDRA PRATAP SINGH @ PANKAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2023 INSC 41524 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Maghavendra Pratap Singh (Pankaj Singh), was convicted for the murder of businessman Goverdhan Aggarwal and related offences under Sections 302, 201, 120B of the IPC and the Arms Act, based largely on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution’s case lacked any eyewitnesses, direct forensic linkage, or rel

SHIVAKUMAR & ORS.versusSHARANABASAPPA & ORS.

2020 INSC 34924 April 2020Dismissed

The plaintiffs filed a suit claiming ownership of several properties on the basis of a Will dated 20‑05‑1991 executed by the deceased Sri Sangappa and sought to declare a trust created by the defendants void. The defendants challenged the genuineness of the Will, pointing to numerous irregularities such as the use of d

DIPAKBHAI JAGDISHCHANDRA PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER

2019 INSC 56824 April 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Dipakbhai Jagdishchandra Patel, was implicated in a counterfeit currency case after co‑accused 1‑3 claimed the fake notes originated from his residence. No counterfeit notes were actually recovered from his home and the only incriminating material was the co‑accused statements recorded by police under Se

DELHI ADMINISTRATIONversusVIDYA GUPTA

2018 INSC 40424 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Administration appealed the acquittal of Vidya Gupta, a sweet shop vendor, who was charged under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for storing adulterated ghee used to make jalebis. The Supreme Court held that Section 7, read with its explanation, deems any person who stores adulterated food for t

HEERA LAL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2017 INSC 39024 April 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The wife, Lalita, committed suicide within five years of her marriage, alleging daily quarrels and dowry demands by her mother‑in‑law and father‑in‑law. A dying declaration recorded by a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate detailed the harassment and the in‑laws’ presence at the time of the act. The trial court acquitted the acc

VUTUKURU LAKSHMAIAHversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2015 INSC 35224 April 2015Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the murder of Patrangi Ramanaiah, who was stabbed by a group of accused during an unlawful assembly. The trial court and High Court had convicted most of the accused under Sections 302, 148 and 324 IPC, relying on eyewitness testimony, a dying declaration, and forensic evidence, while acquitt

RAMAN KUMARversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2009 INSC 60524 April 2009Appeal(s) allowed

Raman Kumar was convicted by the High Court for dowry death under Sections 304B and 498A of the IPC based on the death of his wife Suman Bala, who allegedly died from burns after being allegedly harassed for dowry. The Supreme Court examined whether the prosecution had proved the essential ingredients of a dowry death,

ANIL KAKversusKUMARI SHARADA RAJE & ORS.

2008 INSC 51624 April 2008Dismissed

Maharani Sharmishthabai Holkar executed a detailed Will on 4 November 1992 that referred to three appendices containing the specific distribution of her assets. The appendices were not signed by the attesting witnesses and were not in existence at the time of execution. Applications for probate were filed by the execut

OM PARKASH BATISHversusRANJIT @ RANBIR KAUR AND OTHERS

2008 INSC 52524 April 2008Case Allowed

The appellant, Om Parkash Batish, owned a residential building and had engaged a casual worker, Ram Lal, for a short period to carry out repair work. While on the roof of an adjoining textile mill, Ram Lal suffered an electric shock and died. The respondents filed a claim for compensation under the Workmen Compensation

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD AND ANR.versusP. KATA RAO

2008 INSC 52924 April 2008Dismissed

The Managing Director of State Bank of Hyderabad initiated departmental proceedings against P. Kata Rao, an employee, on twelve charges, some of which overlapped with criminal charges for which he was later acquitted. The enquiry officer found him guilty of most charges and the appointing authority dismissed him; the d

ABDUL VAHAB ABDULMAJID SHAIKH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2007 INSC 45824 April 2007Dismissed

The accused were convicted under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act for kidnapping an industrialist and extorting a Rs 1 crore ransom. The conviction rested primarily on a detailed confessional statement recorded by the DCP from co‑accused A‑12, which was later retracted. The appellants argued tha

ABDUL VAHAB ABDUL MAJID SHAIKH AND ORS.versusSTA TE OF GUJARAT

2007 INSC 45924 April 2007Dismissed

The case concerned the abduction of businessman Jayendra Mahendra Tripathi in January 1994, for which a ransom was demanded. A co‑accused, A‑9, gave a detailed confession to the police under Section 15 of the TADA Act, which was later retracted. The Supreme Court held that the confession was recorded in compliance with

GIRDHAR SHANKAR TAWADEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2002 INSC 22324 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Girdhar Shankar Tawade was tried for abetment of suicide under IPC s.306 and cruelty to a woman under s.498‑A. The prosecution relied on contradictory oral testimony of the deceased's brother and cousin, three letters written by the deceased, and a dying declaration. The trial court and the High Court convicted him on

EZHIL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2002 INSC 22824 April 2002Dismissed

The three accused (Ezhil, Saravanan and Mohammed Iqbal) were charged with robbery, murder and related offences after a car they were travelling in was intercepted carrying articles belonging to the deceased, Masukuthu Ali, whose body was later found stabbed. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including

TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR.versusN. RAJU REDDIAR AND ANR.

1996 INSC 58224 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents (plaintiffs) sued the T.N. Electricity Board for Rs. 46,08,820, claiming that the freight rates for transporting iron and steel were to be paid on a multi‑slab basis as indicated in a handwritten addition to a letter appended to their tender. The High Court Division Bench accepted this claim, holding th

MIS. BHUWALKA STEEL INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANO!HERversusUNION OF IND!A & OTHERS

2017 INSC 26524 March 2017Matter referred to larger bench

The Supreme Court examined whether Rule 5 of the Hot‑Re‑rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997, which allows the annual capacity of production (ACP) to be deemed equal to actual production for the 1996‑97 year, creates a legal fiction and is ultra vires Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

MANMEET SINGH ALIAS GOLDIEversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2015 INSC 25324 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Manmeet Singh (alias Goldie) was convicted under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code for dacoity with murder, based on an alleged robbery of a large sum of money and the killing of Mohinder Singh. The prosecution alleged that five or more persons participated in the dacoity, but only the appellant was id

MD. BANI ALAM MAZID @ DHANversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2025 INSC 26024 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was accused, along with a co‑accused, of kidnapping and murdering a 16‑year‑old girl in Assam. The prosecution relied on three circumstantial links: the victim was last seen with the appellant, the appellant’s extra‑judicial confessions to several villagers, and the recovery of the dead body after those c

HIRALAL BABULAL SONIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2025 INSC 26624 February 2025Disposed off

The case involved a fraud scheme where fake telegraphic transfers were used to withdraw Rs. 6.7 crore from a bank, the proceeds of which were allegedly used to purchase 205 gold bars that were later seized from accused Nandkumar Babulal Soni. The trial court convicted Soni under Sections 120B and 411 of the IPC, direct

NANJAPPANversusRAMASAMY &ANR

2015 INSC 15224 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Nanjappan, entered into a 1987 sale agreement to sell his sole property for Rs 45,000, receiving an advance of Rs 25,000, with the balance to be paid within 2½ years. The time for execution was extended repeatedly, ultimately spanning eight years, and the respondents paid a total advance of Rs 42,500. Th

P. MANIversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2006 INSC 10624 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, P. Mani, was convicted of murdering his wife by allegedly setting her on fire, based solely on her dying declaration. The High Court upheld the conviction, holding the dying declaration reliable and noting the appellant's alleged absconding and lack of injury as circumstantial support. On appeal, the Sup

BISHWANATH PRASAD SINGHversusRAJENDRA PRASAD AND ANR.

2006 INSC 11524 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Bishwanath Prasad Singh, sold a piece of land to the respondents on 24 June 1977 and simultaneously executed an agreement for reconveyance, the parties agreeing that the sale would become absolute only upon payment of Rs.3000 within 23 months. The respondents claimed the transaction was a usufructuary mo

MANGU KHAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2005 INSC 10524 February 2005Dismissed

The appellants Mangu Khan, Sirdar Khan and Subedar Khan attacked an informant, his father and brother over a dispute concerning a bund, using lathis, farsi and tanchia. The father and brother were killed on the spot while the informant sustained injuries. The trial court convicted all five accused under Sections 148, 3

ROSHAN SINGH & ORS.versusZILE SINGH & ORS.

1988 INSC 5424 February 1988Dismissed

The case involved descendants of a common ancestor who had partitioned their agricultural land in 1955 and later their residential properties. A memorandum of partition (Exh. P‑12) dated 3 August 1955, later confirmed by a settlement (Exh. P‑1) on 31 January 1971, listed the properties allotted to each party. The dispu

HARE KRISHNA SINGH & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1988 INSC 5324 February 1988Case Allowed

The case involved a murder at Sadar Hospital where Hare Krishna Singh and six others were alleged to have fired upon the deceased Jitendra Choudhary, resulting in his death. The appellants challenged their convictions on several grounds, including the prosecution’s failure to explain injuries sustained by Hare Krishna

STATE OF HARYANAversusSHER SINGH & ORS.

1981 INSC 4624 February 1981Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana charged Sher Singh and his two sons with the murder of Sher Singh's half‑brothers, alleging they assaulted and burned the victims in a village courtyard. The trial court convicted them under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC, sentencing Sher Singh to death and the others to life imprisonment; the High

MUNNA LALversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2023 INSC 7824 January 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the murder of Narayan in 1985, for which Munna Lal, Sheo Lal and Babu Ram were convicted under section 302 IPC based largely on the oral testimony of two eye‑witnesses, PW‑2 (Ram Vilas) and PW‑3 (Hemraj), and medical evidence. The Supreme Court examined the credibility of these witnesses, noting PW‑2

SHAMNSHAEB M. MULTTANIversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2001 INSC 4324 January 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, his brother and father were tried for murder (IPC s.302) of the appellant's wife; the trial court acquitted them after witnesses turned hostile. The Karnataka High Court, however, convicted the appellant under IPC s.304B (dowry death) and s.498A without a specific charge for s.304B. The Supreme Court exa

KARAN SINGH AND ORS. ETC.versusBHAGWAN SINGH (DEAD) BY L.R. AND ORS. ETC.

1996 INSC 12924 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Bhagwan Singh, a co‑owner of undivided joint‑family agricultural land, sold portions of the land in specie to strangers who later sold parts to Karan Singh (the appellant). Bhagwan Singh filed a suit for pre‑emption under the Punjab Pre‑emption Act, 1913, claiming his co‑owner right. The trial court dismissed the suit,

RAMJILAL AND ORS. ETC.versusGHISA RAM ETC.

1996 INSC 12524 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, co‑owners of land sold by a widow who possessed only a limited estate, filed a suit under Section 15(1)(b) of the Punjab Pre‑emption Act, 1913 seeking pre‑emption of the sale. The trial court decreed in their favour and the decree was upheld on appeal, but the second appeal was dismissed. While these p

UNION OF INDIAversusVIJAY KRISHNA UNIYAL (D) THROUGH LRS.

[2017] 14 S.C.R. 6823 December 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India, as the owner of land covered by an Old Grant, issued a notice to resume a 3.398‑acre property in Landour Cantonment occupied by Vijay Krishna Uniyal, who sued for a permanent injunction claiming ownership based on a 1980 sale deed and long possession. The trial court, the first appellate court and t

HAMID ALI KHAN (D) THROUGH LRS. & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2021 INSC 77423 November 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants challenged the acquisition of their land for a residential‑commercial scheme, arguing that the State had improperly invoked the urgency clause under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to dispense with the hearing mandated by Section 5A. The High Court had dismissed the writ petition, but on

SMT. BAYANABAI KAWAREversusRAJENDRA S/O BABURAO DHOTE

2017 INSC 113623 November 2017Dismissed

The plaintiff purchased a plot from a housing cooperative society by a registered sale deed dated 29‑12‑1981 and was placed in possession. The defendant later encroached on the land and erected a hut, prompting the plaintiff to sue for possession and mesne profits. The trial court and first appellate court dismissed th

JARNAIL SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1995 INSC 77523 November 1995Case Partly allowed

The appellant and four others were tried for murder, rioting and attempt to murder. Eye‑witnesses PW4 and PW6 testified that the appellant and his brother fired at the deceased Sukhdev Singh, while a defence witness DW5 also admitted the appellant’s firing. The trial court acquitted three accused on the basis of doubt

PARVEEN KUMARversusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2024 INSC 71723 September 2024Dismissed

Parveen Kumar was married to Raksha Devi, who filed multiple complaints alleging cruelty, including an FIR under Section 498-A and a maintenance petition under Section 125 CrPC. Within two years of marriage, she died by ingesting aluminum phosphide tablets, and her brother lodged an FIR accusing the husband of cruelty

GOVINDBHAI CHHOTABHAI PATEL & ORS.versusPATEL RAMANBHAI MATHURBHAI

2019 INSC 107023 September 2019Dismissed

The appellants, sons of the deceased donor, claimed that a property gifted by their father to the respondent was ancestral and that the donor lacked authority to execute the gift deed, alleging the deed was forged. The trial court held the property ancestral, a view affirmed by the first appellate court, but the Gujara

S.P.S. RATHOREversusC.B.I. & ANR.

2016 INSC 90723 September 2016Disposed off

S.P.S. Rathore, a senior police officer, was convicted under Section 354 IPC for molesting a minor girl, Ruchika, after she was forced into his office and embraced against her will. The prosecution relied primarily on the testimony of a single eye‑witness, PW‑13 (Aradhana), whose account was corroborated by other witne

DHAL SINGH DEWANGANversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2016 INSC 90523 September 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Dhal Singh Dewangan was accused of murdering his wife and five daughters. The prosecution relied on statements of village witnesses (PWs 1,2,3,5) that they heard the appellant’s mother (PW‑6) accuse him, and on circumstantial evidence such as the presence of a blood‑stained knife and the appellant’s uncon

PREM KUMAR GULATIversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

2014 INSC 66823 September 2014Disposed off

The deceased Rajni died from severe burns after kerosene oil was poured on her and she was set alight. Her dying declaration named her husband Mahender Singh, her brother‑in‑law Prem Kumar Gulati and his wife Simla as participants, but did not specify who actually poured the oil or lit the fire. The trial court and Hig

DELTA DISTILLERIES LIMITEDversusUNITED SPIRITS LIMITED & ANR.

2013 INSC 64923 September 2013Dismissed

Delta Distilleries supplied Indian Made Foreign Liquor to United Spirits under a contract that made the buyer responsible for sales tax. A dispute arose over a set‑off/refund claimed by Delta from the Sales Tax Department, which United Spirits argued reduced its tax burden. The arbitral tribunal allowed United Spirits

KULDEEP SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 64023 September 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The police, acting on secret information, seized four sealed bags containing 150 kg of poppy husk from the appellant's residence. No samples were taken at the time of seizure; instead, the Station House Officer later broke the seals, mixed the contents, and collected samples before resealing the bags. The appellant was

STATE OF WEST BENGALversusSRI ORILAL JAISWAL AND ANR.

1993 INSC 30723 September 1993Case Partly allowed

The State of West Bengal appealed the Calcutta High Court's acquittal of Orilal Jaiswal and his mother, Gujarati Debi, on charges of abetment of suicide (Sec. 306 IPC) and cruelty (Sec. 498A IPC). The Supreme Court examined whether the victim’s mother, brother and other close relatives provided sufficient evidence of c

STATE DELHI (ADMINISTRATION)versusLAXMAN KUMAR & ORS.

1985 INSC 20223 September 1985Case Partly allowed

The case concerned the death of Sudha, who was found burnt in a Delhi flat; the prosecution alleged that her mother‑in‑law Shakuntala and husband Laxman Kumar deliberately set her on fire to avoid dowry demands, while the defence claimed an accidental fire from a kerosene stove. The trial court convicted all three accu

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

2024 INSC 62323 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appeals challenge the Special Judge’s order on charge (24‑12‑2021) and charge‑framing order (03‑03‑2022) against Karnataka Emta Coal Mines Ltd (KECML) and its former MD for alleged conspiracy to illegally sell coal washery rejects. The Court examined whether the CBI’s investigation was predicated solely on the 2013

IRFAN @ NAKAversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2023 INSC 75823 August 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Irfan, was convicted and sentenced to death for allegedly setting fire to a room that killed his son and two brothers, based primarily on two dying declarations. The prosecution argued that the appellant had motive and that eye‑witnesses saw him pour inflammable substance and lock the door. The defence c

T.K. REDDYversusSTATE OF A.P. AND ORS.

2002 INSC 34623 August 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, T.K. Reddy, was convicted of murdering his wife Ramulamma by allegedly setting her on fire, based primarily on a dying declaration recorded by a magistrate (Exhibit P‑2) that accused him of the act. A second dying declaration recorded by police (Exhibit P‑5) claimed the wife had set herself on fire due t

MEHBUB SAMSUDDIN MALEK AND ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1996 INSC 93023 August 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the appeal of Mehbub Samsuddin Malek and two co‑accused convicted for a communal riot in Baroda. The driver (appellant No.1) stopped his bus opposite a mob of armed Muslim youths, got down, and conversed with them, after which the mob attacked the passengers, leading to deaths. The Court held

G H GIRISH SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2019 INSC 79623 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttarakhand appealed the acquittal of Girish Singh and Jodh Singh, who were charged under Sections 304B r/w 34 and 306 r/w 34 of the IPC for the alleged dowry death of Ishwari Devi, who committed suicide by burning within seven years of marriage. The High Court convicted them, relying on unproduced letters

DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMYversusARUN SHOURIE

2014 INSC 50623 July 2014Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined an editorial published by Arun Shourie that criticised a report of a Commission of Inquiry headed by a sitting Supreme Court Judge, Justice Kuldip Singh. Dr. Subramanian Swamy filed contempt petitions alleging that the editorial scandalised the Court. The Court was asked to decide (i) whether

GIAN CHAND & ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2013 INSC 48823 July 2013Dismissed

The appellants were seized at night while travelling in a jeep that contained ten bags of poppy husk (total 410 kg). They were convicted under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and sentenced to ten years of rigorous imprisonment. On appeal they argued that the prosecution failed to

KALIYAversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2013 INSC 48923 July 2013Dismissed

The appellant, Kaliya, mother‑in‑law, was convicted of murdering her daughter‑in‑law, Guddi, who was burnt alive in the appellant's house. Guddi’s dying declaration, stating that Kaliya poured kerosene on her, was recorded by a doctor and a nurse, but the original document was lost and only a carbon copy was produced.

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADURAIversusAYYAPPAN TEXTILES LTD.

2013 INSC 49023 July 2013Dismissed

Ayyappan Textiles Ltd., a manufacturer of cotton yarn under heading 52.03, was inspected on 30 August 1993 and two registers and a file of weekly test reports were seized. The Central Excise Department issued a show‑cause notice alleging that the company had been producing yarn of higher counts (40s, 43s, 60s, 82s) tha

PANTANGI BALARAMA VENKATA GANESHversusSTATE OF AP.

2009 INSC 94423 July 2009Dismissed

The case concerns the murder of MP Magunta Subbarama Reddy, his gunman, and injuries to two witnesses. Accused No.1, Pantangi Balarama Venkata Ganesh, a member of the Peoples War Group, was arrested on the day of the incident with a pistol, cartridges and a pink shirt bearing his blood. Eye‑witnesses, DNA profiling lin

KAVITAversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

1998 INSC 27223 July 1998Appeal(s) allowed

Kavita was accused of throwing her two children into a well and then jumping in, after which she allegedly made an extra‑judicial confession to three villagers that she could no longer endure her husband's torture. The trial court and the Madras High Court convicted her of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and attempted suicide (S

AGNIRAJ & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE THROUGH DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CB-CID

2025 INSC 77423 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a violent incident on 14 November 2012 in which members of a political rival family were attacked, resulting in three deaths. The prosecution relied on three key witnesses – PW‑1, PW‑2 and a 10‑year‑old child PW‑9 – as well as fingerprint and weapon‑recovery evidence to secure convictions of accused

MAHARANA PRATAP SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS

2025 INSC 55423 April 2025Disposed off

Maharana Pratap Singh, a constable in the CID dog squad, was dismissed from service in 1996 following departmental proceedings that found him guilty of four charges, while he was later acquitted of the related criminal charges. The appellant challenged the dismissal, alleging denial of due process, vague charges, and t

PURAN CHANDversusSTATE OF H.P.

2014 INSC 31523 April 2014Dismissed

The appellant, Puran Chand, was convicted under Section 376 IPC for raping a 17‑year‑old girl who later attempted suicide. He appealed, claiming false implication due to enmity, a 20‑day delay in filing the FIR, and that the medical report showing an intact hymen created reasonable doubt. The Supreme Court held that th

STATE OF M.P.versusMUNSHI SINGH & ORS.

2009 INSC 59323 April 2009Dismissed

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed the acquittal of Munshi Singh and others for the murder of Sobran. The trial court had found the testimony of three eye‑witnesses unreliable and, relying on ballistic evidence that contradicted their statements, acquitted the accused. The High Court upheld this acquittal, holding th

SIATE OF PUNJABversusNIRMAL SINGH

2009 INSC 59623 April 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The trial court convicted Nirmal Singh under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for possessing poppy husk recovered from his house and sentenced him to ten years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine. The Punjab and Haryana High Court acquitted him, holding that the parameters of Section

NOORJAHANversusSTATE REP. BY D.S.P.

2008 INSC 51523 April 2008Case Allowed

The appellant, the aunt of the husband, was convicted under Section 498A of the IPC for allegedly participating in dowry demand that led to the death of the wife. The prosecution alleged that the husband, his brother, and the aunt demanded jewellery and cash, and that the husband and brother strangulated the wife while

NETAJI ACHYUT SHINDE (PATIL) & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2021 INSC 20023 March 2021Dismissed

The case concerns the murder of Suhas on 5 July 2011, for which three accused—Netaji Achyut Shinde (A‑1), Samadhan Shinde (A‑2) and Balasaheb Shinde (A‑3)—were charged under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. A telephonic intimation at 17:45 was treated by the trial court as the FIR, leading to the conviction of A‑2

VIMAL CHAND GHEVARCHAND JAIN & ORS.versusRAMAKANT EKNATH JAJOO

2009 INSC 38723 March 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant partnership firm claimed title to four godowns in Nasik based on a registered deed of sale executed in 1974 by the respondent's father. The respondent occupied the property as a licencee and later contested the deed, alleging it was a security for a Rs.50,000 loan. The trial court dismissed the suit, hold

ABDULWAHAB ABDULMAJID BALOCHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2009 INSC 38423 March 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was part of a group that abducted Bhagvandas Sindhi and attempted to extort money; when the victim resisted, the appellant allegedly fired a revolver at him, causing a fatal head wound. The weapon and a bullet were later recovered, and a ballistic expert testified that the bullet was fired from the seized

JAISHREE ANANT KHANDEKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2009 INSC 39123 March 2009Dismissed

The victim Aruna suffered severe burns after the appellant Jaishree allegedly poured kerosene on her and set her alight; Aruna died fifteen days later. During her dying period she gave five dying declarations, which were recorded by medical staff and police. The trial court convicted Jaishree of murder under Section 30

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusBALVEER SINGH

2025 INSC 26123 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh prosecuted Balveer Singh for the murder, concealment and conspiracy to murder his wife, relying heavily on the testimony of the 7‑year‑old daughter, Rani, as the sole eye‑witness. The High Court acquitted the accused, holding that the child’s delayed statement and residence with an inimical

AMITversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2012 INSC 10023 February 2012Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a neighbour, abducted a three‑year‑old girl from her home under the pretext of giving her biscuits, subsequently raping and murdering her. The trial court convicted him under IPC sections 364, 376, 377, 302 and 201 and imposed death for the murder, which the High Court affirmed. On appeal, the Supreme Co

SAHDEO @ SAHDEO SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2010 INSC 11523 February 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined contempt proceedings initiated suo motu by the Allahabad High Court against police personnel accused of illegally detaining a man whose whereabouts were unknown. The High Court had presumed the detainee dead under Section 108 of the Evidence Act, despite only 4½ years having elapsed, and conv

SARDAR SINGHversusSTATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION, DELHI)

1993 INSC 6523 February 1993Case Partly allowed

Sardar Singh, his wife Saraswati and his brother's wife Savitri were charged with murder and with concealing evidence under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 of the IPC. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence: the deceased's illicit relationship with Saraswati and Savitri, the discovery of his body buried in

DWARKA PRASADversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

1993 INSC 6623 February 1993Case Partly allowed

Dwarka Prasad was convicted of murder under sections 302 and 307 IPC. The prosecution alleged that he and a co‑accused attacked the deceased and a witness with knives, motivated by a prior altercation, and that the FIR was lodged several hours after the incident. The accused claimed he was guarding his grandfather's fi

KULWANT SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2004 INSC 5723 January 2004Dismissed

The appellants, Kulwant Singh and others, were charged with murder, attempt to murder and causing hurt arising from a land‑boundary dispute in which two of the victims, Kartar Kaur and Partap Singh, were injured and later died. The trial court acquitted them on the basis of private defence, but the High Court convicted

SHRI GOPAL AND ANR .versusSUBHASH AND ORS.

2004 INSC 5923 January 2004Dismissed

The case involved a murder arising from a rivalry between two village groups, leading to the death of Ramkumar. Five persons were tried; the trial court convicted all under Sections 148, 302 and 149 of the IPC, sentencing them to life imprisonment. The Rajasthan High Court acquitted three of the accused of the charges

HARBANS LALversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1996 INSC 12023 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Harbans Lal was convicted for the murder of his wife Punni Devi, who died from burns, along with his two sons. The trial court sentenced all three to life imprisonment; the High Court acquitted the sons but upheld the husband's conviction. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the prosecution's case, which rested mainl

VIMLA BAI (DEAD) BY LRS.versusHIRALAL GUPTA AND ORS.

1989 INSC 39822 December 1989Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Bhikubai, claimed possession of a house inherited from her brother Rakhmaji, asserting that under the Bombay School of Hindu law a female bandhu is an heir. The respondents argued that the family, having migrated from Mathura, was governed by the Banaras School where a female bandhu cannot inherit, and t

RANDEEP SINGH @ RANA & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2024 INSC 88722 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted under Sections 364, 302, 120-B and 201 of the IPC for the abduction and murder of Gurpal Singh, based largely on the testimony of an alleged eyewitness, CCTV footage, and confessional statements made to police. The Supreme Court examined the credibility of the eyewitness, noting material o

ARVIND KUMAR @ NEMICHAND & ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2021 INSC 76422 November 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a land‑dispute over a pathway between the prime accused Surjaram and the deceased Ladduram, which escalated into a violent clash on 18‑07‑1989 resulting in two deaths and several injuries. The trial courts and the High Court delivered mixed judgments, convicting some accused under Section 302 r.w. S

K.V. PRAKASH BABUversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2016 INSC 105122 November 2016

The appellant, K.V. Prakash Babu, was convicted under Sections 498‑A and 306 of the IPC for the suicide of his wife, who allegedly suspected him of an extra‑marital affair. The prosecution alleged that the husband's alleged relationship and the resulting suspicion constituted mental cruelty that drove the wife to kill

RAMESH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2016 INSC 104922 November 2016Dismissed

The case involves the death of Roshni, who suffered 100% burns and gave a dying declaration to a Judicial Magistrate in hospital after a doctor certified her fitness to speak. The trial court acquitted the four accused, rejecting the dying declaration and relying on the victim's brother's testimony that the accused wer

C.B.I.versusASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL & ANR.

2013 INSC 77722 November 2013Dismissed

The CBI appealed against the Delhi High Court’s order quashing a Special Judge’s grant of pardon to respondent No.2 (Abhishek Verma) under Section 306 of the CrPC, who had confessed to forging a fax message on the instructions of respondent No.1 (Ashok Kumar Aggarwal). The Supreme Court examined the scope of the court’

C.B.I.versusASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL

2013 INSC 77822 November 2013Dismissed

The CBI filed a case against Ashok Kumar Aggarwal for possessing disproportionate assets and obtained sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The respondent challenged the validity of the sanction, alleging that material was not placed before the Finance Minister and that th

GOVIND SINGHversusHARCHAND KAUR

2010 INSC 79822 November 2010Appeal(s) allowed

Govind Singh, a former Social Security Minister, resigned on 12 January 2002 and filed his nomination as an independent candidate on 23 January 2002. He was elected MLA from the Sherpur (SC) constituency on 13 February 2002. The defeated candidate, Harchand Kaur, filed an election petition alleging that Singh had indul

GANGARAM SHANTARAM SALUNKHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 88122 November 2006Dismissed

The appellant, Gangaram Shantaram Salunkhe, was convicted under IPC Section 302 read with Section 34 for the murder of Bhaulal Jadhav. The prosecution relied on two eye‑witnesses (PW4 and PW5), a dying declaration of the deceased recorded by PW6, and medical evidence. The appellant challenged the identification, arguin

BANNARI AMMAN SUGARS LTD.versusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ORS.

2004 INSC 66522 November 2004Disposed off

The Tamil Nadu Government had granted an exemption from purchase tax on sugarcane to sugar mills in the cooperative and public sectors in 1975. In 1988 it withdrew the exemption for mills exceeding a turnover ceiling and made the withdrawal retrospective to April 1988. Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. and related mills, which

UMA & ANR.versusTHE STATE REP. BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

2024 INSC 80922 October 2024Dismissed

The trial court acquitted Ms. Uma and co‑accused of murder, holding that the prosecution had not proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly discounting medical evidence in the absence of an eyewitness. The State appealed, and the Madras High Court reversed the acquittal, convicting the appellants on charges

ALAGARSAMY AND ORS.versusSTATE REPRESENTED BY DY. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

2009 INSC 119622 October 2009Dismissed

The case arose from a caste‑based election dispute in Melavalavu village where six Dalits were murdered and forty persons were charged, seventeen of whom were convicted under IPC sections 302, 149 and 34 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellants challenged their convictions on the ground that the Fir

SRI CHAND GUPTAversusGULZAR SINGH AND ANR.

1991 INSC 26922 October 1991Dismissed

The landlord filed an eviction application under Section 14(1)(b) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, alleging that the tenant, Guizar Singh, had sublet the premises to his brother Avtar Singh. The Rent Controller and the Rent Control Tribunal relied on an affidavit filed by Avtar Singh before the Income Tax authorities, in

NAGAMMA @ NAGARATHNA & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA

2025 INSC 113522 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka alleged that a police constable (A1) borrowed money from a fellow police officer who later demanded repayment, leading A1's wife (A2) to invite the victim to their home and murder him with two choppers. The trial court convicted A2, A3 and A4 under Section 302 read with Section 34, while acquitti

BALWINDER SINGH (BINDA)versusTHE NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU

2023 INSC 85222 September 2023Disposed off

The case arose from a 2005 drug seizure in Chandigarh where the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) recovered heroin from a car driven by Satnam Singh and later arrested Balwinder Singh based on a confession recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act. The High Court had upheld both convictions, relying on the confessional st

GOPI @ GOVERDHANNATH (D) BY LRS. & ORS.versusSRI BALLABH VYAS

2022 INSC 100022 September 2022Dismissed

The respondent, Ballabh Vyas, claimed ownership of a small shop (Mulgi) based on a registered sale deed dated 27 June 1985 and sought eviction of the appellants, who were tenants succeeding the original lessee Balraj. The appellants denied the respondent’s title, asserting that Balraj had purchased the property for Rs.

STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusRAJENDRAN

1999 INSC 43522 September 1999Appeal(s) allowed

The accused Rajendran, a jobless alcoholic, was alleged to have strangled his wife and set fire to their hut, resulting in the deaths of his wife and two daughters. The trial court, relying on a series of corroborative circumstantial facts – including repeated quarrels, the accused’s presence in the house at the time o

IQBAL AHMED (DEAD) BY LRS. & ANR.versusABDUL SHUKOOR

2025 INSC 102722 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The trial court decreed specific performance of a sale agreement between the plaintiffs and the defendant. The defendant appealed and, during the pendency of the appeal, filed an application under Order XLI Rule 27(1) of the CPC to lead additional documentary evidence. The High Court admitted this evidence without firs

RAM PYARE MISHRAversusPREM SHANKER AND ORS.

2008 INSC 96222 August 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a violent incident on 12 July 1978 in which two brothers, Prem Shanker and Hari Shanker, armed with a knife and a lathi, assaulted and caused the death of Mohan Mishra. The trial court convicted them under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, but the Allahabad High Court acquitted them on the groun

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusKHERAJ RAM

2003 INSC 41322 August 2003Appeal(s) allowed

Kheraj Ram, suspecting his wife's infidelity, murdered his wife, two daughters and his brother‑in‑law on the night of 10‑10‑1992. The trial court convicted him under Section 302 IPC and imposed death, relying on a series of circumstantial facts – motive, prior quarrels, his presence with the victims, an extra‑judicial

NAZIR KHAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF DELHI

2003 INSC 41422 August 2003Directions issued

The case involved nine accused who conspired to kidnap foreign nationals in India to demand the release of jailed militants. The main conspirator, Umar Sheikh, escaped after an exchange of hijacked‑plane passengers, while six co‑accused were convicted under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA

S. TIRUPATHI RAOversusM. LINGAMAIAH & ORS.

2024 INSC 54422 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute arose from a civil suit concerning the partition of ancestral land, which led to a decree directing the Tahsildar to mutate the name of the first respondent in revenue records. The Tahsildar failed to comply, prompting a contempt petition that was initially allowed by a Single Judge but later set aside by a

SANJAY RAJAKversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

2019 INSC 78722 July 2019Dismissed

The appellant, Sanjay Rajak, was convicted under IPC s.364(A) for kidnapping a 5‑6‑year‑old child and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence: a classmate’s testimony that a man with a covered face, addressed as "uncle" by the child, abducted him; parents’ identification of the

MD. ALAUDDIN KHANversusKARAM THAMARJIT SINGH

2010 INSC 41822 July 2010Matter referred to larger bench

The election for the 9th Manipur Legislative Assembly was won by MD Alauddin Khan by a margin of two votes over Karam Thamarjit Singh, who filed an election petition under Section 100(1)(d)(iii) alleging impersonation of dead voters in certain polling stations and seeking a recount and declaration of the election as vo

DHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 41922 July 2010Case Partly allowed

The appellant Ohan Singh was convicted for the death of his brother Shiv Ram, who died after being struck on the head with an iron rod during a family property dispute. The prosecution relied on Shiv Ram's dying declaration, recorded by a Head Constable after a doctor certified that he was fit to speak, which identifie

DAVINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2023 INSC 58522 June 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Davinder Singh, was convicted by the trial court and the Punjab & Haryana High Court for offences under Sections 376, 452 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, based on the allegation that he threatened the prosecutrix with a knife at her residence. On appeal before the Supreme Court, the appellant contended

PAPAN SARKAR @ PRANABversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2026 INSC 52822 May 2026Case Allowed

The appellant accused were convicted of pre‑meditated murder based on the "last seen together" theory, alleged extra‑judicial confessions, recoveries of alleged weapons and a motorcycle, and serological evidence. The Supreme Court examined whether the time gap between the accused being last seen with the deceased and t

AEJAZ AHMAD SHEIKHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2025 INSC 52922 April 2025Dismissed

The case concerned the alleged murder of Amina and her three daughters by setting them on fire, for which the accused, Aejaz Ahmad Sheikh's brother, was initially convicted and sentenced to death. The High Court later acquitted him, prompting appeals by the State and the complainant. The Supreme Court examined the reli

JAFARUDHEEN & ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2022 INSC 46422 April 2022Disposed off

The case involved a violent clash between members of two political parties in Kerala, resulting in the murder of a CPI(M) member. Sixteen accused were charged, but the trial court acquitted A-10 to A-16 while convicting five others. The High Court upheld the convictions but reversed the acquittals of A-10 to A-13, rely

M.A. ANTONY @ ANTAPPANversusSTATE OF KERALA

2009 INSC 58822 April 2009Dismissed

The appellant, M.A. Antony, was convicted of murdering six members of a family in Kerala and sentenced to death, along with other imprisonments, based largely on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution relied on motive, the appellant's presence at the crime scene, forensic evidence such as fingerprints and scalp hair,

STATE OF PUNJABversusHARJAGDEV SINGH

2009 INSC 58122 April 2009Disposed off

The State of Punjab prosecuted Harjagdev Singh for the murder of his parents. The accused was arrested, gave a disclosure statement that led to the recovery of the murder weapon, and subsequently made a confession before a Judicial Magistrate under Section 164 of the CrPC admitting his guilt. The trial court convicted

BRIJ RAJ SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.versusSEWAK RAM AND ANR.

1999 INSC 19722 April 1999Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, legal representatives of the deceased Brij Raj Singh, sued the defendants for possession of land on the basis of a registered gift deed dated 18‑Jan‑1961, executed by the donor Kanwar Chander Raj Saran Singh and presented for registration by a duly authorised attorney. The trial court held the deed valid

GOVINDASAMIversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

1998 INSC 19422 April 1998Dismissed

Govindasami was accused of murdering his uncle Nagamalai, the latter's wife, two sons and a daughter in May 1984. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence: a land‑dispute motive, a wrist‑watch recovered from the crime scene that belonged to the accused, a blood‑stained lungi and a promissory note found on him,

ANSHAD AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

1994 INSC 16822 April 1994

The Supreme Court examined the convictions of five accused (Al, A2, A3, A4, A5) for the murders of Savitri Devi and her grandson Sunil and related robbery. The Sessions Court had sentenced them to life imprisonment, but the Karnataka High Court enhanced the sentences of Al, A2 and A3 to death. The Court held that the H

COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAXversusSAI PUBLICATION FUND

2002 INSC 16922 March 2002Dismissed

The Sai Publication Fund, a trust created by devotees of Sai Baba to spread his teachings, published and sold books, pamphlets and related material at nominal cost. The Commissioner of Sales Tax contended that the trust was a "dealer" under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, invoking the amended definition of "business" i

DEVENDER PAL SINGHversusSTATE N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ANR.

2002 INSC 16822 March 2002Case Partly allowed

The appellant Devender Pal Singh was arrested after being deported from Germany and recorded a confessional statement under Section 15 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA). The Designated Court convicted him of offences under TADA and the IPC, including criminal conspiracy, and sentenced h

SUCHA SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2001 INSC 16622 March 2001Dismissed

During the peak of militancy in Punjab, two teenage sons of Diwan Singh were abducted from their home by four armed men, including the appellant Sucha Singh, and were later found shot dead. The parents were present in the house at the time of the abduction. The prosecution proved the abduction and the subsequent murder

FERRO ALLOYS CORPN. LTD. AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1999 INSC 12422 March 1999Dismissed

Ferro Alloys Corp. Ltd (FACOR) sought a mining lease for chromite in Sukinda Valley after the Central Government, following a high‑power expert committee (Sharma Committee), reduced the area previously granted to Tata Iron & Steel Co. (TISCO). The Committee assessed the needs of all claimants, including FACOR, and the

VIJAYAN @ VIJAYA KUMARversusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

1999 INSC 12522 March 1999Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a long‑standing rivalry between two neighbouring families over stone slabs that blocked drainage. On 5 October 1984, after a morning altercation in which the appellant's faction slapped the deceased's father, the deceased Natarajan and his brother either pursued the appellant (prosecution version) o

STATE (THROUGH CBI/NEW DELHI)versusS.J. CHOUDHARY

1990 INSC 10422 March 1990Matter referred to larger bench

The State, represented by the CBI, appealed against a High Court order that barred the prosecution from examining a forensic document expert, S.K. Gupta, whose opinion linked a typewritten slip on a grenade parcel to a specific college typewriter. The issue centered on whether an expert's opinion on typescript falls wi

THAKORE UMEDSING NATHUSINGversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2024 INSC 19822 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The accused were tried for murder, dacoity and robbery after the victim's jeep was allegedly hijacked; the trial court acquitted them of murder and dacoity but convicted them of robbery. The State appealed, and the Gujarat High Court reversed the acquittal, convicting the accused of murder and related offences. The Sup

NARESH KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2024 INSC 14922 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Naresh Kumar was convicted under Section 306 of the IPC for allegedly abetting his wife Rani's suicide in 1993, based largely on the fact that she died within seven years of marriage and that he repeatedly demanded money for a business. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the deceased's brother and

VAHITHAversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2023 INSC 15122 February 2023Dismissed

The appellant Vahitha was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly strangling her five‑year‑old daughter in the house of her mother‑in‑law. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the mother‑in‑law, two other family members, and two independent neighbours who saw the appellant near the child's body, as well as

RAMESHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2011 INSC 14822 February 2011Dismissed

The case involved the murder of money‑lender RL and his wife during a robbery of their house‑cum‑shop, where the accused A‑1 (Gordhan Lal), A‑2 (Bharat Kumar) and A‑3 (Ramesh) were convicted of murder, robbery and related offences. The prosecution relied on a chain of circumstantial evidence, including blood‑stained cl

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusM/S. GANESH DAS BHOJRAJ

2000 INSC 9122 February 2000Appeal(s) allowed

The importer M/s. Ganesh Das Bhojraj claimed exemption from customs duty on green beans under Notification No.129/76-Cus, but the Central Government amended the exemption by Notification No.40/87-Cus, imposing a 25% duty. The importer contended that the 1987 notification, although published in the Gazette of India, was

THE STATE OF KARNATAKAversusMOIN PATAL AND OTHERS

1996 INSC 29522 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka prosecuted four respondents for the murders of two brothers, alleging they were killed with an axe and sickle. The trial court convicted them under IPC sections 302, 34 and 324 based on eye‑witness testimony, recovered blood‑stained weapons, and post‑mortem reports. The Karnataka High Court acqui

LAXMAN NAIKversusSTATE OF ORISSA

1994 INSC 8822 February 1994Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the appeal of Laxman Naik, who was convicted of raping and murdering his 7‑year‑old niece. The prosecution case was built entirely on circumstantial evidence, including eyewitnesses who saw the accused and victim together, the accused’s false statements about the victim’s whereabouts, medical

MOHAN LAL SHAMLAL SONIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

1991 INSC 6722 February 1991Dismissed

The appellant's premises were raided by Customs officials, leading to the seizure of gold, silver, and cash and the filing of two criminal complaints under the Customs Act, 1962 and the Gold Control Act, 1968. After the trial magistrate closed evidence, the prosecution sought, under Section 540 of the old Code (now Sec

THAMMARAYA AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA

2025 INSC 10822 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Thammaraya and Basappa were convicted for murder and concealment of dead body under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the IPC based largely on circumstantial evidence and alleged disclosure statements that led to the recovery of certain articles. The prosecution's case hinged on the recovery of a gold chain, d

STATE OF KERALA AND ANR.versusMOHAMMED BASHEER

2019 INSC 6522 January 2019Dismissed

The respondent Mohammed Basheer claimed ownership of about two acres of jenmam land, asserting that it was not a private forest under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 and that a certificate of purchase issued by the Land Tribunal under s.72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 vested title

MOHAMMED SALIM (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.versusSHAMSUDEEN (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.

2019 INSC 7122 January 2019Dismissed

The plaintiff, Shamsudeen, claimed inheritance rights in two properties originally owned by his grandmother Zainam Beevi, alleging that he was the son of Mohammed Ilias (a Muslim) and Valliamma (a Hindu) born before Ilias's death. The defendants contested his paternity, arguing that the marriage between Ilias and Valli

POOJA PALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2016 INSC 8622 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed

Pooja Pal, the widow of slain MLA Raju Pal, alleged that the state police and administration were complicit or indifferent in the murder of her husband and sought a fresh investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The High Court dismissed her writ petition, but the Supreme Court held that when an inves

SHAIKH RAFIQ & ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2008 INSC 8722 January 2008Case Allowed

The appellants Shaikh Rafiq and Fatimbee were convicted for the murder of Noor Miya Mohd. Hussain, allegedly after they, together with the deceased's daughter‑in‑law Jaibunisa, came to his house and, following a dispute, poured kerosene on him and set him alight. The conviction rested solely on a dying declaration reco

B. SHASHIKALAversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2004 INSC 5122 January 2004Dismissed

The deceased, married to the brother of the appellant, was allegedly poured with kerosene and set alight by the appellant and her mother. She escaped the house, was rescued by neighbours, and later died from extensive burns. While in the hospital, a dying declaration was recorded by a Munsif Magistrate with the assista

DASTAGIR SAB AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2004 INSC 5222 January 2004Dismissed

The appellant Dastagir Sab and another were convicted of rape under Section 376(2)(g) of the IPC. The prosecution proved that the victim had seen the accused on three occasions before the assault, that the accused were chased, caught, and allegedly confessed, and that semen was found on the victim's clothing. The defen

SANJEEV KUMARversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

1999 INSC 2122 January 1999Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a murder case where Sanjiv Kumar was seen entering and exiting the victim's house with a knife, was found with blood‑stained clothes, and a knife bearing human blood was recovered from his residence. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including the recovery of blood‑stained cl

S.D. SONIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1990 INSC 39821 December 1990Dismissed

The appellant S.D. Soni was married to Varsha, who was found dead in their matrimonial home. The defence claimed suicide, citing a note (Exh. 80) and alleged poisoning, while the prosecution alleged homicide, pointing to internal injuries to the pancreas and spleen and a fabricated suicide note. The Court held that the

BHIM SINGH &.ANR.versusKAN SINGH

1979 INSC 27721 December 1979Case Partly allowed

The case concerned a suit for possession of a house in Bikaner, claimed by Bhim Singh and Himmat Singh (plaintiffs) on the basis of a patta issued in their names, while the defendant Kan Singh asserted ownership as a surviving coparcener and alleged the transaction was benami. The trial court held the plaintiffs were o

HARPAL SINGH @ CHHOTAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2016 INSC 104521 November 2016Dismissed

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of Harpal Singh @ Chhota and co‑accused for kidnapping, abduction for ransom and conspiracy under IPC §§ 364A, 395, 412, 471, 1208 and Arms Act § 25. The Court found the victim’s testimony – recorded under §§ 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. and reiterated at trial – to be truthful and suffi

SURINDER KUMARversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2012 INSC 52421 November 2012Dismissed

The appellant Surinder Kumar was convicted under Sections 304B and 498A of the IPC for the death of his wife, Kiran Bala, who suffered 90% burn injuries and gave a dying declaration blaming him for dowry demands. The appellant challenged the admissibility of the declaration, arguing that his wife was too injured to mak

KUNJUMON @ UNNIversusSTATE OF KERALA

2012 INSC 52521 November 2012Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Kunjumon, entered a house with a common intention to commit robbery, threatened an 11‑year‑old girl and subsequently dragged a 90‑year‑old woman from her cot, beating her on the head with a wall clock, leading to her death. He was convicted by the trial court and the High Court under IPC sections 302 (mu

M. CHINNASAMYversusK.C. PALANISAMY AND ORS.

2003 INSC 66121 November 2003Appeal(s) allowed

In the 1999 Karur parliamentary election the returned candidate won by 2,847 votes. The defeated candidate filed an election petition alleging irregularities in the counting of about 15,000 rejected votes across five categories, but the petition disclosed only vague, general allegations without the required particulars

MRINALINI ROY RATNA PROVA MONDAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

1996 INSC 136721 November 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the reclamation of tank fisheries covering about 1,495.93 acres. The petitioners argued that "land" under Section 3(a) does not include tank fisheries and that the acquisition was not for a public purpose, rendering the n

MURARI LAL S/O RAM SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1979 INSC 24821 November 1979Dismissed

Murari Lal was convicted of murder and related offences on the basis of two key pieces of evidence: a wrist‑watch belonging to the deceased recovered at his instance, and a handwritten note found beside the dead body that a handwriting expert identified as being written by the appellant. The appellant contended that th

SURINDER KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2011 INSC 77721 October 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Surinder Kumar, was accused of setting fire to his lover Kamlesh Rani, who later died from severe burns. The sole evidence against him was a dying declaration recorded by an executive magistrate at a hospital, which alleged that Kumar had poured kerosene on her and set her ablaze. The trial court rejecte

JASWANT SINGHversusGURDEV SINGH & ORS.

2011 INSC 77821 October 2011Dismissed

Jaswant Singh filed several suits concerning ownership of land in Simbli, Hoshiarpur, and the parties entered into a compromise on 27 November 1972 which led to a decree on 8 December 1972. The dispute later centered on the interpretation of that compromise—whether Singh owned 12.5 acres or only 8 acres—and on the admi

RAVEENDRAN K & ANR,versusEXCISE INSPECTOR VADAKARA & ANR.

2008 INSC 119821 October 2008Dismissed

The appellants, licensees of arrack shops, were convicted under Section 57A(iii) of the Kerala Abkari Act, 1967 for selling liquor adulterated with methanol. Samples taken from their godowns revealed the presence of the noxious substance, and the prosecution argued that the licencees had either mixed or permitted the m

GULJAR ALI ETC.versusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

1997 INSC 70021 October 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Three brothers—Raj Mohammad, Niaz Ali and Gulzar Ali—were convicted for the murder of Tara Chand, a factotum of Jai Paul, based on circumstantial evidence, letters showing motive, and recovered weapons. The prosecution relied on letters seized from the accused, expert handwriting analysis, and statements by the accused

BANARSI DASversusBRIG MAHARAJA SUKHJIT SINGH AND ANR.

1997 INSC 70221 October 1997Dismissed

Banarsi Das filed a suit for permanent injunction claiming peaceful cultivation of land he alleged to have inherited, while the defendants asserted ownership and produced documentary evidence of a sale deed. The trial court dismissed the suit; the District Judge reversed that decision and decreed in favor of the plaint

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search