RAMAYANA ISPAT PVT. LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.
2025 INSC 42431 March 2025Dismissed
The appellants, large industrial consumers and captive power generators, challenged the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission's (RERC) 2016 Open Access Regulations, alleging that they exceeded RERC's jurisdiction over inter‑state open access, imposed unreasonable penalties for drawal variations, required a 24‑hou…
M/S FAIME MAKERS PVT. LTD.versusDISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(3), MUMBAI & ORS.
2025 INSC 42331 March 2025Case Allowed
The appellant, Faime Makers Pvt. Ltd., owned a parcel of land in Mumbai after acquiring it from Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Private Limited. The respondent society applied for a Unilateral Certificate of Deemed Conveyance under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963, which was dismissed on 22 February 2021 …
SAU. JIYAversusKULDEEP
2025 INSC 13531 January 2025Case Partly allowed
The marriage between Sau. Jiya and Kuldeep was dissolved by a family court on the ground of cruelty, a decree later affirmed by the High Court. After the husband remarried in 2019, the parties disputed a permanent alimony settlement, with the wife seeking a lump‑sum amount and the husband contesting his income and asse…
SHRIPAL & ANR.versusNAGAR NIGAM, GHAZIABAD
2025 INSC 14431 January 2025Disposed off
The workmen, employed as gardeners in the Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam's horticulture department since the late 1990s, alleged that they were dismissed orally in July 2005 while a conciliation proceeding was pending, without notice or retrenchment compensation. They claimed the termination violated Sections 6E and 6N of the U…
KULDEEP SINGHversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
2025 INSC 13731 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Kuldeep Singh, was charged under Sections 366, 376 and 506 IPC for alleged abduction and rape of his wife, Respondent No.3, after she filed a statement alleging forced marriage. The appellant contended that the marriage was solemnised voluntarily under Sikh rites and that, under Exception 2 to Section 37…
BHARAT SHER SINGH KALSIAversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ANR.
2024 INSC 7731 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Bharat Sher Singh Kalsia, purchased a portion of land from a Power of Attorney (PoA) holder who had been authorized by the landowners to manage, sell, and register their property. A FIR was lodged alleging criminal offences under Sections 409, 467, 468, 471 and 420 IPC, claiming the sale deed was fraudul…
M/S BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. AND ANOTHERversusATM CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.
2023 INSC 104230 November 2023Dismissed
The dispute involved a property originally leased to Burma Shell Oil Storage and Distribution Company, whose lease expired on 31‑12‑1997. The respondent, the absolute owner, filed a suit in 2006 seeking possession of the property, which was decreed in 2010, but did not claim damages for the period of unlawful occupatio…
ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR & ANRversusURMILA G. & ORS.
2023 INSC 104430 November 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The Additional Tahsildar filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Kerala Upa Lokayukta that directed the correction of revenue records and tax collection concerning a property owned by the respondents. The respondents had earlier lodged a complaint with the Lokayukta seeking such correction, and the Upa Lokayu…
ELDECO HOUSING AND INDUSTRIES LIMITEDversusASHOK VIDYARTHI AND OTHERS
2023 INSC 104330 November 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, ELDECO Housing, filed a suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 31‑08‑1998 concerning the sale of a property, after learning that the vendor was attempting to sell to third parties. The respondent filed an application under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC seeking dismissal of …
JASMINBHAI BHARATBHAI KOTHARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2025 INSC 17230 January 2025Dismissed
Jasminbhai Bharatbhai Kothari, convicted under IPC Section 302 read with Section 34 and the Arms Act, sought an extension of temporary bail, which the Gujarat High Court refused. While filing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Supreme Court, he also filed an interlocutory application seeking exemption from surre…
RAKESH KUMAR CHARMAKAR & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
2025 INSC 13630 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were appointed as temporary part‑time sweepers under a Special Recruitment Drive to fill vacant, sanctioned posts in the Madhya Pradesh Veterinary Department. They sought regular pay‑scale benefits under a 1984 circular that granted revised pay‑scale to temporary employees after three years of service, a…
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusSEKH JAMIR HOSSAIN AND ORS.
2025 INSC 78829 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The CBI investigated a violent attack on the house of Sekh Jamir Hossain that occurred on the day election results were announced in West Bengal, where a mob assaulted the complainant, looted his property and molested his wife. The accused, including politically influential respondents, were arrested and a charge‑sheet…
RAKHI SADHUKHANversusRAJA SADHUKHAN
2025 INSC 78929 May 2025Disposed off
Rakhi Sadhukhan filed for divorce from Raja Sadhukhan and was awarded permanent alimony of Rs.20,000 per month with a 5% increase every three years by the Calcutta High Court. She later contended that the amount was insufficient given the husband’s higher income and the standard of living she enjoyed during the marriag…
ARATHY RAMACHANDRANversusBIJAY RAJ MENON
2025 INSC 58729 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The mother, a working professional, filed a petition seeking permanent custody of her two minor children, alleging the father might forcibly remove them. The Family Court restrained the father and granted limited visitation, which the father appealed. The High Court then ordered a 15‑day monthly interim custody for eac…
VISHNU KUMAR SHUKLA & ANRversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR
2023 INSC 102628 November 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Vishnu Kumar Shukla and his wife, were charged under IPC sections 448, 454 and 380 for allegedly breaking into a shop and stealing goods. They contended that the complaint was frivolous, based on a forged tenancy agreement, and that the FIR was an abuse of process. The trial magistrate rejected their di…
SIVAMANI AND ANR.versusSTATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLORE TALUK POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT
2023 INSC 102728 November 2023Disposed off
The appellants were convicted under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code for attempting to murder the complainant, based on an incident where they allegedly tried to stab him with knives, causing only simple abrasions. The trial court sentenced them to ten years' rigorous imprisonment, which the High Court reduced to f…
BIDYUT SARKAR & ANR.versusKANCHILAL PAL (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ANR.
2024 INSC 70428 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of a 1999 agreement to sell land, but the agreement was marked as Exhibit‑1 with an objection for insufficient stamp duty. The trial court dismissed the suit, holding the agreement inadmissible under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. The Calcutta High Court reversed that de…
N.S. GNANESHWARAN ETC.versusTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ANR.
2025 INSC 78728 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were charged under sections 120B, 420, 468 and 471 of the IPC and section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly diverting bank funds. Parallel civil recovery proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal were settled through a One Time Settlement (OTS) in which the ba…
CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATIONversusREGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 78628 May 2025Disposed off
The Chandigarh Administration appealed against several orders of the Punjab and Haryana High Court that directed the construction of a verandah in front of Court Room No.1 of the High Court and the laying of green paver blocks in a kutcha parking area. The Administration argued that the verandah could jeopardise the UN…
BATLANKI KESHAV (KESAVA) KUMAR ANURAGversusSTATE OF TELANGANA & ANR.
2025 INSC 79028 May 2025
The appellant, Batlanki Keshav (Kesava) Kumar Anurag, sought to quash FIR No. 103 of 2022 alleging offences under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, claiming the allegations of sexual relations under a false promise of marriage were fabricated. The de‑facto complainan…
PRADIP N. SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
2025 INSC 29128 February 2025
The appellant, a former District Collector, was charged under Sections 409, 219 and 114 of the IPC for allegedly misusing his official position to restore government land to private allottees who were not cultivating it and were residing abroad. The High Court dismissed his application under Section 482 CrPC to quash t…
GAMBHIR SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2025 INSC 16428 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Gambhir Singh, was convicted and sentenced to death for the murder of his brother, sister‑in‑law and their four children. The prosecution relied on three alleged incriminating circumstances – motive, last‑seen testimony and recoveries of weapons – to link the appellant to the crime. The Supreme Court hel…
SHEIKH JAVEED AHMAD & ANR.versusSTATE OF J&K & ORS.
2025 INSC 62427 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Dr. Sheikh Javeed Ahmad and Dr. Abdul Hamid Rather were appointed as Senior Residents in Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation at SKIMS with the promise of sponsorship for a two‑year diploma and subsequent appointment as Assistant Professors. The diploma could not be obtained because the sponsoring institute failed to sec…
RAJU @ NIRPENDRA SINGHversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2025 INSC 39227 February 2025Dismissed
The appellant accused were convicted for kidnapping and gang‑rape of a village girl who was under 17 years of age at the time of the offences. The trial court and the High Court held that the victim was a minor, that she was held captive for two months, and that her testimony was reliable despite the absence of physica…
JANARDAN DAS & ORS.versusDURGA PRASAD AGARWALLA & ORS.
2024 INSC 77826 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiffs, operating a petrol pump on a jointly owned property, claimed a specific performance of an oral agreement dated 06‑06‑1993 to purchase the land, alleging that the co‑owner brother had authority to bind the three sister co‑owners via a General Power of Attorney. The trial court dismissed the suit, finding…
M/S EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION LIMITEDversusREGIONAL PF COMMISSIONER II AND RECOVERY OFFICER, RO BENGALURU (KORAMANGALA) & ANR.
2025 INSC 104526 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Ltd (EARC), challenged a Karnataka High Court order that dismissed its writ petition and directed the transfer of Rs.75 lakh deposited by it to the EPFO. The dispute arose from the default of Acropetal Technologies Ltd in paying provident fund dues, leading to EPFO assertin…
DOGIPARTHI VENKATA SATISH AND ANR.versusPILLA DURGA PRASAD & ORS.
2025 INSC 104626 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants owned a property that was leased to Aditya Motors, a sole proprietorship of Pilla Durga Prasad. After the lease expired, the appellants filed an eviction suit against the lessee and its assignees. The suit was later amended to substitute the proprietor, Pilla Durga Prasad, in place of the firm. The defen…
PUTAIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2025 INSC 104226 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the conviction of two accused, Putai and Dileep, for the rape and murder of a 12‑year‑old girl, based solely on circumstantial evidence and forensic material. The trial and High Courts had upheld the death penalty for Putai and life imprisonment for Dileep, relying on recovered items, a sniff…
THE STATE OF ODISHAversusNIRJHARINI PATNAIK @ MOHANTY & ANR.
2024 INSC 34626 April 2024
The State of Odisha appealed against the High Court’s order that quashed the cognizance taken by the Special District Judge, Bhubaneswar, of offences under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 477(A), 120(B) and 34 of the IPC relating to a conspiracy to forge documents and illegally transfer government land. The FIR, lodged in…
VASANTA SAMPAT DUPAREversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 104325 August 2025Case Allowed
The petitioner, Vasanta Sampat Dupare, was convicted of rape and murder of a four‑year‑old girl and sentenced to death, a sentence that was affirmed on appeal, reviewed, and followed by rejected mercy petitions. He filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a fresh sentencing hearing in accordance with the procedur…
SRI R RAGHUversusSRI G M KRISHNA & ANR.
2025 INSC 104025 August 2025Dismissed
The Karnataka State Financial Corporation (KSFC) recovered a debt from Hoysala Thermo Farmers Pvt. Ltd. and, after default, auctioned agricultural land (Sy. No.67) belonging to the managing director, G.M. Krishna. The appellant, R. Raghu, purchased the land at the auction and later obtained a sale certificate as truste…
SATAURAM MANDAVIversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ANR.
2025 INSC 89225 July 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellant was convicted for aggravated penetrative sexual assault of a five‑year‑old girl under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and Section 376AB IPC, and was sentenced to imprisonment for the remainder of his natural life. The offence occurred on 20 May 2019, before the 2019 amendment to Section 6 of the POCSO Act, whi…
SUKDEB SAHAversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS
2025 INSC 89325 July 2025Disposed off
The appellant, Sukdeb Saha, challenged the Andhra Pradesh High Court's refusal to transfer the investigation of his 17‑year‑old daughter's suspicious death at a coaching institute to the CBI. He alleged that the local police investigation was biased, incomplete, and that crucial forensic evidence and CCTV footage were …
SHAKUNTLA DEVIversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2025 INSC 58125 April 2025Dismissed
The appellant, a mother‑in‑law, was accused of repeatedly torturing her daughter‑in‑law over dowry demands, leading the young woman to commit suicide by poison. The trial court convicted her under Sections 304B and 498A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, but the High Court acquitted her of those off…
OKHLA ENCLAVE PLOT HOLDERS WEL. ASONversusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY & ORS.
2025 INSC 57325 April 2025
The Builder Durga Builders purchased 235 acres in Faridabad to develop a residential colony and was contractually obliged to allocate plots to Economically Weaker Sections, No Profit No Loss (NPNL) and open‑market categories. The Builder failed to honour the allotment terms, prompting allottees to file Writ Petition (C…
AKSHAY GUPTA & ANR.versusICICI BANK LIMITED & ORS.
2025 INSC 39125 March 2025Disposed off
The appellants, who were flat buyers, entered into a settlement with ICICI Bank and the builder to resolve disputes over loan repayment and possession of apartments. Under the settlement, the appellants paid the outstanding principal and pre‑EMI amounts, the builder contributed its share, and the bank waived interest a…
MARIAPPANversusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2023 INSC 103424 November 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, accused No.1, was convicted of murder (s.302 IPC) for stabbing the deceased during a heated verbal quarrel, while co‑accused No.2 and No.3 were acquitted. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether the appellant's act fell under Exception 4 to s.300 IPC, thereby constituting culpable homicide not amo…
BAR COUNCIL OF MAHARASHTRA AND GOAversusRAJIV NARESHCHANDRA NARULA & ORS.
2025 INSC 114724 September 2025Disposed off
The Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa referred a complaint filed by Khimji Devji Parmar against advocate Rajiv Narula to its Disciplinary Committee under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, alleging professional misconduct for identifying a plaintiff in consent terms of a civil suit. The Supreme Court examined whether di…
A. JOHN KENNEDY ETC.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND OTHERS ETC.
2025 INSC 44324 March 2025Directions issued
The petitioners, displaced tea estate workers, and public interest litigants sought the removal of long‑standing encroachments and restoration of forest lands in the Agasthyamalai landscape, which includes the Singampatti Zamin forest leased to Bombay Burma Trading Corporation Limited for tea cultivation for over 95 ye…
HARSHIT HARISH JAIN & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2025 INSC 10424 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants purchased a flat and paid stamp duty, but later cancelled the booking due to the developer's delay and executed a cancellation deed on 17 March 2015, which was registered on 28 April 2015 after an amendment to Section 48(1) of the Maharashtra Stamp Act reduced the refund limitation period from two years …
M.C. RAVIKUMARversusD.S. VELMURUGAN & ORS.
2025 INSC 88823 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The complainant filed Criminal Complaint No. 1828 of 2019 alleging offences under several sections of the IPC against the accused. The accused first filed a quashing petition under s.482 CrPC, which the High Court dismissed. Six months later they filed a second quashing petition on the same grounds, and the High Court …
SAKINA SULTANALI SUNESARA (MOMIN)versusSHIA IMAMI ISMAILI MOMIN JAMAT SAMAJ & ORS
2025 INSC 57023 April 2025Dismissed
The appellant, Sakina Sultanali Sunesara, challenged two consent decrees arising from compromises in suits concerning disputed land, alleging she had no notice of the compromises and that they were procured by fraud. She filed applications under Order XLIII Rule 1‑A to set aside the decrees, while the respondents argue…
SIVAKUMARversusTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ANR.
2025 INSC 55823 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Manager at the Head Office of HDFC Ltd., was charged in an FIR for allegedly suppressing the fact that a mortgaged property had been acquired by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board and for cheating the purchaser at a public auction conducted in 2012. He filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking t…
ADV BABASAHEB WASADE & ORSversusMANOHAR GANGADHAR MUDDESHWAR & ORS
2024 INSC 5223 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, a charitable society, faced a dispute over the validity of its 2002 executive elections after the President, Vice‑President, Secretary and other office‑bearers had died, leaving a Working President, Adv. Babasaheb Wasade, to manage affairs. Sixteen members requested a meeting to elect a ne…
IN RE: “CITY HOUNDED BY STRAYS, KIDS PAY PRICE” versus
2025 INSC 101822 August 2025Directions issued
The Supreme Court, acting suo moto, took cognizance of a news report of a child’s death from a stray dog bite in Delhi and issued directions to pick up, sterilise, deworm and vaccinate stray dogs across the National Capital Region, initially prohibiting their release back onto the streets. Several NGOs and individuals …
ESAKKIMUTHUversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2025 INSC 88022 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Pitchu Mani and Esakkimuthu, were convicted of murder under Sections 302 and 302 read with 34 of the IPC based primarily on the testimony of the deceased's son and wife, who were interested witnesses. The appellants challenged the convictions, arguing that the witnesses could not have covered the 16 km …
SHAILYAMANYU SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2025 INSC 99522 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a non‑executive director of Procter & Gamble Hygiene Ltd., was summoned as an accused in a criminal complaint alleging that the company distributed expired drugs to an unlicensed dealer, violating the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940. The appellant challenged the summoning order under Section 482 of the CrPC,…
RAMANUJ KUMARversusPRIYANKA
2025 INSC 54322 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Ramanuj Kumar, filed a petition for divorce under Sections 13(1)(ia) and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging irretrievable breakdown of his marriage to Priyanka. The parties had been living separately for over eleven years, with the appellant caring for their elder daughter and the respondent carin…
NAJRUL SEIKHversusDR. SUMIT BANERJEE & ANR.
2024 INSC 18422 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a BPL card holder, filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 alleging that his 13‑year‑old son lost vision after a cataract surgery performed by the respondents. The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission found a deficiency in the medical services and awarded compen…
THAMMARAYA AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA
2025 INSC 10822 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants Thammaraya and Basappa were convicted for murder and concealment of dead body under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the IPC based largely on circumstantial evidence and alleged disclosure statements that led to the recovery of certain articles. The prosecution's case hinged on the recovery of a gold chain, d…
MANISH YADAVversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 15122 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Manish Yadav, was charged under the IPC for rape, assault and criminal intimidation and under the SC/ST Act for caste-based atrocities, based on allegations that he induced a consensual relationship through a false promise of marriage and later abused the complainant. The complainant’s statement under Se…
RAMKRISHNA FORGINGS LIMITEDversusRAVINDRA LOONKAR, RESOLUTION PROFESSION OF ACIL LIMITED & ANR.
2023 INSC 101321 November 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the approval of a resolution plan for ACIL Ltd., where the Committee of Creditors (CoC) had approved a plan with an 88.56% majority after multiple revisions. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had stayed the plan and ordered a re‑valuation of ACIL's assets by the Official Liquidator, a …
METPALLI LASUM BAI (SINCE DEAD) AND OTHERSversusMETAPALLI MUTHAIH (D) BY LRS.
2025 INSC 87921 July 2025
The dispute concerned the ownership of a 4‑acre 16‑gunta plot in Dasnapur village, claimed by the second wife of the deceased Metpalli Rajanna (Lasum Bai) under a registered Will dated 24 July 1974 and an oral family settlement. The trial court held that the Will was genuine, that it allocated a specific share to Lasum…
VICTIM ‘X’versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.
2025 INSC 87721 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned allegations that the Superintendent of a women’s protection home in Patna administered intoxicating substances to inmates and facilitated their sexual exploitation. The accused, respondent No.2, was granted bail by the Patna High Court despite the victim not being notified, contrary to Section 15A(3)…
KHURSHEED AHMAD CHOHANversusUNION OF TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS. ETC.
2025 INSC 87621 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a police constable, was summoned to the Senior Superintendent's office and allegedly detained illegally for six days during which he suffered severe genital mutilation and other injuries, as confirmed by medical reports. His wife complained to the police seeking registration of an FIR against the officia…
SUKHENDU BHATTACHARJEE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS
2026 INSC 52321 May 2026Disposed off
The appellants, engaged as Work Charged and Muster Roll workers in various departments of the Government of Assam before 1 April 1993, rendered continuous service for decades. The State, through a Cabinet decision dated 22 July 2005, regularized about 30,000 similarly situated workers, but due to clerical lapses the ap…
SANJAY COLAROversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2025 INSC 68621 April 2025Disposed off
The appellant, Sanjay Colaro, was convicted under Sections 279 and 304A of the IPC for causing a fatal road accident by rash driving. He was sentenced to six months' simple imprisonment and a fine, which he appealed through the criminal appellate hierarchy up to the Supreme Court. The appellant argued that, given the l…
BINA BASAK & ORS.versusSRI BIPUL KANTI BASAK & ORS.
2024 INSC 27921 March 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned a plot of land allotted by the West Bengal Relief and Rehabilitation Department to a refugee family that migrated from East Pakistan in 1950. The lease deed was initially executed in the name of Smt. Hem Prova Basak, but the government later ordered inclusion of the two younger brothers' names and ev…
UNION OF INDIAversusSALEEM KHAN
2025 INSC 100820 August 2025Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined two bail appeals arising from a 2020 FIR under the IPC, Arms Act and UAPA, involving accused no.11 (Saleem Khan) and accused no.20 (Mohd. Zaid). Both had been denied bail by the trial court, but the Karnataka High Court granted bail to Khan while refusing it to Zaid. The Court held that Khan'…
SHATRUGHANversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2023 INSC 63020 July 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved an appeal by Shatrughan against his conviction for murder under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the death of his nephew Jagat Ram. The prosecution's case relied mainly on the testimony of the deceased's uncle, who claimed to have heard the victim shout that Shatrughan was assaulting him with …
SRIversusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, Q BRANCH, RAMANATHAPURAM, TAMIL NADU
2026 INSC 51620 May 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Sri Lankan national named Ranjan, was arrested in 2021 and charged under multiple statutes for allegedly being the absconding accused "Sri" (A‑5) involved in a conspiracy to revive the banned LTTE. The prosecution’s case rested solely on the belated testimonies of two witnesses who identified the appel…
THE TEHSILDAR, URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST AND ANR.versusGANGA BAI MENARIYA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 12120 February 2024Disposed off
The respondents claimed that a lease (patta) of a government grazing land was granted to them by the Gram Panchayat in 1959 and filed a suit for permanent injunction without seeking a declaration of title. The appellants argued that the Panchayat lacked authority to lease the land, the lease deed was unproved, and the …
JAGGOversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2024 INSC 103419 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were employed by the Central Water Commission on part‑time, ad‑hoc contracts as Safaiwalas and a Khallasi from 1993 to 2004, performing essential housekeeping and maintenance functions for more than ten years. After their application for regularisation was rejected by the Central Administrative Tribunal,…
AMUTHAversusA.R. SUBRAMANIAN
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 75519 December 2024Dismissed
Amutha and A.R. Subramanian were married in 2002 but lived apart for more than fifteen years following a series of disputes, including the wife filing a false dowry harassment complaint against the husband. The husband filed for divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion, which were initially rejected by the trial and…
AJITH G. DAS & OTHERS ETC.versusTHE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 114819 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Kerala Public Service Commission (KPSC) conducted recruitment for Junior Health Inspector Grade‑II positions and published rank lists, but several vacancies remained unfilled due to overlapping candidates and non‑joining. The State Government, after a Tribunal order, recommended that KPSC expand the rank lists to f…
THE STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.versusAMIN LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS & ORS.
2024 INSC 87519 November 2024Dismissed
The plaintiffs, heirs of Amin Lal, sued the State of Haryana and the Public Works Department for possession of land on the basis of revenue records, sale deeds and mutation entries. The trial court ruled in favour of the plaintiffs, holding that the State had not proved adverse possession. The State appealed and the fi…
SD. SHABUDDINversusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA
2025 INSC 99919 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Sd. Shabuddin, was convicted under Section 411 of the IPC for dishonestly receiving stolen property after being found in possession of cash amounts of Rs.25,000 and Rs.2,60,000, which he could not account for. Both he and co-accused Moulana were acquitted of theft (Section 379 IPC) by the Trial Court and…
DHARAM SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.
2025 INSC 99819 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, six former daily‑wage employees (Class‑IV peons/attendants and a Class‑III driver) were engaged by the U.P. Higher Education Services Commission between 1989 and 1992 and continued to work for decades. The Commission repeatedly sought sanction of fourteen permanent posts for such workers, but the State …
KAUSHIK PREMKUMAR MISHRA & ANR.versusKANJI RAVARIA @ KANJI & ANR.
2024 INSC 54019 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants purchased half of a 3.40‑hectare land from respondent No.2 in 1985, and a sale deed was executed on 02‑12‑1985 but remained unregistered due to stamp‑duty deficiency until 14‑06‑2011. Respondent No.2 later executed a second conveyance in 2010 in favour of respondent No.1 for the same land, leading the ap…
PARTEEK BANSALversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS
2024 INSC 32419 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a chartered accountant, was accused of offences under Sections 498A, 406, 384, 420 and 120(B) of the IPC in two FIRs – the first lodged in Hisar, Haryana on 10 Oct 2015 and the second in Udaipur, Rajasthan on 15 Oct 2015, both based on the same allegations. The appellant sought quashing of the second FIR…
CHANDRA SHEKHAR SINGH AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 37219 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, who held post‑graduate degrees in microbiology, food science and technology, applied for the post of Food Safety Officer (FSO) under a Jharkhand Public Service Commission notification that required a "degree" in specified subjects or a Master’s in Chemistry. After clearing the written exam, they were di…
PUNEET SABHARWALversusCBI
2024 INSC 22119 March 2024Dismissed
The CBI filed a case alleging that R.C. Sabharwal, a former public servant, owned assets disproportionate to his known sources of income and that his son, Puneet Sabharwal, abetted him. The trial court framed charges under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 10…
JUGAL KISHORE KHANNA (D) THR. LRS. & ANR.versusSUDHIR KHANNA & ORS.
2024 INSC 22419 March 2024
The dispute involved two properties originally purchased by Roop Kishore Khanna (RKK) for the joint Hindu family of his father Tek Chand Khanna. After RKK's death, his brother Attar Chand Khanna's (ACK) heirs claimed a 50% share in the Kamla Nagar property, alleging it remained joint family property, while the appellan…
KUSHA DURUKAversusSTATE OF ODISHA
2024 INSC 4619 January 2024Dismissed
Kusha Duruka, accused under the NDPS Act, filed multiple bail applications after his arrest on 3 February 2022. The first bail request was rejected by the Sessions Court, and a subsequent application before the Odisha High Court was also dismissed, while his co‑accused was granted bail. During the pendency of a Special…
IRFANversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 101218 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant alleged that Respondent No.2 and his two sons murdered his father and injured his brother, leading to an FIR under sections 147, 148, 302, 304 and 34 of the IPC. After the charge‑sheet, the trial proceeded to the stage of recording the accused's statement under Section 313 of the CrPC. Respondent No.2 app…
M.V. LEELAVATHIversusDR. C.R. SWAMY @ DR. C.R. KUMARA SWAMY
2025 INSC 99418 August 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellant-wife filed for divorce on the ground of mental cruelty and was granted a decree of divorce and permanent alimony of Rs.15,00,000 by the Family Court, which the High Court upheld. The appellant challenged the alimony amount, arguing she was unemployed, while the respondent, a doctor, demonstrated a higher …
MALA CHOUDHARY & ANR.versusSTATE OF TELANGANA & ANR.
2025 INSC 87018 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, a 70‑year‑old widow and her daughter, entered into an oral agreement to sell a plot of land in Telangana, receiving a large sum via bank transfers but later refusing to execute the sale deed. The complainant, an agent of a powerful builder, filed a criminal complaint alleging fraud and intimidation, lea…
KAUSHAL SINGHversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
2025 INSC 87118 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a District Judge, was criticised by a Rajasthan High Court Single Judge for granting bail to an accused (Sethu @ Angrej) in a manner deemed cavalier and for ignoring the accused's criminal antecedents. The High Court's strictures labelled the appellant's conduct as indiscipline, negligence, and disobedie…
THE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESHversusKAMAL AGARWAL & ORS. ETC
2024 INSC 31718 April 2024Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered an FIR (Case No.227 of 2017) registered in Arunachal Pradesh alleging cheating under sections 420, 120B and 34 IPC in connection with a Rs 1 crore payment for land situated in Rajasthan. The accused contended that the dispute was purely civil, involving a loan or advance for property purcha…
GOVIND KUMAR SHARMA & ANRversusBANK OF BARODA & ORS
2024 INSC 32618 April 2024Disposed off
The borrowers defaulted on a loan from Bank of Baroda, which initiated SARFAESI proceedings and conducted an open auction of the mortgaged premises. The appellants, who were tenants of the borrowers, became the highest bidders and were issued a sale certificate, thereby converting their status to owners. The borrowers …
MUKHTAR ZAIDIversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2024 INSC 31618 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was summoned after a Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) in Aligarh rejected a police closure report under Section 173(2) CrPC and took cognizance of offences under Sections 147, 342, 323, 307 and 506 IPC as well as Section 190(1)(b) CrPC. The CJM based this decision not only on the protest petition filed by …
TR. A. BABUversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
2025 INSC 79918 March 2025
The appellant, a 68‑year‑old former managing trustee of two charitable trusts, was convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for criminal misconduct, criminal breach of trust and misappropriation of grant‑in‑aid funds meant for schools for specially‑abled children. The High Court rejected his appeal agains…
RAJ KUMAR @ BHEEMAversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI
2025 INSC 132217 November 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Raj Kumar was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC based primarily on the identification by the injured eye‑witness, PW‑18, whose testimony was recorded via video‑link eight and a half years after the incident. The High Court upheld the conviction, relying on the witness's identification, the appella…
VISHVJEET AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER
2026 INSC 25417 March 2026Disposed off
The petitioners, contractual toll‑collection employees, were arrested after an altercation with an advocate who allegedly refused to pay toll charges, leading to an FIR under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. While one lawyer filed a bail application, members of the Barabanki Bar and the Bar Council enga…
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusCHATRA
2025 INSC 36017 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
In 1986 a minor girl (referred to as V) was found unconscious and bleeding after the accused Chatra allegedly raped her. The trial court convicted Chatra under Section 376 IPC based on medical evidence, circumstantial evidence and the testimony of a key eyewitness, Gulab Chand, despite the victim’s silence. The High Co…
Y. P. LELEversusMAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. & ORS.
2023 INSC 73216 August 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The Maharashtra State Electricity Board filed a Special Civil Suit for recovery of money against Miraj Electric Supply Co. and its directors. During the plaintiff's evidence, the defendants' counsel withdrew his vakalatnama, and the trial court proceeded under Order XVII Rule 2 CPC, ultimately decreeing the suit ex par…
BALJINDER KUMAR @ KALAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2025 INSC 85616 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Baljinder Kumar, accused of murdering his wife, two children and sister‑in‑law, was convicted by the Trial Court and sentenced to death under Sections 302, 308 and 325 IPC. The High Court upheld the conviction, relying mainly on the testimonies of three witnesses despite contradictions and lack of forensic linkage. On …
JAI PRAKASHversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2025 INSC 86116 July 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Jai Prakash, was convicted of raping and murdering a 10‑year‑old girl. Evidence included the victim’s body recovered from his hut, the last‑seen testimony of child witnesses, and DNA matches linking the appellant to the victim’s underwear and hair. The trial and High Courts affirmed conviction under IPC …
BYLURU THIPPAIAH @ BYALURU THIPPAIAH @ NAYAKARA THIPPAIAHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2025 INSC 86216 July 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Byluru Thippaiah, brutally murdered his wife, sister‑in‑law and three children on 25 February 2017, alleging that his wife and the children were not his and accusing them of promiscuity. He was tried under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, convicted and sentenced to death by the trial court, a senten…
LEHNA SINGH (D) BY LRS.versusGURNAM SINGH (D) BY LRS. & ORS.
2024 INSC 42916 May 2024
The case arose from a suit for perpetual injunction where the plaintiff claimed ownership of land by natural succession, while the defendants relied on a Will that the trial court held to be suspicious and invalid. The trial court's decree in favour of the plaintiff was set aside by the first appellate court, which gra…
PRADEEP NIRANKARNATH SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
2025 INSC 35016 March 2025Dismissed
The appellant, a retired IAS officer, challenged the registration of multiple FIRs relating to alleged land allotment irregularities during his tenure as Collector of Kachchh. He sought a writ of mandamus directing the police to conduct a preliminary inquiry before registering any further FIRs, relying on Lalita Kumari…
PRADEEP NIRANKARNATH SHARMAversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR.
2025 INSC 34916 March 2025Dismissed
The appellant, a former collector, was charged under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) for alleged financial transactions involving proceeds of crime arising from land allotments, bribery and hawala. He sought discharge at the pre‑trial stage, arguing that the PMLA could not be applied retrospectively…
IRFAN ALIAS BHAYU MEVATIversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2025 INSC 15016 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants Irfan and Asif Mevati were convicted of kidnapping, rape, and related offences and sentenced to death based largely on a DNA profiling report (Exhibit‑157). The trial court and the High Court relied on the report without examining any of the scientific experts who prepared it, and the appellants were giv…
PRADEEP BHARDWAJversusPRIYA
2025 INSC 85215 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant-husband filed a petition for divorce under Section 13(1)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging cruelty, but the Family Court dismissed it and the High Court upheld that dismissal. The parties had been living separately since October 2009, amounting to over sixteen years of estrangement, and the appellant…
NEETHU B. @ NEETHU BABY MATHEWversusRAJESH KUMAR
2025 INSC 85315 July 2025
The mother filed review petitions after the Supreme Court dismissed appeals that had granted permanent custody of their 11‑year‑old son to the father. New psychological reports showed the child suffering anxiety and separation‑disorder anxiety due to the impending custody change. The Court examined whether such fresh e…
G. MOHANDASversusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS
2025 INSC 85415 July 2025Dismissed
The appellant, a building owner, conspired with officials of the Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation and an architect to obtain a spurious renovation permit and then demolish an existing structure to erect a four‑storeyed commercial building in a zone where such construction is prohibited. A vigilance enquiry esta…
KATTAVELLAI @ DEVAKARversusSTATE OF TAMILNADU
2025 INSC 84515 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was convicted and sentenced to death for murder, rape and robbery based on circumstantial evidence, a last‑seen theory, confessions, recovered items and DNA evidence. The Supreme Court examined whether these evidentiary pillars were proved beyond reasonable doubt and whether the investigation complied wit…
P. RAVINDRANATH & ANR.versusSASIKALA & ORS.
2024 INSC 53315 July 2024Case Allowed
The plaintiffs entered into an agreement to sell a Bangalore property in 1981, paying an advance but failing to execute the sale deed within the stipulated three‑month period, citing a government restriction on registration. The defendants sent multiple notices demanding payment of the balance and eventually forfeited …
VIRENDER PAL @ VIPINversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2025 INSC 71015 May 2025Dismissed
The appellant, Virender Pal, was convicted under Section 304‑B of the IPC for the dowry death of his wife, Punita, who allegedly died after being harassed for dowry demands. The prosecution presented testimony that the husband and his relatives repeatedly demanded money, subjected the victim to physical and mental crue…
SURESH KUMAR AGARWALversusM/S HALDIA STEELS LIMITED & ANR
2025 INSC 63615 April 2025Case Allowed
The appellant, Suresh Kumar Agarwal, was accused by M/s Haldia Steels Ltd. of fraud and criminal misappropriation relating to a memorandum of understanding (MOU) for the transfer of a mining lease and share transfer. The complaint, filed six years after the alleged breach, alleged that an advance of Rs.50 lakh was paid…
RAJENDHIRANversusMUTHAIAMMAL @ MUTHAYEE & ORS.**
2025 INSC 50815 April 2025
The Supreme Court entertained a miscellaneous application seeking recall of its own judgment dated 03.01.2024 in Civil Appeal No. 37 of 2024 on the ground that the respondents had not been served and therefore did not appear. The Court held that non‑service justified recalling the judgment and ordered the appeal to be …
A. RANJITHKUMARversusE. KAVITHA
2025 INSC 97814 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The husband filed a divorce petition in 2012 on grounds of cruelty and adultery, and the Family Court granted a decree of divorce in 2016 on the ground of cruelty. The wife appealed, and the Madras High Court set aside the decree, holding that the alleged cruelty stemmed from the wife's father's rude utterances, which …
MADHUKAR & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2025 INSC 81914 July 2025Case Allowed
The appellants were charged under two FIRs, the first involving offences such as unlawful assembly and assault, and the second containing grave charges of sexual assault under Section 376 IPC. The complainant in the second FIR later filed an affidavit stating she no longer wished to pursue the case, having received a m…
KATHYAYINIversusSIDHARTH P.S. REDDY & ORS.
2025 INSC 81814 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a daughter of the late K.G. Yellappa Reddy, alleged that her brothers and their sons forged a family tree and a partition deed to exclude her and her sisters from a Rs 33 crore compensation awarded for family land acquired by the Bengaluru Metro Rail Corporation. Based on these forged documents, the resp…
ANISH M RAWTHER @ ANEES MOHAMMED RAWTHERversusHAFEEZ UR RAHMAN & ORS.
2024 INSC 46014 June 2024Dismissed
The respondents filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the CPC seeking recovery of Rs. 1,04,16,576 and later submitted a memo under Rule 3(6)(b) asking the trial court to decree the suit. The trial court rejected the memo, but the Karnataka High Court set aside that order and directed the trial court to accept the …
SOUMYA RANJAN PANDA & ORS.versusSUBHALAXMI DASH & ORS.
2026 INSC 48814 May 2026
The Supreme Court examined the fallout from the denial of renewal of recognition to Sardar Rajas Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre (SRMCH) due to serious deficiencies, which forced the transfer of 124 MBBS students to three private medical colleges in Odisha. Interim orders had required the students to pay …
HANSURA BAI & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 71114 May 2025Disposed off
The appellants, mother and aunt of Deva Pardhi, challenged a High Court order that refused to transfer the investigation of Deva's custodial death to another agency and denied bail to the sole eyewitness, Gangaram Pardhi. Deva was allegedly tortured and killed by local police officers, and Gangaram, who witnessed the t…
SHRICHAND RAJARAM KUKREJA AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
2025 INSC 79414 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The complainant, a sub‑contractor, alleged that the appellants (directors of Bharat Udyog Ltd.) had partially paid him for work on a sewerage plant and had forged engineers' signatures to claim they performed the work. He filed an FIR alleging cheating, forgery and related offences under the IPC, seeking recovery of th…
EBY CHERIANversusJEREMA JOHN
2025 INSC 70914 May 2025Case Partly allowed
The parties, married in 2016, separated in 2023 when the mother left the matrimonial home with their daughter. The father, employed on rotational overseas assignments, filed a petition for permanent custody and sought interim visitation. The Family Court allowed limited weekend and video contact and required the father…
LAL MOHD. & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2025 INSC 81114 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, members of a political party, were arrested after a communal protest triggered by an incendiary social media post on 10 October 2022 and were later released on bail. Six months later, the police prepared a gang chart and lodged a fresh FIR on 30 April 2023 under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social…
EMPLOYER IN RELATION TO MANAGEMENT OF KATRAS AREA OF M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED, DHANBADversusWORKMAN-SHAHDEO DAS
2025 INSC 101113 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Shahdeo Das joined Bharat Coking Coal Limited in 1990 with a service record showing his date of birth as 18‑09‑1960, which he himself declared at the time of joining. In 2015, after a gap of 25 years, he applied for correction of his date of birth to 05‑01‑1972 based on a school leaving/transfer certificate issued that…
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAversusSCHOTT GLASS INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR.
2025 INSC 66813 May 2025Rejected
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) alleged that Schott Glass India abused its dominant position in the neutral glass tubing market by offering volume‑based target rebates, functional "no‑Chinese" rebates, a long‑term supply agreement with its joint‑venture Schott Kaisha, and by allegedly tying clear and amber tu…
ANOSH EKKAversusSTATE THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
2026 INSC 35713 April 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The former Jharkhand minister Anosh Ekka was convicted in two separate cases arising from the same set of allegations of acquiring disproportionate assets and misusing his office. The High Court rejected his application for suspension of sentence and bail during the pendency of the appeal, prompting a special leave pet…
HARBINDER SINGH SEKHON & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
2026 INSC 15913 February 2026
The appellants, a group of agriculturists and a nearby school, challenged a Change of Land Use (CLU) dated 13‑12‑2021 that permitted a cement‑related grinding unit on land classified as a rural agricultural zone in the Sangrur Master Plan. The High Court had upheld the CLU, relying on a subsequent approval recorded on …
RAMESH A. NAIKAversusTHE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ETC.
2025 INSC 30313 February 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a bank manager, was convicted of murdering his two minor children, his sister‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law in June 2010, motivated by his disapproval of his sister‑in‑law’s relationship. The trial court sentenced him to death, a judgment affirmed by the Karnataka High Court. On appeal, the Supreme Court exam…
REENA BANERJEE AND ANOTHERversusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 110112 September 2025Directions issued
The petitioners, a charitable trust and an individual, sought enforcement of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016 to improve conditions in state‑run care homes for persons with cognitive disabilities, citing overcrowding, inadequate health care, abuse and lack of education. The Court examined whethe…
GEETA @ REETA MISHRAversusAJAY KUMAR MISHRA
2025 INSC 110212 September 2025Disposed off
The parties were married in 1996 and later lived separately, with the husband filing for divorce on grounds of cruelty in 2009. The Family Court granted the divorce in 2019, which the High Court affirmed in 2023. The wife appealed, seeking a payment of Rs.10,00,000 towards their daughter's marriage expenses, alleging t…
PADAM MEHTA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS
2026 INSC 47612 May 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants filed a public interest litigation seeking the inclusion of the Rajasthani language in the syllabus of the Rajasthan Eligibility Examination for Teachers (REET) 2021 and the use of Rajasthani as a medium of instruction in schools. The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that a writ of mandamus req…
JAWALA REAL ESTATE PVT LTD & ANR.versusHARESH
2025 INSC 66912 May 2025Disposed off
Jawala Real Estate Pvt Ltd (later merged with Macrotech Developers) allotted a three‑bedroom flat to Haresh in 2013, who paid an advance but failed to pay the balance, leading the developer to cancel the allotment. Haresh filed a complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), which set as…
VIJAY KUMAR JOSHIversusAKASH TRIPATHI & ORS.
2025 INSC 67012 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned employees of cooperative societies that were merged into the Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board (MPSEB) and sought pension benefits. The key issue was whether these absorbed employees were entitled to pension and, if so, whether their service in the societies prior to absorption could be counted …
MD. RAHIM ALI @ ABDUR RAHIMversusTHE STATE OF ASSAM & ORS.
2024 INSC 51111 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Md. Rahim Ali, was declared a foreigner by the Foreigners Tribunal, Nalbari, on the basis that he failed to prove his Indian citizenship under Section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946. He challenged the Tribunal's order, arguing that the authorities had no material basis for the allegation of illegal migrat…
VINEETA SRINANDANversusHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ON ITS OWN MOTION
2025 INSC 140810 December 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Vineeta Srinandan, a former director of Seawoods Estates Ltd., issued a circular alleging a "dog mafia" influencing judges, which the Bombay High Court held to be criminal contempt under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and sentenced her to one week imprisonment and a fine. She promptly filed a reply af…
JAYEDEEPSINH PRAVINSINH CHAVDA & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2024 INSC 96010 December 2024Case Partly allowed
The appellants, husband and in‑laws, were charged under Sections 306, 498A and 114 of the IPC for the alleged suicide of the wife after twelve years of marriage, based on a FIR filed by her father. They sought discharge under Section 227 of the CrPC, arguing that no prima facie case existed, particularly for abetment o…
MITC ROLLING MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR.versusM/S RENUKA REALTORS AND ORS.
2025 INSC 130010 November 2025Appeal(s) allowed
MITC Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. filed a commercial suit for recovery of Rs.2.5 crore. The trial court rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC on the ground that the plaintiff had not complied with the mandatory pre‑institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The appellant cha…
AKHTAR ALI @ ALI AKHTAR @ SHAMIM @ RAJA USTADversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2025 INSC 109710 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were convicted for the rape and murder of a minor girl based on circumstantial evidence, a disputed 'last seen' theory, alleged motive of lust, and DNA forensic reports. The Supreme Court examined the credibility of the motive, the reliability of the last seen testimony, and the integrity of the forensic…
ROHINI SUDARSHAN GANGURDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
2024 INSC 51910 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Rohini Sudarshan Gangurde, was charged under Section 306 of the IPC for allegedly abetting her husband’s suicide by harassing him over money and property. The husband was found hanged in their jointly owned house, and the mother filed an FIR alleging physical and mental abuse by the wife. The trial court…
UNIWORLD LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.versusINDEV LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.
2024 INSC 51510 July 2024Dismissed
The appellant and respondent entered into a leave‑and‑license agreement for a warehouse, which the respondent later terminated for non‑payment of storage charges. The respondent filed a suit for permanent injunction and vacant possession, expressly reserving the right to claim arrears of rent and damages, and was grant…
DUNI CHANDversusVIKRAM SINGH AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 51610 July 2024Case Allowed
The plaintiff, Tota Ram, claimed ownership of a land based on a registered Will dated 12‑12‑1988 executed by the deceased Beli Ram, while the defendants relied on a later Will dated 16‑05‑1994 to transfer the land to themselves and subsequent purchasers. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the first appellate court…
YOGESH GOYANKAversusGOVIND & ORS.
2024 INSC 51010 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant purchased farming land from a seller during the pendency of a suit challenging earlier release deeds, and obtained a registered sale deed while fully aware of the litigation. He applied to be impleaded as a defendant under Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC, but the Additional District Judge dismissed the applica…
MAMTA DEVIversusSANJAY KUMAR
2026 INSC 34610 April 2026Disposed off
The parties were married in 2002 and have two children. They lived separately from 2018, with the husband filing for divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion under Sections 13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The Family Court found that the wife’s conduct amounted to cruelty and that the husband had b…
RAMADEBI RAUTRAYversusSTATE OF ODISHA & ORS.
2026 INSC 24310 March 2026Appeal(s) allowed
Ramadebi Rautray contested the election of Basanti Sahoo (the respondent) as Chairman of the Delang Panchayat Samiti, alleging that the respondent was disqualified under Section 45(1)(v) of the Orissa Panchayat Samiti Act, 1959 for having a third child after the statutory cut‑off date. The Election Tribunal found the r…
POORANMALversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
2026 INSC 21710 March 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Pooranmal was convicted along with co‑accused Ladu Lal for the murder of Ladu Lal’s wife, Aruna, under Sections 302/34 and 201 of the IPC. The prosecution’s case against Pooranmal rested solely on three pieces of circumstantial evidence: call detail records showing frequent communication with Ladu Lal, a …
RACHANA GANGU & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2026 INSC 21810 March 2026Disposed off
The petitioners, parents of individuals who died after receiving COVID‑19 vaccines, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking an independent medical board, protocols for early detection of adverse events and compensation. Similar petitions were filed in the Kerala High Court, which directed the Union to formulate …
ANURAG KRISHNA SINHAversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ANR.
2026 INSC 21910 March 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a descendant and trustee of the Srimati Radhika Sinha Institute and Sachchidanand Sinha Library, challenged the Bihar State Legislature's 2015 Act that compulsorily acquired the Institute and dissolved its trust. The High Court had upheld the Act, but the Supreme Court examined whether the legislation wa…
ALAGAMMAL AND ORS.versusGANESAN AND ANR.
2024 INSC 2810 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The sellers (Alagammal and others) entered into a registered agreement of sale on 22‑Nov‑1990 with the buyers (Ganesan and others) for Rs.21,000, stipulating that the balance be paid within six months. The buyers paid only a fraction of the amount and failed to complete the purchase before the deadline, while the selle…
SHUVENDU SAHAversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.
2026 INSC 3679 April 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Shuvendu Saha, was involved in a tenancy dispute with the respondent‑2 complainant, which was settled in a civil suit that was subsequently dismissed. Despite the settlement, the complainant filed a criminal complaint leading to an FIR for offences under Sections 409, 417, 418, 419, 420 and 506(2) IPC an…
ABHISHEK SHARMAversusTHE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS.
2026 INSC 2209 March 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were appointed as junior staff nurses on an "academic arrangement" basis under the 2009 SRO, and later sought regularisation under the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010, which excluded such appointments via Section 3(b). The State argued that the exclusion was valid because …
DR. SUSHIL KUMAR PURBEY & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.
2026 INSC 2129 March 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The complainant, married to Dr. Rishi Raj, filed an FIR in March 2022 alleging torture, dowry demands and an attempt to strangle her, implicating her husband, his parents (the appellants) and his sister‑in‑law. The parents‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law sought quashing of the criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC; the …
GOBIND SINGH AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2026 INSC 2119 March 2026Dismissed
The appellants, Gobind Singh and others, sued the Union of India and others for a declaration of title and permanent injunction over land in Gwalior. The trial court decreed in their favour, but the respondents appealed; during the appeal the appellants filed an application under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC to produce certif…
AKOLA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR.versusZISHAN HUSSAIN AZHAR HUSSAIN AND ANR.
2025 INSC 13988 December 2025Case Allowed
The Akola Municipal Corporation revised property tax rates for the years 2017‑18 to 2021‑22 after a 16‑year hiatus, invoking its statutory powers under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act. Dr. Zishan Hussain filed a public interest litigation alleging that the revision was irrational, arbitrary and procedurally …
GOVIND MANDAVIversusSTATE OF CHATTISGARH
2025 INSC 13998 December 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Govind Mandavi was convicted for murder under IPC s.302 r/w s.34 and for an offence under the SC/ST Act based on the testimony of the deceased's wife (PW‑2) and her father‑in‑law (PW‑1), who identified the accused after a delayed statement and a Test Identification Parade (TIP). The Supreme Court examined…
DASHWANTHversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
2025 INSC 12038 October 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was convicted and sentenced to death for murder, kidnapping, rape and offences under the POCSO Act based on four alleged pillars of evidence: a last‑seen‑together theory, CCTV footage, a confession‑derived disclosure statement and DNA profiling. The Supreme Court examined whether each of these pillars was…
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusPARMESHWAR RAMLAL JOSHI AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 12058 October 2025Disposed off
The complainant, Parmeshwar Ramlal Joshi, lodged FIRs alleging threats and interference in his granite mining business by a former minister and police officials, and sought transfer of the investigation to the CBI. He first filed a criminal writ petition in the Rajasthan High Court, which was dismissed as withdrawn. He…
R. RADHAKRISHNA PRASADversusSWAMINATHAN & ANR.
2024 INSC 4638 July 2024Dismissed
The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of a 1998 agreement to purchase a property for Rs 30 lakhs, having paid an initial advance of Rs 3 lakhs and claiming to have paid an additional Rs 15 lakhs thereafter. The trial court denied specific performance but ordered the defendant to refund the total advance o…
WARISversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2025 INSC 7128 May 2025
The appellant, Waris, was convicted under Sections 302, 201, 376(2)(i) and 376AB of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for raping and killing his step‑daughter. During the trial, his original counsel withdrew and he could not afford a new lawyer, so the trial court appointed a legal‑aid defence counsel on th…
COL. RAMNEESH PAL SINGHversusSUGANDHI AGGARWAL
2024 INSC 3978 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the guardianship of two minor children of Colonel Ramneesh Pal Singh and Sugandhi Aggarwal. The Family Court had awarded permanent custody to the father with visitation rights to the mother, but the Delhi High Court set aside that order and ordered shared custody. The Supreme Court examined the welfa…
M/S CHOPRA HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusHARBINDER SINGH SEKHON & ORS.
2026 INSC 3358 April 2026Appeal(s) allowed
M/s Chopra Hotels Private Limited (the appellant) owned a property whose building plan was affected by an interim order dated 24‑12‑2025 issued in CWP No. 38742 of 2025, which kept certain provisions of the Punjab Unified Building Rules, 2025 in abeyance. The High Court refused to implead the appellant in that writ pro…
RAVI PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2025 INSC 12917 November 2025
The petitioners, original allottees of a group housing project in Greater Noida, challenged the Allahabad High Court's dismissal of their writ petition seeking restoration of a cancelled lease, identification of genuine allottees, and completion of construction. The Supreme Court observed that the dispute involved comp…
ROHAN VIJAY NAHAR & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2025 INSC 12967 November 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, private landowners in Maharashtra, challenged revenue annotations and mutation entries that labelled their lands as private forests and vested in the State, arguing that the statutory requirements for acquisition were not fulfilled. The State contended that notices issued under Section 35(3) of the Indi…
PREM AGGARWALversusMOHAN SINGH & ORS.
2025 INSC 12147 October 2025Dismissed
The appellant, Prem Aggarwal, entered into an agreement to purchase a property in 1989, paid Rs.25,000 as earnest money and later sued for specific performance, which the Supreme Court dismissed on the ground of bar under Order II Rule 2 of the CPC, but awarded her Rs.2 crore as compensation. The respondents deposited …
BASAMSETTI RAMA DEVIversusTHE STATE OF A.P. & ORS.
2024 INSC 10557 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined two criminal appeals challenging High Court orders that quashed criminal complaints and set aside committal orders against police officers accused of custodial deaths. The appellants alleged that the deceased were killed in police custody and that the High Court relied solely on CID and CBI r…
MUSLIMVEETIL CHALAKKAL AHAMMED HAJIversusSAKEENA BEEVI
2026 INSC 357 January 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiff‑appellant, Muslimveetil Chalakkal Ahammed Haji, sought specific performance of a 2007 agreement to purchase a 1/11th share of a three‑acre school property from the defendant‑respondent, Sakeena Beevi, who was one of nine heirs. After the death of the father, the heirs executed an unregistered power of att…
KUNHIMUHAMMED@KUNHEETHUversusTHE STATE OF KERALA
2024 INSC 9376 December 2024Dismissed
The appellant, a sympathiser of a political party, participated in a violent clash on 11 April 2006 during which he stabbed the deceased Subrahmannian multiple times with a knife, causing fatal injuries to vital organs. The trial court convicted him under Sections 302, 324 and 326/34 of the IPC and sentenced him to lif…
STATE OF CHHATTISGARHversusAMIT AISHWARYA JOGI
2025 INSC 12856 November 2025Dismissed
The trial court acquitted Amit Aishwarya Jogi in a 2007 murder case involving the killing of a Congress leader, after a CBI‑investigated chargesheet superseded the original police investigation. The State of Chhattisgarh, the CBI and the victim’s son (de‑facto complainant) sought leave to appeal the acquittal, but the …
P. ANJANAPPA (D) BY LRSversusA.P. NANJUNDAPPA & ORS.
2025 INSC 12866 November 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved a joint family property dispute among descendants of Pillappa, concerning the validity of two registered release deeds (1956 and 1967) and an unregistered palupatti (partition) deed of 1972. The plaintiffs argued that the releases were ineffective and that the palupatti could not be relied upon, while…
MANDAKINI DIWAN AND ANR.versusTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS.
2024 INSC 6666 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, mother and brother of Ranjana Diwan, alleged that her death in 2016, officially recorded as suicide, was suspicious due to six ante‑mortem injuries and possible influence by her husband, a senior judicial officer, over the police investigation. They filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a fair…
R. SREENIVASAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2023 INSC 8036 September 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a co-accused in a murder case, was acquitted by the trial court on the ground that the prosecution failed to prove that the deceased was last seen in his company. The High Court reversed this acquittal and convicted the appellant under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC, relying on a disputed 'last seen' th…
TAHIR V. ISANIversusMADAN WAMAN CHODANKAR, (SINCE DECEASED) NOW THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES & ORS.
2025 INSC 10446 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Tahir V. Isani, purchased a property in 2007 from M/s Rizvi Estate & Hotels Pvt. Ltd., a bona‑fide buyer who derived title from the original owner and not from the judgment‑debtor (the Maliks). The Maliks, as judgment‑debtors, had obtained a decree in a 1996 suit for ejectment, which was later executed a…
RAMKIRAT MUNILAL GOUDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC.
2025 INSC 7026 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was convicted and sentenced to death for the rape and murder of a 3‑year‑9‑month‑old child based on three strands of circumstantial evidence: a disputed 'last seen together' testimony, an alleged extra‑judicial confession, and a forensic soil match. The Supreme Court examined whether the investigation was…
SAJAL BOSEversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
2026 INSC 3226 April 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned an FIR registered on 18 October 2022 alleging assault, criminal intimidation and related offences against eight persons, including Sajal Bose, his wife Nabina Bose and Chandidas Joardar. The High Court quashed the proceedings against two co‑accused but refused to grant the same relief to the three ap…
SAVE MON REGION FEDERATION & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH & ORS.
2026 INSC 3206 April 2026Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined a public‑interest writ petition filed by Save Mon Region Federation alleging that the Arunachal Pradesh government had repeatedly awarded public‑works contracts through non‑tender methods, favoured firms linked to the Chief Minister and other officials, and failed to maintain proper procureme…
GYANENDRA SINGH @ RAJA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.
2025 INSC 3356 March 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Gyanendra Singh, was convicted for raping his nine‑year‑old daughter, resulting in convictions under Sections 376(2)(f) and 376(2)(i) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, with a life sentence and a fine. He appealed, arguing that because the offences overlapped, the special law (POCSO) under…
SANJAYversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2025 INSC 3176 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Sanjay was convicted of murder and rape of a four‑year‑old girl, X, and sentenced to death by the trial court, a decision affirmed by the High Court. The prosecution's case relied on the victim’s last‑seen testimony, an extra‑judicial confession by the accused that led to the recovery of the body and clot…
THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI & ORS.versusCENTURY TEXTILES AND INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ORS.
2025 INSC 366 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Century Textiles entered into a lease for Block‑A in 1928 under the Bombay Improvement Trust Transfer Act, 1925, with a 28‑year term that expired in 1955. The lease required the construction of poorer‑class dwellings and contained no clause obligating the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to convey the land after…
KARNATAKA STATE ELECTRONICS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.versusKUMAON ENTERTAINMENT AND HOSPITALITIES PVT. LTD.
2023 INSC 8715 October 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The Karnataka State Electronics Development Corporation (KSEDC), a wholly‑owned public sector undertaking, allotted a 0.25‑acre plot to Kumaon Entertainment for IT‑related activities on a lease‑cum‑sale basis, with a tentative price of Rs 1 crore per acre and a provision that the final price would be fixed later. The a…
RAJENDRA ANANT VARIKversusGOVIND B. PRABHUGAONKAR
2025 INSC 6335 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Rajendra Anant Varik, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a dishonoured cheque and was ordered to pay compensation. He appealed, and the First Appellate Court acquitted him, holding that the complainant was an unlicensed money‑lender under the Goa Money‑Lenders Act, whic…
HARJINDER SINGHversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
2025 INSC 6345 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, father of the deceased Dharminder Singh, challenged the High Court's order quashing a summons issued by the trial court under Section 319 of the CrPC against respondent No.2 (Varinder Singh) for alleged abetment to suicide. The incident involved a confrontation on 10 May 2016 where the deceased was taunt…
SHASHIN PATEL AND ANR.versusUDAY DALAL AND ORS.
2026 INSC 1255 February 2026Case Partly allowed
The appellants, Shashin Patel and Bhavini Patel, heirs of the original occupier of Flat No.7 in Malboro House Co‑operative Housing Society, sought admission as members of the Society by paying the required contribution many years after the Society’s formation. Their application was initially rejected by the Society’s A…
M/S S.R.S. TRAVELS BY ITS PROPRIETOR K.T. RAJASHEKARversusTHE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION WORKERS & ORS.
2025 INSC 1525 February 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2003, which repealed the Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976, and whether the State Transport Authority (STA) could delegate the power to grant contract carriage, speci…
ABDUL JABBARversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
2024 INSC 995 February 2024
Abdul Jabbar was convicted by a trial court for offences under Sections 323 and 325 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, receiving three months' imprisonment for the former and one year with a fine of Rs.500 for the latter. The High Court, noting a 13‑year delay in the proceedings, reduced the latter sentence…
DHARMENDRA SHARMAversusM. ARUNMOZHI & ANR.
2026 INSC 105 January 2026Disposed off
The petitioner, Dharmendra Sharma, filed contempt petitions alleging that respondent No.1 (M. Arunmozhi) willfully failed to refund Rs.3,99,100, the cost of non‑judicial stamp papers, as directed by the Supreme Court in Dharmendra Sharma v. Agra Development Authority (2025) 1 SCC 422. The respondent returned the expire…
GURDEV SINGH BHALLAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS
2024 INSC 225 January 2024Dismissed
The appellant, an Inspector, was summoned along with three other police officials under Section 319 of the CrPC following allegations that they demanded money and tortured the accused and his family in a misappropriation case. The trial court allowed the summoning, the High Court upheld that order, and the appellant ch…
AMANJOT SINGH CHADHAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 11274 September 2025Disposed off
The petitioner sought a writ under Article 32 of the Constitution directing all States and Union Territories to implement Section 6 of the Anand Marriage Act, 1909, which mandates rules for registering Sikh Anand Karaj marriages. The Court noted that while some jurisdictions had notified such rules, many had not, resul…
RAJASTHAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONversusLAVANSHU SANKHLA & ORS.
2026 INSC 4444 May 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) issued an advertisement on 7 March 2024 for 181 Assistant Prosecution Officer posts, requiring a law degree. Several candidates applied online before obtaining their degrees and later acquired the qualification on 22 August 2024. The RPSC issued press notes clarifying that…
G.V. ADHIMOOLAM & ORS.versusTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ANR.
2025 INSC 6814 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, who are relatives of the complainant, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash FIR No. 21 of 2019 alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 342, 294(b) and 506(1). The complainant claimed he had invested Rs. 1.5 crore in a Nissan car dealership run by the appellants, was denied pa…
KARANDEEP SHARMA @ RAZIA @ RAJUversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2025 INSC 4444 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was convicted of kidnapping, rape, and murder of a minor based entirely on circumstantial evidence, a confession narrated by a police officer, and DNA/FSL reports. The Supreme Court examined the reliability of the 'last seen' testimony, the admissibility of the confession under Sections 24, 25 and 26 of t…
SOVARAN SINGH PRAJAPATIversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2025 INSC 2254 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Sovaran Singh Prajapati was convicted of murdering his wife and daughter under Sections 302 and 201 IPC and sentenced to death by the Trial Court, a judgment affirmed by the Allahabad High Court. The appellant challenged the conviction on the ground that the trial was not a fair trial, citing numerous procedural irregu…
MISSION ACCESSIBILITYversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 13763 December 2025Disposed off
Mission Accessibility, a disability‑rights organization, filed a writ petition seeking modification of the scribe‑registration timeline for the Civil Services Examination and the introduction of laptops with screen‑reader software and accessible digital question papers for visually‑impaired candidates. The petition arg…
RANJEET MITTALversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. ETC. ETC.
2024 INSC 7663 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased Anjali Agarwal was found dead after allegedly falling from the terrace of her matrimonial home. The trial court framed charges against her husband and in‑laws under sections 498‑A, 306, 302 and 201 IPC read with section 34, alleging abetment to suicide and murder. The High Court quashed these charges, hold…
C. KAMALAKKANNANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE C.B.C.I.D., CHENNAI
2025 INSC 3093 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was convicted under Sections 120B, 468 and 471 of the IPC for allegedly preparing a postal cover that transmitted a forged marksheet. The prosecution’s case hinged on the testimony of a handwriting expert who claimed the cover bore the appellant’s handwriting, but the original postal cover was never produ…
SANJAY SADASHIV BENDRE & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2025 INSC 4003 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, senior firemen of the Pune Municipal Corporation, challenged the corporation's order that reduced their retirement age from 60 to 58 years based on a reclassification of their post as Class III under the 2014 Recruitment Rules. The High Court had upheld the lower retirement age, interpreting the newer c…
SARANGA ANILKUMAR AGGARWALversusBHAVESH DHIRAJLAL SHETH & ORS.
2025 INSC 3143 March 2025Dismissed
The appellant, a real‑estate developer, was penalised by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) with 27 penalties under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act for failing to deliver possession of residential units. While insolvency proceedings were initiated against the appellant under Section 9…
MARY PUSHPAMversusTELVI CURUSUMARY & ORS.
2024 INSC 83 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant filed a civil suit for declaration of title, possession and permanent injunction over an 8‑cents parcel of land, which had previously been the subject of litigation culminating in a High Court judgment on 30 March 1990. In the second round of litigation, the trial court and a later High Court judgment lim…
BRIJ NARAYAN SHUKLA (D) THR. LRS.versusSUDESH KUMAR ALIAS SURESH KUMAR (D) THR. LRS. & ORS.
2024 INSC 93 January 2024
The appellant, Brij Narayan Shukla, purchased a 3500 sq. ft. plot by a registered sale deed dated 21 January 1966 and sought an injunction with alternative relief for possession after the respondents obstructed construction in 1975. The respondents claimed title by adverse possession, alleging continuous possession sin…
RELIANCE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR.versusJAYA WADHWANI
2024 INSC 103 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined two civil appeals challenging the decisions of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, State Commission and District Forum, which had held the insurer liable to pay the sum assured after the assured's suicide. The central issue was the date from which an insurance policy becomes …
SATISH P. BHATTversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR
2024 INSC 163 January 2024Dismissed
Satish P. Bhatt and Vishwanath R. Nayak, directors of Astral Glass Pvt Ltd, were convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to ten months imprisonment with a compensation liability of Rs.1.10 crore. They entered into a settlement undertaking on 3 July 2018 to pay Rs.4.63.5 lakh to the c…
STATE OF NCT OF DELHIversusRAJ KUMAR @ LOVEPREET @LOVELY
2024 INSC 113 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent was arrested under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act, and the investigation period of 90 days expired on 15 September 2020. The investigating officer obtained two extensions, first to 11 November 2020 and then, on 7 November 2020, a further 30‑day extension …
RAJENDHIRANversusMUTHAIAMMAL @ MUTHAYEE & ORS.
2024 INSC 123 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiffs filed a suit seeking a declaration that a 2011 sale deed was void, claiming ownership of a parcel of land based on an alleged oral partition among four brothers and a will executed by one brother. The trial court and the subordinate appellate court dismissed the suit, finding that the oral partition was …
KABIR PAHARIAversusNATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 6232 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Scheduled Caste candidate with benchmark disabilities, secured a high rank in the NEET‑UG 2024 examination and applied for admission to the MBBS UG course at AIIMS, New Delhi under the SC‑PwBD quota. The Vardhman Mahavir Medical College’s disability certification board deemed him ineligible under NMC n…
NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST & ANR.versusCLIFFORD D SOUZA ETC. ETC.
2025 INSC 4402 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The New Mangalore Port Trust (NMPT) had revised licence fees for land allotted to several licensees and issued demand notices for arrears. The licensees challenged the retrospective application of the revised tariff before the Karnataka High Court, which dismissed their writ petitions, leading NMPT to file writ petitio…
SHABEEN AHMADversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 3072 March 2025Disposed off
The appellant, brother of the deceased, filed FIRs alleging that the deceased wife was subjected to relentless dowry demands and cruelty by her in‑laws, culminating in her death by strangulation within two years of marriage. The trial court denied bail to the accused in‑laws, but the High Court later granted bail to al…
RAJNISH SINGH @ SONIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 3082 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Rajnish Singh, was charged under Sections 376, 384, 323, 504 and 506 IPC for alleged sexual exploitation and blackmail of the complainant, who claimed he promised marriage and later married another woman. The complainant alleged a 16‑year consensual relationship that began with a forced act in 2006, duri…
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR
2026 INSC 1132 February 2026Disposed off
The State of Tamil Nadu filed a suit under Article 131 of the Constitution against Karnataka and the Union of India, seeking a declaration that Karnataka's construction of check dams and diversion structures on the Pennaiyar River without Tamil Nadu's consent was illegal and violated the fundamental rights of its inhab…
SANDEEP SINGH BORAversusNARENDRA SINGH DEOPA & ORS.
2026 INSC 1052 February 2026Case Allowed
The case concerned a petition by Sandeep Singh Bora (appellant) challenging a High Court interim order that directed the Returning Officer to allot a party symbol to respondent Narendra Singh Deopa and allow him to contest the Zila Panchayat election after his nomination had been cancelled for alleged non‑disclosure. T…
VINOD KANJIBHAI BHAGORAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
2024 INSC 1002 February 2024
The appellant, Vinod K. Bhagora, served as a Postal Assistant for the Central Government from 1983 to 1993 and then joined the Gujarat State Government as a Senior Assistant after obtaining a No‑Objection Certificate and tendering a technical resignation. He sought to have his ten years of Central Government service co…
SHAKEEL AHMEDversusSYED AKHLAQ HUSSAIN
2023 INSC 10161 November 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent filed a suit for possession and mesne profits of a property relying on an unregistered power of attorney, agreement to sell, affidavit and will, while the appellant, who was in possession, claimed title through an oral gift (Hiba) from his brother. The trial court decreed possession in favour of the resp…
TARUN SHARMAversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2025 INSC 11391 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the conviction of Tarun Sharma under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Munish Kumar, based primarily on a dying declaration recorded by a police Sub‑Inspector. The Supreme Court examined whether the dying declaration was reliable, given that the victim had been unconscious for most of the period, the…
J. SRI NISHAversusTHE SPECIAL DIRECTOR, ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND ANR.
2026 INSC 3091 April 2026Disposed off
The appellants, a company and its directors, were alleged to have acquired shares of a Singapore entity without RBI approval, violating Section 4 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA). The Enforcement Directorate seized their assets under Section 37A, but the Competent Authority later refused to confirm the sei…
SHRI. MASAIDEVI VIVIDH KARYAKARI SAHAKARI SEVA SANSTHA MARYADIT WAREWADIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2025 INSC 4361 April 2025Dismissed
The appellant society applied to register as a new Primary Agricultural Credit Co-operative Society (PACCS) but the Scrutiny Committee rejected the application on grounds of lack of financial viability and failure to meet statutory criteria. The State of Maharashtra, exercising its discretion under the Maharashtra Co-o…
ANIL MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2024 INSC 1891 March 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant lodged an FIR in 1999 alleging assault, abduction and other offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323 and 364 IPC against three accused. During trial, the accused entered into a settlement agreement with one victim (Respondent No.5) but the original complainant (the appellant) was neither a party to nor …