UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusEX. HC/GD VIRENDER SINGH
2022 INSC 85022 August 2022Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether the Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme for Central Armed Police Forces should be applied from 1 January 2006 or from 1 September 2008, and what financial up‑gradation entitlement it confers. It held that the MACP Scheme became operative on 1 September 2008, superseding …
COMMISSIONER OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & ANR.V. M. C. SHEELA EVANJALIN & ORS.versusM. C. SHEELA EVANJALIN & ORS.
2019 INSC 94322 August 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, initially appointed as a Road Gang Mazdoor in 1988, repeatedly sought promotion to higher municipal posts on the basis of her Diploma in Civil Engineering, filing numerous writ petitions. The Madras High Court directed her appointment as Town Planning Inspector, despite the fact that the post is governe…
SHAYARA BANOversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2017 INSC 78522 August 2017
The Supreme Court, by a 3:2 majority, set aside the practice of 'talaq-e-biddat' (triple talaq) as unconstitutional. The case arose from a petition by Shayara Bano, who was divorced by her husband through triple talaq. The majority held that triple talaq is manifestly arbitrary and violates Article 14 of the Constituti…
DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY AND ORS.versusRAJU, THROUGH MEMBER, JUVENILE JUSTICE BOARD AND ANR.
2013 INSC 54922 August 2013
A gang‑rape on 16‑12‑2012 involved a juvenile who was placed before a Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). Dr. Subramanian Swamy and others approached the JJB seeking impleadment and an interpretation of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 so that the juvenile could be tried as an adult. The JJB d…
GM, SRI SIDDESHWARA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. & ANR.versusSRI IKBAL & ORS.
2013 INSC 55622 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined a sale of mortgaged property under the SARFAESI Act where the auction purchaser paid only 25% of the price initially and the balance after 11 months. The borrower had sent a letter consenting to accept the balance payment and authorising issuance of a sale certificate, which the Bank accepted…
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusVIJAY SINGH AND ORS.
2012 INSC 34722 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents were appointed as Masters, Physical Training Instructor and Hindi Teacher on a purely ad‑hoc basis between 1994 and 1996 by District Education Officers, and their services were regularised on 1‑Oct‑2003. After regularisation they claimed that the ad‑hoc period should be counted for seniority, but the de…
RAM ASHISH DIXITversusCHAIRMAN PURVANCHAL GRAMIN BANK LIMITED AND ANR.
2012 INSC 34622 August 2012Dismissed
Ram Ashish Dixit, an officer of Gorakhpur Kshetriya Gramin Bank, was found guilty of irregularities in loan disbursement and was punished with stoppage of one increment for three years. He was considered for promotion from Junior Management Grade‑I to Middle Management Grade‑II in 1995, 1997 and 1999 but was not promot…
DEVINDER SINGH NARULAversusMEENAKSHI NANGIA
2012 INSC 34822 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The husband and wife were married on 26 March 2011 but lived apart from the outset, and the husband filed a petition under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking a declaration of nullity within three months. During mediation the parties agreed to dissolve the marriage by mutual consent and filed a joint petition …
THE CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, SECUNDERABAD AND ORS.versusG. RATNAM AND ORS.
2007 INSC 85522 August 2007Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned departmental trap investigations conducted by Railway Vigilance officers against three railway ticket examiners who were alleged to have demanded excess money from decoy passengers. The respondents were charged under Rule 3 of the Railway Services (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and, after departmental inquiri…
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.versusMADAN CHANDRA BRAHMA AND ANR.
2007 INSC 85622 August 2007Appeal(s) allowed
Madan Chandra Brahma was appointed temporarily in Gauhati Bank in 1969 and later promoted to officer. After successive mergers, he became an officer of Central Bank of India in 1990. He claimed retirement at age 60, invoking clause 1.2 of Regulation 19 of the Central Bank of India (Officers) Service Regulations, 1979, …
CONFEDERATION OF EX-SERVICEMEN ASSOCIATIONS AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2006 INSC 53322 August 2006Case Partly allowed
The Confederation of Ex‑Servicemen Associations filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking free and full medical aid for ex‑defence personnel, their families and dependents, arguing that such aid is a fundamental right under Articles 14 and 21. The Union of India responded that the Ex‑Servicemen Contributory Health…
KULDIP NAYARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2006 INSC 53222 August 2006Dismissed
The Supreme Court dismissed writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 2003, which amended the Representation of People Act, 1951 to remove the requirement of domicile/residence in a State for election to the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) and introduced an …
RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATLON AND ORS.versusZAKIR HUSSAIN
2005 INSC 36622 August 2005Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, Zakir Hussain, was appointed as a daily‑wage conductor on a two‑year probation and was terminated for unsatisfactory performance without any enquiry. He appealed to the departmental authority, which dismissed his grievance, and then filed a suit in a civil court seeking a declaration that the terminatio…
RUDRA KUMAR SAIN AND ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2000 INSC 40822 August 2000Case Partly allowed
The case concerned the inter‑se seniority of officers in the Delhi Higher Judicial Service appointed either by direct recruitment from the Bar or by promotion from the Delhi Judicial Service. The Delhi High Court had prepared seniority lists that excluded promotees appointed under Rules 16 and 17 on the ground that the…
R.D.SAXENAversusBALRAM PRASAD SHARMA
2000 INSC 40922 August 2000Disposed off
The appellant, a senior advocate and former legal advisor to a cooperative bank, refused to return the bank's case files after the retainership was terminated, demanding payment of alleged fees of Rs. 97,100. The bank filed a complaint before the State Bar Council, which was transferred to the Bar Council of India; the…
THE EXCISE SUPERINTENDENT MALKAPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESHversusK.B.N. VISWESHWARA RAO AND ORS.
1996 INSC 92122 August 1996Disposed off
The State (Excis e Superintendent, Malkapatnam) sought to fill 723 posts by selecting candidates whose names were sponsored through the employment exchange, while the respondents, who applied independently, were excluded. The respondents approached the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, which issued interim direct…
HARNAMA SINGH (DEAD) LRS. ON RECORD & OTHERSversusSHRI HARBHAJAN SINGH
1991 INSC 20422 August 1991Dismissed
Three brothers sold land to Harbhajan Singh; the fourth brother, Ujagar Singh, filed four pre-emption suits which were decreed on the condition that the pre-emption money be paid by 30 August 1970. The pre‑emptors appealed for a reduction of the amount and obtained an extension of time for deposit, but their appeals we…
KARNANI PROPERTIES LTD.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
1990 INSC 25022 August 1990Dismissed
Karnani Properties Ltd., a real‑estate company that lets premises and provides services such as electricity, water, cleaning and lift maintenance, was referred to an Industrial Tribunal over a dispute concerning wages, dearness allowance and gratuity. The company challenged the Tribunal’s award on the grounds that it d…
PRATHAMA BANK, HEAD OFFICE MORADABAD, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMANversusVIJAY KUMAR GOEL & ANR.
1989 INSC 25222 August 1989Disposed off
The respondent, an employee of Prathama Bank, was dismissed after a disciplinary inquiry in which he was not given adequate opportunity to examine the documents relied upon against him. He filed a suit challenging the validity of the inquiry and seeking reinstatement. The bank contended that the bank was not a "State" …
PREM PRAKASHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1984 INSC 15022 August 1984Case Allowed
The petitioners, members of the Scheduled Caste, challenged their exclusion from appointment as Sub‑Judges in the Delhi Judicial Service despite being on the merit list of the 1980 competitive examination. The High Court had fixed the number of reserved vacancies based on the number of candidates qualifying for general…
WELCOME HOTEL AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS
1983 INSC 10022 August 1983Dismissed
The State of Andhra Pradesh issued orders fixing maximum prices for certain cooked food items served by catering establishments under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Several hoteliers challenged the orders, arguing that the term "foodstuffs" in the Act does not cover cooked food and that the price fixation was arb…
GIAN SINGH MANNversusTHE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AND ANR.
1980 INSC 16122 August 1980Dismissed
Gian Singh Mann, a judicial officer of the Punjab Civil Service (Judicial Branch), challenged the High Court's order withdrawing his judicial work and his subsequent premature retirement, seeking reinstatement and promotion to the Selection Grade and the Punjab Superior Judicial Service under a reservation claim. He fi…
G. R. LUTHRAversusLT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS.
1979 INSC 15522 August 1979Case Allowed
G.R. Luthra and D.R. Khanna were recruited to the Punjab Judicial Service in 1950, Luthra securing a higher rank and a permanent post while Khanna obtained a lower rank and a temporary post. After the creation of Haryana and the Delhi High Court, both officers continued serving in Delhi and were placed senior to Khanna…
UNITED BANK OF INDIA (NOW PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK)versusSWAPAN KUMAR MULLICK & ORS.
2025 INSC 88122 July 2025Disposed off
Swapan Kumar Mullick worked for United Bank of India for 36 years and resigned in 2006 citing mental depression, opting for provident fund benefits rather than pension. A 2010 circular issued under a bipartite settlement offered a new pension option to employees who had not previously opted for pension, and Mullick app…
S. TIRUPATHI RAOversusM. LINGAMAIAH & ORS.
2024 INSC 54422 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute arose from a civil suit concerning the partition of ancestral land, which led to a decree directing the Tahsildar to mutate the name of the first respondent in revenue records. The Tahsildar failed to comply, prompting a contempt petition that was initially allowed by a Single Judge but later set aside by a…
AMIN MERCHANTversusCHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE & REVENUE & ORS.
2016 INSC 54522 July 2016Dismissed
Amin Merchant imported eight consignments of goods classified under Customs Tariff sub‑heading 2208.10 and paid duty at the rate of Rs 300 per litre or 400% whichever was higher, as prescribed in the Finance Act. He contended that the Finance Minister’s budget proposals for 1993‑94 and 1994‑95 required a lower duty (85…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusKAMLA DEVI
2005 INSC 30722 July 2005Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Union of India challenged a Central Administrative Tribunal order that granted pension benefits to a deceased canteen employee who retired before the cut‑off date of 1 October 1991. The employee’s husband had retired on medical grounds on 12 July 1990 and died on 28 March 1991. Earlier Supreme Court judgm…
CHANDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.
2003 INSC 32622 July 2003Dismissed
The appellants, three members of the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service, were compulsorily retired on 31 March 1999 under a notification that reduced the retirement age to 58 years, with an exception allowing extension to 60 years for officers deemed to have continued utility. They challenged the order, arguing that the…
HARI RAM GUPTA (DEAD) THROUGH L.R. KASTURI DEVIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
1998 INSC 26722 July 1998Dismissed
Hari Ram Gupta retired in 1980, before the Uttar Pradesh Palika (Centralised) Service Retirement Benefits Rules, 1981 came into force. He filed a writ petition seeking a pension under the 1981 Rules, contending that Rule 3(2) and (3) gave the Rules retrospective effect and that the phrase "finally withdrawn" allowed hi…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR.versusBADRINARAYAN ACHARYA ETC. ETC.
1996 INSC 76522 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, who were assistant teachers, were deputed at the Government's expense in 1966 to obtain higher qualifications such as graduation and B.Ed. The Government issued a Finance Department memo on 22 October 1964 stating that only employees who attended training at their own cost would be eligible for two adv…
P.CHANDRAMOULYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1994 INSC 28022 July 1994Dismissed
Four members of the General Reserve Engineers Force (GREF) were tried by a Court‑Martial convened under a warrant of the Chief of the Army Staff authorising the Chief Engineer and were convicted of offences under Sections 63, 39(a) and 41 of the Army Act. They challenged the jurisdiction of the Court‑Martial, the effec…
ORGANON (INDIA) LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS INFER (INDIA) LTD.) AND ANR.versusTHE COLLECTOR OF EXCISE AND OTHERS
1994 INSC 27722 July 1994Dismissed
Organon (India) Ltd., later known as Infer (India) Ltd., obtained a wholesale licence for poppy husks in Madhya Pradesh and entered into a contract to export 1,000 tonnes to the Netherlands. The company sought a permit from the Collector of Excise, Mandsaur, to move the husks to Bombay for export, claiming that no exci…
SH. DEWAN CHAND BHALLAversusDR. ASHOK KUMAR BHOIL
1994 INSC 28122 July 1994Dismissed
The appellant, a government servant, was allotted a government residential accommodation and was a tenant of a residential building owned by the respondent landlord. The landlord invoked Section 14(3)(a)(iv) of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 to obtain possession, arguing that the tenant was liable fo…
BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ANR. ETC.versusDR. SHIV JATAN THAKUR AND ORS. ETC.
1994 INSC 28222 July 1994Disposed off
Dr. Shiv Jatan Thakur, a member of the Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC), claimed that, as a member, he was entitled to the same facilities and amenities as the Chairman, invoking the Constitution and the BPSC (Conditions of Service) Regulations. He also sought punitive action against the Chairman for allegedly re…
LIFE INSURANCE CORPN. OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.versusPROF. MANUBHAI D. SHAH ETC. ETC.
1992 INSC 18122 July 1992Dismissed
The petitioners, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and Doordarshan, appealed against High Court orders directing LIC to publish a rejoinder to a criticism of its premium policy in its magazine and directing Doordarshan to telecast a documentary on the Bhopal gas disaster. The issues were whether a State‑owned c…
STATE OF ORISSAversusDANDASI SAHU
1988 INSC 18422 July 1988Dismissed
The State of Orissa contracted Dandasi Sahu for an irrigation project; after completion and final payment, Sahu claimed extra work and invoked the arbitration clause. The arbitrator awarded Rs 15,23,657 plus interest without giving reasons. The Sub‑ordinate Judge set aside the award, but the Orissa High Court restored …
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusATIC INDUSTRIES LIMITED
1984 INSC 11622 June 1984Appeal(s) allowed
The Union of India challenged a demand for differential excise duty on dyes manufactured by ATIC Industries Ltd., arguing that the definition of "related person" in the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 was unconstitutional and that ATIC's wholesale buyers, Atul Products Ltd. and Crescent Dyes & Chemicals Ltd., were "r…
DR. PRADEEP JAIN ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.
1984 INSC 11722 June 1984Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether state-imposed domicile or residence requirements for admission to MBBS and postgraduate medical courses violated the Constitution’s guarantee of equality. It held that wholesale reservation based solely on domicile is unconstitutional, but a limited reservation of up to 70% of seats (…
STATE OF KERALA & ANOTHERversusASIANET SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. & OTHERS
2025 INSC 75722 May 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered whether assessees engaged in broadcasting television signals to subscribers are liable to pay both entertainment tax under State enactments (Entry 62, List II of the Constitution) and service tax under the Finance Act, 1994 (Entry 97, List I). The Court held that the activity of broadcastin…
KASIREDDY UPENDER REDDYversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.
2025 INSC 76822 May 2025
The appellant challenged the arrest of his son, Kessireddy Raja Shekhar Reddy, alleging that the police failed to provide appropriate and meaningful grounds of arrest, thereby violating Article 22 of the Constitution. The son was arrested on 21 April 2025 by the CID in connection with offences under Sections 420, 409, …
SAKHAWAT AND ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2025 INSC 77722 May 2025
The appellants were convicted under Sections 302, 307 and 34 of the IPC for the murder of Sukha based primarily on the testimony of the complainant and other prosecution witnesses. During bail proceedings, three eyewitnesses submitted affidavits stating that the appellants were not involved, but the investigating offic…
IN RE: RIGHT TO PRIVACY OF ADOLESCENTS versus
2025 INSC 77822 May 2025
The Supreme Court examined a criminal appeal filed by the State of West Bengal challenging a High Court order that had set aside the conviction of an accused under the POCSO Act and IPC for raping a 14‑year‑old girl who later married him and bore a child. The Court restored the conviction for offences under Section 6 o…
PATEL ENGINEERING LTD.versusNORTH EASTERN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD. (NEEPCO)
2020 INSC 40322 May 2020Dismissed
Patel Engineering Ltd. challenged three arbitral awards dated 29‑03‑2016 concerning payment for extra lead under a contract with North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Ltd. (NEEPCO). NEEPCO filed applications under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; the Additional Deputy Commissioner upheld the…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusR.P. SINGH
2014 INSC 40422 May 2014Dismissed
R.P. Singh, an Assistant Engineer in CPWD, faced departmental proceedings for alleged misconduct. The Inquiry Officer found the charges unproved, but the Disciplinary Authority disagreed, sought advice from the UPSC, received a recommendation to reduce his pay, and imposed the penalty, communicating the UPSC advice onl…
Y.P. SARABHAIversusUNION BANK OF INDIA AND ANR.
2006 INSC 35022 May 2006Dismissed
Y.P. Sarabhai, a Manager (Security) of Union Bank of India, remained absent from duty from June to November 1997 without sanctioned leave, allegedly to evade a transfer to Chennai. The disciplinary authority, after a detailed enquiry, found him guilty of contravening Regulation 13 of the Bank's Conduct Regulations and …
GEN. OFFICER COMM. IN CHIEF, LUCKNOW AND ORS.versusR.P. SHUKLA (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.
2006 INSC 35122 May 2006Appeal(s) allowed
Three short‑term army personnel were convicted by a Summary Court Martial of serious misconduct and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment and dismissal. They challenged the proceedings before the High Court on the ground that Army Rule 180 was not observed, and the High Court set aside the martial proceedings and ordered …
VJJAY SYAL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
2003 INSC 29722 May 2003Dismissed
The Punjab Subordinate Selection Board conducted a written test for Assistant District Transport Officer posts and later lowered the qualifying standard, calling additional candidates for interview. The appellants, who were not selected, challenged the selection on grounds of arbitrariness, excessive interview marks, a…
MD. FIROZ AHMAD KHALIDversusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR & ORS.
2025 INSC 53522 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Muslim member of the Manipur Bar Council, was appointed to the State Waqf Board under Section 14(1)(b)(iii) of the Wakf Act, 1995. After a former board member (respondent No.3) lost his Bar Council seat, he challenged the appointment, arguing that Explanation II to Section 14(1)(b) only applies to MPs …
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusRAMESH CHANDER DIWAN
2025 INSC 53922 April 2025Dismissed
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) appealed against the High Court's order discharging Ramesh Chander Diwan of offences under Sections 120B and 420 of the IPC, on the ground that no sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) had been obtained. Diwan, originally appointed by the Governmen…
KANCHHUversusPRAKASH CHAND & ORS.
2025 INSC 54222 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant filed a civil suit in 1987 seeking cancellation of a sale deed, but the respondents repeatedly obtained adjournments and were eventually set ex parte, leading to a decree in 1991. The respondents later filed applications under Order IX Rule 13 and the Limitation Act, which were dismissed, and their subseq…
RAMANUJ KUMARversusPRIYANKA
2025 INSC 54322 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Ramanuj Kumar, filed a petition for divorce under Sections 13(1)(ia) and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging irretrievable breakdown of his marriage to Priyanka. The parties had been living separately for over eleven years, with the appellant caring for their elder daughter and the respondent carin…
M/S J N REAL ESTATEversusSHAILENDRA PRADHAN & ORS.
2025 INSC 61122 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute involved multiple claims over the same property, with the original plaintiff seeking specific performance of an agreement to sell and the appellant (original defendant No.8) seeking to be impleaded as a defendant under Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC. The trial court allowed the appellant’s impleadment, but the …
RAM CHANDERversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ANR.
2022 INSC 46822 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioner, convicted of murder and related offences, served 16 years of a life sentence and applied for premature release under Chhattisgarh Prison Rule 358. The appropriate government sought the opinion of the Special Judge who, without providing detailed reasons or considering the factors laid down in Laxman Nas…
RAHUL S SHAHversusJINENDRA KUMAR GANDHI & ORS.
2021 INSC 27022 April 2021Dismissed
The case arose from a protracted dispute over a one‑acre property in Bengaluru that had been sold multiple times, leading to conflicting claims and a series of suits for declaration, possession, and execution. The decree‑holders obtained a decree for possession, but the judgment debtors and subsequent purchasers repeat…
CHEBROLU LEELA PRASAD RAO & ORS.versusSTATE OF A.P. & ORS.
2020 INSC 34422 April 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the validity of G.O. Ms. No.3/2000 issued by the erstwhile Andhra Pradesh Government, which provided 100% reservation for Scheduled Tribe candidates in teacher posts in scheduled areas. The Court held that under Paragraph 5(1) of Schedule V, the Governor may only exclude or modify an existing…
NAND KUMAR MANJHI & ANR. ETC.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ETC.
2019 INSC 54622 April 2019Dismissed
The State of Bihar advertised 40 Assistant Conservator of Forests (ACF) posts in 1985 and filled them by December 1987. Unsuccessful candidates, including the appellants, lobbied the government and were appointed on 13 April 1988 despite the merit list being exhausted, an appointment the Court held to be illegal and fo…
S. RAJASEEKARANversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2017 INSC 115922 April 2014Hearing Adjourned
The petitioner, an orthopaedic surgeon, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking the Supreme Court’s intervention to enforce the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and related regulations to curb the high incidence of road accidents in India and to improve post‑accident care. The Court examined the extensive data on accide…
N. SURESH NATHAN & ORS., ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC. ETC.
2010 INSC 23022 April 2010Disposed off
The case concerned promotion of Section Officers/Junior Engineers to the post of Assistant Engineer in the Pondicherry Public Works Department under the 1965 Recruitment Rules. The Supreme Court examined whether its earlier decision in N. Suresh Nathan & Ors. v. Union of India bound courts on the method of considering …
ASHUTOSH CHATURVEDIversusPRANO DEVI @ PARANI DEVI & ORS.
2008 INSC 50922 April 2008Dismissed
The predecessor of the appellant filed a suit on 21 May 1990 for declaration of title, possession and setting aside a sale deed. During the pendency, two further sale deeds were executed, and an interim order of status quo was granted. Thirteen years later, on 11 June 2003, the appellant sought to amend the plaint to c…
PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.versusGURMAIL SINGH
2008 INSC 51422 April 2008Case Partly allowed
Gurmail Singh, a senior employee of the Punjab State Electricity Board (PSEB), was promoted to Upper Division Clerk (UDC) in 1986 and later opted for UDC as his induction post, thereby losing the revised Lower Division Clerk (LDC) pay scale that his junior colleagues received. He filed a writ petition challenging the B…
STATE OF A.P.versusNATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS.
2002 INSC 21522 April 2002Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the sale of electricity by National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. (NTPCL) to electricity boards in other states constituted an inter‑State sale and could be taxed by the states under their Electricity Duty Acts. It held that electricity is a "good" and that its generation, transmissi…
UNION OF INDIAversusMAKHAN CHANDRA ROY ETC.
1997 INSC 43022 April 1997Appeal(s) allowed
The Union of India challenged two orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) that had granted higher pay‑scales to a laboratory assistant and a malaria technician beyond those prescribed in the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1986. The Supreme Court held that the Tribunal had overstepped its jurisd…
VISHWAS ANNA SAWANT AND ORS.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY AND ORS.
1994 INSC 16922 April 1994
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay resolved in 1975 to reserve promotion posts for backward classes, including Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and denotified and nomadic tribes. Although a seniority‑wise list of eligible backward‑class employees was prepared, the corporation denied promotions to several ap…
ANAND S. BIJIversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.
1993 INSC 16222 April 1993Disposed off
The appellant, who had appeared for the All India Post‑Graduate medical entrance examination of 1992, was not allotted any seat despite having higher marks than some candidates who were later admitted in Kerala. After the first, second and third admission lists were issued, the remaining vacant seats were surrendered t…
DR. A.K. SABHAPATHYversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.
1992 INSC 11722 April 1992Case Partly allowed
Dr. A.K. Sabhapathy challenged Kerala's use of the first proviso in Section 38 of the Travancore‑Cochin Medical Practitioners' Act, 1953, which allowed the State to exempt certain persons from the registration requirements for practising modern (allopathic) medicine. The State had issued notifications (May 4 1977, Sept…
MST. KANCHANIYA AND ORS.versusSHIV RAM AND ORS.
1992 INSC 11822 April 1992Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined a dispute over 19 Bighas 8 Biswas of agricultural land originally granted by maufi to a temple in former Gwalior State. After the maufi grant was revoked, the land became Aukaf property and was managed by the temple's Pujari, who was only a manager under a Parwana issued pursuant to Section 1…
DEVAKI NANDAN PRASADversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
1983 INSC 4522 April 1983Case Allowed
The petitioner, a former member of the Bihar Education Service, sought enforcement of a 1971 Supreme Court mandamus directing the State to compute his pension based on his promotions to Class II and Class I. Despite the Chief Minister’s orders in 1974, the State computed his pension as if he retired from Class I only, …
K.DHEENADHAYALANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.
1980 INSC 9222 April 1980Dismissed
The petitioner, a direct recruit Joint Commercial Tax Officer (JCTO) appointed in 1966, challenged a fresh combined inter‑se seniority list prepared by the Government in 1977 which placed him below a transferee recruit in the 1967 list. The High Court had earlier quashed the original seniority list and directed a fresh…
DR. JAYA THAKUR & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2024 INSC 24622 March 2024
The petitioners challenged the constitutionality of Section 7(1) of the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service, and Term of Office) Act, 2023, which replaces the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister in the Selection Committee for appointing the C…
KIRPAL KAUR AND ANOTHERversusRITESH AND OTHERS
2022 INSC 32322 March 2022Dismissed
The dispute concerned an agreement dated 11‑02‑2004 whereby Gurmeet Singh sold land to Jai Parkash for Rs.4,00,000, of which Rs.3,50,000 was paid as earnest money. The defendants argued that the agreement was a loan/security document intended for marriage expenses, while the plaintiffs contended it was a genuine sale c…
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.versusM/S BRAHMAPUTRA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED
[2018] 6 S.C.R. 96222 March 2018Dismissed
The State of Bihar challenged the appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arguing that the Bihar Public Works Contracts Arbitration Tribunal Act, 2008 excluded the Central Act for works contracts. The parties had a contract dated 22 June 2012 containing an arbitra…
SMT. POONAMversusSUMIT TANWAR
2010 INSC 16122 March 2010Dismissed
The petitioners, married on 30‑Nov‑2008, filed a dissolution suit under Section 13‑8(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The Delhi Family Court ordered them to wait six months before filing a second motion under Section 13‑8(2). The wife filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking a decree of div…
JAFARIAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2010 INSC 16222 March 2010Disposed off
The petitioner, a Pakistani national, had completed a nine‑year sentence imposed by a Sessions Court but remained detained in Central Jail, Jaipur. He filed a writ of habeas corpus under Articles 32 and 21 of the Constitution, alleging illegal detention. The State of Rajasthan expressed no objection to his release, and…
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusJAGDISH
2010 INSC 15922 March 2010Dismissed
Jagdish, a Class‑3 life convict sentenced in 1999, applied for premature release after serving more than ten years. The High Court ordered his case to be considered under the remission policy dated 04‑02‑1993, rejecting the newer short‑sentencing policy of 13‑08‑2008. The State appealed, arguing that the later policy, …
MOHD. ASLAM @ BHUREversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
2007 INSC 33022 March 2007Dismissed
Following the demolition of the Babri Masjid, two criminal cases (197/92 and 198/92) were registered and investigated by the CBI. The Uttar Pradesh Government, after consulting the Allahabad High Court, established a Special Court at Lucknow via a notification dated 9 September 1993, but later issued an amendment on 8 …
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusRANBIR SINGH RATHAUR AND ORS.
2006 INSC 16322 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerns several army officers who were tried by General Court Martial for espionage, some convicted and others dismissed administratively under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950. Their writ petitions challenging the Court Martial proceedings and the administrative dismissals were dismissed by the Delhi High Co…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.versusSHRI RAMCHANDRA RAMMILAN MISHRA @ PANDEY
2004 INSC 19222 March 2004Case Partly allowed
The Commissioner of Police, Mumbai detained Shri Ramchandra Rammilan Mishra @ Pandey under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities (Bootleggers) Slumlords and Drug Offenders Act, 1981 to prevent activities prejudicial to public order. The detenu challenged the detention, contending that the …
C.M. BEENA AND ANR.versusP.N. RAMACHANDRA RAO
2004 INSC 19422 March 2004Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent (landlord) sued the appellants (father and son) for mandatory injunction to vacate a shop premises, alleging that a deed of licence executed in 1981 had terminated. The trial court and first appellate court found the appellants to be tenants, but the High Court reversed, treating the deed as a licence to…
GAUHATI HIGH COURT AND ANR.versusKULADHAR PHUKAN AND ANR.
2002 INSC 17122 March 2002Disposed off
Kuladhar Phukan, a judicial officer of the Assam Judicial Service, was appointed ad‑hoc as Deputy Secretary in the Assam Legal Service in 1986 after his application was forwarded by the High Court and his services were spared. He was later regularised and promoted in the Legal Service without any consultation with the …
AKHTARIBIversusSTATE OF M.P.
2001 INSC 16522 March 2001Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, filed an appeal that remained pending in the Madhya Pradesh High Court for many years without being listed for hearing. The High Court rejected her bail application, prompting a petition before the Supreme Court. The Court held that speedy trial is …
GURUDEVDATIA VKSSS MARYADIT AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
2001 INSC 16422 March 2001Dismissed
The appellants sought a restrictive voters list under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Second Amendment) Act, 2000, arguing that the amendment should apply to societies that had already become members before the amendment. The High Court dismissed their writ, holding the list was finalised before the amendment. T…
FERRO ALLOYS CORPN. LTD. AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1999 INSC 12422 March 1999Dismissed
Ferro Alloys Corp. Ltd (FACOR) sought a mining lease for chromite in Sukinda Valley after the Central Government, following a high‑power expert committee (Sharma Committee), reduced the area previously granted to Tata Iron & Steel Co. (TISCO). The Committee assessed the needs of all claimants, including FACOR, and the …
MOHD. ASLAMversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 42422 March 1996Dismissed
Mohd. Aslam filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking reconsideration of the Supreme Court's judgment in Manohar Joshi v. Nitin Bhaurao Patil, alleging it was incorrect. The Court held that Article 32 cannot be invoked to challenge the correctness of a decision on its merits or to obtain its reconsideration. It fu…
THE CANTONMENT BOARD, SECUNDERABADversusG. VENKETRAM REDDY AND ORS.
1995 INSC 20022 March 1995Appeal(s) allowed
The Secunderabad Cantonment Board levied octroi on goods entering the cantonment and the levy was challenged on the ground that the Board lacked authority under Section 60 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 because no municipality in the State imposed octroi and because there was no machinery for assessment. The High Court up…
N. KUNHICFLEKKU HAJI(D) BY LRSversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.
1995 INSC 20322 March 1995Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, N.K. Haji, ran a primary school and applied for its upgradation to an upper primary school under the Kerala Education Rules. Although the initial 1975 notification did not list his school, the Government later issued a revised order sanctioning the upgradation, which was challenged on the ground that the…
DR. V.L. CHANDRA AND ORS. ETC.versusALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND ORS.
1990 INSC 10022 March 1990Disposed off
The petitioners, long‑serving researchers at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), challenged the termination of their services after the completion of research projects, alleging that they were entitled to continued employment given their 10‑15 years of service and advanced age which limited other job p…
A.M. MATHURversusPRAMOD KUMAR GUPTA
1990 INSC 10322 March 1990Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by A.M. Mathur, former Advocate General of Madhya Pradesh, against a High Court order in which Justice B.M. Lal had dismissed a review petition and made disparaging remarks about Mathur's conduct. The Court held that such derogatory comments were unwarranted, lacked jurisdiction, and…
G.S. LAMBA & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
1985 INSC 6622 March 1985Case Allowed
The petitioners, recruited to the Indian Foreign Service (Branch B) through limited departmental examinations, were promoted to integrated Grades II and III and placed in seniority lists dated June 1979 and June 1983. They challenged these lists, arguing that the lists were prepared on a quota‑rotation system that gave…
ANUN DHAWAN & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2024 INSC 13622 February 2024Disposed off
The petitioners, claiming to be social activists, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking that the Union and State governments formulate and implement Community Kitchens to combat hunger, malnutrition and starvation, and also sought a National Food Grid beyond the Public Distribution Scheme. The Court noted that…
LUCKNOW NAGAR NIGAM & OTHERSversusKOHLI BROTHERS COLOUR LAB. PVT. LTD. & OTHERS
2024 INSC 13522 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the statutory vesting of enemy property in the Custodian for Enemy Property under the Enemy Property Act, 1968 amounts to an expropriation that transfers ownership to the Union of India, thereby invoking Article 285's tax exemption. It held that the Custodian acts only as a trustee fo…
UNION OF INDIAversusA. ALAGAM PERUMAL KONE & OTHERS
2021 INSC 10922 February 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The Union of India appealed against a Madras High Court order that directed it to grant a Freedom Fighter's pension to A. Alagam Perumal Kone under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme. The petitioner had first applied for the pension in 1997, but the application was rejected and the order became final. Thirtee…
KUDRAT SANDHUversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2018 INSC 18522 February 2018Directions issued
The petition sought judicial directions on the selection of chairpersons, judicial, administrative, technical and expert members of various tribunals under the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and Other Authorities (Qualification, Experience and Other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2017. The Supreme Court, after …
SAYYED RATANBHAI SAYEED (D) TH. LRS. & ORS.versusSHIRDI NAGAR PANCHAYAT & ANR.
2016 INSC 19722 February 2016Dismissed
The appellants, small‑scale shopkeepers near the Shirdi Sai Baba shrine, had a 1979 compromise decree granting them rehabilitation on their occupied plots. Subsequent town‑planning, development‑plan and highway‑control‑line notifications rendered the decree practically impossible to execute, prompting the Nagar Panchay…
RAVINDERSINGH @ RAVI PAVARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2013 INSC 12022 February 2013Disposed off
The case arose from the 2009 hooch tragedy in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, where spurious country‑made liquor containing methyl alcohol caused 147 deaths and 205 injuries. Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar (appellant) and Jayesh Hiralal Thakker (respondent) were charged under several sections of the IPC and the Bombay Prohibition Act …
KOKKANDA B. POONDACHA AND OTHERSversusK.D. GANAPATHI AND ANR.
2011 INSC 14722 February 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants filed a partition suit and the respondents later applied under Order XVI Rule 1(1) and (2) read with Section 151 of the CPC to file a list of witnesses, naming the appellants' advocate, N.R. Karnath, as a witness. The trial court allowed the list but rejected the request to summon the advocate because no…
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusROHITAS & ORS.
2008 INSC 24222 February 2008Case Allowed
The respondents were acquitted by a trial court of offences under IPC sections 498A and 304B. The State of Rajasthan filed an application under CrPC section 378(1) seeking leave to appeal the acquittal, which the Rajasthan High Court dismissed without recording any reasons. The Supreme Court held that an order refusing…
MADHYA PRADESH RAJYA SAHAKARL BANK MARYADITversusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.
2007 INSC 18522 February 2007Dismissed
The appellant, Madhya Pradesh Rajya Sahakari Bank Maryadit, challenged a 1997 order by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies that amended recruitment rules to include reservation for SC, ST, OBC and physically handicapped persons. The High Court set aside the order as ultra vires, and the appellant appealed. The Supr…
KANCHUSTHABAM SATYANARAYANA AND ORS.versusNAMUDURI ATCHUTARAMAYYA AND ORS.
2005 INSC 9522 February 2005Dismissed
The appellant, a lessor, leased land to the respondent, a tenant, and later filed an eviction petition under the Andhra Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1956, which was initially allowed, giving him possession. The tenant appealed and the Sub‑Collector set aside the eviction, ordered restitution and remanded the matter for fresh d…
SOLOMON ANTONY AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.
2001 INSC 10822 February 2001Dismissed
The appellants, contractors licensed to vend arrack, challenged the Kerala government's demand for excise duty on a designated quantum of rectified spirit, arguing that the duty was unconstitutional, arbitrary and payable only on spirit actually imported. The State had amended Rule 8 of the Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposa…
MURLIDHAR DAYANDEO KESEKARversusVISHWANATH PANDU BARDE AND ANR.
1995 INSC 13022 February 1995Dismissed
The State allotted 11 acres of land to a tribal respondent. The appellant entered into a sale agreement with the tribal and applied to the Collector for permission to alienate the land under the Bombay Revenue Code. The Collector and Commissioner refused, stating that land assigned to Scheduled Tribes cannot be sold or…
K. MURUGAN ETC. ETC.versusFENCING ASSN. OF INDIA, JABALPUR & ORS. ETC. ETC
1991 INSC 6122 February 1991Disposed off
The Indian Olympic Association (IOA), a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, was embroiled in a leadership dispute when a faction of members requisitioned a special general meeting to move a no‑confidence motion against President B.S. Adityan and the Executive Council. The Executive Council de…
STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.versusSHIVA PARASHAD DAS AND ORS.
1985 INSC 3222 February 1985Appeal(s) allowed
Shiva Prasad Das, a forester appointed by the Conservator of Forests, was suspended by the District Forest Officer pending a disciplinary enquiry into alleged negligence. He challenged the suspension before the Orissa High Court, arguing that it violated Article 311(1) of the Constitution and Rule 12 of the Orissa Civi…
RATHI KHANDSARI UDYOG ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ETC.
1985 INSC 3322 February 1985Dismissed
The petitioners, owners of khandsari sugar factories in Uttar Pradesh, challenged the applicability of the U.P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 (as amended in 1970) to their product, arguing that what they produce is "khandsari sugar" and not "khandsari" covered by the Act, and that the levy of market fee and lice…
H.D. VORAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
1984 INSC 4422 February 1984Dismissed
The appellant was allotted a flat in 1951 under an order of requisition issued by the State Government under the Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948, without the order specifying a public purpose. He occupied the flat, paying rent irregularly, and later the building was purchased by the third respondent who sought derequ…
DAYARAM ASANAND GURSAHANIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
1984 INSC 4222 February 1984Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a District Judge, sought to have his seniority counted from his earlier service as an Assistant Judge under the Bombay Judicial Service Recruitment Rules and to receive the salary and allowances of the selection‑grade pay scale, as well as posting as an Inspecting District Judge. The Bombay High Court re…
BALASAHEB VISHNU CHAVANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
1984 INSC 4322 February 1984Dismissed
The appellants, who were promoted to Assistant Judges from the Junior Branch of the Maharashtra Judicial Service, claimed seniority over four Bar recruits (respondents Nos. 2‑5) who were appointed as Assistant Judges under the proviso of Rule 5(2)(i)(b) before being promoted to District Judges. The High Court dismissed…
RANDHIR SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
1982 INSC 2422 February 1982Case Allowed
The petitioner, a driver‑constable in the Delhi Police Force, challenged the lower pay scale applicable to driver‑constables compared to drivers in other Delhi Administration departments, invoking the principle of "equal pay for equal work" under Articles 14, 16 and 39(d) of the Constitution. He argued that his duties,…
MOHD. TAHIR HUSSAINversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI
2025 INSC 10022 January 2025
Mohd. Tahir Hussain, an under‑trial accused in multiple FIRs including rioting and the murder of an IB official, has been in custody since March 2020 and sought interim bail to contest and campaign in the 2025 Delhi Assembly elections. The Delhi High Court allowed only a custodial parole for filing his nomination, prom…
V. SURENDRA MOHANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.
2019 INSC 7522 January 2019Dismissed
The appellant, a practicing advocate, applied for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) under the partially blind category, submitting a disability certificate showing 70% visual impairment. The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPC) had issued a notification, based on a State Government order consulted with t…
DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ETC. ETC.versusASSOCIATION OF CONCERNED CITIZENS OF NEW DELHI AND OTHERS ETC. ETC.
2019 INSC 7022 January 2019Disposed off
The New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) enacted the 2009 Determination of Annual Rent Bye‑laws, introducing a Unit Area Method (UAM) for fixing rateable value, replacing the earlier method based on annual rent under Section 63 of the NDMC Act, 1994. A batch of writ petitions filed by property owners challenged the const…
POOJA PALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2016 INSC 8622 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed
Pooja Pal, the widow of slain MLA Raju Pal, alleged that the state police and administration were complicit or indifferent in the murder of her husband and sought a fresh investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The High Court dismissed her writ petition, but the Supreme Court held that when an inves…
BUSSA OVERSEAS & PROPERTIES (P) LTD. & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2016 INSC 116422 January 2016Dismissed
Bussa Overseas & Properties Ltd. sought a refund of excess provisional customs duty under Section 18(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. The customs authority directed the claim to be made under Section 27(2) and the appellants contested this, filing a writ petition. The High Court dismissed the writ and, on review, rejected …
BCCIversusCRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BIHAR & ORS.
2015 INSC 6422 January 2015Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is a "State" under Article 12 and concluded that, although it is not, it performs public functions and is therefore amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The Court upheld the Probe Committee’s findings that Gurunath Meiyappan…
STATE BANK OF PATIALA & ORS.versusVINESH KUMAR BHASIN
2010 INSC 5422 January 2010Appeal(s) allowed
Vinesh Kumar Bhasin, a retired officer of State Bank of Patiala, applied for relief under the bank's Exit Option Scheme three days before his statutory retirement and was denied. Claiming disability from a road accident, he alleged discrimination and lodged complaints with the Commissioner and Chief Commissioner for Pe…
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusV.C. SUBBARAYUDU AND ORS.
1998 INSC 3722 January 1998Appeal(s) allowed
The Government of Andhra Pradesh issued G.O. No. 304 (Nov. 20, 1979) to take over the Divisional Accountants cadre from the Accountant‑General’s administrative control and to create a separate state cadre, offering those officers the option to join the state service. Accountants of the Subordinate Accounts Service (SAS…
THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.versusPIJUSH KANT! DAS AND ANR.
1996 INSC 11022 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Calcutta Municipal Corporation was formed by merging three municipalities, including Garden Reach, under the Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. Respondent No.1, who had been an Education In‑charge in Garden Reach Municipality on a pay scale of Rs. 380‑910, was placed after the merger in the post of Education…
CHANDRA MOHAN TIWARI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1992 INSC 2422 January 1992Dismissed
Chandra Mohan Tiwari and Ram Pal Singh Sengar were convicted of murder after the Madhya Pradesh High Court set aside a trial court acquittal. They appealed to the Supreme Court under Section 379 of the CrPC and Section 2(a) of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970, challenging the…
M.L. JAINversusUNION OF INDIA
1991 INSC 1122 January 1991Case Allowed
M.L. Jain, a former High Court Judge, had his pension fixed at Rs 21,500 per annum in 1985, later increased to Rs 46,100 per annum after amendments to the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954. He challenged the ceiling of Rs 8,000 on the special additional pension imposed by clause (b) of paragraph 2 of …
ABID HUSSAIN AND OTHERS ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
1987 INSC 2222 January 1987Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioners, Air‑Conditioned Coach Incharges‑Attendants of the Northern Railway, filed writ petitions under Article 32 alleging they were denied overtime allowance that their counterparts in the Western, Central and Eastern Railways received for extra duty exceeding 96 hours in two weeks. They claimed this differen…
DHANJIBHAI RAMJIBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
1985 INSC 1022 January 1985Dismissed
The appellant, appointed as a Sales Tax Officer on a two‑year probation, continued in service without a confirmation order and was terminated after three years. He challenged the termination before the Gujarat High Court, which dismissed his writ petition and the subsequent appeal. The Supreme Court examined three cont…
ARVIND @ ABASAHEB GANESH KULKARNI & ORS.versusANNA @ DHANPAL PARISA CHOUGULE & ORS.
1980 INSC 922 January 1980Appeal(s) allowed
The mortgagor Parisa Chougule executed two possessory mortgages in favour of Ganesh Dattatraya Kulkarni and later a simple mortgage. After his death, his adult son Bhupal, acting as manager and guardian, sold four of the ten mortgaged lands to the mortgagee for Rs.3050, the amount largely covering the mortgage debts. T…
K.V. SWAMYNATHAN AND ORS.versusE.V. PADMANABHAN AND ORS.
1990 INSC 40121 December 1990Dismissed
The appellants, sons of K.S. Vaiyapuri Chettiar, claimed ownership of six house doors in Town Survey No. 666/2 based on sale deeds executed in the 1940s and a decree for specific performance. The respondents, occupying the doors, argued that they held the property by long‑term permissive leases and had acquired title b…
BALMER LAWRIE WORKERS' UNION, BOMBAY AND ANR.versusBALMER LAWRIE AND CO. LTD. AND ORS.
1984 INSC 24121 December 1984Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined a challenge by the Balmer Lawrie Workers Union (a non‑recognised union) to the constitutional validity of Section 20(2)(b) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 and to Clause 17 of a settlement that required a 15 % deduction from ar…
NORTHERN INDIA CATERERS (INDIA) LTD.versusLT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI
1979 INSC 27421 December 1979Dismissed
Northern India Caterers (India) Ltd., which runs a hotel and restaurant, challenged a Delhi sales‑tax assessment on the ground that meals served to casual diners were taxable as a sale. The Supreme Court had earlier held that such service was not a sale because diners could not take away unconsumed food and the transac…
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusKISHORI LAL MINOCHA
1979 INSC 27621 December 1979Dismissed
The State of Uttar Pradesh sued Kishori Lal for the shortfall of Rs 20,100 that arose when the excise licences he won at a public auction were resold at a lower price because he failed to deposit one‑sixth of the bid amount as required by the Excise Rules. The respondent argued that no contract was completed under Arti…
R.K. ANANDversusREGISTRAR, DELHI HIGH COURT
2012 INSC 52321 November 2012Disposed off
Senior advocate R.K. Anand was held guilty of contempt for attempting to suborn a court witness in a criminal trial where he represented the accused. The Delhi High Court punished him with a four‑month ban from appearing before the High Court, a fine of Rs 2,000 and recommended that he be stripped of his senior‑advocat…
AMERANDRA PRATAP SINGHversusTEJ BAHADUR PRAJAPATI AND ORS.
2003 INSC 66221 November 2003Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a member of a scheduled tribe, purchased a parcel of land in Sundergarh that had previously been transferred among tribal owners and later sold to a non‑tribal with statutory permission. The respondent encroached on the land and claimed title by adverse possession, arguing that more than twelve years of …
STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusJAIN PLASTICS AND CHEMICALS LTD.
2001 INSC 57721 November 2001Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Bihar and others entered into a contract with Jain Plastics & Chemicals Ltd. for the supply of PVC pipes and fittings, but the company delayed delivery, leading the appellants to terminate the contract and procure the fittings at a higher price. The appellants deducted the additional cost from the final pa…
SURESH KUMAR JAINversusSHANTI SWARUP JAIN AND ORS.
1996 INSC 136221 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a tenant inducted in 1973, challenged an eviction suit filed by the landlord in 1990, arguing that the suit was barred under Section 20 of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 because the ten‑year exemption period for newly constructed buildings had expired. The k…
R.C.SOODversusHIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
1994 INSC 52821 November 1994Case Allowed
R.C. Sood, then Registrar of the Rajasthan High Court, was suspended by the High Court under Rule 13 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958, on the allegation that he altered a draft recruitment advertisement, changing the age eligibility date from 1 January 1994 to 1 January 1…
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORSversusCH. BHAJAN LAL AND ORS.
1990 INSC 36321 November 1990Disposed off
The State of Haryana filed a special leave appeal after the Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed a First Information Report (FIR) that had been lodged on a complaint alleging that former Chief Minister Ch. Bhajan Lal had amassed wealth through corrupt means. The Supreme Court examined whether the allegations disclosed…
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.versusEX. PILOT OFFICER ARUN GOVIL
1989 INSC 35621 November 1989Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a former Indian Air Force pilot, was appointed by the State of Uttar Pradesh as Secretary of the Zila Sainik Board on a contractual basis for a fixed term, which was successively extended up to 30 August 1985. His services were terminated on 29 March 1985, and he filed a writ petition challenging the te…
SUKHDARSHAN SINGH ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
1989 INSC 35721 November 1989Dismissed
The appellants challenged the validity of Section 15 (as amended) of the Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1973, alleging it violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The High Court had upheld the provision, and the matter reached the Supreme Court. The Court observed that the Act was enacted…
STATE OF M.P.versusGANEKAR MOTGHARE
1989 INSC 35821 November 1989Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a Deputy Director in the Madhya Pradesh Department of Geology and Mining, was compulsorily retired under Rule 56 of the Fundamental Rules after a Screening Committee, which included the Head of Department S.S. Dave, recommended his retirement. The respondent challenged the order by filing a writ petitio…
MAFABHAI MOTIBHAI SAGARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
2024 INSC 80621 October 2024Case Partly allowed
Mafabhai Motibhai Sagar was convicted of murder and related offences and sentenced to life imprisonment. After the Supreme Court directed a speedy decision on his remission application, the Gujarat Government granted remission but imposed four conditions, two of which the appellant challenged as vague and arbitrary. Th…
RATILAL JHAVERBHAI PARMAR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.
2024 INSC 80121 October 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants filed a civil application under Article 227 before the Gujarat High Court, which was orally dismissed on 1 March 2023 without the judge indicating that reasons would follow. More than a year later, a detailed reasoned order dated 1 March 2023 was uploaded, having actually been prepared on 12 April 2024 a…
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusABHISHEK GUPTA ETC.
2024 INSC 79621 October 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) sought to acquire 952.18 acres of land in Panchkula for a mixed‑use development, but the landowners objected under Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, claiming exemption for fruit trees and alleging that their structures were authorized. The High Court quashed th…
PROFESSOR (DR.) SREEJITH P.S.versusDR. RAJASREE M.S. & ORS.
2022 INSC 113721 October 2022Appeal(s) allowed
Professor (Dr.) Sreejith filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of Dr. Rajasree as Vice‑Chancellor of APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, alleging that the appointment violated UGC Regulations which require a search committee to recommend a panel of three to five names. The Kerala High Court had dismis…
VAIBHAVI ENTERPRISEversusNOBEL CERA COAT & ORS.
2021 INSC 65721 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined a dispute arising from ONGC's invitation of Expressions of Interest for natural gas allocation. Three firms submitted bids; one later revised its offer to lift gas within 65 days, prompting ONGC to re‑invite fresh bids. The original writ applicant, Nobel Cera Coat, filed a petition seeking a …
ASHOK KUMAR & ANRversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS
2016 INSC 120521 October 2016Disposed off
The case concerned promotion of Class IV civil court staff to Class III posts in Bihar. The original selection used an 85‑mark written test and 15‑mark interview, but the High Court directed a fresh examination with 90 marks for the written part and 10 for the interview. The appellants participated in the fresh process…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.versusSARVA SHRAMIK SANGH, SANGLI AND ORS.
2013 INSC 70821 October 2013Disposed off
The State of Maharashtra terminated the services of 256 workmen employed on 25 lift‑irrigation schemes after transferring the schemes to a sugar factory. The workmen claimed entitlement to reinstatement and backwages, arguing that the termination was a breach of Section 25N of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, while t…
MAHMADHUSEN ABDULRAHIM KALOTA SHAIKHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2008 INSC 119721 October 2008Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of sections 2(3) and 2(5) of the Prevention of Terrorism (Repeal) Act, 2004, which allow a Review Committee to deem cases registered under the repealed POTA as withdrawn when it finds no prima facie case. The petitioners (relatives of Godhra‑train victims) argued that th…
DAYANDEOGANPAT JADHAVversusMADHAV VITHAL BHASKAR AND ORS.
2005 INSC 51621 October 2005Dismissed
The appellant, a tenant of agricultural lands Gut Nos. 2325 and 2326, became a deemed purchaser under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 on the tillers' day of 1 April 1957. He repeatedly expressed unwillingness to purchase the land, and the Mamlatdar and Agricultural Lands Tribunal recorded his statem…
LATE NAWAB SIR MIR OSMAN ALI KHANversusCOMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, HYDERABAD
1986 INSC 21621 October 1986Case Partly allowed
The Nizam of Hyderabad (Sir Mir Osman Ali Khan) challenged the inclusion of certain immovable properties and an annual payment of Rs.25 lakhs in his net wealth for wealth‑tax purposes. The Supreme Court held that properties for which full consideration was received and possession handed over, even without a registered …
RAMA KANT MISRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
1982 INSC 7721 October 1982Appeal(s) allowed
Rama Kant Misra, a workman with over 14 years of service and secretary of the workers' union, was charged on 18 November 1971 with using abusive and threatening language towards a senior officer over a wage deduction. An inquiry found the charge proved and recommended dismissal, which was effected on 6 April 1972 befor…
SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTDversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS
2023 INSC 86521 September 2023Dismissed
South Eastern Coalfields Ltd, which operates coal mines in Madhya Pradesh, challenged the levy of a terminal tax by the municipal council on the basis that municipal statutes cannot apply to Scheduled Areas. The company argued that Article 243ZC of the Constitution excludes Part IXA (municipalities) from Scheduled Area…
RAKESH KUMAR AGARWALLA & ANR.versusNATIONAL LAW SCHOOL OF INDIA UNIVERSITY, BENGALURU & ORS.
2020 INSC 55721 September 2020Disposed off
The petitioners challenged NLSIU's admission notice dated 03‑09‑2020 which introduced a separate online National Law Aptitude Test (NLAT) instead of the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) scheduled for 28‑09‑2020. The Court examined whether the petitioners had locus, whether the notice required prior recommendation of th…
INDIAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCEMENT OF RESEARCH AND EDUCATION HALDIA (!CARE) & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2017 INSC 96921 September 2017Disposed off
The petitioners, ICARE Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, sought approval and recognition under Section 11(2) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 for MBBS courses. The Medical Council of India (MCI) conducted several inspections, including a surprise compliance‑verification inspection on 24‑April‑2017, and f…
JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusMAHESH SHARMA & ANR.
2010 INSC 62621 September 2010Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined land measuring 29 Bighas and 17 Biswas that had been vested in the Government of Rajasthan under the Rajasthan Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs Act, 1952. The Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) had later issued acquisition notifications under the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 and …
RITESH TEWARI & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2010 INSC 62921 September 2010Dismissed
The original landholders, whose holdings exceeded the ceiling under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, were assessed as surplus and transferred a major portion of the land to Mayur Sahkari Awas Samiti in 1982. The Act deemed such surplus land vested in the State, but the authorities never took physical …
RAJESH KOHLIversusHIGH COURT OF J & K AND ANR.
2010 INSC 63021 September 2010Dismissed
Rajesh Kohli, a probationary District & Sessions Judge in Jammu & Kashmir, was found unsatisfactory by the High Court's Full Court and his service was terminated by the State Government. He challenged the termination, alleging that the order was stigmatic, that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to recommend terminatio…
MOHAMMAD SADIQ AND ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.
2007 INSC 96221 September 2007Dismissed
The Institute of Engineering and Rural Technology (IERT), a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, decided to close one of its centres, retrenching 105 employees. The employees filed a writ petition seeking their absorption under the Uttar Pradesh Absorption of Retrenched Employees of Government…
B.R. KAPURversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.
2001 INSC 45321 September 2001Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether J. Jayalalithaa, convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment, could be appointed Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu after her party won a majority. The Court held that a person convicted and sentenced to imprisonment of two years or m…
STATE OF U.P.versusDHARMENDRA SINGH AND ANR. ETC.
1999 INSC 43121 September 1999Appeal(s) allowed
The State of U.P. prosecuted Dharmendra Singh and Narendra for the pre‑meditated murder of five members of a complainant’s family, including children and an elderly man, after a personal grievance and an attempted molestation. The trial court convicted them under Section 302 IPC and sentenced them to death, calling the…
DR. J.N. BANAVALIKARversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR.
1995 INSC 59021 September 1995Dismissed
Dr. J.N. Banavalikar, a Specialist Grade‑I in tuberculosis and chest diseases, was given the additional charge of Medical Superintendent of R.B.T.B. Hospital (a Delhi Municipal Corporation hospital) and served for about five and a half years. He was later removed from that post and Dr. Sudhakar Patnaik, a senior pathol…
NANO KISHOREversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
1995 INSC 59121 September 1995Appeal(s) allowed
INDIAN METALS AND FERRO ALLOYS LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1990 INSC 29721 September 1990Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined applications for mining leases of chromite in Orissa, focusing on the Rao report prepared by the Secretary of the Ministry of Mines. It held that the Rao report is a decision of the Central Government under Section 30 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and there…
D. C. GOUSE AND CO. ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ANR. ETC.
1979 INSC 19321 September 1979Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975, which imposed a non‑recurring tax on buildings based on a "capital value" calculated as sixteen times the building's annual value. The petitioners challenged the Act on four grounds: (1) it was beyond the State's legislative competence because it taxed the c…
REKHA SHARMAversusTHE RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT, JODHPUR & ANR.
2024 INSC 61521 August 2024Dismissed
The Rajasthan High Court advertised 120 vacancies for Civil Judges and published cut‑off marks for each category except the Persons with benchmark disabilities. Appellants Rekha Sharma (40% visual disability) and Ratan Lal (55% locomotor disability) applied under the disabled category, appeared for the Preliminary Exam…
GANGA VISHAN GUJRATI & ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.
2019 INSC 93821 August 2019Dismissed
The appellants, appointed as Land Records Inspectors (LRIs) through a limited departmental examination for vacancies that arose in 2008‑09, 2009‑10 and 2010‑11, were placed in seniority lists dated 2012‑14 and later treated as appointed in 2014‑15. They claimed seniority should be computed from the year the vacancy aro…
SHAILESH MANUBHAI PARMARversusELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA THROUGH THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER & ORS.
2018 INSC 72821 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The petition filed by Shailesh Manubhai Parmar, the Chief Whip of the INC in Gujarat, challenged the Election Commission's circulars that introduced the "None of the Above" (NOTA) option in Rajya Sabha (Council of States) elections. The Court examined whether NOTA, which was introduced for direct elections to Parliamen…
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.versusACHAL SINGH
2018 INSC 74021 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed
Four doctors of the Provincial Medical Service applied for voluntary retirement under Rule 56(c) of the Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Rules, but the State Government did not accept their notices. The High Court allowed the doctors' writ petitions, treating them as retired. On appeal, the Supreme Court held that the explana…
PARISONSAGROTECH (P) LTD. &ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2015 INSC 59721 August 2015Dismissed
The appellants, manufacturers of edible oils, challenged two Central Government notifications that prohibited the import of crude palm oil through Kerala ports, arguing that the notifications were ultra vires the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 and violated Article 14 by arbitrarily discriminating …
VIKRAM SINGH@ VICKY &ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2015 INSC 59121 August 2015Dismissed
The appellants were convicted under Sections 302 and 364A of the IPC for kidnapping a 16‑year‑old boy, demanding a Rs 50 lakh ransom and murdering him, and were sentenced to death. They challenged the constitutionality of Section 364A on the ground that its mandatory death or life imprisonment provision was disproporti…
PROF. K.V. RAJENDRANversusSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CBCID SOUTH ZONE, CHENNAI & ORS.
2013 INSC 54521 August 2013Dismissed
Prof. K.V. Rajendran, an associate professor, alleged that a Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) and other officials tortured him in 1998 and that the State police investigation was inadequate. He repeatedly approached the High Court seeking transfer of the investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), but t…
STATE OF U.P.versusSANJAY KUMAR
2012 INSC 34521 August 2012Dismissed
The respondent, Sanjay Kumar, was convicted of raping and murdering an 18‑year‑old girl, Divya Rani, and was sentenced to death by the Sessions Court. The High Court of Allahabad commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment, holding that the case did not fall within the "rarest of rare" category. The State of Uttar…
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE, NARELA, DELHIversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
2008 INSC 95721 August 2008Dismissed
The Agricultural Produce Market Committee (AMC) of Narela claimed exemption from income tax under section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, asserting it was a "local authority". The Finance Act, 2002 added an exhaustive Explanation to section 10(20) defining "local authority" as a Panchayat, Municipality, Municipal C…
ALL INDIA FEDERATION OF TAX PRACTITIONERS & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2007 INSC 84921 August 2007Dismissed
The All India Federation of Tax Practitioners challenged the levy of service tax on chartered accountants, cost accountants and architects under the Finance Acts of 1994 and 1998, arguing that such tax fell within State List Entry 60 (taxes on professions) and was barred by Article 276. The Supreme Court examined the c…
CANTEEN MAZDOOR SABHAversusMETALLURGICAL ENGG. CONSULTANTS (I) LTD. & ORS.
2007 INSC 85221 August 2007Dismissed
The Canteen Mazdoor Sabha filed a civil appeal challenging a Jharkhand High Court decision that set aside an Industrial Tribunal award granting canteen workers the same pay scales as MECON’s VIP Guest House and Tea Club employees. The core issue was whether a master‑servant (employer‑employee) relationship existed betw…
RAJIV RANJAN SINGH 'LALAN' AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2006 INSC 52721 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court heard writ petitions filed as public‑interest litigation by two MPs alleging that former Bihar Chief Ministers Lalu Prasad Yadav and Rabri Devi had unduly influenced the transfer of an Income‑Tax Appellate Tribunal member, the appointment of a Special CBI Judge, and the change of public prosecutors in…
COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT, KANYA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL BAL VIDYA MANDIR, ETAH, U.P.versusSACHIV, U.P. BASIC SHIKSHA PARISHAD ALLAHABAD, U.P. AND ORS.
2006 INSC 52921 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The Committee of Management of Kanya Junior High School, a Jain‑run minority institution, terminated Assistant Teacher Santosh Upadhyay for acts of indiscipline after a show‑cause notice, suspension and enquiry. She challenged the termination, arguing that under Rule 11 of the Uttar Pradesh Recognised Basic School Rule…
M/S. WIDIA (INDIA) LTD. AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.
2003 INSC 41021 August 2003Dismissed
The case concerned the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 and its amendment in 1993 which inserted the words "retrospectively or prospectively" in Section 3(1). The petitioners challenged the validity of the amendment for lack of the President's assent under Article 304(b) of the Constitution, and also questione…
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUTversusM/S. KISAN SAHKARI CHINNI MILLS LTD.
2001 INSC 38421 August 2001Dismissed
The Uttar Pradesh government imposed administrative charges on molasses sold by sugar factories under Section 8(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964. The Commissioner of Central Excise held that these charges should be included in the assessable value of molasses under the Central Excise Act, 1944, …
KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATIONversusM/S. MEHUL CONSTRUCTION CO.
2000 INSC 40721 August 2000Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered several Special Leave Petitions and a writ petition challenging orders of various High Court Chief Justices or their nominees made under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint or refuse to appoint an arbitrator. It held that such orders are administrative in …
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusDHANWANTI DEVI AND ORS.
1996 INSC 91121 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Union of India appealed against an award of solatium and interest granted by an arbitrator under Section 8 of the Jammu & Kashmir Requisition and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1968, where the respondents' lands had been acquired for defence purposes. The Supreme Court examined whether the 1968 Act, like th…
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ETC.versusSMT. MALTI KAUL AND ANR. ETC.
1996 INSC 92021 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 empowers a development authority to levy a development fee on applicants for plan sanction. The High Court had held that no such power existed, but the Supreme Court read Sections 14, 33, 41, 56 and related provisions as confe…
H.S.S.K. NIYAMI AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1990 INSC 24221 August 1990Dismissed
Two sugar factories in North Mysore challenged the constitutional validity of Section 3(3C) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and a 1966 government notification that placed them in Zone 1 for sugar price fixation, alleging loss and denial of a notice‑hearing. The factories argued that the zoning violated their fun…
DR. HARIHAR PRASAD SINGH AND ORS.versusPRINCIPAL, M.L.N. MEDICAL COLLEGE ALLAHABAD AND OTHERS.
1990 INSC 24521 August 1990Dismissed
The appellants, junior doctors who were on house‑job on 22‑Aug‑1989, had been admitted to the second year of a postgraduate degree course under the Uttar Pradesh "Residency Scheme" which was given retrospective effect from 1‑Aug‑1987. The High Court, hearing writ petitions by other doctors, held that clause 5 of the sc…
RAJENDRA JHAversusPRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, BOKARO STEEL CITY, DISTRICT DHANBAD AND ANR.
1984 INSC 14821 August 1984Dismissed
Rajendra Jha, a dresser in the Steel Authority of India, was dismissed on charges of misconduct. Because an industrial dispute was pending, the management sought approval of the dismissal under section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court held the domestic inquiry invalid but also ordered tha…
LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ANR.versusDURGA PADA MUKHERJEE & OTHERS
1980 INSC 15821 August 1980Appeal(s) allowed
The State Government of West Bengal issued three notifications under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire land belonging to the respondents for what it claimed was a public purpose—first for the expansion of a private company's factory and later for industrial development. The respondents objected, alleging that …
KHURSHEED AHMAD CHOHANversusUNION OF TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS. ETC.
2025 INSC 87621 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a police constable, was summoned to the Senior Superintendent's office and allegedly detained illegally for six days during which he suffered severe genital mutilation and other injuries, as confirmed by medical reports. His wife complained to the police seeking registration of an FIR against the officia…
VICTIM ‘X’versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.
2025 INSC 87721 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned allegations that the Superintendent of a women’s protection home in Patna administered intoxicating substances to inmates and facilitated their sexual exploitation. The accused, respondent No.2, was granted bail by the Patna High Court despite the victim not being notified, contrary to Section 15A(3)…
SWARAJ ABHIYAN (V)versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2017 INSC 66021 July 2017Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined a writ petition under Art. 32 challenging the failure of several State Governments and Union Territories to implement mandatory provisions of the National Food Security Act, 2013 (NFS Act), including grievance redressal officers, State Food Commissions, social audits and vigilance committees.…
AVTAR SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2017 INSC 111621 July 2016Reference answered
The petitioners challenged the cancellation of their appointments and termination of service on the ground that they had either omitted or misrepresented information about criminal prosecutions, arrests, convictions or pendency of cases in the verification forms required for recruitment. The Supreme Court was asked to …
A. SUBASH BABUversusSTATE OF A.P.& ANR.
2011 INSC 51421 July 2011Disposed off
The appellant, a Sub‑Inspector, married a woman (the second wife) by concealing that he was already married, collected money from her family and threatened them. The second wife filed a complaint alleging offences under Sections 494, 495, 417, 420 and 498A IPC. The High Court quashed the complaint under Section 498A, h…
STATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHERversusPEOPLES UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES, KERALA STATE UNIT AND OTHERS
2009 INSC 93521 July 2009Case Partly allowed
The Kerala High Court directed the State to implement the 1975 Kerala Scheduled Tribes (Restriction on Transfer of Lands and Restoration of Alienated Lands) Act, but the State failed to comply, leading to multiple extensions and a contempt petition. The State subsequently enacted the 1999 Kerala Restriction on Transfer…
PATEL RAJNIKANT DHULABHAI & ANR.versusPATEL CHANDRAKANT DHULABHAI & ORS
2008 INSC 84721 July 2008Disposed off
The petitioners alleged that the respondents, who were parties to a family property dispute, sold and transferred portions of the disputed land and allowed construction despite two interim orders of this Court dated 26‑April‑2004 and 10‑January‑2005 that prohibited any creation of third‑party interest without notice to…
STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.versusNITIN AGNIHOTRI AND ANR.
2008 INSC 84921 July 2008Case Allowed
The father (respondent No.2) lodged an FIR under Section 366 IPC alleging that Nitin Agnihotri (respondent No.1) abducted his daughter. The High Court quashed the FIR and, despite finding no police lapse, imposed a cost of Rs.50,000 on the State and the complainant. The State appealed, contending that cost should not b…
JOHN VALLAMATTOM AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA
2003 INSC 32221 July 2003Case Allowed
The petitioners, two Christians, challenged Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 which barred Christians from bequeathing property for religious or charitable purposes unless a will was executed at least twelve months before death and deposited as prescribed. They argued that the provision discriminated again…
THE STATE OF PUNJABversusBALDEV SINGH
1999 INSC 28221 July 1999Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a batch of appeals concerning searches under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. It held that an empowered officer must inform a suspect of his right to be searched before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, and that this duty is imperative, not merely directory. Failure t…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORSversusSH. RAJIV YADAV, IAS AND ORS.
1994 INSC 27521 July 1994Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned an IAS officer, Rajiv Yadav, who was allocated to the Manipur‑Tripura cadre despite his preference for the Union Territories cadre, his home state. He challenged the allocation before the Central Administrative Tribunal, arguing that the reservation of SC/ST candidates for their home states in the ca…
NARENDRA NATH PANDEY & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
1988 INSC 18121 July 1988Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, appointed as direct recruits to the Uttar Pradesh Provincial Civil Service, challenged seniority lists that placed demobilised armed‑forces officers (respondents) above them. The respondents had been recruited under the Uttar Pradesh Non‑Technical (Class‑II) Services (Reservation of Vacancies for Demobi…
VENKATLAL G. PITTIE & ANR.versusBRIGHT BROS. (PVT.) LTD.
1987 INSC 17921 July 1987Appeal(s) allowed
The landlords (Venkatlal G. Pittie & Anr.) sued their tenant (Bright Bros. Pvt. Ltd.) for eviction, alleging that the tenant had erected permanent structures in violation of clause (p) of s.108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and s.13(1)(b) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1974, and…
JHARIA S/O MANIYAversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANOTHER
1983 INSC 8121 July 1983Dismissed
The petitioner Jharia was convicted under IPC s.302 read with s.34 and sentenced to life imprisonment, a conviction upheld by the Rajasthan High Court while his co‑accused were acquitted. He applied for special leave to appeal to the Supreme Court under Article 136, but the petition was dismissed, as was a subsequent r…
SILPPI CONSTRUCTIONS CONTRACTORSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ETC. ETC.
2019 INSC 69621 June 2019Dismissed
Silppi Constructions Contractors submitted technical bids for two government tenders but their bids were rejected on the ground that they failed to meet eligibility criteria and that adverse remarks against their sister company were taken into account. The petitioner appealed the rejection, but the appellate authority …
SUKHENDU BHATTACHARJEE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS
2026 INSC 52321 May 2026Disposed off
The appellants, engaged as Work Charged and Muster Roll workers in various departments of the Government of Assam before 1 April 1993, rendered continuous service for decades. The State, through a Cabinet decision dated 22 July 2005, regularized about 30,000 similarly situated workers, but due to clerical lapses the ap…
DILEEP KUMAR PANDEYversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 74921 May 2025Dismissed
The case concerned two teachers who challenged actions taken against them by the Air Force School, Bamrauli, alleging that the school was a "state or authority" under Article 12 of the Constitution and therefore subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The majority held that the school, managed by the Indian Air…
IN RE: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL REPORTS OF THE OFFICERS OF THE INDIAN FOREST SERVICE versus
2025 INSC 74821 May 2025
The Supreme Court examined a Government Order dated 29 June 2024 issued by the Madhya Pradesh Government that made District Collectors and Divisional Commissioners – officers of the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) – the reporting, reviewing and accepting authorities for Performance Appraisal Reports (PAR) of Indian…
PINKY MEENAversusTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR & ANR.
2025 INSC 75621 May 2025
Pinky Meena, a former Government Teacher, applied for and was selected as a Civil Judge in the Rajasthan Judicial Service. After resigning from her teaching post, she completed her probationary training but was later served a show‑cause notice and discharged on allegations of simultaneously obtaining LL.B. and B.Ed. de…
KISHOR K. MEHTAversusREKHA H. SHETH & ORS.
2014 INSC 97621 May 2014Disposed off
The petitioner, a lifetime trustee of the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, alleged that respondent No.6 failed to give notice of a Board of Trustees meeting as ordered by this Court on 14 February 2014, constituting willful contempt. The Court had earlier stayed the meeting scheduled for 7 February 2014 and order…