Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

35028 judgments · newest first · showing 17201–17400

Mithlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mithlesh Kumar, married to Riya Kumari, faced a complaint (Case No. 1669/2017) alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 307, 498A and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, claiming dowry demands and cruelty. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, asserting innocence and that he has been trying …

Yashodhar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellants, Yashodhar Mahto and Ramakant Mahto, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge, Darbhanga, which rejected their anticipatory bail application under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. They were accused of …

Ritesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ritesh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a seizure of 72.6 litres of codeine‑containing cough syrup from Asha Nursing Home and charged under section 21C of the NDPS Act. He contended that he had no ownership or control over the nursing home and that the seizure was effected …

Mirtunjay Kumar @ ChhotuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners – Mirtunjay Kumar, Upendra Sharma and Bebi Devi – applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Complaint No. 802 of 2024, which alleges offences under several IPC sections (341, 323, 498A, 379, 504, 506, 34) and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They contend they are …

Sohit Kumar @ Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

CONVERTED

The appellants, Sohit Kumar and Golu Kumar, filed a criminal appeal challenging the rejection of their anticipatory bail petition. They sought permission to amend the cause title and to convert the appeal into a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code and …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Vikash Kumar, the owner of a Sumo vehicle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 478 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellant, Rahul Kumar, appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking anticipatory bail after a lower court had rejected his bail application. The FIR alleged that after marrying the informant, …

Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh BindversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, four brothers from Gaya, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged criminal trespass, assault, outraging the modesty of an informant who claimed SC status, and theft of Rs.30,000. They …

Md. RajuversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Md Raju, the husband of the deceased, applied for bail in a case where the informant alleges he killed his daughter over a dowry demand. The FIR charges him under sections 103, 61 and 3(5) of the BNS. The petitioner contends that no dowry was demanded, that the death was a suicide by hanging as per …

New Hope AAS Consultants Pvt. Ltd.versusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

New Hope AAS Consultants Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging the disqualification of its technical bid by the Technical Bid Evaluation Committee (TBEC) under NIT‑03/2024 and seeking certiorari and mandamus to declare its bid responsive. The petitioner alleged procedural irregularities and …

Navin Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, a group of twelve individuals, appealed under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against orders dated 28‑06‑2025 and 29‑07‑2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Madhubani. The FIR alleged that the appellants assaulted an …

Premshankar Chaudhary @ Prem Shankar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants – Premshankar Chaudhary, Golu and Prakash Chandra Mishra – appealed under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against an order dated 31 July 2025 of the Exclusive Special Judge (SC/ST Act) that had refused bail in a case arising …

Pappu Singh @ Nand Kishore SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several sections of the Bihar Penal Code for assaulting an informant, stealing her mangalsutra, and allegedly abusing her caste name. The appellants argued that the case was retaliatory, …

Shambhu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shambhu Rai appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against an order that denied him bail in a case alleging assault and caste‑based abuse. The FIR alleged that Rai assaulted the informant and used caste slurs, but the appellant contended the …

Usha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants – Usha Devi, Amin Bagvai and Nitu Kumar – were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and threatening him to vacate a community hall, with accusations of caste‑based abuse. They appealed to the Patna …

Mathura Lohar @ Mathura VishwakarnaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, eight members of a family, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for assaulting an informant with brick plates and allegedly abusing her caste name. They appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14A(2) of the Act against the …

New Hope AAS Consultants Pvt. Ltd.versusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

New Hope AAS Consultants Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging the Technical Bid Evaluation Committee’s decisions that disqualified its technical bid and ordered the opening of the financial bid in a government tender. The petitioner sought certiorari to quash the …

Sudha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, four women from Nagra Basantpur, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions for allegedly assaulting an informant in a land‑dispute‑related incident. They filed an appeal under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST Act …

Mithilesh Kumar @ Mithilesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Mithilesh Kumar was charged with firing at an informant, causing gunshot injuries, and allegedly abusing the informant in a caste-based manner. The charges were under Sections 352, 351(3), 109(1) of the Bihar Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act, and Sections 3(i), (r), (s) of the Scheduled Castes …

Rajesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants Rajesh Yadav, Arvbind Yadav and Md. Sadam were charged under several IPC provisions and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and abusing the complainant, who claimed SC/ST status, in a land‑dispute context. The appellants …

Kamlesh Kumar MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Kamlesh Kumar Mehta, was charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and using caste-based abuse in a land dispute. The informant claimed to belong to a SC/ST community, while the …

Amod Kumar @ Amod SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, four men from Rashulpur Kori Gaon, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and using caste-based abusive language. They contended that the …

Ahmed @ Ahmad Hussain @ Mate Ahmad @ Ahmed MateversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Ahmed Hussain, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing an informant in his caste name during a site inspection. The appellant contended that he was unaware of the informant's caste, that the alleged abuse was not …

Md. Faiyaz Ali @ Fariyaj AliversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Md. Faiyaz Ali, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant, a member of a Scheduled Caste, with a knife. The trial court denied bail, holding that the offence fell within the ambit of the Act. The …

Rajnish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Rajnish Kumar and Bikash Kumar Ray, appealed under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against an order dated 03‑09‑2025 of the Additional Sessions Judge‑1 cum Special Judge SC/ST Act, Bhojpur, which had denied bail in a case alleging firing on an informant and …

Md. Hakeem Miya @ Md. HakeemversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Md. Hakeem Miya, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly kidnapping a 14‑year‑old daughter of an informant belonging to a Scheduled Caste, purportedly for illicit intercourse or marriage. The appellant contended that the …

Indradev SadayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Indradev Saday, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping and assault case (G.R. No.56/2025) registered under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, with his father’s assistance, abducted the informant’s daughter and assaulted the …

Saryu ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Saryu Chaudhary applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case alleging he fraudulently withdrew Rs 7.5 lakh from the informant’s bank account, invoking several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. Both parties asserted that the matter was essentially a monetary dispute and expressed willingness …

Anand Kumar @ Raju Kumar @ Raju YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anand Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a fraud case (Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 14 of 2015) involving alleged offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, where Rs.1,95,000 was transferred to his bank account. He claimed innocence, a clean …

Pramod RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pramod Rai feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where authorities recovered liquor and Mahua from a public area not in his possession. He argued that he was implicated solely on secret information without proper investigation and that nothing was seized …

Rohit Jha @ Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners Rohit Jha and Hema Devi sought bail in a dowry‑death case where the informant’s daughter was alleged to have been killed for non‑payment of dowry. The senior counsel withdrew the bail application for Rohit Jha, leaving only Hema Devi, who is the mother‑in‑law of the deceased and aged …

Anwarul HaqueversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Anwarul Haque and Shahnawaz Hussain, were arrested in connection with a case where 101.5 grams of brown sugar was seized from the first petitioner. The seizure was alleged to be irregular because no independent witness was listed, violating mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act. Both …

Ranjit Rawat @ Ranjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ranjit Rawat and Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Jamui P.S. Case No. 794 of 2024) filed under Sections 125(a), 351(2), 351(3), 191(2), 190 of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that they pelted bricks and …

Mithlesh Ray @ Mithilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Mithlesh Ray and Hari Kishor Ray, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 337 of 2024) involving multiple offences under the BNS, including assault, robbery and rioting. The FIR alleged that they, along with others, entered the informant's house armed, …

Sunil Kumar NiralaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Nirala, was granted provisional bail on 8 September 2025 on the condition that his wife would confirm they were living happily together. The wife, Jaymala Devi, appeared before the Patna High Court and affirmed that she was indeed living happily with her husband. The …

Raj Kumar MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers from Basmanpur, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging they were falsely implicated in an assault on an informant and his family over a pathway dispute. The FIR …

Raj @ Swad @ Toufik AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, a 19‑year‑old student, was arrested in connection with an alleged offence under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the B.N.S., accused of luring the informant’s daughter with a view to marriage and taking her to another place. The prosecution’s case is based largely on suspicion; the victim …

Biplab HalderversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioners Biplab Halder and Shyamal Biswas were implicated in an excise case involving alleged recovery of 882 litres of liquor, charged under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act. They contended that they were not caught in possession, did not own …

Ritesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ritesh Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for bail in a kidnapping case registered under Sections 137(2), 140(3), 96, 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The alleged victim, the informant's granddaughter, gave a statement under Section 183 B.N.S.S. that she was not kidnapped and …

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Deepak Kumar and Lalu Yadav, filed a bail petition fearing arrest in Bhagwanpur Hat P.S. Case No. 83 of 2025, which alleged their participation in a violent assault on an informant resulting in serious injury and theft. They contended that the main accusation was against co‑accused …

Muniya Devi @ Munni @ Muni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Muniya Devi sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 14 litres of liquor were recovered from her house. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was located in a joint‑family property, so …

Guriya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Guriya Devi and Rinku Devi, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and related provisions for allegedly assaulting an informant and her son with caste‑based abuse. They applied for anticipatory bail under Section 14(A)(2) of the …

Ashish Sachdeva @ Aashish SachdevversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ashish Sachdeva, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly transporting 388.8 litres of liquor in his vehicle. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor …

Md. Arwaj @ RekhatulversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Arwaj, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 101.280 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle, that the liquor was not found in his …

Rina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rina Devi, the owner of a Scorpio vehicle and a Bullet motorcycle, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 468 litres of liquor from her vehicles, violating Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicles, had a …

Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Singh @ Gunnu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case (Saran Cyber P.S. Case No.75 of 2025) alleging that he helped open a bank account using the personal details of an informant’s son, which was later used for fraudulent transactions. The petitioner argued that the account …

Akshay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Akshay Yadav was charged under several provisions of the Bihar N.S. Act, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly making caste‑based remarks and assaulting an informant during a land dispute. He applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, accused of caste‑based assault under the SC/ST Act, appealed against the lower court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail. The FIR alleged that the accused had humiliated and assaulted the complainant and others on caste grounds. The appellants contended they were falsely implicated …

Sri Awadh Kishore Prasad Bidyarthi Jee @ Bidyarthi JeeversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Awadh Kishore Prasad Bidyarthi, was charged under several provisions of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing and threatening a depositor on caste grounds. He applied for anticipatory …

Kshatri YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Kshatri Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Kuchaikot PS Case No. 271 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that Yadav participated in a violent assault on Vishal Kumar, causing a grievous head injury, and that other …

Sudhir Sharma @ Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudhir Sharma, filed an anticipatory bail petition fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (Karpi P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025) filed under several sections of the B.N.S. The petition sought relief from arrest pending investigation. Counsel for the petitioner requested …

Raj Kumar PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Raj Kumar Patel was arrested for alleged firing on the leg of an informant's son, charged under IPC sections 307, 34, 120B and Arms Act section 27. He contended that the FIR named an unknown assailant and his only link was ownership of a mobile number used by others, for which he had …

Sanjay RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Rai, was charged under IPC sections 363, 366A, 34 and POCSO Act section 8 for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant by promising marriage. The victim, now about 20 years old, testified that she voluntarily eloped with Ranjit Kumar Rai, married him, and is …

Sanjeet Patel @ Sanjit Patel @ Sanjit Kumar PatelversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Patel, was arrested in connection with an alleged offence under Section 317(5) of the B.N.S and Section 8/21(C) of the NDPS Act relating to a commercial quantity of cough syrup. He applied for bail, which had been rejected on 29‑04‑2025, arguing that the investigation had …

Mahavir MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahavir Mahto and Muneshwar Mahto sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from an orchard not belonging to them. They argued that the liquor was not in their possession, the …

Shibu Yadav @ Shibu MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Shibu Yadav was arrested in connection with a case alleging attempted rape of a minor girl, the daughter of an informant, under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false and stemmed from a land …

Raja Ram ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellant, Raja Ram Chaudhary, was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly participating in a mob that assaulted the shop of informant Umesh Ray, refused payment, stole money and used caste-based abuse. The …

Raj Nandan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellants Raj Nandan Yadav, Sunil Yadav and Bablu Patel appealed under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the rejection of their anticipatory bail petition filed on 5 August 2025. They were charged with assault, theft and caste-based abuse under several …

Awadhesh Ranjan JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Awadhesh Ranjan Jha, the appellant, filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw that application so that he could surrender before the trial court and apply for regular bail on its merits. The learned counsel for the appellant requested this withdrawal. The court …

Abhinandan Yadav @ Abhinandan Kr.versusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhinandan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 317(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 75.300 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle not owned by him and that …

Lalan Prasad @ Dr. LalanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dr. Lalan Prasad, a registered medical practitioner, was implicated in an FIR (Case No. 98 of 2025) under Section 105 of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 after the wife of the informant, Mahesh Yadav, died following treatment by the petitioner. The informant alleged negligence, but …

Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Ravi Kumar and Bhola Prasad, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 171 of 2025) filed under Section 96 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, alleging the disappearance of a minor. The informant, Anuranjan Kumar, claimed the girl had …

Raj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellants, five residents of Sundarpur, were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly setting fire to an informant's house, burning valuables and snatching a gold chain while abusing the …

Saidullah Mian @ Sipahi Mian @ Saidlaru MianversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Saidullah Mian, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Majhauliya PS No.523 of 2025) involving communal violence during a Lord Mahavir procession, where 20 persons were injured and the FIR named 30 individuals with details and 20 unknown persons. The FIR alleged offences …

SHIV CHAND KUMAR @ SHIVCHAND BIND @ SHIVCHANDRA KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Shiv Chand Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 70(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging rape of a minor. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, raped the informant's daughter, who has given a statement supporting …

Tanikan Bind @ Tanik PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Tanikan Bind, applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No.109 of 2025) alleging violation of Sections 25(1-AA), 25(1-B)(1), 26(1) and 26(2) of the Arms Act for allegedly operating an illegal gun factory at his residence. The prosecution contended that illegal firearms and related …

ANIL KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Anil Kumar was implicated in a criminal case (PS Case No. 434 of 2021) for alleged forgery of documents related to an HL bridge contract under the PMGSY, involving sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that a certificate dated 16‑06‑2016 was forged to obtain …

Sushila DeviversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a case (Mahindwara P.S. Case No. 51 of 2025) where they were implicated for offences under Sections 96, 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, alleged kidnapping of a minor. The prosecution alleged that the accused had …

Arhul DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arhul Devi was arrested under several provisions of the Arms Act after a co‑accused, Praveen (Munna Singh), claimed he had hidden a pistol and cartridges in her house. The petitioner argued that the recovery was false, that proper search‑seizure procedures were not followed, and that she had no …

Surendra GoswamiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Surendra Goswami, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 45 litres of liquor and 225 litres of fermented jawa mahua recovered from his house, which were destroyed on the spot. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, that the …

Prabhoo Yadav @ Prabhu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Prabhoo Yadav, was charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 75, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for allegedly outraging the modesty of a ten‑year‑old girl and assaulting the victim’s father. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and that no …

Balram Kumar @ Balram Kumar RajakversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Balram Kumar Rajak was arrested for alleged kidnapping of a minor girl, an offence punishable under Section 87 of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The FIR was lodged five days after the alleged incident, and the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. were contradictory, with the …

Dasanand MandalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants were accused of forcibly entering the informant's house, assaulting her family, looting jewellery worth Rs. 2 lakh, and abducting the informant's daughter‑in‑law, with the prosecution invoking several sections of the Bihar Non‑tribal Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. …

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Raja Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. During the hearing, his counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail and instead surrender to the trial court to seek regular bail. The Court granted the request, emphasizing that the …

Bablu Kumar Singh @ Bablu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, Bablu Kumar Singh and Prince Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging they assaulted the informant’s father with a stick, causing fatal head injuries that led to his death on 20‑08‑2025. The FIR, registered under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), …

Niranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Niranjan Kumar, was arrested on allegations that he transported twelve minor girls to a spinning mill in Tamil Nadu by promising them employment, an act alleged to be human trafficking under Section 143(5) of the B.N.S and Section 79 of the Juvenile Justice Act. The petitioner …

Nitesh Yadav @ Nishu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitesh Yadav, sought bail in a case registered under sections 25(1‑B)a and 35 of the Arms Act after a pistol and cartridge were recovered from his house. He alleged that the recovery was false and that he was implicated due to a land dispute with agnates. He had been in custody since …

Dinesh Patel @ Dinesh kumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellant, Dinesh Patel, was charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant during a land‑related dispute. The trial court rejected his bail application, prompting an appeal …

Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Arvind Kumar was charged under Sections 419, 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly refusing to execute a sale deed after receiving Rs 44.70 lakh from the informant for land in Bihta. The parties had a written agreement to complete the sale within nine months, but the petitioner failed …

Birendra PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Birendra Pandey, was charged under several provisions of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, the Arms Act and the SC/ST Act for allegedly attempting to forcibly take land belonging to the informant and for caste-based abuse. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting that he does …

Baby Khatoon @ BebeeversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellants, Baby Khatoon and Badal Khan, appealed under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Special Judge's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged mob assault and grievous injuries to the informant. The prosecution alleged that the …

Ramawati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, seven residents of Belaudi village, filed an application for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Mohania PS Case No. 568 of 2025) concerning alleged offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (BNSS) relating to financial irregularities in the …

Shashibhushan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers from Nalanda district, were implicated in a criminal case (Sare P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025) for alleged assault on an informant, theft of cash and a gold chain, and possession of a rifle, with charges under multiple sections of the B.N.S. 2023 and the Arms Act. They …

Mahendra SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahendra and Harendra Sahani sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 90 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to their house. They argued that no liquor was found in their possession, the …

Vishal Kumar Jha @ Vishal Jha @ RajaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal Kumar Jha applied for bail in a case (Danapur P.S. Case No. 751 of 2024) where he was implicated under sections 103, 111(2), 61(2), 3(5) of the BNS and section 27 of the Arms Act for the alleged shooting of an informant's son. The FIR named unknown miscreants, and the investigation later …

Satish Yadav @ Satish Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellants, Satish Yadav and Nitish Yadav, appealed against the trial court’s order rejecting their anticipatory bail under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The prosecution alleged that the appellants, along with others, …

Baiju RamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Baiju Ram, was arrested in connection with a theft case (Sections 331(4) and 305 of the B.N.S.) after a co‑accused, Chotu Kumar, gave a confessional statement implicating him. The petitioner contended that he is innocent, that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants, and that …

Ramesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ramesh Yadav petitioned the Patna High Court for bail in a criminal case (Narpatganj P.S. Case No.101 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, arising from a land‑dispute altercation that caused injuries. The petitioner claimed he was …

Sajjan Thakur @ Sajan ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Sajjan Thakur and Subodh Rai, were charged under several provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly using caste slurs and assaulting an informant who had approached them regarding a Nal‑Jal scheme. The FIR was lodged 22 days after the alleged incident, and …

Jay Kumar Mandal @ Jay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Jay Kumar Mandal, applied for bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S, 2023, alleging he assaulted a woman who protested against cutting a banana plant, causing a forehead wound. He claimed innocence, stating the incident stemmed from a family altercation and …

Nepu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nepu Yadav, was charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly entering the informant's house armed, firing shots, and threatening the informant's son. He sought bail, arguing that the FIR was lodged two days after the alleged incident, no …

DHANANJAY KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, Dhananjay Kumar, appealed to the Patna High Court seeking anticipatory bail in a case registered under sections 126, 115(2), 352 and 351 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 3(1)(r)(s)/3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The counsel argued that although …

Vinay Kumar Ray @ Binay Kumar Roy @ Vinay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants filed an appeal seeking anticipatory bail in a case registered under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, alleging that they were falsely implicated in an alleged assault and caste-based abuse of the …

Bittu Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Bittu Kumar Jha was arrested on charges of kidnapping a 17-year‑9‑month‑old girl for marriage, alleged under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 7 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution’s case is based on the FIR, while the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. claims she left …

Bolu Kunwar @ Bholu Kumar @ Subindra Kunwar @ Subin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

The appellant, Bholu Kunwar (also known as Bholu Kumar, Subindra Kunwar, Subin Kumar), filed Criminal Appeal No. 4492 of 2025 arising from a police case registered in Jalalpur, Saran. The appeal was before the Patna High Court with Mr. Raghwendra Pratap Singh appearing for the appellant, while the …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought bail in a case registered under Section 64(1) of the B.N.S., alleging he was falsely implicated in a rape and theft allegation. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner entered the informant's house, raped the informant, assaulted her son, and stole a mobile …

Aman Kumar agrawalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Aman Kumar Agrawal, feared arrest in a case (Kanti PS Case No. 524 of 2024) involving alleged offences under Sections 317(4), 317(5), 324(4) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the recovery of 497.16 litres of liquor from his Scorpio and …

Amiruddin Shah @ Amiruddin Shah SinghversusThe State Of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellant, Amiruddin Shah, appealed against the order of the District and Additional Sessions Judge that rejected his anticipatory bail application. The appellant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The High Court considered the request and, without addressing the merits of the …

Md. ImranversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Md. Imran, the owner of a motorcycle, was made an accused in a case where 166.101 kg of ganja and the motorcycle were seized. He was not named in the FIR nor arrested at the scene, and he has no prior criminal record. He applied for bail, arguing that his only connection to the contraband is …

Raju YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five members of the Yadav family from Dulamdih, Gaya, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 190, 115, 76, 109, 303(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The State had not produced the injury report at the time of the …

Prashant KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Prashant Kumar and Sajan Kumar, were accused of taking a loan of Rs.1,40,000 and refusing to repay it, subsequently abusing the informant on a telephone call with caste-based slurs and threats. The FIR was filed under IPC sections 406, 420, 504, 506, 34 and SC/ST Act 3(1)(r)(s). The …

Babli BegumversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Babli Begum, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 1.125 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she was not present at the spot of …

Ravi PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellants, nine individuals, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Court that denied them anticipatory bail in a case registered under multiple IPC sections and Section 3(i)(x) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The FIR alleged that the accused had abused a college …

Nawnit KumarversusUttar Bihar Gramin Bank

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Nawnit Kumar filed Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18599 of 2024 against Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank and related officials, alleging grievances. During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner’s grievances were settled, and he sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, …

Gopal Gupta @ Gopal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Gopal Gupta, sought regular bail in a case involving alleged sexual exploitation of a minor, child marriage, and related offences under Sections 64, 351(2), 351(3) of the BNS, Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, and Section 9 of the Protection of Child Marriage Act. The victim’s …

Shiv Nandan Singh @ NunuversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shiv Nandan Singh appealed against the denial of anticipatory bail in a SC/ST case where he was alleged to be one of seven accused who allegedly assaulted a complainant at his house. The prosecution alleged caste-based abuse and assault with an iron rod, but the appellant contended he was falsely …

Pramila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Pramila Devi and Gorakh Ray applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, based on an informant's allegation that they abducted a minor girl for immoral purposes. The petitioners contended …

Takori Manjhi @ Takauri Manjhi@ Takaudi AmnjhiversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Takori Manjhi, was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly assaulting informant Prakash Paswan. The prosecution alleged a brutal assault with intent to murder, while the appellant contended …

Manoranjan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Manoranjan Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related assault case (Mahila PS Case No. 14 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State opposed the bail, …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that a FIR (Case No. 682/2025) had been lodged against him for alleged conspiracy to commit loot and possession of a loaded pistol, invoking Sections 310(4), 310(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the …

Ramanand SadaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramanand Sada, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 30 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his immediate possession, and he was unaware that …

Chandrabhushan KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Chandrabhushan Kumar, sought bail in a murder case (Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 45 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 103(1), 118(1), 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with an accused named Navin Kumar, was implicated in the …

Bharat MandalversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The appellants, three members of the Mandal family, filed an appeal against an order dated 14‑10‑2025 that granted them anticipatory bail in a criminal case arising from a complaint under sections 307, 148, 323, 379, 504 and 354B of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the …

Ranjan KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, was granted anticipatory bail on 23‑02‑2026. The bail order erroneously recorded that he had two prior cases, whereas a supplementary affidavit showed he actually had four cases under the Excise Act involving the alleged recovery of 4.520 litres of liquor. The …

Tarkeshwar DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Tarkeshwar Das and Dhaneshwar Das, were arrested in connection with an FIR alleging assault on the informant's son and firing of gunshots, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 103(1) and 109 of the B.N.S. The FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident and …

Md. Shaukat @ Md. SaukatversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Md. Shaukat applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS case No.200 of 2025, where he is alleged to have fired a bullet at the mother of an informant, an offence punishable under Section 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution asserted the specific allegation, while …

Shailesh Giri @ Shailendra GiriversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shailesh Giri, was arrested for alleged kidnapping of the informant's sister with the intent to solemnise marriage, and charged under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The FIR was lodged 39 days after the alleged …

Rambabu Rai @ Rambabu RayversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Rambabu Rai was arrested in connection with Bibhutipur police case No. 307 of 2025, charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 for alleged assault with a weapon causing injuries to an informant. The prosecution alleged that Rai, armed, struck the informant on the head with a Paghariya, …

Diwakar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Diwakar Kumar was arrested in a case alleging offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, based on an FIR in which an informant claimed an attempted abduction and the recovery of liquor from a seized vehicle. The petitioner …

Mithlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a case involving the alleged recovery of 6,000 kg of powdered hemp from a truck. He argued that he has a clean record, was not in possession of the seized goods, and merely hired the …

SHIVSHAKTRI CHOUHANversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shivshaktri Chouhan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 518 of 2021) alleging offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 379, 504, 506/34 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others …

Md. Ayaz Akhtar Arzoo @ Ayaz Akhtar ArzooversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Md. Ayaz Akhtar Arzoo and Md. Alamgir, appealed under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Special Judge's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged mob formation, caste‑based abuse of a constable, and damage to government …

Nitish Kumar @ Nitish Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The High Court heard bail applications of Nitish Kumar Yadav and Deepak Yadav, both accused under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act for the alleged assault and death of a detainee in a remand home. The FIR was based on a letter (No. 418) that made no mention of any …

Vijay SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vijay Singh applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., stemming from a property dispute with his brother-in-law. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and the informant’s husband assaulted each other, …

Dhaneshwar Das @ Dhaneshwar Kumar @ DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Tarkeshwar Das and Dhaneshwar Das, were arrested in connection with an FIR alleging assault on the informant's son and firing of gunshots, filed under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 103(1) and 109 of the B.N.S. The FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident and …

Rinku YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rinku Yadav, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code for an alleged robbery where five miscreants allegedly robbed an informant of Rs. 8,000 and valuables. The petitioner claims innocence, stating that no incriminating material was …

Sushila Devi @ Suhila DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of women residing in Samhuta Tarkulwa Dera, Buxar, filed an application fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (Dhansoi P.S. Case No. 131 of 2025) that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, …

Saryug YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Saryug Yadav, applied for regular bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 246 of 2025) where he was accused under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the BNS for allegedly assaulting the informant’s father with various weapons, resulting in death. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Priyanka Singh, …

Rohit Paswan @ Rohit Kumar Paswan @ Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rohit Paswan, applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged robbery of Rs. 2,04,000 from a Bank of India branch and alleged collusion in offences under Section 394 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case rests mainly on the confessional statement of a …

Anil Sah @ Anil Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anil Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a motorcycle and a truck. He has five prior excise cases and contends that no liquor …

Md. SabbirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Md. Sabbir and Md. Naushad, applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged offences under several sections of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR described a shooting incident on 19 April 2024 where several co‑accused opened fire on the informant’s family, but the …

Vinod Sao @ Binod SaoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Vinod Sao and Sushma Devi, were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly threatening and assaulting a police informant. They applied for anticipatory bail under Section 14(A)(2) …

Nabi Hasan @ NabihasanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Nabi Hasan, applied for anticipatory bail after a police raid recovered 15 litres of cough‑syrup containing codeine from a bush near his house. He claims a clean record and argues that the substance was not in his possession and that he fled before being apprehended. The State …

Shreyas Anima- JV (Joint Venture)versusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Shreyas Anima JV filed a writ petition challenging the Departmental Tender Committee’s rejection of its technical bid, alleging that the decision was made without any reasons and was arbitrary. The petition sought quashing of the memo rejecting its representation, setting aside the decision that …

Babita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Babita Devi and Alok Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging that they were implicated in the alleged kidnapping of the informant’s minor daughter. The informant claimed the daughter was abducted, but the girl was later …

Dinesh Yadav @ Dinesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners – Dinesh Yadav, Indrajit Yadav and Mamta Devi – sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case (PS Kaluahi Case No. 85 of 2025) filed under Sections 137(2), 87, 96 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that they abducted a 17‑year‑old girl, the …

Abdul SalamversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case (PS Case No. 40 of 2025) under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners kidnapped and molested a girl, whose statement under Section 183 of the …

Sima DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Seema Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Bagaha Mahila P.S. Case No. 38 of 2025) alleging her involvement in sexual exploitation and the creation of obscene videos under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 65(1), 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. …

Golu Mistry @ Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Golu Mistry, was charged under several provisions of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod. The appellant contended that the allegations were false, arising from a land …

Jyotish Kumar @ Azgar Kumar @ Ajagar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Jyotish Kumar, was implicated in a FIR alleging assault on an informant who was transporting labourers, resulting in injury to the informant's hand. The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and that the matter had been compromised out of court. The State …

Vishal Kumar @ Vishal Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vishal Kumar was arrested in connection with an alleged kidnapping of a minor girl, the daughter of an informant, under sections 137(2), 96, 3(5) and 351(2) of the Bihar Penal Code. The victim’s statement under Section 183 of the Bihar N.S.S. indicated she was taken by unknown persons and mentioned …

ARVIND PRASAD @ ARVIND RAM @ TIWARIversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Arvind Prasad, sought regular bail in a case under Section 309(4) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging he was falsely implicated in a robbery where Rs. 1,90,000 was stolen. The prosecution’s case relied on a confessional statement by co‑accused Uma Prasad, which named …

Shankar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shankar Prasad, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1.5 litres of liquor from a scooty he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had …

Bashistha Thakur @ Ranjan Kumar ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bashistha Thakur, was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault, outrage of modesty, and threats under Sections 109, 115(2), 126(2), 76 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted the informant and her husband, causing …

Manoj Kewat @ Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Kewat, a resident of Village Puraina, was implicated in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 110, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 for allegedly assaulting his step‑sister and her brother with a lathi, causing head injury and a fractured hand. The petitioner contended …

KRISHNA KUMAR @ KRISHNA SAHversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Krishna Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder case (IPC sections 302, 201) and later charged under sections 120B and 34. The deceased was the son of an informant whose body was recovered near a railway track. The informant initially lodged an FIR against unknown persons but, after seven …

Shivshankar SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shivshankar Sah and Mukesh Sah applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.32 of 2025) alleging assault on their brother during a family dispute over property. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners beat the informant, breaking his hands and injuring his head. The petitioners …

Uday ChaurasiyaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, members of the Chaurasiya family, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for allegedly entering an informant's house, abusing her by caste name and assaulting her and her husband, causing injuries. They sought bail, arguing …

Rekha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rekha Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who was allegedly killed for dowry demands, was arrested in connection with a dowry‑death case (Bhawanipur P.S. Case No. 141 of 2025) under Sections 103(2), 80 and 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, read with Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rohit Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (Ghoshi PS Case No. 511 of 2024) alleging he abducted the informant's minor daughter and kept her in Delhi. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, the charges were vague, and the victim’s statement indicated she left …

Baliram Singh @ Balram SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Baliram Singh applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case (Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023) based solely on a co‑accused's confessional statement, as his name does not appear in the FIR and no physical evidence links him to the crime. The State opposed …

Shatrudhan Manjhi @ Shatrudhan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three residents of Mastipur village, sought bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code for an alleged attempted kidnapping and assault. They claimed innocence, stating the allegations were vague, the injuries to the victim were minor, and they had no …

Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Petitioner Rajesh Yadav applied for anticipatory bail. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court’s permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court granted the request and dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn. No substantive …

Shambhu ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shambhu Manjhi, was arrested in connection with a case involving the seizure of 250 litres of illicit liquor and charged under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He had previously applied for regular bail, which was denied …

Pankaj Kumar Rawat @ Pankaj Rawat @ Panka RautversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Rawat, was implicated in a FIR (Amnaur PS Case No. 290 of 2020) alleging assault and other offences arising from a dispute over a bamboo fence during flood conditions. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, a clean antecedent, and that the allegations were …

Abhay Kumar Jha @ Abhay Jha @ Sonu JhaversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioners Abhay Kumar Jha and Nirbhay Kumar Jha applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in PS case No.138 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code including assault, robbery and causing grievous hurt. The prosecution alleged that on 15‑08‑2025 Sonu …

Anish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police seized 211.68 litres of liquor from a Mahindra pickup vehicle registered in another person's name. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor or the vehicle at the time of seizure and that the investigation was …

Anjani Ram @ Saurabh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anjani Ram, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 42 litres of liquor from his TVS motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not in his …

Ranjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ranjit Kumar applied for regular bail in a theft case (Arwal P.S. Case No.351 of 2025) registered under sections 303(2), 317(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, with several other sections added later. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner sold stolen articles at his shop, based …

Md. Arbaz Khan @ Arbaz KhanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Arbaz Khan, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case under sections 137(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The informant’s wife, initially alleged to have been kidnapped by the petitioner and a co‑accused, was later found to be in a love affair with the …

Nitish MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Nitish Mukhiya, applied for bail in a case registered as Raniganj P.S. Case No. 147 of 2024, which alleges his involvement in the murder of his wife under Sections 304(b), 302 and 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution contends that the petitioner, as the husband of the …

MANOJ PATHAK @ MANOJ KUMAR PATHAKversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Pathak applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, alleging that the FIR’s informant was not an eyewitness and that the petitioner was not named in the brother’s statement. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was …

Salamuddin @ Md. SalamuddinversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Salamuddin applied to the Patna High Court for bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 265 of 2025) alleging abduction under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, and later Section 12 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution …

Raj Kishore Kumar @ Raj Kishore PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Raj Kishore Kumar, was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly stabbing an informant, causing a simple injury. He had been in custody since 19 February 2025 and claimed innocence, asserting that he was falsely implicated and had no prior criminal …

Raj Kumar RajbanshiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a murder case (PS Rajauli Case No. 438 of 2025) under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for alleged dowry‑related killing. The prosecution alleged they …

Vikas Yadav @ Vikas Yadav Kumar @ Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vikas Yadav, filed a bail application in the Patna High Court fearing arrest in Atri Police Station Case No. 376 of 2025, which alleged his involvement in assault and other offences under the BNS. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted the victim, but the …

Uday Shankar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Uday Shankar Kumar, sought bail in a murder case (Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 211 of 2025) where he was implicated under Sections 103 and 61(2)(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the deceased’s body was found at a co‑accused’s house and that the …

Monu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Monu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Banka Mahila P.S. Case No. 21 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506, 494/34 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged he assaulted the victim to demand dowry, …

Santosh RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Ray was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute case (Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 281 of 2025) and charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, that the allegations against him were vague and that he had no prior …

Anjur Sai @ Jamil AkhtarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Anjur Sai and Md. Aftab Alam, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case (Dhaka P.S. Case No. 513 of 2023) involving multiple IPC offences including extortion, assault and theft. An earlier anticipatory bail order dated 27.04.2024 was not acted upon because the petitioners …

Suraj Yadav @ Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Suraj Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.38 of 2025, which alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The FIR described an assault and shooting of Amar Kumar by several accused, but the petitioner’s name does not appear in the …

Sanjay Kumar Dubey @ Sanjay DubeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sanjay Kumar Dubey and Rupesh Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a 2012 case alleging obstruction of an informant during the operation of an illegal saw‑mill, invoking offences under IPC sections 413, 353, 186, Section 33 of the Forest Act and several provisions …

Om Prakash Singh @ Om Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Om Prakash Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (PS‑747/2022) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 498, 323, 504, 379 and 34. He claimed he was falsely implicated, while the State opposed the bail. The High Court, relying on the Supreme …

Chandan Kumar Yadav @ Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Chandan Kumar Yadav and Kundan Kumar Yadav, were implicated in a FIR alleging theft of 100 letter pads and threats with firearms under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They contended that the allegations were vague, that no specific overt act was attributed to them, …

Rajiv KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rajiv Kumar, a chartered accountant, was implicated in a fraud case where he allegedly drafted a partnership deed for a new firm that used a name similar to his client’s company, leading to accusations of cheating and criminal conspiracy under several IPC sections. He applied for anticipatory bail, …

PRATIMA DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pratima Devi, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Chanpatiya Case No. 111 of 2025) alleged under Sections 103(1) and 238 read with Section 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The prosecution claims she, along with co‑accused, strangulated the brother of an …

Sadhdha Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sadhdha Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment complaint (Case No. 170c of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 341, 498-A, 504/34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3/4. The State opposed the bail, asserting the petitioner’s …

Shivam Kumar Singh @ Shivam Kumar @ Kallu Singh @ KalluversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Shivam Kumar Singh, was arrested during a police check when 500 grams of charas was recovered from him, leading to charges under Sections 20(b)(ii) and 29 of the NDPS Act. The petitioner claimed false implication, highlighted that the seized quantity was far below commercial levels, …

Alina MajumdarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Alina Majumdar filed a writ petition seeking release of her vehicle seized by excise officials after 3.5 litres of illicit liquor were found in it. The District Magistrate ordered release only upon payment of a penalty of Rs 4,97,532 and an additional 3% surcharge, invoking Rule 12A of the Bihar …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar filed a bail application fearing arrest in a case (Teghra P.S. Case No. 186 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) and 69 of the BNS. The prosecution alleged that Kumar, a neighbour of the informant, had a physical relationship with her and …

AMIT YADAV @ AMIT KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Amit Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case (Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 473 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 334(1) and 303(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case is based on a co‑accused’s confessional statement and the recovery of …

Sintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sintu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging his involvement in a staged disappearance of an informant's husband. The prosecution alleged that he harbored the missing husband, while the petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and merely provided shelter without …

Tapan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Abhay Singh and Maini, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No.120 of 2024 alleging offences under several IPC sections, including assault and robbery. The FIR alleged that they, along with others, attacked a group returning from Bhawanipur, causing injuries and …

Ravi Raushan @ Ravi Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ravi Raushan and Rahul Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Sigori P.S. Case No.147 of 2024) involving alleged assault, attempted shooting, and theft, with offences listed under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 109, 303(2), 76 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR …

Alok KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Alok Kumar and Rahul Kumar were arrested in connection with a murder case (Lohiyanagar P.S. Case No. 75 of 2025) alleged under Sections 61(2) and 103(1) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. They claimed they were falsely implicated, asserting an alibi that they …

Sanjeev Kumar Choudhary @ Sanjeev ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Petitioner Sanjeev Kumar Choudhary applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in connection with a case (No. 77 of 2025) alleging assault and other offences under several sections of the B.N.S. He contended that the case was false, rooted in a long‑standing land dispute and …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a brother-in-law and two sister-in-laws, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with an anti‑PS case alleging dowry harassment and the death of a family member. The prosecution’s case is based on a complaint that the deceased was assaulted by her husband and in‑laws and later …

Md. AfrozversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Afroz, was implicated in a case alleging abduction of a minor girl under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution claimed the accused entered the informant's house with arms and forcibly took the girl away. The petitioner contended that the girl …

Pappu MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pappu Mahato, was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault, stabbing and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He claimed innocence, asserting that the allegations stem from an old village dispute and that the injury to the informant was minor. The …

Ratan DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ratan Das, a constable in the CISF, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Sheikhpura Mahila P.S. Case No. 21 of 2025) alleging assault, torture, and desertion of his wife. The prosecution alleged offences under various sections of the Bihar Negotiable …

Satish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Satish Kumar was arrested in connection with the murder of the informant's grandson, alleged under Sections 103(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution’s case is based mainly on the fact that the petitioner was last seen with the deceased, with no eyewitnesses, forensic evidence, or motive …

Alok KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Alok Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging misappropriation of Rs. 3,79,353 and parcels while employed as a delivery boy. He applied for bail, claiming innocence and stating he had taken a personal loan of Rs. 44,500 from the employer, which he was ready to repay. The State opposed …

Kriti KamalversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioners, comprising three separate police officers, filed anticipatory bail applications in connection with a complaint case (PS Case No.336/2024). While these applications were pending, the trial court quashed the underlying complaint on 18-02-2026 in Criminal Miscellaneous No.47802 of 2025 …

Muni Karmakar @ Muni KarmkarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, who are in‑laws of the deceased, were arrested in connection with a murder case (Barsoi P.S. Case No. 233 of 2025) under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners killed the informant's daughter, while the petitioners claimed they were …

Vinod Baitha @ Binod BaithaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Vinod Baitha, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to the alleged murder of his brother. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was involved in an assault on the informant’s son during a theft, …

Karamat Mian @ Karamat MiyaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Karamat Mian, applied for regular bail in a murder case registered under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, stating there was no eye‑witness or material evidence against him, and that co‑accused had already been granted anticipatory bail. The State …

Lalan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Lalan Kumar, a 22‑year‑old, was arrested on 25 July 2025 in connection with an alleged kidnapping of the minor daughter of an informant. He was charged under Sections 96 and 3(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and a statement from the victim was recorded under Section 183 of the same code. The …

Pappu Sah @ Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Pappu Kumar, Awadhesh Kumar and Kunti Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (P.S. No.248/2025) alleging assault with an iron rod, a knife, and theft of a gold mangalsutra, charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They contended that the …

Veer Pratap Singh @ Banti SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner Veer Pratap Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case where he was accused of assaulting the wife of an informant and other offences under various sections of the B.N.S. He contended that the allegations were false, arising from a family dispute, and that injuries were …