Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 2006

1,018 judgments, newest first — showing 201–400.

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS.versusSURINDER SINGH BANOLTA

2006 INSC 90824 November 2006Dismissed

Surinder Singh Banolta was elected to the Zilla Parishad on 5 January 2001. Earlier, in 1998, he had been declared an encroacher under the Himachal Pradesh Public Premises (Rent Recovery and Land Eviction) Act, a disqualification ground under Section 122(c) of the Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Act, 1994. A complaint

G.L. VIJAINversusK. SHANKAR

2006 INSC 90924 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a tenant, challenged an order fixing fair rent by filing a revision petition under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960. The High Court admitted the petition on the condition that the appellant deposit 50% of the arrears and continue paying the reduced rent. The Supre

STATE OF M.P. AND ORS.versusLAUT KUMAR VERMA

2006 INSC 91024 November 2006Dismissed

Laut Kumar Verma, engaged on daily wages, applied before the Labour Court for classification as a permanent clerk, claiming that continuous service of more than six months entitled him to permanent status under Clause 2 of the Standard Standing Orders and protection of Section 25‑F of the Industrial Disputes Act. The L

HOTEL & RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION AND ANR.versusSTAR INDIA PVT. LTD. AND ORS

2006 INSC 91124 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Hotel & Restaurant Associations, representing owners of large and small hotels, challenged the rates demanded by broadcasters under TRAI's tariff orders, arguing that they are consumers entitled to TDSAT's jurisdiction under Section 14 of the TRAI Act. TDSAT held that the hotels were not subscribers or consumers an

SAURABH PRAKASHversusDLF UNIVERSAL LTD.

2006 INSC 91224 November 2006Disposed off

The appellant purchased a flat from DLF Universal Ltd. and paid earnest money and instalments, but later could not continue payments and sought a refund of the amounts paid, proposing a swap for a smaller property. DLF refused to adjust the earnest money and the appellant filed an application before the Monopolies and

JAGDISH MURAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 54124 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Jagdishmura was charged under Section 307 IPC for allegedly firing a pistol at the neck of PW‑2, a driver, in an attempt to murder him. The trial court acquitted him, finding the key witnesses’ statements contradictory, the motive unestablished, and the FIR ante‑dated and improperly investigated. The High

STATE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAMversusSURYA SANKARAM KARRI

2006 INSC 54224 August 2006Dismissed

The respondent, a Chief Commercial Inspector of the South Eastern Railway, was convicted under Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for possessing assets disproportionate to his known income. The conviction was set aside by the High Court on the ground that the sanction for prosecution was granted by

RAMJEE RAI AND ORSversusST A TE OF BIHAR

2006 INSC 54324 August 2006Dismissed

The appellants, a group of villagers, forcibly took the deceased Baijnath Singh and his brother onto a boat, assaulted Singh, resulting in his death; the body was recovered after five days and identified by several eye‑witnesses. The trial court convicted the accused under Sections 302, 34 and 201 IPC, a decision affir

TULSI AND ORS.versusCHANDRIKA PRASAD AND ORS.

2006 INSC 54424 August 2006Dismissed

The appellant had earlier mortgaged a portion of a house to a third party and later executed a single document selling the entire house to the respondents, which contained a right to redeem the mortgage. The respondents attempted to redeem, were refused, and filed suit for redemption and specific performance. The trial

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARHversusM/S. PUNJAB LAMINATES PVT. LTD.

2006 INSC 54524 August 2006Dismissed

Punjab Laminates Pvt. Ltd. manufactured paper‑based decorative laminated sheets and classified them under Chapter 39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Commissioner of Central Excise argued that the goods should fall under sub‑heading 4823.90 of Chapter 48 and that the exemption under Notification No. 135/89‑C

KISHORI LALversusSALES OFFICER, DISTRICT LAND DEVELOPMENT BANK AND ORS.

2006 INSC 54624 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Kishori Lal, an agriculturist, obtained a loan from the District Land Development Bank in 1971 and mortgaged his agricultural land as security. He was a minor at the time of the loan, defaulted on repayment and the bank initiated recovery proceedings culminating in an auction of the mortgaged land. The Board of Revenue

SANDEEP SUBHASH PARATEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 54724 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a student, claimed membership in the Halba Scheduled Tribe to obtain admission to a Bachelor of Engineering program, but the Caste Scrutiny Committee later invalidated his caste certificate. He continued his studies under interim orders of the High Court, completed the course, and sought his degree after

SURENDRA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 54824 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, two brothers, were convicted of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and causing hurt (Sec. 324 IPC) for the death of their uncle Devaji and injuries to his children during a property‑related dispute. They claimed they acted in private defence after being attacked by the deceased and his son, who allegedly came armed.

KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAM LTD.versusMOHAMMED RAFI

2006 INSC 54924 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The daily‑wage workman Mohammed Rafi claimed that his termination by Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Ltd. violated Section 25‑F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and the Labour Court ordered his reinstatement. The employer appealed; a single High Court judge set aside the award, holding that the workman had not proved he

BIHAR STATE FINANCIAL CORPN. AND ORS.versusMIS. CHEMICOT INDIA PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 55024 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Bihar State Financial Corporation, a statutory body under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, approved a loan to a small‑scale industrial unit and later agreed to an additional term loan of Rs 15 lakhs conditioned on the submission of a DGTD registration certificate. The loan agreement was registered withou

M/S. O.N.G.C. LTD.versusCOMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI

2006 INSC 55124 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

MIS O.N.G.C. Ltd imported 3‑D seismic tapes and claimed exemption from customs duty under the 1999 notification, which required an Essentiality Certificate (EC) issued by the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons and a valid Petroleum Exploration Licence (PEL). The original licence expired on 14‑Nov‑1997; ONGC applied fo

JAI NARAIN PARASRAMPURIA (DEAD) AND ORS.versusPUSHPA DEVI SARAF AND ORS.

2006 INSC 55224 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The promoters of a proposed company purchased a house and land before incorporation and later transferred the title to the incorporated company, which was declared the owner by a decree. The promoters, acting as directors, subsequently entered into a sale agreement with the appellants and also leased the property, lead

GENERAL MANAGER, VIJAYA BANK AND ANR.versusPRAMOD KUMAR GUPTA

2006 INSC 55324 August 2006Case Partly allowed

The appellant, General Manager of Vijaya Bank, terminated the employment of the respondent clerk on grounds of repeated unauthorised absences, issuing notices requiring him to report within 30 days. The respondent reported within the stipulated period after each notice, but the bank refused his re‑entry and treated him

OM PRAKASH SRIVASTAVAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2006 INSC 46324 July 2006Disposed off

Om Prakash Srivastava, extradited from Singapore, filed a writ petition in the Delhi High Court under Article 226 alleging violation of the Extradition Act and inhuman prison conditions in Uttar Pradesh. The Delhi High Court held that it might have jurisdiction but that the Allahabad High Court could more effectively d

ORISSA HYDRO POWER CORPORATION LTD.versusSANTWANT SINGH GILL (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 46424 July 2006Disposed off

The original respondent, Santwant Singh Gill, entered into an agreement with the Executive Engineer of the Indravati Dam for concrete‑cum‑masonry work, but failed to complete the work and was later replaced by another contractor. Gill filed a money suit against the State of Orissa, the General Manager of the Upper Indr

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.versusRAJASTHAN CHEMIST ASSOCIATION

2006 INSC 46224 July 2006Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 4A of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994, which levied tax on the first point sale of drugs, medicines and formulations by wholesalers to retailers based on the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) printed on the package rather than the actual consideration paid. T

RADHESHYAM AJITSARLA AND ANR.versusBENGAL CHATKAL MAZDOOR UNION AND ORS.

2006 INSC 35924 May 2006Disposed off

The Baranagore Jute Factory was ordered to be wound up in 1987 but a scheme of arrangement was later approved, allowing the mill to operate as a going concern under a committee of management. The scheme earmarked a fund with the High Court registrar for payment to pre‑scheme unsecured creditors, including the Nemani Gr

M/S. GROUPE CHIMIQUE TUNISIEN SAversusSOUTHERN PETROCHEMICALS INDUSTRIES CORPN. LTD.

2006 INSC 36224 May 2006Case Allowed

The Tunisian company Groupe Chimique Tunisien supplied phosphoric acid to Southern Petrochemicals under purchase orders that incorporated the Fertilizer Association of India (FAI) terms, which contain an arbitration clause (clause 15). After non‑payment, the supplier sued in a Jordanian court, where the respondent argu

HARSH VARDHAN BANSALversusCHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD AND ANR.

2006 INSC 36024 May 2006Disposed off

Harsh Vardhan Bansal applied for an industrial flat under the Chandigarh Housing Board scheme, which requires that the applicant and his family not own any residential property. A complaint alleged that Bansal already owned a flat in NOIDA under the Air Force Naval Housing Board scheme, leading the Board to cancel his

GURUBACHAN SINGH AND ANR.versusRAM NIWAS

2006 INSC 36124 May 2006Disposed off

The landlord, Ram Niwas, filed an eviction suit against tenants Gurubachan Singh and another, alleging default in rent and unauthorized sub‑letting of a shop to the Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation (RTDC) at Rs 2100 per month for four months. The tenants contended that they had deposited rent in court under Se

D.ANURADHAversusJOINT SECRETARY AND ANR.

2006 INSC 23924 April 2006Dismissed

The appellant, D. Anuradha, challenged the preventive detention of her husband under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974, alleging procedural violations. She contended that the reference to the COFEPOSA Advisory Board was made after the statutory five‑we

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.versusSUNIL KUMAR AND ORS.

2006 INSC 24024 April 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The predecessor of the respondents was granted a lease over forest land, but later encroached on an additional 146.42 acres. The Kerala State Government initially decided to regularise the encroachment by granting a lease, but after the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 came into force, it rejected the request, stating tha

PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR JHAversusSTA TE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS.

2006 INSC 24224 April 2006Dismissed

Purushottam Kumar Jha, appointed as a Field Clerk on compassionate grounds by the State of Bihar in 1996, was provisionally transferred to the newly created State of Jharkhand after the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000. He claimed he was actually a Law Officer/Legal Assistant, refused clerical duties, and alleged that th

SANKARAN MOITRAversusSADHNA DAS AND ANR.

2006 INSC 17224 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed

On the day of a West Bengal Assembly election, Assistant Commissioner Sankaran Moitra led a police lathi charge at a polling booth, during which the husband of complainant Sadhna Das was beaten to death. A private complaint was filed, the Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance and issued a warrant. The accused sough

EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONversusALL INDIA I.T.D.C. EMPLOYEES UNION AND ORS.

2006 INSC 17424 March 2006Disposed off

The Union of Employees of a Government undertaking challenged a notification that enhanced employee and employer contributions under the Employees State Insurance Act, claiming it did not apply to them. A Rajasthan High Court dismissed the writ as non‑maintainable but directed the ESIC to "consider" waiving the contrib

A. SUDHAKARversusPOST MASTER GENERAL, HYDERABAD AND ANR

2006 INSC 17524 March 2006Dismissed

Sub‑Post Master A. Sudhakar was charged with misappropriating Rs 5,000 received for a Kisan Vikas Patra. A departmental enquiry found him guilty of the first charge and part of a third charge and the Director of Postal Services, who was also his appointing authority, imposed compulsory retirement. Sudhakar appealed to

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSMT. KUSUM RAI AND ORS.

2006 INSC 17624 March 2006Dismissed

A taxi insured with National Insurance Co. was driven by a Khalasi who held only a Light Motor Vehicle licence, not a licence for a commercial vehicle. The vehicle met with an accident, resulting in the death of a 12‑year‑old girl. The claimants filed a petition under Sections 163A and 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, an

STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.versusP. KRISHNAMURTHY AND ORS.

2006 INSC 17724 March 2006

The State of Tamil Nadu, after a high‑level committee report on environmental damage caused by sand quarrying, inserted Rule 38A in the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules to vest exclusive sand‑quarrying rights in the State and to terminate all existing private leases. The Madras High Court upheld the rule but c

KERALA SAMSTHANA CHETHU THOZHILALI UNIONversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 17824 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Kerala, after banning the sale of arrack in 1996, enacted the Kerala Abkari Shops Disposal Rules, 2002 which required that each toddy shop employ one former arrack worker. The rules (specifically Rules 4(2) and 9(10)(b)) were challenged by a federation of toddy‑tappers and toddy‑shop workers on the ground

STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS.versusTATA CUMMINS LTD. AND ANR.

2006 INSC 17924 March 2006Dismissed

The State of Jharkhand sought to deny Tata Cummins Ltd. the sales‑tax exemption granted under Industrial Policy 1995 and notifications 478/479, arguing that the company did not have legal title to the land and could not produce a registered lease of fifteen years. Tata Cummins contended that it owned the building in wh

MUNNA CHANDAversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2006 INSC 10424 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved an altercation between two groups that culminated in the death of Moti Suklabaidya. The appellants, Munna Chanda and Ujjal, were convicted by the trial court and the High Court under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC for murder, based largely on the testimony of prosecution witnesses. On appea

SUNILA JAINversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2006 INSC 10524 February 2006Dismissed

Sunila Jain appealed against a preventive detention order issued under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (COFEPOSA) against her husband, D.K. Jain, who had been released on bail by the Special Court of Economic Offences on the ground that the alleged offence was bailable. T

P. MANIversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2006 INSC 10624 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, P. Mani, was convicted of murdering his wife by allegedly setting her on fire, based solely on her dying declaration. The High Court upheld the conviction, holding the dying declaration reliable and noting the appellant's alleged absconding and lack of injury as circumstantial support. On appeal, the Sup

A.P.S.R.T.C. AND ORSversusG. SRINIVASA REDDY AND ORS.

2006 INSC 10724 February 2006

The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (AP SRTC) issued a 1988 circular allowing absorption of casual employees but expressly excluding contract labour. Several scavengers employed through contractors filed writ petitions seeking regularisation under the circular. The High Court, on multiple occasions, dir

RISHI PAL SINGH AND ORS.versusMEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR.

2006 INSC 10824 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Meerut Development Authority acquired about 180 acres of land under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the Special Land Acquisition Officer fixed its market value at Rs.30 per square yard. The Reference Court, hearing a claim under Section 18, determined a compensation rate of Rs.126 per square yard a

MOHINDER PRASAD JAINversusMANOHAR LAL JAIN

2006 INSC 10924 February 2006Dismissed

Manohar Lal Jain, a co-owner of a shop, filed an eviction petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, claiming a bona fide personal requirement to run a wholesale Ayurvedic medicine business. The Rent Controller dismissed the petition for lack of proof of such requirement an

CHAIRMAN & M.D., BHARAT PET. CORPN. LTD. AND ORS.versusT.K. RAJU

2006 INSC 11024 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a senior sales officer of Bharat Petroleum Ltd., was charged with eight instances of financial irregularities and dismissed from service under the Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules. He challenged the dismissal, arguing that some charges were vague and that the punishment was disproportionate. The Ker

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusS.C. PARASHAR

2006 INSC 11124 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Deputy Commandant of the CRPF, was found guilty of failing to maintain absolute devotion to duty and acting in an unbecoming manner after a vehicular accident. The disciplinary authority imposed three penalties: reduction of pay to the minimum of the time‑scale for three years with cumulative effect,

M.P. HOUSING BOARD AND ANR.versusMANOJ SHRIVASTAVA

2006 INSC 11224 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Manoj Shrivastava, was engaged by the M.P. Housing Board as a daily‑wage Sub‑Engineer and worked for more than 240 days. He claimed permanent status under Clause 2(i) of the Standard Standing Orders, which provides that an employee who has completed six months' satisfactory service in a clear vacancy be

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusMALTI SHARMA

2006 INSC 11324 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Malti Sharma, an Inspector appointed under the Nursing Council Act, was terminated in April 1996 and challenged the termination by filing a writ petition. While the petition was pending, the Government of India issued a direction to abolish the post of Inspector, relying on an Office Memorandum that dee

HIMMAT SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 11424 February 2006Dismissed

Himmat Singh, a Head Constable, applied for voluntary retirement which was accepted on 24 August 2000. He later claimed to have withdrawn the application on the same day, alleged bias by the fifth respondent, and contended that the Lines Officer failed to make an entry in the police correspondence register as required

BISHWANATH PRASAD SINGHversusRAJENDRA PRASAD AND ANR.

2006 INSC 11524 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Bishwanath Prasad Singh, sold a piece of land to the respondents on 24 June 1977 and simultaneously executed an agreement for reconveyance, the parties agreeing that the sale would become absolute only upon payment of Rs.3000 within 23 months. The respondents claimed the transaction was a usufructuary mo

INDOCHEM ELECTRONIC AND ANR.versusADDL. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, A.P.

2006 INSC 11624 February 2006Dismissed

Indochem Electronic supplied an EPABX telephone system to the Additional Collector of Customs, Andhra Pradesh, with a one‑year warranty and a promise to open a service centre. The system was defective from the outset, and despite repeated complaints the supplier failed to provide satisfactory maintenance, even after th

MUSARAF HOSSAIN KHANversusBHAGHEERATHA ENGG. LTD AND ORS.

2006 INSC 11724 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant supplied stone chips for a West Bengal construction project and was paid by post‑dated cheques issued by the respondent from its registered office in Kerala. The cheques were deposited in a West Bengal bank, bounced, and a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed be

M/S. MAHARASHTRA STATE SEEDS CORPN. LTD.versusHARIDAS AND ANR.

2006 INSC 11824 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Maharashtra State Seeds Corporation Ltd., dismissed its assistant field officer, Haridas, after a departmental enquiry found him guilty of several misconducts and the Managing Director issued a second show‑cause notice changing the proposed penalty from freezing two increments to dismissal. The High Cour

STATE OF M.P. AND ORS.versusARJUNLAL RAJAK

2006 INSC 11924 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Arjunlal Rajak was appointed as a daily‑wage chowkidar by the State of Madhya Pradesh without a written offer or compliance with recruitment rules. He worked in various departments, the last being the production division of the Forest Department, which was later abolished, and his services were terminated without obser

CANARA BANK AND ORS.versusSWAPAN KUMAR PANI AND ANR.

2006 INSC 12024 February 2006Disposed off

Swapan Kumar Pani, an accountant of Canara Bank, was first exonerated in 1989 of charges of unauthorised removal of special bearer bonds. Later, after a CBI report, the bank’s Managing Director invoked Regulation 18 of the Canara Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976 to set aside the exonera

THE HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARDversusSUBHASH CHAND AND ANR.

2006 INSC 12124 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board appointed Subhash Chand as a contract Arrival Record Clerk for short seasonal periods. The contract expressly allowed termination without notice and conferred no right to regularisation. After his services were terminated, Chand raised an industrial dispute alleging unfair

STATE OF U.P.versusSHEO SHANKER LAL SRIVASTAVA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 12324 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Sheo Shanker Lal Srivastava, a private secretary to the Uttar Pradesh Lok Ayukta, was charged with misconduct for refusing to hand over the key to his almirah containing public documents and for using indecent language. The Lok Ayukta, who was also the disciplinary authority, conducted the inquiry, appointed a retired

VINOD KUMAR MATHURSEVA MALVIA AND ANR.versusMAGANLAL MANGALDAS GAMETI AND ORS.

2006 INSC 12424 February 2006Disposed off

The case involved three trusts registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, where several change notices for appointment and deletion of trustees were filed. The Assistant Charity Commissioner approved a change notice without conducting the mandatory enquiry, prompting the Joint Charity Commissioner to remand th

PUNJAB STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORP. LTD.versusSIKANDER SINGH

2006 INSC 12624 February 2006Dismissed

The Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation (the appellant, a State) sued two of its employees, an inspector and a field officer/supervisor, for loss of wheat allegedly caused by their negligence and misappropriation. Both employees had been dismissed in departmental proceedings; the inspector was reinstated after depo

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK AND ORS.versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND ORS.

2006 INSC 10324 February 2006Dismissed

Standard Chartered Bank and its officers challenged show‑cause notices issued under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) alleging that Sections 50, 51, 56 and 68 were unconstitutional as they violated Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The Bank argued that FERA, being in the Ninth Schedule, should not

K.S. KRISHNASWAMY ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2006 INSC 88823 November 2006Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the Office Memorandum (O.M.) dated 11 May 2001, issued to clarify pension calculations, overrode the earlier O.M. dated 17 December 1998. The Court held that the later memorandum is merely a clarification and does not repeal the earlier instruction, which remains the governing policy.

M/S. BENARA VALVES LTD. AND ORS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND ANR.

2006 INSC 88923 November 2006Disposed off

The Central Excise Department levied large duty and penalty demands on Mis. Benara Automotives Pvt. Ltd. (BAPL) and Mis. Benara Valves Ltd. (BVL) for alleged clandestine removal of excisable goods. The appellants appealed before the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal and sought a stay of the pre‑deposit

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusHASMUKHBHAI HIRABHAI RANA

2006 INSC 89023 November 2006Case Partly allowed

The respondent was initially issued a selection letter on 1 January 1990 and an appointment letter on 13 June 1990 by the Divisional Commercial Manager (DCM). After a charge sheet in 1993, the DCM conducted an enquiry and ordered the respondent's removal from service, which was affirmed by the Appellate Authority and t

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusDESH RAJ

2006 INSC 89123 November 2006Dismissed

Deshraj was appointed on daily wages for specific work in the Public Works Department and filed a writ petition seeking regularisation. The Allahabad High Court, by a single judge, directed the creation of a supernumerary post and ordered payment of minimum pay scale, a decision later upheld by a division bench despite

GANPATIBAI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 54023 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants challenged a scheme under the M.P. Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973, and the consequent notification (Sec. 4) and declaration (Sec. 6) issued under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. They filed a civil suit in 1990, which was held non‑maintainable by the civil court in 2001. Subsequently, they filed

LAXMI SHARMA AND ORS.versusV.C. CHHATRAPATI SAHUJI MAHARAJ UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

2006 INSC 37723 June 2006

The Himalaya Ayurvedic Mahavidyalaya admitted students to its BAMS programme without any university affiliation. After the admissions, the State Government and the Central Council of Indian Medicine inspected the college three times (1995, 1997, 1999) and each time recommended permanent affiliation. The university gran

K.H. SIRAJversusHIGH COURT OF KERALA AND ANR.

2006 INSC 35223 May 2006Dismissed

The Kerala High Court invited applications for 70 Munsif‑Magistrate posts and conducted written and oral examinations, prescribing minimum cut‑off marks of 35% (written) and 30% (oral). Several candidates, including K.H. Siraj, failed to meet the oral cut‑off and challenged the select list, alleging violation of reserv

CHAIRMAN S.E.B.I.versusSHRIRAM MUTUAL FUND AND ANR.

2006 INSC 35323 May 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) appealed against Shriram Mutual Fund and another respondent for repeatedly exceeding the 5% limit on transactions through associate brokers, violating Regulation 25(7)(a) of the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, and failing to comply with the terms of its Certifica

PRINCIPAL, AYURVEDIC COLLEGE AND ORS.versusSUSHIL CHANDRA MISRA AND ANR.

2006 INSC 35423 May 2006Disposed off

The respondent, S.C. Misra, was appointed lecturer in science at an Ayurvedic college. When the science section was closed in 1971‑72 his post was abolished and his services were terminated on 6 June 1972. After the college was taken over by the Government, he failed to submit the required option to join government ser

THE STATE OF PUNJABversusHARCHAL SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.

2006 INSC 35523 May 2006Dismissed

The State of Punjab acquired "Chahi" land in Kambali village for the expansion of an industrial focal point under a Section 4 notification of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs 85,000 per acre, which the District Judge upheld, but the High Court raised the compensation to

MOHANPRASAD TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 35623 May 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner, a social worker, filed a public interest writ petition seeking an inquiry into alleged political support for the Chief Minister in a trust motion. The High Court conditioned admission of the petition on a Rs.1 lakh deposit to demonstrate bonafide, which the petitioner paid. After the Chief Minister resi

DIRECTOR (MKT.) INDIAN OIL CORP. LTD. AND ANR.versusSANTOSH KUMAR

2006 INSC 35723 May 2006Disposed off

Santosh Kumar, an Assistant Manager (Operations) at Indian Oil Corporation's Hissar Depot, was charge‑sheeted for irregular diesel supply and found guilty of six out of eight charges. The disciplinary authority dismissed him, and the appellate authority affirmed the dismissal without recording any reasons. Kumar filed

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.versusMEWA SINGH

2006 INSC 16623 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Punjab acquired land for urban development in SAS Nagar and framed a 1974 scheme to allot residential plots to persons whose land was taken. Mewa Singh, claiming a one‑fourth share in 66 kanals 9 marlas, applied in 1980 for a plot, asserting sole entitlement. Earlier writ proceedings (1981) granted relief

CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR PUDA AND ANOTHERversusMRS. SHABNAM VIRK

2006 INSC 16723 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab Urban Development Authority (PUDA) advertised a housing scheme with a tentative flat price of Rs 6.3 lakh, stating that the price could be revised upward. Applicants, including the respondent, applied, signed a proforma undertaking to abide by all terms and to pay any higher cost due to material price fluctu

O. KONAVALOVversusCOMMANDER, COAST GUARD REGION AND ORS.

2006 INSC 16823 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed

A Panama‑registered vessel carrying Ukrainian crew entered Indian territorial waters without authorization and was arrested by the Coast Guard. The Customs Department seized the cargo and later confiscated the vessel under the Customs Act, 1962. The chief officer and other crew members filed applications seeking paymen

RISHIROOP POLYMERS PVT. LTD.versusDESIGNATED AUTHORITY AND ADDITIONAL SECRETARY

2006 INSC 16923 March 2006Disposed off

Rishiroop Polymers imported Acrylonitrile‑Butadiene Rubber (NBR) from Germany and Korea. The Designated Authority, under the Customs Tariff Act, found that such imports caused material injury to the domestic industry and imposed an anti‑dumping duty. The Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal later conve

RISHI ROOP POLYMERS PVT. LTD.versusDESIGNATED AUTHORITY AND ADDL. SECRETARY AND ORS.

2006 INSC 17023 March 2006Case Partly allowed

Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd filed an anti‑dumping petition alleging that imports of Styrene Butadiene Rubber (SBR) from several countries were injuring the domestic industry. The Designated Authority (DA) investigated, classified the imports under custom sub‑heading 4002.19, and recommended anti‑dumping duties which t

N. SRINIVASA RAOversusSPL. COURT UNDER A.P. LAND GRABBING (PROHIBITION) ACT AND ORS.

2006 INSC 17123 March 2006Disposed off

The case concerned agricultural lands originally purchased by a protected tenant, Uppari Ramaiah, under the Andhra Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1950. Ramaiah sold portions of the land to non‑agriculturists without the required Tahsildar sanction, rendering the transfers void under Sections 47 and 49 of the Tenancy Act. The hei

PURAN DASversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 10023 February 2006Dismissed

Puran Das, a constable in the Indo‑Tibetan Border Police, was suspended in 1973 and later removed from service in 1976. The Himachal Pradesh High Court set aside his removal and reinstated him with consequential benefits. He subsequently qualified for the required promotion tests in 1984 and 1986, becoming eligible for

INTELLECTUALS FORUM, TIRUPATHIversusSTATE OF A.P. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 10123 February 2006Disposed off

The Intellectuals Forum filed writ petitions challenging Government Orders that alienated the bed lands of the historic Peruru and Avilala tanks in Tirupati to the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam, the Tirupati Urban Development Authority and the A.P. Housing Board for housing projects. The High Court dismissed the petiti

VIRENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHYversusNIRMALA DEVI AND ORS.

2006 INSC 10223 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

After the death of Mahendra Narayan Sharma, his wife succeeded to his estate and later died. Virendra Kumar Tripathy applied for a succession certificate claiming to be the real brother of Mahendra, while Nirmala Devi claimed to be Mahendra's sister, asserting that their father Ram Briksh Sharma had two wives and that

CHAIRMAN-CUM-M.D., T.N.C.S. CORPN. LTD. AND ORS.versusK. MEERABAI

2006 INSC 4023 January 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation dismissed K. Meerabai, a junior assistant, after a departmental enquiry found her guilty of misappropriating stock and money, while a parallel criminal case against her under Sections 409 and 477-A IPC ended in acquittal. The High Court ordered her reinstatement, holding that t

L.I.C OF INDIAversusSUSHIL

2006 INSC 4123 January 2006Case Allowed

The respondent, Sushil, was appointed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India on the basis of a claim that he belonged to the Scheduled Tribe Halba. The Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims found his claim to be fraudulent and ordered invalidation. The Bombay High Court, relying on an undertaking

PARME HANSDA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF BIHAR(NOW JHARKHAND)

2006 INSC 87522 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, Jharia Kisku, was alleged to have been caught stealing and was tied and assaulted by the accused, Parme Hansda and Churka Hansda, along with other villagers. He later died from his injuries. The trial court convicted the accused under IPC Sections 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) and 342 (w

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusKUNISETTY SATYANARAYANA

2006 INSC 87622 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a clerk in the Postal Department, was initially appointed as an open category (OC) employee but later obtained promotions to posts reserved for Scheduled Tribes (ST) by falsely claiming ST status on his school certificate. After a show‑cause notice, he admitted he did not belong to the ST community, lea

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATAversusM/S. HOOGL Y MILLS CO. LTD.

2006 INSC 87722 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Hooghly Mills Co. Ltd., purchased an industrial undertaking from Fort Gloster Industries Ltd. and, under the sale agreement, assumed the vendor’s accrued and future gratuity liability of about Rs 3.5 crore. The assessee claimed depreciation on this amount under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, arguing

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONversusL.P. TIWARI

2006 INSC 87822 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the promotion of two State Forest Service officers, L.P. Tiwari and D.P. Dwivedi, to the Indian Forest Service. Both officers challenged the Selection Committee’s assessment, alleging that they should have been classified as "outstanding" and given seniority over other candidates. The Central Adminis

RAM CHANDRA SRIVASTAVAversusCHAIRMAN, DDA AND ANR.

2006 INSC 87922 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Ram Chandra Srivastava challenged the service charge and ground rent levied by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) through a writ petition. The Single Judge of the Delhi High Court dismissed the petition, holding that the service charge was a tax unrelated to services and that the accounting of ground rent was not un

M/S. RELIANCE SALT LTD.versusM/S. COSMOS ENTERPRISES AND ANR.

2006 INSC 88022 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Reliance Salt Ltd (appellant) entered into a consignment agreement with Cosmos Enterprises (respondent No.1) which required the latter to furnish a Rs 5 lakh bank guarantee from Bank of India (respondent No.2). The consignment agent failed to settle the appellant's bills within the stipulated 30‑day period, prompting t

GANGARAM SHANTARAM SALUNKHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 88122 November 2006Dismissed

The appellant, Gangaram Shantaram Salunkhe, was convicted under IPC Section 302 read with Section 34 for the murder of Bhaulal Jadhav. The prosecution relied on two eye‑witnesses (PW4 and PW5), a dying declaration of the deceased recorded by PW6, and medical evidence. The appellant challenged the identification, arguin

SURENDERversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2006 INSC 88222 November 2006Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the appeal of Surender, convicted under Sections 306/34 (abetment of suicide) and 498A/34 (dowry harassment) of the IPC. The prosecution proved that Pushpa, his wife, was repeatedly harassed and beaten for dowry demands, was expelled from the matrimonial home, and later committed suicide whil

BABU SINGH AND ANOTHER.versusRESHAMPAL SINGH AND ANR.

2006 INSC 88322 November 2006Dismissed

The trial court convicted Reshampal Singh and another for murder under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced them to death. The Punjab and Haryana High Court affirmed the conviction but reduced the sentence to life imprisonment, imposed a fine of Rs. 50,000 and additional rigorous imprisonment for default, and upheld a

WHIRLPOOL OF INDIA LTD., BANGALORE (KARNATAKA)versusTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (INTELLIGENCE 3) SOUTH ZONE, BANGALORE (KARNATAKA)

2006 INSC 88422 November 2006Dismissed

Whirlpool of India Ltd., a licensed user of the "Whirlpool" trademark, entered into an OEM agreement with Applicomp India Ltd. to manufacture appliances under the brand. Applicomp was exempt from sales tax under a State Government notification issued under Section 19C of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. The dispute c

SRIKANTversusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BIJAPUR AND ORS.,

2006 INSC 88522 November 2006Disposed off

The appellant challenged the detention of his brother under the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985 by filing a second habeas corpus petition after an earlier petition had been dismissed. The respondents argued that the doctrine of res judicata barred the second petition because it raised the same gr

DHARAMPAL ARORAversusPUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR.

2006 INSC 88722 November 2006Case Partly allowed

The appellant, an Assistant Revenue Accountant of the Punjab State Electricity Board, was suspended in 1974, charge‑sheeted, reinstated in 1975 and later allowed to cross the efficiency bar only from 1 April 1976, treating the period of suspension as non‑duty. An inquiry resulted in an order on 16 March 1984 stopping o

PRAKASH SINGH AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 64222 September 2006Directions issued

The petitioners, former senior police officers and a public interest group, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking directions to the Union and State governments to enact a new Police Act replacing the colonial Indian Police Act, 1861, and to implement comprehensive police reforms. They argued that the existing

SURENDRA SINGH GAURversusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 64322 September 2006Dismissed

Surendra Singh Gaur, originally appointed as Assistant Agriculture Engineer in Madhya Pradesh, voluntarily requested transfer to the Irrigation Department in 1975, where he was absorbed as Assistant Engineer in 1981. The Agriculture Department later granted him a proforma promotion to Class‑I effective from 1979, but r

M/S. C.T. COTTON YARN LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE

2006 INSC 64422 September 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Mis. C.T. Cotton Yarn Ltd., a 100% export‑oriented unit, purchased cotton domestically and manufactured yarn for export. During carding and combing, soft cotton waste was generated, which the company sold in the domestic market. Initially it was informed that the waste was non‑excisable, but after the Finance Act, 1995

SUSHMITA BASU AND ORS.versusBALLYGUNGE SIKSHA SAMITY AND ORS.

2006 INSC 64522 September 2006Dismissed

A group of teachers from a recognized private unaided school filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the school to implement the Third Pay Commission's salary recommendations with retrospective effect. The single judge of the Calcutta High Court granted the relief, but the Division Bench se

RAM PRAVESH SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

2006 INSC 64622 September 2006Dismissed

The appellants were employees of a co‑operative society that was liquidated and its undertaking merged with the Bihar Electricity Board. The Board did not take over the employees, and the appellants filed writ petitions seeking their absorption. The High Court dismissed the petitions and the appeal was upheld. The Supr

U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION. DEHRADUNversusSURESH PAL

2006 INSC 64722 September 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Suresh Pal, appointed as a conductor with the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation in July 1988, was found on 28 July 1989 to have allowed twenty passengers to travel without tickets, constituting misappropriation of fare. A domestic enquiry led to his dismissal effective 5 January 1990, which was upheld by the Indust

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.versusPARTAP SINGH AND ORS.

2006 INSC 64822 September 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, originally appointed as Junior Basic Training (JBT) teachers in the Haryana Education Department, acquired B.A. and B.Ed. qualifications during service and were subsequently granted the grade of Social Study Master along with an increment under Rule 4.4 of the Punjab Civil Services Rules, 1969. The Sta

M/S. JHUNJHUNWALA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 64922 September 2006Disposed off

The appellants, commission agents dealing in timber harvested by farmers, challenged assessments that treated them as "manufacturers" under the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 after an amendment to Section 2(ee). The State relied on a circular issued by the Commissioner of Trade Tax, which interpreted purchases from

KISHORE EKNATH NIKAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 65022 September 2006Dismissed

On 11 April 1998, accused A1 stabbed the deceased Parshant to death while witnesses PW2 and PW3 attempted to intervene. Accused A2 stood by, threatened the witnesses and inflicted a knife injury on PW3, thereby preventing them from assisting the victim. The trial court convicted A1 and A2 under Sections 302, 504 and 56

M/S. DUNCANS INDUSTRIES LTD., CALCUTTversusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI

2006 INSC 53822 August 2006Disposed off

Mis. Duncans Industries Ltd., a cigarette manufacturer, was served with two show‑cause notices covering the period July 1973‑February 1983, one by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta and another by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi. The Assistant Collector incorporated the material of the Delhi

CONFEDERATION OF EX-SERVICEMEN ASSOCIATIONS AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 53322 August 2006Case Partly allowed

The Confederation of Ex‑Servicemen Associations filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking free and full medical aid for ex‑defence personnel, their families and dependents, arguing that such aid is a fundamental right under Articles 14 and 21. The Union of India responded that the Ex‑Servicemen Contributory Health

RANGNATH HARIDASversusDR. SHRIKANT B. HEGDE

2006 INSC 53922 August 2006Disposed off

The respondent purchased a flat from the appellant under an agreement dated 16 September 1985 and later filed a suit for specific performance. During the suit the parties executed a consent decree on 1 November 1991, confirming the original agreement and setting reciprocal obligations: the appellant to hand over the fl

SETTU AND ORS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2006 INSC 53422 August 2006Case Partly allowed

The case involved three accused who attacked a man, causing his death, and also injured his friend. Appellant No.1 used a concealed knife to inflict multiple head injuries that proved fatal; Appellant No.2 cut the victim's back and knee and also wounded the friend; Appellant No.3 struck the victim's right hand causing

PUSHKAR SINGHversusANSUIYA

2006 INSC 53522 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord, Pushkar Singh, filed an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act claiming a bonafide requirement for his family and seeking possession of a flat let to the tenant, Ansuiya, since 1990. The Additional Rent Controller allowed the petition, holding that the landlord could not be

T. ANJANAPPA AND ORS.versusSOMALINGAPPA AND ANR.

2006 INSC 53622 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants filed a suit claiming title to a municipal allotment, purchasing the land two days after filing, and alleged that the respondents had encroached on a portion of the property by erecting a hutment three years earlier. The respondents contended that they had been in possession since 1969, paid municipal ta

LAL CHANDversusORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2006 INSC 53722 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The owner of a truck employed a driver, examined his licence and conducted a driving test, concluding the driver was competent. The truck met with an accident and the insurer paid compensation to the claimants. The insurer later sought recovery, arguing the driver’s licence was fake and that the owner breached Section

Y.P. SARABHAIversusUNION BANK OF INDIA AND ANR.

2006 INSC 35022 May 2006Dismissed

Y.P. Sarabhai, a Manager (Security) of Union Bank of India, remained absent from duty from June to November 1997 without sanctioned leave, allegedly to evade a transfer to Chennai. The disciplinary authority, after a detailed enquiry, found him guilty of contravening Regulation 13 of the Bank's Conduct Regulations and

GEN. OFFICER COMM. IN CHIEF, LUCKNOW AND ORS.versusR.P. SHUKLA (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 35122 May 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Three short‑term army personnel were convicted by a Summary Court Martial of serious misconduct and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment and dismissal. They challenged the proceedings before the High Court on the ground that Army Rule 180 was not observed, and the High Court set aside the martial proceedings and ordered

PERCEPT D'MARK (INDIA) PVT. LTD.versusZAHEER KHAN

2006 INSC 16122 March 2006Dismissed

Percept D'Mark (India) Pvt. Ltd. entered into a three‑year promotion agreement with cricketer Zaheer Khan that contained a clause giving the company a right of first refusal on any third‑party endorsement offers, even after the contract expired. After the term ended, Khan signed a similar agreement with another firm. P

RAJESH KUMAR AGGARWAL AND ORS.versusK.K. MODI AND ORS.

2006 INSC 16222 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, beneficiaries of a welfare trust, claimed that the trustees had withheld bonus shares and dividends of Godfrey Philips Ltd., depriving them of benefits. They sought to amend their plaint to include a prayer for the sale of the shares and investment of proceeds in government securities, along with a mand

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusRANBIR SINGH RATHAUR AND ORS.

2006 INSC 16322 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerns several army officers who were tried by General Court Martial for espionage, some convicted and others dismissed administratively under Section 18 of the Army Act, 1950. Their writ petitions challenging the Court Martial proceedings and the administrative dismissals were dismissed by the Delhi High Co

JAGAT RAMversusVARINDER PRAKASH

2006 INSC 16422 March 2006Dismissed

Jagat Ram, son of Manshan, claimed possession of land that had been subject to a 1945 compromise granting life interest to Kirpi, widow of Sunder, and thereafter to Manshan. Kirpi later adopted Varinder Prakash and gifted the land to him. After Kirpi's death in 1967, Manshan filed a suit for possession in 1982. The tri

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusBIKAR SINGH

2006 INSC 16522 March 2006

Bikar Singh, a conductor with Haryana Roadways, was dismissed for allegedly embezzling fare money. He appealed the dismissal to the Additional Transport Commissioner, which was rejected, and then filed a civil suit seeking a declaration that he remained in service and that the dismissal orders were void. The trial civi

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIAversusM/S. LAXMI CATTLE FEED INDUSTRIES

2006 INSC 9922 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) invited tenders for damaged foodgrains and accepted a bid from Laxmi Cattle Feed Industries, which deposited the earnest money. The buyer later sought cancellation of the portion of the contract that could not be performed and a refund of the balance, also requesting waiver of storag

E.S.I.CversusC.C. SANTHAKUMAR

2006 INSC 87121 November 2006Disposed off

The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) sought to recover arrears of contributions from employers as arrears of land revenue under Section 45‑B, relying on orders passed under Section 45‑A. The Kerala High Court held that the five‑year limitation in the proviso to Section 77(1A)(b) applied to such claims, whi

LEKHAversusP. ANIL KUMAR

2006 INSC 87221 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The parties divorced after a period of separation; the mother later remarried. Their 12‑year‑old son had been living with the mother. The father filed a petition under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 seeking custody. The trial court, after interviewing the child who expressed a clear desire to remain with his mother,

RISHIKESH SHARMAversusSAROJ SHARMA

2006 INSC 87321 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The husband, Rishikesh Sharma, filed a petition for dissolution of his marriage to Saroj Sharma under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging mental cruelty and desertion. The parties had been living separately since 1981, with the wife filing multiple criminal cases against the husband, and their only child, bo

KALYAN SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2006 INSC 87421 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

On 31 July 1989, a group of accused, including Kalyan Singh, allegedly surrounded a well where Durga Singh Rawat was bathing and Kalyan Singh is said to have urged Budh Singh to fire, resulting in the victim's death. The trial judge, after detailed analysis of witness statements and noting inconsistencies and the enmit

MRF LTD., KOTTAYAMversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ASSESSMENTS) SALES TAX AND ORS.

2006 INSC 63621 September 2006Appeal(s) allowed

MRF Ltd. invested heavily in expanding its tyre and rubber manufacturing unit in Kerala under a Memorandum of Understanding that promised a seven‑year sales‑tax exemption. The company obtained an eligibility certificate and a Board of Revenue exemption order covering 30 Dec 1996 to 29 Dec 2003. The Kerala Government la

KHAMBAM RAJA REDDY AND ANR.versusPUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2006 INSC 63721 September 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted by the Andhra Pradesh High Court for causing the death of Khambam Venkatramana Reddy, based primarily on the eye‑witness testimony of the victim's wife that the accused threw a 25‑30 kg stone on the victim's head. The defence argued that the principal accused was crippled by polio and coul

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusTARSEM LAL AND ORS.

2006 INSC 63821 September 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a railway employee, claimed pay and allowance from the date he received a proforma promotion in September 1997, rather than from his actual promotion in August 2001. The Union of India relied on Railway Board Circular dated 15/17 September 1964 and Paragraph 228 of the Indian Railway Establishment Manua

KR.GEORGEversusM/S. INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION AND ORS.

2006 INSC 63921 September 2006Dismissed

A recovery suit was decreed against K.R. George, whose property was sold to the decree holder. The appellant entered a compromise with respondents No.9 and No.10, resulting in sale certificates in their favour, but later filed a review alleging fraud and a third‑party offer to remit the sale consideration. The Supreme

FAQUIR CHAND AND ANR.versusSUDESH KUMARI

2006 INSC 64021 September 2006Disposed off

The respondent filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement, claiming she was ready and willing to fulfil her part by paying the consideration. The appellant contended that the suit should fail because the pleadings did not expressly state readiness and willingness as required by Section 16(c) of the Speci

VIDYA VARDHAKA SANGHA AND ANR.versusY.D. DESHPANDE AND ORS.

2006 INSC 64121 September 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether employees appointed on a temporary or contract basis for a specific academic year could claim a right to continue in service after the period expired. The respondents, appointed as temporary teachers with terms allowing termination at any time without notice, continued in their posts

RAJIV RANJAN SINGH 'LALAN' AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 52721 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court heard writ petitions filed as public‑interest litigation by two MPs alleging that former Bihar Chief Ministers Lalu Prasad Yadav and Rabri Devi had unduly influenced the transfer of an Income‑Tax Appellate Tribunal member, the appointment of a Special CBI Judge, and the change of public prosecutors in

RAM BADAN SHARMAversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2006 INSC 52821 August 2006Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the case of Ram Badan Sharma and his father-in‑law, who were accused of killing their daughter‑in‑law Sanju Kumari by poisoning her after persistent demands for a colour TV, a motorcycle and cash. The prosecution proved that the accused repeatedly demanded dowry, harassed and beat the victim,

COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT, KANYA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL BAL VIDYA MANDIR, ETAH, U.P.versusSACHIV, U.P. BASIC SHIKSHA PARISHAD ALLAHABAD, U.P. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 52921 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Committee of Management of Kanya Junior High School, a Jain‑run minority institution, terminated Assistant Teacher Santosh Upadhyay for acts of indiscipline after a show‑cause notice, suspension and enquiry. She challenged the termination, arguing that under Rule 11 of the Uttar Pradesh Recognised Basic School Rule

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.versusSRI SRI LAKSHMI JANARDAN THAKUR AND ORS.

2006 INSC 53021 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The State of West Bengal initiated proceedings under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 to determine whether the land held by the deity Sri Sri Lakshmi Janardan Thakur constituted a public or private religious endowment. The Revenue Officer and subsequent appellate authorities held the endowment to be public, allow

RANCHI REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusSUSHIL KUMAR MAHTO AND ORS.

2006 INSC 45821 July 2006Disposed off

The petitioners filed a public interest litigation alleging that the Ranchi Regional Development Authority (RDA) had illegally sanctioned the construction of certain multi‑storeyed buildings in violation of the Regional Development Authority Act, the Building Regulations and the Building Byelaws, 1981. The Jharkhand Hi

GIAN DASSversusTHE GRAM PANCHAYAT, VILLAGE SUNNER KALAN AND ORS.

2006 INSC 45921 July 2006Disposed off

The appellant, a Saunjidar, obtained a decree for possession of land from the trial court and the first appellate court. The High Court, on a second appeal under Section 100 of the CPC, set aside those decrees, holding that only the Collector under Section 11 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 co

M/S. R.R. HOLDING P. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI AND ANR.

2006 INSC 46021 July 2006Disposed off

R.R. Holding Ltd filed its return for AY 1986-87 claiming a loss and later disclosed a commission income of Rs 1.61 crore, prompting a notice under section 148. The assessee sought interest on a tax refund under section 244(1A) and appealed to the Delhi High Court, which held that the matter was covered by the preceden

STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.versusOM PRAKASH AND ORS.

2006 INSC 46121 July 2006Disposed off

The Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission advertised 390 posts of Homeopathic Medical Officer, requiring either a recognized degree or a recognized diploma in Homeopathy, with a proviso that "preference will be given to degree holders." After the selection process, many degree‑holders who were eligible were not appoi

ASHOK LENKAversusRISHI DIKSHIT AND ORS.

2006 INSC 23721 April 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Chhattisgarh granted excise licences for retail liquor sale under the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915 and the 2002 Rules. After objections were raised, a writ petition was filed before the Chhattisgarh High Court, naming 65 licence‑holders as parties while omitting 126 others. The High Court cancelled all th

M/S. MUKUND LTD.versusHINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.

2006 INSC 23821 April 2006Disposed off

Mukund Ltd appealed against an arbitral award that ordered it to pay Rs 1.26 crore plus costs and post‑decree interest at 11% per annum to Hindustan Petroleum. The Bombay High Court reduced the quantum to Rs 71.3 lakhs but retained the 11% interest rate. Mukund sought further relief, contending that the award should be

VINIT SAXENAversusPANKAJ PANDIT

2006 INSC 15821 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Vinita Saxena married Pankaj Pandit in 1993, but the marriage lasted only five months and was never consummated because the husband suffered from paranoid schizophrenia, rendering him incapable of performing matrimonial duties. The wife alleged mental and physical cruelty, including abuse by the husband and his mother,

NAVEEN KOHLIversusNEELU KOHLI

2006 INSC 15721 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The husband, Naveen Kohli, filed a petition for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on the ground of cruelty, alleging that his wife, Neelu Kohli, was bad‑tempered, engaged in indecent conduct, transferred property to herself, and repeatedly harassed him through criminal and civil complaints. The trial court fou

HARIDAS DASversusSMT. USHA RANI BANIK AND ORS.

2006 INSC 15921 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Haridas Das entered into an oral agreement in 1982 to purchase a suit property, paid most of the consideration and took possession with a promise of a registered sale deed within three years. To protect his possession he filed Title Suit No. 201/85, reserving the right to sue for specific performance, and later filed T

MANISH MOHAN SHARMA AND CO.versusRAM BAHADUR THAKUR LTD. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 16021 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Two groups of family shareholders in Ram Bahadur Thakur Ltd. filed a petition under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, alleging ouster from management. The Company Law Board (CLB) removed the directors, facilitated a family settlement and, on 19 August 1999, passed an order under Section 402 incorporating

KRISHNASWAMY S. PD. AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 9721 February 2006Dismissed

The appellants, who were the intended purchasers of a property, challenged an order of pre‑emptive purchase made by the Income Tax Department under Section 269UD of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the ground that the order was unreasoned and they were denied a hearing. The property owner did not contest the order, and aft

RAMESH KUMARIversusSTATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) AND ORS.

2006 INSC 9821 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed

In a property dispute, the appellant obtained a stay order protecting his possession, but respondents broke the lock and removed articles from the premises. The appellant lodged a complaint on 9 and 13 September 1997 alleging a cognizable offence against a police officer, but the police refused to register an FIR under

SANGHAMITRA GHOSHversusKAJAL KUMAR GHOSH

2006 INSC 86420 November 2006Disposed off

Sanghamitra Ghosh filed a transfer petition seeking to move a matrimonial suit for restitution of conjugal rights to Bangalore, alleging physical and mental torture by her husband Kajal Kumar Ghosh and his parents, and claiming she was driven out of the marital home with their minor child. Both parties later entered in

CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHOPAL AND ORS.versusM/S. LEENA JAIN AND ORS.

2006 INSC 86520 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, employed as contractual data entry operators and paid hourly, sought regularization of their posts on the ground of having rendered long service. The Central Administrative Tribunal directed the employer to consider their cases, but the employer challenged the order and the High Court dismissed the wri

M/S. SURESH CHANDRA KHANDELWAL AND CO.versusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 86620 November 2006Case Partly allowed

M/s Suresh Chandra Khandel Wal & Co. sought a benefit under the Madhya Pradesh Entertainment Duties (Advertisement Tax) Act, 1936, requesting the benefit to be back‑dated to 1 April 1996. Their writ petition was dismissed, and they filed a Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) to rely on a decision in another writ petition. The

OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPN. LTD.versusENGINEERING MAZDOOR SANGH

2006 INSC 86720 November 2006Disposed off

The Oil & Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) employs seasonal casual/contingent workers for field survey work from November to May each year. The Engineering Mazdoor Sangh sought regularisation of those workers who had completed at least 240 days of attendance in a twelve‑month period, invoking Rule 2 of the Certified Stan

M/S. AMBICA CONSTRUCTIONversusUNION OF INDIA

2006 INSC 86820 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Ambica Construction entered into a works contract with the Union of India (Railways) which incorporated Clause 43(2) requiring a No‑Claim Certificate after the works were finally measured. The contractor could not complete the work on time, faced deductions and was denied payment and refund of its security deposit unle

KANSING KALUSING THAKORE AND ORS.versusRABARI MAGANBHAI VASHRAMBHAI AND ORS.

2006 INSC 86920 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a public‑interest litigation filed by villagers of Rasana Nana, Gujarat, which challenged the allotment of rehabilitation lands to six original land‑owners whose property had been acquired in 1954 for an agricultural university. The Court held that the writ petition was an abuse of process, f

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusRAJESH KUMAR

2006 INSC 87020 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Rajesh Kumar, a constable appointed on 2 December 1989, was discharged on 18 October 1992 under Rule 12.21 of the Punjab Police Rules on the ground of unauthorized absenteeism and unsuitability. Lower courts, including the High Court, held that the discharge was punitive, based on misconduct, and theref

BHIMAPPA CHANDAPPA HOSAMANI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2006 INSC 63320 September 2006Dismissed

The appellants were charged under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Lakshman, who was sleeping on the 'katta' of his house. The trial court acquitted them, finding that the mother of the deceased (PW‑1) was not a truthful eyewitness and that the younger brother (PW‑2) was not an eyewitness,

ARUN KUMAR NAYAKversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 63420 September 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Department requisitioned the local Employment Exchange for an Extra Departmental Sub Post Master vacancy, giving preference to ST/SC candidates, and the Exchange sponsored 40 names, including a general‑category candidate (respondent No.4). A corrigendum mandated a wider public notification, which invited applicatio

BIPIN BIHARIversusSTATE OF M.P.

2006 INSC 63520 September 2006Disposed off

The appellant, Bipin Bihari, was convicted under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code for attempting to murder the complainant after firing a gun that injured the complainant's calf. The trial court sentenced him to life imprisonment and a fine; the High Court reduced the imprisonment to two years but increased the fin

M/S INDIAN OIL CORPORATIONversusM/S NEPC INDIA LTD. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 45220 July 2006Case Partly allowed

Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) entered into fuel supply contracts with NEPC India Ltd. and its sister company, securing the dues by hypothecating two aircraft. After NEPC defaulted, IOC obtained injunctions and later filed criminal complaints alleging theft, cheating, criminal breach of trust and mischief for the removal

M/S. H.V. INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS

2006 INSC 45320 July 2006Dismissed

H.V. Industrial Electronics Pvt Ltd manufactures power controllers (light dimmers/heat controllers) and initially classified them under heading 8543.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, later reclassifying them under 8536.90. The Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs issued show‑cause notices asserting that th

M/S. FALCON TYRES LTD.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 45420 July 2006Dismissed

Falcon Tyres Ltd., a tyre manufacturer in Karnataka, procured rubber from Kerala and claimed exemption from entry tax under the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979, arguing that rubber is agricultural produce covered by Section 3(6) and the Second Schedule. The assessing authority, the Joint Commissioner, and the

S. SUDERSHAN REDDY & ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2006 INSC 45520 July 2006Dismissed

Four accused were convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Khaja Saheb. The prosecution relied mainly on the testimony of PW‑3, a close relative of the deceased, while other eye‑witnesses (PW‑1, PW‑2, PW‑4) either gave only partial support or later retracted their statements. The appellants contended that PW‑3

VIKRAMA SHAMA SHETTYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 45620 July 2006Dismissed

Vikram Shama Shetty applied for an FL‑III licence to sell foreign liquor from his restaurant located near a mosque. Rule 45(1‑C) of the Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules bars licences for establishments within 75 metres of a religious institution. While an earlier appellate authority had allowed the licence based on an archi

INDIAN FINANCIAL ASSN. SEVENTH PAY ADVENTISTSversusM.A. UNNEERIKUTTY AND ANR.

2006 INSC 45720 July 2006Dismissed

The Indian Financial Association of Seventh Day Adventists (the appellant) owned a 30‑cent property containing a church, school and other buildings. It passed a resolution to sell the land and, through a duly executed power of attorney, its representative (defendant No. 2) entered into two sale agreements with the plai

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusRAJ KISHORE YADAV AND ANR.

2006 INSC 37620 June 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court heard Civil Appeal No. 1442 of 2005 filed by the State of U.P. against the High Court's order that set aside the dismissal of Raj Kishore Yadav, a government employee, and reinstated him with full benefits. The employee had been charged with five serious offences, four of which were proved beyond doub

M/S. H.P.L. CHEMICALS LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH

2006 INSC 23620 April 2006Appeal(s) allowed

H.P.L. Chemicals Ltd., a manufacturer of hydrazine, produced a by‑product called "denatured salt" and claimed it should be classified under heading 25.01 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, which carries a nil duty rate. The Deputy Commissioner classified the product under heading 38.23 (now 38.24), a residuary hea

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.versusALL INDIA MANUFACTURERS ORGANIZATION AND ORS.

2006 INSC 23520 April 2006Dismissed

The State of Karnataka entered into a Memorandum of Understanding and a Framework Agreement (FWA) with a private consortium to develop the Bangalore‑Mysore Infrastructure Corridor, requiring acquisition of about 20,193 acres of land. Several public‑interest writ petitions challenged the FWA on grounds of fraud, misrepr

PRABHAKARAN AND ORS.versusM. AZHAGIRIPILLAI (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 15520 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs, heirs of the original mortgagor, sued the heirs of the mortgagee for redemption of a usufructuary mortgage dated 7 September 1935 and for an account of income. The mortgagee had assigned the mortgage to an assignee on 12 February 1954, and the plaintiffs argued that this assignment deed was an acknowled

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusKANKUBEN (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2006 INSC 15620 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The workmen (respondents) filed applications under Section 33‑C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking recovery of overtime allowances for duties involving moving locomotives. The Labour Court allowed the applications and awarded the claimed amounts. The employer (Indian Railways) challenged the award by filin

TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF A.P. LTD. AND ORS.versusM/S SRI RAMA KRISHNA RICE MILL

2006 INSC 9520 February 2006Disposed off

The appellant, Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd., issued a provisional and then a final assessment of Rs.1,41,270 against the respondent, a low‑tension consumer, alleging pilferage of electricity. The respondent objected and appealed under the Terms and Conditions of Supply, seeking a right to cross‑examine the off

M/S MOTOR INDUSTRIES CO. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, AURANGABAD

2006 INSC 3920 January 2006Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Motor Industries Co. Ltd., a manufacturer of nozzles, nozzle holders and injectors, was served a show‑cause notice demanding central excise duty on its nozzles and nozzle holders used in the assembly of injectors, the department alleging they were intermediate products under tariff heading 8409.00 and that the comp

SHRIKANTversusVASANTRAO AND ORS.

2006 INSC 3720 January 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Shrikant, was elected to the Maharashtra Legislative Council but his election was challenged on the ground that he held subsisting government contracts, which under Section 9A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, would disqualify him. The contracts involved work for the State Government, one of

RADHA MOHAN SINGH @ LAL SAHEB AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2006 INSC 3820 January 2006Disposed off

The case concerned the murder of Hira Singh during a Holi celebration in Ballia, Uttar Pradesh, where five accused assaulted him and others. The trial court convicted all five under Sections 302 and 149 of the IPC, imposing life imprisonment, while the High Court affirmed the convictions. On special leave, the Supreme

M. NAGARAJ AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS

2006 INSC 71119 October 2006Reference answered

The petitioners challenged the Constitution (Seventy‑Seventh), (Eighty‑First), (Eighty‑Second) and (Eighty‑Fifth) Amendment Acts, which inserted Article 16(4A) (reservation in promotion for SC/STs with consequential seniority), Article 16(48) (exclusion of carry‑forward vacancies from the 50% ceiling) and a proviso to

SAMGHAJI HARIBA PATILversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2006 INSC 71519 October 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Samghaji Hariba Patil, was charged under IPC sections 302, 307, 504 r/w 34 for the murder of Murugappa during a land‑related quarrel. The trial court acquitted him, finding that the prosecution had not proved his motive, that the alleged weapon (a hammer) was not typical for agricultural use, and that wi

GURPREET SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA

2006 INSC 71219 October 2006Reference answered

Gurpreet Singh appealed against the Union of India challenging the applicability of the rule of appropriation in execution of award decrees under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (as amended by Act 68 of 1984) and the entitlement to interest on solatium. The Court examined whether the normal CPC rule of appropriation (Or

KISHANSING TOMARversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF AHMEDABAD AND ORS.

2006 INSC 71319 October 2006Disposed off

The Chairman of the Standing Committee of Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) feared a delay in elections to the new municipal body whose term was due to expire on 15 October 2005, and filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State Election Commission and the State Government to hold elections before th

THIRUNAVUKARASU MUDALIAR (DEAD) BY LRS.versusGOPAL NAIDU (DEAD) BY LRS.

2006 INSC 71619 October 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord filed an eviction suit and the tenant invoked Section 9 of the Madras City Tenants' Protection Act, 1921 seeking a court‑ordered sale of the suit‑land. The trial court fixed a price and a six‑month payment schedule; the tenant made only partial payments. On appeal the appellate court enhanced the price and

MAJOR SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2006 INSC 71719 October 2006Disposed off

Major Singh and Baldev Singh were convicted of murdering Kashmir Singh by severing his head, allegedly motivated by suspicion that Kashmir had caused the death of their sister Sukhwinder Kaur. The prosecution relied on the eyewitness testimony of Lakhbir Singh, who identified the accused under electric light, and on me

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusMUKESH AND ORS.

2006 INSC 71819 October 2006Disposed off

The State of Madhya Pradesh charged three reservation clerks with abetting Suresh Shah in the illegal procurement and sale of railway tickets under Sections 143(1) and 143(2) of the Railways Act, 1989. Shah was arrested with a large number of tickets and cash, but later absconded, and the clerks were convicted on the b

R. SUNDARARAJANversusSTATE BY D.S.P., SPE, CBI, CHENNAI

2006 INSC 71919 October 2006Dismissed

The appellant, a Group D public servant at the Chennai Harbour Telephone Exchange, demanded and accepted a bribe of Rs.1500 for securing a permanent telephone connection for a subscriber. He was caught red‑handed in a police‑arranged trap, leading to a charge sheet under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The tria

ANIL SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

2006 INSC 72019 October 2006Case Partly allowed

The appellants, Anil Singh and another, were named in an FIR for the murder of Ranjit Singh but the investigating officer filed a final report clearing them, which the magistrate accepted, and no chargesheet was filed against them. During the trial, witness testimony implicated the appellants, leading the prosecution t

SUBHASH MARUTI AVASAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 72119 October 2006Dismissed

The appellant, accused No.3, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for the killing of Baban, based on eyewitness testimony of the deceased's mother (PW‑1) and other prosecution witnesses. The appellant claimed an alibi, asserting he was unable to walk due to a compound fracture and relied on a doctor's certific

PRABHAT KUMAR SHARMAversusUNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ORS.

2006 INSC 72219 October 2006Dismissed

Prabhat Kumar Sharma, a member of the Lohar community in Bihar, claimed Scheduled Tribe status to obtain reservation benefits in the Civil Services examinations. The UPSC initially allowed him to appear as a Scheduled Tribe candidate based on a High Court direction, but later treated him as an Other Backward Class afte

T. VIJAYALAKSHMI AND ORS.versusTOWN PLANNING MEMBER AND ANR.

2006 INSC 72319 October 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, owners of land converted for non‑agricultural use within a residential zone, applied to the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) for sanction of a building plan on 29‑Nov‑2004. The BDA delayed the application and eventually rejected it, stating that the land fell in a "Valley Zone" of a proposed compre

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusJUMMASHA DIWAN

2006 INSC 72419 October 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a daily‑wage casual worker on a railway electrification project, was retrenched when the project closed and received compensation under Section 25‑F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. He challenged the retrenchment, claiming 1,060 days of continuous service that should have given him higher seniority

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BANGALOREversusM/S SPICE TELECOM, BANGALORE

2006 INSC 71419 October 2006Dismissed

Spice Telecom imported 30 radio terminals in 1998 and claimed exemption from customs duty under Notification No. 11/97 (as amended) which exempts BTS ancillary equipment. The Revenue argued that the radio terminals are independent equipment and not ancillary, rejecting the claim. The Customs Tribunal, relying on techni

SURESH PATHRELLAversusORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE

2006 INSC 72619 October 2006Dismissed

The appellant, a Chief Manager of Oriental Bank of Commerce, was dismissed after an enquiry found him guilty of misappropriating Rs.10 lakh by opening a fraudulent account and transferring the funds to three third parties. The appellant challenged the dismissal, arguing that no loss was suffered by the bank, the crimin

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, A.P.versusSURESH JHUNJHUNWALA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 72719 October 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, exporters of garments under the Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) scheme, filed shipping bills claiming export benefits, but the goods were intercepted and found to be cheap garments grossly mis‑declared and heavily over‑invoiced. The Commissioner of Customs ordered confiscation of the goods under Secti

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusS.D. BANDHOPADHYAY AND ORS.

2006 INSC 72819 October 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned draughtsmen employed in the Ordnance Factories who had received a pay‑scale uplift under an Office Memorandum (OM) dated 13‑Mar‑1984, which was based on educational qualifications. A later OM dated 19‑Oct‑1994 revised pay scales on the basis of length of service and the respondents claimed entitlemen

KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN AND ORS.versusSAJAL KUMAR ROY AND ORS.

2006 INSC 73019 October 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) advertised eight Lower Division Clerk vacancies with an upper age limit of 25 years, relaxable only for specified categories. Four applicants, including Sajal Kumar Roy, were over‑aged and not members of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, or other exempt categories, yet were allowed

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusSARJEET SINGH AND ANR.

2006 INSC 73119 October 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan and a Gram Panchayat jointly implemented the "Jal Pradyot Vojna" water‑supply scheme, under which the Gram Panchayat hired Sarjeet Singh as a pump driver on a fixed‑term contract that was extended until the scheme’s completion on 7 Nov 1997. When the scheme ended, his services were terminated. He

SRI ANAND HANUMATHSA KATAREversusADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND ORS

2006 INSC 73219 October 2006Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a habeas corpus petition challenging a detention order passed under the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot‑Leggers, Drug Offenders, Gamblers, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum Grabbers Act, 1985. The order was issued on 7 Oct 2005, approved by the State Government

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTDversusM/S PARAMOUNT POLYMERS PVT. LTD.

2006 INSC 73319 October 2006

M.L.L.C. Steels, a consumer of electricity, defaulted on dues and had its supply disconnected. The undertaking was taken over by the Haryana Financial Corporation and sold "as is where is" to Paramount Polymers. After the sale, the electricity board (Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.) introduced clause 21A in its

SHANAKR DEB ACHARYAND ORS.versusBISWANATH CHAKRABORTY AND ORS.

2006 INSC 73419 October 2006

The appellants (Sankar Deb Acharya & Ors.) and the respondents (Biswanath Chakraborty & Ors.) were recruited on a temporary basis through the West Bengal Public Service Commission. The dispute concerned inter‑se seniority and promotion under the merit‑cum‑seniority policy, specifically whether seniority should be based

KUMARAN SILK TRADE (P) LTD.versusDEVENDRA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 73519 October 2006Dismissed

Kumaran Silk Trade (P) Ltd. obtained a sanctioned plan for a basement, parking, ground floor and three upper floors but illegally constructed additional floors 4, 5 and 6, violating building bye‑laws and the plan. A contempt application was filed and the Madras High Court ordered status‑quo on 2 March 2001; the appella

YUVARAJ AMBAR MOHITEversusSTTE OF MAHARASHTRA

2006 INSC 73619 October 2006Dismissed

The appellant, a Judo Karate teacher, was accused of murdering his foster sister-in-law after a dispute involving another autorickshaw driver. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, notably that the deceased was last seen with the appellant, and the testimony of three witnesses, including a child who identi

COMMISSIONER EXCISE AND ANR.versusMANOJ ALI AND ANR.

2006 INSC 73719 October 2006Dismissed

The Commissioner of Excise cancelled the wholesale and retail licences of Manoj Ali (respondent) and forfeited his security on the ground that a large quantity of IMFL and beer was seized from a room in the premises, which the department claimed was under his possession. The respondent contended that the seized stock b

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search