Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 2014

794 judgments, newest first — showing 401–600.

PARMINDER ALIAS LADKA POLAversusSTATE OF DELHI

2014 INSC 2716 January 2014Dismissed

The appellant was convicted under IPC sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal intimidation) for forcibly raping a 14‑year‑old girl. He argued that only an attempt to rape occurred and that, under the proviso to Section 376(1), the sentence could be reduced below the statutory minimum of seven years for adequate and speci

KM. HEMA MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 3116 January 2014Dismissed

The appellant, KM Hema Mishra, was named in an FIR under Sections 419 and 420 IPC and sought quashing of the FIR and pre‑arrest protection by filing a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The High Court dismissed the petition, refusing to grant anticipatory bail because Section 438 of the CrPC, which pr

VARINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

2014 INSC 3316 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a visitor to a central prison in Punjab, was searched and found carrying a mobile phone and charger, leading to an FIR under Sections 42 and 45 of the Prisons Act, 1894. The High Court dismissed his petition under Section 482 of the CrPC to quash the FIR, holding that the possession of the phone indicate

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROAD DEVELOPMENT DIVISION NO.ILL, PANVEL & ANR.versusATLANTA LIMITED

2014 INSC 3216 January 2014Disposed off

The State of Maharashtra, through its Executive Engineer, challenged an arbitral award dated 12 May 2012, filing applications under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act before the District Judge, Thane, while Atlanta Limited filed a petition before the High Court of Bombay on the same day. The High Court ordered the trans

K.K.SHARMAversusHIGH COURT OF DELHI AND ORS.

2015 INSC 6315 December 2014Dismissed

The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 5838 of 2012 filed by K.K. Sharma and others against the High Court of Delhi’s orders dated 23 Oct 2009 and 1 Jun 2012. The High Court had been directed to implement a 1998 judgment that declared a 1988 amendment to the Delhi High Court Establishment Rules void for violating

DIPANWITA ROYversusRONOBROTO ROY

2014 INSC 72815 October 2014Disposed off

Ronobroto Roy filed a petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging that his wife Dipanwita Roy had an extra‑marital relationship and bore a child with another man. To prove the allegation of infidelity, he applied to the Family Court for a DNA test of the child, which was dismissed, but the

SARJEET SINGH (D) TH. LRS.versusHARI SINGH & ORS.

2014 INSC 72915 October 2014Dismissed

The appellants, co‑sharers of a Shami/at Patti Sayar (common village land) in village Dahina, filed a civil suit seeking declaration and possession of the land against the respondents. The trial court and the first appellate court decreed in favour of the appellants, granting them possession. The High Court set aside t

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusPRONAB CHAKRABORTY

2014 INSC 72715 October 2014Disposed off

Pronab Chakraborty, a police inspector, faced departmental charges of disproportionate assets and other misconduct. He retired on superannuation on 31 January 2008, and sought to halt the continuation of the departmental proceedings, arguing that Rule 10(1) of the West Bengal Services (Death-cum-Retirement Benefit) Rul

ABDUL BASIT @ RAJU & ORS. ETC.versusMD. ABDUL KADIR CHAUDHARY & ANR.

2014 INSC 100515 September 2014Disposed off

The petitioners were granted bail by the Gauhati High Court under the default bail provision of Section 167(2) CrPC. The respondent sought cancellation of that bail alleging misrepresentation and that the direction to the CID under Section 173(8) did not render the charge‑sheet infructuous. The High Court entertained a

BAR COUNCIL OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusB. NARAYAN SWAMY & ANR.

2014 INSC 100415 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh disciplined advocate B. Narayan Swamy for attesting blank stamp papers in his capacity as a Notary, finding him in violation of the Notaries Act and Section 35 of the Advocates Act. The State Bar Council imposed a lifetime debarment, which the Bar Council of India stayed and set aside,

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-1, NEW DELHIversusVATIKA TOWNSHIP PRIVATE LIMITED

2014 INSC 62915 September 2014Disposed off

The case concerned a block assessment of undisclosed income for the period 01‑04‑1989 to 10‑02‑2000, where the Assessing Officer failed to levy surcharge under Section 113 of the Income‑Tax Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax sought to levy surcharge retrospectively, relying on a proviso inserted in Section 113 by the

C.K. DASEGOWDA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2014 INSC 48815 July 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, a group of ten accused, were charged with offences including voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons under Section 324 read with Section 34 of the IPC, among other sections. The trial court acquitted them, finding reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in prosecution witnesses and lack of corrobo

BHUWAN MOHAN SINGHversusMEENA & ORS.

2014 INSC 49015 July 2014Dismissed

The husband appealed against a High Court order directing that maintenance to his wife and child be payable from the date of the application under Section 125 of the CrPC, rather than from the date of the Family Court's order. The Supreme Court observed that the wife’s application had remained pending for nine years du

ROHTAS BHANKHAR & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2014 INSC 48515 July 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the validity of a 1997 Office Memorandum that withdrew an earlier 1970 order which had relaxed qualifying marks for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates in departmental promotion examinations. The appellants argued that the withdrawal violated the constitutional provisions allowing reservat

JAFAR IMAM NAQVIversusELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

2014 INSC 39615 May 2014Dismissed

Jafar Imam Naqvi, a practising advocate, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a mandamus directing the Election Commission of India to take stern action against politicians and parties making hate speeches during the election campaign, including cancellation of party recognition and candidature. The petitione

LICIL ANTONYversusSTATE OF KERALA&ANR.

2014 INSC 27415 April 2014Dismissed

The appellant, wife of a man detained under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA), challenged the order of preventive detention on the grounds of an alleged inordinate delay between the alleged smuggling of red sanders (17 Nov 2012) and the issuance of the dete

KAKALI GHOSHversusCHIEF SECRETARY, ANDAMAN & NICOBAR ADMINISTRATION AND ORS.

2014 INSC 27315 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a woman Central Government employee, applied for uninterrupted child care leave (CCL) of 730 days to care for her minor son, but the competent authority granted only 45 days without explaining the refusal of the remaining period. The Central Administrative Tribunal directed the authority to grant the ful

NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITYversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 27515 April 2014Case Allowed

The Supreme Court considered writ petitions filed by the National Legal Services Authority and a transgender association seeking legal recognition of transgender persons' self‑identified gender and the status of a "third gender" under the Constitution. The Court examined constitutional provisions (Arts. 14, 15, 16, 19,

PRAKASHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2014 INSC 27115 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Prakash was accused of murdering Gangamma on 5 November 1990 and of stealing her ornaments. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence: his alleged presence in the victim's house at 1 p.m., a fingerprint on a plastic cover, blood‑stained clothes matching the victim's blood group, recovery of orname

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusROSHAN KHAN & ORS.

2014 INSC 2515 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan prosecuted six accused for gang rape and kidnapping of a 14‑year‑old mentally deficient girl, relying on the victim's testimony, her father's eyewitness account, medical examination, and forensic evidence showing semen on the victims' clothing. The trial court convicted all six under IPC sections

BALAJI STEEL RE-ROLLING MILLSversusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS

2014 INSC 102814 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Balaji Steel Re‑rolling Mills, a partnership engaged in manufacturing hot re‑rolled products, challenged an order of the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs that fixed its production capacity and duty liability. The matter was remanded by the Appellate Tribunal, but on a later appeal the Tribunal dismissed the a

NARESH KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2014 INSC 77714 November 2014Dismissed

Naresh Kumar was married to Rekha Rani, who within ten months complained to her father about dowry harassment by her husband and his family. Despite repeated pleas, the husband threatened divorce and forced her to return to his home, after which she set herself on fire and died. The prosecution proved that the dowry de

SAMEER SINGH AND ANOTHERversusABDUL RAB AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 72114 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Sameer Singh and another, challenged an order of a Sub‑Judge’s execution court that it had become functus officio and therefore could not entertain their application under Order XXI Rules 97, 99 and 101 of the CPC concerning a disputed immovable property. The execution court had earlier executed a decre

AK DEVAIAHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2014 INSC 71514 October 2014Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the appeal of A.K. Devaiah, convicted under Sections 3, 4, 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Sections 498‑A and 304‑B of the IPC for the death of his wife, who committed suicide by self‑immolation within a year of marriage. The prosecution proved that the husband demanded dowry, that the wif

RAUNAQ EDUCATION FOUNDATIONversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2014 INSC 72514 October 2014Dismissed

The Raunaq Education Foundation was allotted 76 acres of forest land by the State of Haryana in 1972 for establishing an educational complex, subject to conditions of timely construction. The foundation failed to develop the school for decades, prompting the Gram Panchayat to seek return of the land, leading to a resum

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusSMT. SUVARNAMMA & ANR.

2014 INSC 71614 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka appealed the acquittal of Smt. Suvarnamma and her husband Manjunath for the dowry‑related death of the bride, Soumya, who died from severe burn injuries within seven years of marriage. The prosecution proved that the accused had harassed the victim for dowry and that the mother‑in‑law poured kero

ANANDA POOJARYversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2014 INSC 72414 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Ananda Poojary, a caretaker of his foster mother Dorathi Kutinho, was convicted under IPC sections 302 and 201 for allegedly murdering her to obtain her property, which she had bequeathed to him subject to marrying a Christian woman. The trial and High Courts relied on a post‑mortem report indicating asphyxia by smothe

DR. THAKAR SINGHversusSH. MULA SINGH (D) THR. LR. & ORS.

2014 INSC 71414 October 2014Disposed off

Dr. Thakar Singh and others mortgaged several shops in Moga to Suba Singh and Saudagar Singh in 1942, later redeeming the mortgage in 1969. The mortgagees, however, retained possession and leased the premises to several tenants. The mortgagors sued for possession, and the lower court held the suit barred under the Rent

RAJNI RANI & ANR.versusKHAIRATI LAL & ORS.

2014 INSC 72214 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants filed a suit for declaration of ownership of a share in land and an injunction. The defendants filed a counter‑claim asserting title under a Will dated 18‑May‑1995, which the trial judge dismissed as barred by Order 2, Rule 2 of the CPC because the plea had not been raised in the earlier suit. The High C

RAJIB RANJAN & ORS.versusR. VIJAYKUMAR

2014 INSC 71714 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board rejected R. Vijaykumar's tender after a performance report, prepared by the appellants (public servants), found his equipment unsatisfactory. Vijaykumar unsuccessfully pursued civil remedies, withdrew his suit, and then filed a criminal complaint alleging forgery and conspiracy

P.S. MEHERHOMJIversusK.T. VIJAY KUMAR & ORS.

2014 INSC 71014 October 2014Dismissed

The appellant, a company secretary of Rallis India Ltd., was accused in a private complaint of defamation under Sections 499 and 500 IPC for a letter allegedly sent to Ashika Capital Ltd. that contained false allegations against the complainants. The trial court took cognizance of the complaint and summoned the appella

OM PRAKASHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2014 INSC 101814 October 2014Dismissed

The victim, a 15‑year‑old girl, was allegedly lured to the house of Chhoti under the pretext of fetching lassi, where Om Prakash and Kartar Singh locked the door and raped her. The FIR was lodged after a 20‑day delay, explained by the victim’s mother’s absence. Evidence—including the victim’s testimony, medical examina

R. N. AGARWALversusR. C. BANSAL & ORS.

2014 INSC 72014 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The CBI filed a charge‑sheet in a Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act against six persons for conspiracy, forgery and corruption. The Special Judge, exercising powers under Section 5 of the Act and the Code of Criminal Procedure, summoned three additional persons who had been listed as witnesses. The D

SMT. USHA KAPOOR & ORS.versusGOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 99114 August 2014Dismissed

The Government of India issued two notices in 2001‑2002 for the resumption of a 3.20‑acre bungalow site in the Allahabad cantonment, invoking powers under Order No.179 of the Governor‑General‑in‑Council dated 12 September 1836. The appellants, Smt. Usha Kapoor and others, contended that they owned the land by virtue of

MIS. OPERA HOUSE EXPORTS LTD. ETC. & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. ETC.

2014 INSC 98214 July 2014Appeal(s) allowed

MIS Opera House Exports Ltd. and others were adjudicated under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) for alleged violations relating to export bill realizations. The adjudicating authority issued an order on 11 October 2007, which was served on the company on 25 October 2007. The company filed an appeal befo

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERSversusDHANJIT SINGH SANDHU

2014 INSC 19414 March 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent was allotted a plot in 1986 with a condition to complete construction within three years under the Punjab Estates (Development and Regulation) Act, 1964. Failing to build, the authority demanded a non‑construction/extension fee to avoid resumption of the plot, which the respondent paid. Later he sought a

J. RAJIV SUBRAMANIYAN & ANR.versusM/S. PANDIYAS & ORS.

2014 INSC 19614 March 2014Disposed off

The borrowers (respondent Nos. 1 and 2) defaulted on loans from State Bank of India, leading the bank to invoke the SARFAESI Act and issue demand and possession notices. The bank later approved a private‑treaty sale of the mortgaged immovable assets to the appellants for a consideration barely above the reserve price.

RAJASTHAN STATE TPT CORPN. & ANR.versusBAJRANG LAL

2014 INSC 19214 March 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (the Corporation) appealed against judgments that had upheld a civil suit filed by its former trainee conductor, Bajrang Lal, challenging his removal from service for alleged embezzlement. The lower courts had found that the disciplinary enquiry violated principles of natu

GAJANAN KAMLYA PATILversusADDL. COLLECTOR & COMP. AUTH. & ORS.

2014 INSC 9914 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Gajanan Kamlya Patil, a landowner, was served a notice under Section 10(5) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 demanding surrender of possession of his land, with a threat of force if he failed to comply. The notice was issued after the Act had been repealed by the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) R

BIRJUversusSTATE OF M.P.

2014 INSC 9814 February 2014Disposed off

The appellant Birju was convicted for the murder of a one‑year‑old child, shot with a pistol after the child’s grandfather refused to give him money for liquor. The trial court and the High Court sentenced him to death, invoking his extensive criminal record as an aggravating factor. On appeal, the Supreme Court examin

V.K. VERMAversusCBI

2014 INSC 10314 February 2014Case Partly allowed

V.K. Verma was convicted under Section 161 of the IPC and Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 for demanding a bribe of Rs.265 in 1984. The trial court sentenced him to one and a half years’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.5,000 on each count, which the High Court uphe

VOLTAS LTD.versusROLTA INDIA LTD.

2014 INSC 10214 February 2014Case Partly allowed

Voltas Ltd. and Rolta India Ltd. entered into civil construction contracts which later gave rise to disputes and termination. The appellant invoked the arbitration clause in 2006, after which the respondent filed a counter claim of Rs.333.73 crores in 2011. The key issue was whether the counter claim was barred by limi

M/S SIEMENS AKTIENGESELISCHAFT & S. LTD.versusDMRC LTD. & ORS.

2014 INSC 10114 February 2014Dismissed

Siemens and other bidders challenged the award of a contract by the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) for 486 standard gauge cars to Hyundai Rotem, arguing that the GEC (energy consumption) values used to adjust bids were untenable and that the Government’s appointment of a committee to review the tender process whil

ENERCON (INDIA) LTD. & ORS.versusENERCON GMBH & ANR.

2014 INSC 10014 February 2014Disposed off

The parties to a joint venture executed an Intellectual Property License Agreement (IPLA) containing an arbitration clause, but the appellants argued that the IPLA was not a concluded contract and therefore no arbitration agreement existed. The Supreme Court held that the arbitration clause is separable from the underl

K. SUBRAMANIversusK. DAMODARA NAIDU

2014 INSC 77613 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant, a government college lecturer, alleged that the accused, also a lecturer, borrowed Rs 14 lakhs in cash in 1997 and issued post‑dated cheques which were later dishonoured, leading to a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding that the

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusSURENDRA SINGH

2014 INSC 77413 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against a High Court order that reduced the sentence of Surendra Singh, who was convicted for causing death by rash and negligent driving of a jeep. The trial court had sentenced him under IPC sections 279, 337 and 304‑A to six months and two years of rigorous imprisonment

GHANSHYAM SARDAversusM/S. SHIV SHANKAR TRADING CO. & ORS.

2014 INSC 77513 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a dispute concerning J.K. Jute Mill Company Ltd., a sick industrial company under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA), whose net worth had reportedly turned positive. The plaintiff sought a civil court declaration that the company was no longer a sick company,

VINOD KUMARversusGANGADHAR

2014 INSC 70813 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Vinod Kumar filed a suit for specific performance of a contract to purchase a house; the trial court dismissed the suit and the High Court, acting as the first appellate court, affirmed the dismissal. The appellant contended that the High Court had not examined the evidence, ignored the submissions and grounds of appea

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusMOHAMMAD MUSLIM TAGALA

2014 INSC 71013 October 2014Disposed off

The respondent was convicted under Sections 363, 366A and 376 of the IPC and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. On appeal before the Rajasthan High Court, his counsel only sought a direction that the State Government exercise its power under Section 433 of the CrPC to commute the sentence, and the public prosecutor di

RAKESH &ANRversusSTATE OF U.P. &ANR.

2014 INSC 54413 August 2014Dismissed

An FIR under Section 364 IPC was lodged against the appellants. The police investigation concluded that no case was made out and submitted a final report under Section 173 CrPC, which the magistrate accepted. Despite accepting the negative report, the magistrate also ordered the case to proceed as a complaint, recorded

NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY & ORS.versusTRIPPLE ENGINEERING WORKS

2014 INSC 54313 August 2014Dismissed

The North Eastern Railway terminated two contracts awarded to the respondent contractor in 1994, after which arbitration proceedings were initiated in 1996 under a clause that required the arbitrators to be gazetted railway officers. Despite the passage of nearly two decades, no arbitral award had been rendered, and th

PURSHOTTAM DAS TANDON DEAD BY LRS.versusMILITARY ESTATE OFFICER & ORS.

2014 INSC 54113 August 2014Dismissed

The appellant, the estate of the deceased, claimed ownership of a bungalow and the land on which it stood, asserting title derived from a purchase in 1848. The Union of India contended that an 1836 grant vested only the building in the appellant’s ancestors, with the land remaining subject to a right of resumption. The

BALRAM SINGH YADAV@ BALRAM YADAVversusABHAY KUMAR SINGH

2014 INSC 39413 May 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Abhay Kumar Singh, filed a nomination for a Bihar Legislative Council seat but the Returning Officer rejected his papers for not attaching the current electoral roll required under Section 33(5) of the Representation of People Act, 1951, as he belonged to a different constituency. The High Court set asi

RISAL SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2014 INSC 39513 May 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Assistant Sub‑Inspector Risal Singh was dismissed by the Superintendent of Police under Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution, who dispensed with a disciplinary inquiry and gave no reasons for the dismissal. The appellant challenged the order, arguing that a reason must be ascribed when an inquiry is waived, and the Hi

KANHAIYA LALversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2014 INSC 19013 March 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Kanhaiya Lal was convicted under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC for the murder of Kala, whose body was recovered from a well belonging to the appellant. The prosecution's case rested on the fact that the deceased and the appellant were last seen together at a neighbour's house and on an alleged motive of

BHAGWAN TUKARAM DANGEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2014 INSC 18813 March 2014Disposed off

The appellant, Bhagwan Tukaram Dange, and his father were convicted of murdering Dange's wife by beating, dousing her with kerosene and setting her on fire while intoxicated. The prosecution's case relied on two dying declarations recorded by a head constable and a special judicial magistrate, both corroborated by the

BASTIRAMversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2014 INSC 9713 February 2014Dismissed

The case involved four appellants who, armed with pistols, attacked the complainant’s party, causing three deaths and one injury. They were convicted under Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 34 of the IPC. On appeal, the appellants argued that one of them, Bastiram, was not present at the scene and that medical (po

AMIT CHANCHAL JHAversusREGISTRAR HIGH COURT OF DELHI

2014 INSC 86512 December 2014Dismissed

Advocate Amit Chanchal Jha was convicted by the Delhi High Court for criminal contempt after allegedly abusing a lady advocate in the courtroom, resulting in a seven‑day imprisonment, three‑month debarment and a direction to refer the matter to the Bar Council of India. Jha appealed to the Supreme Court, contending tha

AJAY KUMAR PALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2014 INSC 86712 December 2014Case Allowed

Ajay Kumar Pal was sentenced to death by a Special CBI Judge on 9 April 2007, a sentence confirmed by the Jharkhand High Court and the Supreme Court on 16 March 2010. He filed a mercy petition on 10 April 2010, which was forwarded immediately but only disposed of after a delay of three years and ten months, with the Pr

M/S. NOVA ADSversusMETROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS.

2014 INSC 86412 December 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the Chennai City Municipal Corporation (the Corporation) or the Metropolitan Transport Corporation (MTCL) had statutory authority to erect and manage bus shelters under the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919. By interpreting Sections 203, 285, and 285‑A, the Court held that

M/S. NOVA ADSversusMETROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS.

2014 INSC 86412 December 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the Chennai City Municipal Corporation (the Corporation) or the Metropolitan Transport Corporation (MTCL) had statutory authority to erect and manage bus shelters under the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919. By interpreting Sections 203, 204, 285, 285‑A and related provisio

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM/S. AGARWAL IRON INDUSTRIES

2014 INSC 77212 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India challenged the Allahabad High Court's order quashing a search and seizure conducted under Section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act at the premises of M/s Agarwal Iron Industries. The High Court had held that the search warrant was issued mechanically without a reasonable basis. The Supreme Court examined

INDIAN COUNCIL OF MEDICAL RESEARCHversusT.N. SANIKOP & ANR. ETC. ETC.

2014 INSC 102712 November 2014Case Partly allowed

The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) sought to acquire 40 guntas of land in Belgaum for a medical research centre, and the Land Acquisition Officer initially fixed compensation at Rs 1,050 per gunta. The reference court enhanced this to Rs 7,000 per gunta, and the Karnataka High Court further raised it to Rs 9

EMBASSY HOTELS PVT.LTD.versusMIS. GAJARAJ & CO. & ORS.

2014 INSC 102612 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Embassy Hotels Pvt. Ltd. filed a suit for specific performance of a 1978 agreement for sale of land that had been mortgaged by the vendor, M/s. Gajaraj & Co., to Srinivasa Perumal Financing Corporation. The mortgaged land was sold by court auction to the appellant, who obtained a sale certificate that was confirmed by

SARDAR TAJENDER SINGH GHAMBHIR AND ANOTHERversusSARDAR GURPREET SINGH & OTHERS

2014 INSC 62712 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration and injunction and later amended the plaint, increasing the valuation and creating a deficiency in court fee. The trial court did not order a time limit for payment of the deficit fee. The defendants appealed; the first appellate court observed the lack of a time order and al

UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHERversusSANJEEV V. DESHPANDE

2014 INSC 53812 August 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether Section 8 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985 applies to psychotropic substances that are listed in the Act’s Schedule but not in Schedule‑I of the NDPS Rules. It held that the prohibition in Section 8 is absolute and covers all such substances, and that

KURATIKAR SUDHAKARversusSTATE OF AN DH RA PRADESH

2014 INSC 53912 August 2014Dismissed

The appellant was charged with murder under Section 302 IPC for hacking a father and son to death with an axe while they slept. The trial court acquitted him, citing a 17‑hour delay in lodging the FIR, the absence of a proven motive, and the claim that the family witnesses could not have seen the accused. On appeal, th

GOVT. OF A.P. & ANR.versusB. JAGJEEVAN RAO

2014 INSC 97312 May 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a government servant, was convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced to one year’s rigorous imprisonment. The High Court, on an application under Section 389(1) of the Cr.P.C., suspended the execution of the sentence but did not stay the conviction. The Department dismissed the

T. N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPADversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 18212 March 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court disposed of several interlocutory applications filed by various States seeking greater releases from the Ad‑hoc Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA). The Court modified its earlier order of July 2009, directing the National CAMPA Advisory Council (NCAC) to issue gu

JUMNI AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2014 INSC 18412 March 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved six in‑laws accused of murdering Asha Devi, who died from extensive burns. The prosecution's case rested solely on Asha Devi's dying declaration implicating all six accused. Two of the accused, Prem Nath and Raj Bala, raised an alibi, presenting multiple witnesses showing they were at work and elsewhe

SUDIPTA LENKAversusSTATE OF ODISHA AND ORS.

2014 INSC 18712 March 2014Disposed off

A contractual government teacher in Odisha was sexually harassed by a Sub‑Inspector of Schools, lodged multiple complaints, and was later set ablaze, dying from her injuries. The petitioner, a law student, filed a writ under Article 32 seeking transfer of the investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) a

PHATU ROCHIRAM MULCHANDANIversusKARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD & ORS.

2014 INSC 18512 March 2014Dismissed

The appellant, a promoter/shareholder of Relectronics Ltd., challenged the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board’s termination of a lease‑cum‑sale agreement for two industrial plots allotted to the company, arguing that the company owned the land and that the Board required prior court permission under the Compa

PRAVASI BHALAI SANGATHANversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 18312 March 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard a public‑interest writ petition filed by Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan seeking pre‑emptive orders against hate speeches by elected representatives, arguing that such speeches violate Articles 14, 15, 19, 21 and fundamental duties. The Court examined whether existing statutes—IPC, SC/ST (Prevention of

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - ILLversusM/S.CALCUTTA KNITWEARS, LUDHIANA

2014 INSC 18612 March 2014Dismissed

The case concerned a search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act on two premises of the Bhatia Group, which led the assessing officer to record a satisfaction note under Section 15880 on 15 July 2005, after the block assessment of the searched person was completed on 30 March 2005. The respondent, M/s Calcutta Knitw

G. DHANASEKARversusM.D. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPN. LTD.

2014 INSC 9612 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a 46‑year‑old tourist‑taxi driver, suffered fractures to his right arm and leg in a collision with a bus operated by the respondent. He claimed compensation under s.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, asserting functional disability of 35% that impaired his earning capacity. The Motor Accident Claims Tr

RENU & ORS.versusDISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, TIS HAZARI & ANR.

2014 INSC 9512 February 2014Disposed off

The appeal arose from the appointment of Class IV staff in courts subordinate to the Delhi High Court on an ad‑hoc basis without proper advertisement, which the petitioners challenged as violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court examined whether such appointments could be regularised, wheth

MITHILESH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2014 INSC 104011 December 2014Case Allowed

The petition was filed by the father of a college girl who died after falling from a hostel roof, alleging that the death resulted from ragging and that the Rajasthan police investigation was biased, incomplete, and failed to record the victim's statement. The petitioner sought a transfer of the investigation to the Ce

SRI PRABIN RAM PHUKAN &ANR.versusSTATE OF ASSAM & ORS.

2014 INSC 86011 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, co‑landholders of a 59‑bigha estate in Assam, failed to pay Rs 731.70 land revenue, leading the Deputy Commissioner to auction the land under Section 70 of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886. No proper notice of demand or sale was served on the appellants, and the auction attracted no bidders,

CHANDANA DASversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

2014 INSC 62311 December 2014Matter referred to larger bench

The case concerned the Khalsa Girls High School, a Sikh‑run school in Calcutta, and whether it qualified as a minority institution under Articles 26 and 30 of the Constitution, thereby entitled to appoint its own teachers without complying with Rule 28 of the 1969 Management Rules. The appellants, two teachers appointe

O.M. CHERIAN @ THANKACHANversusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2014 INSC 76811 November 2014Case Partly allowed

The appellant O.M. Cherian (Thankachan) was convicted under Sections 498A and 306 IPC for the suicide of his wife and was sentenced to two years and seven years of rigorous imprisonment respectively, with the sentences ordered to run consecutively by the trial court and the Kerala High Court. The appeal before the Supr

JOGINDER SINGHversusUNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH & ORS.

2014 INSC 102511 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Joginder Singh, selected for the post of Constable in Chandigarh Police, was denied appointment after a criminal case (FIR No. 200) was discovered during verification. He had been honourably acquitted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani, on 4 October 1999. The appellant disclosed the existence of the case and its

NAR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2014 INSC 77011 November 2014Disposed off

Nar Singh was convicted under Section 302 IPC and Section 25(1B) of the Arms Act for the murder of Rajbir, based largely on circumstantial evidence and a forensic science laboratory (FSL) report (Ex‑P12) linking a recovered bullet to a country‑made pistol. The trial court and the High Court failed to put the FSL report

COLLECTOR SINGHversusL.M.L. LTD., KANPUR

2014 INSC 76911 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Collector Singh, a semi‑skilled workman, was dismissed by L.M.L. Ltd. after a departmental inquiry found him guilty of throwing jute/cotton waste balls at a foreman and allegedly using abusive language. The Labour Court upheld the dismissal, relying on the appellant's apology letter, and the High Court affirmed that aw

SUKHJIT SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2014 INSC 58811 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Sukhjit Singh was convicted under Section 364 IPC for allegedly abducting his wife Kuljit Kaur and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment. The trial court and the High Court upheld the conviction, relying mainly on evidence establishing the marital relationship, while ignoring the mother’s testimon

C. P. JOHNversusBABU M. PALISSERY & ORS.

2014 INSC 62511 September 2014Dismissed

C.P. John, a losing candidate, filed an election petition challenging the election of Babu M. Palissery on grounds of bribery, false pamphlet distribution and alleged suppression of criminal convictions. The High Court dismissed the petition, holding it lacked material facts and was non‑compliant with Section 83 of the

PAWAN KUMAR RALLIversusMANINDER SINGH NARULA

2014 INSC 53711 August 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, having given a loan of Rs.60 lakh, received three cheques from the respondent which were dishonoured by stop‑payment. He issued a handwritten notice on 27 April 2012 and a formal legal notice on 24 May 2012 demanding payment, and subsequently filed a criminal complaint under Sections 138, 141, 142 of the

GANESH DATTversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2014 INSC 42011 June 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted for the murder of Prabhunath and the assault of his son Moti Lal, based on the prosecution’s claim that they attacked the victims with firearms, an axe and lathis. The trial court and the High Court upheld convictions under sections 302, 307, 324, 147, 148 read with 149 of the IPC. On appe

DHARAM DEO YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

2014 INSC 26511 April 2014Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Dharam Deo Yadav, was convicted for the murder of a New Zealand tourist, Diana Clare Routley, based largely on circumstantial evidence, including eyewitnesses who saw the accused with the victim, the accused's confession leading police to a skeleton recovered from his house, and DNA testing that matched

MADHUKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2014 INSC 26911 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Madhukar, a former government employee who resigned on 18 July 1960 and immediately joined Hislop College as a lecturer, retired from the college on 24 May 1983. He sought to have his earlier government service (21 June 1950 to 17 July 1960) counted for pension under the Government Resolution dated 11 March 1992, which

MAHINDER DUTT SHARMAversusU.0.1. & ORS.

2014 INSC 26711 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Mahinder Dutt Sharma, a police constable, was dismissed for a 320‑day unauthorized and willful absence. After serving 24 years with commendations, he sought compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, citing family deaths, his wife's cancer and his own ill‑health. The Depu

ANNAPURNAversusMALLIKARJUN & ANR.

2014 INSC 26811 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The judgment debtor sought to set aside a court‑sale of his house under Order XXI Rule 89 of the CPC but failed to make the mandatory deposit of the sale price. The executing court rejected his application and the appellate court dismissed his appeal. He then filed a writ petition, and the High Court, relying on a late

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusMANOJ KUMAR

2014 INSC 26611 April 2014Dismissed

The State of Rajasthan appealed against the Rajasthan High Court’s judgment that acquitted two accused (Hemant Kumar and Manoj Kumar) and convicted Raju (Raj Kumar) for the death of Anirudh Mishra arising out of a property dispute. The accused claimed the right of private defence. The Supreme Court examined whether the

DINESHAN K.K.versusR.K. SINGH & ANR.

2014 INSC 18111 March 2014

The petitioner obtained a writ from the Gauhati High Court directing the Union of India to re‑designate him as a Warrant Officer and extend his pay. The Union appealed to the Supreme Court (Civil Appeal No. 25 of 2008), which dismissed the appeal, thereby upholding the High Court’s directions. The petitioner later file

VIJAYANDER KUMAR & ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.

2014 INSC 8911 February 2014Dismissed

The appellants, directors of a textile firm, were accused by a supplier (informant) of fraudulently transferring company assets and issuing post‑dated cheques that later bounced, leading to an FIR under Sections 420 and 120‑B IPC. The police concluded the matter was civil, but the magistrate rejected this view and took

DR. PURSHOTAM KUMAR KAUNDALversusSTATE OF H.P. AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 9311 February 2014Dismissed

Dr. D.D. Gupta, a lecturer with an MD in Pharmacology from Maharishi Dayanand University, was denied consideration for promotion to Assistant Professor by the Departmental Promotion Committee on the ground that his degree was not recognized by the Medical Council of India (MCI). He challenged the decision, and the High

DR. SUHAS H. POPHALEversusORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ITS ESTATE OFFICER

2014 INSC 9211 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Suhas H. Pophale occupied a flat in the Indian Mercantile Mansion under a leave‑and‑license agreement dated 20‑12‑1972, which was later deemed a tenancy under Section 15A of the Bombay Rent Act (effective 1‑Feb‑1973). The premises became owned by Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., a government‑owned company, on 1‑Jan‑197

BALURAMversusP. CHELLATHANGAM & ORS.

2014 INSC 85810 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff sought specific performance of a sale agreement entered into by the trustees of the Subbaiah Paniker Family Welfare Trust. The appellant, a beneficiary of the trust, applied to be impleaded as a defendant, alleging prejudice if the sale proceeded at the agreed price. The trial court allowed his impleadmen

SHLOK BHARDWAJversusRUNIKABHARDWAJ & ORS.

2014 INSC 85410 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The husband and wife married in 1996; the husband filed for divorce in 1997 and the wife filed a criminal case alleging cruelty under Sections 498‑A, 406, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial magistrate acquitted all accused in 2002. While the parties later settled their differences and obta

GM. (OPERATIONS) S.B.I. &ANR.versusR. PERIYASAMY

2014 INSC 85510 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

R. Periyasamy, a permanent cash officer of State Bank of India, was dismissed after a departmental enquiry found, on a preponderance of probabilities, that he was responsible for a cash shortage of Rs.1,25,000 and had violated service rules. The dismissal was upheld by the disciplinary authority and departmental appeal

CHARU KHURANA & OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2014 INSC 102410 November 2014Hearing Adjourned

The petitioners, female make‑up artists, challenged the Cine Costume Make‑up Artists and Hair Dressers Association's bye‑laws that barred women from obtaining make‑up artist cards and required a five‑year Maharashtra residence. The Court examined the constitutional guarantees of equality (Arts. 14, 15, 21), the right t

M/S. BHAGWATI VANASPATI TRADERSversusSENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES, MEERUT

2014 INSC 70310 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Bhagwati Vanaspati Traders, a sole proprietorship of B.K. Garg, bought a six‑year National Savings Certificate (NSC) in 1995. On maturity in 2001 the postal authorities refused to pay the Rs 10,075 due, contending that an NSC could be issued only in an individual’s name and the certificate was therefore invalid. Th

A. TAJUDEENversusUNION OF INDIA

2014 INSC 70210 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant A. Tajudeen was prosecuted under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 for allegedly receiving foreign exchange without an authorized dealer. The Enforcement Directorate relied on a purported statement made on 20‑April‑1989, statements recorded during a raid on 25‑Oct‑1989 and while in custody on 26‑O

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.versusRAMANAND PANDEY

2014 INSC 70410 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Ramanand Pandey, a Rural Agricultural Extension Officer, was promoted to Agriculture Development Officer (ADO) on 23 December 2005, with a condition that the Deputy Director verify any pending disciplinary inquiry. No such inquiry existed, but Pandey sent a representation on 14 August 2006 stating a complaint was pendi

RASHEEDA KHATOON (D) THROUGH LRS.versusASHIQ ALI S/O LT. ABU MOHD (D) THROUGH LRS.

2014 INSC 70110 October 2014Dismissed

The case concerned an alleged oral gift (hiba) of a house by Abdul Haq, a Muslim, to Rasheeda Khatoon about seven years before his death. After Haq's death, his heirs sought possession, prompting Rasheeda to file a suit for declaration of ownership. The trial court and first appellate court held the oral gift valid, de

BASAPPA S/O SANGANABASAPPA BAHVIKATTIversusT. RAMESH S/O TANGAVELU AND ANR.

2014 INSC 70510 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Basappa, a construction worker (Goundi), was seriously injured when a bus driven rashly collided with his motorcycle, resulting in a permanent disability of 58% to his whole body. He filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, seeking Rs 15,00,000; the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 93,80

MD. JAMILUDIN NASIRversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2014 INSC 70710 October 2014Case Allowed

The Supreme Court delivered a judgment on 21 May 2014 in MD Jamiluddin Nasir v. State of West Bengal concerning an alleged offence of waging war against the State under IPC 121. Subsequent to that judgment, the parties filed criminal miscellaneous petitions seeking correction of typographical and factual errors in the

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusASSOCIATED CONTRACTORS

2014 INSC 100110 September 2014Dismissed

The State of West Bengal filed a Section 34 application to set aside an arbitral award before the District Court of Jalpaiguri, while the High Court of Calcutta had earlier entertained interim relief under Section 9 and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11. The High Court held that, under Section 42 of the Arbitrat

MADHYA PRADESH STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITYversusPRATEEK JAIN & ANR.

2014 INSC 62110 September 2014Disposed off

The dispute arose under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act between Prateek Jain (complainant) and Rakesh Kumar Jain (accused). While a criminal appeal was pending, the parties settled and filed a joint application under Section 147 seeking compounding and requested that the matter be taken before a Lok Adala

STATE OF JHARKHANDversusBHADEY MUNDA & ANR.

2014 INSC 100310 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, who were Functional Managers in the erstwhile State of Bihar, were recommended for promotion to General Manager/Deputy Director by a Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) on 15 February 1999. After the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 bifurcated Bihar and created the State of Jharkhand, the respondents

MAHAMADKHAN NATHEKHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2014 INSC 100210 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Three accused were tried for the murder of Firozbhai under Sections 302, 120(8), 201 of the IPC and Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act. The trial court acquitted them, finding that the prosecution's circumstantial case did not establish a homicidal death and that the injury could have been accidental. The Gujarat High Co

SANGILI @ SANGANATHANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2014 INSC 62010 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sangili, was convicted of murdering a schoolboy, Muthuramaligam, on the basis of circumstantial evidence that included a phone call, alleged motive, and the recovery of a bicycle and knives. The prosecution failed to produce any eyewitnesses, did not establish a motive, and could not prove the last seen

SREE BALAJI NAGAR RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2014 INSC 61710 September 2014Disposed off

The appellants, a residents' association, challenged land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for a canal scheme, where an award was made on 30‑Nov‑2006 but physical possession of the land was never taken and the proceedings were stayed by the courts. The Right to Fair Compensation an

VADODARA MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusPURSHOTTAM V. MURJANI AND ORS.

2014 INSC 61610 September 2014Dismissed

A boat operated by Ripple Aqua Sports under a licence from Vadodara Municipal Corporation was overloaded with 38 passengers (capacity 22) and capsized, killing 22. The victims filed a consumer complaint alleging deficiency in service. The State Consumer Commission and the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

UNION OF INDIA & ANRversusJAI KISHUN SINGH (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.

2014 INSC 61810 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether a Freedom Fighter pension granted to the deceased respondent was improperly awarded, as he was only 7‑8 years old in 1942 and could not have participated in the freedom struggle. Documentary evidence, including a 1975 voter list and a 1977 deposition, showed his age to be about 42 in

M/S SHAHA RATANSI KHIMJI & SONSversusPROPOSED KUMBHAR SONS HOTEL P. LTD. & ORS.

2014 INSC 48210 July 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, M/s Shaha Ratansi Khimji & Sons, held a lease over a godown on a portion of land. The respondent, Proposed Kumbhar Sons Hotel Ltd., purchased the lessor's interest, demolished the building and dug a trench that threatened the godown, and asked the appellant to vacate. The appellant claimed that the lease

EASWARIversusPARVATHI & ORS.

2014 INSC 48310 July 2014Dismissed

The plaintiffs, as legal heirs of the deceased Ponnangatti Gounder and his predeceased wife, sued for declaration and injunction over two properties (Schedule A – ancestral, Schedule B – self‑acquired). The trial court decreed in their favour for both properties. The first appellate court reversed the decree concerning

MD. JAMILUDIN NASIRversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2015 INSC 31610 April 2015Case Allowed

The appellants were convicted under Section 121 of the Indian Penal Code for waging war against the State in a trial court in West Bengal. They appealed the conviction to the Calcutta High Court, which upheld the judgment. Subsequently, the appellants filed Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions before the Supreme Court seek

K V.S. RAOversusC.B.I & ORS

2014 INSC 18010 March 2014Case Allowed

The petitioners sought transfer of two criminal proceedings pending in the Special Court, Lucknow, to the Special Court, Delhi, arguing that the cases were similar in nature and that most witnesses were medical officers, with the ultimate decision taken at the ministerial level in Delhi. The CBI opposed the transfer, c

POOJA BHATIAversusVISHNU NARAIN SHIVPURI & ANR.

2014 INSC 17910 March 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Vishnu Narayan Shivpuri was charged under IPC sections 342, 326‑8 and 506 for allegedly throwing sulphuric acid on his wife, Pooja Bhatia. The Sessions Court denied his bail, but the High Court later released him on bail. After his release, the Superintendent of Police submitted a counter‑affidavit stating that Shivpur

PHOOL CHANDRA & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2014 INSC 93810 March 2014Dismissed

The petitioners, convicted under Sections 363, 366 and 506 of the IPC for a kidnapping case, appealed to the Allahabad High Court, were granted bail and sought an early hearing of their criminal appeal. The High Court ordered the case to be released and listed before an appropriate bench, prompting the petitioners to f

M/S ENGINEER BUILDER & ASSOCIATESversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

[2014] 1 S.C.R. 97710 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a construction contractor, obtained an arbitration award on 4 September 2007 and filed an execution petition. The respondents sought to set aside the award under Section 34 of the Jammu and Kashmir Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1997, but the High Court directed them to file under the Jammu and Kashmi

CHENNAI METROPOLITAN WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD AND OTHERSversusT.T. MURALI BABU

2014 INSC 8810 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Junior Engineer of the Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board, was absent without authorization from 28‑08‑1995 to 31‑03‑1997 and submitted a medical certificate belatedly. A charge‑sheet under Regulations 6(1) and 6(2) was issued, the enquiry officer found the charges proved and the dis

PRATIMA CHOWDHURYversusKALPANA MUKHERJEE & ANR.

2014 INSC 8710 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Pratima Chowdhury, a member of a West Bengal cooperative housing society, sought to transfer her flat and membership to Kalpana Mukherjee, claiming the transfer was a gift without consideration. The arbitrator found the transfer invalid, noting that the letters effecting the transfer were likely drafted by Partha Mukhe

MATHEW VARGHESEversusM. AMRITHA KUMAR & ORS.

[2014] 2 S.C.R. 73610 February 2014Disposed off

The case concerned the sale of a mortgaged property by a bank under the SARFAESI Act. The Supreme Court examined whether the bank, as a secured creditor, had complied with Section 13(8) of the Act and Rules 8 and 9, which require a 30‑day individual notice and a public notice before any sale. It held that the sale effe

R. UNNIKRISHNAN AND ANR.versusV.K. MAHANUDEVAN AND ORS.

2014 INSC 1910 January 2014Dismissed

The respondent, V.K. Mahanudevan, obtained a Scheduled Caste (SC) certificate in 1987 after the Kerala High Court accepted a KIRTADS report that he belonged to the Thandan community, a notified SC. Subsequent scrutiny, prompted by a Full Bench observation in Pattika Jathi case, led the State Government to re‑examine hi

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.versusKIRPAL SINGH

2014 INSC 2210 January 2014Dismissed

The respondents, employees of National Insurance Co., opted for voluntary retirement under the General Insurance Employees Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2004 (SVRS 2004) and claimed pension under the General Insurance (Employees) Pension Scheme, 1995. The insurers rejected the claim, arguing that pension under t

STATE OF GUJARATversusRATANSINGH @ CHINUBHAL ANOPSINH CHAUHAN

2014 INSC 2010 January 2014Dismissed

The State of Gujarat charged Ratansingh under sections 376, 302 and 201 of the IPC for the alleged rape and murder of a seven‑year‑old girl. The trial court convicted him, awarding a death sentence for murder and life imprisonment for rape. On appeal, the Gujarat High Court acquitted him, holding that the prosecution’s

HARDEEP SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

2014 INSC 2110 January 2014

The Supreme Court examined the scope of Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which empowers a court to proceed against persons not originally accused if evidence shows their involvement. It held that the power can be exercised at any time after the charge‑sheet is filed and before judgment, provided the

ARUN KUMAR AGRAWALversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 90610 January 2014Disposed off

In Arun Kumar Agrawal v. Union of India & Ors., the Supreme Court considered interlocutory applications filed in a writ petition under Article 32. The petitioner sought to have certain disparaging remarks about his bonafides, made in paragraph 63 of the judgment, expunged, arguing they were irrelevant to the decision.

SELVARAJ @ CHINNAPAIYANversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2014 INSC 8469 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Selvaraj was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly strangling his infant daughter, based on testimony of the mother, mother‑in‑law and a sister, who later turned hostile, and on a medical report that did not conclusively indicate homicide. The Supreme Court examined the credibility of the hostile

K.K. SINGHAL & ORS.versusSTEEL STRIPS LTD.

2014 INSC 8459 December 2014Dismissed

The appellants K.K. Singhal & Ors. issued 33 cheques that were dishonoured, leading the respondent Steel Strips Ltd. to file 26 complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The parties later entered into a settlement at Chandigarh, where the respondent agreed to withdraw the complaints in exchange fo

KUNWARPAL @ SURAJPAL & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANR.

2014 INSC 8499 December 2014Dismissed

The appellants were convicted under IPC sections 302 and 34 for the murder of Ranjit Singh, allegedly attacked with lathis and tabbal by the accused amid a land dispute. The prosecution relied on eye‑witnesses PW3 Atmaram and PW4 Chaman Lal, whose testimonies were corroborated and supported by a post‑mortem report esta

STATE OF M.P.versusRAM MANOHAR PANDEY

[2014] 11 S.C.R. 2689 December 2014Dismissed

Ram Manohar Pandey, a civil engineer on deputation, was charged with corruption offences under Sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Both the Municipal Corporation of Ujjain and the State Government refused to grant sanction for his prosecution while he was in service, yet a charge‑shee

RAKESH MEHTA AND OTHERSversusPUNJAB AND SINO BANK

2014 INSC 10389 December 2014Disposed off

The appellants, originally promoted to the Middle Management Grade Scale‑II (MMGS‑II) in 1996, opted for a horizontal transfer to the Specialist Electronic Data Processors Cadre within the same grade in September 1997. Other officers were promoted vertically from the Junior Management Grade Scale‑I (JMGS‑I) to the same

DURGAPUR CASUAL WORKERS UNION & ORS.versusFOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 8489 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) closed its rice mill and thereafter employed 49 former contract workers as casual daily‑wage employees. The workers sought regularisation, alleging that their continued casualisation constituted an unfair labour practice under item 10 of the Fifth Schedule of the Industrial Disputes

UMA SHANKAR GAUTAMversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2014 INSC 8479 December 2014Dismissed

The appellant, accused No.1, was convicted along with five others for offences under Sections 147, 149 and 302 of the IPC for the murder of Kalua. The High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant and two others, but acquitted accused Nos.5 and 6 on the ground that no lathi injuries were found on the deceased and t

THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC (LAW AND ORDER-F) AND ANOTHER.versusNABILA AND ANOTHER.

2014 INSC 8529 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, the Secretary to the Government (Law & Order‑F), appealed against a Madras High Court order that quashed a preventive detention order issued under Section 3(1)(a) of the National Security Act, 1980 against a man arrested in September 2012 for alleged breach of the Official Secrets Act. The High Court had

DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, HARIDWAR AND ANR.versusHARISH MALHOTRA

2014 INSC 8519 December 2014Dismissed

The respondent, a cable television network operator registered under the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995, began transmitting two private video channels and was directed by the District Magistrate of Haridwar to pay a license fee of Rs.11,88,500 under Rule 17(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Cinema (Regulation o

MOFIL KHAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2014 INSC 10169 October 2014Dismissed

Mofil Khan and two co‑accused brutally murdered eight members of their own family, including women, children and a physically disabled boy, to obtain property. The trial court sentenced them to death, a decision affirmed by the Jharkhand High Court. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the "rarest of rare" doc

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.versusKAUSARBAG COOP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ANR.

2014 INSC 6979 October 2014Dismissed

The case concerned a claim by Kausarbag Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. for Transferable Development Rights (TDR) on a 3.5‑acre parcel that had been acquired by the State under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and shown as an existing garden in the development plan. The Society argued that under Development Control Regu

GENERAL MOTORS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITEDversusASHOK RAMNIK LAL TOLAT & ANR.

2014 INSC 6959 October 2014Case Partly allowed

The complainant purchased a Chevrolet Forester advertised as an SUV capable of off‑road travel, but the vehicle was a passenger car and not fit for the promised use, leading him to allege unfair trade practice under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The District Forum, State Commission and National Consumer Disputes R

STATE OF ORISSA AND ANR.versusFAKIR CHARAN SETHI DEAD THROUGH LRS AND ORS.

2014 INSC 6969 October 2014Disposed off

The respondents claimed tenancy rights over a 4.16‑acre plot based on a 1942 lease (Hatapatta) from the ex‑ruler and alleged continuous possession and cultivation even after the land vested in the State under the Orissa Estate Abolition Act, 1951. The State contested the authenticity of the lease, rent receipts, tenanc

SHREE SHYAMJI TRANSPORT COMPANYversusFOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 6999 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Shree Shyamji Transport Company, submitted a bid for a Mandi Labour Contract (MLC) of the Food Corporation of India (FCI). FCI rejected their bid invoking Clause 4(III) of the Model Tender Form, alleging that the appellants' Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) had been forfeited in an earlier Road Transport Con

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KOLKATAversusKALIPADA BHAKAT & ORS.

2014 INSC 6989 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Port Trust had allotted a plot of land to Raj Virmani on a month‑to‑month lease which was terminated in 1983, and eviction proceedings were instituted against him. In 1992 Kalipada Bhakat appeared before the estate officer as Virmani's power of attorney holder and later occupied the premises without the Trust's per

SRI GANGAI VINAYAGAR TEMPLE & ANR.versusMEENAKSHI AMMAL & ORS.

2014 INSC 6939 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved three interconnected suits concerning a lease of property owned by a private trust: O.S.5/78 filed by the tenants challenging the trust's ownership, and O.S.6/78 and O.S.7/78 filed by the trust for arrears of rent. All three suits were tried together, resulting in a common judgment but separate decree

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusCHANDGI RAM & ORS.

2014 INSC 6149 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan prosecuted Chandgi Ram and others for the murder of Surender, alleging that the accused beat him to death with iron rods, pipes and lathis, constituting offences under IPC s.302 read with s.34 and s.452. The trial court convicted the accused based on the testimony of the deceased's wife, two mino

UNION OF INDIAversusRAJ KUMAR BAGHAL SINGH (DEAD) TH. LRS. & ORS.

2014 INSC 6139 September 2014Dismissed

The Union of India acquired two parcels of land in Punjab for a military cantonment under notifications of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (1989 and 1988). The Collector initially fixed compensation at Rs 2 lakhs per acre, which was later enhanced by the Reference Court and subsequently reduced by the Punjab & Haryana H

GAURAV KUMAR BANSALversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 6159 September 2014Disposed off

The petitioners, Indian seamen and their families, filed writ petitions under Article 32 seeking a direction to the Government of India to intervene and secure the release of Indian crew members held hostage by Somali pirates and to frame anti‑piracy guidelines. The Government responded with an affidavit detailing the

STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.versusASHOK KUMAR SINGH & ORS.

2014 INSC 4819 July 2014Dismissed

The State of Bihar filed a criminal appeal against an FIR lodged in 2002 against IAS officer Ashok Kumar Singh for alleged corruption while he was Managing Director of the Bihar State Financial Corporation. The FIR was issued by the Bihar Vigilance Investigation Bureau after the bifurcation of Bihar into Bihar and Jhar

PUNJAB UNIVERSITYversusUNIT TRUST OF INDIA & ORS

2014 INSC 4809 July 2014Disposed off

Punjab University and Punjab Agricultural University invested in Unit Trust of India's Institutional Investors Special Fund Unit Scheme‑1998, expecting a guaranteed 13.5% return and repurchase at par. When the maturity proceeds fell short, they filed complaints before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.versusAHMEDABAD GREEN BELT KHEDUT MANDAL & ORS.

2014 INSC 3829 May 2014Disposed off

The Gujarat government prepared a development plan in 1987 reserving a "green belt" for public housing. After ten years the reservation lapsed under Section 20 of the Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976. The Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority later framed a town‑planning scheme reserving the same l

SUBRATA CHATTORAJversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 3929 May 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined petitions seeking to shift investigation of the multi‑state chit‑fund (Ponzi) scam, which defrauded lakhs of depositors of roughly Rs 10,000 crore, from the State Police to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The scam involved companies operating across West Bengal, Tripura, Assam and

CHANDRA PRAKASHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2014 INSC 3859 May 2014Dismissed

On 26 January 1996 a bomb exploded at the SMS Stadium in Jaipur, leading to the arrest of six accused, including Chandra Prakash, Abdul Mateen and others. The prosecution relied on the testimony of an approver (PW‑1) who implicated the accused, on material recovered from the accused’s premises (ammonium nitrate, dynami

ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIAversusSTATE OF M.P. & ORS.

2014 INSC 9729 May 2014Dismissed

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and a public‑spirited petitioner sought a writ directing the preservation of the Bade Baba Jain Temple at Kundalpur, Madhya Pradesh, alleging illegal construction by the Jain Temple Trust and claiming the site was a protected monument of national importance under the Ancient Mon

KISAN SHANKAR KATHOREversusARUN DATTATRAY SAWANT & ORS

2014 INSC 3849 May 2014Dismissed

Kisan Shankar Kathore was elected to the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, but a voter filed an election petition under RPA s.100(1)(d)(i) and (iv) alleging that Kathore’s nomination was improperly accepted because he failed to disclose government dues, his wife’s bungalow and vehicle, and his interest in a partnership

SWAPNIL AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2014 INSC 3939 May 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The husband, Swapnil, filed an application for restitution of conjugal rights, but his wife left the matrimonial home in April 2011 and later lodged two police complaints alleging dowry demands and threats to kill. A First Class Judicial Magistrate framed charges under IPC sections 498A and 506 Part II and under Sectio

COFFEE BOARDversusM/S. RAMESH EXPORTS PVT. LTD.

2014 INSC 3919 May 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Coffee Board, a statutory body, failed to provide International Coffee Organization (ICO) export stamps to Ramesh Exports, causing loss of shipment and recall costs. The exporter filed two suits: O.S. No.3150 of 1985 for loss due to delayed shipment and O.S. No.4763 of 1986 for costs arising from the recall. The tr

DHAN RAJ @ DHANDversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2014 INSC 3869 May 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the convictions of Ohan Raj and Badal for murder and robbery, which were based primarily on circumstantial evidence, the extra‑judicial confession of a co‑accused, and the recovery of a briefcase and wrist‑watch. The Court held that the co‑accused’s confessions were inconsistent—naming differ

MOSIRUDDIN MUNSHIversusMD. SIRAJ AND ANOTHER

2014 INSC 3879 May 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant, Mosiruddin Munshi, paid Rs.5,00,001 to the accused for a plot of land but the seller failed to deliver title documents, prompting a criminal complaint under IPC sections 420 and 1208. The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate treated the complaint as an FIR and ordered investigation under CrPC secti

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusMAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD.

2014 INSC 3839 May 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India challenged two show‑cause notices issued to Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. for alleged short payment of excise duty for the years 1982‑85, contending that the Department had misapplied Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. The High Court set aside the notices, holding that the post‑1996 amendment to Section

NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD MIHONA AND ANR.versusMADHYA PRADESH MUNICIPALITIES ACT, 1961

2014 INSC 2639 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Nagar Palika Parishad, Mihona issued notices under the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 to Ramnath for encroaching on a public road. Ramnath filed a suit seeking declaration of title over the land and a permanent injunction, claiming ancestral ownership. The trial court and two appellate courts held the suit

MURALIDHAR @ GIDDA & ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2014 INSC 2619 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were charged with murder and related offences based primarily on a dying declaration (Ex.P‑22) recorded by a police constable who wrote the victim's words as dictated by a police inspector, with later overwriting and insertion of names in different ink. The trial court found the declaration unreliable, n

JACKYversusTINY@ ANTONY & ORS.

2014 INSC 2629 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, claiming ownership of a shop, filed a civil suit against the respondent‑tenant. The respondent filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking to quash the plaint and the suit proceedings. The Kerala High Court entertained the writ and set aside the plaint, imposing costs on

MAJOR GENERAL H.M. SINGH, VSMversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2014 INSC 189 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Major General H.M. Singh, the senior most Major General in the DRDO, was recommended by a Selection Board for promotion to Lieutenant General. As he was due to superannuate on 29‑Feb‑2008, the President granted two extensions of service under Army Rule 16A to allow his promotion to be considered. The Appointments Commi

CREDIT SOCIETY EMPLOYEES UNIONversusB. YASHODABAIAND OTHERS

2014 INSC 8438 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The South Central Railway Employees Co‑Op Credit Society Employees Union challenged a High Court order that had set aside a 12 June 1998 order implementing the Supreme Court’s 13 January 1988 judgment that reservation could not be applied to promotions. The High Court held the Supreme Court judgment to be per incuriam

NARINDER S. CHADHA & ORS.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI & ORS.

2014 INSC 8448 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a circular issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai that added Condition No.35 to licences for eating houses, prohibiting the sale of tobacco and any apparatus such as hookah, and imposing specific dimensions for smoking areas. The Court held that Section 6 of the Cigarettes Act

GOLD QUEST INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITEDversusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2014 INSC 6118 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Gold Quest International Private Limited, a numismatic company, faced an FIR under Section 420 IPC and Sections 4, 5, 6 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation (Banning) Act after several customers alleged non‑delivery of promised gold coins. All claimants, including the primary complainant, settled their disputes wit

TELIKICHERLA SESIBHUSHAN (DEAD) BY LRS.versusKALLI RAJA RAO (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS.

2014 INSC 6108 September 2014Dismissed

The appellant, Telikicherla Sesibhushan, agreed to purchase land from the deceased respondent, Kalli Raja Rao, and to repay a Rs.20,000 loan taken by the respondent from a bank. The appellant made partial payments but failed to repay the entire loan, leading to a decree against the bank's suit for recovery. The respond

LEELA RAJAGOPAL & ORS.versusKAMALA MENON COCHARAN & ORS.

2014 INSC 6128 September 2014Dismissed

The mother, K.P. Janaki Amma, executed two wills in 1981 and 1982 bequeathing a house to her daughter Kamala Menon and granddaughter Geetha, expressly excluding her sons. The sons challenged the validity of the later will, alleging undue influence, suspicious circumstances such as the daughter’s involvement in executio

J.J. IRANI & ANR.versusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2014 INSC 5358 August 2014Appeal(s) allowed

On 3 March 1989 a fire broke out at temporary pandals erected for Tata Iron and Steel Company's Foundation Day, killing and injuring many. The Inspector of Factories conducted a preliminary investigation on 5‑6 March 1989 and later received a detailed committee report on 23 April 1990; a criminal complaint was filed on

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusRAJENDRA & ORS.

2014 INSC 4778 July 2014Case Partly allowed

The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of six accused under Sections 498‑A, 304‑B and 306 of the IPC. The Supreme Court examined whether the prosecution had established the essential ingredients of a dowry death and the presumption under Section 113‑B of the Evidence Act. It held that the prosecution proved, b

STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.versusRAFIQ MASIH (WHITE WASHER)

2014 INSC 4798 July 2014

The State of Punjab filed a Special Leave Petition challenging a High Court order that barred recovery of excess pensionary payments made to the respondent, a white washer, on the ground that the employee had not committed fraud. The Supreme Court examined the apparent conflict between earlier decisions: Shyam Babu Ver

KHIM SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2014 INSC 4788 July 2014Dismissed

Khim Singh was convicted of murdering his wife Himuli Devi with a kulhari (axe) and sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC. The trial and High Court relied solely on circumstantial evidence, including testimonies of the appellant's mother, sister‑in‑law, the village pradhan and a neighbour, the recovery o

MR. VIKRAM BAKSHI & ORS.versusMS. SONIA KHOSLA (DEAD) BY LRS.

2014 INSC 3818 May 2014Disposed off

Two business groups that had entered into a joint venture fell out over shareholding and director appointments, leading to a cascade of more than 80 proceedings, including company law petitions, contempt suits and criminal complaints under Section 340 Cr.P.C. The Supreme Court noted the deadlock and, rather than adjudi

NATIONAL ALUMINIUM CO. LTD. & ORS.versusANANTA KISHORE ROUT & ORS.

2014 INSC 3748 May 2014Appeal(s) allowed

National Aluminium Company Ltd. (NALCO) had established two schools for the children of its employees and entered into management agreements with external trusts. The school staff filed writ petitions claiming they were employees of NALCO and entitled to parity of pay with NALCO's own workers. The High Court held that

SADASHIV PRASAD SINGHversusHARENDAR SINGH & ORS.

2014 INSC 178 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a dispute arising from the public auction of Plot No.722, attached in a debt recovery proceeding against a partnership firm. Sadashiv Prasad Singh, the highest bidder, was confirmed as the purchaser, took possession and obtained mutation of the property. Harendar Singh, brother of the origina

DR. BALWANT SINGHversusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS.

2014 INSC 7667 November 2014Case Partly allowed

Dr. Balwant Singh, a retired Director General of Police, lived in a house opposite the Rajasthan State Assembly where frequent political rallies, loudspeakers and police‑set up barricades created constant noise and disturbance, rendering his residence uninhabitable. After his oral and written complaints to the Commissi

CENSUS COMMISSIONER & OTHERSversusR. KRISHNAMURTHY

2014 INSC 7627 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a challenge to two orders of the Madras High Court that had directed the Census Department to conduct a caste‑wise census, including Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, in order to achieve social justice. The appellant, the Census Commissioner, was not a party to the earlier writ petition

E. BAPANAIAHversusSRI K.S. RAJU ETC.

2014 INSC 7657 November 2014Disposed off

E. Bapanaiah, a depositor, filed a contempt petition against K.S. Raju, promoter director of Nagarjuna Finance Ltd., alleging wilful breach of an undertaking given to the Company Law Board (CLB) to repay deposits. The High Court division bench set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by a single judge, finding Raj

YUSUFBHAI NOOR MOHAMMED JODHPURWALAversusMOHMMED SABIR IBRAHIM BYAVARWALA

2014 INSC 7637 November 2014Disposed off

The landlord filed a Special Leave Petition challenging a Gujarat High Court order that had set aside an appellate decree allowing eviction of the tenant under Section 12(3)(b) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. The tenant had been in arrears of rent before the suit and on the date of

RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.versusDWARKA PRASAD KOOLWAL & ORS.

2014 INSC 5317 August 2014Disposed off

The Rajasthan State Electricity Board (RSEB) introduced a Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) scheme and, later, a Pension and General Provident Fund (GPF) scheme in 1988, requiring employees to choose between them within 90 days. Over the next eight years RSEB issued a series of notices extending the window for switchin

NAWAL KISHORE SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 5347 August 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a former seaman of the Shipping Corporation of India, was declared medically unfit and his registration was cancelled by the Shipping Department in Mumbai. He filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking disability compensation, claiming that a refusal letter was sent to his residence in Gaya, B

RAMAIAH @ RAMAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2014 INSC 5367 August 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Ramaiah, was charged with dowry‑related offences (IPC 498‑A, 304‑B, 201, 176) and violations of the Dowry Prohibition Act (ss.3,4) after his wife Laxmi died an unnatural death within six months of marriage. The trial court acquitted him, finding no evidence of dowry demand, harassment, or that the presum

SHAILESHBHAI @ PAPPU BALUBHAI CHUNARA & ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJRAT

2014 INSC 5307 August 2014Dismissed

The appellants were convicted of murder, attempt to murder and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 302, 34, 323 and 114 based solely on the dying declaration of the victim, Champaben, who identified the accused as having set her ablaze with kerosene. The defence argued that three separate dying declarations were inc

STATE OF M.P. AND ORS.versusANEES KHAN

2014 INSC 5297 August 2014Disposed off

Anees Khan, engaged as an assistant driver, was disengaged in July 1992 and obtained an ex parte order from the Labour Court in February 1994 directing his reinstatement with back wages. He received back wages for the period up to the order but neither reported for duty nor initiated any proceeding to enforce reinstate

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusCHANDRESHWAR PATHAK

2014 INSC 5327 August 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Chandreshwar Pathak was temporarily appointed as a police constable in 1988 by the Inspector General of Police without any advertisement or selection process. After a departmental review, a show‑cause notice was issued in 2003 and his services were terminated. He challenged the termination before the Patna High Court;

STATE BANK OF PATIALAversusPRITAM SINGH BEDI & ORS.

2014 INSC 4727 July 2014Dismissed

A group of State Bank of Patiala employees who retired under the Bank's Voluntary Retirement Scheme in 2000 had completed more than 19 years and six months of service but less than 20 years. The Bank refused to grant them pension under the State Bank of Patiala (Employees) Pension Regulations, 1995, prompting the emplo

SOBARAN SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF M.P.

2014 INSC 4767 July 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for the death of Narendra Singh. The prosecution's case relied on the testimony of five ocular witnesses, two of whom were declared hostile and the remaining three were relatives of the deceased whose statements were recorded only

ANIL GUPTAversusSTAR INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR

2014 INSC 4707 July 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner, Anil Gupta, the Managing Director of Star India Pvt Ltd, appealed against a Delhi High Court order that quashed the summons issued to the company but allowed proceedings against him under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complaint alleged dishonour of cheques issued by t

VISHWA LOCHAN MADANversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 4697 July 2014Disposed off

The petitioner sought a declaration that the All India Muslim Personal Law Board's efforts to establish Dar-ul-Qaza courts and issue Fatwas constitute an illegal parallel judicial system and that such Fatwas are unenforceable under the Constitution. The Court examined whether Dar-ul-Qaza is a court of law and whether a

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search