Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 1990

401 judgments, newest first — showing 201–400.

ASSAM SILLIMANITE LTD. AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 8916 March 1990Disposed off

Assam Sillimanite Ltd. held three mining leases for sillimanite in Meghalaya, which were prematurely terminated by the State Government on 7 December 1972 under section 4A of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1951, without giving the lessee any notice. The company filed a writ petition under Arti

HUNDRAJ KANYALAL SAJNANI ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 8816 March 1990Dismissed

The petitioners, Group‑A Income‑Tax officers promoted from Group‑B, challenged the 1973 Seniority Rules and the accompanying seniority list, alleging that the rules were based on a mistaken finding that promotions exceeded the statutory quota and that the classification of officers into Group‑A and Group‑B violated Art

INDIAN OXYGEN LTD.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

1990 INSC 3916 February 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Indian Oxygen Ltd. had two establishments in Bihar where a 1971 settlement granted 14 paid holidays to factory staff and 18 to office staff. The company sought to treat International Labour Day (1 May), a compulsory holiday under the Bihar Industrial Establishments (National and Festival Holidays and Casual Leave) Act,

M.P. PRADHANversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1990 INSC 4016 February 1990Appeal(s) allowed

M.P. Pradhan joined the Uttar Pradesh State Government as a paid apprentice on a permanent basis on 1 July 1937 and subsequently held various officiating posts before being appointed to the permanent post of Copyist on 1 August 1941. He retired in February 1976 at the age of 58 and claimed that, under Fundamental Rule

RATILAL B. SONI & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

1990 INSC 4116 February 1990Dismissed

The appellants, originally Talatis in Gujarat's Revenue Department, were transferred to the Panchayat Service under the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 and later deputed as Circle Inspectors in the State Service. When vacancies arose, they were reverted to their parent Panchayat cadre, and they claimed a right to be absor

JOGINDER SINGH SAINI ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

1990 INSC 4216 February 1990Dismissed

The land of the appellants was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for a residential development. The appellants operated a plant nursery and claimed compensation for the nursery plants, potted plants, and mother trees. The Land Acquisition Collector allowed removal of nursery and potted plants and denied com

BHARAT FORGE & PRESS INDUSTRIES (P) LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BARODA, GUJARAT

1990 INSC 916 January 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Bharat Forge & Press Industries manufactures pipe fittings such as elbows, bends and reducers from steel pipes and tubes on which excise duty has already been paid. The Department classified these fittings under the residuary tariff entry 68, arguing they are a distinct commercial commodity, while the appellant contend

HIRAJI TOLAJI BAGWANversusSHAKUNTALA

1990 INSC 1016 January 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Hiraji Tolaji Bagwan, a protected lessee of agricultural land, challenged the eviction proceedings initiated by Shakuntala, who claimed to be landlady after a partition of the ancestral property on 29 June 1959. The Supreme Court examined whether a partition of joint family (ancestral) land could lawfully give a share

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusANAND CHINTAMAN DIGHE

1990 INSC 1116 January 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, A.C. Dighe, a district chief of the Shiv Sena party, was arrested for the murder of a corporator and charged under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) and several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The designated court in Pune granted him bail while the investigation wa

MOHINDER SAIN GARG ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1990 INSC 35215 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Punjab advertised 47 (later 54) posts of Excise and Taxation Inspectors, requiring a written test (300 marks) and a viva voce interview (100 marks, 25% of total). Over 1,200 candidates were called for interview for the 54 vacancies, and the unsuccessful candidates challenged the procedure, alleging arbitra

PRIYANKA OVERSEAS PVT. LTD. AND ANRversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 35315 November 1990Dismissed

Priyanka Overseas Pvt. Ltd. imported 10,681.832 metric tonnes of palm kernel from Nigeria in 1987 under an Open General Licence (OGL). The Customs authorities treated palm kernel as a canalised item, confiscated the goods and imposed a redemption fine and penalty. The company argued that palm kernel is distinct from pa

SYED HASAN RASUL NUMA AND ANRversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1990 INSC 35415 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Development Authority issued a public notice on 5 July 1975 proposing to change the land use of the Dargah Shaheed Khan area from residential to recreational. The notice was required to be published under Section 44 of the Delhi Development Act, 1957, which mandates that it be made known by any two of the thr

RAVIKANT BHAGOJI DHUMAL AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1990 INSC 35515 November 1990Dismissed

A 29‑year‑old woman, Chandrakala, vanished near Bharana Naka while alighting from a bus and was later found dead, having been raped and throttled. The initial police investigation wrongly focused on the bus crew, but CID Inspector Kulkarni later implicated three accused – a hotel waiter (appellant No.1) and two young m

VIKRAM SINGH AND ANR.versusSUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD, HARYANA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 35615 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Haryana Excise and Taxation Inspectorate (Class III) Rules, 1969 provided for 250 marks in the written test and 100 marks in the viva voce, making the viva component 28.5% of the total 350 marks. Vikram Singh and Nawab Singh cleared the written examination and were interviewed in March 1986. The first interview was

RAI CHAND JAINversusMISS CHANDRA KANTA KHOSLA

1990 INSC 35715 November 1990Dismissed

The tenant, Rai Chand Jain, leased a house from landlady Chandra Kanta Khosla for residential purposes, but later operated a printing press (M/s Navneet Prakashan) from the premises. The landlady sought eviction on grounds of non‑payment of rent, change of use, and her bona‑fide requirement for the house. The trial cou

GRAM PANCHAYAT AND ANR.versusSHREE VALLABH GLASS WORKS LIMITED AND ORS.

1990 INSC 8715 March 1990Dismissed

The Gram Panchayat sought to recover property tax from Shree Vallabh Glass Works Ltd., which had been declared a sick industrial company under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. The Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) had conducted an enquiry under s.16, found the company

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR. ETC.versusR.V. RAYANIM ETC. ETC.

1990 INSC 815 January 1990Dismissed

The State of Andhra Pradesh entered into a contract with contractor R.V. Rayanim for constructing an earth dam. A dispute led to arbitration, where the arbitrator issued a non‑speaking award of Rs.19.39 lakhs in favour of the contractor, mentioning consideration of escalation damages but not quantifying any amount for

BABULAL NAROTIAMDAS AND ORS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY

1990 INSC 38714 December 1990Dismissed

The appellant, a managing agent, was entitled under a company resolution dated 20 July 1949 to receive an extra remuneration of Rs 15,000 per annum. Shareholders sued to enjoin the payment, claiming the resolution illegal; the trial court decreed in their favour but the High Court reversed, upholding the resolution. Th

TAPAN KUMAR MUKHERJEEversusHEROMONI MONDAL AND ANR.

1990 INSC 35014 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Junior Land Reforms Officer, issued a memo on 3 August 1987 directing police assistance to certain patta holders, contrary to an interim order of the Calcutta High Court that restrained interference with the petitioners' possession of disputed lands. The High Court held the appellant guilty of contempt

MEHRA BROS.versusJOINT COMMERCIAL OFFICER, MADRAS

1990 INSC 35114 November 1990Dismissed

Mehra Bros., a registered dealer under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, manufactured and sold automobile seat covers and claimed they should be taxed at the lower rate of 3.5%. The assessing authority, invoking Section 3(3) and Item 3 of Schedule I, levied tax at the higher single point rate of 13%, treating

ESKAYEF LIMITEDversusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE

1990 INSC 28114 September 1990Dismissed

The appellant, ESKA YEF Ltd., manufactured Bifuran Supplement, Neftin‑50 and Neftin‑200 and claimed they were exempt from central excise duty as "animal feed supplements" under Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff, relying on a 1984 notification. The Revenue argued that the products contained furazolidone, a veterinary

KAMARUNNISSA ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 28214 September 1990Dismissed

The wives of three men detained under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA) challenged the validity of the detention orders, arguing that the men were already in custody, that the grounds described the offence as "bailable" indicating non‑application of mind, t

INCOME TAX OFFICER, CALICUTversusSMT. N.K. SARADA THAMPATTY

1990 INSC 28014 September 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a member of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), claimed that a partition agreement dated 3 July 1958 and a subsequent civil court decree had dissolved the HUF, so that the family could not be taxed as a HUF for assessment years 1967-68, 1968-69 and 1969-70. The Income Tax Officer rejected the claim, holding

GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. ETC.versusM.A. KAREEM AND OTHERS ETC.

1990 INSC 28314 September 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved two groups of civil servants. Lower Division Clerks (LDCs) from district police offices were appointed to the Chief Office in 1970 on the condition that they would forgo seniority based on their prior service; after 13 years they sought to have that seniority counted, and the Andhra Pradesh Administra

SYED FAROOQ MOHAMMADversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1990 INSC 19414 May 1990Dismissed

Syed Farooq Mohammad was detained under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 after narcotics were seized from two cars on 19 July 1989. He challenged the detention on grounds of a five‑month delay in issuing the order, a further delay in arrest, non‑s

SADHU SINGH GHUMANversusFOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS.

1990 INSC 3714 February 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Food Corporation of India sued Sadhu Singh and others for recovery of Rs.2 lakh based on a contract that contained an arbitration clause. The defendants appeared, sought production of the original agreement to enable filing of a written statement, and then invoked Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for a stay of t

M.K. HARIHAR IYERversusAUTHORISED OFFICER LAND REFORMS, TIRUNELVELI

1990 INSC 3614 February 1990Dismissed

M.K. Iyer, a landowner in Kanyakumari district, held more than 30 standard acres and filed a return under the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1961. The Authorised Officer determined his family size and allowed him 30 acres plus stridhana for his wife and daughter, prompting Iyer to appeal. Wh

AKBAR BADRUDIN JIWANIversusCOLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, BOMBAY

1990 INSC 3814 February 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a stone‑processing firm, imported calcareous stone slabs from Italy, obtaining certificates and expert reports that the material was not marble. Customs seized the goods, classifying them as "marble" under tariff entry 25.15 and the restricted item 62 of the Import‑Export Policy, and ordered confiscation

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALCUTTAversusBRITISH PAINTS INDIA LTD

1990 INSC 38613 December 1990Appeal(s) allowed

British Paints India Ltd. valued its stock‑in‑trade at the cost of raw materials only, excluding overheads, claiming that paints have a short shelf‑life. The Assessing Officer added the overheads to the stock value under section 145 of the Income‑Tax Act, increasing tax for 1963‑64 and allowing a deduction for 1964‑65.

M.O.H. UDUMAN AND ORS.versusM.O.H. ASLUM

1990 INSC 34813 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a partnership formed in Pondicherry in 1962 among the father and his sons, later continued by the sons after the father's retirement. In 1978 the respondent sued for dissolution of the partnership and accounting, claiming it was a partnership at will, while the appellants contended that the deed, gov

SMT. SHANTI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

1990 INSC 34913 November 1990Disposed off

The deceased, Smt. Kailash, was married to Sat Pal and allegedly subjected to harassment by her mother‑in‑law (Smt. Shanti) and another relative for not providing a scooter and television as dowry. She was found dead under unnatural circumstances within seven years of marriage, and the accused were charged under IPC se

MAJOR SURESH CHAND MEHRAversusDEFENCE SECRETARY (U.0.1.) AND OTHERS

1990 INSC 34713 November 1990Dismissed

The petitioner, a Major in the Indian Army, was accused of assaulting the regimental medical officer during a dispute over a steel almirah. An initial inquiry by the commanding officer found the allegation unsubstantiated, but higher commanders later concluded there was sufficient circumstantial evidence and ordered di

KULWANT SINGH GILLversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1990 INSC 27813 September 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an Inspector in the Punjab Food and Supplies Department, was charged with purchasing sub‑standard wheat and, after giving an explanation, was penalised by the disciplinary authority with stoppage of two pay increments having a cumulative effect. The appellant contended that such a penalty amounted to a m

P.N. VEETI NARAYANIversusPATHUMMA BEEVL AND ANOTHER

1990 INSC 27913 September 1990Dismissed

The appellant sought to enforce a decree for Rs.56,769.80 against the estate of the deceased Muslim debtor Vellappa Rawther. The High Court had reduced the decree to one‑fourth, holding that the debt was divided among the heirs according to Muslim Personal Law and that the acknowledgment and partial payment made by def

G.B. MAHAJAN AND ORSversusJALGAON MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS.

1990 INSC 27713 September 1990Dismissed

The Jalgaon Municipal Council, having received a gift of land, sought to develop it by constructing an administrative building, a vegetable market and a commercial complex on a self‑financing basis, appointing a private developer (Respondent No. 6) to execute the project and to dispose of occupancy rights for a fee. Re

CHHETRIYA PARDUSHAN MUKTI SANGHARSH SAMITIversusSTATE OF U.P AND ORS.

1990 INSC 23013 August 1990Dismissed

The Chhetriya Pardushan Mukti Sangharsh Samiti filed a letter alleging that an oil mill and a refinery in the Sarnath area were causing severe air and water pollution, leading to health hazards and ecological damage, and treated the letter as a writ petition under Article 32. The respondents, including the State of U.P

D.B. RAJUversusH.J. KANTHARAJ AND OTHERS

1990 INSC 20213 July 1990Dismissed

The appellant D.B. Raju contested his election to the Karnataka Legislative Council, alleging that the 242 nominated members from 121 Mandal Panchayats were added to the electoral roll after the deadline for filing nomination papers (3 p.m., 3 June 1988). The High Court held that the roll was not updated by that time a

KRISHENA KUMAR AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 20113 July 1990Dismissed

The petitioners, retired railway employees who had opted for the Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) scheme, challenged twelve Railway Board notifications that allowed certain CPF retirees, after specified cut‑off dates, to switch to the pension scheme while denying the same option to other similarly situated retirees. T

BRITISH INDIA STEAM NAVIGATION CO., LTD.versusSHANMUGHA VILAS CASHEW INDUSTRIES AND ORS.

1990 INSC 8513 March 1990Appeal(s) allowed

British India Steam Navigation Co., Ltd. chartered the vessel Steliosm to ship 4,445 bags of cashew nuts for Shanmughavilas Cashew Industries, but only 3,712 bags were delivered. The respondent sued the appellant in the Cochin Sub‑ordinate Court for the shortage; the trial court decreed in favour of the respondent and

SHRI SITARAM SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1990 INSC 8213 March 1990Dismissed

The petitioners, owners of sugar mills in Uttar Pradesh, challenged the Central Government's notifications fixing levy‑sugar prices on a zonal basis under Section 3(3‑C) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, alleging that the price‑fixation was arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Article 14. The Court examined

SMT. VIDHYA DHARI BHAGATversusALLAHABAD LAW JOURNAL CO. LTD.

1990 INSC 3313 February 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord (appellant) obtained two eviction orders against the tenant under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958: one under section 14(1)(e) for personal bona fide requirement and another under section 14(1)(a) for non‑payment of rent, the latter being settled by compromise with the tenant delivering possession. The six

SESHASAYEE PAPER & BOARDS LIMITED, ERODEversusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, COIMBATORE

1990 INSC 3413 February 1990Dismissed

Seshasaye Paper & Boards Ltd, a manufacturer of paper assessable under Tariff Item 17 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, claimed deductions for both a trade discount and a "service charge discount" paid to its dealers (indentors) while fixing the normal price for excise duty under Section 4 of the Act. The Central Ex

HIRALAL CHAWLA & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

1990 INSC 3213 February 1990Disposed off

The Supreme Court dealt with writ petitions filed under Article 32 challenging the acquisition of land previously bought by cooperative housing societies for residential purposes when the area was later notified for the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA). The Court examined the validity of the acquisiti

DORAB CAWASJI WARDENversusCOOMI SORAB WARDEN & ORS.

1990 INSC 3513 February 1990

The appellant, a co‑owner of an undivided family dwelling, sued to restrain the sale of his brother's half‑share to a stranger and to prevent the stranger from taking possession. The trial court granted an interim mandatory injunction, but the Bombay High Court set it aside, holding that the facts did not show a prima

BASTHI KASIM SAHEB (DEAD) BY L.RS.versusMYSORE STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS.

1990 INSC 34612 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Basthi Kasim Saheb, travelling in a Mysore State Road Transport Corporation bus, was injured in an accident on 2 July 1964 when the driver failed to slow down while avoiding a bullock‑cart and entered a muddy section of the road, causing the bus to overturn. The claimant sought Rs.75,000 compensation under s.166 of the

DESH RAJ GUPTAversusINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL IV, U .P. LUCKNOW AND ANOTHER

1990 INSC 27612 September 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, D.R. Gupta, an assistant cashier of Rampur Zila Sahkari Bank, was suspended and dismissed after a domestic inquiry that was later found to have violated principles of natural justice. A reference under s.4‑K of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act was made to an Industrial Tribunal, where the Tribunal first

BARA SINGHversusKASHMIRA SINGH AND ORS.

1990 INSC 27512 September 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the sale of a 3/5 share of ancestral land by three Jat Sikh co‑owners who had migrated from their village. The remaining co‑owners filed a declaratory suit claiming that, under local custom, ancestral land could not be alienated except for necessity or as a bona‑fide act of good management, and that

SMT. AZRA FATIMAversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

1990 INSC 19812 July 1990Dismissed

The wife of Syed Ali Raza Shafiq Mohammed filed a writ petition challenging his preventive detention under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988. The detenu was already in judicial custody with his bail application rejected, and the State sought to det

DABUR INDIA LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.

1990 INSC 19712 July 1990Disposed off

M/s Dabur India Ltd. manufactured a homeopathic toothpaste called Homeodent for M/s Sharda Boiron Laboratories between 1985 and 1988 and paid excise duty under the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944. The State Excise authorities later claimed that Homeodent contained alcohol (through mother‑tincture) and therefore attrac

ELIZABETH ANTONYversusMICHEL CHARLES JOHN CHOWN LENGERA

1990 INSC 13812 April 1990Dismissed

The petitioner, Elizabeth Antony, lodged a caveat to oppose the grant of probate of a will claimed to have been executed by the deceased Mary Aline Browne, alleging that the will was fictitious and that she had a caveatable interest arising from a trust, a gift deed and a later will of Zoe Enid Browne. The Subordinate

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusK.T. SHASTRI

1990 INSC 412 January 1990Dismissed

K.T. Shastri, recruited in 1966 as a Senior Scientific Officer in the Defence Science Service, was later placed in the Defence Aeronautical Quality Assurance Service (DAQAS) after the service was trifurcated. In 1985 the Government issued an order raising the superannuation age to 60 years for scientific and technical

BHANWAR LALversusSMT. PREM LATA & ORS.

1990 INSC 512 January 1990Appeal(s) allowed

A joint family house was auctioned to satisfy an ex‑parte money decree of Rs 5,557.10. The coparceners objected, the sale was confirmed, and they filed a suit under Order 21 Rule 63 CPC to set aside the sale, valuing the property at Rs 15,000. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the District Court allowed the appea

GAURI SHANKER SHARMA ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. ETC.

1990 INSC 712 January 1990Dismissed

The case concerned the death of Ram Dhiraj Tiwari while in police custody. The prosecution alleged that Sub‑Inspector Rafiuddin Khan (Accused No.1) beat the deceased with lathis and dandas after his arrest on 19 Oct 1971, causing 28 injuries that led to death, and also demanded a bribe. The defence claimed the arrest o

VISHNU PARTAP SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

1990 INSC 612 January 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a house in Chhatarpur that the Maharaja had listed as his private property in July 1948 and subsequently gifted to his father‑in‑law on 25 August 1948. The State of Madhya Pradesh claimed that, because the Maharaja’s sovereign powers ceased on 1 May 1948 when his state merged into the United State of

PANKAJ BHARGAVA AND ANR.versusMOHINDER NATH AND ANR.

1990 INSC 38511 December 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The landlords and tenants jointly obtained permission for a five‑year limited tenancy under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. After the tenancy expired, the landlords sought possession, but the tenants argued that a prior tenancy already existed and that the permission was obtained by fraud, rendering it

R.M. NARAYANA CHETTIAR AND ANOTHERversusN. LAKSHMANAN CHETTIAR AND OTHERS

1990 INSC 31711 October 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants filed a representative suit against the respondents for framing a scheme of a public charitable trust, which required leave under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The subordinate court granted the leave on the same day without issuing any notice to the respondents. The respondents applied to ha

RAJASTHAN STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS.versusLAXMAN LAL ETC. ETC.

1990 INSC 31811 October 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan State Electricity Board (RSEB) and its employees entered into a first settlement on 22‑Feb‑1972 fixing pay‑scale No. 3 for Meter Readers/Checkers, later clarified by a second settlement on 2‑Dec‑1972 that created two grades (I and II) with different scales. The High Court quashed the second settlement and

YADLAPATI VENKATESWARLUversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANR.

1990 INSC 27311 September 1990Dismissed

The Vijayawada Municipal Council originally levied property tax under the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Areas) District Municipalities Act, 1920. After the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 repealed the old Act, the State Government issued several General Orders directing the council to levy tax under the new Act, later

MISS LIZA ARULANANDAMversusSMT. A.S. SULOCHANA

1990 INSC 27211 September 1990Dismissed

Miss Liza, the tenant, occupied a double‑storeyed building and paid Rs 170 per month. The landlady applied under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 (as amended by Act 23 of 1973) for fixation of a fair rent. The Rent Controller, after an enquiry and based on a commissioner's valuat

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1990 INSC 27411 September 1990Dismissed

Ashok Kumar was charged with murdering his sister‑in‑law, Asha Rani, by burning her to death in a dowry‑related dispute. The trial court acquitted him, finding no motive, contradictions in medical testimony, and a defective investigation. The Rajasthan High Court, invoking Sections 378 and 386 of the CrPC, set aside th

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusRAMJEE PRASAD AND ORS.

1990 INSC 13611 April 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar advertised vacancies for junior teaching posts in its medical colleges and fixed 31 January 1988 as the last date for receipt of applications, requiring three years of experience as a Resident or Registrar. Several junior teachers, including Ramjee Prasad, challenged the cut‑off date, alleging it was

SABYASCHI SENGUPTA AND ORS.versusNANI GOPAL DATTA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 13711 April 1990Disposed off

A batch of West Bengal Civil Service (Executive) officers filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking seniority rules. The Calcutta High Court ordered the State to frame such rules and later stayed its own judgment for eight weeks, allowing the State to fill vacancies. The State appealed, and the Supreme Court inte

WORKMEN OF ENGLISH ELECTRIC COMPANY OF INDIA LTD., MADRASversusPRESIDING OFFICER & ANR.

1990 INSC 311 January 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined appeals by workmen challenging a Division Bench decision that dismissed their claim for confirmation and back wages under the Industrial Disputes Act. The workmen argued that 131 of the 186 casual employees had completed the requisite 240 days of service and were entitled to confirmation, whi

PHAGWARA IMPROVEMENT TRUSTversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1990 INSC 31410 October 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Phagwara Improvement Trust prepared a development scheme under the Punjab Town Improvement Trust Act, 1922 covering lands of several respondents. Notices under Section 36 were published in a newspaper in April 1976 and later in the Punjab Government Gazette in May 1976, after the deadline for filing objections had

MALAYAMMAL AND ORS.versusA MALAYALAM PILLAI AND ORS.

1990 INSC 31310 October 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Karuppanna Pillai executed a will in 1942 disposing of his property in five schedules, dedicating the Schedule E properties to the construction of his own samadhi and a matam, and to the performance of poojas, feeding the poor and distribution of saffron‑coloured clothes. Two legatees sued the third legatee, the manage

JIWANI KUMARI PAREKHversusSATYABRATA CHAKRAVORTY, MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE WEST BENGAL HANDICRAFT DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD.

1990 INSC 31510 October 1990Disposed off

The Supreme Court, in an order dated 16 January 1990, directed the respondent to surrender possession of premises requisitioned under the West Bengal Premises Requisition and Control Act within nine weeks, subject to any pending High Court order or acquisition of an independent right. After the Land Acquisition (West B

BHOOLCHAND AND ANR.versusKAY PEE CEE INVESTMENTS AND ANR.

1990 INSC 31610 October 1990Dismissed

The original lessor let two shops and an adjoining house to Bhoolchand Chandiram in 1943 with an option to sub‑let. The tenant sub‑let one shop to Arts Palace in 1946 and later, on 1 April 1948, to Super Dry Cleaners. After the original lessor’s share was sold to Kay Pee Cee Investments in 1974, the new landlord sought

SYNDICATE BANK SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (REGD.), THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, SHRI K.S. BADLIA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS), BANKING DIVISION, JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIAMENT ST. NEW DELHI-1

1990 INSC 22710 August 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Syndicate Bank Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Employees Association filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking enforcement of the constitutional reservation policy for SC/ST employees in promotional Group ‘A’ officer posts of Syndicate Bank. The bank, following a 1981 circular, argued that reservations a

DR. TRILOKI NATH SINGHversusDR. BHAGWAN DIN MISRA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 22810 August 1990Dismissed

A selection committee was formed to appoint a Reader in Linguistics in the Department of Hindi at the University of Lucknow. The committee, comprising three experts in Hindi literature rather than linguistics, recommended Dr. Triloki Nath Singh for the post, placing Dr. Bhagwan Din Misra second. Dr. Misra challenged th

YOGESH KUMAR AND ORS.versusBHARAT PETROLEUM CORPN. LTD. AND ORS.

1990 INSC 22910 August 1990Dismissed

The petition concerned the cancellation of a No Objection Certificate (NOC) issued under Rule 144 of the Petroleum Rules, 1976 to Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd for operating a petrol pump on a lease‑hold site. The District Magistrate, invoking Rule 151, cancelled the NOC on the ground that the licensee no longer had

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRASversusK.R. SADAYAPPAN

1990 INSC 19510 July 1990Appeal(s) allowed

K.R. Sadayappan, a film distributor, purchased a plot of land in his son's name for a total consideration of Rs.1,40,000, but his wealth statement omitted this investment and his return showed only Rs.80,000. The Income Tax Officer treated the unaccounted Rs.18,750 as undisclosed income and imposed a penalty under sect

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.versusRAMESHWAR RATHOD

1990 INSC 19610 July 1990Dismissed

The respondent's truck was seized by police on 10 December 1974 for an alleged violation of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 that purportedly occurred on 15 March 1972. The respondent sought the vehicle's return through petitions before the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which held that Section 6A of the Act, as amended

MISS RAJ SONIversusAIR OFFICER INCHARGE ADMINISTRATION & ANR.

1990 INSC 13110 April 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner, a teacher who joined before the Delhi Education Act, 1973, claimed she was entitled to retire at age 60 under Section 208 of the Delhi Education Code, which was protected for existing employees by Section 8(1) of the Act and Rule 110 of the Rules. The school management, a society run by Air Force office

MALLIKARJUNA RAO AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1990 INSC 13210 April 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned whether a High Court or an Administrative Tribunal could compel the State of Andhra Pradesh to amend the Andhra Pradesh Animal Husbandry Service‑Special Rules, 1977, which governed promotions of Veterinary Assistant Surgeons. Petitioners sought to have promotions made solely on seniority, challenging

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANRversusRAM DIYA

1990 INSC 13310 April 1990Dismissed

The State of Haryana appealed against High Court orders directing it to consider premature release of two convicts whose death sentences had been commuted to life imprisonment. The convicts were sentenced before the 1978 amendment introducing Section 433A of the CrPC, which mandates a minimum of 14 years’ actual impris

A.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, HYDERABAD & ANR.versusB. SARAT CHANDRA & ORS.

1990 INSC 13510 April 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission advertised a combined examination in 1983 for Grade‑I services, specifying that candidates for Deputy Superintendent of Police must be at least 21 years old on 1 July 1983. The respondent, B. Sarat Chandra, was 19 days short of this age and was therefore not considered for t

SPECIAL MILITARY ESTATES OFFICERversusMUNIVENKATARAMIAH & ANOTHER

1990 INSC 210 January 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Special Military Estates Officer appealed two arbitrator awards concerning compensation for land requisitioned by the Union under the Defence of India Act, 1962. The land remained requisitioned beyond 10 January 1968, when the Defence Act ceased to operate and Section 25 of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Imm

P. ORR AND SONS (P) LTD.versusASSOCIATED PUBLISHERS (MADRAS) LIMITED

1990 INSC 3439 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord sought eviction of the tenant under section 14(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, claiming the building needed immediate demolition for reconstruction. The tenant contended the building was structurally sound and that the landlord’s motive was purely economic. The Rent Co

A.K. BHATNAGAR AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 3449 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned 29 employees of the Central Information Service whose ad‑hoc service was regularised in 1977. They claimed that their period of ad‑hoc service (1964‑1977) should be counted for seniority and that they should be placed above regular recruits appointed through examinations up to 1970. The High Court an

NITYANANDA KAR AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF ORISSA AND ORS. ETC.

1990 INSC 3459 November 1990Dismissed

The State of Orissa merged two administrative cadres, OAS II and OSAS III, and introduced a 'year of allotment' system to determine seniority. Mergerists challenged the seniority of direct recruits, especially those assigned the year 1972, arguing that the Orissa Administrative Service Class II (Appointment of Officers

CHANDER BHANversusHOTILAL GUPTA AND OTHERS

1990 INSC 3069 October 1990Dismissed

A vacancy for Upper Division Clerk arose in the Delhi Small Causes Court. The appellant, Chander Bhan, claimed the post on the basis of being a graduate and invoking the rule of rotation under Rule VI of the High Court Rules. Respondent No. 1, Hotilal Gupta, claimed seniority. The Judge of the Small Causes Court initia

MILAK BROTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 3079 October 1990Dismissed

The appellants, Milak Brothers, exported blanched, roasted and salted peanuts packed in vacuum containers, claiming that the processed product was a "processed food" and not a "groundnut kernel" for which export duty was levied under the Indian Tariff Act, 1934 and the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The Revenue argued that

DEVDUTTA AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS. ETC.

1990 INSC 3089 October 1990Appeal(s) allowed

A group of surplus Block Level Extension Officers were absorbed as Sales‑Tax Inspectors in Madhya Pradesh between 1967 and 1970 and were later confirmed retrospectively on 15 February 1980 with effect from 31 March 1967. The existing Sales‑Tax Inspectors challenged the retrospective confirmation and the seniority list

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusDELHI CLOTH MILLS & ANR.

1990 INSC 3099 October 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh sought to recover differential excise duty on excess wastage of military rum that was exported by the respondents, Delhi Cloth Mills, under a lower export duty rate. The respondents argued that the duty on excess wastage could not be levied, and the Allahabad High Court quashed the demand. Th

SITA RAMversusCHHOTA BHONDEY AND OTHERS

1990 INSC 3109 October 1990Dismissed

The dispute involved Sita Ram (appellant) and Chhota Bhondey (respondent No 1) together with two other family members over shares in lands recorded in Khata Nos 72 and 73 in Sambhalpur Sheoli, Uttar Pradesh. The matters were examined in consolidation proceedings under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, where

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusC. BERNARD

1990 INSC 3049 October 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Bank of India charged its employee C. Bernard with claiming a loss‑adjustment facility using forged travel receipts. The Bank appointed Shri U.B. Menon as Enquiry Officer and Disciplinary Authority, but Menon retired during the enquiry and continued to conduct it, ultimately ordering Bernard's discharge. Th

POONJABHAI VARMALIDASversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDABAD

1990 INSC 3119 October 1990Dismissed

The assessee, Poonjabhai Varmalidas, had written off certain debts as bad under Section 10(2)(xi) of the Income Tax Act, 1922 in 1959‑60. His business ceased before the amounts were later recovered in the assessment years 1964‑65, 1965‑66 and 1967‑68, after the 1961 Act had repealed the 1922 Act. The Revenue taxed the

SMT. ISABELLA JOHNSONversusM.A. SUSAI

1990 INSC 3129 October 1990Dismissed

The landlord (respondent) filed an eviction suit under the Andhra Pradesh Rent Control Act, seeking possession and mesne profits. The tenant (appellant) contended that the City Civil Court lacked jurisdiction, asserting that the matter fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Rent Controller under Section 3 of the

DELHI CLOTH AND GENERAL MILLS LTD.versusS. PARAMJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER

1990 INSC 3059 October 1990Dismissed

Delhi Cloth & General Mills Ltd., a tenant, sought protection under the Jammu and Kashmir Houses and Shops Rent Control Act, 1966, but was denied because its annual net income exceeded Rs 40,000, triggering clause (iii) of Section 1(3). The tenant challenged the clause as violative of Article 14, alleging arbitrary dis

SARDA PLYWOOD LTD. AND ANRversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 1309 April 1990Dismissed

Sarda Plywood Ltd. and another challenged a 1989 notification issued under the Destructive Insects and Pests Act, 1914, which restricted the import of "any plant" including timber logs. The petitioners argued that the timber, intended for plywood manufacture, would not come into contact with crops and therefore should

MANAGEMENT OF M/S M.S. NALLY BHARAT ENGG. CO. LTD.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

1990 INSC 319 February 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Management of M.S. Nally Bharat Engineering Co. Ltd., challenged a notification by the Bihar Government that transferred a pending dismissal reference of a workman (respondent No.4) from the Labour Court, Dhanbad to the Labour Court, Patna under Section 33‑B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The tran

K.M. SHARMAversusDEVI LAL & ORS.

1990 INSC 19 January 1990Dismissed

K.M. Sharma filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of Shri Devi Lal as Deputy Prime Minister, contending that the oath he took was not the one prescribed by Article 75(4) and Schedule III of the Constitution and that he was still serving as Chief Minister of Haryana when the oath was administered. The Union

RAJASTHAN STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDversusCESS APPELLATE COMMITTEE AND ANR. ETC.

1990 INSC 3038 October 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan State Electricity Board (RSEB) operates a thermal power station that draws river water for condenser cooling and discharges it after passing through a neutralisation arrangement that cools the water before release. RSEB was assessed cess under the Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977 a

SANWARMAL KEJRIWALversusVISHWA COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS.

1990 INSC 818 March 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sanwarml Kejriwal, occupied a flat in Vishwa Cooperative Housing Society under a leave‑and‑license agreement from 1957. After the member‑allottee transferred his interest, the society sought his eviction under Section 91(1) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, arguing that the society‑member rel

SMT. PUSHPA DEVI & ORS.versusMILKHI RAM

1990 INSC 298 February 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Milkhi Ram, the landlord, filed an eviction suit under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 alleging arrears of rent, unauthorised sub‑letting and alterations. The tenants, Pushpa Devi and her son, together with Saligram (who claimed to be a sub‑tenant), tendered the arrears on the first heari

MAHABIR COLD STORAGEversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATNA

1990 INSC 3827 December 1990Dismissed

Mahabir Cold Storage, a partnership firm newly constituted after the original firm Prayagchand & Hanumanmal took on Periwal & Co. as a partner, claimed a development rebate for machinery installed by the original firm in 1959‑60. The claim was made in the 1962‑63 assessment year. The issue was whether the new firm, a s

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAYversusNEW STANDARD ENGINEERING CO. LTD.

1990 INSC 3807 December 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay challenged the assessment of rateable value of a housing building constructed by New Standard Engineering Co. Ltd. under a Government subsidised scheme for industrial workers. The corporation had fixed the rateable value under Section 154(1) of the Bombay Municipal Corporatio

INCOME TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK AND ORS.versusBIJU PATNAIK

1990 INSC 3837 December 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Biju Patnaik, was assessed for the year 1957-58 but allegedly failed to disclose a Rs.15 lakh capital gain from the sale of his mining business. The Income Tax Officer, after obtaining approval, issued a notice under sections 147(a) and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to reopen the assessment, alleging

RAMESH ENTERPRISES ETCversusCOFFEE BOARD

1990 INSC 3817 December 1990Dismissed

The appellants, exporters of coffee, participated in a Coffee Board auction on 18 May 1977. Clause 10 of the auction terms provided that any increase or reduction in taxes or duties occurring within 45 days from the date of auction, inclusive of that day, would be shared equally between the Board and the purchasers. On

PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

1990 INSC 3847 December 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Partap Singh and his co-accused were charged under IPC sections 302 and 326 read with section 34. The charge‑sheet framed the appellant only vicariously under section 34, as the prosecution had no material linking him directly to the knife injuries. At trial, the prosecution led eye‑witness testimony that Partap actual

HAMDA AMMALversusAVADIAPPA PATHAR AND 3 OTHERS

1990 INSC 3417 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant purchased a suit‑property from the vendors by a sale deed executed on 9 September 1970 and registered it on 26 October 1970. Before the registration, the respondent filed a money suit on 13 September 1970 and obtained attachment before judgment of the property on 17 September 1970, later obtaining a decre

TEHRI BANDH VIRODHI SANGARSH SAMITI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P AND ORS.

1990 INSC 3427 November 1990Dismissed

The petitioners, a public‑interest group, filed a writ under Article 32 seeking to restrain the construction of the Tehri Dam on the ground that the government had not considered seismic safety. The respondents – the Union of India, the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Tehri Hydro Development Corporation – contended that

ASHOKA MARKETING LTD. AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusPUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1990 INSC 2237 August 1990Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered appeals by Ashoka Marketing Ltd. and other tenants whose leases in premises owned by nationalised banks and the Life Insurance Corporation had expired and who were facing eviction under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 as well as proceedings under the Delhi

D.V. KAPOORversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 2257 August 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a civil servant, was transferred to New Delhi but failed to report for duty, leading to disciplinary proceedings under the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules. While the proceedings were pending, he took voluntary retirement, and the government continued the enquiry under Rule 9 of the Central Civil S

MRS. T. DEVAKIversusGOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

1990 INSC 797 March 1990Case Allowed

Mrs. T. Devaki, wife of R. Thamaraikani, challenged a detention order dated 15‑08‑1989 issued under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1982. The order, passed by the Collector and District Magistrate, alleged that Thamaraikani’s assault on a minister at a public seminar threatened public order. The

GOVIND RAMJI JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1990 INSC 807 March 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant and two others were convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and of concealing evidence under Section 201 read with Section 34 IPC. The High Court set aside the murder convictions, confirmed the conviction under Section 201 for the appellant, and enhanced his sentence from three to s

CHAIRMAN, TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARD, MADRASversusT.N. GANAPATHY

1990 INSC 287 February 1990Dismissed

The Tamil Nadu Housing Board allotted residential plots to low‑income applicants in 1963. In 1975 it issued fresh demands for additional amounts covering excess compensation for land acquisition and development charges. T.N. Ganapathy filed a suit in representative capacity on behalf of all low‑income allottees seeking

VLJAY COTION AND OIL MILLS (P) LTD.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1990 INSC 3776 December 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Vijay Cotton & Oil Mills Ltd. owned 6 acres in Kutch, which the Government of Gujarat took possession of on 19 November 1949 under an agreement to provide equivalent land, but later issued a notification under Section 6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act on 1 February 1955 to acquire the land. The Collector awarded compens

LAKSHMI BANGLE STORESversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 3786 December 1990Dismissed

Lakshmi Bangle Stores booked a railway wagon in June 1964, declaring the value of the consigned glass bangles as Rs.25,000. The wagon was involved in an accident on June 22, 1964 and the goods were delivered after an open assessment on September 4, 1964, revealing that more than half were damaged. The appellant claimed

SMT. GITARANI PAULversusDIBYENDRA KUNDU ALIAS DIBYENDRA KUMAR KUNDU

1990 INSC 3796 December 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Gitarani Paul purchased land from the Bauries, who were under‑Raiyats, after the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 came into force. She sued Dibyendra Kundu and Dasarathi Dutta for declaration of title and possession, alleging that on 5 June 1960 the defendants, aided by police, destroyed her crops and disturbe

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, CALCUTTAversusSMT. ANJAMLI KHAN

1990 INSC 3406 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Commissioner of Wealth Tax assessed wealth tax on Smt. Anjamli Khan for three assessment years, estimating compensation payable for agricultural lands acquired by the State under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. Khan contended that the right to receive such compensation was not an "asset" under Sectio

KESHAV CHANDRA JOSHI AND ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 3396 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, forest officers promoted on an ad‑hoc basis due to the non‑availability of direct recruits, claimed that their continuous service of 5‑12 years should count towards seniority and that their appointments were a relaxation of the recruitment rules under Rule 27. The respondents, direct recruits, argued t

DR. (MRS.) KIRTI DESHMANKARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 2706 September 1990Dismissed

The appellant and respondent No.5 were candidates for a postgraduate obstetrics and gynaecology seat at G.R. Medical College, Gwalior. The appellant challenged the admission of the foreign‑national respondent on two grounds: (i) the respondent’s mother‑in‑law, a former professor, sat on the College and Hospital Council

PERIYAR AND PAREEKANNI RUBBERS LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA

1990 INSC 2716 September 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Kerala acquired 190.37 acres of land from Periyar and Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd. for irrigation and industrial projects under the Kerala Land Acquisition Regulation, 1089. The Collector fixed the market value at very low rates, which the appellant challenged, seeking higher compensation, severance, injurious‑

SATYANARAYAN SHARMA AND ORS.versusNATIONAL MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS.

1990 INSC 2206 August 1990Dismissed

The petitioners, daily-rated workmen of National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd., filed a writ seeking regularisation and equal pay for equal work, alleging they performed the same duties as regular employees. The respondents contended that there was no work or vacancy for the petitioners, who were retained on the

NORTHERN CORPORATIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 2216 August 1990Disposed off

Northern Corporation imported MSCR defective sheets in 1984 and stored them in a customs warehouse. The Income Tax Department imposed a ban under Section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, preventing the goods from being cleared. After the ban was lifted in 1988, customs demanded payment of duty at the higher rate pre

LAMINATED PACKINGS (P) LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GUNTUR

1990 INSC 2226 August 1990Dismissed

Laminated Packings (P) Ltd. lamination of duty‑paid kraft paper with polyethylene produced polyethylene‑laminated kraft paper. The issue was whether this process amounted to "manufacture" under Section 2(f) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and thus attracted excise duty. The Collector (Appeals) held it was not

SMT. MAYAWANTIversusSMT. KAUSHALYA DEVI

1990 INSC 1266 April 1990Dismissed

Mayawanti sued Kaushalya Devi for specific performance of a 1971 agreement to sell a factory, machinery and related assets for Rs 50,000, having paid Rs 5,000 as earnest money. The dispute centered on whether the document recorded in the petition writer's register (Exhibit PW‑11/A) proved a valid, certain contract and

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANR.versusM. HAYAGREEV SARMA

1990 INSC 1276 April 1990Appeal(s) allowed

M. Hayagrevsarma, a government employee, had his date of birth recorded in his service book on the basis of his S.S.L.C. certificate and applied for alteration in 1962, which was rejected in 1968. After the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Recording and alteration of date of birth) Rules, 1984 came into force, he file

VINAY KUMAR VERMA AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS

1990 INSC 1286 April 1990Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Bihar State Government could, by executive order, merge the cadre of District Engineers (part of the Rural Engineering Organisation, created by a 1965 executive order) with the cadre of Executive Engineers governed by the statutory Bihar Engineering Service Rules, 1939. The appell

DR. (MRS.) ROSHAN SAM BOYCEversusB.R. COTTON MILLS LTD. AND ORS.

1990 INSC 1246 April 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a landlord, obtained a decree of eviction against B.R. Cotton Mills Ltd. (respondent No.1) but the High Court granted the tenant eight weeks to vacate subject to an undertaking not to part with possession. Respondent No.1, through its director, filed the undertaking without stating that it was in possess

GWALIOR RAYON SILK MFG. (WVG.) CO. LID.versusCUSTODIAN OF VESTED FORESTS PALGHAT AND ANR.

1990 INSC 1296 April 1990Dismissed

The appellant, Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing Co., operated a large eucalyptus plantation in Kerala and contended that the plantation was not a "private forest" under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971, relying on the definition of "private forest" in the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963. The

RAM PIARIversusBHAGWANT & ORS.

1990 INSC 766 March 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a disinherited daughter, challenged a will executed by her ailing father one day before his death, which left all property to the sons of her sister. She alleged that the beneficiary's father had taken an active role in drafting the will and that suspicious circumstances surrounded its execution, despite

MAHABIR AUTO STORES & ORS.versusINDIAN OIL CORPORATION & ORS.

1990 INSC 776 March 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Mahabir Auto Stores, a partnership firm that had been distributing Indian Oil Corporation's (IOC) lubricants since 1965, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing IOC to continue supply after the corporation abruptly stopped deliveries on 27 May 1983. The High Court dismissed the petition, ho

VANNARAKKAL KALLALATTHIL SREEDHARANversusCHANDRAMAATH BALAKRISHNAN AND ANR.

1990 INSC 786 March 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant entered into an agreement on 9 October 1978 to purchase 80 cents of land, but before the sale deed was executed the property was attached on 16 November 1978 by a third‑party creditor. The sale deed was executed on 23 November 1978, after the attachment. The Kerala High Court held that the sale was subjec

DHAN SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 3765 December 1990Case Partly allowed

The petitioners were ex‑servicemen re‑employed in the Haryana civil service who had served in the Indian Army during the 1962‑68 national emergency. The State had adopted the Punjab Government National Emergency (Concessions) Rules, 1965, which granted benefits such as increments, seniority and pension to such ex‑servi

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTDversusYASHWANT GAJANAN JOSHI AND ORS.

1990 INSC 3755 December 1990Dismissed

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (the Corporation) was authorised under the Petroleum and Minerals Pipeline (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 to lay a pipeline and appointed Mrs. A.R. Gadre, a Special Land Officer of the Corporation, as the competent authority to determine compensation for landowners

M.L. SACHDEVversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1990 INSC 3375 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court, hearing a public‑interest writ under Article 32, directed the Union of India to fill the vacancies in the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission within three weeks, later extending the deadline to 7 July 1990. The Union, represented by Secretary A.N. Verma, failed to appoint a Chairman

BUDHWA ALIAS RAMCHARAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1990 INSC 3025 October 1990Disposed off

The appellants were charged with murder, rioting and unlawful assembly under IPC ss. 147, 149 and 302 for the killing of Hanuwa, a villager, during a group rivalry. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the testimony of the victim’s mother (PW‑1) and sister (PW‑5), who were close relatives and thus interested witness

DILAVER HUSSAIN SON OF MOHAMMADBHAL LALIWALA ETC.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.

1990 INSC 3015 October 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from the June 9, 1985 communal riot in Dabgarwad, Gujarat, where a mob set fire to the house of Maniben, killing her, her daughters, grandchildren and a neighbour’s son. The appellants were charged under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 and several sections of the Indian Pen

INDIRA BAIversusNAND KISHORE

1990 INSC 2695 September 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Indira Bai, bought property and built a godown with the assistance of the respondent, Nand Kishore, who did not initially assert any pre‑emptive right. After construction, the respondent served a notice claiming his statutory right of pre‑emption under the Rajasthan Pre‑emption Act, 1966 and sued to enfo

J.K. AGGARWALversusHARYANA SEEDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS

1990 INSC 2685 September 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, J.K. Aggarwal, a Company Secretary of Haryana Seeds Development Corporation Ltd., faced a disciplinary inquiry that could lead to his dismissal. He sought permission to be represented by a lawyer under Rule 7(5) of the Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1952, but the inquiry authority

M. SUNDERAMOORTHYversusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE

1990 INSC 1235 April 1990Dismissed

S. Sundaramoorthy, an accountant‑cum‑head clerk in the Tamil Nadu Forest Training School, was accused of demanding and receiving a Rs 100 bribe from canteen contractor PW‑1 after promising to help restore the contractor's licence. A trap was arranged, the money was handed to the appellant, and a phenolphthalein test on

NATIONAL UNION OF ALL INDIA RADIO AND ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ETC.

1990 INSC 1225 April 1990Disposed off

The petitioners, staff artists of All India Radio and Doordarshan, challenged a 1982 government circular that bifurcated them into "artists" and "government servants" and required them to exercise an option to choose their status. They sought parity with regular civil servants, pension rights, and a declaration that al

KESHAVJI RAVJI & CO. ETC. ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1990 INSC 265 February 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The partnership firm Keshavji Ravji & Co. paid interest to its partners on their capital credits and also received interest from the same partners on borrowings during the assessment year 1975-76. The Assessing Officer disallowed the interest paid to partners without setting off the interest received, leading to a high

DEVI CINE PROJECTOR MANUFACTURING CO., ETC. ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1990 INSC 275 February 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Devi Cinema and other firms challenged the disallowance of interest paid to their partners under Section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had held that the entire interest paid by the firm to a partner was disallowable, ignoring any interest the partner paid back to the firm on borro

BHOOP ALLEGED SON OF SHEOversusMATADIN BHARDWAJ SON OF LAKMI CHAND

1990 INSC 3734 December 1990Dismissed

In a suit for pre-emption of agricultural land, the Sub‑Judge granted a decree in favour of Shanti Devi, requiring her to deposit four‑fifths of the purchase price by 18 Nov 1968. She deposited the amount on 19 Nov 1968 due to administrative delays. The Sub‑Judge held that the failure to deposit on the exact date extin

DY. COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX (LAW), BOARD OF REVENUE(TAXES,) ERNAKULAMversusCOCO FIBRES

1990 INSC 3744 December 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee, a registered dealer under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, purchased coconut husks and converted them into coconut fibre, claiming that no manufacturing process was involved and thus the purchase value should not be taxed under Section 5A. The Sales Tax Officer and appellate authority disagreed, assessin

DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusD.T.C. MAZDOOR CONGRESS

1990 INSC 2654 September 1990Dismissed

The Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) terminated the services of three permanent employees under Regulation 9(b) of the Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952, which allowed termination by one month's notice or pay in lieu thereof without assigning reasons or holding an

SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD.versusC.I.T., HARYANA, HIMACHAL PRADESH, DELHI

1990 INSC 2664 September 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. (the appellant) claimed exemption from tax on Rs.58,735, a trading liability that had been allowed to the Indian Sugar Company before it was amalgamated into Saraswati in 1962. The Income Tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner disallowed the claim, but the Income Tax Tr

JUTE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR.

1990 INSC 2674 September 1990Disposed off

The Jute Corporation of India Ltd. was assessed for income tax for AY 1974-75 and later claimed a deduction of Rs.11,54,995 for its liability to Purchase Tax, an issue not raised before the Income Tax Officer. While hearing its appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, the corporation was allowed to raise thi

T. RAMAKRISHNIAHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

1990 INSC 1914 May 1990Dismissed

The appellant, a chartered accountant, was appointed as a non‑official member of the Karnataka Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 4(2) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, with his tenure periodically extended. Upon retirement he claimed a superannuation pension under the Mysore Civil Service Rules, 1957, argu

BANK OF INDIAversusT.S. KELAWALA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 1924 May 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court considered two appeals involving Bank of India and a private company concerning wage deductions during industrial actions. In the first appeal, employees participated in a four‑hour strike covering crucial banking hours; the Bank had issued a circular stating that participants would forfeit the full d

RURAL LITIGATION AND ENTITLEMENT KENDRA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1990 INSC 1884 May 1990Disposed off

The Supreme Court revisited the Doon Valley mining dispute, where earlier orders (30 August 1988) had halted all mining except for a few cases and directed afforestation of the valley. Numerous applications were filed thereafter seeking permission to remove stacked material or extensions of time, which the Court had be

LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI AND ORS.versusCONST. DHARAMPAL AND ORS.

1990 INSC 1934 May 1990Dismissed

The respondents were Delhi Police constables whose services were terminated in April 1967 for taking part in an agitation. They filed writ petitions seeking quashing of the termination orders and reinstatement, relying on earlier High Court judgments that declared similar terminated constables to have been in continuou

INDIAN TEXTILE PAPER TUBE CO. LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, MADRAS

1990 INSC 1904 May 1990

The appellant, Indian Textile Paper Tube Co. Ltd., imported goods that were initially classified under a higher duty heading and later obtained a refund order after the Appellate Collector re‑classified them under a lower duty heading. The Central Government, exercising suo motu power under Section 131(3) of the Custom

SANJEEV KUMAR AGGARWALversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

1990 INSC 1214 April 1990Dismissed

Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal was detained under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act while already in judicial custody on remand. He challenged the detention on the grounds that the detaining authority had not considered his existing custody, had not applied its mind

RAM BHAGAT SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

1990 INSC 1204 April 1990Disposed off

The petitioners, SC/ST law graduates, challenged Haryana's Rule 8 which required a uniform 55% aggregate mark for all candidates in the Judicial Service examination, alleging it denied them equality of opportunity despite a 20% reservation. The State argued the mark ensured efficiency. The Supreme Court examined the co

REFERENCE UNDER ARTICLE 317(1) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIAversus-

1990 INSC 2183 August 1990Disposed off

The President of India referred a complaint under Article 317(1) to the Supreme Court alleging that a member of the Punjab Public Service Commission, G.K. Saini, slapped the Chairman, Santosh Chowdhary, without provocation. After extensive evidence, including affidavits of the Chairman, three other members, and the res

KHANJAN PALversusSTATE OF U.P.

1990 INSC 2193 August 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Khanjan Pal was accused of stabbing his co‑worker Deep Singh to death in a factory. The trial court acquitted him, discarding eye‑witness testimony and finding reasonable doubt. On appeal, the Allahabad High Court accepted the witnesses, found Pal responsible for the death, and convicted him under Section 302 IPC (murd

J.L. VARANDANIversusSMT. ASHALATA MUKHERJEE (DEAD) BY LRS.

1990 INSC 2173 August 1990Dismissed

The appellant, a tenant, defaulted on rent and was sued for eviction by the landlady. He filed petitions under Sections 17(2) and 17(2A) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, seeking to deposit arrears in instalments and to obtain protection against eviction under Section 17(4). The trial court ordered him to pay th

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.versusHOME DECORATORS AND FINANCE (PVT.) LTD. AND ANR.

1990 INSC 1783 May 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, Home Decorators & Finance Ltd. and its managing director, organized two music programmes in Jabalpur by promoting a so‑called "Nav Nirman Group" scheme. Entrants were required to pay a non‑refundable Rs.2 admission fee and a Rs.10 membership subscription refundable after ten years, and were given invit

SHAMBHU DAYAL AGARWALAversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.

1990 INSC 1853 May 1990Dismissed

The petitioner, a mustard oil manufacturer, had 562 bags of mustard seeds and 262 tins of oil seized under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 for alleged licence violations. After the seizure, the Collector, invoking section 6E, ordered the release of the goods to the petitioner, even though confiscation proceedings w

RAMESH CHANDRAversusRANDHIR SINGH AND ORS.

1990 INSC 1803 May 1990Dismissed

The claimant, Randhir Singh, suffered permanent disability after a collision with a truck owned by Ramesh Chandra and sought compensation for loss of earnings, treatment expenses, and general damages for pain and suffering. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation under three separate heads and the High

NEELAGANGABAI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 1813 May 1990Dismissed

The appellants owned land that was acquired by the Hubli Dharwar Municipal Corporation for its own purposes. A reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was made to a civil court for determination of compensation, but the court proceeded without serving notice to the corporation as required by Sectio

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSUKUMAR SENGUPTA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 1773 May 1990Disposed off

The case concerned the implementation of the 1974 and 1982 India‑Bangladesh agreements concerning the lease of a small tract of land (Teen Bigha) to enable Bangladesh’s access to its enclaves Dahagram and Angarpota. The petitioners argued that the agreements amounted to a cession of Indian territory and a surrender of

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusDR. N. RAMACHANDRA RAO AND ORS. M. PANDURANGA RAJU AND ORS.

1990 INSC 1823 May 1990Dismissed

The respondents, originally recruited as Civil Assistant Surgeons, claimed they were bypassed for promotion to the post of Additional Director of Medical and Health Services despite being ranked higher in the original select list. The dispute centered on whether the three‑year service requirement under Rule 2 of the Sp

TARA CHAND AND ANR.versusRAM PRASAD

1990 INSC 1843 May 1990Dismissed

Anandi Bai held a shop in Jaipur under an 11‑month lease that was terminated by a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, but she continued in possession and paid rent, becoming a statutory tenant. She died in September 1966 and her heirs (the appellants) were sued for ejectment by the landlord, who a

GAZI KHAN @ CHOTIAversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.

1990 INSC 1702 May 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Gazi Khan, detained under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1989, filed a representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The representation was disposed of after an unexplained delay of 27 days, including a 7‑day gap with no explanation for the

MARRI CHANDRA SHEKHAR RAOversusDEAN, SETH G.S. MEDICAL COLLEGE AND ORS.

1990 INSC 1682 May 1990Disposed off

M.C.S. Rao, born in Andhra Pradesh and belonging to the Gouda community, held a Scheduled Tribe certificate and applied for MBBS seats in Maharashtra seeking reservation benefits. His application was rejected because the Gouda community is not listed as a Scheduled Tribe in Maharashtra. The petitioner argued that the c

VISHAL JEETversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 1712 May 1990Disposed off

Vishal Jeet filed a public‑interest writ petition under Article 32 seeking a CBI inquiry into police negligence, the forced prostitution, Devadasi and Jogini systems, and rehabilitation of victims. The Court observed that prostitution is a socio‑economic problem requiring preventive, not merely punitive, measures and t

SUNIL GUPTA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.

1990 INSC 1722 May 1990Disposed off

The petitioners, social workers who staged a peaceful dharna for school teachers, were arrested, convicted under Section 186 IPC and sentenced to one month’s imprisonment. After serving the sentence they were detained further and alleged that police handcuffed and paraded them in public without any written authority, v

F.S. GANDHI (DEAD) BY LRS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, ALLAHABAD

1990 INSC 1732 May 1990Appeal(s) allowed

F.S. Gandhi, the deceased, owned several lease‑hold properties in Allahabad. The leases expired in 1958 and 1963 and the Government of Uttar Pradesh served notices to vacate, but the assessee continued to occupy the premises under a month‑to‑month tenancy and collected rent. The Wealth Tax Officer, the Appellate Assist

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusMOTI RAM AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

1990 INSC 1742 May 1990Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed to the Supreme Court against the High Court's order acquitting 24 of the 41 accused in a mass‑murder case that left 13 victims dead. The prosecution alleged a conspiracy by the accused to murder the victims during a sugar‑cane cutting, relying heavily on the testimony of several ocul

KRISHNA KUMAR KHEMKAversusGRINDLAYS BANK P.L:C AND ORS.

1990 INSC 1752 May 1990Dismissed

The appellant sought a declaration that certain properties belonged to a joint family and that a trust over them was void. A receiver was appointed with an injunction restraining any "transfer" of the properties. Grindlays Bank, the original tenant of four flats, surrendered two flats to Tata Finlay, and the receiver l

MAHESH KUMAR CHAUHAN @ BANTIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 1762 May 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Mahesh Kumar Chauhan was detained under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974. He filed a representation challenging his detention on 18‑21 August 1989, which was forwarded to the sponsoring authority on 25 August and the authority’s comments were received

SANATAN GAUDAversusBERHAMPUR UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

1990 INSC 1182 April 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, having secured more than 40% marks in his M.A. examination, was admitted to a three‑year LL.B. course but later the university refused to declare his pre‑law and intermediate law examination results, claiming he was ineligible because he did not meet a 40% aggregate requirement. The Supreme Court examine

PAUL BROTHERS (TAILORING DIVISION) AND ORS. ETC.versusASHIM KUMAR MANDAL AND ORS. ETC.

1990 INSC 1192 April 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court dealt with the aftermath of the Sanchaita Investment Company case, where a Commissioner was appointed to attach and sell properties of the defunct firm. One such property, house No. 52/1/IB, was sold on an "as is where is" basis to Ashim Kumar Mandal and others, who then sought vacant possession. The

MOSTT. SIMRIKHIAversusSMT. DOLLEY MUKHERJEE @ SMT. CHHABI MUKHERJEE & ANR.

1990 INSC 732 March 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a private complaint for offences under IPC sections 323 and 452 before a Judicial Magistrate First Class, who transferred the case to a Second Class Magistrate for enquiry under CrPC sections 192(2) and 202. The Second Class Magistrate issued process against the respondents, who challenged the issua

C.D. GEORGEversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, TRICHUR

1990 INSC 742 March 1990Appeal(s) allowed

C.D. George, a licensed gold dealer, kept his showroom on the ground floor of a four‑storeyed building but stored gold ornaments on the third floor. He was charged under the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 for failing to maintain accounts (Sec. 55(3)) and for allegedly carrying on business in premises other than those specifi

SMT. DULARIA DEVIversusJANARDAN SINGH & ORS.

1990 INSC 752 March 1990Dismissed

The plaintiff, an illiterate woman, was deceived by defendants who made her sign two deeds—one a genuine gift deed to her daughter and the other a fraudulent sale deed to the defendants—by misrepresenting the character of the documents. She later discovered the fraud and filed a suit to cancel the sale deed, while cons

VLRENDRA NATH GUPTA AND ANR.versusDELHI ADMINISTRATION AND ORS.

1990 INSC 722 March 1990Dismissed

Two teachers of the Kerala Education Society Senior Secondary School, a Delhi‑aided linguistic‑minority institution, challenged the appointment of T.N. Vishwanathan Nair as Vice‑Principal. The school had advertised the post requiring a Master’s degree, teaching experience and the ability to speak and write Malayalam, a

H.L. RANDEV AND ORS.versusHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 3351 November 1990Dismissed

The appellants, who were promotees in the Punjab Superior Judicial Service, challenged a seniority list prepared by the Punjab & Haryana High Court that gave seniority to direct recruits appointed before the 1976 amendment of the service rules. The dispute centered on whether seniority should be calculated from the dat

MANGANESE ORE (INDIA) LTD.versusCHAND LAL SAHA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 3361 November 1990Dismissed

Manganese Ore (India) Ltd. paid its mine workers a cash wage, an attendance bonus and supplied grain at concessional rates. The workers claimed that the cash value of the grain concession and the attendance bonus were being deducted from their statutory minimum wages fixed by a government notification, and filed applic

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusINDIA AUTOMOBILES AND CO. AND ORS.

1990 INSC 2161 August 1990Dismissed

The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) acquired two properties on Mount Road, Madras, which had been leased to India Automobiles. LIC applied to the Rent Controller for fixation of fair rent, but the tenants argued that the lease covered only vacant land and that the superstructures they built belonged to them,

GURJA BEDIA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1990 INSC 2151 August 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, three brothers, were convicted under IPC sections 302, 394 and 34 for the murder of Bigna Bedia and robbery of his house. The sole eye‑witness, the victim's wife (PW‑14), claimed to have identified the accused but later said she was unconscious until the police arrived, casting doubt on her testimony. T

UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHERversusVASANBHARTHI AND OTHERS

1990 INSC 681 March 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India and an Additional Secretary appealed against a Gujarat High Court order that had quashed a detention order issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974, against Vasanbharthi Jivanbharthi. The detenu challenged the detention on the

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusP.V. PAVITHRAN

1990 INSC 691 March 1990Dismissed

The State of Andhra Pradesh filed a criminal appeal against the quashing of an FIR registered against IPS officer P.V. Pavithran under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The FIR was lodged on 8 March 1984, but the investigation report was filed only on 17 September 1987, leading the respondent to seek quashing of the FI

SMT. SHAKUNTALA MEHRISHIversusNEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COMMIITEE AND ORS.

1990 INSC 661 March 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner, a primary teacher who retired in 1977 from an aided school, had opted for pension under a 1975 notification issued under Rule 126 of the Delhi School Education Rules. Despite her retirement, the Delhi Administration delayed payment of pension and gratuity, finally promulgating a pension scheme in 1988.

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusBAKSHI RAM

1990 INSC 701 March 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Bakshi Ram, a constable of the Central Reserve Police Force, was convicted under Section 10(1) of the CRPF Act for forcibly entering a constable's room and assaulting his wife, and was sentenced to four months' rigorous imprisonment. While his appeal against the conviction was pending, the department dismissed him from

ERA SEZHIYANversusT.R. BALU AND ORS.

1990 INSC 711 March 1990Dismissed

In a 1986 Rajya Sabha election by the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, the appellant, Era Sezhiyan, lost and challenged the rejection of one ballot paper marked with green ink (a pen different from the blue‑ink pen supplied in the booth) and the acceptance of three ballots where the figure ‘1’ was placed in the wrong c

C.D. AILAWADIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1990 INSC 671 March 1990Dismissed

C.D. Ailawadi, an Audit Officer in the Defence Services, challenged his compulsory retirement order issued under rule 56(j)(i) of the Civil Services Fundamental Rules, claiming he had an unblemished record and that no review had been conducted six months before he turned 50 or completed thirty years of service, entitli

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search