GIRISHBHAI DAHYABHAI SHAHversusC.C. JAIN & ANR
2009 INSC 97931 July 2009Appeal(s) allowed
Girishbhai Dahyabhai Shah was prosecuted under Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for allegedly selling adulterated curd. The sample was taken on 8 April 1988 and the Public Analyst’s report indicating adulteration was filed on 4 May 1988 but was only served to the accused on 17 July 1…
MOHAMMAD AFTAB MIRversusSTATE OF J & K & ORS.
2011 INSC 25231 March 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Sub‑Inspector of the Jammu & Kashmir Police, claimed out‑of‑turn promotion for his exemplary conduct during the 1995 Charare Sharif incident, relying on Circular No.14‑GR of 1990 which provided accelerated promotion for outstanding anti‑militancy performance. The High Court dismissed his petition, appl…
YOGRAJ INFRAS. LTD.versusSSANG YONG ENG. & CONSTRN. CO. LTD. & ANR.
2012 INSC 5731 January 2012Disposed off
Yograj Infra Ltd. furnished bank guarantees under a construction contract with Ssang Yong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. After the contract was terminated for alleged non‑performance and over‑payment, the respondent invoked the guarantees. Yograj filed a Section 9 application under the Arbitration and Conciliation…
JOSHNA GOUDAversusBRUNDABAN GOUDA & ANR.
2012 INSC 5831 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
In the 2007 election for Sarpanch of Kulagada Gram Panchayat, the appellant Joshna Gouda was declared elected. The respondent Brundaban Gouda filed an election petition under Sections 31 and 34 of the Orissa Gram Panchayat Act, 1964, alleging that the appellant was ineligible because she had not attained the age of 21,…
JEEVAN CHANDRABHAN IDNANI & ANR.versusDIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, KONKAN BHAVAN & ORS.
2012 INSC 5631 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the formation of a post‑poll "aghadi" (front) by councillors of the Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation after municipal elections. The petitioners argued that the second proviso to sub‑section (2) of Section 31A of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 allows the creation of an aghadi or…
SOU. SANDHYA MANOJ WANKHADEversusMANOJ BHIMRAO WANKHADE & ORS.
2011 INSC 8331 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Sandhya Manoj Wankhade, filed a complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 against her husband and his mother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law. The trial court and the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court deleted the mother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law from the proceedings on the groun…
IQBAL SINGH NARANG & ORS.versusVEERAN NARANG
2011 INSC 82730 November 2011Dismissed
The respondent filed a criminal complaint under IPC sections 193, 420 and 120‑B alleging that the appellants made false statements before the Rent Controller. The Rent Controller, a statutory quasi‑judicial body, had earlier disposed of a related application, holding the complaint pending. A Judicial Magistrate later i…
BHARAT STEEL TUBES LIMITEDversusIFCI LIMITED
2010 INSC 83730 November 2010Disposed off
Bharat Steel Tubes Ltd. had borrowed money from Punjab National Bank and entered into a one‑time settlement, paying only part of the amount. It later engaged Assets Care Enterprises Ltd. (ACE) to pay the balance, and ACE assigned its rights to IFCI Ltd. IFCI invoked the SARFAESI Act to enforce security and sought aucti…
UNION OF INDIAversusHASSAN ALI KHAN AND ANR.
2011 INSC 73430 September 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The Union of India appealed against the Bombay High Court's order granting bail to Hassan Ali Khan, who was accused under Section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) for handling billions of dollars allegedly derived from criminal activity and for obtaining multiple passports fraudulently. The Supreme Co…
OM PRAKASH & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2011 INSC 72830 September 2011Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether offences under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the Customs Act, 1962 are non‑cognizable and, if so, whether they are bailable. It held that Section 9A of the Excise Act and Section 104(4) of the Customs Act expressly deem the offences non‑cognizable, and that the statutes themselves,…
CHATTERJEE PETROCHEM (I) PVT. LTD.versusHALDIA PETROCHEMICALS LTD. & ORS.
2011 INSC 72930 September 2011Dismissed
The Chatterjee Group filed a Company Petition under Sections 397, 398, 399, 402, 403 and 406 of the Companies Act, 1956 alleging oppression by Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. (HPL) for failing to register 155 million shares transferred to them and for allotting 150 million shares to Indian Oil Corporation, which they claime…
RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND NATURAL RESOURCE POLICYversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2012 INSC 30830 July 2012Disposed off
The Supreme Court heard two interlocutory applications seeking permission for the ship "Oriental Nicety" to be anchored, beached and dismantled at Alang, Gujarat. The petitioner argued that the ship could not be allowed entry without strict compliance with the Basel Convention and that it might contain hazardous wastes…
SMT. MOUMITA PODDARversusINDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.
2010 INSC 45630 July 2010Dismissed
The Supreme Court heard appeals by Smt. Moumita Poddar challenging the appointment of a retail outlet dealership to respondent No.2 (Alpana Saha) by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. The High Court had set aside the entire selection on the ground that the Selection Committee failed to follow the policy circular dated 4‑Sept‑…
ANIL MISHRAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS
2008 INSC 87830 July 2008Dismissed
Anil Mishra, a Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, challenged an adverse entry for the year 2000‑01. He filed representations to the Chief Commissioner and the Central Government, both of which were rejected. He then moved an Original Application before the Central Administrative Tribunal alleging the entr…
DHARMENDRA GOELversusORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
2008 INSC 88230 July 2008Case Allowed
The appellant purchased a Tata Sumo and insured it, renewing the policy on 13 February 2002 for Rs 3,54,000. The vehicle was involved in an accident on 10 September 2002 while the policy was in force. The insurer’s surveyor declared the vehicle a total loss and valued it at Rs 1,80,000, whereas the repair estimate was …
M/S PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS (CLEVELAND) INC.versusM/S INDIAN MRI DIAGNOSTIC & RESEARCH LTD. & ANR.
2008 INSC 110429 September 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a US‑based manufacturer of medical diagnostic equipment, negotiated with the respondents for the supply of a whole‑body CT scanner. The first offer lapsed, and a second quotation for a refurbished scanner was accepted, but the respondents failed to open a correct letter of credit and did not obtain the r…
SALAUDDIN AHMED & ANR.versusSAMTA ANDOLAN
2012 INSC 35929 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Rajasthan Government issued notifications granting reservation in promotion for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, which were later quashed by the Rajasthan High Court because the State had not complied with the quantifiable data requirements laid down in M. Nagaraj's case. General‑category employees filed civi…
REKHABEN H. SHETHversusCHARU K. MEHTA & SONS.
2010 INSC 45329 July 2010Dismissed
The respondent, a permanent trustee of the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, sought the removal of the petitioner and four other trustees alleging misfeasance and misuse of trust funds. The Joint Charity Commissioner ordered that the trustees could not make any policy decisions or financial transactions without hi…
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusMAHAVEER C. SINGHVI
2010 INSC 45229 July 2010Dismissed
Mahaveer C. Singhvi, an Indian Foreign Service probationer appointed in 1999, was discharged on 13 June 2002. He challenged the discharge before the Central Administrative Tribunal, the Delhi High Court, and finally this Court, alleging that the order was punitive, based on alleged misconduct uncovered through a secret…
KISHOR KUMAR & ORS.versusPRADEEP SHUKLA & ORS.
2012 INSC 12029 February 2012Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered Special Leave Petitions challenging the selection of 766 pharmacist vacancies advertised by the Uttar Pradesh government. The petitioners argued that, despite higher merit, they were excluded because the State applied Rule 15(2) of the U.P. Pharmacists Service Rules, 1980, which mandates ba…
M/S. GODREJ SARA LEE LIMITEDversusRECKITT BENCKISER AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD. AND ANR.
2010 INSC 6629 January 2010Appeal(s) allowed
M/s. Godrej Sara Lee Ltd appealed to the Supreme Court against the Delhi High Court’s order that it had jurisdiction to entertain appeals against the cancellation of its registered designs by the Controller of Patents and Designs, Kolkata under Section 19 of the Designs Act, 2000. The Controller had cancelled two desig…
PRABIR MONDAL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2009 INSC 120328 October 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants Prabir Mondal, others and Mongal Das were convicted under Sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for an alleged attempt to murder the complainant in a pump room. The prosecution claimed the victim was attacked with a knife, resulting in incised injuries to his left palm and cheek. The medical injur…
SPEAKER HARYANA VIDHAN SABHAversusKULDEEP BISHNOI & ORS.
2012 INSC 43728 September 2012Disposed off
Five Haryana MLAs merged with the Indian National Congress and the Speaker accepted the merger. Kuldeep Bishnoi filed disqualification petitions under Article 191 and the Tenth Schedule, alleging the merger violated paragraph 4(1). The High Court, invoking Order 41 Rule 33 CPC, directed the Speaker to decide the petiti…
BEDANGA TALUKDARversusSAIFUDAULLAH KHAN & ORS.
2011 INSC 72128 September 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The Assam Public Service Commission advertised a combined competitive examination with a reservation of 3% for physically disabled candidates. Respondent No.1, a physically disabled applicant, applied under the original advertisement but did not submit the required disability certificate by the stipulated deadline, nor…
JAWANT P. SANKPALversusSUMAN GHOLAP & ORS.
2010 INSC 43928 July 2010Dismissed
The petitioner challenged the order of the Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission, which had found that police officials tortured the complainant's son while in custody under Section 12(a) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, and had recommended compensation. The High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ, h…
P.J. AGRO TECH LIMITED & ORS.versusWATER BASE LIMITED
2010 INSC 44128 July 2010Appeal(s) allowed
P.J. Agro Tech Ltd and its directors were served with a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for the dishonour of a cheque that had been drawn by a third party, K. Balashankar Reddy, from his personal savings account. The appellants contended that the cheque was not drawn on any …
MOHAN MALI & ANR.versusSTATE OF M.P.
2010 INSC 25128 April 2010Disposed off
Mohan Mali and another were convicted under IPC sections 302, 324 and 326 and sentenced to life imprisonment. One co‑accused, Dhanna Lal (appellant No.2), claimed he was a juvenile at the time of the offence. The Supreme Court examined the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, …
VINISHA JITESH TOLANI @ MANMEET LAGHMANIversusJITESH KISHORE TOLANI
2010 INSC 25228 April 2010Disposed off
The wife and husband were married in Goa under Hindu rites and the marriage was registered there. The husband filed a petition under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in Goa seeking annulment. The wife, who had been residing in the United Kingdom and later in Delhi, filed a petition under Section 25 of the Cod…
M/S. ANGEL BABY PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.versusNEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
2010 INSC 74327 October 2010Dismissed
The petitioners, Angel Baby Products Pvt. Ltd. and Hira Lal Gupta, failed to execute a lease deed for a commercial plot allotted by NOIDA within the 120‑day period, citing mis‑description of the plot and a municipal drain, and sought a waiver of the penalty. The Chief Executive Officer of NOIDA waived the penalty and g…
JAI BALAJI INDUSTRIES LTD.versusPEC LTD. & ORS.
2009 INSC 120127 October 2009Dismissed
Jai Balaji Industries Ltd. entered into a purchase agreement with a foreign seller for manganese ore and a subsequent High Seas Sale Agreement with PEC Ltd., a government company, which was to act as seller. After the cargo arrived, Jai Balaji tested a small portion, found it sub‑standard and rejected the entire consig…
BANDA CHINNA SUBBARAYUDU & ORS.versusTHAILAM VISHANATHA RAO & ANR.
2009 INSC 120227 October 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants obtained a decree for recovery of money and the decree-holder initiated execution proceedings, resulting in the sale of the appellants' property on 25 November 2003. On the same day a third party obtained a stay of the execution proceedings, which remained in force until 2 December 2004. Because of the s…
M/S NEW HORIZON SUGAR MILLS LTD.versusGOVT. OF PONDICHERRY TH. ADDL. SEC. & ANR.
2012 INSC 43027 September 2012Dismissed
New Horizon Sugar Mills Ltd and its directors, who had guaranteed a bank loan, defaulted and faced attachment of their properties under the Pondicherry Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2004. They challenged the validity of that Act and a government order attaching properties, arguin…
OM PRAKASHversusASHWANI KUMAR BASSI
2010 INSC 55027 August 2010Dismissed
The landlord filed an eviction petition under Section 13‑B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 and served the tenant on 19 May 2005, requiring the tenant to apply for leave to contest within 15 days. The tenant filed the application one day late, on 4 June 2005, and then sought condonation of the delay …
P.A. MOHAMMED RIYASversusM.K. RAGHAVAN & ORS.
2012 INSC 19227 April 2012Dismissed
The appellant, P.A. Mohammed Riyas, contested the 2009 Lok Sabha election from Kozhikode and filed an election petition alleging that the respondent, M.K. Raghavan, committed corrupt practice by publishing false statements, invoking Sections 81, 100, 101 and 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The petiti…
ARUP DAS & ORS.versusSTATE OF ASSAM & ORS.
2012 INSC 5427 January 2012Dismissed
The Director of Land Records and Survey, Assam advertised 160 seats for the Assam Survey and Settlement Training Institute and selected 160 candidates. Subsequent lists of candidates were prepared, but the Government refused to approve them, prompting petitions. The petitioners argued that appointments could be made fr…
BRIGADIER MAN MOHAN SHARMA, FRGS (RETD.)versusLT. GEN. DEPINDER SINGH
2008 INSC 135326 November 2008Appeal(s) allowed
Lt. Gen. Depinder Singh (author) entered a publication agreement with Dattatreya Prakashan, later acquired by the appellant (Trishul Publications). After publishing the first and second editions, the appellant refused further editions and suggested the author authorize another publisher, Natraj Publishers, to reprint 1…
OM PRAKASH MARWAHA (D) THR. LRS. & ORS.versusJAGDISH LAL MARWAHA (D) THR. LRS.
2008 INSC 135426 November 2008Dismissed
The plaintiff sought vacant and peaceful possession of a Delhi property, but the suit was dismissed. The plaintiff appealed, and during the first appeal the sole defendant died. An application for substitution of the defendant’s legal heirs was filed but remained pending, and the decree was erroneously drawn up against…
U.P. STATE SUGAR & CANE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITEDversusCHINI MILL MAZDOOR SANGH & OTHERS
2008 INSC 109426 September 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a sugar mill, employed certain workers as "seasonal workmen" but they performed duties throughout the year and were paid seasonal wages. The workers claimed they should be declared permanent and receive permanent workmen benefits. The State of Uttar Pradesh referred the dispute to the Labour Court, which…
U.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDversusLAXMI KANT GUPTA
2008 INSC 109526 September 2008Appeal(s) allowed
Laxmi Kant Gupta, a temporary employee of the U.P. State Electricity Board, was terminated in 1986 without compliance with Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. He raised the dispute only after a ten‑year delay, and the Labour Court ordered his reinstatement without back wages, citing the delay. The Hi…
BUDHADEV KARMASKARversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2012 INSC 30626 July 2012
The Union of India sought modification of a Supreme Court order that had constituted a Committee to examine rehabilitation of sex workers. It prayed to delete the Durbar Mahila Samanwaya Samiti from the Committee, alleging the Samiti advocated repeal of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 and recognition of sex …
REPUBLIC OF ITALY & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2013 INSC 28226 April 2013Disposed off
Two Italian marines were arrested by Kerala police for killing two Indian fishermen 20.5 nautical miles off the Kerala coast. The Supreme Court earlier held that the State of Kerala lacked jurisdiction and that only the Union of India could investigate and try the marines, pending a determination of the applicability o…
M/S INDTEL TECHNICAL SERVICES PVT. LTD.versusW.S. ATKINS RAIL LTD.
2008 INSC 97625 August 2008Case Allowed
M/s. Indtel Technical Services Pvt. Ltd. and W.S. Atkins Rail Ltd. entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on 11 June 2002 to jointly prepare a tender for the Indian Railways Crashworthiness Project. The respondent unilaterally terminated the MoU and withdrew the joint bid, leading the applicant to claim breach and …
D. SUDHAKAR & ORS.versusD.N. JEEVARAJU & ORS.
2012 INSC 5225 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
Five legislators were elected to the Karnataka Legislative Assembly in 2008 as independents. They supported the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government and served as cabinet ministers, but withdrew their support in October 2010, prompting the Speaker to disqualify them under paragraph 2(2) of the Tenth Schedule for "de…
C.N. ANANTHARAMversusM/S. FIAT INDIA LTD. AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
2010 INSC 81124 November 2010Disposed off
The petitioner bought a diesel Fiat Siena Weekender and complained of engine rattling noise, leading the dealer to replace the engine and other parts. Unsatisfied, he demanded a new vehicle or a refund of the purchase price and expenses, filing complaints before the District Forum, State Commission, and finally the Nat…
ATUL MANUBHAI PAREKHversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
2009 INSC 125624 November 2009Dismissed
The appellant, Atul Manubhai Parekh, was convicted under Section 120‑B of the IPC and sentenced to 15 days of rigorous imprisonment with a fine. He had already undergone 15 days of detention in connection with other cases and sought a set‑off of 30 days under Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, arguing…
NAREN CHANDRA NASKARversusARUN BHATTACHARYA & ORS.
2008 INSC 108624 September 2008Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Naren Chandra Naskar, challenged the registration of his sale deed, alleging forgery, after a criminal complaint was filed by the District Registrar. Both his deed and the respondent's deed were recorded with identical registration details, prompting the Calcutta High Court to order an enquiry by the Dis…
VADIRAJ NAGGAPPA VERNEKAR (D) THROUGH LRS.versusSHARAD CHAND PRABHAKAR GOGATE
2009 INSC 24524 February 2009Dismissed
The suit concerned the ownership of a flat and the validity of letters of administration obtained by the respondent. A key witness, Sadanand Sheshgiri Shet, gave his evidence by affidavit under Order 17 Rule 4 CPC. The plaintiffs later moved a motion under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC seeking to recall the witness to adduce fa…
INDU JAINversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
2008 INSC 121523 October 2008Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the custodial death of R.K. Jain, a Deputy Commissioner who suffered from asthma and died of asphyxia after being detained in a dust‑filled, windowless room by officers of the Lokayukta. The Sessions Court had framed charges under Section 304 Part II IPC but omitted Section 330 IPC; the High …
RAM JETHMALANI & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS
2011 INSC 70723 September 2011Matter referred to larger bench
The petitioners, led by Ram Jethmalani, sought a writ directing the Union of India to recover unaccounted money of Indian citizens held in foreign banks and the Court had earlier appointed a Special Investigation Team (SIT) headed by two retired Supreme Court judges. The Union of India filed Interlocutory Application N…
KULDEEP SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2010 INSC 64023 September 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The police, acting on secret information, seized four sealed bags containing 150 kg of poppy husk from the appellant's residence. No samples were taken at the time of seizure; instead, the Station House Officer later broke the seals, mixed the contents, and collected samples before resealing the bags. The appellant was…
HARYANA WAREHOUSING CORPORATIONversusJAGAT RAM & ANR.
2011 INSC 15223 February 2011Dismissed
The Haryana State Warehousing Corporation promoted Ram Kumar to Assistant Manager (Administration) over the senior Jagat Ram, relying on a comparative assessment of their service records. Jagat Ram challenged the promotion, arguing that Regulation 8(2) of the 1994 Regulations mandates promotion on a seniority‑cum‑merit…
SHIV KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF GOA THROUGH HOME SECRETARY
2009 INSC 23623 February 2009Dismissed
Shiv Kumar Mishra was convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act for possession of 1.31 kg of ganja and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, arguing that the weight should exclude seeds, leaves, and moisture, which would reduce the quantity below the 1 kg threshold for a 'small quanti…
SMITHA JOHNYversusJOSNY VARGHESE & ORS.
2010 INSC 72322 October 2010Dismissed
The case concerned a vacancy for the post of High School Assistant (English) (HSA‑English) that arose on 1 April 2005 in a Kerala government school. Respondent No.1, an Upper Primary School Assistant, claimed she was the only UPSA qualified (B.Ed. in English) at that date and sought promotion, while the petitioner, a L…
PAL @ PALLAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2010 INSC 63422 September 2010Disposed off
The appellant lodged an FIR alleging murder and later filed a protest petition that was treated as a complaint, leading to two parallel criminal proceedings: one based on a police charge‑sheet and another on the complaint. The accused in the police case were the witnesses in the complaint case and vice‑versa, and none …
DEVINDER SINGH NARULAversusMEENAKSHI NANGIA
2012 INSC 34822 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The husband and wife were married on 26 March 2011 but lived apart from the outset, and the husband filed a petition under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking a declaration of nullity within three months. During mediation the parties agreed to dissolve the marriage by mutual consent and filed a joint petition …
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERversusBHAVANI
2008 INSC 50622 April 2008Dismissed
Bhavani, a former employee of a Kerala cashew factory, claimed pension under the Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995, asserting she retired on 31‑12‑1995 based on her employer's service records showing her date of birth as 31‑12‑1935. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner relied on its own records, which listed her date…
RAJENDRA PRATAPRAO MANE & ORS.versusSADASHIVRAO MANDALIK K.T.S.S.K. LTD. & ORS.
2012 INSC 14222 March 2012Disposed off
The appellants complained that the Karkhana sugar factory had enrolled 6,617 persons who did not meet the eligibility criteria under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. After the Commissioner of Sugar failed to act, a writ petition led to an inquiry by the Regional Joint Director, who confirmed the inelig…
NETRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF M.P.
2007 INSC 33322 March 2007Appeal(s) allowed
Netraaj Singh was acquitted by a trial court of charges under IPC s.302 r/w s.149 on the ground of inadequate evidence. The State appealed, and during the pendency of the appeal the appellant obtained permission to replace his counsel with Mr. Ashutosh Singh. However, the cause list for the final hearing still named th…
SATYANARAYANA SULTANIA & ANR.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2010 INSC 5122 January 2010Dismissed
On February 3, 2000, a truck carrying 100 quintals of paddy belonging to the petitioners was stopped by a food inspector, and the grain was seized and later confiscated under Clause 6(2) of the Madhya Pradesh Essential Commodities (Exhibition of Price and Price Control) Order, 1997. The petitioners challenged the seizu…
ZENITH STEEL TUBES AND INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANR.versusSICOM LIMITED
2007 INSC 117221 November 2007Matter referred to larger bench
The appellants, a sick industrial company and its guarantor, sought to enforce a personal guarantee for a loan after the company defaulted. The respondent invoked Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, while the guarantor claimed protection under Section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies …
LEILA DAVIDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2009 INSC 119021 October 2009Disposed off
Petitioners filed multiple writ petitions under Article 32 alleging various grievances, but their pleadings were deemed per se contempt of the Supreme Court. During the hearing, they disrupted proceedings, used abusive language, and one petitioner threw a footwear at the judges, all in the presence of senior law office…
BENARSI KRISHNA COMMITTEE AND ORS.versusKARMYOGI SHELTERS PVT. LTD.
2012 INSC 41621 September 2012Dismissed
The dispute arose from an arbitral award dated 12 May 2004, which was sent to the respondent's counsel rather than to the respondent itself. The respondent filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, more than nine months after the award was received by counsel, claiming the time li…
VILLAYATI RAM MITTAL (PVT.) LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2010 INSC 62721 September 2010Dismissed
The petitioner, a construction company, submitted the lowest bid for a government construction project and furnished earnest money as required by the tender notice. After the bids were opened, the petitioner sent a letter correcting a figure in its bid, which increased the bid amount substantially. The employer treated…
T.A. HAMEEDversusM. VISWANATHAN
2008 INSC 23621 February 2008Disposed off
The Kerala High Court Division Bench referred a question of law to its Full Bench concerning the applicability of Section 11(17) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act to legal heirs of a deceased tenant. The Full Bench answered the question but then proceeded to decide the civil revision petition on its …
STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.versusK. GOVINDAPPA & ANR.
2008 INSC 132820 November 2008Dismissed
The State of Karnataka challenged the appointment of K. Govindappa as Lecturer in History in an aided private college, arguing that the post formed part of a larger cadre of lecturers and should be subject to the reservation roster. The college had six lecturer posts across different disciplines, but the History post w…
NIKHIL MERCHANTversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR
2008 INSC 94820 August 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a former managing director of a company that had defaulted on a loan from Andhra Bank, was charged by the CBI with cheating, forgery and corruption offences. The bank’s civil suit for recovery was later compromised, with clause 11 stating that both parties withdrew all claims against each other. The appe…
SUPREME COURT BAR ASSOCIATION & ORS.versusB.D. KAUSHIK
2012 INSC 29720 July 2012Disposed off
The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) sought clarification on the criteria devised by its Implementation Committee to identify members who regularly practice before the Supreme Court and are therefore eligible to vote in SCBA elections under the "One Bar One Vote" principle. Various suggestions were made, including …
RAM PARSHOTAM MITTAL & ANR.versusM/S HILLCREST REALTY SDN.BHD. & ORS. ETC.
2009 INSC 92620 July 2009Dismissed
The case concerned whether Hotel Queen Road Pvt. Ltd., a special purpose vehicle, had converted into a public company by resolutions passed on 30 September 2002, which were accompanied by a Form 23 filing and a statement in lieu of prospectus. The conversion would affect the applicability of Section 87(2)(b) of the Com…
U.P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN.versusMOHD. GHILMAN SHARIF & OTHERS.
2009 INSC 92720 July 2009Disposed off
The Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (the appellant) sought to enforce a scheme of nationalisation that granted it exclusive rights to operate on certain routes and cancelled the permits of private operators. Private operators, including Mohd. Gilman Sharif, challenged the scheme, arguing they were entitl…
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusRAJ KISHORE YADAV AND ANR.
2006 INSC 37620 June 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court heard Civil Appeal No. 1442 of 2005 filed by the State of U.P. against the High Court's order that set aside the dismissal of Raj Kishore Yadav, a government employee, and reinstated him with full benefits. The employee had been charged with five serious offences, four of which were proved beyond doub…
REDAUL HUSSAIN KHANversusNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY
2009 INSC 124819 November 2009Dismissed
The petitioner, Redaul Hussain Khan, was arrested on 31 May 2009 for allegedly sending money to an extremist group later declared an unlawful association under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA). While the investigation was transferred to the National Investigation Agency, the petitioner sought statu…
SAYED MOHD. AHMED KAZMIversusSTATE, GNCTD & ORS.
2012 INSC 48719 October 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Sayed Mohd. Ahmed Kazmi, was arrested in connection with an alleged bomb attack and was placed in police and then judicial custody. After the initial 90‑day period expired, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate extended his custody for another 90 days with retrospective effect, despite the appellant's pendin…
CHALLA JAYA BHASKAR & ORS.versusTHUNGATHURTHI SURENDER & ORS.
2010 INSC 70819 October 2010Case Allowed
The case concerned Civil Assistant Surgeons (CAS) in the Andhra Pradesh Medical and Health Services who, after obtaining a post‑graduate degree, were transferred laterally to the teaching cadre as Assistant Professors. The transferred officers claimed that their prior service as CAS should be counted for seniority in t…
SHAGUN MAHILA UDYOGIK SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADITversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2011 INSC 59819 August 2011Dismissed
The appellant, a Mahila cooperative society, challenged the award of a contract for supplying fortified blended food under the Integrated Child Development Scheme, arguing that the eligibility criteria in the Expression of Interest (EOI) were arbitrary and that the contract period should be limited to one year. The Hig…
KESHAV DUTTversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2010 INSC 53019 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a meter reader, was convicted under Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding a bribe, based primarily on a handwriting expert’s report linking him to a paper (Ex.PR) used in the alleged offence. The Supreme Court examined whether such expert opinion could be admitted witho…
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.versusMITHILESH KUMAR
2010 INSC 53119 August 2010Dismissed
The Bihar Public Service Commission advertised vacancies for Instructors and Assistant Instructors to train persons with disabilities. The respondent applied, was interviewed and declared successful, but after the interview the Empowered Committee decided to shift training to NGOs and asked the Commission not to recomm…
RAMESHBHAI PANDURAO HEDAUversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2010 INSC 15719 March 2010Dismissed
The appellant's brother was found dead and a post‑mortem concluded natural causes; the police investigation was closed. Dissatisfied, the appellant filed a complaint before a Metropolitan Magistrate alleging murder and sought a fresh police investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). Th…
M/S VEENA CORP.THROUGH RAJAN BABULAL MEHTAversusASHOK ARJANBHAI JOLIA & ORS.
2009 INSC 36919 March 2009Dismissed
The case arose from a dispute under the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme where the developer (M/s Veena Corp.) had obtained the Slum Rehabilitation Authority’s (SRA) sanction for an amended plan to provide a detached structure for a flour mill belonging to respondents No.1 and No.2. The respondents were entitled to a 225 sq …
M/S. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPN. LTD. & ORS.versusM/S. SUPER HIGHWAY SERVICES & ANR.
2010 INSC 11319 February 2010Dismissed
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation entered into a dealership agreement with Super Highway Services for the retail sale of petroleum products. The corporation terminated the agreement under Clause 58 after a sample of diesel failed a marker test, but the dealer alleged that it was never properly served notice of the test, …
RAMDAS BANSAL (D)versusKHARAG SINGH BAID & ORS.
2012 INSC 4419 January 2012Dismissed
The appellant, Ramdas Bansal, held a 21‑year lease of a building (Grace Cinema Hall) on premises in Kolkata and, after the lease expired, the respondents filed a suit for vacant possession and rectification of the lease description. Bansal sought to introduce documents alleging that the respondents were "Thika" tenants…
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusRAJA MOHAMMED AMIR MOHAMMAD KHAN
2010 INSC 4819 January 2010Dismissed
The respondent, Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan, was declared the sole legal heir of the estate of the late Raja of Mahmudabad, which had been taken over by the Custodian of Enemy Property under the Enemy Property Act, 1968. The Custodian’s ledger showed a credit of Rs 1,77,38,828.11 as of 27‑03‑2002, representing ren…
MAHESH RATILAL SHAHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2010 INSC 4919 January 2010Dismissed
Mahesh Ratilal Shah filed a writ petition alleging that the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) had listed the shares of Presto Finance Ltd. despite fraudulent dealings, and that the BSE’s Rules and Bye‑laws, never published in the Gazette, were ultra vires the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956. The petition sought d…
BANK OF BARODA & ORS.versusGANPAT SINGH DEORA
2008 INSC 147818 December 2008Appeal(s) allowed
Ganpat Singh Deora, a Bank of Baroda employee aged 40 with 13 years of service, opted for voluntary retirement under the Bank's 2001 Voluntary Retirement Scheme (BOBEVRS‑2001). While he received the scheme’s retiral benefits, his claim for a pension under the Bank of Baroda Employees Pension Regulations, 1995 was denie…
PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.versusFOOD INSPECTOR AND ANR.
2010 INSC 78618 November 2010Appeal(s) allowed
Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd., the manufacturer of sweetened carbonated water, was prosecuted after a public analyst reported the presence of the pesticide carbofuran (0.001 mg/L) in its product, alleging adulteration under Rule 65 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 and Section 2(ia)(h) of the Preven…
HAR SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2008 INSC 105418 September 2008Dismissed
The appellants were accused of murdering Bhupal Singh after a dispute over gambling winnings. The prosecution alleged that the accused followed the deceased, assaulted him, and that he was killed shortly thereafter, with his body later recovered at the instance of accused Mohan Singh. The trial court, relying on the te…
DINESH SETHversusSTATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI
2008 INSC 94018 August 2008Dismissed
Dinesh Seth was married to Rama, who died by hanging within two years of marriage. The trial court framed a charge under IPC Section 304B (dowry death) read with Section 34 and convicted the accused. On appeal, the Delhi High Court acquitted them of the 304B charge but convicted Seth under IPC Section 498A (cruelty) an…
SWARAN SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE THROUGH STANDING COUNSEL & ANR.
2008 INSC 94118 August 2008Disposed off
The appellants were charged under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for calling a Scheduled Caste informant "Chamar" (or "Chuda‑Chamar") in what the FIR described as a public setting. The Supreme Court examined whether the term "Chamar" in contemporary usa…
DHARAM PAL & ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR.
2013 INSC 47918 July 2013Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether a magistrate, after receiving a police report under Section 173(3) CrPC, could disagree with the report, issue summons to persons listed in column 2 and either try them or commit the case to a Sessions Court, and whether the Sessions Court could, upon committal, take cognizance and su…
CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE VELLORE & ORSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2013 INSC 48218 July 2013Case Allowed
The Supreme Court examined four notifications issued by the Medical Council of India (MCI) and the Dental Council of India (DCI) that introduced a single National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) for admission to MBBS, BDS and postgraduate medical courses. Petitioners, including Christian Medical College Vellore an…
YASHWANT SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
2013 INSC 48118 July 2013Disposed off
The Supreme Court dealt with a series of Special Leave Petitions and contempt proceedings filed by trained teachers seeking appointment to vacant primary teacher posts in Bihar. The State of Bihar had given an undertaking in 2006 to recruit these teachers, but failed to fulfil it, prompting contempt petitions. The Cour…
FACULTY ASSOCIATION OF AIIMSversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2013 INSC 48018 July 2013Disposed off
The Faculty Association of AIIMS challenged the application of reservation policy to specialty and super‑specialty faculty posts at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, invoking Articles 15, 16 and 335 of the Constitution. The Court examined whether the rule of reservation could be extended to these highly tech…
DESIYA MURPOKKU DRAVIDA KAZHAGAM & ANR.versusTHE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
2012 INSC 17618 April 2012Dismissed
The petitioners, including Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam, challenged the constitutional validity of the 2000 amendment to the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968, which required a political party to secure at least 6% of the state's valid votes and win at least two legislative seats to be recogn…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusTANTIA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.
2011 INSC 30818 April 2011Dismissed
The East Central Railways awarded a risk‑and‑cost tender to Tantia Construction for a rail over‑bridge. Subsequent design changes required an extended viaduct, increasing the work and cost. The contractor refused to undertake the additional work, which was not covered by the original agreement, and the Railways attempt…
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusK.M. POONAM & ORS.
2011 INSC 13518 February 2011Disposed off
The owner of a jeep obtained a motor insurance policy covering six occupants, including the driver. The vehicle, however, was carrying fifteen passengers when it met with an accident, resulting in multiple deaths and injuries. Claimants filed compensation claims, and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held the insurer …
KRISHAN GOPALversusSANDHYA DEVI & ORS.
2009 INSC 20418 February 2009Dismissed
The respondents, parents of a deceased pillion rider, filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for death caused by a bus and a scooter. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the claim, holding the appellant had not proved negligence. On appeal, the Himachal Pradesh Hi…
REPUBLIC OF ITALY AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2013 INSC 4318 January 2013Disposed off
The case arose from an incident on 15 February 2012 when two Italian naval officers aboard the merchant vessel M.V. Enrica Lexie fired on an Indian fishing boat 20.5 nautical miles off the Kerala coast, killing two fishermen. The Kerala police lodged an FIR under the Indian Penal Code and arrested the officers, which t…
BURDWAN CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.versusASIM CHATTERJEE & ORS.
2012 INSC 4018 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Burdwan Central Cooperative Bank dismissed Respondent No.1, a Grade‑III employee, on the ground of financial irregularities he allegedly committed while employed with an affiliated cooperative society (Raipur Krishi Unnayan Samity). The employee challenged the dismissal, arguing that the bank had no juris…
AIR INDIA CABIN CREW ASSN. & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2011 INSC 80817 November 2011Dismissed
The Air India Cabin Crew Association challenged the management’s revised promotion policy and the government’s 2003 directive that equalised the retirement and flying ages of male Flight Pursers and female Air Hostesses. The petitioners argued that these changes violated earlier bilateral settlements, the Air Corporati…
O.N.G.C. LTD.versusENGINEERING MAZDOOR SANGH
2009 INSC 115017 September 2009Disposed off
The Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) regularly hires seasonal casual workers for its field surveys. A tribunal ordered that 153 identified workmen who met educational qualifications and 240 days of service be regularised before any new recruitment. The Supreme Court, in its 20 November 2006 order, enjoined ONGC f…
DR. PUNEET GULATI AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
2011 INSC 58217 August 2011Disposed off
The case concerned a reservation policy by the State of Kerala that reserved 100% of seats in super‑specialty medical courses for students from Kerala, later amended to 10% for candidates with rural service. Applicants from outside Kerala challenged the policy as unconstitutional. The Kerala High Court held the 100% re…
JAGDISH PRASAD SHARMA ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
2013 INSC 47517 July 2013Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether the University Grants Commission (UGC) could, through regulations under the UGC Act, impose a composite scheme that revised pay scales and raised the retirement age of teachers from 62 to 65 years on State universities and colleges. The petitioners argued that the UGC's recommendation…
SALIL BALIversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2013 INSC 47417 July 2013Dismissed
The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions challenging Sections 2(k), 2(1), 15, 16, 17, 19 and 21 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, on the ground that the age limit of 18 years for juveniles was arbitrary and violated Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, especially in the wa…
R. RAVINDRA REDDY AND ORS.versusH. RAMAIAH REDDY AND ORS.
2010 INSC 10717 February 2010Dismissed
The petitioners, sons of H. Ramaiah Reddy, filed a suit in 2005 seeking declaration of their coparcenary rights, partition of ancestral lands and a declaration that a 1975 order of the Karnataka Land Tribunal granting occupancy rights to Annaiah Reddy was illegal. The trial court held the suit barred by limitation and …
SPEAKER, ORISSA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLYversusUTKAL KESHARI PARIDA
2013 INSC 3817 January 2013Dismissed
Four legislators elected on a National Congress Party (NCP) ticket defected to the ruling Biju Janata Dal (BJD) in the Orissa Legislative Assembly. The NCP state president filed disqualification petitions before the Speaker under the Orissa Legislative Assembly (Disqualification on Ground of Defection) Rules, 1987, see…
A.V.M. SALES CORPORATIONversusM/S. ANURADHA CHEMICALS PVT. LTD.
2012 INSC 3517 January 2012Case Allowed
The parties entered into a supply agreement at Calcutta (place 'C') and a mutual understanding that any dispute would be litigated exclusively in Calcutta courts. When a dispute arose, the petitioner filed a suit in Calcutta, but the respondent filed a separate suit in Vijayawada (place 'V'), which was decreed in the r…
D.N. JEEVARAJU & ANR.versusD. SUDHAKAR & ORS. ETC.
2010 INSC 89316 December 2010Dismissed
Five independent MLAs who had supported the BJP government in Karnataka withdrew their support and were disqualified under paragraph 2(2) of the Tenth Schedule. They filed writ petitions challenging the disqualification and sought to amend paragraph 9 of their petitions, which mistakenly stated that they had not left t…
HDFC BANK LTD.versusJ.J. MANNAN @ J.M. JOHN PAUL & ANR.
2009 INSC 131416 December 2009Case Partly allowed
The HDFC Bank alleged that its Managing Director, J.J. Mannan, defrauded the bank of Rs.2.04 crore by obtaining a loan through fictitious transactions and colluding with other firms. An FIR was filed and the accused applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC, which the Madras High Court granted in a bl…
BABULAL KHANDELWAL & ORS.versusBALKRISHAN D. SANGHVI & ORS.
2008 INSC 116416 October 2008Dismissed
Respondent No.1 filed an administration suit to administer the intestate estate of his deceased parents. During the suit he sought to amend the plaint to implead the appellants, alleging that two properties had been alienated to a company and to the appellants during the parents' lifetimes. The Bombay High Court allowe…
MANOJ SHARMAversusSTATE & ORS.
2008 INSC 116616 October 2008Appeal(s) allowed
Manoj Sharma was charged in an FIR for offences including cheating, forgery and fraud under Sections 420, 468, 471, 34 and 120‑B IPC. The complainant and the accused later reached an amicable settlement and the complainant withdrew the allegations. The Delhi High Court refused to quash the FIR, prompting an appeal to t…
V. RANGANATHANversusN. BASKARAN AND ORS.
2010 INSC 62016 September 2010Dismissed
The petitioner, V. Ranganathan, applied for the post of Principal in a Government Higher Secondary School and was placed tenth in the reserve list. He filed an original application before the Central Administrative Tribunal seeking a direction that the UPSC appoint him to the post instead of the selected candidate, N. …
KEDAR NARAYAN PARIDA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ORISSA AND ANR.
2009 INSC 114416 September 2009Dismissed
The petitioners were accused of murdering a woman’s husband; although the FIR named 19 persons, only a few were initially charge‑sheeted, allegedly due to the influence of a local MLA who provided alibis. The High Court, invoking its inherent powers under Article 226, directed the police to file charge‑sheets against a…
UNION OF INDIAversusRANU BHANDARI
2008 INSC 104916 September 2008Dismissed
Sanjay Bhandari was detained under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA) for alleged misuse of Export Promotion Capital Goods licences and smuggling of imported vehicles. His wife, Ranu Bhandari, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the de…
RAJU JHURANIversusM/S GERMINDA PVT. LTD.
2012 INSC 33516 August 2012Case Partly allowed
The landlord, Raju Jhurni, obtained an eviction decree against the tenant company under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, but the decree did not determine the arrears of rent. He then filed a winding‑up petition before the Company Court under Sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking recov…
SUPREME COURT BAR ASSOCIATION & ORS.versusB.D. KAUSHIK
2012 INSC 33616 August 2012Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocate‑on‑Record Association (SCAORA) filed IA No.6 seeking clarification of a judgment dated 20 July 2012 that applied the "ONE BAR ONE VOTE" principle to bar‑association elections. The earlier judgment excluded from voting in SCBA elections any person w…
SUBHASH POPATLAL DAVEversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2013 INSC 46716 July 2013Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders issued under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA) and the National Security Act, 1980. The petitioners, many of whom had absconded or evaded execution of the orders,…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.versusINDIAN HOTEL & RESTAURANTS ASSN. & ORS
2013 INSC 47016 July 2013Dismissed
The Maharashtra government amended the Bombay Police Act, 1951 by inserting sections 33A and 338 to prohibit any dance performance in eating houses, permit rooms and beer bars while exempting certain establishments such as three‑star hotels and members‑only clubs. The amendment was challenged on the ground that it viol…
M/S. HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusMR. RAM PARSHOTAM MITTAL & ORS.
2013 INSC 46816 July 2013Dismissed
The Delhi High Court, after substantially hearing an appeal, allowed the appellants to withdraw the appeal and extended the interim relief granted earlier until 10 May 2010. The appellants contended that the High Court, having become functus officio upon permitting withdrawal, could not lawfully extend interim relief o…
GHANSHYAM DASS RELHANversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
2009 INSC 92216 July 2009Dismissed
Ghanshyam Dass Relhan was appointed as a clerk in the Haryana Government in 1958, confirmed and later promoted, and resigned in 1977 after obtaining permission to join the Kurukshetra Central Bank as a Senior Accountant. He retired from the bank in 1997, received retirement benefits but not a pension, and claimed a pen…
AUTHORIZED OFFICER, INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK AND ANR.versusM/S. ASHOK SAW MILL
2009 INSC 92116 July 2009Disposed off
The Authorized Officer of Indian Overseas Bank (IOB) sought to enforce its security interest over the assets of Mis. Ashok Saw Mill under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act after the borrower defaulted on loans, leading to possession and eventual sale of assets. The borrower challenged the actions before the High Court …
H.U.D.AversusRAJ SINGH RANA
2008 INSC 83516 July 2008Case Allowed
The Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) allotted a residential plot to Raj Singh Rana under an allotment letter that stipulated a 7% simple interest rate on instalments of the tentative sale price. After the plot’s acquisition cost was enhanced, HUDA demanded additional payment with interest rates of 10% and 15%…
M/S. JINDAL STAINLESS LTD. & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
2010 INSC 21516 April 2010Matter referred to larger bench
The petitioners, including M/s. Jindal Stainless Ltd., challenged the validity of various State entry tax statutes on the ground that they violated Articles 301, 302, 303 and 304 of the Constitution. The Division Bench observed that several High Courts had treated Article 304(a) and 304(b) as independent, concluding th…
DESIYA MURPOKKU DRAVIDA KAZHAGAM AND ANR.versusTHE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
2011 INSC 21216 March 2011Hearing Adjourned
The Supreme Court examined eleven writ petitions and three special leave petitions filed by registered unrecognised political parties seeking a common election symbol for the upcoming Tamil Nadu Assembly elections. The parties challenged several provisions of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968…
NTPC LIMITEDversusANSALDO CALDAIE BOILERS INDIA P. LTD. & ANR.
2012 INSC 9316 February 2012Appeal(s) allowed
NTPC Ltd invited bids for a super‑critical steam‑generator package and rejected the bid of Ansaldo Caldaie Boilers India Ltd on the ground that its proposed Qualified Steam Generator Manufacturer had not designed and engineered the evaporator, an integral part of the generator, but had outsourced its manufacture to a t…
YOGRAJ INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.versusSSANG YONG ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
2011 INSC 84515 December 2011Disposed off
An interlocutory application was filed by SSANG YONG Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. seeking clarification and correction of several clerical errors in the Supreme Court's judgment dated 1 September 2011 in Civil Appeal No. 7562 of 2011. The applicant contended that paragraph 35 incorrectly stated that the SIAC Rul…
NELAPATLA RAMAIAH & ORS .versusKAMATAM BIKSHAMAIAH & ORS.
2009 INSC 130715 December 2009Dismissed
The original landowner sold agricultural land in 1961‑62 and handed over possession to the purchasers. The land changed hands several times through further agreements for sale in 1968 and 1969, eventually reaching the present defendants. The original owner filed suit for injunction, declaration of title and possession,…
JASWANT KAUR & ANR.versusSUBHASH PALIWAL & ORS.
2009 INSC 130815 December 2009Dismissed
The petitioners, tenants of a shop room, challenged an eviction suit filed by Subhash and Gopal Paliwal, claiming that a will executed by the deceased owner bequeathed the premises to Gopal, rendering Subhash not a landlord. The tenants admitted in their written statement that the Paliwals were their landlords and paid…
NARENDRA KANTEversusANURADHA KANTE & ORS.
2009 INSC 130915 December 2009Dismissed
Narendra Kante filed a suit seeking declaration, permanent and mandatory injunctions concerning a property he claimed as ancestral, alleging that no valid partition had been effected and that a deed of family settlement dated 8 February 1967, which was not signed by all co‑sharers, could not be relied upon. The trial c…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusDIPAK MALI
2009 INSC 131115 December 2009Dismissed
Dipak Mali, a civilian motor driver, was suspended on 10 August 2002. Sub‑rules (6) and (7) were inserted into Rule 10 of the Central Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1965 by a 2003 notification, effective 2 June 2004, mandating that a suspension be reviewed within ninety days or be extended after such review; otherwise the…
LEELA HOTELS LTD.versusHOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
2011 INSC 80015 November 2011Appeal(s) allowed
Leela Hotels Ltd. entered into a sub‑lease with HUDCO for a hotel project, which was later cancelled, leading to arbitration. The arbitrator awarded HUDCO to pay Leela Hotels a principal sum plus interest. HUDCO deposited Rs 89.78 crores, claiming it was towards the principal, while Leela Hotels argued it should first …
AMAR SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA
2010 INSC 77915 November 2010Matter referred to larger bench
Amar Singh and Jaya Pradha, both Members of Parliament, filed writ petitions under Article 32 challenging the threat of disqualification after being expelled from the Samajwadi Party, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in G. Viswanathan's case. They argued that the decision improperly extended the Tenth Schedule's…
MAHMOOD AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.
2007 INSC 115415 November 2007Dismissed
The case concerns the murder of Ram Singh by a group of five assailants armed with firearms and lathis. The son of the deceased, PW‑1, witnessed the attack, lodged a First Information Report (FIR) within about one and a half hours, and identified the accused. All three eye‑witnesses (PW‑1, PW‑2, PW‑3) testified, and a …
M/S. SUSHI LA CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.versusBHARAT COKING COAL LTD. AND ORS.
2010 INSC 61415 September 2010Dismissed
The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by M/s. Sushi La Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and another appellant challenging the suspension of coal supplies by Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (BCCL) under a Fuel Supply Agreement (FSA). The suspension was based on a CBI FIR alleging that the appellants were diverting allotted coal to the open ma…
M/S COAL INDIA LIMITED & ORS.versusCOAL CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION & ORS.
2010 INSC 61515 September 2010Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined whether Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL) could suspend coal supplies to 45 industrial consumers under a Fuel Supply Agreement (FSA) when no FIR had been filed against those consumers. The Court noted that Clause 4.4 of the FSA and the 2007 New Coal Distribution Policy permit suspension only …
SURENDERA PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
2010 INSC 61615 September 2010Case Allowed
Surendra Pratap Singh filed an FIR alleging that his brother was murdered by four persons, including MLA Brijesh Mishra. While three accused were arrested, the MLA evaded arrest and later secured a transfer of the investigation to the CBI, after which the Uttar Pradesh government withdrew eight cases against him. The p…
M/S. COAL INDIA LIMITED AND ORS.versusALOK FUELS (P) LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR
2010 INSC 61215 September 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, Alok Fuels Ltd. and others, were supplied coal by Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (BCCL) under a Fuel Supply Agreement (FSA) that required the coal to be used only in their plants. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) lodged an FIR alleging that the respondents were diverting the allotted coal to the open…
DAWALSABversusKHAJASAB
2009 INSC 90715 July 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, an elderly father, filed a petition under Section 125 of the CrPC before the Family Court at Bijapur seeking monthly maintenance of Rs.5,000 from his son, who was employed in Syndagi. The Family Court dismissed the petition, holding it lacked jurisdiction because the son worked in Syndagi, and the High C…
MEERA SAHNIversusLT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS.
2008 INSC 82815 July 2008Dismissed
The appellants purchased land that had been notified for acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and claimed that they had obtained prior permission under Section 5 of the Delhi Lands (Restrictions on Transfer) Act, 1972, to transfer the land. The High Court dismissed their review and writ petitions, holding …
BHARAT KARSONDAS THAKKARversusM/S. KIRAN CONSTRUCTION CO. AND ORS.
2009 INSC 82915 May 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from a long‑standing dispute over leasehold lands originally granted to Sowar Ramji Vaity. After a series of agreements, the respondent Kiran Construction Co. (Respondent No.1) sought to enforce a 1982 injunction restraining the Vaity family and others from dealing with the properties, despite having no …
KAUSHALYA DEVI MASSANDversusROOPKISHORE KHORE
2011 INSC 20715 March 2011Case Partly allowed
The complainant, a widowed lady, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for the dishonour of several cheques issued by the respondent. The Judicial Magistrate sentenced the respondent to pay a fine of Rs 4 lakh as compensation, which the High Court later enhanced to Rs 6 lakh. The complai…
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusRAM PRAKASH
2011 INSC 20615 March 2011Dismissed
The respondent purchased a leasehold property from the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) in 1972. From 1983 onward, DDA issued multiple show‑cause notices alleging that the respondent misused the premises for office purposes and carried out unauthorized terrace construction. The respondent contended that the alleged mi…
KAPIL MUNI KARWARIYAversusCHANDRA NARAIN TRIPATHI
2012 INSC 9215 February 2012Dismissed
In the 51‑Phulpur Lok Sabha election, Kapil Muni Karwaria was declared elected after the Returning Officer rejected Chandra Narain Tripathi's nomination for lacking the required ten proposers under Section 33 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, because the second proposer, Pramod Kumar, had been deleted from…
JARNAIL SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2009 INSC 3315 January 2009Appeal(s) allowed
Jarnail Singh was convicted by the trial court for causing the death of Ramtar under Section 304 Part II of the IPC and sentenced to eight years' rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, although the appeal was filed by the accused and not the State, altered the conviction to the more serious …
PRADIP KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2012 INSC 61214 December 2012Disposed off
Pradip Kumar, a Judicial Member of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) appointed directly from the Bar, was discharged from service on 20 November 2009 under Rule 8(3) of the Tribunal Rules, allegedly in response to a complaint by members of the Bar and a report by the President of CESTAT. T…
DEEPTI BHANDARIversusNITIN BHANDARI & ANR.
2011 INSC 84414 December 2011Disposed off
The case involved a matrimonial dispute between Depti Bhandari and Nitin Bhandari, centering on visitation rights to their minor daughter after the mother shifted residence from Jaipur to Delhi. The father had been granted visitation rights in Jaipur, but the mother sought to modify the order to allow visitation in Del…
CITICORP. MARUTI FINANCE LTD.versusS. VIJAYALAXMI
2011 INSC 79314 November 2011Disposed off
The appellant Citicorp Maruti Finance Ltd. entered into a hire‑purchase agreement with the respondent for a Maruti Omni. After the respondent defaulted on monthly instalments, the bank repossessed the vehicle, informed police, and later auctioned it to a third party. The respondent filed a complaint before the Consumer…
PARMENDER KUMAR & ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
2011 INSC 79414 November 2011Disposed off
The appellants, members of the Haryana Civil Medical Services, applied for postgraduate medical courses under a reserved quota as per a university prospectus that required three years of regular service and a NOC issued before 6 April 2011. After the entrance exam, results and a merit list were declared, the Haryana Go…
VANIYANKANDY BHASKARANversusMOOLIYIL PADINHJAREKANDY SHEELA
2008 INSC 114614 October 2008Dismissed
The respondent obtained a decree for possession of a suit property in 1990, which was later enforced through execution proceedings in 2004. The appellant, after the execution commenced, filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged oral agreement and sought an injunction to stay the eviction. The High Court set a…
LUDHIANA IMPROVEMENT TRUST & ANOTHERversusM/S. TODAY HOMES AND INFRASTRUCTURE (PVT.) LIMITED
2008 INSC 114714 October 2008Disposed off
The Ludhiana Improvement Trust (LIT) and the State of Punjab filed an appeal against the Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, who had, relying on the Konkan Railway decision, referred a dispute to an arbitrator under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arose from allegat…
RAMA DEVIversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.
2010 INSC 61014 September 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Rama Devi, was charged under IPC sections 406, 420, 465, 468 and 120‑B for allegedly conspiring with her vendor to sell a plot of land to the complainant despite knowing it had been previously transferred. The trial magistrate took cognizance of the complaint, and the appellant sought to quash the procee…
GADDAM RAMAKRISHNAREDDY & ORS.versusGADDAM RAMI REDDY & ANR.
2010 INSC 61114 September 2010Dismissed
In 1952 G. Pullareddy gifted a life estate in his share of family property to his wife Sheshamma, stipulating that after her death the property would pass to his minor son G. Ramireddy. After Pullareddy's death, Sheshamma executed relinquishment, sale deeds and a will. Ramireddy sued to declare those deeds void, and th…
AMICUS CURIEversusPRASHANT BHUSHAN & ANR.
2010 INSC 40314 July 2010Hearing Adjourned
An amicus curiae, senior advocate Harish N. Salve, brought to the Supreme Court's notice statements made by senior advocate Prashant Bhushan in a Tehelka interview alleging widespread corruption in the higher judiciary and specifically imputing misconduct against Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia. The Court, on 6 November 200…
BHARAT PARIKHversusC.B.I. & ANR.
2008 INSC 82414 July 2008Dismissed
The appellant, Bharat Parikh, was charged in a special CBI case in 1996. After five years he sought production of certain documents, which were eventually produced in 2002, and then applied for reopening of the case and discharge. The Special Judge rejected the application, and the Bombay High Court dismissed his Secti…
PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusBHUPINDER SINGH
2008 INSC 82514 July 2008Case Partly allowed
In 1989 PUDA invited applications for higher‑income houses, requiring a Rs 4,000 earnest deposit and expressly stating that no interest would be paid on it. Unsuccessful applicants who did not request a refund of their deposit were later included in a second draw of lots in 1996, after which PUDA returned the deposits …
DURGA PRASAD AND ANR.versusSTATE OF M.P.
2010 INSC 32314 May 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the conviction of Durga Prasad and others under IPC sections 498-A and 304-B for the alleged dowry death of Kripa Bai, who committed suicide within seven years of marriage. The trial and High Courts had relied solely on the testimony of the victim's mother and brother, alleging cruelty and ha…
TAHAZHATHE PURAYIL SARABI & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2009 INSC 81514 May 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants' husband was robbed and thrown from a moving train in 1998, resulting in his death. The appellants filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal, which awarded Rs.4 lakh in 2007 but granted interest only in case of default. The appellants appealed, arguing that interest should accrue …
ASHOK SADARANGANI & ANR.versusUNION OF !NOIA & ORS.
2012 INSC 13214 March 2012Dismissed
The petitioners, who had obtained large credit facilities from two banks by allegedly submitting forged lease documents as collateral, defaulted on payments and were prosecuted for fraud and related offences. The banks later settled the civil dues through a one‑time settlement, and the petitioners sought to have the cr…
BHUSHAN POWER AND STEEL LTD. AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ORISSA AND ANR.
2012 INSC 13114 March 2012Appeal(s) allowed
Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd. (appellant) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the State of Orissa on 15 May 2002, wherein the State agreed to recommend iron‑ore mining leases for the appellant’s integrated steel plant. After restructuring of the Bhushan group, the State claimed the MOU had ceased and dem…
CHAND PATELversusBISMILLAH BEGUM AND ANR.
2008 INSC 36414 March 2008Dismissed
Chand Patel was married to Bismillah Begum, the sister of his first wife, while the first marriage was still subsisting. Bismillah Begum and her minor daughter sought maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The lower courts held that the marriage, though irregular, continued to subsist and orde…
AKHILESH YADAV ETC. ETC.versusVISHWANATH CHATURVEDI & ORS.
2012 INSC 60713 December 2012Disposed off
The Supreme Court reviewed a 2007 order that directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to inquire into alleged disproportionate assets of a political family and to submit its report to the Union of India. The petitioners sought a review, arguing that the Court lacked jurisdiction to order a CBI inquiry without…
SUNITA JHAversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND
2010 INSC 60613 September 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Sunita Jha, was charged under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code for cruelty to the complainant, Asha Rani Pal, on the ground that she was living with Pal's husband as his wife. The trial court rejected her discharge application, and the Jharkhand High Court affirmed that her cohabitation made her a f…
STATE OF M.P.versusHARISHANKAR BHAGWAN PD. TRIPATHI
2010 INSC 51013 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh prosecuted two individuals under Section 161 IPC and Sections 5(1)(d) and 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 for demanding illegal gratification in connection with an excise licence. A trap was arranged in which the complainant handed over treated currency notes; the deceased acc…
REETA NAGversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
2009 INSC 104513 August 2009Dismissed
The petition concerned whether a Judicial Magistrate could order a reinvestigation under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure after a charge‑sheet had been filed under Section 173(2) and charges were framed against some accused while others were discharged. The Supreme Court held that once a charge‑sheet is…
SHIPPING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.versusMARE SHIPPING INC.
2011 INSC 49013 July 2011Dismissed
The case involved a charter party for the carriage of crude oil from Ras Sukheir to a safe Indian port, where the charterers nominated Vadinar Single Berth Mooring (SBM) for discharge. The vessel arrived at Vadinar, tendered a Notice of Readiness (NOR) but could not moor at the SBM due to inadequate equipment. An adden…
UP STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusKRISHNA BALA AND ORS.
2006 INSC 42613 July 2006Case Partly allowed
The appellant, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, challenged the award of Rs.5,12,000 made by a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal to the widows and children of Rajveer Singh, who died in a motor accident on 29‑Nov‑1990. The Tribunal had used a multiplier of 22, based on the deceased’s presumed 22 years of service left…
CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE VELLORE & ORSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2013 INSC 34413 May 2013Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the validity of a 2010 notification issued by the Medical Council of India (MCI) introducing the National Eligibility Entrance Test (NEET) for admission to postgraduate medical courses across India. Petitioners challenged the MCI's competence under the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, to imp…
BALCHANDRA L. JARKIHOLI & ORS.versusB.S. YEDDYURAPPA & ORS.
2011 INSC 40013 May 2011Appeal(s) allowed
Thirteen BJP MLAs wrote to the Governor withdrawing support from Chief Minister B.S. Yeddyurappa, prompting the Governor to ask the CM to prove his majority and the CM to file a disqualification application under the Tenth Schedule against them. The Speaker issued show‑cause notices, gave only three days to respond (in…
D. SUDHAKAR & ORS.versusD.N. JEEVARAJU & ORS.
2011 INSC 39413 May 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether independent legislators who extended support to Shri Yeddyurappa in forming a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government and subsequently joined his Council of Ministers had forfeited their independent status under the anti-defection law. The Court held that merely offering support and a…
S.P. GUPTAversusASHUTOSH GUPTA
2010 INSC 32213 May 2010Dismissed
A criminal complaint under Section 420 read with Section 120‑B IPC was filed by the father of the respondent alleging that the petitioner, S.P. Gupta, as the attorney of accused No.1, misrepresented the ownership of a property, assuring it was free of encumbrances and that accused No.1 was the sole owner. The trial cou…
SURESH KUMAR BHIKAMCHAND JAINversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
2013 INSC 9713 February 2013Dismissed
The petitioners, a former minister and MLA, were arrested for alleged misappropriation of funds and charged under several IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act provisions. Although the charge‑sheet and a supplementary charge‑sheet were filed within the 90‑day period prescribed by Section 167(2) of the CrPC, the prosecut…
RAM PAL SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.
2009 INSC 18413 February 2009Dismissed
The incident on 1 October 2006 resulted in the death of Brijesh Kumar Singh and injuries to Manvender Singh. The FIR named Ram Pal Singh, Deepak Singh, Ajai Kumar Singh and Anil Kumar Singh, but they were not listed as accused in the charge‑sheet. During trial, PW‑1 (Kamlesh Singh) identified the appellants as particip…
PRAGJYOTISH GAONLIA BANK & ANR.versusBRIJLAL DAS
2009 INSC 18513 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether a Scheduled Caste officer, placed 39th on a promotion selection list for Officer Scale II, was entitled to automatic promotion under a concession in NABARD circulars. The bank had 17 vacancies and a circular stating that SC/ST candidates within the number of vacancies would be automat…
OM CONSTRUCTION CO.versusAHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORP. & ANR.
2009 INSC 2613 January 2009Appeal(s) allowed
OM Construction Co, a contractor, completed stone‑paving work for Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) but was not paid the full amount due. The contract contained Clause 30 of Form B‑1, which referred disputes to arbitration, but the arbitration clause did not specify a procedure for appointing an arbitrator. OM Cons…
DEEPAK BAJAJversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR
2008 INSC 129212 November 2008Case Allowed
The Supreme Court examined a writ petition under Article 32 challenging a preventive detention order issued against Deepak Bajaj under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974. The petition was filed before the order was executed, raising the issue of maintainability of pre‑…
VALJI KHIMJI AND COMPANYversusOFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF HINDUSTAN NITRO PRODUCT (GUJARAT) LTD. AND ORS
2008 INSC 92512 August 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The Official Liquidator of Hindustan Nitro Product (Gujarat) Ltd. auctioned the company's assets after wide newspaper publicity, accepting the highest bid of Rs.3.51 crores from Valji Khimji & Co. and confirming the sale on 30 July 2003. Subsequent higher offers were made by two other companies more than a year later, …
MAHINDER KUMAR & ORS.versusHIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH REGISTRAR GENERAL &ORS
2013 INSC 46112 July 2013Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the selection process for entry‑level District Judges in Madhya Pradesh for the 2006‑07 recruitment. Petitioners challenged the High Court's use of a normalization procedure for written‑exam marks and the alleged introduction of a 50% cut‑off at the final stage, arguing that such steps were n…
KODIKUNNIL SURESH @ J. MONIANversusN.S. SAJI KUMAR, ETC. ETC.
2011 INSC 39012 May 2011Appeal(s) allowed
Kodikkunnil Suresh was elected from the Mavelikkara Lok Sabha seat reserved for Scheduled Castes. His election was challenged on the ground that he was a Christian and therefore not a member of any Scheduled Caste under the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950. The High Court declared his election void, holding …
NANO KISHORE OJHAversusANJANI KUMAR SINGH
2010 INSC 31912 May 2010Hearing Adjourned
The Supreme Court entertained a contempt petition filed by trained primary school teachers alleging that the State of Bihar had failed to honour its undertaking to fill 34,540 vacant assistant teacher posts with trained teachers in order of seniority. The Court examined the Bihar Special Elementary Teachers' Recruitmen…
PURNO AGITOK SANGMAversusPRANAB MUKHERJEE
2012 INSC 57311 December 2012Dismissed
In the 2012 presidential election, petitioner Purno Agitok Sangma challenged the election of Pranab Mukherjee on the ground that Mukherjee held two "offices of profit" – Chairman of the Indian Statistical Institute (ISI) and Leader of the House in the Lok Sabha – at the time of filing his nomination, which would disqua…
AJAY MAKENversusADESH KUMAR GUPTA & ANR.
2012 INSC 57711 December 2012Disposed off
The Delhi High Court dismissed an election petition challenging the 2009 Lok Sabha election of Ajay Maken on grounds of alleged corrupt practices. The appellant argued that the petition should be thrown out for (i) the copy served on him not being a true copy under Section 81(3) of the Representation of the People Act,…
PUTTASWAMYversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ANOTHER
2008 INSC 141311 December 2008Disposed off
The appellant was convicted under Sections 279 and 304A of the IPC for causing the death of a seven‑year‑old girl by negligent driving of a tractor. He was sentenced to six months' simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs.2,000, with the conviction under Section 279 later set aside by the High Court. During the pendency of…
M/S SRI KRISHNA AGENCIESversusSTATE OF A.P. & ANR.
2008 INSC 128811 November 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Sri Krishna Agencies, filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for three dishonoured cheques of Rs. 5 lakh each. The respondent argued that the dispute was already before an arbitration forum and therefore the matter was civil, prompting the Andhra Pradesh High Court…
ZENIT MATAPLAST P. LTD.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
2009 INSC 113011 September 2009Disposed off
Zenit Mataplast Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging the allotment of 17 acres of land to Mahendra & Mahendra Ltd. and another party, alleging that the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation acted arbitrarily, with bias and favouritism, violating Article 14 of the Constitution. The Bombay High Court admitted …
VIKAS CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
2010 INSC 49611 August 2010Dismissed
The accused Vikas Chaudhary and co‑accused abducted a young man, killed him and thereafter made repeated ransom calls to the victim's parents. The petitioner argued that the offence under IPC s.364A was completed at the time of abduction and that he was a juvenile when the offence was committed, invoking the Juvenile J…
KALPNATH SINGHversusUDAI NATH & ORS.
2010 INSC 49711 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant applied for a sand mining lease under the Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963, and was recommended for grant by the District Magistrate and State Government. The respondent, a member of a socially and educationally backward class (SEBC), claimed preference under clause (e) of Rule 9(2) a…
MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF WAKFSversusSHAIKH YUSUF BHAI CHAWLA & ORS.
2012 INSC 22911 May 2012
The Supreme Court examined several Special Leave Petitions challenging the Bombay High Court's interim order that, pending the constitution of a proper Maharashtra State Board of Wakfs under the Wakf Act, 1995, the Charity Commissioner should continue to administer Muslim Wakf properties. The Court held that the Board …
APM TERMINALS B.V.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2011 INSC 38411 May 2011Disposed off
APM Terminals BV challenged the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust’s (JNPT) decision to exclude it from the Fourth Container Terminal tender, arguing that a licence agreement clause (8.31) barred the exclusion. The Union of India had altered its port policy to prevent private monopolisation, stipulating that operators of one …
ASHRAFI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
2013 INSC 24011 April 2013Disposed off
The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals concerning compensation for lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in Haryana. The Court examined the method of determining market value, the appropriateness of deductions for development costs, the use of the belting system, and the manner of applying annual infl…
SATYAVIR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.
2010 INSC 9611 February 2010Dismissed
Satyavir Singh, armed with his brother's licensed double‑barrel gun, fired two shots at Dharam Prakash, the brother of an informant, injuring him. The trial court convicted Singh under Section 307 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act; the first appellate court acquitted him on the basis that the firing was accidental, re…
RAMRAJ @ NANHOO @ BIHNUversusSTATE OF CHHATIISGARH
2009 INSC 129710 December 2009Dismissed
Ramraj, convicted under IPC sections 302 and 201 for murdering his wife, was sentenced to life imprisonment. The High Court upheld the conviction, and the petitioner sought release after serving 14 years, arguing that remission had effectively reduced his term to about 17 years. The Supreme Court examined the statutory…
STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.versusKABERI KHASTAGIR & ORS.
2008 INSC 141110 December 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, appointed as supervisors and Child Development Project Officers (CDPO) under the Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) in West Bengal, claimed that they were State Government employees and sought mandatory promotion of 75% of CDPO and Assistant CDPO posts from female supervisors. The High Court he…
NITIN GUNWANT SHAHversusINDIAN BANK & ORS.
2012 INSC 27510 July 2012Dismissed
The petitioner, Nitin Gunwant Shah, claimed to be a monthly tenant of a flat in Mumbai based on a 1989 "Leave and Licence" agreement and sought a declaration to that effect. The Indian Bank, holding a mortgage over the same property, obtained a decree for recovery of dues and sought to sell the flat, also asking the co…
SUBHASH POPATLAL DAVEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2012 INSC 27610 July 2012Hearing Adjourned
The bench examined several writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders at the pre‑execution stage. The petitioners argued that, under the Right to Information Act, 2005, a detenu should be furnished with the grounds of detention before arrest, and that the five exceptions laid down in Alka Subhash Gadia's ca…
LAKHWINDER SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2008 INSC 80410 July 2008Dismissed
Lt. General Lakhwinder Singh, an Indian Army officer, was recommended twice by Special Selection Boards for promotion to the rank of Lieutenant General. The Central Government, acting as the appointing authority, rejected the recommendations, deeming him "unfit" because his profile was the weakest among the candidates …
SATISH SITOLEversusSMT. GANGA
2008 INSC 80610 July 2008Disposed off
Satish Sitole and Smt. Ganga were married on 22 May 1992. The wife left the matrimonial home in August 1994 and the parties lived apart for 14 years, during which they filed multiple suits including a dowry complaint under IPC 498‑A and a petition for divorce under Sections 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act.…
M/S TODAY HOMES & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.versusLUDHIANA IMPROVEMENT TRUST & ANR.
2013 INSC 34010 May 2013Disposed off
The dispute arose between M/s Today Homes & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (and Mapletree Properties) and the Ludhiana Improvement Trust over a joint‑venture agreement dated 24‑05‑2005, which the Trust later claimed was void. The developers filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199…
ANTRIX CORP. LTD.versusDEVAS MULTIMEDIA P. LTD.
2013 INSC 33710 May 2013Dismissed
Antrix Corp. Ltd. and Devas Multimedia entered into an agreement containing an arbitration clause that required disputes to be referred to senior management and, failing that, to an arbitral tribunal governed by ICC or UNCITRAL rules, with the seat in New Delhi and Indian law as the governing law. After Antrix terminat…
SYED BASHIR-UD-DIN QADRIversusNAZIR AHMED SHAH & ORS.
2010 INSC 14010 March 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a graduate suffering from cerebral palsy, was appointed as a Rehbar‑e‑Taleem (teaching guide) under Section 22 of the Jammu and Kashmir Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1998. Respondent Nazir Ahmed Shah challenged the appointment, and the J…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM/S. NEELAM ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
2010 INSC 14210 March 2010Dismissed
The Union of India and others entered into a contract with M/s Neelam Engineering for security lighting, which later gave rise to disputes resolved by an arbitrator who awarded Rs.1,70,020 in favour of the respondent. The respondent filed a petition under Sections 14(2), 17 and 29 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 to have t…
RAVINDER RAJversusM/S. COMPETENT MOTORS CO. PVT. LTD. & ANR.
2011 INSC 11510 February 2011Dismissed
Ravinder Raj booked a Maruti car in the mid‑1980s, paid an advance and later paid the full price in February 1989. Before the official billing on 5 April 1989, the government raised excise duty, increasing the car's price by about Rs.6,710, and the dealer asked the buyer to pay the excess amount, which he did under pro…
RAJU & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA
2010 INSC 9410 February 2010Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the conviction of two appellants, Raju and Mangli, under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Ishwar. The incident arose after the deceased misbehaved with women at a marriage ceremony, leading the accused to assault him; the co‑accused were armed with k…