FIONA SHRIKHANDEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
2013 INSC 55322 August 2013Dismissed
The appellant, accused of insulting her sister‑in‑law's religious sentiments, was charged under Section 504 of the IPC after a complaint alleging that she dragged a deity's idol from a puja room, causing damage and intending to provoke a breach of peace. The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, applying Section 20…
RAM PYARE MISHRAversusPREM SHANKER AND ORS.
2008 INSC 96222 August 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from a violent incident on 12 July 1978 in which two brothers, Prem Shanker and Hari Shanker, armed with a knife and a lathi, assaulted and caused the death of Mohan Mishra. The trial court convicted them under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, but the Allahabad High Court acquitted them on the groun…
SETTU AND ORS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
2006 INSC 53422 August 2006Case Partly allowed
The case involved three accused who attacked a man, causing his death, and also injured his friend. Appellant No.1 used a concealed knife to inflict multiple head injuries that proved fatal; Appellant No.2 cut the victim's back and knee and also wounded the friend; Appellant No.3 struck the victim's right hand causing …
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusKHERAJ RAM
2003 INSC 41322 August 2003Appeal(s) allowed
Kheraj Ram, suspecting his wife's infidelity, murdered his wife, two daughters and his brother‑in‑law on the night of 10‑10‑1992. The trial court convicted him under Section 302 IPC and imposed death, relying on a series of circumstantial facts – motive, prior quarrels, his presence with the victims, an extra‑judicial …
NAZIR KHAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF DELHI
2003 INSC 41422 August 2003Directions issued
The case involved nine accused who conspired to kidnap foreign nationals in India to demand the release of jailed militants. The main conspirator, Umar Sheikh, escaped after an exchange of hijacked‑plane passengers, while six co‑accused were convicted under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA…
RAGHBIR SINGHversusSURJIT SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1994 INSC 33622 August 1994Dismissed
Raghbir Singh, convicted under IPC sections 326 and 149 and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment, was released in November 1988 and subsequently contested the Punjab Vidhan Sabha election in February 1992. The respondent filed an election petition alleging that Singh was disqualified under sub‑section 3 of S…
ESAKKIMUTHUversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2025 INSC 88022 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Pitchu Mani and Esakkimuthu, were convicted of murder under Sections 302 and 302 read with 34 of the IPC based primarily on the testimony of the deceased's son and wife, who were interested witnesses. The appellants challenged the convictions, arguing that the witnesses could not have covered the 16 km …
AMIT RANA @ KOKA & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF HARYANA
2024 INSC 54322 July 2024Case Partly allowed
The appellants were convicted under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for attempting to murder a victim, causing a spinal injury that resulted in paralysis. The trial court sentenced each appellant to rigorous imprisonment for 14 years and a fine, a sentence affirmed by the High Court. The Supre…
SOMESH CHAURASIAversusSTATE OF M.P. & ANR.
2021 INSC 34922 July 2021Disposed off
The appellant Somesh Chaurasia sought cancellation of bail granted to the second respondent, who had been convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and whose sentence was suspended under Section 389(1) CrPC. While the suspension was in force, an FIR (No. 143 of 2019) alleged that the second respondent had murdered the …
SANJAY RAJAKversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR
2019 INSC 78722 July 2019Dismissed
The appellant, Sanjay Rajak, was convicted under IPC s.364(A) for kidnapping a 5‑6‑year‑old child and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence: a classmate’s testimony that a man with a covered face, addressed as "uncle" by the child, abducted him; parents’ identification of the…
RAM GOPALversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DEHRADUN
2019 INSC 79122 July 2019Dismissed
The CBI investigated a 1992 fraud where a fictitious bank account was opened in the name of Raj Kumar, deposits of Rs 3,22,056 were forged into it and withdrawn through seventeen cheques, leaving a small balance. Two bank employees, Ram Gopal (messenger) and Pankaj Kumar Jain (assistant clerk), were later charged and c…
ATUL TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF UP. & ANR.
2014 INSC 49922 July 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh challenging the High Court's grant of bail to several convicts who had been sentenced to life imprisonment for serious offences under the IPC and the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013. The central issue was whether, at the post‑conviction stage, th…
SAURABH KUMAR THROUGH HIS FATHERversusJAILOR, KONEILA JAIL & ANR.
2014 INSC 50222 July 2014Dismissed
Saurabh Kumar was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute case and was produced before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, who remanded him to judicial custody under an order dated 1 July 2013. The petitioner filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 32, alleging illegal detention, police brutality and claim…
SHYAM NARAIN PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P.
2014 INSC 50022 July 2014Dismissed
Shyam Narain Pandey, a school principal, was convicted under IPC sections 147, 148, 302/144 read with 120B and sentenced to life imprisonment. He applied for a stay of his conviction under Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, arguing that the conviction would deprive him of his livelihood, but the High Cou…
DHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2010 INSC 41922 July 2010Case Partly allowed
The appellant Ohan Singh was convicted for the death of his brother Shiv Ram, who died after being struck on the head with an iron rod during a family property dispute. The prosecution relied on Shiv Ram's dying declaration, recorded by a Head Constable after a doctor certified that he was fit to speak, which identifie…
MANNU SAOversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2010 INSC 42022 July 2010Dismissed
Mannu Sao was convicted under IPC sections 302 and 201 for murdering his wife, Bimla Devi, whose body was found burnt. He claimed she had committed suicide by self‑immolation, but the post‑mortem showed death by throttling before the burns. The trial and High Courts upheld the conviction based on a chain of circumstant…
RAJ RAJENDRA SINGH SETH @ R.R.S. SETHversusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR.
2008 INSC 85522 July 2008Dismissed
Doctor R.R.S. Seth demanded Rs 500 from a relative of a patient for proper medical treatment, directing the payment to be made to his ward boy Nag Narain who would pass it on. A CBI‑led trap recovered the money and the doctor and ward boy were arrested. They were convicted under IPC sections 1208 (conspiracy) and 161 (…
SONELALversusSTATE OF M.P.
2008 INSC 85622 July 2008Dismissed
The appellant Sone Lal was convicted of murdering Ram Khilawan after the victim's wife and son testified that he stabbed the deceased three times. The trial court, supported by forensic evidence linking the blood on the knife to the victim, sentenced him to life imprisonment, a decision affirmed by the High Court. The …
SHAMBHOO SINGHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2008 INSC 85722 July 2008Case Partly allowed
Shambhoo Singh was convicted of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and offences under Secs. 447, 307 and 324 for stabbing his neighbour during a land dispute. The trial court sentenced him to life imprisonment for murder and additional terms for the other offences. The appellant argued that the killing occurred in a sudden quarrel …
SWAMY SHRADDANANDA @ MURALI MANOHAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2008 INSC 85322 July 2008Disposed off
Swamy Shraddananda, convicted of murdering his wife Shakereh under sections 302 and 201 IPC, was sentenced to death by the trial court and the Karnataka High Court affirmed the sentence. The Supreme Court, hearing a split decision on sentencing, noted that while the murder was cold‑blooded and motivated by greed, the d…
RAJATHIversusC. GANESAN
1999 INSC 28622 July 1999Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant wife filed a petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking maintenance, alleging that her husband, who had sufficient means, had neglected and refused to maintain her and was living with another woman. The husband contended that the wife could not prove a second marriage under Section …
STATE OF PUNJABversusKESAR SINGH
1996 INSC 76422 July 1996
Kesar Singh was convicted of murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment on 28 May 1987. After serving a little over eight years, he filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC in the Punjab & Haryana High Court seeking premature release. The High Court entertained the petition and…
BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ANR. ETC.versusDR. SHIV JATAN THAKUR AND ORS. ETC.
1994 INSC 28222 July 1994Disposed off
Dr. Shiv Jatan Thakur, a member of the Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC), claimed that, as a member, he was entitled to the same facilities and amenities as the Chairman, invoking the Constitution and the BPSC (Conditions of Service) Regulations. He also sought punitive action against the Chairman for allegedly re…
DAVINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2023 INSC 58522 June 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Davinder Singh, was convicted by the trial court and the Punjab & Haryana High Court for offences under Sections 376, 452 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, based on the allegation that he threatened the prosecutrix with a knife at her residence. On appeal before the Supreme Court, the appellant contended…
STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBI, ACB, VISAKHAPATNAMversusELURI SRINIVASA CHAKRAVARTHI AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 75822 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The CBI filed an FIR in 2006 alleging that a senior Cotton Purchase Officer and his associates conspired to buy cotton at market rates, hoard it, and sell it to the Cotton Corporation of India (CCI) at the higher Minimum Support Price (MSP) through benami farmers, causing an alleged loss of Rs 21.19 crore. A chargeshee…
SAKHAWAT AND ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2025 INSC 77722 May 2025
The appellants were convicted under Sections 302, 307 and 34 of the IPC for the murder of Sukha based primarily on the testimony of the complainant and other prosecution witnesses. During bail proceedings, three eyewitnesses submitted affidavits stating that the appellants were not involved, but the investigating offic…
IN RE: RIGHT TO PRIVACY OF ADOLESCENTS versus
2025 INSC 77822 May 2025
The Supreme Court examined a criminal appeal filed by the State of West Bengal challenging a High Court order that had set aside the conviction of an accused under the POCSO Act and IPC for raping a 14‑year‑old girl who later married him and bore a child. The Court restored the conviction for offences under Section 6 o…
UNION OF INDIA REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY CHENNAI BRANCHversusBARAKATHULLAH ETC.
2024 INSC 45222 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) investigated members and office bearers of the Popular Front of India (PFI) for alleged offences under the IPC and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), including conspiracy, recruitment, and weapons training aimed at establishing an Islamic state. The respondents were…
CHANDRASEKAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE
2017 INSC 46522 May 2017Dismissed
The appellants Chandrasekar and another were convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and of voluntarily causing hurt under Section 324 IPC for repeatedly assaulting the deceased on the head with a hammer, sickle and iron rod, resulting in his death. The prosecution relied heavily on the testimony of an injured eyewit…
JOSE S/O EDASSERY THOMASversusSTATE OF KERALA
2013 INSC 35322 May 2013Dismissed
The appellant Jose was convicted for murdering his wife by dousing her with petrol and setting her ablaze while she slept, and for attempting to murder his grandchild. The prosecution relied on the victim's dying declaration, recorded by a doctor, and a series of circumstantial facts indicating motive, opportunity, and…
ROHTASHversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2012 INSC 24422 May 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Rohtash was convicted by the High Court for dowry death under Sections 304‑B and 498‑A IPC, based on alleged dowry demands of Rs.10,000 and Rs.5,000 and the claim that his wife Indro committed suicide by poison. The trial court had acquitted all accused, finding material inconsistencies in witness stateme…
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusRAMESH CHANDER DIWAN
2025 INSC 53922 April 2025Dismissed
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) appealed against the High Court's order discharging Ramesh Chander Diwan of offences under Sections 120B and 420 of the IPC, on the ground that no sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) had been obtained. Diwan, originally appointed by the Governmen…
RAMANUJ KUMARversusPRIYANKA
2025 INSC 54322 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Ramanuj Kumar, filed a petition for divorce under Sections 13(1)(ia) and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging irretrievable breakdown of his marriage to Priyanka. The parties had been living separately for over eleven years, with the appellant caring for their elder daughter and the respondent carin…
AEJAZ AHMAD SHEIKHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 52922 April 2025Dismissed
The case concerned the alleged murder of Amina and her three daughters by setting them on fire, for which the accused, Aejaz Ahmad Sheikh's brother, was initially convicted and sentenced to death. The High Court later acquitted him, prompting appeals by the State and the complainant. The Supreme Court examined the reli…
CHELLAMMAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2025 INSC 54022 April 2025Disposed off
The appellants, a mother‑in‑law and her son‑in‑law, were convicted under Section 498‑A of the IPC for cruelty to a woman and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment and fine. They sought to replace the imprisonment with an enhanced fine, but the court held that fine cannot substitute imprisonment under Section 498‑A. The pr…
S.C. NARANGversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
2025 INSC 68822 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
A four‑year‑old girl studying in the nursery class of Maxfort School, Delhi, alleged that a classmate sexually assaulted her. A charge‑sheet was filed under Section 21 of the POCSO Act read with Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act against the school principal, two teachers and the V…
LEONARD XAVIER VALDARISversusJITENDRA RAMNAYARAN RATHOD & ORS.
2024 INSC 34422 April 2024Disposed off
In the Bombay High Court, two single judges issued contradictory orders on the same set of facts concerning the framing of a charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The first judge upheld the charge, while the second judge directed that the charge should not be framed, creating a conflict. The Supreme Court …
IMRANversusMR. MOHAMMED BHAVA & ANR
2022 INSC 46722 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The case involves a murder and related offences under the IPC where ten persons were charged, including Accused No.6 (Mohammed Bhava) and Accused No.8 (Mohammed Musthafa). Both had been granted anticipatory bail and regular bail respectively by the Karnataka High Court, orders which were later challenged by the complai…
ANUJ SINGH @ RAMANUJ SINGH @ SETH SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR
2022 INSC 46322 April 2022Dismissed
The appellants, Anuj Singh and Manoj Singh, were involved in a land dispute with Kumar Nandan Singh, who was repairing a wall. During an altercation, the appellants approached the scene armed with firearms and fired at the informant, causing injuries to his left foot and right arm; other accused used spears and lathis.…
RAM CHANDERversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ANR.
2022 INSC 46822 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioner, convicted of murder and related offences, served 16 years of a life sentence and applied for premature release under Chhattisgarh Prison Rule 358. The appropriate government sought the opinion of the Special Judge who, without providing detailed reasons or considering the factors laid down in Laxman Nas…
JAFARUDHEEN & ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA
2022 INSC 46422 April 2022Disposed off
The case involved a violent clash between members of two political parties in Kerala, resulting in the murder of a CPI(M) member. Sixteen accused were charged, but the trial court acquitted A-10 to A-16 while convicting five others. The High Court upheld the convictions but reversed the acquittals of A-10 to A-13, rely…
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERSversusMUKESH SHARMA
2019 INSC 54522 April 2019Appeal(s) allowed
Several convicts sentenced to life imprisonment filed writ petitions challenging Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006, which required them to serve 14 years of actual imprisonment and earn a minimum of four years of remission before their cases could be considered for remission. T…
KUMAR GHIMIREYversusTHE STATE OF SIKKIM
2019 INSC 54922 April 2019Case Partly allowed
Kumar Ghimirey was convicted under Sections 9 and 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 and Section 341 of the IPC for attempting to sexually assault a seven‑year‑old girl, and was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the Sikkim High Court altered the convictio…
RAMESH KUMAR @BABLAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2016 INSC 117922 April 2016Case Partly allowed
The case arose from a clash between two groups in 1997 where the appellant, Ramesh Kumar @ Babla, was alleged to have struck the complainant with a sword, causing head injuries. The trial court convicted him under Section 307 of the IPC for attempted murder and sentenced him to three years' rigorous imprisonment, a dec…
KANHAIYA LAL & ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2013 INSC 27422 April 2013Dismissed
The case involved the murder of five persons by a large unlawful assembly allegedly motivated by revenge for the death of the village Sarpanch's son. The trial court convicted 17 accused, sentencing six to death and others to life imprisonment, while some were acquitted. On appeal, the High Court reduced the death sent…
DAYA KISHANversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2010 INSC 23422 April 2010Case Partly allowed
The case arose from a violent incident in which the nephew of a first informant, Rajesh, was shot dead and others injured after a dispute over goods. The appellant, Daya Kishan, was convicted under Sections 302, 307, 323 and 148 read with Section 149 of the IPC, the first conviction being based on alleged participation…
SHAUKATversusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL
2010 INSC 23522 April 2010Disposed off
The appellant Shaukat and his father Sabbir were charged with killing Wilayat and injuring Rahmat over a dispute about digging earth from a village pond. The trial court convicted Shaukat under Sections 302 and 307 IPC; the High Court reduced the conviction to Section 304(Part I) and 308 IPC, invoking Exception 4 to Se…
RAM NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P.
2009 INSC 58722 April 2009Dismissed
The appellant Ram Narayan and eight others were tried for offences under Sections 147, 148, 302, 307 and 436 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code arising from a three‑stage violent incident. The trial court acquitted all accused, relying on alleged inconsistencies in the FIR, the semi‑digested food found in t…
M.A. ANTONY @ ANTAPPANversusSTATE OF KERALA
2009 INSC 58822 April 2009Dismissed
The appellant, M.A. Antony, was convicted of murdering six members of a family in Kerala and sentenced to death, along with other imprisonments, based largely on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution relied on motive, the appellant's presence at the crime scene, forensic evidence such as fingerprints and scalp hair,…
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusNARESH KUMAR @ KAKA & ORS.
2009 INSC 59022 April 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The Sessions Judge convicted the accused under IPC sections 302 read with 34 and 323 read with 34, sentencing them to life imprisonment. The Himachal Pradesh High Court later acquitted the accused, concluding that the prosecution’s version was not credible. The State of Himachal Pradesh appealed this acquittal to the S…
RAMESH KUMAR @ TONIversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2009 INSC 58322 April 2009Disposed off
The appellant, while working in his field, struck Rajinder Pal on the head with a spade after a verbal altercation when the victim entered the field. The victim later died, and the trial court convicted the appellant under Section 302 of the IPC, sentencing him to life imprisonment, a decision upheld by the High Court.…
STATE OF PUNJABversusHARJAGDEV SINGH
2009 INSC 58122 April 2009Disposed off
The State of Punjab prosecuted Harjagdev Singh for the murder of his parents. The accused was arrested, gave a disclosure statement that led to the recovery of the murder weapon, and subsequently made a confession before a Judicial Magistrate under Section 164 of the CrPC admitting his guilt. The trial court convicted …
P.D. LAKHANI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.
2008 INSC 50822 April 2008Case Allowed
The appellants, owners of Lakhani Rubber Udyog Ltd, lodged a complaint alleging trademark infringement by Saraswati Utpadan Pvt Ltd. The complaint was initially made to the Station House Officer (SHO), who directed the complainant to approach the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP). The SSP ordered an investigation, …
BATHULA NAGAMALLESWARA RAO & ORS.versusSTATE REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
2008 INSC 51222 April 2008Dismissed
The case involved the murder of two villagers in Uddandarayunipalem, for which twelve accused were charged under various IPC provisions. The trial court convicted all except A-3 (who died) and the High Court upheld convictions of A-1, A-2, A-10, A-11 and A-12 while acquitting A-4 to A-9 on the ground of insufficient ev…
GOVINDASAMIversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
1998 INSC 19422 April 1998Dismissed
Govindasami was accused of murdering his uncle Nagamalai, the latter's wife, two sons and a daughter in May 1984. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence: a land‑dispute motive, a wrist‑watch recovered from the crime scene that belonged to the accused, a blood‑stained lungi and a promissory note found on him,…
ANSHAD AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
1994 INSC 16822 April 1994
The Supreme Court examined the convictions of five accused (Al, A2, A3, A4, A5) for the murders of Savitri Devi and her grandson Sunil and related robbery. The Sessions Court had sentenced them to life imprisonment, but the Karnataka High Court enhanced the sentences of Al, A2 and A3 to death. The Court held that the H…
R.K. GARG, ADVOCATEversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
1981 INSC 9822 April 1981Case Partly allowed
Advocate R.K. Garg, appearing for a petitioner in a Rent Act matter, threw his shoe at the presiding judge after the petition was dismissed for non‑payment of process fee under Order 9 Rule 2 CPC. The judge sought to arrest him under Section 228 IPC and referred the matter to the Himachal Pradesh High Court under Secti…
THIRUMOORTHYversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2024 INSC 24722 March 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a 17‑year‑old at the time of the 2016 offence, was identified as a Child in Conflict with Law (CICL) but the charge sheet was filed directly before a Sessions Court without referral to a Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). The trial court convicted him under sections of the IPC and the POCSO Act and sentenced …
VIJAY KUMAR GHAI & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
2022 INSC 32622 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, directors of Priknit Apparel Ltd, received an investment of Rs 2.5 crore from Respondent No. 2 (SMC Global Securities) in exchange for 2,50,000 equity shares, but failed to launch an IPO as per the memorandum of understanding. The complainant filed a police complaint in Delhi which was dismissed, and su…
RAMESH ALIAS DAPINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
2021 INSC 19822 March 2021Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Ramesh alias Dapinder Singh, was the driver of two maternal uncles (S and N) who assaulted the informant PW1 and his friends, resulting in the death of one friend. The trial court convicted all three accused under Sections 302, 323, and 324 read with Section 34 of the IPC, a conviction affirmed by the Hi…
HAKEEM KHAN & ORS.versusSTATE OF M.P.
2017 INSC 25422 March 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from a violent clash during a panchayat election in Sehore, Madhya Pradesh, where a group of accused, armed with lathis and fasris, attacked members of the complainant party, resulting in one death and several injuries. The trial court acquitted all seventeen accused, reasoning that the incident occurred…
PRAKASHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2013 INSC 19022 March 2013Dismissed
The case involves the kidnapping and murder of a seven‑year‑old boy, Kamlesh, whose body was discovered on a hillock after he failed to return from school. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence, including eyewitnesses who saw the accused with the child, recovery of blood‑stained clothing from one acc…
UMESH SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2013 INSC 19322 March 2013Dismissed
Umesh Singh was convicted for the murder of Shailendra Kumar, who was shot with a revolver and rifle by Singh and several co‑accused. The prosecution relied on the eye‑witness testimony of the victim’s cousin (PW2) and corroborating statements of other witnesses, while the defence challenged the validity of the FIR (ar…
M/S. GHCL EMPLOYEES STOCK OPTION TRUSTversusM/S INDIA INFOLINE LIMITED
2013 INSC 18722 March 2013Dismissed
The GHCL Employees Stock Option Trust filed a criminal complaint alleging that the Managing Director, Company Secretary and other directors of M/s. India Infoline Ltd. (the respondents) had sold 8,76,668 of its shares and misappropriated the proceeds, constituting criminal breach of trust and cheating. A Metropolitan M…
RAKESH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2013 INSC 18822 March 2013Dismissed
The deceased Kailash, married to Rakesh, was subjected to dowry harassment by her husband and mother‑in‑law and was set ablaze in their home, resulting in her death. The prosecution relied primarily on Kailash's dying declaration, which was recorded by a Judicial Magistrate after a doctor certified her fitness to testi…
SAYED DARAIN A.HSAN @ DARAINversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.
2012 INSC 14322 March 2012Dismissed
The appellant Sayed Darain Ahsan was convicted under IPC sections 302 and 34 for the murder of Mughal, based on the testimony of four local eyewitnesses who identified him and his associate as the shooters. The defence argued that the eyewitness accounts conflicted with medical evidence showing only a single bullet wou…
PROMODE DEYversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2012 INSC 14422 March 2012Dismissed
The case involved the murder of Pratima Nandi on 23 February 2002. An eight‑year‑old girl, Manika (PW‑2), testified that the accused, Promode Dey, entered the house with a large dao and killed her mother. Her testimony was corroborated by her grandmother (PW‑1), her father (PW‑11), a village resident (PW‑8) and the rec…
K. NEELAVENIversusSTATE REP. BY INSP. OF POLICE AND ORS.
2010 INSC 16022 March 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant-wife, K. Neelaveni, complained that her husband had contracted a second marriage, given gold ornaments, subjected her to cruelty and forced her to abort a pregnancy, leading to a police charge‑sheet under IPC sections 406, 494 and 498A. The accused filed a petition in the Madras High Court seeking quash o…
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusJAGDISH
2010 INSC 15922 March 2010Dismissed
Jagdish, a Class‑3 life convict sentenced in 1999, applied for premature release after serving more than ten years. The High Court ordered his case to be considered under the remission policy dated 04‑02‑1993, rejecting the newer short‑sentencing policy of 13‑08‑2008. The State appealed, arguing that the later policy, …
NETRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF M.P.
2007 INSC 33322 March 2007Appeal(s) allowed
Netraaj Singh was acquitted by a trial court of charges under IPC s.302 r/w s.149 on the ground of inadequate evidence. The State appealed, and during the pendency of the appeal the appellant obtained permission to replace his counsel with Mr. Ashutosh Singh. However, the cause list for the final hearing still named th…
STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIGILANCE & ANTI-CORRUPTION, TIRUCHIRAPALLI, TAMIL NADUversusV. JAYAPAUL
2004 INSC 19622 March 2004Leave Granted & Allowed
The Inspector of Police (Vigilance & Anti‑Corruption) in Tiruchirappalli received information that the accused, V. Jayapaul, was extracting money from vehicle owners using bogus notices. He lodged a First Information Report under Sections 420, 201 IPC and Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption…
DEVENDER PAL SINGHversusSTATE N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ANR.
2002 INSC 16822 March 2002Case Partly allowed
The appellant Devender Pal Singh was arrested after being deported from Germany and recorded a confessional statement under Section 15 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA). The Designated Court convicted him of offences under TADA and the IPC, including criminal conspiracy, and sentenced h…
SUCHA SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2001 INSC 16622 March 2001Dismissed
During the peak of militancy in Punjab, two teenage sons of Diwan Singh were abducted from their home by four armed men, including the appellant Sucha Singh, and were later found shot dead. The parents were present in the house at the time of the abduction. The prosecution proved the abduction and the subsequent murder…
VIJAYAN @ VIJAYA KUMARversusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
1999 INSC 12522 March 1999Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from a long‑standing rivalry between two neighbouring families over stone slabs that blocked drainage. On 5 October 1984, after a morning altercation in which the appellant's faction slapped the deceased's father, the deceased Natarajan and his brother either pursued the appellant (prosecution version) o…
THAKORE UMEDSING NATHUSINGversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2024 INSC 19822 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The accused were tried for murder, dacoity and robbery after the victim's jeep was allegedly hijacked; the trial court acquitted them of murder and dacoity but convicted them of robbery. The State appealed, and the Gujarat High Court reversed the acquittal, convicting the accused of murder and related offences. The Sup…
VIKAS CHANDRAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2024 INSC 26122 February 2024Dismissed
The appellant Vikas Chandra challenged the summons issued to respondent No.2, the former Secretary of Mandi Samiti, for alleged abetment of his father's suicide under Section 306 IPC. The father had died by poison after allegedly being denied salary, and a suicide note blamed the respondent, but the note contained no r…
RAVINDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2024 INSC 13122 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed
Ravindra Kumar applied for a constable post in February 2004 and was later implicated in a criminal case, which he was acquitted of in September 2004. He filed a character verification affidavit in October 2004 stating that no criminal case had ever been registered against him. The State cancelled his selection in Apri…
NARESH KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2024 INSC 14922 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Naresh Kumar was convicted under Section 306 of the IPC for allegedly abetting his wife Rani's suicide in 1993, based largely on the fact that she died within seven years of marriage and that he repeatedly demanded money for a business. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the deceased's brother and…
VAHITHAversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
2023 INSC 15122 February 2023Dismissed
The appellant Vahitha was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly strangling her five‑year‑old daughter in the house of her mother‑in‑law. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the mother‑in‑law, two other family members, and two independent neighbours who saw the appellant near the child's body, as well as …
M/S APEX LABORATORIES PVT. LTD.versusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LARGE TAX PAYER UNIT - II
2022 INSC 21622 February 2022Dismissed
Apex Laboratories, a pharmaceutical company, claimed a deduction under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act for expenses incurred in providing gifts, travel, hospitality and other "freebies" to doctors to promote its product Zincovit. The Assessing Officer, on the basis of a CBDT circular dated 01‑08‑2012 and the 2002 M…
RAJUversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA
2019 INSC 25322 February 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Raju was convicted along with two others for gang-rape under IPC s.376(2)(g) and appealed, claiming he was a juvenile at the time of the offence. The High Court rejected his claim, finding insufficient evidence, and upheld the conviction. The Supreme Court directed its Registrar (Judicial) to conduct an a…
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusDHRUV GURJAR AND ANOTHER
2019 INSC 25422 February 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against two orders of the Madhya Pradesh High Court that quashed FIRs relating to serious offences including IPC sections 307, 294, 34, 394 and Arms Act sections 25 and 27 on the ground that the complainant had reached a compromise with the accused. The Supreme Court examined whethe…
RAVINDERSINGH @ RAVI PAVARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2013 INSC 12022 February 2013Disposed off
The case arose from the 2009 hooch tragedy in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, where spurious country‑made liquor containing methyl alcohol caused 147 deaths and 205 injuries. Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar (appellant) and Jayesh Hiralal Thakker (respondent) were charged under several sections of the IPC and the Bombay Prohibition Act …
K. SRINIVAS RAOversusD.A. DEEPA
2013 INSC 12222 February 2013Disposed off
The husband (K. Srinivas Rao) appealed against a High Court order that set aside a decree of divorce in his favour. The Supreme Court examined whether the wife’s filing of false, indecent and defamatory complaints, and multiple criminal proceedings against him and his family, amounted to mental cruelty under s.13(1)(i‑…
SOM RAJ @ SOMAversusSTATE OF H.P.
2013 INSC 12422 February 2013Dismissed
During a ceremonial feast at Kishan Singh's house, appellant Som Raj (Soma) assaulted his nephew Sardari Lal with a sharp‑edged agricultural implement called a 'darat', striking the back of the victim's head and causing a fatal skull injury. Five eyewitnesses (PW1, PW2, PW3, PW6, PW8) testified that the appellant was a…
BALDEV SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2011 INSC 14922 February 2011Disposed off
In 1997 the prosecutrix was abducted, raped and beaten by three accused who were later convicted under IPC sections 376(2)(g) and 342 and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs 1,000 each. The accused had already served about three and a half years when they appealed to the Supreme Court, conte…
DAYAL DASversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2011 INSC 14622 February 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Dayal Das, was convicted under IPC sections 304(Part‑II) and 328 and Rajasthan Excise Act s.54‑A for the death of Lal Chand, who allegedly died after consuming illicit liquor at the appellant's soda‑lemon shop. The sole evidence linking the appellant was the statement of PW‑12, who said he saw Lal Chand …
RAMESHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2011 INSC 14822 February 2011Dismissed
The case involved the murder of money‑lender RL and his wife during a robbery of their house‑cum‑shop, where the accused A‑1 (Gordhan Lal), A‑2 (Bharat Kumar) and A‑3 (Ramesh) were convicted of murder, robbery and related offences. The prosecution relied on a chain of circumstantial evidence, including blood‑stained cl…
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusROHITAS & ORS.
2008 INSC 24222 February 2008Case Allowed
The respondents were acquitted by a trial court of offences under IPC sections 498A and 304B. The State of Rajasthan filed an application under CrPC section 378(1) seeking leave to appeal the acquittal, which the Rajasthan High Court dismissed without recording any reasons. The Supreme Court held that an order refusing…
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ANTI EVASION COMMERCIAL TAXES, BHARATPURversusM/S. AMTEK INDLA LIMITED
2007 INSC 19022 February 2007Disposed off
Mis. Amtek India Ltd. purchased plant and machinery and was assessed a penalty under Section 78(5) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 on the ground that the invoice and delivery challan dates did not match, leading the Assessing Officer to deem the documents non‑genuine. The assessee successfully challenged the penal…
OM PRAKASHversusSTATE OF HARYANA
1999 INSC 7722 February 1999Appeal(s) allowed
Om Prakash, a 23‑year‑old BSF constable, was convicted of murdering seven members of a rival family in a pre‑meditated attack stemming from a long‑standing land dispute. The trial court sentenced him to death, which the High Court upheld. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the case qualified as a "rarest of …
THE STATE OF KARNATAKAversusMOIN PATAL AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 29522 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Karnataka prosecuted four respondents for the murders of two brothers, alleging they were killed with an axe and sickle. The trial court convicted them under IPC sections 302, 34 and 324 based on eye‑witness testimony, recovered blood‑stained weapons, and post‑mortem reports. The Karnataka High Court acqui…
RAJA RAM AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1994 INSC 8622 February 1994
Ten persons, including eight appellants, were tried for murder (Sec. 302 read with Sec. 149 IPC) and other offences arising from an assault on the deceased Halke. The High Court convicted them of murder and sentenced them to life imprisonment, along with convictions under Sec. 323 and Sec. 325 IPC for causing hurt. On …
LAXMAN NAIKversusSTATE OF ORISSA
1994 INSC 8822 February 1994Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the appeal of Laxman Naik, who was convicted of raping and murdering his 7‑year‑old niece. The prosecution case was built entirely on circumstantial evidence, including eyewitnesses who saw the accused and victim together, the accused’s false statements about the victim’s whereabouts, medical…
NAIN SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
1991 INSC 6522 February 1991Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were convicted for the murder of Bali and for causing injuries to his wife, based on the testimony of several eye‑witnesses and medical reports. The trial court sentenced them to life imprisonment under IPC s.302 read with s.34 and six months under s.323/34; the High Court reduced the murder charge to cu…
MANISH YADAVversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 15122 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Manish Yadav, was charged under the IPC for rape, assault and criminal intimidation and under the SC/ST Act for caste-based atrocities, based on allegations that he induced a consensual relationship through a false promise of marriage and later abused the complainant. The complainant’s statement under Se…
MOHD. TAHIR HUSSAINversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI
2025 INSC 10022 January 2025
Mohd. Tahir Hussain, an under‑trial accused in multiple FIRs including rioting and the murder of an IB official, has been in custody since March 2020 and sought interim bail to contest and campaign in the 2025 Delhi Assembly elections. The Delhi High Court allowed only a custodial parole for filing his nomination, prom…
THAMMARAYA AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA
2025 INSC 10822 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants Thammaraya and Basappa were convicted for murder and concealment of dead body under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the IPC based largely on circumstantial evidence and alleged disclosure statements that led to the recovery of certain articles. The prosecution's case hinged on the recovery of a gold chain, d…
MARIAM FASIHUDDIN & ANR.versusSTATE BY ADUGODI POLICE STATION & ANR.
2024 INSC 4922 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, a married couple, obtained a passport for their minor child allegedly without the husband’s genuine consent, leading the husband to file a complaint alleging forgery of his signature and cheating. The trial magistrate ordered further investigation, resulting in a supplementary charge‑sheet that added of…
POOJA PALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2016 INSC 8622 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed
Pooja Pal, the widow of slain MLA Raju Pal, alleged that the state police and administration were complicit or indifferent in the murder of her husband and sought a fresh investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The High Court dismissed her writ petition, but the Supreme Court held that when an inves…
BCCIversusCRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BIHAR & ORS.
2015 INSC 6422 January 2015Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is a "State" under Article 12 and concluded that, although it is not, it performs public functions and is therefore amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The Court upheld the Probe Committee’s findings that Gurunath Meiyappan…
SHAIKH RAFIQ & ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2008 INSC 8722 January 2008Case Allowed
The appellants Shaikh Rafiq and Fatimbee were convicted for the murder of Noor Miya Mohd. Hussain, allegedly after they, together with the deceased's daughter‑in‑law Jaibunisa, came to his house and, following a dispute, poured kerosene on him and set him alight. The conviction rested solely on a dying declaration reco…
B. SHASHIKALAversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2004 INSC 5122 January 2004Dismissed
The deceased, married to the brother of the appellant, was allegedly poured with kerosene and set alight by the appellant and her mother. She escaped the house, was rescued by neighbours, and later died from extensive burns. While in the hospital, a dying declaration was recorded by a Munsif Magistrate with the assista…
DASTAGIR SAB AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2004 INSC 5222 January 2004Dismissed
The appellant Dastagir Sab and another were convicted of rape under Section 376(2)(g) of the IPC. The prosecution proved that the victim had seen the accused on three occasions before the assault, that the accused were chased, caught, and allegedly confessed, and that semen was found on the victim's clothing. The defen…
LEHNAversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2002 INSC 3922 January 2002Appeal(s) allowed
Lehna was convicted of murder (Sec. 302 IPC), attempt to murder (Sec. 324 IPC) and assault (Sec. 458 IPC) for killing his mother, brother and sister‑in‑law and injuring his father and nephew during a family land dispute. The trial court sentenced him to death, which the High Court confirmed. On appeal, the Supreme Cour…
SANJEEV KUMARversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
1999 INSC 2122 January 1999Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a murder case where Sanjiv Kumar was seen entering and exiting the victim's house with a knife, was found with blood‑stained clothes, and a knife bearing human blood was recovered from his residence. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including the recovery of blood‑stained cl…
VINAYAK SHIVAJIRAO POLversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
1998 INSC 3822 January 1998Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a sepoy in the Indian Army, was accused of murdering his wife whose headless, highly decomposed body was found in a well. He made a voluntary extra‑judicial confession to military officers admitting to strangling his wife, and later, at his suggestion, the police recovered the victim’s head from another …
CHANDRA MOHAN TIWARI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1992 INSC 2422 January 1992Dismissed
Chandra Mohan Tiwari and Ram Pal Singh Sengar were convicted of murder after the Madhya Pradesh High Court set aside a trial court acquittal. They appealed to the Supreme Court under Section 379 of the CrPC and Section 2(a) of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970, challenging the…
BHAGEL SINGHversusSWARAN SINGH AND ORS.
1992 INSC 2522 January 1992Disposed off
The dispute arose over a proposed drain through the fields of the complainant, Baghel Singh, leading to a violent clash between his party and that of Swaran Singh and his brothers. During the altercation, Swaran Singh, armed with a rifle, fired two shots that killed Kandhara Singh and Darbara Singh, while his brothers …
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusRAM SAGAR YADAV AND ORS
1985 INSC 1122 January 1985Appeal(s) allowed
The Uttar Pradesh State prosecuted four police officers for the death of Brijlal, who was arrested on a spurious charge and died in police custody after being beaten. The prosecution relied heavily on Brijlal's dying declaration to the magistrate, which identified the Station House Officer and constables as his assaila…
S.D. SONIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
1990 INSC 39821 December 1990Dismissed
The appellant S.D. Soni was married to Varsha, who was found dead in their matrimonial home. The defence claimed suicide, citing a note (Exh. 80) and alleged poisoning, while the prosecution alleged homicide, pointing to internal injuries to the pancreas and spleen and a fabricated suicide note. The Court held that the…
STATE(SPE HYDERABAD)versusAIR COMMODORE KAILASH CHAND
1979 INSC 27521 December 1979Dismissed
The respondent, a retired Air Force officer who had been re‑employed and transferred to the Regular Air Force Reserve and subsequently to the Auxiliary Air Force, was charged under section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for offences alleged to have occurred between March 1965 and March 1967. He moved to have …
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusKISHORI LAL MINOCHA
1979 INSC 27621 December 1979Dismissed
The State of Uttar Pradesh sued Kishori Lal for the shortfall of Rs 20,100 that arose when the excise licences he won at a public auction were resold at a lower price because he failed to deposit one‑sixth of the bid amount as required by the Excise Rules. The respondent argued that no contract was completed under Arti…
MANJIT SINGH & ANR.versusDARSHANA DEVI & ORS.
2024 INSC 89521 November 2024Dismissed
The original plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an oral sale agreement dated 12‑02‑1986 concerning a property that the owner subsequently sold to defendants No.2 and No.3 on 29‑08‑1986. The trial court granted the decree in favour of the plaintiff, but the first appellate court set aside the decree, hol…
PAWAN KUMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2023 INSC 101221 November 2023Appeal(s) allowed
Pawan Kumar was convicted of murder and attempt to murder (IPC ss.302, 307 read with s.34) and sentenced to life imprisonment and seven years rigorous imprisonment. He contended that he was a juvenile at the time of the offence (01‑12‑1995) and sought the benefit of the Juvenile Justice Act. The trial court and High Co…
HARPAL SINGH @ CHHOTAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2016 INSC 104521 November 2016Dismissed
The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of Harpal Singh @ Chhota and co‑accused for kidnapping, abduction for ransom and conspiracy under IPC §§ 364A, 395, 412, 471, 1208 and Arms Act § 25. The Court found the victim’s testimony – recorded under §§ 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. and reiterated at trial – to be truthful and suffi…
SUBHASISH MONDAL @ BIJOYversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2013 INSC 76621 November 2013Dismissed
The appellant Subhasish Mondal was convicted of murdering his elder brother and mother in Kharagpur, allegedly motivated by a grievance over a job given to his brother after their father's death. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including the victim's injuries, the presence of a silver chain belonging…
B. CHANDRIKAversusSANTHOSH & ANR
2013 INSC 76721 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, the divorced wife of the first accused, challenged summons issued against her in a case under Section 420 read with Section 34 IPC. The police investigation had filed a refer report stating that the complaint was not proved, and the complainant testified that only the husband had been entrusted with mone…
R.K. ANANDversusREGISTRAR, DELHI HIGH COURT
2012 INSC 52321 November 2012Disposed off
Senior advocate R.K. Anand was held guilty of contempt for attempting to suborn a court witness in a criminal trial where he represented the accused. The Delhi High Court punished him with a four‑month ban from appearing before the High Court, a fine of Rs 2,000 and recommended that he be stripped of his senior‑advocat…
GURMAIL SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
2012 INSC 52821 November 2012Dismissed
The case arose from a violent clash between two rival families over a land dispute, which culminated in the murder of Gurdial Singh and injuries to several others. Eight persons, armed with guns and gandasas, assembled and attacked the victims; three of the accused died during trial, leaving five to stand trial. The tr…
SURINDER KUMARversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2012 INSC 52421 November 2012Dismissed
The appellant Surinder Kumar was convicted under Sections 304B and 498A of the IPC for the death of his wife, Kiran Bala, who suffered 90% burn injuries and gave a dying declaration blaming him for dowry demands. The appellant challenged the admissibility of the declaration, arguing that his wife was too injured to mak…
KUNJUMON @ UNNIversusSTATE OF KERALA
2012 INSC 52521 November 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Kunjumon, entered a house with a common intention to commit robbery, threatened an 11‑year‑old girl and subsequently dragged a 90‑year‑old woman from her cot, beating her on the head with a wall clock, leading to her death. He was convicted by the trial court and the High Court under IPC sections 302 (mu…
MANGAL SINGH & ANR.versusKISHAN SINGH & ORS.
2008 INSC 133421 November 2008Case Partly allowed
The case arose from an assault on Omkar Lal, who was attacked with pharsas and lathis by three accused. The trial court convicted all three under Section 307 IPC (attempt to murder) and sentenced them to five years’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine. The High Court acquitted one accused, altered the conviction of the re…
KILARI MALAKONDIAAH @ MALAYADRI & ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2008 INSC 133521 November 2008Dismissed
The appellants, members of a political faction, assaulted the deceased with deadly weapons, causing his death, and injured three other persons. They were convicted under Sections 302 read with 34 and 307 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. On appeal they argued that the father of the deceased was not examined, that …
MD. RAFIQUE @ CHACHUversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2008 INSC 133621 November 2008Dismissed
The appellant, MD Rafique, was charged with murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and voluntarily causing hurt (Sec. 398 IPC) for shooting the shop owner and assaulting his sons. The trial court convicted him on both counts; the Calcutta High Court upheld the murder conviction but set aside the 398 conviction. On appeal, the appellant…
KALYAN SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2006 INSC 87421 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed
On 31 July 1989, a group of accused, including Kalyan Singh, allegedly surrounded a well where Durga Singh Rawat was bathing and Kalyan Singh is said to have urged Budh Singh to fire, resulting in the victim's death. The trial judge, after detailed analysis of witness statements and noting inconsistencies and the enmit…
AHMAD UMAR SAEED SHEIKHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
1996 INSC 136421 November 1996Dismissed
The appellant, Ahmad Umar Saeed Sheikh, was charged under IPC sections 307, 332, 427, the Foreigners Act, and TADA sections 3 and 4. He contended that the FIR, lodged on a Sub‑Inspector's complaint, was invalid because it was recorded without the prior approval of the District Superintendent of Police required by TADA …
R.C.SOODversusHIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
1994 INSC 52821 November 1994Case Allowed
R.C. Sood, then Registrar of the Rajasthan High Court, was suspended by the High Court under Rule 13 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958, on the allegation that he altered a draft recruitment advertisement, changing the age eligibility date from 1 January 1994 to 1 January 1…
BHAGIRATH SINGH S/O MAHIPAT SINGH JUDEJAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
1983 INSC 17821 November 1983Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was charged under Section 307 IPC for stabbing a victim and was granted bail by the Sessions Judge. The State appealed, and the Gujarat High Court cancelled the bail, citing the victim's status as a social and political worker and the seriousness of the offence. The Supreme Court held that cancellation of…
MURARI LAL S/O RAM SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1979 INSC 24821 November 1979Dismissed
Murari Lal was convicted of murder and related offences on the basis of two key pieces of evidence: a wrist‑watch belonging to the deceased recovered at his instance, and a handwritten note found beside the dead body that a handwriting expert identified as being written by the appellant. The appellant contended that th…
MAFABHAI MOTIBHAI SAGARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
2024 INSC 80621 October 2024Case Partly allowed
Mafabhai Motibhai Sagar was convicted of murder and related offences and sentenced to life imprisonment. After the Supreme Court directed a speedy decision on his remission application, the Gujarat Government granted remission but imposed four conditions, two of which the appellant challenged as vague and arbitrary. Th…
SHYAM NARAYAN RAMversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. ETC.
2024 INSC 80021 October 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, who filed the FIR, was convicted along with three others for murder and related offences based on eyewitness testimony and forensic evidence. During the trial, the defence counsel admitted the genuineness of the prosecution's documents and dispensed with formal proof, invoking Section 294 of the CrPC. Th…
MOHD. FIROZversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2022 INSC 112921 October 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Mohd. Firoz, was convicted of rape and related offences under Sections 376(2)(i), 376(2)(m) and 376A of the IPC and Sections 5(i), 5(m) read with 6 of the POCSO Act, and was sentenced to life imprisonment (with the qualification ‘remainder of his natural life’) for the IPC offences and 20 years for the 3…
SUMITHA PRADEEPversusARUN KUMAR C.K & ANR.
2022 INSC 113321 October 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, mother of a 12‑year‑old girl, alleged that her brother‑in‑law sexually assaulted the child, causing severe trauma and a decline in academic performance. An FIR was filed under IPC sections 354 and 354A and POCSO Act sections 7, 8, 9 and 11. The Sessions Court denied anticipatory bail to the accused, but …
KAVITHA LANKESHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
2021 INSC 65421 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from the murder of journalist Gauri Lankesh, investigated under the Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act, 2000 (KCOCA). The Commissioner of Police granted prior approval under Section 24(1)(a) to invoke Section 3 of KCOCA against several accused, including Mohan Nayak, based on material indicating o…
PREM SHANKAR PRASADversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.
2021 INSC 65821 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Prem Shankar Prasad filed an FIR against respondent No.2 for offences under sections 406, 407, 468 and 506 IPC. An arrest warrant was issued, the accused absconded and a proclamation under s.82 CrPC was made, followed by proceedings under s.82‑83. The trial court dismissed the accused's anticipatory bail …
M. SRIKANTHversusSTATE OF TELANGANA AND ANR.
2019 INSC 117221 October 2019Disposed off
The complainant alleged that a property inherited from her father was fraudulently transferred to her brother through a forged will and deed, and that the brother subsequently executed a lease to accused No.4, who sub‑leased it to HPCL. The complaint also implicated several other parties, but the High Court quashed the…
SURINDER KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2011 INSC 77721 October 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Surinder Kumar, was accused of setting fire to his lover Kamlesh Rani, who later died from severe burns. The sole evidence against him was a dying declaration recorded by an executive magistrate at a hospital, which alleged that Kumar had poured kerosene on her and set her ablaze. The trial court rejecte…
RAMESHversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2010 INSC 71721 October 2010Dismissed
The case arose from a violent clash over disputed land in Jind, where several accused, armed with pistols, lathis and other weapons, assembled and attacked a group of persons, resulting in the death of Krishan and injuries to others. The trial court convicted the appellants under Sections 302, 307, 323, 324, 148, 449 I…
RAVEENDRAN K & ANR,versusEXCISE INSPECTOR VADAKARA & ANR.
2008 INSC 119821 October 2008Dismissed
The appellants, licensees of arrack shops, were convicted under Section 57A(iii) of the Kerala Abkari Act, 1967 for selling liquor adulterated with methanol. Samples taken from their godowns revealed the presence of the noxious substance, and the prosecution argued that the licencees had either mixed or permitted the m…
LOKESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.
2008 INSC 120121 October 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved the murder of Chandra Pal Singh, for which respondent No.2 was alleged to have conspired with S.B. Singh to hire shooters. The trial court denied bail, but the Allahabad High Court granted bail, reasoning that the prosecution case was weak and that key statements were recorded only after 2.5 months. T…
STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T. NADUversusRAKIAPPAN AND ORS.
2008 INSC 119121 October 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The State prosecuted Rakiappan and others for the homicidal death of two persons, relying on the testimony of PW2, a 12‑year‑old child who was injured during the incident. PW2 regained consciousness and gave a statement to the investigating officer on 13 December 1995, which the trial court accepted, convicting the acc…
STATE OF PUNJABversusGURDIP KAUR
2008 INSC 119221 October 2008Dismissed
The State of Punjab appealed the acquittal of Gurdip Kaur and co‑accused by the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The trial court had convicted them under IPC s.302 read with s.34 for murder. The High Court set aside the convictions, citing a substantial delay in lodging the FIR, an unexplained delay in forwarding the rep…
STATE OF GOAversusSUBHASH GHOGLE
2008 INSC 119321 October 2008Dismissed
The State of Goa charged Subhash Ghogle with murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly strangling Bendita Parriera on 4 January 1999. The trial court convicted him based on a series of circumstantial facts, including alleged motive, presence at the scene, noises of a quarrel, and forensic evidence, and sentenced him t…
STATE OF PUNJABversusAVTAR SINGH
2008 INSC 119421 October 2008Dismissed
The trial court convicted the accused under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for murder. The Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside the conviction, acquitting the accused on the basis of a substantial delay in lodging the FIR, a further delay in forwarding the report to the Elaka Magistrate, and a discrepan…
ASHOK KUMAR MONDALversusSAMIR KUMAR MONDAL & ANR.
2008 INSC 119621 October 2008Dismissed
The deceased was allegedly struck on the head with a crowbar by his brother during a domestic altercation, leading to his death. The trial court convicted the brother under Section 304 Part‑II of the IPC. On appeal, the Calcutta High Court acquitted him, holding that the eyewitness testimonies were unreliable, there wa…
SHIV RAM AND ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
1997 INSC 69921 October 1997Dismissed
The case involved a mass murder in which 24 persons were accused of killing five members of a family, including the brutal decapitation of three victims and the burning alive of a ten‑year‑old boy, allegedly as revenge for the earlier murder of A‑1's brother. The prosecution relied on two eye‑witnesses who were close r…
GULJAR ALI ETC.versusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
1997 INSC 70021 October 1997Appeal(s) allowed
Three brothers—Raj Mohammad, Niaz Ali and Gulzar Ali—were convicted for the murder of Tara Chand, a factotum of Jai Paul, based on circumstantial evidence, letters showing motive, and recovered weapons. The prosecution relied on letters seized from the accused, expert handwriting analysis, and statements by the accused…
A. DEIVENDRANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
1997 INSC 70321 October 1997Disposed off
The case involved a dacoity and murder where five accused were committed to the Sessions Court; one accused, MR, was granted pardon by the Chief Judicial Magistrate after commitment and examined as an approver. The Supreme Court held that after a case is committed to a Sessions Court, only that Court can grant pardon u…
SUNILversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI
2023 INSC 84021 September 2023Disposed off
The case arose from an altercation between two families in Jahangir Puri, Delhi, after which Babu Ram (non‑appellant) fetched a licensed gun and fired indiscriminately from a roof, killing two persons and injuring twenty‑six others. The appellants – Sunil, Shri Krishan and Ravinder – were convicted under Sections 302 a…
FIRST GLOBAL STOCKBROKING PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusANIL RISHIRAJ & ANR.
2023 INSC 84521 September 2023Dismissed
The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) repealed the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) but saved prosecutions for offences under sections 56 and 57 of FERA if cognizance was taken within two years of FEMA's commencement. An Enforcement Officer appointed under FERA filed a complaint on 11 February 20…
RAJESH & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2023 INSC 83921 September 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the kidnapping and murder of 15‑year‑old Ajit Pal, for which three relatives – Rajesh Yadav, Raja Yadav and Om Prakash Yadav – were convicted and sentenced to death (two of them) and life imprisonment based largely on circumstantial evidence and confessions recorded before they were formally accused.…
KALA SINGH @ GURNAM SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2021 INSC 51921 September 2021Case Partly allowed
The appellant Kala Singh and co-accused were involved in a sudden fight with the deceased, Shamber Singh, after a quarrel over a stolen pigeon while intoxicated. The co-accused struck the deceased on the head with a rod, causing death, after which the body was disposed of in a canal. The trial court convicted them unde…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusDALBIR SINGH
2021 INSC 52021 September 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved Dalbir Singh, a constable of the CRPF, who was convicted in a criminal trial for firing his service weapon, leading to his dismissal from service. He was later acquitted by the High Court, reinstated, and subsequently faced a fresh departmental charge sheet alleging misuse of his service rifle in 1993…
JASBIR SINGHversusTARASINGHAND OTHERS
2015 INSC 68421 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents were convicted under Sections 466, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code for forging documents to appropriate property. The trial court sentenced them to imprisonment ranging from one to three years. The High Court reduced each sentence to the period already served, relying on the respondents'…
SURESH SAKHARAM NANGAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2012 INSC 41721 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Suresh Sakharam Nangare, was convicted along with his co-accused for the murder of his brother-in-law, Sanjay Lokhare, who died from severe burns. The prosecution's case relied primarily on the testimony of an approver, Shabbir Fariyad Khan, who claimed the appellant only held the victim's legs after the…
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, HYDERABADversusK. NARAYANA RAO
2012 INSC 41821 September 2012Dismissed
The CBI investigated a scheme in which bank officials and private individuals defrauded Vijaya Bank of Rs 1.27 crore by sanctioning housing loans. K. Narayana Rao, a panel advocate for the bank, was charged as accused 6 for allegedly giving false legal opinions on ten loans. The High Court, invoking Section 482 of the …
MALLESHAPPAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2007 INSC 95921 September 2007Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Malleshippa, was convicted of murder, kidnapping and concealment of dead body under Sections 302, 364 and 201 IPC based on the testimony of the deceased's mother and wife and police officers. The body was highly decomposed, headless and handless, and its identification relied solely on underwear and a wa…
KHAMBAM RAJA REDDY AND ANR.versusPUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2006 INSC 63721 September 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were convicted by the Andhra Pradesh High Court for causing the death of Khambam Venkatramana Reddy, based primarily on the eye‑witness testimony of the victim's wife that the accused threw a 25‑30 kg stone on the victim's head. The defence argued that the principal accused was crippled by polio and coul…
B.R. KAPURversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.
2001 INSC 45321 September 2001Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether J. Jayalalithaa, convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment, could be appointed Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu after her party won a majority. The Court held that a person convicted and sentenced to imprisonment of two years or m…
RAMMI @ RAMESHWAR ETC.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1999 INSC 42821 September 1999Dismissed
The appellants, Rammi alias Rameshwar and Bhura alias Sajjan Kumar, were charged with murder of Sardar Singh Thakur inside a moving bus, allegedly as revenge for a prior killing. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the bus driver, the conductor, and a passenger, as well as weapons recovered under Section 27 of t…
STATE OF U.P.versusDHARMENDRA SINGH AND ANR. ETC.
1999 INSC 43121 September 1999Appeal(s) allowed
The State of U.P. prosecuted Dharmendra Singh and Narendra for the pre‑meditated murder of five members of a complainant’s family, including children and an elderly man, after a personal grievance and an attempted molestation. The trial court convicted them under Section 302 IPC and sentenced them to death, calling the…
MR.'X'versusHOSPITAL Z
1998 INSC 37421 September 1998Dismissed
The appellant, a doctor who tested HIV‑positive, had his status disclosed by Hospital Z when he was about to marry Ms. Y, leading to social ostracism. He filed a consumer complaint seeking damages for breach of medical confidentiality and violation of his right to privacy under Article 21. The Supreme Court held that t…
SHAM SUNDERversusPURAN AND ANR.
1990 INSC 29821 September 1990Disposed off
The dispute arose when the respondents, armed, attacked Partap Singh after a protest over burnt sugarcane damaging his wheat crop, leading to his death. The trial court convicted the respondents under section 302 IPC (murder) and sentenced them to life imprisonment. The High Court, however, acquitted them of murder, co…
SUBE SINGH & ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
1988 INSC 29221 September 1988Dismissed
The petitioners, adolescents under twenty‑one, were convicted of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment. They sought relief under Section 5 of the Punjab Borstal Act, 1926, which allows detention in a Borstal Institution in lieu of transportation or rigorous imprisonment fo…
VINAYAK ETC.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
1984 INSC 17421 September 1984Disposed off
Seven persons were tried for a series of murders allegedly committed as part of a criminal conspiracy under s.302 read with s.120B IPC, and for murder under s.302 read with s.34 IPC. The trial court acquitted all of them of the conspiracy charge but convicted two of them (accused 1 and 6) for the murder of Malan. The H…
STATE OF U.P.versusDR. G. K. GHOSH
1983 INSC 12521 September 1983Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, Dr. G.K. Ghosh, a government orthopaedic surgeon, was convicted by a Special Judge for demanding and accepting illegal gratification from a patient’s father under Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and for criminal intimidation under Section 161 IPC. The conviction was set aside b…
PRAMOD SURYABHAN PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
2019 INSC 93921 August 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Pramod Suryabhan Pawar, sought to quash a First Information Report (FIR) filed under Sections 376, 417, 504, 506(2) of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(u), (w) and 3(2)(vii) of the SC/ST Act, alleging that the allegations were based on a false promise to marry and on WhatsApp messages sent before the relevant p…
SURESH AND ANRversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2018 INSC 73421 August 2018Disposed off
The case involved the murder of Chander Bhan, an election agent of a losing candidate, allegedly killed by supporters of the same candidate to frame the winning candidate in a false case. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including an extra‑judicial confession, forensic recovery of a gun and pellets, a…
LT. COL. PRASAD SHRIKANT PUROHITversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2017 INSC 78421 August 2017Appeal(s) allowed
Lt. Col. Prasad Shrikant Purohit, a serving Army officer, was accused of conspiring with others to plant a bomb in Malegaon in 2008, resulting in six deaths. The case was investigated first by the Anti‑Terrorist Squad (ATS) and later by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), leading to divergent charge‑sheets, with t…
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusRATHIN DANDAPAT AND OTHERS
2015 INSC 59921 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from the killing of nine persons and injuries to many villagers in Netai, West Bengal, where the CBI investigated and filed a charge sheet against 21 accused, some of whom were absconders. After the charge sheet, several proclaimed offenders were arrested and the CBI sought police remand under Section 16…
VIKRAM SINGH@ VICKY &ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2015 INSC 59121 August 2015Dismissed
The appellants were convicted under Sections 302 and 364A of the IPC for kidnapping a 16‑year‑old boy, demanding a Rs 50 lakh ransom and murdering him, and were sentenced to death. They challenged the constitutionality of Section 364A on the ground that its mandatory death or life imprisonment provision was disproporti…
RAJU @ DEVENDRA CHOUBEYversusSTATE OF CHHATISGARH
2014 INSC 55821 August 2014Disposed off
The case concerned the murder of Bhavna Tripathi, the daughter‑in‑law of accused No.1 (Shashi Tripathi), who was alleged to have hired contract killers (accused Nos.2 and 4) to kill her over a domestic dispute. The sole eyewitness, a 13‑year‑old servant (PW‑21), identified the accused and described how accused No.4 cau…
MANJEET SINGH KHERAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2013 INSC 54721 August 2013Dismissed
The petitioner, Manjeet Singh Khera, sought a court order directing the prosecution to produce the original complaint filed with the Anti‑Corruption Bureau that had initiated the investigation leading to an FIR and charge‑sheet under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and IPC s.109. The prosecution contended that t…
STATE OF U.P.versusSANJAY KUMAR
2012 INSC 34521 August 2012Dismissed
The respondent, Sanjay Kumar, was convicted of raping and murdering an 18‑year‑old girl, Divya Rani, and was sentenced to death by the Sessions Court. The High Court of Allahabad commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment, holding that the case did not fall within the "rarest of rare" category. The State of Uttar…
M.N. OJHA & ORS.versusALOK KUMAR SRIVASTAV & ANR.
2009 INSC 106321 August 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, bank officials, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a criminal complaint filed by a guarantor alleging offences under the IPC. The Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate had taken cognizance of the complaint and issued non‑bailable warrants without examining…
RAM TAWEKYA SHARMAversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
2008 INSC 95621 August 2008Dismissed
Three police constables were accused of robbery under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. While the criminal trial was pending, the authorities initiated departmental proceedings under the Bihar Police Manual. The constables were later acquitted in the criminal case, but the departmental inquiry led to their…
IQBAL SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2008 INSC 96021 August 2008Case Partly allowed
The appellants, who were first cousins of the complainant, removed tubewell pipes from a piece of common land while armed with spades. When the complainant party intervened and objected, a verbal altercation escalated into a physical fight, during which the deceased Sikander Singh was killed and two others were injured…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusTULSHIRAM BHANUDAS KAMBLE AND ORS.
2007 INSC 85021 August 2007Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Maharashtra prosecuted fifteen accused for a violent incident in which two persons were killed and three injured. The trial court convicted five of them under Section 302 IPC (murder) with life imprisonment and others under Sections 324 and 452 IPC. The Bombay High Court acquitted the accused of the murder…
RAM BADAN SHARMAversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2006 INSC 52821 August 2006Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the case of Ram Badan Sharma and his father-in‑law, who were accused of killing their daughter‑in‑law Sanju Kumari by poisoning her after persistent demands for a colour TV, a motorcycle and cash. The prosecution proved that the accused repeatedly demanded dowry, harassed and beat the victim,…
GANESH K. GUL VE ETC.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2002 INSC 34421 August 2002Dismissed
The case involved a mob of sixty persons who formed an unlawful assembly with the common object of murdering Satwa and his sons. The trial court convicted thirteen accused and acquitted the rest, including Ganesh K. Gulve (accused No.24). The High Court upheld the convictions of eleven accused, reversed Gulve's acquitt…
TALLURRI VENKAIAH NAIDU AND ANR. ETC.versusPUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
1996 INSC 91221 August 1996Dismissed
The case concerned the murder of Pallamareddi Ramanareddi by bombs allegedly hurled by Tallurri Venkaiah Naidu (appellant) and co‑accused. The trial court acquitted several accused but convicted the appellant under sections 120‑B/302 IPC and related provisions. The High Court set aside the trial court's acquittals and …
BABA PEER PARAS NATH AND ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA
1996 INSC 91821 August 1996Dismissed
Six accused were tried for a terrorist attack on a temple. All made confessional statements before a Superintendent of Police under Section 15 of the Terrorist and Disruptive (Prevention) Activities Act (TADA). Two of them, Baba Peer Paras Nath and Baldev Nath, were charged only under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for at…
THE STATE OF PUNJABversusTEJINDER SINGH AND ANR.
1995 INSC 48321 August 1995Dismissed
The State of Punjab charged Tejinder Singh (A‑1) and Darshan Singh (A‑2) with murder of Jasbir Singh after a boundary dispute, alleging that both approached the victim with gandasas and assaulted him, leading to his death. The Special Court convicted A‑1 under s.302 IPC and acquitted A‑2, prompting A‑1 to appeal his co…
GURDIAL SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
1995 INSC 48421 August 1995Disposed off
Gurdial Singh, along with two others, was charged with murder under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 and under Section 25 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the three accused fired at the victim, Ram Pal, causing his instantaneous death, and forensic evidence linked the appellant's unlicensed 12‑bore gun…
STATE OF U.P.versusKAPIL DEO AND ANOTHER
1991 INSC 20321 August 1991Dismissed
The case arose from the murder of a 12‑year‑old domestic help, Vinod Kumar, in 1968. Four persons – Kapil Deo, his wife Sheo Kumari, their son Vidya Sagar and brother Ramapati – were charged under IPC s.302, s.302 read with s.34 and s.201 read with s.34. The trial court convicted Vidya Sagar of murder and the others of…
AYUB @PAPPU KHAN NAWAB KHAN PATHANversusS.N. SINHA AND ANR.
1990 INSC 23921 August 1990Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioner, Ayub, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 on grounds that he was a "bootlegger" and a "dangerous person" involved in several offences. The petition challenged the detention, arguing that the detaining authority had not applied its mind and that t…
KHURSHEED AHMAD CHOHANversusUNION OF TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS. ETC.
2025 INSC 87621 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a police constable, was summoned to the Senior Superintendent's office and allegedly detained illegally for six days during which he suffered severe genital mutilation and other injuries, as confirmed by medical reports. His wife complained to the police seeking registration of an FIR against the officia…
VICTIM ‘X’versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.
2025 INSC 87721 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned allegations that the Superintendent of a women’s protection home in Patna administered intoxicating substances to inmates and facilitated their sexual exploitation. The accused, respondent No.2, was granted bail by the Patna High Court despite the victim not being notified, contrary to Section 15A(3)…
STATE REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICEversusK. N. NEHRU ETC.
2017 INSC 65921 July 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The State filed a criminal appeal against the discharge of K.N. Nehru, a former minister, and his wife under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The FIR alleged that they had amassed assets disproportionate to their known income, with the investigation also focusing on the income and assets of their son, Arun. Whil…
MS. EERA THROUGH DR. MANJULA KRIPPENDORFversusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
2017 INSC 65821 July 2017Disposed off
The appeal concerned the interpretation of Section 2(d) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, where the appellant, a mentally retarded adult, argued that "age" should include mental age so that she could be treated as a child. The Court examined the POCSO Act's objects and reasons, its d…
MR. ROBERT JOHN D'SOUZA AND OTHERSversusMR. STEPHEN V. GOMESANDANOTHER
2015 INSC 50621 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, directors of Mukka Welfare Society, were summoned in a criminal complaint alleging breach of trust and cheating in respect of a 1996 sale of society land. The complainant, not a member of the society, filed the complaint more than a decade after the deeds were executed, despite an earlier police investi…
MUNILAL MOCHIversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ANR.
2011 INSC 51221 July 2011
The appellant was charged with misappropriation of funds under the National Rural Employment Programme (NREP) for offences under several IPC sections and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. After a protracted investigation, he was convicted in 2004 and sentenced to two and a half years' rigorous imprisonment, which…
A. SUBASH BABUversusSTATE OF A.P.& ANR.
2011 INSC 51421 July 2011Disposed off
The appellant, a Sub‑Inspector, married a woman (the second wife) by concealing that he was already married, collected money from her family and threatened them. The second wife filed a complaint alleging offences under Sections 494, 495, 417, 420 and 498A IPC. The High Court quashed the complaint under Section 498A, h…
NARINDER KUMARversusSTATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR
2010 INSC 41421 July 2010Dismissed
Narinder Kumar was charged with murdering Kola Ram after a heated exchange during a Baisakhi procession, where he allegedly returned with a 12‑bore gun and shot the victim. The prosecution relied on consistent testimony of four eye‑witnesses, corroborated by medical and forensic evidence linking the appellant to the sh…
JAI KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2009 INSC 92821 July 2009Dismissed
On 9 October 1991, Jai Kumar and co‑accused robbed money and a tractor and threw the victim, Raghbir Singh, into a canal. The victim, who was intoxicated, tried to climb out, was kicked on the face and thrown back into the water, resulting in his death. All accused were convicted under IPC sections 392, 397 and 302 rea…
RAMESH DUTI & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
2009 INSC 92921 July 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, members of the managing committee of Shastri Memorial School, obtained a civil decree for possession of a plot of land and later sold a portion of it, after which a First Information Report (FIR) was lodged alleging cheating and offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC. The ap…
KISHAN LALversusDHARMENDRA BAFNA & ANR.
2009 INSC 93621 July 2009Dismissed
Kishan Lal filed a complaint alleging that nine (later ten) accused cheated him of Rs 4.65 crore. An FIR was lodged against all accused, but the charge‑sheet was filed only against Accused 1 and 2, and the Metropolitan Magistrate took cognizance of them. The complainant sought, under Section 173(8) of the CrPC, a direc…
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, NEW DELHIversusM.N. SHARMA
2008 INSC 84821 July 2008Case Allowed
The respondent, a Sub‑Registrar, was convicted by a Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 120‑B IPC and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. While his appeal was pending, he filed an application under Section 389(1) read with Section 482 of the CrPC seeking suspension of the conviction, …
STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.versusNITIN AGNIHOTRI AND ANR.
2008 INSC 84921 July 2008Case Allowed
The father (respondent No.2) lodged an FIR under Section 366 IPC alleging that Nitin Agnihotri (respondent No.1) abducted his daughter. The High Court quashed the FIR and, despite finding no police lapse, imposed a cost of Rs.50,000 on the State and the complainant. The State appealed, contending that cost should not b…