Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Criminal Procedure Code

17749 judgments · newest first · showing 3601–3800

KIRITBHAI RAMESHBHAI TRIVEDI POA OF YOGESH RAMESHBHAI TRIVEDIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by a Judicial Magistrate. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the …

SAMIRBHAI NAVINCHANDRA PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

Samirbhai Navinchandra Patel, the original complainant, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the …

JOSHI MANSUKHBHAI NAGJIBHAIversusJOSHI AMITKUMAR HARSHADBHAI

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, the original complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed against the acquittal of the accused by the 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patan. The issue before the Gujarat High Court was whether the complainant, deemed the victim of a dishonoured …

RONAKBHAI PRAMODBHAI PATELversusRUPEN DINUBHAI PATEL

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, the original complainant, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the respondent in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, deemed the victim of a dishonoured …

FORGE @ FORGE PVT. LTD THRO PRAVINCHANDRA SHAMJIBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, the original complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held that a complainant in a Section 138 case …

DHAVALBHAI KACHRABHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the …

PRAVINBHAI NAGINBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, Pravinbhai Naginbhai Patel, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The key issue was whether the original complainant, who is also the victim of a …

DHARMESHBHAI DHIRAJBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The original complainant, Dharmeshbhai Dhirajbhai Patel, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The key issue …

ASHWIN BABUBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

Ashwin Babubhai Patel, the original complainant, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, has a statutory right to file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 …

M/S. ATUL GLASS WORKSversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS, challenged the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court judgment in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held …

KANUBHAI CHHAGANBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, particularly Celestium Financial Ltd. v. …

ABHISHEKSINH SURENDRASINH LODHAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

DISPOSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

The applicant filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside the FIR and order in Criminal Case No. 176/2019. While the application was pending, the substantive case was concluded on 30 October 2025, resulting in the applicant's conviction under Section 138 of the …

GHANSHYAMBHAI CHATURBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal …

MAHENDRABHAI MITHALAL CHOPRAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

Mahendra Mithalal Chopra appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, claiming the right to file an appeal as the victim‑complainant. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court judgment in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held …

SPECIAL POLICE ESTABLISHMENTversusKAMTA PRASAD MISHRA AND OTHERS

2026 INSC 644Dismissed

The Special Police Establishment (SPE) of Madhya Pradesh, constituted under the 1947 Act to investigate corruption‑related offences, was directed by the High Court to disclose information sought by a Town Inspector under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI). The appellant argued that a 2011 …

ZALA MAHENDRASINH KESHARISINHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The original complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed a criminal complaint, and the trial court acquitted the accused. The complainant appealed the acquittal under Section 378(4) CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the …

MAHESHBHAI SHIVARAMBHAI SADHUversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

Maheshbhai Sadhu, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure …

SHAH RAJMAL CHAMPALALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, has a statutory right to file an appeal …

RADHIKKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI DHAMELIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The applicant, Radhikkumar Jayantibhai Dhameliya, filed a successive regular bail application under Section 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure after a charge sheet was filed for offences under Sections 61, 316(3), 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He had been in custody …

PRAJAPATI VIJAYBHAI MELABHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The original complainant, Prajapati Vijaybhai, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal …

PRAVINBHAI NAGINBHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The original complainant, Pravinbhai Naginbhai Patel, appealed against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gyanasekaran, which held that the complainant is …

M/s. ANKUR POLYMERS THRO ANKUR PRAKASHCHANDRA CHOKHAWALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The original complainant under Section 378(4) of the CrPC sought leave to appeal against the acquittal of accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat. The High Court considered the recent Supreme Court judgment in Celestium Financial …

RAMESHBHAI MAVJIBHAI BODARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, the original complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed against the acquittal of the accused by the 10th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajkot. The High Court examined whether a complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case is deemed a victim entitled to …

SATISH KRISHNA PUJARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

BAIL GRANTED

Satish Krishna Pujari appealed against his conviction in CBI Special Cases 35/2011 and 36/2012, where he was found guilty of several IPC offences and sentenced to up to three years imprisonment. He sought suspension of the substantive sentence pending final disposal of the appeal, arguing that he …

SHARIQUE AHMAD MOHAMMAD WARIS MOMINversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash a Criminal Miscellaneous Application under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. filed by his wife and daughter for maintenance. The petitioner claimed that a Khula and a mutual‑consent divorce dated 25‑08‑2020 and 07‑09‑2020 respectively …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar, the driver of a Scorpio vehicle, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 441.9 liters of foreign liquor. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not recovered from his physical possession, that his name was linked only through a co‑accused’s confessional statement, and that …

DR. RAMESHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2026 INSC 635Dismissed

The District Civil Surgeon, acting as the appropriate authority under the Pre‑Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994, conducted a search, seized Dr. Ramesh’s sonography equipment and issued a notice under s.20(1) of the Act. Dr. Ramesh appeared before the Advisory …

Sourabh Kumar TiwaryversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sourabh Kumar Tiwary, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, 2018, with 397.15 litres of liquor recovered. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was involved because the seized liquor was found …

Manawati Devi @ Manti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Manawati Devi and Dinesh Kumar Ray, were named in an FIR for alleged assault and outrage of modesty against an informant in a land dispute. They contended that the incident was a mutual scuffle with no serious injury, as evidenced by a medical report indicating only simple body …

Rina Devi @ Rina KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rina Devi, was named in an FIR for alleged participation in a violent incident where a golden chain was snatched from an informant, with multiple offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 listed. She contended that she was not involved in the assault, only implicated as a …

STATE OF GUAJRATversusKAILASHGIRI RAMGIRI GOSWAMI

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The State of Gujarat appealed under Section 378(1)(3) of the CrPC against the acquittal of Kailashgiri Ramgiri Goswami by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gondal, who found insufficient evidence to sustain charges under Sections 363 and 366 of the IPC. The prosecution relied on the testimony of …

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusRAVI SHANKAR SINGH & ORS.

2026 INSC 650Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against directions issued by the Madhya Pradesh High Court that trial courts, while trying cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, must examine the sanctioning authority under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before charge‑framing, even when …

Lilawati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Lilawati Devi was accused of kidnapping a minor, administering medicine to render her unconscious, and forcing her to work as a maid. The original FIR listed bailable offences under IPC sections 363 and 34, but later the FIR was amended to include non‑bailable offences under IPC sections 371 and 328 …

Balmiki SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Balmiki Singh and relatives, appealed to the Patna High Court against the refusal of bail by the Exclusive Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The trial court had denied bail in a case registered for offences including …

Kamlesh Yadav @ Kamlesh BadshahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Kamlesh Yadav and Ravi Kumar Yadav, were charged under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly assaulting an informant and causing bodily injuries with alleged intent to cause death. They contended that the case was false, arising from a personal dispute, …

Chandan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Chandan Singh and Supan Mallah, were named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 636 litres of liquor recovered. The recovery was not made from the petitioners' conscious physical …

Ranjana DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ranjana Devi, the Mukhiya of Darbey‑Bhadaur Gram Panchayat, was named in an FIR (Pandarak PS Case No. 14 of 2018) for alleged misappropriation of government project funds in collusion with a junior engineer, invoking IPC sections 409, 420 and 34. She contended that her statutory role was limited to …

Suraj Sah @ Suraj Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners Suraj Sah, Satish Sah and Ashok Kumar Yadav were named in an FIR under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly pelting stones at police personnel during a Sarswati Puja immersion procession, causing injuries. Ashok Kumar, who was arrested while his …

Renu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Renu Devi, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The seized 60 litres of mahua liquor was recovered from the residence of a co‑accused, not from the petitioner's …

Dewa GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dewa Gupta, a politician, filed an anticipatory bail petition after being implicated as a financier of nine co-accused in a murder case (Town P.S. Case No. 734 of 2025) despite not being named in the FIR. The FIR alleged that the co-accused killed a youth during a Mahaviri Jhanda …

MAHESHBHAI CHANABHAI KHUNTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

44-PARTLY ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioners sought quashing of FIR No.11213016200424 dated 30‑04‑2020, which alleged offences under IPC sections 448, 323, 504, 114 and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(v). They claimed the FIR was filed out of vengeance after the complainant was removed from the post of Sarpanch and …

Chakradhari RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chakradhari Ram was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 125 litres recovered from an auto rickshaw bearing registration No. BR24 PA 7699. The petitioner contended that he had sold the auto in August 2024 and was not in conscious physical possession of …

Sakaldev MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sakaldev Mahto, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, 2022, with 240 litres of liquor recovered from a vehicle registered in his name. He contended that the vehicle had been sold to another person in …

Nitish Sah @ Nitesh SahaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Nitish Sah, was named in an FIR for possession of 21.540 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed the motorcycle used to transport the liquor was lent in friendly faith to co‑accused Suraj Kumar Choudhary, who later implicated …

Chhotu Singh @ Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chhotu Singh, was named in an FIR for allegedly possessing 105 litres of illicit liquor and engaging in illegal manufacturing under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that his name was implicated solely on the basis of a co-accused's suspicion and …

Nitish Kumar @ Nitesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Nitish Kumar and Lallu Yadav, were named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (amended 2022), with 283 litres of liquor recovered. They contended that the liquor was found in an open …

Magan Yadav @ Suraj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Sukarbeg Chak, were named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 280.905 litres recovered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They contended that the liquor was seized from an open public area, not from …

Santosh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Yadav was named in an FIR for allegedly possessing 152.4 litres of illicit liquor and using a motorcycle to transport it, offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had no connection with the motorcycle …

Tetri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Tetri Devi, the wife of a deceased man, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 72.6 litres of Nepali liquor were recovered from a hut purportedly belonging to her. The petitioner contended that …

Umesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Umesh Yadav, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 203 litres of liquor were recovered from a river‑bed in Kadhan Diara. Counsel argued that the liquor was found in an open …

Ramji ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four residents of Sanghatpar village, were named in an FIR for alleged possession of 75 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They contended that the liquor was recovered from a hut unrelated to them and that they had no conscious …

Ram Bachan Kumar @ Ram Bechan MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ram Bachan Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged possession of 77.760 litres of illicit liquor and alleged illegal manufacturing under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that his inclusion was based solely on suspicion and hostile statements from neighbours, and that he …

Umesh Ray @ Umesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Umesh Ray and Sanjeet Kumar, were named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, with 624 litres of liquor recovered from the scene. They contended that their names were linked to the …

Manju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manju Devi was named in an FIR for allegedly possessing 100 litres of illicit liquor and being involved in its illegal trade under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She claimed the motorcycle used to transport the liquor was owned by her husband and lent to a friend, and that she had no …

Vinod RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Vinod Ray, Dharmendar Kumar and Lav Kumar were named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly manufacturing and trading illicit liquor, with 150 litres of liquor recovered. They applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the police had …

Ravi Bhushan Kumar @ Bhushan RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravi Bhushan Kumar, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 200 litres recovered from two motorcycles. The prosecution’s case relied on a co-accused’s disclosure, but no liquor …

UPENDRA CHAUDHARYversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Upendra Chaudhary, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 15 litres of liquor recovered from a field belonging to him. The petitioner contended that the field was an open, …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Kumar was named in an FIR for allegedly possessing 54.75 litres of illicit liquor and for illegal manufacturing/trading under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the seized liquor was not in his conscious physical …

MAHESHKUMAR RAMANLAL SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

52-TRANSFERRED TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT

Maheshkumar Ramanlal Shah, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. He invoked Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …

SAHIL ABDULSATTAR MANSURI & ORS.versusSAFIMAHAMAD FAFIRBHAI MANSURI & ORS.

2026 INSC 626

The father of the appellants filed a criminal complaint in 2007 alleging that while on Haj pilgrimage the accused forged his signature and created bogus partition and sale deeds to insert their names into revenue records. Despite multiple orders, the investigation stalled, case papers were lost, and …

Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rahul Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a case alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust for taking Rs.3 lakh on the promise of securing a CRPF job and refusing to return it. He filed a bail petition claiming innocence, lack of fraudulent intent, and a clean antecedent, while also …

Sunaina DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, who are the mother‑in‑law, father‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of the complainant, applied for bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑harassment case (Sections 498A IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act). They claimed that they had been granted protection under Section 41A CrPC during …

Sachin Yadav @ Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sachin Yadav, sought bail in a case where he was alleged to have participated in an extortion and assault incident at a grocery shop, resulting in charges under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code. The petitioner argued that the FIR was lodged a day after the incident, that the …

Nagendra Mandal @ Nage MandalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Nagendra Mandal, applied for bail in connection with FIR No.245/2023 alleging offences under several IPC sections, including assault and outraging modesty. He contended that the FIR only recorded his exhortation and no overt act, and that the investigating agency’s final report …

VASHRAMBHAI RAMJIBHAI CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Vashrambhai Ramjibhai Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS in connection with FIR No. 11996006260457 alleging offences under Sections 140(3), 64(2)(m), 123, 351(3) and 54 of the BNS. The applicant claimed false implication, no prior record and that custodial …

Nitesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Nitesh Kumar Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case involving the alleged recovery of 291.375 litres of foreign liquor from the dicky of his Hyundai car. The prosecution alleged that …

Rahul RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Rahul Ram, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case (PS Kuchaikote Case No. 419 of 2022) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for possession of 703.96 litres of illicit liquor. The prosecution’s case was based on the …

SUNIL KUMAR SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Sunil Kumar Singh, convicted under Section 302 of the IPC, appealed his sentence. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. The court examined Section 394 of the CrPC (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) which …

BIRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant Biraj Singh filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate and police reports. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. The Court applied Section 394 of the …

HALKHORI RAM @ RAM BILASH RAMversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Halkhori Ram, died during the pendency of Criminal Appeal No.192 of 1997. The court examined a police letter and death certificate confirming his demise. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, …

LAKHAN MAHTOversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Bijendra Prasad was convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and appealed the conviction. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. No near relative filed an application under CrPC Section 394 (or the corresponding Section 435 of the …

BALMIKI MAHTONversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Balmiki Mahton, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a death certificate and police reports. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of …

ANANDI YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Anandi Yadav, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No. 491 of 2003 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate and police reports. The court examined the letters from the Senior Superintendent of Police and the SHO …

JANG BAHADUR MANDALversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Jang Bahadur Mandal, died during the pendency of Criminal Appeal No.559 of 2002. The court examined a police letter and a death certificate confirming his death. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …

RAM CHHABILA SINGH and ANRversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellants, Ram Chhabila Singh and Ram Nasika Singh, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, both appellants died, as evidenced by death certificates and police reports. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 …

BISHWANATH SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant Bishwanath Singh, convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced to imprisonment with a fine, died during the pendency of his criminal appeal. The court examined the death certificate and relevant police reports, and applied Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure …

ARUN KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Arun Kumar Singh, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.45 of 2001 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a death certificate and police reports. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. Under …

SHANKER MAHTOversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Shanker Mahto, convicted under Section 302 of the IPC, appealed his sentence. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate and police reports. Under Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), no …

RAJ KUMAR BANSversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant Raj Kumar Bansfor filed a criminal appeal, but during the pendency of the appeal he died, as evidenced by a death certificate and police reports. The appellant's counsel sought to continue the appeal, but no near relative filed an application for leave to proceed. The court examined …

ARBIND PANDITversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Arbind Pandit, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.432 of 2004 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a letter from the Senior Superintendent of Police and a report from the SHO. The court examined the effect of the appellant's …

RAMDEO YADAV and ANRversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The criminal appeal filed by Ramdeo Yadav and Ramratan Prasad against the State of Bihar was pending when the Superintendent of Police reported that both appellants had died, a fact corroborated by death certificates issued by the Gram Panchayat Mukhiya. The Court examined the effect of the …

RAGHUBIR GOPEversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant Raghubir Gope filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the police and local authorities reported that the appellant had died, and a death certificate was produced. The Court examined the letters and the statutory provisions governing …

RAMANAND SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant Ramanand Singh filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.113 of 2004 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate and police reports. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. The Court …

RAM PRASAD BHAGAT @ PATLUKWAversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Ram Prasad Bhagat, died during the pendency of Criminal Appeal No. 542 of 2000 before the Patna High Court. The court examined a letter from the Superintendent of Police and a police report confirming the death. Relying on Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 …

SANTOSH KUMAR JHA @ LALAN SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Santosh Kumar Jha, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a death certificate and police reports. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. The Court examined Section 394 …

GAJADHAR PRASADversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Gajadhar Prasad, filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a death certificate annexed to a police report. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal after his death. The …

KANTIR SAHNIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Kantir Sahni, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.776 of 2005 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a death certificate annexed to a police report. The court examined the letters from the Senior Superintendent of Police and the …

BIJENDRA PRASADversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Bijendra Prasad was convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and appealed the conviction. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. No near relative filed an application under CrPC Section 394 (or the corresponding Section 435 of the …

SAROJNI DEVIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Sarojni Devi, died while her criminal appeal against a conviction under Section 302 IPC was pending. The High Court examined the reports confirming her death and applied Section 394 of the CrPC (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) which provides that an …

RAM PRIT RAJAKversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Ram Prit Rajak, convicted under Section 302 IPC, appealed his sentence. While the appeal was pending, he died, and a death certificate was submitted. Under CrPC Section 394 (and the corresponding Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), no near relative applied for leave to …

SHIV BALAK YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Shiv Balak Yadav, filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of …

RAGHU YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Raghu Yadav, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.263 of 2008 before the Patna High Court. Police reports dated 14-05-2026 and 15-05-2026 established that the appellant had died. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which mirrors Section 435 of the …

LAL BACHAN PANDEYversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Lal Bachan Pandey, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a death certificate and police reports. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. The Court examined Section 394 …

KRISHNA RAJBANSHIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Krishna Rajbanshi, filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate and police reports. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal after his death. The Court …

RAM BABU PRASADversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Ram Babu Prasad, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.543 of 1997 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a death certificate and police reports. The court examined whether the appeal could continue in the absence of a filing by …

SUKHDEV TANTIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Sukhdev Tanti, died while his criminal appeal against a conviction under Section 302 IPC was pending. The court examined a police letter confirming his death and applied Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …

NEMDHARI YADAVversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Nemdhari Yadav, filed a criminal appeal which was pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. Under Section 394 of the Code …

AJAY KUMAR SHARMAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Ajay Kumar Sharma, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment with a fine imposed by the trial court. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as reported in a police letter dated 14 May 2026. The High Court examined Section 394 of …

UDAI SINGH @ UDAI MAHTO @ DOCTORversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Udai Singh, convicted under Section 302 of the IPC, appealed his sentence. While the appeal was pending, he died, as confirmed by police reports. No near relative applied for leave to continue the appeal under CrPC Section 394 (or its counterpart in the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita). The Court …

GHURAN TANTIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Ghuran Tanti, convicted under Section 302 IPC, appealed his sentence. During the pendency of the appeal, police reports confirmed his death and a death certificate was produced. No relative filed an application to continue the appeal, invoking Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding to Section 435 of …

JAI RAM RAIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Jai Ram Rai, was convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and appealed the conviction and sentence. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. Under Section 394 of the CrPC (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …

ANUJ YADAV @ KANBUCHHAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Anuj Yadav, was convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and appealed the conviction and sentence. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police letter. Under Section 394 of the CrPC (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), an …

BISHO YADAVversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Bisho Yadav, convicted under Section 302 of the IPC, appealed his sentence. While the appeal was pending, he died, and a death certificate was produced. No near relative filed an application under CrPC Section 394 (or the equivalent Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) to continue …

RAMASHISH KOERIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Ramashish Koeri, died while his criminal appeal was pending, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. No near relative applied for leave to continue the appeal under Section 394 of the CrPC (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita). The Court, relying …

HARBANS YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Harbans Yadav, died while his criminal appeal against a conviction under Section 302 IPC was pending. The High Court examined a police letter confirming his death and considered Section 394 of the CrPC (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) which governs …

RAM CHANDRA SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Bachan Singh, filed a criminal appeal which was pending when he died, as confirmed by a police letter and a death certificate. The court examined the applicable provision, Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …

BASANT CHAUDHARYversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Basant Chaudhary, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.1116 of 2011 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the Superintendent of Police reported that the appellant had died. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of …

SHEORAJ MANJHI @ LANGRAversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Sheoraj Manjhi was convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and a fine was imposed by the trial court. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal, invoking Section 394 of the CrPC …

SHANKAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Shankar Gupta, filed a criminal appeal which was pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency, the appellant died, and a death certificate was submitted by the police. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya …

BAIKUNTH SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Baikunth Singh, died as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. The appeal was pending before the Patna High Court. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which is mirrored by Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, …

MRITUNJAY PANDEY @ BIRESH PANDEYversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Mritunjay Pandey, died while his criminal appeal against a conviction under Section 302 IPC was pending. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) which provides that an appeal abates if the appellant …

ANIL SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Anil Singh, convicted under Section 302 of the IPC, appealed his sentence. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal, invoking Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding …

TULSI CHOUDHARYversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Tulsi Choudhary appealed a conviction under Section 302 IPC where a fine had been imposed. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. The Court examined Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …

RAM DEO TIWARYversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Ram Deo Tiwary was convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and a fine was imposed by the trial court. While his appeal was pending, the appellant died, and no near relative filed an application to continue the appeal. The High Court, relying on Section 394 of the CPC (corresponding to Section 435 of …

NANHAK PASWANversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Nanhak Paswan, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and a fine was imposed by the trial court. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports. The High Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (now Section 435 …

KAULESHWAR BHUIAversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Kauleshwar Bhuia, died during the pendency of his criminal appeal before the Patna High Court. The court received a police letter confirming his death and noted that no near relative had applied for leave to continue the appeal. Relying on Section 394 of the Code of Criminal …

TUKLAL YADAVversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Tuklal Yadav, filed a criminal appeal which was pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police letter and a death certificate. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the …

BALO @ BALESHWAR MAHTOversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Balo @ Baleshwar Mahto, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.1155 of 2011 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the Superintendent of Police reported that the appellant had died. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding …

HARGEN KOERI and ANR.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellants, Hargen Koeri and Vijay Koeri, filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the police informed the court that both appellants had died. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya …

DILIP MALLAHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Dilip Mallah, was convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and appealed his sentence. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal under CrPC Section 394 …

WAKIL PASWANversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Wakil Paswan, filed a criminal appeal before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal after his death. The Court examined …

BAHADUR MANDAL @ JAY PRAKASH MANDALversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Bahadur Mandal, filed a criminal appeal which was pending when he died. The Superintendent of Police and the SHO submitted reports confirming his death, along with a death certificate. The court examined these documents and considered Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, …

DEENA NATH YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Deena Nath Yadav, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate and police reports. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. The Court applied Section 394 of …

Dharmendra Mahto @ DharoversusThe State Of Bihar

ABATED

The appellant, Dharmendra Mahto, was convicted under Section 302 IPC and appealed the conviction and sentence. While the appeal was pending, a police letter confirmed that the appellant had died. No near relative filed an application under Section 394 of the CrPC (or Section 435 of the Bharatiya …

Reyazuddin MianversusThe State Of Bihar

ABATED

Reyazuddin Mian, convicted under Section 302 of the IPC with a fine imposed, filed an appeal which remained pending when he died. The police confirmed his death and no near relative applied for leave to continue the appeal under Section 394 of the CrPC (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …

DAYANAND BHAGATversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Dayanand Bhagat, filed a criminal appeal which was pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency, the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate and police reports. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. Under Section 394 of the …

Braj Kishore Yadav @ Buchchan YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

ABATED

The appellant, Braj Kishore Yadav, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.864 of 2013 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the Superintendent of Police reported that the appellant had died. The Court examined the report and, relying on Section 394 of the Code of Criminal …

Jagarnath Pandey and AnrversusThe State Of Bihar

ABATED

The appellants Jagarnath Pandey and Chinta Devi filed a criminal appeal against a conviction under Section 302 IPC, which included imprisonment and a fine. While the appeal was pending, both appellants died, as confirmed by a police letter. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal …

DEEPAK KUMAR SINHA @ DEEPAK PRASADversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Deepak Kumar Sinha, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate issued by the Government of Jharkhand. The High Court examined a letter from the Superintendent of Police and a police …

AMIR LAL RAIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Amir Lal Rai, filed a criminal appeal which was pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency, the appellant died, as confirmed by a death certificate and police reports. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of …

DEVENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Devendra Singh, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.222 of 2003 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as reported in a letter from the S.H.O. Maner. The court examined the effect of the appellant's death on the pending appeal under Section 394 …

ARJUN YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant Arjun Yadav filed a criminal appeal, but during the pendency of the appeal he died, as evidenced by a death certificate and police reports. The court examined the letters from the Superintendent of Police and the SHO confirming the death. The issue was whether the appeal could continue …

RAM NARESH SINGH @ NARESH AHIRversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Ram Naresh Singh, died while his criminal appeal was pending before the Patna High Court. The Superintendent of Police and the investigating officer submitted reports confirming the death, along with a death certificate issued by the village Mukhiya. No near relative filed an …

DAIJI DEVI @ DAIJEE DEVIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Daiji Devi, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate and police reports. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which mirrors Section 435 of the …

KAILASH SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Kailash Singh appealed his conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder, but died while the appeal was pending. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (and its counterpart Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) which provides that an appeal abates …

RAM NAGINA SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant Ram Nagina Singh appealed a conviction under IPC 302 for which a fine had been imposed. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate and police reports. Under Section 394 of the CrPC (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, …

BHUSHAN GIRIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Bhushan Giri, convicted under Section 302 of the IPC, appealed his sentence. While the appeal was pending, he died, and a death certificate was submitted. Under Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), an appeal abates if the appellant …

RANJIT SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Ranjit Singh, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate issued by the Gram Panchayat Mukhiya. The Supreme Court (Patna High Court) examined a letter from the Superintendent of Police …

SITA RAM SAHNIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Sita Ram Sahni, was convicted under Section 302 IPC and appealed the conviction. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate and police reports. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (now Section 435 of …

Karu RajbanshiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Karu Rajbanshi, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged his involvement in the illegal transport of country-made liquor under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution’s case was based on a secret tip and the confessional …

Sunaina KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sunaina Kumari, the owner of a motorcycle from which 20 litres of country-made liquor was seized, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. She applied for anticipatory bail, asserting she was not named in the FIR and had no involvement …

Prashant Kumar singhversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Prashant Kumar Singh, sought bail after being implicated in a case where 108 litres of illicit Nepali liquor were seized from an E‑Rickshaw he owned. The police seized the liquor during a raid based on an informant’s tip, arresting a co‑accused, Mohammad Alam, who disclosed the …

DHYANI YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Dhyia Yadav, filed a criminal appeal against his conviction under Section 302 of the IPC, which included a term of imprisonment and a fine. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, and a death certificate was produced. The Court examined Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding …

GUDDU KUMAR RABIDASversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant Guddu Kumar Rabidas filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.445 of 2005 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a death certificate annexed to police reports. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. …

LUCHO SHARMA @ LOCHAN SHARMAversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Lucho Sharma, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate annexed to a police report. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. Pursuant to Section 394 of …

CHAMRU BISHWASH and ANRversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellants Chamru and Jagdish Bishwash appealed against a conviction under Section 302 IPC and a fine imposed by the trial court. While the appeal was pending, both appellants died, as confirmed by police reports. Under Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya …

BALIRAM MAHTOversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Baliram Mahto, convicted under Section 302 of the IPC, appealed his sentence. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. Under Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), no …

JANGALI YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Jangali Yadav, filed a criminal appeal which was pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency, the appellant died, and a death certificate was produced by the police. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. The Court, applying Section 394 of …

RAM CHANDER TIWARY and ANRversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellants Ram Chander Tiwary and Kameshwar Tiwary filed a criminal appeal challenging their conviction and fine under Section 302 IPC. While the appeal was pending, both appellants died, as confirmed by police reports and death certificates. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of …

BIKAU NONIA and ANRversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellants, Bikau Nonia and Lal Mohan Bind, appealed their conviction under Section 302 of the IPC. While the appeal was pending, both appellants died, as confirmed by police reports. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal under Section 394 of the CrPC …

DHANANJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant Dhananjay Singh appealed a conviction under Section 302 IPC for which a fine had been imposed. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. Under Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …

AWADHESH SHARMAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Awadhesh Sharma, died while his criminal appeal was pending, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. Under Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), no near relative filed an application to continue the …

TEJO RAMversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Tejo Ram, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.215 of 2011 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the Superintendent of Police reported that the appellant had died. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the …

PRAKASH SHARMAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Prakash Sharma, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and a fine was imposed by the trial court. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police letter and a death certificate. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue …

HARIMAN BINversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant Hiraman Bin, convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, appealed his sentence. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by a letter from the Superintendent of Police. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya …

NAVIN CHOUHANversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Navin Chouhan was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and a fine was imposed by the trial court. While his criminal appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police letter and report. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal under …

MANAGER CHAUDHARY and ANR.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellants, Manager Chaudhary and Moti Chaudhary, were convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced to imprisonment and a fine. While the appeal was pending, both appellants died, as confirmed by police reports. The Court examined Section 394 of the CPC (corresponding to Section 435 of …

SARYU SINGH @ SARYUG SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Saryug Singh, was convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and appealed the conviction and sentence. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal under CrPC Section 394 (or the …

RAJENDRA DASversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Rajendra Das, was convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced to imprisonment and a fine. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. The Court examined Section 394 of the CPC (corresponding to Section 435 of the …

MD. AINUL HUQUEversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR and ORS

ABATED

The appellant, Md. Ainual Haque, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.106 of 2011 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police superintendent's letter and an S.H.O. report. The Court examined whether the appeal could continue in the absence …

DEVENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Devendra Singh, died while his criminal appeal against a conviction under Section 302 IPC was pending. The court examined the death certificate and relevant police reports, and applied Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …

RAJENDRA SINGH @ RAJENDRA SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant Rajendra Singh, convicted under Section 302 IPC, appealed his sentence. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports. The Court examined Section 394 of the CrPC (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) which provides that an …

RAM ADHIN SINGH and ANRversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellants, Ram Adhin Singh and Ram Dhyan Singh, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment with a fine. While the appeal was pending, both appellants died, as confirmed by police reports and death certificates. The State indicated it would not pursue …

SHIV SAGAR RAIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Shiv Sagar Rai appealed a conviction under Section 302 IPC, which included a fine, before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, and no near relative filed an application to continue the appeal. The Court examined Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding to …

SAGHIR AHMADversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Saghir Ahmad, was convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced to imprisonment and a fine. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. No near relative filed an application to continue the appeal. Relying on Section …

SINGESHWAR PRASAD YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Singeshwar Prasad Yadav, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and a fine was imposed by the trial court. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (and the corresponding …

RAM SWAROOP BHUIYANversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Ram Swaroop Bhuiyan, died during the pendency of his criminal appeal. The court examined a police letter confirming his death and noted that under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), an …

SANTAN SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant Santan Singh, convicted under Section 302 of the IPC, appealed his sentence. During the pendency of the appeal, he died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. Under Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), …

VED NARAIN PRASADversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Ved Narain Prasad, was convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and a fine was imposed by the trial court. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, and no near relative applied for leave to continue the appeal. The Court examined Section 394 of the CPC (corresponding to Section …

BABAN CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant Baban Chaudhary appealed a conviction under Section 302 IPC, but died during the pendency of the appeal. Police reports and a death certificate confirmed his death. Under Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), no near …

SAROJ THAKURversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Saroj Thakur, filed a criminal appeal which was pending before the Patna High Court. During the pendency, the appellant died, and a death certificate was produced by the police. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. The Court examined Section 394 of …

BABUDHAN YADAV @ DHANA YADAVversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Babudhan Yadav, died during the pendency of Criminal Appeal No.857 of 2011. The court examined a letter from the Superintendent of Police and a police report confirming the appellant's death. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of …

DWARIKA MAHTOversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Dwarika Mahto, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and appealed the conviction. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, and no near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal. The Court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, …

BINOD DASversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Binod Das, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.409 of 2010 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate annexed to the record. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the …

JANGI GIRI and ANRversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellants Jangi Giri and Yamuna Giri filed a criminal appeal against a conviction under Section 302 IPC, which included a fine imposed by the trial court. During the pendency of the appeal, both appellants died, as confirmed by police reports and death certificates. No near relative applied for …

NAND KISHORE YADAVversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Nand Kishore Yadav, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. Police reports dated 13-05-2026 and 14-05-2026 established that the appellant had died, and a death certificate was attached. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 …

MAHESH RAMversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Mahesh Ram appealed his conviction under Section 302 IPC, which included a fine, but died during the pendency of the appeal. The High Court examined the reports confirming his death and applied Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) …

JANESHWAR SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Janeshwar Singh, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.1188 of 2010 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as evidenced by a death certificate and police reports. The court examined Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (now …

TRIVENI SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Triveni Singh, appealed a conviction under Section 302 IPC and a fine imposed by the trial court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died, as confirmed by a police letter and report. The court examined Section 394 of the CrPC (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …

MANGAL MARANDIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Mangal Marendi, convicted under Section 302 IPC, appealed his sentence. While the appeal was pending, he died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. No near relative filed an application under CrPC Section 394 (or BNS 2023 Section 435) to continue the appeal. The Court noted that …

CHANDRA SHEKHAR SINGH and ANRversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant Rabindra Singh, convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced to imprisonment with a fine, died during the pendency of his criminal appeal. Police reports and a death certificate confirmed his death. The Court examined Section 394 of the CrPC (corresponding to Section 435 of the …

DHARMENDRA MANDALversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Dharmendra Mandal, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No. 498 of 2011 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the Superintendent of Police reported that the appellant had died. The Court examined the report and considered the provisions of Section 394 of the Code of …

JANKI RAMversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Janki Ram, filed a criminal appeal (DB) No.47 of 2011 before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the police reported that the appellant had died. Under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …

SHAKUNTALA DEVIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

Shakuntala Devi, convicted under Section 302 of the IPC, appealed her sentence. While the appeal was pending, she died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. No near relative filed an application under Section 394 of the CrPC (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …

SIKANDAR KHANversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Sikandar Khan, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. While hearing the appeal, the court received police reports confirming that the appellant had died, accompanied by a death certificate. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal after the …

LALA SINGH @ RAM NIWAS SHARMAversusSTATE OF BIHAR

ABATED

The appellant, Lala Singh (also known as Ram Niwas Sharma), filed a criminal appeal against the State of Bihar. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died, as confirmed by police reports and a death certificate. No near relative filed an application for leave to continue the appeal after his …

Sachidanand YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

ABATED

The appellant, Sachidanand Yadav, died while his criminal appeal against a conviction under Section 302 IPC was pending. The court examined a letter confirming his death and applied Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (now Section 435 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) which …

Manoj Kumar @ Manoj SinghversusThe State Of Bihar

ABATED

Manoj Kumar, convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced to imprisonment and a fine, died while his criminal appeal was pending before the Patna High Court. The Superintendent of Police informed the Court of his death, and no near relative filed an application to continue the appeal under …

VINOD KUMAR MISHRA @ VIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicant, Vinod Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief against the State. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the State’s counsel was present. The High Court observed that the …

Ajay RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ajay Ram, was implicated in a FIR (Deo P.S. Case No. 109 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 147, 149, 323, 341, 325 and 436 of the IPC for assault, rioting and arson. He contended that the allegations were false, arising from a family partition dispute with his younger …

Sant Kumar Das @ Sant Das @ Sant RavidasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sant Kumar Das, sought anticipatory bail after his name was implicated in a robbery case (Section 394 IPC) based solely on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, Vipin Kumar Das. He argued that no material was recovered from him, he has a clean antecedent, and a similarly situated …

MEHULBHAI S/O. JITMALBHAI BHARUBHAI BARJODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The petitioner, Mehulpur, applied for regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before a charge-sheet was filed, alleging offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The State opposed, arguing the offences were serious. The court examined factors such as the applicant's short …

GOUR ACHARJEversusTHE STATE OF TRIPURA & ORS.

2026 INSC 535Dismissed

The appellant, Gour Acharjee, was convicted for the murder of his wife Soma Acharjee, who died after being subjected to severe dowry-related torture. The prosecution alleged that Soma was beaten, sustaining head and chest injuries, and subsequently hanged to simulate suicide, while the defence …

JANARDAN PRASAD SHUKLA and ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. and ANR.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's intervention in a criminal proceeding. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, although the State's Government Advocate was present. The Court observed the …

Rahul Gupta @ Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Rahul Gupta sought anticipatory bail after a dowry complaint (Case No. 90 of 2025) alleged that he and his family demanded Rs. 10 lakh and a four-wheeler, harassed the complainant, and threw her out of the house. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, highlighted a …

Balram PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Balram Paswan, Lal Paswan and Ram Kala Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.166 of 2023) involving multiple IPC offences including assault, attempt to kidnap, and theft. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners participated in a violent intrusion, …