RATTAN SINGHversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
1996 INSC 146711 December 1996Dismissed
The appellant, a former army man, was convicted of murdering Kanta Devi, who was shot in her courtyard at night. The deceased, moments before being shot, shouted that the appellant was standing with a gun. The gun was later found near the body. The appellant appealed, arguing that the omission in the FIR regarding the …
MOHAN BIR SINGH CHAWLAversusPANJAB UNIVERSITY, CHANDIGARH AND ANR.
1996 INSC 146811 December 1996Disposed off
Mohan Bir Singh Chawla challenged Punjab University’s rule that added a ten‑percent weightage to the qualifying‑exam marks of candidates who had passed the exam from the same university for admission to its LL.B. programme. The Supreme Court examined whether such university‑wise preference violated Articles 14 and 15 o…
VIKRAM SHITOLE AND ANR.versusTHE M.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS.
1996 INSC 146911 December 1996Dismissed
The appellants, Vikram Shitole and others, held permits to operate stage carriages on the Gwalior‑Indore route, which had been notified as a frozen route under Section 68‑D(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. A self‑employment scheme allowed unemployed graduates to run stage carriages on such routes subject to specific…
PATEL BHUDARBHAI MAGANBHAI AND ANR.versusPATEL KHEMABHAI AMBARAM AND ORS.
1996 INSC 147111 December 1996Dismissed
The dispute arose over a property mortgaged by widow Bai Jivi in 1911; after her death in 1955 the property passed to her daughter Hati, who filed a suit for redemption of the mortgage. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the Additional District Judge decreed in favour of the respondents, holding that Hati was the …
SMT. CHATRO WIDOW OF NAND RAM AND ORS.versusSAHAYAK SANCHALAK CHAKBANDI, MEERUT AND ORS.
1996 INSC 147211 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Jallo purchased the proprietary right of a Zamindari estate in 1933 and became the khudkhash-holder. She later inducted her husband Tunda as a tenant, who died in 1947‑48. After the enactment of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, a dispute arose over who succeeded to the estate of either Tunda or …
PARBATI DEVIversusPURNA PATRA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 147311 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant purchased a one‑fourth share of land that had been auctioned in 1938 to Babu Suryanarayan, who obtained possession and later sold the same share to Hemamali Devi, who in turn sold it to the appellant in 1950. The appellant filed a suit for partition of that share, and the trial court and the appellate cou…
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, DELHI AND ANR.versusREGISTRAR, DELHI HIGH COURT, NEW DELHI
1996 INSC 118011 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Former Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao, whose security is covered by the Special Protection Group (SPG) Act, was summoned as an accused before the Tis Hazari Court. The Commissioner of Police, Delhi and the Director of the SPG sought a change of venue, arguing that the court complex could not provide the "proximate s…
S.K. SATTAR SK. MOHD. CHOUDHARIversusGUNDAPPA AMABADAR BUKATE
1996 INSC 118111 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a co‑owner of a shop, obtained a defined share of the premises through a partition among brothers. The respondent, a tenant, continued to pay rent to the elder brother and refused to pay rent to the appellant after the partition, leading to termination of his tenancy and an eviction petition under the Hy…
THE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BARODAversusM/S. THE GAEKWAR MILLS LTD.
1996 INSC 118211 October 1996Dismissed
Gaekwar Mills Ltd manufactured a fabric consisting of 33% polyester, 32% viscose and 35% cotton. The Collector of Central Excise argued that the fabric should be classified as a cotton fabric under Item 19 of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule, while the CEGAT held that it fell under Item 22 for man‑made fabrics. The S…
SHIVSAGAR TIWARIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 118311 October 1996Disposed off
The petition challenged the 1994 allotment of 52 shops/stalls by the then Minister of Urban Development, Smt. Shiela Kaul, alleging that the allotments were made arbitrarily to her relatives, friends and staff in violation of the prescribed tender policy. The CBI report confirmed that the minister bypassed the policy a…
KRISHNAN KAKKANTHversusGOVERNMENT OF KERALA AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 118411 October 1996Dismissed
The Kerala government issued a circular designating RAIDCO and KAICO as the sole suppliers of pump sets to farmers in eight districts under subsidy schemes, which private dealers challenged as violating their Article 19(1)(g) right to trade and the equality clause, Article 14. The Supreme Court examined whether the res…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusDR. KRISHNA CHANDRA SAKSENA
1996 INSC 118511 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Dr. K.C. Saksena, a medical officer, was caught in a trap for allegedly demanding a bribe. After investigation, the State Government granted sanction for prosecution under Section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Before a challan could be filed, Saksena invoked Section 482 of the CrPC and obtained a stay; the Hig…
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusTHE DISTRICT JUDGE AND ORS.
1996 INSC 118611 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Uttar Pradesh challenged a decision that excluded lands covered by agreements to sell, but not yet transferred by sale deed, from the holding of a tenure‑holder for purposes of the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960. The tenure‑holder argued that having parted with possession un…
K. BASAVARAJAPPAversusTAX RECOVERY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 118711 October 1996Dismissed
The appellant, K. Basavarajappa, had entered into an agreement to purchase land from a tax defaulter, Y.S. Devendra Murthy, and filed a suit for specific performance. The land was attached and auctioned by the Tax Recovery Officer under the Income Tax Act. Within 30 days of the auction, the appellant filed an applicati…
AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusNAWAB KHAN GULAB KHAN AND ORS.
1996 INSC 118911 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation sought to remove unauthorised hutments erected by pavement‑dwellers on a main road. The High Court stayed the removal until suitable accommodation was provided and required a hearing. On appeal, the Supreme Court held that pavements are public property intended for free pedestrian mo…
KESHAV LAL THAKURversusSTATE OF BIHAR
1996 INSC 119011 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
A case was registered under Section 31 of the Representation of People Act, 1950, which is a non‑cognizable offence. The police filed an FIR and investigated, submitting a report seeking the appellant's discharge. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, relying on the report, took cognizance and proceeded against the appellant.…
A. KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA
1996 INSC 119111 October 1996Disposed off
A. Kumar filed several writ petitions challenging a customs show‑cause notice under Section 124 of the Customs Act, a seizure order under Section 132‑A of the Income Tax Act, and the demurrage rates of the Madras Port Trust. The customs authorities had found that the imported stainless‑steel circles, declared as "defec…
GORAKHNATHversusSTATE OF UTIAR PRADESH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 119211 October 1996Dismissed
The dispute concerned the grant of an FL‑16 excise licence in Varanasi. The fifth respondent, Mohd. Khalil, held a temporary licence which was cancelled on 3 July 1993 by the District Excise Officer. Assuming a vacancy, a notification was issued and the appellant, Gorakhnath, was granted a licence. The fifth respondent…
GURU BIPIN SINGHversusSH. CHONGTHAM MANIHAR SINGH AND ANR.
1996 INSC 119411 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant had earlier faced a criminal complaint in 1966 under Section 500 IPC, which was settled by an apology and compromise. In 1990 a fresh complaint was lodged alleging that the appellant, by claiming his book was based on a manuscript of King Bhagyachandra, had forged a false document, thereby cheating the pu…
UNION OF INDIAversusKISHAN CHAND AND ORS.
1996 INSC 119511 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Union of India acquired land and initially awarded compensation of Rs.2,500 per bigha under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Additional District Judge enhanced the compensation to Rs.5,000 per bigha in December 1973. On further appeal, the Delhi High Court raised the compensation to Rs.12,000 per bigha and grant…
THE PRESIDENT, A.P.M.C., TALUKA DARWHA, DISTRICT YAVATMAL,MAHARASHTRAversusMANIKANT AND ORS.
1996 INSC 119611 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The President of A.P.M.C. appealed to the Supreme Court against the Bombay High Court's enhancement of compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The land, about 3 acres, was acquired for a market yard and the acquisition officer had fixed a market value of Re.0.36 per square foot, which the r…
MANGLA GIRIversusREGIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE VARANASI AND ANR.
1996 INSC 119711 October 1996Dismissed
The petitioner, a government employee, was charged with defalcation of several sums of money and shortage of sugar as per special audit reports for the years 1981-82 and 1982-83. He was given an opportunity to make good the loss but failed to deposit the required amount, after which an order of removal from service was…
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusSH. BALJIT SINGH
1996 INSC 119811 October 1996Dismissed
Sh. Baltit Singh, who enlisted in the Army in 1975 and was regularised in 1977, suffered a thigh injury in 1979 while in service. He was medically downgraded, later diagnosed with a psychiatric condition, and invalidated out of service in 1981. He filed a petition for disability pension under Rule 173 of the Army Pensi…
MRS. NALINI NAVIN BHAGWATI AND ORS.versusMR. CHANDRAVADAN M. MEHTA
1996 INSC 120011 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Manvantrai Mehta died leaving property and a will of his wife Kamlaben. The sons, including Chandravadan Mehta, obtained probate of Kamlaben’s will in 1987. The other children, led by Nalini Navin Bhagwati, filed an application under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act to revoke that probate. The trial court refus…
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADURAIversusM/S. T.V. SUNDARAM IYENGAR AND SONS LTD.
1996 INSC 103511 September 1996Disposed off
M/s T.V. Sundaram Iyengar & Sons Ltd. received deposits from customers in the ordinary course of its trade. The deposits were initially recorded as capital receipts (security deposits). When a portion of these deposits remained unclaimed for a long period, the company wrote them off to its profit and loss account. The …
THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, E.S.I. CORPORATION AND ANR.versusFRANCIS DE COSTA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 103711 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The employee, Francis De Costa, was injured in a road accident while riding his own bicycle to work, about one kilometre from his factory and fifteen minutes before his shift began. He claimed disablement benefit under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, and the ESIC Court allowed the claim, which was later dismi…
MANCHERI PUTHUSSERI AHMED AND ORS.versusKUTHIRAVATTAM ESTATE RECEIVER
1996 INSC 104111 September 1996Dismissed
The suit land was mortgaged in 1896 and a decree for redemption was finally passed in 1960. During execution proceedings the mortgagor deposited the mortgage money and value of improvements on 14 March 1969, after which the mortgagee's right to possession ceased. The appellants argued that Section 4A of the Kerala Land…
DEPUTY COLLECTOR, MINICOY AND ORS.versusNAVADIGOTHI MOHAMMED AND ORS.
1996 INSC 103811 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the South Pandaram lands of Lakshadweep, where villagers, through their Mooppans (trustees), historically enjoyed a collective right to collect coconuts but held no ownership over the land or trees. The administration, invoking the Laccadive, Minicoy and Amindivi Islands Revenue and Tenancy Regulatio…
J.S. PARIHARversusGANPAT DUGGAR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 103011 September 1996Dismissed
The Rajasthan High Court had earlier quashed a seniority list of engineers prepared with retrospective effect and directed a fresh list. Contempt proceedings were initiated under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, and a single judge, while considering the merits, held that the respondents had not wilfully …
SH. S.K. VAISHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 103111 September 1996Dismissed
The petitioner, S.K. Vaish, an Assistant Engineer, was suspended and subjected to disciplinary proceedings that culminated in compulsory retirement in 1986. On appeal, the department directed that the punishment be treated partly as suspension and partly as in‑service, leading to his reinstatement and treatment as on d…
PRAMOD LAHUDAS MESHRAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 103211 September 1996Dismissed
The petitioner, a qualified candidate from a Scheduled Caste, applied for the post of Overseer/Junior Engineer (Civil) advertised by the State of Maharashtra and was appointed on probation based on a recommendation letter from the Member Secretary of the Regional Subordinate Service Selection Board. After nine months o…
BABU SINGH BAINS ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 103311 September 1996Dismissed
The petitioner, Babu Singh Bains, owned a free‑hold plot in Chandigarh and constructed a double‑storeyed building that he used partly as a guest house, violating the city’s land‑use regulations. The Estate Officer, invoking Section 8A of the Capital of Punjab (Development & Regulation) Act, 1952, resumed the property a…
MJHEER H. MAFATLALversusMAFATLAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
[1996] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 111 September 1996
Mafatlal Industries Ltd (the transferee) sought to amalgamate with Mafatlal Fine Spinning and Manufacturing Co Ltd (the transferor) under a scheme of arrangement approved by a meeting of equity shareholders. The appellant, Miheer H. Mafatlal, a 5% shareholder and director of the transferor, objected under Section 391 o…
COOCH BEHAR CONTRACTORS' ASSOCIATION AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
1996 INSC 104011 September 1996Dismissed
The appellants, contractors engaged in civil construction works for government departments, were assessed under Section 6‑D of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. They challenged the assessment on four grounds: denial of declaration forms allegedly violating Article 14, inclusion of the value of stores and materi…
SHRI CHANDER CHINAR BADA AKHARA UDASIN SOCIETY AND ORS.versusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 103411 September 1996Disposed off
The Shri Chander Chinar Bada Akhara Udasin Society established a private medical college but the Jammu & Kashmir Government failed to frame admission guidelines. Students filed a writ petition; the High Court single judge formed a committee that selected candidates via oral interviews and a short time‑table, which the …
AHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusMANILAL GORDHANDAS AND ORS.
1996 INSC 103611 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation submitted a revised development plan under the Bombay Town Planning Act in January 1976. The Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 came into force on 30 January 1978, repealing the Bombay Act and establishing the Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (AUDA) with power…
S. GOPAL REDDYversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
1996 INSC 72711 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, S. Gopal Reddy, was convicted under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 for demanding dowry in connection with a proposed marriage. He appealed, arguing that a demand made during pre‑marriage negotiations does not fall within the statutory definition of "dowry" and that the prosecution’s evidenc…
MRS. MEENAL EKNATH KSHIRSAGARversusM/S. TRADERS AND AGENCIES AND ANR.
1996 INSC 72811 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Mrs. Meenal Eknath Kshirsagar, owner of a flat in Bombay, filed a suit for eviction of a firm and its partner, claiming she and her husband had no other residential premises and therefore required the suit premises for personal occupation. The husband had previously been a tenant of a two‑bedroom flat (Olympus) and lat…
RAJA RAM YADAV AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF BIHAR
1996 INSC 50511 April 1996Disposed off
Eight accused were convicted for the pre‑meditated murder of six members of a single family in Baghora village, Bihar, in May 1987, an incident that also involved arson and the killing of 26 persons in total. The conviction was based solely on the testimony of a nine‑year‑old child witness who initially identified only…
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALCUTTA (CENTRAL)versusMIS PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS PVT. LTD.
1996 INSC 35311 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Calcutta appealed against the Settlement Commission’s order that dropped penalty proceedings for assessment years 1970-71 to 1974-75. The assessee, Paharpar Cooling Towers Pvt. Ltd., had filed a settlement application under Section 245‑C of the Income Tax Act for assessment year 1975-76,…
M/S. AVTAR SINGH & CO. PVT. LTD.versusM/S. S.S. ENTERPRISES AND ORS.
1996 INSC 35411 March 1996Disposed off
The parties were involved in two distribution agreements for the film 'Aag Ka Dariya', one dated 28 February 1985 with R. Venkatraman and a later one dated 7 October 1993 with M/s. Avtar Singh & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Three suits arose: a Bombay suit by Venkatraman seeking cancellation of the 1985 agreement, a Madras High Court…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusJASWANT RAI KOCHHAR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 35511 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Union of India issued a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to acquire land for a housing scheme. The government later intended to use the land for a District Centre, a commercial purpose, and the High Court quashed the notification on the ground that the change of user violated the pu…
DURGA PRASADversusNAVEEN CHANDRA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 35611 March 1996Dismissed
The respondent filed a suit for specific performance which culminated in a decree on 14 January 1994. Respondent No.2 and others filed applications under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC to set aside the decree, while the appellant moved a preliminary objection challenging the maintainability of those applications. The trial court …
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.versusSHRI PRABHAKAR BHIKAJI INGLE
1996 INSC 35711 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a police officer, was removed from service by the Commissioner of Police under Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution and challenged the removal before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT), which confirmed the removal on March 6, 1995. He filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) under Article 136, w…
B. SHANKARANANDversusCOMMON CAUSE AND ORS.
1996 INSC 35811 March 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the interpretation of Section 4(e) of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences Act, 1956, concerning the composition of the institute's supreme body. The question was whether the five persons to be nominated by the Central Government must all be scientists, or whether only one must be a no…
STATE OF KERALAversusK. MOIDEENKUTTY AND ORS.
1996 INSC 36011 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Kerala appealed against the order of the Taluk Land Board, Kozhikode, which had first declared that declarant K. Moideenkutty possessed 3,171.53 acres of excess land under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1961. The Board later reopened the case and, on the basis that 877 tenants occupied 1,726.90 acres and tha…
IN RE M.P. DWIVEDI AND ORS.versus.
1996 INSC 4811 January 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the handcuffing of under‑trial prisoners, members of the Khedut Mazdoor Chetna Sangath, while being transferred between jail and court, which was done without written authorisation from a magistrate as required by Madhya Pradesh Police Regulation 465. Earlier Supreme Court judgments (Prem Sha…
KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KERALA
1996 INSC 4911 January 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered applications filed by the revenue challenging certain observations made in its earlier judgment in the appeals of Kerala Financial Corporation and others. The contested observations (paras 9‑15) held that when advances are written off and become bad debts, the assessee could claim a refund …
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARNATAKA (CENTRAL), BANGALORE AND ORS.versusCHOWGULE AND CO. LTD.
1996 INSC 5011 January 1996Disposed off
The appellant, the Commissioner of Income Tax, challenged the Bombay High Court’s order quashing a notice issued under s.263 of the Income Tax Act against Chowgule & Co. Ltd., an exporter of iron ore whose export proceeds were credited in rupees by an Indian bank. The issue was whether Rule 115 of the Income Tax Rules,…
STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIRversusDR. ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 5111 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Jammu & Kashmir appealed against a High Court order that had refused to condone a three‑month delay in filing an appeal against a promotion order for certain lecturers. The lecturers had been appointed on a regular basis but had not completed the seven years of regular service required under G.O. No. 517‑H…
SH.MULKRAJversusSH. SUNDER DAS AND ORS.
1996 INSC 5211 January 1996Disposed off
The appellant, who had obtained possession of certain plots in New Delhi, filed a suit for a mandatory injunction against the third respondent, which became final. Subsequently, the appellant and the first two respondents each purchased a one‑third share of the property, leading to a partition suit that resulted in a f…
STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.versusB.S. NANJUNDAIAH
1996 INSC 5311 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Karnataka filed a land acquisition proceeding against B.S. Nanjundaiah under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. A notification under Section 4(1) was published on 6 December 1973 and a declaration under Section 6 on 3 February 1975, but the respondent challenged them for lack of an enquiry under Section 5‑A. …
NARANBHAI DAYABHAI PATEL AND ANR.versusSULEMAN ISUBJI DADABHAI
1996 INSC 5411 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Naranbhai Patel and another, became deemed purchasers of agricultural land under Section 32 of the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, effective 1 April 1957. The respondent, the former landowner, executed a trust deed and registered it under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 without giving …
SMT. AFSAR JAHAN BEGUM ETC.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 5511 January 1996Dismissed
The petitioners, private bus operators, sought to ply their vehicles on routes intersecting notified routes, invoking a modification under Section 102(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 that relaxes the distance restriction to 25 kilometres. The State Government had issued a notification allowing such relaxation but pr…
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.versusDR. RAMESH PRASAD
1996 INSC 5611 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Dr. Ramesh Prasad, a teacher at Moti Lal Nehru Medical College (a college maintained by the Uttar Pradesh Government), filed a writ petition seeking to remain in service until the age of 60, the superannuation age prescribed for university teachers under the U.P. State University Act. The Allahabad High Court ordered t…
SULTANA BEGUMversusPREM CHAND JAIN
1996 INSC 145510 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The landlady Sultana Begum obtained a decree for eviction of her tenant Prem Chand Jain. The tenant claimed that possession had been handed over to the landlady's attorney, who then allowed him to remain as a licencee on payment of a licence fee, arguing that this amounted to an adjustment of the decree and rendered it…
M.C. MEHTAversusSTATE OF.TAMIL NADU
1996 INSC 145410 December 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ filed by M.C. Mehta challenging the employment of children below fourteen in hazardous factories and mines in Sivakasi and elsewhere, alleging violation of the fundamental right under Article 24 of the Constitution. The Court examined the constitutional mandate under…
BALARAM PRASAD AGRAWALversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
1996 INSC 145610 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, father of Kiran Devi, alleged that his daughter was subjected to continuous cruelty by her husband, mother‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law, culminating in her suicide by jumping into a well. The trial court acquitted the accused of murder (Sec. 302) and the High Court upheld that acquittal. On appeal, the Supr…
M/S. BRIJ MOHAN DAS LAXMAN DASversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD
1996 INSC 145710 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a partnership firm, paid interest to a partner who was also the Karta representing his Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) on deposits made in his individual capacity. The Income Tax Officer added this interest back to the firm's income under Section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, treating it as a disallowe…
KULDEEP INDUSTRIAL CORPORATIONversusINCOME TAX OFFICER AND ORS.
1996 INSC 145810 December 1996Dismissed
Kuldeep Industrial Corporation, a partnership firm, claimed to be a manufacturer of stainless steel utensils and filed tax returns showing losses for AY 1977-78 and 1978-79 and a small profit for AY 1979-80. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) discovered that no manufacturing activity took place, issued notices adding income,…
STATE OF GUJARATversusSUHRID GEIGY LTD. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 145910 December 1996Dismissed
The State of Gujarat issued demand notices for excise duty on Xylocaine and other medicinal preparations containing Xylocaine, invoking the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955. The assessees challenged the notices and the Gujarat High Court quashed them. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whe…
M/S APPOLLO TYRES LTD.versusTHE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND ANR.
1996 INSC 146010 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Mis Appollo Tyres Ltd., while setting up a tyre manufacturing plant, entered into an agreement with General Tyre International Company to act as its purchasing agent for equipment. The agreement required the appellant to pay a 3% commission on the FOB value of each item procured. Customs assessed duty on the invoice va…
SHEOJI MAHTO AND ORS.versusTHE ADDITIONAL MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS.
1996 INSC 146110 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, who were raiyats holding land adjoining a parcel sold by the respondents, filed an application for pre-emption under Section 16(3)(i) of the Bihar Lands Ceiling Act within three months of the sale deed's registration. The Collector rejected the application, and the Patna High Court dismissed the appella…
MAJOR YOGENDERA NARAIN YADAV ETC.versusSHRI BINDESHWAR PRASAD AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 146210 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Major Yogendra Narain Yadav, a demobilised short‑commissioned army officer, was appointed a permanent Assistant Engineer in the Bihar Roads and Buildings Department with seniority back‑dated to 15 April 1963 under a 1969 Government circular. Several respondents, initially appointed as temporary Assistant Engineers and …
MAJOR SINGHversusRATTAN SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 146410 December 1996Dismissed
Daulat Singh executed a Will in 1974 bequeathing his property to his brother Rattan Singh, who died shortly thereafter. The appellant, a sister, challenged the Will and the respondents filed a suit for declaration based on it. The trial court dismissed the suit, a first appellate court affirmed, but the Punjab & Haryan…
VIJAY SINGH ETC. ETC.versusVIJAYLAKSHMI AMMAL
1996 INSC 117410 October 1996Disposed off
The landlady (respondent) sought eviction of the tenants (appellants) under Section 14(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, claiming she needed to demolish an old building to erect a new shopping complex. The Rent Controller found the landlord's requirement bona‑fide and ordered evictio…
KARAN SINGHversusSTATE (DELHI ADMN.)
1996 INSC 117610 October 1996Dismissed
Karan Singh was arrested in 1988 for possessing an unauthorised country‑made pistol and three live cartridges within a TADA‑notified area. The case was initially filed under the Arms Act, but the Metropolitan Magistrate transferred it to a Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act,…
INDER SINGH AND ANR.versusTHE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.
1996 INSC 117810 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, tenants of agricultural land, applied under Section 22 of the Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955 in 1960 but were rejected for not having twelve years' continuous possession. A second application in 1965 was allowed, and the Financial Commissioner confirmed the order. The Punjab and Haryana …
STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusM.NEETHI CHANDRA, ETC. ETC.
1996 INSC 102410 September 1996Disposed off
The State of Bihar issued a resolution (No.20) that candidates from reserved categories who qualified on merit would not be adjusted against the reserved quota, leading to grievances that such candidates were denied their preferred courses. The Patna High Court devised a seat‑allocation scheme whereby reserved seats we…
GURSHARAM SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
1996 INSC 102510 September 1996
Gursharan Singh demanded Rs. 2 lakh from Nirmal Singh for terrorist activities, threatening death. After a meeting where a revolver‑wielding accomplice threatened the victim, a reduced sum of Rs. 70,000 was agreed, of which only Rs. 50,000 was paid. The trial court convicted Singh under IPC Sections 387 (extortion) and…
DILIP KUMAR TRIPATHY AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 102610 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Orissa advertised for Sepoy recruitment and prepared a first list of 225 candidates, appointing all except six reserved‑category candidates. To fill remaining vacancies, a second list of about 200 candidates, drawn from earlier test‑takers, was prepared, but only 16 were provisionally appointed despite vac…
MRS. R.D. BHATIAversusSMT. RAJINDER KAUR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 101910 September 1996Disposed off
The appellant, an advocate, was suspended for two years by the Bar Council of India on a complaint that she colluded with the opposing party and other lawyers to set aside an ex‑parte decree, allegedly acting as a mediator and misappropriating Rs. 3,500. The disciplinary committee relied on the complainant's affidavit,…
M/S. RANADEY MICRONUTRIENTS ETC.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE
1996 INSC 102810 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, manufacturers of micronutrients, challenged the classification of their products for excise duty. An earlier Board circular (June 1990) classified micronutrients as "plant growth regulators" under heading 38.08, while a later circular (November 1994) re‑classified them as "other fertilisers" under headi…
DR. DILIP KUMAR DEKA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF ASSAM AND ANR .
1996 INSC 102910 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Dr. D.K. Deka and Dr. P.K. Baruah, doctors at Mahendra Mohan Choudhary Hospital, were accused by a Guwahati High Court judge of manipulating medical reports to keep accused Geeta Kalita in hospital, thereby thwarting a court order to produce her in police custody. The judge, relying on a medical board’s report that fou…
SHATRUGHNA PRASAD SINHAversusRAJBHAU SURAJMAL RATHI AND ORS.
1996 INSC 102010 September 1996Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Shatrughna Prasad Sinha, was charged after an interview published in Stardust magazine allegedly outraged the religious feelings of the Marwari community and defamed them as a class. Complaints were filed in the magistrate courts of Pune and Nasik. The High Court held that the Pune complaint did not disc…
M. BHASKARversusJ. VENKATARAMA NAIDU, REP. BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER A. NARAYANASWAMY NAIDU
1996 INSC 102210 September 1996Dismissed
The appeal arose under the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960, where the appellant, M. Bhaskar, was alleged to have wilfully defaulted on rent from June to October 1990. The landlord, J. Venkataramana Naidu, was represented by his brother‑in‑law A. Narayanaswamy Naidu. The appellant c…
NARAMADABEN MAGANLAL THAKKERversusPRANJIVANDAS MANGANLAL THAKKER AND ORS
1996 INSC 102310 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Motilal Gopalji owned a property and executed a gift deed on 15 May 1965 in favour of the first respondent, reserving his right to retain possession and collect rents during his lifetime. Within a month he executed a cancellation deed on 9 June 1965, stating that the conditional gift had not been accepted and that poss…
PRABHAT KUMAR SHARMA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 72510 July 1996Dismissed
The petitioners, appointed as LT Grade teachers in a government‑aided private college, challenged the legality of their ad‑hoc appointments, alleging that the college had not complied with the procedure prescribed in Section 18 of the Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Commission and Selection Board Act, 1982 a…
SMT. MAQBOOL FATMA AND ORS.versusDEPUTY CUSTODIAN GENERAL, EVACUEE PROPERTY AND ANR.
1996 INSC 72610 July 1996Dismissed
The petitioners, heirs of evacuee Ashfaq Hussain, claimed rights over property vested in the Custodian under the Administration of Evacuee Properties Act, 1950. An order of the Assistant Custodian dated June 22, 1961 was communicated to shareholders, but a revision application under Section 27 was filed only on August …
NATWARBHAI MAGAINBHAI PATELversusCOLLECTOR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 66410 May 1996Dismissed
Natwarbhai Magajnbhai Patel filed a Special Leave Petition challenging a Gujarat High Court order that vested excess vacant land, surrendered under Section 10(5) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, in the State. The petitioner argued that compensation should be paid before the government could utilize…
POONAM VERMAversusASHWIN PATEL & ORS.
1996 INSC 66910 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Poonam Verma, sued Dr. Ashwin Patel (a registered homoeopathic practitioner) and Dr. Rajeev Warty for negligence after her husband died following treatment with allopathic medicines prescribed by Dr. Patel, who was not qualified to practice allopathy. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission d…
PRADEEP KRISHENversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 66510 May 1996Disposed off
Pradeep Krishen, an environmentalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging a Madhya Pradesh Forest Department order that allowed villagers around sanctuaries and national parks to collect tendu leaves. He argued that the order was ultra‑violet to the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and violated Articles …
GAN GAD HARANversusJANARDHANA MALLAN AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 66610 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant purchased a joint‑family property from the father of the respondents when the latter were minors, for Rs 9,000. After the father's death, the respondents filed a partition suit alleging that the sale was for inadequate consideration, that there was no legal necessity, and that most of the alleged antecede…
SH. ASHOK V. DAVIDversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 67010 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, direct recruits to the Karnataka Administrative Service, completed their probation on 14 July 1976 but were not formally confirmed until 1 January 1986, a delay of nearly ten years. Because of this undue delay, they were excluded from the 1983 select list for promotion to the Indian Administrative Servi…
STATE OF MANIPURversusTHINGUJAM BROJEN MEETI
1996 INSC 67210 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Manipur issued a "Die‑in‑Harness" compassionate appointment scheme for dependents of government servants who died in service, later revising it to exclude ad‑hoc, off‑iciating, work‑charged and casual appointees. The dependents of two confirmed work‑charged employees sought appointments under the scheme; t…
TAGIN LITIN ETC.versusSTATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH
1996 INSC 67310 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute concerned the appointment of the Head Gaonburah of Simong village in Arunachal Pradesh. The Deputy Commissioner approved the petitioner's appointment on 31 January 1994 and issued a WT message on 15 February 1994 directing that the petitioner be informed. No actual communication of the appointment to the pe…
SH. P.K. DAVEversusPEOPLES UNION OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (DELHI) AND ORS.
1996 INSC 67410 May 1996Dismissed
The petitioners, Peoples Union of Civil Liberties and others, filed a public‑interest writ seeking the suspension and criminal prosecution of Dr. Khalilullah, Director of G.B. Pant Hospital, alleging massive financial irregularities. The Delhi Health Secretary recommended his suspension, the Chief Secretary suggested h…
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATIONversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
1996 INSC 67510 May 1996
The case arose from the abduction and alleged murder of Advocate Kulwant Singh, his wife and their two‑year‑old child, for which the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association sought an independent inquiry. The High Court declined to intervene, prompting a civil appeal before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court dir…
M.C. MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 67610 May 1996Disposed off
M.C. Mehta filed a public‑interest writ under Article 32 seeking control of air and noise pollution from stone‑crushers, pulverisers and mining operations near the tourist resorts of Badkhal Lake and Surajkund in Haryana. The Haryana Pollution Control Board and the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute …
M.C. MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 67710 May 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the Delhi Development Act, 1957 which mandates the relocation of hazardous, noxious, heavy and large industries from Delhi and the subsequent use of the land vacated. Various committees (Alphons, Jain, Khanna) submitted schemes on how the land should be utilized. The Court held that the land …
CYCLE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.versusT.I. RALEIGH INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 66810 May 1996Dismissed
The appellant, Cycle Corporation of India Ltd., sought rectification of the trade mark ‘Raleigh’ owned by the respondent, T.I. Raleigh Industries Pvt. Ltd., alleging that the proprietor had not used the mark bonafide for a continuous period of five years and that neither the respondent nor any registered user was using…
STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIRversusSHAM LAL AND ORS.
1996 INSC 67810 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State discovered a large embezzlement by employees of the Jammu & Kashmir Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd. and filed an FIR under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and the Ranbir Penal Code. The accused filed a writ petition in the High Court seeking to quash the FIR and obtain …
NARINDRA KUMAR JAINversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1996 INSC 67910 May 1996Dismissed
The appellant, Narindra Kumar Jain, served as manager of Kisan Rice Mills and was responsible for large stocks of paddy. During his tenure, 1,500 quintals of paddy were found missing, leading to charges under Sections 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court acquitted him, but the Madhya Pradesh High Court…
STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.versusSLBARAM BARAL (SIMARAM BARAI)
1996 INSC 68010 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Orissa filed a suit for Rs.1,46,820 against S. Baram Baral, which was decreed ex parte. The appellant sought relief under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the trial court set aside the ex parte decree subject to a payment of Rs.50. On revision, the Orissa High Court set aside the t…
M/S ATIABIRA REGULATED MARKET COMMITIEEversusM/S GANESH RICE MILLS
1996 INSC 68210 May 1996Dismissed
The appellant, Mis Attiabira Regulated Market Committee, appealed against Mis Ganesh Rice Mills challenging the High Court's decision that the villages of Saharatikira and Bheden were outside the notified market area under the Orissa Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1956. The central issue was whether these villages fe…
M/S. SHIV SHAKTI GOLD FINGERversusASSTI. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, JAIPUR
1996 INSC 68310 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Shiv Shakti Gold Finger applied for exemption from Rajasthan sales tax on its Gole Papad, a circular snack made of maida, salt, starch, papad soda, alum and food colour, invoking a 1970 notification that exempted "Papad and Badi (Mangori)". The Assistant Commissioner rejected the claim, holding that the exemption did n…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusMIS. SHARMA COAL CO.
1996 INSC 68410 May 1996Disposed off
The Union of India (Railways) appealed a Guwahati High Court order that directed the Railways to allocate unutilised wagons to non‑priority articles after the exhaustion of all priority categories under its Preferential Traffic Scheme (PTS). The original PTS classified sponsored coal in Category C and non‑sponsored coa…
DAULATRAMversusSAROOP RAM AND ANR.
1996 INSC 68510 May 1996Dismissed
Daulat Ram filed a suit seeking declaration and possession of land, alleging that a private partition had allotted the property to him and that he had singly redeemed the mortgage, thereby becoming a mortgagee by subrogation. The trial court and the Punjab & Haryana High Court held that the mortgage was redeemed jointl…
RAMCHANDRA DAYARAM GAWANDEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 68610 May 1996Dismissed
The appellant, a State Police Service officer promoted to Superintendent in 1976, was placed on the select list in 1977 and given seniority from April 30, 1978. He claimed a year of allotment of 1972 under the seniority rules, which the Central Administrative Tribunal rejected. The Supreme Court examined whether the fa…
SUKHBIR SINGH AND ORS.versusBRIJ PAL SINGH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 68710 May 1996Dismissed
The first petitioner purchased land from the respondent under a 1975 sale deed that included a reconveyance agreement. The respondent sued for specific performance, alleging the petitioner refused to execute the sale deed despite the respondent’s readiness and attendance at the Sub‑Registrar’s office on 9 March 1977, w…
M/S. WATERFALL ESTATES LTD., MADRASversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TAMIL NADU I, MADRAS
1996 INSC 50110 April 1996Dismissed
Waterfall Estates Ltd., a public limited company engaged in tea and coffee estates, incurred a managing agency commission. Until AY 1963-64 it allocated head‑office expenses, including the commission, proportionally among wholly taxable, partially taxable and wholly exempt income. From AY 1964-65 it treated all activit…
URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, JODHPURversusGOKUL NARAIN AND ANR.
1996 INSC 50210 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Urban Improvement Trust (Jodhpur) acquired land of Gokul Narain under Section 52 of the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 and paid compensation. The High Court later enhanced the compensation and, applying the Central Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (as amended), awarded solatium, interest and additional amount, whi…
RAM NATH MAHTOversusSTATE OF BIHAR
1996 INSC 50310 April 1996Dismissed
The appellant, Ram Nath Mahato, was alleged to have participated in a night robbery on a train, during which a passenger was killed and others injured. A witness (PW 6) identified Mahato in a test identification parade conducted by Judicial Magistrate PW 7, but at trial PW 6 refused to recognize him, claiming fear. The…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusMAHBOOB S. ALLIBHOY AND ANR.
1996 INSC 50410 April 1996Dismissed
The State of Maharashtra appealed to the Supreme Court against a Bombay High Court order that dropped contempt proceedings initiated against respondents in a customs refund dispute. The respondents had filed a writ seeking refund of duty, which the Customs Department alleged was obtained on the basis of forged document…
STANDARD GAMES ETC.versusSTATE OF UP. AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 50010 April 1996Dismissed
The appellant installed a coin‑operated video‑game machine that lights up and starts a game when a coin is inserted. The issue before the Court was whether such a machine falls within the definition of "entertainment" under Section 2(g) of the U.P. Entertainment and Betting Act, 1979 and consequently attracts the enter…
STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusMD. KALIMUDDIN AND ORS.
1996 INSC 4510 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Bihar prepared a panel of 273 candidates for Assistant Teacher posts under the 1975 Bihar Government Assistant Teachers Service Encadrement Appointment and Transfer Rules. While 98 candidates were appointed (91 joined), the remaining candidates were placed on a waiting list. The High Court, by interim orde…
THE CHURCH OF SOUTH INDIA TRUST ASSOCIATIONversusTHE TELUGU CHURCH COUNCIL
1996 INSC 4610 January 1996Dismissed
The Church of South India Trust Association (CSITA) claimed that the Telugu Church Council (TCC) had merged into the Church of South India in 1947 and therefore the properties transferred to CSITA were held in trust. TCC contested the merger and sought declaration of its continued existence. Earlier suits decided by th…
KARUMANDA GOUNDERversusMUTHUSWAMY GOUNDER AND ORS.
1996 INSC 4710 January 1996Dismissed
Karumanda Gounder appealed against a High Court order that upheld the sale of a parcel of land originally gifted by his brother Komaraswamy Gounder to a third party and then sold to Muthuswamy Gounder. Karumanda claimed the land was joint family property and that his brother, being a "mild lunatic," lacked capacity to …
RADHEY SHYAM SINGH AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 14449 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Government of India, via a 1975 resolution, created a Subordinate Services Commission to recruit non‑technical Class III posts and issued a 1993 advertisement stipulating zone‑wise recruitment with separate merit lists for each of 15 zones. Applicants who scored higher marks than some selected candidates challenged…
DY. GENERAL MANAGER, REDESIGNATED AS DEPUTY DIRECTOR, INTER STATE BUS TERMINAL ETC.versusSMT. SUDERSHAN KUMARI AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 14469 December 1996Disposed off
The appellant, Deputy Director of the Inter State Bus Terminal, appealed against the conviction of Smt. Sudershan Kumari for filing false certificates and affidavits. The Supreme Court examined whether the respondent had indeed produced a false affidavit attested by an oath commissioner and whether the notary could be …
HARI SHAMRAO HIMJE AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 14479 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, who were promoted from Data Processing Assistants to Data Processing Supervisors, were placed in the entry‑level Grade ‘A’ (pay Rs.1600‑2600) instead of the higher promotional Grade ‘B’ (pay Rs.2000‑3300). They contended that this classification was unjust and sought to be fitted into Grade ‘B’ with the…
DHIRENDER SINGH ETCversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 14499 December 1996Dismissed
The appellants, police officers, were promoted on an ad‑hoc basis under the sports quota by the Superintendent of Police on 16 January 1990, without the required approval of the DIG. The promotion order stipulated that the officers could be reverted at any time without notice and without seniority rights. The appellant…
DR. BALJIT SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA
1996 INSC 14509 December 1996Dismissed
Dr. Baljit Singh, a H.C.M.S.-II officer, gave a three‑month notice of voluntary retirement under Rule 5.32(b) of the Punjab Civil Service Rules on 20 September 1993 and handed over his charge on 11 February 1994 without the government's acceptance. The Government declined to accept his retirement because serious crimin…
NASIK MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusHARBANSLAL LAIKWANT RAJPAL AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 14529 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned a scheme under the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966 for reserving land for stables and a road, which was later modified to reserve the same land for informal housing and stables. The original reservation was deleted and a corrigendum restored the status quo ante with a slight modificati…
DR. NARINDER SINGH POONIAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 14539 December 1996Disposed off
Dr. Narinder Singh Poonia, a researcher, was conducting a DST‑funded project titled "Chemical, Physico‑Chemical, Structural and theoretical investigations of alkali and alkaline earth cation systems…". The Department of Science and Technology (DST) terminated the grant under condition XIII, which reserves the right to …
MIS. PILIBHIT ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. (P) LTD. AND ANR.versusSPECIAL OFFICER (ELECTRICITY) AND ANR.
1996 INSC 11709 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Pilibhit Electric Supply Co., held a licence to generate electricity which was revoked and its undertaking was taken over by the Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Board on 1 December 1975. The Special Officer, under Section 7‑A of the Indian Electricity Act (as amended by U.P. Act 14 of 1976), fixed the co…
HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD.versusSMT. A. RADHIKA THIRUMALAI
1996 INSC 11719 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (HAL), a public sector undertaking, had rules permitting compassionate appointments of dependents of deceased employees, subject to vacancy availability (Rule 78.3). After her husband, a Senior Inspector, died in 1987, the respondent applied for such an appointment and was placed on a waiting…
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.versusCHARANJI LAL GOEL
1996 INSC 11729 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Charanji Lal Goel, a Punjab government employee, joined the army in 1963 and was released in 1969. After release he was appointed Taxation Inspector in 1970 and was granted seniority from his army entry date under Rule 4 of the Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965. In 1972 he was directly recru…
ALLAHABAD BANKversusSHRI PREM SINGH
1996 INSC 10099 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Allahabad Bank appointed Shri Prem Singh as a temporary cashier for one day at a time through successive letters, each stating that his service would automatically terminate at the end of the day. After four days of such employment (14-17 June 1977), the bank did not offer further work. The respondent filed an industri…
TEJKUMAR BALAKRISHNA RUIAversusA.K. MENON AND ANOTHER
1996 INSC 10109 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Tej Kumar Balakrishna Rui, was declared a notified person under Section 3(2) of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992. Section 3(3) of the Act provides that any property of a notified person stands attached from the date of notification. After being notifi…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusGARWARE NYLONS LTD. ETC.
1996 INSC 10119 September 1996Dismissed
Garware Nylon Ltd. manufactured nylon yarn and nylon twine. Until 1977 the twine was cleared under Item 18 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, which allowed a partial exemption for fishing‑net use. After the introduction of Item 68 in 1977, the revenue re‑classified the twine under Item 68 and demanded duty, whic…
COMMISSIONER, SALES TAX, U.P., LUCKNOWversusM/S. GIRJA SHANKER AWANISH KUMAR
1996 INSC 10129 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Commissioner of Sales Tax appealed against a High Court order that had accepted the turnover disclosed in the assessee's account books despite the assessee's failure to maintain a stock register as required under Section 12(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948. The assessee, a manufacturer of silver ornament…
L.T.C. BHADRACHALAM PAPERBOARDS AND ANR.versusMANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 10139 September 1996Dismissed
The appellant, T.C. Bhadrachalam Paper Boards Ltd., claimed exemption from non‑agricultural land assessment on the basis of G.O. No. 201 (1976) issued under Section 11 of the Andhra Pradesh Non‑Agricultural Lands Assessment Act, 1963. The order was not published in the Official Gazette nor laid before the Legislature a…
NATIONAL EX-SERVICEMEN CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE ETC. ETC.versusCONTROLLER GENERAL OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS AND ORS.
1996 INSC 10149 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioners, ex‑servicemen re‑employed in Central Government posts, challenged the denial of dearness relief on their pension, alleging discrimination compared with civilians re‑employed in public‑sector undertakings. They argued that a 1975 Ministry of Defence letter extending dearness relief to armed‑forces pensi…
F.B. TARAPORAWALA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusBAYER INDIA LTD. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 10159 September 1996Disposed off
Builders sought permission to construct buildings in an area where chemical factories operated, prompting the Bombay High Court to prohibit any construction within a 1 km radius of the factories. The chemical manufacturers appealed, arguing that the prohibition infringed the residents' right to reside and that the High…
UNION OF INDIAversusMOHAN SINGH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 10169 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The first respondent claimed freedom‑fighter status and applied for a pension under the Freedom Fighters' Pension Scheme, relying primarily on a certificate from an MLA and a co‑prisoner as proof of six months' imprisonment. The Government examined the documents and concluded that they were insufficient to establish th…
SREEDAM CHANDRA GHOSHversusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS.
1996 INSC 10179 September 1996Dismissed
S.C. Ghosh, an Assistant Graduate Teacher, was appointed to officiate as Headmaster of Kahilipara High School after the retirement of the regular headmaster. When a regular headmaster, Mukul Chandra Roy, was transferred to that post, Ghosh challenged the transfer, claiming he had been promoted to a regular headmaster u…
M/S. VICTORIAN GRANITES (P) LTD.versusP. RAMA RAO AND ORS.
1996 INSC 10189 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, M/s Victorian Granites (P) Ltd, challenged the Government’s order setting aside the assignment of mining leasehold rights by the original lessee, P. Rama Rao, to Magam Inc. The lease, granted under the Andhra Pradesh Mines & Mineral Concession Rules, 1966, was transferred exactly two years after its gran…
NALANIKANT RAMADAS GUJJARversusTULASIBAI (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 8589 August 1996Dismissed
The plaintiff's ancestor leased a vacant plot of land to Binny Company in 1889, which then constructed a building and installed ginning and pressing machines before the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Houses Rates (Control) Act, 1947 came into force. The lease was subsequently transferred to the appellant, who was late…
T.M.A. PAI FOUNDATION AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC
1996 INSC 8609 August 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court, hearing numerous interlocutory applications in the T.M.A. Pai Foundation matter, clarified that the fee structures it had fixed for the academic years 1993-94, 1994-95 and 1995-96 are confined to those years only and are not refundable. It ordered that the fee order of 11 August 1995, applicable to 1…
JYANTILAL RATANCHAND SHAHversusRESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS
1996 INSC 8599 August 1996Dismissed
The petitioners, a charitable society and a trust, challenged the High Denomination Bank Notes (Demonetisation) Act, 1978, claiming that the Act extinguished their property rights in high‑denomination notes without compensation, violated Articles 19(1)(f), 19(1)(g) and 31(2) of the Constitution, imposed unreasonable ti…
SH. NAJAMAL HUSSAIN MEHADIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 8629 August 1996Disposed off
The appellant, a Police Inspector, was transferred and ordered to vacate his residential quarter after a senior police officer filed a false report alleging misconduct during a raid on a hotel that was operating beyond permitted hours. The senior officer’s report led to departmental proceedings, a fine, and the appella…
PUNE CANTONMENT BOARD AND ANR.versusM.P.J. BUILDERS AND ANR.
1996 INSC 8639 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined a dispute where M.P.J. Builders had been granted a building sanction under the Cantonments Act, 1924, but failed to commence construction within the stipulated period and later sought extensions of time after the sanction had lapsed and after new building bye‑law restrictions were imposed. Th…
RAMESH CHANDER AND ORS.versusDELHI ADMINISTRATION AND ORS.
1996 INSC 8649 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Three police constables were dismissed after a departmental inquiry and criminal prosecution for allegedly extorting money, but were later acquitted by a Sessions Court. They sought reinstatement and back wages before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), which annulled their dismissals on the ground that the puni…
LOURDU MARI DAVID AND ORS.versusLOUIS CHINNAYA AROGIASWAMY AND ORS.
1996 INSC 8669 August 1996Dismissed
Petitioners filed a suit for specific performance of a 1976 sale agreement for two doors, claiming they had paid part consideration and were ready to perform, while respondents 1 and 2 delayed execution. The trial court found breach by respondents but denied specific performance, holding that respondent 3 was a bona‑fi…
STATE OF AP. AND ORS.versusIND. NATALI GRANITE LTD.
1996 INSC 8679 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Andhra Pradesh and others challenged the writ filed by Ind. Natali Granite Ltd., which questioned the State Government's competence to levy a cess on mining leases. The High Court initially held the amendment to the District Boards Act, 1955, which sought to levy the cess, ultra vires, and subsequently aff…
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKAversusV. HARISHBABU
1996 INSC 7109 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Secretary to the Government of Karnataka (appellant) contracted V. Harishbabu for canal work, but disputes led to arbitration. The arbitrator issued an award on 22‑April‑1993 and the respondent filed a petition under Sections 14 and 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 on 23‑April‑1993, attaching a copy of the award. Th…
BANI SINGH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.
1996 INSC 7099 July 1996
The appellants were convicted under IPC sections 366 and 368 and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine. They appealed to the Allahabad High Court, which admitted the appeal, stayed the sentence, and granted bail, but later dismissed the appeal for non‑prosecution because the appellant and his coun…
SAMSUDDIN RAHMAN AND ORS.versusBIHARI DAS AND ORS.
1996 INSC 7119 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, owners of a parcel of land covered by a patta, claimed that land had gradually accreted to their estate as the Barak river receded over 15‑16 years. They sought a declaration of title over the accreted land, which was also claimed by the respondents under an annual patta granted by the Deputy Commission…
THE STATE OF RAJASTHANversusRAJASTHAN AGRICULTURE INPUT DEALERS ASSOCIATION
1996 INSC 7129 July 1996Dismissed
The State of Rajasthan sought licences for dealers selling Bajra seeds that had been coated with insecticides, invoking the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961. The respondents, seed dealers, contended that such processed seeds were not "agricultural produce" within the meaning of Section 2(1)(i) and the S…
THE SECRETARY, TAMIL NADU WAKF BOARD AND ANR.versusSYED FATIMA NACHI
1996 INSC 7139 July 1996Dismissed
Syed Fatima Nachi, a divorced Muslim woman, filed a petition under Section 4(2) of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 seeking maintenance from the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, alleging that her children, parents and other relatives were unable to pay. The Wakf Board appealed to the High Court to qua…
SHANGRILA FOOD PRODUCTS LTD. AND ANR.versusLIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 7149 July 1996Dismissed
Shangrila Food Products Ltd., a sub‑tenant of Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), was evicted under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 and an order for damages of about Rs 12 lakhs was made by the Estate Officer. The City Civil Court upheld the eviction but set aside the damages a…
SMT. MITHLESH KUMARI AND ANR.versusTHAKUR SHEO SARAN SINGH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 7159 July 1996Dismissed
The dispute concerned the succession to the Partapner Raj estate, an ancient impartible zamindari governed by the rule of lineal primogeniture. After the death of the minor adopted heir Raja Maha, competing claims arose: Kalka Singh of the senior branch asserted his right to the impartible estate (Lists A and C) while …
HARISH KUMAR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF M.P.
1996 INSC 7169 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Harish Kumar and Ram Sharan were convicted by the Madhya Pradesh High Court for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and attempt to murder (Sec. 307 IPC) after a trial court had acquitted them. They pleaded private defence of person, claiming that earlier hostile incidents and injuries to their father and themselves created a genuine…
BHAIYA BAHADUR SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1996 INSC 7179 July 1996Dismissed
Bhaiya Bahadur Singh, a government school teacher, drove his tractor onto a disputed boundary and allegedly trampled a portion of the victim's wheat field. Angered, he fetched a licensed single‑barrel gun, returned, and fired two shots, injuring two persons and killing a third. He pleaded that the shooting was in self‑…
PATTAM KHADER KHANversusPATTAM SARDAR KHAN AND ANR.
1996 INSC 7189 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
In a partition suit, a house was auctioned and the sale was confirmed by the court on 7 August 1984. The auction purchaser obtained a sale certificate only on 9 November 1989 and filed an application for delivery of possession on the same day. The appellant contended that the application was barred by the one‑year limi…
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, SPE, SIU (X), NEW DELHIversusDUNCANS AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD. CALCUTTA
1996 INSC 7209 July 1996Dismissed
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) sought to continue investigations into two FIRs alleging criminal breach of trust, forgery and cheating against Duncans Agro Industries Ltd. and its officers. The Calcutta High Court quashed the FIRs, holding that the allegations did not prima facie constitute an offence and th…
HINDUSTAN STEELWORKS CONSTRUCTION LTD.versusTARAPORE AND CO. AND ANR.
1996 INSC 7229 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd. (HSCL) awarded a construction contract to Tarapore & Co. (the contractor) and obtained fourteen unconditional bank guarantees from Bank of India, each stipulating that HSCL was the sole judge on breach and loss. After the contractor failed to complete the work, HSCL rescinded the …
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusSURJEET SINGH
1996 INSC 7249 July 1996Disposed off
Surjeet Singh, a heavy‑vehicle driver appointed in 1986, was medically declared unfit in 1993 due to a deficiency in sight and was compulsorily retired. He sought a compassionate appointment for his son as a clerk under Government of Haryana instructions dated 22 February 1991 and 28 August 1992. The Government rejecte…
M/S. WILH, WILHELMSENversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL-I
1996 INSC 6949 June 1996Dismissed
The appellant, a Norwegian shipping company, was assessed for AY 1958‑59 on the basis of separate Indian‑trade accounts. The Income Tax Officer, following Central Board instructions issued under Rule 33 and Section 5(8) of the Income Tax Act, disallowed depreciation on eight ships that had been in the fleet for more th…
THE SECRETARY, HAILAKANDI BAR ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
1996 INSC 6589 May 1996Disposed off
The Hailakandi Bar Association filed a writ petition under Article 32 alleging that Superintendent of Police A.K. Sinha Cashyap submitted a false report and affidavit to the Supreme Court to conceal police brutality that led to the death of under‑trial prisoner Nurul Haque. The Court examined the CBI investigation, med…
H.U.D.A. AND ANRversusKEWAL KRISHAN GOEL AND OTHER ETC.
1996 INSC 6599 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) advertised residential plots requiring a 10% earnest‑money deposit with the application. Allottees accepted the allotment, paid the earnest money and further deposits amounting to 25% of the price, and were to pay the balance in lump sum or six instalments. After paying so…
T. LAKSHMI NARASIMHA CHARI ETC.versusHIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS ETC.
1996 INSC 6509 May 1996Disposed off
The appellant, a District Munsif who had been temporarily promoted to Subordinate Judge, was removed from service by the Andhra Pradesh High Court after a departmental inquiry found him guilty of misconduct. He appealed to the Governor under Rule 21(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and A…
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BARODAversusMIS. M.M. KHAMBHATWALA
1996 INSC 6609 May 1996Dismissed
The respondents, M.M. Khambhatwala, manufactured certain excisable goods in their factory and claimed exemption under Notification 80/80-CE. They also obtained agarbatti, amla podi and dhup from household ladies who worked outside the factory without power, for which the respondents paid piece‑rate wages. The revenue a…
NAMAD HASSAN BHAGAD AND ORS.versusSTATE OFGUJARAT AND ORS.
1996 INSC 6619 May 1996Disposed off
During a TADA investigation, the police attached seven ships under Section 7A of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, alleging the vessels were purchased with proceeds of terrorist activity. The owners challenged the attachment, arguing that the ships were bought before the Act came into force and …
UNION OF INDIAversusSH. AB. SHAH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 6629 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Union of India filed a complaint under Section 73 of the Mines Act, 1952 alleging that Oriental Coal Co. Ltd. and its officials violated conditions 3 and 6 of the permission to split pillars with hydraulic sand stowing. The trial court and the High Court acquitted the respondents, holding that the alleged breach wa…
P.S. RAJYAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR
1996 INSC 6639 May 1996
P.S. Rajya, an Income‑Tax Officer, was charged under Section 5(2) read with 5(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for possessing assets disproportionate to his income. A departmental inquiry conducted by the Central Vigilance Commission, and later concurred by the UPSC and the President, exonerated him of the cha…
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusSMT. KAMLA DEVI AND ANR.
1996 INSC 6519 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Kamla Devi was appointed on an ad‑hoc basis under the U.P. Temporary Government Services Rules, 1975 and was repeatedly absent from duty. The State terminated her service on 23 September 1980 under Rule 14(a), which allows termination with one month’s notice or pay in lieu. She sought reinstatement and back wages, but …
SCINDIA EMPLOYEES UNIONversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 6529 May 1996Dismissed
The SCINDIA Employees Union challenged the acquisition of land on which its workshop stood, arguing that the acquisition for the expansion of a dockyard for defence purposes was not a public purpose and that the Union was a "person interested" under Section 3(d) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, entitled to notice and…
BHARATHI KNITTING COMPANYversusDHL WORLDWIDE EXPRESS COURIER DIVISION OF AIRFREIGHT LTD.
1996 INSC 6549 May 1996Dismissed
Bharathi Knitting Co. contracted DHL Worldwide Express to transport a cover containing export documents, which failed to reach the consignee in time, causing the buyer to pay a reduced amount and the appellant to claim a loss of Rs.4,29,392.60. The courier’s consignment note contained a limitation clause restricting li…
SUPREME CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETYversusM/S. H.S. NAG AND ASSOCIATES (P) LTD.
1996 INSC 6559 May 1996Dismissed
The Supreme Co‑operative Group Housing Society entered into a construction contract with H.S. Nag & Associates that contained an arbitration clause (clause 32). After additional towers were awarded, a dispute arose and the respondent filed an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 to refer the matter…
P.T.R EXPORTS (MADRAS) PVT. LTD. AND ORS.versusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 6569 May 1996Dismissed
The petitioners, exporters of readymade garments, challenged the Government’s amendment to the export policy effective 1 January 1996, which abolished the Manufacturer Export Entitlement (MEE) and Non‑quota Exporter (NQE) quotas and introduced a system based on Past Performance Entitlement (PPE) and First‑Come‑First‑Se…
CH. RAMA RAOversusTHE LOKAYUKTA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 6579 May 1996Dismissed
The petitioners challenged interim orders issued by the Andhra Pradesh Lokayukta that suspended and transferred them without prior notice or hearing, alleging violation of natural justice and the unconstitutionality of Sections 3, 4, 7 and 12 of the AP Lokayukta & U.P. Lokayukta Act, 1983. The Supreme Court examined th…
RAKESH SINGHA ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ETC. ETC.
1996 INSC 4969 April 1996Dismissed
The case arose from a violent incident on 10 May 1978 at a marriage venue in Simla, where a group of youths armed with hockey sticks, iron rods and other weapons attacked the gathering in retaliation for a prior altercation involving a parked jeep. The assault resulted in injuries to several persons and the death of Su…
HARDIAL SINGH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
1996 INSC 4979 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants Hardial Singh, Uttam Singh and Gurnam Singh were charged with murder, grievous hurt and rioting for firing on members of an informant party who were cultivating land belonging to Khazan Singh. The incident occurred when the accused, armed with guns and rifles, confronted the cultivators who were ploughin…
DR. H. MUKHERJEEversusS.K. BHARGAWA
1996 INSC 4989 April 1996Dismissed
Dr. H. Mukherjee, a Central Government employee, filed a civil suit seeking Rs. 2 lakh in damages against his superior, S.K. Bhargava, alleging that the latter deliberately issued vindictive orders and tampered with official records to harass him and block his appointment as Chief Controller. The defendant contended th…
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.versusSARVOTAM VEGETABLE PRODUCT ETC. ETC.
1996 INSC 4999 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, dealers in edible oils and stainless steel, made numerous inter‑state sales and furnished C‑forms obtained from their purchasers in their tax assessments. A survey revealed many of these C‑forms to be invalid or spurious, leading the tax authorities to issue notices for additional tax and penalty. The …
SADASIVAMversusK. DORAISAMY
1996 INSC 2149 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Sadasivam sought a declaration that a sale deed executed by his father Marappa in favour of the respondent Doraisamy was a sham and that his interest in the joint family property remained unaffected. The lower courts had held the sale deed valid and the will of the grandfather Karuppanna, bequeathing half…
G. RAMASWAMY@ SURYAPRAKASA RAOversusLANKA SUBBARAO PATRUDU AND OTHERS.
1996 INSC 2159 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The grandfather, Gulla Kondala Rao, executed a deed of gift in 1947 in favour of his second wife, Narasamma, and she later bequeathed the same properties to the plaintiffs by a registered will in 1964. The adopted son, Ramarao, later sold the properties claiming they were joint family assets, but the plaintiffs challen…
DADAR AVANTI COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. BOMBAYversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY AND ORS.
1996 INSC 2169 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Dadar Avanti Cooperative Housing Society challenged the permission granted by the Municipal Commissioner allowing two flats in its building to be used as a surgical nursing home, a change from the residential use sanctioned in the original plan. The society argued that the building was approved for residential use …
U. P. RAJKIYA NIRMAN NIGAM LTD.versusINDURE PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 2139 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The U.P. Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Ltd (appellant) and Indure Pvt Ltd (respondent) were negotiating a joint tender for the U.P. State Electricity Board. The appellant sent a draft agreement which it did not sign; the respondent returned a counter‑proposal deleting clause 10 and materially altering clause 12. No consensus ad…
TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARDversusA. VISWAM (DEAD) BY LRS.
1996 INSC 2199 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Tamil Nadu Housing Board acquired 339 acres of land, including a one‑acre parcel earmarked for a public park, under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The original owners, represented by A. Viswam (deceased), claimed they remained in possession and sought a perpetual injunction against the Board. The Board argued that…
UNION OF INDIAversusS.S. UPPAL AND ANR.
1996 INSC 349 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
S.S. Uppal, a State civil servant, was selected for absorption into the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) against a non‑state quota. Although his name appeared in a panel for a vacancy that arose on 1‑Feb‑1989, he was actually appointed on 15‑Feb‑1989, after the seniority rules were amended on 3‑Feb‑1989. Uppal chall…
PATEL MOT!BHAI NARANBHAI AND ANR.versusDINUBHAI MOTIBHAI PATEL AND ORS.
1996 INSC 359 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute concerned ownership of certain properties and was referred to arbitration, resulting in an award on 26 February 1986. Neither party applied to file the award in court within the 30‑day period prescribed by Article 119 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Six years later, the arbitrator himself filed the award and s…
BEHARI PRASAD ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR
1996 INSC 379 January 1996Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined appeals by four accused convicted of murder, rioting and related offences under the IPC and Arms Act. The prosecution case rested on eye‑witness testimony of close relatives of the deceased, who were present at the scene when the accused allegedly assaulted the victim and, after being urged b…
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONversusSTATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND ANR.
1996 INSC 389 January 1996Case Allowed
The National Human Rights Commission filed a writ petition under Article 32 on behalf of about 65,000 Chakma refugees settled in Arunachal Pradesh, alleging persecution, quit notices and threats of eviction by the All Arunachal Pradesh Students Union. The Chakmas had applied for Indian citizenship under Section 5(1)(a)…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.versusM/S. NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION CO., BOMBAY AND ANR.
1996 INSC 399 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Maharashtra entered into a construction contract with National Construction Co. and obtained a performance guarantee from the Central Bank of India. When the contractor abandoned the work, the State sued the bank alone for the guaranteed amount; the suit was dismissed for non‑joinder of the contractor and …
MIS NATIONAL ALUMINIUM CO. LTD.versusRAJ KISHORE @ SAHU JENA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 419 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Mis National Aluminium Co. Ltd., sought to enforce its right as a beneficiary of compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in pending proceedings before the Sub‑Judge of Angul. The respondents, Raj Kishore @ Sahu Jena and others, were served notice but failed to appear. The legal question was wh…
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusJAN KALYAN SAMITI, SHEOPURI, GHAZIABAD AND ANR.
1996 INSC 429 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) acquired land by issuing a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on 25‑02‑1986 and a declaration under Section 6 on 26‑02‑1986, both of which were published together on 10‑04‑1986. The respondents challenged the acquisition, arguing that the notifica…
PREETAM SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.versusASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND ORS.
1996 INSC 439 January 1996Remitted to Lower Court
The dispute involved Bhoomidari rights over 38.25 acres in a village undergoing consolidation under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, where the Gaon Sabha objected to the appellants' entries in revenue records. The Consolidation Officer ordered expunction of the appellants' names, and the Settlement Officer reman…
KING PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 13118 November 1996Dismissed
The appellants, former zamindars, challenged the vesting of their estates in the State of Uttar Pradesh under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, which they claimed left their rights to work mines intact. The Collector issued notices to stop mining and offered leases governed by the U.P. Minor Mine…
EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. CALCUTTAversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALCUTTA
1996 INSC 13128 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
East India Hotels Ltd., an approved hotel, claimed both the extra depreciation allowance under clause (iii) and the extra shift depreciation allowance under clause (iv) of Item III of Appendix I to the Income Tax Rules for AY 1977-78. The Revenue argued that an approved hotel could claim only the extra depreciation all…
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POSTSversusB. RAVINDRAN AND ANR.
1996 INSC 13138 November 1996Dismissed
The case concerned ex‑servicemen who retired before age 55 and were re‑employed in the civil service. Their pay was fixed at the minimum scale, and they claimed advance increments where the total of pay plus pension was less than the pay drawn at retirement, invoking Office Memoranda (OM) of 1958 and 1983. The Governme…
SHIV SAGAR TIWARIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 13148 November 1996
The Supreme Court examined a public interest writ petition challenging the allotment of 52 shops and stalls by the then Minister of Urban Development, Smt. Sheila Kaul. The Court found that the allotments were made without public notice, contrary to the policy she herself had framed in 1994, and were granted to her rel…
THE COMMISSIONER, CORPORATION OF MADRASversusMADRAS CORPORATION TEACHERS MANDRAM AND ORS.
1996 INSC 13158 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Corporation of Madras adopted a dual policy for appointing Education Officers, upgrading the post to Deputy Director and seeking to fill it by transferring a Government officer. The Madras Corporation Teachers' Mandram challenged this action before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, which directed the Corporat…
MADHYA PRADESH TRIATHLON ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANR. ETC.versusINDIAN TRIATHLON FEDERATION AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 13168 November 1996Disposed off
The Madhya Pradesh Triathlon Association filed transfer petitions under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking relief against the Indian Triathlon Federation and others. The parties had earlier agreed to settle their disputes pursuant to Rule XIX of the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) Rules, which mandates …
M/S. KILPEST PVT. LTD.versusSHEKHAR MEHRA
1996 INSC 11598 October 1996Dismissed
Mehra and Dubey, the original promoters of Kilpest Pvt. Ltd., fell out and Mehra was removed as director and denied notice of meetings that led to share allotments favoring Dubey. Mehra filed a petition under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 alleging oppression and mismanagement, which the High Court tri…
K.K. SIDHARTHANversusT.P. PRAVEENA CHANDRAN AND ANR.
1996 INSC 11608 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging that the appellant had issued two post‑dated cheques which were presented and returned unpaid with the endorsement "Payment countermanded by the drawer" and purportedly for insufficient funds. The appellant contended…
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusSAMAR SINGH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 11618 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, an IAS officer of the 1962 batch, was promoted to Additional Secretary but was not empanelled for the post of Secretary. He challenged the non‑inclusion before the Central Administrative Tribunal, which held that the Special Committee had acted arbitrarily by not recording reasons for his exclusion and …
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusSH. KESHAV RAM AND ORS.
1996 INSC 11628 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Himachal Pradesh appealed against a decree that had declared the respondents, Sh. Kesha v Ram and others, as owners in possession of a disputed land parcel (Khasra No. 153/1). The respondents had relied on an alleged order of the Assistant Settlement Officer directing a correction in the revenue register, …
SMT. YALLAWWversusSMT. SHANTAVVA
1996 INSC 11638 October 1996Disposed off
Basappa filed a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(i‑b) of the Hindu Marriage Act and obtained an ex‑parte decree on 15‑12‑1989. Basappa died on 26‑05‑1990; the wife, Shantavva, claimed she only learned of the decree on 31‑03‑1990 and was not properly served, filing an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to set as…
HARIBHAU DAGDU TANDALEversusINDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE ASSOCIATION LTD. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 11648 October 1996Dismissed
The Registrar, invoking Section 102(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960, issued an interim winding‑up order against Industrial Co‑operative Association Ltd and appointed a special liquidator. The society appealed to the State Government under Section 104, but while the appeal was pending the liqui…
STATE OF ORISSAversusSHARAT CHANDRA SAHU AND ANR.
1996 INSC 11668 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The wife lodged a written complaint with the Women’s Commission alleging that her husband had contracted a second marriage (offence under IPC 494) and was harassing her for dowry (offence under IPC 498A). The Commission forwarded the complaint to the police, who investigated both offences and filed a charge‑sheet; the …
STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.versusMANGANESE ORE (INDIA) LTD. AND ANR.
1996 INSC 11678 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiff, Manganese Ore (India) Ltd., sued State Bank of India (SBI) and an exporter for payment under letters of credit (LC) issued by SBI. The trial court held SBI not liable because the ore supplied did not meet the quality specifications stipulated in the LC, but the High Court reversed this, holding SBI liabl…
CHIEF COMMISSIONER, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHversusJANGI LAL JAIN AND ANR. ETC.
1996 INSC 11688 October 1996Dismissed
The case arose from a Punjab & Haryana High Court decision that the delegation of power to levy property tax to the Chief Administrator of the Union Territory of Chandigarh under the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 (as amended) exceeded legislative competence and violated the Constitution. The …
DEVCHAND KALYAN TANDELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.
1996 INSC 8498 August 1996Dismissed
The appellants, Devchand Kalyan Tandel and Jayantilal, were charged under Section 135(1)(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 for transporting ten silver ingots without a transport voucher in a notified area under Section 11‑K. The prosecution recovered the ingots from a secret compartment of an ambassador car and established t…
RAJENDRA SINGHversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 8508 August 1996Dismissed
The appellant, a licensee of several liquor shops under the Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, failed to pay licence fees for July and August 1994. The authorities issued a show‑cause notice, gave him a date to appear, and later published a notification of cancellation and re‑auction, which was subsequently held. The appellant…
KALLATHIL SREEDHARAN AND ANR.versusKOMATH PANDYALA PRASANNA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 8528 August 1996Dismissed
In a partition suit, a cinema theatre was allotted to a woman and her minor son subject to payment of Rs.1,55,000 each. Unable to pay, the theatre was auctioned. The appellant advanced Rs.2,10,391 to the woman to set aside the sale, on the condition that she would sell the theatre to him for Rs.7,44,000. The appellant …
THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. ETC.versusDEVRAJBHAL CHHAGANBHAL AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 8538 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Gujarat appealed against a compensation agreement entered into under Section 11(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which fixed compensation at Rs. 140 per guntha, an additional 20% for land development, a 15% solatium and interest at 4.5% as of the agreement date. The issue was whether the parties could…
M/S. AVIJIT TEA CO. PVT. LTD.versusM/S. TERAI TEA CO. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 8548 August 1996Case Partly allowed
The dispute arose from an agreement for the sale of green tea leaves in which Avijit Tea Co. advanced Rs. 20 lakh, later deposited with a court receiver. Avijit Tea filed a suit for specific performance, which was dismissed by a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court, and the Bench ordered a refund of Rs. 19,33,873.…