Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 2002

577 judgments, newest first — showing 201–400.

SUKHBIR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2002 INSC 9320 February 2002Case Partly allowed

The case involved Sukhbir Singh, who was convicted of murder (Section 302 IPC) along with eight co‑accused for a fatal assault that arose from a sudden quarrel over mud splashed on him. The prosecution alleged that all nine formed an unlawful assembly with a common object to kill the deceased, invoking Section 149 IPC.

SHIV DUIT JADIYAversusGANGA DEVI

2002 INSC 9420 February 2002Appeal(s) allowed

In the first suit, the tenant defaulted on rent but deposited the arrears in court under Section 13(4) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950, and the trial court denied eviction. The landlord appealed, withdrew the appeal, and meanwhile filed a second suit alleging a new default for the per

SRI SWAMI KRISHNANAND GOVINDANANDversusM/S. M.D. OSWAL HOSIERY (REGD.)

2002 INSC 9120 February 2002Dismissed

The appellant, a registered charitable society, sought eviction of the tenant under Section 22(d) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, claiming a bona‑fide need for the premises. The tenant denied that the appellant was a public institution and that it required the premises. During trial the tenant’s counsel conceded b

ASHEESH PRATAP SINGH AND ORS.versusM. SACHDEVAND ORS.

2002 INSC 56319 December 2002Directions issued

Thirty-two students who had qualified the CPMT in 1998 were admitted to Azamgarh Medical College, completed the first professional MBBS examination, and then discovered that the college was closed due to infrastructure deficiencies. The Supreme Court had earlier directed the Medical Council of India (MCI) and the Direc

MAHILA BAJRANGI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.versusBADRIBAI W/O JAGANNATH AND ANR.

2002 INSC 56419 December 2002Dismissed

Mahila Bajrangi, through her legal representatives, filed a suit for declaration of title and possession of a house, claiming ownership based on a gift deed executed by her mother Gopali, who she alleged was the lawful wife of the deceased Gendilal. The defendants contended that Gopali's marriage to Gendilal was invali

SUNIL KUMAR RANAversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 56519 December 2002Dismissed

Sunil Kumar Rana filed a nomination for a municipal council seat, but his nomination was rejected because he had more than two living children, a disqualification under Section 13A of the Haryana Municipal Act as amended in 1994. The amendment introduced a proviso that a person with more than two children would not be

P.U. JOSHI AND ORS.versusTHE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, AHMEDABAD AND ORS.

2002 INSC 56619 December 2002Dismissed

The appellants, who were Supervisors in the Accounts & Entitlement wing of the Indian Audit and Accounts Department, claimed promotion to Assistant Accounts Officer on the basis that their pay scale and duties were identical to Section Officers and that they were entitled to equal pay for equal work. The Department arg

SHALIGRAM SHRIVASTAVAversusNARESH SINGH PATEL

2002 INSC 56219 December 2002Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal against the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s order upholding the rejection of a candidate’s nomination in a bye‑election. The Election Commission had instructed Returning Officers to require candidates to fill a proforma disclosing information relevant to disqualification under Section 8

SYNDICATE BANKversusR. VEERANNA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 56719 December 2002Disposed off

Syndicate Bank sued R. Veeranna and others for repayment of loans totaling Rs 16,15,091.05. The defendants accepted liability but contested the bank's claim for a higher rate of interest, arguing that the increase violated natural justice and the bank's own circulars. The trial court awarded the loan amount with intere

STANDARD PENCILS (P) LTD. ETC. ETC.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADRAS

2002 INSC 40019 September 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Standard Pencils Ltd., a manufacturer of Kum‑Kum pencils, sought exemption from excise duty under Notification 235/1986‑CE, which exempts goods described as "Kum‑Kum" under sub‑heading 3307.90 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Assistant Collector and the Collector (Appeals) classified the pencils under headin

B.L. WADHERAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 21419 April 2002Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined a public‑interest writ petition challenging several gifts of village common (shamlat) land by the Bhondsi Gram Panchayat to a former Prime Minister and his trust. The petitioner alleged that the gifts violated the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulations) Act, 1961, its 1964 Rules, and the Fo

KARAM CHANDversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 15219 March 2002Dismissed

The dispute concerned a 22-kanal agricultural plot that had been auctioned by the Rehabilitation Department and later sold to Rameshwari Dass. Karam Chand claimed to be the sub‑lessee of the land and applied for its transfer in his favour. After the sale was finalized and a conveyance deed issued to Dass, Chand filed a

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BTDA, BAGALKOTversusMOHD. HANIF SAHIB BAWA SAHIB

2002 INSC 15319 March 2002Case Partly allowed

The State of Karnataka acquired agricultural plots in Bagalkot under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, fixing a base market value of Rs 3 per sq ft based on a 1979 valuation. The Reference Court applied a 10 % per‑annum appreciation for subsequent years, arriving at Rs 6.85 per sq ft for 1985 and, after a 20 % deduction

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.versusVISHNUNARAYAN AND ASSOCIATES (P) LTD. AND ANR.

2002 INSC 15419 March 2002Dismissed

The State of West Bengal, having taken over the management and later the undertaking of the Great Eastern Hotel under the 1975 and 1980 Acts, transferred the undertaking (except lands and buildings) to the Great Eastern Hotel Authority. The Authority issued a circular to occupants of shop, office and godown premises wi

THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHINversusMIS. KESARIA TEA CO. LTD.

2002 INSC 15019 March 2002Dismissed

The case concerned Kesaria Tea Co. Ltd., which had earlier claimed a deduction for a provision made towards purchase tax liability for the years 1978‑81. In the assessment year 1985‑86 the company wrote back the provision, believing that the liability had ceased following the rejection of a special leave petition in th

HOTEL SEA GULLversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

2002 INSC 15119 March 2002Dismissed

The appellant Hotel Sea Gull obtained a Panchayat sanction to construct a five‑storey hotel and built the ground and first floors. It then erected a second floor without obtaining permission under Section 46 of the West Bengal Town and Country (Planning and Development) Act, 1979. The planning authority issued notices

MANSOOR KHANversusMOTIRAM HAREBHAN KHARA T AND ANR.

2002 INSC 15519 March 2002Dismissed

The landlord filed an eviction suit in 1985 against the tenant of a shop in Risod, before the city was declared a municipality. In 1989 Risod was notified as a municipality, bringing the Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949 into force for the premises. The tenant argued that, becau

AVTAR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

2002 INSC 8619 February 2002Dismissed

Avtar Singh, a convicted prisoner, applied to have the period of his parole counted towards his total sentence. The Punjab and Haryana High Court rejected his claim, holding that Section 3(3) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988 excludes parole periods from the total sentence. He appealed

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusO. CHAKRADHAR

2002 INSC 8819 February 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Railway Recruitment Board (RRB) Bangalore advertised for Junior Clerk‑cum‑Typist posts and appointed candidates, including the respondent. A CBI investigation later uncovered widespread irregularities—absence of a mandatory typing test, tampering of answer sheets, and procedural violations—rendering the entire sele

SAURASHTRA OIL MILLS ASSOCIATION, GUJARATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.

2002 INSC 8919 February 2002Dismissed

The Saurashtra Oil Mills Association challenged Gujarat's 2000 order fixing stock limits for edible oilseeds and edible oils, arguing that the Central Government's 1997 amendment deleting these items from its 1977 Storage Control Order implied repeal of the State's 1981 order and created a constitutional conflict. The

KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY BOARDversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 8719 February 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a dispute where Karnataka Electricity Board (KEB) entered into a written agreement with landowners to acquire 21 acres 14 guntas for a power station, agreeing to pay Rs 14,250 per gunta for two‑thirds of the land and to pay solatium fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer (LAO). The LAO issued

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusRAM SEWAK AND ORS.

2002 INSC 55618 December 2002Disposed off

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed the Allahabad High Court's acquittal of five accused in a murder case arising from a factional clash. The deceased had given a dying declaration naming Ram Sewak as the shooter, which was corroborated by a promptly lodged FIR and eyewitness testimony. The trial court convicted all fi

ROHIT SINGHAL AND ORS.versusPRINCIPAL, JA WAHAR N. VIDYALA YA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 55718 December 2002Disposed off

Five students from a rural background in Uttar Pradesh were admitted to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya (JNV) and later migrated to a JNV in Kerala as per the scheme's national integration policy. They faced language and cultural difficulties, leading to alleged indiscipline and their discharge on disciplinary grounds. The

M/S. INDIA HOUSEversusKISHAN N. LALWANI

2002 INSC 55818 December 2002Dismissed

The respondent filed two revision petitions against a High Court order under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent) Control Act, 1960, but applied for a certified copy of the order after the 30‑day limitation period had expired. The Supreme Court held that, under Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963, the time req

BEG RAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2002 INSC 55918 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh issued a government order to lease sand mining rights on the Yamuna river bed for a term of three to five years. The appellant was initially granted a one‑year lease, which the Collector later extended by two years on the ground that the original lease should have been for a minimum of three

SUDHANSU SEKHAR SAHOOversusSTATE OF ORISSA

2002 INSC 56018 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a District Malaria Officer, was convicted by the Sessions Court and the Orissa High Court for rape (IPC s.376) and wrongful confinement (IPC s.342) based primarily on the testimony of Ms. X, a lady supervisor who alleged she was taken to the appellant's house at night and forced to have sexual intercours

SWAMI NATH CHOUHAN AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 56118 December 2002Dismissed

The appellants, Swami Nath Chouhan and others, claimed tenancy of 4 Bighas 4 Kathas and 15 Lechas at Hukanpukhuri, alleging a lease from respondents 5‑7 in 1947, while the land had been acquired by the Union of India in 1943 for defence purposes and later reconveyed without possession. The Union issued a notice under R

SUNDERBHAI AMBALAL DESAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2002 INSC 47518 November 2002Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered the procedure for custody and disposal of property seized by police under Sections 451 and 452 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The petitioners sought further directions on how seized items should be handled when the accused denies involvement and no physical article is recovered. T

AVTAR SINGH AND ORSversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2002 INSC 39618 September 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were apprehended in a truck carrying 640 kg of poppy husk at an odd hour; two were sitting on the bags and one was driving. They were convicted under Section 15 of the NDPS Act on the basis of presumptions of possession under Sections 54 and 35 of the Act, without any direct evidence of custody or contro

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusNIHAL SINGH

2002 INSC 39718 September 2002Disposed off

Nihal Singh, a life convict under Section 302 IPC, filed a writ petition in the Punjab & Haryana High Court seeking classification as a Class‑B prisoner under para 576‑A of the Punjab Jail Manual, which provides facilities based on classification. The Single Judge declared the classification scheme ultra‑vires of Artic

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, AHMEDABADversusL.T.E.C. (P) LTD., BOMBAY

2002 INSC 39818 September 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee, I.T.E.C. (P) Ltd., sold projectors to Mis. International Talkie Equipment Co. Pvt. Ltd. and claimed exemption under Notification 71178. The Revenue issued a notice under Section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excise Act, alleging Mis. International was a "related person" and demanded excise duty and penalty for t

S. SHANMUGAVEL NADARversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

2002 INSC 39918 September 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Division Bench decision of the Madras High Court in M. Varadaraja Pillai's case merged into the Supreme Court's order of 10 September 1986, which dismissed appeals on the ground of non‑joinder of the State as a necessary party. The Court held that the Supreme Court order did not d

RAKESH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2002 INSC 30518 July 2002Dismissed

The case concerned the murder of Dharam Pal, who was beaten by six accused persons amid a long‑standing enmity with the family of a former MLA, Raja Ram. The Sessions Court acquitted four of the accused on the ground that their identity was not established and convicted two of them under Section 304 Part II/149 IPC, ho

VIJA Y KUMAR MADAN AND ORS.versusR.N. GUPTA TECHINCAL EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ORS.

2002 INSC 21318 April 2002Disposed off

The plaintiffs, owners of a leasehold premises in Gurgaon, sued the defendants for recovery of rent arrears and ejectment. The defendants failed to appear on the scheduled date, leading the trial court to proceed ex-parte and later set aside the ex-parte order under Order 9 Rule 7, imposing a condition that the defenda

COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE, NAGPURversusM/S. WAINGANGA SAHKARI S. KARKHANA LTD.

2002 INSC 21218 April 2002Dismissed

The Commissioner of Central Excise appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal which held that the making of trusses, columns and purlines by the assessee constituted manufacture. The Tribunal relied on the decision in Aruna Industries v. CCE Guntur, applying it to the facts

GURMAIL SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2002 INSC 14718 March 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Gurmail Singh was arrested after allegedly arriving at a police station carrying a gunny bag on his head containing 27 kg of black gunpowder and four detonators, allegedly inspired by two constables to surrender. The Designated Court convicted him under Section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention)

RAM GOVIND UPADHYAYversusSUDARSHAN SINGH AND ORS.

2002 INSC 14818 March 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant's brother was murdered during a violent incident at a polling booth, leading to the filing of an FIR under Section 302 IPC and the arrest of several accused. The accused applied for bail, which was rejected by the trial court, the High Court, and the Sessions Judge. After a second FIR for witness intimida

S.K KUSHWAHAversusD.K. JOSHI AND ORS.

2002 INSC 14918 March 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. S.K. Kushwaha, a lecturer with a Ph.D. but without the required M.Ed. or B.Ed., was appointed Principal of the College of Education, Kurukshetra University, after the Executive Council purportedly relaxed the qualification requirement. Respondent D.K. Joshi challenged the appointment, arguing that the B.Ed./M.Ed. q

SHALINIversusKURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY AND ANR.

2002 INSC 3318 January 2002Disposed off

Ms. S. Janani, a B.Sc. Home Science student, failed her April 2000 examination and applied for re‑evaluation within 20 days of the result but without the original detailed marks card (DMC). The university rejected the application, and after receiving the DMC on 6 Nov 2000 she re‑applied on 8 Nov 2000, was re‑evaluated

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusBHUSHAN SACHDEVA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 3418 January 2002Disposed off

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 12.53 lakh in compensation for a 1994 accident, directing United India Insurance Co. to pay the amount jointly with the driver, while the insured driver did not appeal. United India Insurance Co. filed a revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, believing it

OM PRAKASH GUPTAversusRANBIR B. GOYAL

2002 INSC 3518 January 2002Dismissed

The appellant, a tenant, was evicted by decree for non-payment of rent. He sought relief on the ground that a subsequent event – the Haryana Urban Development Authority's (HUDA) resumption proceedings against the landlord – had been set aside, claiming that this extinguished the landlord's title and amounted to evictio

LAKHWINDER SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2002 INSC 54817 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, three constables, were convicted for murder, attempted murder and related offences arising from a violent incident on 24 December 1996. The prosecution's case relied on three eye‑witnesses, forensic reports and seized weapons, but the Supreme Court found serious deficiencies: the FIR was interpolated to

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2002 INSC 54917 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Ashok Kumar was convicted under Section 376(2)(g) IPC for rape, based on the allegation that he facilitated the rape committed by the deceased Anil Kumar. The prosecution's case relied on the testimony of the victim's brother, who claimed the victim had told him that both men had raped her, and on the app

DR. (MRS.) RENUKA DATLA AND ORS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX KARNATAKA AND ANR.

2002 INSC 55017 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were assessed for AY 1992-93 and appealed, resulting in partial modifications and a waiver of interest. A demand was re‑computed on 31‑12‑1998 and remained unpaid when the appellants filed a declaration under Section 88 of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme (Finance Act, 1998). The designated authority reject

JANKI NARAYAN BHOIRversusNARAYAN NAMDEO KADAM

2002 INSC 55117 December 2002Dismissed

The respondent filed a suit for possession of property on the basis of a Will that was signed by two attesting witnesses. At trial only one attesting witness and the scribe were examined, while the second witness, though alive, was not called. The trial court accepted the Will, but the District Judge reversed, holding

CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 54217 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Cellular Operators Association of India (appellants) challenged the Government's decision to permit Fixed Service Providers to offer Wireless in Local Loop (WLL) with limited mobility, arguing that the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) failed to consider the level‑playing‑field issue, viola

SHREE DIGVIJA Y CEMENT CO. LTD. AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2002 INSC 55217 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The cement manufacturers challenged Clause 9A of the Cement Control Order, 1967, which required a payment of Rs 9 per metric tonne on non‑levy cement, arguing that it was a tax imposed without statutory authority. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether the clause was ultra vires Section 18G of the Industries (D

SUSHILAversusIIND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BANDA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 55317 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The landlady Sushila purchased a shop in 1977 and sought its eviction under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, to accommodate her married, unemployed son Prem Prakash who had an electrical‑wiring certificate and wanted to start a business. The tenant, Baij

M/S INDIAN CHARGE CHROME LTD. AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 54317 December 2002Disposed off

The dispute concerned the legality of the Orissa State Government's recommendation to grant a mining lease of 84.881 hectares of chromite to Nava Bharat Ferro Alloys Ltd. (respondent ‘N’) and the subsequent approval of that recommendation by the Central Government. The appellant, Indian Charge Chrome Ltd., challenged t

DEVENDER PAL SINGHversusSTATE N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ANR.

2002 INSC 54417 December 2002Dismissed

The petitioners filed review applications under Article 137 of the Constitution seeking to set aside death sentences imposed by the Supreme Court in three criminal appeals. They argued that because one of the three judges on the bench had either acquitted the accused or suggested life imprisonment, the death penalty sh

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusM/S. HINDUSTAN BULK CARRIERS

2002 INSC 54517 December 2002Case Partly allowed

The dispute arose over the period for which interest under Section 234B (and related sections 234A, 234C) could be levied by the Income Tax Settlement Commission after an assessee disclosed previously undisclosed income under Section 245C. The revenue argued that interest should be limited to the date of regular assess

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAIversusM/S. DAMANI BROTHERS

2002 INSC 54617 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Revenue appealed against an order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission concerning Daman! Brothers' settlement application. The Supreme Court examined whether the Commission could waive or reduce interest under Section 220(2) while exercising powers under Section 245(4), whether assessment orders issued before th

BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.versusO.P. SWARANAKAR ETC.

2002 INSC 54717 December 2002Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the validity of Voluntary Retirement Schemes (VRS) introduced by State Bank of India and other nationalised banks, focusing on whether an employee’s application for retirement could be withdrawn before the bank’s acceptance despite a clause stating the request was irrevocable. The Court held

SALEEM BHAI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 55417 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs filed suits seeking a declaration that several earlier decrees and orders were illegal, null and void. The defendants moved to reject the plaints under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, alleging no cause of action and that the suits were barred by res judicata. The trial court, without de

M/S. OCL INDIA LTD.versusSTATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 55517 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

M/s OCL India Ltd., a cement manufacturer, was assessed under the Orissa Sales Tax Act for the year 1986-87. The Sales Tax Officer issued an assessment order in 1987, which was later subjected to a show‑cause notice by the Assistant Commissioner in 1995 under delegated revisional power, but the proceedings were dropped

M/S. BHUPINDRA STEELS (P) LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE

2002 INSC 39017 September 2002Dismissed

Bhupindra Steels Ltd, a manufacturer of ingots, claimed exemption from excise duty under Notification No. 208/83, asserting that the "ends of M.S. Flats" used as inputs fell within sub‑item 8 of the notification. The Central Excise authorities rejected the claim; the Collector (Appeals) allowed it, but the Customs Exci

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusDAVID RAZARIO AND ANR.

2002 INSC 39117 September 2002Appeal(s) allowed

An octogenarian woman was robbed and murdered in Bangalore. The prosecution proved that the accused, David Razario and Christopher David, had pawned a tape recorder belonging to the victim and later sold it, and that the weapon used in the assault bore the victim's blood group. The trial court convicted them under Sect

RULI RAM AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2002 INSC 39217 September 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the killing of two children during a panchayat election in Haryana, allegedly by the accused Ruli Ram and his son Ramesh as retaliation for the victims' family refusing to vote for their candidate. The trial court convicted them under Section 304 Part‑II IPC and sentenced them to ten years' rigorous

SRI S.K. SARMAversusMAHESH KUMAR VERMA

2002 INSC 39317 September 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Mahesh Kumar Verma, a former railway employee, was allotted official accommodation while in service but failed to vacate after his retirement in 1984. The railway administration invoked Section 138 of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 to recover possession, but the Calcutta High Court set aside the order, holding that the

M/S. M. SUBBARAO AND SONSversusYASHODAMMA AND ORS

2002 INSC 39417 September 2002Dismissed

The tenants (Mis. M. Subbarao & Sons) were ordered to vacate non‑residential premises under the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961. The Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1999 came into force on 31‑12‑2001, repealing the 1961 Act and containing a savings provision (Section 70). The tenants argued that, because the new Act did n

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., CHANDIGARHversusNICOLLETTA ROHTAGI AND ORS.

2002 INSC 38917 September 2002Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether a motor insurer can appeal a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal award under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 when the insured has not filed an appeal. It held that an insurer’s right of appeal is limited to the statutory defences listed in Section 149(2) and cannot be used to

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSONIC ELECTROCHEM (P) LTD. AND ANR.

2002 INSC 39517 September 2002Dismissed

The Supreme Court heard appeals by the Union of India against the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s order quashing excise duty notices served on Sonic Electrochem Ltd. for the plastic body of its electro‑mosquito repellent (EMR) and a "fragrant mat". The issues were whether the plastic body constituted "goods" under the Cent

HANS RAJ AND SONSversusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS.

2002 INSC 30417 July 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the validity of Notification SRO 348 dated 20 August 1982, which imposed an additional toll of Rs 0.06 per kilogram on dry fruits such as almonds, walnuts and kernels exported from Jammu & Kashmir. The petitioners argued that the levy was a fee requiring quid‑pro‑quo and that the State had no

BIJOY SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2002 INSC 20917 April 2002Case Partly allowed

The case concerned a mass murder on 25 August 1991 in which Vijay Singh was killed and Sanuj Singh injured; twelve men were charged under IPC sections 302, 149 and 307 and the Arms Act. The trial court convicted all accused, but on appeal the Supreme Court examined procedural lapses such as delay in lodging the FIR, de

DHARMENDRASINH @ MANSING RATANSINHversusSTTE OF GUJARAT

2002 INSC 21017 April 2002Dismissed

The appellant, Dharmendrasinh, was convicted of murdering his two sons. The prosecution relied primarily on the ocular testimony of his wife, who described the incident in detail, and was corroborated by a neighbour. The defence challenged the credibility of the wife’s testimony, the contradiction regarding where the F

RAMINDER SINGH SETHIversusD. VIJAYARANGAM

2002 INSC 21117 April 2002Dismissed

The landlord filed an eviction suit under clause (a) of Section 21(1) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961, alleging that the tenant was in arrears of rent. The tenant argued that the advance rent paid at the commencement of tenancy should be adjusted against the arrears, and that Section 18, which limits advance re

JAIPUR ZILA SAHAKARI BHOOMI VIKAS BANK LTD.versusSHRI RAM GOPAL SHARMA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 2917 January 2002Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the dismissal of Ram Gopal Sharma by Jaipur Zila Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd while an industrial dispute was pending. The employer had filed an application for approval of the dismissal under the proviso to Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but the application was reje

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusC.M. JAYA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 3017 January 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court considered appeals by New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against a Delhi High Court order that held the insurer liable for the full compensation awarded to third‑party claimants in a motor accident. The issue was whether an insurer that has not taken on higher liability by receiving a higher premium is boun

M/S. ORISSA TEXTILE AND STEEL LTD.versusSTATE OE ORISSA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 3117 January 2002Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the amended Section 25‑0 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (and the identical Section 6‑W of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act) which governs the closure of large industrial undertakings. The Court considered whether the procedural and substantive defects iden

PANDURANG KALU PATIL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2002 INSC 3217 January 2002Disposed off

A1, A2 and A3, armed with guns, chased Ramdas and his brother Narayan and shot them; Ramdas died while Narayan survived. The trial court convicted A1 and A3 for murder under s.302 IPC, A2 for attempt to murder under s.307 IPC and acquitted A4 and A6 who carried knives. The High Court upgraded A2’s conviction to murder

BHAIJIversusSUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THANDLA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 54016 December 2002Dismissed

The appellant, a member of an aboriginal tribe, purchased land from tribal bhumiswamis during the period covered by Section 1708 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959. He failed to submit the required information within the prescribed two‑year period, prompting the Sub‑Divisional Officer to issue a show‑cause n

MOHD. HOSHAN, A.P. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF A.P.

2002 INSC 38816 September 2002Disposed off

The deceased Razwana Parveen, aged 18, married appellant No.1 and was allegedly subjected to continuous mental cruelty and dowry demands by her husband and his mother, leading her to self‑immolate. The trial court acquitted the accused of Sections 304‑B, 306 and 498‑A IPC, doubting the dying declaration and witness tes

HARDEEPversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

2002 INSC 33816 August 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Hardeep and his father Maha Singh were charged with the murder of Rajinder Singh. The trial court convicted Hardeep under IPC 304 Part I and acquitted Maha Singh, while the High Court upheld Hardeep's conviction, upgraded it to IPC 302, and retained the father's acquittal. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the cred

SHER BAHADURversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 33916 August 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a former casual labourer who was later given temporary status as a khalasi in the Indian Railways, was charged with fraudulently obtaining his appointment letter and was dismissed after a disciplinary enquiry. The enquiry report relied on the order of his appointment as documentary evidence but failed to

HARJIT SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2002 INSC 34116 August 2002Disposed off

Six accused were charged with murder, attempted murder and other offences arising from a land‑dispute clash in Chhichrewal, Punjab. The trial court convicted all of them under Sections 302, 307, 323, 324, 326 IPC read with Sections 148 and 149, while the High Court set aside the convictions of three. The Supreme Court

A.V. MOHAN RAO AND ANR.versusM. KISHAN RAO AND ANR.

2002 INSC 30216 July 2002Dismissed

The appellant‑accused filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a criminal complaint that alleged violations of Sections 60, 63, 68 and 68‑A of the Companies Act, 1956, involving the alleged siphoning of funds from Non‑Resident Indians into offshore entities. The High Court refused to quash the co

RAM KHILONA AND ORS.versusSARDAR AND ORS.

2002 INSC 30316 July 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants (Ram Khilona et al.) had entered into an agreement of sale with the respondents (Sardar et al.) but the sale deed was never executed. After execution, the covenantors allegedly altered the agreement by inserting two independent marginal witnesses to lend authenticity. The respondents sought specific perf

PRADEEP KUMAR BISWAS AND ORS.versusINDIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL BIOLOGY AND ORS.

2002 INSC 20216 April 2002Dismissed

The appellants, former employees of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), challenged their termination, arguing that CSIR is a "State" within Article 12 of the Constitution and therefore subject to fundamental rights protections. The High Court dismissed the writ petition relying on Sabhajit Tewary,

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR.versusM.R. GANESH BABU AND ORS.

2002 INSC 20416 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the claim of four specialist officers of the State Bank of India (SBI) that they were entitled to the higher starting salary (advance increments) granted to Probationary Officers, Trainee Officers and Rural Development Officers (RDOs) under the 1979 SBI Officers Order. The respondents argued

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusK.A. KUNCHINDAMMED

2002 INSC 20516 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 authorized officers seized a lorry carrying sandalwood oil and later ordered its confiscation and that of the vehicle, publishing the order in the official gazette. The vehicle's owner applied to a Judicial Magistrate for interim custody, which was dismissed on the ground that only the au

STATE OF ORISSAversusTHAKARA BESRA AND ANR.

2002 INSC 20616 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Orissa prosecuted Thakara Besra and another accused for rape under Section 376 of the IPC. The prosecutrix testified that the accused forced entry through the thatched roof, assaulted her, and left blood and semen stains on her petticoat, which were confirmed by medical and forensic reports. The trial cour

BECKODAN ABDUL RAHIMANversusSTATE OF KERALA

2002 INSC 20716 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Beckodan Abdul Rahiman was arrested after a police search that uncovered 11 grams of opium. The search was conducted without complying with the mandatory procedural safeguards under Section 42(2) and Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, namely the requirement to forward a written reco

P. RAMA CHANDRA RAOversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2002 INSC 20316 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, accused of corruption under the Prevention of Corruption Act, were acquitted by special courts after two years of delay, relying on time‑limit directions from the Common Cause and Raj Deo Sharma cases. The Karnataka High Court set aside the acquittals and entertained appeals without giving notice to th

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusM. DEVENDRAPPA AND ANR.

2002 INSC 2816 January 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka charged M. Devendarappa and another with forging bank guarantees and impersonating a bank manager, invoking IPC sections 465, 468, 471, 420 and 120‑B. The Karnataka High Court, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 of the CrPC, quashed the proceedings on the ground that there was no def

BAR COUNCIL OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusKURUPATI SATYA NARAYANA

2002 INSC 47415 November 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The State Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh appealed against the Bar Council of India's Disciplinary Committee order that set aside the State Council's decision to strike off advocate Kurupati Satyanarayana for grave professional misconduct. The advocate had received Rs. 14,600 on behalf of a client in execution proceeding

M/S. SHYAMA CHARAN AGARWALA AND SONSversusUNION OF INDIA

2002 INSC 30115 July 2002Disposed off

The contractors Mis. Shyama Charan Agarwala & Sons entered into construction contracts with the Union of India and, after disputes arose, referred the matters to arbitration. The arbitrator awarded reimbursement for additional costs relating to stone aggregate, excavation of rock, and work in a restricted area. The Uni

CHANDRA BIHARI GAUTAM AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2002 INSC 20115 April 2002Dismissed

On 23 July 1994 a mob of 300‑400 persons armed with guns and petrol bombs attacked the house of informant Ganesh Singh in Amarpur, Bihar, killing six members of his family. The informant identified 19 persons, including the appellants Chandra Bihari Gautam and others, and the prosecution charged them under IPC Section

BIHARI MANJHI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2002 INSC 20015 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed

In a case of gruesome carnage in Bihar that left 35 dead, the Designated Court convicted several accused under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) and the Indian Penal Code based solely on a confessional statement of Bihari Manjhi recorded by a police inspector. The statement was taken

KRISHNA MOCHI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR ETC.

2002 INSC 19915 April 2002Dismissed

The case concerned a mass‑caste massacre in Bihar in which 35 members of a community were killed and many others injured. Thirteen persons were charged under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) and the Indian Penal Code; four were acquitted and the remaining nine were convicted, four o

M.C. MEHTAversusKAMAL NATH AND ORS.

2002 INSC 14415 March 2002Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the liability of Span Motels Pvt. Ltd. (SMPL) for constructing walls and bunds on the banks and bed of the River Beas, which interfered with the river's natural flow and caused environmental degradation. The Court affirmed earlier findings that SMPL's actions violated the public trust doctrin

CHOWDARAPU RAGHUNANDANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

2002 INSC 14515 March 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner was detained under Section 3(1)(i) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 after customs seized a large quantity of dutiable cell‑phones from his baggage at Chennai Airport. He claimed the goods were not his, that the customs statement was made under coerc

AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIAversusSATYAGOPAL ROY AND ORS.

2002 INSC 14315 March 2002Dismissed

The Airports Authority of India appealed a Gauhati High Court order that awarded compensation for cutting trees on its land using a multiplier of 18 years' yield. The appellant argued that the multiplier violated the Supreme Court’s decision in State of Haryana v. Gurcharan Singh, which limits the multiplier to eight y

STATE OF PUNJABversusHARNEK SINGH

2002 INSC 8415 February 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Punjab appealed against a High Court order that quashed FIRs and subsequent proceedings against Harnek Singh, alleging that the investigations were conducted by police officers not authorized under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The accused had been investigated under notifications issued under th

THE RANGE FOREST OFFICERversusS.T. HADIMANI

2002 INSC 8515 February 2002Disposed off

The workman, S.T. Hadimani, claimed that he had rendered service for 240 days in the relevant year and that his employment was terminated without payment of retrenchment compensation. The employer, the Range Forest Officer, denied that the workman had completed the requisite 240 days. The Labour Tribunal accepted the w

STATE OF HARYANAversusRAM SINGH

2002 INSC 2515 January 2002Case Partly allowed

The State of Haryana prosecuted several accused for the murder of Manphool under Sections 302, 149 and 201 IPC. The trial court convicted all, but the High Court acquitted Ram Singh, citing inconsistencies between his thumb‑marked disclosure statement and his arrest date, and gave him the benefit of doubt. On appeal, t

SYNCO INDUSTRIESversusSTATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPUR AND ORS.

2002 INSC 2415 January 2002Dismissed

Synco Industries filed a complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) alleging that State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur had frozen its sanctioned working facilities without prior notice, seeking damages of Rs. 15 crore and additional expenses of Rs. 60 lakh. The NCDRC dismissed the petition

STATE OF HARYANAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

2002 INSC 2615 January 2002Directions issued

After the bifurcation of Punjab in 1966, the Government of India allocated 3.5 MAF of Ravi‑Beas water to Haryana under a 1976 notification. Haryana could not draw its share through the existing Bhakra Main Line Canal and therefore proposed the Sutlej‑Yamuna Link (SYL) Canal, completing its portion in 1980 while Punjab

SUGANTHI SURESH KUMARversusJAGDEESHAN

2002 INSC 2715 January 2002Disposed off

The complainant S.S. Kumar filed a criminal revision against the conviction of Jagdeeshan under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for two dishonoured cheques amounting to Rs. 4,50,000. The trial magistrate sentenced the accused to imprisonment till the rising of the court and a fine of Rs.5,000, which the c

LALLAN RAJ AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2002 INSC 47314 November 2002Disposed off

The case involved fourteen accused who, on the night of Holi, encircled and assaulted Bindeshwari Rai with deadly weapons, resulting in his death. The trial court convicted all of them under Section 302 IPC, with some also under Section 307 IPC, while the High Court later acquitted them of the Section 302/149 charge bu

RAMILABEN HASMUKHBHAI KHRISTI AND ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2002 INSC 33614 August 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The victim, Pragnesh Kumar, died from severe burns after allegedly being attacked by a group of accused. Four dying declarations were recorded by a medical officer, a police sub‑inspector and two executive magistrates, none of which were accompanied by a medical certificate confirming the victim's mental fitness. The s

MUNUSWAMY AND ORS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2002 INSC 33714 August 2002Dismissed

The appellants—Munuswamy and his sons Kujlaresan and Selvam—conspired to kill the deceased, Adhimoolam, by waiting at a roadside, chasing him, overpowering him, and stabbing him with a pen‑knife on the father's order. The deceased died from injuries to vital organs. All three were convicted under Sections 341, 302 and

JAI SINGHversusSHAKUNTALA

2002 INSC 14114 March 2002Dismissed

Shakuntala, the natural daughter of the deceased Sunda Ram, sued to be declared owner of his property, challenging a registered adoption deed that named Jai Singh as an adopted son. The trial court and two appellate courts held that the adoption was invalid and decreed in favour of Shakuntala. On appeal, the Supreme Co

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusVIJAY KUMAR JAIN

2002 INSC 14214 March 2002Disposed off

V.K. Jain, an Assistant Engineer promoted to Executive Engineer in Uttar Pradesh, was compulsorily retired under U.P. Fundamental Rule 56(c) after a Screening Committee considered four adverse entries in his character roll, including a withholding of integrity. The High Court set aside the retirement, holding that only

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR .versusDELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION AND ORS.

2002 INSC 14014 March 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (as amended) after the Delhi High Court had struck it down as violative of Article 14 and as eroding judicial independence. The Court held that Parliament has the competence to enact the Act

ALLARAKHA K. MANSURIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2002 INSC 8014 February 2002Dismissed

Allarkha K. Mansuri was charged with murder under Sections 302, 504 and 114 IPC for allegedly stabbing Abdul Karim Ali Mohamed with a dharia. The trial court acquitted him, relying on alleged discrepancies in the FIR, the time of death, weapon identification and the alleged lateness of statements under Section 161 CrPC

BALDEV SINGH GANDHIversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS .

2002 INSC 8114 February 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Baldev Singh Gandhi, an elected municipal councillor, publicly criticised the house‑tax assessment list prepared by the Municipal Council of Jandiala Guru, using pamphlets, loud‑speakers and inviting taxpayers to discuss grievances. The Punjab State Government claimed his actions caused difficulty in tax collection and

MAM CHAND PALversusSMT. SHANTI AGARWAL

2002 INSC 8214 February 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a dispute between tenant M.C. Pal and landlady Smt. Shanti Agarwal concerning eviction under the U.P. Urban Building (Regulation, Letting and Eviction) Act, 1972. The key question was the meaning of "date of first hearing" for the purpose of Section 20(4), which shields a tenant from eviction

LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-CUM-DSWO, A.P.versusB.V. REDDY AND SONS

2002 INSC 7914 February 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The land of the respondents was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894; the Collector awarded Rs 11,000 per acre while the claimants demanded Rs 30,000‑30,000 per acre. A reference court fixed the market value at Rs 75,000 per acre but, relying on the pre‑1984 Section 25, limited compensation to the amount claim

STATE OF PUNJABversusJUGRAJ SINGH AND ORS.

2002 INSC 8314 February 2002Appeal(s) allowed

On 23 October 1989, two nephews of Hardip Singh were shot dead by Jugraj Singh and his accomplices who were armed with guns and a gandasa. The prosecution presented the two surviving relatives as eye‑witnesses, supported by a post‑mortem report that identified gun‑shot injuries, and the trial court convicted the accuse

MICHAEL B. FERNANDESversusC.K. JAFFER SHARIEF AND ORS .

2001 INSC 8814 February 2001Dismissed

The appellant filed an election petition challenging the election of respondent No.1 to the Lok Sabha and impleaded the Election Commissioner, Returning Officer and Chief Electoral Officer as respondents. The High Court ordered their deletion, holding that Section 82 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 limits

KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusASHRUFULLA KHAN AND ORS.

2002 INSC 2214 January 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) challenged the grant of a stage‑carriage permit to private operators Ashrufulla Khan et al. for a route that overlapped a small portion of a notified route covered by a scheme of total exclusion prepared under Chapter IVA of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The High C

NIRMA LTD.versusM/S. LURGI LENTJES ENERGIETECHNIK GHBH AND ANR.

2002 INSC 2314 January 2002Dismissed

Nirma Ltd. filed a Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution seeking to appeal an order of the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, which had decided an appeal under sub‑section (2) of Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petition raised the question of whether a second appeal is bar

R. KAPILNATH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusKRISHNA

2002 INSC 53613 December 2002Dismissed

The tenant (R. Kapilnath, deceased, through LRs) occupied a house owned by a temple and paid rent to the temple's pujari, Krishna, who filed an eviction suit under the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961. The Munsif Court granted eviction under clause (p) of Section 21(1) but not clause (h); the decision was upheld by the

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.versusMANAS KUMAR CHAKRABARTI AND ORS.

2002 INSC 53713 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The State of West Bengal appointed Dinesh Chandra Vajpai, an Additional DGP, as Director General & Inspector General of Police (DG & IGP). Manas Kumar Chakraborty, a fellow IPS officer, challenged the appointment, arguing that only a substantive DGP could be appointed to the post and that the selection lacked a "credib

MANSAB ALIversusLRSAN AND ANR.

2002 INSC 53813 December 2002Disposed off

The complainant challenged a High Court order that granted bail to one co‑accused (Irsan) in a murder‑related case, alleging that the order was laconic and failed to state reasons. The Supreme Court reiterated that the discretion to grant or refuse bail under the Criminal Procedure Code must be exercised with care, bal

BIJAY KUMAR MAHANTYversusJADU @ RAM CHANDRA SAHOO

2002 INSC 53913 December 2002Dismissed

The officer-in-charge of a police station arrested Jadu (the respondent) despite a certified bail order issued by the Sessions Judge. The High Court initiated contempt proceedings under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, found the officer guilty of contempt, and sentenced him to seven days of civil impriso

RAGHUNATHversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 46813 November 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Raghunath and eight others were convicted under IPC sections 148, 149, 302, 323, 325, 436 and 452 for a violent incident in which the deceased Kundan Lal was killed. The Supreme Court examined contradictions in witness statements, the improbability of the prosecution’s version of the melee, the lack of e

DWARKA DAS AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2002 INSC 46913 November 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether a High Court, exercising criminal appellate jurisdiction under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C., could direct the State Government to file an appeal against an acquittal by a Sessions Judge. The High Court had ordered the Advocate General of Haryana to file a leave‑to‑appeal application

SHRAWAN BHADAJI BHIRAD AND ORS.versusSTTE OF MAHARASHTRA

2002 INSC 47013 November 2002Dismissed

The accused, members of the Bhirad family, were convicted for assaulting Ganesh Dhage with swords, causing severe injuries, under Sections 147, 148, 307 read with Section 149 of the IPC. The victim, while hospitalized, identified the accused by name in a statement recorded by doctors, which the defence claimed was spec

BHARAT COKING COAL LTD.versusKARAM CHAND THAPAR & BROS. PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

2002 INSC 47113 November 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (appellant) claimed that certain lands, buildings and other assets owned by Karam Chand Thapar & Bros. Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) vested in the Central Government under Section 3G(vi) of the Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972, and issued notices for possession. The respondents contended t

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusSKIPPER CONSTRUCTION CO. (PVT.) LTD. AND ANR.

2002 INSC 47213 November 2002Directions issued

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) had awarded a plot of land to Skipper Construction Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., which later sought a bank guarantee from New Bank of India for the balance payment. The bank officials allegedly facilitated the guarantee with irregularities, prompting a disciplinary inquiry. The Supreme Court, a

DANA YADAV @ DAHU & ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2002 INSC 38313 September 2002Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the convictions of seven accused in a murder case arising from a Naxalite attack in 1983. The key issue was whether identification of an accused for the first time in court, without a prior test identification parade or corroboration, could support a conviction, especially when the accused wa

C.V. RAJENDRAN AND ANR.versusN.M. MUHAMMED KUNHI

2002 INSC 38413 September 2002Dismissed

The tenants (appellants) challenged a second eviction petition filed by the landlord (respondent) under Section 15(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, claiming the landlord’s bona‑fide requirement for his son. An earlier appellate authority had held that the second petition was not barred by

RATTAN DEVversusPASAM DEVI

2002 INSC 38513 September 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Rattan Dev filed a suit for a permanent injunction which was decreed by the trial court. The defendant appealed and the first appellate court reversed the decree, dismissing the suit on the ground that the plaintiff did not appear as a witness and an adverse inference was drawn. Rattan Dev filed a second appeal under S

SAMPATH KUMARversusAYYAKANNU AND ANR.

2002 INSC 38613 September 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff filed a suit in 1988 for a permanent injunction over agricultural land. In 1999, before trial commenced, he sought to amend the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC to add relief for declaration of title and recovery of possession, alleging dispossession by the defendant in 1989. The trial court and t

RITA LALversusRAJ KUMAR SINGH

2002 INSC 38713 September 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a widow who had undergone a kidney transplant, filed an eviction petition under Section 14 of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982, alleging that the respondent, her employee, occupied the premises as a tenant and was in arrears. The respondent sought leave to defend, denying

BINDESHWARI PRASAD SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2002 INSC 33213 August 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were acquitted by a Sessions Court of murder charges under Sections 302 and 302/114 IPC. The State's appeal against the acquittal was dismissed by the High Court on a limitation ground, after which the informant filed a criminal revision under Section 401 of the CrPC. The High Court set aside the acquitt

MAHADEO SAHNI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2002 INSC 33313 August 2002Dismissed

The appellants were part of an unlawful assembly that assaulted two men with various weapons, causing their deaths. The trial court, based on eyewitness and medical testimony, convicted all accused of murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC, and also under Sections 148 and 147 IPC for other offences. The Hig

M/S. LAKSHMI PRECISION SCREWS LTD.versusRAM BAHAGAT

2002 INSC 33413 August 2002Dismissed

Lakshmi Precision Screws Ltd. terminated the employment of Ram Bahagat under Clause 9(f)(ii) of its Certified Standing Orders after he was absent for ten days without leave. The company sent a notice on 17 October 1990 asking him to report within 48 hours, warning that failure would be deemed disinterest and his name w

PREM SURANAversusADDL. MUNSIF AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AND ANR.

2002 INSC 33513 August 2002Dismissed

Advocate Prem Surana, who was also an accused in a criminal case, entered the Jaipur District Court and, after his application for exemption from appearance was rejected and a non‑bailable warrant issued, verbally abused and slapped the presiding Judicial Magistrate in open court. The District Judge referred the incide

PADMASUNDARA RAO (DEAD) AND ORS.versusSTATE OF T.N. AND ORS.

2002 INSC 13613 March 2002Disposed off

The case concerned a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 issued before the 1984 amendment, under which a declaration under Section 6(1) was made within the three‑year period but later quashed by the High Court. The State then issued a fresh declaration and the appellants challenged its val

SHAMBHU MURARI SINHAversusPROJECT AND DEVELOPMENT INDIA LTD. AND ANR.

2002 INSC 13913 March 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a draftsman trainee who rose to General Foreman, applied for voluntary retirement under a scheme effective 12-18 October 1995. The employer accepted the application on 30 July 1997, subject to a later release memo. Before the actual release date, the appellant sent two letters (7 August and 27 September

SHARDA DEVIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2002 INSC 13713 March 2002Disposed off

Sharda Devi appealed against the State of Bihar challenging a land acquisition award. The dispute turned on whether a Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) could be filed before a Division Bench of the High Court against the judgment of a Single Judge who had decided an appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

BHATIA INTERNATIONALversusBULK TRADING S.A. AND ANR.

2002 INSC 13813 March 2002Dismissed

Bhatia International entered into a contract with Bulk Trading containing an ICC arbitration clause, agreeing that the arbitration would be held in Paris. Bulk Trading sought an injunction under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in an Indian court to restrain the appellant from dealing with its as

RAN SINGH MALIKversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 7813 February 2002Dismissed

The appellant, appointed as Deputy Director (Feed and Fodder) in 1987, claimed that his post was a regular Class I veterinary cadre post and sought the revised pay scales of 1987 and 1988 and seniority over two respondents appointed later to cadre posts. The State argued that the post was an ex‑cadre position created w

INDIA AUTOMOBILES (1960) LTD.versusCALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR.

2002 INSC 7613 February 2002Disposed off

India Automobiles (1960) Ltd., the owner of a nine‑storey commercial building, leased the premises to a tenant who sub‑let parts of it. The Calcutta Municipal Corporation fixed the annual value of the property under Section 174 of the Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980, by taking into account the rent paid by the

U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHADversusRAM KRISHNA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 7713 February 2002Disposed off

The Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad (the Board) framed a housing scheme in a development area declared under the Uttar Pradesh Planning and Development Act, 1973. The scheme was notified under Section 28 of the Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 in 1980, and the State Government gave its appr

ATMA S. BERARversusMUKHTIAR SINGH

2002 INSC 53312 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord, a retired Indian Revenue Service officer, constructed a house in Moga and later let part of it to the tenant. After a decade he sought eviction on the ground of needing the premises for his own occupation because of age, health and lack of alternative residence. The Rent Controller and the Appellate Autho

AKHILESHWAR KUMAR AND ORS.versusMUSTAQIM AND ORS.

2002 INSC 53412 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Four siblings purchased a commercial premises to start their own businesses, particularly plaintiff No. I who intended to run a clothing shop. The premises were occupied by the respondents as tenants. The trial court, applying Section 11(1)(c) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction Control) Act, 1882, held that

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.versusSMT. AMARJEET KAUR AND ORS.

2002 INSC 53512 December 2002Dismissed

The respondents, landholders under the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, were initially found not to hold surplus land. After the Rajasthan (Imposition of Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 came into force, they were later declared to have surplus land and the State sought to reopen the earlier 1955 proceedings und

TULSI RAM AND ORS.versusMATHURA SAGAR PAN TATHA KRISHI AND ANR .

2002 INSC 46212 November 2002Disposed off

The dispute involved the Barai community, owners of a group of tanks used for betel leaf irrigation, and the Dhimar fishing community who had been allowed to fish in those tanks under a historic Wajib-ul-arz agreement. The Barais sought an injunction to stop the Dhimars from fishing, claiming the right was only a licen

KASTURI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2002 INSC 46312 November 2002Dismissed

The State of Haryana acquired about 84 acres of agricultural land for the development of residential and commercial sectors. After a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the District Judge fixed a uniform compensation of Rs.125 per square yard. The High Court Single Judge reduced this amount to

VASANT ARJUNRAO BHANDAKversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2002 INSC 46512 November 2002Dismissed

Vasant Arjunrao Bhandak was charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and contended that the Principal Sessions Judge, Belgaum, lacked jurisdiction because the judge was not a "Special Judge" as defined in Section 3 of the 1988 Act. He argued that the appointment of the judge under a notification issued purs

SUBHASH RAMKUMAR BIND @ VAKIL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2002 INSC 46612 November 2002Dismissed

The appellants were convicted for murder of Harish Bhatia using a 9 mm pistol and a .38 calibre revolver, and were sentenced to death under IPC sections 302/34 and Arms Act section 27(3). The High Court upheld the death sentence, treating the weapons as prohibited arms under the Arms Act based on a government note. The

ALAMGIRversusSTATE (NCT. DELHI)

2002 INSC 46712 November 2002Dismissed

Alamgir, a Pakistani national, travelled to Delhi with his wife Halima and stayed at a hotel. He left her locked in the room on 19 September 1991 and failed to return; her body was later found strangulated. Two slips of paper near the body bore handwriting identified by an expert as Alamgir's. He was arrested in Bombay

MS. ARUNA ROY AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2002 INSC 38012 September 2002Dismissed

The Supreme Court dismissed a public‑interest writ petition challenging the National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCFSE) 2000 on the grounds that it was framed without consulting the Central Advisory Board of Education (CABE) and that it violated secularism and Article 28. The Court held that CABE is a no

UNION OF INDIAversusHANSOLI DEVI & ORS.

2002 INSC 37912 September 2002Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined the scope of Section 28‑A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which allows a fresh application for re‑determination of compensation. It considered whether a dismissal of an application under Section 18 on the ground of delay amounts to "not filing an application" within the meaning of Section

GURPREET SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2002 INSC 38212 September 2002Dismissed

Gurpreet Singh, an ex‑Air Force officer, was charged with murdering his wife Kalpna by setting her on fire. There was no eye‑witness; the prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence including a strained marital relationship, a pending divorce with a monetary settlement, prior instances of domestic violence, the appel

K.G. PREMSHANKERversusINSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR.

2002 INSC 38112 September 2002Dismissed

The appellant, K.G. Premshanker, sought to quash criminal prosecution on the ground that a civil suit for damages against him had been dismissed, and he argued that the civil judgment should prevail over the criminal case. The High Court rejected this plea and the matter reached the Supreme Court. The Court examined th

TARUN BORA @ ALOKA HAZARIKAversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2002 INSC 32912 August 2002

The appellant, Tarun Bora (alias Aloka Hazarika), was convicted under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code for kidnapping and under Sections 3(1) and 3(5) of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) for alleged terrorist conduct. The offence occurred on 18 August 1991, whereas Section 3(5) of TAD

DR. J.J. MERCHANT AND ORS.versusSHRINATH CHATURVEDI

2002 INSC 33012 August 2002Disposed off

The doctors filed a petition before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) alleging that a complaint of medical negligence against them should be dismissed or stayed, arguing that the case involved complicated questions of law and fact and that a nine‑year delay in disposal rendered the consumer fo

I.C.D.S LTD.versusBEENA SHABEER AND ANR.

2002 INSC 33112 August 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The husband entered into a hire‑purchase agreement with I.C.D.S. Ltd., and his wife stood as guarantor, issuing a cheque for part payment. The cheque was returned unpaid and the appellant served a statutory notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, thereafter filing a criminal complaint. The res

HINDUSTAN MOTORS LTD.versusTAPAN KUMAR BHATTACHARYA AND ANR.

2002 INSC 30012 July 2002Disposed off

The workman, Tapan Kumar Bhattacharya, assaulted his supervisor in 1980, was suspended, found guilty of major misconduct in a departmental enquiry and dismissed. The employer sought approval of the dismissal under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and the Industrial Tribunal initially approved it.

T. FENN WALTER AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 29912 July 2002Disposed off

The case examined whether a sitting High Court judge appointed as President of a State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission could continue to function as a judge. A group of advocates challenged the appointment, arguing it created a master‑servant relationship and threatened judicial independence, while the governmen

STATE BANK OF SAURASHTRAversusM/S. ASHIT SHIPPING SERVICES (P.) LTD. AND ANR.

2002 INSC 19212 April 2002Disposed off

The State Bank of Saurashtra (appellant) sought leave to defend a summary suit filed by Ashit Shipping Services (respondent No.1) under Order 37 of the CPC, which claimed payment on a bond that the bank alleged was an indemnity, not a guarantee. The bank alleged fraud and collusion involving the respondent and a second

VIKAS AGGARWALversusANUBHA

2002 INSC 19312 April 2002Dismissed

The appellant and respondent married and later separated, with the appellant filing for divorce in a U.S. court while the respondent returned to India and filed a suit for judicial separation and maintenance. The Delhi High Court, through a Single Judge, initially restrained the appellant from proceeding in the U.S. co

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAIversusK.V. SHRAMIK SANGH AND ORS.

2002 INSC 19512 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The K.V. Shramik Sangh, a trade union representing contract workers in the Mumbai Municipal Corporation's solid waste management department, filed a writ petition seeking abolition of the contract labour system and absorption of the workers as permanent employees, alleging that the contracts were sham and that the corp

KANNIAMMALversusCHELLARAM

2002 INSC 19612 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The landlady, who occupied a portion of a building for residential use, leased another portion to a tenant for non‑residential purposes. She sought eviction of the tenant under Section 10(3)(a)(iii) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, claiming a bona‑fide need for the premises to start her s

GOVT. OF A.P. AND ORS.versusJ. SRIDEVI AND ORS.

2002 INSC 19712 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents purchased parcels of land that were agricultural on the appointed day of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and later converted them to residential use after a master plan amendment. They applied to the Hyderabad Urban Development Authority for layout approval, which was conditioned on a

ABDUL HAI KHANversusSUBAL CHANDRA GHOSE AND ORS.

2002 INSC 19812 April 2002Disposed off

The appellants, private stage‑carriage operators, held permits issued under the 1963 nationalisation scheme (as modified in 1980) and claimed that the Regional Transport Authority (RTA) could not grant permits to other private operators on routes overlapping those nationalised routes. They sought a writ of mandamus to

GOVERNMENT OF HARYANAversusHARYANA BREWERY LTD. AND ANR.

2002 INSC 7512 February 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Government of Haryana issued a show‑cause notice demanding excise duty on beer brewed by Haryana Brewery Ltd, alleging that the wastage in the brewing process exceeded the statutory allowance. The brewery contended that duty could be levied only after the beer became fit for human consumption and that the 7% wastag

M.P. ELECTRICITY BOARDversusSHAIL KUMARI AND ORS.

2002 INSC 2112 January 2002Dismissed

The Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board (MPEB) was sued by the dependents of a workman who died after riding over a live electric wire that had fallen on a rain‑soaked road. The Board argued that the wire fell because a third party had illegally tapped the line, invoking the "act of a stranger" exception to strict liabili

CHARAN LAL SAHUversusDR. APJ ABDUL KALAM AND ORS.

2002 INSC 52911 December 2002Dismissed

Charan Lal Sahu, an advocate, filed an election petition and a special leave petition challenging the election of Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam as President of India, alleging that his own nomination was wrongly rejected and that certain provisions of the Presidential and Vice‑Presidential Elections Act, 1952 were unconstitut

DR. PRABHA ATRIversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2002 INSC 53011 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Prabha Atri, an anaesthetist at Kamla Nehru Memorial Hospital, was suspended pending a domestic enquiry after being charged with negligence and breach of medical ethics. She wrote a letter on 9 January 1999 stating that if her grievances were not addressed, she would resign with immediate effect. The hospital treat

STATE OF HARYANAversusMANGE RAM AND ORS.

2002 INSC 53111 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana prosecuted four accused for causing grievous injuries that led to the death of a police constable. The trial court convicted them under sections 325 and 326 read with 34 of the IPC, acquitting them of murder (302/34). The High Court reversed this, discarding the victim's dying declaration and an ey

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, GUJARATversusLOV. S. KINARIWALA

2002 INSC 53211 December 2002Dismissed

The respondent, a beneficiary of a trust, received income from a partnership firm which was assigned to the trust and later distributed. The beneficiaries, including the respondent, assigned their interests to a Body of Individuals (B.O.I.) and claimed that the assets should be valued as belonging to the B.O.I. The Ass

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusMADHU SINGH AND ORS.

2002 INSC 37611 September 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The State Board conducted a combined entrance exam for MBBS and BDS seats for the 1997‑98 session. Respondent No. I, not selected for MBBS, opted for BDS and was admitted. After some MBBS seats became vacant, petitioners sought mid‑stream admission to those seats; the Patna High Court directed the Controller of Examina

RANJIT SINGH @ JITA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2002 INSC 37711 September 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted by a Designated Court for offences under the IPC, TADA and the Arms Act based largely on two police witnesses and confessional statements recorded under Section 15 of the TADA Act after a half‑hour "cooling period". Independent village witnesses were hostile and did not corroborate the pro

JAYANTIBHAI BHENKARBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2002 INSC 37811 September 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Nine persons were charged with murder and related offences arising from a 1989 assault in Singpur, Gujarat. The appellant, Jayantibhai Bhenkarbhai, claimed an alibi, asserting he was in Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar attending legal proceedings on the day of the incident. The trial and High Courts rejected his alibi, convic

K.M SHARMAversusINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 13 (7) NEW DELHI

2002 INSC 19011 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed

K.M. Sharma received compensation and interest for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act. The Income Tax Department issued reassessment notices under Section 148 for assessment years 1968-69 to 1971-72 and 1981-82, alleging tax on the interest received. Sharma contended that the reassessments were barred by the

SHARAD KUMARversusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

2002 INSC 19111 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Sharad Kumar, employed as an Area Sales Executive, was terminated without a show‑cause notice or enquiry. The dispute was referred to conciliation, and the Delhi Government refused to refer it to an Industrial Tribunal or Labour Court, stating that Kumar was not a "workman" under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes

ASHEESH PRATAP SINGH AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2002 INSC 13311 March 2002Disposed off

The petitioners were students admitted to a private medical college in Uttar Pradesh that was later found to lack the laboratory facilities and faculty required under the 1993 Medical College Regulations. The Supreme Court, recalling its earlier order dated 4 May 2001 directing an inspection by the Medical Council of I

HARBHAJAN SINGHversusPRESS COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS.

2002 INSC 13511 March 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Harbhajan Singh, a former editor of the Indian Observer, had served two consecutive three‑year terms as a member of the Press Council of India (1982‑85 and 1985‑88). When the Federation sought to nominate him again for the seventh Council, the Press Council rejected his nomination, relying on Section 6(7) of the Press

P.S.E.B. AND ANR.versusWAZIR SINGH

2002 INSC 13211 March 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab State Electricity Board (PSEB) issued a circular on 19 September 1991 stating that daily wage workers who had completed 500 working days up to a specified cut‑off date and were continuing in service of the Board would be eligible for conversion to work‑charged employees. Wazir Singh, a daily wager, filed a s

GURBAX SINGHversusKARTAR SINGH AND ORS.

2002 INSC 7411 February 2002Dismissed

Jamail Singh executed two sale deeds on the same day, one (Ex P-2) at 10:00 a.m. and the other (Ex D-1) with no time recorded. Lower courts found that Ex P-2 was executed earlier and therefore should have priority over Ex D-1. The Punjab and Haryana High Court affirmed this finding and dismissed the appeal against it.

VASHU DEOversusBAL KISHAN

2002 INSC 1811 January 2002Dismissed

The appellant, Vashu Deo, was a sub‑tenant of Bal Kishan who had leased a shop from the Sarvjanik Sampati Trust under the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950. The appellant fell into rent arrears and Bal Kishan sued him for recovery of rent and eviction, while the Trust simultaneously sued Bal K

AMAR NATH CHOWDHURYversusBRAITHWAITE AND CO. LTD. AND ORS.

2002 INSC 1911 January 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Amar Nath Chowdhury, an employee of Braithwaite & Co. Ltd., was removed from service by the Disciplinary Authority, who was also the Chairman‑cum‑Managing Director of the company. He appealed the removal before the Board of Directors, but the same Chairman‑cum‑Managing Director presided over and participated in the Boa

GANESH TRIVEDIversusSUNDAR DEVI AND ORS.

2002 INSC 2011 January 2002Dismissed

Ganesh Trivedi bought a residential premises in Kanpur from landlord Jagdamba Prasad Awasthi. The premises had been let to Suraj Prasad, who died in 1985 leaving his brother Deo Narain as the sole heir and occupant. Vikas Shukla applied to the Rent Controller to have the premises declared "deemed vacant" on the ground

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusSUNIL J. KINARIWALA

2002 INSC 52810 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Sunil J. Kinariwala, a partner in a firm, created a trust and assigned fifty percent of his ten percent partnership share to the trust, claiming that the income was diverted at source and therefore not assessable in his total income. The Income Tax Officer held the assignment to be an application of income and included

MR. "X"versusHOSPITAL "Z"

2002 INSC 52610 December 2002Disposed off

The appellant, a medical practitioner, was found HIV‑positive when his blood was tested at Hospital Z during a donation for a relative. The hospital disclosed his HIV status to the relatives of his fiancée, leading to the cancellation of his marriage and social ostracism. The appellant sought compensation for breach of

L.T.C. LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PATNA

2002 INSC 52710 December 2002Dismissed

I.T.C. Ltd., a cigarette manufacturer, was served with show‑cause notices for removing 20 sticks from each machine daily as samples for quality‑control testing, without paying excise duty. The company argued that excise duty should not apply because the cigarettes were not yet packed, a step it claimed was part of manu

ALLA CHINA APPARAO AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2002 INSC 43210 October 2002Dismissed

The appellants, six convicted accused, appealed against their life sentences for murder under Sections 302, 149, 148 and 506 IPC, arguing that the prosecution's case relied on partisan eyewitnesses, lacked independent witnesses, showed no dragging injuries, and suffered an alleged delay in forwarding the FIR to the mag

GANGADHAR BEHERA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ORISSA

2002 INSC 43310 October 2002Dismissed

The case arose from a violent clash over the construction of a shed that resulted in the death of a man. The prosecution alleged that a group of accused formed an unlawful assembly, assaulted the victims and caused the murder. The trial court convicted fifteen accused under Sections 302, 148, 149 and 307 IPC; the High

M/S. KANTHI ENTERPRISES & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2002 INSC 37210 September 2002Dismissed

The appellants, dealers under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, challenged the retrospective operation of an Explanation inserted in 1996 to the first proviso of Section 5(1‑A), arguing that it imposed a new tax burden they could not pass on to consumers and was therefore unreasonable and arbitrary. The State contended that

TALUK LAND BOARD AND ORS.versusCYRIAC THOMAS AND ORS.

2002 INSC 37310 September 2002Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal by the Taluk Land Board against a Kerala High Court order that accepted sale deeds executed by the sisters of Cyriac Thomas, the declarant. The central question was whether the sisters, as daughters of the deceased Elanjikkal Cyriac, possessed a legal share in the agricultural land

SODANI CEMENT AND CHEMICALS (P) LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, JAIPUR

2002 INSC 37410 September 2002Appeal(s) allowed

Sodani Cement and Chemicals (P) Ltd., a small‑scale industry (SSI) manufacturing ordinary Portland cement, sought the benefit of Notification No. 23/1989‑CE which exempts cement produced in a vertical shaft kiln with a licensed capacity not exceeding 200 tonnes per day from the normal excise duty of Rs. 215 per tonne,

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHIversusHINDUSTAN SANITARYWARE & INDUSTRIES

2002 INSC 37510 September 2002Dismissed

The dispute centered on whether plaster of paris used to make moulds for sanitaryware qualifies as an "input" eligible for exemption under Notification No. 217/86, as amended by Notification No. 82/87, under the Central Excise Rules. Hindustan Sanitaryware & Industries, the respondent, claimed the exemption, but the ex

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.versusHARYANA CIVIL SECRETARIAT PERSONAL STAFF ASSOCIATION

2002 INSC 29810 July 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Haryana Civil Secretariat Personal Staff Association filed a writ seeking parity of pay for Personal Assistants (PAs) in the State Civil Secretariat with those in the Central Secretariat, invoking the principle of equal pay for equal work after the Fourth Central Pay Commission. The Punjab & Haryana High Court, rel

INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS (I)versusINSTITUTE OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND ORS.

2002 INSC 27810 May 2002Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Election Commission of India (ECI) could de‑register a political party under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 when the party called a hartal that involved force, intimidation or coercion, allegedly violating the Constitution. The Kerala High Court had dire

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusKISHAN LAL

2002 INSC 27910 May 2002Disposed off

The State of Rajasthan prosecuted Kishan Lal for rape under Section 376 IPC; the trial court sentenced him to seven years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine, which the Rajasthan High Court reduced to the period already served without recording adequate and special reasons. The State appealed to the Supreme Court under A

JOGINDER PALversusNAVAL KISHORE BEHAL

2002 INSC 28010 May 2002Dismissed

The landlord, Joginder Pal, filed an eviction petition under Section 13(3)(a)(ii) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, claiming the premises were needed for the office of his chartered‑accountant son. The tenant, Naval Kishore Behal, occupied the premises for non‑residential purposes and contested the e

RUPA ASHOK HURRAversusASHOK HURRA AND ANR.

2002 INSC 18910 April 2002Heard

The Supreme Court considered whether a writ petition under Article 32 could be filed to challenge a Supreme Court judgment after a review petition had been dismissed, and whether the Court could correct such a judgment using its inherent powers. It held that a final order of the Supreme Court is not amenable to a writ

KEDARNATHversusMOHAN LAL KESAWARI AND ORS.

2002 INSC 1610 January 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord filed a suit in the Allahabad Court of Small Causes under the U.P. Urban Buildings Act for arrears of rent and eviction, which was decreed ex‑parte and executed. The tenants applied under Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC to set aside the decree but neither deposited the decretal amount nor filed a prior applicat

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search