Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17749 judgments · newest first · showing 2801–3000
The petitioner, Ravindra Rai, was not named in the FIR but was implicated in a case of illegal liquor manufacturing under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, where 3350 litres of illicit liquor were seized near Gandak Bandh, an open public area. Counsel argued that the …
The petitioners, five Yadav brothers, were charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod, lathi, and a knife, causing injuries and intent to cause death. They contended that the incident was a mutual free fight, with both sides …
Mukesh Kumar, the petitioner, was not named in the FIR relating to an illegal liquor case (Town P.S. Case No.435 of 2025) but was implicated solely because a motorbike registered in his name was seized. The prosecution alleged his involvement in the manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, citing …
The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 6.75 litres of IMFL recovered in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He contended that his only connection to the seized bike, of which …
The petitioners, Bibi Julekha and Md Mazuddin, were named in an FIR for offences under Sections 420, 467 and 468 of the IPC arising from a private complaint related to a land dispute. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing that they might be arrested. The Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision …
Ajay Kumar, husband of Kavita Devi, filed a petition fearing arrest in a criminal case alleging torture and dowry harassment under sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He denied the allegations and offered to pay Rs.3,000 per month as temporary relief to his …
Rohan Arvindbhai Modiyaa appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modiyaa, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modiyaa, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The Gujarat High …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modi, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court considered whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, has a statutory right to file an appeal under the proviso to …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modiyaa, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modi, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, asserting that the complainant, as the …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modiya, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, asserting that the complainant, as the …
The appellant, Devang Dinubhai Shah, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the Metropolitan Magistrate’s order of acquittal. He invoked Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, …
The appellant, Swami Vivekanand Credit Cooperative Society Ltd, filed an appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court authority in Celestium …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as a victim, is entitled to file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of …
The appellant, the original complainant in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by invoking Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, is …
The High Court of Gujarat considered applications under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. I‑68 of 2012, which alleged offences of forgery, cheating, criminal breach of trust and criminal conspiracy relating to a disputed piece of land claimed by the Ramji Mandir …
Hansaben Jagdishbhai Soni, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of Hiteshbhai Harshadbha Raval and another under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to …
The High Court of Gujarat considered applications under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. I‑68 of 2012, which alleged offences of forgery, cheating, criminal breach of trust and criminal conspiracy relating to a disputed piece of land claimed by the Ramji Mandir …
Amit Baldevbhai Patel, the original complainant, appealed the acquittal of Nitin Rasiklal Dave under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could invoke the proviso to Section 372 CrPC (or Section 413 …
The petitioners, five individuals, were declared absconders in a case registered under Sections 420, 419, 406 and 417 of the Indian Penal Code. They sought pre‑arrest (anticipatory) bail fearing imminent arrest. The State argued that a proceeding under Section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code had …
The appellant, Ram Sharan Sah, was convicted under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a police informant and using caste-based abuse during a land‑dispute incident in 2019. He appealed the order of the Special Judge dated 17‑12‑2021 …
The petitioner, Kaushalya Devi, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 67 litres recovered from her joint family house. She contended that her name was listed solely on suspicion, that she was …
The petitioner, Umesh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No.325 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 126(2), 109(2), 117(2), 351 and 352 of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023. He claimed a clean record and argued that the incident …
The appellant, Dharam Raj Kumar, appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail by the Exclusive Special Court under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case involving alleged caste-based abuse and assault. The FIR alleged that the appellant, along with 25 co‑accused, assaulted the …
The petitioner, Dilip Rajbhar, was named in a complaint case (Gopalganj Complaint No.2304 of 2019) alleging offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 406, 498A, 504 and 506 relating to dowry harassment and torture of his wife. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and that the allegations …
The petitioners, two women residing in Kadamkuan, Patna, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 130 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found …
The petitioner, Atul, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order of cognizance dated 08‑09‑2017 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate in a case alleging offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 498A and 379 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute. The FIR …
The petitioner, elder brother‑in‑law of the complainant, filed an application under Section 482 CrPC to quash the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate’s order of cognizance dated 08‑09‑2017 in a case involving alleged dowry harassment, assault and theft under Sections 323, 504, 506, 498A and 379 IPC. …
The petitioner, Sameer Kumar, a godown manager, was charged under Sections 353, 420, 406 and 409 IPC read with Section 34 for allegedly shifting 300 bags of Custom Milled Rice to bags marked by other governments and for being absent during an inspection. He filed a discharge application which was …
The petitioner, Deepak Singh, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 501.12 litres recovered under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016. He contended that he neither owned the vehicle used to transport the liquor nor had any physical …
The petitioner, Amar Nut, sought anticipatory bail after learning of an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 105 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to him. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the complaint was …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was seized from a location not under his control, that a hostile chaukidar had …
The petitioner, Kavita Devi, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor after 16 litres were recovered from her house. She sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was not in her conscious possession and that the seizure violated Section 103(4) of the …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 318(4), 112(2) and 61(1) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, Section 11 of the Bengal Gambling Act, 1867 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging …
Petitioner Ranjan Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 450 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He claimed he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession of …
Chhathi Kunwar was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, with six litres of liquor seized. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was recovered from an open public place …
Ankesh Yadav and Amit Yadav were named in an FIR under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly manufacturing and trading illicit liquor, with 172.8 litres recovered from two motorcycles. The petitioners contended that they were not owners of the motorcycles, …
The petitioner, Rahul Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor from a village area not in his possession. He argued that the recovery was from a public place, that he was implicated …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, based on the recovery of 16 litres of liquor from a motorcycle registered in his name. He contended that he was not present at …
The petitioners, Upendra and Birendra Singh, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order of cognizance dated 15‑01‑2001 passed by the Judicial Magistrate in Complaint No.1605 (C) of 1999, which alleged forgery, fraud and criminal conspiracy relating to a deed of …
Shatrughan Kumar Mehta filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Complaint Case No.743 of 2018, which alleged offences under Sections 379, 498A, 323, 504 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial court …
The petitioners, Adyanand Singh, Sarvanand Singh and Lal Bihari, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 06-10-2017 passed by the ADJ‑I‑cum‑Special Judge of the SC/ST Act, Aurangabad, which had taken cognizance of …
The petitioners, members of the Pandit family, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a February 2018 order of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nawada, which had taken cognizance of a complaint under Section 498A of the Indian …
Uttam Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a) and 44 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, after 3.06 litres of liquor was recovered from his joint‑family house. The petitioner contended that the liquor was not in …
Pintu Chaudhary was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, after 20 litres of liquor were seized from his joint family house. The petitioner contended that the liquor was not in his …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, with 172.8 litres recovered from the house of Kamlesh Yadav. The petitioner contended that his name was …
The petitioners, Bholu Thakur and Golu Thakur, were named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 1114 litres recovered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They contended that they were only joint owners of the family house, were not …
Harendra Mahto was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 186.27 litres of liquor recovered from a thatched hut. The petitioner contended that he was not present at the site, had no possession of …
The petitioner, Kailash Chandra Lohiya, director of Turbotech Infranet Pvt. Ltd., faced a complaint (No. 2906 of 2022) alleging cheating under IPC sections 406 and 34, with a claimed loss of Rs. 45,16,500. He had already returned Rs. 40,00,000 and handed a demand draft of Rs. 5,16,500 to the …
Ramkali Devi was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, after 30 litres of liquor were recovered from a hut. The petitioner argued that the seizure was not made from her conscious possession and …
The petitioner, Rajendra Mehta, was implicated in an excise case involving the alleged recovery of 295 litres of codeine syrup, although his name does not appear in the FIR. He is the registered owner of the seized vehicle but the prosecution offered no material showing his conscious possession or …
The petitioner, Dilip Rai, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 126 litres seized from a public bamboo grove. Counsel argued that the liquor was recovered from an open area, not in the …
The petitioner, Amarjit Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor. He argued he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was implicated due to a hostile …
Ruka Devi was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 36 litres recovered from her joint family house. The petitioner contended that the liquor was not in her conscious possession and that the …
The petitioner, Kunal Raj, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 107.385 litres of liquor recovered. He contended that he was implicated only because he is the registered owner of the seized …
Shiv Kumar Singh was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, with 11.25 litres of liquor recovered. The petitioner argued that he was implicated only because his motorcycle, which he had gifted to …
Gore Lal Mandal was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 27 litres of liquor from a car he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware that the …
Amresh Ray applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1)(2) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of illicit liquor from a third party's premises and a vehicle. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the seized liquor, had no ownership of …
Petitioner Pramod Kumar Chaudhary feared arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 70 litres of spirit from a car. He asserted that he was not the owner of the vehicle, no spirit was found in his possession, and the case was based solely on confessional …
Petitioner Sanjit Sahni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered for alleged offences under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, relating to the alleged recovery …
Ranjeet Mahto applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Excise Act alleging the recovery of 35 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious possession of the liquor, merely being …
Anand Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 720 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested, no liquor was …
The petitioner, Premchand Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 17 litres of liquor from a location not in his possession. He argued that he was implicated mechanically by police …
The petitioner, Amit Paswan, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 17 litres of liquor from a location not under his control. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor and that the police had …
The petitioners, Timal Ravidas and Lalit Paswan, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 328 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor and 11,000 litres of raw material from a public …
The petitioner, Arvind Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 600 litres of liquor. He argued that the alleged recovery was from a public place, no …
Muntasir Alam, the owner of a motorcycle from which 11.250 litres of liquor was recovered, was charged under Sections 272, 273, 414 and 34 of the IPC and Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that he had a clean antecedent, …
Petitioners Rujesh Ram and Sanju Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where liquor was recovered from a joint family house. They argued that they were not arrested at the scene, …
The petitioner, Ajay Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, involving recovery of liquor from his house and those of relatives. He argued that he …
The petitioner, Bablu Nut, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 105 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was seized from a location not under his control, that the complaint originated from a …
The petitioner, Rudal Nut, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 210 litres of liquor and destruction of 150 litres of semi‑prepared liquor near his house. He argued that no liquor was found in his possession, the alleged recovery site …
The petitioner, Bhola Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a pond not in his possession. He argued that the recovery was from land he does not own, that the …
The petitioner, Nitu Kumari, was implicated in a case involving the seizure of 108 litres of liquor from three vehicles, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was …
The petitioner, Sanjeet Rai, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged involvement in the theft of two motorcycles. The prosecution claimed that secret information led to a search of the petitioner’s house and the recovery of the …
The petitioner, Anshu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S. He alleged that he was falsely implicated in an assault on his nephew and son, claiming the injury report did not support a knife attack and that no specific allegation …
The petitioner, Nagmani Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a police case (PS Case No. 116 of 2021) alleged that 11.7 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was …
The petitioner, Subodh Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a garden behind a school. He claimed a clean criminal record, no arrest, and that the alleged liquor was located in a public area not under his …
The petitioners, Ashok Kumar Singh and his son Sidarth Kumar Singh, were named in a criminal complaint alleging cheating, criminal breach of trust, dishonest misappropriation of property and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 406, 409, 420 and 120‑B. They contended that the matter was …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging illegal possession of 1,954.08 liters of liquor, punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and Section 188 of the IPC. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not in possession of the seized …
The petitioner, Md Sadim Sheikh, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS Madhwapur Case No. 68 of 2024) alleging the abduction of a 17‑year‑old girl for illicit intercourse or marriage. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, contending that the alleged victim voluntarily left her …
The petitioner, Ramesh Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 600 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in …
The petitioner was named in an FIR for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC, concerning a business transaction where a sum of Rs. 51,54,800 remained unpaid. The petitioner argued that the dispute was purely civil, arising from a commercial hardship, and …
The petitioners, Tuttu @ Sanjeet Kumar and Shashi Kumar, were named in an FIR for multiple offences under the IPC and the Arms Act, including alleged firing on an informant's brother and tearing the clothing of women. They contended that they were only brothers of a co-accused and had no role in the …
The petitioner, Niraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 281 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to alleged possession of 120 ml of liquor in a Swift car. He argued that he was not …
The petitioner, Md Affzal Hussain, was implicated in a case alleging possession of 119.20 litres of liquor recovered from a pickup vehicle he owned, invoking Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He applied for anticipatory bail, …
The petitioner, Nanhak Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 175 litres of liquor and 200 litres of Jawa Mahua were recovered from a kiln not under his possession. He argued that the …
The petitioner, Bhedan Mandal, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 24 litres of liquor seized. He contended that the liquor was found in an open plastic bag accessible to the public and not …
The petitioners, named in FIR No.92 of 2025, were charged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant, causing grievous injuries. They contended that the allegations were false, stemming from prior enmity, and that the injuries were simple in nature. …
The petitioner, Sandeep Vishwakarma, was named in an FIR for demolishing an informant’s house, demanding extortion money and assaulting family members. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the extortion allegation was directed only at co‑accused and that no specific charge of outraging …
The petitioners, four men from Savath village, were named in an FIR for assaulting an informant and others during a land dispute, alleged to have caused bodily injury with intent to cause death under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. They applied for anticipatory bail, arguing …
The appellant, Ramakant Yadav, was charged under several IPC provisions and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing a contractual partner by using caste slurs and refusing payment. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge. On …
Mantosh Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 80 litres seized from a ditch near the Gandak river. The petitioner argued that the liquor was recovered from an open public place and not from his conscious possession, and that the seizure list …
Rahul Kumar was charged under several IPC offences and provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing a caste name and assaulting a woman’s daughter with a sharp instrument, causing a finger injury. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the incident arose …
Petitioner Mamta Devi, who was not receiving maintenance from her husband after his retirement as a teacher, approached the Patna High Court seeking a direction to deduct maintenance from his pension. The Family Court had earlier ordered maintenance to be deducted from his salary, but the pension …
The petitioners, members of the Keshri family, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 14‑12‑2017 that had taken cognizance against them under IPC Sections 323 and 498A and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition …
The petitioners, two minors aged 11 and 12, were accused of murdering a child and were denied bail by the Juvenile Justice Board, a decision affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge. They filed a criminal revision under Section 102, arguing that the denial violated the Juvenile Justice (Care and …
The petitioner, Sunita Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 11 July 2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rosera, in S.Tr. No.672 of 2015. The application was filed after the trial court had already …
The appellant, Bittu Kumar, was charged under multiple sections of the BNS, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly exploiting a woman by establishing a physical relationship under the pretext of marriage, abusing her caste name and extorting …
The appellants, three young men, were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his wife, using caste-based slurs, and stealing property on 28 July 2025. They …
The petitioners, three brothers from Khagaria, sought bail in a case alleging kidnapping, abduction, rape, and conspiracy under IPC sections 363, 366(A), 376, 120(B), 34 and section 4 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution’s informant claimed his minor daughter was kidnapped on 4 December 2023, but the …
The appellant, Shivajee Kumar Singh, appealed against the refusal of regular bail in a case under IPC Section 103(1) and the SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(v), alleging that the FIR was fabricated and he had no criminal antecedent. The prosecution argued that the appellant had confessed to the crime, though …
The appellant, Anshu Pandit, was charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act for allegedly being part of a mob that shot a victim who later died. The prosecution’s case relied …
Shambhu Kumar was charged under several IPC offences and sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act for alleged loan fraud and caste‑based threats. He contended that the allegations were vague, he had a clean record, and the informant had fabricated the case. The trial court had refused anticipatory bail. …
The petitioners, three women from Kodhal village, were named in an FIR alleging that they, along with others, assaulted an informant and her family on 14 December 2024, resulting in the death of the informant's brother‑in‑law. Their earlier bail application was rejected on the erroneous ground that …
The petitioner, Anil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 188 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a) and 38(2) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 218.04 litres of liquor from a house not owned by him. He argued that he …
The appellant, Rahul Manjhi, was arrested in connection with FIR No.568 of 2022 alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 307, 376(D) of the IPC and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act. His bail applications had been rejected twice and he had been in custody for over three years without …
The petitioners, who are the in‑laws of the complainant, sought quashing of the order dated 16‑08‑2022 that took cognizance of a complaint alleging dowry demand, torture and attempted murder under Sections 498A, 307 IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioners contended that the …
The appellant, Suman Kumar Mandal, was charged under several provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the Income Tax Act for alleged assault, intimidation and defamation related to a viral video. He sought anticipatory bail, but the Special …
The appellant, Suggan Harijan, was charged under IPC sections 302, 201 and 34 for a murder case (Jagdishpur PS Case No. 119 of 2023). He applied for regular bail under Section 14(A)(2) of the CrPC, but his bail was rejected twice by the trial court. The appellant argued that he had been in custody …
The petitioners, Amar Sahni and Dharmendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 18 litres of liquor from a jointly owned family house. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested on the spot, and …
Uma Devi, a woman with no prior criminal record, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 82 litres of liquor from a dilapidated house she does not own. She contended that the accusation was fabricated by a …
The petitioner, Yogendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a), 32(i)&(iii) and 41(i)&(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 277.920 litres of liquor from his Scorpio vehicle. He argued that he had a clean …
Munna Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, involving alleged recovery of 17 litres of liquor near the Sone River. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the liquor …
The appellants, Lalan Sah and Ramesh Sah, appealed to the Patna High Court under Section 14(A)(2) of the CrPC against the Special Judge's refusal to grant regular bail in a case arising from an alleged assault on 4 May 2023, charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 34 and the SC/ST Act. The …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 4,242.120 litres of liquor from two vehicles and a dilapidated house. The petitioner contended that he was not in …
Mukund Kumar Jha sought anticipatory bail after the FIR alleged that a large mob, including him, surrounded a police station, destroyed documents, set fire, and assaulted police officers, injuring a lady constable. The petitioner argued that the FIR made only a general, omnibus allegation of assault …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 406.08 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He contended that he was not …
The petitioner, Ajit Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 279, 337, 338 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 10.125 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor was not in …
Raja Rai sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under IPC sections 188, 272 and 34 and the Bihar Excise Act sections 30, 38 and 41 for allegedly recovering 28 litres of liquor from an auto. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in …
The petitioner, Vijay Mukhiya, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that liquor was recovered from a motorcycle and a scooty that he did not own. He argued that no liquor was found in his immediate possession and that he was …
The petitioners, residents of Paharpur West village, sought anticipatory bail after learning that they might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 121, 121(1), 132, 74, 76, 109, 352, 351(2) and 61(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act. They contended that they have clean antecedents …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Mishra, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 alleging that 86.535 litres of liquor were recovered from his joint‑family house. He contended that he was not arrested at …
Shayam Mishra petitioned for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 384, 379, 504 and 506 of the IPC. His first anticipatory bail application was rejected because he was alleged to have caused a stab wound resulting in grievous injury. He filed a …
Manoj Kumar Jaiswal filed a written complaint on 06-06-2022 regarding an incident that occurred on 05-06-2022 and subsequently filed a writ petition seeking the police to lodge an FIR. The State contended that an FIR had already been lodged on an application filed by the petitioner on 12-02-2026, …
The petitioner, Chandrama Prasad, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, based on the recovery of 189 litres of liquor. He contended that he was implicated only because he owned the car used to …
The petitioner, Brajesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 127(2), 103(1) and 303(2) of the B.N.S. The informant’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner had been declared an absconder and that proceedings …
The petitioners, members of the family of a deceased woman, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a dowry‑related death case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The informant alleged that the victim had warned him of a threat of murder by her …
The petitioner, Satyam Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS‑Simri Bakhtiyarpur, Case No.170/2024) alleging kidnapping of a girl for marriage under IPC sections 366(A), 372, 120B, 363 and 34. The victim, now recovered, gave a statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. asserting that she was in love …
The petitioner, Sakin Kumar, was charged under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged kidnapping of a girl. The prosecution alleged that he abducted the victim, while the petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that the victim voluntarily left her home and lived with him in …
The petitioners were arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that they attempted to break a wall, committed theft of Rs.40,000 and jewelry, and threatened the informant's family. The petitioners contended that the FIR was a …
Hamida Bano, the mother‑in‑law of the informant, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The informant alleged that, after six years of childlessness, Hamida Bano pressured her son to take a second marriage and, …
The petitioner, Reshajuddin Quraishi, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 130 litres recovered. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the vehicle bearing his …
The petitioner, Khurshid Alam, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Sikti PS Case No.112 of 2020) involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The State argued that the petitioner had been declared an absconder and that proceedings under Section 82 of the …
The petitioner, Sudhir Chaudhary, was named in an FIR for alleged involvement in illegal sand mining under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 111(3) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The police raid recovered a tractor and sand, and a local chowkidar identified fifteen accused, including the petitioner, …
Chhotu Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act (Amendment) 2022, based on a farmer’s disclosure and the recovery of 50 litres of liquor. The petitioner contended that he was not arrested on the …
The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, was not named in the FIR but was implicated by police suspicion in an illegal liquor case involving the seizure of 388.8 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The prosecution alleged that a mobile phone seized …
Satya Prakash Pande was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 405 litres of liquor recovered. He contended that his name appeared only because he was the registered owner of a car, which he had sold before the seizure, and that he had no conscious …
The petitioner, Md. Ataullah, was not named in the FIR but was implicated in a case of illegal liquor trade under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 16.2 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that the motorcycle had been sold to …
Shailesh Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, with 535 litres seized. He contended that the liquor was recovered from an open public area and not from his conscious …
The petitioner Kanhaiya Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, with 95 litres of liquor seized. The petitioner argued that the liquor was recovered from an open field, not under his …
Petitioners Ravi Manjhi and Anuradha Devi were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 2,656.8 litres recovered from a hut, a bike and an open field. They contended that the …
The appellant, Md. Hasan Arshad, was charged under IPC sections 302, 120(B) and 34, and under sections 3(2)(v)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for a murder case (Korha P.S. Case No. 49 of 2023). His bail applications had been rejected twice, and he …
The petitioners, Shamsuddin Kuraishi and his son Sahil, were accused of multiple offences including assault, robbery and causing hurt, based on a complaint by a neighbour over a dispute concerning a hand‑pump and chicken shed. They contended that the allegations were false, that the injuries …
The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, with 84 litres of liquor recovered. He contended that he was implicated only because his scooty, which he had lent to a …
The petitioner, Mohammad Sarfaraz Ansari, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly engaging in the illegal trade of 180 litres of illicit liquor. He contended that he was merely the driver of the auto in which the liquor was being carried and had …
The petitioner, Hanuman Rai, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 135.180 litres seized from a car. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not recovered from his personal possession, …
The petitioner, Ganesh Mahto, feared arrest in a case (Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 427/2022) involving offences under Sections 384, 386, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He filed an anticipatory bail application, although he was not named in the FIR. The Court observed that a proceeding under …
The petitioners, Subodh Yadav and Ajay Yadav, were not named in the FIR relating to a violent arson case in Bhargama where the informant's husband was burnt alive. Their alleged involvement emerged only from a co-accused's confessional statement, and the informant, an eye‑witness, did not identify …
The petitioners, Nagendra Prasad and Sagar Kumar, were named in an FIR for assaulting an informant, allegedly causing a head injury with intent to cause death, arising from a monetary dispute. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the assault charge did not apply to the first petitioner, the …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, was implicated in a prohibition and excise case for alleged illegal liquor trade, solely because he is the registered owner of a seized vehicle, though he was not named in the FIR and no liquor was found in his possession. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing lack …
The petitioner, Rabindra Rai, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 135 litres of liquor seized from a vehicle. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that the …
The petitioner, Kamali Manjhi, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 14 litres recovered from a community hall belonging to Shakalu Manjhi. The petitioner contended that the seizure violated …
Md. Irshad Sheikh was arrested in connection with a case alleging recovery of 120 litres of illicit liquor from an e‑rickshaw, charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. The petitioner contended that he was innocent, that the liquor was recovered from the vehicle and …
The petitioner, Abhishek Ranjan, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 92.58 litres of illicit liquor alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. He applied for regular bail, asserting innocence, a clean antecedent, and offered to donate Rs. 25,000 to a …
The appellant, Pradeep Sah, was charged under several IPC offences and sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod, causing a head injury. The appellant contended he had a clean record, the FIR was lodged more than eight days after the …
The appellants, a family of six, appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the trial court’s refusal to grant anticipatory bail in a case registered under several IPC offences and Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act. The FIR …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in Complaint No. 9092 of 2023 filed under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, a former business partner, cheated the complainant, while the …
Prabhakar Singh was charged under sections 318(4) and 308(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly taking Rs.8.5 lakh from Lallan Ram without executing a sale deed. The …
The petitioners, Ayush Anand and Gyanshu Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order dated 17 November 2023 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate under Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which found that respondents Nos. 5‑7 were in possession of a disputed property. The …
The petitioner, Ashish Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 2567 of 2024) alleging assault and torture for dowry demands under Sections 85, 86 and 303(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State …
Pralhad Narhari Rupnar, convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for the death of his wife, filed an interim application under Section 389 of the CrPC seeking suspension of his life sentence and bail while his appeal is pending. The applicant argued that the conviction was perverse, relying solely …
The Special Court convicted Chetan Yashwantrao Pagare and Aman Prakatsingh Jat for kidnapping, ransom demand and murder of 22‑year‑old Vipin Bafna, imposing death sentences. The State sought confirmation of the death penalty, while the appellants challenged the conviction on grounds of insufficient …
The Special Court convicted Chetan Yashwantrao Pagare and Aman Prakatsingh Jat for kidnapping, ransom demand and murder of 22‑year‑old Vipin Bafna, imposing death sentences. The State sought confirmation of the death penalty, while the appellants challenged the conviction on grounds of insufficient …
The Special Court convicted Chetan Yashwantrao Pagare and Aman Prakatsingh Jat for kidnapping, ransom demand and murder of 22‑year‑old Vipin Bafna, imposing death sentences. The State sought confirmation of the death penalty, while the appellants challenged the conviction on grounds of insufficient …
The State (Union of India) filed an application seeking leave to appeal a 2018 judgment of the Special (CBI) Judge in Pune that acquitted Sub‑Inspector Kishor Bhikaji Ingle, who was charged under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding a bribe from a …
The petitioners, Shree Swami Samarth Construction, sought to recall the complainant and other witnesses for cross‑examination in six cheque‑bounce cases filed in 2016 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Earlier applications to set aside the "No Cross Order" had been allowed in 2021, …
The petitioners, Shree Swami Samarth Construction, sought to recall the complainant and other witnesses for cross‑examination in six cheque‑bounce cases filed in 2016 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Earlier applications to set aside the "No Cross Order" had been allowed in 2021, …
The petitioners, Shree Swami Samarth Construction, sought to recall the complainant and other witnesses for cross‑examination in six cheque‑bounce cases filed in 2016 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Earlier applications to set aside the "No Cross Order" had been allowed in 2021, …
The Bombay High Court considered six writ petitions filed by Shree Swami Samarth Construction seeking to set aside orders that denied recall of the complainant and other witnesses for cross‑examination under Section 311 of the CrPC. The complaints, filed in 2016 under Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The appellants, Leena B. Kadlag and Siddharth Arvind Waghmare, appealed against their conviction under Sections 120B and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and a one‑year simple imprisonment with a fine. They filed an interim application seeking suspension of the sentence pending the disposal of the …
The petitioner, Chandeswar Rai, was charged under IPC Sections 406, 420, 467 and 468 for allegedly preparing a false genealogy by providing misleading information. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence and that the dispute is essentially a civil matter concerning family lineage. The …
The petitioners, Ramesh Kumar, Munna Ram, Sheela Devi and Manu Ram, were implicated in a police case (Kesariya PS Case No. 555 of 2023) for alleged assault, robbery and other offences under sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC. The informant claimed that the accused assaulted his …
Petitioner Bipin Giri sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (sections 115(2), 352, 126(2), 303(2), 85, 3(5) of the BNS). The prosecution alleged assault and dowry demands by the complainant, his wife Kajal Kumari. The trial court had earlier referred the matter to a …
The petitioners Gautam Kumar, Jitendra Kumar and Mithilesh Kumar were implicated in a 2019 complaint (Case No. 243) alleging kidnapping, theft and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 363, 366, 379 and 120B. The complainant claimed the accused abducted Ranjana Devi and forced her into …
The petitioner, Ganauri Ram, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with a 2024 FIR (Case No. 42) that alleged his involvement in multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including rioting, assault, grievous hurt, and outraging the modesty of women. The …
The petitioner, Srikant Rai, was named in an FIR alleging offences under several IPC sections and the POCSO Act, including alleged rape and conspiracy. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming the FIR was filed maliciously and that the victim’s statement under Section 164 of the CrPC did not name …
The petitioners, accused in PS case No. 491 of 2025 for offences under the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest. The FIR alleged that a gang of 20‑25 persons, including the petitioners, assaulted an informant with iron rods and stones, causing grievous injuries. …
The petitioners, accused in PS case No. 491 of 2025 for offences under the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest. The FIR alleged that a gang of 20‑25 persons, including the petitioners, assaulted an informant with iron rods and stones, causing grievous injuries. …
Avinash Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a complaint alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 379, 504, 506, 120(B) and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, relating to alleged cheating and cheque bounce involving a sum of Rs. 11.30 lakh. The petitioner argued …
The petitioners, Hapunmay Hansda and Shivlal Marandi, feared arrest in a case originally filed under Section 137(2) of the BNS, later amended to include Sections 103(1), 238(A), 61 and 3(5) of the BNS. They claimed the woman petitioner was falsely implicated based on suspicion and that the alleged …
Md. Arzoo Khan, a ward secretary, was implicated in a case (PS No.67/2022) alleging misappropriation of Rs 31,22,700 of government funds meant for development schemes, under Sections 409, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, clean antecedents, …
The petitioners – Radhika Devi, Surendra Pratap and Vikash Kumar – are the mother‑in‑law, father‑in‑law and elder brother of the husband of the deceased Savita Kumari, who allegedly committed suicide following dowry‑related cruelty. They were implicated in a case registered under Sections 80(2), 85, …
Mukesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS No.516/2023) alleging offences under sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the IPC. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that a prior FIR (No.510/2023) reflected a counter‑case, and that the delay …
The petitioners, six residents of Jahari Pakari village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS case No. 332 of 2025, which alleged assault on an informant resulting in grievous hurt. The prosecution alleged that petitioner No.1, Surendra Ray, assaulted the informant with a …
Rakesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 488 of 2021) originally filed under Sections 366 and 34 of the IPC, later amended to include Sections 504, 506 and Section 6(E) of the IT Act. The victim, the informant's daughter, alleged that Kumar abducted …
The petitioner, Mithun Paswan, sought anticipatory bail in connection with Bodhgaya Police Station Case No.313 of 2024, wherein he was alleged to have participated in an assault on an informant and the informant's family members, including the use of an iron rod, leading to injuries. The prosecution …
The petitioner, Rakesh Chaudhary, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, with 75 litres of liquor recovered. He contended that his name was recorded solely based on a chowkidar's …
Prince Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Sections 30(c) and 30(d) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 50 kg of jawa mahua from a distillery, which was destroyed. The petitioner claimed he had a clean antecedent, that the alleged contraband was not in his possession, …
The petitioner, Rajan Devi, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 5 litres of liquor recovered near her house. She contended that the recovery was based solely on the testimony of a local …
Vijay Singh and his son Chandan Kumar were named in an FIR for alleged cheating of Rs. 15 lakh under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. They contended that the underlying dispute was civil, arising from a cancelled business agreement with the informant's wife, and that they have …
The petitioner, Bablu Kumar, was implicated in a complaint alleging conspiracy to forge a partition deed to unlawfully acquire land, invoking IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. He contended that the partition of the ancestral property was lawfully completed in 2011, that his mutation of share was …
The petitioners Raju Kumar, Shyam Babu Paswan and Vinod Paswan were charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his family with an iron rod and sword, causing injuries. They contended that the injuries were minor, …
The petitioner, Vinay Shankar Chaudhary, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of ten litres of liquor from another person, Angan Kumar. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and …
The petitioner, Shambhu Sah, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging assault, robbery, and other offences under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (B.N.S.) Act, 2023, arising from a land‑dispute incident on 18‑02‑2026. He claimed the allegations were false, citing …
The petitioners were named in an FIR (Phulparas PS Case No. 66 of 2026) under several offences of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, alleged to have assaulted an informant and family members with intent to cause death arising from a neighbourhood dispute. The petitioners contended that the incident …
The petitioner, Sarswati Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a vehicle she owned. She argued she had no conscious possession, was not arrested at the spot, …
The petitioner, Kamlesh Kumar, was implicated in a case alleging possession of 76.125 litres of liquor recovered from his Maruti car, invoking Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not …
