Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17749 judgments · newest first · showing 3001–3200
The petitioners, Sheodayal Ram and Ram Ayodhya Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 53 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not arrested at …
Manish Mandal applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 11.625 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from his motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioner, Sohan Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 42.5 litres of illicit liquor and charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and offering to donate Rs. 25,000 to …
The petitioner, Sanjit Rai, was implicated in an excise case for alleged illegal manufacture and transport of illicit liquor, though his name does not appear in the FIR. The prosecution alleged that he owned the motorcycle used to carry nine litres of liquor, but the recovery was not from his …
The petitioner, Sikindra Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 12.75 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and possessed a …
The petitioners, Santosh Yadav and Shambhu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging that liquor was seized from a truck not owned by them and that they were implicated based on secret information without …
Petitioner Pano Devi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(b) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that the alleged liquor was recovered from a riverbank and not from her possession. The petitioner, a woman with one …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar Panday, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 518 litres of liquor recovered. He contended that his name was listed only based on a co-accused's disclosure and …
The petitioner, Mahamaya Rai, was named in an FIR for alleged offences under the NDPS Act after 46 kg of ganja was recovered from his ancestral house. While the police raided the premises, his two sons fled but were later apprehended; however, no direct disclosure linked the petitioner to the …
The petitioner, Gujesh Kumar Ray, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, with 18.75 litres of liquor recovered. He contended that his name was mentioned only based on a co‑accused's …
The petitioner, Suresh Sahani, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, with 17 litres of liquor recovered. He contended that his name was listed solely based on a chowkidar’s …
The petitioner, Bharat Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 62 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 17.5 litres of illicit liquor was seized from a co‑accused who named him. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a confessional statement, …
The petitioner, Saroj Kumar Paswan, was implicated in a case of illegal liquor trade under Sections 30(a) and 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 1.2 litres of illicit liquor were recovered. He was not named in the FIR and argued that he was only the owner of the motorcycle used to …
The petitioner, Pankaj Manjhi, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly engaging in the illegal trade of liquor, with 18.9 litres of illicit spirit recovered from a motorcycle. The petitioner contended that his name was listed solely based on a …
The petitioner, Lalan Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 495 litres of liquor from his Scorpio vehicle. He contended that he was not present at the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and he was unaware of his …
The petitioner, Md. Salman, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and that the vehicle was …
The petitioners, five women residing near Srinagar Police Station, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving numerous offences under the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. They contended that they were falsely implicated after merely …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 0.375 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …
The petitioners, Mamina Khatoon, Saleya Khatoon and Sheikh Jokhu, were named in an FIR under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting a complainant with an iron rod and knife, causing grievous injuries. The FIR was lodged on 8 February 2026 based on a complaint filed …
Rohit Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of 518,400 litres of liquor from a vehicle and a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no …
Maharaj Kumar, the brother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, was implicated in a murder case (Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023) based on a suspicion that a dowry demand led to the crime. The petitioner, who lives separately in Delhi, argued that he had no involvement in the …
Munilal Yadav was named in an FIR for assaulting an informant’s son under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. He argued that the dispute arose from a neighbourhood quarrel, the injuries were simple, and no criminal case was filed by his side, negating any intention to cause death. …
The petitioners, Audhesh Rai and Rajan Kumar Yadav, were implicated in a case of illegal liquor manufacturing under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, based on the recovery of 450 litres of spirit from a thatched shed. They argued that they were not named in the FIR, that the …
The petitioners, six brothers and a sister-in-law, were named in an FIR for assault, robbery, and outraging modesty under various sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from a dispute in Parsa Bazar. They contended that the criminal case was fabricated to further a pending land title …
Petitioners Bittu Kumar and Nitesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 89.61 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle. They argued they were not caught in possession, were not owners of the vehicle, and …
The petitioner, Abhinandan Kumar Ray, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 18 litres of liquor from his cowshed. He argued that the liquor was not in his …
The petitioner, Radhe Yadav, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 25.6 litres of liquor from a public riverbank, with no possession found on him. He argued he has a clean antecedent and the recovery was based solely on a confessional statement …
The petitioners, comprising Basanti Devi, Umesh Sahni, Neeraj Kumar and Suraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 188.94 litres of liquor from a maize field. They contended that the liquor was not …
The petitioner, Md. Bulbul, was not named in the FIR but was implicated in a robbery case (Puraini P.S. Case No. 144 of 2025) based on a confessional statement of co‑accused Md. Fahim. The FIR alleged theft of cash, identity documents and a mobile phone from a finance branch manager. The petitioner …
Petitioners Prince Kumar and Golu Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor from an auto. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not in possession of the liquor, were not …
The petitioner, Subhash Raut, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 for allegedly manufacturing and trading illicit liquor, with ten litres of liquor recovered near an open bush area. Raut applied for anticipatory bail, contending that his …
The petitioners, Mohan Sada and his sons Ram Kumar Sada and Ajay Sada, were named in an FIR (Sursand PS Case No. 446 of 2024) under Sections 80(2) read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for allegedly causing the death of an informant's married daughter over a dowry demand for a …
The petitioner, Irshad Alam @ Mithun, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal matter arising from a case registered under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. During oral arguments, the court noted that the proceedings had already been initiated under the said provision. Relying on the …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 9.27 litres of liquor recovered from a hut belonging to Dhanji Singh. The petitioner contended that the recovery was not …
Badal Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 13.5 litres of liquor were recovered from an asbestos‑shaded room allegedly linked to him, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The petitioner asserted he has a clean antecedent, the …
The petitioner, Khagesh Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 195.375 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and …
The petitioner Ranjan Kumar was named in an FIR for alleged loot of Rs.2000, an Aadhaar card and a mobile phone, and was charged under Sections 304(2), 3(5) and later 317(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. He contended that he was implicated solely on the suspicion of a co-accused, Rohit Kumar, and …
Petitioner Raja Singh was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, based on the recovery of 22 litres of liquor from an open public place. The petitioner contended that his name was listed solely on a …
The petitioner, Tufan Baitha, was named in an FIR for allegedly possessing 28 litres of illicit liquor and violating Sections 272 and 273 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the seized liquor was not in his conscious …
Petitioner Pradip Mishra sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He has two prior cases, one involving alleged recovery of 777.600 litres of liquor from two Scorpio vehicles, but was not arrested on the spot …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, owner of a vehicle from which 153 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the vehicle’s ownership alone …
Surendra Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 15 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not …
Bimla Devi was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under IPC sections 274, 275 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 156.105 litres recovered from her house. She contended that the house was occupied by several adult family members …
Dashrath Singh Bhokta was named in an FIR for alleged involvement in the recovery of 60 kg of doda from the open Sankhwa forest, invoking Sections 8, 17(c) and 18(c) of the NDPS Act. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the recovery was from a public place and that only suspicion …
The petitioner, Sanjay Ram, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, with 7.04 litres of liquor seized. He contended that the seizure was made from the house of a co‑accused and not from his …
The petitioners, three residents of Nilmani Pokhar, were implicated in a 2018 case (PS Jaynagar No. 551) for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor, with 126 litres of IMFL seized. They argued that the liquor was recovered from an open area accessible to the public and not from …
The petitioner, Sarju Vind, was implicated in an excise case for alleged illegal manufacture and transport of illicit liquor, based on the recovery of two litres of liquor from a motorcycle registered in his name. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, had no knowledge of the liquor being …
The petitioner, Raj Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016, arising from a collision between his private Scorpio and a police vehicle that injured a police officer. The petitioner …
The petitioner, Prakash Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, after 85 litres of liquor were recovered. He contended that the vehicle bearing his registration was used by his …
The petitioner, Ratneshwar Kumar, a former Data Entry Operator at Buxar Treasury, was dismissed after an FIR was lodged alleging he received a bribe from pensioner Saryu Ojha on 22 July 2020. The FIR was filed only after a video surfaced on 28 August 2020, and the investigation relied solely on that …
The appellant, Bihul Yadav, appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case filed under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several provisions of the Indian Penal Code and Arms Act. The informant alleged a chain of assaults and offences …
The appellants, a group of men from the Pandit family, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several sections of the Bihar Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant and her son over a wage dispute at the informant's house. The trial …
The appellants, J.P. Yadav and Chunnu Yadav, were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and attempting to snatch a chain during a dispute at Chatar crossing. They …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Mahila P.S. Case No. 73 of 2025) where he was charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that he assaulted the …
The appellant, Rahul Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 364, 328, 302 and 120(B) and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for the alleged murder of a victim who had gone missing. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the trial court, prompting an appeal under Section 14‑A(2) …
The petitioner, Rupesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being named an accused in a murder case (IPC sections 302 and 201) arising from a headless body discovered in 2020. The FIR was lodged on 17 July 2020, and the investigation identified the petitioner only in 2022, prompting his bail …
The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittal of Jasubhai Mangabhai Patel and another under Sections 306 r/w 114 IPC, alleging they abetted the suicide of Kiritbhai. The prosecution relied on alleged threats recorded in the deceased's diary and writings on his shirt, but the trial court found the …
The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittal of Jasubhai Mangabhai Patel and another under Sections 306 r/w 114 IPC, alleging they abetted the suicide of Kiritbhai. The prosecution relied on alleged threats recorded in the deceased's diary and writings on his shirt, but the trial court found the …
The petitioners, the father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of the complainant, sought quashing of the order of cognizance dated 08‑05‑2019 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498A, 354B/34 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged dowry …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a 2010 order of the Judicial Magistrate that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498A, 323 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. They argued that the case had become infructuous. The State, …
The appellant, Birja Prasad, was arrested after customs officials intercepted a bus and allegedly recovered 20 kg of charas, of which 10 kg was said to be in his bag. He was convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act and sentenced to ten years’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs 1 …
The petitioner, Raja Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 342 litres of liquor from a seized vehicle. He argued that the ownership report of the …
The petitioners, Kundan Kumar, Rudal Kumar and Suresh Das, were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 900 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, although no liquor was seized from them and the informant’s identity was omitted from the FIR. They sought …
The petitioner, Dilkhush Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered against him for alleged offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 330.840 litres of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle he owned. The …
The appellant, Anand Prasad Yadav, was convicted by the Sessions Court under Section 324 of the IPC for allegedly throwing acid on four victims during a land dispute. On appeal, the High Court examined the testimony of seven prosecution witnesses, most of whom were injured parties or relatives, and …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar Choudhary, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 195.12 litres of liquor recovered. He contended that the liquor was seized from a tempo he owned, which is a …
Vickky Kumar was arrested in connection with an excise case alleging illegal manufacture and transport of 69 litres of illicit liquor, the liquor being recovered from a motorcycle registered in his name. The petitioner contended that he did not have conscious possession of the liquor and that his …
The petitioner, Sujeet Sahni, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 16.875 liters recovered from an abandoned hut. The petitioner argued that the seizure was made in a public open place, …
The petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a Family Court order dated 30 May 2015 that directed him to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.4,000 to his wife and Rs.3,000 to his minor daughter. The petitioner argued that circumstances had changed and …
The petitioner, Natraj Gupta, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 10 July 2018 in which the Additional District and Sessions Judge had granted him anticipatory bail with several conditions, notably Condition No. 2, which the petitioner …
The petitioner, Dinesh Ram, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a public place near a peepal tree. He has four prior cases under the …
The petitioner, Amit Yadav, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 126 litres of liquor recovered. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious physical possession, that the …
The petitioners, Rakesh Kumar and Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 650 litres of illicit country‑made liquor recovered from an open place. The prosecution alleged their …
Six brothers from Danapur were implicated in a case alleging theft of cattle and assault on a complainant, Rakesh, under sections of the B.N.S.S and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. Petitioners numbered 3 and 4 withdrew their anticipatory bail applications, while petitioners 1, 2, 5 …
The petitioner, Md. Kalamuddin, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a complaint under Section 83 of the Criminal Procedure Code. During arguments, the court observed that the proceedings were initiated under Section 83, which deals with complaints and …
The petitioners, four individuals from Jalal Basant village, were named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with a recovery of 15 litres of country-made liquor. They contended that the police had …
The petitioner, Nitin Raj, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 69, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S.S., based on allegations by an informant that he had a non‑consensual relationship and recorded a video of her. The petitioner contended that the relationship was …
The petitioner, Ramesh Mahto, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 8.4 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. …
The petitioners, Niraj Gupta and Thakur Ritesh Kumar, feared arrest in a 2019 case (PS 137) involving alleged assault and property damage, charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 308, 504 and 34. Although the offences were initially bailable, a charge‑sheet was filed in 2023 and their earlier …
The petitioner, a former District Welfare Officer, was implicated in a vigilance case alleging he accepted a bribe of Rs.40,000 and amassed disproportionate assets of about Rs.69.9 lakh. He applied for anticipatory bail under Sections 13(2) and 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, …
The petitioner, Sandeep Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly discarding 15.75 litres of illicit foreign liquor. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but no liquor …
The petitioners, Sanjeev Kumar and Rajeev Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. They claimed they were falsely implicated by an informant with whom they have a property dispute, alleging that …
The petitioner, Md. Raju, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 7 liters of liquor recovered near his cottage. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was not in his conscious …
The petitioner, Umrawati Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 110 litres of liquor from a field she shared with Naresh Prasad. She argued that she was not arrested at the scene, no …
Petitioner Rajiv Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(iii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 alleging he was involved in the recovery of 90 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that he was not in …
The petitioner, Mohammad Jahruddin Ansari, was not named in the FIR but was implicated in an alleged illegal liquor trade based on a disclosure by an apprehended individual. The police recovered 135 litres of illicit liquor, but there was no evidence of the petitioner's conscious physical …
Akshay Kumar Ray, the owner of a motorcycle from which 24 litres of liquor was allegedly recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware of any …
Santosh Singh Yadav was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, with 319.68 litres seized from his indigo car. The petitioner contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession …
The petitioner, Rajendra Patel, was apprehended in connection with a robbery case (PS Case No. 92 of 2021) involving alleged theft of a bag of torn currency notes, for which the police recovered the bag and returned it to the informant. The petitioner was not named in the FIR and the only …
The petitioner, Joginder Sah, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly engaging in the illegal manufacture and trade of liquor, with 6.6 litres of illicit liquor recovered. The petitioner contended that his name was recorded solely based on a …
The petitioner, Raja Paswan, was implicated in an excise case (PS No.219 of 2025) for alleged illegal manufacture and possession of 20,500 liters of illicit liquor, although his name does not appear in the FIR. He argued that the liquor was not recovered from his conscious possession; the motorcycle …
The petitioner, Amar Nath, challenged a cognizance order dated 29‑05‑2014 taken by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, under IPC sections 406, 420 and 34. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner had taken an election certificate from the informant, Manoj Kumar, and coerced him to vote for …
The petitioner, Md. Gufran, was implicated in a case alleging possession of 135 litres of illicit Nepali liquor on his Honda Shine motorcycle, alleged to be a violation of Sections 274, 275 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that the motorcycle had …
The petitioner, Nishant Kumar Shukla, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 51 litres of liquor from a car. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the …
The petitioner, Sandeep Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Excise Act, where 10 litres of liquor and 80 litres of fermented material were recovered from a house that is part of a joint …
The petitioner, Md Jalal, was arrested for possession of 9.43 grams of smack under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act. He filed an application for regular bail, claiming innocence and a clean antecedent, having been in custody since 29‑04‑2026. The State opposed the bail on the ground of the …
Ramsikil Mahto was named in an FIR for alleged involvement in the illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 135 litres recovered in connection with Sursand P.S. Case No.134 of 2026 under Section 317(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and …
Naulesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a FIR (Ghoshi PS Case No. 37 of 2025) alleging assault on the informant's son and others, with charges under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (B.N.S.) and an added section 103(2). He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the incident …
The petitioner, Mohit Kumar Chaudhary, was named in an FIR for alleged possession of 27 litres of illicit liquor and violation of Sections 272, 273 IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed that his motorcycle, which was used to transport the liquor, had been lent in …
Chandan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 1,533 litres of codeine cough syrup, recovered from a house under construction that was open to the public. The petitioner contended that the premises were controlled by laborers and masons, so the seizure could not be said …
Dr. Priyanka Kumari, a government doctor, was named in an FIR for allegedly possessing 10 litres of foreign liquor in violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She contended that the liquor was not in her conscious possession and that she had sold her scooter, the vehicle …
The petitioners, Washim Raja and Md. Kashif Raja, were named in an FIR for assaulting an informant and his family under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. They contended that the incident was a mutual free‑fight in which both sides sustained injuries, and that the injuries were …
The petitioner, Raj Kumar Ram, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Non‑Transported Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 24.49 litres of liquor recovered from a house …
The petitioner, Alok Kumar Thakur, was named in an FIR for alleged outrage and teasing of a 19‑year‑old informant, alleged to have occurred on 10 March 2026 and reported on 12 March 2026. He sought anticipatory bail, contending that the incident was a mere threat arising from a neighbourhood dispute …
The petitioner, Asha Devi, was named in an FIR for allegedly kidnapping a newborn baby of the informant's daughter, who later died due to childbirth complications. The petitioner contended that the real accused is her son, Rishuraj, who had married the informant's daughter and fathered the child, …
Chandra Devi, the owner of a motorcycle from which 24.75 litres of liquor was seized, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. She argued that she had no knowledge of the liquor being in her vehicle, that the liquor …
Vikrama Sahani was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 56 litres seized from an open area. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his conscious physical possession and that the seizure was made from a public place, seeking anticipatory bail. …
The petitioner, Upendra Rai, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 135 litres recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that the seizure was not made from his conscious possession and that procedural requirements under Section 103(4) of the …
The petitioner, Uday Prasad, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 5 liters of liquor recovered from a hut near Pitambara Temple. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his conscious …
The petitioner, Jitendra Chauhan, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, with 255 litres of liquor recovered from an abandoned hut. He contended that the liquor was found in a …
Rampukar Singh applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor and spirits from a location not owned by him and seizure of two motorcycles. He contended that no contraband was …
The petitioners, Naziya Khatoon and Kitabuddin Ansari, were named in an FIR for alleged involvement in the murder of an informant's son, alleged to have been carried out by their daughter-in-law through poisoning. The petitioners argued that the only substantive allegation was against the …
Vikash Kumar Yadav applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 216 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no ownership of the seized vehicles, …
The petitioner, Sudama Ray, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 32 litres of liquor recovered from a bamboo orchard near his house. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the …
The petitioner, Kailash Paswan, was not named in the FIR but was implicated because illicit liquor was recovered from a Bajaj Discover motorcycle registered in his name, which he had lent to co-accused Rohit Kumar. He contended that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and that the recovery …
The petitioner, Atul Kumar Dubey, was not named in the FIR relating to an assault and theft under IPC Section 394. During investigation, a co‑accused, Amresh Kumar, made a confessional statement implicating the petitioner, while another co‑accused, Raja Kumar, allegedly stole the motorcycle. The …
Petitioners Chotu Kumar and Aniket Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15.3 litres of liquor. They argued that they were not arrested at the spot, the …
The petitioner, a 78‑year‑old senior citizen, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the pending complaint case No.1146(C) of 1999, which involved offences under Sections 323, 324, 341, 348, 354, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal …
The appellants, Ram Babu Roy and Lal Babu Rai, were charged under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant at a marriage ceremony. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was …
The appellant, Prem Kumar Paswan, was convicted by a Sessions Court for raping an eight‑year‑old girl, under Section 376 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment with a fine. He appealed, challenging the conviction on grounds of procedural lapses, lack …
The petitioner, Sumesh Kumar, was arrested in a case alleging kidnapping of a minor girl (the victim) and offences under IPC sections 363, 366A and POCSO Act section 8. He contended that he is innocent, asserting that the victim’s statement recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC shows they had …
The petitioner, Kishu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging dowry harassment under Section 85 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The marriage took place on 13‑12‑2021 and the complainant alleged continuous dowry demands and cruelty. The petitioner …
The appellant, Ashutosh Kumar, brother of Amrit, appealed under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a complaint alleging assault, criminal intimidation and other offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. The complainant, Amrapali …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 07-04-2018 passed by the Additional District Judge (VI) of Siwan, which had dismissed their revision petition against a cognizance order in Complaint Case No. 146 of 2016. The trial …
The petitioners, a group of Pathak family members, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 08-06-2018 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Siwan, which dismissed their discharge petition filed under Section 227 Cr.P.C. The High Court considered …
The petitioner, an 80‑year‑old man, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of an FIR registered under Sections 406, 420, 467 and 468 IPC alleging forgery and conspiracy in a property transaction. The FIR was lodged three months after the informant, the vendor, had filed civil …
The petitioners, Md. Islam and his wife Khushnama Khatoon, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 20-08-2018 that had rejected their earlier application under Section 227 CrPC. The order was passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, …
The petitioner, Om Prakash, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Excise Act, where 464.94 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a pick‑up van he owned. He argued that he had a clean …
The petitioner, Nokhlal Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 11 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his possession, and the complaint …
The petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 16 July 2016 that had dismissed his earlier petition under Section 239 Cr.P.C. The trial court later sent a letter indicating that the original case (Araria P.S. Case No. 302 of 2012) had …
Mukesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 62 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession, the FIR omitted the …
The petitioner, Maga Ram Sahni, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashment of FIR No. 204 of 2010 registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The State had already filed a charge sheet on 29 August 2010. The …
The petitioners, Shamim Haidar and Pradeep Kumar, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 08‑07‑2015 in which the Siwan Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 472 and 34 of the …
The petitioners, a group of six individuals, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 30 March 2011 passed by the Sub‑divisional Judicial Magistrate of Vaishali, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 498A and 323 of the Indian …
The petitioner, Syed Faiz Ahmad, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 406, 420, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging fraud involving a large sum of money invested by an informant. The petitioner contended that the allegations primarily target his partners …
Amit Kumar, the owner of a pick‑up van, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 155.76 litres of liquor. He applied for anticipatory bail, contending that he had a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and had no conscious …
The petitioner, Ashwani Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of large quantities of beer and liquor from a location not in his possession. He argued that the police relied on secret information without proper …
Vikrant Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(A), 32(i)(iii) and 41(i)(iii) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 910.320 litres of liquor from a tractor he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was not arrested at the spot, and …
Ashok Ram was implicated in a case under Section 47(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 30 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession, and possessed a clean …
Talib, the owner of a car from which 284 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, alleging that he had no knowledge of the alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act and that the driver acted without his consent. He …
The case arose from a violent incident on disputed land in Samastipur where the informant, Md. Nizamuddin, alleged that 23 persons looted construction materials and assaulted him and others. The trial court acquitted fifteen of the accused, convicting only three (Md. Akhlak, Md. Hussain and Md. …
The petitioners, Deepak Paswan and Bhulti Devi, father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of the complainant, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case filed under Section 85 of the B.N.S. The complainant, Babita Kumari, alleged that after her marriage she was demanded a dowry of Rs.1 …
Rabindra Nath Pandey filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 11 April 2018 passed by the First Trial Court, Rohtas. He requested liberty to raise all points raised in his petition before the trial court at an …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 07-07-2018 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 406, 494, 498 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (II) of Saharsa had …
The petitioner, Vishal Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 100 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, that the liquor was …
The petitioner, Istekhar Alam, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 27 litres of liquor were recovered from his car. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the time of …
The petitioner, Md. Imran Alam, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 78.75 litres of liquor from a vehicle, although he was not arrested at the scene and did not have the liquor in his conscious possession. The police …
The petitioners Shamsher Alam, Jamila Khatoon and Hajra Khatoon filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 12 June 2018 passed by the Additional District Judge‑II, Gaya, which had rejected their discharge petition filed under Section 227 CrPC in …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashment of FIR No. 265 of 2017 registered at Kesariya Police Station for offences under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The learned court concerned reported …
The petitioners, Ganesh Singh and Vijay Kumar Rai, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 16 July 2018 that had set aside a trial court judgment. The order in question was issued by the Additional District and …
The petitioner, Rohit Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 936 litres of liquor from a public road. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not …
Petitioners Pravin Kumar, Shushma Sinha and Vinita Kumari filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash earlier orders and stay further proceedings in a Mahila Police Station case. The petitioners argued that they had already been …
The petitioner, Hari Narayan Thakur, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 07-07-2018 that had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 279, 465 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner argued that the case had become …
The petitioner, Sahil Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Tandwa P.S. Case No. 115 of 2025) under Sections 25(1‑B) and 26 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a pistol, live cartridges and a country‑made gun were recovered, but the recovery was from co‑accused …
The petitioner, Karanjeet Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, with 138.060 liters recovered from a mango orchard. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of liquor from his bamboo orchard. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting a clean criminal record and claiming that the liquor was concealed by …
Petitioner Raj Kishore Ray sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of two litres of liquor from a Santro car. He asserted a clean criminal record, non‑ownership of the vehicle, and that the …
Vishal Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 243 litres of liquor were seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his …
The petitioners, Raj Kumar and Kunal Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged recovery of 6,912 litres of liquor from a truck, with charges under Sections 317(5), 111, 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. They argued …
Manoj Kahar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of two litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that the …
The petitioner, Raj Gupta, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The informant, a neighbour, claimed that Gupta and his wife verbally abused him on 15 January 2026 and that Gupta assaulted …
The petitioner, Md. Azhar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2016 case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 307, 504 and 506 of the IPC. He claimed to have a clean record and alleged that the informant falsely implicated him, noting that no arrest or Section 82 …
Petitioner Ranjan Sahani applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested. The petitioner then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted …
The petitioner, Shobhi Kumari, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bihar Non‑Statutory (BNS) Act, 2023. She claimed she has a clean record, is a woman, and that the informant, a neighbour, falsely lodged …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Rajak, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging that 8.640 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was …
Chhote Lal Ram was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, based on the recovery of four litres of liquor from a motorcycle dicky. The petitioner contended that the motorcycle was lent to a family friend …
The petitioners Ranjay Singh, Raju Paswan and Vijay Paswan were named in an FIR for assaulting an informant, alleged to have caused head and bodily injuries under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. They contended that the case was false, asserting that the head injury was inflicted …
The petitioner, Rohit Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, where liquor was allegedly recovered from various locations including vacant land. He contended that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, has a …
The petitioner, Jitendra Yadav, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor and violations of the Arms Act, with 13 litres of liquor seized from a motorcycle and 21 litres from a house. He contended that he had no connection to the motorcycle and that the house …
The petitioners, three residents of Ratanpur village, were named in an FIR (P.S. Case No.89 of 2026) under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault on an informant and police officers. They contended that the FIR did not specifically implicate them, as the alleged …
Vikash Kumar Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41 of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 255.5 litres of liquor from a Chevrolet car he owned. The petitioner argued that he had a clean …
Mohan Manjhi was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly manufacturing illicit liquor, with eight litres recovered from a tanker at his residence. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious physical possession and that the …
The petitioner, Satan Ram, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 (Amendment) after 14 litres of liquor were recovered from a tanker. He contended that the liquor was recovered from a joint …
Krishna Pasi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from locations not belonging to him and asserting that he was not arrested and has a clean antecedent. The …
The petitioner, Suraj Bhan Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 8.25 litres of liquor were recovered from a house not belonging to him and that he had no possession of the liquor. He …
The petitioners, Ravi Kamat and his wife Anita Devi, were named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with six liters of liquor recovered from an open area behind their shop. They contested that the liquor …
The petitioners, three women, were named in an FIR alleging kidnapping of a 16‑year‑old girl for illicit intercourse or marriage, under sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. They contended that the allegations arose from a …
The petitioner, Subham Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged theft of cash and jewellery from a neighbour's house, under Sections 331(4) and 305 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR was based largely on suspicion arising from a neighbourhood dispute, and the petitioner asserted a clean …
The petitioner, Raju Kushawaha, sought anticipatory bail after a police raid recovered 882 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle he owned, alleging he was not in possession and was unaware of the driver’s misuse. He argued that he has a clean criminal record and that ownership of the vehicle alone …
The petitioner, Rajesh Ram, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, after 42 litres of liquor were recovered from an open maize field belonging to Sunil Bhagat. He applied for anticipatory bail, …
The petitioner, Narendra Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, after 45 litres of liquor were recovered from a public carrier. Counsel argued that the liquor was not in the …
Rabri Kumari sought anticipatory bail after the police seized 65 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned, alleging a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She argued she had no conscious possession, was not arrested at the spot, and was unaware that Lalo Yadav …
The petitioner, Tanun Miyan, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code alleging defalcation of Rs. 4,69,895 from funds allocated for the Nal Jal Yojana in Gram Maharani Bhopat. The petitioner contended that the allegations were politically motivated …
Shakuntala Devi and Pramod Singh, the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, filed a bail application fearing arrest in a case alleging murder and dowry offences. The prosecution alleged they killed the deceased, charging them under Sections 80(2), 103(1), 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic …
The petitioners, Ram Bali Singh and family members, were named in an FIR for assault with an iron rod during a land dispute, alleged under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They contended that the incident was a "free fight" with no intention to cause death and that the injuries …
Puja Devi, the petitioner, was not named in the FIR but was implicated in a case of illegal liquor trade under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act because a motorcycle registered in her name was used to transport 25 litres of illicit liquor. She contended that the …
The petitioners – Lata Devi and her sons Sintu and Ashish – were named in an FIR for allegedly kidnapping a 16‑year‑old girl with the intent of illicit intercourse or marriage, under Sections 96, 137(2) read with 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They contended that they were implicated only …
The petitioner, Koshila Devi, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 16 liters recovered from the back side of her house. She contended that the liquor was found in an open area accessible to the public and not under her conscious possession, …
The petitioner, Dewandar Prasad, was named in an FIR for alleged assault and related offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, arising from a land dispute. He contended that the incident was a free‑fight in which both parties were injured and that he had no intention to …
The petitioner, Akash Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 30 litres of liquor recovered from a public roadside. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was …
The petitioner, Dhaneshwar Kumar Pandey, was named in an FIR under Section 304B of the IPC for the death of the informant's daughter, who died before reaching a hospital. The petitioner's counsel argued that the FIR lacked any allegation of dowry demand and that the post‑mortem and forensic reports …
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 360 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he was not present at the spot of …
The petitioner, Arju Hussain, was named in an FIR for alleged involvement in transporting 673.2 liters of illicit liquor using a vehicle that bore police markings. He contended that he was merely the registered owner of the vehicle, which had been sold to Kamlesh Kumar Singh on 12-02-2022, well …
The petitioners, Manish Kumar, Ram Shobhit Das and Sunita Devi, were implicated in a dowry death case (IPC 304B read with 34) after the death of the informant's daughter, alleged to be due to a dowry demand of Rs.3 lakh and a motorcycle. The petitioners contended that the death was a natural suicide …
The petitioner, Raju Das, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of liquor recovered from a joint family house. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, and that the …
The petitioner, Anil Singh, was not named in the FIR but was implicated in an alleged illegal liquor case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022, based on a co-accused's confession. The seizure involved 25 litres of illicit liquor, but the court noted that the liquor was …
The petitioners, Mithlesh Kumar and Sanjit Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 154.890 litres of liquor. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not arrested …
The petitioners, Ashok Paswan and Samit Kumar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 37 and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery of 1.875 litres of liquor from Nikki Devi. They argued they have a clean …
The petitioner, Nilam Devi, mother‑in‑law of the deceased, was named in an FIR for alleged involvement in the dowry‑related death of the informant's daughter under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The husband of the deceased had earlier been acquitted, with the informant …
Petitioners Anand Yadav and Satish Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 675 litres of liquor from a field belonging to another person. They argued that no liquor was found in their possession, the …
