Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17749 judgments · newest first · showing 3201–3400
The petitioner, Vishnukant Dube, was not named in the FIR relating to theft of diesel/crude oil from the Barauni pipeline, but a copy of his voter ID was found in a vehicle owned by his brother, leading to his implication. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that mere possession of his ID does …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, was not named in the FIR but was implicated in an alleged illegal liquor trade involving the recovery of 70 litres of illicit liquor from a scooty under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that the seized liquor was not in his physical …
The petitioners, Bhikhari Manjhi and Pramod Manjhi, were named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 10 litres of country-made liquor recovered from a bush near their house. They contended that the …
The petitioner, Suranjan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 32 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no liquor in his …
Laxminiya Devi applied for anticipatory bail in a case under the Excise Act where 34.8 litres of liquor were recovered from a house that is part of a joint family property. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, and that the liquor was not in her conscious …
The petitioner, Ashok Nat Dhuman Nat, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. He argued that the alleged 8‑litre liquor was recovered from a place adjacent to his house, not from his possession, and that the informant (a watchman) had not …
Gore Chaudhary, a resident of Nawada, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 47(A) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from a jointly owned house. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the property being a …
The petitioner, Md. Juman, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with ten litres of liquor recovered from a tanker. He contended that his name was linked to the case based on secret information and …
Babloo Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 32.250 litres of liquor recovered from the courtyard of his house, which is a joint family …
The petitioner, Champa Devi, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 80 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. She claimed a clean antecedent and offered to donate Rs. 25,000 to charity without admitting guilt. The State opposed her bail …
The petitioner, Asha Devi (also known as Kaushalya Devi), was named in an FIR for alleged mental and physical cruelty and related offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. She contended that the allegations were false, arising from a property dispute, and that she is the second wife living …
The petitioner, Raja Das, was named in an FIR for alleged involvement in the illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 540 milliliters of country-made liquor recovered in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the liquor …
Manohar Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016‑2018 for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with three litres of liquor reportedly recovered from the dicky of his motorcycle. The petitioner contended that the …
Petitioner Md. Aftab, proprietor of Mediaim Health Care, was named in a complaint alleging cheating under IPC sections 420 and 34 for supplying defective medical equipment and threatening the informant. The informant, Diwakar Narayan Upadhyay, claimed the petitioner sent machines worth Rs. 3,00,900 …
Petitioners Rupa Kumari and Shailendra Prasad filed a petition seeking quash of FIR No. 664 of 2021 registered at Agamkuan Police Station for offences under Sections 341, 323, 354A, 379, 498A, 504, 506/34 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The FIR alleged dowry demands, cruelty …
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 21‑06‑2014 by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. They argued …
The petitioner, Md. Mehtab Alam, was charged in a complaint case (No. 287 of 2024) under Sections 323 and 498A IPC for alleged torture and dowry harassment of his wife, Bibi Rabiya Khatoon. He denied the allegations and feared arrest, offering to pay Rs. 3,000 per month as temporary relief. The High …
A.K. Biswas, the appellant in a criminal appeal, died on 28 July 2025. His counsel sought abatement of the appeal under Section 394 of the Criminal Procedure Code, noting that no relative was willing to continue the proceedings. The CBI, representing the State, argued that even if the appeal is …
The appellant, Lalan Singh Chandrabansi, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and abusing an informant and his family using caste slurs during a private altercation linked to a land dispute. The appellant contended that …
The appellant, Sumit Kumar, was charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the informant’s family, attempting to forcefully marry the informant’s daughter, and abusing caste names in …
The appellants, Kesho Yadav and Arun Kumar, appealed under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against an order dated 07.11.2025 that had denied them bail in a case arising from an alleged assault on a informant during a field‑ploughing dispute. …
Rekha Devi, the wife of Ganesh Sah, was implicated in a case alleging she snatched a gold chain and participated in assault against an informant, alleged to be a caste‑based offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. She appealed the order dated …
The petitioners, six members of the Mahto family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 354B, 379, 504 and 506/34. The informant’s counsel informed the court that the petitioners had been declared absconders and that proceedings under …
The petitioner, Chandrasekhar Singh, was implicated in a complaint (No. 632 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 318(1), 318(4) and 351(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023, relating to a disputed sale of a brick‑kiln partnership. The complainant claimed that while three partners, …
The petitioners, who are in‑laws of Respondent No.2, challenged the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's order rejecting their applications for discharge in a criminal case (CC No.1283/PW/2020). The FIR alleged only that the in‑laws urged the respondent to seek divorce and contained no other …
Kundan Kumar was arrested on 27 September 2022 in connection with a POCSO case involving alleged rape, assault, intimidation and attempts to poison the victim, as alleged in FIR dated 25 November 2019. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the trial was still pending, while the State highlighted …
The petitioner, Asha Kumari, filed an Original Criminal Miscellaneous proceeding under Section 340 of the CrPC seeking an inquiry into alleged false and frivolous statements made by the respondents in two criminal writ cases (CWJC No. 7006 of 2017 and CWJC No. 15940 of 2017). The key issue was …
The petitioners, Sunita Devi, Mithu Kumar, Nirala Kumar and Pankaj Kumar, feared arrest in a case (Minapur PS Case No. 243 of 2023) involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code. They argued that they have clean antecedents, are not named in the FIR, and that anticipatory bail had already …
Arvind Singh, a fishery leaseholder, challenged a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate's order that converted a Section 163 proceeding into a Section 164 proceeding under the Bihar Non‑Statutory (BNSS) and imposed prohibitory restraints on his land. He sought writs of certiorari, mandamus, and compensation, …
The petitioner, Imran Nobi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple IPC offences and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act. He argued that his two prior cases pertained to the same offence as the present FIR and cited a similar anticipatory bail order granted …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 420 and 120(B) of the IPC, Section 10 of the Bihar Conduct of Examination Act, 1981 and Section 67 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. He argued that he has a clean antecedent and that a similar …
The petitioners, Indrajeet Prasad and Ishwar Prasad, alleged that they were falsely implicated in a dowry‑related murder case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. They claimed to have clean antecedents and argued that the informant was not an eyewitness, …
The petitioner, Md. Haroon, sought regular bail after his earlier bail application was rejected. He argued that a co‑accused, Pankaj Bahardar, had been granted bail under similar circumstances and that the trial was progressing slowly, with only one of eight prosecution witnesses examined after two …
The petitioners, Yadolal Thakur and his sons Rajesh and Mukesh, feared arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. They argued they have clean antecedents, had previously cooperated with police under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C., and a similar …
Petitioners Sanjay and Lakshman Tatma were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 138 litres of illicit liquor. They contended that they were innocent, that their brother Mukesh, who was involved in the liquor business, had …
The petitioner, Sanjay Yadav, filed a bail application in Patarghat P.S. Case No. 156/2024 for offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the Arms Act. He has been in custody since 19 November 2024. The petition was the second attempt after an earlier bail denial, which was …
The petitioner, Chhotu Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging illegal liquor trade and obstruction of a police raid. He claimed the allegations were false, stating that no contraband was found and no …
The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an excise case involving the seizure of 342 litres of illicit Nepali liquor. The prosecution alleged his involvement under Sections 30(a), 32(3), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, citing a …
The petitioner, Niraj Rai, was arrested in November 2022 and charged with offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail before the Patna High Court, having already been denied bail on four prior …
The appellant Sadir Quaraishi was convicted by a Special Judge under Section 376AB of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act for the alleged rape of a five‑year‑old girl, based largely on the victim’s testimony and a delayed FIR. The appellant appealed, arguing that the four‑day delay in lodging the …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gyanasekaran, which held that the …
Mas Financial Services Ltd., a non‑banking financial company, financed a vehicle that was hypothecated to it under a loan agreement with the original owner, Chandrasinh Jadeja. The vehicle was seized by police in a case under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and later released to the purchaser, …
Ashokbhai Ramjibhai Maniya, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The appellant filed the appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
The appellant, Navin Kumar Shah, was charged under several provisions of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a woman, Ramanti Devi, and her son during a land dispute. The trial court refused …
The petitioner, Anita Devi, daughter of the deceased Deo Pujan Singh, filed a writ petition seeking direction to lodge an FIR against private respondents (her late father’s co‑habitants) alleging they murdered him to grab his property. The court examined the pleadings, noting that the deceased, aged …
Arvind Kumar petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under IPC sections 363, 366(A)/34 and POCSO Act section 8, alleging kidnapping and sexual offences involving a minor. He contended that the allegations were false, stating …
The appellant Vijay Mahto was convicted for the murder of Kamaldeo Rai under Sections 302 and 34 IPC. The prosecution relied on eight witnesses, most of whom only arrived after hearing a cry and claimed to have identified the accused in torchlight, a fact not recorded in the FIR or produced as …
The petitioner, Basudeo Shaw, a 68‑year‑old senior citizen, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of 2,558 litres of codeine cough syrup from his Patna residence, though he was residing in Kolkata and had rented out the premises. He contended that the investigation was mechanically …
The petitioner, Md. Shahjad Alam, was implicated in a complaint (No. 741 of 2022) alleging assault and torture of the complainant for dowry demands, invoking Sections 498A and 323 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended his innocence and highlighted that, pursuant to a …
The petitioners, Pratik Kumar Singh and Dinesh Dubey, dealers of Japanese harvester machines, were accused in Complaint Case No. 99 of 2024 of supplying a used harvester with a tampered engine and forged company sticker, attracting offences under IPC sections 406, 420 and 34. They applied for …
The petitioner, Pritam Paswan, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the police to recover a missing minor girl reported missing on 5 August 2020 (Desari PS case No.200 of 2020). The petition, pending since 2023, alleged that despite numerous police appearances and counter‑affidavits, …
Indra Shekhar Maharaj and Raushan Kumar Maharaj were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and abusing a woman of a scheduled caste over a dispute involving bamboo pots. The …
The petitioner, Jitendra Dhangar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in anticipation of arrest for an alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 5.220 litres of liquor from his residence. He argued that he was not …
The petitioners, a group of individuals surnamed Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code relating to offences such as kidnapping, assault, and rioting. They alleged that the FIR was a retaliatory move in a land dispute, …
The petitioners, four Yadavs from Madhepura, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. relating to alleged assault, destruction of property, and other offences. They contend they have clean antecedents, are senior citizens, and were …
Amar Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022 for alleged recovery of 53.040 litres of liquor from a hut near his son Rohit Kumar's house. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioners—Kapil Singh, Harishankar Singh, Roshan Kumar and Rocket Kumar—sought anticipatory bail in a case registered in 2012 alleging offences under several IPC sections, the Arms Act and related provisions. They claim they have clean records and contend that the complainant, who alleged …
Triloki Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 39 litres of liquor, including 4 litres from his shop. The petitioner argued he has a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his …
Petitioner Rahul Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly possessing 8 litres of liquor. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was found in his conscious …
Ramnaresh Bhagat was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor, with 43.20 litres of liquor recovered. The petitioner contended that his motorcycle, which was used to …
The petitioners, Dharmendra Paswan and Raghav Kumar Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, concerning the alleged recovery of 654 litres of liquor from a semi‑constructed house belonging to Jagdish Paswan. They …
The petitioner, Gajendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, wherein an informant alleged that the petitioner's son died in an electric shock incident and that the petitioner was implicated due to a dispute …
Ravi Prasad applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(A) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in custody, had no possession of the liquor, and was implicated solely on a confessional statement of another …
The petitioner, Md. Jabbar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 108 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Sangeeta Devi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged possession of ten litres of liquor. She contended that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that …
Arun Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing five litres of illicit liquor and being involved in its illegal trade. He argued that the liquor was found in a motorcycle he owned, which he had sold to Anand Kumar in 2020, and …
Gautam Kumar was accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 96.250 litres of liquor recovered from a washroom in a joint family house. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 270 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized …
The petitioner, Solen Dey, was implicated in Beur P.S. Case No. 100 of 2023 for alleged offences under IPC Sections 406, 420, 379 and 506/34, accused of taking Rs 20 lakh from an informant for a land transfer that was never executed. He argued that the matter was essentially a civil, monetary …
The petitioner, Matani Kunwar, a housewife, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 28.6 litres of liquor recovered from her residence. She contended that the liquor was found in a house …
The petitioners, Ranjan Kumar and Niraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 411 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. They argued that they were not caught in possession of the alleged liquor, were not owners of the seized vehicle, and …
The petitioner, Mahesh Sah, was named in an FIR for alleged assault, robbery and other offences under various IPC sections, including 341, 323, 504, 506, 379, 307 and 304/34. The police investigation resulted in a charge‑sheet only for offences under sections 323 and 504, and the petitioner sought …
The petitioners, Dilip Kumar and Ashish Kumar, were named in an FIR for alleged possession of 2.5 litres of Kingfisher strong premium beer under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, recovered from the refrigerator of co‑accused Samir Alam. They contended that the beer was not in …
The petitioner, Lalan Tiwari, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging offences under Sections 363, 365, 376, 506 and 34 of the IPC, stemming from an alleged assault, kidnapping and rape of a woman who later claimed the accusations were false. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioners, three brothers, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from a location adjacent to their house. They argued that they were not arrested, …
Vishal Sahani and Subhash Sahani applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 175 litres of liquor and 3400 litres of mahua liquor were seized and destroyed from a bamboo orchard belonging to …
The petitioners, Ramesh Kumar and Dilip Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 111 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 783 litres of liquor from a bush near a mango …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Section 414 of the IPC, with 32 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he did not have …
The petitioner, Jitendra Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 32, 36 and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 882 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the seized …
The petitioner, Harihar Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that liquor was recovered from premises adjacent to his house and not from his possession. He argued he has a clean antecedent and …
The petitioner, Sawooda, was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 33 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She asserted that she had no knowledge of the contraband, possessed a clean antecedent, and that ownership of the vehicle alone should not constitute evidence of …
The petitioners, Vinod Rai and Amit Kumar, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, alleging that the alleged seizure of 600 litres of liquor occurred at a premises unrelated to them and that they were implicated solely on the …
The petitioners, six individuals from Gaya district, applied for anticipatory bail under Sections 318(4), 112(2) and 61(1) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, Section 11 of the Bengal Gambling Act, 1867 and Section 30(A) of the Excise Act, alleging that liquor (2.55 litres) was recovered near Ajay …
The petitioners, four women related to the Sahani family, were named in an FIR for alleged kidnapping and other offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. The alleged victim later recovered and, in her statement, denied that the petitioners were involved in the …
Petitioner Raja Ram Sahani was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 30(b) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly recovering 20 litres of liquor from the bank of the Marni River. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in …
Chhathi Devi, a woman with no prior criminal record, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 22 litres of liquor from a hut near Bankipur Club Gate. She applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was recovered from …
The petitioners, Vikash Kumar and Prakash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 244.15 litres of liquor was allegedly recovered from their jointly‑owned house. They argued that the liquor was not …
The petitioner, Ashok Singh, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under IPC sections 272 and 273 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution’s case rested mainly on a disclosure by a co‑accused, with no evidence of the petitioner’s conscious …
Nitu Devi was named in an FIR for allegedly possessing 10 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She contended that the liquor was recovered from her house without a valid search under Section 103(4) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and that she …
Lokesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 70.560 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned, implicating him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He argued that he was not present at the seizure, had no conscious …
Ashutosh Kumar, a resident of Nalanda district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 324(3) (426 IPC), 111(3) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, relating to the alleged recovery …
The petitioner, Sushma Devi, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 40 litres of liquor recovered. She contended that she was implicated only because her scooter, registered in her name, …
The petitioners, Jitu Yadav and Pankaj Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 272, 273, 34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from their vehicles. They argued that the first petitioner …
Pinki Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered against her for alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of liquor from a joint‑family house. The petitioner argued that she was not arrested, no liquor was …
Pinki Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where 518,400 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle she owned. The petitioner argued that she was not present at the seizure, had no conscious …
The petitioner, Sanjiv Rajak, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act, alleging that 174.9 litres of liquor were recovered from a car he owned. He argued that he was not present at the …
The petitioner, Vijay Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 144 litres of liquor from a car. He argued that he was not in possession of the seized vehicle, was not arrested on the spot, …
The petitioner, Motilal Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after a complaint under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleged that six litres of liquor were recovered from his joint family house. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his conscious possession, …
The petitioner, Shani Kumar Mandal, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (amended 2018) alleging recovery of 27 litres of liquor from his residence. He argued that …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was only the owner of one of the seized …
The petitioner, Lal Babu Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 1,010.88 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle, no liquor was found in his …
The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Kumar, was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 317(5), 338, 336(3) and 61(2) of the Bihar Penal Code, based primarily on the statement of a co‑accused who claimed the petitioner had supplied a stolen motorcycle. The co‑accused, Kulesh Kumar, was found in …
The petitioner, Suman Devi, mother‑in‑law of the deceased, was named in an FIR for the alleged murder of the informant’s sister over a dowry demand of Rs 10 lakhs. The prosecution alleged that she conspired to cause the death, while the defence argued she lived separately, had no involvement in …
The petitioner, Shivsant Kumar, was named in an FIR for multiple offences including assault and kidnapping under various sections of the Bihar Penal Code. He claimed that the alleged physical assault was actually directed at co‑accused and that he merely inquired about his kidnapped niece, with …
The petitioner, Alok Kumar Pandey, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 1291 of 2024) alleging offences under Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the allegations against him were vague …
Harindar Mishra sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a West Champaran complaint (Case No. 2562(C) of 2023) alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 406 and 384/34 for allegedly taking an informant's money. The prosecution opposed bail, while the petitioner claimed innocence and offered to pay …
Abdul Rahman appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences alleging assault with an iron rod. The appellant claimed he had a clean record and was falsely implicated, arguing that the alleged injury to the …
The petitioner, Bharat Tiwary, sought bail to avoid arrest in a criminal complaint (Case No. 658 of 2023) filed under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had resolved their marital dispute through mediation and executed a settlement agreement covering …
The petitioner, Bablu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in CR No. 1752 of 2024 for alleged assault and torture of a victim to demand dowry under Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The State opposed the bail, but the Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh …
Vikash Kumar applied for bail fearing arrest in Complaint No. 871/2024, which alleged offences under Sections 85/316(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court settlement whereby the petitioner agreed to pay a total …
The petitioner, Arse Azam Alam, sought bail in a criminal case (PS Chanpatia Case No. 145 of 2025) filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed that the dispute with the respondent, Reshma Khatoon, had been amicably settled and the parties …
The petitioner, Bhawesh Sah, faced arrest in a cheating case (Case No. 295 of 2025) alleging he defrauded Rs. 11 lakh from the second opposite party. He had returned Rs. 3 lakh and offered to repay the remaining amount in monthly installments until January 2027. Relying on a mediation report, his …
Shivshankar Sah applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (Gopalganj Mahila P.S. Case No. 03 of 2024) where he is charged under several IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State opposed the bail, alleging assault and torture of the victim for dowry. The court, …
The petitioners – Pavitra Sahu, Urmila Devi and their sons – feared arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No.191 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 115, 156, 303 and 84 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They claimed innocence and sought anticipatory bail. The State opposed the application. …
The petitioner, Nasra Parween, sought relief fearing arrest in a criminal case (PS Case No. 559 of 2024) involving alleged assault under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. She contended that she was falsely implicated and pleaded innocence. The petition also highlighted …
Vivek Kumar filed an application fearing arrest in Complaint No. 855 of 2024, which alleged he had a physical relationship with Simran Kumari under various sections of the BNS. The prosecution claimed he misused a pretext of marriage, while the petitioner asserted his innocence and that he was …
The petitioner, Md. Allauddin (also known as Gulab), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a Mahila Police Station case alleging dowry‑related offences under several sections of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted and tortured the victim …
The petitioners, a group of Yadavs from Avrakkha village, feared arrest in connection with Suiya Police Station Case No. 69 of 2025, which alleged they had burnt an informant’s shop. The prosecution charged them under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code (BNS) for offences including arson, …
Shabana Praveen filed a revision petition challenging the acquittal of respondents Firoz Ahmad Khan and Nazia Parween by the trial court, which was upheld by the appellate court. The petition alleged that the lower courts erred in acquitting the accused on charges under IPC sections 420, 387, 354 …
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 374 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 85, 3(5) and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted and tortured the victim to demand …
The petitioner, Usha Kumari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint (No. 9296 of 2022) alleging criminal breach of trust under Section 406 IPC for allegedly taking Rs. 7 lakh on loan and not repaying. The prosecution claimed the petitioner and co‑accused failed to return the loan …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378(4) CrPC, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 …
Shree GhanShyam Textile, through Kalpesh D., appealed to the Gujarat High Court against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC, but the Court considered the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under …
The appellant, the original complainant, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, particularly Celestium Financial v. A. …
Baldevji Pratapji Rajput, the original complainant in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patan. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
Manvenrasinh Narendrasinh Sindha, the original complainant, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court had acquitted the accused, and the appellant filed the appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS. The High …
The wife appealed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against a Family Court judgment that dismissed her petition for annulment of marriage on the ground that the Hindu marriage ceremony of ‘Saptapadi’ was not performed, and directed a police complaint for alleged false statements. The …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to …
The appellant, Abhishek Tiwari, was charged under several provisions of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged assault and caste-based abuse on 17-11-2025. He contended that the FIR was lodged four days after the incident without …
Vivek Kumar Sharma appealed to the Patna High Court against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments (B.N.S.) and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The appellant alleged that he was …
Gaina Pandit (Rupesh Pandey) appealed against the Special Court’s order rejecting his anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under the Bihar N.S. and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. He argued that the notice was duly served, he has a clean …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Sikandra police case No. 358/25, which alleged offences under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the informant, causing injuries …
The petitioner, Jaldhar Das, sought anticipatory bail in a missing‑person case (Sono P.S. Case No. 151 of 2004) where he was named as an accused under IPC sections 364 (kidnapping) and 34 (common intention). He claimed he had no knowledge of the alleged offence and no criminal antecedents, arguing …
The petitioner, Rahbar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint (No. 77-C/2023) filed by his wife Aisha under IPC sections 379 and 498A and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner had tortured the wife for dowry, leading her to leave the matrimonial home …
The petitioner, Laxmi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Goraul, Case No. 326 of 2024) filed under Sections 137(2), 96, 3(5) of the BNS after an informant alleged his daughter's disappearance and implicated the petitioner. The petitioner contended that he and the girl were in …
The petitioners, comprising the mother, father and two brothers of Vishnu Rajak, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Nathnagar‑Madhusudanpur, Case No. 319 of 2022) filed under Sections 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly kidnapping a minor girl for marriage. The …
The petitioners, four accused persons, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Madhepur PS Case No.130 of 2025) involving alleged assault with knives under multiple sections of the Bihar law and the Criminal Procedure Code. The prosecution alleged that the first two petitioners, Mohammad Gulaser and Md. …
Sweta Kumari, a Panchayat Teacher, was implicated in a case (Belhar P.S. Case No. 243/2025) for allegedly forging her experience certificate, leading to an FIR under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B). She submitted a resignation letter to the District Education Officer, Munger, claiming she …
The petitioner, Tarun Kumar Singh, sought regular bail in a case (Ekma P.S. Case No. 508 of 2023) involving an alleged offence under Section 363 of the IPC, with the prosecution alleging rape of a minor. The victim initially gave a statement under Section 161 CrPC indicating a consensual …
Lalo Sah petitioned the Patna High Court for bail in a case registered under Sections 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging dowry demands and cruelty after his marriage in 2018. He claimed innocence, stating that marital discord and his wife's mental …
The petitioner, Krishna Yadav, was implicated in a case of illegal sand mining under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, based on the allegation that his tractor was used in the offence. He argued that he was falsely implicated, that no specific allegation was made …
Rohit Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with PS Asthawan Case No. 360 of 2025, which alleges offences under Sections 304 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case is based on a robbery of a bank employee, and the …
Manindra Pandey sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging forced entry into a house and attempted rape, with charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act. The petitioner claimed the allegations were false and stemmed from a …
The petitioner, Yogi Sahani, a 78‑year‑old resident of East Champaran, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 140(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the informant’s son was kidnapped and later found dead, with the …
Rohit Kumar applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 153 of 2025) alleging his involvement in a mob extortion and assault on an informant’s house. The prosecution alleged that Kumar, along with many co‑accused, threatened the informant and damaged a vehicle. …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (PS Mohanpur Case No. 363 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including assault and grievous injury to the informant. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, armed, …
The petitioners, Ratan Das and Nagina Das, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Jale PS Case No. 219 of 2025) alleging assault under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged they assaulted an informant and caused injuries, while the …
The petitioner, Satish Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 103.680 litres of liquor from his Bolero car. He argued that he was not present at the spot, had no conscious possession …
Domi Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, involving the alleged recovery of 198 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. The petitioner argued that the case diary had not been …
The petitioners, Suman Devi and Baijanti Devi, were named in a complaint alleging multiple IPC offences arising from a land sale dispute. They contended that the dispute was civil, they have clean antecedents, and the police investigation concluded no criminality. Despite the trial court taking …
Saraswati Devi, operator of a brick kiln, was named in a 2019 complaint alleging violations of Sections 37 and 38(D) of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. She had obtained provisional permission to operate the kiln on 29 May 2019, but the kiln became non‑operational due to the …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case (PS No. 47 of 2026) alleging possession of 90 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated by a local chowkidar and asserted a clean criminal record. The …
Manoj Shankar Gandhi, a DGM posted at Bihta Airport Project, was accused in a 2015 complaint (Case No. 3141(C) of 2015) of mental and physical cruelty under Section 498A IPC and Section 85 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. The petitioner contended that the marriage had been dissolved by a Family Court …
Rahul Singh applied for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 153.3 litres of liquor from a car. He argued that he was not arrested, did not have the liquor in his possession, was not the car's owner, and that the case was based solely on a …
The petitioner, Madhu Ranjan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 20 litres of illicit liquor and engaging in its illegal trade. He argued that the liquor was recovered from his car, which was misused by the driver, and …
The petitioner, Satyam Kumar, was named in an FIR for a robbery committed at gunpoint, based solely on the identification by a co-accused, Ritik Raj, who was apprehended by private persons. The petitioner contended that the only incriminating material was the co-accused’s statement, which he alleged …
The petitioner, Saima Khalid, was named in an FIR for alleged breach of trust involving a Rs.25 lakh investment made by an informant in her company, Wayfareroworld Advent Pvt. Ltd., which allegedly failed to return the promised amount. The petitioner contended that the dispute was purely civil, …
The petitioner, Nanu Chaudhary, was implicated in an excise case after 172 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from his vehicle and two individuals identified him as the owner. He filed an anticipatory bail application, asserting his innocence and clean antecedent, and offered to donate Rs. …
Manoj Saw, also known as Shailendra Kumar, was implicated in a murder case (Sections 302 and 34 IPC) after an informant alleged that his brother was taken by the petitioner and later found dead. The petitioner argued that he has a clean record and that the police investigation concluded with a final …
The petitioners, three brothers from Ghonghiya village, filed anticipatory bail applications in a criminal case (PS Case No. 512 of 2025) alleging offences under various sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act. Petitioners 1 and 3 withdrew their applications, which the court permitted, …
Petitioner Rajesh Kumar, a PACS chairman, was implicated in a case (Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 363 of 2024) for alleged defalcation of approximately Rs. 20 lakh, charged under Sections 316(2), 318(1), 303(2), 61(2) and 3(5) of the BNS. He sought provisional bail, asserting innocence and willingness to …
The petitioner, Dhirendra Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging extortion, assault and other offences arising from a dispute over the construction of a boundary wall. He claimed the wall was being built on government land and that the informant falsely …
Mahinur Khatoon, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman alleged to have been dowry‑relatedly tortured and murdered, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that she, along with others, participated in …
The petitioners, Kiran Devi and Ashok Paswan, sought anticipatory bail in a complaint registered under Sections 406 and 420 IPC relating to an alleged fraudulent sale deed of land. They claimed to have clean antecedents and argued that the complainant had executed the sale deed after receiving the …
The petitioner, Upendra Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 39.96 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, …
Pankaj Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 37(C) of the Excise Act. He argued that he was not arrested, that the liquor was recovered from a hut not belonging to him, and that the complaint …
The petitioners, five relatives of a co-accused in a dowry‑death case (Sakri P.S. Case No. 151 of 2025), sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 80, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was killed for dowry, implicating the …
The petitioners, Binod Yadav and Tuntun Kumar Chaudhary, were named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 35 litres of liquor recovered from the bed of River Falgu. Their counsel argued that the …
The petitioner, Ankit Rai, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 750 litres of liquor. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …
The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 21.600 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor being in the vehicle and that his friend Sanjeet had misused the …
The petitioners, Pappu Mahto, Chandan Mahto and Dilip Mahto, were named in an FIR (Town P.S. Case No. 206 of 2026) for assaulting an informant and others, alleged to be punishable under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act. They applied for anticipatory …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Kapri, was implicated in a case alleging recovery of about 7 litres of illicit liquor from a motorcycle registered in his name, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. He contended that he had sold the motorcycle to Nippu Kumar on 24 …
The petitioner, Noor Kalim Mian, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 18.9 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and …
Kamla Devi and Saurav Kumar were named in a criminal complaint (Case No. 880 of 2024) under Sections 318(4) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly failing to return security money of Rs.14.20 lakh that had been given against a shop they owned. The shop was rented to the complainant, who …
The petitioner, Murajan Kumar, was named in an FIR for allegedly possessing 54.75 litres of illicit liquor and engaging in illegal manufacturing under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming no connection with the recovered liquor …
The petitioner, Binay Kumar Sahani, was implicated in a case (PS Case No. 440 of 2023) for allegedly possessing 10 litres of illicit liquor and engaging in illegal trade under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed that his motorcycle, which was used to transport the …
The petitioner, Md. Raja Khan, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case under Section 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Right of Marriage) Act, 2019, alleging that he had pronounced triple talaq on his wife. The trial court rejected the bail application without considering the object of the Act. The …
The petitioner, Arun Mukhiya, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, with 36 litres of liquor recovered from a cattle house that is jointly owned by his family. The petitioner …
Jagdish Yadav was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 99 litres recovered from the back side of his house. The petitioner contended that the liquor was recovered from an open area near the …
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 1,400 litres of liquor from eight motorcycles. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the scene, did not have the seized …
Santosh Kumar Singh was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 36 liters recovered. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was transported in a motorcycle owned by Singh, which he had lent to a friend in good faith. Singh contended that he had no physical …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018, with 207 liters recovered. He argued that the liquor was seized from an open area accessible to the public, …
Santosh Mandal sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 379.98 litres of liquor from an orchard not owned by him. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in his possession, and …
The petitioner, Surendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 47(A) and (f) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor and Jawa Mahua. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested on the spot, and the alleged contraband was …
Mahesh Paswan applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under IPC sections 272, 273 and 34 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (sections 30(a), 38(1) and 41(1). The prosecution alleged that liquor was recovered from a motorcycle and from a house that is part of a joint …
The petitioner, Jitendra Dhangad, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Compulsory Statutes (B.N.S.S.) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He claimed that the alleged liquor recovery was from …
The petitioner, Ajit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under several IPC sections arising from a dispute between rival gitti sellers that led to firing and injuries. He claimed a clean record and asserted that the informant falsely implicated him, noting …
The petitioner, Abhyas Kumar, sought relief from anticipated arrest in an excise case (Case No. 81 of 2025) involving the alleged recovery of 6.84 litres of illicit liquor, for which he was named as a co-accused being the brother of the primary accused. He asserted his innocence, clean antecedent, …
The petitioner, Mithilesh Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 and Sections 281 and 125(a) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. He argued that the liquor was recovered from a vehicle he did not …
The petitioner, Nitu Devi, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case where 4.770 litres of liquor were recovered from a motorcycle she owned. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was being transported illegally, but the petitioner argued she had no …
The petitioner, Dinanath Majhi, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He …
Mukesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 120 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not …
Kundan Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 210 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that he has a clean criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and …
The petitioner, Sawan Thakur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016-2022, alleging recovery of 70.8 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to him. He has a criminal antecedent of nineteen cases, fourteen of which …
Petitioner Prabhat Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 361.875 litres of liquor from two vehicles. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioners, Shanichari Devi, Amit Bahardar and Saroj Bahardar, sought anticipatory bail in a case (R.S. P.S. No. 26 of 2026) where they were alleged to have participated in an assault on the informant's father and brother over a land dispute, resulting in the father's death. The prosecution …
The petitioner, Prakash Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 228 litres of liquor from a public pond. He argued that the liquor was not in his …
Vinod Sahani applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, alleging the recovery of 120.420 litres of liquor from a tractor. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious …
