BHUDEV MALLICK ALIAS BHUDEB MALLICK & ANR.versusRANAJIT GHOSHAL & ORS.
2025 INSC 17517 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, heirs of the original defendants in a 1965 title suit, were restrained by a permanent injunction that barred them from disturbing the respondents' possession of the suit property. After four decades, the respondents filed an execution application in 2017 alleging breach of the injunction, leading the tr…
BALBIR SINGH & ANR. ETC.versusBALDEV SINGH (D) THROUGH HIS LRS. & ORS. ETC.
2025 INSC 8117 January 2025Dismissed
The plaintiffs obtained decrees for specific performance of a sale agreement, directing them to deposit the balance consideration within 20 days and the defendants to execute sale deeds. The trial court decrees were set aside by a first appellate court, but the High Court later restored them in regular second appeals, …
SUNKARI TIRUMALA RAO & ORS.versusPENKI ARUNA KUMARI
2025 INSC 9217 January 2025Dismissed
The petitioners, partners of an unregistered partnership firm, filed a suit seeking recovery of Rs 30 lakhs from another partner of the same firm. The trial court held the suit maintainable, but the High Court reversed, invoking Section 69(1) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, which bars suits by partners of an unreg…
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL U.P. LUCKNOW & ORS.versusSUSHIL KUMAR & ORS.
2025 INSC 124116 October 2025Disposed off
The Uttar Pradesh Legislative Council’s recruitment process for staff was challenged on grounds of unfairness, arbitrariness and collusiveness, leading to writ petitions and a special appeal. The High Court, while hearing the special appeal, directed a suo motu public interest litigation and ordered a preliminary enqui…
THE STATE OF HARYANAversusJAI SINGH AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 112216 September 2025Dismissed
The State of Haryana amended the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 by inserting sub‑clause (6) to s.2(g) through Haryana Act No. 9 of 1992, which declared that lands reserved for village common purposes under the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 would vest …
DASTAGIRSABversusSHARANAPPA @ SHIVASHARANAPPA POLICE PATIL (D) BY LRS. & ORS.
2025 INSC 112016 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiff, a coparcener of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), challenged the sale of a suit land by the Karta (father) to the fifth defendant, alleging the sale was not for legal necessity but to meet the Karta's personal habits. The central issue was whether the sale was made to meet the legal necessity of the Karta'…
KOMAL KRISHAN ARORA & ORS.versusSANDEEP KUMAR & ORS.
2025 INSC 112316 September 2025Disposed off
The father filed a habeas corpus petition after the mother left India with their daughter and allegedly left their five‑year‑old son with the maternal grandparents without informing him, violating UK High Court video‑call orders. The High Court of Punjab & Haryana directed that interim custody of the son be handed over…
BALJINDER KUMAR @ KALAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2025 INSC 85616 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Baljinder Kumar, accused of murdering his wife, two children and sister‑in‑law, was convicted by the Trial Court and sentenced to death under Sections 302, 308 and 325 IPC. The High Court upheld the conviction, relying mainly on the testimonies of three witnesses despite contradictions and lack of forensic linkage. On …
THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ANR.versusJSW HYDRO ENERGY LIMITED & ORS.
2025 INSC 85716 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Himachal Pradesh government entered into an Implementation Agreement with JSW Hydro Energy Ltd (formerly JIL) to supply 12% free power for the first 12 years and 18% thereafter from a 1045 MW hydro project. When the free‑power obligation rose above the 13% cap prescribed in CERC (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Reg…
SATENDER KUMAR ANTILversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR.
2025 INSC 90916 July 2025Dismissed
The State of Haryana filed an application seeking modification of a Supreme Court order that required police to serve notices under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, only through the mode prescribed in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and not via electronic means such as WhatsApp. …
TOSH KUMAR SHARMAversusHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD & ORS. R1: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD R2: STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH R3: SELECTION & APPOINTMENT COMMITTEE OF U.P.H.J.S. EXAMINATION
2025 INSC 92116 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Tosh Kumar Sharma, had ranked 38th in the merit list for the 2016 direct recruitment to the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service, where 37 General Category posts were advertised. The High Court forwarded the top 37 names for appointment, but the Governor approved only 36, leaving one vacancy. The appell…
BYLURU THIPPAIAH @ BYALURU THIPPAIAH @ NAYAKARA THIPPAIAHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2025 INSC 86216 July 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Byluru Thippaiah, brutally murdered his wife, sister‑in‑law and three children on 25 February 2017, alleging that his wife and the children were not his and accusing them of promiscuity. He was tried under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, convicted and sentenced to death by the trial court, a senten…
MALA DEVIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 85516 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Mala Devi, the widow of a temporary railway employee who died in harness after 9 years 8 months of service, sought family pension under the Railway Pension Rules, 1993. The Central Administrative Tribunal and the Patna High Court dismissed her claim, holding that her husband’s service was not regularized and that the t…
SHIV BARANversusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.
2025 INSC 86016 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Shiv Baran filed a criminal appeal against the High Court's order quashing a summons issued under Section 319 of the CrPC against Rajendra Prasad Yadav, who was not charge-sheeted but named in the FIR. The trial court had earlier summoned Rajendra based on eyewitness statements that he was present at the …
JAI PRAKASHversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2025 INSC 86116 July 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Jai Prakash, was convicted of raping and murdering a 10‑year‑old girl. Evidence included the victim’s body recovered from his hut, the last‑seen testimony of child witnesses, and DNA matches linking the appellant to the victim’s underwear and hair. The trial and High Courts affirmed conviction under IPC …
P KRISHNA MOHAN REDDYversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2025 INSC 72516 May 2025Disposed off
The petitioners, former public servants, were charged in a large‑scale corruption case involving alleged manipulation of liquor allocations and kickbacks. They applied for anticipatory bail, but the Andhra Pradesh High Court denied relief, relying on confessional statements recorded from co‑accused under Section 161 of…
RAGHUNATH SHARMA & ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR.
2025 INSC 72316 May 2025Case Allowed
The appellants entered into a series of sale agreements and a compromise deed, after which an FIR (No.432/2014) for offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC was filed. The High Court, invoking its inherent powers under Section 482 of the CrPC, quashed the FIR on the basis of the compromise. The complainant later applied…
THE STATE OF KERALA ETC. ETC.versusTHE PRINCIPAL, KMCT MEDICAL COLLEGE AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
2025 INSC 51816 May 2025Disposed off
The Kerala Medical Education Act, 2017 created an Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee to fix fees for private medical colleges. The Committee approved a fee of Rs. 20 lakhs for NRI students, directing that Rs. 5 lakhs of each fee be placed in a corpus fund for BPL scholarships, a decision later challenged by the Sta…
VANASHAKTIversusUNION OF INDIA
2025 INSC 71816 May 2025
The petitioners challenged the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change's 2017 Notification and the 2021 Office Memorandum, which sought to grant ex post facto environmental clearances for projects that had commenced without prior clearance under the 2006 EIA Notification. The Court examined whether such retr…
BALJINDER SINGH ALIAS AMANversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
2025 INSC 79616 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Baljinder Singh, alleged that the respondents, Mandeep Singh and Narinder Kumar, attacked him and his driver with wooden sticks, leading to the driver’s death. The respondents were charged under Sections 302, 323, 34, 427, 120B (with 148 and 149 later deleted) of the IPC and sought regular bail under Sec…
RIKHAB BIRANI & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 51216 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Rikhab Birani and Sadhna Birani, entered into an oral agreement to sell a godown for Rs 1.35 crore, which the buyer, Shilpi Gupta, failed to fully pay, leading the sellers to re‑sell the property at a lower price. The buyer subsequently approached the Metropolitan Magistrate to register an FIR alleging …
NAFEES AHMAD & ANR.versusSOINUDDIN & ORS.
2025 INSC 52016 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants challenged a High Court order that set aside a First Appellate Court judgment on the ground that it failed to comply with Order 41 Rule 31 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The central issue was whether non‑compliance with the rule—specifically the omission of "points for determination"—automatically vitia…
KAMAL & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
2025 INSC 50416 April 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellants, comprising a husband and his parents-in-law, sought to quash an FIR filed by the wife shortly after divorce proceedings were initiated, alleging offences under Sections 498-A and 114 of the IPC. The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that the allegations, however vague, would be tested at trial.…
IRWAN KOURversusPUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.
2025 INSC 49416 April 2025Dismissed
The Punjab Public Service Commission advertised vacancies for the Punjab Civil Service with a reservation for "ex‑servicemen". The appellant, a former Indian Army captain, was appointed under this reservation, while respondent No. 4, a former officer of the Indian Military Nursing Service (IMNS), was denied appointment…
STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.versusCOMBINED TRADERS
2025 INSC 49616 April 2025Dismissed
The State of Rajasthan challenged the validity of sub‑rule (20) of Rule 17 of the Central Sales Tax (Rajasthan) Rules, 1957, which allowed the cancellation of Form C declarations issued by dealers on grounds of fraud or misrepresentation. The High Court held that the State lacked authority to make such a rule because i…
N. ESWARANATHANversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
2025 INSC 50916 April 2025
The petitioner N. Eswaranathan, convicted of several offences, filed a first Special Leave Petition (SLP) which was dismissed by the Supreme Court with an order to surrender. He subsequently filed a second SLP on the same grounds, with the same Advocate-on-Record (AOR) P. Soma Sundaram and counsel S. Muthukrishnan fili…
ADAVYA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.versusM/S VISHAL STRUCTURALS PVT. LTD. & ORS
2025 INSC 50716 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant and respondent No.1 formed an LLP governed by an agreement containing an arbitration clause (Clause 40). Disputes arose over the ITF project, and the appellant issued a Section 21 notice of arbitration only to respondent No.1 and filed a Section 11 application appointing an arbitrator, also only naming re…
THE AUROVILLE FOUNDATIONversusNATASHA STOREY
2025 INSC 34816 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Auroville Foundation (appellant) appealed against a Madras High Court order that set aside a standing order appointing members nominated by the Residents' Assembly to the Auroville Town Development Council. The respondent, Natasha Storey, had filed a second writ petition seeking the same relief as an earlier petiti…
THE AUROVILLE FOUNDATIONversusNAVROZ KERSASP MODY & ORS
2025 INSC 34716 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Auroville Foundation appealed against the National Green Tribunal's (NGT) directions that required it to prepare a new township plan and to obtain environmental clearance before completing the Crown Road and other roads in Auroville, alleging that the Tribunal had exceeded its jurisdiction. The respondents, residen…
GANGUBAI RAGHUNATH AYAREversusGANGARAM SAKHARAM DHURI (D) THR. LRS AND ORS.
2025 INSC 35516 March 2025Disposed off
The plaintiff, Gangubai Raghunath Ayare, sued for administration of her father‑in‑law's estate and sought to declare a sale deed by her brother Vishnu null and void. The trial court dismissed the administration claim for lack of necessary parties but declared the sale deed void and ordered possession of half the proper…
PRADEEP NIRANKARNATH SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
2025 INSC 35016 March 2025Dismissed
The appellant, a retired IAS officer, challenged the registration of multiple FIRs relating to alleged land allotment irregularities during his tenure as Collector of Kachchh. He sought a writ of mandamus directing the police to conduct a preliminary inquiry before registering any further FIRs, relying on Lalita Kumari…
VISHNOO MITTALversusM/S SHAKTI TRADING COMPANY
2025 INSC 34616 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a former director of a corporate debtor, was served a notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoured cheques drawn before the commencement of insolvency proceedings. While the insolvency process and a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC were imposed on 25 July 2018, the dem…
SHIVALEELA AND OTHERS A1: SHIVALEELA A2: KUMARI KAVYA A3: KUMARI PURNIMA A4: KUMARI SHRAVYA A5: MASTER VEERESH A6: K. H. M. SHIVAMURTHAIAHversusTHE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & OTHERS R1: THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. R2: SRI. GIRISH B. R3: DR. BASAVARAJA
2025 INSC 35716 March 2025Case Partly allowed
The deceased, K.H.M. Shivamurthaiah, died in a motor vehicle accident, leaving behind a family dependent on his earnings from agriculture, milk‑vending and tractor‑hiring. The Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal (MACT) awarded compensation based on a notional monthly income of Rs.10,000, which the High Court reduced to Rs.8…
PRADEEP NIRANKARNATH SHARMAversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR.
2025 INSC 34916 March 2025Dismissed
The appellant, a former collector, was charged under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) for alleged financial transactions involving proceeds of crime arising from land allotments, bribery and hawala. He sought discharge at the pre‑trial stage, arguing that the PMLA could not be applied retrospectively…
WESTERN COAL FIELDS LTD.versusMANOHAR GOVINDA FULZELE & ANR.
2025 INSC 23316 February 2025
The Supreme Court examined two appeals challenging the forfeiture of gratuity by a public sector undertaking (Western Coal Fields Ltd.) and the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) after employees were terminated for misconduct. The employees argued that forfeiture required a criminal conviction, which …
OM PRAKASH AMBADKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2025 INSC 13916 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a police officer, was ordered by a Judicial Magistrate to register an FIR under Sections 323, 294, 500, 504 and 506 IPC after a complainant filed an application under Section 156(3) CrPC alleging humiliation and assault. The Magistrate, relying on the complainant’s narrative, directed police investigatio…
IRFAN ALIAS BHAYU MEVATIversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2025 INSC 15016 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants Irfan and Asif Mevati were convicted of kidnapping, rape, and related offences and sentenced to death based largely on a DNA profiling report (Exhibit‑157). The trial court and the High Court relied on the report without examining any of the scientific experts who prepared it, and the appellants were giv…
RAKESH KUMAR RAGHUVANSHIversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2025 INSC 9616 January 2025Dismissed
The appellant, Rakesh Kumar Raghuvanshi, was intercepted on a train carrying three cartons later found to contain 50 kg of opium poppy husk. He claimed he was unaware of the cartons and had only complied with police directions to exit the coach. The trial court, relying on the seizure and the appellant's inability to e…
VIJAY @ VIJAYAKUMARversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2025 INSC 9016 January 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellant Vijayakumar, together with friends, was returning from a movie late at night when they encountered the deceased, who was allegedly drunk and slapped the appellant. In a sudden altercation, the appellant picked up a cement brick and struck the deceased on the head, causing death, and later set the body on …
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & OTHERSversusVIKASH TIWARY @ BIKASH TIWARY @ BIKASH NATH
2025 INSC 7916 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Vikash Tiwary, a life convict serving a sentence for multiple offences, was transferred by the Inspector General of Prisons from Hazaribagh Central Jail to Central Jail, Dumka on 17 May 2023 after the jail superintendent warned of a potential gang war and insufficient staff to control notorious inmates. The respondent …
MAHENDRA AWASEversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2025 INSC 7616 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Mahendra Awase was charged under Section 306 of the IPC for allegedly abetting the suicide of Ranjit Singh, who had taken a loan and was reportedly harassed by the appellant for repayment. The prosecution relied on a suicide note and audio transcripts of heated conversations, but the Supreme Court examine…
U. SUDHEERA & OTHERSversusC. YASHODA & OTHERS
2025 INSC 8016 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, legal heirs of certain defendants, challenged an interim order dated 20 September 2024 passed by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in a second appeal (SA No. 518 of 2023) that directed the parties to maintain the status quo without first formulating any substantial question of law as required under Section …
KAILAS S/O BAJIRAO PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2025 INSC 111715 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Kailas and co-accused were convicted under the NDNDPS Act for possession of 39 kg of ganja seized during a police raid, with the trial court relying on a video recording of the raid and a chemical examiner's report. The High Court set aside the convictions and ordered a re‑trial, holding that the video wa…
ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR.versusTANYA ENERGY ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS MANAGING PARTNER SHRI ALLURI LAKSHMI NARASIMHA VARMA
2025 INSC 111915 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The State Bank of India (SBI) had secured credit facilities from Tanya Energy Enterprises, which defaulted and faced recovery proceedings under the SARFAESI Act and the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act. SBI introduced a One Time Settlement (OTS) 2020 Scheme requiring a 5% up‑front payment for any application, but t…
PNB HOUSING FINANCE LIMITEDversusSH. MANOJ SAHA & ANR
2025 INSC 84715 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, PNB Housing Finance Ltd., took symbolic and later physical possession of a premises that had been offered as security for a loan to the borrower (2nd Respondent) after the borrower defaulted. The 1st Respondent claimed to be a tenant of the premises since 1987 under an unregistered lease and sought resto…
NEETHU B. @ NEETHU BABY MATHEWversusRAJESH KUMAR
2025 INSC 85315 July 2025
The mother filed review petitions after the Supreme Court dismissed appeals that had granted permanent custody of their 11‑year‑old son to the father. New psychological reports showed the child suffering anxiety and separation‑disorder anxiety due to the impending custody change. The Court examined whether such fresh e…
VIJAY KUMARversusCENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 84815 July 2025Case Allowed
Vijay Kumar, a former Chief Manager of Central Bank of India, was compulsorily retired after an inquiry found him guilty of sanctioning loans without proper appraisal. The disciplinary authority imposed retirement and the Field General Manager, acting as appellate authority, reduced his pension to two‑thirds without co…
PRADEEP BHARDWAJversusPRIYA
2025 INSC 85215 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant-husband filed a petition for divorce under Section 13(1)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging cruelty, but the Family Court dismissed it and the High Court upheld that dismissal. The parties had been living separately since October 2009, amounting to over sixteen years of estrangement, and the appellant…
G. MOHANDASversusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS
2025 INSC 85415 July 2025Dismissed
The appellant, a building owner, conspired with officials of the Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation and an architect to obtain a spurious renovation permit and then demolish an existing structure to erect a four‑storeyed commercial building in a zone where such construction is prohibited. A vigilance enquiry esta…
L. MURUGANANTHAMversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & OTHERS
2025 INSC 84415 July 2025Directions issued
L. Muruganantham, a person with Becker Muscular Dystrophy and autism, was arrested on a false complaint and detained in Central Prison, Coimbatore. He alleged that the prison failed to provide adequate medical care, nutrition, and disability‑friendly facilities, leading to a deterioration of his health. The State Human…
KATTAVELLAI @ DEVAKARversusSTATE OF TAMILNADU
2025 INSC 84515 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was convicted and sentenced to death for murder, rape and robbery based on circumstantial evidence, a last‑seen theory, confessions, recovered items and DNA evidence. The Supreme Court examined whether these evidentiary pillars were proved beyond reasonable doubt and whether the investigation complied wit…
JAYKISHOR CHATURVEDI & ETC.versusSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
2025 INSC 84615 July 2025Dismissed
The appellants, promoter‑directors of a listed finance company, were found to have purchased shares in violation of SEBI's insider‑trading regulations and were penalised by an SEBI Adjudicating Officer on 28‑08‑2014. The penalty orders required payment within 45 days and were affirmed by the Supreme Court in 2019, afte…
M/S TORINO LABORATORIES PVT. LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 84915 July 2025Dismissed
The appellant, Torino Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., challenged the EPF authorities' decision to treat it as part of its sister company, Vindas Chemical Industries Pvt. Ltd., for the purposes of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The authorities had clubbed the two entities based on common …
IN RE : ALARMING RISE IN THE NUMBER OF REPORTED CHILD RAPE INCIDENTS versus
2025 INSC 69515 May 2025
The Supreme Court, exercising suo moto jurisdiction, took notice of a surge in reported child rape cases and issued directions in 2019 to establish exclusive POCSO courts in districts with more than 100 cases, along with measures for forensic support, sensitisation of officials, and public awareness. Over subsequent ye…
VIRENDER PAL @ VIPINversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2025 INSC 71015 May 2025Dismissed
The appellant, Virender Pal, was convicted under Section 304‑B of the IPC for the dowry death of his wife, Punita, who allegedly died after being harassed for dowry demands. The prosecution presented testimony that the husband and his relatives repeatedly demanded money, subjected the victim to physical and mental crue…
IN RE: CONSTRUCTION OF MULTI STOREYED BUILDINGS IN FOREST LAND MAHARASHTRA versus
2025 INSC 70115 May 2025
The case concerned 11.89 ha of land in Kondhwa Budruk, Pune, notified as Reserved Forest under the Indian Forest Act, 1878, which was later allotted to the Chavan family in 1998 for agricultural purposes without Central Government approval under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980. The Chavan family subsequently sold the…
ISHWAR CHANDA SHARMAversusDEVENDRA KUMAR SHARMA & ORS.
2025 INSC 70015 May 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court heard a Special Leave Petition filed by Ishwar Chanda Sharma challenging a High Court order that directed the appointment of a receiver for Sri Giriraj Temple in Mathura with a preference for a person from the Vaishnav Sampradaya rather than a practising advocate. The Court examined the long‑standing …
POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITEDversusMADHYA PRADESH POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY
2025 INSC 69715 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd (the appellant) sought CERC orders to approve the commercial operation date of its inter‑state transmission assets and to recover compensation for delays caused by Madhya Pradesh Power Transmission Company Ltd (respondent No.1). CERC, exercising powers under s.79(1) of the Electricit…
M/S INTERSTATE CONSTRUCTIONversusNATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD.
2025 INSC 69915 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, M/s Interstate Construction, executed work orders for a power project for the respondent, NPCC, and later disputed certain recoveries, leading to arbitration. The arbitral tribunal awarded the appellant principal sum plus interest, distinguishing pre‑reference, pendente‑lite and future interest periods. …
M/S GAYATRI PROJECT LIMITEDversusMADHYA PRADESH ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED
2025 INSC 69815 May 2025Disposed off
The appellant, Gayatri Project Ltd., entered into a works contract with the Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation and invoked arbitration under Clause 67.4 of the contract, resulting in a 2011 award in its favour. The respondent challenged the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, …
V. S. R. MOHAN RAOversusK. S. R. MURTHY & ORS.
2025 INSC 70815 May 2025Dismissed
The appellant, V.S.R. Mohan Rao, purchased land recorded in survey no. 10 in 1997 and occupied it, while the respondent claimed ownership of an adjoining 555‑square‑yard parcel in survey no. 9 based on a 1965 sale deed. The respondent filed a petition before the Special Court under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Pro…
JHARKHAND URJA UTPADAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR.versusM/S BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED
2025 INSC 53315 April 2025Dismissed
The respondent, M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., sued Jharkhand Urja Utpadan Nigam Ltd. and another party for recovery of a sum based on an award. The Commercial Court pronounced a judgment, but the petitioners filed their appeal under Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act 2015 after a delay of 301 days and so…
SURESH KUMAR AGARWALversusM/S HALDIA STEELS LIMITED & ANR
2025 INSC 63615 April 2025Case Allowed
The appellant, Suresh Kumar Agarwal, was accused by M/s Haldia Steels Ltd. of fraud and criminal misappropriation relating to a memorandum of understanding (MOU) for the transfer of a mining lease and share transfer. The complaint, filed six years after the alleged breach, alleged that an advance of Rs.50 lakh was paid…
JANSHRUTI (PEOPLE’S VOICE)versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 53615 April 2025Dismissed
The petitioners, Janshruti (People’s Voice), filed a writ under Article 32 seeking gender‑neutral guidelines for domestic violence complaints and a declaration that Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (now Section 84 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) is unconstitutional. The Court examined whether the provision violate…
CRYOGAS EQUIPMENT PRIVATE LIMITEDversusINOX INDIA LIMITED AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 48315 April 2025Dismissed
The dispute arose when Inox India Ltd filed a trademark suit alleging that Cryogas Equipment Pvt Ltd and LNG Express infringed its proprietary engineering drawings and related literary works used in cryogenic semi‑trailers. LNG Express moved an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC, arguing that the drawings w…
RAJENDHIRANversusMUTHAIAMMAL @ MUTHAYEE & ORS.**
2025 INSC 50815 April 2025
The Supreme Court entertained a miscellaneous application seeking recall of its own judgment dated 03.01.2024 in Civil Appeal No. 37 of 2024 on the ground that the respondents had not been served and therefore did not appear. The Court held that non‑service justified recalling the judgment and ordered the appeal to be …
SUSHILA & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2025 INSC 50515 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, who are relatives of a husband, were summoned in a complaint under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and Dowry Act s.4 after the husband’s marriage had been dissolved by an ex‑parte divorce decree on 31‑05‑2012. The complaint, filed three years after the divorce, alleged that the appellants had visited t…
SATISH CHANDER SHARMA & ORS.versusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS.
2025 INSC 49115 April 2025Dismissed
The petitioners, retired officers of the Himachal Pradesh State Forest Development Corporation, challenged the denial of pension benefits under the 1999 corporate sector pension scheme, arguing that the Supreme Court’s decision in State of H.P. v. Rajesh Chander Sood, which upheld a cut‑off date of 02‑12‑2004, was per …
S.C. GARGversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 49315 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, S.C. Garg, Managing Director of Ruchira Papers Ltd., was charged under Section 420 IPC for allegedly cheating respondent R.N. Tyagi after the parties had already resolved a dispute over seven dishonoured cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The earlier NI Act case resulted in Tyag…
THE CORRESPONDENCE, RBANMS EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONversusB. GUNASHEKAR & ANOTHER
2025 INSC 49015 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The R.B.A.N.M.S. Educational Institution, a charitable trust in possession of a Bangalore property since 1905, was sued by respondents who claimed a right to prevent the institution from alienating the land based on an alleged 2018 agreement to sell and an advance cash payment of Rs.75 lakh. The institution filed an ap…
BISWAJIT DASversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
2025 INSC 8515 January 2025Case Partly allowed
Biswajit Das, a Development Officer of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, was convicted under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act for fraudulently obtaining insurance settlements by falsely claiming the insured were dead. He was sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonm…
GOVINDversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2025 INSC 131814 November 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Govind was convicted for murder under Section 302 IPC and for illegal possession of a firearm under Section 25 of the Arms Act based primarily on the recovery of a country‑made pistol and two live cartridges from an iron box in his house and a forensic report linking the cartridges to the bullets recovere…
M/S ARMOUR SECURITY (INDIA) LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER, CGST, DELHI EAST COMMISSIONERATE & ANR.
2025 INSC 98214 August 2025Disposed off
M/s Armour Security (India) Ltd., a security services company, received a show‑cause notice under Section 73 of the CGST Act from the State GST authority for alleged tax deficiencies. Subsequently, the Central GST authority conducted a search and issued two summons under Section 70 to the company's directors to produce…
AJMERA SHYAMversusSMT. KOVA LAXMI & ORS.
2025 INSC 99214 August 2025Dismissed
The appellant, Ajmera Shyam, challenged the election of Smt. Kova Laxmi, alleging that she failed to disclose income shown in her income‑tax returns for four financial years in the Form 26 affidavit, marking it as “Nil”. The High Court dismissed the election petition, holding that the omission was not a substantial def…
PERNOD RICARD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHERversusKARANVEER SINGH CHHABRA
2025 INSC 98114 August 2025Dismissed
Pernod Ricard India Private Ltd. and a related entity own the registered trademarks BLENDERS PRIDE, IMPERIAL BLUE and SEAGRAM'S for premium whiskies. They sought an interim injunction to stop Karanveer Singh Chhabra from using the mark LONDON PRIDE, alleging infringement and passing off. The Commercial Court and the Ma…
SANJIT SINGH SALWAN & ORS.versusSARDAR INDERJIT SINGH SALWAN & ORS.
2025 INSC 98814 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants and respondents, both claiming to be trustees of a charitable trust, were involved in a dispute that led the respondents to file a suit for perpetual injunction. The trial court dismissed the suit under Section 92 of the CPC, prompting an appeal during which the parties agreed to arbitration and later ac…
KESARI NANDAN MOBILEversusOFFICE OF ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX (2), ENFORCEMENT DIVISION – 5
2025 INSC 98314 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Kesari Nandan Mobile, challenged two provisional attachment orders dated 13 November 2024 and 18 December 2024 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax under section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act. The orders were issued after earlier attachment orders of October 2023 had au…
A. RANJITHKUMARversusE. KAVITHA
2025 INSC 97814 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The husband filed a divorce petition in 2012 on grounds of cruelty and adultery, and the Family Court granted a decree of divorce in 2016 on the ground of cruelty. The wife appealed, and the Madras High Court set aside the decree, holding that the alleged cruelty stemmed from the wife's father's rude utterances, which …
STATE OF KARNATAKAversusSRI DARSHAN ETC.
2025 INSC 97914 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Karnataka appealed against a High Court order that granted bail to a celebrity actor (A2) and co‑accused in a murder‑conspiracy case involving Sections 302, 120B and 34 IPC, where the victim was allegedly kidnapped, tortured and killed after sending obscene messages to A2’s partner. The High Court had reli…
SMT. ARIFA & ORS.versusABHIMAN APARTMENT COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS.
2025 INSC 87514 July 2025Dismissed
The petitioners, who had earlier entered into a sale agreement with the cooperative society and executed a power of attorney (PoA) that was later cancelled, filed a suit for permanent injunction which was dismissed by the trial court and affirmed by the first appellate court. The High Court, on remand, dismissed the se…
SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH ALIAS SHAILESH R. SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2025 INSC 86914 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a co‑founder of a media production firm, sought to quash an FIR filed by a rival media financier alleging offences under sections 60(b), 316(2) and 318(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The High Court, instead of simply deciding the petition, directed the parties to undergo mediation and ordered t…
KATHYAYINIversusSIDHARTH P.S. REDDY & ORS.
2025 INSC 81814 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a daughter of the late K.G. Yellappa Reddy, alleged that her brothers and their sons forged a family tree and a partition deed to exclude her and her sisters from a Rs 33 crore compensation awarded for family land acquired by the Bengaluru Metro Rail Corporation. Based on these forged documents, the resp…
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusNIRU @ NIHARIKA & ORS.
2025 INSC 82214 July 2025Rejected
The wife and two minor children of a deceased engineer who died in a 1995 motor vehicle accident filed a claim for loss of dependency before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which awarded compensation using a multiplier of 13 and a 9% interest rate. The insurer appealed, contending that the multiplier should be redu…
VIKRAM BHALCHANDRA GHONGADEversusTHE HEADMISTRESS GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL AND JUNIOR COLLEGE, ANJI (MOTHI), TAH. AND DISTT. WARDHA & ORS.
2025 INSC 82414 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioner, son of a teacher who died while in service at an aided school, claimed death‑cum‑retirement gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The claim was rejected by the school authorities, the appellate authority and the High Court, which held that the teacher was not an employee within the meaning o…
PANDURANGANversusT. JAYARAMA CHETTIAR & ANR.
2025 INSC 82514 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Pandurangan, purchased a property from Hussain Babu, who had earlier bought it from Jayam Ammal. He later discovered that Defendant No. 1, claiming co‑ownership, had obtained an ex‑parte decree in a 1996 partition suit that the appellant alleged was collusive and fraudulently obtained. The appellant file…
COMMUNIDADE OF TIVIM, TIVIM, BARDEZ GOAversusSTATE OF GOA & ORS.
2025 INSC 83514 July 2025Dismissed
The Communidade of Tivim, a traditional agricultural community in Goa, sought permission from the Administrative Tribunal to settle a tenancy dispute with private respondents by bifurcating the disputed land on a 60:40 basis. The dispute arose from a 2017 trial court decree that declared the private respondents as agri…
ORISSA HIGH COURT AND OTHERSversusBANSHIDHAR BAUG AND OTHERS ETC.
2025 INSC 83914 July 2025Disposed off
The Orissa High Court, on its administrative side, challenged its own earlier order that had struck down Rule 6(9) of the 2019 Rules allowing suo motu designation of Senior Advocates. The petitioners argued that the rule was consistent with Section 16(2) of the Advocates Act and the Supreme Court’s Indira Jaising judgm…
MADHUKAR & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2025 INSC 81914 July 2025Case Allowed
The appellants were charged under two FIRs, the first involving offences such as unlawful assembly and assault, and the second containing grave charges of sexual assault under Section 376 IPC. The complainant in the second FIR later filed an affidavit stating she no longer wished to pursue the case, having received a m…
ASIAN PAINTS LIMITEDversusRAM BABU & ANOTHER
2025 INSC 82814 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Asian Paints Ltd., a paint manufacturer, discovered that counterfeit paints bearing its brand were being sold by Ram Babu. The company, through a power of attorney, engaged an IPR consultancy to investigate and the investigation led to an FIR under the IPC and Copyright Act. The trial court convicted Ram Babu, but the …
ARUN KUMAR SHARMA & ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
2025 INSC 82614 July 2025Dismissed
The appellants filed an application before the National Green Tribunal (NGT) seeking to quash a No‑Objection Certificate (NOC) and consent for a petrol pump at Khasra No. 109/1/2, alleging violations of environmental and municipal regulations. While the NGT dismissed the application, the appellants appealed to the Supr…
VIBHOR GARGversusNEHA
2025 INSC 82914 July 2025Case Allowed
The husband filed a divorce petition and sought to introduce secretly recorded telephone conversations with his wife as evidence, submitting memory cards, a CD and transcripts. The Family Court allowed the evidence, but the High Court set aside that order on the ground that the recordings violated the wife's right to p…
DHANASINGH PRABHUversusCHANDRASEKAR & ANOTHER
2025 INSC 83114 July 2025Case Allowed
The appellant, Dhanasingh Prabhu, advanced a loan of Rs.21 lakh to the respondents who were partners of the partnership firm “Mouriya Coirs”. The respondents issued a cheque in the name of the firm which was dishonoured, prompting the appellant to serve a statutory notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments…
TORRENT POWER LIMITEDversusU.P. ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS
2025 INSC 83814 July 2025Case Allowed
The Supreme Court examined a petition filed by an individual (respondent No.4) before the Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (UPERC) seeking an investigation under Section 128 of the Electricity Act, 2003 into a Distribution Franchisee Agreement (DFA) between Torrent Power Limited (the appellant) and the d…
ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS.versusNIRMALA DEVI
2025 INSC 84314 July 2025
The case concerned the allotment of residential and commercial plots to land owners (oustees) whose land was acquired by the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) in 1992 for a residential development project. The oustees filed suits under Section 39 of the Specific Relief Act seeking mandatory injunctions to comp…
KUM. SHUBHA @ SHUBHASHANKARversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR
2025 INSC 83014 July 2025Dismissed
The appellant A-4, a young woman engaged to B.V. Girish, was unwilling to marry him and confided her grievance to friend A-1, who enlisted cousin A-3 and A-2 to murder the fiancé. The deceased was fatally injured with a steel rod on 3 December 2003; eyewitnesses were later discredited and the case hinged on circumstant…
BINOD PATHAK & ORS.versusSHANKAR CHOUDHARY & ORS.
2025 INSC 84214 July 2025Case Partly allowed
The plaintiffs filed a title suit in 1984 which was dismissed by the trial court but later allowed by the first appellate court. The defendants appealed, and the High Court set aside the first appellate court's decree, holding that several defendants had died during the pendency of the first appeal and their legal heir…
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS.versusM/S SHREE NIWAS RAMGOPAL & ORS.
2025 INSC 83214 July 2025Dismissed
The dispute arose when Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) stopped supplying kerosene to a partnership firm after one of its three partners died, despite the partnership deed stating that death would not dissolve the firm. The partnership filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing IOCL to continue supply unti…
M/S UNITED SPIRITS LTD.versusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
2025 INSC 83314 July 2025Dismissed
United Spirits Ltd., a manufacturer of beer and Indian Made Foreign Liquor, challenged the levy of entry tax by the State of Madhya Pradesh for the period April 2007 to March 2008, arguing that the State Government warehouses, not the manufacturers, caused the entry of goods into the local area and that no notification…
STATE BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICEversusB.T. RAMESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 84014 July 2025Case Partly allowed
The State of Karnataka challenged the Karnataka High Court’s order that quashed criminal proceedings against former BBMP Chief Engineer B.T. Ramesh on the grounds that the chargesheet was filed more than four years after the alleged misconduct and that no sanction under Section 197 of the CrPC was obtained. Ramesh had …
MANDEEP SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
2025 INSC 83414 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants challenged the recruitment of 1,091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians in Punjab Government Degree Colleges, alleging that the State bypassed the Punjab Public Service Commission (PPSC) and ignored UGC regulations. The High Court Division Bench upheld the recruitment, reversing a Single Judge’s order…
M/S STEMCYTE INDIA THERAPEUTICS PVT. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, AHMEDABAD -III
2025 INSC 84114 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
M/s Stemcyte India Therapeutics, a joint‑venture stem‑cell bank, was assessed service tax for its enrolment, collection, processing and storage of umbilical cord blood stem cells for the period 1 July 2012 to 16 February 2014. The appellant claimed exemption as a "Healthcare Service" under Notification No.25/2012‑ST an…
THE HP POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD.versusM/S BRUA HYDROWATT PVT. LTD. & ORS.
2025 INSC 68014 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Himachal Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Ltd (HPPTC) built a 66 kV Bay at Urni for three generating companies and sought the full construction cost from Brua Hydrowatt Pvt Ltd (BHP), the lead partner, under a Connection Agreement dated 02‑07‑2021. BHP argued that the cost should be shared proportionately wit…
NOBLE RESOURCES AND TRADING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (EARLIER KNOWN AS ANDAGRO SERVICES PVT. LTD.)versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 68414 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Noble Resources and Trading India Private Ltd, a two‑star export house, imported crude degummed soybean oil under a duty‑free credit entitlement certificate issued pursuant to the EXIM Policy 2002‑2007. The Customs authorities denied the exemption, holding that the oil was an agricultural product excluded by Notificati…
SHRICHAND RAJARAM KUKREJA AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
2025 INSC 79414 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The complainant, a sub‑contractor, alleged that the appellants (directors of Bharat Udyog Ltd.) had partially paid him for work on a sewerage plant and had forged engineers' signatures to claim they performed the work. He filed an FIR alleging cheating, forgery and related offences under the IPC, seeking recovery of th…
LAL MOHD. & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2025 INSC 81114 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, members of a political party, were arrested after a communal protest triggered by an incendiary social media post on 10 October 2022 and were later released on bail. Six months later, the police prepared a gang chart and lodged a fresh FIR on 30 April 2023 under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social…
EBY CHERIANversusJEREMA JOHN
2025 INSC 70914 May 2025Case Partly allowed
The parties, married in 2016, separated in 2023 when the mother left the matrimonial home with their daughter. The father, employed on rotational overseas assignments, filed a petition for permanent custody and sought interim visitation. The Family Court allowed limited weekend and video contact and required the father…
HANSURA BAI & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 71114 May 2025Disposed off
The appellants, mother and aunt of Deva Pardhi, challenged a High Court order that refused to transfer the investigation of Deva's custodial death to another agency and denied bail to the sole eyewitness, Gangaram Pardhi. Deva was allegedly tortured and killed by local police officers, and Gangaram, who witnessed the t…
M/S DHANBAD FUELS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR
2025 INSC 69614 May 2025Dismissed
The Union of India filed a money suit of over Rs 8.73 crore in a Commercial Court in August 2019 without first complying with the pre‑institution mediation requirement of Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The defendant, Dhanbad Fuels Pvt. Ltd., raised a preliminary objection and sought rejection of the pl…
NAGARAJAN & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU
2025 INSC 70314 May 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellants were convicted under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (PoFA) for selling adulterated curd and various food items, receiving six months' imprisonment and fines. They sought release on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, arguing that Section 20AA of PoFA, which excluded probation, …
MOHIT KUMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.
2025 INSC 70414 May 2025Disposed off
The Uttar Pradesh Police Recruitment and Promotion Board (UPPRPB) issued a 2021 notification for sub‑inspector recruitment requiring OBC candidates to submit a caste certificate in a specific state‑prescribed format. Mohit Kumar and Kiran Prajapati, both OBC candidates, submitted certificates in the Central Government …
NATIONAL SPOT EXCHANGE LIMITEDversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 69414 May 2025
The Supreme Court examined whether secured creditors could claim priority over assets attached under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and the Maharashtra Protection of Investors and Depositors Act (MPID Act) by invoking the SARFAESI Act and the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy (RDB) Act. It also considered…
MRS. VARSHATAI W/O. SH. SANJAY BAGADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUDICIARY, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI AND ORS. ETC.
2025 INSC 48614 April 2025Dismissed
The case concerned a former municipal council member who challenged the display of the name of the Municipal Council of Patur in Urdu alongside Marathi on the council’s building signboard, alleging that Marathi is the sole official language under the Maharashtra Local Authorities (Official Languages) Act, 2022 and that…
PINKIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.
2025 INSC 48214 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined appeals filed by the victims of an interstate child‑trafficking racket challenging the High Court's grant of bail to thirteen accused persons charged under IPC sections 363, 311 and 370(5). The Court found that the High Court had ignored crucial factors such as the seriousness of the offence,…
M/S B N PADMANABHAIAH AND SONSversusR N NADIGAR & ORS.
2025 INSC 21414 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, B N Padmanabhaiah and Sons, had obtained a permanent injunction against the State of Karnataka in O.S. No.80 of 1978 concerning a parcel of land, and the decree became final after being upheld by appellate courts. Later, former students of a government school and other citizens filed a representative sui…
DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINGH & ORS.versusTHE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND & ORS.
2025 INSC 7214 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, senior civil judges in Jharkhand, qualified the suitability test for promotion to the Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service but were not selected because junior judges with higher marks were placed ahead of them in a merit list. They challenged the High Court's dismissal of their writ petition, arguing th…
CUDDALORE POWERGEN CORPORATION LTDversusM/S CHEMPLAST CUDDALORE VINYLS LIMITED AND ANR.
2025 INSC 7314 January 2025Dismissed
The plaintiff, Chemplast, entered into an agreement to sell a parcel of land to the appellant, Cuddalore Powergen, but registration of the sale deed was blocked by a Government Order (GO) that reserved the land for a power project. The plaintiff filed a first suit seeking a permanent injunction against the appellant an…
RAJEEB KALITAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 7514 January 2025Directions issued
Advocate Rajeeb Kalita filed a public‑interest writ petition under Article 32 seeking a mandamus directing all States and Union Territories to provide separate, accessible toilet facilities for men, women, persons with disabilities and transgender persons in every court and tribunal. He highlighted the deplorable condi…
M/S POLY MEDICURE LTD.versusM/S BRILLIO TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD
2025 INSC 131413 November 2025Dismissed
Poly Medicure Ltd., a company engaged in import‑export of medical devices, bought a software licence from Brillio Technologies to automate its export‑import documentation. The software malfunctioned, and the company filed a consumer complaint seeking a refund, alleging deficiency in service. The State Consumer Commissi…
EMPLOYER IN RELATION TO MANAGEMENT OF KATRAS AREA OF M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED, DHANBADversusWORKMAN-SHAHDEO DAS
2025 INSC 101113 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Shahdeo Das joined Bharat Coking Coal Limited in 1990 with a service record showing his date of birth as 18‑09‑1960, which he himself declared at the time of joining. In 2015, after a gap of 25 years, he applied for correction of his date of birth to 05‑01‑1972 based on a school leaving/transfer certificate issued that…
ASHOK DHANKADversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.
2025 INSC 97413 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Ashok Dhankad, challenged a Delhi High Court order that granted regular bail to accused wrestler Sushil Kumar under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging abduction, assault with dangerous weapons, and the death of a complainant's son. The High Cou…
MINIversusCBI/SPE COCHIN
2025 INSC 98013 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, the widow of a deceased clerk who worked in the Passport Office, challenged the conviction of her husband under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The prosecution alleged that the accused demanded an extra Rs.200 over the lawful passport fee of Rs.1,000 and that the…
KAMAL GUPTA & ANR.versusM/S L.R BUILDERS PVT. LTD. & ANR. ETC.
2025 INSC 97513 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from an oral family settlement reduced to a Memorandum of Understanding/Family Settlement Deed (MoU/FSD) signed by Pawan Gupta (PG) and Kamal Gupta (KG) but not by KG's son Rahul Gupta (RG). PG and others filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointme…
SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOLversusISMAT AHMED AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 98413 August 2025Dismissed
The tenant (appellant) occupied a flat in Kolkata and was served a summons for eviction on 29 September 2022. He filed applications under Sections 7(1) and 7(2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, together with a Section 5 Limitation Act application, 17 days after the statutory 30‑day period for depositing r…
HANUMANTHARAJU B (DEAD) BY LR.versusM AKRAM PASHA & ANR.
2025 INSC 68213 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased Sub‑Inspector of the CRPF was injured in a road accident and claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) initially awarded compensation based on a 61.94% disability assessed by a Medical Board, but on reconsideration a Commissioner appointed by the Tri…
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAversusSCHOTT GLASS INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR.
2025 INSC 66813 May 2025Rejected
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) alleged that Schott Glass India abused its dominant position in the neutral glass tubing market by offering volume‑based target rebates, functional "no‑Chinese" rebates, a long‑term supply agreement with its joint‑venture Schott Kaisha, and by allegedly tying clear and amber tu…
JITENDER @ KALLAversusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR.
2025 INSC 66713 May 2025Reference answered
The Supreme Court examined the procedure for designating Senior Advocates after concerns were raised in Jitender @ Kalla regarding the 100‑point assessment and the role of bar members in the Permanent Committee. It considered whether the point‑based system introduced in Indira Jaising I and modified in Indira Jaising I…
VIJAYA BANK & ANR.versusPRASHANT B NARNAWARE
2025 INSC 69113 May 2025
Vijaya Bank required its senior middle‑manager, Prashant B. Narnaware, to serve a minimum of three years and to pay Rs 2 lakhs as liquidated damages if he resigned earlier, as stipulated in clause 11(k) of his appointment letter. The employee resigned after less than two years and paid the amount under protest, subsequ…
TUKESH SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2025 INSC 68313 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were convicted for murder, attempted murder and related offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 307 of the IPC based on the testimony of several injured eyewitnesses. The eyewitnesses either knew some of the accused before the incident or did not, but none of them positively identified the accused…
M/S HARCHARAN DASS GUPTAversusUNION OF INDIA
2025 INSC 68913 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a MSME supplier based in Delhi, entered into a contract with ISRO for construction of staff quarters, which contained a clause fixing Bengaluru as the seat of arbitration. Disputes arose and the supplier invoked the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Development) Act, 2006, prompting the Delhi Facilita…
THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS.versusDR. PASUPULETI NIRMALA HANUMANTHA RAO CHARITABLE TRUST
2025 INSC 67913 May 2025
The State of Telangana allotted a parcel of government land to the Dr. Pasupuleti Nirmala Hanumantha Rao Charitable Trust under the Telangana Alienation of State Lands and Land Revenue Rules, 1975, subject to three conditions. The Trust later subdivided the land and sold plots, allegedly breaching those conditions. The…
CMJ FOUNDATION AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF MEGHALAYA AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 21113 February 2025Disposed off
The Chandra Mohan Jha (CMJ) University was established in 2009, but its sponsor appointed a Chancellor without the required approval of the Visitor (the Governor of Meghalaya). The Supreme Court examined whether this appointment violated Section 14(1) of the CMJ University Act, 2009, and whether the State Government’s …
P. RAMMOHAN RAOversusK. SRINIVAS AND ORS. ETC.
2025 INSC 21213 February 2025Disposed off
The petitioners, originally appointed as Work Inspectors in 1990 and later as temporary Assistant Executive Engineers (AEEs) between 1990‑1992, sought seniority over the 1997 batch of AEEs recruited through the APPSC. The State Government regularised the temporary AEEs in 2005 but placed them below the 1997 regular rec…
RAMESH A. NAIKAversusTHE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ETC.
2025 INSC 30313 February 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a bank manager, was convicted of murdering his two minor children, his sister‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law in June 2010, motivated by his disapproval of his sister‑in‑law’s relationship. The trial court sentenced him to death, a judgment affirmed by the Karnataka High Court. On appeal, the Supreme Court exam…
TAPAS KUMAR PALITversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2025 INSC 22213 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was arrested in March 2020 after his vehicle was intercepted and items allegedly linked to Naxalite activities were recovered. He has been in judicial custody for five years, with the trial still ongoing and only 42 of the planned 100 witnesses examined, some of whom have turned hostile. The central issue…
RAMESH MISHRIMAL JAINversusAVINASH VISHWANATH PATNE & ANR.
2025 INSC 21313 February 2025Dismissed
The appellant, Ramesh Mishrimal Jain, entered into an agreement to sell dated 03‑09‑2003 with the mother of respondent No.1 concerning a house in Khed. The agreement stipulated that the appellant was already in possession of the property as a tenant and that ownership possession would transfer only after execution of a…
JSW STEEL LTD.versusTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE MUMBAI PORT TRUST MUMBAI & ORS.
2025 INSC 25713 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
JSW Steel Ltd. (appellant) challenged a High Court order that allowed the Mumbai Port Trust (respondent No.1) to withdraw Rs.70 lakh it had deposited as security for the removal of a capsized barge wreck. The dispute centered on whether liability for removing the wreck under Section 14 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 fel…
M/S TOMORROWLAND LIMITEDversusHOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 20713 February 2025Disposed off
M/s Tomorrowland Limited, the highest bidder for a 5‑star hotel site, paid the first instalment but argued that HUDCO (Housing and Urban Development Corporation) was obliged to obtain statutory approvals and execute a sub‑lease before demanding further payments. HUDCO failed to secure the necessary approvals and a perp…
MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusMAHADEO KRISHNA NAIK
2025 INSC 21813 February 2025Disposed off
Mahadeo Krishna Naik, a bus driver for Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), was dismissed after a fatal accident in 1996. The Labour Court upheld his dismissal, but the corporation later obtained a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) award that placed sole blame on the lorry driver, a fact it failed…
M/S ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PVT. LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 21513 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
M/s ABCI Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. submitted a financial bid of Rs 1,569 crores for a tunnel project but due to a typographical error the bid appeared as Rs 1,569 only. The appellant discovered the mistake on 24‑08‑2023, promptly informed BRO and sought to withdraw or rectify the bid, but BRO demanded justification, de…
PUJA FERRO ALLOYS P LTD.versusSTATE OF GOA AND ORS.
2025 INSC 21713 February 2025Dismissed
The appellant companies, industrial units in Goa, claimed a 25% rebate on electricity tariffs under a 1991 notification that was later rescinded in 1995 and amended in 1996. They argued that their entitlement crystallised when they applied for power and that the State could not withdraw the benefit due to promissory es…
VINOD @ NASMULLAversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2025 INSC 22013 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Vinod @ Nasmulla was convicted under IPC sections 395 and 397 and Arms Act section 25 for a dacoity involving a bus robbery on 28 September 1993. The prosecution's case rested on a dock identification by a police constable (PW‑9) and the alleged recovery of a country‑made pistol at the time of his arrest,…
SITHARA N.S. & ORS. ETC.versusSAI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
2025 INSC 142512 December 2025Dismissed
The appellants, legal representatives of two deceased motorcyclists, claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, alleging that a canter lorry driven by respondent No.1 caused the fatal accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and the Karnataka High Court dismissed the claims, finding tha…
THE DIRECTOR OF TOWN PANCHAYAT & ORS.versusM. JAYABAL & ANR. ETC.
2025 INSC 142312 December 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, sons of sweepers who died in service, were initially appointed on compassionate basis as sweepers. After joining, they filed writ petitions seeking promotion to the post of Junior Assistant, arguing that they were qualified for the higher post at the time of their original appointment. The High Court o…
MAMMAN KHANversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2025 INSC 111312 September 2025Disposed off
Mamman Khan, a sitting MLA, was charged in two FIRs relating to large‑scale communal violence in Nuh district. The trial court, citing the need for speedy disposal of cases involving legislators, ordered a separate charge‑sheet and segregated his trial from the co‑accused, a decision affirmed by the High Court. The app…
RAJUL MANOJ SHAH ALIAS RAJESHWARI RASIKLAL SHETHversusKIRANBHAI SHAKRABHAI PATEL & ANR.
2025 INSC 110912 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant filed a suit in 2012 seeking a declaration that her sister‑in‑law could not sell a jointly owned bungalow and that an agreement to sell dated 21‑10‑2011 was void. After the sister‑in‑law died, the court substituted a Nazir as defendant No.1. In 2021 the respondent (defendant No.2) applied to amend his wri…
MANSI BRAR FERNANDESversusSHUBHA SHARMA AND ANR.
2025 INSC 111012 September 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether the appellants, who entered into buy‑back memoranda of understanding for residential units, were "speculative investors" and thus barred from filing Section 7 insolvency petitions, and whether the 2019 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Ordinance and the subsequent 2020 Amendm…
MANIKLAL SAHUversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2025 INSC 110712 September 2025Dismissed
The appellant Maniklal Sahu and three co‑accused were convicted of murder under s.302 IPC for throwing the victim Rekhchand Verma from a terrace and assaulting him, resulting in injuries that led to septic shock, pneumonia and paraplegia, and the victim died nine months later. The High Court reduced the conviction to a…
VANEETA PATNAIKversusNIRMAL KANTI CHAKRABARTI & ORS.
2025 INSC 110612 September 2025Dismissed
The appellant, a faculty member of NUJS, filed a complaint on 26 December 2023 alleging sexual harassment by the Vice‑Chancellor, claiming the last incident occurred in April 2023. The Local Complaint Committee dismissed the complaint as time‑barred because the filing was beyond the three‑month statutory period and the…
CONFEDERATION OF REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA (CREDAI)versusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
2025 INSC 111212 September 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered appeals by CREDAI, Godrej Properties and Sai Sahara Developers challenging a National Green Tribunal (NGT) order that applied the General Conditions (GC) of the EIA 2006 Notification to building and construction projects (Item 8(a)) and township projects (Item 8(b)) within 5 km of environme…
GEETA @ REETA MISHRAversusAJAY KUMAR MISHRA
2025 INSC 110212 September 2025Disposed off
The parties were married in 1996 and later lived separately, with the husband filing for divorce on grounds of cruelty in 2009. The Family Court granted the divorce in 2019, which the High Court affirmed in 2023. The wife appealed, seeking a payment of Rs.10,00,000 towards their daughter's marriage expenses, alleging t…
ITC LIMITEDversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.
2025 INSC 111112 September 2025Disposed off
The appellant, ITC Limited, a manufacturer of stationery, stored 7,600 pre‑packed exercise books in a warehouse in Bengaluru. On 2 July 2020, Respondent No.2, a legal metrology officer, entered the premises under Section 15 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009, inspected and seized the packages alleging non‑compliance with…
PRAKASH ASPHALTINGS AND TOLL HIGHWAYS (INDIA) LIMITEDversusMANDEEPA ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 110812 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute arose from an electronic tender for a Road User Fee collection contract where the appellant, Prakash Asphaltings and Toll Highways (India) Ltd, was the highest bidder and respondent No.1, Mandeepa Enterprises, was the lowest bidder. Respondent No.1 claimed it had mistakenly quoted a per‑day rate of Rs 9,72,…
SHANTI DEVI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. GORANversusJAGAN DEVI & ORS.
2025 INSC 110512 September 2025Dismissed
The plaintiffs claimed a one‑third share in agricultural land and sought a permanent injunction and joint possession, alleging that a sale deed dated 14‑06‑1973 was fraudulent and void because they never executed it and received no consideration. The trial court dismissed the suit as time‑barred; the First Appellate Co…
REENA BANERJEE AND ANOTHERversusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 110112 September 2025Directions issued
The petitioners, a charitable trust and an individual, sought enforcement of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016 to improve conditions in state‑run care homes for persons with cognitive disabilities, citing overcrowding, inadequate health care, abuse and lack of education. The Court examined whethe…
M.S. PATTERversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 111512 September 2025Directions issued
The case arose from a cholera outbreak and deaths at the Lampur Beggars' Home in Delhi, allegedly caused by contaminated water and poor sanitation. The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking accountability, compensation, and systemic reforms, which the Delhi High Court partially addressed but later dismi…
ANNA WAMAN BHALERAOversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2025 INSC 111412 September 2025Dismissed
The appellants, a former Circle Officer and Talathi, were accused of certifying mutation entries based on forged documents that facilitated an illegal property transfer between 1996 and 1998. An FIR was lodged in 2019 and the appellants filed anticipatory bail applications, which received intermittent interim protectio…
PARADIP PORT AUTHORITYversusPARADEEP PHOSPHATES LTD.
2025 INSC 97112 August 2025
The Paradip Port Authority (formerly Paradip Port Trust) and Paradeep Phosphates Ltd. entered into a 1985 agreement for a captive berth, with tariff rates subject to periodic revision. Dispute arose when the Authority unilaterally increased rates in 1993, leading to arbitration, an appellate authority order, and a High…
YOGESH MADHAV MAKALWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2025 INSC 96412 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a medical aspirant, sought validation of his Scheduled Tribe (Koli Mahadev) caste certificate, which had been confiscated and invalidated by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee. The High Court upheld the Committee’s order, dismissing the appellant’s writ petition. On appeal, the Supreme Co…
DASARI ANIL KUMAR & ANOTHERversusTHE CHILD WELFARE PROJECT DIRECTOR & OTHERS
2025 INSC 97212 August 2025Disposed off
The appellants, who had adopted four minor girls under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, had their custody seized by police on the basis of an FIR and the children were placed under the Child Welfare Project Director. The appellants challenged the police action, arguing it was illegal and violated Articles…
A. KARUNANITHIversusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2025 INSC 96712 August 2025Disposed off
The case concerned two village officials, A‑1 (Village Administrative Officer) and A‑2 (Village Assistant), who were convicted under Sections 13(1)(d), 13(2) and 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and receiving a bribe of Rs.500. A trap was laid using phenolphthalein‑treated notes, leading to the…
JAWALA REAL ESTATE PVT LTD & ANR.versusHARESH
2025 INSC 66912 May 2025Disposed off
Jawala Real Estate Pvt Ltd (later merged with Macrotech Developers) allotted a three‑bedroom flat to Haresh in 2013, who paid an advance but failed to pay the balance, leading the developer to cancel the allotment. Haresh filed a complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), which set as…
THIRUNAGALINGAMversusLINGESWARAN & ANR.
2025 INSC 67212 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement, but the trial court passed an ex‑parte decree after the defendants stopped appearing. The defendants later obtained condonation of delay for earlier applications under Order IX Rule 13, but the Supreme Court dismissed those condonation petitions i…
HARPREET SINGH TALWAR @ KABIR TALWARversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT TH. NATIONAL INVESTIGATING AGENCY
2025 INSC 66212 May 2025Dismissed
The appellant, Harpreet Singh Talwar, was charged with facilitating the import of a consignment of heroin‑laden talc stones through a front company, M/s Magent India, after meetings with a foreign conspirator in Dubai. The prosecution alleged that he coordinated the shipment, used proxy firms, fabricated invoices, and …
NDA SECURITIES LTD.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
2025 INSC 67612 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant NDA Securities Ltd. filed a criminal appeal challenging a Delhi High Court order that had allowed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by respondent No.2, directing the Bombay Stock Exchange to release Rs 15.90 lakhs withheld as payout for shares sold on superdari. The dispute arose from an FIR …
DEEP SHIKHA & ANR.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.
2025 INSC 67512 May 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the married daughter (appellant No.1) and the mother (appellant No.2) of a woman who died in a road accident. The High Court had reduced the daughter’s compensation to Rs.50,000 and dismissed the mother’s claim, relying on Manjuri Bera. The Court held that a married daughter ca…
P. SHANTHI PUGAZHENTHIversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SPE/CBI/ACB/CHENNAI
2025 INSC 67412 May 2025Dismissed
The appellant, an Assistant Superintendent at Chennai Port Trust, was convicted for abetting her husband, a public servant, in acquiring assets disproportionate to his known income during the check period 2002-2009. The assets were held in the appellant's name, and she was alleged to have concealed the wealth, thereby …
RAJESH CHADDHAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2025 INSC 67112 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Rajesh Chaddha was convicted under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged cruelty and dowry demands by his wife, who claimed physical and mental torture, including a miscarriage. The High Court, exercising revisionary jurisdiction, upheld the conviction despite the …
OFFICE FOR ALTERNATIVE ARCHITECTUREversusIRCON INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES LTD.
2025 INSC 66512 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Office for Alternative Architecture, challenged a Delhi High Court order that, while appointing an arbitral tribunal under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, excluded certain claims as non‑arbitrable. The appellant argued that the court should only examine whether a prima facie arb…
VIJAY KUMAR JOSHIversusAKASH TRIPATHI & ORS.
2025 INSC 67012 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned employees of cooperative societies that were merged into the Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board (MPSEB) and sought pension benefits. The key issue was whether these absorbed employees were entitled to pension and, if so, whether their service in the societies prior to absorption could be counted …
TUSHAR HIMATLAL JANIversusJASBIR SINGH VIJAN & ORS.
2025 INSC 66312 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant inherited a 22,000‑sq‑ft plot in Chembur and terminated a 1972 lease to a partnership firm, filing an eviction suit. Respondent No.1, claiming tenancy rights over 550 sq ft based on a family settlement agreement, obtained an interim injunction restraining the appellant from dispossessing him, which the Hi…
SUKHDEV SINGHversusSUKHBIR KAUR
2025 INSC 19712 February 2025Reference answered
The case arose from a decree of nullity under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, wherein the Punjab & Haryana High Court had held the marriage void. The appellant contested whether, despite the void status, the spouse could claim permanent alimony under Section 25 and interim maintenance under Section 24 of th…
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.versusPRISM CEMENT LIMITED & ANR
2025 INSC 19912 February 2025Dismissed
Prism Cement Ltd., a unit that had been granted an absolute tax exemption under the Package Scheme of Incentives 1993 (PSI 1993) through an Eligibility Certificate (20‑02‑1998) and an Entitlement Certificate (24‑03‑1998), challenged the Maharashtra State's attempt to withdraw that benefit after the Finance Act, 2002 am…
THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE ASSISTANT DIRECTORversusKANHAIYA PRASAD
2025 INSC 21012 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Union of India, represented by the Enforcement Directorate, appealed against a Patna High Court order that granted regular bail to Kanhaiya Prasad in a PMLA case involving alleged money laundering of proceeds from illegal sand mining by his father. The High Court had released the respondent without satisfying the t…
K. KRISHNAMURTHYversusTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
2025 INSC 20812 February 2025Disposed off
The appellant, K. Krishnamurthy, was searched under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act in November 2010, during which he disclosed an income of Rs.2,27,65,580 for AY 2011-12 and later, during assessment proceedings, disclosed an additional Rs.2,49,90,000 arising from land transactions. The Assessing Officer levied a pen…
KAMALKISHOR SHRIGOPAL TAPARIAversusINDIA ENER-GEN PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
2025 INSC 22312 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, an independent non‑executive director of D.S. Kulkarni Developers Ltd., was named in complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for the dishonour of cheques issued by the company. The cheques were not signed by him and he had resigned from the board before the offences occurred. He so…
JOTHI @ NAGAJOTHIversusTHE STATE, REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2025 INSC 141711 December 2025Dismissed
The appellant Jothi @ Nagajothi and her husband were intercepted by police who seized 23.5 kg of ganja and seized cash, drawing two samples (S-1 and S-2) at the spot and forwarding one for forensic analysis. The trial court convicted them under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) and 8(c) r/w 29(1) of the NDPS Act, imposing…
KAPADAM SANGALAPPA AND OTHERSversusKAMATAM SANGALAPPA AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 130711 November 2025Dismissed
The case concerned a long‑standing dispute between two sections of the Kuruba community over the performance of rituals and custody of idols of Lord Sangalappa Swamy. A compromise decree dated 1 November 1933 required the respondents to pay half the pooja expenses, to rotate the idols every six months and to appoint tr…
SURENDRA KOLIversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 130811 November 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Surendra Koli, a former domestic help at the Nithari residence, was convicted for the murder, rape and related offences of a minor based on a Section 164 confession and alleged discoveries under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. The Supreme Court had earlier affirmed his conviction and death sentence in 2011, and a revie…
K. SUBRAMANIAM (DIED) THROUGH LRS K.S. BALAKRISHNAN & ORS.versusM/S KRISHNA MILLS PVT. LTD.
2025 INSC 130911 November 2025Dismissed
M/s. Krishna Mills Pvt. Ltd., the landlord, leased a property to K. Subramaniam who paid only a fraction of the agreed rent, leading the Rent Controller to fix a higher fair rent. The lessee contested the fair rent but did not obtain a stay of the order, and continued to pay only a portion of the amount, resulting in a…
MOHAMMAD AFZAL MOHAMMAD SHARIFversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 110011 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a 17‑year‑old who was assaulted during communal riots in Akola on 13 May 2023, claimed that the police failed to register a First Information Report (FIR) despite his written complaint and hospital statement. He alleged that the assailants also murdered a man mistakenly identified as a Muslim, and that h…
M/S SHIV STEELSversusTHE STATE OF ASSAM & ORS.
2025 INSC 112611 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
M/s Shiv Steels challenged reassessments for the years 2003-2004, 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 that the Assam tax authorities had made after the original assessments were held time‑barred under Section 19 of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993. The revenue department obtained prior sanction from the Commissioner and invok…
ARSHNOOR KAUR & ANR.versusTHE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 95411 August 2025Disposed off
The petitioners, two female candidates who ranked higher than a male candidate in the JAG Short Service Commission selection, challenged a notification that allotted only three vacancies for women against six for men, alleging violation of Articles 14, 15, 16 and 19 of the Constitution. The Court examined whether, afte…
IN RE: “CITY HOUNDED BY STRAYS, KIDS PAY PRICE” versus
2025 INSC 97711 August 2025Directions issued
The Supreme Court, acting suo moto, examined a dramatic rise in dog bite incidents across India, especially in the National Capital Region, which disproportionately affected visually‑impaired persons, children, the elderly and the poor. Data presented showed a steep increase in reported bites and highlighted the public…
GURDEEP SINGHversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB
2025 INSC 95711 August 2025Dismissed
The appellant, an Assistant Superintendent of Jail, was alleged to have facilitated a private vehicle ride for two police constables escorting an undertrial prisoner, during which two unidentified youths attacked the constables with red chilli powder, a knife and a kirpan, attempting to free the prisoner. The prosecuti…
TIME CITY INFRASTRUCTURE AND HOUSING LIMITED LUCKNOWversusTHE STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2025 INSC 96611 August 2025Disposed off
Time City Infrastructure and Housing Ltd filed Civil Suit No.447/2025 seeking an ex parte injunction under Order 39 Rule 3 of the CPC. The Civil Judge (Senior Division) granted the injunction without recording reasons or complying with the proviso requiring delivery of the application, affidavit, plaint and supporting …
IN RE: N. PEDDI RAJU AND OTHERS versus
2025 INSC 98911 August 2025
A transfer petition seeking to move a criminal case from the Telangana High Court to the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) contained scandalous remarks against the Telangana High Court judge hearing the matter. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition and, suo moto, issued contempt notices to the petitioner’s lawyer, th…
SUMAN MISHRA & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 20311 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, a husband and his in‑laws, sought to quash a FIR and charge‑sheet filed after the husband filed a divorce suit, alleging that the FIR was a retaliatory, vexatious measure. The FIR originally alleged rape under Section 376 IPC, but the charge‑sheet omitted that offence and no protest petition was filed a…
DR. AMARAGOUDA L PATILversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 20111 February 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the appointment of Dr. Anil Khurana, Director General of the Central Council for Research in Homeopathy, as Chairperson of the National Commission for Homeopathy. The appellant, Dr. Amaragouda L. Patil, challenged the appointment on the ground that the respondent did not satisfy the statutory…
RUPA AND CO. LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusFIRHAD HAKIM AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 24511 February 2025Directions issued
The appellants Rupa & Co. Ltd paid Rs.4,00,92,000 for a plot of land in New Town, Kolkata, based on HIDCO's promise to convey it on a free‑hold basis. HIDCO later altered the terms to a 99‑year lease and subsequently demanded additional payment at market rates, prompting the appellants to file a writ petition which the…
OM PRAKASH GUPTA ALIAS LALLOOWA (NOW DECEASED) & ORS.versusSATISH CHANDRA (NOW DECEASED)
2025 INSC 18311 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from two second appeals concerning specific performance suits where the respondents died during pendency. The heirs of the deceased respondents filed substitution applications, but the High Court dismissed applications for condonation of delay and held the appeals abated. The Supreme Court examined the p…
CANARA BANKversusAJITHKUMAR G.K.
2025 INSC 18411 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The father of Ajithkumar G.K. died in service of Canara Bank in December 2001, and the son applied for a compassionate appointment under the bank's 1993 scheme. The bank rejected the claim on grounds of sufficient family pension, terminal benefits and the son's age exceeding the limit, prompting a writ petition that wa…
M/S TECHNO PRINTSversusCHHATTISGARH TEXTBOOK CORPORATION & ANR.
2025 INSC 23611 February 2025Disposed off
The appellant, a printing firm, was issued a show‑cause notice by the Chhattisgarh Textbook Corporation seeking an explanation why it should not be blacklisted for three years and its EMD forfeited, alleging breach of tender clauses relating to time‑bound delivery and other obligations. The appellant challenged the not…
JAY KISHAN AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.
2025 INSC 19811 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants challenged the registration of FIR No.0092/2023 under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the three predicate cases cited in the FIR were essentially civil property and monetary disputes. The High Court had dismissed the writ petition and allowed the…
MOHAN LAL FATEHPURIAversusM/S BHARAT TEXTILES & ORS.
2025 INSC 140910 December 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, a husband and wife, entered into a partnership deed containing an arbitration clause and later appointed a sole arbitrator, Mr. Anjum Javed, to resolve disputes with the respondents. The arbitrator repeatedly demanded administrative expenses, which the respondents challenged under Sections 14 and 15 of …
VINEETA SRINANDANversusHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ON ITS OWN MOTION
2025 INSC 140810 December 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Vineeta Srinandan, a former director of Seawoods Estates Ltd., issued a circular alleging a "dog mafia" influencing judges, which the Bombay High Court held to be criminal contempt under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and sentenced her to one week imprisonment and a fine. She promptly filed a reply af…
DR. SOHAIL MALIKversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2025 INSC 141510 December 2025Dismissed
The case involved an IAS officer (the aggrieved woman) who alleged that an IRS officer (the appellant) sexually harassed her at Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi. She filed a complaint under the POSH Act before the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) of her own department, the Department of Food and Public Distribution. The app…
MITC ROLLING MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR.versusM/S RENUKA REALTORS AND ORS.
2025 INSC 130010 November 2025Appeal(s) allowed
MITC Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. filed a commercial suit for recovery of Rs.2.5 crore. The trial court rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC on the ground that the plaintiff had not complied with the mandatory pre‑institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The appellant cha…
LIPI BOILERS LTD.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, AURANGABAD
2025 INSC 129710 November 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Lipi Boilers Ltd. entered into a contract to design, procure, manufacture and supply a bagasse‑fired boiler in CKD condition, with several bought‑out components delivered directly to the buyer’s site. The revenue issued a show‑cause notice alleging that the value of these bought‑out items should be added to the boiler’…
R. RAJENDRANversusKAMAR NISHA AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 130410 November 2025Case Allowed
The appellant, a doctor, was alleged to have had an extramarital affair with respondent No.1, resulting in the birth of a child in 2007 while she was married to Abdul Latheef. Respondent No.1 filed criminal complaints for cheating and harassment and sought a DNA test to establish the appellant as the biological father,…
K.S. MANJUNATH AND OTHERSversusMOORASAVIRAPPA @ MUTTANNA CHENNAPPA BATIL, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS AND OTHER
2025 INSC 129810 November 2025Dismissed
The original vendors executed an unregistered agreement to sell (ATS) of 354 acres of land to the original vendees in 2000, but later issued a unilateral notice of termination in 2003 citing a pending suit and a vendor's death. The original vendees continued to perform their obligations and sued for specific performanc…